►
From YouTube: October 12, 2017 Intergovernmental Relations Committee
Description
Minneapolis Intergovernmental Relations Committee Meeting
A
Good
afternoon
I'm
calling
to
order
a
regularly
scheduled
meeting
of
the
intergovernmental
relations
committee.
My
name
is
Elizabeth
Glidden
and
the
chair
of
this
committee
and
I'm
joined
today
by
council
members
or
Sami
Frey
Council
President
Johnson
and
councilmember
Andrew
Johnson.
We
are
a
quorum
of
the
committee.
We
have
three
items
on
the
agenda
for
today.
The
first
is
a
presentation
of
a
Metropolitan
Council
policy
positions
document
and
mr.
Yuri.
Are
you
gonna
introduce
that
for
us?
Madam.
B
Chair
I
will,
my
name
is
Chan
Ranieri
I'm,
the
director
of
government
relations.
This
is
the
first
time
the
city
has
adopted
policies
to
discuss
policies
for
adoption
regarding
the
Metropolitan
Council.
Miss
Olson
has
been
working
for
several
months
on
this
issue
with
city
staff
yourselves
and
also
met
council
members
to
come
up
with
this
document
she
will
be
presenting
in
I
yeah.
He
can
stop.
I
should
go
along
for
questions
and
I'll
turn
it
over
now
to
Lauren.
C
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
council,
members,
I'm
Lauren
Olson
government
relations
representative
I'm,
here
to
present
to
you.
Some
potential
met
council
policy
positions.
As
you
know,
we
have
state
positions
and
federal
government
positions,
and
this
is
the
first
time
that
we
are
looking
at
adopting
some
regional
governance
related
positions.
As
Jean
said,
I've
been
working
with
staff
to
kind
of
prepare
a
draft
for
your
consideration
and
look
forward
to
seeing
this
take
shape
over
time
that
you.
D
C
You
know
the
Met
Council
is
a
seven
represents
the
seven-county
metro
area
and
there
could
be
a
disagreement
within
the
seven
counties
and
the
communities
within
those
counties
about
the
roles
of
Met,
Council
and
policy
direction.
So
we
think
there
is
value
to
share
some
of
our
general
vision
as
a
city
about
roll
of
the
mat
Council
and
then
some
specific
recommendations
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
every
recommendation,
because
we
don't
have
time
so
I
and
I
will
provide
a
high-level
overview
all
right.
C
As
we
look
at
any
policies
at
the
city
in
any
level,
we
look
through
all
our
minneapolis
values,
including
a
lens
of
racial
equity.
Deep
racial
disparities
exist
in
many
areas
of
life,
housing,
transportation,
employment,
wealth
and
we
Minneapolis
recognizes
that
reducing
or
eliminating
these
disparities
is
necessary
to
the
vitality
of
the
city
and
the
region,
and
we
look
at
net
council
policies
through
this
lens
as
well.
C
C
The
primary
theme
that
you'll
find
in
the
land-use
section
is
that
Minneapolis
supports
compact
development
patterns
because
those
best
leverage
all
the
investments
that
are
being
made
by
the
Met
Council
and
in
water
and
transit
and
development.
They
also
leverage
those
private
investments.
They
tend
to
be
more
environmentally
friendly,
and
these
are
also
the
of
development
patterns
that
people
increasingly
want
in
their
places
to
live.
C
Currently,
the
livable
communities
demonstration
account
is
no
more
than
40
percent
should
be
given
to
many
of
us
at
st.
Paul.
According
to
guidelines,
however,
the
Met
Council
does
have
discretion
to
award
more
than
that,
and
at
this
point
we
are
just
wish
to
remind
them
that
they
do
have
that
discretion
and
they
should
feel
free
to
utilize
it
on
the
tax
based
revitalization
account.
No
more
than
50%
of
those
funds
can
go
to
any
single
municipality
in
a
metro
area.
C
Topical
transportation,
obviously
transit
is
very
important,
and
the
Met
Council
is,
you
know,
provides
Metro
transit
services.
These
are
some
of
the
different
priorities
that
we
want:
the
Met
Council
to
consider
when
they're,
making
decisions
about
transit
investments
we
want
to
continue
to
serve
those
existing
riders
and
not
just
focus
on
new
ridership,
sometimes
federal
formulas
and
stuff
can
can
lead
to
that
outcome.
