►
From YouTube: March 24, 2016 Zoning & Planning
Description
Minneapolis Zoning & Planning Committee Meeting
A
Good
morning,
I'll
call
to
order
with
a
much
better
microphone
than
mu
soup,
the
regular
meeting
of
the
March
24th
zoning
and
planning
committee
I'm
Lisa,
vendor
I
chair
the
committee.
We
have
a
quorum
today
with
council
members,
Goodman
Andrew,
Johnson,
Council,
President,
Johnson
and
council
member
wasabi
will
be
joining
us
shortly.
A
We
have
three
items
on
our
agenda
today.
Two
items
are
on
consent.
The
first
is
regulations
for
establishments
referring
to
staff
and
ordnance
related
to
regulations
for
establishments
that
provide
free
food,
clothing
and
services,
and
then
the
second
item
is
approving
appointments
to
our
heritage
preservation.
Commission.
These
are
two
reappointments
for
folks.
Who've,
already
been
serving
at
lower,
foul
sure
who's.
The
excellent
chair
of
our
hpc
and
sue
hunter,
we're
who
has
in
the
past
been
a
mayoral
appointment
that
is
now
shifting
to
be
a
council
appointment.
So
I
would
move
those
two
items.
A
If
there
any
discussion,
seeing
none
all
those
in
approval,
please
say
aye
aye
any
opposed
those
two
items
carry.
The
third
item
is
a
discussion
item
which
is
receiving
from
staff
an
update
about
the
Minneapolis
comprehensive
plan.
We
will
be
starting
this
significant
effort
here
with
this
council
action,
but
a
lot
of
work
has
already
happened,
so
I'd
invite
staff
to
come
on
up
and
please
a
walk
us
through
the
presentation.
B
B
As
you
know,
bed
staff
have
done
an
enormous
amount
of
work,
preparing
the
city,
the
community
and
certainly
our
departments
for
the
next
comp
plan,
update
process,
and
so
essentially
we're
here
this
morning.
For
two
reasons,
one
is
to
provide
you
with
a
brief
update
and
overview
of
where
we
are
in
that
comp
plan
process
and
then,
secondly,
to
also
request
council
action
to
direct
us
to
one
officially
begin
that
update
process
and
then
to
to
receive
and
file
the
mission
and
values
that
will
help
to
guide
that
update
process.
B
Run
like
page
here
so
as
you
as
you
may
well
know,
okay
did
I
go
too
far.
My
apologies,
as
you
may
well
know,
the
comp
plan
is
required
to
be
updated
every
10
years,
and
so
the
next
update
is
due
at
the
end
of
2018,
and
so
it
that
essentially
gives
us
a
three-year
window
to
get
this
critically
important
work.
That
which
is
certainly
why
your
support
and
cooperation
over
the
next
three
years
will
be
invaluable
to
ensuring
the
success
of
this.
This
process.
B
It
provides
a
forum
for
enterprise-wide
coordination,
collaboration
and
engagement
around
some
of
the
big
questions
that
we
need
to
ask
ourselves
and
answer
about
our
city's
future
questions
about
how
our
city
is
changing
about
inclusive
growth,
economic
competitiveness
and
resilience,
and
certainly
questions
about
the
changing
demographics
and
diversity
in
our
community.
And
so
this
is
an
opportunity
to
set
the
framework
for
planning
our
city's
future
based
on
principles
guided
by
shared
prosperity
and
equity,
and
with
that
being
said,
I'm
going
to
ask
kjersti
Munson
to
come
to
the
podium.
C
Thank
you,
executive
director,
Taylor
and
thank
you,
madam
chair
committee,
members.
Indeed,
c-pod
staff
have
been
engaged
in
this
process
with
Metropolitan
Council,
in
coordination
with
city
leadership
and
staff.
For
a
couple
of
years
now,
long-range
planning
staff
facilitated
the
city's
review
and
comment
on
thrive,
MSP
2040
back
in
the
spring
of
2014.
We
then
reviewed
the
regions
for
discreet
policy
plans
for
housing,
transportation,
water
and
Parks,
and
evaluated
the
region's
projections
for
growth
in
Minneapolis
for
population
households
and
jobs
to
2040.
C
C
That
page
guidance
is
provided
for
required
plan
elements,
including
land
use,
transportation
parks
and
trails,
housing,
resilience,
economic
competitiveness
and
implementation.
