►
From YouTube: Historic District Board of Review - April 26, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
And
welcome.
A
To
the
historic
district
reporter
review
meeting,
I
apologize
for
my
late
delay.
It's
been
a
little
bit
of
a
long
delay
long
day
for
me.
So
we'll
get
this
started
brooke
you
want
to
do
real,
quick.
D
D
E
D
A
Okay
with
that
we'll
go
to
the
last
month's
minutes,
has
everyone
had
a
chance
to
review
them
for
any
corrections
or
additions
need
to
be
made
all
right?
Hearing
none
I'll,
take
a
motion.
I
move.
We
accept
planets.
A
Okay
with
that
we'll
get
into
our
applications
that
have
been
submitted
just
to
go
over
a
little
bit
of
how
the
application
process
goes.
For
some
of
you
have
not
been
to
one
of
these,
we
will
first
have
the
applicant.
Whoever
is
representing
the
application,
come
up
to
the
podium
I'll.
Have
you
state
your
name
address
at
that
point
in
time,
appropriate?
That's
super
important!
A
Okay,
brooke
will
go
over
the
application
of
what's
been
submitted
for
the
audience
and
the
board
to
here
at
that
point
in
time,
I'll
ask
the
applicant
if
they
have
anything
more
to
add
to
the
application
of
what's
been
stated,
and
then
at
that
point
the
board
will
have
time
to
ask
any
questions
that
they
have
about
the
application.
G
I'm
mike
prickett
919
west
first
street
this
circa
1880
gable
front
home
located
at
927.
West
first
street
is
owned
by
mike
rickett
and
is
a
non-contributing
structure.
Zoned
historic
district
residential
brook
slides
are
coming
out.
I
I'm
trying
to
get
that
picture.
Okay,
I'm
on
I'm
talking
sorry,
okay,
yeah!
I
was
trying
to
do
two
things
at
once.
I
apologize.
G
The
applicator
is
requesting
to
install
two
new
transom
windows
on
the
east
side,
infill
the
west
side
basement
window,
replace
the
south
side
basement
door
and
replace
the
south
side
main
level
window
with
a
patio
door.
Mr
prickett
has
already
received
a
staff
approved
coa
to
replace
two
north
side
front
windows.
G
G
G
It
does
show
just
for
your
information.
The
1886
sanborn
map
does
show
the
home
originally
had
a
porch,
but
the
porch
was
located
on
the
side
not
over
here,
but
I
just
wanted
to
show
that
for
extra
additional
information,
I
will
go
back
to
the
pictures
of
the
proposed
items.
H
H
B
H
H
H
H
H
H
The
front
door
here
we
talked
about
nicole
71
that
was
approved
by
you
all
or
whatever.
I
do
want
to
transfer
them
over
it
too,
because
if
you
look
at
the
front
of
the
house,
you
did
have
it
up
there.
Didn't
you
yeah
the
front
of
the
house.
You
can
see
how
tall
much
taller
the
windows
are
than
the
door,
so
I
assume
it
probably
had
a
transom
there
at
one
time
we'll
find
out
when
we
tear
the
siding
off
stuff,
but
I'm
going
to
make
a
transom
come
up
on
top
of
the
door.
H
K
M
We've
had
discussions
typically
speaking,
that
type
of
structure
is
it's
not.
M
A
All
right
here,
you
know
comments
from
the
audience
we'll
go
through
our
findings
of
fact
tom.
Let's
go
sure.
J
Per
the
residential
guidelines
for
awnings
on
page
35,
awnings
for
windows
or
porches
were
common
features
of
buildings
in
the
late
19th
century.
They
should
be
built
over
the
doors
or
windows
should
not
damage.
The
original
structure
should
fit
the
opening
and
our
significant
architectural
details
and
what
you're,
adding
back
to
the
front
of
that
house,
I
think
is
going
to
you
know,
really
make
a
huge
improvement,
especially
with
the
alignment
of
the
doors
and
the
front
windows,
doors
and
entrances
for
residential
guidelines.
39
through
42
doors
are
often
the
building
central
visual
element.
J
I
J
J
Will
improve
the
overall
look
and
new
windows
or
no
new
windows
were
being
added
except
the
transom
windows,
and
I
believe
that
was
transfers.
J
N
N
I
agree
with
everything
tom
said.
I
guess
the
only
additional
comment
is
I'm,
and
this
has
happened
before
I'm
kind
of
confused.
Why
this
is
a
non-contributing
structure.
It's
1880,
gable
front
building
seems
to
me
that
it
contributes
to
the
historic
district
but
camille
pfeiffer,
whoever
it
was
that
did
this.
I.
B
G
G
J
G
C
N
N
C
A
G
This
circa
1900
cottage,
located
at
919,
west
first
street
and
owned
by
my
cricket,
is
a
contributing
structure
as
owned
historic
district
residential.
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
build
an
addition
on
the
south
and
west
side.
B
G
You
see
the
pictures
currently
front
and
back-
and
this
is
the
proposed
with
the
addition-
the
proposed
exterior
of
the.
G
H
H
H
H
H
Do
some
things
there
so
we
sold
our
house
in
the
country
and
if
you
go
back
to
my
other
picture
there
we're
gonna,
you
can
see,
it's
got
about
a
312
roof
on
it.
It's
just
really
flat
and
stuff,
so
we're
just
going
to
decapitate
it
build
out
to
the
west
and
out
to
the
south
and
try
to
make
it
just
a
little
bit
bigger
and
more
livable
our
kitchen's.
Actually
in
the
basement
there
right
now,
which
is
totally
in
the
flood
zone.
A
O
A
G
I
M
H
I
J
D
J
Is
that
and
when
anything
is
in
the
flood
plain,
is
it
more
about
the
flow
of
water
so
that
the
water
can
get
back
out?
Yes,
yes,
it's.
A
N
Well,
since
this
you
know
it
says
it's
contributing.
We
agree
that
it's
really
not
a
contributing
strong
job.
I
don't
really
feel
like
the
guidelines
should
have
much
impact.
You
know
per
se
on
what
happens
here,
but
I
don't
seem
to
be
in
a
problem
anyway,
because
this
addition
is
it's
going
to
be
on
the
rear.
N
I
should
say
this:
we
refer
to
page
16
of
the
residential
guidelines
for
these,
and
the
first
point
is
they
should
be
at
the
rear,
not
on
the
front
of
the
sides,
and
it
should
be
secondary
to
the
main
structure
which
it
is
it's
compatible
in
design
with
the
original,
which
is
0.3
and
I'm
not
sure
the
other
points.
Really,
it
shouldn't
imitate
an
earlier
historic
style.
It's
just
not
exactly
what's
there,
it
seems
to
be
to
me
to
be
completely
compatible
with
the
guidelines.
K
E
J
A
A
N
A
K
C
P
B
G
The
circa
1890
contributing
gable
front
home
owned
by
dr
kevin
watkins
is
owned.
Historic
district
residential
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
add
a
second
story.
Addition
on
the
north
rear
extent
of
the
home
build
steps
down
the
front
of
the
porch
instead
of
the
current
side,
location
and
tenure
story.
Windows
on
the
west
side,
install
a
single
window
in
the
kitchen
on
the
west
side
include
a
window
in
the
west
wall
of
the
second
floor.
G
Addition
remove
the
rear,
brick
chimney,
install
two
windows
on
the
northern
wall
of
the
rear
addition
and
remove
two
windows
on
the
north
wall
of
the
first
floor.
He
is
also
requesting
to
build
a
20-foot
by
30-foot
garage
with
a
loft
and
a
covered
catwalk
between
the
garage
and
the
back
door
of
the
home.
G
G
Just
to
get
a
little
a
very
brief
history
of
the
home,
as
I
said
it
was
constructed
in
1890.
It
was
one
of
the
earliest
documented
mail
order
homes
built
in
the
united
states
as
far
as
the
time
period
of
catalog
homes,
flower
mill
owner
george
trout,
built
the
home
and
five
adjacent
homes
as
an
investment
properties.
G
It
was
originally
shipped
in
sections
to
rail
by
madison
for
reassembly
and
several
of
these
homes
in
that
area
have
been
rehabilitated.
P
Thanks
brooke,
I
I
was
going
to
go
through
some
history
with
characters
and
voices
and
a
whole
lot
more
dramatic
character.
If
any
of
you
know
me
who
would
understand
that,
but
brooke
got
that
part,
so
1890s,
of
course,
mr
true
brought
this
here
point
of
just
conversation,
maybe,
but
in
context
contributing.
