►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 050720
Description
Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 050720
A
A
C
A
E
G
A
E
A
A
B
H
A
I
A
I
E
A
B
Commissioner,
I'm
going
to
ask
that
we
pause
here
for
just
a
minute
because
there's
about
a
30
second
delay
and
and
while
we're
paused
here,
let
me
say
that
I'm
afraid
now
that
the
meeting's
already
started
we're
probably
not
going
to
be
able
to
accommodate
or
stop
the
meeting
to
be
able
to
to
try
to
get
the
other
commissioner
on.
But
after
this
we
will
try
our
best
to
prepare
him
for
the
next
one,
so
that
he's
able
and
familiar
with
with
joining
on
that's
fine.
A
A
J
B
C
Okay,
very
well.
Our
first
item
is
item.
6A
consideration
of
the
preliminary
platform
field,
subdivision
phase
nine,
exactly
the
applicant
edward
beckelheimer,
krk,
limited
engineer,
consulting
30.38,
acre
tract
located
south
of
shiloh
drive
and
west
of
kirby
drive.
The
zoning
for
this
development
is
r1.
The
proposed
use
is
residential.
The
proposed
number
of
lots
is
114..
C
K
B
L
A
Yes,
sir,
I
noticed
that
one
of
the
comments
in
planning
is
obviously-
and
I
saw
that
in
the
flat
this
is
r1,
yet
the
lots
are
under
6
000
square
feet
and
I
guess
I'll
ask
the
engineer
of
record.
If
what
is
you
know,
we
can
approve
this
subject
to,
I
guess
a
zone
change
because
they're
not
going
to
meet.
You
know
the
building
code
right
now
with
an
r1.
C
N
A
C
A
B
L
B
C
B
C
Absolutely
if
we
could
go
if
we
could
go
up
to
the
aerial,
which
I
believe
is
a
slide
before
or
one
more
I'm
sorry
and
here
you
can
actually
get
a
little
bit
of
overview
of
how
the
traffic
flow
from
elgato
is
needed
over
to
connect
to
general
milton
and
then
out
to
kill
him
industrial.
So
there's
quite
a
bit
of
limitation
there
for
traffic
flows.
B
I
A
A
B
A
It's
60
foot
right
away,
yeah
and
okay.
Well,
I
guess
the
question
I
have
then:
is
you
have
a
60-foot
road,
60
foot
wide?
You
have
a
30-foot
easement.
If
you
look
at
that
plat,
I'm
not
sure.
What's
in
the
eastman,
I'm
gonna
guess
there's
a
pipeline
or
something
in
there,
so
it's
gonna
be
a
tight
squeeze
of
anything
and
the
other
thing
that
I
have
a
comment
on
here.
Is
you
know
if
you
look
at
the
numbers
you
look.
A
This
is
a
very
small
piece
of
property
in
my
opinion,
and
I
understand
what
you
guys
are
saying
that
this
connection
is
vitally
needed,
but
I
think-
and
I'm
just
gonna
give
you
my
comment
on
this
thing.
My
comment
on
this
thing
would
be
that
for
a
five
acre
track
you
take
and
I
kind
of
looked
at
this
plaid
over
and
over.
A
B
If
I
can't
just
one
one
a
little
context
here,
this
is
one
phase
of
a
multi-phase
master
plan,
and
so,
although,
although
you
might
be
concerned
that
that
is
a,
you
might
be
concerned
about
the
amount
of
land
that
they're
using
to
build,
this
road
consider
the
amount
of
land
as
part
of
the
whole
master
plan,
and
that
this
connection
is
important
to
the
entire
master
plan.
So
the
developer
developed
this
entire
master
plan.
It's
not
just
this
track
that
they're
considering.
So
this
connection
is
a
big
part
of
it.
J
J
C
Okay,
so
kirby
just
for
the
record
commissioners,
is
expressing
his
concern
that
by
this
the
lot
is
already
five
a
little
over
five
acres
and
by
requiring
that
roadway,
a
little
over
an
acre
would
be
lost
which
could
be
better
utilized
for
warehouse
space.
It's
quite
a
lot
of
acreage
to
remove,
which
also
would
not
be
taxable
property
if
the
road
was
there
so
he's
kind
of
concerned
of
the
loss
of
potential
warehouse.
Based
on
this,
I
have
a
common
term.
D
L
A
A
D
C
B
Well,
for
that
I
will
have
our
traffic
engineer
speak
to
the
importance
of
that.
