►
From YouTube: June 16, 2017 Minneapolis City Council
Description
Minneapolis City Council Meeting
A
Good
morning
and
welcome
to
this
regularly
scheduled
meeting
in
the
Minneapolis
City
Council
we're
going
to
begin
our
meeting
this
morning.
We
have
two
groups
that
we
would
like
to
recognize
this
morning
and
we
do
that
sometimes
before
council
meeting
and
people
want
to
come
up
and
take
a
picture.
So
we
want
to
move
through
this
very
very
smoothly.
If
we
can.
A
You
have
to
transport
costs
all
that
kind
of
things,
so
this
was
a
much
more
simple
operation
and
very,
very
useful.
So
we're
happy
to
have
them
here
and
just
want
to
recognize
them
and
they
will
be
exhibiting
at
the
stone
art
Art
Festival
this
weekend,
Saturday
and
Sunday
and
we'll
have
their
exhibits
by
the
Pillsbury
email,
so
both
inside
and
outside
and
you'll
be
able
to
find
them
because
we'll
have
American
flags
and
French
flags
in
front
of
their
exhibits.
So
we
really
welcome
them.
B
We
are
very
happy
to
be
here.
We
were
welcomed
in
a
great
manner
all
the
studio,
welcomed
us
and
helped
us
a
lot,
and
so
a
small
group
of
French
parties
from
different
pot
of
friends
from
Nancy
these
two
friends
from
Paris
from
Normandy
and
a
smaller
small
chance.
We
have
this
print
specialty.
Where
glass
blowers
fly
majors,
we
have
an
international
artist,
God
lovers,
who
have
a
best
worker
in
eyeglass
in
France
and
ok,
fused,
glass
and
clay
different
things.
We
would
like
to
say
a
special
thank
you.
B
So
kirino
is
from
module,
one
which
is
a
small
town
in
France,
just
close
to
Paris
and
like
Minneapolis
account
dedicated
to
art,
would
like
to
thank
you
and
offer
you
a
medal
from
the
mayor.
We
said
wow,
it's
a
great
things
to
go
to
the
United
States,
so
this
is
a
middle
and
some
changes
made
there,
and
this
is
documentation
from
Morrisville
aware
and
our
international
glass
artist
of
use
some
changes
from
each
region
in
the
east
of
in
the
east
of
France.
A
C
A
D
Good
morning
my
name
is
Toni
still
a
and
an
ambassador
for
the
Red
Lake
nation,
and
we're
very
grateful
to
be
here
today
in
regard
to
this
project,
I'd
like
to
introduce
you
to
resignation,
tribal
chairman,
darrell,
GC,
key
senior,
German
psyche
and
then
Justin,
bolio,
Becky,
Landon
and
then
on.
My
right
is
Brianna
bastard
and
I'll.
Give
the
mic
over
to
chairman
Tiki.
E
Buzu
onion
martini
I
would
you
went
into
limbo?
You
know
one
minute:
Eva
got
to
be
doing.
Ch
bonds,
cuz
I
go
running
good
morning,
everybody.
My
name
is
taro
Seki
tribal
chairman
for
real
Ignatian.
It's
a
pleasure,
and
it's
good
to
be
here
to
visit
and
listen
to
the
City
Council
meeting
and
and
to
see
all
your
people
here
for
different
initiatives
that
you're
going
to
be
adjusting
and
we
have
an
exciting
project.
We're
doing
here.
E
E
This
is
exciting
for
a
lake
109
units
efficiency,
apartments
for
one
bedroom,
two
bedroom
three
bedrooms
and
also
we're
going
to
move
locate
our
Wellness
Center
I.
Let
me
see:
that's
in
Bloomington
make
Street
and
we're
going
to
move
in
movement
all
there,
this
all
being
for
great
fire,
and
you
should
have
a
people
that
live
here.
We
have
3,500
to
4,000
members
that
live
here
in
a
mr.
pelikan
area
and
that
include
I'm.
E
F
It's
not
what
Justin
did
it's
a
group
effort.
These
guys
do
a
lot
of
work
and
we've
worked
with
a
lot
of
people.
We
realized
that
we
needed
some
more
apartments
or
we
need
some
more
living
spaces
for
not
just
our
people,
but
all
the
people
down
here
Minneapolis
has
a
crisis
in
that
sense,
so
this
was
aligning
with
our
goals
for
what
we
have
for
our
tribe,
as
well
as
the
goals
for
the
city.
F
E
A
You
I
just
got
promoted
council
frozen,
but
I
just
wanted
a
still
kick.
That's.
Okay,
I
just
really
want
to
have
people
pay
attention
to
pay
attention
to
it's
item
number
10
on
the
Community
Development
regulatory
services
agenda
and
it
is
a
2017
pipeline,
affordable,
housing,
trust
fund
project
recommendation.
A
That's
a
recommendation
for
2.7
million
dollars
from
the
fund
to
complete
to
work
on
this
and
I'm,
going
to
try
and
pronounce
those
Tony's
helped
me,
but
will
see
me
know:
Bheema
DZ,
Wien
project,
so
I
hope,
I,
didn't
don't:
okay,
okay,
okay,
all
right
all
right!
All
right!
The
good
life!
That's
what
it
means!
Awesome!
Okay,
thank
you
so
much,
and
if
we
can
people
kind
of
lean
in
and
squinching
we
can
get
the
council
in
there
too.
A
G
G
An
organized
this
is
actually
an
organized
event
of
the
Minnesota
City
primary
Minneapolis
City
Republican
Party
on
this
occasion
to
have
the
opportunity
to
come
down
to
City
Hall.
We
don't
get
that
opportunity
very
often
take
a
look
at
some
of
these
seats
here
and
hope
that
some
of
us
may
be
occupying
them
someday
as
we
once
did,
and
we
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
be
here
with
you
and
to
have
our
picture
taken.
Thank
you.
G
H
And
I
just
want
to
thank
you.
I
want
to
thank
our
city
council
members
for
their
service
to
our
city.
We
are
a
minority
group
and
minister
in
Minneapolis
as
Republicans,
but
we
are
at
least
20%
of
the
voting
public
and
we
do
provide
a
lot
of
the
taxes
and
the
foundation
to
keep
this
city
alive
financially.
So
I
want
to
thank
you
all.
H
A
J
I
J
I
J
I
A
Remember,
where
some
attending
to
a
family
matter,
we
have
a
quorum
present.
Next
item
on
the
agenda
is
adoption
of
the
agenda.
The
first
item
is
a
motion
by
myself
to
amend
the
agenda
to
include,
under
the
order
of
resolutions,
a
resolution
celebrating
100
40th
anniversary
of
the
parish
of
Our
Lady
of
Lourdes.
Is
there
a
second
on
that
motion?
Second,
any
discussion,
seeing
none
all
in
approval,
say
aye
aye
opposed
that
carries
next.
A
We
have
a
motion
by
councilmember
Gordon
to
amend
the
agenda
to
modify
item
six
under
the
order
of
introduction
and
referral
calendar
to
refer
the
tobacco
sales
ordinance
to
the
health
environment
and
community
engagement
committee.
There.
Second,
on
that
motion
moved
and
seconded
any
discussion,
seeing
none
all
in
approval,
say:
aye
aye
opposed
bacteria's.
Next
we
have
a
motion
to
adopt
the
agenda,
then,
as
amended.
So.
A
L
A
Have
been
moved
and
seconded
any
discussion,
seeing
none
all
in
approval,
say
aye
aye
opposed
that
carries
next.
We
have
referral
of
petitions,
communications
and
reports
to
the
proper
committee.
Some
any
discussion,
seeing
none
all
in
approval,
say
aye
aye
opposed
that
carries
the
reports.
The
standing
committees
are
next
and
the
first
is
committee
of
the
whole.
That
committee
is
chaired
by
council.
Vice
president
Elizabeth
Clinton's.
K
We
have
three
items
on
the
agenda.
The
first
is
directing
staff
to
prepare
ordinance
language
for
a
municipal
minimum
wage
ordinance
and
I
will
note
that
we
have
a
special
committee
of
the
whole
media,
On
June
20
seconds
at
3:30
for
the
purpose
of
hearing
public
testimony
on
the
minimum
wage
ordinance
item.
2
is
the
resolution
declaring
commitment
to
performance
measures
and
management
system
usage
and
finally,
we
have
a
appointment
to
the
workplace.
Advisory,
Committee
and
I
will
move
off
the
items.
Councillor.
K
A
M
You,
madam
president,
community
development
and
regulatory
Services
Committee
is
bringing
forward
14
items
for
approval
this
morning.
Item
number
one
is
a
bond
issuance
for
friends
of
Sparrow.
Academy
two
are
the
liquor
business
and
gambling
license
applications.
Three
is
a
license
settlement
conference
for
his
exclusive
development
rights
to
ideal
development
for
property
at
41st
and
Fremont
Avenue
North
item
five
is
exclusive
development
rights
to
Wellington
management
for
a
personal
and
LAN
white
and
second
Avenue
North
item.
Six
is
a
first
mortgage
refinance
and
subordination
for
st.
