►
From YouTube: October 10, 2018 Housing Policy & Development Committee
Description
Minneapolis Housing Policy & Development Committee Meeting
B
A
Cam
Gordon
and
we
have
a
agenda
before
us.
This
is
October
10th,
a
regularly
scheduled
meeting.
We
have
seven
items
on
the
agenda,
but
before
we
go
into
the
agenda,
I'd
like
to
give
our
staff
an
opportunity
to
introduce
some
new
folks
from
cpad
who
have
just
started
and
I,
don't
necessarily
want
them
to
have
to
stay
for
the
whole
meeting,
but
I'm,
hoping
that
these
will
be
familiar
faces
after
a
while
for
all
of
us.
So
I
asked
the
skilled
them
to
come
up
and
introduce
the
new
staff
chair.
C
Garden
committee-
thank
you
just
wanted
to
take
a
minute
to
introduce
to
the
committee
some
new
staff
on
the
residential
finance
team
they're
in
the
back
row.
Amy
Geisler
is
joining
us
as
a
in
a
newly
created
position.
A
Supervisor
position
on
my
team
supervising
project
coordinators,
she's
back
to
the
city
after
a
period
away
over
in
st.
Paul
and
we're
delighted
to
welcome
back
next
to
Amy
is
Jamie
Radle,
whose
first
day
is
today
and
she
is
coming
to
us
also
from
the
city
of
st.
Paul
from
the
planning
department.
C
C
C
A
Well,
thank
you
very
much
and
you're
welcome
to
stay
as
long
as
you
want,
but
now
you've
already
been
introduced,
so
I
will
read
through
the
agenda
and
then
I'll
move
the
consent
items
unless
any
of
my
colleagues
want
to
pull
something
off.
But
the
first
item
is
a
land
sale
and
we'll
have
a
public
hearing
on
that
and
then
the
three
consent
items
are
acknowledgement
of
a
livability
communities
act
funding
award.
The
third
item.
A
Second
consent
item
is
approving
exclusive
development
rights
to
Park
Place
Apartments
for
a
period
not
to
exceed
12
months,
ansan
a
city-owned
parcel
at
2806,
Park,
Avenue,
south,
and
the
fourth
item
is
passage
of
resolution
authorizing
submission
and
priority.
Ranking
of
our
grant
funding
for
the
2018
Metropole
council
liveable
communities,
demonstration
account
France,
then
I'm
going
to
just
go
ahead
and
move
those
three
consent
items.
It
seemed
no
need
for
discussion,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye,
any
opposed,
say
no,
any
abstentions.
That
motion
carries.
A
D
Good
afternoon,
chair
of
board
and
committee
members,
the
staff
is
recommending
the
sale
of
3110
Upton
Avenue
north
through
the
Minneapolis
homes
program.
The
policies
for
the
program
were
established
by
City
Council
on
December
11th
2015
and
further
staff
established
on
its
February
10
2017
staff
recommends
the
sale
of
3110
Upton
Avenue
north
to
tie
Hahn
LLC
for
its
appraise
that
I
have
$40,000
subject
to
conditions.
D
31
Tim,
Upton,
Avenue
North
was
acquired
on
October
20
of
2017
from
Hennepin
County
tax
forfeited
land
for
$40,000
staff,
marketed
this
property
with
two
open
houses,
houses,
Eldon,
March
2018,
and
with
notification
to
a
listserv
of
now
over
2,400
perspective
developers
and
homebuyers.
This
is
the
only
application
received
for
the
property
based
on
the
program
criteria
established
by
the
Minneapolis
Homes
program
manual
used
to
evaluate
all
offers
received.
Taeyeon
LLC
is
recommended
as
the
purchaser
to
evaluate
responsibility.
D
The
staff
consulted
with
the
Department
of
regulation
Services
staff
to
verify
the
status
of
vacant
buildings,
rental
properties,
and/or
other
properties
owned
by
the
proposed
purchaser
in
the
city
of
Minneapolis,
and
there
were
no
concerns.
The
property
was
constructed
in
1908
as
the
1796
square-foot
3-bedroom
1-bath
single-family
house.
The
purchaser
intends
to
invest
one
hundred
forty
one
thousand
dollars
to
rehabilitate
3110
Upton
Avenue
north
there's
a
3-bedroom
1-bath
single-family
home
and
to
market
it
exclusively
to
owner
occupants.
D
Cps
construction
management
staff
reviewed
the
scope
of
work
and
estimates
that
were
submitted
by
the
applicant
and
confirmed
that
the
scope
and
work
estimates
are
sufficient
to
meet
the
minimum
rehabilitation
standards
of
the
Minneapolis
Homes
Program
notification
was
provided
to
the
Jordan
neighborhood
on
April,
5th
2018,
and
today
the
developer
Allen
tang
is
here
representing
taeyeon
LLC.