Each
of
these
overarching
plan
elements
has
a
number
of
specific
topics
that
must
be
addressed
within
our
plan.
Here,
you
see,
what's
listed
under
a
land
use
as
an
example
for
Minneapolis
detailed
minimum
requirements
are
provided
for
each
topic
area,
which
our
plan
must
meet
or
exceed.
C
In
addition
to
what
seven
intensity.
Under
the
category
of
plan
elements,
there
are
additional
expectations.
We
must
meet
natural
resource
protection,
historic
resource
protection
and
public
facilities
must
be
addressed.
According
to
the
statute,
we
also
consider
equity
a
plan
requirement
from
both
a
regional
and
city
perspective,
as
well
as
a
sea
pet
directive
outlined
in
the
department
and
division
plans
that
we've
developed
with
executive
director
Taylor
over
the
last
year.
As
the
executive
director
mentioned,
the
plan
must
be
completed
by
the
end
of
2018,
including
time
for
public
comment
and
adjacent
city
review.
C
We
anticipate
producing
the
plan
in
five
phases.
The
launch
phase
is
about
mobilizing
and
informing
the
community
about
the
update.
The
key
directions
phase
is
about
defining
an
outline
of
priority
policy
topics.
The
policy
framework
phase
is
about
shaping
goals
in
policy
language
around
those
topics
in
the
policy
document
phase
we
synthesize
and
draft
actual
chapters,
and
we
end
with
the
review
phase.
Each
of
these
will
include
engagement
strategies
customized
to
that
phase
of
work,
as
we
think
about
what's
important
to
us
in
2015.
C
Looking
out
to
2040,
we
thought
it
would
be
interesting
to
look
back
at
big
themes,
that
dominated
Minneapolis
plans
of
the
past
and
to
recognize
that
these
plans
reflect
and
codify
our
values
at
any
given
time.
They
truly
have
an
impact
in
the
50s.
The
big
ideas
were
about
highways
and
helipads
in
the
60s
urban
renewal,
in
the
80s,
Environmental
Protection
and
downtown
revitalization,
and
the
aughts
mixed-use
and
transit
first
and
in
the
09
plan,
sustainability,
arts
and
culture
and
multimodal
is
amor
big
themes.
C
In
the
current
plan,
the
themes
of
equity,
health
and
opportunity
have
emerged
as
key
values.
This
is
the
mission
statement
you'll
find
on
one
of
your
handouts.
The
mission
and
values
summary
which
you
have
before
you
as
a
receive
and
file
document
today,
Minneapolis
2040
and
in
aspiring
City
growing,
an
equity
health
and
opportunity
on
that
same
handout.
You'll
find
a
brief
outline
of
the
comprehensive
plan,
values
which
are
based
on
the
values
and
strategic
directions
adopted
by
the
city
in
2014.
They've,
been
further
informed
by
engagement
across
the
enterprise,
as
well
as
with
leadership.
C
Competitiveness
will
strengthen
economic
competitiveness
to
fuel
growth
and
economic
sustainability,
while
supporting
public
and
private
sector.
Innovation
and
good
government
will
develop
and
maintain
a
fiscally
sustainable
government
that
works
for
everyone
with
fair
and
transparent
public
systems.
C
Finally,
we've
also
established
a
clear
set
of
goals
for
civic
engagement.
We
aspire
to
meaningful
and
relevant
dialogue,
inclusive
representation,
transparency
and
access
to
information
and
opportunities
to
engage
empowerment
and
a
feeling
that
contributions
have
been
heard
and
responded
to
an
effective
use
of
city
resources.
C
We're
planning
to
launch
public
engagement
for
the
plan
at
the
Community
Connections
conference
on
April
second,
and
are
grateful
for
the
involvement
of
you,
madam
chair,
as
well
as
the
mayor
council,
president
johnson
and
councilmember
Reich
in
that
launch.
Our
website
has
been
under
development
and
will
go
live
the
same
day.
That
site
will
be
a
platform
for
engagement
and
information
sharing,
including
interactive
maps
that
will
provide
users
with
real-world
and
policy
insights
about
each
of
our
comp
plan
values
to
make
a
long
story
short
committee
members.
We
are
ready
to
begin.
C
Our
request
to
this
committee
today
is
to
adopt
the
resolution
officially
launching
the
Comprehensive
Plan
Update
and
establishing
City
Council
expectations
of
staff
in
the
delivery
of
that
plan
and,
secondly,
to
receive
and
file
the
supporting
documentation.
