►
Description
Minneapolis Public Health, Environment, Civil Rights, and Engagement Committee Meeting
A
Good
afternoon,
I'm
gonna
call
to
order
this
meeting
with
the
public
health
environment,
civil
rights
and
engagement
committee
I'm,
the
vice
chair
of
the
committee
and
chair
Cunningham,
is
out
on
vacation
today,
so
I'll
be
chairing
the
meeting,
I'm
joined
by
councilmembers,
Cano,
Schrader
and
Johnson,
and
that's
a
quorum.
So
we
can
conduct
our
business
Thanks
committee
members
for
being
here.
A
We
have
one
public
hearing,
three
consent
items
and
a
discussion
item
I
think
just
in
case
there's
staff
here
for
the
consent
items
I'm
going
to
take
those
first
and
then
we'll
take
a
brief
report
on
our
public
hearing,
which
is
on
the
neighborhood
and
community
engagement
commission.
So
the
consent
items
include
a
grant
from
the
Minneapolis
downtown
Improvement
District
for
street
outreach,
a
Public,
Health,
Advisory
Committee
appointment
in
a
Minneapolis
workforce
advisory
committee.
Appointment
actually
two
appointments.
A
Would
anybody
like
to
pull
any
of
those
items
for
discussion?
Seeing
nobody
was
you
to
do
so?
I
will
move
those
three
consent
items
forward
for
approval
all
those
in
favor,
please
say:
aye
aye,
any
opposed,
say
no.
Those
carry
so
now
we'll
move
on
to
our
public
hearing
and
I.
Think
that
we
will
start
with
a
brief
staff
presentation-
and
this
is
a
hearing
on
our
neighborhood
community
engagement,
Commission
appointments.
This
is
one
of
the
Commission's
where
we
actually
have
a
public
hearing,
but
as
part
of
the
resolution
and
we're
gonna
have
mr.
B
Afternoon
vice-chair
Gordon
and
committee
members,
my
name
is
Cheyenne
Bodine
and
I
am
the
internal
services
manager
in
the
neighbourhood
and
community
relations
department.
I
am
before
you
today
to
present
three
appointments
to
the
neighborhood
and
community
engagement
Commission
to
our
City
Council
appointments
and
one
is
a
mayoral
appointment.
The
to
City
Council
appointments
are
Jeffrey
strand
Award
for
and
Queen
Kimmons
of
Ward
5
and
the
mayoral
appointee
is
Mary
deduce
Winton.
B
The
neighborhood
and
community
engagement
Commission
advises
the
mayor,
City
Council
and
the
neighborhood
community
relations
department
on
a
wide
range
of
community
engagement
issues.
One
of
the
major
responsibilities
that
the
Commission
has
had
over
the
past
years
has
been
providing
recommendations
to
the
NCR
Department
mayor
and
council
on
neighborhood
funding
programs
into
the
looking
into
the
future.
One
of
the
big
pieces
of
work
that
they
will
be
advising
the
city
on
is
neighborhoods
2020,
the
future
of
funding
for
neighborhood
organizations
beyond
the
year
2020
in
the
past.
B
There
are
16
members
on
the
body.
Eight
of
them
are
appointed
by
the
mayor,
City
Council
and
park
board
and
the
other
eight
are
selected
by
neighborhood
organizations
and
as
for
the
enabling
resolution
of
the
body,
there
is
a
public
hearing
required
for
the
appointments.
So
this
concludes
my
presentation.
Thank.
C
A
D
Don't
feel
it's
right
that
this
person
is
being
reappointed
when
there
are
other
commissioners
who
have
not
attended
multiple
multiple
meetings
and
have
basically
missed
nothing
and
are
not
being
reappointed
and
who
are
highly
highly
qualified
for
that
position.
I
feel
it's
an
injustice
to
the
city
and
an
injustice
to
our
communities
that
this
person
is
being
reappointed
and
I'm.
