►
From YouTube: City of Madison Board of Zoning Appeals - March 15, 2021
Description
Renewals:
1. Darlisa Davis – Conditional Use permit for a preschool/daycare facility.
Location: 431 Ivy Tech Dr. Zoned: General Business (GB)
One-Year Renewal
2. Kimberly S. Taylor for Jefferson County Transitional Services – Conditional Use permit to house a maximum of ten (10) residents – nine Transitional Services Residents and one (1) manager.
Conditions: Not to exceed maximum residency of ten (10); One (1) year renewals; Transitional Services rules to be maintained.
Location: 309 St. Michael’s Ave. Zoned: Historic District Residential (HDR)
One-Year Renewal
3. Yong Perry – Conditional Use permit for retail sales of furniture & household goods.
Location: 845 W. Main St. Zoned: Local Business (LB)
One-Year Renewal
4. One Scientific Inc. – Conditional Use permit for engineering office and lab.
Location: 2715 Clifty Dr. Zoned: General Business (GB)
One-Year Renewal
5. Russell N. Linville – Conditional Use permit to operate auto repair business.
Location: 1801 Allen St. Zoned: Medium Density Residential (R-8)
One-Year Renewal
6. Hanover Baptist Church – Conditional Use permit for a worship center.
Location: 3894 W. SR 56 Zoned: Low Density Residential (R-4)
One-Year Renewal
7. Mason & Mefford Auto Sales Inc – Conditional Use permit for an auto sales lot.
Location: 3112 Wilson Ave. Zoned: Light Industry (M-1)
One-Year Renewal
8. Jim Macke – Conditional Use permit for two log cabins to be utilized for guest cottages.
Location: 1708 Dugan Hollow Rd. Zoned: Hillside (HS)
One-Year Renewal
9. Wilson Frasier LLC (Jerry & Mary) – Conditional Use permit for a Bed & Breakfast.
Location: 618 E. Second St. Zoned: Historic District Residential (HDR)
One-Year Renewal
10. Camille Fife – Conditional Use permit to operate a professional consulting service in applicant’s home.
Location: 608 Mulberry St. Zoned: Historic District Residential (HDR)
One-Year Renewal
11. Eric Davis – Conditional Use permit for a mobile home at the rear of 992 Saddletree Lane.
Location: 992 Saddletree Ln. Zoned: Medium Density Residential (R-8)
One-Year Renewal
New Applications:
1. L & L Properties, LLC – Variance from Development Standards (Setback Variance) for a one (1) foot setback on the west property line and a four (4) foot and six (6) inch setback from the east
property line for a rear addition rebuild. Also included on this variance application is a two (2) foot setback on the east property line for enclosing a part of a side porch.
Location: 1018 W. Main St.
Zoned: Medium Density Residential (R-8)
2. Catherine Sallie Evans – Variance of Use in order to operate a seasonal ice cream business from a restored vintage camper storefront.
Location: 502 E. Vaughn Dr.
Zoned: Open Space (OS)
3. Rich & Sallie Plass – Variance from Development Standards (Setback Variance) for a zero lot line on the east property line. The applicants are planning on enclosing their porch with a sliding
door/window unit & to cantilever & extend their deck three (3) feet to the south.
Location: 811 W. First St.
Zoned: Historic District Residential (HDR)
4. Vickie Demaree – Variance from Development Standards application in order to build a triplex unit at proposed site. Variance from Section 6.12 floor area ratio, lot area lot width, and side
yard setbacks.
Location: 1938 Michigan Rd.
Zoned: Low Density Residential (R-4)
5. James McCormick – Variance from Development Standards (Setback Variance) for a zero (0) lot line on the south property line and nine (9) foot setback on the west property line. The applicant
is planning on building a 24’ x 30’ pole style garage.
Location: 1201 Wells Dr.
Zoned: Medium Density Residential (R-8)
6. Kevin Watkins – Variance from Development Standards (Setback Variance) for a two (2) foot setback on the east property line in order to build a garage addition, a two (2) foot setback on the east property line in order to build a 2nd story addition, and a six (6) inch variance on the south property line in order to build front steps.
Location: 222 W. Second St.
Zoned: Historic District Residential (HDR)
Tabled Applications:
N/A
Business – Old or New:
1. George & Jean Reed – Letter to the Board of Zoning Appeals regarding their conditional use permit for a mobile home at 533 Spring Street.
