►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 032119
Description
Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting 032119
A
B
A
A
A
A
A
E
Good
afternoon
mr.
chairman
and
members
of
the
Commission
Rhea
Silvia
with
Utilities
Department
I,
will
just
make
a
quick
presentation.
This
is
the
same
presentation.
I
made
it
to
City
Council
last
year
in
August,
and
also
in
this
Monday
and
based
on
these
councils
authorized
to
have
a
workshop
in
two
weeks.
We
don't
have
the
date
yet
to
cooperate
and
possibly
come
up
with
a
solution.
E
E
E
This
is,
we
had
completed
a
master
plan
in
2015
that
master
plan
addressed
2050
to
220
65,
and
it
identified
almost
two
hundred
and
eighty
seven
million
dollars
for
water
investment
and
471
million
dollar
for
wastewater
investment,
and
this
is,
of
course,
to
support
600
10,000
people
as
it
passed
city
grows.
We
will
be
doing
a
master
plan
upgrade
because
the
master
plan
is
almost
five
year
old.
E
These
are
the
improvement
we
need
to
do
for
water
and
wastewater
on
the
capital
improvement
program
for
last
next,
five
years
because
of
the
growth.
Most
of
this
improvement
is
team
to
the
growth.
As
you
can
see,
all
those
are
all
brand
new
tank
I
mean
most
of
you
know.
The
lion
we
have
two
tanks
is
been,
one
is
empty
for
forever,
but
city's
going.
So
we
need
to
have
that
storage
capacity.
So
we
need
to
read.
We
need
to
download
the
tank
rebuild
the
tank.
E
E
B
E
Water
still
is
ok,
it's
the
sewer
is
the
one
we
are
in
dire
need.
Part
of
the
issue
is,
if
you
can
see
the
big
ticket
item
and
others
that
plant
was
supposed
to
be
built,
the
contract
was
awarded
in
2009,
we
didn't
acquire
the
land
until
2015
and
since
it's
a
huge
price
tag,
32
million
dollar
we
didn't
winter
plan.
Of
course
we
didn't
have
money,
budget
short
days
and
I've
in
last
three
years.
Every
opportunity
I
have
a
been
telling
council
and
the
management
look.
E
We
don't
have
capacity,
we
need
to
build
it,
and
so
we
are
delayed-
and
there
was
another
plant
is
in
my
store
area,
which
was
on
radio.
That
plant
was
also
not
built
and
we
are
not
building
that
plant
is
this
moment,
because
that
plan
was
there
was
twice
they
went
out
on
bids
a
both
time.
It
came
in
like
35
and
32
million
dollar
dollar
for
a
1.65
million
gallon
plant,
which
is
outrageous,
and
so
we
decided
to
put
a
lift
station,
but
everything
is
pumping
to
one
line
since
my
mother's
is
not
built.
E
So
this
is
the
last
rate:
increase
was
done
for
the
sewer,
which
was
to
fund
88
million
dollars.
In
that
time,
remember,
the
CIP
is
based
on
five
year
same
thing:
a
water
wake
was
increased
to
fund
89
million
dollar
I'm,
just
gonna
just
remind
Commission
and
mr.
chairman,
just
a
LP
Copeland
cost
us
110
million
dollars,
and
these
are
some
old
2010.
As
you
can
see,
the
CIP
need
was
almost
three
hundred
two
million
dollars.
We
need
when
and
be
another
rate
adjustment,
so
we
fall
behind.
E
Our
revenue,
we
are
doing
good
thanks
to
the
growth,
but
it's
not
that
good
that
we
can.
We
can
sustain
another
180
billion
dollar
upon.
As
you
can
see,
our
operation
is
not,
we
are
keep
it
steady
upward
debt
service
is
the
one
growing,
and
the
other
interesting
thing
is
growing.
Is
the
eight
fees
to
the
general
fund,
the
more
money
we
bringing
in?
Of
course,
we
are
Enterprise.
Fund
general
fund
takes
a
takes
a
share
of.
