►
Description
Minneapolis Community Development and Regulatory Services Committee Meeting
A
Good
afternoon
this
is
the
regularly
scheduled
community
development
regulatory
services
committee.
The
date
is
May
2nd
2017.
My
name
is
Jacob
Frye
I'm,
the
chair
of
this
committee
and
I
am
joined
by
a
quorum
including
council
members,
Cano,
Quincy
and
Reich.
We
are
indeed
a
quorum
of
this
committee.
A
We've
got
18
items
on
the
agenda
for
today,
first
I'm
going
to
move
the
consent
items
and
I'll
kind
of
read
through
exactly
what
they
are
item
number
11,
some
liquor
business
and
gambling
licenses
number
12
is
a
banned
business
license
operating
conditions
for
Charbel,
Petroleum,
Co
I'm,
doing
businesses
Tesoro
riverside
shop
at
25,
17
riverside
ave
13
is
authorizing
an
amendment
to
an
existing
home
loan
to
portland
village
LP,
which
reduces
the
loan
interest
rates
from
6.09
to
zero.
For
all
interest
accruing
in
the
future.
A
15
contract
amendments
with
Minnesota
homeownership
Center,
specifically
increasing
a
contract
for
administration
and
oversight;
second,
increasing
a
contract
to
cover
payments
on
counseling
agencies
and
third
increasing
a
contract
for
the
financial
and
homeownership
counseling
services
by
a
network
of
counseling
agencies.
Item
number
16
is
agreement.
Is
another
agreement
with
mhf
a
authorizing
an
agreement
to
receive
and
use
the
predictive
cost
model
to
assist,
with
assisting
cost
containment
for
affordable
housing.
A
17
is
approving
a
waiver
of
the
60-day
waiting
period
set
forth
in
Chapter
249
of
the
Minnesota
Code
of
Ordinances,
and
that's
for
4108
beard
avenue.
South
number
18
is
referring
to
staff
subject
matter
of
an
ordinance
amending
title
13,
chapter
267,
which
is
relating
to
licenses
and
business
regulations.
Amusements,
adding
and
amending
provisions
and
relating
to
places
of
adult
entertainment
and
I
will
go
ahead
and
move
items
11
through
18
councilmember,
Quincy.
B
Thank
You
mr.
chair,
just
a
quick
technical
item.
I
was
speaking
with
the
clerk
a
little
bit
earlier.
Today.
Item
number
15:
we
probably
might
want
to
consider
having
a
simple
referral
to
ways
and
means
it
is
a
contract
and
involves
some
money
and
it's
just
an
extension
to
be
on
consent.
Equation
means,
but
for
technical
purposes,
I'd
like
to
add
that
to
that
as
a
referral
item
other
than
that
simple
I.
A
Agree
with
councilmember
Quincy
I
think
that
makes
sense
to
send
it
over
to
Ways
and
Means.
Thank
you.
So
all
I
will
move
all
items
noting
that
item
number
15
should
be
referred
to
ways
and
means
any
further
discussion
on
items
11
through
18
agenda,
seeing
none
all
those
in
approval.
Please
say:
aye
aye
aye,
all
those
opposed
say
no,
that
those
items
pass.
A
C
Afternoon,
chair
Frye
and
members
of
the
committee,
this
is
a
public
hearing
for
the
2017
consolidated
plan
action
plan.
This
is
our
annual
application
to
the
Department
of
Housing
and
Urban
Development
for
our
federal
Community,
Development
Block,
Grant,
home
investment
partnerships,
emergency
solutions,
grant
and
housing
opportunities
for
persons
with
AIDS
funding.
C
We
are
also
asking
for
authority
to
submit
the
plan
to
HUD
by
August
16th
of
this.
This
year
after
we
are
notified,
our
official
award
amounts
from
HUD,
as
well
as
a
directing
finance
staff,
to
make
adjustments
to
the
schedule
for
in
the
2017
general
resolution
budget
to
reflect
that
actual
budget
and
also
to
direct
staff
to
incur
pre-award
costs
as
of
our
program
year
start
of
June
first.
This
would
allow
us
to
get
contracts
underway
effect
of
that
date
for
2017
programming.
A
A
D
A
Member
Reich
has
a
moves.
Approval
of
this
item.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
the
consolidated
plan
action
plan?
No,
seeing
none
all
those
in
approval,
please
say:
aye
aye,
all
those
opposed
say
no,
and
that
item
passes
item
number
2
is
a
modification
number
three
to
the
consolidated
redevelopment
tax,
increment
financing
plan
and
here
to
speak.
F
Afternoon
mr.
chair
council,
members,
murk
Winkle
lake
director
of
development
finance
in
the
report
before
you,
staff
is
recommending
passage
of
the
attached
resolution
approving
modification
number
three
to
the
consolidated
tax
increment
financing
plan.
This
is
a
simple
modification
that
updates
the
tax
increment
budget
in
the
tip
plan.
F
This
maximum
amount
will
be
sufficient
to
pay
off
of
2009
Target
Center
bonds,
pay
operational
costs
of
NCR
Department
through
2020,
and
and
also
restore
approximately
nine
point
one
four
million
dollars
in
funding
to
neighborhood
action
plans,
phase
two
NRP.
As
you
may
recall,
in
earlier
this
year,
in
early
february,
the
council
authorized
use
of
tax
increment
revenue
to
restore
the
NRP
funding
contingent
upon
approval
of
this
modification,
because
the
tax
increment
budget
is
being
increased.
That
requires
a
public
hearing.
