►
Description
Minneapolis Community Development and Regulatory Services Committee Meeting
A
Good
afternoon
welcome
to
the
regularly
scheduled
meeting
of
the
community
development
and
regulatory
services
committee
for
today,
May
16th
I've
been
joined
by
a
quorum
of
the
committee,
including
council
members
were
Sami,
Frei,
Quincy
and
cano.
We
have
a
lengthy
agenda.
I'll
first
start
by
moving
the
consent
agenda,
which
are
items
14
through
19.
They
include
the
regular
liquor
business
and
gambling
license.
A
Applications
for
May
16th,
as
well
as
business
license
operating
conditions
for
the
business
known
as
masons
mansion
and
uptown
authorizing,
submit
all
of
a
state
grant,
as
well
as
a
partnership
with
Midwest
urban
strategies
for
the
labor
re-entry
program.
Item
18
is
a
project
analysis
authorization
for
the
condos
on
Blaisdell.
This
is
as
an
additional
a
resolution
and
item
number
19
is
an
application
of
the
Met
Council
for
Bassitt
Creek
Valley.
A
Are
there
any
items
anyone
would
like
to
pull
items
14
through
19,
seeing
none
I'll
move
the
consent
agenda,
all
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
all
right.
Any
opposed.
That
item
is
approved.
We've
been
joined
by
councilmember
Reich.
We
have
13
public
hearings
on
our
agenda
this
morning,
starting
with
item
number
1.
Mr.
Ramadan.
Welcome.
B
Madam
chair
council
members
as
good
to
see
you
again,
we
start
with
the
land
seller
36:31
Colfax,
Avenue
North.
This
is
a
sale
through
the
vacant
housing
recycling
program
now
called
many
office
homes
for
policies.
A
program
established
by
the
City
Council
on
December
11
2015
staff
recommends
sale
of
3631
Colfax
to
Northside
Homes
LLC
force,
appraised,
value
of
20,000,
so
two
conditions:
the
staff
market,
is
home
to
its
current
list
of
city
council
approved
how
developers
the
staff
recommends
Northside
home
LLC.
B
As
the
purchaser
notification
was
sent
to
the
McKinley
Neighborhood
Association
36:31
Colfax
was
acquired
on
December
29
2000
CNM
Canas,
Tax
Credit
land
for
$1.
It
was
constructed
in
1915
and
there's
a
1482
square
foot,
two
bitter
one-bath
single-family
home
the
African
intends
to
rehabilitate
is
the
3-bedroom
2bath
pink
family
home
and
sell
exclusively
to
an
owner-occupant
who
meets
the
80%
household
median
income
and
African
proposal
invest
two
hundred
and
fifty
five
thousand
three
and
fifty
seven
dollars
to
rehabilitate
the
property.
B
A
A
B
B
Community
Land
Trust,
as
the
purchaser
notification
was
sent
to
the
Weber
Camden
neighborhood
38:23
Bryant
was
acquired
on
December
29th
2016
from
Hennepin
County's
tax
for
that
land
for
$60,000
it
was
construction
in
1922
and
it's
a
2029
square-foot
four-bedroom,
one-bath,
single-family
home
and
the
applicant
intends
to
rehabilitate
it
as
a
3-bedroom.
One
of
the
difference
was
not
a
legal
bedroom
one
bath,
single-family
home
and
is
sell
exclusively
to
an
owner-occupant.
It
meets
to
80%
house
of
the
area.
B
A
There
any
questions
for
mr.
Ramadan
on
item
number
two
seeing
none.
Thank
you
for
your
report,
we'll
open
the
public
hearing
on
item
number
two,
which
is
a
land
sale,
38:23,
Bryant,
Avenue
North.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
to
this
issue?
Anyone
anyone
seeing
none
will
close
the
public
hearing,
councilmember
Quincy
thank.
A
B
Chair
councilmembers,
35:42,
Lyndale,
Avenue
north
this
was
a
staff
recommended
to
sale
to
35
42
Linda,
the
PRG
incorporated
for
its
appraised
value
of
$20,000.
Subject:
conditions
the
staff
again
marketed
this
to
our
Hope
House
approved
nonprofit
developers.
The
notification
was
sent
to
the
McKinley
Neighborhood
Association
35:42
was
acquired
in
December,
29,
2016,
15
of
economy.
