►
From YouTube: July 11, 2017 Transportation & Public Works
Description
Minneapolis Transportation & Public Works Committee Meeting
A
Okay,
we
will
open
the
public
hearing,
which
are
the
public
meeting,
which
is
the
regular
scheduled
meeting
of
the
transportation
Public
Works
Committee
I'm
councilman
rice
I
will
be
chairing
the
committee
I'm
joined
by
a
counselor
bender.
We
are
not
a
quorum
of
the
committee
and
will
not
be
conducting
actionable
items
on
the
agenda
presented,
but
we
do
have
the
opportunity
to
have
a
presentation
and
we
wanted
to
take
advantage
of
that.
So
what
I
will
do
is
I
will
get
into
item
1
director
hutchinson.
B
C
Thank
You
mr.
chair
member
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
Jeff
Handel
and
I'm,
a
principal
professional
engineer
and
the
transportation
engineering
design
division
of
the
Department
of
Public
Works.
This
is
a
public
hearing
and
request
for
city
council
to
authorize
conveyance
of
a
city-owned
parcel
to
the
adjoining
property
owner.
C
There's
a
roughly
triangular
shaped
piece
of
property,
southeast
of
the
southeast
corner
of
the
intersection
of
11th,
Avenue
and
5th
Street
south,
which
the
city
owns
in
fee
title
and
which
used
to
be
occupied
by
a
portion
of
fifth
Street.
That
portion
of
5th
Street
has
been
removed,
and
the
city
engineer
has
determined
that
the
parcel
is
no
longer
needed
for
municipal
operations.
C
The
owner
of
the
adjacent
property
timeshare
systems
has
offered
to
purchase
the
property
for
the
appraised
value
of
one
hundred
and
fifteen
thousand
dollars,
and
the
Planning
Commission
has
recommended
that
city
council,
through
its
zoning
and
planning
committee,
should
vacate
portion
of
city
right
away,
corresponding
to
the
parcel
the
request
before
used,
authorised
proper
city
officials
to
convey
the
property
by
executing
a
quitclaim
deed
to
timeshare
systems
for
the
sale
price
of
one
hundred
and
fifteen
thousand
dollars.
I'll
say
near
the
podium
in
case
there's
any
questions.
I.
A
Don't
see
any
questions
for
the
presentation,
I
will
open
the
public
hearing
and
I
wish
to
come
forward.
Anyone
wish
to
come
forward
and
make
comment
so
I'm
opening
the
public
hearing
to
receive
testimony,
noting
that
the
committee
member
is
not
in
attendance,
will
have
the
opportunity
to
view
the
meeting
video
prior
to
the
committee.
Acting
on
this
item
and
the
adjourned
meeting
on
Thursday
July
13th
at
1:30
p.m.
the
public
hearing
will
be
continued
to
the
adjourn,
be
thank
you
now
we
do
have
a
presentation
on
item
10.
B
Mr.
chair
and
member
of
the
committee,
councilmember
bender,
Kathleen
may
L,
with
our
transportation
planning
and
programming
division
has
been
on
our
behalf
leading
our
effort
on
the
topic
of
shared
youth
mobility.
We
were
lucky
enough
to
be
a
selected
City
for
more
in-depth
study
and
recommendations
by
some
partner
agencies
who
have
taken
an
interest
in
in
the
topic
here,
and
we've
worked
collaboratively
with
other
partners
in
the
region
to
increase
our
understanding
of
both
the
opportunities,
as
well
as
some
of
the
pressures
facing
us.
D
Right
good
morning,
mr.
chair
committee,
member,
my
name
is
Kathleen
mail
and
a
supervisor,
transportation
planner
and
the
transportation
planning
and
programming
division
of
Public,
Works
and
I
just
wanted
to
give
a
little
bit
of
background
on
the
shared
use.
Mobility
Center,
which
is
the
organization
who
is
putting
forth
this
plan.
The
shared
use
mobility
center
is
referred
to
as
some
C
acronym,
the
chicago-based
not
but
with
the
mission
to
foster
collaboration
and
shared
mobility.
D
This
includes
things
like
bike,
share,
car
sharing,
ride-sharing
and
more,
and
also
helping
to
grow
the
industry
with
transit
agencies,
cities
and
communities
around
the
nation.