P
P
The
original
house
would
have
been
just
a
gable
front,
seven
room
house
without
the
addition
on
the
back,
I
have
poked
a
hole
through
the
dining
room,
all
into
what
will
be
the
kitchen,
and
it
is
in
fact,
an
original
exterior
wall,
and
so
that
is
a
subsequent
addition,
so,
just
in
context
of
original
materials,
oh
the
fireplace
on
the
back
the
chimney
on
the
back
is
not
original
the
two
windows
on
the
back,
also
not
original
structures-
things
we
may
be
mentioning
today:
restoration,
preservation,
renovation,
restoration
of
course
implies
that
we're
restoring
it
to
its
original
either
structure
or
restoring
it
to
something
that
is
original
to
the
character
of
the
architectural
style,
not
necessarily
verbatim
what
was
originally
built
there.
P
But
rather
the
original
character
of
the
building
preservation
implies
that
we
are
preserving
a
home
that
would
otherwise
fall
into
decay,
using
it
for
modern
purposes
and
making
it
a
habitable
home
for
for
generations
to
come.
Renovation
would
imply
that
we
are
changing,
improving,
making
things
new.
Renewing
again,
all
of
these
things
brought
together,
of
course,
implies
stewardship,
which
is
what
I
want
to
be
to
this
home.
I
want
to
maintain
its
original
character
in
the
neighborhood
part
of
the
appeal
to
me
and
buying
this
structure.
P
I've
driven
by
these
houses
for
years
and
just
thought
man,
those
are
so
cool.
That's
real
neat!
I,
like
everybody
else.
Oh
those
are
sears
houses,
sears
houses,
well,
they're,
not
sears
houses,
in
fact,
but
they
are
catalog
homes.
I
really
like
them.
I
think
it's
an
important
block
as
the
other
three
corners
are
currently
owned
by
hmi
and
it's
an
important
block
to
maintain
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
and
preserve
an
important
historical
structure
in
our
community.
So
those
are
my
intentions
going
forward.
P
I,
if
we
could
go
maybe
to
they
were
not
allowed
in
homes.
It's
okay,
we'll
just
go
through
these
one.
At
a
time
it's
fine.
They
were
not
aladdin
homes,
they
were
not
sears
homes.
P
I
have
found
several
catalogs
from
chicago
mail
order:
houses
in
the
late
1890s
1900s,
all
of
them
very
similar
in
nature.
They
provided
a
number
of
different
models
of
homes.
They
provided
features
that
you
could
add
to
your
models:
different
entrances,
different
porches
and
porticos
different
interior
arrangements.
P
In
some
cases
and
in
many
cases,
different
window
arrangements
and
door
arrangements,
so
those
things
were
all
original
to
the
catalogs
and
I
believe
mr
tro
had
in
his
mind
he
was
buying
them
all
six
building
them
all
six
at
one
time,
either
his
investment
property
to
sell
or
as
rental
property,
for
I
think
he
owned
the
lumber
yard
there
and
several
other
businesses,
but
but
for
his
employees,
and
so
he
was
keeping
things
on
a
spartan
level.
P
I
think,
but
certainly
some
features
could
have
been
added
to
them
had
they
wanted,
and
it
would
be
my
hope
and
intention
to
restore
those
features
that
would
have
been
available
on
the
original
home.
For
my
use,
starting
on
the
front
porch
first
thing
you
might
notice
no
stairs
up
the
front
and
that
brick
lattice
work
again,
probably
put
on
in
the
40s
or
50s
there's
a
ton
of
them
around
madison.
Just
like
that
not
original
to
the
home.
P
My
interest
would
be
number
one
to
restore
the
original
look
of
the
home
number
two
on
the
picture
on
the
right.
You
see
my
steps
down
into
a
gutter.
It
doesn't
look
like
it
would
be
handicapped
accessible
by
anybody,
probably
not
built
to
code.
I
would
bet
not
original
to
the
home
either.
My
intention
would
be,
as
at
least
two
of
the
other
trow
houses
on
that
block
are
to
have
a
front
entry
staircase
up
the
front.
P
P
The
one
on
the
right
is
from
one
of
the
original
catalogs,
actually
an
aladdin
home
very
similar,
gable
front
home
very
similar
front
porches
also
with
the
brick
pilings.
I
guess
for
the
porches.
I
don't
think
that
was
original
and
in
fact
the
house
next
to
it
at
220,
west.
Second,
somebody's
calling
me,
I
don't
wanna
answer
right
now.
P
P
P
There
is
a
silhouette
of
an
original
post
on
in
the
paint,
and
the
finish
on
the
front
of
that.
I
believe
that
we
can
draw
from
that
silhouette
that
that
there
was
an
original
turned
post
there
about
a
six
inch
turned
post
was
the
original
porch
wood
post.
P
So
my
intention
would
be
ask
my
neighbor
if
I
could
go
and
sketch
it
and
have
those
redone
the
way
the
originals
would
have
been
so
I
would
like
to
return
it
not
unlike
the
one
on
the
left.
There.
I've
got
a
dozen
or
more
pictures
of
different
houses
around
town
with
a
similar
architectural
style.
I
think
victorian
folk,
I
think,
is
what
you
all
call
it
or
gable
front
for
sure,
but
anyway
that
would
be
compatible
with
the
style
of
the
building.
P
So
if
we
can
move
on
the
next
slide,
then
this
is
the
side
of
the
house
as
it
appears
right
now
and
then
a
back
angle
of
the
house.
I
believe,
looking
at
it,
maybe
from
mr
mcwilliams
driveway,
but
these
are
the
proposed
changes
I
would
like
to
make
to
the
side
of
the
house
number
one,
and
this
has
already
been
staff
approved,
remove
the
asbestos
shingle
or
return
it
to
its
clabbert.
I
did
not
indicate
the
panels
on
there,
but
but
anyway,
to
return
it
to
its
original
backup
there.
P
Just
a
second
for
me.
Thank
you.
It's
okay
return
the
panels
to
their
original.
I
hope
they're,
all
in
good
shape,
based
on
the
house
next
door
that
they
did
the
same
thing
to.
I
think
that
they
will
be
they
were
put
on
at
the
same
time
addition
on
the
rear
again
by
the
way,
not
an
original
feature
of
the
house.
P
The
house
ended
there
where
the
basic
square
of
the
house
is
and
that
shed
roof
on
the
back
was
added
for
a
kitchen
later
on
the
so
I
would
be
taking
that
up
and
if
you
would
back
up
just
one
more
for
me
for
just
a
minute
back
up
there,
we
go
the
second
picture
on
the
right.
There
shows
my
house
on
the
corner
and
220
220
was
previously
approved
to
have
that
second
floor
edition
put
on
the
back.
They
did
a
fabulous
job
of
it.
P
Also
clobbered
siding
hardy
board
new
siding.
On
top
of
that,
which
would
be
my
intention
to
use
the
hardy
board,
I
want
to
take
that
a
step
further
and
actually
put
the
vertical
stripping
in
there,
so
it
mimics
the
original
panels
a
little
more.
They
just
put
cloud
horizontal,
siding
there.
Also
the
house
next
door
did
not
put
any
trim
work
around
the
windows.
Those
windows
are
very
plainly
framed
in.
P
A
Well,
okay,
now
we
can
move
forward
one
here:
okay,
that's
good!
Yes!
This
here
actually
is
just
a
continuation
of
your
roof
right,
there's,
no
divider
or
no
step
in
or
anything
of
the
roof
right
of.
A
Yep
because
it
looks
like
the
one
next
door-
yeah
it's
hard-
that's
just
my
bad
artwork!
Well,
I
would.
P
The
new
addition
sets
just
well
okay.
If
I
look
at
the
one
next
door,
there
is
a
slight
inset
on
it.
My
intention
would
be
to
match
up
the
exterior
walls
and
the
roof
lines,
so
they
are
seamless
more
or
less
times,
okay,
okay,
yeah,
so
other
additions
that
were
mentioned.
I
broke
in
the
opening
the
two
windows
to
the
front
of
the
building
clarestory
windows
that
I
would
be
on
either
side
of
the
fireplace
I'll
show
you
some
more
detail
of
those
from
the
inside
in
a
minute
and
a
little
more
description.
P
The
addition
on
the
back.
Basically,
we
want
that
to
be
all
one
seamless
edition,
we're
going
to
take
it
down
to
the
original.
Whatever
is
underneath
that-
and
I
am
assuming
it's
clabbered,
but
not
the
original
panels-
on
the
first
floor
of
that
back
section,
so
I
will
need
to
add
new
window
there.
That's
the
location
and
I'll
show
you
the
floor
plan
here
in
just
a
second
of
the
kitchen,
which
makes
much
more
sense
as
opposed
to
how
the
kitchen
is
placed
right
now.