B
That's
tax
forfeited
land
for
$1
was
construction
in
1917
as
a
2,200,
a
square
foot
two
bedroom
one
bath
single-family
home
the
applicant
intends
to
rehabilitate
is
a
2-bedroom
1-bath,
single-family
home
and
two
cellars
exclusively
the
owner
occupant,
who
meets
the
83
80
%
household
median
income
tax
and
proposes
to
invest
one
hundred.
Ninety
five
thousand
to
rehabilitate
the
property
and
our
construction
management
staff
found
that
it
met
all
the
program
criteria
and
are
there
any
questions
on
this?
One
are.
A
There
any
questions
for
mr.
Ramadan
on
item
number
three,
seeing
none.
Thank
you
for
your
report,
we'll
open
the
public
hearing
on
item
number
three,
which
is
a
land
sale
at
35,
42,
Lyndale,
Avenue
north.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
to
this
issue,
anyone
anyone
seeing
none,
we'll
close
the
public
hearing
council
member
fry?
Thank.
A
B
Madam
chair
council
members,
32
scuse
me
to
335
Upton
Avenue
North.
The
staff
recommends
the
seller
to
35
up
to
now
from
North
to
Salem
Inc
for
its
appraised,
I
of
30,000.
Subject:
conditions
this
house
was
marketed
for
over
six
months
without
receiving
any
offers
to
purchase
through
his
listserv
over
1200
people.
We
finally
received
an
offers
from
Salem
Inc
just
recently,
and
the
staff
is
recommending
them
as
the
purchaser
notification
was
provided
to
the
north
side.
B
Residence
redevelopment
Council
23:35
up
to
Navin
North,
was
acquired
on
June
22nd
2016
from
Hennepin
County
as
a
taxpayer
that
land
for
$1
was
constructed
in
1916.
Does
1903
square
foot
3-bedroom,
1-bath,
single-family
home
the
applicant
intends
to
invest.
Excuse
me
to
rehabilitate
as
a
3-bedroom
1-bath
single-family
home
and
to
sell
exclusively
to
an
owner-occupant.
The
applicant
proposes
to
invest
one
hundred
four
thousand
forty
eight
dollars
to
rehabilitate
the
property.
A
E
A
B
Chair
council
members,
1916
Newton,
Avenue
North
staff
recommends
the
sale
of
1960
Newton
Avenue
North
to
Salem
e4
at
the
phrase
day
of
38,000
substitute
conditions.
Again
we
marked
this
property
for
over
ten
months.
We
did
receive
an
offer
early
on
in
that
process,
but
none
in
the
last
ten
months
or
so
staff
recommends
them
as
a
purchaser.
B
A
There
any
questions
for
mr.
Ramadan
on
item
number
five,
seeing
none.
Thank
you
for
your
report,
we'll
open
the
public
hearing
on
this
item,
which
is
a
landfill
at
916,
Newton,
Avenue
north.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
to
this
issue,
anyone
anyone
seeing
none,
we'll
close
the
public
hearing,
councilmember
fry
thank.
A
B
17:15
Oliver
Avenue
North
the
sales
through
the
vacant
house
and
recycling
programs
to
PRG
incorporated
for
the
phrase.
I
have
32,000
subject:
conditions
staff
market
discrepancy
actually
did
have
a
sale
and
approval
back
in
the
fall.
The
people
were
unable
to
go
through
it.
They
had
a
little
bit
overwhelmed
when
they
had
another
property
working
at
the
same
time,
so
that
it
returned
to
us
to
the
city
notification
once
again
provided
to
North
Side
residents
redevelopment
council.
B
As
we
know,
we
originally
acquired
this
property
on
October
23
2015
from
Tennessee
County,
Tax
Board,
a
fitted
land
for
$1.
It
was
constructed
in
1922,
and
this
is
a
2907
square
foot,
3-bedroom,
2bath
single-family
home
the
African,
a
chance
to
rehabilitate
as
a
3-bedroom
2bath
single-family
home
and
to
sell
exclusively
to
an
owner-occupant
under
the
howl
program,
which
requires
it
to
be
under
80%
area
median
income.
The
applicant
proposes
to
invest
250,000,
rehabilitate
the
property
and
again
see
PEZ
construction
management
staff
reviewed
and
found
it
met
all
our
program
criteria.
A
A
And
they're
putting
a
lot
of
money
into
it.
Are
there
any
questions
on
item
number
six,
seeing
none
we'll
open
the
public
hearing
on
item
number
six,
which
is
1715
Oliver,
Avenue
North?
