►
From YouTube: Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No 1 020921
Description
Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No 1 020921
A
Call
this
meeting
to
order
a
meeting
of
the
tax
increment
reinvestment
zone
number
one
it's
tuesday
february,
9th
5
30
and
we're
calling
the
meeting
to
order.
That's
item
one
item:
two
roll
call.
A
C
C
A
Thank
you
very
much
item
number
three
on
the
agenda
citizen
comments.
Citizens
are
required
to
fill
out
an
online
witness
card
no
later
than
5
45
pm
and
can
be
found
at
the
city's
website.
Comments
are
limited
to
three
minutes
per
speaker.
No
more
than
three
persons
will
be
allowed
to
speak
on
any
one
side
of
an
issue.
Speakers
may
not
pass
or
minutes
to
another
speaker
comment
should
be
relevant
to
the
city
business
delivered
in
a
professional
manner.
No
derogatory
remarks
will
be
permitted.
A
Anybody
sign
up.
I
know
we
still
have
a
little
bit
of
time,
but.
A
Very
good:
okay:
let's
go
ahead
and
go
to
item
four
on
the
agenda
discussion
with
possible
action
regarding
the
downtown
church
project
as
prepared
by
able
city
board
members
comments
regarding
this
information
presented
and
any
other
matters
incident
there
too.
And
if
you
recall
what
we
did
the
last
time
was.
We
went
through
the
presentation
put
together
by
able
city
to
review
the
project
as
we
asked
them
to
bring
it
to
us
and
we
took
a
couple
of
their.
A
A
We
tabled
item
seven
related
to
getting
information
on
the
tours
grant
on
an
eda
grant,
which
we
asked
able
city
to
collect
some
information
from
for
us
on
this,
and
then
they
also
were
asked
to
collect
little
information
on
some
information
on
any
z
tax
abatements
as
they
relate
to
the
turs
in
this
zone.
So
why
don't
we
go
to
the
to
begin
with
the
two
table?
The
two
items
that
were
tabled
in
the
last
meeting
and
finish
off
this
presentation
able
city.
A
B
B
Ending
date
for
this
grant,
I
don't
know
if
you
all
had
a
time
a
chance
to
read
it,
but
it's
for
the
area.
It
would
be
for
the
area
in
salinas,
which
I
don't
know
if
you
can
see
my
cursor.
But
it's
you
know
that
that
dash
area
in
the
in
the
map-
and
so
there's
a
there's,
it's
an
ongoing
grant
and
we
can
apply
for
it
and
the
application.
I
have
the
link
application.
A
A
C
C
So
I
would
almost
say
that,
maybe,
if
with
respect
to
mr
so
I
don't
see
if
he
wants
to
do,
do
we
want
to
do
a
motion
kind
of
asking
city
council
to
consider
it
as
a
priority
project
for
consideration
for
an
eda
grant,
because
the
way
it
works
is
you
need
to
select
three
or
four
priority
projects
and
they
get
submitted
to
the
to
the
cog
and
then
from
there.
C
It
gets
submitted
to
ada
or
it
gets
approved
by
council,
and
then
it
gets
submitted
for
to
the
cog
and
then
the
council
of
governments,
and
then
it
goes
to
eda,
but
we
would
have
to
at
least
have
our
projects
submitted
as
a
priority
project
for
consideration
by
council.
What
do
you
think
about
that?
Mr
smith?.
D
Yeah,
I
I
agree
with
that.
It
would
make
no
sense
to
you,
know,
start
working
on
it
and
then
not
not
be
prioritized.
I
know
at
the
time
that
we
were
talking
about
this.
The
city
had
some
other
I
I
know
there
was
something
on
the
city
agenda
for
ada
grant,
so
there
may
be
another
priority,
but
I
agree
with
that.
I'm
also
again,
very
supportive
of
this.
D
Make
a
motion
that
that
we
proceed
with
this
plan
of
submitting
eda
grant
for
salinas
or
an
area
related
to
salinas
street
and
to
make
that
request
to
city
management
nfp
to
the
city
council
for
prioritization
of
this
project.
A
Going
once
going
twice:
okay,
sensing
no
further
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
and
support
of
this
indicate
by
saying.
