►
From YouTube: September 19, 2017 Audit Committee
Description
Minneapolis Audit Committee Meeting
A
Good
morning,
I'm
now
going
to
call
to
order
this
meeting
of
the
Minneapolis
Audit
Committee
on
Tuesday
September
19th.
My
name
is
Lenny
Palmisano
and
I'm.
The
chair
of
this
committee
with
me
at
the
dais,
are
the
following
committee
members.
We
have
councilmember
Alondra
Connell
David
Fisher,
vice-chair
Scott
Neal,
councilmember,
John,
Quincy
and
Commissioner
Liz
Wilensky.
Let
the
record
reflect
that
we
have
a
quorum.
Please.
A
A
It's
been
moved
and
seconded
to
adopt
the
agenda.
All
those
in
favor
of
the
motion,
please
say:
aye
aye
opposed
the
eyes
have
it.
The
agenda
is
adopted.
First,
we
need
to
accept
the
minutes
from
our
last
meeting
on
June
27th,
so
I
will
move
adoption
of
those
minutes.
All
those
in
favor,
please
say:
aye
opposed
the
eyes.
Have
it
in
the
minutes.
For
that
meeting.
A
Our
adopted
colleagues
before
us
today
is
the
Minneapolis
Police
Department
body,
camera
audit
body
cameras
are
an
important
tool
for
safety
and
for
transparency
in
our
city,
but
like
any
tool,
it's
the
responsibility
of
the
user
to
ensure
that
it's
used
appropriately.
So
after
a
series
of
high
profile
incidents.
This
year
we
directed
our
audit
team
to
look
into
the
use
of
body
cameras.
Part
of
this
was
also
to
fulfill
the
state's
requirement.
So
if
this
would
be
early,
it
was
after
six.
Months
of
use
will
also
be
satisfying
the
state's
legislative
requirement
today.
A
B
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
good
morning
out
of
committee.
My
name
is
Walt
Etzel
I'm,
the
director
of
internal
audit.
Here
at
the
city
me
appleĆs
and
on
the
agenda,
like
you
said,
we
just
have
that
one
audit,
which
is
the
mobile
and
body
worn
camera
after
that
I,
will
also
give
the
typical
order
or
update
that
you
used
to
seeing.
B
C
B
So,
to
provide
a
little
background,
the
Minneapolis
Police
Department
utilizes
body,
worn
cameras
and
squad
car
cameras
to
record
instances
of
police
work
and
interactions.
The
usage
is
dictated
by
policy
and
is
governed
in
part
by
state
statutes.
Both
the
body,
worn
camera
and
squad
cameras,
which
we
refer
to
you
in
this
report,
is
mobile.
Video
have
systems,
officers
and
administrators
used
to
access
archive,
categorize
view
share
and
delete
information.
A
Mr.
tezo
I
think
this
is
I
just
want
to
also
set
up.
How
will
operate
here.
I
think
it
might
work
best
and
most
comfortably
if,
as
people
have
questions
from
the
dais
here,
that
you
just
raise
your
flag
and
I'll
be
I'll,
be
looking
if
you
want
clarification
on
a
specific
item,
I
also
forgot
to
mention,
but
it's
very
important
to
mention
that
we
have
the
police
with
us
here
today.
So
thank
you,
assistant,
Chief,
Joseph,
commander,
Granger,
deputy
chief
Halverson
for
being
here
and
being
part
of
this
audit.
A
B
Going
through
odd
objectives
and
scope
notes,
audit
consisted
of
multiple
work
streams,
primarily
the
Minnesota
state
legislative
requirements.
As
you
all
know,
this
has
been
on
our
audit
plan.
Already
we
plan
on
doing
this
work.
It
was
just
expanded.
We
looked
at
IT
general
controls
around
the
technology
and
equipment
and
general
usage
and
body-worn
camera
policy
review.
B
The
deck
is
organized
with
these
Chevron's
in
the
top
and
these
five
categories,
and
so
as
we're
going
through
these
slides
the
category
that
we're
speaking
to
will
be
highlighted
in
green,
so
we
don't
get
lost
and
we
know
where
what
topic
we're
on
there.
So
this
is
to
sort
of
help
everyone
keep
track
of
exactly
where
we
are
in
this
presentation.
Thank.
A
You
mr.
Tuttle
I
also
just
wanted
to
interject
here
that
this,
like
auto
all
audit
reports,
the
report
and
the
content
of
this
report
isn't
public
until
we
order
it
published
so
I
do
have
copies
here
for
people
that
are
interested
and
as
soon
as
we
do
order
that
published
I'll
give
them
to
the
clerk.
Thank.
B
B
Doing
that
it
just
means
it's
not
in
our
policy,
there
were
also
access,
authorization
and
procedure
issues
and
video
classification
issues,
so
part
of
the
state
requirements
is
that
we
assign
a
record
type
and
when
I
say
that
I
mean
like
public
private
confidential,
those
type
of
record
types,
the
categories
that
we
have
these
videos
in,
so
we
have
use
of
force.
We
have
arrests,
those
need
to
be
lined
up.