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
to
this
issue,
anyone
anyone
seeing
none
will
close
the
public
hearing,
councilmember
fry
thank.
B
Madam
chair
council
members,
14:26
pin
Avenue
North
staff,
recommends
the
sale
of
14:26,
pin
Avenue
north
to
PRG
for
its
appraised
day
of
28,000.
Subject,
conditions:
this
is
another
one
that
we
saw
back
in
just
in
January.
Interestingly
enough,
this
person
thought
he
could
just
buy
the
property
and
do
what
everyone
and
when
he
found
out
that
there
were
certain
requirements
and
restrictions.
He
said
instead
of
signing
this
redevelopment,
contract
I
don't
want
to
go
for
with
this
program,
and
so
we
said.
Okay,
this
is
a
great
property.
B
It
seems
somebody
else
will
want
it,
and
fortunately
we
were
recommending
PRG
to
take
this
property.
It
will
begin
notification
provided
to
Northside
residence.
Redevelopment
Council
14
2016
was
acquired
on
October
23
2015
from
Hennepin
County's
tax
forfeited
land
for
25,000.
It
was
constructed
in
1922
and
is
a
three
thousand
eight
or
22
square
foot.
B
Six
bedrooms
two
baths,
duplex,
which
lost
his
duplex
licensing
napkin
intense
rehabilitated
as
a
forbidden,
two-bath
single-family
home,
is
to
sell
exclusively
to
an
owner-occupant
under
the
80%
area,
median
income
after
proposal
to
invest
two
and
a
fifty
four
thousand
rehabilitate
the
property,
and
it
does
meet
all
of
our
construction
management
staff
requirements.
Are
there
any
questions
on
this
property
are.
A
There
any
questions
for
mr.
Allen
on
item
number,
seven,
seeing
none.
Thank
you
for
your
report,
we'll
open
the
public
hearing
on
item
number,
seven,
which
is
a
land
sale,
14:26,
Penn,
Avenue
north.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
to
this
issue?
Anyone
anyone
seeing
none
will
close
the
public
hearing
council
member
fry.
Thank.
A
B
B
Subject:
conditions
again,
this
was
famous
for
our
house,
nonprofit
developers
and
the
recommendation
North
sent
home
LLC
is
a
purchaser
was
also
notified
notification
given
to
the
north
side
residential
redevelopment
council,
once
in
Irving,
a
true
north
was
acquired,
September
15
2016
from
Hennepin
County's
tax
forfeited
land
for
55,000
was
constructed
in
1925
as
a
1096
square
foot,
4-bedroom,
2bath,
single-family
home
the
applicant
intends
to
rehabilitated
the
3-bedroom
2bath
single-family
home
and
to
sell
exclusively
to
an
owner-occupant.
That
means
80%
area
median
income
guidelines,
a
proposal
to
invest
two
hundred.
B
A
There
any
questions
for
mr.
ramadan
on
item
number
eight,
seeing
none
we'll
open
the
public
hearing
on
item
number,
eight,
which
is
a
landfill
at
11:10,
Irving,
Avenue
North.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
to
this
issue?
Anyone
anyone
sing,
none
we'll
close
the
public
hearing,
councilmember
fries
thank.
A
G
So
we
are
requesting
the
host
approval
for
the
city
of
landfall
village
to
issue
the
revenue
notes
for
refinancing
the
outstanding
city
of
Minneapolis
debt.
The
empty
density
Minneapolis
authorized
the
hosts
approval
on
April
28th
of
2017.
The
city's
resolution
is
invalid,
since
the
public
hearing
was
now
so
at
this
time
we
are
requesting
that
the
City
Council
authorized
the
amended
and
restated
city
resolution
and
hold
a
public
hearing
for
this
project,
and
we
do
have
individuals
from
the
project
here
are.
A
There
any
questions
from
miss
Shaw
or
the
applicant,
seeing
none.
Thank
you
for
your
report,
we'll
open
the
public
hearing
on
item
number
nine,
which
is
a
resolution
amending
a
previous
revolution'
resolution
to
give
host
approval
to
the
issuance
of
revenue
obligations
for
the
refinancing
of
a
project
for
the
benefit
of
folks
doing
businesses.
Resource
Inc.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
to
this
issue?
A
H
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
council
members
in
the
report
before
you
staff
is
recommending
the
City
Council
authorized
housing
improvement
area
financing
to
the
Wellington
condominium
project.