D
A
There
be
no
opposition
to
this
emotion,
carries
next
item
on
the
agenda
that
what
we
asked
able
city
to
collect
information
on
was
to
talk,
collect
information,
and
this
had
to
do
with
also
meeting
with
sue
darcy
to
collect
some
of
this
information
and
get
her
her
experience
with
this
was
on
any
z,
tax,
abatements
able
city.
B
So,
yes,
we
had
a
call
with
sue
really
she,
since
she
was
involved
with
with
this
project
from
the
beginning,
she
gave
us
a
a
great
history
as
to
why
things
were
done,
the
way
they
were
and
why
the
nazi
and
the
tours
overlapping
and
you
know
the
nuances
of
tax
abatements
versus
tax
rebates.
B
If
you
go
to
the
statute,
you
can
also
see
it
under
tax
abatements
there
and
they're
pretty
they're,
pretty
it's
it's
a
common
problem
that
happens
even
if
there
wasn't
a
any
z
on
this,
the
city
could
do
a
tax
abatement
project
with
somebody
and
and
they
and
what
they
ask
you
to
do
by
statute
is
to.
If
there's
a
tours
board,
the
purse
board
gets
presented
that
that
potential
tax
abatement
when
it
gets
you
know
the
reason.
B
This
is
all
especially
when
there's
bonds
already
functioning
under
the
or
or
borrowed
on
under
the
tours.
Then
it
becomes
a
an
issue
of
you
know
these.
These
monies
that
are
abated
not
being
available
to
pay
a
bond.
So
we
essentially,
I
don't
know
how
much
I
took
the
the
notes.
We
asked
two
to
get
some
background
and
her
answers
and
notes
on
what
we
discussed
and
that's
what
I
have
here.
I
have
it
in
alternating
colors
just
so
that
it's
easier
to
read.
B
There's
no
other
reason
for
that,
and
you
can
basically
see
what's
there.
I
think
more
importantly,
what
we
need
to
do
is
add
a
note
to
the
application,
the
any
z
application
that,
where
the
tours
overlays
that
come
and
talk
to
or
refer
it
to
the
tours
for
discussion,
and
she
suggested
that
we,
you
know
have
these-
you
know
robust
discussions
with
whomever
it
is
that
is
looking
for
an
because
it's
not
that
they
can't
get
an
abatement.
B
That
statute
falls
under
something
else,
which
requires
guidelines
and
criteria
for
tax
abatements
to
be
re-looked
at
every
three
years,
and
rea
are
every
two
years
and
ever
and
re-adopted
by
the
city,
and
so
you
know
there's
just
nuances
in
there
that
we
have
to
take
care
of,
and
then
also
you
know,
talk
to
people
who
want
to
have
those
who
who
are
asking
for
an
abatement
and
talk
to
them
about
rebates
rather
than
abatements
yeah,
so
go
ahead.
A
I
think
viviana's
point
here
able
city's
point
is
very
clear
and
you'll
see
in
the
notes
there
that
the
idea
is
that
we,
the
the
the
tours,
can
offer
an
incentive
just
as
well
as
an
abatement
program
could
offer,
and
the
key
point
that
was
mentioned
right
now
by
viviana-
and
I
think
is
the
most
important
is
that
the
reason
the
state
indicates
that
abatements,
any
z,
abatements
within
turns
districts
must
go
to
the
tourist
board
first
for
discussion
is
that
since
it
deters
coffer,
deters
money
to
pay
it,
it
should
occurs,
float,
bonds
and
use
bond
money
for
a
project.
A
A
I
think
we're
gonna
be
fine,
but
it
was
just
encouraging
to
hear
this
from
sue
because
she's
actually
experienced
it
and
worked
with
it.
So
I
I
appreciate
the
background
you
all
did
on
this.
Any
questions
from
the
board
members.
C
Yeah,
well
probably,
mrs
chairman,
basically
I
I
probably
want
to
discuss
maybe
offline
with
the
consultants
just
that
last
footnote
just
because
I
don't
think
to
be
honest
with
you,
I
don't
think
since
moving
to
the
building
department,
that's
been
done.
Yeah.