D
E
So
my
name
is
Marcia
Mariani
and
I'm
from
the
Cooper
neighborhood
I'm,
a
charter
member
of
the
neighborhood
and
community
engagement,
commission
and
I
am
aware
that
we
have
a
very
open
process
whereby
neighborhoods
select
and
elect
their
people
to
the
commission,
their
representatives.
The
establishing
resolution,
indicated
that
all
the
elections
shall
be
held
in
the
manner
by
which
neighborhoods
hold
their
elections.
E
Many
neighborhoods
are
different
in
that
regard.
I
didn't
expect
my
election
to
have
NCR
involvement
during
the
day
of
the
election
or
the
door.
I
was
asked
to
leave
as
a
candidate,
and
the
door
was
shut
for
discussion.
That
door
should
have
remained
open.
I
should
have
been
able
to
remain
in
the
room.
The
result
was
solved.
I
was
put
back
into
position.
The
question
I
have
is:
why
did
that
happen?
E
Also
because
our
elections
are
so
very
public,
the
NRP
had
always
had
an
open
process
now
with
regard
to
your
appointment
process,
we're
in
the
dark
and
we'd
like
you
to
help
us
out
here.
I
know
that
years
ago,
Elizabeth
Glidden
was
on
a
committee
that
did
make
the
appointments.
Do
you
still
have
that
committee?
Who
are
the
members?
How
is
the
appointment
made?
Do
you
have
a
process
we'd
like
answers
to
those
questions?
It's
not
very
difficult,
I,
don't
think,
but
we
would
really
like
to
have
answers.
A
F
F
My
seeking
reappointment
is
not
a
retrospective
action,
rather,
as
stated
in
the
reasons
I
want
to
serve.
I
have
a
deep
25
year
plus
background
in
neighborhood
organizations,
both
as
a
neighborhood
board
chair
director,
NRP
policy
board
member
and
in
CEC
member.
However,
I
think
this
is
a
time
of
change
and
I'm
very
interested
in
being
part
of
the
change
process
that
we
are
embarking
upon.
F
A
Seeing
no
one,
then
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
I
can
speak
a
little
bit
about
the
process
because
I
was
involved
in
it
in
terms
of
making
this
election
I
can't
speak
about
necessarily
the
attendance
of
Commissioners,
but
the
there
was
a
committee
that
formed
or
a
task
force.
It
included
three
council
offices
and
staff
from
the
department,
and
we
looked
at
all
the
applications
and
we
reviewed
them
and
discuss
them
and
made
the
selection
that
way,
based
on
criteria
that
we
had
and
I
have
to
say.
A
It
was
actually
especially
difficult,
and
it
was
odd
this
time
because
we
had
what
looks
to
us
like
a
dedicated
group
of
people
seeking
reappointment
who
had
committed
time
and
energy
and
were
bringing
assets
and
benefits
to
the
Commission.
At
least
it
was
our
understanding,
and
so
it
was
difficult.
Usually
when
there's
somebody
who's
been
doing
a
good
job
on
a
border
commission
and
they
reapply
it's.
A
It's
we're
not
faced
with
too
many
people
wanting
to
reapply,
so
that
did
make
it
rather
difficult
and
challenging
for
us,
and
we
had
to
look
at
lots
of
the
aspects
and
how
that
would
fit
in
and
how
that
would
work.
I
have
to
say
that
it
didn't
necessarily
reflect
on
anybody
who
wasn't
chosen
either
it
was.
It
was
difficult
decision,
tells
the
members
Raider
and
council
member
Cunningham
with
the
other
council
offices
that
were
involved
in
it,
and
so,
if
you
want
to
add
anything,
you
can
go
ahead.
A
You
might
want
to
hear
from
staff
and
see
if
the
process,
if
there
is
more
vetting
that
was
done
in
terms
of
the
process
or
anything
like
that
and-
and
you
might
also
want
to
help
answer
some
of
the
questions
about
the
neighborhood
elections-
I'm,
not
so
knowledgeable
about
what
would
have
happened
there.