This
will
be
his
second
project
with
C
pet.
Are
there
any
questions?
I.
A
E
A
B
A
Thank
you.
Is
there
anybody
else
who
would
like
to
speak
on
this
matter,
seeing
them
and
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
and
I
will
move
item
1
the
land,
sale,
43110,
Upton,
Avenue
north
forward
for
approval
any
discussion
on
the
motion,
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
all
those
opposed
say
no,
any
abstentions.
That
motion
carries
that
will
bring
us
to
our
discussion
items.
The
first
is
about
emergency
solutions
grant
funding.
This
is
a
report
back
on
a
staff
direction.
A
F
Thank
You
chair
Gordon
and
committee
members,
I'm
Kati
to
Pinkins
housing
policy
coordinator
at
C
ped
and,
as
you
just
mentioned,
the
council
gave
C
ped
and
intergovernmental
relations
staff
direction
to
evaluate
and
report
on
potential
amendments
to
consolidated
plan
that
would
include
spending
some
emergency
solutions
grant
or
ESG
funding
to
support
overnight
shelter
operations.
As
a
reminder,
the
city
receives
about
$900,000
per
year
in
the
ESG
funds
from
HUD.
F
The
funds
are
currently
used
for
street
outreach,
rapid
rehousing
shelter,
rehabilitation
and
renovation
and
program
administration
under
HUD
rule,
the
greater
of
sixty
percent
of
our
entitlement
or
about
five
hundred
and
fifty
eight
thousand
dollars
can
be
set
aside
for
shelter,
rehab
and
renovation,
essential
services,
outreach
and
shelter
operations.
We
currently
set
aside
that
sixty
percent
for
shelter,
rehab
and
renovation
and
street
outreach
about
forty
four
percent
is
for
shelter,
renovation
and
16
percent
for
street
outreach
with
the
city
matching
those
funds
in
response
to
the
staff
direction.
F
We
consulted
with
the
office
to
End
Homelessness
and
inquired
with
shelter
providers
to
better
understand
some
of
the
needs
in
the
system.
We
explored
and
continued
to
explore
the
capital
needs
and
know
that
there
are
capital
needs
and
will
continue
to
be,
and
for
these
reasons
we
recommend
continuing
to
prioritize
capital
improvements.
F
However,
we
also
know
that
there
has
been
an
increase
in
the
unsheltered
adult
homeless
population
and
since
some
capital
improvements
are
less
critical
or
time-sensitive,
and
given
the
current
context
around
that
increase
and
unsheltered
adult
homelessness,
we
are
coming
forward
to
recommend
a
pilot
within
that
essential
services.
Category
that
I
mentioned
earlier.
F
The
office
to
end
homelessness
and
and
shelter
providers
identified
an
opportunity
to
address
a
specific
need
to
target
resources
for
case
management
for
housing
placement
out
of
the
large
single
adult
shelters,
the
median
length
of
stay
and
adult
shelters
is,
is
96
nights
and
a
quarter
of
people
and
adult
shelters
have
been
there
two
hundred
and
thirty-eight
nights
or
more
and
by
comparison
for
family
shelter.
It's
about
33
nights.
F
So
the
pilot,
the
a
concept
here,
would
focus
on
getting
the
long
term
stairs
out
of
the
adult
shelter
system
and
the
goal
is
to
see
if
this
intensive
case
management
would
help
to
free
up
space.
In
the
shelter
system,
ultimately
improving
the
capacity
and
and
function
of
the
system.
Overall,
we
make
this
recommendation
we'll
still
prioritize
ESG
funds
for
critical
shelter
rehab,
with
a
focus
on
Life
Safety
needs.
F
If
approved,
we
would
evaluate
the
pilot
and
make
recommendations
going
forward
to
determine
perhaps
how
to
build
some
flexibility
into
the
system
while
maintaining
rehab
and
renovation
as
a
priority.
So
that's
that's
the
overview.
The
next
report,
you'll
hear
is
more
specifically
in
response
to
the
capital
RFP
that
went
out
this
year.
If
the
council
does
wish
to
move
forward
with
a
pilot,
there
would
be
a
consolidated
plan.
Amendment
is
necessary
and
again
it
would
be
part.
A
So
it
sounds
like,
even
if
there
wasn't
a
pilot,
it's
on
the
table
right
now,
you're
suggesting
then
you're
recommending
that
there
should
be
more
flexibility
with
the
spending
for
I
mean
it's
that's.