B
Right,
right
and-
and
let
me
also
add
that
it
would
be
good
to
because
the
guidelines
and
criteria
for
tax
abatements,
I
went,
and
I
looked
at
them
and
what
other
cities
do.
Is
they
put
a
a
note
in
there
that
says
that
where
there
is
a
terse
that
tax
abatements
are
either
not
allowed,
or
you
have
to
go
to
the
tours
board
to
to
ask
for
those,
for
you
know
to
ask
for
an
incentive
in
that
area
just
to.
C
C
A
Yeah-
and
in
this
case
you
raise
a
good
point,
but
in
this
case,
for
example,
we
haven't
had
a
situation
where
a
application
for
a
tax
abatement
has
taken
money
away
from
the
tours
and
then
it
hindered
our
ability
to
repay
a
bond
and
that's
primarily
the
reason
that
that
they
talk
about
this
and
on
the
state
level.
So
yes,
please,
I,
let's
do
some
further
research,
but
we
asked
viviana
to
get
some
initial
information,
and
this
was
the
initial
information,
an
idea
behind
how
terza's
and
in
any
z's
interact.
D
One
other
thing,
mr
chairman,
on
and
media
might
be
aware:
we
left
the
inner
city
reinvestment
study,
kind
of
hanging
here
in
vienna.
You
might
be
aware
we
were
supposed
to
have
a
housing
summit,
so
we're
reconvening
that
group.
It
would
be
great
to
make
anything
that
would
end
up
being
an
incentive
to
layer
it
on
that
study
as
well.
So
any
recommendations
that
yourself
or
ms
darcy
might
have
get
them
to
us,
so
we
can
get
them
to
hrna
and
plug
him
into
that
study.
D
A
Very
good,
okay.
Okay.
That
concludes
the
unless
I'm
mistaken.
That
concludes
the
tabled
activity
for
from
the
last
meeting.
Is
that
correct.
B
A
Okay,
very
good.
Is
there
anything
any
other
discussion
really
well,
there
is
a.
A
I
have
a
couple
of
points
to
point
out
on
this
item
so
as
a
follow-up
to
what
I
was
going
to
do
that,
I
will
admit
I
haven't
done
in
this
week
period,
but
I
will
start
immediately
after
this
meeting
is
I'm
putting
together
the
a
memo
to
the
city
manager's
office,
just
following
up
on
the
action
and
activity
taken
on
by
the
turs
board
in
terms
of
approving
the
project
so
that
we
can
move
forward
and
meet
with
the
financial
advisors
of
the
city.
A
The
city
asked
me
just
to
put
together
this
information
in
a
in
an
email
and
send
it
off
to
them
so
then
that
they
can
take
the
next
step,
in
fact,
kirby
schneidman
volunteered
to
carry
that,
but
I
just
haven't
prepared
the
memo
and
as
soon
as
I
do
that
after
this
meeting
I'll
copy,
the
appropriate
people
and
we
can
move
forward
any
other
discussion
related
to
this
item.
A
Very
good
sensing,
none
I'll
move
to
the
next
one,
and
that
is
item
five
item.
Five
actually
is
a
discussion.
I
just
had
discussion
with
possible
action
authorizing
the
the
tours
board
and
city
of
laredo
to
seek
financing
opportunities
for
the
development.
I'm
sorry
I
I
covered
that
in
the
last
item.
So
I'll
just
say:
ditto
to
this
item
and
we've
covered
it
here,
item
six:
is
there
any
other
discussion
on
item
five.
A
Item
six
discussion
with
possible
action
regarding
the
monthly
invoice
submitted
by
able
city
the
board
has
the
had
the
the
invoice
now
for
a
while
and
I'd
like
to
entertain
a
motion
that
we
approve
the
invoices
submitted.
Is
there
a
motion.
E
A
Okay,
then
I
I
will
I
I
will.
I
will
initiate
some
of
the
discussion
just
to
get
some
information
out
there.
I
know
that
I've
heard
from
a
couple
of
board
members
just
discussing
one
of
the
items
that
was
of
interest
and
so
that
we
can
get
a
little
bit
more
into
it
able
city.
Could
you
describe
a
little
bit
in
detail
a
little
bit
more
of
what
went
under
the
5.1
project,
visioning
and
consensus?
Please.