E
E
And
this
is
the,
as
you
can
see
the
sewer
collection
system.
This
is
Unitec,
which
is
we
just
finalized
the
design
we
will
upgrade
the
Unitec
plan,
so
this
support
any
any
development
coming
in
on
this
area.
This
is
the
plan.
I
just
told
you,
some
brachio
was
not
built.
This
plan
was
to
take
care
all
this
growth,
all
the
way
to
El
Pico
without
come
to
Bluebird
and
all
of
those
are
supposed
to
be.
E
Taken
care
of
by
this
plan,
this
Bank
was
not
built,
so
there
is
a
lift
station
pumping
here.
Everything
goes
through
this
line
and
all
the
sewer
from
North
Laredo
comes
through
this
line
and
connect
here
and
then
goes
in
front
of
mall
del
Norte
goes
to
Sakata
probably
means
this
line
is
four
year
old
same
line.
We
didn't
put
additional
line
because
the
idea
was
once
we
build
Morales.
All
this
word
will
be
intercepted
here
and
once
we
build
some
lady,
all
the
sword
will
be
intercepted.
Here
seems
it
was
not
done
now.
E
We,
this
line,
is
overloaded
by
knowing
that
we
can
approve,
because
that's
a
TCK
violation.
I
can
have
sewer
overflow
and
a
proof
submission,
and
so
that's
why
we
should
we
stop
approving
subdivisions
and
you,
you
Commission,
using
those
comments
that
we
have
no
diversity.
We
do
have
some
temporary
solution,
but
we
cannot
just
approve
subdivision
based
on
temporary
solution.
E
G
E
E
G
E
G
My
understanding
with
the
comments
that
have
been
brought
forth
with
the
flats
that
we
have
is
that
we
have
lines
18-inch
lines
that
serve
a
disproportionate
number
of
households
and
we
have
clogged.
We
have
I,
guess,
log
jams
in
San,
Ysidro
and
mines
Road,
and
so
why
are
we
building
smaller
waste
collection
lines
when
we
know
that
that's
where
them?
The
most
of
the
growth
is
going
to
be.
E
To
answer
your
question
collections
lines
under
man,
what
what
happening
these
are.
These
are
a
bigger
collection
line,
which
is
the
San
Ysidro
intercept
of
mine
problem.
This
is
where
it
intercept
here.
All
these
were
from
mine
start
coming
at
this
point,
going
underneath
I
before
and
coming
through,
Manila
squeak,
intercepting
here
and
then
going.
This
is
the
line
which
is
a
30
inch
line,
doesn't
have
capacity.
E
So
what,
as
I
told
you,
we
don't
want
sewer
Flo,
and
so
we
had
temporarily
put
putting
some
suction
pump
at
the
end
of
Canal
Street,
where
the
Stein
Mart
is
just
to
keep
the
sewer
flow.
So
we
don't
have
spills
I
mean
we
can
keep
it,
but
we
cannot
approve
subdivision
based
on
a
temporary
fix.
That's
why
the
permanent
solution
means
all
those
other
infrastructure
needs
to
be
in
place.
So
if
I
have
a
path
council
give
me
a
direction.
Yes,
there
is
a
needs
to
be
a
rate
increase.
E
If
you
want
to
grow,
there
needs
to
be
a
rating
is
to
fund
these
projects,
so
if
they
they
approve
a
rate
increase.
I
can
start
approving
subdivision
and
keep
those
temporary
pumping
system
because
we
we
already
funded
those
improvements,
but
at
this
moment
that's
the
eve
and
hopefully
I
mean
they
all
understand
and
that's
why?
Hopefully
they
will
make
a
decision
now.
E
The
land
acquisition
was
one
thing,
just
as
you
know
that
that
property
used
to
be
the
endzone
plant,
so
city
cannot
close
the
property
until
we
get
a
clean
bill
of
health
from
the
tcq
it
took
almost
3-4
year
and
then
then
we
don't
put
in
had
money.