Anne
senior
housing
item.
M
Seven
is
a
reconveyance
of
land
from
the
city
to
the
state
from
the
state
to
the
city
item
eight
is
a
contract
amendment
with
gimmick
item.
Nine
is
a
contract
with
the
homeownership
Center
item.
10
is
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund
pipeline
recommendation
for
the
project
known
as
B
me
know:
C
mod
dizzy
when
I
get
that
right.
M
I
do
want
to
note
that
this
is
the
second
largest,
affordable
housing
trust
fund
award
we've
made
in
the
history
of
the
fund,
and
it
says
something
about
our
commitment
to
partnering,
with
our
friends
at
the
Red
Lake
band.
To
be
able
to
serve
members
of
our
community
off
reservation
that
is
so
desperately
needed.
This
is
a
really
great
project
of
107
units
and
affordable
housing,
as
well
as
the
embassy
and
a
Wellness
Center
going
into
this
location.
M
So
it
the
committee,
really
loved
the
project
and
we're
glad
we
were
able
to
get
it
in
line
with
our
cost
containment
regulations
to
be
able
to
fund
it
item
number
11
is
a
contract
with
the
school
district
for
step
up
interns;
item
12
as
a
grant
from
the
US
Department
of
Energy
13
as
a
grant
from
Hennepin,
County
and
14
is
a
contract
amendment
with
Homeline.
With
that
I'll
move
all
items
1
through
14
for
approval
this
morning,
counselor.
A
Goodness
move
the
Community
Development
regulatory
services
to
report
any
discussion
on
any
of
those
items.
Seeing
none
I
just
want
to
point
out
an
item
or
how
excited
I
am
that
we
have
moved
forward,
selecting
a
developer
for
a
textbook
that
a
property,
a
commercial
property
in
my
ward,
41:46
Freeman.
It
was
a
long
and
tortuous
road
to
get
control
of
that
property,
but
thanks
to
our
great
staff,
we're
moving
forward
on
a
really
exciting
proposal
with
great
community
input
clerk
call
the
roll
councilmember.
N
A
O
You,
madam
president,
the
health
environment
and
Community
Engagement
committees
bringing
forward
four
items
for
consideration
today.
The
first
is
an
amendment
to
an
agreement
with
Fairview
diagnostic
laboratories
for
school-based
clinic
services.
Second
item
is
approving
an
appointment
to
the
public
health
advisory
committee
of
cage,
a
star
for
c2
from
Ward
to
the
third
is
approving
the
applicator.
The
application
submitted
for
an
outdoor
amplified
sound
permit
related
to
the
X
Games,
and
the
fourth
item
is
approval
of
a
number
of
appointments
to
the
Minneapolis
Advisory
Committee
on
Aging
they're,
all
in
the
agenda.
O
A
K
A
K
E
K
K
I
K
A
P
You,
madam
president,
today
we
have
5
items.
Item
number.
One
is
the
contract
amendment
with
the
state
of
Minnesota,
inter
technologies.
Group
second
item
is
the
contract
amendments
with
advanced
public
CDE.
Third
item
is
a
contract
with
Minneapolis
Public
Schools
for
SROs
to
end
this
summer
and
to
end
this
summer.
I
could
just
continue
on
to
finish
this
summer
and
the
fourth
item
is
a
contract
with
those
very
United
and
area
partners
for
West
for
the
West
Broadway
collaborative
public
safety
strategies.
A
K
A
P
P
A
A
Counselor
yang
has
moved
public
safety
number
four
and
five
I
will
speak
to
item
four
at
which,
which
I
have
an
amendment
to
the
agreement
with
that
came
through
public
safety
and
then
also
ways
and
means
moved
to
amend
the
agreement.
It's
in
front
of
you
to
act
as
a
fiscal
agent,
Pillsbury
night's
munities
access
fiscal
agent
to
manage
two
hundred,
seventeen
thousand
eight
hundred
dollars
the
funding
for
the
West
Broadway
collaborative
public
safety
strategies.
A
It's
actually
my
motion
takes
the
administrative
fee
down
to
a
10%
administrative
fee
and
then
takes
the
administrative
fee
out
of
the
grant
recommendation,
and
the
remainder
then
would
be
moved
in
the
final
sentence.
The
Minneapolis
Police
Department
is
authorized
to
spend
up
to
thirty
two
thousand
two
hundred
dollars
toward
a
new
portable
camera
or
the
West
Broadway.
A
Cordon
I
will
speak
to
that
motion
if
it's
great
with
people
I
have
to
say
that,
in
listening
to
the
programs
that
were
described
for
the
collaborative
public
safety
strategies,
I
was
impressed
to
hear
that
a
number
of
the
ideas
that
were
brought
forward
really
mixed
nicely
with
people's
concerns
about
the
challenges
on
West,
Broadway
and
activation.
Obviously
is
the
thrust
of
quite
a
few
of
these
projects
and
the
the
geography
was
more
narrowly
defined,
West
Broadway's
a
very
long
Street,
and
it
was
a
challenge
to
come
up
with
a
little
bit
narrower
scope.
A
So
Lyndale
Avenue
to
Gerard
was
the
focus,
and
so
my
concern
is
that
we
have
a
place
for
people
when
they
come
to
participate
in
these
activities
like
dinners
on
in
Hawthorne
crossings
or
three-on-three
basketball
tournaments.
That
people
feel
safe
in
the
spaces
that
are
going
to
be
used
to
program
the
Avenue
and
so
the
portable
cameras.
I
know
people
know
how
often
we
get
requests
for
portable
cameras
from
the
police
department,
but
I
probably
get
two
in
a
month
where
people
will
complain
of
high.
A
You
know
criminal
activity
and
ask
for
camera
to
be
placed
in
a
particular
area.
Also
this
year
have
to
say
that
I
met
with
Miss
Alicia
beaks,
who
was
the
daughter
of
her
del
beaks,
who
was
murdered
on
Penn
Avenue
in
intersection,
where
there
wasn't
a
camera,
it
made
the
apprehension
of
the
people
responsible,
much
more
difficult,
and
it
is
really
a
challenge
so
I'm
responding
to
that
I'm.
Also
responding
in
this
little
area
of
Hawthorne
crossings.
A
We've
had
a
request
from
urban
home
works,
which
has
done
a
beautiful
job
of
activating
their
space
across
the
street
from
Hawthorne
crossings,
but
they
remain
subject
to
a
lot
of
the
challenges
that
go
on
on
West
Broadway
block
north
of
West
Broadway
is
a
on
Fremont
Avenue,
North,
Emerson
Avenue
north
is
a
very,
very
busy
what's
been
described,
as
you
know,
a
place
where
people
meet
to
buy
drugs.
If
they
there
have
been
homicides.
There
have
been
multiple
multiple
shootings
in
this
area,
and
so
the
camera
is
important
for
me.
A
I
think
too,
so
that
people
can
feel
safe,
sending
their
families
coming
themselves
to
these
activities
that
are
going
to
be
planned,
and
it
is
a
use
of
a
camera
that
then
doesn't
diminish
the
stock
of
cameras
for
other
places
in
the
community,
where
we
know
will
be
asked
to
send
portable
cameras.
This
southerner,
so
I
would
hope.
I
get
a
second
and
would
appreciate
your
support
on
this
second
circuit.
Second
move-in.
Second,
any
discussion,
Amanda
Maher.
Q
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
am
first
want
to
say,
I
appreciate
the
value
of
cameras
and
that
there
are
people
who
want
and
need
them.
I
will
offer
to
work
with
you
to
find
a
way
to
fund
a
camera
this
summer
at
Hawthorne
crossing,
because
I
too
have
heard
those
voices,
but
there
is
a
principle
at
stake
here
with
these
collaborative
strategies
dollars
that
I
think
is
is
worth
is
worth
following
and
worth
honoring
here
that
we
ask
the
community
to
go
through
a
process
to
make
decisions
about
these
dollars.
Q
The
community
made
decisions
in
good
faith
about
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars.
Decisions
have
been
made
by
the
community
using
community
criteria
and
community
reviewers,
about
which
of
these
strategies
should
be
chosen
and
I.
Think
in
good
faith
for
the
community
to
have
faith
in
City
Hall
at
the
process
they
agreed
to
and
work
through
mattered
that
it
would
be
important
to
give
them
the
resources
that
we
were,
that
we
promised
them.
I.
Q
Q
They
will
also
be
facilitating.
Meetings
between
the
north
side
and
the
south
side
cohorts
to
help
build
those
relationships
across
the
city
and
creating
opportunities
for
capacity
in
the
organization,
but
also
stakeholder
relationships,
and
so
I
think
that
it
is
important
and
and
the
principle
at
stake
here
is
not
just
hair.
We,
you
know
spending
money
on
the
north
side,
but
it's
are
we
allowing
the
community
to
make
decisions
about
how
to
spend
money
on
the
north
side,
and
this
is
inherently
not
the
community
making
this
decision.
