►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 071918
Description
Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 071918
B
D
B
B
Do
we
have
a
second
okay?
All
those
in
favor
I,
like
motion,
carries.
Thank
you
next
item
that
we
have
is
a
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
of
the
city
loiter
by
rezoning,
Lots,
five
and
six
block
16
26
s
to
division
located
27:19
and
the
2721
hi
mr.
Upton
Lamar
Highway
from
r2
to
b1
limited
business
district.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anyone
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
of
this
zone
change
in
favor
of
the
zone.
Change!
G
D
D
J
L
L
We
would
reflect
that
on
the
future
and
use
math
and
also
shows
a
trend
of
change
as
well,
and
the
other
thing
is
is
that
when
you
all
get
a
chance
to
look
at
that
part
of
South
Laredo,
you
may
want
to
consider
doing
more
than
just
a
piecemeal
change
for
that
residential
and
moving
into
the
commercial
as
a
practical
matter,
and
this
thing
is
on
I
miss
up
up
the
highway.
That's
a
commercial
corridor!
There's
no
two
ways
about
it:
they're
asking
for
a
b-1,
which
is
the
least
intense
of
the
commercial
uses
and.
E
Under
stand,
what
y'all
saying
I
completely
get
it?
No,
it's!
Let
me
just
be
clear
what
you're
saying
what
you're
saying
is:
there's
already
be
one
there.
It
is
a
colorful
corridor,
so
it
falls
in
line
with
kind
of
what's
already
there,
the
development
scenario.
Okay.
So
my
question
to
you
is
this:
in
the
medium
density,
residential,
the
the
last
sentence
of
the
description
here
says:
thoughtfully
designed
small
office,
retail
or
mixed-use.
Buildings
can
also
be
built
at
key
intersections
to
provide
neighborhood
amenities.
E
Civic
buildings
should
also
respect
the
character
of
a
primarily
residential
neighborhood,
but
can
also
be
used
as
landmarks.
So
does
this
project
have
these
characteristics
of
what
is
defined
under
here,
medium
density,
residential,
the
way
that
is
proposed,
and
if
it
has
those
characteristics,
does
it
make
it
easier
for
us
to
to
approve
it
as
opposed
to
not
having
those
characteristics,
because
it
seems,
like
that's
an
exception
within
medium
density?
It.
L
Is
a
an
exception
within
media?
There's,
that's
these
disc,
medium
density,
residential
Zinn
description,
but
if
you
look
at
the
land
use
equivalent
chart
that
was
provided
to
us
by
the
consultants
and
you
look
at
that
conversion,
you
will
see
that
medium
density,
residential
under
the
land
use
I
mean
under
the
conversion
chart,
does
not
recognize.
L
1V1
is
not
recognized
until
you
either
get
to
high
density,
residential
or
neighborhood
mixed-use,
and
in
this
case
we
know
that
the
corridor
is
already
going
to
be
commercial.
More
than
is
residential,
so
the
neighborhood
mixed-use
or
even
mixed
you
Center.
It
would
be
the
proper
designation
if
you
are
going
to
remap
that
under
those
under
those
use
existing
uses
under
those
under
those
use
categories.
K
L
L
You're
gonna
want
to
be
allowing
even
offices
and
small
businesses
to
to
begin.
You
take
that
in
that
case,
and
that
in
that,
of
course,
is
where
you
could
wreak
to
a
sticking
point
and
I.
Don't
think
a
lot
of
folks
recognize
that
when,
when,
when
that
comp
plan
was
going
on
because
I
mean
there's,
there's
there's
two
trains
of
thought
there.
You
have
your
Urbanists
new
Urbanists
who
feel
like
you
know.
L
You
should
have
this
opportunity
for
those
lighter
use
and
their
businesses
to
actually
be
within
the
neighborhood
areas,
and
then
you
have
folks
who
live
in
those
neighborhoods
who
have
a
completely
different
opinion
about
that.
They're,
like
I,
really
want
my
neighborhood
to
be
for
single
family
or
you
know
whatever,
but
I
don't
want
businesses
now,
that's
when
you
get
into
the
issue
of
you
know.
What
are
you
gonna
do
on
the
fringe
of
the
neighborhood,
and
maybe
it's
permissible
there
and
the.
E
Way
the
way
I
read
the
definition
of
the
medium
density
is,
that
is
that
we
don't
have
a
problem
with
you.
Building
businesses
there,
but
there
have
to
be
businesses
that
are,
can
enhance
the
quality
of
life,
possibly
even
the
value
of
the
residential
that
surrounds
it
right.