B
B
There
were
16
controls
as
well
that
were
compliant,
but
we
would
recommend
enhancements
on
those.
So
you
have.
We
have
some
detail
that
we
can
share
with
the
committee
and
the
police
department
in
areas
that
we
think
that
are
compliant,
but
advise
that
they
enhance
some
of
those
processes
that
they're
that
they're.
D
B
So,
rather
straightforward
now,
this
work
was
done
by
backbone
consulting
so
there
are
Co
sourced
IT
auditors,
which
would
also
make
them
an
independent
audit
function.
So
as
we
get
this
to
the
governing
body
at
the
city
into
the
states,
they
can
have
that
comfort
that
this
was
this
work
was
done
by
a
third-party
independent
of
the
city
that
statute.
So
if
any
questions
there
are.
A
There
any
questions
related
to
the
state
reporting
requirements.
I
have
one
just
because
we've
spoken
about
this-
and
we
were
speaking
about
this
yesterday
with
the
VA
chief
Halverson,
we're
six
months
into
the
active
body
camera
program,
and
is
it
fair
to
say
that
it's
nice
that
we're
doing
this
now,
because
now
we
can
build
these
things
in
and
be
fully
complaint
like?
Would
you
expect
a
brand
new
program
in
this
first
six
month
period
to
necessarily
meet
all
of
these
56
criteria?.
B
Madam
chair
I,
don't
know
if
I
have
an
answer
to
that
honestly
I
mean
we.
We
drafted
our
policy
before
the
statutes
came
out
over
finalized.
We
did.
We
did
do
a
consultation
in
2015
and
one
of
the
recommendations
in
that
consultation
over
the
body
camera
program
was
keeping
tabs
on
the
statutes
to
make
sure
that
any
changes
we
need
to
make
in
the
program
remain
there.
So
I
don't
know.
If
it's
fair
to
say,
we
need
a
warmup
period
for
that
or
six
months
or
nine
months
or
whatever
it
I.
C
B
All
right
so
now
we're
going
to
jump
into
equipment
and
software
and
as
well
backbone,
are
Co
source
IT.
Auditors
did
this
work
they're
the
experts
here.
So
if
detailed
questions
do
come
out
of
this
I
might
refer
to
them.
For
some
of
these
answers,
there's
a
lot
of
technical
stuff.
In
a
couple
of
these
slides,
the
police
department
chose
axon,
which
was
formerly
taser
for
equipment
and
software
vendor.
B
We
agreed
with
their
choice
when
we
did
the
consultation
of
their
pilot
program,
and
so
we
wanted
to
run
through
some
of
the
equipment
features
here
and
talk
about
some
of
the
limited
work
that
we
did
there's
up
to
a
12
hour
battery
life
on
the
cameras,
so
we
feel
like
they're
sufficient.
The
batteries
are
adequate
for
a
typical
shift.
There's
adequate
data
storage
capacity,
I,
don't
think
we'll
ever
have
to
worry
about
the
camera
running
out
of
storage
space
for
video
recording,
they're
tamper.
B
So
this
isn't
like
a
camera
that
you
buy
as
a
consumer
where
you
can
take
memory
cards
out
or
plug
into
your
home
computer.
This
is
all
of
the
connections
are
proprietary.
This
isn't
something
that
you
can
tamper
with
and
and
that
officers
or
system
administrators
or
anyone
else
can
just
simply
plug
USB
cord
into
and
pull
all
the
information
out.
We
felt
that
was
pretty
important
to
talk
about
here
from
the
public's
perspective
of
no.
E
B
There
is
like
I
mentioned
non
removable
storage.
The
data
is
encrypted
within
the
cameras
at
rest
and
in
transit
using
the
FIPS
140-2
cryptographic
model,
which,
from
what
I
understand
is,
is
extremely
sophisticated,
as
I
mentioned.
Also,
the
data
port
is
proprietary
so
where
they
dock
their
cameras
to
charge
and
upload,
isn't
something
that
you
can
find
equipment
to
do
elsewhere.
This
is
proprietary.
B
So
if
you
have,
if
you're
wearing
your
camera-
and
you
have
it
on-
and
you
need
to
activate
the
video
you
press
the
button
you
have
30,
it
starts
saving
the
30
seconds
back
with
30
seconds
is
what
we've
currently
set
that
buffer
to
for
video.
Only
so
it's
muted
I
think
there's
an
option
to
not
have
muted
they've
just
mute,
but
there's
30
seconds
of
video
back.
If
you
have
your
camera
powered
on
mm-hmm
I
think
that
buffer
can
be
extended
up
to
two
minutes
from
the
30
seconds.
B
But
beyond
that
it
doesn't
have
that
capacity.
There's
also
GPS
within
field
tagging,
so
officers.
If
they're
in
pursuit
and
something
happens
they
can,
they
can
use
their
camera
to
GPS
tag
that
location
if
they
need
to
go
back
or
document.
You
know
where
things
happened
as
they
were
doing
their
work.
B
It's
weather
resistant
to
an
ip67
standard
which
I
know
very
little
about,
but
apparently
that's
good.
There
is
remote
activation
capabilities
with
these
cameras
that
doesn't
mean
that
here
at
City
Hall
they
can
turn
people's
cameras
on
and
off.