Thank
you
for
your
generous
time
and
for
your
consideration
of
this
item.
Council.
D
Member
Goodman
has
question
Thank
about
sure.
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
we'll
start
with.
When
I
look
at
your
community
engagement
plan
to
date,
it's
not
very
robust
as
it
pertains
to
people
who
don't
use
technology
at
all,
so
we
know
that
a
percentage
of
our
population
and
it's
a
fairly
significant
percentage
of
people
who
are
older,
are
not
going
to
be
tweeting
with
the
plan
or
meeting
in
a
box
having
party
part
participating
in
the
interactive
piece
of
it,
social,
media
or
digital
workshops.
D
A
If
I
might
jump
in
I
appreciate
the
question
and
ports,
your
answer,
I
do
also
have
a
staff
direction
today
that
will
ask
staff
to
come
back
with
a
detailed
engagement
plan,
with
the
expectation
that
every
council
member
who
wants
to
sit
down
and
review
the
list
of
stakeholders
the
engagement
strategies
and
the
timeline
has
a
chance
to
give
those
detailed
comments
before
it
would
come
back
through
this
committee,
but
yeah
I
think
that
staff
is
likely
ready
to
give
some
general
answers
today.
That's.
C
E
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
council
members,
so
I
really
appreciate
the
question
and
I
think
that
it's
a
very
good
question.
So
I,
let
me
go
through
a
little
bit
of
detail
about
what
we're
thinking
about
for
civic
engagement
and
we
do
have
behind
the
to
Pedro
roadmap
that
you
got
in
your
packet
about
a
40
page
document
that
then
that's
final
review
right
now
and
then
I
understand
will
be
now
reviewed
by
councilmember,
so
I
think
that's
a
very
good
thing.
I
want
to
mention
that.
E
To
that
you
know
we
create
these
civic
engagement
goals.
We
have
a
lot
of
objectives
under
them.
A
lot
of
what
you'll
see
is
inclusive
representation,
meaningful
dialogue,
a
lot
of
that
does
not
happen
with
technology,
and
so
we
have
designed
our
engagement
process
for
basically
any
personality
and
skill
set
and
ability
to
participate.
So
we
will
use
technology
absolutely
there's
a
lot
of
great
elements
to
our
website.
E
I
am
NOT
someone
who
naturally
lends
my
personality
to
just
being
on
technology,
I
like
to
talk
and
interact
with
people,
and
so
what
we
have
our
in-person
interactions.
We
have
these
large
group
events
like
Community
Connections
conference
and
then
we
will
have
technology,
and
so
let
me
give
you
some
examples
so
large
convening
events.
It's
Community,
Connections
conference.
It's
going
to
be
a
key
directions.
E
Meeting
later
in
the
year
for
the
for
the
staff
research
team
to
talk
about
the
key
directions
that
they've
developed
the
priorities
and
their
teams,
we
will
be
doing
a
lot
of
mobile
engagement.
This
is
I,
think
going
to
be
the
most
prominent
feature
of
our
engagement
process
is
going
out
to
where
people
are
and
naturally
gather.
So
we
want
to
do
a
lot
of
interaction
at
street
festivals,
cultural
festivals,
events,
where
people
gather
like
religious
institutions,
community
centers.
E
We
will
be
going
to
people
because
we
know
that
a
lot
of
people
don't
have
the
time
or
inclination
or
ability
to
come
to
us
to
engage.
So
that's
also
where
technology
comes
into
play
too.
There's
a
lot
of
people
who
won't
come
to
a
large
meeting,
but
they
might
add
midnight
be
on
their
computer
fiddling
around
and
and
once.
E
D
A
E
We
will
be
tracking
all
of
the
information
what
and
we
have
a
civic
engagement
team
that
I've
been
leading
for
a
few
months
to
develop
a
lot
of
the
information
and
outlines
details
in
the
civic
engagement
plan.
We
have
also
been
creating
documentation
techniques,
because
what
we
really
care
about
is
making
sure
that
we
have
this
inclusive
process,
but
that
also
it's
transparent.
E
The
information
we're
getting
so
we'll
be
tracking
a
lot
of
information,
but
but
one
of
our
first
elements,
at
least
on
the
website,
is
going
to
be
an
open
question
related
to
big
ideas.