So
they
I'll
give
you
an
example
like
one
might
be.
A
restaurant
right
would
be
something
that
would
do
that
something
that
would
not
be.
E
I
feel
like
there's
nothing
here.
An
I-beam
I
mean
be
wrong,
but-
and
you
all
obviously
have
your
own
opinion,
but
I
think
part
of
our
job
is
to
say
this
project.
If
this
project
does
not
fall
under
the
comm
plans,
recommended
type
of
building
or
use
or
within
the
exception
then
can
we
send
it
back
to
the
developer
to
come
back
and
come
into
the
formerly,
with
with
the
exception,
so
that
whatever
design
they're
going
to
use
or
whatever
kind
of
property
they're
gonna
build?
Or
you
know,
building
or
users
are
gonna?
E
L
L
And
and
CSS:
don't
change,
that's
the
other
issue.
There
I
understand
exactly
what
you're
saying
and
this
comprehend
comprehensive
plan.
I
think
is
pushing
us
in
that
direction,
but
it's
still
disjointed
because
the
comprehensive
plan
is
pushing
us
in
a
certain
direction,
but
our
codes
are
telling
us
something
different
and
when
they
put
them
together
and
try
to
synchronize
them,
then
you
have
this.
L
L
You
know
medium
density,
residential
when
you
know
for
a
fact
that
it's
really
probably
a
mixed-use
in
which
which
does
not
exclude
housing
necessarily
or
apartments
what
it
does
is
it
opens
it
up
to
the
kinds
of
things
that
you're
talking
about
where
you
get
these
other
businesses
in
there.
That,
hopefully,
can
you
know
cohabitate.
L
B
L
K
Of
the
something
that
might
affect
the
the
property
owner
once
we
have
moved
to
be
one,
but
we
do
it
on
our
one.
It's,
whether
the
type
of
businesses
they're
gonna,
try
to
bring
now
have
been
this
compatible
would
be
one.
Then
we
wouldn't
have
any
problem.
We
have
a
pattern
in
that
area
that
most
of
the
area,
its
we
have
a
mechanic
shop,
a
couple
of
blocks
away
and
we
have
a
forest
and
grocery
stores
and
so
on
and
so
forth.
K
They
decide
put
us
a
business,
it
would
be
entirely
up
to
building
department,
we're
looking
at
some
change,
so
I
think
and
I
I
think
it's
appropriate
to
go
with
a
big
one,
because
that
would
bring
that
area
in
compliance
and
that's
what
we
want
to
do.
So
we
need
to
let
bill
Department
to
deal
with
whatever
they
come
back
and
try
to
put
in
there.
If
it's
something
that
is
not
feasible
for
be
one,
then
they
would
need
to
answer
a
conditional
use
permit.
E
Yes,
sir
I
not
understand
what
you're
saying
I
have
a
different
way
of
seeing
it
I
think
the
way
I
see
it
is
city
made
a
policy
decision
that
we
are
going
to
have
a
comp
plan
planners
decided
that
this
particular
piece
of
property
of
this
particular
area
they
want
to
see
it
develop
in
this
particular
way.
So
now
we
have
a
developer.
Who
wants
to
have
it
be
outside
of
what
the
comp
plan
planners
had
decided?
So
the
question
should
be,
in
my
view,
it's
wrong.
E
E
L
Okay,
so
you
tell
me
the
Cobblers
now
what
they
did
again
is.
They
did
not
do
your
assuming
that
they
went
through
the
future
land,
yes,
and
they
they
adjusted
it
accordingly
to
sync
up
with
the
comp
plan
and
what
I'm
trying
to
tell
you
is:
they
did
not
do
that.
They
took
the
old
future
land
use
map
and
they
just
chunked
it
down
and
then
made
some
tweaks
and
then
said:
here's
a
conversion
table.
Okay,
now.
M
L
Other
thing
I'll
point
out
to
you
is:
if
you
do
decide
to
change
the
zone,
okay,
I
think
you're
still
being
consistent,
because
the
zone
at
its
bottom
level
to
be
one
still
allows
the
same
kinds
of
things
that
are
going
to
occur
in
your
mixed-use,
residential
or
medium
density,
residential
and
you,
if
you
look
at
those
two
definitions,
you're
gonna
find
out
that
they're
pretty
darn
similar,
but
for
purposes
of
our
zoning
code,
which
is
the
regulatory
authority.