What
I'm
hearing
I
guess
that
I'll
just
say:
I
wasn't
necessarily
expecting
a
a
a
plan
for
all
that
flexibility.
At
the
same
time,
coming
back
with
a
recommendation
about,
should
we
look
at
what
else
we
could
do
with
the
funding?
So
things
are
getting.
A
Also,
though,
I'm
pleasantly
surprised
that
there's
you
know
this
proactive
approach
and
can
we
hurry
up
and
do
something
so
as
soon
as
recognizing?
Oh,
we
we
should
have
more
flexibility
and
while
look
at
this
need
and
I
will
note,
that
I
also
met
with
shelter
providers
and
went
to
one
of
their
meetings
and
meant
to
and
also
talked
with
somebody
who'd
been
homeless
for
a
long
time
and
actually
caught
in
the
overnight
shelter
system
for
two
years,
and
so
there
clearly
is
I
forget
the
statistic
I
heard.
A
But
it's
a
lot
of
people
don't
spend
as
much
as
three
months
or
so
it's
a
short
time
period,
and
then
they
never
go
back
to
shelters.
But
if
you're
there
for
three
months
or
maybe
six
months,
then
the
likelihood
that
you'll
be
there
in
two
years
is
greatly
and
dramatically
increased.
So
there's
some
problem
with
the
system
and
we
think
those
shelters
should
be
somewhere
where
people
go
a
short-term
basis
and
then
they
cycle
through
and
they
go
on
and
they
find
stable
housing
while
they're
not
finding
stable
housing
there.
A
G
G
That
much,
but
actually
one
of
my
constituents
is
here
today
who
followed
the
process
applied
for
ESG
Capital
has
a
major
ESG
issue
and
I
would
like
to
have
her
heard
about
what
won't
be
done
so
that
we
can
do
case
management
instead,
because
actually,
this
is
like
making
the
poor
people
fight
over
the
crumbs
you're
telling
the
people
at
the
bridge
for
runaway
youth
that
have
done
everything.
We've
asked
them
to
do,
including
housing,
youth,
housing,
youth
with
children,
creating
Rita's
house.
We've
done
so
much
with
them
to
do
so.
G
Many
good
things
and
we're
telling
them
that,
because
you're,
not
a
life,
safety
issue
and
you're,
also
not
case
management.
There
isn't
a
place
for
us
to
help.
You
do
something
that
as
I
understand,
it
is
fairly
critical.
So
perhaps
the
chair
would
indulge
the
good
folks
from
the
bridge
and
let
them
explain
their
project
and
then
we
can
see
why
we're
making
that
everyone
fight
over
the
crumbs.
A
So
I
was
hoping
that
maybe
we
could
do
that
when
we're
talking
about
the
actual
funding
allocations,
which
is
the
next
item
on
the
agenda,
we
could
maybe
shift
that
a
little
bit.
Let
me
ask
this
question.
First,
though,
is
how
would
we
make
the
determination
what
criteria
would
we
put
on
things
going
into
the
future?
H
Glass
from
the
program
manager
for
the
emergency
solutions
grant
program,
part
of
the
application
and
intake
process
for
the
capital
program
for
ESG
is
a
site
visit
done
by
our
construction
management
staff
and
then
a
thorough
review
of
the
scope
that
they
have
submitted,
and
the
purpose
of
that
is
twofold,
really
to
make
sure
that
the
items
that
have
been
identified
as
a
need
are
in
fact
needed
to
help
us
determine
how
critical
that
need
is.
Is
it
something
that
could
maybe
wait
as
it
soon
isn't?
You
know?
Was
it
broken?
H
A
G
I
ask
one
additional
question,
of
course,
so
there's
a
whole
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
ESG
money
that
does
not
go
to
capital.
It
also
goes
to
other
things.
Why
couldn't
the
adult
case
management
come
out
of
that
side
of
the
ledger
instead
of
having
it
come
out
of
the
capital
side
where
there
are
pressing
needs,
I
mean
in
fact,
I
think,
there's
more
money
that
that
goes
into
staffing
all
of
these
different
efforts
versus
capital.
So
if
we
think
we
need
to
do
a
pilot
program,
why
wouldn't
we
do
it
out
of
that
portion?
G
G
A
F
A
G
Mr.
chair
I
want
to
say
I:
don't
have
any
objection
with
doing
a
pilot
project
with
regard
to
single
adult
case
management,
but
that
seems
to
me
to
be
an
ongoing
thing.
You
hire
someone
to
do
that
case
management.
Then
what
are
we
going
to
be
put
in
the
position
next
year
of
saying
well
where's
the
money
for
that
position?