It
didn't
surprise
me
that
staff
might
come
and
try
to
help
facilitate
I
will
note
that
Cedar
Riverside
neighborhood
is
the
big
question
mark
about
neighborhood
two
groups
applied
to
for
recognition.
A
A
Decertification
I
think
that
there's
yet
to
make
a
selection
about
what
neighborhoods
going
to
qualify
to
participate
in
the
CPP
funding
next
round,
but
maybe
staff
can
also
help
answer
that
question.
I
have
been
in
communication
with
councilmember
or
Sami,
who
is
also
a
council
member
who
serves
actually
probably
more
of
the
neighborhood
than
I
do
and
we're
trying
to
see
how
we
can
help
as
a
City
Council
I'm
kind
of
regroup
and
help
them
go
through
a
process
so
that
they
could
form.
A
B
Chair
Gordon
committee
members,
I,
can
add
a
little
more
clarity
to
the
election
process
for
the
resident,
who
spoke
and
also
can
address
the
issue
around
the
appointment
process.
I'll
start
with
that
one,
our
role
at
NCR
is
just
to
coordinate
the
applications
organized
the
convene,
the
group
of
the
selection
committee
amongst
the
council
members
and
their
staff.
We
did
not
vet
applications
prior
to
that
meeting
and
put
together
the
list
of
applicants
and
applications
for
the
council
members.
B
That
was
the
extent
of
our
role
and
as
to
the
election
process
for
neighborhood
organizations
similar
to
what
we
do
for
the
council
office.
We
administer
process,
collect
the
applications
and
abide
follow,
though
there's
actually
election
rules
that
the
neighborhoods
organized
and
determined
themselves.
So
we
follow
that
process
and
we
don't
facilitate
the
elections.
We
bring
in
the
League
of
Women
Voters
to
do
that,
so
that
is
actually
in
the
election
rules
that
the
neighborhood
organizations
outline
to.
B
So
my
understanding
from
that
was
there
was
a
conflict
of
interest,
raced
and
so
neighborhood
organizations
send
electors,
and
one
of
the
electors
was
the
husbands
of
the
husband
of
one
of
the
candidates
and
the
group
decided
to
either
allow
it
or
not
allow
it
and
the
candidates
were
asked
to
leave.
The
room
was
my
understanding.
So,
okay.
G
B
The
vice-chair
Gordon
council
member
Johnson,
so
actually
my
records
for
that
individual
Commission
member
she's
missed
three
out
of
the
12
last
year
of
meeting,
so
that's
25%
less
than
one-third,
and
that
is
what
the
bylaws
call
for.
So
you
can
miss.
You
can't
miss
more
than
three
committee
meetings
in
a
one
year
cycle
and
the
NCE
C
does
not
unselect
their
members.
They
could
recommend
to
the
appointing
authorities,
any
member
that
they
think
may
be
should
be
unseated
so
or
members
who
are
appointed.
B
G
A
A
Well,
I'm
prepared
to
move
the
recommendation,
appreciate
people
coming
in
and
making
their
comments.
Some
ways
would
have
been
maybe
good
to
get
some
information
or
some
thought
in
the
future
and
I
also
will
just
make
one
comment.
I
would
like
to
see
us
really
think
about
how
the
neighborhood
elections
take
place
and
do
that
in
a
different
manner.
I've
had
this
idea
that
I
don't
know
that
it's
it's
resonated
well
with
anybody
and
I.
A
But
that's
also
something
I'd
like
to
see
that
NCC,
the
Commission
actually
lead
on
and
come
forward
with
and
I'm
thinking.
Maybe
that's
part
of
some
of
the
work
that
you're
doing
I.
Don't
know
that
we're
gonna
take
comments,
because
it's
our
turn
to
talk
now
Marcia,
but
maybe
we
can
talk
later,
no
because
I,
unless
you
really
love
the
idea.