We
could
not
support.
52
million
dollar
bond
just
talked
to
two
point:
six
million
dollar
payment
every
year.
G
E
If
you
look
at
capital
improvement
program,
this
is
a
wish
list.
It
is
funded
every
year
during
the
budget
with
the
bond
cell.
So
if
it's
not
funded,
it's
just
a
wish
list,
and
if
you
look
at
the
city's
web
page,
we
have
six
hundred
seven
hundred
million
dollar
capital
improvement
program.
Very
few
of
them
are
funded.
E
Let
me,
let
me
show
you
what
we
this
is
the
preliminary
number
and
as
I
say,
we
council
did
authorize
me
last
year
to
go
ahead
and
hire
a
consultant
to
go
through
the
rate
study
which,
which
we
did
and
I
mean
I.
Just
don't
want
you
guys
to
get
bored
with
all
this,
but
they
did
say
that
2
percent
annual
increase
is
good,
but
that's
not
enough
to
sustain
the
new
bond.
E
C
E
H
I
Stop
as
a
related
bill
right,
I
guess,
I
have
a
question
and
I
know
it's
easy
to
look
back
into
the
past
and
say
where
it
worked
where
this
all
went
wrong.
But
at
what
point
could
this
have
been
avoided
and
and
what
could
have
been
done
for
what
it
just
so
that
we
can
some
context
and
understand
how
we
got
here
at.
E
E
C
Chairman,
yes,
if
I
may
so
our
recommendation
to
City
Council
will
be
to
up
to
bring
the
funding
for
that
particular
improvement.
So
we
could
so
in
that
in
a
way
that
we
don't
start
the
go
to
the
Radel,
because
if
we
stop
the
growth
operator,
then
that's
that's.
Coming
back
to
us,
we
still
meet
that
the
plant
solution.
It
improvements,
I
mean.
A
The
plants
are
there,
the
problem
we
need
is
a
collection
lines
and
obviously
that's
that's.
What
needs
to
get
funded?
You
need
the
collection
lines
to
be
able
to
continue
growth
and,
unfortunately,
that
cost
money
and
to
be
able
to
pay
back
that
debt.
It
can
I
go
back
on
all
ratepayers
I
do
know
that
one
was
that
25
year
of
increased
past
within
ten
or
eleven.
A
A
E
So
so
that's
what
the
consultant
is
coming
back.
If
you
look
at
this
is
the
last
page.
We
do
have
the
two
percent
rate
increase
every
year,
yeah
so,
but
the
two
person
cannot
sustain
that
additional
growth,
additional
debt
service,
so
he's
proposing
5.6
percent-
and
this
is
combined
both
water
and
sewer
residential.
G
G
E
H
A
K
E
J
H
H
C
A
E
I
H
E
F
E
General
fund
does
not
support
utilities;
they
can
they
don't
they
can't
even
support
yeah
general
fund
yeah,
so
council
will
look
at
different
option.
One
of
the
option
they've
been
talking,
maybe
target
to
the
developers.
Those
are
one
of
the
option,
which
is
not
a
very
popular
thing.
It
also
because
if
you
charge
$500,
the
impact
is
heavier
on
the
residential
home
side,
but
they
will
have
I
mean
we.
We
want
their
direction.
This
is
our
proposal.
They
will
have
different
options
or
will
sit
down
with
City
Council.
Okay,.
A
A
Okay,
the
next
item
that
we
have
is
going
back
to
regular
agenda
item
6a.
This
is
a
public
hearing,
many
rezoning
ordinance
of
the
city
of
Laredo
by
rezoning
all
that
part
of
block
2019
Eastern
Division,
located
at
3203
Chacon
street
from
b3
to
m1
the
proposed
uses,
a
trader
tractor
trailer
parking
site
is
currently
undeveloped
and
the
staff.
A
D
D
A
N
N
Good
evening,
my
name
is
so
die
that
Jackson
and
the
real
estate
broker
for
this
property.
