►
From YouTube: January 19, 2016 Transportation & Public Works
Description
Minneapolis Transportation & Public Works Committee Meeting
A
I'll
call
this
meeting
to
order
it's
a
regularly
scheduled
meeting
with
transportation,
Public
Works
Committee
I'm
console
my
break
I'll,
be
chairing
a
committee
I'm
joined
by
my
colleagues,
councilor
Yang,
glidden,
bender
and
Gordon.
We
are
a
quorum
and
can
proceed.
We
have
nine
items
today
on
the
agenda
between
a
public
hearing
and
discussion
item,
the
remainder
of
consent.
I
will
go
through
the
consent
items
and
councilmember
can
pull
them.
After
that.
Further
discussion
of
the
desire
item
two
is
receiving
and
filing
the
2016
paving
program
report.
A
Second
2016
on
the
following
ordinances:
amending
the
Minneapolis
code
of
ordinances
and
its
title:
13
title
18
as
listed
item
5
is
the
Xerxes
avenue
south
la
reconstruction
project,
designation
and
setting
the
public
hearing
and
that
public
hearing
will
be
set
for
march
first
2016
item
6
is
the
quarterly
submit
all
traffic
zones,
restrictions
and
controls
for
the
fourth
quarter
2015
and
will
be
receiving
and
filing
that
report
item?
Seven?
B
C
Morning,
mr.
chair
committee,
members,
my
name
is
Chris
engelmann
I
am
a
project
engineer
with
the
Public
Works
transportation
engineering,
the
design
division.
I
am
the
project
engineer
for
the
38th
street
east
reconstruction
project.
The
38
street
east
reconstruction
project
is
a
proposed
project
between
Hiawatha
Avenue,
minnehaha
avenue
on
38
street
east.
It's
a
full
reconstruction,
so
the
whole
roadway
new
pavement
curb
gutter,
sidewalks
ad,
a
compliant
pedestrian
ramps,
storm
drain,
unlit,
signing
striping
and
other
related
items
and
work
are
considered
for
this
project.
C
The
reconstructed
will
continue
to
carry
the
two-way
traffic
and
add
a
bike
facility
in
each
direction.
Working
will
be
removed
for
the
roadway
section
and
the
proposed
street
with
is
32
feet,
except
in
configurations
near
the
Hiawatha
Avenue,
where
the
road
configurations
already
established.
We
heard
today
to
ask
to
pass
a
resolution
ordering
the
city
engineer
to
proceed
and
do
the
work
and
adopt
special
assessments
in
the
amount
of
170
1730
dollars
and
eighty
eight
cents
pass.
C
A
See
none.
Thank
you.
I
will
now
open
the
public
hearing,
and
this
is
the
public
hearing
fried
and
one
the
thirtieth
Street
reconstruction
project,
as
described
on,
wish
to
come
forward.
Anyone
signed
in
see
you
none
with
that
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
move
approval
of
the
item
or
any
further
discussion,
see
none
all
in
favor,
say
aye
senting
name
that
carries.
D
Good
morning
good
morning,
and
thank
you
for
having
me
on
your
agenda
this
morning,
I
wanted
to
update
you
on
our
car
share
program.
Since
the
last
update
we
had
in
this
committee
on
November
10th,
if
you'll
bear
with
me,
I've
got
some
repeat
items
for
the
benefit
of
those
that
are
just
kind
of
tuning
in
to
the
issue.
D
Some
of
this
is
very
familiar
to
you
and
then
we'll
go
on
to
what
we've
been
doing
since
our
last
meeting
and
get
into
the
details
of
the
meat
of
the
policy
and
ordinance
that
we're
proposing
as
you're
all
familiar
with
the
different
car
share
models
that
we've
been
talking
about
round
trip
where
the
car
is
picked
up
by
a
customer
at
a
reserve
space
and
the
trip
is
ended
when
it's
research
return
to
that
same
stage.
Space.
D
As
a
point-to-point
floating
model,
where
the
service
area
contains
all
the
vehicles
and
the
trip
starts
when
a
vehicle's
picked
up
and
then
ends
when
it's
dropped
off
anywhere
within
the
service
area
and
the
one
we're
not
as
familiar
with
that,
we
will
be
dealing
with.