This
involves
passing
an
ordinance
that
establishes
the
Wellington
condominium,
housing,
improvement
area
or
HIA.
It's
known
also
passing
a
resolution
that
imposes
fees
on
participating,
condo
units
in
the
building
passing
a
resolution
authorizing
the
issuance
of
hi-8
bonds
to
provide
long
term
financing
for
the
project
and
authorizing
staff
to
enter
into
agreements
with
the
Wellington
condo
association
in
western
bank.
H
Western
bank
will
be
the
short-term
construction
lender
in
the
project.
Both
the
ordinance
and
the
two
resolutions
are
attached
to
your
RCA.
The
Wellington
condominium
building
is
located
in
Ward
7
in
the
Loring
Park
neighborhood,
and
there's
a
map
attached
to
you
to
the
RFC
as
well.
This
four
and
a
half
story
building
was
constructed
in
1910,
so
it's
rather
old
constructed
initially
as
an
apartment
building,
but
was
converted
to
condo
units
in
1980s
there.
H
Twenty-Four
units
in
the
building
the
property
is
in
need
of
some
major
repairs
and
improvements,
including
restoration
of
the
entire
facade
of
the
building.
The
irca
indicates
replacement
of
the
primary
electrical
system
that
should
be
changed
to
electrical
system.
Upgrades
are
needed
and
then
repair
of
the
rear,
porch
and
stair
system,
which
provides
second
means
of
egress
to
the
condo
units
in
case
of
a
fire.
If
the
porch
and
stairs
are
not
repaired,
this
building
will
likely
be
condemned
in
the
next
several
years.
So
this
is
a
major
improvement
that
needs
to
happen.
H
City
staff
also
worked
with
the
association's
consultant
to
identify
some
energy-efficient
enhancements
that
will
be
added
to
the
association's
replacement
reserve
plan.
At
the
moment,
many
of
the
condo
units
are
virtually
unsellable.
The
market
values
for
these
units
range
from
about
a
hundred
thousand
up
to
one
hundred
and
sixty
thousand
dollars
per
unit.
If
the
repairs
and
replacement
are
made,
we
would
envision
that
the
market
values
would
increase
up
into
the
160
to
220
thousand
dollar
range,
so
about
a
sixty
thousand
dollar
increase
on
the
average
based
on
current
bid.
H
The
total
project
cost
is
approximately
1
million
three
hundred
forty
five
thousand
dollars.
The
Association
has
allocated
this
cost
to
the
twenty-four
units
based
on
each
units.
Ownership
interest
in
the
property.
The
allocated
costs
ranges
from
about
forty
three
thousand
dollars
to
eighty
thousand
dollars
per
unit.
The
Association
has
been
unable
to
provide
or
obtain
private
long
term
financing
for
the
project
due
in
part
because
of
the
high
cost
of
the
project
and
the
lack
of
sufficient
collateral,
that's
actually
owned
by
the
Association.
It
would
be
the
reserve
funds
etc.
H
In
these
types
of
situations
where
there
is
no
private
financing
options
available,
condo
and
townhome
associations
in
the
city
of
Minneapolis
can
apply
for
long-term
HIA
financing
by
the
city,
the
Wellington
kind,
no
association
mitad
and
each
a
financing
application
back
in
july
of
2015,
and
they
have
met
all
the
guidelines
and
minimum
criteria.
That's
contained
in
the
city's
HIA
policy,
which
was
adopted
in
February
2011
and
is
attached
to
your
are
CA.
H
The
city's
HOA
policy
requires
that
sign
petitions
supporting
the
HOA
financing
from
must
come
from
owners
of
at
least
75%
of
the
units.
To
date,
the
city
has
received
signed
petitions
from
the
owners
of
21
of
the
24,
so
it's
approximately
88%,
the
city
has
received
a
letter
from
one
of
the
owners
opposing
the
HOA
financing
notice
of
the
public
hearing
was
sent
to
all
the
condominium
owners.
If
the
HOA
financing
is
approved,
each
owner
will
then
have
two
options.
H
Their
first
option
would
be
to
pay
in
cash
their
allocated
portion
of
the
total
project
cost
to
the
Association
by
June
30th,
and
they
can
use
whatever
source
is
at
their
disposal.
The
second
option
would
be
financing
their
portion
of
the
total
project
costs
through
the
hie
and
financing
provided
by
the
city.
So
there's
the
two
options:
each
each
owner
will
have.
