►
From YouTube: May 17, 2016 Transportation & Public Works
Description
Minneapolis Transportation & Public Works Committee Meeting
A
Good
morning,
this
is
the
regular
scheduled
transportation
of
Public
Works.
Committee
this
day
may
17
2016
I'm
councillor
break
I'll,
be
chairing
the
committee
and
drain.
My
my
colleagues
on
the
committee,
including
council
president,
vice
president
glidden
council,
members
of
palmisano
bender
and
gordon.
We
are
a
quorum
councilor
Yang
is
out
little
today
and
will
not
be
joining
us.
We
have
several
items
on
the
agenda
12
in
total
or
actually
teed
in
total,
several
which
around
the
consent
I'll
go
through
those
any
committee.
A
Member
can
pull
them
if
they
wish
for
further
consideration
item
2
is
the
2016
protected
bike
waste
program
layout
approvals,
and
these
are
approvals
for
the
streets
list.
Eleventh
avenue,
southwest
river
parkway,
26,
blaisdell
avenue,
south
29th
street
west
four
th
street
west
in
franklin,
avenue
east
to
twenty
ninth
avenue
south
to
seabury
avenue.
Item
three:
is
the
godfrey
parkway
bridge
replacement
layout
approval?
That's
a
resolution
approving
that
project
item
4
is
the
contract
lyndale
neighborhood
association
for
graffiti
prevention
project
item
five?
A
Is
the
agreement
with
Hennepin
County
for
traffic
signal
system
renovation
project
item
six
is
an
agreement
with
the
shingle
creek
watershed
management
Commission?
For
Cleveland
Neighborhood,
Association,
private
stormwater
management
practices,
a
series
of
actions
for
that
item,
sevens
agreement
with
the
Metropolitan
Council
for
bus
shelters
on
nicollet
mall
item
8,
as
the
agreement
with
the
Minneapolis
Park
and
Recreation
Board
for
storm
water
pump
station
easements
item
nine
is
the
Washington
Avenue
reconstruction
project,
cooperative,
evil,
Hennepin
County
and
that's
executing
that
agreement
with
them
for
that
project.
A
Is
the
donation
of
the
minneapolis
downtown
council
for
peavey,
plaza
plantings
and
that's
evaluative
properly
$15,000
item
13
as
the
water
service
line
repair
assessment
cancellation
for
specific
address
the
amount
listed
item
14
as
the
2017
2020
Public
Works
consulting
pool
item
15
is
the
bid
for
metal
seated
gate
valve
16
is
the
bid
for
lime.
Sludge
holding
tank
repair
and
17
is
the
bid
for
the
grit
chamber,
that's
from
a
little
bit
for
contact
engineered
solutions
for
the
amount
listed,
and
that
is
all
the
consent
items.
A
B
Good
morning,
mr.
chair,
yes,
that
we
we
have
a
resolution
and
I
think
you
are
going
to
read
the
resolution,
but
this
is
National
Public
Works
week.
It's
a
something
that
happens
annually
where
we
recognize
the
really
the
employees
of
public
works
for
the
services
that
they
provide.
The
city.
Thank.
A
And
whereas
the
department's
thousand
plus
employees
know
that
Minneapolis
depends
on
Public
Works
and
the
men
and
women
of
the
profession
are
always
there
and
always
ready.
And
whereas
the
support
and
understanding
and
informed
citizenry
is
vital
to
the
efficient
operational
Public.
Works
systems
and
programs,
such
as
water
sewer
streets
in
solid
waste
collection
and
whereas
the
health,
safety
and
comfort
of
the
community
greatly
depends
on
these
facilities
and
services.
A
And
whereas
the
quality
of
the
effectiveness
of
these
facilities,
as
well
as
their
planning
design,
construction,
are
vitally
dependent
on
the
efforts
and
skill
of
Public
Works
officials
and
whereas
the
efficiency
of
the
qualified
and
dedicated
personnel
who
staff
the
public
works
department
is
materially
influenced
by
the
people's
attitudes
and
understanding
of
the
importance
of
the
work
they
perform.