A
B
Well,
this
is
5.1
project
project,
visioning
and
consensus
is
putting
all
the
projects
together
that
we're
looking
at
doing,
and
we
did
that
both
in
december
and
in
january.
B
This
reflects
two
months
and
we're
giving
a
form
and
and
direction
to
the
project
as
we're
going
along
with
you
and
when
we
do.
When
we
go
out
to
a.
E
I
want
to
also
you'll
be
able
to
also
the
work
that
we've
all
worked
on
together
over
the
past
few
months
is
also
going
to
be
used
in
some
of
these
grants
that
you're
talking
about
applying
for
so
a
lot
of
the
groundwork
is
already
laid
out.
You
know
now
that
there
is
a
consensus
on
the
projects
that
you're
pursuing.
A
Very
good-
and
I
know
that's
an
important
part
of
eda
grant
proposal-
is
by
stakeholder
by
any
more
comments
or
questions.
C
A
B
Okay,
we
forgot
to
just
I
I
we
were
just
talking
about
talking
about
those
motions
and
I
wasn't
able
to
talk
about
next
steps
and.
A
B
It's
real
simply,
it's
just
to
form
a
committee
to
put
together
a
an
action
plan
of
going
and
showing
the
the
progress
of
the
projects
as
as
as
as
al
as
has
been
approved
and
talking
to
stakeholders.
B
There's
already
been
discussion
with
the
with
the
city,
so
it's
just
a
matter
of
getting
a
a
a
committee
together
to
formulate
a
plan
as
as
to
how
we
would
go
about
unfolding
a
public
meeting.
A
C
The
only
thing
chairman
on
this-
and
I
don't
know
if
the
board
might
agree
with
me
or
not-
but
I'd
like
to
see
a
timetable
as
to
how
we're
going
to
be
implementing
it,
so
that
way
we're
all
on
the
same
sheet
of
music,
and
you
know
we're
not
in
2022
talking
about
you
know
what
we're
gonna
do
right.
So
if
we
can
for
the
next
month,
have
that
timeline
established
as
to
the
hard
days
of
to
get
projects
done.
So
that's
the
key
issue,
project's
done.
A
Okay,
well,
that's
construction
started,
so
that's
different
from
the
that's
different
from
what
from
what
was
just
discussed.
Now
I
think
so.
I
wanna,
I
wanna,
ask
you
more
for
more
comment
on
that.
Ms
garcia,
then,
because
what
we
were
discussing
was
creating
the
vehicle
for
getting
public
input
to
this
to
this,
as
as
it's
been
proposed.
A
C
I
just
understand,
mr
chairman,
now
the
only
thing
is
establish
that
timing
of
how
much
time
that
is,
and
then
you
know
set
it
up
so
that
way
we
can
see
some
hard
dates
again.
I
don't
want
to
be
in
2022
talking
about
it.
Well
we're
going
to
be
going
out
for
bid.
You
know
I
should
be
not
forbidden
about
less
than
six
months.
E
Mr
mr
chair,
mr
chair,
we
can
assist
you
all
with
that
with
everything
that
everybody
is
saying.
Essentially,
we
can
put
together
a
proposed
project
schedule,
beginning
with
public
engagement
and
a
time
frame
and,
at
the
same
time,
put
out
a
schedule
of
time
from
that
point
to
getting
this
to
to
a
process
where
you
we
can
bring
in
engineering
design
time
as
well
as
construction.
B
So,
but
I
think
I
think
really
if
we
can
just
talk
about
maybe
putting
a
committee
together
and
discussing
how
we
would
you
know,
work
backwards
from
these
tasks.
I
think
it
would
be
especially
where
it
comes
to
public
participation.
B
I
think
it
would
be
a
really
good
thing
and
I
thought
you
know.
I
think
it
would
be
great
if
you
were
part
of
that
committee.
C
Yeah,
I
don't
mind
if
the
chairman
wants
to
lead
it
now
I'll
join
in,
and
I
think
we
could
use
some
another
chairman.
Somebody
from
the
from
the
private
sector
would
be
good.
That
way.
You
know
we
balance
out
the
the
three-person
committee.
A
So
so
I'll
work
with
ms
garcia
myself
and
would
whoever
another
board
member
that
would
like
to
be
on
this
subcommittee.