It's
anticipated
that
most
of
the
owners
will
choose
the
HOA
financing
option.
So
here's
how
it
all
work
the
city
will
enter
into
separate
finance
agreements
with
the
Wellington
condominium
association
and
Western
bank.
H
H
Versa,
con
construction
company,
which
is
the
association's
general
contractor,
will
then
make
the
necessary
repairs
and
improvements
between
July
and
November
of
this
year.
The
association
will
pay
for
these
repairs
with
the
construction
loan
proceeds
and
whatever
cash
they
receive
from
any
of.
If
any
of
the
condo
owners
decide
to
pay
upfront.
When
the
project
is
complete
eat,
then
the
city
will
chew.
Long-Term
general
obligation,
bonds
or
perhaps
a
loan
bond
proceeds
will
have
used
to
pay
off
the
construction
loan
from
Western
Bank
Fund
a
one-year
debt
service
reserve
and
pay
other
financing
costs.
H
The
size
of
the
bond
issue
will
not
exceed
1
million
five
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars.
As
indicated
in
the
attached
bond
resolution,
then
starting
next
year
in
2018,
the
city
will
impose
HIA
fees
on
each
condo
unit.
That
selected
the
hae
financing
the
hie.
The
HOA
fee
will
vary
from
unit
to
unit
depending
on
each
units,
allocated
costs
of
the
project
and
will
range
from
anywhere
from
forty
one
hundred
dollars
to
seventy
eight
hundred
dollars
per
year.
H
The
annual
fee
for
each
unit
will
remain
constant
for
19
years,
similar
to
a
special
assessment,
but
it's
not
so
HIA
fee.
The
annual
HOA
fee
will
appear
on
each
condo
units,
property
tech
statement,
and
it
will
be
due
just
like
their
property
taxes,
one-half
by
May
fifteenth
and
the
other
half
by
October
15,
also
just
like
property
taxes.
H
These
fees
will
have
a
first
lien
on
the
property
in
the
case
of
foreclosure,
the
HOA
fees
that
are
collected
by
the
city
would
then
be
used
to
make
semiannual
bond
payments
in
order
to
account
for
potential
delinquencies.
The
bonds
will
also
be
secured
by
one
hundred
and
five
percent
coverage.
That's
built
into
the
bond
issue,
the
pledge
of
all
the
associations,
cash
and
other
assets
and
the
one-year
debt
service
reserve
that
will
be
funded
by
bond
proceeds.
So
in
this
way,
HIA
bonds
end
up
being
more
secure
than
your
typical
City
special
assessment
bond.
H
It's
currently
anticipated
that
the
HOA
fees
will
not
be
pre
payable.
So
when
a
unit
sells,
the
new
owner
will
be
responsible
for
paying
the
fees
along
with
their
property
taxes,
at
least
during
that
19
year
period,
until
the
HOA
fees
terminate
with
that
madam
chair
I'd
be
happy
to
answer.
Any
questions
are.
A
There
any
questions
for
mr.
Winkle
Haake
on
his
very
thorough
report.
Thank
you.
We
will
open
the
public
hearing
on
item
number
10,
which
is
passage
of
an
ordinance
with
regard
to
the
Wellington
condominium
housing
improvement
area.
The
resolution
imposing
the
improvement
fees
as
well
as
authorizing
the
issuance
of
taxable
geo
bonds
and
authorizing
appropriate
agreements
between
the
condominium
association,
Wellington
Bank
to
Western
Bank
to
facilitate
the
project.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
to
this
issue?
Please
step
forward
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
D
A
There
anyone
else
here,
who'd
like
to
speak
to
this
issue,
anyone
anyone
seeing
that
I'm
going
to
close
the
public
hearing
I'm
going
to
move
approval.
I
have
a
few
comments.
I
want
to
make
about
this.
I
know
the
residents
in
this
building
quite
well.
I
lived
500
steps
from
this
building
for
20
years.
It
was
one
of
the
only
remaining
historic,
pre-war
buildings
built
in
the
neighbourhood
when
the
Lorin
Greenway
went
up
and
it
sits
in
the
shadow
of
some
of
the
most
expensive
property
in
the
city
of
Minneapolis.
A
A
This
is
financing
of
last
resort,
there's
no
doubt
about
it
and
we
provide
the
safety
net
in
a
way
we've
come
in
and
provided
where
the
market
has
failed,
which
is
my
philosophy
with
regard
to
public
finance,
where
the
market
can't
come
in
and
do
what
it
needs
to
do.
