►
From YouTube: September 28, 2017 Zoning & Planning Committee
Description
Minneapolis Zoning & Planning Committee Meeting
A
Good
morning,
I
will
call
to
order
a
regular
meeting
of
the
zoning
and
planning
committee.
Today
is
September
28th,
2017,
I'm,
Lisa
bender
I
chair
the
committee,
and
we
have
a
quorum
today
with
councilmembers
Reich
Goodman
Andrew
Johnson
in
Council
President
Johnson.
We
have
four
items
on
our
agenda
today.
All
are
on
consent,
but
I
will
pull
item
three
off
for
a
discussion
and
believe,
that's
probably
why
most
people
are
here
as
well.
A
So
item
number
one
is
a
rezoning
at
301
and
3
11
East
Lake
Street
to
see
to
item
number
two
is
a
rezoning
at
25,
50,
Pillsbury
Avenue,
to
r4
to
allow
an
opportunity
to
add
more
residential
units
to
the
building
item.
Number
four
is
a
referral
to
staff
of
an
ordinance
amending
our
zoning
code
related
to
pet
boarding
and
animal
shelters,
so
move
the
consent
items
one
two
and
four
see.
A
If
there's
any
discussion,
seeing
none
all
and
approval,
please
say
aye
aye
any
opposed
those
three
items
carry
and
then
we
have
item
three
we'll
begin
with
a
presentation
from
staff
and
I
believe
mr.
poor
was
going
to
give
us
an
update,
just
kind
of
an
overview
of
where
this
process
is
at
I'll.
Note
that
we
don't
have
a
public
hearing
scheduled
for
this
item
today,
so
I
know
a
number
of
folks
are
here
interested
in
this
item
and
so
we'll
start
with
the
staff
presentation
and
go
from
there.
Thank
you
good.
B
More
chair,
bender
I,
think
at
this
time
we
don't
I'm,
not
sure
we
need
to
go
through
a
full
staff,
presentation,
I
guess
what
I'd
rather
do
is
say
a
couple
things.
One
is
that
homeand
was
introduced,
April
5th
in
2016.
There
was
a
lot
of
work
done
around
it
with
the
community.
It
did
go
to
a
hearing.
There
was
some
strong
views
on
both
sides.
B
It's
great
to
see
that
kind
of
passion
about
a
neighbor
that
people
care
a
lot
about
the
history
and
the
properties
and
I
appreciate
folks
who
came
down
today
to
follow
the
process
and
be
involved
with
it.
I
at
this
time
on,
staff
is,
does
have
a
report,
but
we
understand
there's
been
some
recent
more
comment
coming
in
from
the
neighborhood.
B
We
understand
that
there
may
be
more
time.
We
could
benefit
from
more
time
to
gather
more
comment.
One
thing
that
is
important
that
I
want
to
say
today,
though,
is
that
interim
protection
would
expire
on
October
5th
of
this
year.
To
date,
we've
had
37
certificates
had
no
change.
All
of
them
have
been
approved,
so
even
under
interim
protection,
people
have
been
able
to
to
do
the
changes
of
modifications
to
their
properties
going
through
that
review.
We've
had
two
certificates
of
appropriateness.
B
One,
of
course,
was
s
DS
Funeral
Home,
a
major
move
that
helped
the
community
and
part
of
a
redevelopment
scheme
at
that
intersection
and
those
were
both
approved.
The
other
was
a
single-family
on
some
window
changes.
So
what
I'd
like
to
notify
the
council
today
is
staff
is
going
to
let
that
inner
protection
expire.
We
don't
think
there's
any
significant
properties
or
potential
resources
that
are
in
imminent
risk
and
that
if
the
guidelines
are
put
in
place
early
next
year,
there's
no
property,
that's
gonna.
We
feel
that
will
be
demolished
within
that
time.
B
C
B
Straighter
would
still
review
it
as
a
potential
historic
resource.