That
means
there's
other
devices
like
a
holster
mechanism
or
things
that
you
can
put
in
the
car
if
you
open
doors
or
turn
lights
on
that
can
remotely
activate
the
camera
to
turn
on
as
well.
B
It's
not
a
we're
watching
you
and
we
can
watch
through
your
camera
as
far
as
I
know,
and
there
are
power
and
record
indicators
on
the
camera.
So
when
the
cameras
on
there's
an
officer
can
tell
there's
a
light
that
shows
that
the
power
is
on
and
then
when
it's
recording,
there's
an
there's,
an
indication
of
light,
so
an
officer
or
someone
within
their
sight
could
hopefully
see
that
it's
recording.
We
didn't
find
any
issues
with
the
equipment.
We
think
it's
great
equipment.
There
wasn't
anything
that
we
were
concerned
about
with
the
equipment.
B
Software,
software
and
and
the
cloud
so
we
in
the
consultation
we
did
a
little
bit
more
analysis
on
cloud
storage.
Back
then
axon
was
using
the
Amazon
Cloud
they've
recently
switched
to
the
Microsoft
Azure
cloud.
We
have
an
isolated
cloud
environment,
which
means
our
data
isn't
commingled
with
other
municipalities,
other
body,
camera
programs
or
data
is
segregated
there,
the
its
aegis
compliant
cloud
environment,
so
criminal
justice
information
requirements,
they're
all
embedded
into
the
software.
B
E
B
Our
role
based
access
controls
in
the
software
so
administered
it
can
we
have
a
bunch
of
roles.
Administrators
have
certain
rights
that
officers
might
not
have
so
on
and
so
forth.
So
you
can.
You
can
customize
those
those
roles
and
you
can
also
configure
retention
schedules.
So
we
have
various
types
of
video
that
we're
recording
example,
non-evidence
or
an
arrest
or
a
start-up
or
a
training.
B
You
can
assign
a
retention
schedule
to
to
all
those
video
types,
there's
also
detailed
logging
and
reporting,
actually
very
detailed
logging
and
reporting
we're
really
happy
to
see
how
much
detail
we
could
get.
You
can
pull
up
a
camera,
see
you
when
it
was
powered
on
how
long
video
it
took
you
can
there's
information.
Then
there
on
the
battery
life,
really
good
logging.
There
there's
also
MPD
smartphone
integration.
So
what
the
camera
comes?
A
smartphone,
that's
integrated.
B
B
There's
there's
capability
for
multi-factor
authentication
and
what
that
means.
Is
you
have
your
typical
sign-in
and
pass
word,
but
it
can
also
have
another
mechanism,
another
layer
of
authentication
for
you
to
get
in
so
that
could
be.
Sometimes
you
can
get
it
like
an
electronic
token.
That
has
a
number
that
rotates.
Sometimes
it
can
be.
D
Tatlock,
just
a
question
about
the
forensic
fingerprint
item:
does
that
finger?
Is
there
a
different
fingerprints
when
an
a
video
is
shared?
So
if
you're
the
recipient
of
a
shared
video,
is
there
a
is
there?
Is
there
a
unique
fingerprint
for
that
as
well,
or
is
that
or
do
we
keep
track
of
that
with
just
some
kind
of
logging
system,
I'm.
B
Gonna
guess
here
and
they
can
confirm
whether
I'm
right
I
think
it
would
be
the
same
fingerprint
to
authenticate
that
that
was
an
unaltered
version
of
that
original
video.
So
if
you
did
something
before
you
shared
it
like
redacted
faces
or
blurred
out
scenes,
then
it
would
be
a
different
fingerprint.
Okay,
I'm
correct
sorry,
sorry,
madam
chair,
for
not
addressing
you
there's
the
deletion
approval
workflow,
so
things
can't
just
be
deleted
accidentally
or
fat-fingered
with
some
of
the
key
board
and
original
videos
are
never
modified.
B
We
also
think
that
they
should
be
doing
periodic
access
reviews
so
as
a
not
as
an
officer
might
leave
employment
with
the
city
ensuring
that
their
their
system
access,
because
evidence.com
is
web-based
so
you
could
go
at
home
and
use
it,
but
their
access
is
is
truncated,
appropriately
and
document
2.
We
ask
them
that
they
document
their
access
control
procedures.
So
what
are
the
processes
that
they
follow
to
provision,
monitor
and
control
access
to
the
system?
B
B
But
what
we've
found
in
some
of
our
work,
that
things
could
be
miscategorized,
so
something
that
wasn't
training
could
accidentally
or
purposely
be
categorized
as
training
and
in
90
days
it
would
be
deleted
from
the
system,
so
we're
recommending
that
retention
schedule
be
bumped
up
to
1
year.
So
in
case
anything
was
mislabeled.
We
wouldn't
have
issues
of
it
being
lost
before
we
needed
to
use
it
or
wanted
to
use
it,
and
then
mapping
data
core
data.
B
Category
stood
out
of
classifications
like
I
mentioned
before,
there's
public
private
I
think
use
of
force
is
public
information.