They
pilot
programs
conduct
research
and
provide
advice
and
expertise
to
cities
and
regions,
and
through
that
work
they
hope
to
extend
the
benefits
of
shared
mobility.
Tall
last
year,
some
si
was
funded
through
the
McKnight
Foundation
to
work
with
a
host
of
regional
stakeholders
to
produce
the
shared
mobility
action
plan
for
the
twin
cities.
D
We
supported
public
works,
supported
this
work
through
interviews,
review
and
collaboration
on
effort
and
in
particular,
traffic
and
parking
services,
as
well
as
transportation,
planning
and
programming
or
involved
in
this
effort.
This
model
of
producing
a
shared
mobility
action
plan
has
been
done
once
before
in
the
nation
in
LA
that
was
done
last
year.
Some
si
has
received
additional
funding
from
the
McKnight
to
support
the
implementation
of
this
plan
through
convening
a
regional
implementation
working
group
throughout
the
coming
year.
D
A
E
F
E
Inception
of
this
conversation
started
with
this
Marc
city's
application
led
led
by
city
staff,
Jon
Huertas
in
particular
to
to
look
at
how
the
Twin
Cities
could
be
competitive
for
large,
basically
large
federal
project
around
some
of
these
issues.
So
just
a
little
bit
of
background
on
that.
So
as
we
move
forward
with
McKnight's
interest
and
also
with
Metro
Transit's
interest
around
a
an
app
that
would
combine
these
services,
we
really
really
started
to
jump
in
the
detail,
so
I'm
going
to
give
a
little
bit
overview
of
just
background
on
shared
mobility.
What
we?
E
What
we've
learned
over
the
last
year
and
some
of
our
recommendations
so
some
see
as
guessing
mentioned,
we
do
a
bunch
of
different
things.
We
connect
public
public
agencies
and
transit
with
them
with
the
shared
mobility
industry
and
with
nonprofit
organizations
community-based
organizations.
We
have
a
toolkit
so
on
a
website.
Charity's
mobility,
center
dot
or
we've
got
a
lot
of
best
practices
and
policy
information
on
the
industry,
and
we
do
some
research
for
the
federal
government
on
the
impacts
of
these
services.
They
also
provide
technical
assistance
in
this
case
action
plan
for
the
Twin
Cities.
E
We
also
do
some
work
in
terms
of
pilot
projects,
so
started
this
process.
As
I
said
about
actually
15
months
ago
now,
we've
done
three
stakeholder
workshops.
These
have
been
mostly
public
record
professionals,
some
community-based
organizations,
but
we've
we've
had
about
150
people
or
so
in
these
workshops,
we've
done
over
85
interviews
and
we're
now
in
the
design
stage
of
the
plan.
So
it's
a
draft
final,
if
you're
interested
in
looking
at
draft
that
we'd
like
to
provide
that
but
we're
in
the
design
phase
and
expect
it
to
be
public
by
the
end
of
month.
E
So
just
a
little
bit
of
background
on
what
we
mean
by
shared
mobility,
so
we
define
shared
mobility
as
anything
that
supports
other
kinds.
It
is
at
backbone,
so
that
can
be
car
sharing
bike
sharing
services
like
uber
and
lyft
taxis,
but
also
sort
of
the
emerging
space
of
micro
transit,
which
is
sort
of
an
imprecise
term,
but
really
refers
to
any
small
vehicles
that
can
provide
perhaps
late-night
service
or
service
at
times
a
day
or
times
a
week.
E
That's
difficult
for
public
transit
to
provide,
there's,
also
sort
of
the
physical
definition
of
bringing
all
these
services
together
through
through
what
we.
What
we
call
mobility
hubs,
a
location
where
you
can
access
a
bunch
of
different
services
and
really
has
an
impact
on
people's
ability
to
navigate
the
city
without
without
needing
to
own
car.
So
I
won't
spend
too
much
time
on
these
trends.
E
But,
as
you
all
know,
there's
a
lot
happening
in
this
industry
right
now
from
autonomous
vehicles
to
innovations
around
paratransit
delivery
and
driving
those
costs
down
to
partnerships
with
translation
network
companies
around
around
service
delivery.
One
of
the
things
India
to
my
heart
is:
is
electric
vehicle
car
sharing
I'll
just
a
sec?
Talking
about
that,
but
also
a
lot
of
movement
around
you
know
integrations
of
trips
and
actually
the
payment
of
trips,
whether
it's
by
a
single
card
or
by
it
by
an
app
so
part
of
what's
driving.