G
How
does
that
not
become
ongoing,
and
how
does
that
not
come
out
of
capital
ongoing
these
capital
expenditures
are
by
nature
one-time
expenses
expenses,
although
I
would
say,
Harbor
lights
has
had
six
times
there,
one
time
so
I
mean
they've
gotten
quite
a
bit
of
money
from
us,
but
I
do
want
to
point
out
that
by
doing
this
pilot,
if
it
became
permanent,
this
would
then
become
a
permanent
source
of
funding
and
there'd,
be
even
less
money
for
capital.
Well,.
A
I
appreciate
that
it's
a
little
bit
more
like
the
outreach,
which
is
kind
of
the
same.
The
same
thing
happens
with
the
outreach
funding
there.
So
maybe
we
can
look
at
what
the
funds
are,
what
they're
going
for
and
if
there's
some
some
flexibility
in
terms
of
implementing
the
pilot
this
year
or
not,
and
then
I
think
we'll
let
somebody
from
the
bridge
for
youth
speak.
Maybe
after
you
make
your
presentation,
Tiffany
Oh
counselor
member
bender
also
wants
oh
well.
While
you
get
ready,
councilmember,
bender,
hey.
I
Mr.
chair
I
appreciate
what
you
just
said,
but
I
I
actually
was
was
going
to
jump
in
and
and
and
suggest
that
perhaps
we
do
take
item
up,
take
up
item
number
five,
which
is
more
the
over
arching
policy
question
and
and
that
our
staff
just
spoke
to
and
then
separately
take
up
item
6,
which
is
the
recommendation
for
this
year,
because
I
think
they
are
two
separate
questions
and
while
customers
may
have
specific
opinions
about
the
particulars
of
this
year's
recommendation,
I
I
do
think
item.
I
A
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
the
will
of
the
committee,
you
know
I
like
to
lead
by
leading
the
group
where
they
want
to
go,
but
I
appreciate
that
as
well.
The
two,
the
two
actions
that
we
would
take
under
five
are
receiving
and
filing
the
report
we
just
heard
which
has
been
concluded
and
the
staff
direction.
A
So,
if
I'm
happy
to
do
that
now,
because
even
if
the
staff
Direction
passes
that
we
haven't
approved
any
of
the
funding
for
this
year,
but
we've
approved
that
and
I
will?
Why
don't
we?
Why
don't
we
do
that
and
we
can
discuss
whether
or
not
we
should
actually
vote
on
them,
but
I
will
move
that
we
receive
and
file
the
report
and
I'll
move
the
staff
direction
being
responsive
to
councilmember,
bender
and
I
can
read
the
staff
direction.
So
everybody
knows
what
it
says.
A
The
substantial
amendment
will
be
subject
to
a
public
hearing
before
this
committee
by
the
end
of
2018
and
staff
of
intergovernmental
relations
and
community
planning
and
economic
development
are
further
directed
to
work
with
the
city
of
Minneapolis
Hennepin
County
office
to
End
Homelessness.
To
identify
how
essential
service
case
management
activities
at
single
adult
shelters
will
be
delivered.
A
I
You
mr.
chair,
recognizing
there,
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
history
to
this
discussion.
I
support
the
staff
direction
and,
and
the
intention
of
when
we
take
this
up
to
look
at
the
holistic
need
of
funding
in
and
to
you
know,
certainly
to
have
our
staff
review
that
and
I'm
hearing
from
them.
The
prioritization
would
still
stay
on
those
capital
needs,
but
that
this
would
provide
a
little
bit
more
flexibility
as
we
move
forward.
A
H
D
H
Is
Tiffany
Glasper
I'm,
a
senior
project
coordinator
at
si
pad
and
the
program
manager
for
the
emergency
solutions
grant
for
the
city
each
year,
HUD
provides
emergency
solutions,
grant
funds
to
the
city
of
Minneapolis.
These
funds
are
eligible
for
street
outreach,
rapid
rehousing
capital
and
administrative
costs
for
twenty
eighteen.
Three
hundred
and
ninety
eight
thousand
six
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
was
available
for
emergency
shelter,
capital
renovation
and
rehabilitation
each
spring.
The
city
issues
a
request
for
proposals
for
these
funds.
H
This
year
the
RFP
was
released
in
April
and
we
received
two
viable
proposals:
totaling
more
than
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
funding
requests,
the
bridge
for
youth
applied
and
requested
three
hundred
and
fifty
six
thousand
nine
hundred
and
eighty
six
thousand
dollars.
Excuse
me
three
hundred
and
fifty
six
thousand
nine
hundred
and
eighty
six
dollars
for
complete
renovation
of
their
second-floor
commercial,
kitchen
and
window
replacement
at
their
shelter
facility.