The
reason
that
we
requested
zone
change
10m
one
is
because
the
surrounding
properties
do
in
the
back
side,
do
have
warehouses
and
the
idea
is
to
be
able
to
build
a
small
warehouse
there
and
again
also
as
use
it
as
a
trailer
park.
L
C
A
G
P
P
My
name
is
Jana
Lopez
and
we
do
live
right
on
359
and
I
do
have
for
the
people
that
also
live
here.
This
is
the
older
generation.
We
do
not
want
the
m1
at
all.
We
eject
safely,
because
the
first
of
all
the
traffic
is
already
immense
there
and
that
there
is
no
curb
appeal
there.
You
walk
up
from
your
home
and
you
see
18-wheeler
tractor
trailers.
P
There
I
don't
know
if
they
could
possibly
do
some
form
of
curb
appeal
to
where
we
won't
see
that,
while
we're
driving
or
coming
in
or
out
of
our
homes,
also
the
reverse.
If
she
is
correct,
there
are
other
manufacturers
in
the
back,
but
not
in
the
front
of
359.
So
right
now
we
have
it's
very
difficult
to
come
in
or
out
of
our
homes,
and
it's
just
about
five
minutes
there.
It's
different
individual
homes.
P
F
A
H
A
They'd
have
to
get
text
our
approval
for
those
driveways,
which
means
they
may
ask
for
an
acceleration
or
deceleration
lanes
if
they
grant
if
they
grant
the
excess.
Yes,
I.
C
Know
mr.
Sherman
m1
will
be
appropriate
because
it's
gonna
improve
the
area
now
they're
gonna
have
to
comply
with
a
lot
of
the
requirements
from
my
context
up
so
I
think
it
would
be
more
appropriate.
You
look
for
for
the
neighborhood.
It
would
be
a
more
control
paints,
a
lot
of
too
many
things
in
that
area.
Okay,
all.
A
A
A
Right
then,
we
move
right
on
to
the
next
item.
Is
a
public
hearing?
Men
in
the
zone
endorses
city
loiter
by
resort
approximately
two
point:
nine
five:
nine
acres
located
at
north
of
International,
Boulevard
and
west
of
Springfield
Avenue
from
an
AG
to
a
B
with
three
they
proposed
uses,
a
commercial
and
the
site
is
currently
vacant
and
the
staff
supports
the
zone
change.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
A
O
Sir
chairman
Wayne,
a
supporters,
not
engineering,
we
agree
with
staff
comments,
we're
looking
forward
to
this
zone
change
we
think,
is
appropriate
for
the
area.
There
are
several
be
threes
in
the
areas
you
can
see
from
your
maps
that
are
provided
by
staff,
and
we
agree
with
all
of
their
comments
and
we
hope
you
feel
the
same.
Thank
you
with
trance.
Q
A
A
16
I'm
sorry
rezoning
approximately
two
point:
zero,
six,
seven,
zero
six,
seven
acres
located
north
of
International
Boulevard
in
West
Springfield,
was
in
the
same
area
and
it's
going
from
an
AG
to
a
B
three.
Also
it's
a
separate
track,
but
it's
in
the
same
area
and
the
staff
supports
his
own
change.
O
A
A
D
R
Mr.
chair,
the
adjacent
property
is
Tuscany
village,
it's
a
commercial
shopping
center
and
the
proposed
change
has
a
an
existing
pawn
shop.
That's
been
there
for
about
15
years,
we're
adding
three
commercial
spaces
and
it
will
all
be
part
of
the
same
shopping
center
and
the
zone
change
would
just
make
it
all
commercial
on
mines,
Road
and,
and
that
way
would
be
more
in
tune
with
the
the
proposed
building
use.
Sorry,
your
name
for
the
record
Oh
Richard
cannon.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Thank.
J
S
A
Do
we
have
a
second
second
in
a
second
all
those
in
favor?
All
those
against
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
I
said
that
we
have
is
item
7a.
