►
From YouTube: Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting t2 020620
Description
Planning and Zoning Committee Meeting t2 020620
A
B
C
B
D
E
F
B
G
All
right,
Thank,
You,
commissioners
I'll,
be
brief.
First
I
want
to
say
the
reason
we're
moving.
This
up
is
because
we're
planning
at
7
o'clock
to
have
the
presentation
of
gentlemen,
a
cozy
at
Loreto
College,
the
Fine,
Arts,
Center
and
I
need
to
be
there
to
introduce
him
so
I'll
be
leaving
I'll,
be
brown
7:40,
make
sure
I
get
there
in
time.
So
in
case
we
don't
finish
that
before
then
you'll
see
me
leave
and
I
apologize,
that
I
have
to
think
to
be
over
there.
G
Hopefully
we'll
finish
in
time
and
all
you
all
are
invited,
as
well
as
the
general
public.
If
you
miss
it,
it's
gonna
be
on
public
access
and
also,
if
we'll
have
it
on
our
YouTube
channel
the
city's
YouTube
channel.
So
you
can
catch
it
later.
If
you're,
not
even
it's
gonna
be
a
great
event.
Talking
about
the
economics,
the
financial
situation
of
land
use
and
how
the
pattern
of
land
use
and
larae
was
affected.
The
city's
financial
health
today
how
we
can
change
that
going
forward,
so
it
should
be
a
pretty
interesting
presentation.
G
Next
I
want
to
say
that,
as
we
discussed
last
time,
we
are
working
on
an
ordinance
to
change
how
we
develop
town
homes
and
we're
to
be
bringing
that
we've
noticed
it,
as
the
state
requires
the
15
days,
which
is
an
extra
long
notice
when
we
change
anything
related,
the
ordinance
so
that'll
be
brought
up.
If
the
next
Planning
Commission
meeting
will
have
that.
Speaking
of
the
next
Planning
Commission
meeting
I'm
going
to
ask
the
Commission
to
make
a
motion
to
change
the
time
now.
G
Next,
in
the
middle
of
February
on
the
20th
that
Thursday
we
have
some
conflicts.
Events
going
on
will
be
very
difficult
for
the
commissioners
to
come
downtown,
so
in
consulting
with
Commissioner
via
reality,
we
we
selected
the
best
alternative,
given
the
other
constraints
and
everything
going
on
that
week.
The
best
alternate
we
could
find
was
at
noon
at
the
Joey
Guetta
library,
Public
Library,
which
will
make
it
easier
to
get
there
into
park.
Hopefully
we
looked
at
the
schedule.
We
looked
at
a
lot
of
different
alternatives,
and
that
was
the
best
we
were
able.
B
B
G
B
I
G
And,
let's
quickly
just
want
to
say
planning
nights
if
you
haven't
heard
about
it,
every
Wednesday
in
February
and
March,
and
we've
had
one
already
at
6:00
to
7:30
p.m.
at
different
locations,
we're
having
planning
nights
with
the
first
one
we
had.
We
had
about
50
people
show
up
and
we're
hoping
that
attendance
builds
there.
You
can
get
questions
answered
about
the
future
land-use
plan,
the
thoroughfare
plan,
the
active
transportation
plan,
our
recode
Laredo
project
text,
dots
there,
other
departments
are
there
to
answer
questions.
It
was
a
great
set
up.
G
We'll
have
food
this
next
one
we're
doing
next
Wednesday
at
6:00
p.m.
it's
going
to
be
at
the
Sagara
rec
center
in
South,
Laredo
and
I'm
gonna
be
barbecuing
with
the
help
of
Fernando.
We're
gonna
have
some
pulled
pork
baby,
some
of
y'all
made
nice
of
pulled
pork
and
so
have
other
food
there
and
refreshments.
So
if.
B
All
right
moving
along
now,
the
next
item.
We
have
an
item
6a.
This
is
the
public
hearing
recommendation
of
an
ordinance
with
voluntary
annexation,
initial
zoning
of
m1
on
the
track
of
line
tolling
point,
eight,
four
acres
and
known
as
annexation
tract
one,
the
Elvita
h
motor
no
track.
This
is
located
west
of
los
minute,
Alice,
annex
Road
and
south
of
ff14
72.
K
B
I
B
I
B
G
B
G
We
first
need
to
have
that
policy
discussion
with
the
City
Council,
because,
right
now,
what
we
have
in
place
is
a
process
when
annexations
come
in
to
review
them,
but
we
don't
have
a
policy.
We
don't
have
a
process
in
place
that
allows
us
to
really
question.
Should
we
be
doing
this?
Not
how
do
we
do
it
yeah?
Do
we
clear
it
through,
so
those
are
definitely
discussions.
We're
gonna
be
having
okay
commission
and
then
City,
Council,
okay,.
B
H
B
B
B
I
Right
I
have
a
quick
question
which,
yes,
it's
it's
more
to
the
previous
item,
but
I
thought
it
sorry
didn't
speak
up
quick
enough.
Well,
we
when
we
move
over
to
the
annexation
and
then
it
goes
directly
to
an
m1.
That's
what
it
is
right
now,
annexation
to
be
in
the
city
limits
and
that's
most
m1
right
away.
It's
what's
immediately
for
the
next
year
on
the
tax
rolls
as
m1
and
there's
a
benefit.
There's
the
benefit
under.
Do.
B
I
I
B
Yeah
once
you
bring
it
into
the
city
limits,
it
does
several
things.
First
of
all,
it
allows
you
to
get
utilities,
yes
for
development,
so
without
an
annexation
you
can't
get
utilities
for
development
and-
and
that's
one
of
the
reasons-
the
second
thing
is.
Obviously
the
use
here
is
its
industrial,
and
so
the
tax
rolls
are
really
yeah.
The
last
thing
it
will
be
coming
in
as
taxable
value
as
manufacturing,
m1
and.
B
Is
just
the
initial
step
to
bring
it
in
to
the
city
limits
he
still
has
to
go
through
the
one-stop
shop.
He
has
to
go
through
all
that
particular
scenario
before
he
gets
to
the
building
permit
process.
There's
still
a
ways
to
go.
The
first
step
is
annexation,
once
annexation
is
approved
by
the
City
Council,
which
probably
will
happen
by
April
or
May,
if
somewhere
there
after
that,
he'll
continue
with
his
development
and
design
process
and
submit
all
his
design
for
the
next
phase,
which
would
be
his
construction
link
to.
B
Do
we
have
a
second
a
second
and
a
second
all
those
in
favor
aye
motion
carries.
Thank
you.
Okay.
The
next
item
that
we
have
is
item
C
public
hearing,
recommendation
of
an
ordinance
or
volunteer
annexation.