This
is
the
peer-to-peer
model
which
is
primarily
personally
owned.
D
Some
of
the
things
the
highlights
in
that
policy
were
to
try
to
shoot
for
annual
permitting
rather
than
negotiating
contracts,
annual
reporting
by
the
carshare
companies
instead
of
quarterly.
Since
we
didn't
need
quite
as
much
information
now
that
we've
established
how
it
was
working
in
Minneapolis,
the
coverage
areas
simplified
flat
rate
pricing,
the
number
of
vehicles,
if
we're
going
to
control
that
at
some
point,
all
of
these
things
were
things
that
we
were
going
to
consider
in
an
upcoming
policy.
D
So
if
it
was
just
the
policy
and
we
were
just
issuing
permits
with
the
application
process,
you
give
it
to
see
application.
We
give
you
the
permits.
If
it
were
that
simple,
we
wouldn't
need
ordinance,
but
because
we're
going
to
be
working
on
some
details
of
how
they
do
their
business
and
doing
some
regulation
with
the
policy
we're
required
to
have
that
in
ordinance.
D
I,
you
did
approve
the
consent,
the
public
hearing.
Thank
you
for
februari.
Second,
that's
what
we
were
primarily
here
to
ask
for
today
and
to
update
you
on
where
the
ordinance
was
going.
It's
very
simple
ordinance,
a
couple
of
pages
that
part
1
just
gets
into
putting
CarShare
operating
on
the
list
of
business
licenses
that
are
issued
by
staff
and
puts
it
on
the
fee
schedule.
D
D
The
application
process
is
detailed
in
the
policy
there
will
be
a
package
that
includes
the
business
license,
application
and
the
perfect
application
that
gets
into
more
meat
like
the
vehicle
information.
Where
are
your
reserved
spaces?
Do
you
have
the
permission
from
the
adjacent
property
owners
and
details
like
that?
The
policy
also
allows
for
hybrid
plans
in
anticipation
of
other
models
that
may
not
exist
yet
or
maybe
develop
just
for
Minneapolis,
and
it
gets
into
how
we
issue
the
permits,
the
logistics
of
it.
D
The
permits
will
actually
run
from
februari
first
in
January
31st
each
year
at
kind
of
coincides
with
what
business
licenses
is
doing
with
other
vehicular
type
of
business
license
permits
like
taxis
and
such
so
we're
just
aligned
it
with
that,
and
the
car
share.
Advisory
Committee
is
established
in
this.
This,
we
think,
is
part
of
the
key
to
the
success
of
the
program
long
term.
D
It
establishes
that
the
car
share
operators
that
want
to
participate
in
the
program
are
mandated
and
required
to
be
part
of
this
advisory
committee
so
that
on
a
regular
basis,
we
come
together
and
address.
Whatever
issue
may
come
up
and
kind
of
watch
the
program
as
it
evolves
analyze
the
data
as
it
evolves
and
make
recommendations
for
changes
if
they're
needed
down
the
line
since
there's
so
many
unanticipated
issues
or
anticipated
and
not
known,
we
feel
the
advisory
committee
will
be
key
to
addressing
those
down
the
line.
D
The
policy
also
gets
into
some
finer
details
like
relocation
of
cars
for
abandonment
rules
after
72
hours
or
if
there's
oversaturation
in
an
area.
It
allows
for
a
mechanism
for
us
to
adjust
the
limits
on
the
number
of
vehicles
within
a
particular
area
and
also
requires
the
car
share
operators
to
comply
with
local
state
federal
laws,
pay
fines
pay
for
towing
if
they
get
their
vehicle.
D
Stoughton
such
things
as
details
on
how
the
permits
weather
sticker
or
hang
tag,
how
they're
issued
how
they're
applied,
how
they're
used
by
the
car
share
operators
and
the
parking
privileges
that
come
along
with
participating
in
the
program.
That's
really
the
key
to
whether
good
morning
whether
the
the
car
share
companies
are
going
to
participate
with
the
city
or
just
completely
off
street,
if
they're
going
to
do
in
an
hour
program,
they're
getting
certain
privileges
with
it,
and
so
that's
how
we
are
requiring
those
certain
additional
issues
that
they
have
to
address
in
participation.
