►
From YouTube: 10-08-19 Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1
Description
10-08-19 Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1
A
B
A
Knowing
that
the
member
we
have
a
quorum
and
two
of
the
members
are
not
present
very
good,
that
was
item
number
two
on
the
agenda
item
number
3.
It
is
review
and
approval
of
the
minutes
from
September
13
I.
Don't
think
we
got
them
ahead
of
time
so
that
it
gives
you
a
little
bit
of
an
opportunity
to
look
through
them
in
case
you
see
any
changes.
You.
B
B
A
D
C
B
A
E
A
C
C
D
A
A
F
A
A
Item
number
for
citizen
comments:
the
citizens
are
required
to
fill
out
a
witness
card
and
submit
it
to
the
chairperson
or
designee
no
later
than
2:45
and
identify
themselves
with
the
microphone.
Comments
are
limited
to
three
minutes
for
speaker.
No
more
than
three
persons
will
be
allowed
to
speak
it
on
any
side
of
an
issue.
Should
there
be
more
than
three
people
who
wish
to
speak
of
particular
issue
that
you
select
not
more
than
three
over
senators
to
speak
for
them,
and
the
presiding
officer
mainly
made
public
comments
further
in
the
interest
of
any
meeting.
A
Speakers
may
not
pass
their
minutes
to
another
speaker.
Comments
would
be
relevant
to
the
city
business
and
deliver
in
a
professional
manner.
No
derogatory
remarks
will
be
permitted.
Let
me
just
put
that
on
our
sign-in
sheet.
We
tend
to
sign
in
everybody,
that's
in
the
room
so
that
we
have
a
lot
of
the
visitors
as
well.
So
I,
don't
know
where
that
is
going
around,
but
we
need
to
just
be
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we'll
say
and
the
had
a
chance
to
put
their
name
something
off.
G
G
G
G
Work
with
you
to
see,
we
could
have
something
on
the
agenda
where
maybe
you
officially
designate,
and
then
we
also
at
that
time
kind
of
talk
through
the
the
structure
that
we
would
see
that
organization
playing
more
of
a
communication
collaborative
format,
as
opposed
to
like
a
service
organization.
I
wanted
to
just
kind.
G
G
Potentially,
playing
that
advisory
board
that
the
traffic
study
is
calling
for
under
that
committee,
mr.
McGee
wasn't
really
sure
if
that's
going
to
be
final
or
if
that's
going
to
be
the
recommendation.
So
it's
the
first
conversation
about
that.
So
just
for
you
all
to
be
aware
that
meeting
is
tomorrow
at
6:00
at
the
okay
I'll
get
that
insured
with
you
all,
but
a
tip
that's
occurring
tomorrow.
I
think
it's
I
want.
A
To
say,
I'll
be
traveling
tomorrow,
starting
tomorrow
into
Friday,
so
I
have
any
other
board
members
to
attend.
That
would
be
great
I
think
this
dovetails
with
Carol's
comment
earlier
in
the
first
to
like
about
that
at
least
the
need
to
have
a
organization
or
a
group.
That's
discussing
the
issues
that
are
related
to
at
the
very
least
the
this
zone
in
this
area
that
affects
us
yeah.
G
I
G
G
G
G
G
The
only
we
never
got
into
the
developmental
issues
we
did
on
the
periphery
and
I
want
developmental
being
building
code
issues
that
folks
are
still
facing
when
the
redeveloping
tuck-tuck
we
never
got
to
that,
but
we
did
get
to
a
lot
of
other
things,
and
in
that
case
the
liaison
was
Plessy.
Pfeffer
was
not
really
a
technical
person.
We
think
we
need
a
building
meetings
on
right,
so
we
all
I
think
anybody
that's
tried
to
develop
me
down.
Here
knows
it.
We
need
that
we
it's
now.
G
Since
we've
asked
for
an
official,
we
got,
we
got
for
the
conference
center,
we
got
meseta
and
that
was
I
want
to
say
that
we've
made
some
progress
in
a
few
things,
but
we
need
that
continuum
going
forward
with
technical
folks
too
well,
so
that
we
can
actually
work
on
the
need
of
the
development
issues.
Aside
from
the
communication
gaps
that
we
currently
have.
A
G
I
mean
what
we're
saying
for
now
is
to
have
momentum.
You
know,
designate
a
member
and
an
alternate
and
then
let's
decide
together
with
what
structure
we
want
to
have
it,
because
the
city
has
said
that
they
would
they
would
participate
I.
Would
you
know
we
see
how
people
it's
now
at
the
building
department?
We
need
a
gazing
at
the
building
department.
That's
not
news.