The
initial
zoning
is
m1.
This
is
a
tract
of
land,
totaling,
7.29
acres.
It
is
known
as
annexation
track
3.
The
Blancas
still
of
aleeah's
track
is
located
north
of
FM
1472
mines,
road
and
east
of
la
vessels
loop.
B
B
This
is
a
public
hearing
and
recommendation
of
an
ordinance
for
voluntary
annexation
and
initial
zoning
of
m1,
the
tract
of
land
totaling,
one
point
four,
five
acres
and
it
is
known
as
annexation
trek
for
the
Gullah
s--
property
strike.
It's
located
north
of
FM,
1472
mines,
road
and
east
of
Copper,
Mine
Road.
This
says
public
hearing.
Anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor
of
this.
E
E
B
I
B
B
Next
item
is
item
6e
of
the
carrying
recommendation
of
an
ordinance
with
voluntary
annexation,
an
initial
zoning
of
Ag
for
a
tract
of
land
totalling
81.0
to
a
KERS,
and
this
is
known
as
annexation
track.
Five
cuatro
Vientos
South
Ltd
track
located
east
of
buckler
Inter's,
Road,
Luke,
20
and
north
of
Wormser
Road.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favour
of
this
annexation
in
favor,
of
whose
annexation.
B
Gonna
have
normally,
you
can
request
a
zone
that
you
want
a
night
and
it
goes
back
to
what
the
mission
reticle
heightened
was
saying
if
the
property
is
going
to
develop
over
long
term.
What
you
want
to
do
is
it's
all
about
taxes.
Okay,
so
if
you
go
AG
instead
of
an
r1
or
a
manufacturing
zone,
that's
what
this
AG
is
I
can.
G
A
little
bit
of
context
as
well,
we
as
the
city
should
not
be
doing
annexations
on
demand
all
struggling.
They
come
in
a
cycle
typically
once
a
year,
because
this
does
take
a
lot
of
analysis
on
the
side
of
the
city,
so
staff
would
never
recommend
that
individually,
one
ret
one
annexation
that
just
wants
to
go
with
the
middle
of
the
year,
because
maybe
they
missed
the
first
cycle
come
in.
So
it's
once
a
year
that
we're
doing
these
annexations
and
so
for
somebody,
that's
thinking
ahead
and
they're.
G
G
It
adds,
rather
than
being
taxed,
on
that
higher
valuation
that
would
be
associated
with
an
m1
they're
taxed
on
the
AG
until
they're
ready
to
develop
it
that
that's
the
process,
typically
Solon's
annexing
in
advance
of
when
they're
gonna
develop,
not
right
when
they're
ready
to
develop
because
we
don't,
we
don't
do
them
one-off.
We
do
them
in
a
cycle
when
staff
has
time
put
this
together
and
analyze
cuz.
It
takes
a
lot
of
time
for
us
to
do.
This.
I
have.
I
G
I
G
H
B
Right
motion
carries
the
title
of
the
keyring
in
an
annexation:
the
North
voluntary
annexation,
with
an
initial
zoning
of
m1,
like
many
fracturing
on
a
tract
of
land,
totaling,
100,
acres,
more
or
less
and
known
as
annexation
track.
Six.
The
1472
investments
number
one
track
located
north
of
the
elk
onto
road
and
west
of
a
Farm
to
Market
1472
mines
Road.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
who
wishes
to
speak
in
favor.
J
Good
evening,
commissioners,
my
name
is
Jeff
Gillman
I'm
representing
the
applicant
I,
looked
at
the
packet
and
the
one
thing
that
I'd
like
to
add
is
we've.
We've
come
through,
or
some
of
these
annotations
come
in
before
there's
a
master
plan
and
we
came
through
some
time
back
and
put
a
master
plan
in
front
of
you
for
the
whole
area
and
it
was
approved
with
zoning
goals,
and
these
are
consistent
with
what
was
approved.
So
it's
it's
an
export
Travis,
actually
at
all.
J
We
had
them
done
as
for
tracts
for
internal
reasons
of
you
know,
just
different
things
to
do
with
the
development,
but
the
four
tracks
are
all
contiguous
and
they're
all
part
of
that
master
plan
that
was
approved
by
the
Commission
previously.
So,
if
you
have
any
questions
on
the
next
floor,
I
can
I
can
help
you
out
and.
F
B
H
B
Carries
the
next
item
is
item
6
G.
This
is
a
public
hearing
and
recommendation
of
an
ordinance
for
the
voluntary
annexation
of
the
an
initial
zoning
of
m1
on
a
tract
of
land.
Totaling
fifteen
point:
six:
three
acres
known
as
annexation
tract
7fm;
1472
investment
number
two
track
located
north
of
you
that
can
blue
Road
and
west
of
FM
1472
mines
Road.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
Anybody
who
is
speaking
favor.
B
Have
motion
we
have
a
second
ticket
and
the
sector
tell
those
in
favor
aye.
Oh,
she
carries.
Thank
you.
The
next
item
is
item
6
H.
It's
a
public
hearing
recommendation
of
an
ordinance
of
the
volunteer
annexation.
Initial
zoning
of
m1
on
a
tract
of
land,
totaling,
five
point:
two:
zero:
seven,
seven
acres:
this
is
known
as
annexation
track
eight
and
it's
in
1472
investment
number
three
track
located
north
of
a.com
to
Road
and
west
of
prompter
market
1472
mines
Road.
This
is
a
public
hearing.
B
H
E
D
B
Carries
thank
you
next
time
we
have
is
item
8b
preliminary
consideration
of
the
bleep
out
of
luck
for
in
the
West
half
a
block,
five
blocks,
73,
sculpture,
garden
subdivision
into
lock
for
a
block
73
Calton
guard
said
there
is
an
antenna,
is
residential.
The
proposed
action
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comments
from
planning
and
noise
to
developer,
from
planning.
G
B
M
So,
on
this
next
item,
just
a
quick
overview,
we
have
the
applicant
tell
me
of
tomorrow:
Vardalos
engineers
Ricardo
Ramos,
it's
a
ten
thousand
fifty
four
five
forty
square
foot
tract
located
south
of
Kelton
Lisa,
McPherson
Road,
and
the
current
zoning
is
our
three
and
their
proposed
uses
residential.
Here
we
have
a
quick
overview
of
the
location
map
with
an
aerial
they're,
combining
a
plan
existing
platted
tract
with
a
unpleasant
sliver
off
to
the
east.
F
D
B
M
You
very
much
the
applicant
for
this
development
is
T
V,
V,
Holdings
Limited.
The
engineer
is
held
engineering
and
surveying.
