►
From YouTube: June 7, 2018 Minneapolis City Council
Description
Minneapolis City Council Meeting
A
C
B
C
A
C
A
D
You
good
afternoon,
madam
president,
councilmembers
again
Patrick
taught
at
the
Minneapolis
Assessors
Department
here
to
report
on
the
2018
law,
local
board
of
Appeal
and
equalization
that
concluded
on
May
29th.
What
I
hope
to
do
is
there.
The
full
report
is
in
front
of
you.
I
will
just
be
doing
a
very
brief
summary
of
the
kind
of
a
recap
of
the
local
board
and
then
I'll
stand
for
questions
after
that.
D
To
do
a
little
bit
of
with
me
today,
I'll
introduce
Rebecca,
mom
Quist
who's,
the
director
of
my
office
and
you're
sitting
to
my
left,
yeah
my
left
and
the
next
Rebecca
is
surae
Garnett,
who
who
Lee,
who
is
a
residential
supervisor
in
my
office
as
well?
I
first
want
to
thank
Casey
Carl
and
his
staff.
They
did
an
outstanding
job.
We
had
a
fairly
significant
number
of
Appeals
this
year
and
we
handled
it.
It
says,
seamlessly
and
as
efficiently
as
possible.
D
So
I
really
want
to
make
sure
that
he's
in
his
deaf
are
recognized,
and
then
last
I'd
like
to
make
sure
that
we
recognized
us
the
five
board,
members
that
came
back
and
convened
and
we
convened
four
times
to
make
sure
that
all
the
petitioners
had
their
time
to
appeal
the
their
property
values.
So
so,
with
that
I
will
start
to
in
part
of
a
review
is
we
did
have
to
get
an
extension.
This
year
we
talked
a
little
bit
about
it
earlier
from
amazing
Noor.
D
D
I
think
a
lot
of
the
council
members
like
to
know
as
far
as
the
Appeals
within
their
own
ward,
so
I
provide
this.
Here's
all
13
council
members
or
a
council,
Ward's
I
should
say
it's
interesting
to
note.
Ward,
3
and
7,
not
very
many
Appeals,
but
you'll
see
us
very
significant
amount
of
value
under
appeal.
That's
just
because
we
had
a
I,
think
12
or
13
central
business
district
property
buildings
that
went
under
appeal
and
that's
well.
D
D
As
far
as
appeals
going,
14
was
probably
the
record
for
us,
but
it's
not
that
much.
You
can
look
at
2010
and
we
had
around
500
and
2010,
but
that's
not
a
pretty
typical
year.
I
would
say
they
were
just
coming
out
of
a
recession.
We
were
dropping
values
in
in
tandem
with
the
real
estate
market.
You
know,
if
you
take
a
look
at
500
in
retrospect
err
and
in
comparison,
I
should
say
to
130,000
values
that
half
a
percent
probably
isn't
a
pretty
good
indicator
of.
D
What's
realistic,
you
know
so
when
we
take
a
look
at
a
but
little
over
1%
appealed
this
year.
That's
probably
the
norm
to
be
honest
with
you,
I
think
when
we
look
at
504
as
large
at
the
city
Minneapolis
and
it's
complex
at
the
city,
Minneapolis
is
500
and
we're
looking
at
comparative
historical
data,
maybe
isn't
a
really
good
benchmark.
D
One
of
the
the
maps
that
we
have
here
is
just
where
the
the
calls
and
the
inquiries
from
tax
payers
were
coming
in
and
then
we're
the
board
cases
we're
coming
in
as
well.
So
we
just
wanted
to
show
you.
You
know
where
were
the
phone
calls
come
in?
Where
might
amazed
my
staff
talking
to
people
and
then,
when
these
converted
into
a
tax,
Koren
attacks
a
local
board
case,
and
we
show
that
information
as
well.
D
One
of
the
reasons
why
we
attribute
to
the
the
increase
is
because
we've
made
it
quite
easy.
We
are
very
easy
to
for
property
owners
to
appeal
their
value.