Q
O
This
of
course,
isn't
in
a
second
Ward,
but
I
do
have
an
interest
in
seeing
that
the
collaborative
public
safety
strategies
move
forward
with
integrity,
and
this
is
something
new
that
we're
trying
and
there's
certainly
going
to
be
growing,
pains
and
I.
Think
we're
experiencing
a
growing
pain
here
today
about
these
I
look
at
the
amendment,
and
it
does
seem
to
maintain
a
lot
of
the
integrity
with
what
the
community
wanted
to
do.
But
I
appreciate
what
the
mayor
is
saying
as
well
and
so
I'm
trying
to
find.
O
Is
there
a
spot
where
you
get
to
or
13
of
us
would
all
agree,
and
it
does
seem
like
we
may
have
the
authority
as
a
council,
to
direct
to
the
department
to
find
the
money
to
put
the
camera
in
today,
rather
than
as
the
mayor
saying,
and
the
mayor
of
course
can't
make
a
motion
at
our
meeting.
But
one
of
us
could
so
that
we
could
decide
the
camera
is
of
enough
value.
O
Other
people
think
that
the
there
is
a
way
we
could
get
a
win-win
here
and
perhaps
a
councilmember
Quincy,
oh
he's
out
of
line
now,
but
somebody
ways
and
means
could
help.
Do
that
or
think
about
that
or
32,000
and
the
scheme
of
things
doesn't
seem
like
a
whole
lot
of
money.
For
us
and
I
know
it's
not.
Every
department
is
going
to
be
stressed,
or
for
money
and
they're
going
to
say
it's
difficult
to
come
up
with
those
things.
But
if
any
department
has
a
lot
of
money,
it
would
be
pleased
acquire
sounds.
C
Thank
you,
madam
president,
so
I'm
speaking
today
in
favor
of
this
motion,
I
will
be
voting
to
support
it.
I
have
a
lot
of
things
that
I'll
be
speaking
to
when
I
move.
My
motion
forward
in
the
next
item,
but
I
did
want
to
briefly
address
the
administrative
fee
concept,
which
is
also
a
concept
that
I
bring
forward
in
my
proposal.
C
So
I
was
able
to
you,
know,
work
with
council
president
barb
Johnson
and
the
chair
of
the
Public
Safety
Committee,
councilmember,
bla
yang
on
this
for
the
last
week
and
a
half
or
so
since
it
started
to
approach
the
formal
and
official
city
council
process,
which
is
the
natural
and
the
appropriate
way
for
us,
as
council
members
to
weigh
in
on
this.
This
is
indeed
a
part
of
the
process.
This
was
not
outside
of
the
process.
C
This
is
part
of
the
process
and
in
fact,
I
was
told
multiple
times
by
the
mayor
staff
that
this
was
the
appropriate
so
that
the
appropriate
place
for
my
voice
to
be
heard
because
I
was
my
office
and
myself
we're
not
allowed
to
be
a
part
of
VM.
The
selection
committee
and
and
some
of
the
ideas
that
I
would
bring
forward
were
never
taken
into
consideration.
C
Four
bullet
points
of
the
work
that
would
be
done
under
that
which
is
to
manage
the
contracts
with
the
awardees
to
convene
monthly
meetings
to
create
opportunities
for
relationship
building
among
awardees
and
community
members,
which
I
think
is
the
flexible
part
that
we
can
work
on,
that
we
can
maybe
take
off
of
the
agreement
and
find
other
ways
to
supplement
that
work,
such
as
leveraging
the
resources
we
already
invest
in
our
neighborhood
and
Community
Relations
Department.
To
help
with
that
or
leverage
the
relationship.
C
We
have
through
the
free
technical
assistance
provided
by
cities
United,
which
is
a
partnership
that
the
mayor
brought
together
to
support
this
effort
and
then
number
four
on
the
agreement
is
to
provide
a
written
report
to
the
city,
one
in
September,
one
in
December
to
talk
about
the
outcomes
and
the
measures
and
and
I
agree
that
you
know
this
is
a
new
project.
This
is
a
new
initiative,
so
of
course
we're
going
through
the
learning
curve
of
what
it
means
to
work
together
as
a
mayor's
office
and
the
council
on
this
effort.
C
So
I
think
that
you
know
we
can
certainly
work
with
our
neighborhood
partners
and
their
fiscal
agents
to
decide.
If
maybe
the
September
report
is
not
a
full-out
report,
but
maybe
it's
more
of
a
check-in
and
then
the
December
report
would
be
more
of
a
more
of
a
robust
undertaking.
So
I
think
that
we
can
have
flexibility
as
policymakers,
who
are
weighing
in
on
the
process
now
and
shaping
this
initiative,
which
is
so
direly
needed
by
our
communities.
C
In
fact,
last
night,
an
18
year
old
of
shots
at
aagama,
place
and
little
earth,
and
so,
while
I've
heard
some
councilmembers
desire
more
time
to
consider
this
decision,
I
I,
don't
think
we
have
more
time
right
now,
we're
almost
at
the
end
of
June
and
these
funds
have
to
be
expended
by
December
and
the
shootings
are
happening
right
now.
So
we
have
to
trust
each
other.
We
have
to
do
the
work
together.
Some
of
us
represent
wards
that
are
experiencing
this
type
of
criminal
activity
at
alarming
rates.
C
Other
boards
here
aren't
and
in
fact
comfortably
spreadin,
Glynn
and
I
were
at
a
crime
meeting
together
a
few
days
ago
where
there
was
about
50
people.
So
so
we
are
looking
for
ways
to
impact
this
trend
in
our
community
today,
right
now
and
I
believe
we
have
the
right
set
of
decision-makers
and
circumstances
to
channel
these
resources
in
a
way
that
is
culturally
relevant,
appropriate
in
meeting
the
the
need
that
we
see
in
our
community.
C
A
J
You,
madam
chair,
but
I'm
not
able
to
support
either
of
these
motions
and
I
just
wanted
to
talk
about.
Why
I'm,
not
in
a
position
to
delve
into
the
details
of
what
strategies
are
appropriate
in
these
communities,
but
I
think
the
overarching
values
and
success
of
this
program
is
deeply
important
to
our
work
in
building
trust
with
our
community
around
how
we're
approaching
community
safety
and
policing,
and
this
became
a
very
public
broad
discussion
last
year
around
the
time
of
the
budget,
and
there
was
actually
a
lot
of
organizing
and
interested
in
my
ward.
J
J
To
do
community
based
strategies,
I
was
not
involved
at
all
in
the
development
of
this
process
in
the
process,
but
and
perhaps
like
all
first-time
programs,
there
likely
could
be
improvements
in
the
future
to
the
to
the
process
that
was
used
to
select
projects,
maybe
through
the
evaluation
this
year
we
would
learn
lessons
about.
Where
is
the
right
way
to
involve
community
members?
J
Think
it's
easy
to
say.
Well,
organizations
can
just
do
reporting
and
evaluation
sort
of
absorb
into
their
normal
costs,
but
that's
not
valuing
the
time
and
work
that
it
really
takes
to
run
a
nonprofit
organization
and
to
do
the
professional
work
that
our
partner
organizations
will
be
asked
to
do,
and
so
I
would
expect.
If
we
remove
the
funding,
we
would
be
reducing
the
work
that
the
organization
would
be
expected
to
do.
J
Just
finally
would
say,
one
of
my
concerns
is
that
you
know
many
of
us
have
no
information
about
the
projects
that
were
submitted
for
the
project,
how
they
were
chosen.
I
do
understand
that
items
number
two
and
three
under
item
number.
Four
for
the
agenda
item
five:
we
don't
there
isn't
an
actual
proposal
for
these
two
items.
This
is
my
understanding
again
not
having
been
involved.
That
item
number
two
was
not
submitted
of
the
full
proposal,
so
it
didn't
move
to
the
scoring
criteria.
Come.
J
Sorry
I
thought
that
a
previous
comment
for
about
item
five
so
I'll
hold
my
comments,
then
about
item
five.
So
we
discussed
that
item
so
then,
under
and
before
I
would
just
emphatically
argue
against
the
proposal
to
move
money
from
innovative
community
safety
strategies
to
a
camera
that
we
have
in
our
regular
police
budget.
Where.
A
L
L
As
we're
about
to
take
that
up
in
this
summer.
So
I
guess
that
the
quickest
way
for
me
to
do
that
would
be
to
propose
a
new
motion.
But
I
think
I'd
like
to
offer
an
amendment
on
the
Johnson
amendment,
which
is
essentially
restoring
all
the
funding
associated
with
the
reductions
and
adding
a
further
adjustment
to
the
further
Clause
at
the
end,
which
would
be
to
direct
finance
and
Minneapolis
Police
Department.
To.
L
N
S
My
request
would
be
directing
a
finance
and
Police
Department
staff
to
identify
and
allocate
32,000
for
a
new
portable
camera
for
the
West
Broadway
corridor
and
if
it
needs
to
come
through
ways
and
means
in
the
very
next
meeting
I
would
be.
That
would
absolutely
work.
I
mean
III.