Now,
therefore,
be
it
resolved.
A
A
A
B
D
Morning
morning,
mr.
chair
members
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
Nathan
Koster
supervisor,
transportation,
planner
public
works,
department,
transportation
planning
and
programming
and
I
have
a
brief
presentation.
This
morning
on
the
Complete
Streets
policy,
we
will
be
looking
to
adopt
the
Complete
Streets
policy
for
its
inclusion
as
a
companion
item
to
access
Minneapolis,
the
city's
transportation
plan.
D
So
this
morning
my
presentation
will
cover
what
is
complete
streets.
What
is
the
Complete
Streets
policy
give
an
overview
of
some
of
the
stakeholder
and
advisory
committee.
Outreach
performed
as
a
part
of
this
policy
development
cover
some
of
the
policy
development
items
and
themes
of
the
policy,
give
a
brief
overview
of
some
of
the
research
and
guidance
and
best
practices
that
went
into
making
this
policy
and
cover
some
of
the
framework
and
key
policy
elements
that
I'd
like
to
bring
to
the
attention
today.
D
So
what
are
Complete
Streets
I
provide
a
few
images
here
and
what
I'd
really
like
to
call
out,
though,
is,
although
we
show
a
number
of
images
of
what
people
may
think
of
Complete
Streets
or
what
comes
to
mind,
is
there's
no
prescriptive
design,
which
is
all
inclusive
up.
Complete
Streets.
What
we
really
focused
on
with
this
policy
is
a
decision-making
tool
that
is
very
much
processed,
driven
and
based
in
the
context
of
the
local
environments
that
are
present
within
the
city
of
Minneapolis.
D
So
what
is
the
Complete
Streets
policy?
It's
really
a
focus
on
a
commitment
to
building
a
complete
and
integrated
public
right-of-way
I'd,
really
like
to
re-establish
that
it's
looking
at
the
whole
public
right
away,
instead
of
just
the
streets
itself
and
its
ensuring
that
everyone,
all
users
are
able
to
safely
and
comfortably
use
the
street,
whether
they're,
walking
biking,
taking
transit
or
driving
a
motorized
vehicle,
and
as
I
mentioned,
this
is
all
users,
regardless
of
age,
ability,
income,
socio-economic
background,
gender
or
culture.
D
D
So
some
of
the
backgrounds
of
what
is
complete,
straights
policy-wise,
the
city
bringing
forth
the
Complete
Streets
policy,
I,
would
say
over
the
last
five
to
ten
years.
This
is
a
very
much
a
policy
movement
that
has
grown
both
on
a
local
scale,
there's
number
of
local
cities
in
Minnesota
that
have
passed
a
Complete
Streets
policy,
a
lot
of
counties
and
regional
agencies,
and
this
is
something
that
we
are
looking
to
bring
forward
today.
D
There
is
a
lot
of
growing
support
both
on
the
federal
level
is
well
the
recently
the
US
Surgeon
General
called
call
to
action,
supporting
Complete
Streets,
promoting
a
step
up
step
it
up
plan
which
promotes
walkable
communities
and
walkable
communities
designs
and,
most
recently,
the
federal
transportation
act.
The
fast
act,
which
is
the
first
multi
or
transportation
bill,
specifically
called
all
elements
of
Complete
Streets
to
facilitate
much
more
multimodal
designs
in
the
roadways
and
would
really
like
to
call
the
attention
as
well.
D
Is
this
a
very
much
plan,
that's
consistent
with
and
aligning
with
a
lot
of
the
adopted
city
lands?
We
already
have
in
place
some
of
the
examples.
I
have
access
Minneapolis,
it's
very
much
integrated
to
our
elements
of
Complete
Streets,
even
references
to
Complete,
Streets
approaches
to
street
and
sidewalk
design
guides,
and
the
city's
comprehensive
plan.
Minneapolis
plan
also
other
plans,
I'd
like
to
call
attention
to
the
climate
action
plan
and
an
upcoming
effort
that
the
city's
been
working
on
is
the
downtown
public
realm
framework
plan.