But
one
thing
I'd
also
add
is
we're
not
just
talking
about
traffic?
If
you
leave
these
two
dead
ends,
you
create
two
dead
ends
for
water
as
well,
and,
as
we
know
from
this
last
summer,
we've
had
big
issues.
The
whole
reason
we
had
to
do
the
issue
with
our
boil
water
notice
had
to
do
with
dead
ends,
water
lines,
the
dead
end.
B
Q
Q
That,
from
what
I
understand,
I
dealt
with
this
development
and
this
this
little
acreage
that
they're
trying
to
build
up
now
wasn't
even
part
of
that
development.
This
is
just
the
nature
that
trying
to
squeeze
out
of
that
development
last
second
and
they
agreed
to
this
street
when
they
first
came
through
with
this
master.
K
I
E
I
E
I
Don't
have
the
aerial
view
on
the
on
the
presentation,
so
I
had
to
go
to
google
maps
to
give
give
me
a
aerial
perspective.
I
had
a
hard
time
identifying
where
what
I
was
looking
at
so
as
far
as
the
tax
space.
Well,
you
take
some
you
give
some
right
and
in
this
case
we
do
need
that
road.
So
I
I'm
in
this
agreement
with
the
commissioner,
duenas
and
and
mr
riyad
and
we
need
that
road.
O
B
O
N
N
N
I
know
this
particular
one
of
the
is
the
last
part
of
this
area.
There's
no
more
access
to
to
the
east.
From
here
I
mean
it's
not
like
more
logs
are
going
to
be
created
and
they're
going
to
be.
Adding
to
this
area
of
the
of
the
master
plan
is
the
last
part
and
and
you're
saying
oh
well,
then,
but
the
reality
is
that
this
is
a
platform.
N
N
I
P
N
A
B
He
he
ran
some
calculations
across
us
and
that
we
didn't.
We
asked
for
some
corrections
on
them,
so
we
don't
agree
with
his
calculations,
but
what
he
showed
you
what
he
said.
Even
his
own
example
of
160
000,
that's
for
the
whole
project.
It's
not
per
acre,
it
wouldn't
he's
not
saying
it
would
be
an
additional
160
000
per
acre
of
development,
but
one
of
the
things
that
you
know.
B
You
say:
hey,
no
problem,
no
problem
I'll,
give
you
a
bite,
but
then
you
start
taking
slices
away
and
you
get
down
to
the
last
slice
of
pie,
and
I
say:
okay,
I'd
like
that
bite
now
and
you
say:
well
you
I
can't
give
you
the
bite
because
you're
gonna,
that's
that's
half
the
slice
of
this
pie
or
half
the
slice
of
that's
half
of
the
slice.
If
I
give
you
this
bite
now,
that's
essentially
what
we're
seeing
here
is.
This
was
part
of
a
master
plan
and
that
connection
wasn't
important.
B
Isn't
important,
still
is
an
important
part
of
this
master
plan.
We're
asking
it
to
be
complete
and
and
the
the
the
owner
developer
did
not
have
a
problem
with
it
when
it
was
part
of
the
master
plan.
Last
year
it
was
approved,
and
so
it's
now
an
approved
part
of
the
master
plan
and
and
we're
just
asking
for
that
to
to.
N
N
N
B
We
at
the
meeting
when
it
was
brought
it
wasn't
drawn,
and
one
of
the
comments
were
that
that
needs
that
that
connection
needs
to
be
there
and
the
planning
commission
agreed,
and
so
it
was
the
responsibility
of
the
the
the
engineer
to
redraw
that
and
submit
it
and
they
didn't
submit.
But
the
the
record
is
what
happened
at
planning
commission
the
comments
that
happened
there.
A
H
B
The
master
plan,
our
ordinance,
requires
that
all
phases
adhere
to
what's
in
the
master
plan,
and
so
yes,
this
phase
should
align
with
the
approved
master
plan.
You
know
minor
variations.
We
can
understand
that,
but
when
you're
missing
a
road,
that's
approved
in
the
master
plan,
that
is
not
being
compliance
with
the
master
plan-
and
this
is
the
approved,
approved
master
plan-
doesn't
have
a
connection
there.
J
C
Kirby
for
the
record,
mr
dunyas
was
stating
that
the,
since
this
project
was
initially
developed
by
a
prior
engineering
firm,
which
is
no
longer
available
and
that
there
was
no
actual
written
or
contractual
agreement
on
that.
He
believes
that
this
item
should
should
be
moving
forward
with
a
clean
slate.
