►
Description
Extended Applications:
1. Lisa Riggio – C. of A. to replace wood siding on rear addition and enclosed second story porch with metal siding.
Location: 704 West St.
Zoned: Central Business District (CBD)
New Applications:
1. Donald and Tamara Courtney – C. of A. to build a new 20’ x 17’ garage with vinyl siding and 1 3’ x 3’ vinyl window.
Location: 709 E. First St.
Zoned: Historic District Residential (HDR)
2. Kim and Jeff Kennard – C. of A. to add a 12’ x 16’ porch on the southeast rear side that follows the existing roofline and existing siding on the home.
Location: 506 E. Main St. Zoned: Specialty District (SD)
3. Charles Requet - C. of A. to demolish the shed located on the lot.
Location: 737 Jefferson St.
Zoned: Residential Medium Density (R-8)
4. Richard and Sallie Plass - C. of A. to enclose 10’ x 10’ existing rear second floor porch/balcony; install Mastic carved wood vinyl siding to match existing siding; install sliding glass door unit with integrated side windows; install EPDM black rubber roof.
Location: 811 W. First St.
Zoned: Historic District Residential (HDR)
5. William Tandy - C. of A. to build a 16’ x 28’ two story residential home; change of building plans from previously approved C. of A.
Location: 1017 Park Ave.
Zoned: Historic District Residential (HDR)
New/Old Business:
Persons having any questions regarding these matters are urged to use one of the means for public participation below:
• Public comments may be submitted to the City Plan Commission by email to bpeach@madison-in.gov or by letter addressed to the City Plan Commission, City Hall, 101 W. Main St., Madison, IN 47250. Written public comments must be received by 4pm on February 18, 2021.
• Any member of the public wishing to speak for or against said applications, may appear in person. Members of the public will be invited to speak at the meeting during the referenced application.
This agenda is in DRAFT FORM. Open Door Law does not prohibit the public agency from changing or adding to its agenda during the meeting.
A
D
His
contributing
shotgun
style
home
built,
circa
1860
is
owned
by
kim
and
jeff
bernard
and
zone's
specialty
district
applicant
is
requesting
to
build
a
new
12-foot
by
16-foot
porch
on
the
southeast
rear.
This
project
was
begun
without
a
permit
or
co
application,
and
it
will
be
going
before
the
bca
for
zero
lot
line
variants
and
I'll
flip
through
the.
A
A
E
So
I
kim
canard
my
husband's
working.
We
live
actually
in
westchester.
This
is
going
to
be
a
weekend
place
for
us,
so
this
was
three
hours
round
trip,
but
I'm
more
than
happy
to
be
here
and
as
far
as
I
heard,
someone
mentioned
zoning.
So
we
are
attending
the
zoning
meeting
in
two
weeks.
We
did
hire
approved
contractors
and
we
understood
that
they
were
going
through
all
of
the
protocols
that
needed
to
be
gone
through.
E
So
we
were
because
we
stopped
in
a
couple
times
to
make
sure
we
thought
we
were
doing
the
right
things.
So
when
we
purchased
the
house
it
was
definitely
an
extreme
disrepair
and
it
had
vinyl
siding
across
the
back
and
vinyl
windows
that
were
broken
and
we're
putting
the
lp
siding
on
the
back,
which
I
don't
think
that
you've
mentioned
that.
But
it
is
we
and
it's
already
been
done,
which
we
got
kind
of
a
special
approval
to
get
that
done,
because
the
back
was
open
and
we
had
a
new
roof
put
on.
E
But
we
did
replace
the
windows
with
vinyl
windows,
so
the
vinyl
windows
that
were
there
were
vinyl
windows
that
we
put
in
this
is
the
back.
I
will
say
that,
and
all
of
the
other
windows
are
the
original
windows,
the
three
doors
that
are
from
the
1800s
this
spring,
we're
planning
on
redoing
them,
so
the
front
of
the
facade
of
the
house
is
going
to
look
better
than
it
did
and
the
back
is
going
to
look
better
than
it
did.
E
F
E
There's
actually
siding
on
it.
Now,
if
I
was
just
there,
if
you
want
to
update
it,
it
sounds
like
you
walked.
You
go
by
so
there's
the
lp
sightings
up,
oh
okay,
all
the
way
up
almost
to
the
windows
on
the
back
of
the
house.
On
that
just
the
addition.
So
the
addition
has
it
just
on
the
the
roof
line.
It's
going
to
be
open,
it's
just
an
open
porch
where
it's
not
being
closed
in.
I
thought
so.
I
just
wanted
to
clarify.