This
is
reviewing
consideration
of
the
following
master
plan:
those
prescient
deceased
master
plan,
the
intended
residential
and
commercial
170
acres
sited
is
located
west
of
Concord,
Hills
development
and
east
of
what
relentless
Road
the
zoning
for
this
185
lakh
development
is
AG.
R1
r1,
a
and
B
for
the
proposed
action
is
approved.
A
D
A
Right,
we
have
motion
table
ensemble,
a
motion
and
a
second
all.
Those
in
favor
aye
motion
carries
thank
you
next,
and
then
we
have
is
a
review
in
consideration
of
the
Shiloh
Highland
subdivision
master
plan,
the
antennas,
residential
and
commercial.
The
purpose
of
this
revision
includes
creating
two
phases
out
of
former
phase
two.
The
proposed
action
is
proved
subject
to
the
following
comments:
from
planning
for
water
utilities:
a
notice
to
developer
from
planning.
Yes,
sir.
A
A
O
D
And
we
just
wanted
to
remind
the
city
that
the
city
only
enforces
public
land
use
regulations.
They
do
not.
We
do.
The
city
does
not
enforce
private
land
use
regulations.
They
also
asked
us
to
share
that
this
zone
city,
which
we
are,
has
a
comprehensive
land
use
regulatory
scheme
embodied
in
the
zoning
ordinance
subdivision
ordinance,
Building
Code.
This
is
based
on
protecting.
D
Of
course,
the
health
and
safety
of
our
community
restrictions
are
a
matter
or
easements,
and
covenants
are
a
matter
of
private
contract,
typically
established
by
a
developer
and
occasionally
by
reciprocal
agreement
and
the
property
owners.
Those
restrictions,
as
as
mentioned
earlier,
our
private
and
the
city
does
not
enforce
them.
This
is
not
legal
advice.
This
is
simply
information
to
share
with
the
Commission.
D
I
I
think,
unless
they
have
an
injunction
in
joining
us,
we
can
act
so
I,
don't
know
what
one
crazy
reason
not
to
act
unless
there's
something
that's
preventing
us
legally
from
acting
okay.
Now,
if
you
want
to
table
the
item,
because
you
want
to
get
more
information
from
the
legal
department
before
we
act,
that's
also
an
option.
A
A
Saying
that,
based
on
what
they
have
reviewed,
it's
it's
not
a
matter
of
of
the
cities
that
the
city
can
obviously
enforce
any
kind
of
restrictions.
Yeah
the
only
issue
that
I
can't
with
that
is
I.
Guess.
If
we're
going
to
approve
a
particular
subdivision
plan,
it
does
have
certain
conditions
that
must
be
met
by
the
city,
bring.
E
D
A
D
A
A
D
D
I
G
D
D
G
The
fire
and
the
they
were
trying
to
plat
it.
They
were
trying
to
PLAs
one
of
the
last
proportions
and
it
was
not
in
conformity
with
the
master
plan
that
had
been
done,
shocking
in
1996
or
2000
or
whatever
it
was
done,
and
what
they
were
trying
to
do
was
block
off
those
exits
that
choke
an
easement
that
was
sold
with
the
property
and
which
they're
still
doing
again
with
the
cul-de-sac.
That's
heading
north.
K
D
G
C
K
G
T
U
K
L
T
A
T
C
D
I
I
do
what
I
think
we
should
consider
doing,
assuming
that
this
does
not
hurt
the
developer,
because
I
don't
want
to
do
that
is.
Can
we
table
the
item
request
that
someone
from
the
City
Attorney's
Office
come
here
so
that,
instead
of
you
but
reading
that
to
us
that
we
can
have
them
answer
our
questions?
That
way,
we
are
making
an
informed
decision,
because
you
know
like
I'm,
gonna
attorney,
but
I
have
a
hard
time.
F
G
A
I
T
A
Yeah,
this
is
a
very
flat
sole.
It's
not
a
final
law
I
mean
basically
by
giving
him
from
preliminary
approval.