The
city
should
do
so
if
we
didn't,
in
fact,
this
building
would
be
condemned
as
a
public
safety
issue
and
24
people
would
lose
all
their
entire
investment
as
well
as
their
homes.
A
This
has
been
going
on
quite
a
long
time,
which
is
probably
why
it
seems
so
easy
today
in
many
ways.
I,
don't
think
this
is
something
we
should
celebrate
in
a
way
the
neighbors
are
caught
between
a
rock
and
a
hard
place.
Think
about
it.
We're
talking
about
a
unit
worth
a
hundred
and
ten
thousand
dollars
that
could
get
a
forty
to
fifty
thousand
dollar
assessment.
This
isn't
going
to
improve
their
property,
it's
going
to
preserve
their
property,
so
that
residents
who
want
to
live
and
ownership
and
downtown
can
afford
it.
A
So
I'm,
somewhat
surprised
after
being
the
author
of
this
ordinance
in
2011,
that
only
two
or
three
condos
have
taken
advantage
of
it.
Yet
on
the
same
agenda,
we
now
have
a
project
authorization
for
yet
another
one.
So
we
are
going
to
see
I
think
a
pattern
of
some
conversions
where
improvements
need
to
be
made.
A
It
is
a
very
high
hurdle
to
overcome
to
have
three
different
financing
institutions,
reject
your
application,
so
I'm
thrilled
we're
doing
this
I
think
this
is
the
role
of
the
city
to
intervene
where
the
market
has
failed
and,
in
particular
in
a
non
impacted
neighborhood,
where
home
ownership
is
so
hard
to
find.
So
with
that,
are
there
further
comments
or
questions
a
sing,
none
all
in
favor
of
the
staff
recommendation
signify
by
saying
aye
any
opposed.
That
item
is
approved.
Thank
you
for
being
here
today.
We'll
move
on
to
item
number
11.
Mr.
Wilson
thank.
I
You,
madam
chair
committee,
members
today
we
have
an
application
by
the
Sheraton
room
restaurant,
which
is
located
at
3:37
13th
Avenue
Northeast.
They
are
seeking
a
permanent
expansion
of
their
premises.
To
add
a
street
cafe
to
their
license,
which
is
they
currently
have
an
on
sale
liquor
license
in
sidewalk
cafe.
I
This
is
part
of
the
pilot
program
allowing
businesses
to
construct
a
deck
conforms
to
the
city
of
Minneapolis
standards.
It
can
occupy
a
traffic
lane
directly
in
front
of
the
business.
The
Street
Cafe
will
be
located
directly
in
front
of
the
Sheraton
room.
It
will
be
incorporated
into
their
existing
sidewalk
cafe
and
have
a
total
seating
of
24
seats.
The
design
and
encroachment
on
our
street
was
approved
by
that
public
works
department.
Public
hearing
is
required
for
this
application.
We
didn't
mail,
86
notices
to
residents
and
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
today's
hearing.
I
A
There
any
questions
for
mr.
Wilson
on
item
number
11,
seeing
none
he'll
open
the
public
hearing
on
item
number
11,
which
is
an
expansion
of
premise
for
the
Sheraton
room.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
to
this
issue?
Anyone
is
there.
Anyone
here
from
the
Sheraton
room
come
on
up.
Tell
us
a
little
about
what
you're
going
to
do.
We
need
a
good
news
story.
J
Hello,
hello,
my
name
is
Jared
Ullman
I'm
I'm,
one
of
the
owners
of
the
Chariton
room,
and-
and
so
we
we
inquired
about
about
the
parklet
program,
about
finding
out
information
about
it
for
this
season,
because
we
were
familiar
with
seeing
a
few
of
them
around
town
and
and
that's
when
when
when
we
started
the
conversation
well
pilot
program
got
information
about
the
street,
cafe
and,
and
so
I
guess,
to
kind
of
fix.
Explain
what
we're
doing.
There's
going
to
be.
K
J
The
the
existing
side,
sidewalk
cafe,
which
was
approved
like
in
95
or
something
for
16
to
20
seats,
is
moving
to
it.
Actually,
it's
actually
22
seats.
I
think
that
there
might
have
been
a
slight
error
on
the
application,
but
but
we've
got
22
seats
on
it,
and
and
so
there's
going
to
be,
it's
going
to
be
partially
on
the
on
the
sidewalk
abutting,
the
curb
and
at
4
3
4
60
there
going
to
be
a
budding,
the
curb
and
then
and
then
the
remaining
16
are
going
to
be
on
the
decking.