Other
footage
is
considered
private,
so
mapping
those
record
categories
to
the
to
the
categories
that
they
have
for
the
different
video
types
and
then
ensuring
all
videos
have
the
an
assigned
category.
So
if
you
don't
assign
a
category,
it'll
be
unclassified
which
isn't
really
helpful
for
anyone.
B
D
B
B
Okay,
we're
gonna
get
into
policy
and
training,
then
so
the
scope
here
was
reviewing
the
policy
for
adequacy
based
on
statutes
and
regulations
and
programmatic
coverage.
So
we
have.
We
have
to
comply
with
the
Minnesota
statutes
because
they
have
things
that
they're
saying
that
we
need
in
our
policy,
but
we
also
looked
at
an
in
general
for
a
program
of
this
scope
and
breadth.
B
What
would
we
expect
to
see
in
a
policy
then
we'll
talk
about
deviations
from
that
policy
and
further
considerations,
so
the
initial
body-worn
camera
policy
was
issued
in
June
of
2016
and
updated
a
couple
of
months
ago.
As
most
of
us
know,
it's
categorized
within
the
the
four
200
policy
series
that
covers
equipment
and
supplies.
So
if
we
think
about
the
body
camera
program,
it
is,
it
is
equipment.
But
if
you
think
about
how
to
administer,
monitor
oversee
the
program,
it's
a
little
bit
more
broad
in
scope
than
equipment
and
supplies.
B
So
there's
there's
a
potential
there
for
an
expansion
of
the
policy
and
and
maybe
where
it
sits
and
how
its
it's
housed
within
the
volumes
of
the
police,
department,
policies
and
procedures.
The
policy
contains
sections
that
cover
to
varying
degrees,
the
following
officer
and
supervisor:
responsibilities,
activation
and
deactivation
requirements,
data
access,
retention
and
duplication
rules
and
critical
incident
protocol.
A
G
G
B
B
This
next
slide
doesn't
speak
to
Minnesota
state
statutes.
This
is
our
recommendation
of
items
that
the
policy
should
cover
right.
So
I
won't
read
it
to
you,
but
here's
a
laundry
list
of
topics
that
we
feel
should
be
in
the
policy
that
either
aren't
there
or
aren't
there
in
an
adequate
nature
for
anyone
to
understand
how
to
use
this
program
or
administer
or
some
of
these
processes.
B
There
was
a
little
note
at
the
bottom
as
they
developed
the
body
worn
camera
program.
Other
aspects
might
come
to
light
that
need
to
be
in
here,
so
this
isn't
meant
to
be
an
exhaustive
do
this
in
your
in
your
policies
golden
it's!
Here's
things
that
we
noticed
when
we
were
looking
at
this,
this
broad
program
that
weren't
addressed
in
the
policy.
B
We'll
go
into
a
training
here,
so
we
looked
at
training
materials
for
completeness
so
covering
the
policy
and
the
state
statutes
and
then
using
that
equipment
and
technology,
and
then
for
the
for
completeness.
We
did
look
at
attendance
records
and
timing
prior
to
the
camera
issuance.
So
the
the
Police
Department's
BTU
unit
put
together
the
training
program
and
executed
that
an
officer
had
to
sit
through
the
training
program
to
be
assigned
a
camera
so,
except
for
the
pilot
program
where
there
might
not
have
been
as
robust
a
training
program.
B
Any
officer
that
has
a
camera
today
has
been
through
the
p
d--'s
internal
body,
worn
camera
training
which
we'll
talk
about
here
on
the
next
slide.
So
we
compared
the
policy
to
the
training
materials
to
determine
how
comprehensive
the
training
was,
and
in
general
it
was.
It
was
pretty
comprehensive
to
the
policy
and
I'll
remind
everyone
we
felt
like
there
were
some
gaps
in
what
the
policy
had.
B
There
were
three
attributes
that
in
the
policy
that
weren't
covered
in
the
training
materials,
these
relate
to
situations
like
if,
if
a
camera
becomes,
if
the
battery
dies
and
they
and
they
need
to
go
back
to
the
precinct,
what
do
they
do
and
who
do
they
need
to
notify?
So
some
of
that
information
everything
else
we
felt
like
they
did
a
good
job
I'm,
putting
together
in
those
training
programs,
as
the
policy
is
built
out
and
the
program
is
further
built
out,
we
would
expect
training
and
communication
enhancements.
F
B
A
F
B
D
You,
madam
chair
mr.
petzƤll,
in
the
in
the
report.
You
referenced
a
couple
of
times
how
what
the
policy
is
regarding
off
off-duty
work
and
when
cameras
are
used
or
or
worn
and
off-duty
work.
What
are
examples
of
off-duty
work?
That
officers
would
wear
their
camera
and
activate
it
at
the
appropriate
times.
B
Madam
chair
mr.
Neal
I,
don't
know
a
lot
about
off-duty
work.
Off-Duty
work
is
is
approved,
work
through
the
department
where
officers
can
be
uniformed
with
with
squad
cars
and
work
for
private
companies
or
businesses
within
the
city.
It
might
be
security
or
it
might
be
just
presents
things
like
that.