Without
that
item,.
F
Mr
chairman,
yes
this,
this
is
a
he
said
she
said
classic.
This
is
phase
four
of
a
master
plan
that
apparently
has
at
least
three
other
phases.
I
think
that
I'm
just
going
to
suggest
that
this
item
gets
tabled
and
we
need
to
see
the
whole
story,
because
if
there
was
an
agreement
made
or
voted
on
by
the
board
and
back
then
they
said
yes,
we
agree
with
the
comments
and
that
and
then
they've
done,
one
two
and
three
and
now
at
number
four,
like
kirby's
pie,
analogy
all
of
a
sudden.
F
A
Well
right
now,
let
me
just
go
ahead
and
make
one
comment.
What
kirby
said
was
that
the
master
plan
was
approved
with
a
comment
approved
by
the
planning
and
zoning
commission
that
this
connection
be
added.
Is
that
correct
kirby?
That
is
correct,
so
that
was
there
now,
if
you're
asking
the
planning
department
to
come
back
with
the
notes
where
the
planning
commission
approved
that,
and
you
want
this
table
until
we
get
that
particular
document.
F
You're
saying
that
if
the
developer
agreed
to
those
comments
and
then
they
since
then
have
gone
through
one
two
and
three
and
now
as
the
last
pie
bite
thing
and
I'm
not
saying
this
is
accurate,
then
to
change
that
at
the
very
end.
I
don't
know
how
that
injures
the
the
traffic
cloth
in
the
whole
area.
That's
all
I'm
saying
you
know
it
was
this
contingent
on
the
approvals
of
one
two
and
three,
I
don't
know.
A
Just
a
minute
just
a
minute,
just
a
minute,
let
me
have
kirby
answer
that,
because
what
you're
asking,
if
I
understand
correctly,
is
when
this
master
plan
was
approved,
with
all
the
phases
that
the
commission
added
this
road,
that
that
that
this
was
something
that
needed
to
be
done.
Is
that
pretty
much
summarize
what
you
were
asking
the.
B
Master,
that's
right
the
master
plan,
what
the
master
plan
was
proposed
to
the
planning
commission
and
when
staff
reviewed
it
staff
said
you
need
to
add
this
connection,
and
at
that
meeting
the
planning
commission
decided.
Yes,
they
agreed
with
staff
comments
that
this
connection
needed
to
be
added.
The
engineer,
however,
did
not
redraw
it
and
resubmit
it
to
us
as
they
do
as
they
should.
N
L
F
N
Yes,
okay
for
the
commissioner,
I
don't
know
who
it
was,
but
that
said
that
we
need
to
have
all
the
information
just
first
of
all,
I'm
not
contesting.
So
we
should
enable
this,
because
I'm
not
contesting
that
if
it
was
a
a
concur
by
the
previous
engineer,
I'm
not
I'm
not
contesting
that
now.
Look
at
comment
number
one.
N
So
by
the
time
this
was
done,
we
had
the
master
plan
the
way
we
they
call
the
shack,
not
with
the
streets
so
yeah
by
2019
last
year,
but
so,
if
somebody's
changing
something
after
the
fact
is
not
us
and
like
I
said,
I'm
not
contesting
what
they're
saying
that
it
was
a
that.
That
was
a
comment
that
was
a
concur
with
I'm
just
saying
it
wasn't
myself
and
it
wasn't
the
owner
and
just
to
have
the
timeline.
N
This
was
on
april
4th.
It
is
on
the
screen
april
2019
by
then,
like,
I
said
this
already
recorded
and
constructed
phase
two,
which
is
already
recorded
and
constructed,
was
almost
done,
and
right
now
and
phase
three
was
already
in
construction,
so
and-
and
mr
mejia
had
was
already
in
conversations
to
try
to
revert
back
that.
A
A
N
You
know
like
here
is
more:
you
will
need
to
to
have
a
very
slow
velocity
or
a
very
big
radius
is
to
be
honest,
we
will
need
a
lot
more
space,
but
I
I
could
that's
also
I
mean
it
is
definitely
unsafe.
I
mean
we
will
have
to
do
something
about
slowing
down
any
traffic
there,
because
if
somebody
tries
to
do
that
at
30
miles
that
90
degrees,
they
I
mean
they
could
end
up
on
the
trip.
L
A
Thank
you
that,
thank
you.
Let
me
now
ask
our
traffic
engineer
dan,
the
the
issue
there
on
that.