J
That
is,
that
is
installed
on
the
into
the
parking
lane.
The
the
decking
will
be
installed
and
removed
seasonally
so
that
what
what
we're
applying
to
do
is
to
have
it
removed
by
October,
31st
and
and
the
construction
material
is
wood,
wood,
decking
essentially,
and
we're
going
to
store
it
off-site
during
the
winter
months
and
pretty.
J
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I
will
happily
move.
Approval
of
this
item
want
to
thank
mr.
Ulman
and
businesses,
plural
for
all
the
investment
and
work
that
you've
been
done
doing
on
13th,
Avenue
I
think
13th
is
coming
alive
in
a
major
way.
That's
in
no
small
part
due
to
your
work
over
the
long
haul.
I
think
this
is
yet
another
great
addition
adding
the
deck
you
know
getting
rid
of
a
parking
lot
and
putting
in
a
little
bit
of
urban
paradise
in
Northeast
and
I
can't
wait
to
see
it
happen.
So
thank
you.
D
I
Chair
we
have
an
application
price
Brewing
Company
at
1401,
West,
River
Road.
They
just
received
their
brewing
and
taproom
license
a
couple
cycles
ago
and
they
are
already
expanding
to
add
an
outdoor
patio
that
will
accommodate
an
additional
46
patrons.
This
is
in
the
near
North
neighborhood
in
Ward
5.
I
The
perio
will
be
directly
in
front
of
the
facility
on
private
property
facing
West
River
Road.
We
notified
all
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
the
business
and
the
near
North
neighborhood
group
and
the
Northside
residence
redevelopment
council.
We
received
no
responses
for
or
against
the
application.
Staff's
recommendation
is
that
the
application
be
approved
are.
A
A
A
I
I
Saturday
through
Sunday
and
Monday
through
Friday
till
2:30
a.m.
I'm.
Sorry
and
alcohol
service
will
see
secured.
Am
we
notified
all
residents
and
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
this
business?
Of
today's
public
hearing,
we
also
notified
the
East
on
business
partnership
in
the
downtown
neighborhood
association.
We
received
no
responses
for
against
the
application
staff
finds
they
meet
all
of
our
requirements
and
we
are
recommending
approval
are.
A
K
All
right,
it's
actually
pretty
simple:
we've
owned
the
Eagle
for
about
19
years,
but
this
is
a
about
the
third
time
we've
expanded
the
patio.
This
time
we're
going
to
do
a
major
overhaul
will
be
stamped
concrete,
we're
putting
in
a
very
large
area
of
trees.
It
would
be
very
green,
we're
just
waiting
for
the
permit
still
and
as
soon
as
we
get
that
we'll
be
ready
to
go
it'll
be
very
large
I'm,
looking
very
forward
to
it.
There'll
be
a
non-smoking
section
in
it.
K
E
You,
madam
chair
I,
will
happily
move
approval
of
this
item.
I
want
to
thank
mr.
Edie,
Hopkins
and
eaglebolt
bar
for
their
patience
and
their
investment.
I
know,
there's
been
quite
a
bit
of
red
tape
and
bureaucracy
to
slice
through
in
making
all
this
happen
and
I
appreciate
your
I
appreciate
your
work.
It
will
make
a
big
difference
over
the
summer
on
that
particular
block.
So
thank
you
on
the.
A
F
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee
before
you
today
is
the
draft
of
the
2017,
affordable
housing
trust
fund
request
for
proposals.
There
were
a
number
of
changes
proposed
this
year
that
are
identified
in
the
council
report
and
they're
highlighted
in
yellow
in
the
draft.
That's
attached
to
your
RCA
real
briefly.
Just
a
couple
highlights
on
that
new
this
year
we're
including
new
long
term
affordability
requirements,
we've
increased
sustainability
and
healthy
housing
requirements,
we've
incorporated
affirmative,
fair
housing
requirements
and
then
we've
also
incorporated
new
cost
containment
strategies.
F
A
Okay,
thank
you
for
your
report.
Seeing
none
I'm
going
to
move
approval
of
the
staff
recommendation
along
with
the
staff
direction
and
the
staff
direction
would
be
to
come
back
in
one
cycle
with
a
proposal
to,
on
a
one-time
basis,
consider
additional
gap
funding
for
projects
currently
caught
in
the
pipeline
as
a
result
of
the
federal
tax
market
issues,
tax
credit
market
issues.