Okay,
it
would
be
on
a
case-by-case
basis
and
we
would
render
that
judgment
everyone's
a
case-by-case,
but
I
think
the
fact
we're
talking
about
the
home
district
is
there's
probably
a
high
probability
that
we
might
determine
that
it
needs
to
still
go
through
a
more
intensive
review,
which
is
again
why
we
feel
like
there's
adequate
protections
in
place,
that
we
can
let
interim
protection
labs
and
we're
not
really
foregoing
any
protect
review
of
any
property.
Okay,.
A
D
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I,
appreciate
the
opportunity
address
this
committee
I'm,
certainly
not
in
this
committee,
but
I'm
really
appreciate
that
opportunity.
I
want
to
say
that
this
has
been
probably
the
most
contentious
issue
in
Ward
5
to
come
before
the
council,
while
I've
been
a
member
of
this
council
and
I
understand
that
you
know
anything
that
dives
deeply
into
issues
of
race,
class,
religion
and
private
property,
as
this
is
going
to
cause
a
lot
of
discord,
and
there
has
been
a
lot
of
discordant
on
this
matter
in
this.
D
D
You
know-
and
let
me
just
kind
of
close
by
just
have
a
say
in
this-
then
I
really
appreciates
staff
for
the
incredible
amount
of
work
that
they
put
into
this.
The
report
in
itself
was
like
a
thousand
some
odd
pages.
I
mean
it
was
insane
I
want
to
thank
all
the
community
members
and
those
four
and
those
against
his
rogue
designation
for
their
commitment
to
this
process
for
the
hours
they
spent
and
for
their
willingness
engage
with
the
city
on
what
can
be
a
difficult
and
bureaucratic
process.
D
You
know,
I
think
everyone's,
just
not
happy
and
I
don't
know.
If
that's
a
good
thing
or
a
bad
thing,
I
know
that
people
hold
Homewood,
you
know
really
close
to
their
hearts
and
they
have
you
know
interpretations
of
what
Homewood
means
to
them,
and
you
know
they
feel
very
strongly
about.
You
know
one
side
or
the
other,
and
you
know
as
a
person
who
represents
Ward
five
but
does
not
live
in
Homewood
I.
D
Don't
have
that
sort
of
personal
connection
that
the
folks
there
do
have,
and
you
know,
I
find
it
hard
to
see
that
you
know
I
I
guess
part
of
me
had
hope
that
my
folks
would
just
come
to
some
sort
of
consensus
or
there
would
be
a
majority.
You
know
one
way
or
the
other
and
it
would
make
things
a
lot
easier,
but
that
hasn't
been
the
case
and
you
know
I
think
for
myself.
I've
been
trying
to
work
on
trying
to
buy
more
time
so
that
we
can
find
some
sort
of
resolution.
D
If
anything-
and
you
know
I
think
if
we
can't
you
know
part
of
me
just
feels
that
you
know
maybe
the
next
council
member
in
Ward
5,
whether
it's
me
or
anybody
else
can
make
that
decision
and
go
with
the
folks
here.
So
you
know
that's
kind
of
where
I'm
at
and
again
I
ask
my
colleagues
to
support
the
motion
to
refer
this
item
back
to
staff
for
further
work
and
I
I
can
say:
I
don't
make
this
motion
I'm,
not
a
member
of
this
many
but
I.
Ask
that
my
colleagues
support
that.
Thank
you.
A
A
E
I
apologize
for
interrupting
you,
the
that
there
is
no
vote,
that's
required
by
the
Committee
on
interim
protection
itself,
that
automatically
happens
and,
in
fact,
in
this
case
I
believe
it's
reached
a
period
of
18
months
for
interim
protection,
which
is
all
the
ordinance
provides
for.
So
there
would
not
be
an
opportunity
to
extend
it
even
if
the
committee
so
desired.
So
your
vote
today
or
your
motion
today
does
not
need
to
reflect
the
any
considerations
on
interpret
ection
per
se.