H
Four
hundred
and
thirty-eight
dollars
with
a
pilot
initiative
that
we
just
talked
about.
The
initiative
would
focus
on
intensive
case
management
at
one
or
both
of
the
city's
largest
homeless
shelters
and
the
focus
of
the
pilot
would
be
specifically
to
assist
in
getting
some
of
the
long-term
shelter
users
out
of
the
system
and
into
permanent
housing,
thereby
freeing
up
shelter
capacity.
H
J
Thank
you,
I'm
the
Associate
Director
over
the
rich
for
youth,
and,
yes,
our
request
was
for
windows
and
a
kitchen
renovation.
The
fact
is,
we
don't
have
a
kitchen
on
our
second
floor,
so
it's
a
brand
new
kitchen,
and
why
do
we
need
a
new
kitchen
because
we
recognize
the
growing
needs
of
homeless
youth
in
the
community,
minor
homeless,
youth
with
children
and
in
the
spring,
we're
actually
converting
one
of
our
shelter
floors?
J
Currently
that
has
seventeen
and
eighteen
year
olds
into
a
program
for
pregnant
and
parenting
homeless,
teens,
so
sixteen
to
twenty
year
olds
that
are
pregnant
or
parenting
that
have
no
other
programs
in
Hennepin
County
to
go
to
we'll
be
able
to
come
and
have
access
to
our
third
floor.
In
doing
this,
this
means
we
have
to
restrict
access
to
our
third
floor,
which
has
the
only
kitchen
in
our
building.
J
That
means
our
emergency
shelter,
which
is
on
the
second
floor
that
has
14
youth
every
single
night
that
are
homeless,
unaccompanied
minors
in
Hennepin
County
will
not
have
access
to
a
kitchen,
so
how
will
they
eat?
So
it
is
not
that
we
want
to
build
a
fancy
kitchen.
It
is
not
that
we
want
to
do
renovations.
J
We
simply
want
to
put
in
structure
in
place
so
that
when
a
16
year,
old
or
17
year
old
comes
to
our
program,
that
is
a
minor
we
can
stabilize
get
them
the
independence
and
self-sufficiency
that
they
need
to
prevent
them
from
going
into
an
adult
shelter.
So
it
does
touch
on
safety.
It
does
touch
on
security
and
it
does
touch
on
scale
in
that
there
are
no
other
programs
for
homeless
and
pregnant
teens
in
Hennepin
County
and
a
basic
need
is
food.
This
is
a
critical
piece.
J
The
kitchen
is
just
a
kitchen,
but
it's
a
critical
piece,
because
without
food,
what
are
we
going
to
do?
It
puts
a
significant
kink
into
whether
or
not
we
can
operate
a
pregnant
and
parenting
homeless.
Teen
program,
which
the
office
of
ending
homelessness
is
very
much
in
support
of.
Actually
everybody
that
we've
met
with
in
Hennepin
County
is
very
much
wrecking
recognizing
this
as
a
need
and
they're
applauding
our
efforts.
J
We
work
very
closely
with
all
of
the
providers,
so
we
know
the
needs
that
are
out
there
and
yes,
this
is.
This
is
much
more
than
just
a
renovation.
This
is
a
brand
new
kitchen
to
address
a
growing
need
in
our
communities,
so
happy
to
take
any
questions,
but
just
appreciate
your
consideration
on
that.
So
I.
J
Have
a
kitchen
on
the
third
right
now,
under
our
current
license,
we
operate
two
housing
programs
in
our
campus.
We
operate
our
emergency
shelter,
which
is
on
the
second
floor
and
that's
where
youth
10
through
17
and
then
on
our
third
floor.
We
offer
a
transitional,
so
they
can
meaning
they
can
stay
there
longer
for
16
up
until
18
year
olds.
J
What
we
are
doing
is
we
have
been
following
the
process
and
recognizing
a
growing
need
in
the
community
we're
going
to
convert
our
third,
which
is
where
there
are
16
18
year
old,
single
miners
into
a
program
where
there
are
single
minor,
unaccompanied
parents,
so
they
can
bring
their
children
there
in
doing
so,
one
of
the
requirements
is
step.
Forint
defined
by
our
licensed
under
DHS
is
that
we
have
to
reduce
and
limit
access.
So
the
two
floors
can't
interact.
That
means
staff
can't
interact.
That
means
you
can't
interact.
I
H
Gordon
councilmember
bender,
the
first
I,
want
to
acknowledge
something
that
councilmember
Goodman
said
earlier,
which
was
the
overall
amount
of
ESG
that
the
city
used
to
receive
was
significantly
higher
than
what
we're
currently
receiving.