E
That
will
look
like
the
front
of
the
house
with
the
white
trim
and
the
white
columns,
and
but
it's
the
porch
is
now
it's
stopped,
because
we
have
to
wait
until
we
get
zoning
approval
because
there's
two
additional
posts
that
have
to
go
to
support
it
right
next
to
the
house
yeah.
So
that's
still
in
progress.
Okay,.
G
G
E
G
E
G
E
E
H
G
E
E
I
A
B
B
The
reason
for
the
zero
lot
line
is,
you
know,
you
know
most
downtown
side,
yard,
rear
yard.
Setbacks
are
three
foot
right
and,
of
course,
to
follow
the
the
roof
line
there
there
pretty
much.
Is
there
a
lot
mine
on
the
east
side,
but
I
think
ken
mentioned
something
as
nicole-
and
I
talked
about
you
know
part
of
this
process
of
changing
things.
A
little
bit
with
the
historic
board
is
to
allow
people
to
move
on
with
the
projects
in
a
timely
manner.
B
So,
of
course,
they
won't
get
their
building
permit
until
they
get
the
zoning
approval.
You
know
so,
regardless
of
what
happens
tonight,
you
know
it's
one,
one
part
of
the
puzzle
to
keep
you
know
to
make
them
wait
for
the
zoning
board.
Then
that
puts
them
yet
another
month
you
know
relationship
storyboard.
So
simply
put
this
is
one
part:
they've
got
to
do
the
dca
for
the
zero
lot
line,
and
then
they
can.
You
know
upon
approval
in
both
tonight
and
that
night,
then
they
can
get
this
one.
Okay,.
D
No,
you
would
not,
and
to
also
clarify
what
ms
canard
is
talking
about,
is
that
she
did
receive
staff
approval
on
citing
that
did
follow
guidelines
and
a
few
other
projects
that
she
had
listed
yeah
so
just
to
clarify.
But
no,
you
would
not
need
to
specify
that
in
the
motion-
okay,
but
usually
the
way
mr
wilber
handles.
It
is
just
to
remind
everyone
at
the
end
of
the
meeting
that
there
will
be
further
permits
that
they
may
need
to
apply
for
okay,.
E
J
J
A
J
A
E
A
Our
next
application
is,
and
charles
I
have
never
known
how
to
pronounce
your
last
name
so
you're
going
to
have
to
help
me
out
here:
sort
of
quiet,
okay,
charles
marquette,
at
737,
jefferson
street.
The
project
is
about
tearing
down
a
building
and
brooke.
We'll
have
you
go
through
that
explain
to
the
board
what
that
entails?.
D
K
Well,
we
want
to
tear
it
down
because
that
sidewalk
and
that
the
way
the
ground
is
all
graded
there
we're
having
issues
every
time
we
get
a
really
strong
storm
and
we
get
water
in
the
house,
and
so
I
want
to
do
some
more
dirt
work,
but
to
do
that
that
building
is
kind
of
in
the
way,
and
it's
going
to
make
a
real
it's
going
to
look
really
weird.
If
I
start
leveling
out
the
dirt
there
and
then
kind
of
got
this,
you
know
shed
that's
two
feet
above
it.
C
A
A
A
C
G
F
F
D
D
D
D
F
C
F
I
F
C
F
F
I
L
A
M
M
M
M
L
So
the
concern
is
about
privacy
and
I
think,
we've
been
pretty
diligent.
It's
a
obviously
contingent
units
around
privacy.
The
deck
already
extends
this
four
feet.
We
were
we're
on
the
impression
that
extending
the
deck
several
feet
doesn't
really
change
the
dynamics
about
privacy
actually
in
and
so
as
a
result,
we
didn't
think
it
was
an
issue
because
already
it's
not
terribly
private,
if
you're
on
our
deck,
because
of
that
four
feet.
I
So
the
rest
of
the
board,
if
you
can
see
the
photo
that's
up
now,
you
see
all
the
decks
match,
the
extension
so
across
the
rear.
Looking
toward
the
south,
everyone
has
the
same
extension
out
and
so
the
center
you
know
the
pauses
would
extend
that
center
deck
out.
An
additional
three
feet
are
requesting
to
extend
that
out.
F
One
of
the
things
that
we
did
consider
when
we
were
thinking
through
the
plan
is
that's
an
old
picture,
and
now
there
is
a
home
on
the
right
side
and
there's
another
home,
and
actually
four
more
homes
will
be
on
the
left,
end
of
that
row
of
condos.
And
so
when
we
look
down
the
sight
line
from
that
whole
row
that
our
deck
doesn't
even
extend
as
far
as
the
other
two
homes
or
the
other
actual,
it
will
be
five
homes.