These
folks
can
say:
well,
okay,
you
know
it.
L
We
can
do
it
because
it's
medium
density
and
that's
included
in
the
verbage.
They
have
to
come
in
and
say
we
need
to
be
one
to
do
what
we
need
to
put
a
commercial
plaza
or
whatever
else
in
there
and
so
you're
going
to
have
to
jump
it
up
to
that
next
next
level,
whether
it's
either
mixed
use
or
you
know
what
is
it
neighborhood,
mixed-use,
okay,.
B
In
a
second,
yes,
all
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
I
have
all
those
against
me.
Okay,
we
have.
One
name
motion
carries
thank
you
next
item
that
we
have
many
a
zoning
ordinance
of
the
city
and
writer
by
authorizing
a
conditional
use
permit
per
outside
storage
outdoor
display
area
on
lock,
seven
and
seven
eight
and
nine
block
seven.
Seventy
nine
division
located
at
twenty
three
or
two
more
Seymour
Avenue.
B
A
Good
eye
I
personally
had
delivered
one
better
today
and
this
morning,
I
live
right
next
door
to
the
business
I
mailed
out,
I,
don't
know
why
you
have
only
one
and
support
I
live
across
the
street
from
my
business
1502
Clark
for
the
record.
I
am
a
property
owner
of
the
property.
Also
mr.
Robert
Burke,
who
happens
to
live
next
door
to
my
business,
also
sent
a
letter
I,
don't
know
why
those
letters
wouldn't
be
on
file,
it's
a
mystery
to
me
and
there
must
be
at
least
coordinators
in
favor.
A
K
K
A
Three
block,
and
also
from
my
home
I'm,
a
taxpayer
I
paid
over
five
thousand
dollars
a
year,
taxes,
the
property
where
I
reside
its
value
in
the
vicinity
of
$200,000,
the
home,
where
I
live
and
in
that
hole,
I,
don't
want
the
value
of
my
home
to
be
depreciated
by
a
business
by
a
nuisance.
I
bought
the
property
because
the
property
was
next
door
to
my
business.
I
have
been
in
business
for
18
years.
B
Let
me
let
me
ask
a
good
question
to
the
planning
department.
Does
he
have
a
correct
zoning
for
the
busy?
It's
gotta
be
three,
so
he
has
you
have
the
correct
zoning
plan.
Business.
Yes,
I
think
the
only
question-
and
that
was
a
question
I
was
gonna.
Ask
you
the
reason
for
a
conditional
use
permit
if
he
has
the
correct
zoning.
The.
L
F
A
Than
Clark
Clark
Boulevard
I'm
a
clock
boulevard
of
60,000
cars
go
by
my
home
by
my
business
every
day.
Okay,
this
gentleman
here
Rhett's
this
way,
brags
Arkansas
get
rid
of
everything.
That's
outside
this
is
a
south
east
corner.
This
is
human.
The
most
deplorable
photographs
I'm
about
to
show
you
is
it's
in
the
heart
of
our
scene,.
A
Why
city
inspectors
have
not
done
anything
about?
This
has
been
there
for
about
five
years:
the
tire
shop?
Yes,
hundreds
of
it's
a
fire
hazard,
hundreds
and
hundreds
of
tires
rents,
dirt
Bandon
vehicles
for
the
life
of
me.
I
do
not
understand
how
any
of
the
city
inspectors,
including
including
mr.
Orozco,
mr.
chairman,.
L
L
A
This
week,
six
blocks
from
here
or
nerve
coke
in
San,
Bernardo
thousand
hundreds
of
items
outside
display.
They
have
no
parking.
I
have
been
a
victim
of
retaliation.
My
business
was
targeted
in
March,
I
had
been
in
business
like
I,
showed
you
18
years.
I
have
never
been
bothered
by
any
city
of
inspectors,
I've,
never
gotten
a
citation.
It
became
a
political
attack
on
my
business,
my
livelihood,
the
way
I
internal
living.
A
They
raided
my
place,
I,
don't
know
if
you're
aware
of
that
there
are
so
many
businesses
in
this
city
that
are
not
in
compliance
display
items
outside
such
as
fun
shops,
bicycles,
bicycles,
you
have
lawnmowers
weed
eaters.
What's
good
for
the
goose
should
be
good
for
the
gander.
Ok,
beep,
rezoning,
it's
business,
I've
been
I've,
been
there
like
I,
said
for
eight
years.
Mister.
Why
not
wise
was
kind
enough
to
put
in
a
good
word
for
me
to
rent
that
place
and
the
reason
I've
been
there
since
then.