We
want
to
serve
transit,
dependent
people,
make
sure
we're
providing
adequate
service.
C
Those
all-day
riders,
those
are
people
who
are
not
just
commuting
to
work,
but
need
rely
on
the
bus
for
everyday
activities.
Again,
we
want
to
promote
transit,
which
helps
reduce
those
racial
disparities,
promotes
economic
development,
connects
people,
jobs
and
again
leverages
those
other
investments.
C
It
is
very
important
to
the
city
that
the
amenities
and
facilities
that
that
Metro
Transit
provides
are
provided
an
equitable
way
across
the
Metro
and
that
things
like
shelters,
heat.
Real-Time
information
are
provided
to
everybody
in
the
system.
In
a
way,
we
would
suggest
that
they
review
their
their
facilities
through
the
lens
of
racial
equity
and
economic
equity
biking
and
walking
our
transportation,
and
we
want
to
the
Met
Council
to
give
that
commensurate
investment.
C
We
do
highlight
some
of
the
projects
that
the
city
has
supported
and
we
want
to
reiterate
our
support.
We
have
been
very
strongly
in
support
of
completing
the
C
Line
and
the
D
line
as
the
next
bus
rapid
transit
projects.
We
in
the
in
the
resolution
about
Bottineau
LRT
that
was
really
emphasized
is
that
these
create
important
connections
so
that
Minneapolis
residents
can
access
those
light
rail
investments.
C
C
We
really
need
to
look
at
people
moved
also
they
should
be
looking
at.
Is
this
transit
accessible
to
the
people
who
need
it
and
not
just
how
much
longer
would
your
trip
me
I'm
compared
to
a
car?
For
example,
the
Met
Council
has
adopted
a
position
to
basically
pivot
away
from
expansion
of
highway
infrastructure,
and
we
would
I
think
agree
with
that
direction
and
they
we
have
specific
recommendations
about
giving
transit
a
priority
and
maximizing
high
occupancy
vehicle
lanes
to
to
help
accomplish
that.
C
The
topic
of
aviation,
the
Met
Council,
has
a
role
to
review
the
Metropolitan
Airport
Commission
long-range
plans,
capital
plans
and
also
to
say,
is
the
overall
capacity
of
the
system
working
and
we
just
want
them
to
be
much
more
deliberate
to
develop.
Metrics
that
look
at
what
are
the
impacts
on
the
people
and
the
communities
around
the
airport
to
what?
What
is
the
impact
on
health
and
livability
and
just
to
include
that
in
their
evaluation
topic,
Water
Resources,
the
role
of
the
Met
Council
on
water
supply
is,
it
can
be
somewhat
controversial.
C
Also
and
I
would
say
that
we
we
support
them
playing
a
role
in
a
technical
analysis
to
look
at
the
adequacy
of
the
water
supply
and
help
communities
plan
for
what
they
need
to
do
in
the
future.
I
think
this
is
especially
true
for
some
groundwater
communities,
them
that
might
need
to
look
at
alternatives
for
the
wastewater
system.
Cities
have
pay
a
large
bill
for
their
volume
based
charge
and
that
that
hits
our
resident
customers
directly
as
well.
C
Sack
we
have
a
number
of
recommendations
regarding
sack,
certainly
the
biggest
one
of
the
biggest
concerns
I.
Think
from
the
city's
perspective
is
that
sack
is
often
a
surprise,
large
one-time
charge
and
a
big
obstacle
for
small
businesses.
So
we
really
emphasize
that
we
need
to
overcome
these
barriers
for
small
business.
We
need
to
simplify
a
sack.
We
had
previously
adopted
a
position
that
their
sacks
should
not
be
charged
for
outdoor
seating
and
carry
that
over
into
this
document
as
well.
C
When
it
comes
to
regional
parks,
people
who
use
them
say
that
they're
one
of
the
greatest
amenities
that
we
have
as
a
region
they're
highly
valued.
The
problem
is
that
they
tend
to
be
used
by
older
white
people
to
much
greater
degree
and
they're
just
simply
not
used
equitably.
So
we
would
like
to
really
encourage
that
council
to
to
do
more
to
ensure
that
parks,
trees
equitably.
One
suggestion
is
just
to
increase
transportation
options
to
regional
parks.