F
A
F
We
started
a
mr.
chair
council
members.
We
started
out
back
in
2010
with
projections
at
about
163
million
total.
This
is
gross
increment,
then
the
TIF
district
was
shrunk
for
two
years
by
50%.
The
budget
was
adjusted
at
that
time,
downward
to
about
147
million,
and
that
was
back
in
2011.
So
it's
been
quite
a
few
years
since
we've
updated
the
budget
and
since
that
time,
tax
increment
from
the
district
is
increased
significantly.
So
we
went
from
basically
147
million
up
to
the
180
million
okay.
F
In
total,
and
from
that
total
amount,
there
are
certain
categories
that
can
be
paid
for
a
large
chunk
of
is
sent
back
to
the
county
as
reimbursement,
and
then
we
pay
some
administrative
costs
and
from
from
the
remainder
you
have
to
so
of
two
eligible
uses.
Debt
service
on
target
center
bonds
and
neighborhood
revitalization
purposes,
I,
which
is
a
broad
category.
So.
A
I'll
comment
briefly:
this
is
a
really
good
thing.
It
does
not
get
the
attention
that
it
deserves.
Target
Center
is
getting
paid
off.
We
then
have
thirty
three
million
extra
dollars
that
can
go
to
a
combination
of
the
county
and
NRP
and
specifically
to
our
neighborhoods,
and
you
know,
I
want
to
make
very
clear
that
to
say
that
you
are,
you
know,
Pro
neighborhoods,
getting
funding,
but
then
anti
some
of
the
development
that's
taking
place
along
the
riverfront.
This
is
the
TIF
district
right
here.
A
A
B
You
mr.
chair
you're,
exactly
right,
thank
you
for
pointing
that
out.
I.
Think
that
really
is
that
evidence,
because
when
we
made
the
the
shrink
of
the
size
of
the
district,
we
did
that
intentionally
and
the
purpose
was
to
return
money
to
the
general
fund
for
property
tax
relief.
That
was
a
different
time.
We
were
facing
a
much
different
property
tax
in
Aereo
that
was
just
coming
in
to
changes
at
LGA
at
the
state
level.
B
It
was
remarkable,
so
this
really
represents
a
promise
to
restoring
those
funding
which
we
were
able
to
do
in
February
contingent
on
this
refinancing
or
this
modification.
But
it's
a
the
winner
on
this.
Is
the
taxpayers,
because
now
we're
able
to
restore
that
amount
and
that's
what
represents
growth
in
the
city?
So
it's
because
of
the
Y's
fiscal
relationship
that
we've
had
with
the
tax
district
and
the
relationship
we
have
with
our
taxpayers.
This
is
a
significant
thing
and
it's
certainly
worth
much
more
comment
on
it.
So
thank
you
for
pointing
that
out.
B
G
Right
Thank
You
mr.
chair,
and
yes
thanks
for
highlighting
this,
it's
a
very
significant
thing,
and
we
should
just
reiterate
this:
we
cut
the
district
in
half
and
now
because
it's
performing
so
well
that
half
is
now
over
performing
what
was
once
double
I
mean
and
so
with
half
the
district.
We're
outperforming
the
old
economic
situation
prior
to
that.
So
that's
a
highly
performing
area
and
there's
a
generalized
sort
of
connection
between
you
know
a
robust
central
core
and
the
overall
health
of
a
city.
G
But
here
we
you
know
years
ago
and
continuing
with
this
notion.
We
make
it
explicit.
We
explicitly
said
as
a
city
that
to
invest
and
have
a
thriving
downtown
that
we
explicitly
will
send
dollars
out
to
the
community.
So
you
don't
have
this,
that
shining
downtown
and
deteriorating
outer
ring
of
the
city
and
that's
decades
in
the
making
I
think
that's
good
policy
also
should
be
noted.
Not
only
do
we
make
it
explicit
by
sending
it
back
out,
it's
not
a
need-based
formula.
G
A
Right
any
further
questions
first
at.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
work
on
this.
It's
a
this
is
a
big
deal
so
I'm
going
to
open
the
public
hearing
for
the
consolidated
TIF
district
item.
Does
anybody
want
to
talk
about
this?
Does
anybody
want
to
talk
about
this?
Anybody
seeing
none
I
will
close
the
public
hearing,
I'll,
move
approval
of
this
item
and
I
just
hope.
A
I've
moved
approval
of
this
item
any
discussion,
all
those
in
approval,
please
say:
aye
hi,
all
those
opposed
say
no,
and
that
item
passes
item
number
three:
is
the
mpls
juice
LLC
doing
businesses
truths
at
120,
First
Avenue,
it's
proving
an
application
for
a
sidewalk
cafe
here
to
present
is
I
have
no
idea.
Mr.
H
We
do
have
an
application
by
Minneapolis
juice,
LLC
doing
businesses
truce
and
they
operate
at
120.
1St
Avenue
north
in
Minneapolis
they're
seeking
a
sidewalk
cafe,
license
they're
located
in
the
North
Loop
neighborhood
in
the
Third
Ward.
This
will
be
a
small
sidewalk
cafe
between
two
tables.
Four
chairs:
each
Troost
juice
does
a
mainly
a
wholesale
juice
business,
but
they
do
have
a
deli
with
grab-and-go
foods
and
salads
and
things
in
that
front.
First,
Avenue
public
hearing
is
required
for
the
sidewalk
cafe
portion
of
this
license.
H
We
did
notify
all
residents
and
property
owners
within
300
feet
and
the
downtown
Minneapolis
Neighborhood
Association
and
the
North
Loop
neighborhood
association
of
today's
public
hearing.