It
is
a
4.24
acre
tract
looking
at
some
signing
to
the
Parkway
and
will
to
Springfield
Avenue,
and
the
current
zoning
is
r1
a
for
the
proposed
use
of
residential.
This
is
the
location
map,
aerial
street
view.
M
A
Good
evening,
Commission
Chicago
Vig
on
how
to
engineer
:
engineering
representing
the
client,
my
clients
here
as
well:
Andrew
Brittingham
from
TDB
Holdings,
Inc,
I'm,
pressing
something
right.
We
do
have
an
issue
with
two
comments
and
it
would
be
planning
comment
number
one,
as
well
as
the
textile
comment
for
just
a
quick
history.
We've
spoken
about
this
project,
maybe
about
two
cycles
ago.
We
brought
in
the
master
plan
with
the
same
issue
as
far
as
text.
A
We
had
met
with
text
on
several
meetings
and
they
were
have
been
requesting
us
to
accommodate
some
possible
future
right
away
dedication.
Well,
it's
not
dedication.
That's
actually
acquisition.
So
the
the
thing
is
what
we've
been
asking
before
is
something
tangible
for
us
to
grab
and
put
it
on
our
master
plan.
We
did
receive
a
letter
which
I
believe
is
in
your
correspondence
and.
A
The
letter
we
received
and
I
think
it's
the
same.
One
that
you
all
have
in
your
packets
is
basically
stating.
You
are
probably
aware
that
the
Texas
Department
transportation
will
make
improvements.
Types
35
in
Shiloh
plans
have
progressed
to
the
point
that
we
wish
to
advise
you
that
a
portion
of
your
property
located
below
on
the
below
list
will
be
needed
as
right
away
for
the
proposed
improvement
of
the
highway.
A
It
gives
the
webcam
webcam
number
and
approximately
taking
the
approximate
taking
of
one
point
something
acre,
that's
a
keyword,
approximate
and
then
they've
attached,
a
purchaser
Bill
of
Rights,
which
they
do
that
as
just
a
quick
reference
to
what
the
owner
has
as
rights
when
they
when
they
get
a
a
right
of
a
right
away
request.
However,
this
letter,
if
you
go
on
to
the
next
page-
and
you
go
on
to
the
the
exhibits
that
they
have
here,
the
exhibit
is
just
a
an
overlay
which
of
where
they
think
the
right-of-way
is
gonna.
A
Be
this
letter
still
does
not
provide
a
survey
with
what's
actually
what
we
need
with
distances
actual
area,
so
the
other
answers
have
we've
obtained
is
it
could
still
change?
And
so
we
go
back
to
our
original
point,
something
tangible
for
us
to
take
back
and
actually
draw
it
on
our
master
plan.
Now
us
being
against
these
two
items
by
planning
and
by
text,
dot
still
doesn't
mean
that
they
still
can
get
the
right
away
in
the
future.
A
It
just
means
at
what
step,
when
they're
ready
to
provide
my
client
with
the
right
of
entry
surveyed
and
then
the
negotiated
terms
for
that
track
is
when
actually
the
real
right
away
acquisition
is
is
taken.
I
do
see
here
that
planning
does
have
a
modified
design
to
accommodate
the
expansion
of
text
dot.
A
The
text
out
right
away
and
subsequent
improvements
ask
for
correspondence
this
phase
that
they're
requiring
the
right
away
for
is
not
for
the
face.
That's
going
to
go
under
construction
in
the
next,
hopefully
six
months.
This
phase
is
for
a
future
phase
that
hasn't
been
funded
according
to
us
and
it
hasn't
been
designed
yet
I
know
they
state.
A
The
textile
comment:
states
that
there
are
a
portion
of
of
these
plans
have
been
done,
which
haven't
been
furnished
to
us,
so
I,
don't
think
this
portion
has
been
designed
it's
for
a
future
phase,
two,
that's
still
not
on
their
docket
on
when
they're
gonna
go
up
to
let
when
they're
going
to
construct
it
and
when
they're
gonna
get
their
PS
Emmys
the
plans
and
specs.
So
in
our
position,
which
my
client
purchased,
this
property
a
little
over
a
year
ago,
has
already
put
phase
one
on
the
ground
phase.
H
A
He's
doing
is
he's
getting
all
these
projects
shelf
ready,
because
it's
a
quick
turnaround
for
this
tract.
So
as
soon
as
one's
done,
the
next
one's
gonna
be
completed.
Next
one's
gonna
be
completed,
I
have
brought
future
evidence,
he's
also
the
owner
of
the
lakeside
property,
just
for
just
the
way
the
process
goes.
He
also
is
the
owner
of
a
lakeside
property
where
he
has
had
similar
letters
to
him
by
text,
and
this
is
a
letter
dated
back
in
October
7
2016.
A
That
stated
the
same
thing
in
general
terms:
hey
we're
coming
we're
expanding
Luke
20,
we're
looking
at
obtaining
future
right
away.
There's
gonna
be
these
meetings
this
and
that-
and
he
still
has
not
received
anything
since
then
that
experience
as
far
as
not
having
anything
tangible.
He
can't
accommodate
and
therefore
he's
kind
of
being
put
in
a
bind
to
say:
hey,
you're
gonna.
A
B
A
B
G
A
Depends
on
what
aspect
we're
talking
about
so
I
do
do
deal
mainly
with
the
engineering
part,
but
as
well
as
the
fiscal
part
on
how
it's
going
to
be
a
successful
project,
so
all
I
can
say
is,
as
far
as
planning
wise
we've
even
looked
at
leaving
the
reserve
out
there
and
saying
okay
when
we
plat
will
come
and
leave
this
piece
of
property
here.
For
you,
however,
when
we
leave
it
here,
are
you
going
to
pear
pay
fair
market
value
when
the
Lots
are
in
place,
because
we
accommodated
you
they've
stated?
A
No,
we
are
gonna
pay
for
that
sliver,
that's
unused
its
vacant
and
everything
so
the
accom
thats
on
the
fiscal
end
part
of
it
right.
So
my
client
is
taking
a
big
step
backwards
on
that.
Second,
if
we
accommodate
it
in
the
master
plan
and
we
move
forward,
the
door
is
still
open
for
them
to
come
and
say:
oh
no,
we
need
it
a
little
bit
more
or
we
need
it
a
little
bit
less
and
that's
the
problem.
A
We
truly
have
that
we
still
have
that
revolving
door
that
keeps
on
going
around
that
might
keep
on
hitting
us
when
we're
not
when
we're
designing
this
project.
I
think,
in
my
opinion,
it's
just
my
opinion
if
they
still
haven't
gone
into
the
meat
and
potatoes
of
the
design
of
this
actual
phase.
But
how
do
we
know
they
have
it?