G
F
D
On
the
original
application,
it
is
written
to
enclose
a
10
foot
by
10
foot
porch
and
the
way
that
it
is
written
was
explained
to
enclose
what
was
already
there.
However,
the
site
drawings
make
it
appear
as
if
there
is
an
extension.
So
there
was,
there
has
been
this
confusion,
and
I
think
that's
where
we
were
arriving
at
today
is
because
the
conflicting
written
portion
versus
the
site
plan,
okay,.
G
L
A
D
J
B
C
A
M
F
J
J
B
Want
to
agree
with
owen,
I
think
that
I
mean
if
there
are
issues
in
relation
to
that,
of
course,
it
can
be
brought
up
at
the
bga
meaning
zero
lot
line,
if
that's
the
case,
but
yeah.
What
you
guys
are
discussing
is
simply
the
the
project
as
it
stands
yeah
and
same
thing
honestly
with
if
there
are
concerns
about
water
issues
or
the
cantilever
issues,
those
again
those
are
addressed
when
they
get
the
building
from
there.
You
know
they
need
to
show
that
what
they're
doing
is
you
know,
acceptable
to
basic
code
enforcement.
J
Exactly
so,
I
think
you
know
the
board.
We
need
to
constantly
keep
in
mind
that
you
know
what
color
we
like,
or
you
know
how
we
would
do
it
if
it
was
our
project
that
that
is
all
really
not
anything
we
should
even
address.
You
know
we
have
to
contain
our
comments
to
the
guidelines
and-
and
it
just
keeps
the
meeting
more
efficient
as
well.
A
And
I
would
agree,
I
pondered
over
this
for
quite
some
time
and
went
over
it
again
this
afternoon
and
drove
by
it
the
personal
issues
between
you
and
your
neighbor.
You
know
that
has
to
be
resolved
between
the
two
of
you,
the
side
view,
there's
nothing
that
really
addresses
that
guidelines,
the
materials
that
you're
using
are
you
know
all
follow
the
guidelines.
A
C
C
C
N
The
east
I'm
also
a
former
resident
of
this
exact
condo
unit,
so
having
lived
in
that
unit
and
experienced
the
privacy
issues,
I
understand
some
of
the
neighborly
concerns,
but
also
that's
part
of
being
in
a
community,
that's
close
together
and
everybody
shares
and
lives
together.
It's
very
much
a
shared
space
that
everybody
does
in
good
harmony
and
community,
certainly
in
the
present
state
of
the
decks.
N
I'm
speaking
in
favor
of
this,
as
sally's
mentioned,
all
three
of
these
decks
are
retreated
from
all
the
neighbors
mine,
the
huntingtons
and
the
ones
being
built
all
set
farther
forward.
Even
with
the
three
foot
extension,
they
still
sit
back
from
the
view
on
bond
drive.
I
don't
think
it
will
appreciably
change
the
view
of
the
deck
they
will
all
look
in
line.
N
As
a
matter
of
fact,
I
noted
today,
joe
and
hillary
have
actually
extended
their
deck
as
they
redid
it,
and
theirs
extends
between
10
and
11
inches
past
their
face.
So
so
we're
asking
they're
asking
for
three
feet
here
and
joe
and
hillary
themselves
have
just
extended
close
to
a
foot
themselves.
So
I
think
it's
very
well
in
line
with,
what's
there
and,
I
think
very
appropriate,
I
think
it
will
dramatically
improve
the
the
view
and
enhance
an
existing
structure
in
madison,
so
I'll
be
pulling
support
of
what
they're
doing.
D
J
Well,
the
guidelines
are
really
talking
about
porches,
you
know
added
to
or
modified
on
historic
buildings
contributing
structures
in
madison.
This
is
not
a
contributing
structure.
So,
to
me,
this,
the
guidelines
hardly
even
cover
this
at
all.
This
is
more
of
a
cleaning
estimation
of
an
appearance
commission
which
madison
doesn't
have
so
going
down
the
list.
That's
all
thanks.
J
Let's
ask
for
a
motion
based
on
the
preceding
findings.
Of
fact,
I
move
that
the
madison
historic
district
border
review
grant
a
certificate
of
appropriate
minister
richard
and
sally
plast
for
the
proposed
one
enclosure
of
existing
10
foot
by
10
foot
rear
second
floor
porch.
Two
installation
of
mastic
carved
wood,
vinyl
siding
to
match
existing
siding,
three
installation
of
sliding
glass
door
unit
with
integrated
side
windows
and
four
installation,
black
epbm
rubber
roof
located
at
811
west
first
street.
A
A
C
A
D
This
lot
is
zone
historic,
district
residential.