So
the
conference
on
April
second,
is
about
big
ideas.
That's
it's
the
way,
we're
starting
the
civic
engagement
process.
What
are
your
big
ideas
for
20-40?
Is
it
helipads,
probably
not.
D
G
D
The
Left
everyone's
like
okay,
that's
kind
of
interesting,
but
on
the
right
it
might
not
be
so
interesting
and
funny.
So
are
we
just
letting
anyone
throw
out
any
idea
and
we're
going
to
seriously
consider
it
in
our
comm
plan?
This
is
supposed
to
be
an
economic
development,
transportation
and
land
use.
So.
E
I
think
what
your
mission
statement
resolution
clarify
is
that
this
is
a
plan
about
the
natural
built
and
economic
environment.
Those
are
the
topics
that
we
will
focus
on.
We
will
not
be
able
to
do
engagement
on
every
topic
of
that.
The
policy
groups
are
looking
at
because
that
is
just
infeasible,
but
we
will
be
prioritizing,
particularly.
The
requirements
of
the
met
council
will
be
required,
we'll
be
focusing
on
the
natural
built
and
economic
environment
and
there's
a
lot
of
elements.
You
know,
Public
Health
fits
into
that
really.
D
F
D
A
public
health
thing
I
mean
I,
can
just
I
can
see
this
playing
out
with
advocacy
organizations
with
the
way
this
has
been
set
up
more
than
in
the
past
and
I'm
concerned
about
it.
It
seems,
like
our
staff
is
saying,
come
to
us
with
all
of
your
ideas,
good
or
bad,
and
when
their
ideas
on
the
left,
everyone
thinks
it's
okay,
but
you
know
there
could
be
people
on
the
right
throwing
out
their
ideas
to
Donald
Trump
have
ideas
that
we
might
not
want
on
our
comp
plan.
D
E
Yeah
we
will
be
looking
at
themes,
and
so
the
planners
are
running
negation
process,
but
we
hope
to
achieve
is
participation
from
other
departments
because
they
have
expertise
that
we
don't
have.
We
hope
to
be
having
participation
from
a
lot
of
other
people
at
the
city,
but
the
planners
are
going
to
be
distilling
a
lot
of
the
information,
so
we
will
be
tracking
all
the
comments
we
received.
We
have
a
responsibility
to
do
that,
but
we
will
be
looking
for
themes.
D
E
When
we
think
about
consensus,
we
don't
think
about
everyone
agreeing
we
think
about
everyone
being
heard.
So
a
prominent
element
of
our
civic
engagement
plan
is
always
when
we
do
engagement
going
out
to
a
community
group
going
after
cultural
organizations
saying
this
is
what
we
heard
from
you
last
time.
This
is
how
we
were
able
to
use
some
of
that
information.
E
This
is
why
we
weren't
able
to
use
some
elements
that
you
talked
about
last
time
like
banning
circuses,
and
this
is
how
we
are
moving
forward
and
we
will
use
the
information
we
get
from
you
today.
So
it's
always
about
being
transparent
about
what
we
heard.
What
we
can
use,
what's
not
relevant
to
a
comprehensive
plan
and
then
moving
forward
and
constantly
doing
that
discussion
about
how
your
voice
was
heard
and
how
we
were
able
to
use
it
or
not.
I
think.
A
One
other
important
piece
I
have
to
kind
of
well.
First
of
all,
I
think
I
might
suggest
that
we
have
a
discussion
here
in
the
committee
about
the
engagement
piece
now
I
think
has
a
Morgan.
You
may
have
other
questions
about
other
things,
but
I
think
probably
others
will
have
these
two
so
and
I
think
it's
really
important
I,
because
I
also
have
concerns
about
the
amount
of
staff
time
yeah.
C
A
I
think
this
staff
direction
today
will
help
us
get
more
detail
on
what's
being
planned
and
will
help
the
council
understand
how
much
that
time
we
are
expecting,
mend
and
give
staff
the
ability
to
say
you
know
we
mean
we
may
need
to
say
no
to
something
they
may
need
to
strategically
orient
our
time
and
I
know.
This
is
already
part
of
what
staff
is
thinking
about,
but
I
think
we
just
need
more
detail.
The
other
piece
I
think
is
worth
mentioning
now
is.
A
I.