So
if
you
go
to
Target,
you
might
see
a
uniformed
MPD
officer.
They
could
be
working
for
target
in
an
off-duty
capacity.
Whole
Foods
is
another
example.
B
So
there's
the
the
city
allows
and
I
think
have
worked
out
with
the
police
union
how
that
operates,
but
it's
I
don't
have
a
lot
of
information
on
exactly
what
it
looks
like
and
how
it
works
in
the
policy.
It
does
require
that
the
officers
with
the
camera
wear
it
on
approved
off-duty
work.
So
if
they're
on
approved
off-duty
work,
they
should
be,
they
should
have
the
camera
on
and
be
using
it
as
they
would
if
they
were
on
duty.
D
A
Just
to
clarify
mr.
Tetzel
I
think
I
think
what
was
found
that
it's
very
difficult
to
audit
something
like
that,
because
we
don't
have
the
data
to
try
and
map
footage
to
a
schedule
in
this.
In
that
particular
case,
that's
part
of
why
we
had
to
limit
this
to
just
you
know:
on-duty
work
for
the
city,
although
we
do
indemnify
officers
for
approved
off-duty
work.
C
B
B
C
C
B
It
covered
everything
in
the
policy
how
to
use
the
camera
and
how
to
use
the
associated
software.
So
you
know
there's
the
software
called
evidence
comm.
You
know
when
your
videos
get
uploaded
there,
how
do
you
categorize
them?
Okay?
How
do
you
use
that
software
so
yeah?
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
and.
A
B
B
That's
when
we
could
that's
our
best
sense
of
the
entire
population
of
when
officers
are
dispatched
to
a
situation
and
there's
enough
detail
in
there
for
us
to
understand
when
officers
are
dispatched,
if
they
actually
did
respond
to
that
and
the
type
of
incident
that
it
was
so
really
good
data
to
start
with
from
here's,
where
we
expect
to
see
camera
footage
now
the
policy
changed
this
summer.
So
before
policy
there
were
very
certain
things,
though.
The
camera
was
required
to
be
used
for
after
the
policy
change,
it
was
basically
everything
any
dispatch.
B
Any
call
turn
your
camera
on,
but
we
used.
Our
starting
point
was
that
computer
assisted
dispatch
data
to
see
whether
or
not
a
video
was
existed
for
that
data
there,
and
then
we
did
an
analysis
of
recorded
video
to
measure
how
adequately
cameras
are
being
used
when
required.
An
analysis
of
recorded
video
and
dispatched
to
measure
how
correctly
videos
are
being
categorized.
B
So
we'll
start
with
startup
and
activation,
so
startup
check
wasn't
being
done
sometimes
or
was
sometimes
being
done
in
the
field.
A
startup
check
is,
is
the
purpose
of
it
is
to
make
sure
that
your
camera
is
operable
before
you
head
out
into
the
field
and
get
started
because
once
you're
out
there,
if
your
camera
is
not
working
it,
it's
kind
of
dragged
and
you'd
rather
understand
that
before
you
leave
the
precinct
with
your
car
and
all
of
your
other
equipment.
B
A
B
B
So
we
talked
about
that
buffer
that
30-second
buffer
and
I
mentioned
that
buffer
works
when
your
camera
is
powered
on.
If
your
camera
is
powered
off
and
you
hit
the
record
button,
it
doesn't
have
that
30-second
rolling
buffer
that
it's
been
saving
internally.
So
you
won't
have
that
30-second
preview
you'll
just
have
from
when
you
push
the
button,
which
turned
the
camera
on
and
activated
the
record
function.
B
So
we
have
this
table
here,
which
is
probably
hard
for
a
lot
of
people
to
see,
but
it
goes
through.
The
startup
test
results,
so
we
broke
it
out
to
a
percentage
of
time
that
a
start-up
does
not
exist
before
and
after
policy
and
the
percentage
of
time
the
startup
is
done
in
the
field
before
after
policy.
So
for
start-up
videos
a
percent
of
time,
the
startup
video
does
not
exist
before
policy
was
forty-four
percent
of
the
time
after
policy
twenty
four
percent
of
the
time.
B
So
there
was
an
improvement
there
and
then
the
percentage
of
time
of
the
startup
was
done
in
the
field
before
policy
changed
ten
percent
of
the
time
after
policy
changed
twelve
percent
of
the
time.
So
a
little
little
worse
than
the
performance
there
now
I'm
going
to
jump
into
some
activation
test
results.
So,
starting
in
with
dispatch
data,
we
selected
a
sample
a
statistically
relevant
sample
and
then
tied
that
back
to
evidence
comm
to
look
at
the
videos
there.
B
So
one
of
the
one
of
the
tests
that
we
wanted
to
do
was
whether
the
video
existed
to
begin
with
right.
So
we
did
this
for
CAD
base
and
for
use
of
force
for
use
of
force
before
the
policy
on
26
percent
of
the
time.
The
videos
did
not
exist
in
evidence.com
after
a
policy
change
for
use
of
force,
seven
percent
of
the
time
videos
did
not
exist
in
evidence
comm
for
CAD
base,
which
is
a
more
general
bucket
before
the
policy
changed.