G
We've
been
saying
that
for
three
years
so
well,
hopefully
someday
we'll
have
one
that
that
can
work
with
with
the
folks
that
are
investing
in
building
out
downtown,
so
I
mean
I
kind
of
long
winded.
In
my
answers,
but
there's
a
lot
to
do.
I
mean
Dean
I,
just
came
back
from
a
reclaiming
making
building
conference.
I
did
make
it
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
be
done
there
in
terms
of
that
area.
A
lot
of
communication
work
engagement,
work
with
stakeholders
before
we
even
try
to
write.
G
Housing
summit:
you
know
we
talked
about
that.
We
had
sentence
on
you
here
talking
about
how
they
implemented
it.
It's
the
best
ordinance
that
I've
read.
You
know,
I
read
about
our
talk
about
folks
about
our
incremental.
You
can't
shock
flex
into
reappraising
their
their
properties.
It's
got
to
be.
You
know,
there's
got
to
be
proper
notice,
proper
engagement
and
notification
to
folks
about
what
could
be
coming
and
at
central.
E
A
I
and
I
think
we
need
to
keep
it
in
touch
with
this
and
the
rest
of
the
conversation.
So
I
appreciate
your
talking
to
us
to
us
about
this,
and
definitely
you
know
just
even
a
citizens
of
stakeholders
in
the
downtown
area
individually,
who
are
interested
thanks,
pretty
good
okay,
any
other
other
citizen
comments.
A
Okay,
let's
go
ahead
and
go
to
the
next
item
item
5
discussion
with
possible
action
to
award
contract
for
services.
They
will
city
the
sole
proposal
for
consulting
services
to
the
downtown
curves.
So
let
me
describe
in
what
you're
having
your
packets
is.
The
proposal
submitted
on
June
24th
by
able
city
to.
A
Delineate
and
describe
the
cost
of
the
project,
if
you
recall
it
the
meaning,
the
discussion
focused
on
the
administrative
site
of
this
agreement
in
because
there
were
items
there
in
the
agreement
that
the
city
said.
The
city
spoke
up
and
said
you
know
some
of
this.
We
don't
need
to
form
out,
we
can
be
doing
ourselves
and,
and
then
the
legal
department
outlined
that
when
they
reviewed
this
contract
and
then
I
think
Ben
had
a
couple
of
Ben
point.
A
Another
board
member
had
a
couple
of
questions
regarding
the
values
on
the
agreement,
so
what
I
did
was
I
asked
the
board
to
give
me
an
opportunity
to
return
and
speak
to
the
city
and
then
again
speak
table
city
to
ask
them
to
so.
Let's
talk
about
this
a
little
bit
more
I
met
with
the
co
city
manager
and
she
brought
to
the
meeting
representatives
from
the
finance
department
legal
department.
Who
else
was
there
yeah?
A
G
A
Community,
and
so
we
discussed,
we
went
through
the
line
items
discussing
what
we
needed
at
this
point
didn't
eat
at
this
point
and
came
up
with
a
general
idea
of
what
the
comfort
level
that
the
city
might
be
in
in
terms
of
expenditures
per
month,
but
nothing
set
in
stone
was
just
a
general
discussion
because
we
were
I
was
going
to
go
back
to
April
city
and
then
discuss
our
conversation
with
April
city.
That's
an
example
of
part
of
the
conversation
on
the
original
proposal.
A
We
talked
about
website
development
and
I'm
using
it,
because
it's
an
easy,
it's
it's
easy
to
grasp
hold
up
where
someone
said
well,
do
we
need
a
website
at
this
time?
You
know
we
don't
think
we
don't
need
a
website
at
this
time.
You
can
scratch
out
that
amount.
That's
the
this
website
development
and.
E
A
B
I
A
F
A
For
you,
they
comments
went
back
to
you
right
on
that,
because
I
know
you
could
go
be
there.
That
I
met
with
I
committed
to
meeting
with
able
city
to
bring
back
the
comments.
Okay,
so
I
met
with
able
see
that
with
Viviana
Frank
with
Franco
mouse
key
and
with
my
opinion,
and
they
reviewed
everything
in
a
couple
of
days
ago,
set
something
revised
so
that
we
could
see
it
and
so
I
wanted
to
share
it
with
everyone.
A
A
They
reviewed
the
list
they
had
and
they
broke
out
of
the
list,
things
that
were
one-time,
fixed
fee
costs,
because
in
the
original
proposal
it
appeared
that
it
was
like
a
month
after
month,
12,000,
which
is
not
the
case,
because,
for
example,
once
they
did
I
had
a
1.2,
it's
a
fixed.