Location: 533 Spring St. Zoned: Medium Density Residential (R-8)
One-Year Renewal
For the purpose of hearing those for or against said applications, a public hearing will be held on Monday, April 12, 2021 at 6:30 p.m. in City Hall, 101 W. Main St., Madison, IN 47250.
A
B
B
E
C
E
B
B
B
B
Yes,
I
have
doubt
that
they
yeah
they
were
I'm
looking
at
the
other
side,
they
did
pay
number
seven
mason
and
medford
auto
sales
incorporated
that's
a
conditional
use
for
an
auto
sales
lot
at
3112,
wilson,
avenue
m-1.
That
was
a
one-year
renewal.
No
compliance
number
eight
jim
mackey
conditional
use
permit
for
two
log
cabins
be
utilized
for
guest
cottages,
1708
juvenile
road,
that's
in
the
hillside,
a
one-year
renewal,
more
compliance,
number
nine
wilson,
fraser,
llc,
coordinate
or
then
breakfast
located
at
six
day:
18
east.
Second,
that's
in
historic
district
residential,
a
one-year
renewal.
B
B
Number
three
that
I
understand
have
not
paid
the
first
one
is
number
two
on
the
agenda:
kimberly
taylor
for
jefferson,
county
transitional
services,
that
was
a
conditional
use
to
house
maximum
10
residents
or
nine
transitional
service
residents
and
one
manager
that's
located
at
309,
st
michael's
avenue
hdr.
That
was
a
one-year
renewal.
B
B
C
F
G
A
F
B
F
I
can
I
can
understand
that,
yes
to
a
certain
point
where
you
know
people
that
takes
care
of
their
home
and
like
us,
we
own
it
and
we
need
to
take
care
of
it.
So
it'll
last
us
we're
not
out
here.
I
don't
understand
some
of
these
people
that
rent
glue
in
and
out
and
back
and
forth
all
the
time.
I
understand
that.
H
H
E
B
B
First
on
the
agenda
is
l,
l
properties
llc,
they
want
variants
from
development
standards
for
a
one
foot
back
on
the
west
property
line
and
a
four
foot
six
inch
setback
from
the
east
property
line
called
rear
edition
rebuild
also
included,
is
in
this
variance
application.
There's
a
two
foot
set
back
on
the
east
property
line
from
closing
a
part
of
a
side
porch,
that's
at
1018,
west
main
street.
It's
zoned
r8.
E
I
E
I
So
when
you
open
the
back
door,
the
door
grabs
the
ceiling
in
the
house,
so
we're
gonna
make
that
a
cable
roof
and
on
the
side
porch.
All
we're
going
to
do
is
enclose
three
quarters
of
the
side
porch
so
from
the
main
street
you'll
see
it
still
see
the
the
porch,
because
the
house
sits
up
on
a
hill.
So
you
can't
really
judge
the
distance
of
the
porch
and.
B
E
E
G
D
B
B
K
K
B
D
B
A
B
D
B
B
G
K
B
C
M
L
G
L
Well,
the
point
is
that
we
rarely
have
opportunity
to
use
the
current
deck
in
its
size
because
it's
closed
relatively
it
only
has
opening
to
the
to
the
river.
So
it's
extremely
hot,
so
it's
really
non-usable
space
and
what
we
wanted
to
do
is
expand
the
back
area
of
our
condo
so
that
we
have
a
larger
space
in
the
back
by
enclosing
and
we
thought
of
extending
the
deck
as
a
means
of
giving
us
a
bit
more
room.
So
we
could
sit
some
chairs
out
there.
L
L
L
Well,
the
fact
is,
I
can
stand
on
my
death
right
now
and
look
into
jonah
hillary's
apartment
or
condo.
I
can
we
can
see
right
in
we're
really
not
interested,
but
that's
the
fact.
So
when
we
did
this
wanting
to
extend
the
deck,
we
thought
it
was
a
rather
moot
point
that
privacy
really
isn't
materially
affected
by
extending
our
neck
three
feet,
because
already
we
can
stand
on
our
deck
and
look
into
the
combat.