Don't
want
I've
seen
this
before
and
oftentimes
this
money
gets
lost
and
if
we're
going
to
do
this,
let's
actually
do
it.
K
Thanks
ma'am
chair
I,
just
wanted
to
say
I'm
supportive.
It
sounds
like
this
might
be
a
resolution
to
ensure
that
there
is
funding
for
a
camera
that
can
go
to
this
area
where
there
have
been
some
as
I
understand.
It
previously
request
and
then
allow
the
other
recommended
funds
to
go
to
the
partners
that
were
already
still
in
the
motion
by
Council.
K
President,
Johnson
and
yang
I
mean
I'm
very
sensitive
to
these
pressures
of
how
to
respond
in
the
best
way
possible
to
very
real
crime
and
safety
issues,
and
and
so
I'm
very
supportive
of
this,
and
it
sounds
like
I'll.
Just
tell
you
in
a
big
big
budget
I
think
we
can
find
this
amount
of
money
and
the
mayor
has
pledged
to
help
them
sure
that
that
is
done
as
well.
So
I'm
supportive.
K
A
Further
discussion,
then
I
would
urge
my
colleagues
to
support
this
today.
I
think
that
this
is
a
solution
that
is
helpful.
I
will
point
out,
however,
councilman
van
der,
you
said
you
were
not
involved
with
the
process.
Nor
was
I.
I
want
to
point
that
out
this
process
was
absent,
any
City,
Council
participation,
that's
part
of
the
problem
here
and
I
will
also
say
that
community
includes
urban
homework.
It
includes
the
people
that
live
and
work
and
includes
juxtaposition,
who
actually
was
one
of
the
proposers
who's
had
their
office
shot
a
shot
through
shot
through.
A
This
is
a
serious
problem
and
when
I
asked
for
a
camera
that
I
need
for
one
of
my
communities
who
are
experiencing
drive-by,
shooting
and
I'm
told
there
aren't
enough
cameras,
we
have
to
move
them
from
someplace
else,
because
there
aren't
enough
cameras.
This
is
a
serious
real
situation
and
so
I'm
happy
if
we
direct
the
police
department,
but
we
better
make
sure
in
our
next
budget
if
we
put
enough
money
in
there
for
portable
cameras
so
that
nobody
in
this
city
that
requests
one
has
the
answer.
Sorry
there
aren't
enough
of
them.
N
L
A
C
Madam
president,
so
is
it
can
I
go
ahead
and
make
my
motion
for
number
five?
Yes,
you
may
okay.
Thank
you.
So
we
have
distributed
the
language
for
the
PSC
REM
item
number
five,
which
is
an
amendment
to
the
groups
that
were
brought
to
our
attention
through
the
selection
process
that
the
the
mayor's
office
put
together
for
this
public
safety
money.
So
everyone
can
see
that
there
were
five
six
items
on
this
point
on
this
piece
of
paper
and
each
one
of
these
talks
about
the
different
groups
that
would
be
resourced
through
this
grant
initiative.
C
So
specifically,
the
changes
would
be
instead
of
good
space
murals
for
$40,000.
We
would
do
$38,000
for
Wakeham
of
production
instead
of
police
activities,
League
and
a
women's
group
for
$40,000,
we
would
be
doing
a
sweat
lodge
and
medicinal
garden
with
indigenous
peoples
task
force.
Instead
of
the
little
earth
Youth
Development
Center,
with
a
$65,000
allocation,
we
would
be
doing
a
$65,000
allocation
to
natives
against
heroin
and
the
white
earth
nation.
C
C
In
our
communities,
some
people
refer
to
that
as
the
violence,
interrupter
method,
and
so
a
process
was
then
put
in
place
that
my
office
and
myself
tried
to
participate
in
multiple
times
but
were
consistently
not
listened
to.
And
so
one
of
the
examples
is
you
know.
The
selection
committee
was
handpicked
by
Nicole
Archibald's
in
the
mayor's
office.
C
And
so
that's
where
we
see
we
started
losing
the
integrity
of
this
initiative,
because,
ideally,
this
process
was
supposed
to
be
grassroots
community,
led
for
residents
who
don't
have
access
to
big
nonprofits
or
infrastructure
that
allows
them
to
bring
their
voices
forward
on
how
to
address
crime
and
safety
issues.
And
what
we
saw
is
that
out
of
the
33
ideas,
the
12th
that
were
invited
to
submit
a
full
proposal
indeed
had
to
hire
or
work
with
professional
grant
writers
to
even
get
their
ideas
heard
at
the
second
level.
C
So
what
we're
seeing
here
is
a
systematic
weeding
out
of
individual
residents
who
have
good
ideas
about
how
to
address
the
crime
and
safety
issues
that
the
city
is
not
used
to.
Funding
has
not
funded
before
and
I
that
are
innovative
that
are
supposed
to
meet
the
goals
of
this
grant
that
were
not
supported
through
a
technical
assistance
angle
or
other
methods
to
make
it
through
this
very
speedy
and
oftentimes
and
transparent
process.
And
so
after
these
twelve
ideas
were
were
asked
to
come
forward
with
full
proposals.
C
Then
out
of
those
five
or
six
were
selected
by
this
committee,
and
the
selection
committee
changed
twice
once
at
the
initial
idea
review
and
then
second,
when
they
were
reviewing
the
twelve
to
move
move
down
to
the
sixth.
So
there
was
a
lack
of
consistency
between
the
two
committees
and
in
fact
the
selection
committee,
for
the
most
part,
was
comprised
of
city
staff
and
included
very
few
resident
voices.
C
So
once
again,
you
know
my
office
tried
to
participate,
I,
try
to
participate
to
shape
and
guide
us
in
this
work,
because
it's
it's
us
at
the
end
of
the
day,
who
are
held
responsible
for
the
impact
that
this
work
has
and
for
the
outcomes
and
the
success
that
this
work
has
or
doesn't
have.
So
for
some
of
us
who
represent
wards
that
are
literally
drowning
in
crime
issues,
where
we
have
shootings
regularly
where
people
are
getting
stabbed
or
commercial,
sexual
exploitation
abounds.
The
skin
in
the
game.
C
A
Q
Thank
you
very
much,
madam
president,
and
I
am
going
to
speak
against
this
motion.
I'd
like
to
start
by
just
reminding
folks
what
the
history
is
of
these
dollars,
that,
in
the
wake
of
the
occupation
of
the
fourth
Precinct
and
the
death
of
Jamar
Clark
in
the
demonstrations
that
happened
after
that
and
the
community
conversations
that
happened
after
that.
Q
One
of
the
very
vocal
voices
in
the
community
were
people
saying
we
want
to
take
more
responsibility
for
public
safety
in
our
neighborhood
and
in
my
budget
as
I
framed
my
budget
last
year,
as
I
put
it
together.
I
listened
to
and
heeded
that
voice,
and
we
have
a
mental
health
correspondent,
muddled.
We
have
a
group
violence,
intervention
model,
both
of
them
community-based
and
lead
and
when
I
was
seeking
other
ways
to
make
sure
that
we
had
community-based
public
safety
interventions,
I
realized
and
had
the
idea.
Why?
Q
Don't
we
let
the
community
decide
how
the
community
wants
to
invest
in
public
safety
in
their
neighborhoods,
and
that
is
where
these
dollars
came
out
of.
So
the
point
wasn't
that
City
Hall
would
make
a
decision
about
how
to
enact
public
safety
in
neighborhoods.
We
have
many
many
many
places
in
tens
of
millions
of
dollars
that
we
spend
on
Public
Safety
and
building
Community
Trust.
Q
This
is
$500,000,
and
indeed
in
this
motion,
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
for
the
community
to
make
decision
about
how
to
build
public
safety
and
by
so
doing
hopefully
we
can
build
community
trust
between
us
and
the
community.
Even
further.
That's
the
history
of
this,
and
so
today
there
have
been
a
number
of
inaccuracies
about
the
process
and
I
just
want
to
make
clear
for
colleagues
who
are
considering
this
motion.
Q
Part
of
the
point
was
that
we
as
elected
leaders,
would
not
be
the
ones
making
these
decisions.
We
make
lots
of
decisions
about
the
dollars
of
the
city.
This
is
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
that
we
don't
make.
The
decisions
about
I
could
not
have
been
more
clear
in
my
budget
address
that
that
was
the
intention.
Q
We
did
not.
Nicole
article
did
not
handpick
committees,
people
who
wanted
to
review
these
proposals
got
to
review
these
proposals.
That
is
an
inaccuracy
at
no
point
did
anybody
from
my
office,
most
notably
me
or
Nicole
Archbold
or
my
chief
of
staff,
or
anybody
else
say
well
when
it
gets
to
the
council,
then
you
can
decide
about
these
dollars.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
we've
been
pushing
against
that
notion
from
the
very
very
beginning.
Q
Yes,
the
timeline
was
short
for
getting
the
proposals
back,
because
when
these
dollars
were
in
the
budget
in
December,
you
all
very
clearly
said
those
dollars
have
to
be
out
the
door
by
mid-june,
and
so
this
is
the
timeline
that
we
had
and
we
met
it
and
we
met
it.