P
The
second
floor
would
be
new
construction,
so
that's
the
only
real
window
that
I'm
replacing
per
se
the
other
three
windows.
In
fact,
four
windows
that
I'm
putting
on
the
house
are
on
new
addition,
part
in
the
back,
so
brief
consideration
there.
The
final
thing
I'd
like
to
and
again
these
were
features
on
the
in
the
original
catalogs.
On
these
gable
front
windows
were
side
entries
on
many
of
these.
P
Basically,
I
want
to
take
the
two
windows
that
exist
there
now
extend
them
down,
basically
about
18
inches,
I'm
sorry,
it's
14
inches
from
where
they
exist
now
frame
them
in
exactly
as
the
windows
are
there
now,
with
the
same
pediments
and
and
architectural
additions
there
and
then
build
a
little
stoop.
That's
just
that'll,
be
my
dining
room.
That'll,
give
me
access
to
my
side
yard
for
entertaining
or
whatever,
but
a
little
step
down
there
to
the
outside
as
well.
P
P
If
I
go
to
the
left,
as
I
enter
the
front
door
at
the
bottom
of
your
view
on
the
right,
that's
the
living
room
with
the
fireplace
the
dining
room
is
the
next
room
in
which
is
where
I
would
want
to
add.
I
put
this
in
here,
so
you
can
see
where
I
was
adding
windows,
if
you
don't
mind
I'll
step
over
here,
just
a
second,
because
I
don't
have
a
pointer,
but
these
are
these
two
little
clear
history
windows
that
are
kind
of
high
setting
the
wall
show
you
some
other
pictures.
P
These
would
be
the
little
french
doors.
This
is
where
my
kitchen
cabinet
and
kitchen
sink
basically,
so
that'd
be
the
one
window
off
that
kitchen.
On
that
side,
I
just
put
the
interior
layout,
not
that
that's
in
your
preview
per
se,
but
I
put
it
there
just
so.
You
can
see
the
reason
that
I'm
adding
or
wanting
to
add
those
windows,
so
we
can
move
forward.
Then
these
are
some
images
from
catalogs
of
similar
styled
homes,
fireplaces
with
built-in
bookshelves
and
those
clear
estuary
windows.
P
Those
windows
would
be
custom,
built
windows,
all
wood
frame
windows
and
where
I'm
actually
consigning
some
stained
glass
work
to
put
in
those
because
because
that
would
look
cool
right
so
so
go
forward.
Yes,
these
are
from
the
original
catalog.
These
were
features
that
were
built
in
these
homes.
Originally
some
of
them
did.
They
were
a
little
more
extravagant
features.
I
think
again,
mr
tro
was
not
looking
for
extravagance
in
these.
P
The
kits
he
bought
were
about
870
a
piece
so
anyway,
that's
the
concept
behind
those
and
forward
again
the
picture
on
the
left
again
from
original
catalogs
and
I'll
tell
you.
These
catalogs
were
after
1900,
they
were
not
1890
catalog,
but
but
still
similar
styled
homes
with
side
features
some
with
porticos
some
with
add-ons,
but
the
side
entry
is
what's
of
interest
to
me
there.
P
P
This
is
the
proposed
site
of
a
of
my
garage.
You
can
go
forward
one's
applied.
This
shows
the
setbacks
for
the
garage
so
of
interest.
I
have
spoken
spoken
with
steve,
my
neighbor
steve
matthews,
and
I
I
knew
that
he
had
had
put
some
concerns
in
there
and
we
walked
out
there
in
the
yard
and
just
looked
at
it.
P
In
order
to
maintain
the
east
setback,
the
30
foot
extension
towards
poplar
street
sticks
out
about
four
feet:
past
the
front
of
his
house,
so
he
felt
like
he's
sitting
on
his
front.
Porch
he's
looking
down
the
street
towards
the
street
scenery
the
river
down
towards
the
river
it
partially
obstructed
his
view.
I
certainly
understand
that,
in
the
interest
of
being
a
good
neighbor,
I
would
like
to
actually
amend
that,
and
I've
talked
to
my
contractor
about
making
it
a
21
foot.
P
So
20,
I'm
sorry,
26
foot
four
feet
shorter
than
it
was
so
20
feet
by
26
feet
would
be
the
dimension
of
the
garage
that
puts
the
garage
in
the
same
line
as
the
three
other
tro
cottages
headed
up
poplar
street.
So
I
think
it
would
make
it
look
in
a
nice
smooth
row
of
houses.
Basically,
it's
going
to
be
designed
in
that
same
gable,
front
design.
You
can
go
forward
one
brook
there.
Thank
you
again,
my
architectural
renderings.
Thank
you
very
much.
The
so
same
gable
front
design
same
pitch.
P
It
will
have
a
little
loft
space
on
the
second
floor.
That's
a
16
foot
door
across
the
front,
just
a
single
door.
P
In
a
I
don't
know
I
put
little
crosshatch
doors
on
there
because
they
fit
the
style
I'll
look
but
we'll
make
those
look
nice,
but
they're,
just
an
overhead
door
in
that
style.
J
P
P
P
Yeah
we
talked
about
it
and
I
said
I
said,
he's
a
porch
guy
yeah.
I
said
I
wouldn't
sat
on
his
porch
and
I
said
I
see
your
point
so
so
we
went
and
walked
it
off
there
and
and
moved
the
markers
back
and
I
said,
look
it
was
here
and
he
was
like.
Oh
that's
perfect,
you
know
it
wouldn't
bother
me
at
all
and
I
was
like
okay,
so
it
kind
of
indicated
he
thought
he'd
be
here
for
me,
but
it's
all
right.
P
Obviously
I
do
want
to
be
a
good
neighbor
and
make
sure
that
I
wouldn't
want
somebody
to
build
that
in
front
of
my
house.
So
I
get
it.
Okay,
we
can
move
on
to
the
next
one.
I
guess.
P
P
You
guys
have
all
got
all
kinds
of
comparable
garages
approved
and
I'll
tell
you
what
this
board
has
to
prove
some
actually
pretty
crappy
brushes
in
town.
This
won't
be
nice
one,
not
you
all
particular,
but
in
the
past,
so
we
want
to
make
it
look
pretty
nice
there
and
I
think,
it'll
fit
just
fine.
P
I
did
not
submit
these
pictures.
These
are
brooks
pictures,
I
guess
just
some
architectural
renderings
thomas.
Maybe
to
answer
your
question
there.
The
elevation
from
the
side
just
shows
the
consistency
of
the
roof
raised,
roof
area
or
the
extended
roof
area.
It
will
be
a
consistent.
You
know
it's
not
going
to
be
distinguishable
necessarily
as
an
addition.
P
P
Quite
honestly
is
going
to
be
in
a
little
four
foot
walkway
in
between
the
garage
and
not
really
apparent
to
passers-by
at
all.
So
just
a
connection
and
finally,
the
back
of
the
house
again
the
second
floor
edition
that
we
put
on
there.
P
I
want
to
maintain
all
the
architectural
impediments,
the
the
house
next
door
really
did
not
they
built
it
out
and
it's
just
completely
plain
in
the
rear.
Maybe
the
rear
doesn't
matter
that
much,
but
but
to
me
it
does
I'm
going
to
put
the
same
windows
by
the
way
the
windows
we've
chosen
are
sun,
aluminum
plaid
wood
windows,
and
they
would
be
in
the
same
window
style
as
the
other
windows
and
again
reproduce
the
trim
to
match
the
other
windows
on
the
house
of
interest.
P
On
the
bottom
floor
there
that
white
chimney
not
original
structure
not
attached
to
anything.
There
serves
no
purpose.
I
just
like
to
knock
it
down
and
be
done
with
it.
Please,
and
thank
you,
those
two
windows,
obviously
back
door
there
on
the
left,
the
window
in
the
middle,
it's
a
pretty
original,
a
pretty
new
window.
P
The
other
one
is
at
least
trimmed
out
in
original
style,
but
again
that
was
an
addition,
probably
a
good
20
years
after
the
original
structure
was
built.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
that
makes
it
completely
off
limits
to
me
or
her
off
limits
whatever,
but
the.
P
P
I
don't
think
we've
done
anything
that
would
have
been
out
of
context
with
the
architectural
style
of
the
home
and,
I
believe,
the
side
views
of
the
home.
The
only
the
primary
facade,
of
course,
is
the
front
which
I'm
doing
nothing
with,
except
fixing
the
porch
and
the
secondary
facade
on
the
poplar
street
side.
I
do
want
to
add
a
few
windows.