You
know
we
did
put
it
online,
it's
the
first
year.
We
put
the
application
process
online
and
you
can.
You
can
see
we're
something
that
was
a
hundred
percent.
A
paper
process
now
has
got.
Eighty
percent
of
the
appeals
came
in
via
the
online
service
and
we
saw
applications
coming
in
at
all
hours
of
the
night
from
just
before
midnight
to
after
midnight.
D
You
know
people
work,
you
know
different
shifts
and
I
think
this
allowed
them
to
have
access
and
get
a
hold
of
us
and
and
appeal
their
value.
That
was
more
convenient
for
them.
So
we
expect
to
keep
this
going
forward
and
I
think
it'll
the
more
easy
we
can
provide
this
as
easily
as
we
can
provide
this
information,
their
accessibility.
You
know
we
can
make
sure
that
everybody's
being
heard
and
their
bags
are
being
looked
at.
Mr.
D
C
D
D
Thank
you.
So,
just
to
kind
of
talk
about
where
were
the
appeals
coming
from
so
the
blue?
Is
you
can
see
as
residential?
That's
I
think
we're
at
82
percent
of
the
appeals
for
residential
and
that's
really
indicative
of
uni
apples.
We
have
about
a
hundred
and
twelve
thousand
residential
properties,
we're
predominantly
a
residential
city,
and
because
of
that,
when
values
are
going
out,
we're
going
to
hear
primarily
from
the
residential
and
then
the
green
is
the
apartments
and
we
did
have
a
number
of
increases
in
apartments.
D
But
apartments
have
been
increasing
quite
a
bit
values
of
those
properties,
the
rents
have
continued
to
go
up,
vacancies
are
still
significantly
lower
and
consequently,
property
owners
are
appealing
their
values
as
well.
So,
and
then
commercial
is
the
last
and
the
smallest
piece.
But
again,
it's
probably
the
smallest
piece
of
our
real
estate
tax
base
as
well,
even
though
they
carry
a
significant
amount
of
value.
D
So
I
think
this
is
more
of
that
summary
of
what
happened
at
the
local
board.
The
the
large
blue
section
of
this
this
this
entire
pie
chart
really
is
a
summation
of
all
the
appeals
that
had
occurred
in
the
local
board
process,
so
the
the
large
blue
section
that
is
both
property
owners
that
reached
out
to
us
my
staff
talked
to
them.
They
looked
at
properties,
they
verified
information
with
the
property
owner
and
they
decided
at
the
end
of
the
process.
The
value
sounds
right:
we
didn't
have
to
go
through
the
board
process.
D
They
never
even
engaged
in
any
type
of
work
at
all.
It
was
just
really
reaching
out
communicating
and
getting
those
things.
Those
property
assault.
The
green
section
on
the
on
the
left
hand,
side
the
1119.
Those
are
the
property
owners
that,
after
that
discussion,
we
said
or
either
we
said
or
the
property
was
took,
the
action
to
file
an
actual
application,
and
then
we
would
process
those
applications
and
the
green
ones
were
ones
were.
We
had
a
concurrence
that
the
Veii
was
wrong
and
we
made
an
offer
to
reduce
it.
D
So
we
have
the
63%
that
actually
there
was
no
read
to
change
the
values.
The
109
or
1100
19
was
a
reduction
to
11
157.
Those
were
canceled
appeals.
Those
were
people
that
started
the
process
and
decided
to
cancel
their
appeal
as
they
got
further
into
it.
And
then
you
can
see
that
we
had
some
smaller
percentages.
D
Some
we
just
could
have
even
they
had
filed
we'd
reached
out
to
him,
usually
at
least
three
times
through
a
phone
call
or
emails,
and
we
could
never
got
a
response
back
that
they
wanted
to
have
those
come
out
and
take
a
look
at
the
property.
So
that's
really
a
summary
of
what
happened
at
the
local
board
of
appeals
this
year.
D
As
far
as
how
did
this
impact
our
tax
levy,
when
we
first
issued
our
assessment,
we
had
fifty
two
billion
two
hundred
and
sixty
million
dollars
that
was
on
January
2nd.