And
yes,
it
meant
that
the
timeline
for
turnaround
for
proposals
was
quite
short,
but
there
was
council
involvement.
Q
In
deciding
what
project
should
be
chosen,
that
was
not
the
point,
but
that
there
were
six
or
eight
meetings
in
person
with
council
members,
including
council
president
johnson,
including
councilmember
Connell.
There
were
multiple
emails
over
10
emails
with
updates
offers
to
meet
even
more
frequently.
This
started
in
February
as
we
were,
shaping
the
process
to
get
feedback
from
people
have
them
all
I
have
them
all
in
front
of
me.
We
did
offer
financial
resources
to
little
or
offend
a
councilmember
Cano.
To
get
the
word
out.
Cities
United.
Q
We
found
more
financial
resources
to
get
the
word
out
from
councilmember
Cano
that
didn't
move
forward,
but
we
went
out
of
our
way
to
make
sure
that
councilmember
concerns
were
met,
so
the
proposals
in
front
of
us.
What
we
do
know
is
that
the
alter
ego
project
didn't
score
high
enough
to
be
in
the
top
proposal.
There
may
be
merit
there,
and
if
we
do
this
again,
I
would
say:
let's
work
more
and
move
forward.
The
sweat
lodge
project
didn't
move
to
phase
two.
Q
Q
It
was
part,
it
was
part
mentioned
in
another
project,
but
it
wasn't
something
in
and
of
itself,
but
we
do
know
that
the
that
the
that
the
Frank
downlines
proposal
was
the
highest
scoring
proposal
and
that
cedar
feels
was
the
most
requested
thing
that
people
wanted
most
was
something
to
be
done
about
cedar
fields,
and
so,
if
we
go
with
proposals
that
weren't
part
of
the
process,
there's
a
set
of
information
that
we
don't
have
about
them
moving
forward
like
how
much
does
it
cost
to
implement
them?
Who
is
going
to
be
involved?
Q
You
know
we
are
asking
for
a
whole
bunch
of
stuff.
We
won't
be
able
to
gauge
their
capacity
to
implement
the
idea.
We
don't
know
if
their
budget
is
reasonable
or
not
because
they
have
not
been
through
the
process.
We
don't
have
information
about
measures
or
their
evaluation
plan,
and
we
can't
speak
to
how
they
measure
against
the
categories
of
evaluations,
that
the
other
proposals
were
scored
against
collaboration,
safety,
activation,
community
engagement,
feasibility
and
overall
impact.
Q
Those
were
the
those
were,
the
criteria
that
the
community
chose
and
that
all
the
proposals
that
are
on
this
page
that
were
initially
put
forward
to
this
to
this
body.
Those
were
scored
against
those
community
criteria.
These
have
not
been
these
have
not
been,
and
so
as
we
as
as
people
are
considering
us,
you
know
what
I
would
ask
is.
Q
First
of
all,
we
made
a
commitment
to
the
Native
American
community
in
this
city,
to
the
American
Indian
community,
in
the
city,
about
the
process
about
what
their
participation
in
the
process
would
mean
and
about
what
the
results
would
mean,
and
that
included
that
the
results
they
chose
would
be
the
results
they
got
and
we
at
City
Hall
should
not
be
in
the
business
of
breaking
promises
to
our
indigenous
communities.
And,
finally,
the
principle
at
stake
here
is
from
the
very
beginning,
the
whole
idea
and
it's
basically
public
safety
needs
participatory
budgeting.
Q
That's
the
principle
that
you'll
be
voting
on
today:
it's
not
just
a
set
of
projects
and
which
is
a
good
project
and
which
is
a
bad
project,
but
it's
the
principle
of
do.
Where
are
we
going
to
keep
our
word
to
the
community
and
are
we
going
to
do
what
we
said
we
were
going
to
do
when
we
started
out
down
this
road?
Q
If
this
passes
today
just
know
that
your
mayor
does
not
support
it,
but
that
was
not
my
intention
that
I
understand
that
it
will
breed
this
trust
with
City
Hall,
and
we
will
do
our
best
to
move
forward
together,
but
I
do
not
support
this
and
I
asked
I,
asked
colleagues
and
council
members
on
the
diets
to
vote.
No
tell
us
member
Gordon,
councilmember.
O
You
very
much,
madam
president,
I
appreciate
the
time
in
the
comments
of
my
colleagues
up
here.
There
seems
to
be
quite
a
clear
divide,
probably
from
the
two
elected
officials
we
wanted.
We
would
want
to
be
most
United
about
this
issue,
that's
happening
in
the
Ninth
Ward
and
it's
an
initiative
of
the
mayor's
office
back
looking
on
the
RCA.
The
lead
staff
of
this
is
the
mayor
herself.
So
that's
pretty
significant,
so
my
expectation
and
hope
would
have
been
when
we
today,
we
would
have
had
those
two
individuals
United
firmly
supported
them
behind
this.
O
So
it's
unfortunate
we
got
here.
However,
we
got
here,
I,
don't
know,
and
you
know
we
all
different
things
get
us
to
different
points,
but
it
makes
it
really
hard
for
somebody
like
me
who
wants
to
support
the
community
support.
Little
earth
is
very
supportive
of
the
collaborative
approaches
bought
in
fully
to
let's
develop
a
process,
and
let's
have
participatory
budgeting
over
this
little
bit
of
money.
So
we
can
have
the
community
guiding
some
safety
initiatives
in
the
area
and,
having
me
input,
of
course,
I
recognized
it.
O
Ultimately,
we
are
the
elected
officials,
we're
responsible
for
the
budget,
we're
held
accountable.
So,
of
course
we
have
to
review
those
decisions
as
they
go
out
and
that's
going
to
happen
and
I
think
that
was
always
the
assumption
too.
So
I
have
to
say
that
there
is
it's
not
necessarily
inappropriate
that
the
council
would
want
to
look
at
that
and
scrutinize
those
things
and
make
the
final
judgement
on
that's
an
appropriate
role,
and
here
it
is
I.
Don't.
C
O
How
to
get
the
parties
together
or
how
we'll
really
get
to
a
good
resolution
right
now
today.
The
only
thing
that
I
can
think
of
is
if
we
had
some
more
time-
and
maybe
it's
more
timely,
sir
head
back
when
it
was
beginning,
so
the
process
could
have
got
ironed
out
together.
So
the
policymakers
could
have
been
together
and
say:
do
we
agree?
O
This
is
going
to
be
a
fair
process
in
India
more
time
we
didn't
apparently
take
that
enough
time
there
I'm
wondering
if
maybe,
if
we
had
two
more
weeks,
I
know
this
is
this
would
delay
things
is
to
delay
initiatives
that
are
coming
forward.
The
council
itself.
We
were
pushing
to
get
this
done
quickly
because
we
know
we
want
initiatives
and
Public
Safety
is
paramount,
but
what
I
would
ask
is
if
we
could
hold
it
over.
A
J
You,
madam
chair,
no
began
suppose
about
this
earlier,
but
I
do
think
it's
important
to
just
reinforce
eyes
why
I
can't
support
these
changes
as
we
move
toward
an
era.
You
know
in
this
last
budget
cycle,
we
created
this
one
small
program
in
public
safety
again
as
part
of
a
bigger,
much
bigger
and
very
important
discussion
with
community
across
the
city
about
how
we're
approaching
policing
and
Public
Safety-
and
this
was
part
of
our
commitment
to
community,
to
show
that
we
don't
think
about
policing
simply
as
arrests
and
incarceration
right.
J
That's
as
a
context
in
which
this
money
came
forward
and
honoring.
That
commitment
is
important
and
I
think
you
know
if
there
are
process
concerns
about
something
that
the
city
has
done
with
significant
amounts
of
community
time,
with
folks
from
community
participating
and
ranking
and
scoring
with
internal
and
external
partners
as
part
of
the
process,
with
a
scoring
system
that
was
created
with
community
input.
J
If
there's
a
such
a
problem,
if
the
process
is
so
flawed
that
we
have
to
make
changes
to
literally
almost
every
project
that
was
scored
by
the
community,
we
should
just
start
over,
because
this
took
people's
time.
When
we
go
out
the
community
and
say
we
want
you
to
come
and
volunteer
your
time
to
participate,
we
know
you're
taking
time
away
from
your
families,
your
jobs,
your
other
commitments
and
so
for
us
to
throw
it
out
and
not
honor.
It
I
think
is
breaking
our
commitment
to
the
community
and
it's
something
I
can't
support.
J
So
if
this
process
is
so
flawed
that
we
must
start
over
and
not
use
the
money
this
year,
I
mean
that
that
would
be
a
I
think
a
disappointment
and
not
what
I
would
suggest,
but
it
is
sort
of
re-emphasizes.
Why
I
think
it's
important
to
honor
our
commitment
to
the
community
and
what
came
out
of
this
process,
and
if
the
process
needs
improvement
for
next
year,
then
we
should
make
process
improvements
for
next
year
as
part
of
a
part
of
a
system.