They
would
add
light
a
peel
and
a
little
bit
of
architectural
balance
to
the
home.
That
doesn't
really
exist.
P
It's
a
little
bit
rear
heavy
just
the
way
I
look
at
it,
but
but
I
believe
they
would.
It
would
be
a
more
aesthetically
pleasing
visual
on
that
side
of
the
house.
I
think
that's
all
unless
you'll
obviously
have
some
questions
for
me.
K
K
P
Is
correct,
yeah
I
have
subjected
covenant
with
hmi
john
and
I
have
actually
been
over
there
a
couple
of
times.
Obviously
his
office
is
straight
across
the
street
from
us
as
well
john
and
I
walked
through
there
a
couple
weeks
ago
and
in
order
for
me
to
meet
their
expectations,
I
did
present
application
to
them
as
well.
John
was
very
pleased
with
all
the
changes
we
made
and
and
was
thought
that
they
would
all
add,
contribute
to
the
aesthetic
of
the
home.
Obviously
he's
pretty
learned
in
restoration.
P
K
P
K
C
K
P
K
J
So
kevin
did
I
hear
you
correctly
that
he
has
signed
off
on
the
changes
that
you
know.
P
So
I
haven't
gotten
their
signed
back:
they
they
have
some
board
members
out
of
town,
we've
been
going
back
and
forth.
He
has
my
submission
I
put
in
an
original
original
submission
back
in
in
march.
They
had
reviewed
that,
but
they
wanted
some
additional
details,
specifically
on
materials
number
one
hardy
board,
siding
returning
it
to
its
original
style
and
those
things
the
aluminum
clad
wood
windows.
P
They
were
okay,
they
wanted
spec
sheets
on
those,
and
so
I
gave
them
spec
sheets
on
the
on
the
doors
and
windows
that
we
were
asking
for,
and
I
discussed
at
length
and
in
fact
he
he
is
the
one
that
showed
me-
the
silhouette
on
the
front
of
the
building
next
door
to
suggest
the
wood
columns
columns.
Thank
you
so
so,
yes,
I
do
not
have
a
signed
reply
from
that.
P
F
Yeah
thanks,
I
guess
from
my
perspective,
I
would
like
to
see
us
be
able
to
hear
this
application
tonight
and
take
it
along
and
give
kevin
the
go
ahead
if
need
be
from
our
perspective,
so
you
don't
have
to
get
your
easement
because
that's
going
to
be
a
condition
of
the
improvement
on
that,
I'm
sure
the
yeah
did
that
work.
F
I
think
that
would
work.
Does
that
work
for
you.
P
C
E
Hey
kevin
I'd
like
to
thank
you
for
your
presentation.
E
I
haven't
been
on
this
board
long,
but
I've
been
at
a
number
of
these
meetings
in
the
past
standing
where
you
have
and
I've
had
in
the
audience,
seeing
many
different
homes
and
structures
come
up
here.
I
can't
think
of
when
I've
seen
them
more
well
thought
out
or
comprehensive
communication
that
you've
made
the
extent
that
you've
gone
to
try
to
honor
the
the
guidelines
and
the
architects
every
every
everything.
E
Going
to
do
this
because
it's
the
right
thing
to
do
so.
I've
been
incredibly
impressed
with
your
friend's
presentation.
The
thoroughness
and
I'm
excited
for
you
with
what
you're
doing
with
this
property,
also
very
impressed
with
the
fact
that
you
work
with
your
neighbor,
and
you
guys
worked
that
out,
and
so
you
sat
on
the
porch
and
away
you
go.
The
win-win
was
was
achieved.
So
thank
you
for
just
a
really
really
thorough
and
thoughtful
presentation.
E
P
For
the
record
for
the
board
ken
and
I
hung
out
in
in
the
in
the
alley
between
our
homes
and
discussed
it
as
neighbors,
not
in
context
of
his
position
on
this
board,
you
know
he
he
rendered
no
advice,
consent
or
disapproval
on
anything,
and
it
was
simply
we
were
discussing
what
I
was
going
to
do
with
my
house
as
a
neighbor.
I
personally
don't
have
any
objection
to
ken
being
on
this.
A
All
right
meeting
us
back
in
order
so.
A
This
time
I'll,
I'm
gonna
continue
to
ask
more
questions
from
the
board
ken.
Do
you
want
to.
J
Kevin,
I
wanted
a
point
of
clarification
on
the
front
porch
a
lot
of
the
porches
that
we
looked
at.
They
were
wooden
and
your
current
porch
is
cement.
Now
are
you
proposing
to
take
that
out
and
to
do
it?
Are
you
going
to
leave
it?
I
really.
P
Don't
want
to
take
the
cement
out,
that's
monumental,
undertaking
as
well.
What
I
would
like
to
do
is
dress
it
with
like
wood
planking
on
the
surface
of
the
front,
just
bullnose,
wood,
planking
off
the
front
and
save
us
the
steps
coming
down,
and
then
wood,
rail
and
balusters.
Okay.
J
P
That
just
to
step
down
that
would
probably
be
that
would
probably
be
wood
frame.
Okay
and
part
of
the
reason
is:
there's
an
entry
to
the
seller
right
there
by
that
window,
and
so
I
need
to
manufacture
something
where
I
could
actually
lift
that
up
and
get
to
the
celery,
if
necessary,
for
mechanical,
so
yeah
and
that
wouldn't
be
covered
or
anything
I
mean
no
awning
or
anything
like
that
right.
It's
simply
a
step
down,
basically
right.
A
Just
to
address
something
really
quick,
kenneth
recused
himself,
just
because
of
some
possible
conflicts
of
interest
doesn't
mean
that
there
are
conflicts
of
interest,
but
there
are
possible
conflicts
or
interests
that
may
have
come
up,
and
so
that's
he's
been
kind
enough
to
to
do
that.
Just
to
make
sure
that
no
one
from
the
public
can
think
otherwise
in
this
situation.
A
G
I
did
want
to
make
sure
that
every
board
member
got
a
copy
of
the
two
letters
from
the
neighbors
that
were
public
comment.
Josh
you'd
like
me
to
read
those
I
can
yes
be
good,
okay!
Yes,
let
me
grab
those
real,
quick.
G
G
G
G
G
There
are
rentals
in
the
close
proximity
that
also
use
the
same
residential
parking
spaces
along
poplar
and
west
second
streets
in
this
particular
area.
Additionally,
the
two-story
proposed
garage
would
block
current
tree
and
cityscape
views.
Mr
matthews
is
concerned.
This
large
of
a
garage
would
not
fit
in
the
neighborhood
and
would
obstruct
other
neighborhood
views
and
vistas.
P
P
P
I
believe,
since
the
design
of
the
home
fits
in
with
the
cottages
in
that
section
that
we're
all
built
at
one
time,
I
really
don't
think
it
takes
away
anything
from
the
aesthetic
inside
the
context
of
their
yard
and
it
does
fit
in
the
hdbr
guidelines
in
that
it
is
to
the
rear
of
the
home,
is
diminutive
to
the
to
the
primary
house.
It
is
fits
the
guideline
to
the
letter.
I
think.
P
Finally,
I
just
like
to
say
that,
yes,
with
concern
to
the
size
of
the
front
and
the
impairment
that
it
would
cause
on
their
their
visual
line
of
sight,
I
I
did
request
the
alterations
to
to
accommodate
that.
So
I
hope
that
would
satisfy
my
neighbors
good
fences
and
good
communication.
A
F
P
You
no
there's,
there's
actually
two
other
chimneys
up
on
the
roof.
The
primary
one
is
for
fireplaces
on
the
first
and
second
floor
in
the
living
room
and
upstairs
bedroom.
The
chimney
on
the
back
is
not
attached
to
anything.
Okay.
F
You're
retaining
those
to
the
original
chimney.
Yes,
garages
now
buildings,
as
kevin
mentioned
earlier,
it
is
to
the
rear,
it
does
meet
the
guidelines.
He
has
a
two-story
house,
so
he's
that
is
allowed
by
ordinances.
That's
immortal,
it's
not
a
guideline
and
it
will
be
very
much
in
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
F
Windows
he's
using
metal
platform
windows
which
again,
we
approve
he's,
making
considerable
effort
to
make
sure
those
windows
are
meeting
the
character
in
the
character
of
the
home
as
it
was
built,
porch
columns
and
railings.
I
don't
know
who
that
salesman
was
on
the
brick
porches
by
laundry
for
putting
these
guys
in
this
town,
but
I
agree
with
you
that
that
look
much
better
what's
currently
there
and
with
your
demonstration
and
your
pictures
from
the
catalogs.