That's
what
we
thought
that
the
values
were
at
that
time.
Through
the
appeals
process,
there
was
about
two
billion
dollars,
so
that's
that
pie
chart
that
was
about
two
billion
dollars
that
came
under
appeal
at
the
end
of
the
boards.
When
we
were
done
doing
our
concurrences.
D
When
the
board's
heard
their
cases,
the
result
was
about
a
million
dollar
reduction
from
that
original
assessment
and
then
so
our
final
tax
base
at
the
end
of
the
local
war,
through
its
fifty
two
billion
one
hundred
and
sixty
nine.
So
when
we
look
at
the
reductions
and
I
know
that
there's
been
some
statistics
that
way
this
has
been
we've
been
giving
away
a
lot
of
dollars.
That's
statistically
not
correct,
we
were
actually
it
was
less
than
two-tenths
of
one
percent,
which
was
changed
from
the
original
assessment
to
the
final
assessment.
D
So
so
we
were
at
from
our
initial
assessment,
what
a
beat
that
we
issued
on
January
2nd,
we're
at
ninety
nine
point,
eight
percent
of
what
we
said.
We
we
felt
that
the
tax
base
was
to
hitting
through
the
appeals
process
and
where
we
ended
up
at
the
end
of
the
local
board.
So
we
felt
that
we
have
a
really
rock-solid
assessment
this
year
as
well,
and
this
is
really
my
last
slide.
You
know.
So
what
is
this?
Why
do
we,
what
you
know
kind
of
getting
back
to
your
question?
D
Why
do
we
feel
that
there
was
an
uptick?
Definitely
it's
because
the
increasing
market,
you
know
the
real
estate
market-
is
still
hot.
Today.
I
know
that
in
some
of
the
neighborhood
meetings
that
I've
been
attending,
the
typical
purchase
offer
is
at
a
hundred
percent,
or
is
it
99.9
percent,
or
is
it
a
hundred
and
two
percent?
We
have
yet
to
see
the
market
change,
so
it
just
is
a
really
a
heated
market
at
this
point
in
time
and
again
following
that
or
is
what's
going
to
happen
to
my
taxes,
my
day
is
going
up.
D
It's
not
something
that
we
try
to
keep
to
ourselves,
the
more
information
we
provide,
the
better
our
assessments
going
to
be,
and
we
truly
believe
that
we
don't
look
at
us
appeals
as
a
negative
against
our
assessment.
It
just
actually
it
makes
our
assessment
better
and
stronger
and
more
dependable,
so
I
think
a
lot
of
people
look
at
the
appeals
as
being
a
black
mark
against
the
assessment,
and
we.
D
Accessibility
staff
were
more
accessible,
email
addresses
of
my
staff
are
out
there
and
anywhere
anywhere
in
everywhere,
as
far
as
our
website
and
as
well
as
on
valuation
notices
and
then
again,
there's
internet
tools
that
are
making
people
more
aware
of
what
their
own
value
is,
and
then
the
social
media
we're
finding
that
the
social
media
is
is
impacting
people's
education
and
awareness
and
willingness
to
go
out
there
and
and
appeal
their
values.
So
and
again,
though
it
as
far
as
we're
concerned,
that's
all
those
are
all
good
things.
D
If
I
were
to
project
going
forward,
you
know
this
year
we
were
1,400.
It
wouldn't
surprise
me
if
we're
going
to
be
higher
than
1400
next
year
and
again,
I,
don't
say
that
there's
a
negative
against
our
assessment,
but
I
think
we're
just
doing
a
good
job
out
there.
So
I
think
that's
the
last
of
my
slides
there.
The
packet
that
you
have
in
front
of
me
is
more
detailed.
D
C
D
Through
the
president,
vice
president
Jenkins
we've
never
done
that
analysis.
We've
been
asked
that,
and
in
fact,
that
there
are
neighborhood
means.