Just
kidding
Andrew
had
a
comment,
though
Thank.
G
You
mr.
chair
and
just
based
off
my
question
on
attendance
issues
that
I
know
was
raised
today,
I
think
it
if
my
message
back
to
NCC
would
be
if
there
are
those
concerns,
certainly
bring
them
to
the
council,
raise
them
to.
Obviously
we
have
one
member
today
raising
that
concern
in
the
public
hearing,
and
you
know,
I
am
hesitant
to
make
any
decision
against
somebody
here
who
hasn't
had
an
opportunity
as
well
to
respond
to
that
and
who
is
within
the
rules
on
NCC,
but
certainly
I.
G
G
Think
there's
a
lot
of
folks
that
want
to
be
engaged
and
participate
in
this,
and
so
certainly
you
know
that's
what
we
want
and
expect
of
the
body,
and
so
if
there
are
individuals
who
aren't
ever
in
the
future,
it's
something
that
I
think
there's
opportunities
for
others
who
maybe
are
interested
in
doing
that
level
of
participation
and
really
giving
it
their
all.
And
that's
not
again
no
comment
on
this
particular
individual,
but
just
speaking
broadly
to
the
concerns
overall
about
participation.
A
A
One
of
the
things
we
had
actually
was
a
a
grid
and
a
chart,
and
so
we
could
understand
where
everybody
was
coming
from
and
we
didn't
talk
much
about
attendance,
but
we
did
talk
about
outreach
and
engagement
and
involving
others
and
I
also
am
saying
this
in
part,
because
I
do
recall
some
strong
feelings
from
the
committee
chair
on
this
appointment
too,
and-
and
it
seemed
like
he-
we
helped
contribute
to
getting
us
consensus
around
this
as
the
choice.
So
I
prefer
to
stick
with
the
motion
from
the
subgroup
that
brought
this
forward.
A
But
that
doesn't
mean
other
things
couldn't
happen
in
the
meantime.
So
I
mean
you
can
move
it
as
a
amendment
and
we
can
take
a
vote
on
it
as
well,
but
I
thought
I'd
just
throw
that
in
there
go
ahead.
Okay,
I.
C
Think
you
miss
Jarrett,
no
and
just
to
respond
to
that
I'm
I'm
open
to
just
approving,
because
we
did
have
that
long
discussion.
Just
we
had
that
behind
closed
door.
So
I
appreciate
you
adding
a
lot
more
and
you
know
what
second
that
you
know.
The
chair
definitely
had
some
made.
Some
very
good
points
and
part
of
my
delaying
was
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
there,
but
if
you're
looking
at
approving
all
of
it,
I
I
could
go
on
to
that.
A
All
right,
I,
don't
see
any
more
discussion,
so
maybe
we're
ready
to
go
down
this.
All
those
in
favor
of
the
three
coming
forward:
recommendations
for
the
neighborhood
and
community
engagement,
Commission
appointments,
say
aye
any
opposed,
say
no,
any
abstentions.
That
motion
carries
it's
it's
it's
good
that
there's
some
interest
in
that
there's
some
discussion
about
it,
and
maybe
that
will
help
us
do
a
better
job
next
round.
Two.
Thank
you
for
coming
and
speaking
often
times
we
have
public
hearings.
G
A
These
appointments
and
nobody
comes
in
to
speak.
So
this
is
it
significant
and
we'll
remember
and
you,
and
hopefully
we
can
even
talk
further
later
outside
of
the
committee.
So
with
one
last
item
on
our
agenda-
and
this
is
a
report
or
an
overview,
I
guess
a
draft
update
to
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
and
its
miss
Worthington
gonna
ts
up.
This
is
great
that
this
is
coming
forward.
A
H
You
councilmember
council
members,
I'm
I'm,
going
to
kind
of
set
the
table
here
and
then
ask
Brian
Schaeffer
to
come
up
and
give
you
a
little
bit
more
analysis
here.