Why
that
is
my,
my
colleague,
Matt
Bauer
may
be
able
to
answer
so
the
amount
of
ESG
available
to
the
city
it's
lower
and
lower
and
lower
every
year.
H
I
I
H
I
H
H
It
doesn't
feel
safe,
so
we're
it
makes
sense
to
us
to
try
and
address
that,
and
also
to
put
the
additional
funds.
You
know
you
know,
but
to
address
it,
to
use
the
additional
funds
in
a
different
way,
but
to
try
to
address
that
same
problem,
so
we're
trying
to
address
the
security.
The
safety
and
security
issues
at
Harbor
light
and
then
with
the
ninety
nine
thousand
four
hundred
and
thirty
eight
also
trying
to
see
if
there's
a
way
for
us
to
increase
capacity
at
that
shelter.
A
She
might
have
also
been
asking
about
so
we
see
in
the
report
that
there's
nine
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
or
give
or
take
already
some
of
that
has
got
to
go
to
rapid
rehousing.
Apparently
some
of
that
is
already
committed
to
street
outreach.
We
don't
exactly
know
how
much
there's
a
percentage
number
and
so
then
I
mean
reading
it.
Then
it
sounds
like
once.
You
gave
the
award
to
whoever
Harbor
lights
right.
A
H
K
Mr.
chair
members
of
the
committee,
so
there's
the
900,
let's
say
nine
hundred
thousand
dollar
grant
to
the
city,
then
after
that
it
splits
certain
ways
we
talked
about
the
sixty
percent.
Sixty
percent
of
that
is,
we
can
use
up
to
sixty
percent
of
it
for
street
outreach,
rehab
essential
services
in
operations,
or
we
can
use
any
amount
of
that
for
other
uses
like
rapid
rehousing.
K
The
sixty
percent
we've
held
set
aside
for
street
outreach
in
the
rehab,
so
this
year
there
was
like
a
hundred
fifty
thousand
for
the
street
outreach
that
was
approved
through
the
budget
process
and
then
the
398,000
for
this
RFP,
the
balance
of
the
grant.
Most
of
it
goes
to
rapid
rehousing
to
around
two
hundred
seventy
five
thousand
dollars.
That
goes
for
rapid
rehousing
services
that
are
delivered
through
the
county
and
that's.
K
For
that
and
then
there's
an
admin
piece
for
correct,
oh
yeah,
the
rapid
rehousing
is
required.
I
mean
the
anything
outside
of
that
60%.
Set-Aside
has
to
be
used
for
rehab
and
rehousing
or
homelessness.
Prevention
in
the
city
is
elected
to
use
it
for
prioritized
in
the
county
as
well
prioritize
for
rapid
rehousing,
as
opposed
to
prevention,.
G
You,
mr.
chair,
we
did
an
RFP
that
asked
for
capital
requests,
not
that
asked
for
capital
request
plus
what
could
you
do
to
move
people
out
of
Harbor
lights
so
from
where
I
sit?
The
ninety
nine
thousand
four
hundred
and
thirty-eight
dollars
should
go
to
the
bridge
and
if
we
want
to
and
I
would
actually
support
expanding
single
adult
case
management
we're
in
the
budget
process.
Now
that
seems
like
an
ongoing
thing,
not
a
one-time
thing.
We
should
be
dealing
with
that
very
good
idea
through
the
budget
process,
not
through
the
ESG
money.
G
That's
been
set
aside
for
capital
and
I,
don't
want
to
pick
on
Harbor
Light,
but
I
want
to
be
fair.
That
Harbor
Light
has
received
a
million
plus
dollars
out
of
this
pool
over
a
long
period
of
time,
and
if
you
can't
rattle
off
the
amounts,
I'm
pretty
sure
the
bridge
can
and
they
can
point
out
how
much
money
we've
put
into
Harbor
light.
At
the
same
time,
their
executives
are
meeting
with
a
number
of
us
to
tell
us
they
want
to
get
out
of
the
Harbor
light.
They
came
in
and
told
me
point-blank.
G
They
weren't
even
sure
they
wanted
to
operate
shelter
in
that
site,
anymore
and
I
know.
Miss
Brennan
was
in
the
room,
she's
looking
the
other
way
because
she
wishes.
She
wasn't
in
the
room
for
that
conversation,
but
the
truth
of
the
matter
is
on
one
hand,
they're
telling
us
they're,
not
even
sure
they
want
to
be
doing
this
work
anymore
and,
on
the
other
hand,
they're
collecting
millions
from
us
to
improve
their
building
that
they
essentially
told
me
they
would
tear
down
so
I.
Don't
know,
I
mean
I.