J
We
also
in
the
last
budget,
approved
funding
for
a
small
amount
of
money
to
start
designing
a
participatory
budgeting
process
and
its
councilmember
Gordon
sub.
This
is
a
form
of
participatory
budgeting.
This
is
taking
a
small
amount
of
money
out
of
the
budget
that
council
members
get
to
decide
every
year.
A
billion
dollars
that
we
vote
in
as
policymakers
is
saying
we're
going
to
take
a
different
approach.
This
time
and
again,
you
know
that
is
on
a
much
slower
track
right.
J
I
also
have
concerned
that
in
the
Public
Safety
Committee,
only
the
projects
that
were
not
selected
were
able
to
speak
so
I
had
a
chance
to
go
back
and
watch
that
video
I'm,
not
on
the
committee,
but
none
of
the
community
members
or
participants
in
the
process
were
able
to
speak.
No
one
from
the
community
spoke
about
their
participation
in
the
scoring,
and
none
of
the
projects
that
have
been
eliminated
were
able
to
speak
up
on
behalf
of
those
projects.
So
it's
policymakers
were
supposed
to
weigh
which
projects
are
better
than
others.
J
S
You,
madam
president,
several
points:
first,
not
a
single
one
of
these
proposals,
either
the
originals
or
the
proposed
changes,
or
about
arrests
and
incarcerations.
Such
is
not
the
case.
Every
single
one
of
them
is
community
minded
and
community
leaven
that
a
single
one
has
any
to
do
with
the
rests
or
incarcerations
I
just
want
to
make
that
exceedingly
clear.
S
You
know
a
second
I
am
not
aware
who
was
on
the
selection
committee
I'm,
not
sure
councilmember
Cano
is
aware
of
who
was
on
a
selection
committee
or
if
you
had
any
ability
to
have
gathered
community
input,
making
those
selections.
You
know
I,
agree,
I,
agree
that
last-minute
changes
make
the
process
difficult.
However,
last-minute
selections
also
create
a
process
that
is
flawed.
S
Both
of
those
things
are
true
and
if
we
are
indeed
and
I'm
taking
councilmember
Connors
word,
if
we
are
talking
about
one
week
to
get
ideas
followed
by
another
three
days,
yes,
that
most
definitely
favors
certain
organizations
and
excludes
others.
One
week
is
not
a
lot
of
time,
and
if
we
really
are
talking
about
a
process
that
is
to
have
additional
time
and
transparency.
Yes,
that
applies
today,
but
it
also
applies
to
the
process
itself.
S
It
also
applies
to
the
process
itself
and
clearly
there
was
not
a
lot
of
time
and
apparently
there
was
not
a
lot
of
transparency
either.
So
I
agree
with
councilmember
Gordon's
proposal
to
move
this
to
to
discuss
this
deeper
in
committee.
I,
don't
know
if
there's
a
motion
on
the
table.
To
that
extent.
A
O
A
K
Thanks
ma'am,
president
I
wanted
to
speak
in
favor.
This
motion,
although
I,
will
say
I'm
not
sure
that
the
one
cycle
postponement
is
going
to
solve
the
issues.
That
is
really
a
difference
in
approach
and
what
we
want
out
of
this.
We
may
at
the
enve
kind
of
in
the
same
fat
pan
of
voting
on
what
we
think
about
and
preserving
whatever
there
is
of
the
integrity
of
the
process
and
some
other
things.
I.
Do
think,
however,
that
we
sounds
to
me
at
least
like
we're
quite
divided.
K
If
this,
if
I
was
going
to
vote
on
the
underlying
motion
today,
I
would
not
be
able
to
support
this
number
of
changes
to
the
recommendations
that
had
come
forward.
I
would
be
more
likely
to
support
starting
all
over
if
that
was
the
the
willda
counselled
and
making
so
many
changes
to
the
process,
so
I
think
I
support
the
motion,
we'll
see
how
folks
feel
about
it
and
I'm
not
positive.
K
L
You,
madam
president,
I,
haven't
thought
about
the
idea
of
delaying
it
and
what
that
would
achieve
and
what
it
would
not
so
I
prize
councilmember
Fry's
motion
to
postpone
I,
guess
I'm
not
going
to
support
that
I
would
be
voting
no
for
the
postponement,
precisely
for
the
main
reason
that
this
entire
collaborative
safety
strategy
was
brought
forward
in
the
budget
process
last
year.
The
intent
was
to
get
this
money
out
on
the
street.
It's
to
do
it
quickly
and
and
to
do
it
in
a
in
the
way
that
followed
the
process.
L
So
I
guess
I'd
like
to
talk
to
the
first
amendment
by
councilmember,
Cano
and
I'm
afraid
that
if
we
continue
to
postpone
the
item,
we
wouldn't
have
that
opportunity.
So
since
we're
here
I'd
like
to
fully
discuss
that
motion
first,
so
that's
why
the
primary
reason
to
speak
against
the
postponement
motion
at
this
time.
Constant.
C
Thank
you,
madam
president.
Soon
I
would
actually
be
open
to
postponing
this
item
so
that
we
can
get
more
consensus
between
the
mayor's
office
and
myself.
Nicole
Archibald
is
out
right
now
and
then
she's
been
out
since
yesterday
and
will
be
out
till
the
20th.
That's
the
person
we've
been
working
with
directly
this
issue.
C
I
will
say
that
the
selection
committee
did
not
have
many
resident
voices
and
we
can
go
down
the
list
and
look
at
the
people
that
showed
up
to
both
of
those
selection
committee.
Conversations
through
the
meeting
minutes
that
were
taken
by
your
office
to
identify
the
residents
that
were
actually
a
part
of
this
process.
I'm
aware
that
there
were
four
to
five
city
staff.
C
There
were
a
part
of
the
process-
that's
great,
but
really
this
was
supposed
to
be
led
by
residents
and
supposed
to
award
resident
voices,
not
institutions
to
do
the
work
that
residents
feel
is
really
needed.
So
I
support
the
idea
of
moving
this
to
to
committee,
to
try
to
get
more
clarity
about
the
actual
need
in
our
community
and
how
these
projects
can
meet
that
need.
C
I
will
say
that,
on
the
current
proposed
slate
of
of
the
original,
you
know
recommendations
from
the
selection
committee
that
was
put
together
by
the
mayor's
office,
we're
missing
serving
the
young
men
of
color
and
indigenous
men
who
are
involved
in
the
day-to-day
violence
in
our
communities.
The
rori,
you
know,
wake
them
up
with
wake
them
up.
Productions
is
a
Native
American
young
man
who
grew
up
in
this
neighborhood
and
is
now
hoping
to
connect
with
folks.
At
that
level.
C
Good
space
murals
actually
has
a
couple
of
grants
with
the
city
already
and
is
really
involved
in
other
projects
throughout
the
Ninth
Ward,
which
I
support
and
I'm
working
with
them
on
the
PALS,
the
police
activities
League
with
sherilee
Goodman
she's,
proposing
to
work
with
a
circle
of
young
women.
We
have
groups
of
women
who
are
already
working
with
each
other
to
address
some
of
these
issues.
In
fact,
the
commercial
sexual
exploitation
money
that
we
approved
last
year
is
doing
just
that.
C
The
the
Geralyn
Jackson
proposal
was
an
idea
that
was
not
selected
to
move
forward.
It's
resident
driven.
She
is
a
young
mother
in
this
neighborhood.
That
is
expressing
a
need
that
multiple
people
have
expressed
consistently
in
kind
meanings,
that
I
and
in
this
area
where
this
money
is
intended
to
support.
C
The
natives
against
heroin
project
is
actually
mentioned
a
few
times
in
both
the
ideas
and
the
final
proposals
that
were
submitted
in
the
round
of
12,
and
it
is
actually
the
group
that
shows
up
every
time,
there's
a
shooting.
So
when
you're
talking
about
the
18
year
old,
that
was
shot
last
night
at
little
earth
in
the
little
earth
area,
that
is
a
person
that
was
showing
up
on
the
streets.
It's
not
the
muralists
that
are
showing
up.
It's,
not
the
the
palace
folks
that
are
showing
up.
C
So
that
to
me
is
the
biggest
the
missed
mark
here
is
that
we
are
in
fact
funding
pre
established
institutions
that
are
freestanding
nonprofits,
that
have
served
the
community
for
decades
and
we're
not
really
funding
innovative
ideas
that
our
residents
led
by
the
residents
for
the
residents
without
the
nonprofit
industrial,
complex,
kicking
in
and
so
for
me.
I
would
actually
love
to
be
able
to
work
with
the
mayor's
office
and
more
and
with
my
council
colleagues
more
to
find
this
alignment.
C
C
A
On
here,
actually
comes
from
account
of
the
motion
was
to
postpone
for
a
cycle,
and
my
correct
would
be
on
the
floor
not
back
to
committee.
Okay,
I'm
next
I
would
just
encourage
my
colleagues
to
listen
to
councilmember
Connor
was
willing
to
discuss
on
this
proposal
and
take
some
time
and
I.
Think
part
of
what's
going
on
here
is
it
is
very
difficult
to
define
who
is
the
community?