That
also
shows
that
was
very
typical
in
that
style.
F
New
construction
additions
again
it's
in
the
rear
of
the
home
for
our
residential
guidelines,
you're,
taking
considerable
efforts
to
meet
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
as
far
as
what
it
looks
like
on
the
roofs
and
the
design
and
the
accoutrements.
A
good
word
for
that
for
the
I'm
not
sure
belly.
Specter
said
yes,
sir
okay,
and
I
think
that
the
length
you're
going
to
with
the
characteristics
you're,
adding
into
your
edition.
F
Doors
and
entrances
same
thing:
man,
you
stained
glass,
you're,
looking
for
punishment,
I
applaud
you
for
doing
that
too.
That's
great
indoors.
B
A
A
P
A
Even
my
home,
I
believe,
was
they
were
talking
about.
It
was
stick
homes
or
you
know.
J
Keep
track
of
this
make
sure
I
get
it
all
in
okay,
brooke
to
add
a
second
story
on
the
addition
on
the
north
elevation
to
build
steps
in
the
front
of
the
porch
instead
of
the
side
to
add
two
celestry
windows
on
the
west
side.
Add
one
single
window
on
the
west
side
in
the
kitchen
and
two
or
I'm
sorry,
is
it
sliding
to
our
french
door,
they're
their
french
door,
okay
and
french
door
to
replace
the
two
dining
room
windows
on
the
west
side
and,
let's
see
double
hung
window.
J
P
P
J
Remove
the
accessory
brick
chimney
in
the
back
of
the
house,
which
has
really
no
architectural
value.
Remove
two
windows
facing
north
build
a
20
by
26
foot
garage
with
loft
facing
poplar
street,
with
dormer
facing
the
north,
build
the
covered
walkway
between
the
garage
and
the
rear
of
the
house,
and
this
property
is
located
at
222,
west,
2nd.
C
A
B
G
G
And
then
these
pictures,
the
one
on
the
left,
shows
the
the
deck
extending
out
further
the
proposed
extension
with
the
stairs
and
the
pictures.
The
right
also
shows
the
two
vinyl
wither
proposing
to
place
the
two
vinyl
sliding
glass
doors.
G
The
picture
on
the
left
is
an
example
of
the
doors
that
they
are
proposing
to
use.
The
picture
to
the
right
shows
the
neighbor's
door
that
is
identical
to
what
they
are
proposing
and
those
are
all
the
size.
I
have.
R
Sure
you
have
customers
wanting
to
existing
as
vinyl
siding,
vinyl
windows,
vinyl,
there's
one
to
add
larger
glass,
pretty
much
the
whole
world
of
rear
of
the
home
to
be
able
to
look
over
the
river
and
increase
the
size
of
the
deck
to
make
it
more
usable.
R
You
can
tell
the
deck's
pretty
rough
shape
now
and
I
will
say,
artwork's
getting
a
lot
worse
because
it
not
goes
on
to
you.
I
actually
have
a
drafting
design
degree.
R
But
know
the
really
just
extending
the
deck
size
out
off
the
rear
of
the
property
and
fixing
it
to
pretty
rough
shape,
and
the
homeowner
does
want
to
do
quite
a
bit
of
renovation,
interior
and
exterior
and
lp
smart
siding,
I'm
pretty
sure
she's
going
to
go
with
that
to
get
rid
of
the
vinyl
existing
windows
that
are
vinyl
and
steel
doors,
not
really
historical.
So
we
like
to
stay
with
vinyl
triple
sliders
to
prevent
you
know.
Q
J
R
Yes,
so
that'll
stay,
the
walkway
around
the
front
will
stay
pretty
much
identical
size
and
we
will
be
replacing
the
front
deck.
Also,
okay,
we.
J
R
I
mean
I
think
they
would
consider,
but
I
mean
they're
trying
to
redo
the
whole
property
and
prove
it.
I
think
the
cost
of
those
is
going
to
really
hinder
them
from
being
able
to
do
what
they
want
to
do
and
do
the
improvement.
So
currently
it's
a
rental,
I'm
afraid
if
it
gets
too
cost
prohibitive
they're
going
to
you
know,
leave
it
as
a
rental
and
not
do
the
complete
upgrade
for
themselves
like
they
want
to
do
is
what
I
kind
of
gather
from
the
homeowner.
Are
they
checked
into
a
pace
graph?
They.
J
R
We're
applying
for
that
for
the
smart
siding.
I
don't
know
if
it's
a
possibility,
we
could
do
that
for
the
class.
Would.
J
C
Yeah
they
could
add
it,
but
if
I
remember,
I
think
that
they're
maxed
out
on
the
page,
so
it
wouldn't
benefit
them.
R
R
R
L
A
All
right,
so
here
you
go.
I
have
one
thing.
R
N
R
B
A
D
A
Q
R
A
R
F
That
but
josh
what
if
he
did
the
roof
same
roof
line
he's
got
there
but
carried
on
down
on
the
on
the
west
side
to
where
it
matched
the
roof
the
roof
line,
in
other
words,
on
the
east
side
that
would
that
would
be
doable
women.
I
mean
it's
true
straight
going
straight
across
I'm
going
straight
down.
Let's
see
how
he's
got
the
the
peak
there
yeah
just
take
that
on
down.
A
Would
want
to
do
yeah,
okay,
all
right
so
with
that
we
will
work
towards
the
partial
approval
of
this
based
on
what
we
do
have
now
and
then
extending
the
application
for
further
editions
later
so
ken,
do
you
want
to
start
software
finding
with
that?
Yes,
it
will
thanks.
Sir.
K
Sorry
so
for
the
project
at
901,
what's
the
first
street
for
new
constructed
decks,
we
go
to
residential
guideline
page
64.
and
we
score
in
one
of
them.
Rodney
that
decks
on
the
side
of
the
building
are
successful
as
long
as
they're
not
readily
visible
from
the
street,
so
you're
right
on
the
street,
so
you're
never
going
to
avoid
that
and
then
doors
and
entrances
residential
guidelines-
page
39-42
you're
not
going
to
hit
any
of
them,
but
you
brought
it
up
early
rodney.
This
is
a
non-contributing
home.
It's
all
vinyl!
K
N
I
disagree
because
vinyl
is
specifically
prohibited
by
the
guidelines.
Is
that
is
that
what
you
think
yeah.
J
B
J
A
And
although
that's
you
know
true,
I
will
say
that
you
know
there
is
material
there,
that's
already
vital
and
important.
You
know
in
our
guidelines.
It's
we
will.
You
know,
allow
that,
based
upon
the
material
that
is
already
there,
so
only
for
that
reason
would
I
be
okay.
A
You
will
receive
your
certificate
of
appropriateness
or
the
homeowner
will,
okay
in
the
courses
or
in
order
you
can
begin.
Okay.
Thank
you.
A
The
office
know,
and
if
they
do
want
to
do
the
roof,
then
just
submit
the
drawings
to
them
so
that
we
have
them
before
our
next
meeting
all
right.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
appreciate
it.
C
G
This
contributing
circa,
1870
italian
building,
it's
owned.
Local
business
is
owned
by
ronald
frazee.
Mr
frazee
is
requesting
to
build
a
capital
above
the
entry
door
that
will
project
out
16
inches.
He
will
add
crown
molding
corbels
and
a
flat
roof
that
will
be
painted
to
match
the
trim
as
proposed.
This
capital
would
completely
cover
the
existing
transom
above
the
door.
G
G
I
Yes,
that
will
be
a
main
entry
door
for
the
new
unit
and
I
feel
like
it
needs
some
weather
protection
and
also
I'm
in
love
with
the
piece
of
stone.
That's
existing
above
all
the
windows.
So
therefore
I
don't
want
to
raise
it.
I
actually
did
I've
got
that
transom.
My
motor
knew-
and
I
didn't
put
it
in.
I
would
prefer
to
do
something
like
that
and
keep
a
nice
straight
line
below
the
stone
lines.
I
So
it's
clean
and
looks
like
it
belongs.
I
think
if
we
raise
that
up
and
keep
the
transom,
it's
just
going
to
look
out
of
place,
and
I
wouldn't
do
that
so
and
it's
going
to
be
pretty
much
to
be
in
keeping
with
the
style
and
trimmed
out
very
nicely
and
so
forth,
and
the
new
dorian
and
all
that
was
blended.
A
B
A
A
Any
questions
or
comments
from
the
board.
E
J
Well,
I
I
can't
quite
say
that
I
believe
that
it's
completely
conforming,
but
I
understand
what
you're
saying
and
I
do
see
that
straight
line
across
with
the
stone.