We
received
no
responses
for
or
against
the
application
staff
finds
they
meet
all
the
requirements
and
we
recommend
approval
I.
A
Thank
you,
mr.
Wilson,
any
any
questions
for
staff
at
this
time,
seeing
none
I'll
open
the
public
hearing.
Anybody
here
to
comment
on
truth
are
the
owners
of
Troost
here
by
chance,
know
anyone
here
to
comment.
Anyone
here
to
counter
I'll
move
approval
of
this
item.
It's
it's
really
great
to
see
that
the
first
Avenue
is
coming
alive.
A
You
know
I've
been
saying
for
quite
some
time
that
we
need
to
move
away
from
first
being
just
this
Thruway
for
transportation
and
really
more
focused
on
the
pedestrian.
So
as
we
expand
the
sidewalks
as
we
get
some
additional
activity,
there
I
think
it's
really
a
place
that
can
be
highlighted
on
so
I'll
go
ahead
and
move
approval
of
item
number
three
I'm,
sorry,
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
and
I
will
move
approval
of
that
item.
A
Anybody
here
to
discuss
anybody
want
to
discuss
all
right,
all
those
in
approval,
please
say:
aye
aye,
all
those
opposed
say
no,
and
that
item
passes
item
number
four
is
Penny's
coffee
at
100,
Washington
Avenue,
approving
an
application
for
an
on
sale,
liquor
with
Sunday
sales
class
deed,
license,
rescinding
the
business
license
and
operating
conditions
with
strong
beer
license.
Mr.
Wilson.
H
H
They
did
have
some
sakti
restrictions
that
prohibited
them
from
doing
this
in
the
past,
so
we're
lifting
recommending,
if
you
lift
any
license
conditions
and
expand
their
premises
to
suit
their
needs.
A
public
hearing
is
required
for
the
outdoor
expansion.
We
notified
all
residence
and
property
owners
within
300
feet
and
downtown
Neighborhood
Association.
We
received
one
response
from
our
mailing
and
that
response
was
in
support
of
the
application
and
staff
recommends
approval
of
this
application.
H
A
I
A
You
very
much
I
really
do
appreciate
the
investment
there.
Anyone
else
want
to
speak
to
this
item.
Anyone
else.
Anyone
else
seeing
none
I
will
close
the
public
hearing.
I'll
move
approval
myself
as
well
and
just
say
thank
you
to
Michael
and
the
entire
Penney's
team
over
there
with
Ben
and
Dean
you.
This
was
a
major
gap,
I
think
on
Washington
Avenue.
A
That
has
now
been
I,
think
revitalized
and
cured,
and
you
know
you
can
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
you're
consistently
coming
back
in
to
try
and
do
more,
whether
its
sidewalk
swords
or
booze
or
the
tremendous
crepes
you
have,
which
you
don't
need
approval
from
the
city
on
at
all.
But
it
are
great
they're
good,
so
I've
moved
approval
of
this
item
on
any
discussion,
seeing
none
all
those
approval,
please
say:
aye
aye
those
opposed
say.
No.
That
item
passes
item
number
five
is.
H
You
mr.
chair,
the
Sonora
grill
at
3300,
East
Lake
Street,
is
seeking
a
permanent
expansion
of
premises
today
for
a
an
expansion
of
their
outdoor
patio
area.
They
operate
currently
with
an
on-field
wine
and
strong
beer
licensed
Class
B,
and
they
have
operated
that
way
for
a
few
years
in
a
very
responsible
manner,
by
the
way
they're
adding
48
seats
to
their
existing
patio,
which
is
on
the
west
side
of
the
building,
and
that
will
give
them
a
total
patio
seating
area
of
68
seats.
This
is
in
the
Longfellow
neighborhood
in
Ward
2.
H
H
We
notified
all
residence
and
property
owners
within
300
feet
also
notified
the
Longfellow
community
Council
and
the
Longfellow
Business
Association.
We
received
two
responses
to
our
mailing
this.
Today's
public
hearing,
both
of
those
responses,
were
opposed.
First,
one
indicated
they
anticipate
this
expansion
on
the
patio,
which
will
create
more
noise
and
parking
issues
on
their
block
and
the
second
one
dealt
with
the
fence
and
patio
are
encroaching
on
the
interior
boulevard
of
the
public
right
away.
H
They
are
seeking
further
encroachment
to
expand
the
patio
20-foot
to
the
north
down
that
line
of
33rd
Avenue,
and
we
will
expect
a
traffic
engineer
and
Public
Works
Department
to
approve
that
encroachment.
Extension
with
that.
That
concludes
my
report.
Staffs,
recommending
approval
of
this
application
and
we'll
have
answering.
A
J
Good
afternoon,
chairman
and
councilmembers,
my
name
is
Daniel.
Seyfert
live
at
29
33
33rd,
Avenue,
South
I
share
the
north
property
line.
With
this
property
I've
been
in
my
home
for
33
years,
I'm
opposed
parking
is
already
I
mean
there
is
no
parking
at
any
give
it.
Even
this
weekend
it
was
pouring
rain,
they
weren't
even
using
their
patio.
J
Ding
a
lot
isn't
big
enough
for
what
they
have
no
across
the
street
from
me,
which
is
within
a
hundred
feet
of
senora's
there's
a
three-story
apartment
building
every
night
after
business
hours,
we
have
pretty
much
12
to
14
vehicles
parking
on
our
street
from
that
apartment,
building,
Plus
sonoran
I
noticed
when
they
were
reading
about
this.