Everybody
that
lives
in
the
community
is
part
of
the
community.
A
Every
that
works
in
the
community
is
part
of
the
community
and
it
when
we
have
these
projects.
It
is
a
real
challenge
to
say
this
represents
the
community,
because
you're
going
to
have
different
people
at
the
table
for
every
initiative
that
you
have
so
defining
community.
If
I've
been
here
20
years,
that's
one
of
the
biggest
challenges
that
we
have
and
so
I
would
encourage
us
when
we
talk
about
these
strategies
that
were
perhaps
less
specific
about
the
community,
because
that
people
get
really
riled
up
about
that
stuff.
A
Our
police
arrest
people
in
compliance
with
existing
laws
that
have
been
put
on
the
books
by
legislators
by
us
as
City
Council
members
ordinances.
Then
someone
enters
into
the
criminal
justice
system
where
they
are
charged
by
attorneys.
They
are
judged
by
judges.
Police
do
not
incarcerate
people,
so
I
resent
when
we
talk
about
policing
as
policing
and
incarceration
our
police,
don't
incarcerate.
Anybody
want
to
make
that
clear
man
mayor
thank.
Q
First
in
terms
of
community,
and
who
is
community
cities
United
in
partnership,
city
departments
and
council
member
offices,
the
great
amount
of
outreach
to
make
sure
that
anybody
who
wanted
to
be
part
of
this
process
could
be
part
of
this
process
and
I
appreciate
the
council.
Member
Cano
is
wants
to
work
with
me.
Q
This
is
an
incredibly
important
project,
not
just
for
me,
but
for
the
city,
and
the
conversation
here
today
about
postponement
is
just
a
doubling
down
on
the
principle
of
is
City
Hall
going
to
get
in
and
mess
around
with
what
the
community
decided
or
City
Hall
not
going
to
do
that.
So
I
would
just
say
to
community
and
I
would
say
to
my
colleagues
that
a
vote
to
postpone
is
a
vote.
To
say
yes,
City
Hall
should
have.
Q
You
know
should
be
messing
around
with
decisions
that
the
community
has
made
for
itself
in
a
process
and
a
timeline
that
that,
in
a
timeline,
certainly
that
the
council
decided
and
I
will
just
add
that
committee
members
had
10
days
to
write
their
proposals,
not
5,
just
as
a
small
correction
to
some
other
misinformation
out
there.
But
you
know
what's
happening
here.
Q
Is
it's
not
clear
to
me
if
people
are
arguing
hey,
it
was
a
bad
process
or
if
people
just
didn't
like
the
outcome-
and
it
strikes
me
that
the
community
created
a
set
of
outcomes
in
the
whole
point-
was
to
have
a
product
at
the
end,
the
community
decided
on
what
and
the
whole
point
was
whether
we
liked
it
or
not.
The
community
gets
to
decide,
and
that
is
what
has
happened
here
and
there
can
be
a
process
argument
about
it.
Q
Q
Let's
remember
out
of
all
the
other
dollars
that
we
have
in
the
city,
they
made
it,
they
are
making
proposals
about
250,000
dollars,
and
so
the
question
really
about
post
moment
is:
do
we
actually
want
to
let
the
community
make
decisions
about
these
dollars,
or
do
we
as
City
Hall,
want
to
make
decisions
about
these
dollars
and
I
would
say?
I,
don't
want
city
hall
making
a
decision
about
these
dollars,
because
the
community
already
did.
L
Thank
you
again,
madam
president.
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
on
them
on
the
motion
to
postpone
I
am
concerned
about
the
change
in
the
scope
of
services
and
the
postponement
would
I
think
further
delay
the
implementation
of
the
programs
that's
being
put
forward,
and
it
would
prevent
some
of
the
safety
strategies
to
be
put
in
place
sooner.
I'm
particularly
concerned
about
the
distribution
of
funds,
the
project,
support
coordination
and
the
convening
of
the
awardees
that
is
part
of
the
contract
with
knacky.
To
do
that
and
a
delay
not
only
delays.
L
L
Should
a
delay
occur,
the
postponement
of
it
and
I'm
very
concerned
about
the
relationship
that
we
would
have
with
a
contractor
as
a
fiscal
agent
not
being
able
to
do
their
job
by
the
hint
of
a
reduction
of
those
services
which
are
exactly
the
services
that
we
want
to
have
in
place.
That
is
outside
the
scope
of
the
responsibilities
of
the
Minneapolis
City
Council
and
the
cities.
We
could
do
this
through
neighborhood
Community,
Relations
Department.
L
We
could
do
it
through
the
Minneapolis
Police
Department,
but
it's
really
important
to
understand
that
the
Minneapolis
budget
does
not
create
grants.
We
do
outcome
based
contracts
with
services,
service
providers
and,
in
this
case
we've
selected
Mac
T,
to
build
capacity
and
to
implement
and
to
coordinate
and
to
convene
those
are
something
that
the
city
staff
cannot
do
does
not
have
the
time
or
the
capacity
to
do
in
addition
to
the
other
sources
and
the
other
projects
that
our
staff
busily
working
on
on
our
behalf.
L
O
Well,
I
appreciate
all
the
comments
and
I'll
input
about
the
idea
of
postponing
I
still
support.
It.
I
actually
believe
that
the
community
will
respect
us
for
doing
so.
I
think
that
they'll
recognize
that
there
was
some
difference
of
opinion
on
the
council
here
and
that
we
were
willing
to
respect
each
other
and
listen
to
each
other
and
take
the
time
so
that
we
could
work
some
of
these
details
out.
I
noticed
there
was
some
difference
in
the
previous
agenda
items
that
we
had.
O
We
were
able
to
work
it
out
here
as
a
committee
to
make
sure
that
the
council,
member
from
that
area,
had
some
needs
met
and
the
integrity
of
the
community
process
was
preserved.
I
think
if
we
postpone
this,
that's
what
we're
going
to
be
interested
in
getting
back
and
hearing
about
at
our
next
council
meeting
is
how
did
we
preserve
the
integrity
of
the
community
process
and
and
how
are
we
going
to
move
forward?
O
We
haven't
had
an
opportunity
to
hear
from
Nasty
about
what
a
two-week
delay
might
mean
or
not
I'm,
not
sure
that
it
is
going
to
put
them,
so
they
won't
move
forward
with
any
of
this
work
or
any
anything
I
understand
there
will
be
some
angst
with
all
the
entities
out
there
about.
Oh
well,
I
get
this
grant
awarded
or
not,
but
there's
going
to
be
a
chance
for
them
to
weigh
in
over
the
next
two
weeks.
O
So
I
think
if
we
do
this,
we're
going
to
have
more
respect
from
the
community,
we're
going
to
have
a
better
resolution
in
at
our
next
meeting
and
we'll
probably
have
more
respect
for
each
other.
Our
peers,
so
I
encourage
us
to
at
least
take
this
time.
If
it
doesn't
work
and
in
one
cycle
we
come
back
as
divided
as
ever,
then
we
can
go
through
this
again,
but
hopefully,
with
a
little
less
talking
month.
C
I
just
wanted
to
reiterate
my
support
for
having
more
time
to
have
this
conversation
and
it's
unfortunate.
The
mayor's
office
don't
doesn't
want
to
support
me
in
that,
but
I
do
feel
like
there's
a
significant
gap
here
in
that
we
are
not
funding
when
we
could
be
funding
from
the
12
proposals
that
were
put
forward
and
the
33
ideas
that
came
forward,
work
that
serves
as
violence
interrupters
by
men
of
color
and
indigenous
men
with
indigenous
men
and
men
of
color,
who
are
directly
involved
in
the
activities
that
we
know.
C
Nobody
has
been
able
to
intervene
on
sufficiently
to
stop
the
consistent
shootings
that
are
happening
in
front
of
our
children
in
front
of
our
family
members
in
front
of
our
elders
in
front
of
our
community
residents.
So
it's
unfortunate
that
you
know
the
people
who
were
you
know.
The
organizations
that
were
submitted
on
this
piece
of
paper
were
notified
as
being
awardees
before
the
council
was
able
to
take
final
votes.
I
think
that
was
a
major
misstep
in
this
process.
I
think
it
misled.
People
I
think
it
raised
expectations.
C
Consider
myself
as
a
person,
who's
directly
impacted
by
the
violence
where
our
communities
live,
which
is
also
the
neighborhood
that
I
live
in
I,
don't
get
to
go
home
to
a
safe
place
where
I
can
just
forget
about
all
the
shootings
and
all
the
needles
I
actually
have
to
worry
about
my
children
doing
the
same
things
in
the
same
communities
that
the
very
residents
who
are
impacted
here
are
worried
about.
So
this
isn't
City
Hall
coming
down
on.
C
C
You
know
a
few
months
ago,
at
litterers
we
had
a
community
meeting
that
pulled
together
anywhere
from
50
to
60
people,
with
an
overwhelming
majority
of
women
present
in
the
room,
and
the
question
I
asked
that
that
at
that
meeting
was
where
our
men,
where
are
the
young
men
and
the
mangum
of
color
and
the
indigenous
men
who
are
directly
impacted
by
this?