L
B
N
L
B
A
E
Q
O
M
M
I
purchased
809
west
first
street
in
2006
after
selling
the
house
that
I
grew
up
in
on
main
street
and
it's
one
of
three
attached
town
homes.
The
applicant
center
unit.
811,
is
our
immediate
neighbor,
with
a
common
wall
with
our
home
and
813
is
the
other
unit.
On
the
far
side,
I've
organized
my
comments
to
address
the
specific
questions
that
you
all
always
pose
and
evaluate,
and
also
to
respond
to
some
of
the
specific
comments
provided
by
the
classes.
M
M
The
proposed
deck
extension
would
place
the
entirety
of
the
applicant's
deck
just
outside
of
our
kitchen
and
dining
room
windows.
Currently,
the
applicant's
deck
is
about
15
feet,
deep
with
about
four
feet
of
that
deck.
Extending
beyond
the
southern
exterior
wall
and
11
feet
of
the
deck
is
recessed
behind
the
common
wall.
M
M
M
We
submitted
photos
and
renderings
in
the
package
that
tony
provided
showing
the
site.
The
relationship
between
the
three
residences
and
the
effect
that
the
proposed
changes
at
811
would
have
it
built
the
applicants
and
their
guests,
and
their
future
owners
would
be
able
to
see
directly
into
our
kitchen
and
dining
room
from
three
to
five
feet
away
and
hear
ordinary
volume
conversations
taking
place.
Likewise,
we
will
see
and
hear
whatever
is
happening
on
the
applicant's
desk.
M
Our
nearest
neighbor
to
the
east
is
a
stand-alone
house,
but
the
spacing
is
very
different.
The
closest
edge
of
their
deck
is
approximately
13
feet
from
the
edge
of
ours
and
when
you
add
the
12
foot
width
of
our
deck,
there
was
a
total
of
about
25
feet
between
our
door
and
window
and
the
edge
of
their
deck.
So
it's
a
very
different
situation
there.
M
M
A
M
M
R
M
M
The
applicant
is
the
fourth
family
to
live
at
8
11,
since
I
purchased
my
townhouse
and
no
previous
owner
has
pursued
such
substantial
alterations
to
the
property
is
the
request,
contrary
to
the
public
interest,
the
three
attached
town
houses
at
809,
811
and
813
were
designed
by
an
architect
with
decks
that
are
mostly
recessed
behind
common
walls.
That
was
no
doubt
for
reason,
which
was
to
give
each
home's
deck
and
their
occupants
some
degree
of
privacy.
M
M
Second,
the
roof
of
the
new
room
for
the
applicant
that
the
applicant
wishes
to
create,
which
would
join
our
townhouse,
would
have
little
or
no
downslope
flat
or
almost
flat.
Roofs
are
known
and
frequent
concern
in
buildings
if
the
new
roof
had
a
regular
slope,
I
believe
that
the
interior
ceiling
height
would
be
extremely
low.
M
M
Their
opinion
is
set
forth
in
the
letter
that
you
have
that's
exhibit
f
in
short,
reso
states
that
the
proposed
three-foot
deck
extension
would
not
be
proper
or
possible.
They
also
highlight
other
practical
difficulties
that
would
be
involved
in
the
proposed
project,
which
confirms
that
the
applicant
proposes
a
very
significant
change
to
a
multi-unit
building.
M
So,
in
addition
to
the
proposed
step
being
so
close
to
my
home
is
to
diminish
its
value
building,
it
is
probably
possibly
not
even
within
the
building
code.
Finally,
a
consideration
in
your
finally,
a
consideration
in
your
application
is
whether
the
applicant
would
sustain
an
undue
burden
if
the
application
is
not
granted.
M
I
don't
believe
that
the
applicant
will
sustain
an
undue
burden
if
the
application
is
not
granted.
The
proposal
again
is
to
create
new
discretionary
living
space,
while
not
sacrificing
any
deck
space.
Denial
of
the
application
does
not
preclude
the
applicants
from
leaving
them
home
using
their
app
the
original
footprint.
M
M
R
R
You
should
know
that
the
pictures
of
the
exterior
like
taken
from
above
I
took
about
about
a
year
ago,
so
it
shows
the
plant's
furniture
as
it
existed.
I
don't
understand
their
claim
that
the
deck
is
too
hot
to
use.
Everyone
has
the
same
size.