C
And
housing
Minneapolis
supports
quality,
affordable
and
stable
housing
that
meets
the
needs
of
all
residents
at
all
stages
of
life.
So
we
want
to
provide
a
range
of
housing
options.
A
housing
is
another
topic
where
there
can
be
disagreement
about
the
role
of
the
Met
Council.
One
thing
that
the
Met
Council
does
is
look
at:
what
is
the
need
for
affordable
housing
and
that
each
kind
of
range
of
affordability
and
then
it
allocates
to
communities?
Here's
your
share,
and
this
is
how
you
can
do
your
part.
C
It
then
uses
its
role
and
land
use,
and
it
uses
this
in
grants
to
try
to
help
advance
having
every
community
involved
in
providing
affordable
housing,
and
we
think
that
that
is
a
valuable
role
and
very
important
to
meet
the
needs
that
we
have
as
a
region
and
we're
also
encouraging
the
Met
Council
to
have
a
regional
perspective
on
a
lot
of
the
same
challenges
that
the
city
is
approaching.
How
do
how
do
we
encourage
that
mixed
income
housing?
C
C
And,
regarding
section
8,
this
is
consistent
with
Inc.
What
the
city
has
has
said
to
try
to
encourage
property
owners
management
companies
to
accept
poacher's.
The
Met
Council
is
that
it
runs
a
Housing
Authority.
We
think
they're
in
a
position
to
help
coordinate
better
so
that
people
have
more
mobility
across
jurisdictions
and
to
encourage
project-based
section
8
in
those
communities
that
are
currently
where
there's
not
a
lot
of
housing
choice
available
again.
Climate
change
is
something
that
we
should
be
looking
at
together.
C
Specific
goals
the
Met
Council
has
committed
to
looking
at
everything
through
a
lens
of
climate
impacts,
and,
and
that
is
a
good
step.
We
just
have
some
specific
suggestions
again
when
it
comes
to
the
topic
of
economic,
competitive
competitiveness,
we
will
not
succeed
as
a
region
unless
we
address
the
racial
disparities
that
exist.
A
population
is
currently
about.
24%
people
call
her
the
region.
It
will
be
40%
by
2040.
If
these
asperities
persist,
we
won't
meet
our
full
potential
and
will
be
leaving
people
behind.
So
we
have.
We
encourage
recommendations
that
help
address
that
issue.
C
C
So
we
want
us
to
support
the
health
of
the
airport.
We
also
think
that
managing
some
of
the
negative
impacts
of
the
airport
helps
ensure
the
long-term
sustainability
of
the
airport.
Again,
that
was
kind
of
a
high-level
overview,
and
we
didn't
get
into
a
lot
of
specifics.
But
did
you
have
any
questions?
Well.
A
A
A
I
know
that
miss
Olson
has
spent
a
lot
of
time
working
with
city
staff,
because
we
do
engage
with
the
Met
Council
and
reflect
policy
positions,
often,
though,
in
response
to
individual
planning
efforts
or
project
efforts,
because
there
are
often
opportunities
for
jurisdictions
to
send
in
their
comments
their
feedback.
So
there
are
ways
that
we
are
providing
feedback
to
the
Met
Council
on
a
regular
basis
today,
but
it
doesn't
exist
in
a
space
like
this.
A
couple
other
things
just
for
you
to
know.
A
One
is
that
we
have
had
engagement
from
some
Met
Council
members
who
encouraged
us
to
be
more
specific
or
transparent.
Even
that's
not
the
best
word
but
advocating
around
our
city
positions
around
Met
Council
issues,
and
so
we've
had
some
encouragement
from
that
end
and
and
then
a
reminder
that
there's
a
gubernatorial
election
next
year
and
along
with
that
comes,
we
know
we
will
have
a
new
governor
and
a
new
governor
has
an
opportunity
to
appoint
all
Met
Council
members.
So
we
could
have
some
significant
change
on
the
Met
Council
and
again.
A
That
ends
up
being
sort
of
a
good
reason
for
us
to
have
in
writing
some
positions,
some
of
which
have
been
implied
positions
from
the
city
of
Minneapolis,
but
maybe
never
quite
stated
on
a
on
a
piece
of
paper
before
so
just
want
to
say
thank
you
for
this
work.