They
kept
referring
to
the
west
side
of
the
building.
I
want
to
make
clear
that
the
west
side
of
the
building
is
already
all
outside
seating.
J
What
they're
going
to
be
going
is
north
of
the
building
on
the
west
side.
I
did
not
I
heard
that
it
was
20
feet,
but
I
didn't
hear
20
feet
by
what
I
mean
I
haven't
seen
a
site
plan
or
anything
I'd
like
to
know
some
things
like
that,
I'm
wondering
if
you
people
actually
know,
there's
most
likely
three
businesses
operating
out
of
that
building.
There's
it
was
originally
built
for
numbers,
there's
a
repair
layer
in
there
and
during
the
summer
the
last
couple
of
summers.
J
Senora's
has
been
running
a
I,
don't
know
if
you'd
call
a
festival,
van
or
a
catering
van
or
not
a
van,
but
a
trailer,
and
it
takes
up
a
couple
of
parking
spaces,
one
for
the
trailer
when
it's
there
another
for
carts
that
mean
I've
seen
them
dozens
of
times
out
there.
So
there's
lots
of
parking
spaces
there.
They
lose
a
couple
parking
spaces
because
they
don't
use
their
dumpster
area.
Their
dumpsters
are
outside
of
their
dumpster
area,
all
hurting
our
street,
and
but
right
now
our
street
is
full.
It's
full
48,
more
seats.
J
J
J
I
also
take
exception.
With
this
easement
or
city
property,
I
mean
right
in
the
letter
it
states
on
private
property,
well,
I'm,
pretty
sure
that
city
owns
or
has
some
sort
of
easement
a
two
to
three
feet.
That's
like
well,
that's
already
on
their
existing
patio,
not
to
mention
the
proposed
expansion
like
well.
Why
is
the
city
want
somebody
serving
alcohol
on
their
property
on
a
pretty
big
liability
you
might
book?
Another
thing
is
that
this
is
going
to
go
through
I
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
no
access
to
the
parking
lot.
J
From
this
thing,
no
climbing
over
the
law
I
mean
we
already
have
people
placed
in
the
last
two
weeks.
I've
caught
I've
seen
people
urinate,
not
my
front
Boulevard
watch
them
leave
the
bar
come
on.
Do
it
on
a
boulevard,
I've
seen
him
in
the
parking
lot
I
mean
it
happens.
Every
bar
I
chose
to
live
where
I
do,
but
48
seats
is
totally
ridiculous
for
an
expansion,
especially
when
they
don't
even
hold
the
whole
building
and
most
likely
are
running
three
businesses.
I,
don't
I,
don't
know
everything.
J
A
J
J
A
A
K
Guys,
my
name
is
Paulo
Lea
:
of
Sonora
grill
I
would
love
to
show,
show
you
what
I'm
doing
I
can
do
out
of
the
restaurant.
We've
had
a
really
good
relationship
with
businesses
along
Lestrade
and
the
neighborhood
people.
We've
been
open
there
for
three
years
and
a
half
is
going
to
be
four
years,
December
19,
but
you
already
mentioned
earlier.
K
K
A
lot
next
door:
it's
only
like
I
have
encounter
person
like
10,
not
not
many,
okay,
not
many.
It
does
get
busy.
I
agree.
It
does
get
busy
on
the
weekends
good
night
he
he
usually
doesn't
for
us,
but
I
don't
have
control
over
people
decided
to
park
on
the
street
rather
than
in
the
in
the
parking
lot.
K
K
A
A
M
Ken
London
I
live
at
29,
25,
33rd,
3-doors,
North,
Senora
I'm
opposed
primarily
because
of
the
parking
situation.
I
get
large
family
of
elderly
mother-in-law,
lives
next
door
to
me,
she's
two
doors
down
from
Sonora
and
big
Catholic
family.
We
get
a
lot
of
company
and
very
little
parking
with
their
employees
parking
on
the
street.
I
watch
them
every
day,
perk
and
walk
back
to
the
restaurant
that
starts
at
Burke.
Therefore,
you
know
several
hours
at
a
time.
I
have
no
problem
with
them.
Wanting
to
expand
his
business.
M
A
Any
further
individuals
that
want
to
speak
to
this
item,
anyone
else
anyone
else
seeing
none
I
will
close
the
public
hearing.
A
couple
of
just
brief
questions
here,
as
I
promised
I
would
ask
Wilson.
The
first
is:
what
is
the
square
footage?
Mr.
Wilson
of
the
addition,
and
how
does
that
relate
to
the
public
right-of-way.
H
H
A
You
Jota
love,
24
seats,
total
24
seats,
as
opposed
to
48
seats.
Thank
you
and
then
you
know.
I
would
just
ask
that
that
the
owner
and
then
the
other
individuals
sort
of
discuss
with
sort
of
a
strategy
to
work
out
the
issue
of
urination
following
leaving
leaving
the
bar
as
well
as
as
well
as
noise.
So
if
there
could
be
kind
of
a
strategy
to
deal
with
that
as
people
exit
that
would
be
wonderful.
A
H
Mr.
chair
the
and
the
site
plan,
the
trash
enclosure
is
located
in
a
place
where
the
rubbish
truck
can
service
it,
and
it
will
take
up
two
parking
spaces
in
a
normal
design
if
they
are
not
using
that
and
their
dumpsters
are
using
other
parking
spaces,
that's
something
we
can
will
chest
right
away.
Okay,.