Think
those
checkpoints
back
through
the
council
will
give
us
an
opportunity,
as
a
body
to
help
refocus
that
work
to
respond
to
our
constituents
and
stakeholders
are
saying
to
check
in
with
staff
about
how
much
how
we
doing
on
the
amount
of
staff
time
that's
being
spent
on
engagement.
Maybe
we
would
need
to
correct
you
know
some
pieces
halfway
through
or
whatever,
but
we'll
have
those
opportunities
through
the
full
council
over
the
time.
So
I
didn't
and
council
we're
gonna.
D
Question
so
why
isn't
the
compact
kick
off
its
own
thing?
Why
are
we
taking
it
to
this
Community
Connections
conference,
which
is
essentially
a
group
of
advocates,
rather
than
having
a
kickoff?
That
would
be
inclusive
of
people
who
don't
participate
in
neighborhood
organizations
and
or
are
not
already
part
of
David
rubra
doors
cabal
of
groups?
Madam.
E
D
E
She
sent
a
gov
delivery
to
10,000
business,
licensed
businesses
in
Minneapolis
and
so
she's
doing
a
lot
of
things
that
would
normally
be
done
and
what
has
resulted
is
that
we
have.
The
numbers
are
much
further
past
than
what
they
haven't
been
in
the
past
years,
so
we
have
500
or
so
people
signed
up
for
the
conference
right
now.
E
D
G
President,
thank
you,
I'm
sure,
and
I'm
glad
we're
having
this
discussion.
You
know
as
I
think
about
when
you
talk
about
your
typical
audiences.
That's
you
know.
That's
who
I'm
going
to
hear
from
you
know
in
my
neighborhoods
or
who
are
going
to
access
some
of
this
outreach
as
I
hear
it
laid
out
now.
My
concern
is
for,
and
I
represent
part
of
North
Minneapolis,
obviously
people
that
are
really
disaffected
at
this
point.
G
You
know
they're,
there
I
had
a
whole
series,
and
I
know
my
colleagues
got
copies
of
emails
from
a
number
of
my
constituents
concerned
about
some
of
the
disparities
that
occur
that
exist
easily
the
rest
of
the
city
in
the
way
north
Minneapolis
is
exists
at
this
point
and
sort
of
you
know
in
the
frame
of.
Why
are
you
worrying
about
these
other
things
when
you
know
we're
waking
that
two
o'clock
good
morning
with
gunshots
on
a
regular
basis?
G
G
Savvy
they're
not
going
to
go
to
a
community
meeting.
They
don't
belong
to.
You
know
some
of
these
community
organizations
they're
not
going
to
go
to
a
cultural
festival
because
we
have
to
go
only
have
probably
but
two
of
them
in
North
Minneapolis
in
in
a
summer.
So
how
do
you
get
at
those
people
and
how
do
you
listen
to
them
and
have
as
a
part
of
this
comprehensive
plan?
What
are
we
going
to
do
to
change
the
trajectory
here
of
this
community
that
is
so
different
from
the
rest
of
the
city.
C
But,
of
course,
that
solution
is
going
to
be
very
custom
and
much
bigger
and
more
detailed
than
what
we
could
achieve
in
the
comprehensive
plan
and
I
wanted
to
speak
to
the
previous
item,
to
about
just
sort
of
opening
the
doors
and
letting
everybody
have
ideas.
I
think
that
is
something
we
heard
early
on
and
worked
really
hard
to
set
a
framework
up
to
avoid
this
kind
of
it's
everything.
C
So
I
just
want
to
say
that
this
idea
of
engaging
the
public
first
on
these
six
comprehensive
plan
values
we're
going
out
and
saying
on
the
topic
of
sustainability.
You
know,
let's
talk
about
that
topic,
that's
a
topic
that
we
know
we
need
to
address
as
a
city
on
the
topic
of
economic
competitiveness.
Let's
talk
about
that,
so
that
we're
not
just
going
out
with
an
open,
tabula,
rasa
and
saying
what
do
you
want
to
talk
about?
We're
really
framing
that
conversation
around?
C
What
we
know
are
the
city's
goals
and
objectives
and
then
the
next
phase,
the
key
directions
phase,
is
really
informed
by
these
robust
staff,
research
teams,
who
will
be
looking
at
existing
policy
seeking
information
through
from
our
public
engagement
process,
and
this
diagram
shows
the
the
communication
between
those
between
that
policy,
development
and
civic
engagement.