D
They
were
actively
involved
in
the
development
of
the
policy
and
they
represented
a
wide
range
of
user
groups
and
travel
modes,
and
they
attended
a
series
meetings
over
the
past
year,
as
I
had
mentioned,
to
really
help
staff
generate
a
clear
direction
and
content
and
where
we
want
to
see
this
policy
going
and
really
providing
a
really
good
input
to
really
make
the
policy
as
best
as
it
can
be.
As
far
as
the
stakeholders
that
were
active
throughout,
as
I
mentioned,
this
group
represented
bicyclists
pedestrians,
transit
users,
students,
people
with
disabilities.
D
We
engaged
a
number
of
people
on
the
committee's
with
Advisory
Committee
on
Aging
and
at
one
point
that
the
access
and
Outreach
Committee
reaching
out
to
communities
of
typically
underrepresented
populations,
other
groups
involved,
were
other
transportation
agencies.
Hennepin
County
was
a
very
good
resource.
Having
passed
the
Complete
Streets
policy
back
in
2009,
provided
a
lot
of
lessons
learned
similarly
with
MnDOT
department
of
transportation.
Having
recently
passed
the
policies,
while
very
good
resources
to
provide
us
local
transportation
agencies
to
give
us
context
and
guidance
on
how
they
had
recently
had
successes.
D
D
D
This
is
a
very
context,
sensitive
approach,
looking
at
all
users
and
making
sure
incorporating
innovative
designs
or
approaches
for
projects,
the
goals
being
that
we
would
rebalance
our
investments
such
that
there
are
investments
for
all
users
and
modes
making
sure
they
were
specific
in
consideration
for
green
infrastructure
and
focusing
on
proving
those
transpiration
transparency
and
roles
throughout
project
development
and
equitable
engagement.
When
we
do
the
community
outreach
process.
D
As
far
as
the
policy
development,
we
saw
at
a
number
of
guidance
and
examples
both
nationally
and
locally
there's
a
lot
of
resources
available
and
it
was
utilized
to
the
fullest
extent
possible
throughout
the
development
of
the
policy.
We
conducted
a
number
of
peer
City
reviews,
looking
at
very
much
leading
policy
and
attended
a
number
of
local
trainings
and
webinars
to
really
get
our
hands
around
what
it
means:
the
Old
Main
streets
policy,
key
elements
and
how
we
make
it
transition
that
into
and
implement
the
implementation
phases.
D
So
what
is
the
policy
you
contain?
It
contains
the
policy
statement,
the
purpose
and
vision.
What
does
the
city
want
to
look
like
in
the
future
and
then
the
policy
framework
which
really
focuses
on
what
I'll
cover
in
the
next
slide,
which
modal
priority
framework
and
then,
as
I,
said,
implementation,
Fong,
chronological
order,
programming,
planning,
design,
construction,
operation
and
maintenance,
and
then,
lastly,
it
outlines
the
exemptions.
D
What
I
should?
What
is
one
of
the
key
themes
of
this
policy
is
now
many
policies
throughout
the
country
have
something
like
this,
but
it's
called
the
modal
priority
framework,
and
this
is
a
modal
priority
framework
that
prioritizes
the
modes
in
the
order
of
pedestrians
and
bicycles
and
trans
transit
on
the
same
level.
D
Vice
versa,
it
could
be
transferred
bicycles,
bicycles
or
transit,
followed
by
Motor
Vehicles,
and
this
is
very
much
aligns
with
the
adopted
city
plan
is
very
much
context-sensitive,
aligning
with
all
the
excess
Minneapolis
components
such
as
the
citywide
action
plan,
the
downtown
action
plan,
pedestrian
bicycle
master
plan
and
the
street
and
sidewalk
design
guidelines
and,
as
I
said,
is
very
much
a
context-sensitive
approach
by
doing
this
modal
hierarchy.
This
is
not
implying
that
there's
bike
lanes
on
every
street
or
there's
going
to
be
transit
on
every
street.
D
Some
of
the
key
themes
of
the
policy
is,
as
I
mentioned,
the
modal
priority
framework,
which
will
inform
the
transportation
related
decision-making
process
and
all
transportation
projects
are
subject
to
the
process
laid
forth
by
the
policy.