B
Thirty
five
percent
of
the
videos
did
not
exist
in
evidence
comm
and
after
the
policy
change.
Twenty
nine
percent
of
the
videos
did
not
exist
in
evidence,
become
or
repeat
that
we
tested
whether
or
not
the
video
existed
based
on
CAD
data
looked
for
videos,
twenty
nine
percent
of
the
time
after
the
policy
change,
their
video
did
not
exist
for
an
officer
that
was
dispatched
to
go
to
an
incident.
B
B
B
It
was
turned
on
after
that
they
arrived
at
an
incident
the
last
column
here
on
the
bottom
right.
We
looked
at
the
percentage
of
videos
missing
that
buffer.
So
how
many
times
was
the
camera
completely
powered
off
and
turned
on
by
the
officer
pressing
the
record
button,
rather
than
leaving
it
on
and
then
pressing
record
to
be
able
to
capture
that
30-second
buffer?
A
Just
to
be
clear,
mr.
tezo,
how
I
know
that
one
of
the
things
from
the
equipment
and
software
standpoint
was
that
battery
use
doesn't
seem
to
be
a
problem
with
this
equipment.
So
I
don't
want
you
to
conjecture,
but
whether
or
not
we
think
police
officers
are
trying
to
like
save
their
battery
life,
but
is
there
a
way
that
that's
been
audited
like
when
you're,
when
you're
taking
this
sample
of
size
of
footage?
Are
you
able
to
see
what
the
battery
life
was
on
the
recordings
that
happened
and
I
guess?
Can
you
comment
on
that?
A
B
Ma'am
I'm
sure
there
is
information
there.
The
each
camera
has
an
audit
log
and
you
can
look
at
that
audit
log,
for
whenever
that
camera
was
used,
we
did
look
at
an
audit
log
for
a
post
policy
day
where
we
would
expected
more
footage
to
be
recorded
and
it
shows
battery
levels
I
think.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
there
was
20%
of
battery
life
left
about
20%
of
battery
life
left
after
a
ten-hour
shift.
So
thank.
A
D
Chair
mister,
mister
Tetzel,
this
the
the
data
that
you're
presenting
is
in
a
binary
format
right.
They
it
either
did
comply
or
it
did
not
comply.
So
if
I
were
to
read
the
the
evidence
at
29%
did
not
exist,
is
the
presumption?
Is
it
safe
to
presume
that
71%
of
the
time
it
did
exist
or
is
there
another
category
of
undetermined
or
something.
A
D
B
Now
we're
gonna
get
into
the
deactivation
of
the
camera,
so
camera
act
is
activated
when
dispatched
and
then
the
officer
needs
to
deactivate
the
camera
when
an
incident
concluded
so
cameras
aren't
always
capturing.
One
cameras
aren't
always
capturing
a
clear
view
of
events.
So,
madam
chair
into
your
point,
mr.
Neil,
there's
times
when
we
have
video,
but
it's
it's
not
as
useful
as
you'd
like
it
to
be.
That
just
happens,
and
you
know
we've
seen
ones
where
officers
get
in
a
scuttle
with
someone
their
camera
falls
off
stuff.
B
Like
that's
gonna
happen,
it's
just
that's
how
it
works.
It
might
be
dangerous
to
permanently
attach
it
to
to
them.
Then
it
might
be
become
something
that
someone
can
brag
to
all
of
you
with
you
know,
and
so
I
think
they're
held
on
with
magnets.
So
at
times
they
do
fall
off,
but
I
think
that
they're
secure,
they're
pretty
well.
Mr.
D
B
So
we
look
for
clear
view.
Events
we
look
for
whether
or
not
the
camera
was
turned
off
prior
to
the
event
conclusions.
So
cameras
were
frequently
turned
off
in
transports
when
arriving
at
the
jail,
but
before
custody
of
the
person
in
the
car
was
was
handed
over
to
the
jailer
and
then
cameras
turned
off
without
explanation.
So
in
the
policy,
if
a
camera
is
deactivated
before
an
incident
is
concluded,
they're
instructed
to
document
that
can
either
be.
A
B
We
saw
that
you
know
we
saw
people
saying
you
know
the
idea
activated
early,
here's.
Why
or
you
know,
I
didn't
even
have
footage
here's
why?
So
there
were
good
examples
of
people
following
that
policy
of
when
you
would
expect
to
see
a
video
or
when
you
would
expect
the
video
to
continue
why
that
didn't
happen.
So
of
sampled
videos,
22%
of
body-worn
cameras
were
deactivated
prior
to
the
event
ending
under
the
old
policy,
and
this
went
down
to
12%
under
the
new
policy.
So
there
was
some
improvement
there
and
of
these
events.
B
Here
is
another
table
full
of
data
that,
unfortunately,
a
lot
of
the
audience
can't
probably
really
see
we
broke
down
usage
and
deactivation
test
results
by
category
so
use
of
force
on
categorize,
video,
CAD
based
and-
and
we
also
looked
at
repeat,
activations
and
deactivations.