If
they
meet
the
conditions
that
are
set
forth
in
this
communication,
they
can
continue
to
go
forth.
This
thing
can
still
continue
to
be
researched,
and
you
know
blush
now.
I
could
give
away
those.
C
T
A
C
K
A
K
H
H
D
D
Remember,
the
old
city
attorneys.
What
is
he
had
us
add
that
to
every
single
one
of
our
zoning
ordinances
because
of
a
very
similar
issue.
You
know
there
was
a
restriction
with
rezoning
and
you
know
zoning
a
case
came
forward
and
it
was
in
contravention
of
some.
You
know
private
covenant
and
it
was
a
big
issue
and
that's
when
the
city's
you
know
had
us
put
that
on
everything
ordinances.
D
D
C
C
A
G
I'd
rather
make
a
motion
at
the
table
and
ask
for
the
City
Attorney's
Office
to
be
here
in
the
alternative.
I'd
make
a
motion
to
deny
it,
but
I'd
rather
give
the
opportunity
opportunity
to
get
all
these
ducks
in
a
row
and
ask
for
the
City
Attorney's
Office
to
you.
Motion
will
be
the
table
to
table.
We
have
maple.
F
A
H
C
A
You
all
right
next
data
that
we
have
is
preliminary
consideration
of
the
plight
of
the
shiloh
island
subdivision
phase
two,
the
intent
is
commercial.
This
is
a
three
point.
Four,
six
six
seven
acre
tract.
It
is
located
north
of
International,
Boulevard
and
west
of
Springfield.
The
proposed
action
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comments
from
planning,
probabilities
and
note
to
the
developer
from
planning.
Yes,
sir
chairman.
A
Second
motion:
the
second:
all
those
in
favor
aye
motion
carries
the
next
add
a
new
house.
Preliminary
consideration
of
the
replant
of
sellable
antenna
is
right
away
and
the
proposed
action
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comments
from
Planning
water
utilities
and
a
notice
of
development.
Yes,
sir.
A
To
the
following
comments
taken
a
motion
in
the
second
all
those
in
favor
aye.
Well,
she
carries.
The
next
item.
Is
the
preliminary
consideration
of
the
utility
trailer
park
up?
Let
the
antennas
industrial?
This
is
a
ten
point.
Five
one
acre
tract
located,
Wow
yard
and
west
of
FM
1472
is
a
1
lakh
development
is
m1.
Proposed
action
is
boo,
subject
to
the
following
comments
from
Planning
from
engineering
water
utilities,
a
notice
to
developer.
Yes,
sir,.
J
A
A
J
F
A
D
B
A
C
A
Q
We
get
grita
staff
comments,
however,
not
so
much
or
maybe
get
some
clarity
on
items:
1,
&,
2
under
water
and
utilities
under
water
utilities,
I
am
Number
1.
The
third
10
states
that
for
sewage
the
engineer
has
before
apparently
packaged
with
all
the
requirements
for
a
step
details.
Take
it
to
the
right
over
water
includes
Department,
three
of
you
and
once
it's
approved
and
take
it
to
the
real
health
department.
Q
A
A
Q
A
A
G
Q
The
first
one
question
running
number
two
under
warranty.
Ladies
states,
this
project
has
an
eight
inch
wire
line
on
this
property
site
along
F
in
1472
mines.
Road,
the
fire
department
requires
1,500
gallons
per
minute
for
industrial
developments
that
only
a
12
inch
water
line
can
provide
to
me
this
sounds
like
well.
Let
me
back
up.
Is
this
a
requirement
or
just
a
recommendation?
Well.
M
M
1500
out
of
one
hydron
I
mean
let's
say
you
got
a
corner
lot:
you're
part
of
the
minimum
1500s.
Obviously,
if
you
have
three
hydrants
and
they're
all
getting
five
hundred,
then
you
have,
but
that
that
is
the
table
out
of
the
2012
international
fire
code.