As
I
mentioned.
It
is
a
process.
No
projects
are
exempt
from
the
process,
so
all
projects
will
go
through
the
Complete
Streets
policy
and
tracking
an
implementation
tool
with
the
Complete
Streets
project
delivery
checklist,
following
through
on
certain
elements
of
the
policy
and
tracking
that
to
improve
the
transparency
and
roles,
and
as
I
mentioned.
D
This
applies
to
all
transportation
projects,
both
public
projects
and
private
projects
that
do
impact
and
relate
to
the
public
realm
cities,
cities,
public,
right-of-way,
our
largest
resources
and
as
such,
having
of
Complete
Streets
policy
that
does
control.
That
process
is
a
very
important
component,
because
there
are
a
lot
of
private
developments
that
go
into
an
impact
or
influence
the
public
right-of-way.
Lastly,
one
of
the
key
elements
of
the
Complete
Streets
policy
is
the
exemptions
process.
No
project
is
exempt
the
process
of
complete
streets.
D
However,
exemptions
will
be
requested
if
certain
modal
elements
have
been
documented
in
modal
plans,
but
they
are
not
included
as
a
part
of
the
final
project
and
there's
a
number
of
criteria
that
are
laid
forth,
which
merit
that
request
for
an
exemption,
such
as
if
a
bike
improvement
is
not
included
where
one
is
identified.
That
would
require
an
exemption
from
the
City
Council
and
with
that.
That
concludes
my
presentation.
I'll
stand
by.
If
for
there's
any
questions,
comments
or
discussion,
any.
A
E
Could
move
it
if
you
want
to
I
just
wanted
to
thank
everybody
for
the
work
on
this
is
actually
very
exciting
to
see
this
coming
forward.
I
think
we
landed
in
a
really
good
place
to
with
her
with
the
policy
here,
and
it
sets
us
up
for
the
future.
This
is
actually
a
priority
of
mine
this
year.
That
I
thought
about
was
getting
our
Complete
Streets
policy
done.
E
I
am
was
also
very
hopeful
that
this
would
be
part
of
director
legacy
that
he
could
leave
behind
and
we
for
a
while
there
I
wasn't
sure
we
get
it
completed
in
time,
but
we
have
and
I
think
that's
just
fantastic.
I
really
appreciate
the
patience
and
flexibility
of
staff
and
the
steering
group
did
I
served
on
with
others
here
and
the
Bicycle
Advisory
Committee
pedestrian
Advisory
Committee.
F
You
mr.
chair
I'm
really
excited
that
we've
come
to
this
moment.
This
has
been
actually
years
in
the
making.
This
is
the
second
iteration
of
a
Complete
Streets
policy
that
predates
my
time
on
the
council,
and
then
we've
been
working
on
this
for
probably
a
year
and
a
half
or
so,
and
the
amount
I
mean
when
you
see
the
list
of
stakeholders
it's
impressive,
but
when
you
kind
of
dig
into
how
much
time
you
Nathan
spent
and
other
staff
with
each
of
those
stakeholder
groups,
it's
just
really
a
lot
of
work
went
into
this
policy.
F
You
know
this
is
something
that's
four
pages
long,
which
I
think
is
a
strength.
You
know
we've
really
condensed
what
I
think
is
a
transformative
vision
for
how
we
approach
our
right
of
way
in
the
city
into
a
very
concise
policy
which,
as
you
said,
really
reinforces
where
we're
going,
but
I
think
takes
it
to
the
next
level
and
just
like
really
restates
and
reinforces
it.
I'm
really
excited
about
some
of
the
implementation
tools
that
we
wove
into
the
plan,
in
particular
the
checklist
that
staff
has
been
working
on.
F
That
will
look
at
how
it's
this
project
delivery
checklist.
So
every
time
a
project
comes
forward,
this
will
ask
questions
about
which
modes
are
appropriate
for
this
road.