I
anticipate
this
will
be
a
changing
product.
It
may
not
need
to
be
updated
every
year
and
it's
going
to
certainly
be
a
work
in
progress,
so
I
think
councilmember
Andrew
Johnson
had
some
thoughts
to
share
your
recommendations
for
some
discussion.
Thank.
F
F
You
know
in
a
future
years-
and
maybe
even
you
know,
if
it's
possible
to
work
on
something
until
next
until
is
in
front
of
council,
adding
some
language
about
wildlife
and
sustainable
land
management
on
her
parks
and
trails,
I
think
would
be
helpful.
I
think
we
have
a
lot
of
opportunities
there
to
not
just
promote
access
to
parks
and
equitable
use
of
parks,
but
also
to
help
preserve
sustainable
practices
in
parks
and
to
help
make
sure
that
wildlife
considerations
are
being
maintained,
especially
in
regional
park,
assets
which
are
so
interconnected.
F
Together
and
then
on,
the
trends
and
measures
component
I
think
there
is
an
opportunity
to
add
something
in
there
about
prioritizing
the
most
vulnerable
transit
users
very
similar
to
Complete
Streets.
We
have
some
great
measurements
that
we
are
bringing
up
in
this,
but
I
think
a
little
more
on
that
would
be
hopeful
and
then
the
one
that
I
want
to
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
on
I'll
actually
email.
This
out.
They
have
a
paper
copy,
but
unfortunately
it
has
a
typo
on
it.
F
If
you
add
up
all
of
the
delays
and
changes
in
behavior
and
it's
it's
bad
from
an
environmental
standpoint,
it
pushes
more
traffic
on
to
residential
streets,
which
then
increases
the
risk
of
pedestrian
incidents
as
well.
And
it's
just
a
major
source
of
stress
and
frustration
for
people
across
the
Metro
and
so
I
sent
that
language
out
and
that's
under
projects
to
add
and
implementing
technologies
and
changes
to
improve
timing
of
traffic
both
on
and
crossing
Hiawatha
Avenue,
including
reducing
the
disruption
of
traffic
flows
by
Blue
Line
operations.
F
A
All
right
so
comer
Johnson
has
made
a
motion
to
include
the
language
that
he
read,
which
is
specific
to
improving
traffic
flow
along
Hiawatha
I'll,
say
without
being
someone
who's
been
intimately
involved
in
this
I
know.
This
has
been
sort
of
it.
Long-Standing,
ongoing
discussion
of
continued
evaluation,
any
discussion
or
questions
and
I
want
to
invite.
They
know
that
is
Olson.
You
got
a
heads
up,
I
think
from
council
member
Johnson
that
he
wanted
some
more
desired,
some
more
specific
language
here.
Any
discussion
on.
A
F
D
Thinking
that
you're
missiles
and
I'm,
looking
at
the
parks
and
trails
section
too,
and
one
of
the
thoughts
that
I
have
is,
we
could
be
more
clear
about
supporting
the
need
for
increased
funding
in
the
regional
park
system.
I
mean
I'm,
I.
Think
they're
known
of
bonding,
we
get
is
the
same
as
we
use
we
got
20
years
ago
in
the
operation
and
maintenance
funding
continues
to
be
static
and,
of
course,
costs
have
gone
crazy
so
and.
E
D
Know
you
know
even
the
legacy
funds
and
that
kinda
thing
which
can
support
some
of
the
you
know
natural
habitat
that
you're
talking
about.
We
just
don't
get
our
share
of
those
funds
and
you
know
I
know
they've
done
some
work
about
seeing
what
percentage
of
mirja
of
those
funds
are
generated
here
and
we
we're.
A
A
Right,
thank
you.
I
think
that
is
important
recommendation.
I
think
why
don't
we
just
see
if
we
can
work
with
staff
on
that
and
some
of
the
other
suggestions
and
we'll
do
well,
I
think
that
shouldn't
stop
moving
this
forward
right
now,
but
we'll
kind
of
take
that
into
consideration
if
we
can
add
some
language
on
that,
any
other
comments
discussion
not
seeing
any
so
again.
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
work
on
this
first-of-its-kind
product
and
all
in
approval
of
there's
a
whole.
Please
say:
aye
aye,.