Stick
actually
sticking
it
out
in
the
sun
without
any
covers,
frankly,
maybe
hotter,
but
whatever.
D
B
J
R
F
R
Well,
it's
eleven!
Well,
the
back
is
11
feet
back
so
now
the
wall
is
flush
and
then
their
deck
is
seven
feet,
but
it's
still
a
three
foot
addition.
Yes,
so
you'll
notice
that
see
in
one
in
one
respect
and
that
really
decks
to
me
they're,
you
could
call
them
the
terrace.
The
decks
sit
on
the
foundation
of
the
garage
and
the
garage
is,
as
you
can
see,
the
foundation
wall
sticks
out
a
little
bit
and.
R
The
proposal
wants
to
go
three
feet
beyond
the
foundation
and
with
a
cantilever
design,
which
is
what
rezo
has
told
us.
It's
not
possible
because
the
built-in
code
is
an
extension,
has
to
be
supported
by
a
floor
joists
as
it
sticks
out,
but
the
floor.
Joists
and
all
of
these
units
go
parallel
to
the
river.
They
run
east
west.
You
can't
run
a
floor.
Toys
out,
there's
really
no
way
to.
B
M
B
O
S
S
S
S
It
has
been
my
experience
throughout
30
years
that
flat
roasts
are
always
problematic
and
inevitably
there's
water
penetration
due
to
a
lack
of
drainage
maintenance
and,
as
a
result,
this
can
deteriorate
slash
damage
at
home.
In
a
very
short
time,
repairs
can
be
quite
costly
if
not
taken
care
of
immediately
water
intrusion
also
leads
to
mold,
and
that
can
be
very
costly
to
remediate.
S
The
current
drainage
or
down
spot
spouts
already
appear
to
be
located
on
the
beale
property.
With
the
pictures
provided,
I
think,
you'll
see
in
those
elevations
where
the
downspouts
come
over
actually
past
the
column
wall
and
drain
out
to
the
back
of
the
property,
regardless
of
flat
roof
or
slightly
pitched.
S
S
S
This
is
a
unique
situation
involving
a
variance
of
side
setbacks
to
zero
converting
what
is
not
now
a
party
wall
into
a
party
wall,
so
architectural
drawings
blueprints
as
to
the
specifics
and
scope
of
the
project
required
are
essential
to
ensure
the
indiana
fire
code.
Slash
building
code,
which
is
attached,
you'll,
see
those
cross
sections.
I've
included.
S
Would
be
adhered
to
throughout
the
process.
In
addition,
the
extended
deck
cannot
be
cantilever.
Due
to
the
current
configuration
of
the
joist
in
the
garage
below
the
existing
deck
lies
on
top
of
ceiling
joists
for
the
garage
below
with
furrowing
strips
running
in
an
east-west
direction,
with
a
header
above
the
garage
in
the
same
direction,
I
went
down
and
physically
reviewed
this
at
the
owner's
property.
S
I'm
not
sure
how
you
could
cantilever
the
deck
supports
running
north
and
south
the
required
building
code,
distance
for
structural
integrity,
in
other
words,
for
for
load
and
weight.
Due
to
the
current
construction,
which
mr
or
excuse
me,
crescent
engineering
alluded
to
in
their.
The
only
way
I
can
see
to
do.
That
is
raise
the
floor
over
the
existing
deck
running
the
joists
north
and
south.
But
then
I'm
not
sure
if
the
new
enclosure
would
meet
minimum
room
height
requirement
required
by
the
state
code
and
also
attach
that.
S
S
My
professional
opinion
is
the
original
design
and
construction
of
the
buildings
took
into
consideration
these
issues
and
designed
the
decks
to
create
maximum
privacy.
It
is
when
owners
want
to
make
changes
or
deviate
from
the
original
design
that
affects
the
line
of
sight.
Sound
and
reasonable
privacy
becomes
a
problem,
the
narrative
response
attached
with
application
states.
S
We
believe
this
is
part
of
being
in
a
close
tightly
spaced
community
and
that
simply
requires
courtesy.
Common
courtesy
for
one
is
respectful
and
compassionate
for
the
rights
of
others.
The
common
courtesy
for
another,
especially
in
today's
culture,
is
both
speakers,
a
cake
of
beer
and
come
on
over
and
get
you
some
over
the
most
common
one
of
the
most
common
questions
that
I
get
asked
is:
what
can
you
tell
me
about
the
neighbors?