A
D
You
come
summer
fry
so
I
just
wanted
to
say
briefly
I'm
hearing
the
concerns
and
I'm
also
very
appreciative
of
the
business
owners,
hard
work.
It's
not
easy
to
open
up
a
business
and
grow
it
and
maintain
it.
I
will
say
that
some
of
the
challenges
that
my
residents
have
faced
with
parking
have
been
mitigated
through
some
partnership
with
Lake
Street
Council
to
support
and
incentivize
clients
coming
to
some
of
these
businesses
using
public
transit
and
biking.
D
So
I,
don't
know
if
you
guys
have
bike
racks
in
front
of
Cynara
growth,
but
I
think
that's
a
great
thing.
If
you
do
and
doing
doing
some
creative,
promotional
partnering
with
Lake,
Street,
Council
and
other
business
nodes,
a
business
association
in
your
area
might
be
a
way
to
help
incentivize
people
to
use
public
transit,
walking
and
biking
to
come
to
your
business.
To
help
address
some
of
the
residents
concerns
around
around
parking.
D
In
addition
to
what
you've
mentioned,
where
you
know,
the
city
staff
can
certainly
help
navigate
some
of
these
conversations
about
what
does
it
mean
to
have
a
healthy,
thriving
commercial
corridor
in
a
in
an
area
that
is,
that
is
growing.
So
with
that
I
would
like
to
say,
you
know,
congratulations
for
you
know
maintaining
a
successful,
successful
business,
especially
now
that
we
are
moving
forward
into
a
time
where
I
think
we're
going
to
be
challenged
in
different
ways.
D
A
Thank
You
councilmember,
Cano,
councilmember
Cano
has
moved
the
the
staff
report
and
then
specifically
this
item
forward
any
further
discussion,
seeing
none
all
those
in
approval,
please
say:
aye
aye,
all
those
opposed
say
no
in
that
item
passes
item
number
six
is
the
big
cheese
company
doing
businesses
Haskell's
wine
and
cheese
bar
901
Nicola
troll
here
to
present
is
mr.
Wilson
Thank.
H
You
mr.
chair,
the
big
cheese
company
doing
business
as
Haskell's
wine
and
cheese
bar
at
901,
Nicollet
Mall
is
business.
Seeking
an
on
sale,
wine
and
strong
beer
license
to
be
operated
in
conjunction
with
their
restaurant
done.
Brothers
formerly
operated
restaurant
inside
watt
cafe
in
this
site.
The
Susan
downtown
West
neighborhood
in
the
seventh
Ward
they'll
have
seating
inside
428
and
seating
outside
on
a
sidewalk
café
429
Farrell
jr.
is
the
100%
owner
of
this
business.
H
H
A
N
Name
is
Ted
Farrell,
81
South,
ninth
Street
is
where
I
do.
Business
and
I
live
at
13,
11,
tyrol,
Trail,
Golden,
Valley,
Minnesota,
chairman
and
Councilman.
My
name
is
Ted
Farrell
representing
the
big
cheese.
Big
cheese
was
founded
back
in
1973
and
since
1988
we
resided
in
the
young
Quinlin
building
at
81,
South,
9th
Street,
and
once
the
Dunn
brothers
facility
was
vacated.
We
thought
it
would
be
a
great
opportunity
for
us
to
unplug
that
business,
which
is
currently
about
30
feet
down
the
hallway
and
move
it
down
and
expose
it
to.
N
Hopefully,
this
brand
new
and
lovely
Nicollet
Mall
to
get
exposure.
We
currently
do
all
kinds
of
takeaway
sandwiches
coffees
will
be
expanding
more
on
the
coffee's
etc,
but
we
thought
it
would
be
a
great
addition
not
only
to
our
business
but
the
to
the
city
to
open
up
this
wine
and
cheese
bar
to
explore
different
things
and
deaf
people
have
a
little
taste
and
try
some
craft
beers
and
things
like
that.
So
that's
coming.
A
I
agree.
Thank
you.
Anyone
else,
one
speak
to
this
item.
Anyone
else
seeing
none
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
go
ahead
and
move
approval
of
this
item.
I
agreed,
it
was
going
to
be
a
tremendous
addition
and
Nicollet
Mall
I
think
having
some
additional
retail
and
food
options
on
that
particular
location
would
be,
will
be
wonderful,
any
discussion,
all
those
in
approval,
please
say:
aye
aye,
all
those
opposed
say.
A
H
You,
mr.
chair,
we
have
an
application
from
Tinto,
Kachina
and
Catina
LLC
doing
business
as
Tinto
kitchen
proposed
site
is
49
59
and
Avenue
South
they're,
seeking
an
on
sale,
wine
and
strong
beer
license.
Class
C
to
the
applicant
will
be
opening
a
full-service
restaurant
serving
wine
and
strong
beer,
and
this
location
was
pre
Blee.
Previously
a
bruger's
Ruger's
beigel's
restaurant
who
still
operates
in
a
portion
of
this
building.
This
is
in
the
Lyndhurst
neighborhood
in
Ward
13
and
adjoins
the
Fulton
neighborhood.
H
H
H
We
also
notified
the
Lyndhurst
and
fulton
neighborhood
groups
of
today's
public
hearing.
We
received
ten
responses
from
that
mailing.
Three
of
those
were
opposed
and
seven
were
in
support.
The
three
opposed
were
concerned
about
the
parking
pressure
that
this
addition
might
put:
the
neighborhood
on
street
parking
areas
and
one
was
concerned
with
amplified
sound
on
the
patio
which,
in
this
case,
is
not
permitted
and
not
going
to
be
used
with
that.