The
applicant
is
requesting
to
build
a
new
16
by
28
foot
home
on
the
site,
which
will
require
building
permits,
in
addition
to
an
approved
coa.
He
did
receive
previous
hdbr
approval,
but
is
now
requesting
to
change
the
design,
and
I
will
flip,
through
the.
O
In
the
pictures
there
that
not
a
big
house-
but
you
got
to
keep
in
mind
this
place-
was
the
size
of
the
podium
where
you're
sitting
it's
28
feet
long,
but
we
want
to
keep
it
in
the
style
of
madison
deserve.
So
we
did
have
some
questions
about
some
of
the
materials
we'd
like
to
use.
If
you
approve
this,
the
previous
approval,
we
agreed
to
use
a
probe
like
a
pro
rib
barn
metal
roofing,
not
a
standing
seam
room.
One
of
the
reasons
for
that.
O
H
G
O
O
O
O
H
To
look
as
nice
as
they
can,
but
we
are
worried
about
the
area
somewhat
and
it
is
it's
a
really
small
place,
but
I
think
it's
going
to
look
really
unique.
I
think
when
people
drive
by
they're
going
to
be
like
whoa,
that's
that's
nice.
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
be
anything
tacky
or
anything
like
that,
but
the
neighborhood
is
sketchy
and
I'm
hoping
that
some
requirements
are
made
to
neighbors
or
landlords
that
are
surrounding
us
to
kind
of
update
as
well,
because
we're
not
here
all
the
time
we
just
come.
H
O
O
O
O
J
C
A
A
O
J
A
A
You
know,
there's
already
so
much
improvement
going
on
right
now
with
the
new
entrance
into
the
city
and
the
the
road.
I
think
it's
going
to
be
a
beautiful
place
and,
as
you
said,
you
know
when
you
drive
by
you're,
going
to
be
really
looking
at
that
place.
It's
going
to
catch.
I
think
everybody's
eye.
O
You
can
only
do
so
much
with
a
lot
outside.
You
know.
At
one
time
I
questioned
brian
and
nicole
about
a
garage
door
trying
to
come
up
with
different
designs
and
it's
just
it
doesn't
fit,
and
but
the
carport,
I
think,
would
it's
an
open
area.
The
the
materials
is.
If
we
could
agree
on
the
windows,
I
think
you'd
be
happy
with
what
we're
up
to.
A
C
O
A
And
I
think,
that's
you
know:
that's
reasonable.
A
loop,
wood
and
aluminum
clad
wood
windows
all
could
be
double
pane.
I
think
you
can
even
get
triple
pane
now.
Okay,
so
there
should
be
no
reason
that
you
know
any
of
those
windows
would
be
less
efficient.
In
fact,
I
think
they
might
be
more
efficient
than
the
vinyl.
O
J
A
O
B
C
I
They
talk
about
compatibility
and
some
basic
guidelines
and
you
need
all
of
them
step.
Number
seven
garage
should
be
at
the
rear.
Yours
you
do
that
depth
that
lot,
your
garage
or
carport's
going
to
look
straight
at
the
street.
But
so
you
know
this
is
a
great
project.
I
knew
you'd
have
to
come
back
that
plane.
Just
you
thought
you
had
a
really
deep
lot.
C
A
J
I
have
a
motion
based
on
the
preceding
findings.
Of
fact,
I
move
that
the
madison
historic
district
board
of
review
grant
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
to
williams,
handy
for
the
proposed
construction
of
a
new
16
foot
by
28
foot,
two-story
residential
home
being
a
change
in
plans
from
those
previously
approved
located
at
1017
park,
avenue,
subject
prior
to
the
conditions
specified
in
the
findings
of
fact
made
previously
to
fit
wood
or
aluminum.
Clad
wood
windows
will
be
used
rather
than
the
vinyl
windows
proposed
in
the
application.
A
H
D
Brooke
during
the
february
fast
track,
coa
applications
david
joe
craig
at
810
east
7th
street
on
january
26th,
was
approved
to
replace
wood
porch
columns
with
new
wood
porch
columns,
lindsey
clark
at
828,
west
2nd
street.
On
february,
1st
was
approved
to
install
new
wood
windows
and
a
new
wood
door.
D
And
february
2020
cla
review
bob
green
at
904
and
a
half
west
3rd
street
was
approved
february
of
last
year
to
demolish
a
non-historic
house.
The
update
on
that
is
that
he
stated
that
should
be
done
on
the
24th
would
be,
which
would
be
the
one
year
expiration
mark.
However,
he
said
due
to
the
weather.
It
may
take
a
few
extra
days
and
he
is
asking
if
that
would
be
okay
with
the
board.