S
The
current
neighbors
may
be
terrific,
but
that
is
usually
subject
to
change.
This
is
a
definite
effect
on
value.
Conversations
in
a
tightly
fitted
community
can
be
overheard
or
magnified
by
design
changes.
This
can
affect
value
of
prospective
buyers,
feel
a
lack
of
privacy.
Some
of
the
most
serious
discussions
in
families
are
around
the
dining
room
table.
Slash
in
addition,
would
you
really
want
to
be
eating
supper
and
feel
your
neighbors
are
perpetually
invited
as
they
relax
and
entertain
on
their
deck
a
few
unobstructed
feet
away.
S
S
In
closing
all
the
items
I've
mentioned
have
a
direct
effect
on
the
value
of
property.
As
mentioned
previously,
standalone
properties
on
lots
have
a
direct
effect
on
the
property
owners
themselves.
The
commonwealth
party
wall
properties
effectively
joining
owners
as
well.
Thank
you
very
much.
Do
you
have
any
questions
for.
S
Well,
when
you're,
showing
property
and
people
are
asking
you
questions
about,
you
know.
Why
is
that
deck
sticking
out
so
far
or
why
is
that
abnormal
thing
going
on
it's
kind
of
hard
to
put
an
actual
dollar
value
on
it?
I
feel
like
15
000
is
probably
conservative,
especially
in
this
market,
but
certainly
somebody's
going
to
make
an
offer
they're
looking
for
a
laundry
list
of
things
to
devalue
their
property
in
order
to
justify
making
a
lower
offer.
B
E
L
I'd
just
like
to
make
a
comment
on
the
agus
feelers
enclosed
roof,
the
roof
that
roof
does
have
flashing
that
permanently
attaches
to
our
side
of
our
residence.
That
was
installed
without
any
information
to
us
that
roof
was
installed
without
any
information
provided
to
us.
In
fact,
the
aegis
builders
indicated
to
us
that
they
never
had
to
do
anything.
They
just
built
it
well.
G
N
T
T
T
I
believe
between
the
two
posts
that
we'd
like
to
have
and
a
header
there.
We
would
be
well
well
within
those
specs
and
actually,
if
you
don't
mind,
I
do
want
to
say
I'm
glad
this
has
all
been
brought
up,
but
I
don't
think
we're
fundamentally
changing
any
of
the
existing
conditions.
Certainly,
we
want
to
do
a
project,
but
I
think
all
these
conditions
currently
exist
there's
already
roof.
That
is
flashed
to
the
common
wall.
T
O
T
B
F
U
U
So
I
think
I
can
speak
to
some
of
the
living
conditions
that
was
mentioned
some
of
the
things
you
talked
about
several
resonances
having
lived
in
this
and
no
changes
haven't
been
made
being
a
resident
there
and
we're
all
looking
to
improve
our
homes.
Looking
for
ways
to
do
that
all
through
madison-
and
I
think
the
proposed
remodel
would
greatly
enhance
this
unit
and
any
enhancement
that's
made
to
this
unit
would
increase
the
value
and,
I
believe,
ultimately,
increase
the
bill's
property
value.
U
U
U
U
I
U
U
U
Comment
was
made
about,
you
know,
improvements
of
fieldstick.
They
did
a
great
job
with
much
needed
improvement
of
their
gap.
I
know
they
had
some
water
leakage
issues
and
very,
very
well
done
manner,
fix
those
and
address
those
they
did
extend
their
deck
with
the
box
gutter.
That
does
actually,
as
you
can
see,
from
the
photo.
U
The
box
gutter
is
right
under
the
railing,
so
it
does
increase
the
footprint
of
their
deck
in
a
very
appropriate
manner.
I
think
that
was
very
well
done.
You
can
see
siding
down
how
the
bl
stack
does
extend
further
than
the
other
two
decks.
I
think
that's
very
appropriate
from
my
perspective,
my
deck,
the
huntington's
deck,
do
extend
and
will
extend
further
than
any
of
these
three,
even
with
their
extension.
U
So
I
I
feel
like
this
is
very
much
a
doesn't
dramatically
change
the
the
privacy
issue,
privacy,
as
rich
class
said
we
could
look
around
and
look
at
each
other's
windows
anytime.