Turning
is
if,
assuming
that
the
I
mean
there
is
a
an
approved
comment
in
the
master
plan,
way
back,
I'm
looking
at
the
plan
right
now
and
I'm
seeing
that
there's
about
a
90
that
you'd
have
to
do
to
make
that
street
happen
in
your
opinion.
As
a
traffic
engineer,
what
would
be
a
safe
design,
or
would
this
be
a
safety
sign,
or
what
would
your
comment
be
on
something
like
that.
Q
A
I
I
E
Q
Q
Well,
if
they
it's
not
going
to
change
their
mind
of
which
way
they're
going
to
go,
it's
just
going
to
give
them
more.
I
mean
when
I
was
with
the
highway
department.
Sideout
road
was
being
looked
at
to
be
made
bigger
and
carry
more
traffic,
but
there
wasn't
the
run
off
right
away
on
it.
So
this
is
another
avenue
to
get
more
trucks
going,
north
and
south
in
that
area.
Q
P
Right,
okay
and
so
we're
asking
to
connect
that
road
from
gato
to
general,
milton
that's
a
dead
end,
that's
a
one
warehouse
and
then
olive
gato.
If
you
look
on
the
rest
of
google
maps
empties
onto
sarah
road
and
milo
road
as
well
as
kill
them
right
right,
okay,
so
so
we're
creating
a
go
through
for
this.
This
plot
is
at
the
end
of
got
the
road
and
it
dead.
Zen
dead
ends
into
the
lot.
A
J
J
J
J
A
C
A
B
L
B
R
R
If
we
pretend
that
the
comment
wasn't
ever
agreed
upon,
we're
gonna
lose
the
consistency
of
these
comments
and
I
truly
believe
if
it
was
the
other
way
around,
that
there
was
a
comment
found
in
their
favor,
they
would
be
battling
to
stick
to
that
comment.
Okay,
yeah,
so
I
would
make
I
want
to
make
a.
P
A
D
H
A
A
A
Q
C
C
L
A
J
A
P
F
A
A
P
B
Okay,
yes,
we'll
we'll
look
at
the
records
the
that
may
be
the
reason
for
the
plant,
but
the
comments
on
on
the
plat
and
and
all
the
comments
were
accepted.
That's
that's
where
we
asked
for
that
connection
and
that's
where
it
was
approved.
So
we'll
get
you
the
records.
If
that's
what
you'd
like
to
do,
if
you
want
a
table
and
we'll
get,
you
we'll
also
send
you
a
link
of
the
video
as
well.
F
A
P
A
B
A
Yeah
there
is
no
action
at
this
point
that
approves
or
does
not
approve
this
particular
plan
right
right.
Okay,
so
then
the
motion-
I
guess
that
joey
you're
gonna,
make
a
motion
to.
I
guess,
table
the
item
and
get
the
research
done
and
bring
it
back
to
the
commission,
so
the
commission
can
have
more
information.
Would
that
be?
A
A
Okay,
then,
that
motion
carries
then
that's
what
we
expect
that
our
next
meeting
is
that
all
that
information
research
come
back
to
the
commission,
so
that
there's
clear
information
as
to
who
said
what
and
what's
on
the
tape?
Yes,
sir,
all
right,
thank
you.
Let's
go
ahead,
I'm
sorry
and
continue
now
with
the
other
plat.
What's
the
next
item
is.
K
A
C
G
A
C
F
N
A
D
A
C
C
C
C
K
A
D
C
C
Case
when
this
originally
came
through,
it
was
to
provide
a
punch
through
on
quintana
drive.
Subsequently,
what
has
occurred
is,
if
you
see
on
the
left
on
the
ass
flatted
and
then
on
the
repla.
The
quintana
drive
is
punching
through
and
extending
and
then
blocks.
180
and
181
are
merging
and
182
and
183
are
merging.
So
the
owners
of
180
and
183
will
get
actually
get
larger
lots
and
provide
the
needed
connectivity
to
push
through
on
that
street.
L
K
R
L
A
A
C
E
B
Yes,
just
we,
we
were
able
to
speak
a
few
minutes
before
just
to
show
you
some
of
the
things
we're
doing
to
try
to
make
organization
improve
the
organization
and
to
to
make
it
easier,
more
transparent
and
faster
for
applications
to
go
through
so
we're
doing
our
best.
If
you
ever
have
any
input,
we're
going
to
show
you
along
the
way
and
gather
your
input
and
and
we'll
continue
to
keep
you
updated.
As
always.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
service.