Where
are
they?
Why
aren't
we
hearing
from
them
who's
working
with
them?
So
that's
the
piece
that
to
me
is
really
missing
from
the
slate
of
of
ideas.
C
You
know
that
they're
great
ideas,
you
know,
mural
murals,
are
really
good.
We
have
a
lot
of
those
in
the
Ninth
Ward.
We
want
more,
you
know,
having
a
city
staff
member
from
the
police
department
leading
the
palet
activity
is
great
and
I
know
there
are
nonprofit
that
gets
support
from
other
places.
I,
don't
think
the
city
needs
to
be
funding
itself
per
se.
C
Some
where
we
missed
the
mark
in
identifying
then
uplifting
the
resident
load,
ideas
of
people
who
are
Native
American
and
are
from
these
neighborhoods
and
live
in
these
streets
to
provide
the
strategies
and
initiatives
that
are
going
to
be
serving
our
residents
in
a
way
that
we
haven't
done
before.
That's
my
vendor.
J
Thank
you,
madam
president,
could
come
from
a
surviving
made.
The
motion
or
councilmember
Cana
describe
what
they're
going
to
do
in
the
next
two
weeks
to
involved
like
get
to
the
decision
about
making
these
changes.
That
hasn't
happened
in
the
previous
months,
like
how
would
the
community
be
involved
in
the
next
two
weeks?
The
folk
of
the
council
meeting
we'll
be
voting
on
the
minimum
wage,
so
we
spent
a
lot
of
time
discussing
this,
as
the
counsels
of
the
two
weeks
is
just
to
have
more
discussions
at
City.
J
S
There's
a
major
lack
of
communication
right
now.
I,
don't
think
anybody
would
dispute
that
and
I
think
having
an
additional
two
weeks
to
to
get
on
the
same
page,
and
we
talk
about
a
community
process
and,
yes,
we
value
the
community
process.
We
value
having
substantial
input
in
this
exact
form,
but
when
we,
when
we
talk
about
just
having
one
week
or
one
week
and
three
days
when
we've
had
since
the
last
budget
was
set,
I
think
at
the
very
least
doing
what
we
should
have
done
to
begin
with,
which
is
communicate,
is
necessary.
A
H
A
J
A
R
Thank
you.
Madam
president.
The
committee
will
be
forwarding
12
items
for
consideration
and
approval
today.
Item
one
is
the
2017
alley:
renovation
program,
project,
approval
and
assessment
item.
2
is
the
46th
Avenue
South
Street
reconstruction
project,
approval
and
assessment
item.
3
is
the
Minneapolis
stormwater
management
program
in
annual
report?
I
was
a
great
presentation
for
that
report.
A
A
A
L
You,
madam
president,
wait
and
brings
ways
and
means
brings
forward
14
items
for
your
consideration
this
morning.
The
first
is
a
contract
with
paradigm
for
court
reporting
services
from
the
City
Attorney's
Office
city
coordinators
office
brings
forward
a
grant
acceptance
from
Rockefeller
Foundation
and
a
grant
from
the
McKnight
Foundation
for
the
partners,
place
equity
initiative,
pilot
for
the
green
zone,
policy,
support
and
implementation.
We
also
have
a
grant
from
the
funders
Network
for
that
same
green
zone
policy,
support
implementation
and
there's
a
gift
acceptance
from
Clear
Channel
outdoor
for
billboard
display
time.
L
Item
number
six
is
the
bid
of
low
bid
for
Minneapolis
Convention
Center
we're
finding
some
project
with
messenger
construction.
We
also
have
a
contract
amendment
with
premiere
electrical
corporation
for
some
contract.
Closeout
work
at
the
convention
center
item
number.
Eight
is
the
low
bid
for
fire
station
15
floor
reconstruction,
a
lease
with
t-mobile
for
cellular
equipment
at
the
Hoffman
lease
for
safety,
signs
for
equipment,
storage
and
a
gift
and
donation
acceptance
for
the
2004
for
May
of
2017
report.
L
Item
number
12
is
a
contract
with
eret
a
consulting
group
for
texting
system
for
3-1-1,
Department
items.
13
and
14
are
collective
bargaining
agreements,
one
with
a
semi
Council,
five
that
and
local
nine
for
the
period
ending
December,
31st
2019
and
a
collective
bargain
agreement
with
MTA.
That's
the
Minneapolis
professional
Employees
Association.
Also
through
the
year
2019
I'd
like
to
move
all
14
items
for
approval.
J
Thank
you.
Madam
president,
we
had
three
items
from
zoning
and
planning
item
number
one
is
rezoning
at
501,
East
Lake
Street,
to
see
to
to
allow
for
a
restaurant
with
gender
general
entertainment
item
number
two
is
rezoning
at
8:16
Lowry
Avenue,
North
East,
to
see
one
to
allow
for
a
restaurant
and
item
number
three
is
rezoning:
a
sweet
vacation
for
six
to
zero
Olson
Memorial
Highway
approving
an
application
there
to
allow
for
two
new
K
through
12
schools
and
related
applications.
I.
I
K
I
Q
A
Reported
about
them
and
next
we
have
the
notice
of
ordinance
introductions.
The
first
is
a
notice
of
intent.
I
come
from
recording
to
introduce
at
the
next
regular
meeting
of
the
City
Council,
the
subject
matter
of
northern
spending,
the
code
relating
to
health
and
sanitation,
amending
really
regulations
for
the
use
of
carry
out
bags
in
retail
establishments.
That
notice
was
given
next
we
have
the
introduction
and
referral
calendar.
A
The
first
is
an
introduction
by
councilmember,
Goodman
and
Glidden
to
introduce
the
subject
matter
of
an
ordinance
amending
the
code
relating
to
housing
for
first
reading
in
referral
to
community
development
regulatory
services
committee,
adding
provisions
requiring
the
advance
notice
of
sale
of
multiple
family
rental
dwellings.
Any
discussion
on
that
introduction,
seeing
none
all
in
approval,
say
aye
aye,
aye
opposed
that
carries
next.
We
have
by
councilmember
Goodman
and
councilmember
Reich
notice.
A
Excuse
me
emotion,
introduction
of
the
subject
matter
of
an
ordinance
amending
the
code
relating
to
liquor
and
beer,
or
first
reading,
and
referral
to
Community
Development
regulatory
Services
Committee
of
many
various
provisions
relating
to
temporary
licenses
or
events.
Any
discussion
on
that
introduction,
seeing
none
all
an
approval,
say
aye
aye
opposed
that
carries
next.
A
We
have
pursuant
to
notice
council
member
fry,
is
introducing
the
subject
matter
of
an
ordinance
amending
the
code
into
the
housing
code
for
first
reading
and
referral
to
Community
Development
regulatory
services
amending
and
adding
provisions
related
to
the
regulation
of
short-term
rentals.
Any
discussion
on
that
introduction,
seeing
none
all
in
approval,
say
aye
aye
opposed
a
carry.
A
Next,
we
have,
pursuant
to
notice
council
member
fry
moves
to
introduce
the
subject
matter
and
ordinance
amending
the
code
relating
to
licenses
and
business
regulations
for
first
reading
and
referral
to
the
Community
Development
regulatory
Services
Committee,
adding
a
new
chapter,
351
entitled
short-term
rental
service
provider.
Any
discussion
on
that
introduction,
seeing
none
all
in
approval,
say
aye
aye
Apolo
expect
carries
next.
A
We
have,
pursuant
to
notice
council
member
fry
moves
to
introduce
the
subject
matter
of
an
ordinance
amending
the
code
relating
to
the
zoning
code
or
first
reading,
and
referral
to
the
zoning
and
planning
committee.
Adding
provisions
related
to
the
regulation
of
short-term
rentals.
Any
discussion
on
that
introduction.
They
none
all
in
approval,
say
aye
aye
opposed
that
carries
next.
A
We
have,
pursuant
to
notice,
council
member
Gordon
and
vendor,
introduced
a
subject
matter
of
an
ordinance
amending
the
code
relating
to
licenses
and
business
regulations,
tobacco
dealers
for
first
reading
and
referral
to
the
health
environment,
community
engagement
committee,
amending
regulations
relating
to
the
sale
of
spackle.
Any
discussion
on
that
introduction,
seeing
none
all
in
approval,
say
aye
aye
opposed
back
Airy's
under
resolutions.
We
have
a
resolution
declaring
the
first
day
of
July
somali-american
day
in
the
city
of
Minneapolis.
Any
discussion
on
that
resolution,
a
none
all
an
approval
say
aye
aye
opposed
carries.
A
We
have
a
passage
of
a
resolution
recognizing
august
11
2017
is
national.
Eight
one
one
day
any
discussion
on
that
resolution,
seeing
none
all
in
approval,
say
aye
aye
opposed
that
carries.
We
have
a
passage
of
a
resolution
celebrating
one
hundred
and
fortieth
anniversary
of
the
parish
of
Our
Lady
of
Lourdes.