E
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
sasha,
Bergman
with
the
IGR
department
today
kind
of
marks,
the
beginning
of
our
preparation
for
2018,
with
our
legislative
policy
positions
and
legislative
agenda.
We're
gonna
start
today
with
a
high-level
walkthrough
of
our
policy
positions
in
some
of
our
IG.
Our
staff
recommended
changes.
We
anticipate
no
action
on
this
today,
but
that
these
changes
could
be
incorporated
with
other
changes,
new
policies
at
a
future
date,
potentially
in
November
and
next
week.
E
E
Briefly,
we
recommend
deleting
the
policy
supporting
expanding
investment
authority
for
local
governments,
because
that
was
accomplished
last
legislative
session,
two
proposal
or
two
statements
for
one
regarding
franchise,
fee
Authority
and
one
regarding
distributing
look
an
aide
based
on
the
formula.
We
recommend
adding
specific
statements
about
those.
Those
are
not
inconsistent
with
statements
that
we
already
have
in
the
Legislative
program,
but
we
wanted
to
call
them
out
specifically
based
on
proposals
that
have
surfaced
in
the
last
couple
of
years.
We
did
think
an
erector.
E
We
recommend
adding
those
based
on
some
proposals
that
have
surfaced
at
the
legislature
in
the
last
couple
of
years
and
that
we
anticipate
will
continue
to
come
up,
in
particular
in
2018
on
page
five
in
the
capital
investments
section
we
just
at
this
point
are
recommending
deleting
some
of
the
accomplishments.
From
last
session,
and
then
adding
the
new
city
supported
bonding
projects
on
page
six
recommending
just
some
formatting
changes
in
the
transportation
section.
E
On
page
seven,
under
the
municipal
and
regional
governance
section,
we
recommend
leading
the
support
for
local
option
to
extend
the
on
sale,
liquor
hours
for
the
Superbowl,
because
that
was
accomplished
last
session
and
then
adding
a
statement
supporting
current
current
law
regarding
local
government
authority
to
create
special
service
districts.
This
is
an
issue
that
came
up
last
session
and
we
anticipate
could
come
up
which
there
was
a
bill
to
repeal
city
authority
to
create
those
under
procurement
on
page
7.
E
These
are
some
recommended
changes
from
our
sustainability
staff
about
state
goal,
setting
for
purchasing
of
environmentally-friendly
products
on
page
9,
under
resources
and
funding
for
Public
Safety.
These
are
some
recommended
updates
from
our
health.
Excuse
me,
our
health
department
regarding
mental
health
and
chemical
dependency,
treatment
and
prevention.
E
E
A
You
miss
Bergman
and
I
know
that
some
council
members
had
taken
advantage
of
that
already
and
are
coming
through
the
document
and
it's
you
know
we
have
a
lot
of
existing
policy
positions
and
several
new
ones
are
added
every
year
and
we
try
to
make
sure
that
we're
pairing
that,
with
removing
things
that
do
not,
for
whatever
reason,
need
to
be
on
our
list
anymore,
so
I
know
there's
a
lot
and
I
appreciate
the
outreach
I'm,
not
seeing
any
immediate
question
so
again
to
colleagues.
This
is
just
a
flagging.
A
This
is
one
of
our
most
important
roles
is
to
approve
cannabis,
go
ahead
to
our
team
in
preparation
for
next
year's
session.
So
with
that
I'll
move
to
receive
and
file
on
approval,
say
aye
aye
opposed
that
is
received.
And
finally,
we
have
a
placeholder
here
for
federal
state,
local
updates
manager.
B
I
have
a
few
items
to
report
on
one
at
the
federal
level,
and
that
is
the
whole
tax
proposal.
Again,
there's
no
legislation
drafted
yet
on
the
tax
bill.
There's
been
lots
of
discussions,
many
of
them
I,
think
behind
closed
doors
among
congressmen
and
the
White
House
and
Treasury
Department.
It
appears
that
what
the
big
issue
is
right
now
is
salt
state
and
local
tax
deduction.
B
Several
states,
particularly
Pennsylvania
in
New
York
New
Jersey
California,
are
concerned
that
they
are
high
tax
states,
particularly
property
taxes
in
their
state
and
many
members
of
those
delegations
to
bipartisan
delegations,
and
it
sounds
like
many
of
the
Republicans
in
those
states
are
concerned
about
the
loss
of
this
exemption.