Staffs
recommendation
is
approval.
A
A
H
H
H
H
Hearing
is
required
for
this
application.
117
notices
were
mailed
the
residents
and
property
owners
within
400
feet.
We
also
notify
the
downtown
Minneapolis
neighborhood
in
the
warehouse
district,
Business
Association.
Today's
public
hearing
we
received
no
responses.
The
application
seems
to
meet
all
of
our
requirements
and
our
recommending
approval.
Thank.
A
A
A
O
A
You
we're
very
excited
to
have
you
by
the
way
anyone
else
here
to
speak
this
item.
Anyone
else,
anyone
else
seeing
none
I
will
close
the
public
hearing.
Note
that
sects
world
is
still
there.
Don't
worry.
It's
just
been
moved
around
the
side.
We've
added
several
other
businesses
as
well
and
I
cannot
tell
you
how
much
I
appreciate
the
investment
in
that
particular
location.
I
think
the
building
looks
great.
The
space
I
think
will
be
wonderful
and
I
think
the
concept
that
you're
pushing
through
upstairs
Circus
is
going
to
be
a
winner.
A
H
You
mr.
chair,
the
Walgreen
company
doing
businesses
Walgreens
at
2650,
Hennepin
Avenue
is
seeking
an
extended
hours
license.
This
is
a
recently
constructed
Walgreens
that
just
began
operation
in
March
of
2017
and
again
Walgreens
is.
It
is
requesting
to
operate
24
hours
daily,
currently
their
lawful
hours
allowed
in
that
zoning
district
up
from
6:00
a.m.
to
10:00
p.m.
Sunday
to
Thursday
and
from
6:00
a.m.
to
11:00
p.m.
on
Friday
and
Saturday
Walgreens
management
met
with
the
inspector
of
the
fifth
precinct
to
do
a
full
security
review
for
this
application.
H
H
So
at
this
time
we
are
recommending
that
we
hold
the
public
hearing.
We
did
notify
all
residents
and
property
owners
within
300
feet
of
this
premises.
We
also
notified
the
East
Isles
residents
association
in
the
south
end
up
and
Business
Association
of
today's
public
hearing.
We
received
six
responses
to
were
in
support
of
the
extended
hours
application
for
were
opposed
generally,
the
opposition
related
to
the
lighting,
the
noise
security,
late
night,
noise
from
the
drive-through
etc.
H
So
at
this
point
due
to
the
zoning
issues,
there's
likely
going
to
be
some
more
zoning
land
use
application
work
required
so
at
this
time,
staffs
going
to
recommend
that
you
postpone
approval
or
action
on
this
item
until
the
other
zoning.
The
underlining
zoning
issues
are
resolved
but
recommend
that
you
hold
the
public
hearing
since
we've
noticed
it.
Thank.
B
Mr.
chair
I
think
that's
very
helpful
to
have
that
those
other
issues
resolved.
My
question
was
really
one
of
the
ones
that
had
come
up
as
part
of
the
comments
was
about
the
hours
of
operation
of
the
drive-through
itself
and
whether
that
could
be
restricted
or
not.
That
could
be
part
of
the
issues
taken
up
in
the
zoning
issue.
H
P
Afternoon,
chair
council
members,
I'm
Kimberly
hoeing
and
Zoning
Administration
I'm,
the
planner
that
took
this
through
the
public
hearing
about
a
year
and
a
half
ago
for
the
conditional
use
permits
for
the
drive-through
and
actually
wasn't
a
conditional
use
permit
for
a
site
plan
review
and
a
minor
subdivision,
and
there
were
some
conditions
of
approval
attached
that
I'll
try
to
keep
this
brief.
But
the
history
is
such
that
when
this
came
through
the
drive-through
was
a
permitted
use.
The
property
was
owned
c2
without
the
presence
of
a
pedestrian
oriented
overlay
district.
P
The
project
was
somewhat
controversial.
There
was
a
rezoning
study
that
followed
its
approval
that
resulted
in
the
pedestrian
oriented
overlay
district
being
extended
up
Hennepin,
so
that
now
is
present
on
this
site.
So
while
the
property
was
under
construction,
actually
the
drive
sir
became
non-conforming,
so
the
store
itself
is
conforming.
P
Zoning
staff
didn't
have
an
issue
with
the
24-hour
operations
for
the
store,
but
if
the
drive-through
wants
24-hour
operations,
it's
a
position
of
Zoning
staff
that
an
expansion
of
non-conforming
use
would
be
required
for
the
drive-through,
and
that
would
require
a
separate
public
hearing
before
the
Planning
Commission
and
then
on.
The
enforcement
issues.
The
no
right-hand
turn
sign
is
up
and
the
property
owner
is
actively
working
with
the
zoning
enforcement
staff
on
getting
the
lighting
issues
resolved,
but
that
doesn't
remain
outstanding
at
this
time.
Thank.
H
A
Q
I'm
Kimberly,
Walton,
Walgreens
and
actually
I'm
from
our
corporate
office,
so
my
address
is
35
50,
North,
Lake,
Shore,
Drive,
Chicago,
Illinois
I
do
have
our
local
store
manager.
Who
can
speak
to
some
of
the
issues
when
we
applied
for
the
24-hour
license?
We
heard
from
councilmember
Goodman's
office
about
the
concerns
regarding
the
lighting
I've,
seen
the
pictures
of
the
lighting
in
this
individual
palace
and
I
agree.