Please
send
me
an
email
and
let
me
know
I'll,
take
the
next
board
member
that
responds
unless
there's
someone
now
that
wants
to
say
I
want
to
be
on
this
subcommittee.
C
D
One
observation
or
one
comment,
yes,
is
that
we
should
find
a
place
in
the
city
website
to
start
loading
some
of
these
public
documents.
D
E
D
To
whatever
we're
gonna
announce-
and
I
agree
that
a
timetable
would
be
good
not
just
for
us
but
to
just
keep
expectations
going
or
make
expectations
known
to
the
public
or
what
that
schedule
looks
like.
C
Jose,
I
think
the
intent
is
to
put
this
committee
under
economic
development,
so
I
think
the
ed
webpage
would
be
good,
especially
if
all
the
urges
are
going
to
be
there.
Maybe
church
number
one
church
number,
two,
whatever
the
case
may
be.
If
the
city
keeps
creating
some
sounds
great,
where,
wherever.
D
It
ends
up
is
fine.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we've
got
information
out
there
for
the
public
ahead
of
our
or
our
forums
or
whatever
our
presentations.
D
And
and
then
the
last
thing
on
on,
I
guess
expectations
is
kudos
at
six
months.
We
need
to
be
out
recruiting
engineers
within
90
days.
You
know
if
we
can
get
bonded
whatever
fashion
the
city
thinks
we
should
do
it.
We
should
come
back
and
initiate
projects
quickly.
I
think
none
of
us
need
to
be
on
this
board
more
than
a
year
without
having
a
project.
We
need
to
have
projects,
we
need
to
move
ahead,
and
so
I'm
all
for
that.
D
I
I
want
to
make
sure
the
public
we
receive
public
input,
but
at
the
same
time
we've
we've
got
to
mobilize
and
that's
that's
part
of
the
questions
that
I'm
sure
you
all
get,
because
I
get
them.
When
are
we
going
to
see
a
project
from
the
turks
and
we've
been
we've
been
in
planning
for
a
long
time?
So
just
I
just
want
to
reiterate
that
I
I
do
want.
D
I
do
agree
with
with
able
city
and
taking
public
input
and
and
making
them
part
of
this
process,
but
it
needs
to
be
a
reasonable
period
so
that
we
can
come
back
and
quickly
take
action.
Hopefully
we
get
bonded
and
we
get
all
all
that
we
put
on
paper
right.
But
if
we
don't,
I
think
we've
got
to
mobilize.
A
I
I
agree
jose
your
point
so
well
taken,
although
I
will
note-
and
I
think
it's
important-
that
as
a
board,
we
acknowledge
something
and
that's
that
the
ability
to
bond
or
the
thought
of
being
able
to
bond
is
new.
We
were
having
to
work
with
just
the
funds
we
had
on
hand,
and
that
was
less
than
800
000
until
very
recently,
so
you
know
when
people
do
ask
me
and
I
get
asked
the
same
questions
there's
a
good
there's,
a
good
reason
for
this.
A
The
money
wasn't
there
to
begin
with,
and
so
it
is
now
there
and
now
the
city
has
indicated
it's
its
interest
in
helping
us
match
these
funds
with
bond
money
that
wasn't
there
even
six
months
ago.
So
I
just
don't
want
this
to
fall
on
the
inactivity
of
the
board.
The
board
has
been
working
and
planning
and
I
think,
moving
forward.
A
Okay,
that
said
able
city,
I
think
you,
you
have
a
a
a
marching
order,
so
to
speak
in
terms
of
putting
this
timeline
we've.
Given
you
some
ideas
on
what
to
do.
You
have
mr
garcia
and
myself
on
this
committee.
I'll
give
it
a
day
to
see
if
I
get
anybody
volunteering
to
be
on
this
subcommittee
as
well
and
I'll.
Let
you
know
so
that
we
can
just
start
schedule
a
meeting
to
begin
that
part.
A
Very
good,
okay,
any
other
discussion
on
item
four
before
we
close
it
again.
A
No
okay,
then.
We've
finished
item
four
we've
completed
item
five
and
item
six
last
item
on
the
agenda.
As
a
german,
do
I
hear
you?