This
is
the
auto
industry.
E
Auto
industry
has
made
very
significant
investments
in
this
space.
Every
media
major
automaker
has
has
made
some
type
of
investment,
very
different
strategies
coming
from
Daimler
and
Ford
and
General
Motors,
but
everybody's
sort
of
gotten
into
the
space,
many
with
a
view
towards
economist
vehicles.
Of
course,
what
we
think
this
is
doing
for
the
space
for
shared
mobility.
Is
it's
changing
the
definition
of
a
car
or
transportation
from
something
that
really
for
most
for
most
Americans?
It
equates
with
ownership
to
something
that's
more
of
a
utility.
E
So
this
is
this
is
kind
of
a
new
concept
right
that
that
a
city
would
take
a
hands-on
approach
to
essentially
owning
the
system,
because
infrastructure
is
in
the
public
right-of-way.
Essentially
this.
This
is
a
public
public
system
of
car
sharing
and
we're
seeing
more
and
more
examples
of
that,
whereas
at
the
sort
of
surface
level
public-private
partnership,
consider
mobility
tend
to
be
around
things
like
I'd,
say:
low-hanging:
proof
right,
like
the
ability
to
to
take
a
service
like
a
uber
or
lyft
and
say:
let's
have
a
conch
here,
concierge
aspect
to
it.
E
Let's
make
sure
that
people
that
might
perhaps
not
be
so
familiar
with
the
smartphone
can
dial
in
and
still
still
book
a
trip,
and
you
can
provide
that
layer
of
service
with
that
again.
That
sort
of,
not
not
very
cool
where
we
think
the
industry
is
moving-
is
towards
again
more
consideration
that
utility
all
right.
So
what
are
the
public
assets
in
play?
Streets,
sidewalks,
electricity?
How
can
those
public
assets
be
brought
into
the
process
and
and
be
part
of
the
negotiation
for
how
these
services
are
provided
and
who
they're
provided
for?
E
So
getting
back
to
the
plan
first
thing
we
did
is
we
took
a
look
at
tools
that
we
have
the
information
we
have
and
where
there,
where
there's
opportunity,
and
it's
a
little
bit
hard
to
see
on
this
scale,
but
the
green
dots
and
the
gluon
and
sort
of
pink
dots
are
existing
car
share
and
bike
share
locations.
And
you
see
the
blue
background
is
where
there's
the
best
opportunity
for
the
service
and
we
think,
particularly
in
the
cities
of
Minneapolis
and
st.
E
Paul,
there's
there's
quite
a
bit
of
opportunity
on
sort
of
unmet
untapped
potential
for
these
services,
but
it's
going
to
require
public-private
partnerships.
There's
a
lot
happening
right
now
of
you
know,
I
think
this
is.
This
is
well
known
to
everybody,
but
we
see
capital
investments
in
terms
of
transit,
also
sort
of
seeding
the
potential
growth
of
shared
mobility
and,
of
course,
the
region's
growing.
This
is
going
to
put
new
stresses
in
terms
of
congestion
in
terms
of
greenhouse
gas
impacts
and
and
vehicle
miles
traveled.
E
E
We
said
we'd
like
to
see
20,000
cars
off
the
road
in
five
years
about
a
five
burden,
5%
mode
chip.
How
does
that
happen
with
shared
mobility?
Well,
in
conjunction
with
transit
and
capital
expansion?
We
think
that
approximately
600
vehicles-
this
is
one
scenario:
600
vehicles
and
car
sharing
programs.
Official
800
bike
share
bikes
and,
in
particular,
an
expansion
of
the
van
pool
program
and
inclusion
of
downtown
sites
as
destinations
for
vanpool,
can
also
make
a
big
impact
and
beyond
beyond
those
sort
of
numerical
goals
right.
E
We
think
that
there's
a
real
opportunity
to
put
equity
social
equity
front
and
center
in
a
plan
that
again,
if
I,
can
go
back
to
that
map.
But
it's
a
pretty
small
chunk
of
the
city,
that's
served
by
these
services
and
you
go
just
outside
of
downtown
and
you
have
a
lot
of
opportunity,
but
there
needs
to
be
some
direction
provided
to
how
these
services
might
expand
into
those
surrounding
neighborhoods.