People
would
say
you
know
is,
is
Zillow
an
accurate
tool
and
we
would
tell
them
that
for
the
most
part,
we
we
provide
a
lot
of
the
data
that
they're
using
they
use
their
own
analytics,
but
they
ask
you
know
they
either
buy
or
they
get
all
the
real
estate
data
from
us
for
them
to
view
the
valuation.
D
D
That's
gonna
be
worth
four
hundred
thousand,
because
that's
what
it's
sold
for,
because
the
Department
of
Revenue
and
we
would
subscribe
to
and
say
well,
if
that's
all
for
four
hundred,
then
we
have
to
look
for
everybody
that
has
a
similar
house
and
they
all
should
be
at
four
hundred.
If
they're
all
have
the
same
characteristics,
so
we
will
catch
that
at
the
next
reassessment
of
those
that
neighborhood
and
we're
I
think
Zillow's.
D
If
that's
thing
sells,
that's
one
of
the
benchmarks
they'll
use
and
they
would
go
right
to
that
sale
price,
and
so,
when
you're
checking
you
go
well,
I
think
sold
for
four
hundred
and
it
Zillow
has
it
for
four
hundred.
They
were
right
on
in
the
reality.
Is
you
know
they
can?
As
far
as
I'm
concerned,
I've
never
talked
to
anybody
in
Xela,
but
I
have
seen
where
they
go
right
to
that
sale
price,
because
that's
so,
but
as
far
as
they
were
doing,
they
would
that's
a
good
indicator
of
value
for
them.
F
You
president
bender,
so
mr.
Todd,
when,
when
you
came
out
to
a
couple
of
buildings
in
my
ward,
to
talk
to
residents
who
had
questions,
one
of
the
things
that
we
talked
about
was
that
when
you
file
for
an
appeal,
you'll,
get
reassessed
and,
and
there's
was
the
possibility
that
we'll
look
at
it
and
say:
oh,
my
gosh.
Actually,
your
property
is
even
more
valuable
than
we
thought
and
and
that
your
assessment
could
go
up,
and
that
was
certainly
part
of
what
people
were
thinking
about
when
they
decided.
F
D
Through
the
council
president
counts,
myra
fletcher,
none
of
them
went
up
and
the
we
did
have
one.
When
that
went
to
the
board,
there
was
a
recommended
recommendation
to
go
to
to
increase,
but
the
board
had
changed,
I,
don't
say
midstream,
but
the
through
the
statute.
It
says
that
the
property
owner
has
to
be
notified
before
the
local
board
could
increase,
and
so
when
that
statute
was
read,
then
the
local
board
changed
their
mind
and
actually
had
to
revote
on
that
property.
D
Going
up
now,
when
the
the
slide
that
I'd
shown
you
at
the
the
pie
chart
were
63
percent
of
the
people
that
we
had
talked
to
didn't,
pursue
it,
there's
a
percentage
of
those
that
we
were
done.
We
said
you
know
your
value
is
fine.
Hayden
actually
could
be
higher
those
people,
you
know
unless
they
were
adamant
that
they
knew
what
their
value
is
worth.
It
would
go.
D
G
You,
madam
chair
mr.
Todd,
and
please
we've
seen
more
appeals
in
southwest
than
usual,
but
I'm
concerned
about
the
level
of
engagement
across
our
city.
Still,
as
you
mentioned,
this
is
a
tiny
percentage
overall
and
I
worry
about
the
long
time.
Homeowners,
people
Aging
in
Place
across
our
city
that
maybe
could
have
gotten
a
reduction
if
only
they
had
appealed.
G
D
Do
the
sales
ratio
and
they'll
time
adjusted
depending
on
the
time
of
the
year
and
they'll,
basically
say
at
the
end
of
the
year
at
7,000
sales,
which
is
what
we
had
last
year,
you
were
at
94,
95
percent,
and
so
what
we
would
find
that,
if
we
were
again,
some
of
the
media
has
said
that
we're
the
overall
assessment
would
be
significant
higher
based
on
some
of
the
results,
which
I
would
argue.
That's
not
the
case.
That's
going
to
be
borne
out
in
the
sales
ratio.