If
something
is
on
the
bike
plan,
how
are
we
going
to
incorporate
a
bike
facility
and
if
not,
what
is
our
alternative
options
just
as
one
example
and
so
I
think
that
that's
the
part
where
this
is
really
going
to
get
ingrained
into
the
method
of
street
design?
F
There
were
a
few
other
implementation
pieces
that
there
were
in
a
previous
draft
which
are
not
in
this
one
and
I.
Think
that's!
Okay,
because
again
we
went
at
a
pretty
high
level
with
this
policy,
but
I
do
have
a
staff
direction
that
looks
more
toward
the
implementation
going
forward.
I
work
closely
with
director,
cocky
and
mr.
Kloster
to
write
this
along
with
many
of
the
stakeholders.
F
As
part
of
our
comprehensive
plan
update
I,
think
all
of
these
things
were
already
happening.
They
were
again
in
a
previous
draft
of
the
Complete
Streets
policy
and
these
will
be
on
different
timelines.
So
the
idea
isn't
that
you
would
have
these
all
done
by
the
end
of
this
year
or
by
this
time
next
year,
but
just
that
we
would
be
getting
these
periodic
report
backs
on
our
implementation
progress.
G
Thanks
mr.
chair
yeah,
this
this
is
really
exciting,
especially
you
know
I've
been
here
through
the
not
the
beginning
stages,
but
the
end
stages
of
adapting
the
always
forget
exactly
what
it's
called,
but
the
access,
Minneapolis
10-year
transportation
plan.
So
I
think
this
is,
you
know,
exciting,
to
see
this,
as
we
are
probably
about
to
embark
on.
How
do
we
update
that
plan
and
use
this
as
an
overlay
for
that?
G
I
know
that
there
has
been
a
lot
of
conversation,
a
lot
of
engagement
with
stakeholders
and
make
sure
that
we're
really
feeling
that
were
aligned
and
working
together
in
moving
forward
a
Complete,
Streets
policy.
So
I
really
appreciate.
There
was
a
lot
of
work.
They're
actually
had
a
question
which
is:
do
you
think
that
this
policy
will
it's
a
little
bit
more
about?
What
do
you
think
will
be
the
implications
of
this
policy
on
some
of
the
things
that
are
traditional
ways
that
we
choose
projects
and
things
like
this,
for
example,
having
this
policy?
G
Do
you
think
this
will
have
an
impact
on
how
projects
are
selected
and
forwarded
for
consideration
by
the
Capitol
long-range,
Improvement
Committee?
And
you
know
other
things
kind
of
through
that
process
and
I
just
say
that,
because
of
the
emphasis
on
the
pedestrian
he's
as
your
kind
of
biggest
building
black
and
then
kind
of
moving
forward
from
there
and
I
was
just
curious.
How
you
thought
this
might
start
playing
out
or
is
that
something
you'll
discover,
as
you
start
going
through
those
processes
that
are
part
of
the
traditional
work
of
Public
Works.
D
E
D
G
Well,
I
appreciate
that
and
I
just
really
kind
of
wanted
to
maybe
just
say,
I'm
interested
and
how
this
will
continue
to
play
out.
I
know
that
the
pedestrian
issues
are
really
getting
more
and
more
attention.
You
know
to
see
been
watching
the
news
about
accidents
in
st.
Paul
and
Minneapolis,
and
things
like
that
and
so
I
do
remain.
G
Just
interested
in
I
think
we're
seeing
a
lot
of
change
and
how
we're
approaching
Street
work
I
just
even
look
to
projects
in
my
own
ward,
we
have
this
big
project,
we're
working
on
in
cooperation
with
Hennepin
County,
about
46
Street
being
one
example,
so
I
feel,
like
I,
see
a
lot
of
change
starting
to
happen
and
how
we
approach,
how
do
streets
best
operate
for
all
users
of
those
of
those
modes
and
I
just
look
forward
to
kind
of
seeing
how
this
continues
to
influence
at
work.
So
thank
you.
C
Of
the
many
endorsements
received
for
this
policy,
as
councilmember
bent
vendor
mentions,
was
from
the
AARP,
and
it's
consistent
with
our
designation
effort
this
year
as
an
AARP
age
friendly
community.