E
A
A
So
I
just
think
that
the
process
that
we
use
right
now
to
do
outreach
around
historic
districts,
especially
when
we
were
looking
at
cultural
districts
and
places
where
there
are
so
many
overlapping
issues
probably
needs
to
be
more
expanded
to
from
the
beginning,
make
sure
that
that
we're
really
truly
engaging
the
community
so
I
think
it's
the
right
thing
to
do
at
this
time
to
regroup.
I
do
think
it's
too
bad
that
you
know
so
long
has
gone
by
without
that
happening,
but
the
president.
C
Remember
we
had
a
historic
in
inventory
in
the
Camden
I
think
it's
part
of
actually
in
North
Minneapolis
historic
review
number
of
years
ago,
and
one
of
the
things
they
looked
at
in
my
neck
of
the
woods
was
to
neighborhoods
Shingle,
Creek
and
Lynn
Bohannon
and
said
that
they
had
the
consultants
said
they
had
the
single
largest
concentration
of
post-world
War,
two
housing
in
the
city,
starting
to
have
bungalows
and
then
some
Ramblers
and
you
know
that's
that's
a
unique
resource.
Also
I.
C
Just
think
we
when
I
look
at
all
the
work.
That's
been
done
on
this
I
I
think
we
are
I'm
going
to
make
a
motion
in
addition
to
the
chairs
motion
here,
that
that
we
I,
like
the
words
that
councilmen
being
used
kind
of
a
more
delicate
solution
to
trying
to
preserve
the
integrity
of
some
of
these
places
that
we
have
that
are
unique
in
Minneapolis,
but
yet
allowing
for
the
changes
that
people
want
to
see
to
modernize
to.
C
Repair
to
update
their
homes
and
I
just
think
it's
a
real
challenge.
I
ran
into
this
when
we
were
trying
to
do
a
historic
designation
of
victory.
Memorial
Drive-
and
that
was
the
big
question
was:
do
you
include
the
houses
in
the
in
the
district?
In
the
end,
we
found
out
that
victim,
Royal
Drive
actually
sits
in
Robbinsdale,
so
we
didn't
have
authority
to
it,
but
so
we
did
it.
We
did
a
state
designation,
but
it
doesn't
include
the
houses.
C
It
doesn't
include
the
houses-
and
you
know,
I
mean
I
kind
of
sometimes
wish
it
would.
When
I
see
somebody
paint
one
of
their
stucco
houses,
an
outrageous
color.
You
know,
but
again
it's
a
balance.
It's
a
balance
of
people's
ability
again
to
you
know
in
particularly
modest
places
where
people
with
modest
incomes
live.
It's
a
real
challenge
to
try
to
get
to
some
of
these
historic
repairs
that
that
can
be
quite
costly,
so
I
think
it's
a
good
solution
to
send
it
back
to
staff
I'd
like
to
figure.
C
D
D
I
think
the
issue
is
that
you
know
it's
hard
to
engage
folks
when
you
know
it's
a
quasi-judicial
process
and
you're
the
council,
member
and
people
expect
you
to.
You
know:
do
that
and
I
mean
I'd
love
to
do
that,
but
you
know
I
mean
I,
don't
want
to
lose
my
vote
on
that
as
well
and
so
on.
I
think
that's
a
part
that
has
made
it
tough
for
me,
at
least
you
know
with
regards
to
that,
but
you
know
if
there's
a
process
by
which
you
know
I
can
do
that.
A
So
a
council
president
has
distributed
her
motion
which
reflects
with
what
she
stated
previously.
So
we
have
two
motions:
one
is
to
refer
the
item
back
to
staff
and
the
second
is
this
motion
to
direct
staff
to
work
on
on
communication
and
solutions
that
she
described.
Is
there
any
further
discussion
seeing
down
only
no
provable
peace
say
aye
any
opposed
that
carries
that's
our
final
item.
We
are
adjourned.
I.