A
Prior
to
that,
that
place
have
been
a
dilapidated
abandoned
gas
station.
The
weeds
were
knee-high
I,
cleaned
up
the
place
right
by
the
crimefighter
one
of
these
days
and
see
what
a
difference
my
business
has
made
in
that
neighborhood
as
opposed
to
what
is
going
on
in
the
heart
of
our
city
brush
some
taco
are
linking
to
Papa
Lincoln
in
the
heart
of
our
city
of
Oulu
history,
the
fire
hazard
deplorable,
not
to
mention
the
Mercy
Hospital.
A
Ok,
picking
on
me,
picking
on
me
is
the
small
business
owner
for
not
supporting
somebody's
political
agenda
is
deplorable.
This
city
has
made
me
a
scapegoat,
I
demand
and
I
humbly
request
that
you
give
it
serious
consideration.
I've
been
doing
it
for
18
years.
Why
now,
why
have
I
become
the
subject
of
or
you
cannot
displace
the
outside?
What
about
all
the
other
guys
that
are
doing
it?
Why
it's
enforcement
not
uniform?
A
Those
are
questions
to
both
planning
zoning,
which
probably
you
have
no
teeth
on
that,
but
to
the
inspectors
and
to
Planning
and
Zoning
staff.
You
drive
by
some
kind
of
Nardo
and
coke
hundreds
of
islands
outside
no
parking.
Why
is
this
happening?
Why?
Why
am
I
being
targeted
there's
another
photograph?
This
was
taken
today
or
it
is
that
north
it
is
the
north
west
corner
of
coke,
and
somebody
not
six
blocks
from
here,
so
we're
turning
up
an
IV.
Don't
we
do
what?
Where
do
we
live?
A
You
know
selective
enforcement
I
call
it
selective
enforcement
discrimination
against
my
business,
because
I
did
not
support
somebody's
political
agenda
like
I,
said
18,
business,
I
think
you're
some
business
and
have
never
gotten
a
citation
by
now.
That
is
my
big
question.
Making
your
some
business.
Okay,
all.
K
Would
like
to
to
make
a
comment?
Yes,
sir
mr.
Gomez
I
appreciate
your
coming
before
us.
As
you
may
know,
we're
we're
part
of
the
community
and
we
duty
it's
a
voluntary
work
and
I
understand
your
point,
but
I
think
that
we
will
die.
I
personally
would
like
that
then,
and
we
stick
to
your
to
your
item
because
nothing
of
what
you
mentioned
as
far
as
the
city,
talking
to
you
or
not
I
mean
it's
something
that
that
we
can.
We
can't
do
anything
about
it
if.
M
K
K
You
might
be
right
that
there
might
be
a
lot
of
places,
are
not
in
compliance,
but
it's
time
that
everybody
comes
into
compliance
I've
been
shortly
in
this
in
this
committee
and
I
can
tell
you
that
I
look
for
the
community
and
many
times
bringing
some
businesses
into
compliance
also
is
help
in
the
community
see
so
whatever
transpires
here,
whatever
we
both.
Is
that
gonna
be
you
as
an
individual,
but
actually
it's
we're
going
by
the
ordinance
I.
K
P
A
K
That
was
that
was
shown
on
the
screen.
Okay,
I'm
sure
staff
is
taking
notes,
but
those
those
are
photos
should
be
taken
to
the
building
department,
so
they
can
enforce
it,
but
the
enforcer
or
not
is
not
in
our
state,
I
mean
maybe
someday
you
will
be
here
see
in.
You
will
make
these
issues
that
might
affect
some
people,
some
persons
on
the
community
and
sometime
they
will
like
it.
Sometimes
I
won't
like
it.
We're
gonna
try
to
see
what's
proper
and
what
we
do
believe
is
gonna,
be
as
proper
as
possible.
A
I
am
the
most
imporant
interested
party
in
this
whole
building.
As
far
as
the
value
of
the
neighborhood
and
of
my
home
I,
like
I,
said
my
residence
is
at
1502
Clark
Boulevard
right
across
the
street,
and
if
anybody
is
interested
in
keeping
keeping
values,
property
values
and
doing
away
with
eyesores
that
are
all
over
the
city,
it's
me
well,
look
at
my
lawn
go!
Look
at
my
business,
there's
no
weeds
there!
There's
I
display
beautiful
rods,
beautiful
blankets
outside
and
basically
I'm
just
humbly
once
again
asking
a
small.