We
want
and
we
all
respect
each
other
and
choose
not
to
do
that.
It
turns
a
deck
space
that
would
be
very
tight
and
it's
something
that's
usable.
U
Exhibit
e
you
know:
they've
tried
to
portray
this
as
having
a
whole
table
setting
congregated
out
there.
That
looks
like
about
a
six
foot
round
table
on
a
seven
foot
deck,
so
I
think
they've
taken
some
excessive
liberties
trying
to
exaggerate
the
impact
of
this
when
in
in
reality.
Basically,
if
you're
sitting
in
a
chair,
you're
gonna
have
your
back
to
the
wall,
you're
going
to
be
facing
out
you're
going
to
have
room
to
put
your
feet
and
that's
the
extent
of
what's
going
to
happen
up
there
so
they're
at
seven
feet.
U
There
certainly
is
not
room
for
table
and
chairs
sitting
around
that
again,
the
focus
is
going
to
be
our
wonderful
riverfront
from
the
riverfront.
I
don't
think
we're
we're
changed,
and
I
think
this
is
a
a
great
improvement
to
the
living
quality
to
the
another
fine
residence
in
madison
and
I'm
in
favor
of
this
being
a
neighbor.
A
A
U
A
U
B
B
E
A
R
R
B
K
I
believe,
going
through
the
binding
of
the
facts
will
help
us
separate
out.
A
large
part
of
the
conversation
is
over
over
construction.
It's
over
weakened
walls,
it's
over
floor
joists,
which
are
not
our
topic.
You
know
for
this
point,
I
think
our
our
topic
boils
down
to
again
what
those
what
those
seven
questions
are.
I
think
that
will
help
us
help
us
clear
the
air
a
little
bit
on.
You
know
what
our
facts
we're
talking
about.
Q
Q
So,
first
of
all,
it's
quite
humorous
to
observe
mr
canada's
statement
or
to
hear
mr
canada's
statement
that
people
just
don't
look
in
other
people's
windows
and
have
him
come
up
here
and
present
to
you
photographs.
If
he's
taken
directly
into
my
classmate,
though
apparently
not
only
looked
into
him,
but
he
also
photographed
them.
B
Q
A
Q
Q
E
B
S
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
O
E
V
B
V
V
V
V
V
V
G
G
S
V
B
E
B
B
S
V
It's
the
last
available
lots
on
the
golf
course
at
this
point
to
develop
and
again
we're
just
trying
to
stay
in
keeping
with
I
mean
I
understand
what
you're
saying,
and
you
know
my
observation
was
as
yours
was.
It
was
built
in
the
50s
and
60s
all
the
way
up
the
street.
The
most
recent
development
has
been
often
placed
in
cobblestone
in
that
area,
which
are
that
type
of
project
or
product
that
we're
trying
to
build.
B
Well,
I
wasn't
actually,
I
don't
think
I
was
even
in
madison
when
they
did
the
hoffman
projects.
I
have
no
idea
what
went
on,
but
it
seems
to
me
that
if
you
want
to
do
something
like
this,
you
really
are
going
to
have
to
get
this
thing.
Rezoned
and
of
course,
that
starts
with
planned
commission
and
then
city,
council
and
so
forth.
There's
a
whole
procedure
laid
out
for
it.
G
Is
the
location
like
a
cobblestone?
It's
not
off
that
main
drag
correct.
It's
back
in
sunrise,
where
the
pool
used
to
be.
Is
that
what
we're
talking
about
yeah?
So
I
think
my
concern
is
where
you're
at
you've
got
that
main
road.
That's
a
fairly
busy
road
and
then
to
add.
You
know
three
more
places
in
that
small
lot
to
me.
That's
a
safety
issue,
whereas
cobblestone
it's
kind
of
protected
back
in
here,
it's
not
as
well
traveled
back
there
or
as
busy.
So
I
think
that's
my
concern.
G
R
B
J
J
I'm
on
rose,
allen,
way
between
rose,
allen
way
and
his
property,
and
I
own
on
that
side
of
the
creek
and,
like
you
say,
it's
not
a
safe
place
to
build
on
that
onto
that
road.
Since
I've
lived
there,
there's
john
brown's
wife
was
killed
there.