I
just
wanted
to
and
you're
the
first
committee
that
we
presented
to
so
you'll
hear
this
multiple
times
and
for
that
I
apologize,
but
I
just
wanted
to
let
you
know
a
little
bit
of
about
the
process
of
arriving
at
a
draft
for
this
very
important
document.
H
We
had
about
a
hundred
and
fifty
staff
from
around
the
enterprise
involved
in
research
committees
over
the
past
18
months,
and
they
were
really
the
drivers
behind
what
you
read
in
the
plan
that
is
not
directly
related
to
land
use
and
some
of
those
items
are
related
to
your
committee
today,
and
so
we
wanted
to
take
up.
Excuse
me
a
little
deeper
dive,
the
draft
itself
just
again
to
kind
of
set
the
table.
H
It
has
a
small
number
of
land
use
policies
that
can
really
become
regulatory
per
statute
in
the
requirements
for
a
comprehensive
plan,
but
a
much
longer
list
of
policy
statements
that
support
those
land,
use
policies
and
are
really
interconnected.
So
when
we
talk
about
housing,
we're
also
necessarily
talking
about
transportation
and
we're
talking
about
land
use,
children
for
instance,
and
housing
in
employment.
So
those
are
some
an
example
of
some
of
the
interconnected
policy
statements
that
are
in
the
document.
H
So
today
we
like
to
present
some
of
those
policy
statements
that
are
specific
to
this
committee's
work
and
as
they
relate
to
the
draft
land-use
work,
that's
in
front
of
you,
so
I'm
going
to
just
quickly
talk
about
a
couple
of
slides
here
before
Brian
comes
up.
You
know
this
is
really
the
underpinning
of
the
entire
section.
I
Vice-Chair
Gordon
committee
members
I'll
spend
a
few
10
minutes
just
going
through
a
few
more
slides
and
we'll
open
up
for
questions
and
kind
of
just
look
for
any
feedback
or
dialogue.
You
want
to
have
point
forward,
so
one
of
the
major
elements
that
we
wanted
to
focus
on
is
just
how
environmental
justice,
and
especially
in
land
use,
can
connect,
and
we
want
to
just
connect
one
of
those
dots
for
today.
The
environmental
justice
policy
sets
are
really
broad
statements,
as
established
environmental
justice
frameworks
for
policy
and
regulations.
I
So
it's
about
as
broad
in
of
a
framework
you
can
have
around
that,
and
so
what
does
that
mean?
Is
this
dress
really
tool?
And
you
specifically,
but
also
recognizing
a
grandmother?
Justice
is
so
much
more
than
just
some
of
these
Lanie's
components,
everything
from
equity
and
a
displacement
policies
and
discussions.
We
have
around
housing
issues,
air
quality
and
water
quality
access
to
healthy
food
which
we'll
get
into
today,
and
obviously
the
health
and
energy
of
a
home.
So
there's
a
broad
set
this
a
lot
of
that
work
has
been
carried
forward
by
green
zones.
I
Kelly
Millman
is
here
today
he's
gonna
work
on
the
Southside
Green
Zone
process.
We
can
talk
more
about
that,
but,
as
we
start
thinking
about
that
in
relation
to
the
land,
use
goal
of
production
and
processing,
I
wanted
to
identify
someone
that
was
dot
that
dot
connection,
for
you
is
that
in
the
production
processing
area,
we
really
call
out
to
different
action
steps,
and
one
of
those
action
steps
is
that
we
want
to
prioritize
the
use
of
our
land
in
production
processing.
I
These
are
areas
that
were
formerly
we've
called
industrial
for
the
for
certain
types
of
uses
that
are
have
minimal
or
no
impact
in
air,
air,
water
and
noise
pollution,
and
that
provided
quality
living
wage
jobs.
We're
a
better
position.