A
I
need
I
need
to
continue
to
operate
my
business.
The
way
I've
been
doing
it
for
18
years,
I
display
beautiful
rugs,
blankets
and
also
by
selling
paint
to
beautify
our
city,
I,
sell
house
paint
and
at
an
affordable
price,
and
many
people
are
beautifying
their
homes.
Thanks
to
the
business
that
I
own,
that
I
run,
I
saw
a
portable
paint
to
beautify
a
great
city
of
Arabia.
Let.
B
A
B
B
To
be
in
compliance
and
wants
to
go
ahead
and
move
forward
with
the
city,
I
certainly
share
everybody's
within
the
p3
and-
and
you
know,
and
he's
shown
a
lot
of
areas
that
I'm
sure
notes
have
been
taken
to
going
and
address
the
issues.
I
think
we
all
agree
with
you
that
we
all
want
the
best
for
the
community
and,
like
you
stated,
nobody
wants
anything,
that's
going
to
drop
property
battle.
I
want
to
stay
within
compliance.
That's
why
we
have
zoning
ordinances
to
try
and
say
hey.
L
O
B
A
G
B
O
M
O
D
B
D
B
I
L
That's
not
what
he's
asking
for
a
Cu
P,
so
he
can
continue
outdoor
display,
hey
and
so
what
we
said
is
we
suggest
in
them.
There
are
conditions
that
if
the
Commission
or
the
City
Council
is
wanting
to
go
that
direction,
we
give
our
recommendations
as
to
what
can
be
done,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day
you
or
the
council,
your
recommendation
could
say:
let
him
continue
as
he
is
and
that's
that's
how
we're
going
to
issue
the
permit
so
and
that's
how
you
know
so.
L
K
The
options:
what
happened
is
that
mr.
chairman,
mr.
Vollmer,
we
have
a
building
that
was
that
was
originally
for
gas
station.
Others
and
everybody
in
this
room
have
gone
to
Clark
and
have
seen
the
business
mr.
Comcast
and
I
get
many
of
us
about
being
there,
but
allowing
the
condition
just
permit.
Okay,
it's
allowing
to
walk
away
from
a
compliance.
K
The
p3,
it's
a
good
Sony,
his
business,
a
good
business,
but
the
business
should
be
created
in
accordance
with
a
victory,
exactly
what
we
are
allowing
him
with
a
conditional
use
permit
that
is
not
being
supported
by
staff.
We're
allowing
something
to
continue
if
he
would
have
been
there
for
one
year.
I
could
barely
understand
that
he
would
be
fingering
us
to
the
Hague
ordinances,
but
as
to
his
been
there
for
18
years.
K
L
K
B
B
B
The
only
issue
is
that
the
enclosed
area
might
be
a
little
bit
small
for
your
business
to
continue
because
you're
having
to
use
the
outside
of
it
to
do
some
of
the
displays
or
storage
or
whatever,
and
that's
the
only
thing
I'm
asking
is,
can
you
know
some
modifications
be
done
to
bring
this
particular
place
into
compliance
and
I?
Don't
have
the
answer?
I,
don't
think
you
have
the
answer
with
us
today
either?
Would
it
be
feasible?
B
B
Right
now,
right
now,
we're
really
in
in
in
you
know,
he's
the
first
gentleman
enough,
but
at
this
point
it
is
a
public
hearing
that
is
only
you
know,
one
of
the
departments
that
we
have
does
anybody
else
have
any
questions
for
mr.
Holmes
from
the
Commission?
No
okay.
Thank
you
for
your
comments.
Mr.
mr.
Holmes,
thank
you.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anyone
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
conditional
use
permit
in
favor
of
the
conditional
use
permit
is
there
anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
against
the
conditional
use
permit
against
against.
K
B
L
Okay,
so
the
motion
carries
no
I
mean
he
has
a
right
to
appeal
from
an
ax
from
a
from
a
denial.
I
I
would
have
to
go,
look
and
think
it
through,
because
I
think
it
specifically
says
he
can
appeal
from
a
denial
but
from
a
table.
I'm,
not
sure
you
can
appeal
it
right
at
some
point.
You
know
it
has
to
come
back.
You
has
to
come
back
or
you
can't
hold
him
here
forever
and
or.
B
L
B
Trying
to
work
with
everybody
so
that
it
doesn't
become
a
flat
out.
You
know
we're
trying
to
do
several
things,
and
mr.
woman's
mentioned
it.