D
If
our
model
was
missing
values
by
110
percent,
then
our
overall
sales
ratio
is
going
to
be
over
a
hundred
percent
based
on
those
seven
sales.
It
would
be
completely
ironic
because,
as
far
as
we're
concerned,
the
the
7000
sales
or,
however
many
sales
that
occur
each
year-
that's
a
random
sample.
We
don't
know
which
copies
are
going
to
sell.
D
So
you
know
well,
I
think.
Maybe
what
you
know,
what
we
always
try
to
do
is
figure
out
where
the
pockets
are
and
that's
where
it's
really
difficult
in
a
mass
appraisal
process.
You
know
because
we're
doing
130,000
properties
and
we
got
25
staff
and
it
would
be
ideal
if
we
could
make
sure
that
we
had
every
pocket
identified,
but
even
with
every
pocket,
you
don't
have
enough
sales
to
really
benchmark
it.
So
then
you're
using
okay.
D
So
if
I
don't
have
any
in
that
pocket,
you
know
how
far
do
I
have
to
go
to
find
something
that
might
be
comparable
and
that's
again,
but
you
know
that's
really
what
the
appeals
process
is
about,
because
in
the
mass
appraisal
it's
gonna
really
get
them
all
done,
and
then
the
the
appeals
process
will
get
into
the
pockets
as
the
calls
come
in
and
we
find
out
that
maybe
we
did
miss
it
in
a
particular
area.
Be
right.
G
D
That
would
be
a
no
that
the
camera
model
that
we
use
is
not
accessible.
We
do
hope
that
we're
working
through
to
get
a
new
camera
model
in
the
near
future
with
funding,
and
that
would
have
a
lot
more
transparency
that
will
actually
allow
the
taxpayer
to
get
online.
Look
at
all
their
building
information
and
say
show
me
sales
similar
to
mine
that
might
have
been
used
in
it
and
it'll
pop
up
a
map
show
you
sales
you
hover
over
it.
There
will
be
a
photo,
that'll,
be
sale,
characteristics
and
things
like
that.
D
D
I
still
have
confidence
in
our
sales
ratio,
because
it's
a
statistical
analysis
but
I
think
that
the
tools
that
the
public's
expecting
today
are
different
and
we
need
to
change
with
them,
and
it
it's
in
our
budget
presentation
to
the
fund
that
going
forward
so
I
think
what
you're
hoping
for
is
something
that
we
we
hope,
provide
because
I
think
that
that
1,400
could
actually
have
been
reduced.
If
people
had
the
ability
to
validate
their
own
values.
Mm-Hmm.
G
D
Would
say
no,
the
the
the
appraisal
report
in
in
preparation
for
the
local
board
we
will
share
the
sales,
will
share
actually
more
sales
than
are
actually
in
the
report.
We
will
say:
here's
sales
that
that
are
like
your
property.
You
can
take
a
look
at
them
and
do
your
own
analysis,
but
the
appraisal
of
my
staff
is
their
work
product
and
the
whole
purpose
of
the
abortive
appeals
would
be
the
appraisers
or
my
staff
will
present
their
case.
G
The
board
also
doesn't
see
that
report
ahead
of
time
either
as
well.
I
have
received
several
frustrated
messages
from
constituents
who
said
they
would
have
prepared
differently.
Had
they
been
able
to
see
that
report
ahead
of
time.
I
appreciate
your
explanation,
but
I
do
just
want
to
note
that.
Can
you
share
with
us
what
kind
of
quality
assurance
your
department
uses
for
site
visits
during
appeals?
Do
you
do
a
quality
assurance
on
those
site
visits.
D
Yeah,
as
far
as
the
quality
assurance,
every
billing
characteristic
on
the
field
card
will
be
validated
will
validate
to
make
sure
the
square
footage
correct
the
condition,
the
quality
construction,
the
room
count,
bathroom
count,
updates
any
deferred
maintenance.
Anything
in
fact
oftentimes.
The
the
the
typical
question
not
of
my
staff
should
be.