So
there
are
incidents
where
an
officer
would
turn
the
camera
off
turn
it
back
on,
because
it
was
still
continuing
to
turn
back
off
on
theirs.
B
B
A
B
Not
to
that,
madam
chair,
not
to
that
clarity,
I
would
say
the
policy
did
and
don't
quote
me
on
the
exact
verbiage,
but
allow
officers
to
turn
the
camera
off
see
turn
the
camera
off
if
they
were
having
a
conversation
with
another
officer,
and
so
if
they
were
in
the
middle
of
an
arrest,
sometimes
you
would
see
them
turn
the
camera
off
to
have
a
conversation
with
an
officer
or,
if
they're,
at
a
scene.
They
they
interpreted
that
language
to
mean
to
that
allowed
them
to
turn
the
camera
off.
B
We're
not
saying
whether
that's
right
or
wrong,
but
we
did
test
activations
and
deactivation.
So
that's
happening
though
so
that
probably
needs
to
be
clarified
in
the
policy
and
then
I'm
pretty
sure,
there's
something
in
the
report
that
that
recommends
some
clarification
on
what
that
actually
means.
I
do
understand
when
two
officers
are
communicating
that
there's
not
always
a
need
for
that
to
be
reported.
I,
don't
know
if
that
intended
to
be
at
the
at
the
scene
of
a
crime
or
responding
to
a
call.
B
So,
as
I
mentioned,
an
incident
is
filmed
and
then
an
officer
can
either
use
their
phone
to
categorize
that
video
into
use
of
force,
not
evidence,
startups
training,
significant
incident,
citation,
there's
a
bunch
of
categories
they
can
use.
So
we've
looked
at
Uncategorized
video
to
see
what
it
was.
Why
was
it
and
categorized?
B
D
A
Total
I'm
just
trying
to
summarize
this
table
and
we're
about
to
run
into
the
Committee
of
the
Whole
meeting
here,
but
the
summary
of
this
table
I
think
from
the
numbers
that
are
on
it
are
that
training
is
a
frequent,
miss
categorization.
That
officers
are
labeling
things
training
when
they
shouldn't
be.
Is
that
accurate,
mm-hmm.
B
Yes,
so
before
policy
57%
were
weren't,
categor,
categorizes
training,
but
that
was
inaccurate
and
after
policy
56%
of
videos
categorized
as
training
weren't,
accurate,
again
training
it
or
the
types
of
videos
that
are
deleted
after
90
days
at
it.
So
that's
that's
an
important
one
to
get
right,
but
if
they
change
that
retention
schedule
to
a
year,
it's
less
of
an
issue
on
categorize
videos
or
saved
in
perpetuity
or
tell
they're
categorized
and
then
meet
our
retention
schedules.
So
the
fact
that
they're
uncut
arrests
doesn't
mean
there's
a
risk
of
them
being
deleted.
B
A
B
So
we
also
went
through
a
mobile
video
I'll,
just
I'll
just
kind
of
skim
through
these
I
think
most
people
are
interested
in
the
body
camera
program.
We
have
a
couple
slides
here
that
I
think
are
interesting.
We
looked
at
the
number
of
minutes
per
hour
that
there
were
video
recordings
for
every
officer
that
was
issued
a
camera
for
shifts
that
they
would
be
expected
to
be.
E
B
We
also
analyzed
the
data
presented
by
the
chief
of
police
yesterday
into
the
categories,
so
here's
a
depiction
of
of
what
those
two
tables
look
like
that
he
presented
yesterday
from
a
category
from
a
category
perspective,
so
you
can
see
here
that
things
like
arrest
evidence
almost
doubled
from
pre
to
post
policy.
It's
a
little
concerning,
because
I
would
have
expected
to
see
at
least
double
the
amount
before
the
policy
change.
B
B
Oversight
here
and
I'm
really
just
gonna,
read
off
the
slide.
This
is
directly
other
report,
but,
as
stated
in
the
MPD
body-worn
camera
policy,
this
program's
goal
was
to
enhance
accountability
and
public
trust.
The
policy
continues
in
stating
that
the
policy
provides
MTV
MPD
personnel,
with
procedures
for
the
use
and
management
of
body,
worn
camera
equipment
and
resulting
data.
What
the
policy
and
program
lack
or
how
the
program
is
to
be
governed
and
by
whom,
so
it
doesn't
talk
about
who's
running
this
thing.
B
For
this,
the
P
DS
business
technology
unit
conducted
a
pilot
of
the
equipment
and
technology
developed
and
executed
a
training
program
and
implemented
the
equipment
and
technology
use
across
the
police
department
from
the
implementation.
It's
not
apparent
to
us
that
any
division
with
MPD
or
the
city
focused
on
opera,
opera,
opera,
yeah,
I'm,
not
gonna,
say
that
word
operation
of
the
program
in
pursuit
of
its
original
goals
of
that
of
enhancing
accountability
and
public
trust.
So
to
us,
it
didn't
appear,
like
the
spirit
of
this
program
lived
throughout
after
its
roll
out
through
the
precincts.
B
A
A
Important
in
all
of
our
audits,
is
the
cooperation
in
the
and
the
help
of
those
with
the
data.