E
E
Think
the
first
thing
I
want
to
highlight
is
the
need
to
stabilize
and
expand
car
sharing
that
with
the
current
arrangement,
both
in
terms
of
things
that
are
within
the
control
within
the
domain
of
the
city,
but
things
so
that
are
beyond
that.
So,
for
example,
state
tax
policy,
there's
really
not
an
environment
conducive
to
supporting
the
growth
of
these
services.
E
Reason
I,
shared
information
on
the
LA
model
is,
we
think,
there's
a
real
opportunity
for
sort
of
the
hands-on
partnership
between
the
city
Minneapolis
in
particular,
for
both
both
both
both
Minneapolis
and
st.
Paul.
In
terms
of
growing
these
services
in
a
very,
very
deliberate
way,
I
think
that's
going
to
need
to
involve
putting
speed
space
into
play
on
free
space,
the
city's
parking
assets.
These
are
tools
that
increasingly
we're
seeing
places
like
Seattle
bring
put
bring
into
the
equation.
E
One
of
the
recent
conversations
we
had
in
Los
Angeles
was
was
exactly
about
this.
About
using
parking
is
an
asset
towards
expanding
car
sharing
in
the
disadvantaged
communities,
and
this
exit
came
from
from
a
council
member.
That's
another
big
thing:
I
want
to
spend
some
time
talking
about.
Is
the
transportation
demand
management
environment?
So
it
was
very
clear
from
a
number
of
interviews,
follow-up
conversations.
We
had
all
conversations
we
had
that
there's.
E
There
is
certainly
potential
in
the
TMO
structure
that
exists
right
now,
but
a
needs
shift
from
funding
organizations
to
funding
the
work
that
they
do
so
take
a
sort
of
an
outcomes-based
approach
towards
towards
towards
transportation
demand
management
for
anybody
is
not
familiar
with
TDM.
Basically,
this
is
how
do
we
support
the
use
of
these
services,
promote
the
use
of
these
services
market
them
sometimes
directly
through
subsidies,
transit,
pass
programs-
things
like
this.
We
think
it
can
kind
of
go
to
the
next
level.
E
Beyond
that,
we've
seen
some
best
practices
from
places
like
Denver
and
San,
Diego
and
and
again
Seattle,
where
the
in
particular
the
city
plays
a
more
hands-on
role
with
transportation
demand
management,
sometimes
that
through
a
procurement
process
for
some
of
these
services,
with
the
idea
that
the
team,
only
the
transportation
management
organizations
would
do
that
work.
Some
of
that
is
just
a
matter
of
essentially
serving
as
a
pastor
or
an
intermediary
for
TBM
funds,
as
the
city
of
Denver
does
so
I
think,
there's
some
some
room
for
for
for
improvement
there
and
so
I'll.
E
Stop
there
there's
a
lot
of
information,
but
take
any
questions
and
just
say
that
again
reiterate
that
we're
kind
of
in
the
final
capture
of
this
plan
so
to
speak,
as
Kathleen
mentioned,
with
a
generous
support
from
McKnight
Foundation
we're
able
to
bring
this
plan
forward
and
implementation
and
I
hope
my
hopes
we
can
focus
on
some
focus
on
some
discreet
policy
areas
where
there's
consensus
around
for
improvement.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Any.
F
F
Think
we
all
look
forward
to
seeing
it
in
its
final
form.
I
guess
one
question
I
have
is
about
how
we're
working
with
our
regional
partners
just
because
so
much
of
this
has
to
do
with
more
of
the
regional
transportation
system
and
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
when
you
were
talking
about
our
growth
scenarios,
I
mean
we
are
catching
more
of
the
growth
in
the
central
core,
but
we
still
just
have
so
much
of
our
household
growth
in
our
region.
F
That's
not
without
side
the
the
city
core
and
it
just
when
you
look
at
you
know
what
is
it
650
thousand
people
PLAs
who
are
going
to
be
added
to
the
suburban
area
outside
our
central
city
core?
It
just
means
that
in
our
region,
if
we're
going
to
plan
for
greenhouse
gas
emission
targets
and
those
kinds
of
things
even
vehicle
miles,
traveled,
where
our
roads,
financial
investment
in
our
borrowing
road
system,
all
that
stuff-
that
we
really
need
to
rely
on
our
regional
partners
to
help
with
all
a
lot
of
these.