These
areas
that
we
formerly
called
industrial
to
do
a
lot
more
for
us
as
a
city
both
in
job
creation,
but
also
a
little
recognizing
that
we
want
to
move
away
from
some
of
those
heavy
industrial
uses
and
really
move
into
a
kind
of
a
new
21st
century
manufacturing
and
production
and
processing
type
of
use.
I
In
relation
to
that,
and
as
we
start
talking
about
environmental
justice
and
those
impacts
from
a
production
process
is
also,
we
say,
to
identify
and
limit
new
heavy
industrial
uses
that
have
harmed
human
health
and
throughout
the
city.
This
relates
to
a
lot
of
the
work
that
we've
done
in
our
land
use
tables
that
we
can
do.
I
And
today
many
of
these
areas
are
areas
for
residents
live
at
least
a
mile
from
a
full
story
of
service
grocery
store
and
there's
a
greater
number
of
census,
tracts
that
don't
have
a
grocery
stores
and
a
half
miles.
We're
trying
to
create
a
way,
as
we
start
to
think
about
our
land
use
policies
is
trying
to
identify
opportunities
for
new
stores
to
be
created.
I
New
sites
to
open
up
we've
had
a
little
bit
of
a
stronger
policies
in
the
past,
about
restricting
commercial
growth
into
really
tight
nodes
and
in
portions
of
corridors
and
we're
looking
at
that
a
little
bit
more
broadly
in
our
future
land-use
map.
So
our
our
policy
called
access
to
goods
and
services.
One
of
the
action
steps
highlighted
here:
it's
a
designated
ditional
areas,
and
actually
we
do
that
in
the
autumn,
lanius
plant
or
in
the
land
use
map
that
need
for
the
demand
for
retail
is
greater
than
this
a
current
supply.
I
And
so
how
can
we
allow
for
that?
More
access
to
those
goods
and
services
in
at
the
same
time,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
pair
this
without
policies
as
Heather
was
mentioning
that
are
about
the
access
to
food
itself
and
really
about
the
policy
network
that
we
did,
that
aren't
just
land
you
specific,
but
really
about
how
all
these
things
are
together
as
an
ecosystem
and
talked
about
the
practically
trying
to
get
new
grocery
stores
in
the
area.
So
you
see
this
up
on
their
screen
today.
I
Action
steps
see
from
the
food
access
policies,
kind
of
fits
in
with
this
other
pot
on
the
policy
and
access
to
commercial
goods
and
services,
which
is
looking
at
ways
to
attract
new
grocery
stores.
So
how
can
we
be
out
there
actually
trying
to
fill
those
gaps,
not
just
by
creating
lanes
policy
to
support
those
locations,
but
also
creating
city
actions?
To
go,
find
retailer
or
grocery
stores
to
create
those
spaces
to
allow
that
happen.
I
So
this
is
a
place
where
we're
starting
to
think
about
how
this
comes
together.
Those
are
just
two
examples
of
really
kind
of
connecting
those
two
dots
there's
a
much
broader
example,
so
that
we
can
get
into
with
any
questions
or
discussion
and
I
think
just
really
kind
of
wrapping
it
up.
Is
you
know
next
steps
moving
forward
is
we're
looking
to
end
there
public
comment
period
on
July
22nd,
which
is
in
a
couple
weeks,
we'll
be
releasing
a
new
draft
of
the
route
of
the
plan.
I
A
revised
draft
at
the
end
of
September,
the
end
of
October
there'll,
be
a
Planning
Commission
public
hearing
on
the
draft
of
the
plan
and
then
moving
into
December
for
a
City,
Council
action.
So
that's
kind
of
our
trajectory.
We
wanted
to
kind
of
stay
at
a
high
level
just
to
connect.
Come
of
those
points
to
you
with
you
today
and
then
spend
the
rest
of
time
answer
any
questions
you
may
have,
or
have
any
discussion
with
you
so
with
that
I
can
bring
up
Paul
modish
who's.