But
again
we
will
be
taking
key
directions
to
the
public
in
a
public
meeting
forum
and
not
just
going
out
and
asking
kind
of
tabula
rasa.
What
what
do
you?
What
do
you
think
we
should
do
so?
C
Those
are
specifically
so
that
we
can
begin
to
shape
a
conversation
that
is
appropriate
to
the
Comprehensive
Plan
scope
and
purpose,
and
that
we
can
try
to
manage
and
make
informed
decisions
about
whether
we
should
engage
on
a
certain
topic
or
whether
that's
better
handled
through
another
process.
I
hope
that
helps
to
inform.
F
You,
madam
chair,
one
thing:
I,
was
really
surprised
very
surprised
to
see
missing
from
this
is
there
is
no
talking
that
we
talk
about
cultural
festivals
and
meeting
is
in
a
box,
and
all
this
that
there's
no
mention
of
going
into
our
schools
and
engaging
young
people.
I
mean
these
are
people
that
are
in
20-40,
going
to
be
entering
their
forties
and
in
between
there
going
to
be
making
decision
about
where
they
want
to
live.
E
Am
so
madam
chair
comes
my
comes
to
member
Johnson,
so,
yes,
the
answer
is
yes
just
because
you
don't
see
it
on
our
two
pager,
and
this
is
again
why
a
to
behavior
might
be
a
simplistic
version
of
this
forum,
page
document.
We
have
a
section
in
this
document.
The
full
document
about
key
audiences
and
a
part
of
the
key
audience
element
is
to
reach
people
who
are
traditionally
underrepresented
in
civic
life,
because
this
is
a
20-year
document.
E
Reaching
youth
is
a
one
of
the
key
audiences
for
us
and
when
some
ways
that
we
have
thought
about
doing
that
are
through
cultural
festivals,
because
a
lot
of
families
show
up
at
those,
but
it's
also
through
working
with
the
park
board
and
the
school
board.
We
have
members
of
both
of
those
boards
and
staff
on
our
research
teams,
but
what
we
really
hope
to
do
is
be
able
to
do
exactly
what
you're
talking
about.
We
want
to
focus
on
youth,
so,
yes,
we
thought
about
that,
and
that
is
a
priority
for
us
good.
F
C
The
antig
route
from
youth
Coordinating
Board
has
offered
to
be
that
bridge
and
really
invite
the
youth
Coordinating
Board
to
participate
in
the
process
and
also
the
youth
cabinet
has
offered
to
really
just
be
a
reader.
Almost
like
a
you
know,
a
contributor
to
each
of
our
policy
topics
and
provide
input
from
a
youth
perspective.
So
we
think
that's
a
great
potential
asset
to
process
good.
F
And
a
few
other
things
I
wanted
to
mention
here
to
communities
of
faith,
I'm
sure,
that's
part
of
your
plan,
Neighborhood
Association,
sending
out
letters
to
everyone
I
think
even
he
has
appropriate
block
Club
leaders
leveraging
those
making
sure
we
are
being
geographically
specific
as
well
yes,
making
the
difference
between
the
city
wide
lens
in
the
neighborhood
blends
and
then
the
last
piece
and
I'm
just
gonna
kind
of
throw
a
dialogue
out
here
about
this
buddy.
You
know
coming
from
a
systems,
engineering
background
and
taking
user
input
and
feedback.
F
F
What
about
changing
industries
and
manufacturing
I
know,
there's
a
huge
when
you
think
about
3d,
printing
and
what's
coming
in
that
arena,
you
can
really
see
manufacturing
being
decentralized,
localized
lots
of
changes
there,
so
I
I
just
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
thinking
about
the
future
in
that
way,
I'm
planning
for
it
so
that
10
years
from
now
we're
meeting
it
where
it
is
and
we're
not
constantly
playing
catch-up,
which
is
what
I
think
a
lot
of
cities
end
up
doing.
Madam.
C
Chair
Council
for
Johnson
very
happy
to
hear
that
and
we're
absolutely
on
the
same
page,
and
I
can
tell
you
particularly
with
technology
we
have,
we
have
rapidly
been
expanding
our
purview
and
looking
at
what
other
cities
are
doing
from
an
infrastructure
perspective
from
an
economic
development
perspective
and
also
from
these
future
systems
perspective,
and
I'm
not
sure
if
everyone
is
aware
of
it.