You
know
tell
me
what's
wrong
with
your
property
because,
generally
as
an
appraiser
I
can
see
all
the
great
things
about
a
property,
but
the
homeowner
is
going
to
know.
I
got
a
wet
basement,
I
got
a
bulging
foundation,
I
got
rotted
beams.
D
You
know
tell
me
what's
wrong
with
it,
because
I
don't
often
need
me,
you
know
told
what's
right
about
a
property.
I
already
know
what
the
neighborhood
looks
like,
because
my
staff
are
experts
in
the
area,
they're
assigned
by
property
type
and
they
say
assigned
by
location.
So
one
of
the
questions
I
would
expect
them
is,
for
the
quality
check
is
not
only
to
look
at
was
right
about
the
property,
but
here
from
the
property
owner,
why
they?
What
are
their
concerns?
And
what's
wrong
with
the
property
as
well?
Mm-Hmm.
D
You
know
oftentimes,
it's
the
the
assumption
is
that
at
the
bay
goes
up,
the
top
property
tax
rate
would
go
up
as
well,
and
that's
not
the
case
and
statistically
we
could
demonstrate
that
or
the
last
five
to
six
years
as
the
tax
base
has
gone
up,
the
tax
rate
actually
has
dropped.
You
don't
have
to
necessarily
increase
on
taxes
when
the
day
is
going
up,
because
the
value
for
the
most
part
takes
care
of
that.
D
So
what
we
would
always
say
is
that
we're
going
to
make
sure
that
the
values
are
right
across
the
board
and
that
the
the
tax
burden
is
equally
shared
amongst
all
the
property
owners
and
as
long
as
that's
correct,
then
everybody's
carrying
their
fair
share,
but
for
the
most
part
as
values
go
up,
the
rate
goes
down
and
you
shouldn't
have
to
see
an
increase
unless
budgets
require
additional
revenue
to
fund
additional
programs.
Thank
you.
E
I'll
ask
my
question
yet
no
thank
you
I'm
just
curious
about
how
how
old
the
current
system
is
to
current
software,
because
it
sounds
like
we're
running
some
data
through
some
computer
software.
How
old
is
it.
D
You're,
the
president
council,
member
Gordon,
we
implemented
it
in
2000,
2001
I,
would
say:
we've
had
we
had
iterative
updates
all
the
way
up
until
about
2013
2014.
Now
again
the
statistical
packages
I,
think,
statistics
wise.
You
know,
math,
doesn't
change
a
heck
of
a
lot
I
think
what
what
our
package
is
missing
is
the
reporting
tools
that
allow
the
public,
more
transparency,
but
I
think
we
use
SPSS
and
we
have
other
tools.
So
I
would
I
wouldn't
say
that
our
software
is
faulty
at
all.
D
It's
just
not
providing
the
transparency
and
the
reporting
tools
that
other
jurisdictions
are
providing.
I
have
a
incredible
amount
of
faith
in
the
actual
numbers
themselves
and
again,
that's
borne
out
in
the
sales
race
shows
it's
borne
out
in
the
what
we
would
call
the
price
related
differential,
the
PRDS
and
the
coefficient
of
dispersion
and
the
price
related
bias.
I
mean
there
are
number
of
statistical
measures
that
the
Department
of
Revenue
runs
on
us
that
we
still
continue
to
meet
year
after
year
after
year.
D
In
that
95
96
percent
range,
which
is
again
based
on
the
department
revenue,
we
can't
be
anything
less
than
90
and
you
shouldn't
get
any
more
than
105.
Otherwise,
the
department
revenues
step
in
and
take
a
serious
look
at
what
are
you
doing,
because
you
should
never
be
below
90
and
overall
sales
ratio
and
nothing
above
105.
D
E
I
could
follow
up
then,
so
there
are
more
modern
or
newly
developed
systems
that
would
allow
a
council
member
to
plug
in
an
address
and
maybe
see
how
it
might
work
or
how's
this
accountability
or
transparency.
Would
that
be
improved?
Would
residents
be
able
to
see
and
check
on
the
comparables
or
some
other
information
on
it?