So
I
would
agree
for
the
same
reasons.
N
Well,
likewise,
I
think
technically,
it
probably
is
violent
violating
from
the
guidelines
that
we
don't
normally
like
to
cover
or
transom
if
it
exists,
but
looking
at
what
you're
planning
to
me,
it
seems
like
this
is
a
big
upgrade
of
that
of
that
door.
I
think
it'll
look
a
lot
better
than
what
was
originally
there,
and
so
I
think
this
is.
This
is
why
we
call
them
guidelines
right
they're.
Not
this
is
one
we
want
to
have
a
little
wiggle
right
there
yeah.
Thank
you
ken.
A
E
A
S
Tony
steinhardt
315
central
avenue,
I
would
like
to
just
say
one
thing:
the
application
states.
This
is
an
1850s
shotgun
house
between
the
application
and
some
other
research.
We
believe
the
house
is
of
that
age
but
like
we
either
moved
or
built
with
materials
of
that
age,
but
it
was
not
on
that
site
at
that
time,
so
hopefully,
through
the
through
the
demolition.
Here,
we'll
figure
out
more
about
that.
But
the
house
was
probably
circa
on
that
site
between
1870
and
1880.
S
1886
standby
map
show
it
but
the
materials
and
the
way
the
construction
of
that
house
was
done.
It's
probably
dated
so
either
it
was
moved
or
constructed
from
other
materials.
G
The
circa
1870
shotgun
owned
by
1809
property
group
llc
tony
steinhardt,
is
a
contributing
instructor
zone.
Historic
district
residential.
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
complete
an
extensive
rehabilitation
and
restoration
of
the
home's
original
1850
exterior,
which
he
believes
is
a
more
accurate
construction
date
based
on
historic
records.
G
G
G
In
addition,
the
applicant
is
requesting
to
reopen
an
original
site
entry
and
to
replace
the
existing
roof
with
a
standing
seam
metal
roof.
Mr
steinhardt
has
already
perceived
staff
approved
coas
to
install
historically
appropriate
half-round
gutters,
replace
all
windows
with
new
two
over
two
aluminum
clad
windows,
replace
the
existing
doors
with
wood
and
fiberglass
doors
and
add
a
historically
appropriate
porch
light
by
the
side
door.
G
Renderings
also
to
know
the
there
was
an
1854
plat
map
that
does
not
show
the
home
in
that
location
at
that
time,
and
I
think
maybe
that's
what
mr
steinhardt
was
referring
to
earlier,
that
the
likelihood
that
this
home
was
moved,
but
we
do
see
on
the
1892
sanborn
map.
G
It
does
show
the
house
here
and
it
does
indicate
that
it
had
a
shingle
roof
at
that
time.
G
But
those
are
all
pictures
I
have
so
I
will
go
back
to
the
if
this
one's
okay
for
you
to
accept
one.
You
prefer
okay,.
S
Yeah,
so
in
keeping
with
the
character
of
the
neighborhood,
we
we
are
proposing
to
put
a
standing
sea
metal
roof
on
it.
It's
it
will
be
similar
or
matching
the
one
to
its
west,
doing
a
contextual
addition
that
denotes
the
current
massing.
That
would
be
the
same
as
this
existing
masses,
seemingly
flying
back
and
then
separating
the
new
addition
with
running
the
stainless
steel,
metal,
roof
and
a
modern
approach
down
the
side,
and
then
the
siding
in
the
back
would
be
hardy
board.
S
That
would
be
nine
inches
tall,
which
is
two
times
the
current
historic
siding.
I
have
have
existing
siding
historic
sighting
I've
found.
Hopefully
we
can
find
some
historically
accurate
doors,
but
if
not
approved
already
approved
to
replace
those.
But
the
goal
is
to
repair
and
replace
the
siding
on
the
original
house
to
its
original
character.
J
Tony,
I
know
you're
lifting
the
house,
if
I
heard
correctly
you're
gonna
pour
what
a
new
concrete
foundation.
S
N
And
when
you
say
standing
scene,
I
mean
this-
this
is
true.
Standing
seam
would
not
expose
metal
fastener.
S
N
S
Be
a
stainless
steel,
roof
18
inches
wide
and
then
the
windows
that
will
be
in
its
side
will
be
16.
Inches
wide
nose
pose.
S
A
J
J
You
me
historic
doors
should
be
retained
and
maintained,
and
this
comes
from
residential
guidelines
on
pages,
and
I
marked
it
out.
Excuse
me:
what
page
is
that
on.
J
S
Door,
no,
it's
not
an
original
front
door,
we're
going
to
try
to
find
a
historic
door
if
we
can
use
a
fiberglass
door,
we're
going
to
try
to
restore
the
front
window.
The
other
two
windows
are
deteriorated
to
the
point
where
we
can
restore
the
fingers
crossing
the
front,
but
if
not
we'll
replace
them
with
a
little
bit.
C
Yeah,
just
as
a
reminder,
staff's
already
reviewed
the
doors
replacement,
you
are
reviewing
the
reopening
of
the
side
door.
S
Reopening
the
side
door,
yeah
it'll,
be
it'll,
be
a
fiberglass
single
light.
J
Single
light,
okay,
and
so
I
think,
you're
meeting
the
guidelines
there,
tony
on
the
roof
pages,
53
and
54
in
the
residential
guidelines,
original
materials
should
be
maintained,
replacement
is
appropriate
with
a
pre,
appropriate
substituted
material
and
I
believe
that
shingle
or
the
standing
steam
seam
could
probably
both
have
been
used
during
that
period.
J
Addition
should
not
imitate
any
earlier
historic
style
and
and
actually
in
addition,
we
encourage
more.
You
know,
moderate
or
not
modern,
but
contemporary
characteristics
that
we
might
use
today,
demolition.
I
believe
it's
in
conformance.
I've
walked
by
that
and
it's
it's
ready
to
fall
off.
So
I
believe
that
it
is
appropriate
and
it
doesn't
contribute
to
the
historic
character
of
that
house.
I
think
it
will
stabilize
the
original
structure
which
you're
going
to
restore
oh
and
the
awning
set.
Was
that
already
approved
a
little
side.
J
Okay,
we'll
wrap
it
right
in
there.
I
don't
know
the
page
number
since
that
just
came
up,
but
on
the
east
side,
I
think
that
that
is
appropriate.
The
material
that
you
propose
to
use
it'll
blend
in
with
the
side
of
that
new
addition,
as
well
as
the
roof.
N
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
say,
even
though
sanborn
map
says
that
there's
shingles
there
that's-
and
this
is
an
upgrade
to
what
that
was.
This
is
historic
material.
So
it's
not
a
problem
at
all.
The
effect
is
better,
so
I
had
no
problem
changing
the
roof
materials
at
all
and
everything
else.
I
thought
tom
did
a
beautiful
job.
I
approve
it
all.
J
A
M
104
scenario
street
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
chris
brooke.
G
G
They
are
requesting
to
add
us
around
at
the
left
front
door
or
the
214
inside
and
to
build
a
garage
and
excuse
me,
I
believe,
that's
on
the
right
side,
not
the
left
side,
I'm
sorry!
So
it's
on
the
right
hand,
side
on
the
front
door
and
to
build
a
new
garage
at
the
rear
of
the
property.
The
lands
have
already
received
a
staff
approved
cla
to
replace
the
existing
door
on
the
left
side,
with
a
new
wooden
glass
door
and
you'll
see
pictures
of
the
front
and
the
back
of
the
house
currently.
G
G
K
M
M
Overburden
the
site
really
with
a
tall
roofline
and
there's
a
potential
for
a
deck
space
to
possibly
happen
on
the
south
side
of
the
garage
as
that's
the
flat
roof.
So
if
you
can
go
back
to
the
other
one
yeah,
so
basically
the
shed
on
the
bottom,
the
shed
roof
to
the
on
the
right
side
is
mostly
over
the
garage
it
continues
down.
You
would
really
consider
that
the
top
of
that
flat
wall
would
be
a
perfect
wall
because
there's
roof
behind
it,
but
below
that
line.
M
The
lower
and
the
lower
area
in
the
column
is
brick
and
then
on
the
can
you
go
back
to
the
other
one.
M
And
then,
on
the
the
other
elevation
facing
the
alley
to
the
north
and
facing
the
comfort
station
frozen
brick
columns
as
well.
It's
a
repurpose
of
the
old
brick.
B
M
M
K
M
The
roofing
that
would
be
a
membrane
roof
because
it's
basically
a
flat
structure,
a
shingle
roof
on
the
shed
and
then
membrane
at
the
back.