F
E
E
So
I
was
like
here,
so
we
did
set
sort
of
a
10-year
goal
that
I
think
he
compasses
more
of
the
region,
recognizing
that
city
of
Minneapolis
and
st.
Paul
are
where,
where
where
policy,
change
and
and
and
funding
priorities
are
likely
to
take
place
in
a
much
more
short-term
sense.
But
we
we
do
recognize
that
there's
that
that
sort
of
need
to
bring
the
the
region
as
a
whole,
along
with
this
process,
two
things
about
just
so.
E
We
presented
yesterday
at
my
council,
their
Transportation
Committee
and
through
the
things
they
highlighted
there
were
the
need
to
well.
Is
it
van
full,
but
in
addition
to
that,
they
need
to
focus
regional
solicitation
dollars
on
these
services.
So
right
now
there's
a
sort
of
a
minority
set-aside
among
the
regional
station
that
does
fund
transportation,
demand
management
and
TMO
operations.
E
We
think
there's
an
opportunity
there
to
do
what
some
other
regions
have
done
in
terms
of
making
some
of
those
resources
available,
not
just
within
the
cities
but
regionally
in
a
competitive
way
to
directly
fund
some
of
these
options
through
public-private
partnerships
and
I
guess.
The
other
thing,
I
would
note,
is
really
just
the
process
that
that
Met
Council
that
Metro
Transit
has
started
just
about
a
year
ago,
around
first-class
mile
and
reverse
commute
solutions.
This
is
an
area
where
there's
I
think
there's
an
interest
from
so
good
example.
E
I'm
not
sure
the
precise
neighborhood
I
should
know
this
from
the
Somali
community
to
a
Shakopee
Amazon
job
center
right.
That's
that's
an
issue
for
all
of
us
as
a
region,
and
so
there's
there's
an
opportunity
there
to
look
at
look
at
how
those
services
are
being
provided
and
and
kind
of
bring
those
private
sector
solutions
into
the
fold
so
that
it's
represented
as
part
of
a
part
of
the
network
is
two
small
examples.
There.
D
Mr.
chair
committee,
members
for
the
question
of
how
are
we
working
with
our
regional
partners
and
stakeholders
since
the
smart
cities
challenge
application
was
submitted
over
a
year
ago,
there's
been
a
monthly
convening
of
interested
organizations
that
came
together
for
that
application,
cities
of
st.
Paul,
Minneapolis
and
dot
nice
ride,
and
others
in
the
region
that
have
been
that's
been
a
lot
of
information
sharing
and
trying
to
make
sure
we
all
are
aware
of.
D
You
know
Metro
transit,
app
and
what's
happening
here
and
there
and
then
collaborating
somewhat
too
with
some
C
on
this
effort,
but
really
that
regional
implementation
group
that
is
outlined
in
some
C's
draft
plan
will
be
probably
the
framework
moving
forward
in
terms
of
how
the
regional
stakeholders
move
together
and
that
group
hasn't
been
fully
identified
yet,
but
will
be
in
the
coming
weeks.
In
months.
E
It's
just
the
last
thing
I
mentioned.
There
is
also
that
this
five
year
window
coincides
with
pretty
rapid
expansion
of
capital
projects
for
Metro
Transit
and
a
lot
of
those
areas
along
the
blue
and
green
line.
Extensions
had
very
little
if
any
shared
mobility
services
so
think,
I
think
it's
a
Bottineau
line
and
Southwest
line
move
forward
that
there's
some
discrete
opportunities
there
for
expansion.
A
I
noticed
in
your
presentation,
you
mentioned
how,
with
an
equity
lens
and
getting
new
communities
where
the
system
might
not
naturally
go
that
interventions
can
be
done
right
and
used
as
an
example.
The
nice
ride,
the
orange
bikes.
Could
you
elaborate
a
little
bit
more
on
what
was
so
right
or
the
key
elements
of
that
success?
So.
E
That
thank
you
for
highlighting.
That
is
what
we
noticed
would
buy.
Smart
neighborhoods
is
is
that
there
was
a
very
deliberate
process,
and
this
is
very
similar
to
the
process
that
I
serve
witnessed
firsthand
in
Los
Angeles's.
It
just
takes
a
lot
of
time
right.