They
don't
have.
I
The
plans
well
I'm
just
saying
because
I'm
that's
January,
2nd,
we'll
went
through
this.
You
you
have
it
the
fact
that
you
hadn't
even
received
a
letter,
so
I
mean
there's
a
learning
curve,
obviously
for
me
and
for
others,
yes,
but
nobody
from
tech
starts
showing
up,
which
is
the
do
they
never
show
up.
Mr.
chairman,
sometimes.
I
G
I
I
It's
rhetorical
question,
but
you
can
humor
me
but
saying
yes,
okay,
so
last
stop
on
the
second.
It
was
Bob
there
wasn't
any
anything
in
written.
There
was
nothing
in
writing
to
show
true
intent,
but
there
wasn't
any
writing
plans
and
so
now
we're
now
here
something
writing
here's
some
more
concrete
stuff,
but
now
it's
being
dismissed
as
inadequate.
So
what's
the
next
level
of
inadequacy
that
we're
going
to
have
to
hear
and
only
hear
from
the
side
of
the
developer
and
not
text
dot,
what's
the
standard,
we
need
somebody
to
test
the
standard.
G
In
this
case
for
staff,
that's
why
the
staff
recommendation
includes
them,
accounting
for
the
property
that
text
up
says
they're
going
to
take.
Our
staff
recommendation
is
that
text
on
is
serious
about
this.
They
don't
just
issues
these
these
letters
willy-nilly.
They
they
have
planned
for
this
right-of-way.
They
budgeted
for
it
they're
ready
to
move
on
it.
What
that
timeframe
is
you
have
to
ask
them
specifically,
but
it's
the
same
with
the
other
property
that
was
indicated,
that
expansion
as
well
is
going
to
happen.
Timeframe
may
be
affected,
but
it's
going
to
happen.
G
I
just
want
to
make
sure
you're
aware
of
the
issue
here.
If
we
went
out
ten
miles
into
Webb
County,
where
there's
nothing,
but
somebody
brought
the
Planning
Commission
that
it
got
annexed
and
you
decided
that
was
going
to
be
plotted
as
single-family.
You
significantly
increase
the
value
of
that
land.
G
The
Planning
Commission
gets
to
determine
what
that
land
is
by
the
decisions
that
you
make,
and
so
here
in
this
instance
by
planning
these
as
single
family
lots
you're,
changing
the
value
of
those
properties
significantly
and
what
we've
heard
from
tech
stock
that
would
not
allow
them
to
be
able
to
purchase
this
right-of-way.
We.
I
G
The
city,
the
standard
is
that
a
road
is
on
the
thoroughfare
plan.
That's
the
standard
that
we
use
and
have
used
in
Laredo
with
the
state,
the
the
there
isn't
a
hard-and-fast
standard.
We
work
with
them
based
on
the
plans
that
they
have
that
they've,
given
us
that
they've
communicated
us
in
this
instance
I
think
they've
done
everything
they
need
to
do
to
communicate
that
they
intend
to
purchase
this,
that
they
have
plans
to
expand
this
right-of-way
and
that
it's
their
intent
to
move
on
this,
this
property.
So
we're
satisfied
as
staff
and.
N
I
had
a
comment
like
I'm
the
letter
they
somehow
they
got
the
figure
of
what
they're
asking
for
and
that
overlay
with
what
the
gentleman
was
saying
that
one
point
five
eight
acres
like
I
mean
so
somehow
they
have
an
idea
and
that
idea
that
came
up
with
these
numbers.
Why
is
it
so
present
like?
Why
is
it
almost
impossible
for
text
to
actually
be
a
little
bit
more
detailed
about
what
exactly
that
1.58
is
they?
N
You
know
they
may,
because
somebody
obviously
came
up
with
that
number
to
tell
them
this
letter
and
I
guess
what
they're,
asking
and
I
guess
I'm
curious
to
know
is:
if
somebody
sat
down
and
and
provided
this
figure,
what's
you
know
where
do
they
get?
You
know
where
do
they
get
the
details
of
this?
Can
they
be
a
little
bit
more
specific
or
that's
just
this
is
the
best
that
they
can
do
based.
G
On
the
experience
from
the
city
side,
when
we
and
initiate
something
like
this,
the
next
step
is
a
survey
which
means
we
have
to
have
access
to
the
land,
cooperation
to
some
degree,
with
the
property
owner
to
be
able
and
actually
go
out
and
survey,
something
exactly
so.
They
haven't
done
that,
yet
they
haven't
done
the
survey
that
would
be
the
next
step
in
the
process
of
acquiring
land
would
be
to
do
a
survey,
so
they
know
exactly
how
much
they're
going
to
need.
G
D
D
Okay,
so
why
are
if
we
had
already
approved
the
plat
first
of
all,
and
what
TxDOT
is
doing
is
preventing
somebody
from
enjoying
the
use
of
their
property
without
correctly
compensating
them
I.
Don't
do
property
law,
but
I
do
remember
it
from
law
school
that
constitutes
our
taking
and
they
haven't
been
compensated.
You
can't
run
this
preemptively
and
and
and
if
they
have
specific
plans,
they
need
to
do
something
they
we
need
to
get
that
plan
in
order
to
tell
them.
D
D
This
is
a
master
plan,
only
they're,
not
an
attitude
well,
the
in
the
master
plan.
They
got
to
account
for
that,
but
you
can
ship
the
master
plan
to
account
for
it
well
the
way
that
they
have
it.
They
have
all
these
lots
and
they're.
Gonna
have
to
completely
redesign
the
master
plan
and
once
they
change
the
master
plan,
they
got
to
come
back
again
and
so
they've
already
have
approved
this
master
plan.
Yes,
sir,
but.
G
G
We
know
that
we
know
that
they're
just
approximations,
but
when
you
doesn't
make
something
a
lot,
that's
very
different,
so
your
decision
tonight
will
make
these
single
family
lots
and
if
you
do
that,
what
we've
communicate
and
I'm
just
the
messenger
here,
if
you
do
that,
what
text
out
has
told
us
is,
they
will
not
be
able
to
do
this
project
yeah.
This
right-of-way
expansion
I
mean.
A
That's
what
we've
been
told,
I
I've
had
meetings
with
tech
saw
before
before
this
letter
even
came
out
since
a
little
bit
earlier
than
late
last
year,
somewhere
around
September
October.
This
letter
is
the
same
thing
we
were
told
in
September,
October
we've
sat
with
tech
saw
just
the
engineers
and
the
client
came
sat
with
tech
saw
all
that's
been
discussed,
so
this
letter
is
telling
us
hey,
clients,
I
mean
a
landowner
were
coming
and
we
want
to
take
right
away
that
was
known
to
us
with
or
without
this
letter
back
in
September
October.