There
was
a
the
boom.
Lady
was
hurt,
real
bad
there's,
two
or
three
other
people.
I've
seen
loading
an
ambulance.
J
My
wife
was
rear-ended
there,
getting
ready
to
pull
into
rose
island
way,
there's
a
dip
in
the
road
there
and
where
that
street
across
there
comes
out
there,
it's
they
have
been
ranked
after
rector.
I've
lived
there
10
years
and
I
have
a
lot
of
other
concerns
too
about
it,
but
the
first
thing
he
did
was
have
surveyed
in
the
survey
line.
The
marks
are
in
the
wrong
place.
J
It's
either
in
the
wrong
place
now
or
they
was
when
I
bought
my
property,
because
the
golf
course
people
pulled
the
metal
stake
up
out
of
the
ground
because
he
was
hitting
it
with
her
mower.
They
put
it
against
a
tree
on
my
place.
It's
still
there
and
his
server
mark
is
not
even
close
to
that,
and
I
can
show
you
on
the
south
side,
where
the
survey
stake
he's
put
in
the
ground
is
three
feet
from
the
metal
thing
it's
in
the
ground
there.
J
J
J
J
I
should
go
to
the
state
for
the
federal,
because
it's
running
right
through
my
yard
and
it
does
it
every
time
it
rains
hard
and
each
one
feels
what
I
see
these
people
buy
a
little
piece
of
property,
I'm
not
from
the
city.
I
live
in
the
country,
all
my
life,
but
anyway
they
buy
a
little
piece
of
property
around
here.
J
J
J
J
J
He
said
they
can't
do
it,
though,
because
it's
not
legal,
they
have
to
have
four
foot
of
clearance
and
they
don't
have
it
so
the
next
day
they
were
digging
it
and
putting
it
in,
and
what
do
you
think?
The
lines
that
came
from
his
house
to
the
transformer
pokemon
yard
they're
still
hanging
on
that
pole
down
in
the
creek
on
my
place
and
if
that's
how
he
operates,
he's
not
going
to
build
anything
nice.
K
B
V
It
certainly
it
is
a
sewer
line.
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
I'm
downstream
from
dave,
so
I
mean
my
sewers.
My
sewage
is
on
past
him
before
as
far
as
dave.
First
of
all,
I
wish
you
no
ill
will.
Certainly
we've
spent
a
significant
amount
of
money
on
the
property
already
if
you've
driven
by,
I
don't
know
if
you
saw
the
house
prior
to
the
renovation,
so
I
mean
I
think
that
stands
for
what
we're
going
to
be
doing.
D
V
D
K
What
we're
asking
what
john's
asking
us
right
now
is
if
we
can
get
a
variant
to
put
a
multi-family
living
through
a
dream
up
for
a
triplex
on
a
on
a
piece
of
property.
That's
not
zoned!
To
do
that!
That's
the
that's!
The
question
posed
to
this
board.
Everything
else
if
that
were
granted,
would
come
under
building
permit
and
all
that.
K
K
Respect
to
your
neighbor,
some
of
most
of
his
concerns
deal
with
those
type
of
issues
with
sewer
drainage,
those
type
of
things.
So
I
think
the
thing
that
we
have
to
consider
whether
a
triplex
is
doable
or
acceptable
are
the
things
such
as
safety
acceptability
and
again
going
back
through
the
finding
of
facts.
You
know
how
those
things
are
affected.
There.
B
E
B
E
V
B
B
If
you
put
a
duplex
there,
you'd
still
have
to
have
a
variance
because
you'd
fall
short
of
the
required
amount
of
land
and,
in
my
view,
at
least
for
me,
we've
got
to
stick
to
the
ordinance
as
closely
as
we
can
and
putting
twice
as
many
units
per
acre
approximately,
at
least
for
me.
It's
just
a
stretch.
B
B
You
know,
and
actually,
if
you
put
a
single
family
house
there,
you
probably
wouldn't
need
any
variances,
that's
probably
able
to
meet
all
of
your
required
setbacks.
Sure
and
then
your
only
issue
would
be
environmental,
stuff,
utility
location.
You
know
all
the
stuff
you
got
to
do
to
actually
build
a
building.
That's
of
course
not
our
purview
in
this
board.