It
also
promises
that
we
deliberately
seek
input
from
old,
Erminia,
paulo
tins
and
aspects
in
all
aspects.
Actually,
it
says
of
planning
and
implementation.
I
was
surprised
to
find
out,
as
we
were
looking
through
and
considering
this
Complete
Streets
policy
that
there
are
over
46,000
88
members
in
Minneapolis
alone,
and
is
there
a
way
it's
just?
C
My
question
is:
is
there
a
way
to
institutionalize
their
involvement
and
engagement
in
this
process
beyond
the
work
we
already
do
with
the
Bicycle
Advisory
Committee,
the
pedestrian
Advisory
Committee,
one
thought
I
had
was
perhaps
using
the
newly
revamped
Minneapolis
Advisory
Committee
on
Aging
is
another
resource
for
stakeholder
engagement.
That
would
be
a
lens
toward
working
with
older,
mini
Impala
tins
and
I
just
offer
it
as
a
question.
A
D
Can
address
mr.
chair
councilmember
palmisano,
you
are
correct.
Typically,
Public
Works
does
report
on
projects
to
the
Bicycle
Advisory
Committee
and
the
pedestrian
Advisory
Committee,
and
as
staff
we
have
been
having
ongoing
conversations
with
the
neighborhood
community
relations
staff,
which
does
oversee
the
Advisory
Committee
on
Aging
and
the
Advisory
Committee
on
people
with
disabilities,
and
we
have
been
having
ongoing
conversations
with
their
staff
is
how
those
advisory
committees
can
be
integrated
in
how
we
can
most
effectively
include
them
as
part
of
our
outreach
on
projects.
D
So
there's
something
we
are
working
on
and
that
we
have
been
having
conversations
with
both
those
advisory
committees
and
staff
from
neighborhood
community
relations
who
oversee
those
advisory
committees
as
compared
to
Public
Works
staff
will
oversee
the
bicycle
and
pedestrian
advisory
committees.
Thank.
F
You
mr.
chair
I
think
this
is
a
good
question.
That
kind
of
goes
back
to
the
discussions
we
had
about
developing
implementation
strategies
in
the
staff
direction,
so
AARP
actually
and
some
other
stakeholders
specifically
requested
that
we
create
an
implementation
committee
to
oversee
the
implementation
of
the
Complete
Streets
policy.
This
staff
direction
doesn't
go
that
far
and
give
staff
more
flexibility
in
determining
what
is
the
best
approach.
You
know
utilizing
our
existing
oars
and
commissions
or
if
they
see
that
it's
appropriate
to
look
toward
a
new
body.
F
That
would
really
probably
be
more
temporary
and
kind
of
reflect.
The
kind
of
engagement
that's
happened,
but
I
think
this
is
a
good
question,
so
it
seems
maybe
a
little
bit
time
consuming
for
staff
to
have
to
go
to
four
or
five
different
individual
boards
and
commissions
with
a
street
layout
for
each
layout.
We
do
but
I
think
that's
one
question
for
staff.
As
we
look
toward
the
implementation
of
our
Complete
Streets
policy.
Is
you
know?
F
So
I
think
there
are
multiple
all
that
to
say:
I
think
there
are
multiple
options
and
I.
My
hope
was
that
the
staff
direction
would
capture
the
work
that
staff
will
be
doing
to
recommend
what
would
be
the
best
approaches
to
incorporating
all
that
stakeholder
input
in
specific
projects
and
in
the
policy
work
that
will
need
to
happen
to
implement
our
plan.
D
Mr.
chair
councilmember,
bender
I,
do
understand
your
question
as
it
relates
to
the
community
engagement
and
one
of
the
items
that
we
are
working
on
for
the
Complete
Streets
project
delivery
checklist
is
making
sure
there
is
a
component
that
does
identify
what
the
community
engagement
plan
or
outreach
plan
would
be.
So
there
are
project
specific
that
require
greater
engagement
or
identifying
a
other
stakeholders
that
are
important
to
the
successful
development
delivery
of
a
project.