A
What
we
were
looking
for
is
and
going
to
Commissioner
Commissioner
Rebecca
homers
point
is,
let's
get
the
procedural
part
to
start
the
one
that
you
send
the
right
of
entries
that
you
send
the
surveys
for
us
to
review
the
actual
appraised
value
or
the
value
that
you
appraise
it
at
to
purchase
it
at
so
that
we
can
negotiate
and
go
back
and
forth
that
meet
part
of
the
acquisition
hasn't
started,
and
so,
when
we
asked
well
when
is
it
going
to
start
which
back
in
October?
We
let
him
know
about
this
master
plan?
A
We
took
our
master
plan
and
we
said
phase.
One
is
under
construction,
it'll
be
done
by
the
end
of
the
year
phase
two
phase
three
they're
coming
at
the
beginning
of
the
year,
so
they
had
that
ample
opportunity
to
say:
okay,
you
know
what
here's
the
circuit,
here's
this
going
back
to
Commissioner
Lewis
point
is:
we've
done
multiple
plans
where
we
kind
of
plan
things
and
go
and
the
preliminary
things
and
we
have
our
master
plans
and
we
draw
up
some
lines
where
we
assume
and
I
got
to
give
it
to
them.
A
Not
when
you
really
get
down
to
the
actual
design
of
it
is
when
you
we
solidify
that
those
lines
and
say
okay,
this
is
what
we
got.
I'm
gonna
put
it
on
paper
on
the
sign
it
and
imma
send
it
all.
Those
things
are
gonna
come
that's
not
that
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
doubting
that
I'm.
Just
saying
they're
not
coming
at
the
pace
that
we
told
them
a
long
time
ago.
A
We've
been
telling
them
since
then:
we've
been
here
in
front
of
the
public
telling
them,
and
so
we're
just
waiting
for
them,
and
my
client
is
sitting
here
saying:
I
cannot
wait.
This
is
such
a
high-risk
project
for
us
that
I
need
to
get
all
this
on
the
ground
and
we
furnish
evidence
to
say.
Unfortunately
we
can't
we
can't
proceed
with
an
answer
that
says:
I
don't
know:
do
you
know
that?
Doesn't
that
doesn't
work
that.
G
So
if
you
proved
it
with
staff,
comments,
staff
comments,
just
say:
okay
just
make
an
adjustment
so
that
you're
not
planting
these
locks.
That
text
I
was
indicated
they're
going
to
proceed
on
right-of-way.
So
it's
nice.
This
doesn't
slow
down
their
time
frame
at
all.
If
you
approve
this
with
with
the
staff
comments,
it's
that,
but
you
just
indicate
that
everybody
knows
text
up
knows
the
engineer
knows
we
know
the
liner
knows
the
text.
Dot
is
going
to
take
this.
H
F
A
A
Really,
the
only
difference
is
10
lots
that
might
developer
butchers
in
this
master
plan,
and
the
reason
is,
is
I
have
to
shift
that
road
further
east
to
accommodate
the
minimum
requirements
of
the
lot
size
so
shifting
that
road
and
in
this
other
road,
that's
in
Phase,
two,
that's
already
under
design
that
might
develop
that
my
client
has
already
invested
in.
We
have
to
go
back
redo
the
plans
resubmit
them.
A
L
O
Without
I
guess
speak
for
text,
they
have
made
it
a
little
clearer
that
if
this,
by
the
way
positions
has
happened
this
way,
the
project
is
in
jeopardy.
I'm
not
saying
if
you're
going
to
scrap
or
not,
but
it
isn't
different-
they
should
be
here.
I
feel
like
your
idea
that
they
shouldn't
be
invited
next
time
to
discuss
this
with
you
that
way.
You
get
here
straight
from
them,
but
we
have
to
remember
that
text
on
what
they're
trying
to
do
is
for
the
city.
O
H
E
We
we
have
the
same
comments
when,
when
we
had
the
last
room
and
mr.
Sherman-
and
we
we
discussed
this
and
and
we
kind
of
agreed
that
dick
Todd
is
not
here
right
now
and
what
they
have
provided
for
us.
The
commissioner
I
don't
believe
it's
strong
enough
to
hold
the
developer
from
continuing
with
the
with
the
project.
E
If
we
have
takes
out
with
a
with
a
firm
and
strong
commitment
by
that
piece
of
line,
then
I
would
probably
agree
for
the
comment,
but
I
feel
the
comment
that
is
right.
There
is
that
doesn't
have
any
support
except
the
letter
that
it's
a
that
it's
attached
to
so
I
feel
that
we
can
stay
here
all
night
and
I,
don't
think
we're
going
to
go
anywhere,
but.
B
I
think
what
we
need
to
look
at
is
this:
we
need
to
look
at
the
whole
picture
in
the
community.
One
of
our
biggest
problems
in
this
community
is
transportation.
Yes,
sir,
and
the
design
and
the
roadways,
it's
done,
I
believe
that
what
we
have
before
us
is
trying
to
alleviate
and
have
better
transportation
modes
and
their
state
is
right.
Now
notifying
us
we're
intending
to
do
this
to
enhance
transportation
there
right
now,
I
mean
yes,
they
don't
know
who
Rick?
Can
you
tell
me
who
drew
this
Google
Earth.
A
B
E
Go
ahead
and
finish
the
comment
real
quick
mr.
chairman
I
feel
that
that
we
have
two
options:
either
we
deny
we
approve
it.
I
I
will
strike
that
I,
don't
I,
don't
feel
comfortable
trying
to
to
get
the
developer
and
the
owner
subject
to
do
something
that
we
don't
have
any
anything
to
back
it
up.
I
mean.
Are
we
well,
but
that's.
That's.
B
N
B
Historically,
and
let
me
give
a
little
bit
of
historical
back
when
I
worked
with
the
city
text,
I
will
approach
the
city
and
say
you
know
we're
proposing
a
project
here,
we're
going
to
need
to
take
some
right
away.
There's
a
plat
that
comes
in
you
know.
Let's
see
we
can
get
some
by
the
way
there.
Historically,
that's
what's
been
done
in
the
past.
Okay
texts
are
unfortunate,
is
an
animal
that
takes
a
very
long
time
to
get
going.
B
B
Like
I
said,
I
mean
right
now,
I
think
they
know
what
they
want
to
do,
but
they
themselves
have
to
jump
through
hoops
to
get
funding
to
get
the
project
done.
Funding
may
come
this
year,
it
may
be
denied
I
mean
those
are
just
the
things,
but
they
know
what
they
want
to
do
to
enhance
transportation
for
the
future.
The
problem
is
it
like
I
said
it's
it's.