It's
a
one-time,
fix
fee
expense
and
you're,
not
gonna,
see
that
reoccurring.
A
What
they
did
keep
under
the
monthly
budget
was
that
with
reoccurs
every
month,
they
did
two
of
the
things
they'd
broke
out
the
consultant
fees,
because
what
we
would
do
is
they
would
tell
us
when
they
were
going
to
use
the
consultant
and
work
with
the
consultant,
and
we
would
ask
them
we
would
decide.
I
support
yes,
bring
in
a
consultant
because
we
need
some
additional.
A
We
need
additional
work
or
information
from
the
consultant,
that's
a
separate
fee,
so
they
wouldn't
expend
it
unless
we
approved
it
and
then
they
have
the
optional
services
section,
and
this
is
basically
if
we
requested
it.
So
what
I'm
asking
the
board
to
do
now
and
not
at
this
meeting,
is
to
review
this.
You
have
both
budgets
in
your
packet
now
I
think
you'll
find
similarities
in
the
budget,
except
that
they
broke
them,
broken
it
down
in
a
different
format,
so
that.
A
F
Well,
like
you
know,
I
would
suggest
that
we
not
wait
for
an
additional
meeting.
I
would
suggest.
I
was
happy
with
the
previous
and
I'm
happy
with
the
work
that
it
was
only
having
working
with
him
right
now.
I've
worked
with
many
sub
consultants
and
consultants
over
the
years.
The
contract
is
not.
The
valuable
thing
was
valuable,
as
you
find
very.
B
H
G
F
E
A
G
A
That's
very
close
to
the
line
to
the
conversation
we
had
at
the
meeting
with
the
city
manager,
where
we
talked
about
a
range
of
somewhere
from
eighty
five
to
a
hundred
of
you
recall
or
ninety
five
around
that
area,
so
it
fits.
It
fits
the
discussion
with
the
city
manager's
office
because
we
were
not
locked
in
stolen
the
city
manager's
office,
but
I
asked
for
a
comfort
level
that
we
would
be
close
to.
Obviously,
there's
gonna
be
some
negotiating
and
they
came
without
having
to
go
back.
A
They
came
very
close
to
that
comfort
level
on
there.
You
know
the
way
they
they
put
this
together.
What's
not
here
and
I
want
to
re-emphasize,
because
I
want
this
for
the
record
on
the
minutes
that
they
have
broken
out
the
consultancy
fees
that
we
may
require,
for
example,
from
sue
Darcy.
That's
her
name
right,
sue,
Darcy
Husa,
who
works
with
other
charges
in
other
cities
who
we
maybe
need
her
advice
and
her
her
in
front
of
expertise
from
time
to
time.
That
would
be
a
service.
A
B
F
But
to
me
it's
basically
hanging
bigger
from
a
previous
contract,
especially
the
same
contract,
just
broken
up
difficult
way.
If
there's
something
different
sure,
let's
highlight
back
what
is
I
see
if
there's
nothing.
This
is
not
departing
in
a
significant
way
from
the
previous
contract
right.
We
need
to
get
someone
on
board
it's
over
now,
I,
don't
delay
another
meeting
right
Oh
at
some
point,
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
that
we.
B
C
C
So
what
we
did
is
is
we
put
that
together
as
as
like
what
we
thought
would
be
a
one-time
cost
for
actually
doing
that
particular
task,
but
the
other
partial
in
Congress
that
perhaps
caused
some
people
to
misunderstand
our
intention
hearings,
but
when
it
was
broken
down
this
way
we
thought
we
made
it
clear
that,
actually,
even
today,
all
these
line
items
are
optional.
They're.
C
If
there's
clarity
of
what
they
need
to
do
in
terms
of
the
list
of
tasks,
they
will
do
it,
but
we
need
to
do.
We
need
to
have
a
memorandum
of
agreement
and
so
that
we
start
on
a
sure
foot
on
what
is
going
to
be
done
by
one
party
and
another
party,
all
the
other
items
in
the
care
that
have
to
do
with
other
local
government
districts
like
LC
or
the
county
or
whatever.
C
That's
optional
and
we
come
together
and
we
decide
we
need
to
actually
go
about
the
vetting.
Then
we'll
figure
out
how
much
time
and
resources
that
will
take
and
what
we
need
to
do,
presentation
whatever
it
is
and
we'll
pull
it
together.
I
left
out
from
that
left
out,
but
suit
Darcy
had
some
numbers,
and
here
she's.
C
A
F
E
F
What
we're
what
if
we
feel
like
they're,
not
providing
a
good
service,
then
we
end
it
and
we
can
go
up
another
but
I'm
right,
based
on
my
experience
with
April
cities.