So
there's
been
some
work
done
there.
Also
some
of
this
and
the
big
concern
about
that
is.
This
is
one
of
the
items
that
would
be
used
to
help
pay
for
the
tax
reductions
over
time
and
there's
been
some
concern.
B
Opposition
raised
on
both
sides
of
the
aisle
on
this
issue.
The
second
issue
is
the
corporate
tax.
I
think
that
the
administration
has
suggested,
if
you
know,
with
no
higher
than
20
and
looking
at
the
numbers
it
sounds
like
it
maybe
needs
to
be
higher.
So
there's
a
discussion
on
that
issue.
But
if
the
question
is,
will
this
bill
pass?
That's
a
very
good
question.
B
It
will
require
more
debate
and
discussion
and
will
it
pass
soon,
I
think
everyone
is
now
saying
possibly
end
of
your
early
next
year.
So
I
guess
my
comment
will
stay
tuned
and
watch
this
another
issue.
Last
week
the
Senate
Commerce
Committee
passed
out
a
bill
on
autonomous
vehicles
that
bill
passed
out.
There
were
fifty
some
amendments
in
committee.
The
committee
agreed
that
they
needed
more
work
on
this
issue,
particularly
on
the
issue
of
preemption
of
state
and
local
regulations
regarding
traffic
and
parking
and
things
of
that
nature.
B
So
because
the
bill
when
it
was
first
draft
that
basically
said
we
couldn't
change
any
of
our
rules
and
regs
when
it
came
to
highways
and
roadways
and
in
governing
autonomous
vehicles
that
discussions
are
begun.
Their
continuing
there's
a
meeting
tomorrow
sponsored
by
the
United
States
Conference
of
Mayors
and
the
National
League
of
Cities,
and
our
representatives
will
be
there
to
meet
with
some
congressmen
from
the
house
on
this
whole
issue
of
preemption
and
I
know
that's
a
term.
B
D
B
From
SMG,
and
also
the
detective
boards
testified,
representative
Anderson
indicated
that
they
had
at
least
and
at
a
certain
time,
and
they
will
have
a
continuing
discussion
of
this
issue.
There
were
several
questions
issued
asked
about
security
for
large
events
like
Super,
Bowl
and
Final
Four,
so
I
am
assume.
There
may
be
some
inquiries
about
that
in
future
meetings.
This
week
we
had
a
tour,
miss
leche
and
our
staff
work
very
closely
with
city
staff
and
yourselves
to
have
a
tour
of
the
house.
B
Bonding
committee
least
not
only
was
at
our
art
projects,
but
also
the
universities,
the
park
board,
the
counties,
the
purpose
of
the
tour
is
not
only
don't,
show
our
projects
and
really
try
and
make
it
important
that
these
are
regional
and
statewide
assets.
They
were
also
to
learn
what
legislators
were
thinking
and
some
of
the
questions
revolved
around
you
know:
should
these
projects
and
almost
all
these,
but
are
these
really
region,
or
these
really
state,
and
we
I
think
we
answered
theirs.
B
We
have
to
get
better
answers
and
get
back
when
session
starts,
particularly
on
some
issues.
Dealing
with
you
know
is
this
a
redevelopment
project.
Should
you
in
terms
of
the
upper
harbor
terminal?
There
are
some
issues
about.
Why
should
the
state
be
invest,
investing
in
the
storm
tunnel
and
I?
Think
our
folks
answer
that
question
quite
well
like
we
have
all
these
national
firms
here
we
had
this
runs
into
the
river.
So
a
lot
of
themes
on
those
kinds
of
questions
and
other
questions
about
you
know.
B
Why
should
we
be
doing
this
if
cities
can
do
it
on
their
own,
particularly
when
it
came
to
things
to
questions
about
the
amphitheater
about
Pearl
Harbor,
there
was
actually
a
other
proposal
for
a
city
in
central
Minnesota,
and
one
legislature
made
it
clear
that
there
was
a
amphitheater
and
his
community.
It
was
built
privately,
so
we
have
to
work
on
those
kinds
of
issues,
but
also
the
Senate,
unfortunately,
will
not
be
doing
tours
they
due
to
the
concern
about
the
constitutionality
of
the
governor's
actions.