Basically,
what
it
is
it's
based
on
building
science
and
then
construction
type
and
then
the
use
of
the
building
and
as
you
go
down
the
table,
it's
going
to
give
you
a
water
fullest
required.
M
M
Q
M
E
M
Q
A
Q
L
A
A
G
A
The
next
item
we
have
is
preliminary
consideration
of
the
reef
flat
of
all
of
c25
in
the
North
half
of
c26
wealthiness
subdivision
into
C
25,
a
and
C
25
B
volpina
subdivision
in
ten
is
agricultural
residential
29.97
acre
tract.
It
is
located
west
of
I-35
south
of
us
83
north.
This
lot
is
located
outside
the
city
Lloyd
limits,
but
located
within
the
et
j-extra.
The
pole
section
is
a
proof
subject
of
the
following
comments
from
Planning
from
engineering
from
fire,
water
and
utilities,
and
a
notice
to
developer.
Yes,
sir,.
V
Edward
Sherwood,
CEC
and
I
do
have
a
couple
of
questions
and
maybe
concerns
about
I,
guess
a
few
of
the
comments.
I
guess.
First
off
I
guess
I'd
like
to
preface
my
questions
would
be
with.
We
are
in
the
we
are
in
the
county
where
slowly
this
property
is
in
Athena
subdivision
is
solely
in
the
county.
We
are
in
the
city
etj.
V
A
10
acre
limit
that
that
the
county
looks
at,
and
so
my
concern
really
is
mainly
with
kind
of
the
water
comment,
because
the
water
comment
says
we
cannot
provide
plat
approval,
I
mean
in
all
honesty,
I,
don't
think
the
city
Utilities
Department
should
be
given
us
and
approve
first
off,
they
don't
provide
water
to
Latinas
and
they
don't
provide
sewer
to
Latinas
and
by
you
know
several
of
the
state
codes.
If
we
exceed
10
acres,
we're
considered
an
AG
wrench
were
not
considered
a
residential
youth
lot.
V
Therefore,
we
don't
have
to
provide
water
and
sewer
it's
a
wrench,
so
I'm
just
a
little
bit
concerned
about
maybe
the
precedents
that
that
could
take
and,
of
course,
more
importantly,
how
it
applies
to
to
our
one
situation
here
so
and
then
I
mean
it
kind
of
goes
hand-in-hand
with.
Maybe
some
of
the
other
comments.
Obviously
Fire
Department
says
that
they're
outside
it's
outside
their
jurisdiction,
so
they're
not
going
to
plot,
provide
an
approval.
I
mean
I,
think
that
I
don't
really
have
a
problem
with
that
I
kind
of
make
sense.
V
So
it's
not
in
their
jurisdiction.
We
are
in
web
calendar.
We're
just
in
the
ETJ
and
I
guess
in
some
of
the
the
the
agreements
between
the
city
and
county
for
the
ETJ
I
mean
there
are
certain
things
we
have
to
bring
forward
to
the
city
for
their
review
and
approval
and
concurrence
so
I.
Think
more
than
anything
is
it's
more
of
a
courtesy
type
of
thing:
hey
guys!
We're
kind
of
doing
this,
but
I
mean
a
lot
of
what
I
found
is
because
we
exceed
the
10
acre
lot
sizes.
V
It
exempts
us
from
a
lot
of
the
planning
requirements
by
the
state,
both
municipal
and
county,
so
and
again,
the
department's
associated
with
them.
So
that's
kind
of
what
I
wanted
to
okay
with
that.
So
my
questions
are
really
like
the
water
comment.
You
know,
engineering
providing
Eastman's,
we're
not
gonna,
have
any
Smith's
so
long
supported.
K
U
Well,
oh
I'm
with
you,
but
actually
it's
a
planet,
so
divisional
is
whose
planet
in
the
70s
or
80s
and
70s
they're
mostly
planet,
is
20-acre
tracks.
Now
the
statement
that
you
did
say
is
correct
about
how
the
county
can
do
a
certificate
of
no
plot
required
because
they
are
not
conveying
any
public
improvements.