We
have
a
contract
with
it,
even
though
we
have
a
contract.
Some
consultants
stick
very
much
to
what's
in
there,
but
they've
been
very
flexible
on
adjusting
where
I'm
bringing
on
new
staff.
We
can
do
different
things,
they're
very
flexible
to
adjusting.
F
So
if
we
find
that
we,
if
the
legal
department,
somehow
I,
can
never
get
a
hold
of
them,
but
if
they
find
they
have
extra
time
to
help
us
with
something
which
we
should.
We
should
plan
on
that.
But
if
somehow
they've
got
extra
time,
they
want
to
work
on
some
of
these
things,
I'm
sure
they
will
say
to
be
more
than
happy
to
scale
back
something
the
reality
is
we
need
staff,
that's
going
to
move
forward
and
even
hiring
one
person
would
not
be
as
good
as
having
a
team
of
people
at
different
skills.
F
A
It's
not
it's
a
matter
of
time
as
much
as
a
matter
of
comfort
and
I
and
I
will
be
very
direct,
as
I
was
the
last
time
at
the
last
meeting
about
why
we
didn't
take
action.
The
last
time
we
met
on
this
is
that
the
church
legally,
how
the
church
is
set
up.
It's
independent
and
we
all
realize
that
we're
a
point.
The
more
members
were
appointed
by
the
city.
It
has
a
legal
independence
to
it.
A
A
The
way
we've
done
it
so
far
and
we've
been
pretty
inclusive,
not
letting
anybody
leaving
anybody
out
of
this
conversation,
and
certainly
the
city
part
of
this
I
agree
with
what
you're
saying,
let's
just
make
sure
that
all
of
the
board
members
here
agree
with
you
and
although
I've
been
thinking,
we
would
take
action
today.
We
can
take
action
today
because
it
is
the
item
that.
H
D
F
I
would
suggest
no
because
we
make,
and
especially
in
the
beginning,
this
is
getting
started,
there's
not
a
lot.
Well,
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
fun
stored
up,
there's
not
a
lot
going
on
today
and
then
some
of
us
really
want
to
spend
that.
But
then
we
may
find
out
which
really
we
can't
get
down
what
we
need
to
be
done
this
month.
We've
got
to
spread
out
over
to
us.
A
To
your
point,
that
may
be
a
comfort
level.
There
should
be
that
we
need
we
as
a
board.
It's
our
responsibility
to
be
reviewing
this
on
a
monthly
basis
and
and
I
just
you
seen
an
example,
but
you
know,
if
you
might,
when
it
comes
in,
you
know
it
8,000
to
9,000
three
25,000
and
we're
just
not
comfortable
with
that
expense
and
why
it
was
expected.
That's
it
look
at
that
option.
A
D
Normally
I
mean
that
I'm
coming
from
from
the
city
side,
normally
when
we
award
a
contract,
we're
water
contract
for
services,
and
it's
off
to
this
amount,
I'm,
actually
Monica
and
I-
understand
that
that
this
one
is
up.
Most
of
these
services
are
optional.
We're
gonna
decide
which
items
we
want.
We
work
with:
that's
where
I'm
from
normally,
we
would
have
it
a
tap
and
I
was
doing
so
figure.
Try.
B
A
Just
came
in
what
we
discussed
was
we
talked
about
if
they're
not,
they
were
not
come.
Yet.
What
was
the
discomfort
with
the
way
it
was
proposed,
and
so
they
come
back
and
they've
explained
it
better
in
terms
of
which
of
the
one-time
fees
and
which
other
recurring
fees
and
we've
taken
the
consultancy
out
of
that.
A
A
E
C
B
B
C
E
A
F
Relationship,
let
me
get
a
better
living
contract
from
another
person.
You've
never
heard
of,
but
there's
a
little
comfort
here
that
I
would
expect
should
be
given
based
on
their
passport
monsters.
To
me
outweighs
any
little
small
discrepancy
that
you'd
feel
like
I
mean
you
know,
that's
your
personal
decision,
how
you
vote,
but
I
could
just
speak
to
my
experience
since
I
think
threes
lucky
to
have
them
working
through
this.
Oh.
B
I'm
getting
comfort
with
this
thing
just
for
their.
It
also
basically
said
the
same
things
and
basically
I
like
that
break
down.
Now
that
I
have
an
understanding
of
this
and
I
just
wondering
confirmation
that
the
breeze
didn't
change
as
to
what
we
could
have
initially
agreed,
so
I'm
comfortable
with
it
I
do
want
to
recommend
several
things.