In
about
six
months,
we
probably
will
have
federal
legislation
related
to
particularly
self-driving
cars,
and
I
know
I
think
six
states
already
have
state
legislation.
A
That's
a
zoning
and
planning
committee
date
so
and
I
would
HIGHLY
encourage
staff
to
reach
out
to
every
council
office
and
meet
with
council
members
and/or
their
staff
to
get
this
detailed
feedback
that
I
know
all
of
the
council
offices
is
going
to
have.
So.
Is
there
any
further
discussion
on
that
motion
seeing
down
all
on
approval?
Please
say
aye
any
opposed
name
that
carries
so
then
there
are
several
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
everyone
also
notes
that
there
is
a
resolution
authored
by
councilmember
Reich
and
myself
at
customer.
A
Wake
is
traveling
on
business
today,
so
can't
be
here,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
you
we
go
through
some
of
these
other
elements.
The
resolution
does
go
through
the
sort
of
background
and
legal
context
and
requirements
from
the
Met
Council,
but
we
also
include
some
of
those
pieces
that
you
had
in
your
presentation,
one
of
which
is
these
out
the
statements
of
our
goals,
and
so
we
used
the
adopted
goals
that
this
council
had
discussed
and
adopted
when
we
first
all
took
office.
A
But
I
think
there
are
some
small
changes
to
that
exact
language
and
framework
and
I
want
to
make
sure
to
that.
Mo
knows
where
that
came
from
and
what
is
in
front
of
us.
Could
you
talk
more
about
those
things
and
how
they
relate
to
the
goals
that
we
adopted
as
a
council
at
the
beginning
of
our
term?
Sure.
C
C
What
were
the
big
issues
that
they
thought
that
we
would
need
to
engage
in
as
a
city
looking
forward,
and
then
we
also
engaged
with
both
our
leadership
forum
in
the
months
in
advance
of
identifying
who
steering
committee
members
would
be,
and
then
the
steering
committee
to
shape
and
refine
these
particular
six
goals
or
values
so
that
that's
how
we
developed
it.
I
think
they're
still
strongly
rooted
and
what
was
adapted
in
2014,
but
with
minor
refinements.
A
Does
anyone
have
any
questions
or
comments
about
that
piece
of
this
okay
and
then?
Finally,
we
have
some
of
the
other
process
pieces.
So
the
structure
that
staff
has
recommended-
and
we
have
been
discussing-
is
to
have
research
teams
of
our
staff
from
citywide
enterprise
and
I.
Think
animals
numbers
here
have
commented
on
that
list
and
we
it
was
narrowed
down.
But
could
you
talk
through
that
piece
and
how
we
intend
to
have
those
research
teams
kind
of
engaged
in
this
work
and
what
we
expect
to
come
out
of
them
absolutely.
C
So
you
know
when
we
talked,
for
instance,
to
Gretchen
music
aunt
and
the
health
management
group,
Public
Health
Management
Group,
they
had
a
lot
of
ideas
that
were
very,
very
relevant
to
planning
things
like
walkability,
so
those
kinds
of
ideas
we
want
to
bring
forward
and
say
well
gee.
We
didn't
really
get
too
deeply
deep
into
that.
In
our
last
comprehensive
plan,
I
believe
Gretchen
said
there
were
maybe
one
or
two
sentences
related
to
health.
Of
course,
as
we
look
across
the
country
now
we
see
cities
making
this
a
major
topic
and
their
comprehensive
plans.
C
A
C
Correct,
in
fact,
I
believe
we
are
really
hopeful
that
that
won't
even
be
optional,
that
that
we
will
have
boards
and
committees
engaged
in
these
topics
either.
You
know
participating
directly
in
that
conversation
or
as
a
technical
advisor,
so
that
we're
engaging
to
with
representative
citizens
does.
A
A
C
A
Go
ahead
then,
and
move
to
receive
and
file
the
presentation,
as
well
as
move
the
resolution
offered
by
myself
and
councilmember
right.
Is
there
any
further
discussion
seeing
none
all
in
approval,
please
say:
aye
aye,
any
opposed,
nay
met,
carries.
Thank
you
so
much
for
everyone's
work.
Let
us
know
that
there
are
a
lot
of
staff
who
are
not
hear
the
audience
say
that
have
been
really
engaged
in
this
work
and
we
really
value
all
of
their
time
and
contributions
thanks
and
with
that
we
are
adjourned.
Thank
you.