G
I
I
We
could
also
postpone
this
item
one
cycle
and
take
some
time
just
knowing
the
good
work
that
you
did
to
look
through
the
details
of
these
proposals
and
that's
hard
to
kind
of
second-guess
that
here
in
committee
and
just
give
ourselves
time
to
get
educated
as
committee
members
about
some
more
of
those
details
and
I,
don't
know,
there's
a
time
sensitivity
to
the
you
know.
The
two
weeks
delay
would
be
okay
with
the
grant
cycle.
But
that's
another
suggestion.
H
A
That
we
could
consider
that
a
potential
motion.
We
could
also
move
it
forward
without
recommendation,
but
that
would
the
and
to
see
if
we
could
come
up
with
something
before
the
council
meeting,
that
which
was
an
idea
that
I
was
thinking
because
we
seem
a
little
bit
stuck
and
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
information,
especially
in
terms
of
what
the
99
could
be
use
for.
Councilmember
Goodman,
Thank.
G
You
mr.
chair
I'm,
okay
with
a
delay,
I,
think
that's
a
good
idea.
I'm
pretty
sure
the
request
was
for
more
than
just
the
kitchen
and
some
things
are
more
important
than
others,
and
so
we
could
ask
Chris
I,
don't
know
I,
don't
charge
if
you,
if
you
want
to
let
the
Christine
talk
about.
Is
that
something
that's
workable?
That's
fine
with
me!
If
not,
we
can
delay
until
we
can
find
out.
G
If
that's
okay,
we
also
can
talk
about
whether
or
not
expanding
single
adult
case
management
is
something
that
could
be
in
the
overall
budget.
Not
out
of
this
pool,
I
will
say:
the
downtown
Council
worked
in
partnership
with
a
lot
of
downtown
businesses
to
identify
moving
100
people
out
of
the
Harbor
light,
and
they
used
a
lot
of
private
money
to
do
that,
they
were
able
to
succeed
in
that.
So
I
am
a
believer
given
that
the
private
sector
has
done
this
work,
that
this
is
a
good
thing
to
do.
G
I,
just
don't
think
it's
fair
that
you
do
an
RFP
for
capital
and
then
say:
well,
sorry,
if
you
don't
really
want
to
spend
it
on
capital,
when
there
are
capital
needs,
we
should
have
said
that
we
were
going
to
do
something
different
when
we
issued
the
RFP
then
so,
however,
you
want
to
handle
it
move
it
forward
without
recommendation
delay
one
cycle
or
you
can
take
up
my
motion
if
I
can
I'm
happy
to
move
to
just
grant
the
other
money
to
the
bridge,
but
I'm
also
happy
to
go
along
with
postponing
it.
What.
A
I
You
mr.
chair
I
think
we'll
go
ahead
and
move
to
postpone
one
cycle
and
bring
it
back
to
committee.
If
that's
okay,
the
chair
I'm,
just
to
give
ourselves
more
time
and
fill
up
with
all
the
partners
and
also
voice
my
appreciation
to
Harbor
light
to
the
branch
200
County,
our
partners
in
housing,
people
and
and
the
staff
will
put
time
in
today
of.
A
Course
it's
all
right
to
me,
but
any
committee
members
can
move
anything
they
want,
even
if
it's
not
alright
with
the
chair
in
this
committee,
so
anyway,
I
think
that
seems
reasonable.
I
do
want
to
note
that
I
think
that
we've
highlighted
a
really
dramatic
need
and
I
appreciate
the
accounts.
Remember
Goodman
was
even
saying
that
navigating
folks
through
the
shelter
system
is
it
is
a
big
problem
and
it's
a
really
big
snag.
E
A
E
Members
of
the
committee,
it
would
be
helpful
for
us
to
have
a
little
bit
better
sense
of
exactly
what
you
want
us
to
do
in
the
in
Iran
between
this
meeting
in
next
meeting.
If
you
want,
is
it
additional
information
that
you
want
us
to
meet
with
you
about
offline,
or
is
there
additional
analysis
that
you
want
us
to
do
and
we've
reviewed
the
requests
and
made
our
recommendations?
E
A
There's
some
interest
in
having
some
dialogue
with
the
second
applicant
that
didn't
wasn't
approved
for
funding
to
see
if
there's
and
maybe
look
more
into
that
and
to
see
if
there
is
some
critical
need
that
would
rise
to
the
level
and
that
the
funds
would
actually
assist
with
that's
what
I
picked
up
from
some
comments
down
there:
a
council
member
bender.
Yes,.
I
Mr.
chair,
my
intention
was,
was
just
that.