You
know
angry.
D
We
are
keeping
a
landowner
from
enjoying
his
property
and
basically
holding
it
for
them
for
touch,
thought
to
decide
when
they're
gonna
come
up
with
a
design
if,
when
they're
gonna,
if
they
ever
do,
we
know
what
the
design
for
loop
20
is,
and
it's
sitting
there
stagnant
they're,
finally
doing
the
overpass
that
they
proposed
back
in
1995
in
2020,
so
we're
gonna
keep
this
portion,
which
I
think
it's
10
and
it
affects
the
whole
plan.
Let
them
come
in.
This
is
prelim.
D
They
want
to
come
in
and
come
in
with
a
concrete
plan
before
final
plat
make
them
readjust
readjust
it.
But
at
this
point
we
we
don't
offer
everybody
else,
the
same
courtesy
that
we're
offering
textile
and
and
so
I,
don't
think
that
we
should
hold
it
back
like
let
them
come,
they
can
come,
they
can
come
into
some
one-stop-shop,
they
can
do
an
eminent
domain,
they
can
get
their
attorneys
and
just
say
you
know
what
we're
suing
you
we're
gonna,
buy
the
property
and
then
they
can
fight
it
out.
B
No,
it's
a
written
letter.
I
mean
they
they're
already
advised
you
that
they're
gonna
do
this
and
they
said
we're
taking.
We
need
at
least
one
point.
Five
I
think
the
issue
that
they
haven't
stepped
forward
is
because
chase
they
don't
have
a
cache
at
this
point
in
time
to
do
whatever
they
need
to
do.
Yes,.
M
I
What's
the
and
I
mean
let's
look
at
the
city,
not
just
this
executive
element
we're
Commissioner
for
the
city,
we're
not
for
one
developer.
So
what's
the
what's
the
the
big
significant
of
Delaine,
they
said
we
wanted
to
lay
for
two
weeks
because
that's
what
we
said
last
time
yeah,
but
you
you
poached
on
the
whole
fact
that
there
wasn't
even
any
kind
of
written
advisement.
So
now
you've
got
written
advisement
with
maps,
and
now
this
isn't
adequate,
so
I'm
sure
you're
telling
the
truth.
But
now
it's
way
beyond
just
verbal.
A
A
Not
when
I
got
it
I
mean
the
determination,
the
the
reason
I
got.
It
was
because
we
were
here
and
we
were
making
a
case
like
we
haven't
even
received
a
right
of
entry
letter,
and
that
was
the
main
right
event.
This
is
not
a
right
of
entry
letter.
This
is
just
a
letter
stating
hey
we're
coming
with
this
project
and
we're
looking
at
getting
an
approximate
amount.
A
Now
it's
hard
for
me
and
I
agree
it's
hard
for
me
to
be
up
here
to
discuss
a
comment
against
a
text
not
right
away
again:
it'd
be
a
different
story
if
there
would
be
negotiations
out
at
their
office.
If
we
were
already
in
that
process
and
I,
wouldn't
I
would
like
the
developer
to
come
up
and
say
a
few
words
but
I
think
Rick.
B
At
this
point
you
know
textile
has
already
funded
phase
one
of
this
project.
Okay,
they
already
have
the
money
for
that
and
they're
asking
us
hey.
We
need
case
two
which
will
be
the
second
part
which
is
squared
affects
you.
My
guess
is
that,
if,
for
whatever
reason
they
can't
come
to
terms,
we
may
even
lose
phase
one
one
hundred
and
ten
million
dollars
in
the
city
when
phase
one
is
already
in.
B
M
O
Perhaps
the
best
way
to
look
at
this
and
speaking
out
as
the
city's
traffic
director
is,
we
have
a
look
pretty
a
lot
of
calls
of
congestion.
You
see
I
think
nobody
can
doubt
that
or
debate
that.
So
the
best
way
to
look
at
this
is
we
have
an
outside
entity
that
is
funding
designing
planning
all
these
projects
that
we
need
tech
side
is
not
going
to
build
any
kind
of
connection
any
kind
of
bridge
that
they
can't
support
that
it's
it's
a
advantage
there
on,
listen.
O
Okay,
that
to
me
is
when
you
look
at
it.
If
you're
asking
me
as
a
traffic
director
for
City,
do
we
need
this
project?
Yes,
we
need
it.
Okay,
the
growth
is
tremendous.
That
area
it's
going
to
continue.
There's
no
stopping
the
trucks
are
out
there
and
that's
what
they're
doing
they've
done.
Studies
have
been
down
35
I'm
in
agreement.
What
they're
trying
to
do
so?
That's
what
we
look
like.
We
basically
look
at
we're
looking
at
a
gift
horse
in
the
mouth
and
we're
saying
we
don't
want
I.
A
Do
want
to
add
if
I
can
add
a
couple
of
things
and
we
got
AI
got
a
put
on
record
we're
for
this
project.
The
textile
project,
the
like
I,
said
the
right-of-way
taking
is
going
to
be
taken.
It's
got
to
be
in
a
fair
manner
as
well
as
text.
I
was
looking
at
his
bare
land
and
everybody
would
love
to
buy,
bear
Latin
right
now
and
if
my
developer,
weren't
developing
right
now
would
text
up
be
coming
and
saying.
We
need
this
right
away,
maybe
not
and
yeah.
H
A
Well,
we
don't
know
if
we're
gonna
do
it
today
we
don't
know
we're
gonna,
do
it
now
that
puts
us
in
a
bind
now
the
only
people
that
are
actually
my
clients
being
proactive
and
he's
being
proactive
and
putting
lots
on
the
ground
and
if
we're
talking
about
traffic
flow,
if
maybe
some
of
the
older
commissioners
here
this
road,
that's
in
the
master
plan.
That's
gonna
go
in
Phase
three.
It
was
a
private
road
that
the
Commission
voted
against
it
being
private.
A
My
client
came
back,
put
it
back
the
way
the
city
wanted
it
to
add
that
connection
into
I-35
and
so
he's
also
being
proactive,
and
that
he's
providing
cross
access
flow
within
his
own
development
and
and
so
what
I
really
want
to
emphasize.
Is
we
all
want
to
work
together?
It's
just
timing,
wise
sure.
You
know,
and
we
all
want
to
end
the.
B
We've
already
been
told
by
the
it's
a
communication
that
I
have
here
importance
that
phase
one
is
going
out
for
bids
June,
20th,
okay,
that's
like
four
months
from
now:
that's
phase
one.
So
my
guess
is
they're
going
to
be
working
under
the
acquisition
to
phase
2
to
be
able
to
get
this
whole
project
done.