Q
It
is
a
problem,
it
is
something
we
are
actively
working
to
correct
and
that
something
store
manager
can
speak
to
the
steps
that
we've
taken
as
early
as
a
few
days
ago,
working
with
contractors
consultants
to
get
the
issue
fixed
as
soon
as
possible.
The
issue
is
it
rates
to
the
24-hour
drive-through.
We
understand
there
is
a
zoning
change
that
needs
to
be
made,
but
if
we
could
move
forward
with
the
24-hour
license
for
the
store
operations
that
something
the
store
manager
can
also
speak
to
them,
it's
important.
Q
We
have
them
eight
full
time,
employees
that
impacts
their
hours
and
their
availability
to
work
as
long
and
also
impacts
our
ability
to
be
the
only
Minneapolis
in
store
pharmacy
for
fertility
specialties,
and
so
it
limits
our
access
to
people
who
need
those
resources
as
well,
not
having
that
24-hour
store
availability.
So
now
I'd
like
to
introduce
Jason,
me-men
who's,
our
store
manager,
if
that's
appropriate,
you
could
answer
some
specific
talk
specifically
to
the
steps
we're
taking
as
it
relates
to
the
lighting,
because
we
do
agree
that
that
is
an
issue.
L
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Jason
M
store
manager
at
2650,
Hennepin
Avenue
at
the
Walgreens
store
there.
My
home
address
was
40
362,
bacterial
and
Egon.
The
reason
we
would
like
24-hour
availability
is
obviously
for
convenience
and
emergency
medication
access.
We
would
become
the
closest,
24-hour
location
to
both
HCMC
and
Abbott,
Northwestern,
hospitals
and,
as
Kimberly
spoke
to,
we
are
infertility
pharmacy
within
minnesota
or
one,
and
only
retail,
clinic
in
the
entire
state
for
access
of
these
highly
needed
medications.
L
We
are
also
a
center
of
excellence
for
HIV
medications
and
center
of
excellence
for
compounding
which
those
overnight
hours
is
when
we
are
able
to
do
those
compounding
medications
and
have
the
time
to
do
so.
We
are
also
a
24-hour
support
center
for
the
community
clinic,
which
is
located
off
of
lyndale,
which
does
a
lot
of
oncology.
Medications.
L
I
am
familiar
with
the
dr
concerns
and
one
of
the
things
I
would
like
to.
Let
you
be
aware
of
is
we
would
be
in
compliant
or
willing
to
operate
that
drive-through
from
the
hours
of
8
to
10,
as
we
currently
are,
until
we
can
go
through
the
new
licensing
requirements
that
are
needed
for
that,
this
location
moved
three
black
salt
in
March,
we've
been
running
in
this
look
in
this
neighborhood
for
over
25
years,
and
we've
been
24-hour
status
for
the
last
10
of
those
years.
L
So
the
neighborhood
the
customers
come
to
expect
that
24-hour
convenience,
when
the
site
plan
was
approved,
there
was
24-hour
talk,
and
this
was
just
a
glitch
in
the
business.
Application
did
not
have
the
proper
hours
at
original
application
time.
So
we're
here
today
to
rectify
that,
as
others
have
said,
the
the
signage
for
the
right
turn
onto
27th
has
been
corrected.
As
far
as
the
lighting
issues
I
can
talk
to,
we
have
shut
off
the
mean
pole
light
within
our
parking
lot
today.
So
tonight
we
will
evaluate
what
the
lighting
situation
becomes
at
that
point.
L
Tomorrow
morning,
we
will
take
readings
on
all
lighting
around
the
property
line,
to
see
what
more
steps
need
to
be
done
and
taken.
Care
of
they've
also
requested
that
a
photometric
study
be
completed
to
kind
of
figure
out
what
we
need
instead
of
making
quick
Corrections,
we
want
to
make
sure
we
do
it
right.
L
R
Afternoon
my
name
is
James
berry
I
live
at
3508,
Colfax
Avenue
South
I
am
here
because
I'm
a
Walgreens
customer,
as
previous
speaker
has
said,
we've
come
to
expect
24-hour
availability.
Also
I
think
the
neighborhood
is
a
little
too
dense
to
be
without
access
to
medications
if
needed.
46,
the
Minnehaha
or
Hiawatha
is
a
long
way
to
go
if
you're
really
needing
something
so
as
a
consumer
and
to
help
Minneapolis
image
as
a
big
city
which
do
have
24-hour
functions.
S
Yes,
my
name
is
Anthony
Bosque
I
am
26:41
Humboldt
Avenue
South,
which
is
directly
behind
the
new
Walgreens
of
2650
Hennepin
and
I'm,
one
of
the
people
who
is
troubled
by
the
the
lighting
on
site,
which
is
good
understand
that
you
need
to
light
your
parking
lot,
but
this
also
lights
my
backyard
in
my
neighbor's
backyard
in
my
house
in
my
bedroom.
In
fact,
I
sent.
S
But
my
understanding
from
my
communication
with
Capps
number
Goodman's
staff
has
been
that
Walgreens
hasn't
been
very
responsive
to
this
concern
or
any
others.
This
section,
the
first
I've
heard
the
lights
off.
It
must
have
happened
between
when
I
left,
my
house
and
and
when
I,
when
these
guys
shut
it
off,
because
it
was
on
this
morning.
E
T
One
more
time,
I
just
didn't,
express
coolly.
Okay,
I've
had
privilege
to
live
next
to
my
second
developmental
Walgreens
on
Hennepin
Avenue,
we've
done
the
2400
block
of
Girard
when
they
built
the
last
one
and
no
problems
with
it
at
all.