D
For
instance,
the
parking
privileges
would
point
to
point.
They
get
bark
at
metered
spaces.
If
it's
over
a
two-hour
space,
if
they're
under
two
hours,
then
those
aren't
included
in
what
they
get
to
park
for
free.
They
can't
go
over
that
limit.
They
also
have
some
privileges
in
critical
parking
areas,
but
they
don't
get
to
park
on
streets
where
the
street
sweeping
snow
emergencies
or
rush
hour
lanes
that
sort
of
thing.
So
the
policy
regulates
what
privileges
they
have
in
that
regard
and
the
changes
to
the
company
for
our
benefit.
D
We
need
to
know
when
they
change
their
service
area
or
the
number
of
vehicles
within
that
service
area,
because
the
actual
recovery
rate
on
the
meters
will
change
due
to
the
density
of
the
number
of
vehicles
within
area.
So
the
saturation
point
will
gauge
whether
that
meter
recovery
rate
goes
up
or
down,
and
that
too
I'll
go
back
here
that
that's
required
as
part
of
the
annual
reporting.
D
Whenever
a
point-to-point
company
changes
their
service
area
or
the
number
of
vehicles
in
that
service
area,
we're
asking
for
them
to
give
us
their
transaction
data
for
a
year,
so
that
we
can
see
just
how
much
that
meet
or
recovery
rate
should
be
engage
a
fair
level
of
requirement
from
them.
On
the
round
trip.
The
details
in
the
policy
are
getting
that
owner's
permission
when
they're
adjacent
to
whether
a
business
or
a
private
owners
property.
D
We
don't
know
where
that
will
be
involved
yet
either,
but
but
we're,
including
in
the
policy,
is
that
if
a
peer-to-peer
company
wants
those
on-street
parking
privileges
and
they
want
to
participate
in
the
program,
they've
got
to
follow
the
rest
of
the
rules.
Just
like
the
other
car
share
alligators.
D
As
we
mentioned,
the
reporting
from
the
car
care
companies
would
only
be
annual
and
not
as
much
data.
As
you
see
in
the
pilot
program.
Summary
report
that
we
handed
out
now
that
we
have
a
bit
of
a
direction.
We
don't
lead
as
much
so
we
won't
require
as
much-
and
we
talked
about
this
other
thing
with
the
areas
changing
they
have
to
give
us
transaction
data
for
a
year.
D
Brief
and
a
shortened
version
of
a
flat
rate
structure
that
makes
it
very
easy
to
understand
when
you're
looking
at
the
point-to-point
structure,
there's
two
levels:
either
they're
covering
citywide
as
in
a
or
they're,
not
and
we're
establishing
here
that,
if
they're
not
going
to
be
citywide,
their
service
area
needs
to
be
sixty-seven
percent
or
greater,
and
so
the
pricing
structure.
Here.
As
for
a
the
meter
recovery,
the
680
dollars
was
based
on
what
the
actual
rate
was
during
the
pilot
program
in
calculating
at
680,
so
that
doesn't
change
between
the
two
different
service
areas.
D
Unless
there's
a
metered
area,
if
they're
parking,
where
there
was
once
a
meter
and
we're
removing
a
metered
space
for
it,
they
pay
eighty
percent
of
the
space
value
calculated
on
the
the
same
kind
of
basis
as
we're
using
for
valet
spaces
and
for
calculating
the
value
of
other
spaces
throughout
the
city
if
they
displace
that
meter.
So
that's
it
in
a
nutshell.
D
The
policy
also
gives
us
some
room
for
growth
in
the
future
and
to
adapt
as
we
go.
We
don't
know
what
the
hybrid
models
or
the
peer-to-peer
may
ask
for.
We
don't
know
if
we
need
to
control
saturation
and
while
we're
anticipating
there
may
be
equity
issues,
we're
not
quite
sure
what
those
are
yet.
So
it's
kind
of
hard
to
pin
those
down,
but
we
have
that
ability
to
address
them
as
we
go
and
to
change
the
policy
with
Council's
approval,
top
line
and
you've
already
set
the
public
here,
and
so
that's
a
again
I.