J
Going
back
out
brian
to
the
front
door,
yes,
I
really
I
like
what
they
did
with
the
I
guess
that
would
be
216..
It
matches
the
windows
that
looks
nice.
I
I'm
assuming
that
you
would
not
add
the
side
lights
from
that
picture
there.
This
is
just
an
inspiration.
M
Nice
yeah,
it
looks
much
larger
there,
yeah
yeah,
that's
not
a
rendering
that
I
created.
It's
simply
saying
that
there's
a
house
very
similar
in
nature,
yeah
and
the
whole
focus
on
that
on
this.
This
structure
is:
it
was
built
as
as
tube
as
a
duplex
and
and
they're
turning
it
into
a
single
family
presence,
so
they
want
to
put
emphasis
on
that
door
which
is
going
to
be
their
main
door.
So
the
concept.
B
M
A
surround
similar,
I
don't
think
quite
to
that
detail,
even
but
but
similar
just
to
just
to
create
emphasis
on
on
what
they'll
consider
their
main
door
or
their
entry
door,
but
no
you're
right
there
wouldn't
be
sidelights.
It
would
just
keep
the
keep
the
existing
door.
That's
there
and
just
do.
J
M
That
I
know
when,
when
they
first
came
to
town
they
I
introduced
them
to
nicole
and
brookie
to
talk
about
possibilities
for
the
house
throughout
and
basically
the
structure
the
existing
house
structure.
They
want
to
leave
other
than
really
this
more
or
less
this
change.
They
want
to
leave
everything
as
original
as
possible,
so
yeah
they're,
going
to
restore
the
wood
windows
they're,
going
to
be
all
the
top
playing
necessary
to
bring
back.
There
are
other
windows
and
doors
throughout
there's
a
door
down
the
alley.
M
There's
a
door
down
the
gang
where
the
other
side
they
they
were
hopeful
that
maybe
they
could
change
those
two
windows,
possibly
even
remove
them
because
of
their
interior
layout.
It
wasn't
going
to
work
well,
but
when
we
met
on
the
site-
and
they
talked
about
all
the
possibilities-
their-
I
think
their
intent
was
they
will.
M
They
will
leave
those
all
alone.
Keep
that
fabric
as
original
as
possible.
Their
one
ask
was
to
push
toward
doing
something
like
this,
which
was
you.
O
O
First,
for
not
sending
them
to
written
response,
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
send
out
the
same
little
placards
or
you
know
cards
that
the
planning
commission
does.
Maybe
I
didn't
get
them
or
something
like
that,
but
I
didn't
realize
this
until
actually
today
that
my
door
was
put
up
as
an
example,
so
it
just
brought
some
questions
to
mine.
So
I
guess
my
comments
are
more
about
clarification.
O
O
My
house
and
I
said,
don't
worry,
here's
my
rendering
of
what
it's
exactly
gonna
look
like
what
we're
talking
about.
I
just
wanted
to
basically
make
people
understand
that
there
were
other
french
doors
in
the
neighborhood
and
we
were
going
to
add
something
on
our
side:
porch,
not
the
front
of
the
house
and
here's
what
it
was
going
to
look
like.
We
showed
a
rendering
of
that.
So.
I
O
Using
our
house
as
an
example,
I
had
some
concerns
from
historic
perspective,
which
is
the
house
at
214
and
216.
West
2nd
street
is
pretty
much
like
almost
exactly
like.
What's
at
210
and
two
eight
second
street,
and
those
though
that
property
basically
has
two
doors
in
the
front
because
it
basically
builds
a
duplex
just
as
you
guys
have
talked
about.
So
this
is
the
same
kind
of
orientation.
O
O
You
guys
really
aren't
going
to
remove
brick
and
create
sidelines
right,
because
that
would
be
completely
out
of
character
with
the
way
that
house
was
so
there's
like.
Well,
I
don't
have
a
rendering
to
look
at
so
I
don't
really
know
what
you
have
in
mind
to
do.
Is
it
the
door
of
the
same
size?
I
mean
I
hear
something
about
like
the
windows
or
whatever
or
you're,
looking
to
make
a
bigger
door,
a
bigger
entrance
I
mean,
or
is
it
just
yours,
you're
saying
well
we're
using
an
example.
O
M
O
So
that's
good
clarification.
My
second
question,
then,
is
around
the
garage.
I
don't
claim
to
be
an
expert
at
reading
plans.
Is
that
garage
gonna
be
attached
to
the
house,
or
is
it
gonna
be
away
from
that
yeah?
No.
M
There's,
oh
there's
a
good
30
feet
between
the
house
and
the
garage.
O
Okay,
so
then
I
I
want
to
know
a
little
bit
about
what
your
plans
are
and
it
may
not
be
in
the
purview
of
this
board,
but
just
so
people
have
background.
I
basically
sold
the
previous
owner.
Jim
proved
the
land
behind
this
property
and
it
was
sold
with
a
restriction
which
was
basically
that
the
home
that
was
attached
to
at
214
west,
2nd
street,
the
single
family
owner
owner
occupied
and
the
reason
that
we
did.
O
That
was
because
previously
had
been
two
three-year
departments
managed
by
someone
that
was
doing
a
little
more
than
being
sort
of
a
slumber.
From
our
perspective,
all
kinds
of
different
people
in
there
not
really
taking
care
of
the
place.
We
wanted
to
stop
that,
so
we
put
a
restriction
on
there
for
10
years.
O
So
then
I
see
something
that
basically
says
you
guys
are
going
to
do
a
surround
and
then
you're
going
to
add
a
garage.
But
when
I
look
at
the
pictures
it
looks
to
me
like
there's
a
garage
and
an
apartment
which
is
not
a
garage,
so
I
was
surprised
when
I
saw
that
too.
O
So,
what's
the
plan
with
respect
to
this,
oh,
it
appears
like
you're
adding
apartment
in
the
back,
which
might
be
a
technical
way
around.
The
restriction
that
I
try
to
apply.
M
No
there's
there's
no
there's
no
intent
to
to
mislead
by
any
means.
It
simply
has
a
small
apartment
space
attached
to
the
garage.
They
have
every
intention
of
it's
a
single
family
home.
It's
part
of
they
they
look
at
it
as
part
of
their
their
main
house.
There's
no
intention
to
rent
it
out
to
someone
else.
The
garage
space
itself
is
for
their
vehicles,
so
the
the
yard
between
the
garage
and
the
house
will
get
fenced
in
they'd
like
to
do
a
courtyard.
M
O
O
A
N
Surround
is
an
architectural
feature,
so
the
guidelines
cover
those
on
page,
33
and
34..
Obviously,
we've
already
discussed
that
it's
very
appropriate
for
this
style
of
the
house.
So
that's
definitely
within
the
guidelines.
The
other
thing
is
the
garage.
The
garage
and
out
building
is
recovered
on
page
45,
but
that
specifically
refers
to
historic
garages.
N
We're
not
talking
about
that.
This
is
new,
so
we
instead
covered
on
pages
69
through
71
under
infill
buildings.
N
Not
dominating
the
space,
so
it's
it's
adjacent
in
terms
of
materials
because
I
have
have
wood
and
brick
they're
going
to
be
using
it's
compatible
in
terms
of
setback,
was
on
the
alley
and
they're
following
the
setback.
Laws
ordinances
should
be
compatible
adjacent
buildings
in
terms
of
scale
and
proportion.
It
is
smaller
so,
as
you
would
hope
in
career,
it
isn't
located
in
the
rear.
N
Let's
see
it
is
which
is
0.7
on
page
69
and
so
to
me
all
points
we
read
on,
pin
69
is
compatible
with
the
mall.
It's
not.
It
is
a
more
modern
design.
So
this
is
even
follows.
The
guidelines
of
the
we
read
in
the
department
of
interior
guidelines,
whether
they're
not
trying
to
make
a
old
building
this
is
new.
It's
going
to
have
a
new
style.
E
E
If
this
is
an
inspiration
photo,
I
would
much
prefer
to
see
a
drawing
of
what
it's
supposed
to
look
like,
because
I
think
what
I'm
hearing
is
that
that
door
and
the
thing
above
it
is
what
I'm
trying
to
accomplish
here
and
these
little
windows
next
to
the
door,
aren't
going
to
be
on
this
at
all
right
right.
So
my
question
for
us
as
a
board
is
then:
why
would
we
put
that
picture
up
there
because
it
to
me
it
confuses
me.
B
J
E
I
was
inspired
by
that
it
was
great,
and
then
I
I
learned
that.
Well,
that's
not
really
what
we're
doing
you
know
and
it's
just
new
to
the
board.