Had
no
problems
with
the
24
hours
for
the
store.
Two
two
issues
going
on
now,
or
maybe
three
first
one
is
the
lighting.
It
is
it's
pretty
over-the-top,
so
I
think
we're
moving
in
that
direction.
I've
been
communicating
with
Councilwoman
Goodman,
and
my
concern
with
that
is
to
reiterate.
T
Anthony's
point
is
her
words.
You
can
verify
with
her
Walgreens
hasn't
been
very
cooperative
and
dealing
with
the
issues
that
have
come
up
so
far.
So
that
would
be
my
only
concern
there.
As
you
said,
we're
proactive
find
something
we
can
all
live
with.
I
think
they're,
probably
a
fairly
cost-effective
solution
by
putting
shielding
or
something
over
the
lights
that
they
don't
have
to
spend.
A
lot
of
money.
I
can
appreciate
our
sensitivity
to
business.
T
One
kind
of
an
Avenue
I
can
also
appreciate
how
important
that's
that
corridor
is
for
our
neighborhood
and
for
the
city,
so
I
totally
get.
Why
kind
of
business
standpoint,
open
24
hours
makes
sense
to
open
it
24
hours
at
the
other
location,
no
issues
that
I'm
a
world
I
don't
live
right.
Next
to
that
one
now
Mike,
my
other
concern
would
be
the
drive-through
for
one.
T
There
is
noise
and
light
and
lots
of
issues
with
the
drive-through
during
regular
business
hours
and
as
I
understood
from
the
way
the
ordinance
reads
up
till
10
11
o'clock
I
see
no
issue
with
that
at
all.
My
concern
would
be
middle
of
the
night
driving
back
there
and
I
also
would
question
the
business
need
for
that
means.
T
Is
there
really
going
to
be
a
run
on
pharmaceuticals
in
the
middle
of
the
night,
or
somebody
can't
get
out
of
the
car
and
go
get
their
whatever
drugs
they
need
and
they
don't
have
all
the
drive
through
at
the
current
location
so
that
shouldn't
affect
current
employment.
So
that
would
be
my
concern
there
I
would
think
anyone's
10
o'clock
and
11
o'clock
on
weekend.
Nights
would
be
which
suffice
for
a
drive
through
hours,
otherwise
it's
24
hours
I
think.
Obviously
we
want
a
healthy
business
there.
It's
good
for
everybody.
Thank
you.
A
Anyone
else
here
to
speak
to
this
item
anyone
else
anyone
else
seeing
none
I
will
close
the
public
hearing.
Mr.
Wilson,
are
there
there
any
issues
with
the
drive-thru
being
open
24
hours?
It
was
an
interesting,
interesting
question.
Is
that,
as
opposed
to
the
store,
I,
think
I
think
everybody
agrees?
I
would
think
that
we
eventually
we
want
to
get
to
the
point
where
the
store
is
open.
24
hours
and
everybody
has
access
around
the
clock.
What
are
your
thoughts
on
the
drive-through.
H
Mr.
chair
the
well,
the
underlying
issue
is
it's
not
permitted
by
the
new
pedestrian
overlay
district,
so
we
would
not
recommend
that
the
the
drive-through
be
operated
24
hours,
as
opposed
to
the
store,
would
be
allowed
to
with
this
license
that
we
is
before
us
today
and
we
don't
have
very
many
objections
to
the
24-hour
operation
of
the
store
if
they
comply
with
their
turn,
sign
the
door
issue
and
their
lighting,
so
I'm,
good,
okay,.
A
A
A
H
Thank
You
mr.
chair,
so
we
have
an
amendment
before
the
committee
today
that
will
align
minneapolis
ordinance
with
a
recently
passed
a
state
statute
to
allow
also
liquor
stores
to
operate
on
sundays.
Our
proposed
amendment
would
align
us
exactly
with
the
state
law
which
says
that
you
can
allow
off
sales
on
Sundays
from
11:00
a.m.
to
6:00
p.m.
H
this
change
does
require
a
public
hearing,
so
we
notified
all
off
sale,
currently
licensed
off
sale,
liquor
stores
in
Minneapolis,
all
neighborhood
organizations
and
all
business
associations,
and
we
put
this
proposed
amendment
on
our
website
announcing
today's
public
hearing.
We
received
two
responses.
One
was
opposed
and
particularly
didn't
like
the
concept
of
stores
being
opened
near
university
areas
on
Sundays
and
one
was
in
support,
but
indicated
that
the
hours
should
be
earlier
than
11:00
a.m.
H
H
A
I'm
trying
to
make
it
a
little
more
exciting,
so
anyone
who
wants
to
speak
this
is
kind
of
a
momentous
occasion.
It
would
be
great
if
you
could
come
up
and
argue
like
staunchly
in
favor
or
opposed
to
it.
Isn't
it
anyone
anyone
seeing
none
I
will
close
the
public
hearing.
I'll,
move
approval
of
this
item
and
just
note
that
this
is
an
historic
event.
A
It
was
since
1935
that
liquor
was
able
to
be
sold
on
Sundays
in
Minneapolis
or
anywhere
in
the
state
of
Minnesota.
You
know
I'll
note
that
the
this
council
has
made
several
Pro
liquor
and
alcohol
regulations.
In
fact,
we've
we've
even
taken
quite
a
bit
of
a
laissez-faire
approach
with
quite
a
bit
of
it
man.
We
we
now
have
the
Bloody
Mary
law,
which
allows
you
to
have
a
Bloody
Mary.
Prior
to
9:00
a.m.