A
And
I'm
certainly
willing
to
take
some
time
on
this
folks
want
to
maybe
I'll
just
start
by
asking
a
question
based
on
this
last
slide
and
I
was
really
hoping
it
would
be
mid
or
early
September,
so
cuz,
the
first
time
I've
seen
it
spelled
out
in
black
and
white
quite
like
that,
but
getting
an
in
September
would
be
great
and
then
my
question
is:
is
cpad
planning
on
doing
any
community
engagement
I'm
after
the
release
of
the
last
draft
beyond
providing
it
I
guess
to
the
public,
hopefully
in
a
PDF
searchable
format,
as
well
as
an
electronic
one,
because
I
also
see
the
the
city
I
mean
it's.
A
The
council
could
own
some
of
that
community
engagement
and
we
could
even
get
help
from
our
other
department
departments,
including
including
community
engagement,
so,
and
do
more
of
that
too,
but
I'm
not
quite
sure
what
the
plan
is
right
now
so
I'd
like.
H
To
come
of
recording
and
council
members,
we
we
will
try
to
get
that
out
as
early
as
we
can
in
September,
but
we
would
like
to
give
ourselves
adequate
time
to
revise
it,
so
that
it
is
a
complete
draft
for
the
final
document
in
terms
of
community
engagement.
We
will
have
a
strategy
around
that
later
this
summer
that
we
will
share
with
you.
H
We
don't
have
a
very
large
amount
of
time
between
the
final
draft
and
the
the
end
of
the
year,
but
we
will
certainly
do
engagement
around
the
final
draft
and
we
will
have
a
communication
strategy
around
it,
so
that
we're
communicating
clearly
with
residents
about
changes
that
were
made
and,
as
we've
said
before,
we
will
issue
a
redlined
copy
of
the
draft,
the
final
draft
plan
and
it
will
be
online
and
a
PDF.
So
both
both
formats
for
that
actually.
B
A
C
A
A
Think
one
of
the
things
that
we
could
really
do
in
the
next
few
years
is
take
the
green
zones,
I'm
resolution
and
the
work
that's
been
done
and
it
was
almost
like
a
build
as
you
go
process
to
understand
it
better,
even
even
kind
of
passing
the
resolution
and
deciding
we're
going
to
start
some
green
zones
and
then
what
took
us
a
long
time
to
figure
out.
Actually,
where
would
the
first
one
be,
and
it
was
so
hard
we
ended
up,
choosing
two
and
now
I
think
we're
gonna.
A
A
I
think
it
was
I
can't
remember
now
which
policy
it
was,
but
it
is
a
fear,
so
I
just
want
to
raise
that
comment
and-
and
maybe
even
obviously,
perhaps
by
now,
I'm
expressing
a
little
bit
of
an
opinion
that
maybe
you
should
be
called
out
a
little
more
clear.
Clearly
right
as
one
of
the
things
about
environmental
justice
is
we're
gonna,
refine
and
use
this
strategy
better.
I
Think
if
you
break
down
green
zones
and
the
work
that's
been
done,
which
is
fantastic,
there's
it
lives
in
many
of
the
different
policy
categories
and
discussions
just
identified
two
of
those
today,
but
there's
dozens
of
others.
So
we
have
the
policy
background,
even
though
we
don't
mean
may
not
call
it
green
zone.
So
that's
a
that's
a
conversation
we've
had
internally
a
lot
about
is:
where
do
we
stop
from
calling
out
specific
policy
program,
specific
programs
and
but
giving
us
enough
direction
of
connectivity
and
program
and
policy
support?
So
it
I
think.
H
H
We
had
that
there
are
a
number
of
policy
documents
that
the
city
has
had
in
place
previous
to
this
updated
comprehensive
plan
like
the
climate
action
plan,
for
instance,
that
need
to
be
referenced
into
this
document
so
that
this
kind
of
becomes
a
document
that
has
some
standalone
features
and
also
some
reference
features.