Obviously
he's
got
the
best
interest
of
the
community
at
heart
to
to
making
sure
that
things
get
done
correctly.
He
mentioned
he
at
a
lot
of
different
areas
that
are
out
of
compliance.
Yes,
so
it's
an
issue
of
how
do
we
start
getting
I
mean
we
can
continue
looking
and
the
other
way
the
other
way.
B
B
Just
trying
to
get
everybody
to
compliance
away,
the
zoning
ordinances
have
been
written
right
now.
This
is
an
option
right
now
that
has
been
by
the
Commission
he's
got
an
additional
few
weeks
to
see
if
it
can
be
worked
out,
they
may
just
come
right
back
to
us.
It
doesn't
get
worked
out.
We
move
forward
with
it
one
way
or
the
other
and
the
Commission
votes
on
it.
A
B
K
Mr.
gomez,
real,
yes,
all
right
fisherwoman
is
what
we
did
here
today.
It
was
in
in
your
benefit.
We
had
a
choice
not
to
not
to
grant
the
the
conditions
permit,
but
my
table
in
the
item,
we're
keeping
it
open.
So
you
don't
you
don't
feel
that
that
you
had
been
single
out
what
we're
giving
two
weeks,
so
you
can
get
together
with
building
and
planning
sony
to
get
the
minimum
requirements
to
comply.
K
A
B
B
O
B
L
B
B
Everybody,
that's
even
better.
Okay,
the
woman's.
Thank
you
all
right
next
item.
We
have
amending
the
zoning
ordinance,
a
city
lawyer
by
authorizing
the
conditional
use
permit
for
a
bar
a
lot
to
a
block
to
level
that
subdivision
located
at
25,
11
East,
Elmore,
Boulevard
suite.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anyone
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
in
favor
of
the
conditional
use
permit.
O
G
G
This
business
opened
in
2005
a
very
nice
upscale,
no
key
establishment,
same
location,
Belle
Dean,
and
it
hasn't
really
changed
much
in
13
years.
There's
a
gas
station
yard
heart
looks
like
an
empty
lot,
but
it's
more
like
a
garage
still
the
same
thing
and
we
all
know
the
fine
tell
told
your
partner
house,
so
they
want
to
maintain
it.
So
their
age
range.
G
H
B
B
Motion
and
second
all
those
in
favor
aye,
those
opposed
motion
carries.
Thank
you
next
item
that
we
have
is
public
hearing
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
of
the
city
greater
by
rezoning,
lock
for
a
block
1b
step,
most
of
subdivision
unit
3
located
at
5500,
seven
McPherson
road
from
b3
to
be
for
this
is
a
public
hearing.
Anyone
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
in
favor
of
this
zone
change.
M
I'm
here
in
place
of
mr.
Powell
of
Abu
Abdo,
he
asked
me
to
be
here
because
he
had
to
go
out
of
town
at
the
last
minute.
He
asked
me
to
ask
you
all
to
please
consider
changing
the
zone
being
as
McPherson
has
always
had
boards,
and
he
all
did.
They
did
apply
for
a
conditional
use
permit.
But
it's
gonna
cost
him
a
lot
of
time.
A
lot
until
that
to
see
that
permits
approved.
B
M
J
D
B
No,
no,
no!
She
was
just
making
a
comment
if
I
understand
it
correctly
that,
rather
than
applying
for
conditional
use
permit
without
it
without
a
tenant,
I
guess
it's.
Where
is
good?
It
that's
if
you're
applying
for
a
strict
zone
change
so
that
that
can
get
a
tenant
in
there
easier.
That's
what
I
understood?
Is
it
correct
all
right?
Any
other
questions
for
that?
No!
Thank
you
all
right.
Thank
you.
B
Q
De
la
policÃa
de
you
ISD
reporters
in
la
policÃa,
there
PD,
okay,
don't
I
sound
a
jumbo
pig
of
the
marijuana
injecciones.
So
no
CA
de
drogas
pass
PS
Ave
todo
ESO.
Lo
que
encontrar
police
unit;
okay,
righto
Cyrene's,
okay,
inclusive,
a
hasta
oneno
el
siguiente
de
escuela
es
esteban
condones
sucio
y
el
nino
chiba
caminando
parenteral,
the
kinder
o
first
grade.
Okay
I
got
Alyssa
Eva
Hospital,
oh
okay,
todo
ESO,
se,
estuvo
split
condo
para
que
se
passe
rezones
por
las
que
no
queremos
I
in
the
mr.