Just
by
going
on
the
city
website,
I
believe.
D
You
know
because
we
have
we
don't
have
this
new
system
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
would
actually
see
the
actual
comparables,
but
I
know
that,
based
on
what
in
when
I
look
at
the
let's
say,
Dakota
County,
because
they
have
the
same,
they
have
a
similar
system
with
similar
tools
that
we
would
like.
You
know
you
can
go
in
there.
You
can
say
show
me:
houses
like
mine
that
have
sold,
and
it's
going
to
do
that.
It's
gonna.
D
Do
it
much
better
and
I
would
assume
that
it's
gonna
be
it'll
satisfy
the
questions
at
the
property
owner
has
so
again
in
these
statistical
packages
it
doesn't
I,
don't
because
they're
more
of
a
mathematical
equation,
it
doesn't
really
take
five
sales
making.
Did
you
vote
individual
addresses
per
sale,
reconcile
to
a
number
and
then
store
that
as
here's,
those
five
sales
or
three
sales
and
with
an
excellent?
D
It's
looking
at
sales
dollars
per
square
foot
multipliers,
for
you
know
fireplaces
and
garage
styles,
and
things
like
that
and
it's
adding
up
all
the
inner,
its
iterative
calculations
and
it's
coming
up
with
a
value,
but
ultimately
it
will
provide
sales
for
a
property
owner
that
will
support
or
help
them
argue
their
point
with
their
value.
It
really
will
provide
the
transparency
where
that's
what
we're
really
really
lacking
in
our
current
system.
Well,.
E
D
E
A
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
questions
on
council
members
I?
Don't
fini
all
right?
Thank
you.
So
much
and
I
just
want
to
say
that
we
appreciate
so
much
the
attention
that
your
staff
takes
to
answering
all
of
our
constituents
questions.
My
experience,
at
least
with
the
assessor's
office,
is
that
you've
been
really
responsive
and
working
one-on-one
with
people
and
the
clerk's
office
as
well,
for
taking
all
the
time
during
the
hearing
and
and
all
the
care
I
don't
know.
Mr.
clerk,
if
you
wanted
to
add
anything
to
that
on
behalf
of
your
office,
Madam.
B
President,
thank
you.
I
would
like
to
recognize
the
work
of
the
two
members
of
the
clerk's
office,
who
particularly
play
a
role
as
clerk
to
the
local
board
from
the
clerk's
office
in
the
front
row.
Sua,
Quinto
and
Abby
Sullivan
are
the
ones
who
actually
receive
all
of
the
applications
work
with
the
assessor's
office
to
coordinate
reviews
by
the
assessor's
office
of
those
properties
schedule.
The
local
board
of
appeal
hearings
make
sure
that
they're
trained
attend
those
meetings
and
then
produce
the
record
that
you're
voting
on
today.
A
Thank
you
all
right
with
that.
I
will
go
ahead
and
make
a
motion
to
receive
and
file
the
report
that
we
just
heard,
which
is
the
2018
report
of
the
local
board
of
Appeal
and
equalization.
All
it
was
an
approval
piece
say:
aye
aye,
any
opposed
that
carries
in
the
2018
report
will
be
filed.
The
next
item
is
the
adoption
of
a
resolution
that
would
approve
the
equalized
assessed
valuations,
as
recommended
by
the
local
board
of
Appeal
in
equalization.
On
this
I
will
move
adoption
and
ask
the
clerk
to
please
call
the
roll
counsel.
G
B
A
Carries
and
is
adopted
and
then
finally,
we
are
will
be
directing
the
City
Assessor
to
transmit
these
finalized
assessment
roles
to
Hennepin
County
and
the
state
Department
of
Revenue.
All
an
approval
of
that
please
say
aye.
Any
opposed
that
carries
those
finalized
assessment
rules
will
be
transmitted
and
that's
our
last
item.
Is
there
any
comments
or
final
thoughts
from
Council
members
before
we
adjourn
seeing
none,
we
have
a
motion
to
adjourn
someone.