You
have
to
make
sure
that
you're
bringing
community-based
organizations
in
very
very
early
on
in
the
process
and
that
you
are
prepared
for
the
results,
maybe
being
a
little
bit
different
than
what
you
originally
intended
thanks
a
nice
right.
Neighborhoods
is
not
a
bike
sharing
program.
E
The
works
and
I
think
that
that
that's
kind
of
a
theme
for
for
this
plan
and
a
lot
of
different
ways,
van
pooling,
is
not
something
that
we
traditionally
think
of
as
shared
mobility.
But
it's
something
that
we
see
much
larger
numbers
from
other
sort
of
peer
peer
communities,
and
so
it's
something
that
we
chose
to
lift
off
so
I
think
yeah.
There's
lessons
from
nice
ride
neighborhoods
it's
that
they
take,
that
they
put
a
lot
of
time
into
the
front
end.
A
You
it
sort
of
highlights
the
in
some
ways
the
value
of
this
overall
study,
bringing
a
very
localized
context
to
these
broader
trends.
I
can't
imagine
the
immeasurable
value
that
I
know
director
Hutchinson
director,
which
is
our
planning
division,
we're
looking
at
the
edge
of
a
lot
of
these
conversations
as
a
national
conversation
unfolds,
but
to
have
something
that
we
can
tie
specifically
I.
Imagine
is
a
great
tool.
B
Mr.
chair
and
councilmember
bender,
it
is
a
great
tool
and
the
strategies
that
are
outlined
there
are
a
number
of
strategies
for
the
region
and
then
I
really
appreciate
it.
I
know
you
will
too
that
some
see
has
actually
parsed
out
the
strategies
that
are
most
relevant
for
cities
in
the
city
of
Minneapolis
and
we're
grateful
to
have
some
of
that
to
help
us
advance
our
work
so
that
we're
not
only
working
around
the
edges
that
we're
really
advancing
advancing.
This
study.
F
You
mister
chair,
just
a
quick
note
to
that
probably
goes
without
saying,
but
I
just
think.
We
all
really
appreciate
the
car
to
go
car
sharing
piece
of
the
work
and
look
forward
to
those
recommendations
and
details
about
how
we
can
help
to
foster
that
service
in
our
city.
I
know
a
lot
of
my
constituents
and
others
in
the
wards.
Particularly
you
know
that
are
pretty
transit.
F
Second,
car
or
all
their
cars
were
car
free
and
we're
using
car
to
go
so
make
sometimes
we
have
a
stereotype
of
who
is
car
light
or
car
free
in
our
city
and
anyway,
there
are
a
lot
of
people
choosing
to
be
to
reduce
their
car
ownership
because
of
that
service.
And
now
again
you
know,
I
really
heard
from
a
lot
of
people
that
that
was
a
big
loss
for
them.
So
I
think
we're
all
looking
forward
to
try
to
figure
figure
out
that
piece.
E
Sure
I'll
just
just
say
that
it
comes
when
brothers
say
that
there's
a
lot
of
interest
in
bring
I
want
to
say
bringing
back
car
to
go
but
but
reintroducing
some
some
form
of
one-way
service.
That's
a
piece
of
the
pie
that
that
that
should
be
included
in
the
mix,
but
just
to
be
very
frank
about
that.
E
Of
service
and
the
town
in
a
way
that
was
done
equitably
required
not
only
a
lot
of
time,
but
also
a
lot
of
investment
in
terms
of
the
Department
of
Transportation
staffing,
in
that
case
right,
and
that
means
looking
differently
at
the
the
solicitation
process,
perhaps
not
looking
towards
request
for
proposals,
but
looking
at
our
effuse
and
looking
at
even
expressions
of
interest,
proceeding
that
process
and
taking
the
time
to
do
that.
But
it's
it's
it's
it's
time.
E
And
resource
resource
intensive
work
in
terms
of
in
terms
of
not
not
only
you
know,
art
sort
of
our
our
guidance.
A
Any
closing
questions
or
final
comments
see
none,
since
the
consultant
is
only
in
town
today.
The
presentation
for
this
item
will
take
place,
but
no
action
will
be
taken
until
we
adjourn
meeting
on
Thursday
committee
members,
not
in
attendance
will
have
the
opportunity
to
view
the
meeting
video
prior
to
the
committee
acting
on
the
item
at
the
adjourn
meeting.
So
therefore,
this
meeting
is
adjourned
to
Thursday
July
13
2017
1:30
p.m.