D
I
think
we
have
recent
examples
from
some
of
the
downtown
streets
that
we
have
that
have
much
more
robust
implementation
committees
and
having
the
product
delivery.
Checklist
have
explicit
items
that
do
identify
making
sure
you
are
out
reaching
with
the
correct
elected
officials
and
identifying
that
plan
early
on
in
the
process.
So
there
is
transparency
and
the
roles
and
how
the
outreach
is
performed
as
one
of
the
I
think
that
the
key
outcomes
of
the
Complete
Streets
is
making
sure
there
is
that
touch
point,
and
so
that's
identified
early
on.
A
Good,
thank
you
I
suppose.
There's
elements
of
you
know
you
concepts
of
universal
design,
which
are
you
know.
A
lot
of
cities
are
talking
about
that
that
sort
of
a
280,
livable
cities,
and
so
anytime
we
can
engage
with
folks,
I,
don't
know
if
you
know
want
to
be
assigned
to
the
elementary
school
children
group,
but
but
in
terms
of
our
seniors,
but
I
think
we
have
several
access
points
for
those
folks.
A
I
just
want
to
say
that
it
it's
just
an
impressive
amount
of
work
that
you
did
as
the
lead
staff
person,
but
all
the
support
staff.
That
really
said
this
is
going
to
be
something
that
touches
everything
that
the
department
does,
but
really
every
department
that
engages
in
the
physical
environment
of
the
city,
including
see
Pat
I
mean
this
really
goes
to
the
heart
of
that
and
I
think
we
took
a
really
good
approach
and
the
approach
was
on.
A
Your
early
recommendation
did
not
have
a
canvassing,
a
sort
of
prolific,
prescriptive
document
that
try
to
touch
all
things
for
all
times,
but
something
that
would
be
really
condensed
as
come
summer.
Bender
mentioned.
This
is
four
pages
that
are
extremely
dense,
but
the
sort
of
power
that
these
four
pages
have
is
pretty
pretty
instructive.
I
mean
it
will
be
a
very
centering
document
that
I
think
will
be
durable
in
multiple
situations
that
we
can't
even
contemplate
completely
as
projects
roll
out
and
want
to
be
consistent
with
the
themes
of
this
document.
A
It'll
be
a
strong
I
think
compass
for
a
lot
of
complicated
situations
to
realize
our
built
environment
and
how
people
move
around
on
the
city.
So
to
that
end,
I
really
really
applaud
the
effort
and-
and
don't
underestimate
these
four
pages,
that's
for
sure,
and
so
with
that,
I
think
I
will
move
this
item
with
the
accompanying
staff
direction.
There's
no
further
comment
of
my
bender
mr.
F
A
F
I,
just
don't
steal
your
thunder,
but
I
do
think
that
this
is
part
of
the
legacy,
that
of
all
the
millions
of
things
that
director
cocky
has
left
the
city
from
giant
infrastructure
projects
to
plans
and
policies.
I
really
think
that
this
is
something
going
forward.
That's
going
to
be
a
huge
difference
and
I.
E
A
That's
that's!
Not
the
easiest
thing
to
do.
I
mean
you
could
just
sort
of
deal
with
the
technical
deal
with
the
political
boom
get
her
done,
but
every
time
there
is
always
an
informed
citizen
component
to
your
final
decision,
making
processes
and
I
think
that's
reflected
not
just
in
all
the
work
that's
been
done,
which
is
notable,
but
in
terms
of
the
spirit,
moving
forward.
I
think
that
will
be
an
enduring
thing
that
I
certainly
take
to
heart.
So
thank
you
for
that.
Customer
glidden.
G
E
B
Dr.
cocky,
but
mr.
jerk
committee
members,
I
first
off
I,
agree
entirely.
We
have
a
very
talented,
deep
bench
in
public
works,
I'm
very
fortunate
to
be
able
to
work
with
some
very,
very
talented
people,
but
I
also
really
want
to
thank
your
committee
for
the
all
the
help
and
decisions
that
you've
helped
us
when
work
through
over
the
years
and
you're
very,
very
much
appreciated.
So
thank
you.