D
Yet
now,
first,
we
haven't
actually
seen
the
proposals
from
car
to
go
one
of
the
largest
carriers.
It's
actually
working
now,
so
we
don't
know
exactly
what
they're
pitching
or
what
their
density
or
their
saturation
point
is
from
their
intention
and
some
of
this
again,
like
other
things,
we'll
find
out.
If
we
start
getting
citizen
complaints
that
there's
ten
cars
parked
in
their
neighborhood
and
it's
over
saturated,
then
we
can
address
that
through
the
Advisory
Committee
and
the
policy
allows
for
the
public
works
director
to
actually
set
saturation
limits
if
needed.
E
E
D
E
Thank
you
and
then,
since
we
had
discuss
it,
you
went
over
it
in
your
presentation,
but
I'm
so
since
card
ago
is
moving
a
sort
of
transitioning
their
business
model.
Could
you
talk
about
how
that
is
evaluated
through
the
permit?
So
we've
created
a
financial
incentive
for
companies
to
serve
this
larger
city
area.
Could
you
talk
through
that
a
bit
in
more
detail
about.
E
E
D
We're
going
to
be
able
to
arrive
at
something
that
still
meets
with
the
requirements
of
the
policy,
and
a
key
to
all
of
this,
too,
is
that
whatever
they
get,
we'd
have
to
be
able
to
offer
to
any
other
car
share
company.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
even
and
an
equitable,
no
matter
what
it
is,
that's
applied,
but
we
want
to
make
sure
that
it
fits
in
with
the
policy
as
well.
Is
that
answer?
Okay?
Thank
you.
Thank.
F
D
So
it
really
is
a
matter
of
coverage
between
all
of
the
car
share
companies
and
seeing
if
there
is
a
question
of
equity
and
access.
If
there's
a
neighborhood
that
does
have
that
demand,
much
of
it
can
be
market
driven,
at
least
at
the
start,
while
we
kind
of
dip
our
toes
in
the
water,
but
as
we
find
these
things
out,
the
Advisory
Committee
can
take
those
issues
on
under
consideration
and
make
recommendations
for
changing
it
or
possibly
incentivizing,
covering
such
areas.
That
might
later
on,
say,
wait.
F
And
my
fear,
with
this
market-based
approaches
just
that
it's
going
to
cover
an
area,
that's
pretty
close
to
downtown
and
all
the
upper
areas
of
Minneapolis
mm
may
not
be
covering,
and
you
know
I
think
at
some
point.
We
need
to
figure
out
how
to
incentivize,
folks
or
I,
don't
know
require
folks
to
cover
areas
that
are
much
more
outside
the
downtown
core.
D
Sir
mr.
chair,
the
as
I
said,
the
we're
still
talking
with
car
to
go.
I
think
this
is
in
reference
to
their
reduction
of
service
area
and
they
are
still
committed
to
putting
those
additional
stations
out
there
they're
still
looking
at
six,
and
they
haven't
it's
a
it's
a
little
difficult
for
them
to
go
out
and
get
permission
from
the
adjacent
/,
a
pop
property
owners,
since
we
don't
have
a
policy
yet
to
follow
from
so
it's
which
comes
first
kind
of
thing
and
so
they're
trying
to
identify
where
those
areas
would
be.
D
A
I
suppose
someone
extrapolating
on
the
points
reference
by
councilor
Yang,
those
could
be
marketing
venues
as
much
as
just
the
cars.
Are
there.
Here's
the
amenity,
use
it
or
lose
it
sort
of
thing.
It
could
also
be
a
chance
to
build
market
in
those
areas
that
currently
don't
demonstrate
that
type
of
activity
they
become
educational
centers
and
outreach
outreach
centers
as
much
as
here's
the
cars
for
you
in
this
corner
of
the
city,
sir,
any
further
conversation
seeing
none.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
B
A
This
presentation
and
ongoing
consideration
of
policy
changes
and
ordinance
changes
with
that.
If
there's
no
further
conversation
I'll
move
to
receive
and
file
the
update
of
the
proposed
car
sharing
program
policy,
any
further
discussion
see
none
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
sent
a
name
that
is
accrued
and
we've
concluded
today's
agenda.
Thank
you.