So
that
might
be
a
good
place
for
the
green
zones.
Work
to
reside
is
as
a
reference
to
this
so
that
it
can
continually
be
updated.
H
A
I
appreciate
that,
and
as
somebody
who's
been
here
for
a
while
and
fought
hard
to
get
some
of
those
policies
passed,
you
don't
want
to
think
their
adult
sudden
gonna
disappear,
because
and
and
one
way
to
make
sure
they're
not
disappearing
is
have
them
somehow
cause
out
in
the
complex
or
inform
that
another
one
that
I
was
thinking
about
was
the
urban
AG
policy
plan.
So
we
did
a
lot
of
these
even
through
land
use
and
zoning
and
planning
these
topical
plans.
A
A
It's
a
it's
been
a
big
leap
for
a
lot
of
people
to
say
we're
actually
going
to
allow
food
farming,
food
production
and
growth,
agriculture
in
the
city,
and
now
we
are
allowing
it
in
small
scale,
large
scale
and
I
think
it
could
be
a
way
to
answer
the
problem
of
food
access.
Also
healthier
food
I
also
think
there
might
be
a
lot
of
private
land
that
could
grow.
A
Food
and
people
might
be
willing
to
have
their
land
grow
food
on
it,
and
even
if
they
don't
do
it
themselves
and
then
also
we're
gonna
hit
these
dilemmas.
Where
we
have
a
piece
of
land,
they
could
produce
a
lot
of
food
or
maybe
it's
a
rooftop
owned.
Maybe
it's
the
wall
of
a
building
but
whatever,
but
especially
if
it's
a
plot
of
land
and
then
we're
gonna,
say:
oh
no,
a
higher
use
of
something
else,
and
and
if
we
had
something
in
our
comp
plan,
that
could
say
no
a
certain
amount
of
we
know.
A
We
have
enough
housing,
we'll
know
we'll
have
enough
job
land
and
we
can
still
have
land
set
aside
for
Parks
and
Recreation
and
baseball
and
soccer,
and
for
food
production.
I.
Think
that
would
be
helpful
and
I
know
we
won't
actually
probably
have
a
percentage
of
how
many
acres
per
person
or
whatever,
but
that's
something
and
I
know
there's
a
lot
of
good
stuff
on
food
in
here,
but
if
most
of
it
wasn't
on
actual
growing
food,
I
actually
think
it's
a
home-based
business.
A
If
somebody
could
lease
out
some
of
their
home,
but
then
they
might
have
actually
somebody
else
working
it,
and
so
are
we
gonna
look
the
other
way
or
are
we
gonna
carve
out
some
special
rules,
so
we
can
actually
do
that
in
terms
of
resilience
as
a
city
and
also
in
terms
of
caught
the
cost
of
food.
Those
kinds
of
things
could
be
addressed
in
this
small
way.
This.
H
Food
topic
also
fits
nicely
into
the
production
and
processing
area
of
the
comprehensive
plan,
so
thinking
about
food
production
in
ways
that's
other
than
growing
food
and
dirt,
thinking
about
growing
food,
hydroponically
and
other,
maybe
more
technology
driven
food
production
and
and
that's
another
example
of
living
wage,
job
creation,
production
and
processing
land
use
and
and
ways
to
use
land
in
a
more
efficient
way.
Perhaps
so,
that's
a
yeah.
It's
a
perfect!
It's
perfect
discussion
it
about
transcending
different
topical
areas
of
the
the
document
itself.
A
And
there's
probably
more
comments
that
I
could
make,
but
I'll
try
not
to
go
on
and
on
with
my
stuff,
I'll
have
other
opportunities
as
well.
Are
there
other
questions
that
any
other
committee
members
have
comments
all
right?
Well,
we're
gonna
have
a
chance
to
talk
about
all
this.
A
little
bit
more.
This
fall
I
guess
do.