In
this
case,
that
is,
the
police
department
and
so
I
wanted
to
invite
Assistant,
Chief
Joseph,
just
to
say
a
few
words,
because
we
are
short
on
time.
I'm
not
going
to
ask
you,
sir.
The
questions
that
were
we're
asked
here
today,
but
I'll
save
that
for
Public
Safety,
because
I
have
a
feeling.
That's
the
committee
that
this
is
going
to
so
I
just
wanted
to
offer
you
an
opportunity
to
say
a
couple
words.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
and
committee
I'm
assistant,
Mike
Jones
from
the
police
department
and
chief
Arredondo,
asked
me
to
be
here
today
and
represent
the
police
department
a
lot,
and
we
do
take
these
findings
very
seriously.
We
haven't
had
an
opportunity
to
see
them
yet
so
we're
you
know,
ready
to
dig
into
this
and
see
where
we
go
moving
forward.
E
I
did
I,
do
have
deputy
chief
Halverson
who's
in
charge
of
our
professional
standards,
division,
our
Bureau
and
Commander
Granger,
who
is
oversight
over
our
quality
assurance
unit,
which
is
where
the
audit
process
will
lie
and-
and
you
know,
the
tracking
of
performance
with
the
cameras,
and
we
also
have
a
commander
glamp
II
with
us
who
he
is
the
IT
side
of
this.
Now
he
oversight
over
the
technology.
So
I
want
you
to
know
that
we
do
take
this
very
seriously
and
if
you
have
any
questions,
I'm
glad
to
answer.
A
Great
in
the
interest
of
time,
just
trying
to
thank
you
for
being
here
today,
I
have
some
follow-up
for
suggestions.
Unless
somebody
wants
to
go
first,
because
we
think
this
report
requires
further
action,
I
think
that's
safe
to
say,
we
have
a
number
of
next
steps.
First
I'd,
like
Therese,
even
file
the
report
and
direct
staff
to
publish
it
and
also
to
send
it
to
the
state
as
part
of
our
mandatory
reporting
requirement.
I
think
that's
a
really
important
precedence
is
that
here
today,
so
could
I
have
could
I
have
a
thanks.
C
A
That
carries
I
want
to
give
this
report
to
the
clerk
and
there's
copies
here
for
people
in
the
audience
that
might
want
to
see
that,
along
with
copies
of
some
of
the
slides
that
mr.
Tetzel
just
went
through
second
I'd
like
to
refer
this
to
the
full
council,
with
a
recommendation
that
it
go
to
public
safety,
civil
rights
and
Emergency
Management
Committee
for
further
consideration.
A
I
do
expect
that
at
that
committee,
we'll
be
asking
the
police
department
to
then
continue.
That's
the
appropriate
place
to
do
it.
So
if
I
may
have
a
motion
on
that,
it's
been
moved
and
seconded
all
those
in
favor
of
the
motion.
Please
say:
aye
opposed
the
eyes.
Have
it
and
the
report
will
be
received
and
filed,
published,
sent
to
the
state
and
also
sent
to
City
Council.
A
C
A
Been
moved
and
seconded
all
those
in
favor,
please
say:
aye
aye
opposed
the
eyes
have
it,
and
the
audit
Department
will
report
back
to
this
committee
before
the
end
of
the
year.
That,
just
very
briefly
mr.
Tetzel
has
also
report
prepared
an
update
for
the
committee
of
previous
audit
reports
in
his
audit
plan.
B
Sure,
thank
you,
madam
chair.
You
know
what
we've
done.
The
projects
that
we've
initiated
today
to
complete
our
2017
audit
program
are
the
police
records
management
system,
implementation,
consultation,
IT
third
party
audits,
the
off
street
parking
audit,
that
we've
started
a
payroll
audit,
a
third
party
audit
of
meat,
minneapolis,
a
third
party
audit
of
diversion
solutions
and
the
automatic
license
plate
reader
audit
that
will
be
working
with
Hennepin
County
on.
A
A
Well.
If
with
that
completed,
could
I
have
a
motion
to
receive
and
filed
this
internal
auditors
update,
please
all
those
in
favor
of
the
motion,
please
say
aye
aye
opposed,
say
no,
the
eyes
have
it,
and
the
report
from
the
auditor
is
received
and
filed.
One
special
note
of
thanks
that
I
wanted
to
make
to
the
audit
department
for
this,
while
mr.
Tuttle
did
all
of
the
presentation
on
the
body,
camera
audit
I
really
want
to
appreciate
the
work
and
effort
of
mr.
A
Carroll
Vasilyev
and
the
rest
of
the
audit
team
here
and
they're
all
sitting
here
in
the
second
row
today.
So
thank
you
for
the
work
on
this.
It
was
a
lot
more
robust
than
you
would
originally
plan
for
in
your
2017
work
plan
at
the
beginning
of
the
year,
but
I
I
think
it's
good
work
and
it's
going
to
help
us
all
move
forward.
So
with
that
colleagues,
we've
completed
all
items
on
our
agenda
today,
so
seeing
no
further
business
to
be
presented.
This
meeting
is
adjourned.
Thank
you.