These
are
county
roads,
I
think
it's
pearson,
mosses
where's
the
moss
and
then
also
with
regards
to
the
exemption
about
the
10
acres,
greater
the
model
rules
if
it's
10
acres
or
less
require
so
sort
of
water
and
sewer.
U
So
that's
not
a
requirement
here
or
it
gets
a
little
tricky
is
because
in
this
area
and
on
the
state
came
it's
within
the
sampler
8
OC
cm
boundary.
So
there's
some
issue
about
the
water
and
sewer
services.
Now
a
statement
about
it
not
being
complies
with
tcq.
His
individual
wells
would
be
required
on
this
side
if
they
were
to
pursue
drinking
water,
but
yet
it's
not
required.
So
you
kind
of
get
stuck
yeah.
V
I
mean
I
visited
with
my
client
he's.
He
says
he
doesn't
have
any
drinking
water
out
there.
He
has
water
that
he
uses
to
water
some
trees
on
his
thirty
acres,
he's
got
a
few
trees
and
a
little
dead
chief
over
anybody.
That's
out
there
I'm
sure
you
know.
If
certainly
both
penises
doesn't
have
good
water
I.
V
Don't
think
anybody
in
their
right
mind
is
going
to
connect
to
it
and
drink
it,
so
that
would
give
them
every
right
to
dig
a
well
and
I'm
sure
wealthiness
has
many
many
water
wells,
even
though
they
may
have
a
water
system
that
you
can
connect
you
and
draw
water
from
I
believe
those
guys
probably
dig
their
own
well
and
and
manage
their
own.
Well,
the
septic
system
and.
U
V
Yeah
water
utilities,
fire
I,
don't
know
if
the
all
improvements
after
subdivision
ordinance
probably
should
be
removed.
Thank
you
because
really
I
don't
have
to
you're,
not
gonna,
follow
all
those
subdivisions
are
correct.
Now,
I
I
believe
we
would.
If
we,
if
we're
doing
any
improvements,
I
mean
I
read
a
lot
through
the
state
statutes
and
some
of
them
will
say
that
if
you're
not
doing
any
public
improvements
or
building
a
street,
then
you
don't
have
to
flat
what
we're
not
doing
any
public
improvements
and
we're
not
building
a
street
there.
B
I
D
A
D
A
G
D
D
K
H
A
A
K
A
He's
going
on
what,
if
you
can't
approve
something
on
a
what,
if
no,
that
doesn't
work,
Mr
Lopez
is
common
I'll
bring
the
chief
up
again,
but
that
comment
to
me
is
is
a
what
he
have
coming
and
he's
playing
with
what,
if
what,
if
they
come
in
into
the
city
limits
later
at
the
time
that
they're
gonna
be
asking
for
annexation,
those
things
will
go
through
an
annexation
process
in
which
time,
so
we
have
to
be
addressed
again.
H
H
V
Many
acres
that
one
was
I,
don't
have
it
off
the
top,
so
what
I
think
is
extremely
unique.
Maybe
in
our
situation
is
that
we
exceed
ten
acres,
yes
and
honestly,
I,
don't
even
think
we
should
even
be
cladding
in
the
city,
because
we
exceed
ten
acres
and
there
is
state
code
that
talks
about
that.
The
state
code
in
the
municipal
code
talks
about.
If
you
exceed
five
acres,
you
don't
need
to
play.
K
V
Read
you
know
my
I
know
we
kind
of
went
back
and
forth
on
this,
but
you
know
the
definition
of
a
plat
includes
a
replac.
So
if
it
where
it
says
you
don't
need
to
apply
it
and
also
means
you
don't
need
to
replant.
In
my
opinion,
so
I
know
we.
We
can
agree
to
disagree
on
that,
but
I
just
think
this
could
be
into
something
that
you
know
everybody
that
wants
to
do
something
in
patina.
Is
there
anywhere
in
the
ETJ
now
has
to
get
water,
and
everybody
know.