That
would
be
a
report
that
would
come
back
and
give
us
a
sense
of
what
projects
are
stuck,
what
the
reason.
A
Why
is
and
ideas
for
how
we
could
prioritize
projects
and
approximately
how
much
money
out
of
the
trust
fund
we
should
use
for
this
purpose.
Okay,
I
know
a
lot
of
work
has
been
done
on
this
already
I.
Just
don't
think
it's
ready
to
go
today,
so
with
this
staff
direction,
we'll
anticipate
a
report
on
what
this
one-time
infusion
into
some
of
these
projects
would
do
in
order
to
get
them
to
close
absolutely.
E
F
E
Thank
you
and
I'm
just
going
to
make
a
comment
generally
about
sort
of
the
affordable
housing
crisis
that
we're
in
right
now.
I
mean
we
know
that
we're
likely
losing
4
percent
9
percent
low
income
tax
credits
from
the
state.
We
we
know
that
we're
likely
losing
some
form
of
CDBG
Community
Development
Block
Grant
funding
from
the
federal
government
in
that
light,
I
do
think
it's
necessary
for
the
city
to
step
up
and
we're
sort
of
seeing
our
role
transition
significantly
in
the
last
couple
years.
E
From
simply
a
gap
funder
to
there
I
say
a
primary
funder
in
some
instances,
and
you
know,
should
we
enter
that
sphere
with
with
care
and
caution?
Yet
we
absolutely
should
just
to
be
certain
that
the
every
single
dollar
that
we're
issuing
is
going
to
well
build
affordable
housing
as
opposed
to
lining
pockets.
But
it
is
something
we
need
to
be
cognizant
of.
Thank.
E
A
I
Chair,
madam
chair,
this
matter
involves
the
office
of
liquor
license
currently
held
by
surtax
liquor
Inc.
They
are
located
at
303,
East,
Hennepin
Avenue
and
on
Sunday
March
12th.
The
licensee
was
open
for
business
and
made
multiple
off
sale
beverages
in
violation
of
the
venn
applicable
state
law
and
city
ordinance,
prohibiting
Sunday
sales
on
March
13
2017.
The
licensee
was
served
with
a
notice
of
adverse
action
detailing
the
alleged
violations.
I
I
The
agreement
right
now
reads
that
the
licensee
will
pay
a
fifty
thousand
dollar
civil
penalty
to
the
city
of
Minneapolis
before
May
31st
of
2017,
and
that
the
business
will
serve
a
three
day
suspension
to
include
Sunday,
July,
2nd,
which
is
the
first
Sunday
that
state
liquor
law
will
allow
Sunday
sales
and
then
Sunday,
July,
9th
and
Sunday
July
16th
and
all
the
applicants
are
with
us
today.
If
you
have
any
questions
and
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
myself.
C
Madam
chair
of
the
council
and
Denis
Johnson,
representing
civics,
some
of
the
shareholders
with
us
today,
Melissa
sir
Rick
and
Molly
servicable
part
owners
absurd,
--ax,
liquors
I
would
indicate
to
the
committee
that
we
have
gone
over
the
proposed
agreement.
We've
signed
it
and
we're
going
to
go
bye-bye
it
we
understand
it's
something
that
we're
willing
to
live
with,
make
sure
we
get
paid
and
abide
by
the
closings
and
try
to
move
forward
with
their
lives
are.
A
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I'm,
going
to
move
approval
of
this
resolution.
I
think
that
we
are
at
the
point
where
we've
struck
the
right
balance.
You
know
we're
a
cities
of
laws,
and
so
a
significant
penalty
is
most
definitely
in
order
when
those
laws
have
been
broken,
but
I
believe
that
it's
the
decision
maker
that
should
should
bear
the
penalty
and
not
the
employees
and
not
the
other
administrators
that
were
not
part
of
the
decision
itself.
E
E
I
do
not
believe
that
it
was
either
the
employees,
Melissa
or
or
Molly's
and
I
think
that
that
we
are
at
the
point
right
now
where
we
should,
which
could
call
today
and
bring
this
item
to
a
close,
strongly
discourage
anybody
from
doing
something
like
this
again
yet.
Certainly,
the
business
should
continue
to
operate,
and
so
I
strongly
encourage
my
my
colleagues
to
support
this
resolution
are.