I
wouldn't
want
to
make
this
a
maximum
of
five
year
with
a
renewable
one-year
journey
to
each
term.
B
H
B
A
good
thing
is
we
get
a
monthly
report,
so
we
can
review
it
before
it
gets
dispersed
week.
If
you
have
any
questions
on
it,
we
can
I.
Would
I
just
want
to
have
time
as
a
board
member
it
I'm
on
the
board
on
the
board
a
year
from
now,
I
want
to
be
able
what
we're
paying
for
okay
report
format
or
something
for
the
boards.
E
H
B
You
know
that
they're
just
supposed
to
report
where's
gonna,
be
the
administrative
person
important
here's,
the
request
for
payment
and
here's
all
the
services
right.
So
that
should
be.
You
know:
yeah
I,
just
I
was
asking
for
it
to
be
approved
by
the
board
as
a
motion
every
month,
but
that's
I
guess
doesn't
look
like
that's
the
case.
Would
tummy
off
so
I?
Would
the
secondary
aspect
would
be
that
it
would
be
in
the
form
of
a
report
when
subscribers
or
paid
out?
So
we
could
see
what
was
done.
I
feel
more
comfortable
with
that.
B
B
A
No
yeah
I
agree,
so
so
the
idea
here
being
is
that
we
equated.
We
agree
to
the
contract
and
with
review,
and
the
board
has
a
review,
a
quarterly,
a
quarterly
update,
the
quarterly
review
of
the
contract,
and
that
seems
good
in
my
opinion,
because
at
the
end
of
two
quarters
is
the
six-month
request
nine
month,
and
that
was
a
period
of
time
as
we're
talking
about
where
we
would
have
a
feel
if
this
is
moving
in
the
direction
we.
D
B
G
C
There
might
be
a
moment
in
time
when
there
is
somebody
that
comes
in
from
the
city
or
wherever
that's
you
know
can
be
that
perfect
liaison
somebody's
gonna.
You
know
we're
happy
to
pass
over
whatever
it
is
that
we
need
to
pass
over
to
somebody
who
wants
to
do
what
we're
doing
in
here.
From
the
administrative
point
of
view,
what.
E
B
A
Also
want
to
be
clear
because
I
know
you've
said
that
a
couple
of
times
and
after
that
I
just
wonder.
We
want
to
be
clear
that
what
we
did
was
percent.
It
was
a
not
a
totally
new
contract.
What
was
percent
it
was
a
version
of
the
old
contract
in
a
format
that
was
Maureen.
Lipman
Willis
understand
the
regular
finance
because
we
asked
for
that
clarification
so.
B
A
Difficult
part
of
this
contract
is
page
by
forward.
That's
where
the
challenge
starts
coming
in
that's
the
project.
This
is
all
the
conceptual
administrative
side
moving
up
to
this
and
the
viana
we
talked
about
this
with
Abel
city
a
couple
of
times.
You
know
when
we
were
with
with
Ben
and
I
fluted
myself
and
then
again
when
we
met
I
mean
we're
not
this
first
part
the
project
develop
site.
A
The
goal
here
is
about
nine
months,
mas,
o
menos,
more
or
less
time,
so
that
we
can
just
want
to
breathe
into
the
product
development
partner
and
the
one
thing
that
we
talked
about
so
I
would
admit
you
at
the
meeting
with
cemeteries
here.
This
is
that
we've
been
any
project
money
for
this.
They
leverage
the
the
money
that
isn't
the
Turkish
to
get
some
money
to
move
forward
this
project,
because
the
enemy
of
the
terms
right
now
is
to
drag
this
out
over
30
years,
because
then
administrative
costs
will
sink
us.
A
We
need
to
decide
move
forward
your
two
year,
three
we're
finishing
it
off,
and
then
we
save
ourself
tons
in
administrative
costs,
because
we've
done
it
very
quickly.
That's
the
idea,
but
in
order
to
do
that
in
the
city
manager
recognized
that
point
we're
not
going
to
have
enough
money
in
the
church
to
do
that,
we're
going
to
need
the
city's
help
and
leveraging
what
the
church
does
have
to
at
least
double
triple
Vietnam
and.
I
A
F
A
A
You
know
it's
been
a
it's
been
an
interesting
process.
It's
been
a
long
process
in
fairness
to
the
group
and
I
say
this:
over
and
over
again
we
really
haven't
had
money
to
be
moving
forward
with
project
I
know
we
keep
on
saying
we
could
leverage,
we
could
leverage,
but
the
city
hasn't
necessarily
said
yeah,
that's
called
a
virgin,
so
we're
getting
to
that
position
now.