B
You
know
the
movement
of
business
and
cargo
I
mean
for
us
to
look
at
this
thing
and
say
well,
they're,
never,
but
pay
me
right
now
or
get
it
right
now.
I
think
we
need
to
kind
of
you
know
really
do
our
effort
also
to
figure
out.
How
can
we
all
work
together
because
that
to
me
this
is
a
much
needed
project
in
that
area.
I
mean
it's
a
huge
project
and-
and
you
know
by
it,
not
not
keeping
this
comment
on
here.
I
B
I
Actually,
actually
I
could
make
a
motion,
but
okay,
it
is
I'm
taking
note
that
in
the
letter
it's
dated
the
13th.
So
that's
11
days
after
our
January
2nd
meeting,
so
they
would
think
they
were
able
to
provide
significant
documentation
not
to
your
satisfaction,
investing
into
the
process.
It's
significant,
but
you
had
said,
though-
and
you
said
we
do-
we
don't
have
a
letter,
so
they
provided
a
letter
and
more
I'm.
A
I
I'd
like
to
suggest,
because
we
want
all
the
developers
and
all
the
businessmen
business
people
to
succeed
to
this
significantly
as
they
can,
but
we
have
a
real
problem
in
the
raid
over
transportation
and
traffic
and
everybody
knows
it
and
that's
the
reality
we're
here
for
the
entire
city,
so
that
it
gets
better
for
all
and
safest
safety
wise.
It's
already
been
improved,
the
will
trade
grids
all
the
way
to
59
overpasses
and
the
frontage
acquisition
monies
and
all
that
stuff.
I
A
B
P
My
name
is
Andrew
Bri
I'm,
the
developer
on
this
property
and
I
can
tell
you
upset
across
the
table
from
techstop
before
on
the
lakeside.
We
got
these
same
letters
five
six
years
ago
and
nothing
has
happened.
We
haven't
been
able
to
do
a
project
on
our
commercial
land
and
often
ship
between
Jackman
and
and
Bayview,
and
so
we've
we've
been
at
a
standstill
there.
It's
the
same
thing
happening
now.
There's
projects
on
a
fast
track.
It's
a
very
high
risky
project
for
us
I
mean
this
track
was
dormant
for
a
long
time.
P
P
We
want
to
have
them
shelf
ready
so
that
we
can
continue
these
lots
and
you
know,
like
I,
said:
I
mean
we've
had
these
meetings
with
tech
stuff
before
we
had
it
last
year
and
this
project
may
or
may
not
happen
in
the
next
one
or
two
years.
We
want
to
be
out
of
here
in
the
next
two
three
years,
so
it
makes
it
very
challenging
for
us
to
have
to
go
back
redesign.
I
B
I
B
Is
important
for
us
to
really,
as
a
commission
member,
give
thanks
doctor
to
show
up
here
too
and
give
us
some
good
guys
and
in
two
weeks
it's
certainly
gonna
I
mean
you're
talking
about
a
project
that
is
gonna
enhance
a
whole
community
so
and
we
you
know,
I
know
that
you
guys
want
to
do
that
too.
I
know
what
you're
saying
you
know:
you've
got
a
clock,
that's
ticking!
Let's.
B
What
you
say,
but
you
know
we
really
need
to
get
this
thing
right.
You
know
that's
the
key
thing
here.
We
can't
afford
to
lose
that
say
a
hundred
million
dollars
right
now
that
they've
already
said
they're
gonna
do
phase
one
because
they
may
just
say
well,
you
know
if
we
can't
get
adequate
by
the
way
for
Phase
two
phase,
one
is
gone,
so
100
million
dollars
will
go
somewhere
else
in
the
city
so
two
weeks,
so
we
can
get
text
out
to
the
table.
I
think
would
be
four
hundred
million
dollars.
I!
Think
that's!
P
I
Truly,
we
understood
that
from
the
beginning,
but
yeah
that's
what
it
was
all
about,
not
be
nice
sure
he
just
kind
of
got
to
that
point,
the
very
very
beginning.
Instead
of
all
this
structure,
okay-
and
we're
really
saying
that
we
don't
have
the
text
outside
shame
on
them
for
not
being
here,
okay,
but
we're
representing
the
whole
city.
I
So
we
would
just
like
to
by
ask
you
to
you
know
to
please
agree:
we
would
vote
on
it
anyway,
but
it's
better
if
we're
in
agreement
that
we
give
it
two
weeks
to
me,
provide
you
something
very
compelling
and
to
provide
us
something
compelling.
So
we
understand
the
process
better
and
that
could
be
a
negotiation
on
the
price.
Also
they're
gonna
give
this
up.
It
can't
be
just
for
a
hangover
island
or
something
it
needs
to
be.
Have
some
type
of
a
premium
on
it
right
can.
A
We
or
I
don't
know
mr.
chairman
I
know
you
you're
more
familiar
with
this.
If
the
two
weeks
do
come
and
it
does
get
table,
what's
the
milestone
that
we
want
to
hit
at
that
two
weeks
to
say:
okay,
we
can
move
forward
with
this
room,
move
forward
that
it's
is
it
just
textile
being
here
having
more
information
on
the
project
or
is
it
an
actual
right
away,
dedication
an
actual
offer,
and
that's
where
you
know
I
me
recommending
to
the
client
saying
you
know
what
two
weeks
is
good
yeah,
but
what?
B
There's
a
lot
of
information
that
the
Commission
is
asking
from
techstop
so
by
table
in
for
two
weeks,
we're
gonna
get
them
and
say
you
know
if
they
don't
show
up
well,
then
that
tells
you
clearly
hey
a
commission
understands
clearly
what's
gonna
happen
and
but
for
two
weeks
just
to
get
them
to
come
in
and
say:
hey
you
through,
they
gave
you
a
Google
map.
Somebody
told
you
one
point:
five:
what
is
the
basis?
B
What
are
you
looking
at
and
and
what
kind
of
trying
to
get
some
information
that
we
can
utilize,
because,
like
commission
of
that
crime
was
saying
we're
looking
at
the
whole
city
here,
that's
the
key.
We
got
and
I
understand.
You
know
where
you
guys
are
coming
from
to,
but
we
have
to
make
a
decision
that
affects
the
whole
community
and
and
for
two
weeks
it's
all
we're
asking
you
to
see.
We
can
get
that
information
and
then
hopefully
answers.
L
Yes,
just
for
me,
I
mean
for
me:
it's
it's.
One
of
these
things
were
striking.
This
comment.
I,
don't
want
to
in
the
future
to
know
that
this
decision
impacted
the
flow
or
traffic
of
the
community
and
because
we
made
his
decision,
it
impacted
Laredo,
negatively
I,
totally
understand
where
you're
coming
from
as
far
as
he
wasn't
being
reimbursed.