It
was
that
was
going
over
my
head,
so
I
would
just
encourage
us
in
the
future
to
try
and
have
these
represent
more
of
what
something's
going
to
look
like.
E
The
second
is,
I
think,
there's
another
property
tonight
where
there
was
a
garage
with
a
potential
living
space
above
it.
Yes,
that
was
the
walking
that
we
saw
earlier
right
so
on
on
that
one,
it
seemed
much
more
apparent
that
there
was
the
potential
living
space.
So
until
this
gentleman
came
up
and
kind
of
talked
about
today,
there
might
be
a
place
up
there
as
I'm
looking
through
my
materials
here.
It
wasn't
really
apparent
to
me
now.
Maybe
it's
was
apparent
up
there
and
again
I
was
kind
of
getting
it
not
getting
it.
G
Yes,
you
get
the
in
the
meeting
packet,
you
get
a
copy
of
the
application
with
all
of
these
pictures
submitted.
The
reason
why
I
don't
specifically
mention
the
fact
that
this
has
a
living
space
in
it
is
because
interior
has
no.
We
have
no
perky
with
the
interior,
so
I
feel
like
the
packets
you
get
are
large
and
tough
without
having
to
add
unnecessary
material.
G
So
I
don't
discuss
that,
but
it
is
in
your
meeting
packet
with
the
applications
you
go
through
the
application
itself
and
then
all
the
attachments
to
it
you'll
see
the
the
reference
like
this.
Okay,
I
think
part
of
it.
Probably
my
mistake
for
this
meeting
is
that
I
was
going
through
more.
G
Summary
sheet
so
you're
talking
about
the
staff
report,
that's
supposed
to
be
a
supplemental
to
the
meeting
packet.
G
It
should
be
the
looking
at
the
meeting
packet
first,
examining
the
application
and
then
taking
a
look
at
the
staff
report.
After
would
be
the
general
recommendation.
E
Great,
I
think
you
also
did
then
clarify
that
the
whole
living
space
topic
is
not
really
something
that
we're
concerned
about.
So
the
fact
that
I
saw
more
of
that
earlier
didn't
see
as
much
of
it
here.
It's
really
a
non-issue
because
we're
concerned
not
about
the
interior,
the
exterior
which,
which.
E
It
seemed
like
there
was
a
lot
of
discussion
of
interior.
I
was
seeing
a
lot
of
interior
photos
tonight.
You
know
it's
kind
of
nice,
though
yeah
it
was
kind
of
nice,
but
so
okay,
thank
you
that
that's
extremely
helpful.
A
All
right
jerry,
do
you
appre,
do
you
agree
with
what's
been
said,
though?
Yes,
I
agree
with
westminster.
A
All
right-
and
I
too
agree
for
the
same
reasons
so
with
that
I'll-
accept
the
motion.
N
Based
on
the
preceding
side,
the
preceding
findings,
historic
district
review,
grant
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
to
chris
and
gina
lynn
for
the
proposed
architectural
surround
of
the
front
door
and
new
construction
field.
Building
garage
at
the
rear
of
the
property
located
at
216
to
14,
west
2nd
street.
A
G
This
non-contributing
property
is
owned
by
bill
and
patty
jarrian
is
located
at
rxtv
and
is
a
circa
1970,
modern
movement
branch
style,
home
zoned,
historic
district
residential.
The
applicants
are
requesting
to
build
a
10
foot
by
10
foot,
wood
outbuilding
and
a
10
foot
by
8
foot
deck
behind
the
home
within
a
fenced
backyard.
G
G
These
are
the.
This
is
a
site
plan
showing
the
general
layout
of
the
outbuilding
and
deck.
U
K
Welcome,
thank
you,
sir.
So
for
bill's
project
on
520,
west
2nd
street
new
construction
is
encouraged
to
add
to
the
streetcape
and
promote
economic
development.
That's
on
residential
and
commercial
guidelines,
page
45.
with
the
fence.
You
really
can't
tell
you
know,
shape
or
scale
from
the
streetscape.
E
N
A
Approve
all
right,
you'll
get
a
coa
in
the
mail
and
good
luck
and
congratulations
on
that
make
sure
you
get
in
your
building
permits
with
you.
A
G
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
remove
the
small
24-inch
windows
on
the
west
side
and
to
install
overhead
doors
in
the
north
end
and
middle
sections
of
the
basement
level,
which
will
eventually
be
an
event
and
serving
area.
The
applicant
has
already
received
staff
approved
coas
to
replace
the
siding
windows
and
doors,
to
remove
the
awnings
to
install
lights
at
the
entryways
and
to
resurface.
The
basement
area
exposed
porch
stone
with
coronado
stone.
G
T
T
Q
T
T
B
T
T
T
J
So
I'm
I'm
sorry,
I'm
not.
I
want
to
know
where
the
overhead
doors
are
going
to
be.
I
know
there's
going
to
be
one
on
the
north
elevation
right,
yes
correct
and
then
I
know
it
said
that
there's
one
in
the
middle,
but
I
didn't
know
if
that
was
on
the
western
elevation,
the
overhead
door
or
on
the
eastern
elevation
western
elevation.
J
J
A
Yeah,
this
has
been
long
overdue,
so
you
must
have
got
an
itch
or
something
when
you
you
wanted
the
project.
Didn't
you
that
needs
restored
it.
Does
it
does
any
questions
comments
from
the
audience.
F
Doors
and
entrances
doors
are,
it
says,
are
the
central
visual.
The
visual
we
have
of
the
property
you're
working
on
is
not
good,
so
anything
you're
inducing
there,
but
that's
not
what
it
says.
Placement
doors
may
be
painted.
F
A
What
is
he,
the
other
one
is
he's
already
guessed
that.
A
F
And
I
believe
he
meets
the
guidelines
for
a
residential,
commercial
or
anything
else
you
want
to
do.
Congratulations
appreciate
what
you
know.
A
A
A
A
All
right
we're
ready
for
a
new
old
business.
I
don't
know
of
any
old
business.
Do
we
and
I
don't,
does
anybody
have
any
new
business.
G
All
right,
so
we
had
several
fast
track:
applications
that
were
reviewed
this
month,
kathy
hale
at
1212,
west
2nd
street,
was
approved
on
march
25th
to
install
aluminum-clad
windows,
hardy
board
siding
and
an
aluminum
clad
door
fast
signs
of
louisville
at
4,
one
zero,
zero
one
west
second
street
again
on
march
25th
for
cast
aluminum
sign
letters.
G
Charles
recruit,
at
735
jefferson
street
on
march,
30th
received
approval
to
install
lp,
smart
side
and
aluminum
cloud
windows.
Justin
mcgillin,
with
magellan
holdings
at
801,
east
main
street.
On
march
31st
received
approval
to
install
lp
smart,
siding,
aluminum,
clad
windows,
fiberglass
entry
doors,
coronado,
stone
resurface
of
the
basement
area,
that's
currently
parged
concrete
and
to
remove
the
window
awnings.
G
G
G
Tony
and
lisa
hammock
at
9,
17,
19
west
main
street
on
april
15th
received
approval
to
install
our
lp
smart,
siding
on
their
garage
and
betty
todd
at
7
45
and
a
half
west
3rd
street.
On
april
19th
received
approval
for
a
wooden
glass
front
door.
Solid
wood
will
have
the
oval
shaped
glass
in
the
center
and
then,
if
we
go
to
our
april
2020
coa
review,
we
had
mark
katie
at
801.
East
main
street
had
gotten
a
coa
to
replace
the
doors
with
fiberglass
doors
and
replace
the
windows
with
aluminum
clad.
G
None
of
that
had
been
done.
That
was
the
same.
That
was
victorian.
So
yes,
so
he
had
received
approval,
but
did
not
do
anything
with
that.
G
It
is
in
progress.
Everything
except
the
sighting
has
been
completed
to
the
coa
specifications.
G
They
have
the
tie
back
sheeting
up
currently,
but
the
siding
has
not
been
installed
yet
I
would
say
they're
getting
pretty
close,
I
mean
just
from
looking
at
it,
but
the
project
has
been
started
in
the
appropriate
time.
K
F
G
They
are
working
on
it.
Currently,
david
powell,
at
316
walnut
received
a
coh
to
enclose
his
side
porch
with
hardy
board,
siding
and
installing
iron
railing
to
the
front
steps
that
was
completed
to
specifications
and
sherry
evelyn
at
612,
east
main
street
received
a
coa
to
replace
a
wood
window
on
the
rear,
with
a
metal
and
glass
door
and
install
a
concrete
patio
and
steps
with
an
iron
railing,
and
that
was
also
completed.