Allow
the
committee
members
really
more
than
staff
to
be
able
to
do
some
extra
homework
and
not
to
try
to
ask
to
really
essential
providers
of
services
in
our
community
to
count
like
stand
up
here
and
make
their
case
to
us
because
of
all
the
work
that
staff
has
already
done.
So
I
think
it
was
more
for
council
members
to
have
time
to
ask
our
questions.
Offline,
okay,.
A
Appreciate
that
so
I
don't
think
there'll
be
a
staff
direction
actually,
but
what,
hopefully
you
got
enough
is
a
sense
about
why
we're
stuck
up
here
and
maybe
we'll
reach
out
to
you
individually
separately,
to
learn
more
seeing
no
other
discussion
on
the
motion.
Then
all
those
in
favor
of
the
one
cycle
delay
please
say:
aye
any
opposed.
That
motion
carries
and
now
we'll
move
on
to
our
last
item,
which
is
tenant
case
management.
I
believe
that
you
know
a
shuckman
is
here
to
make
a
report.
M
Mr.
chair
committee,
members,
Noah
shuckman
director
of
regulatory
services,
I
can
speak
briefly
to
the
excuse
me,
the
staff
traction
portion
of
this
item,
which
is
to
direct
regulatory
services
and
see
if
it's
staffed,
you
develop
a
scope
of
services
budget
and
to
slide
two
qualified
external
partner
to
supply
tenant
case
management
related
to
the
Stephen
Friends
rental
dwelling
license
revocations
for
the
remainder
of
2018
I
just
want
to
acknowledge
mr.
A
Thank
you
appreciate
you
being
here.
I
just
want
to
note
that
on
the
agenda,
I
noted
that
there
would
be
an
opportunity
for
community
comment.
This
was
in
light
of
at
a
previous
council
meeting.
We
had
there
seemed
to
be
some
people
that
really
felt
a
need
to
make
comment
about
this
issue.
You
might
recall
that
council
members
is
there
anybody
here
who
did
want
to
comment
on
this
from
the
public.
N
So
it's
not
a
new
story.
I!
Don't
think
that
it's
something
we
need
extensive
discussion
on
I
think
we.
We
all
realized
that
housing,
the
folks
in
our
city
who
are
experiencing
pressures,
pressures
from
landlords
and
evictions
and
other
other
things
that
are
happening
in
our
city,
whether
its
new
development
or
losing
affordable
housing
at
rates
that
our
city
is
new
to.
N
Seeing
that
this
committee
is,
you
know,
willing
to
take
action
willing
to
address
that
and
so
I'm
very
happy
to
have
been
able
to
work
with
our
city
staff,
who
provided
leadership
on
this
front
as
well,
and
we
do
have
another
partner,
the
minneapolis
public
housing
authority,
who
is
who
is
also
at
the
table
actively
proposing
ideas
on
what
we
can
do
here.
So
I'm,
hoping
that
this
is
not
the
end
of
a
conversation.
O
Just
wanted
to
name
that
you
know
our.
This
is
an
issue
that
we've
dealt
with
on
the
north
side
and
I'd
hate
to
take
this
moment
to
kind
of
participate,
but
I
also
think
to
kind
of
piggyback
off
what
counsel
McConnell
said.
This
is
work.
That's
gonna
have
to
continue
and
I
and
I
look
at
this
portfolio,
the
Firenze
portfolio
and
also
a
lot
of
the
microcon
portfolio
and
I.
Think
to
myself.
O
This
is
a
group
of
tenants
who
would
be
supported
by
the
work
that
that
council
members,
Goodman
and
trader
are
getting
ready
to
move.
O
These
are
attendants
who
are
going
to
be
supported
by
the
work
that
the
that
the
council,
president
and
I
are
looking
to
move
and
and
I
think
that
I
think
this
is
a
great
action
and
I
agree
that
this
is
going
to
be
the
continuation
of
a
conversation
and
not
the
end
of
it,
because
we've
got
a
lot
of
work
to
do
and
I
want
to
thank
staff
for
putting
this
work
in
and
and
and
and
just
kind
of
kind
of
nailed
down.
The
importance
of
the
work
that
we're
doing
around
tenant
protections.
A
I
A
Thank
you
very
much
any
other
discussion
on
councilmember
Ellison's
motion.
It's
the
motion
to
direct
regulatory
services
and
Community
Planning
and
Economic
Development
staff
to
develop
the
scope
of
services
and
budget
and
to
select
a
qualified
external
partner
to
supply
tenant
case
management
related
to
the
Stephen
friends.
Rental
dwelling
license
revocations
for
the
remainder
of
2018,
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye,
any
opposed,
say
no.
That
motion
carries
and
seeing
no
further
business
before
us.
This
meeting
is
adjourned.
Thank
you.
Everybody.