D
N
B
K
B
There
there
is
a
see
you
pee
that
has
been
turned
in
on
the
same
property
for
the
next
cycle
of
planning
and
zoning,
for
an
amusement
Redemption
machine
right
now,
they're
asking
for
a
beep
for
but
they're.
Also
then
asking
for
a
conditional
use
permit
for
then
these
web
Redemption
machine
two
different
uses.
H
L
O
B
O
L
People
were
then
to
200
feet,
but
clearly
it's
the
neighborhood,
the
neighborhood
behind
it
is
against
its
own
change.
For
those
of
you
who
don't
remember
some
years
back,
there
was
a
bar
there.
There
was
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
trouble.
This
was
one
of
the
sites
that
actually
sort
of
motivated
the
City
Council.
L
To
address
the
issue
of
what
were
called
renegade
bars,
they
were
bars
that
were
locating
in
a
zone
that
was
not
for
bars,
and
then
they
would
serve
alcohol
and
as
part
of
their
restaurant,
and
then
they
would
kind
of
get
rid
of
the
restaurant
part
and
just
turned
into
a
bar.
So
that's
when
we
got
the
su
P
for
a
restaurant,
serving
alcohol
to
control
that
and
make
sure
that
those
those
volumes
of
alcohol
that
were
sold
were
below
the
50%.
L
So
this
is
one
of
the
one
of
the
sites
that
sort
of
was
a
motivation.
Back
then,
was
a
motivating
factor
for
that,
and
we
did
have
a
lot
of
testimony
at
that
time.
Very
similar
to
worked
with
the
lady
said
on
those
back
streets
were
being
I
mean
they
were
just
jammed
with
cars,
and
there
were
instances
where
syringes
were
found
in
other
stuff.
N
B
Taking
that
we
have
a
motion
in
a
second
all,
those
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
aye.
Those
against
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
that
we
have
is
a
public
hearing
amending
the
zoning
ordinance
to
the
city
or
a
towbar,
authorizing
the
condition
use
permit
for
a
children,
amusement
services
out
doors,
locked,
seven
and
eight
block
to
something
say:
a
subdivision
located
at
63
21
and
63
23
Gaza
Boulevard.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
of
the
conditional
use
permit
in
favor.
Mr.
chairman,
yes,.
B
Second,
all
those
in
favor
aye
carries.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
is
a
seven
eight
and
a
ten
master
plan,
and
this
is
a
request,
review
and
reconsideration
up
at
a
ten
subdivision
master
plan,
the
antennas
residential
and
commercial.
This
is
583
for
26,
acre
tract
located
south
of
Seattle
east
of
Boulevard
and
Western
capital.
Yet
those
road
is
only
for
this
2378
lakh
development
is
our
1a
or
1mh,
or
three
b1
and
b3.
This
track
is
located
in
district
1.
The
proposed
action
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comments
from
Planning
from
traffic.
B
L
This
is
not
a
complete
review
of
the
master
plan.
What
this
is
is
really
an
update
and
really
the
only
reason
that
it
is
here
is
because
we
asked
them
to
bring
it
in
because
they
have
a
plat
that
they're
bringing
in
that
splits
one
of
the
phases,
and
so
we
asked
them
to
bring
the
master
plenty
and
to
show
us
that
split
of
the
face
and
that's
occurring
down
in
the
lower
left-hand
corner
there,
where
you
see
that
commercial
property
right
to
the
right,
and
so
there
was
one
it
was
at
one
point.
L
It's
right
here,
yeah
see
what
this
arrow
is.
It's
this
area
right
here.
This
was
one.
What
will
they
call
the
unit,
but
we
won
even
now
they're
splitting
it
into
two,
and
so
that's
really
all
they're
doing.
We
asked
them
to
bring
the
master
plan
update,
not
a
revision
update
just
so
that
we
were
in
tracking
with.
I
B
The
second
all
those
in
favor
carries.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
is
the
Stanford
Heights
master
plane.
This
is
a
review
and
consideration
of
the
Stanford
Heights
subdivision
master
plan.
The
attendance
residential
and
commercial.
The
site
is
fourteen
point:
zero,
three
acre
tract
located
north
of
Jackman,
Road
and
east
of
Castle
Air,
the
road,
the
zoning
for
this
seventy
seven
lakh
development
is
our
one.
The
proposed
action
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comments
from
Planning
from
engineering
from
traffic
safety
parks
and
leisure,
and
then
notice
the
developer
from
planning.