You
know
what
you
should
be
reimbursed,
but
at
the
same
time,
by
striking
this
comment,
it
could
definitely
jeopardize
Laredo
in
some
way.
P
Yeah
yeah
I
can't
speak
on
text
thoughts
behalf,
but
I
I
would
think
that
if,
if
it
was
developed
or
work
rooftops
on
the
ground,
I
think
they
would
find
a
way
for
this
project
to
work.
I
think
I
think
they
would
make
it
work
somehow
or
another,
but
they're
just
seeing
the
easy
way
and
they're
being
proactive
as
were
being
proactive
but
I.
Think
I'm,
not
an
engineer,
but
I
I
do
feel
strongly
that
there's
there's
other
ways
they
can.
P
A
I
mean
as
long
as
we
we
have
something
tangible
in
two
weeks
and
what
we're
afraid
of
is
in
two
weeks.
We
come
in
and
text
out
here
and
say
we
really
need
to
laugh.
We
really
need
to
land.
If
not
this
projects
not
going
to
happen,
not
this
project
going
to
happen
without
any
engineering
plans
in
front
of
us
without
any
the
actual
documents
in
front
of
us,
and
so
we
might
be
at
the
same
point
here,
but
there's
still
nothing
tangible.
A
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
understand,
because
within
these
two
weeks
I
can
go
meet
with
text
on
and
kind
of,
come
up
with.
What
you
all
are
asking
for.
I
am
totally
for
that.
I
I
would
want
to
go
sit
down
with
them
and
say:
let's
get
the
Commission
what
they
want,
but
unfortunately,
if
we're
just
gonna
come
and
say
and
just
get
their
side
that
they
really
really
really
need
the
project
but
they're
still
not
there
yet
I
just
want
to
kind
of
put
it
out
there
to
say.
D
Reality
is
I
think
we
all
know
what's
going
to
happen
two
weeks
Aztec,
so
it's
gonna
cope
with
a
hypothetical
situation.
They're
not
gonna,
be
able
to
make
it
work
because
to
the
left
of
you,
er
to
the
west
of
you
as
a
railroad
and
their
right
of
ways
are
a
lot
bigger.
So
it's
a
lot
easier
for
text
not
to
stop
your
plat
than
it
is
to
negotiate
with
what
is
a
Kansas
City
southern
or
whoever
owns
the
right
away.
That's
or
the
laughs.
D
So
the
only
one
they're
going
to
be
able
to
do
is
mess
with
you.
They're
not
gonna
have
a
tangible
plan.
They
probably
have
one
that
they're
not
going
to
show
and
we're
gonna
end
up
in
two
weeks
where
we're
either
gonna
have
to
vote
on
it
thumbs
up
or
thumbs
down
thumbs
down.
That's
gonna
be
the
reality
situation.
Cuz
they're
not
gonna,
give
any
more
clarity.
I,
don't
expect
them
to
because
they're
they
have
the
same
issue
all
the
way
south
on
cuatro
Vientos,
where
they
haven't
done
all
the
expansions.
A
The
answer
to
us
on
that
is:
we've
asked
esta
textile
to
relook
at
the
design.
Cuz
30
feet
is
or
50
feet
is
the
max
that
they're
gonna
take
at
the
widest
point.
According
to
their
overlay,
that's
a
5-foot
retaining
wall.
That's
that's!
That's
not!
When
we
see
at
me
as
an
engineer
see
it
there
could
be
alternatives
now.
I'll
say:
if
we
were
here
a
year
ago
and
there
would
be
homes
there,
they
would
find
a
different
alternative
than
to
purchase
22
homes
and
that's
what
I
think
Andrew
was
getting
at
we've
asked
them.
A
Can
you
please
look
at
a
different
design?
Look
at
a
retaining
wall,
look
at
something
to
bring
that
in
and
I
showed
the
and
maybe
next
time
the
the
department
can
ask
for
the
schematic
from
techstop
that
we
were
provided
and
you
can
see
how
much
room
there
is
from
the
right
away
line
to
the
back
of
curtain.
It's
all
their
room
that
I
think
that
they
can
put
a
receipt.
B
B
Very
quickly,
but
at
least
the
due
diligence
had
been
done.
You
know
we
said
hey,
we
went
out
and
we
tried
to
do
everything
we
could.
The
last
thing
we
want
to
do
is
send
the
wrong
message,
a
text
out
that
you
know
they
already
have
110
million
dollar
projects
going
out
for
bidding
June
and
for
us
not
to
do
the
due
diligence
and
say
well,
textile
I'm.
Sorry,
you
screw
they
said.
Well,
you
don't
get
guess
what
guys
we're
taking
110
million
dollars
and
we're
taking
it
out
just
and
that's
what.
Q
We
don't
want
to
do
shed
a
little
light
on
the
long-range
planning
with
Jason
moon,
also
in
the
planning
department.
Last
night's
conversation
with
txdot
is
that
they're
expanding
the
three
lanes
from
that
point
to
I-35
and
they're
both
making
their
way
south
direction.
The
reason
they
couldn't
go
underneath
is
because
they've
wanted
three
lanes.
They
said
the
columns
would,
and
so
that
was
my
understanding.
Their
conversation
yesterday,
they'll
be
at
every
Wednesday's
district
meetings
as
well.
Q
I
Brittenham
trust,
because
you
have
your
interests
in
mind,
it's
just
you
have
to
find
a
balance
here
and
give
them
the
opportunity
to
explain
to
our
satisfaction,
but
hopefully
to
yours,
also
yeah,
okay,
so
I
move
that
we
table
this
item
time,
definite
for
the
February,
20th,
Port,
Commission
meeting.
Okay.
Second,.
B
Next
item,
preliminary
consideration
of
reflowed
a
lot
one
block
to
shiloh
Highland
subdivision:
okay,
shadows,
subdivision
phase:
two:
it's
a
lot
one:
a
block
to
Shiloh
Highland
phase:
two,
the
tennis
commercial.
The
proposed
action
is
approved,
subject
to
the
following
comments
from
Planning
from
watering
utilities
from
traffic
and
they
noticed
a
developer
and.
R
H
R
R
Right,
20
meters,
sorry
rule
simply
it's
a
it's
a
very
simple
project.
What
I
mean
by
that?
Nor
what
properties
owns
the
property?
Amy
West,
that
2.95
acres
so
he'd
be
the
best
person
to
purchase
that
property,
because
I'm
just
gonna
suck
it
into
that
a
lot.
We
don't
need
utilities,
you
don't
need
anything
else,
no
accessibility,
additional
disability
or
it
was
tardy
there,
it's
just
being
absorbed
onto
that
log.
Okay,.