V
E
J
B
Number:
five
on
the
agenda:
james
mccoy
variants
from
development
standards
for
a
zero
lock
line
on
the
south
property
line
and
nine
foot
setback
on
the
west
property
line
without
planning
on
building
a
24
by
three
foot
hole,
style,
garage
located
at
1201
wells
drive
and
that's
our
eight
medium
density,
residential
you're.
Not
the
jim
mccall.
B
W
I
moved
here
about
six
months
ago
to
be
part
of
the
regatta.
I
bought
a
small
fixer-upper,
actually
dave
jenkins,
who
was
here
he's
kind
of
in
deplorable
shape,
working
to
rebuild
it
part
of
it
was
building
a
garage
I
came
down
and
visited
mr
martin
and
asked
how
close
I
could
put
it
rabbit
lane
and
we
discussed
the
what's.
It
called
the
regular
easement
and
I
guess
we
kind
of
skipped
over
the
setback
I
kind
of
pre-bought
materials
with
my
contractor
for
increased
the
size.
W
W
W
So
I
have
to
build
20-foot
off-road
center,
but
then
it
was
brought
to
my
attention
and
on
top
of
that,
there's
another
20
or
30,
I'm
not
exactly
sure.
If
the
numbers
past
that
I'm
supposed
to
stay
behind,
I
would
like
to
build
within
that
and
still
respect
the
20-foot
promote
center
eastman
for
utilities
and
such.
W
G
W
I
think
some
of
the
fences
are
past
the
ease
but
they're
all
within
the
setback
for
sure
all
of
the
fences.
Okay,
but-
and
I
know
some
of
the
properties
on
the
west
of
the
street
on
rabbit-
they
have
to
be
within
the
setback
and
I'm
not
so
sure,
they're
not
within
the
ease,
but
the
one
right
on
the
corner
looks
like.
If
you
took
the
turn
a
little
fast
you'd
be
parked
in
the
garage.
B
W
W
B
W
It's
mobile,
so
it
doesn't
have
to
pay
respect
to
these
things
and
the
one
I
have
now
is
there,
but
there
are
so
many
down
the
road
that
are
more
permanent
structures.
I
think
someone
actually
I
haven't
had
a
chance
to
drive
by
I'm
not
sure
if
they
have
their
permits
yet.
But
someone
told
me
that
someone's
like
pouring
concrete
well
within
the
setback,
yeah.
B
G
D
B
B
D
B
G
B
B
B
B
P
C
G
E
C
B
B
B
X
I
X
X
X
X
X
X
The
so,
in
order
for
me
to
build
on
the
existing
line
or
the
existing
footprint
of
the
house
as
it
exists,
my
setback
would
only
be
about
two
feet:
less
than
two
feet
from
the
property
line
and
basically
just
asking
to
build
inside
the
existing
footprint
of
the
building
and
building
up
from
that.
The.
I
X
X
X
The
third
variance
is
from
the
center
of
poplar
street
to
the
front
of
my
garage
just
to
make
the
garage
suitable
to
be
able
to
park
my
truck
with
my
car.
In
there
it's
kind
of
the
depth
the
garage
needs
to
be
will
still
be
well
within
the
property
line,
more
than
six
feet
off
of
the
sidewalk,
and
but
there
is
some
variants
from
the
center
of
the
street.
On
that
side,
I
would
note
that
other
houses
built
up
the
other
three
tro
cottages,
as
they're
called
built
up
poplar
street.
B
E
X
B
X
B
A
G
D
B
And
I
see
certainly
no
injury
to
the
steps,
six
inches
off
the
sidewalk
and
as
far
as
the
rest
of
the
project
it's
attached
to
the
house,
so
I
see
no
great
problem
for
the
general
welfare
number.
Two
use
and
value
of
the
area
adjacent
to
the
property,
including
the
variance
be
affected
in
a
substantially
adverse
manner.
Mrs
burkhart.
B
X
Now
it
would
just
be
a
loft
space,
probably
just
scoring,
although
I
will
say
that
we
are
providing
all
the
utilities
to
that
building
the
eventuality
that
we
may
want
to
put
a
small
living
space.
It
would
be
very
big
space,
but
yes,
probably
less
than
400
square
feet
up
there.
So
it's
not
just
residents
in
any
way
would
be
a
guest
bedroom
best.