J
He,
mr.
chairman,
members
of
the
Commission
Frank
Assad,
was
Sheriff
the
engineering.
Yes,
that
was
correct.
We
did
send
in
the
request
to
table
at
this
time
uncertain
okay,
after
the
discussion
that
we
had
two
weeks
ago
at
the
last
pnz
meeting,
we
just
spoke
to
the
client
we're
going
to
move
forward
based
on
your
recommendations,
which
is
therefore
making
us
go
back
before
the
parks
work
with
since
we're
adding
additional
Lots
and
adding
in
that
road
and
we're
gonna,
wait
to
go
before
a
park
board
and
then
come
back
before
all.
B
P
O
B
Let
me
just
tell
you
looking
at,
wouldn't
that
we
just
went
on
that.
The
developer
of
the
track
then
was
proposed
to
be
behind.
Your
subdivision
has
asked
to
table
the
development
at
this
point
time
uncertain.
That
means
that,
at
this
current
time,
they're
not
proposing
to
do
anything
who
that
piece
of
property
in
the
back,
they
won't
probably
come
back
to
this
commission
at
a
much
time.
Uncertainty.
That's
the
way
they
put
it,
so
just
so
that
you
know
that
that's!
What's
going
on!
Yes,
sir.
P
B
Me
go
ahead
at
the
last
meeting.
We
asked
him
that
we
didn't
think
that
the
idea
coming
in
through
history
was
a
good
idea.
Cuz,
it's
already
very
narrow,
okay,
the
engineer
redesigned.
They
made
a
street
that
goes
out
to
Casa
Verde
and
into
the
subdivision.
Okay
right,
so
they've
done
that.
However,
at
this
point
in
time,
they're
choosing
because
they've
added
more
Lots
and
they've
done
some
things
to
delay
this
project
from
it
going
for
that
discipline
right,
they
will
go
or
come
back
based
on
the
owner's
request
whenever
they
want
to
to
see.
B
That's
what
the
issue
was.
Would
you
see
a
court
okay
that
they
needed
fire
department
needs
because
they
said
these
are
gonna,
be
more
than
70
lots
right
now,
given
that
Mesilla
Court
is
a
very
narrow
street,
the
only
real
use
that
the
only
one
that
really
needs
an
entrance
and
exit
through
your
street
would
be
a
part
apartment.
Those
are
things
that
can
be
addressed
pretty
easily,
with
fire
control
gates
for
all
the
fire
departments,
because
you
do
have
it
your
own
Street
to
go
in
and
after
that
of
the
subdivision.
B
P
B
Alright,
the
next
item
that
we
have
is
in
subdivision
unit
11-
and
this
is
preliminary
consideration
of
the
plant
subdivision
unit.
11
810
is
residential
19-point
88
acres
located
south
of
Sierra
Vista
Boulevard
in
west
of
cuatro
Vientos
Road.
This
is
120.
Lakh
development
is
an
r1
a
zone,
and
this
proposed
action
is
a
crew
subject
to
the
following
comments.
Mr.
dance,
are
you
in
agreement
with
the
comments?
Yes,.
B
B
Stanford
Heights
subdivision
that's
been
tabled.
The
next
item
is
item
9a
there
Chuck
billboards.
This
is
final
consideration
of
the
plant
of
the
attack.
Billboard
number
three,
the
antennas
commercial-
and
this
is
a
point:
zero,
eight
for
a
contract
located
south
of
Loma,
zetsu
and
west
of
cuatro
Vientos.
The
proposed
action
is
approval.
H
E
D
B
E
B
Sorry,
this
is
a
consideration
of
the
model
subdivision
rules
and
compliance
for
the
plan
of
monocles
subdivision
phase
two
is
that
16.9
six
acre
tract
is
located
west
of
McPherson,
Road
and
north
of
shadow
drive.
The
zoning
498
LOC
development
is
r1
and
the
proposed
action
is
the
planets
and
full
compliance
with
the
home
model.
Rules
and
staff
recommends
approval
motion.
B
You
go
second
in
second,
the
whole,
those
in
favor
aye,
all
right,
yeah
we
have
10
B
consideration
of
the
track
is
located
north
and
the
model
subdivision
will
comply
to
the
sunny
senior
North
as
state
law
subdivision.
The
post
action
is
applied
in
full
compliance
with
the
whole
model
rules
and
the
staff
recommends
approval.
Now
you
can
make
a
book
how
many
motion
to
the
second,
all
those
in
favor
aye
motion
carries.
Thank
you
all.