►
From YouTube: October 19, 2018 Minneapolis City Council
Description
Minneapolis City Council Meeting
A
Good
morning,
everyone
I'm
Lisa
bender
I,
am
the
president
of
the
Minneapolis
City
Council
and
we're
going
to
begin
this
morning's
meeting
with
a
special
resolution,
a
presentation
recognizing
this
month
as
domestic
violence,
Awareness,
Month
and
I'll
turn
it
over
to
my
colleague,
councilmember
Cunningham,
for
the
presentation
and
thank
you
so
much
for
joining
us.
Thank
you.
B
Madam
president,
I
am
very
honored
this
month
to
be
bringing
forward
an
honorary
resolution
declaring
October
domestic
violence,
Awareness
Month
and
with
us
today
we
have
folks
from
standpoint
and
domestic
abuse
project
which
both
do
really
groundbreaking
much
much-needed
work
in
our
community,
ranging
from
working
with
kids,
who
are
exposed
to
the
trauma
and
violence
as
well
as
working
with
the
abusers
to
be
able
to
break
that
cycle.
I
mean
really
really
groundbreaking
important
work.
So
thank
you
all
for
being
here
today.
B
B
At
least
19
women
died
from
domestic
abuse
and
at
least
five
family
members,
friends
and
intervenors
were
murdered
in
the
state
of
Minnesota.
At
least
12
children
were
left
motherless
due
to
domestic
violence,
whereas
economic
justice
and
financial
stability
must
be
named,
recognized
and
be
part
of
the
resources
offered
to
victims,
as
it
is,
a
direct
barrier
for
those
who
are
abused,
whereas
victims
of
domestic
violence
and
their
children
are
at
risk
for
homelessness,
and
whereas
we
have
a
duty
to
enhance
our
response
to
victims
by
regional
partnerships,
education,
outreach
and
enforcement
of
the
law.
C
I'm
Rand
Alexander
I'm,
the
executive
director
at
standpoint
and
I
want
to
thank
the
City
Council
of
Minneapolis
very
much
for
this
resolution
and
for
the
very
important
work
that
they
have
done
recently
on
passing
and
ordinance
saying
that
domestic
violence
victims
can
call
the
police
when
they
need
to
and
to
have
training
that
goes
along
with
that
for
residents
and
for
the
for
the
landlords.
It's
really
important
work
and
we're
really
really
proud
to
work
with
you
guys
on
that.
Thank
you.
D
And
I'm
Jackie
Nelson
I'm,
the
interim
executive
director
at
the
domestic
abuse
project-
and
this
is
my
colleague,
Suri
lokensgard
I-
want
to
just
echo
that
too,
and
really
accept
this
resolution
on
behalf
of
all
the
organizations
and
governments
and
agencies
in
the
city
and
the
Greater
Minneapolis
that
are
working
to
prevent
and
eliminate
domestic
abuse.
And
thank
you
very
much
for
recognizing
us
on
this
special
month.
A
That's
helping
support
men
who
are
being
violent
in
the
home
and
I
say
that
in
part,
because
this
work
is
so
connected
to
our
overall
work.
That
councilmember
Cunningham
is
now
leading
as
chair
of
the
committee
around
violence
prevention
and
knowing
that
people
who
experienced
or
witnessed
violence
in
the
home
as
children.
A
You
know
have
a
very
high
likelihood
of
kind
of
repeating
that
cycle
as
adults,
and
we
know
that
many
of
the
people
who
are
being
violent
in
the
community
had
that
experience
as
children
in
the
home
and
so
finding
ways
that
we
can
intervene
in
a
supportive
way
with
families
to
get
people
the
support
that
they
need.
I.
A
Think
it's
some
of
the
most
important
work
that
the
city
of
Minneapolis
is
doing,
and
over
the
years
a
number
of
us
have
been
able
to
find
funding
to
support
domestic
violence,
support
because
Maura,
Palmisano
and
Reich
and
I
worked
on
that
for
the
past
few
years.
So
I
think
all
of
it
collectively
is
really
helpful
and
then
the
ordinance
actually
hasn't
passed.
A
Yet
so
there's
a
public
hearing
next
week,
which
is
an
important
I,
expect
it
to
but
councilman
Cunningham
and
Strader
have
been
working
on
that
issue,
along
with
a
big
package
of
things
that
comes
in
our
cunningham
is
bringing
that
are
really
looking
at
ways
that
we
can
make
sure
that
again
landlords
are
that
we're
working
with
landlords,
but
not
you
know
not
doing
it
in
a
way.
That's
affecting
tenants
and
leading
to
eviction
so
all
very
exciting
work
I
could
go
on
and
on
about
this
will
stop
now,
wouldn't
thank
you.
B
A
A
A
A
G
Thank
you.
Madam
president,
the
economic
development
of
regulatory
Services
Committee
is
bringing
18
items
forward
this
morning.
Item
number
1
is
a
application
for
a
license.
I'm
going
to
talk
about
items
2
through
7.
Second,
at
the
end,
8
are
the
license.
Approvals
liquor,
license
approvals,
9
or
gambling
license
approvals,
10
or
gambling
license.
Renewals
11
are
business.
License.
Renewals
12
are
licensed
operating
conditions
item
13
our
business
license
renewals
item
14
is
the
results
of
the
settlement.
Friends
item
15
as
a
rental
license
reinstatement
when
I'm.
G
Sixteen
is
a
cost
participation
agreement
with
Hennepin
County
item
17
is
a
loan
for
Cajun
twist
on,
though
that's
for
the
park
chalet
at
worth,
Park,
which
is
actually
in
Golden,
Valley
and
item
number
eighteen
is
our
applications
for
the
environmental
contamination
grant
from
round
the
second
round
the
fall
around
for
2018
and
that's
there's
a
number
of
them
in
items
one
through
five.
With
that,
madam
sure,
I'm
gonna
move
items
one
and
items
eight
through
18
and
then
I'll
come
back
to
the
others.
Councillor.
A
E
G
Right
time,
madam
president,
I'm
gonna
move
to
delete
item
number
seven.
This
was
a
license,
revocation
that
we
no
longer
need
to
revoke
as
a
result
of
fees
to
the
State
Bank
aid.
So
I'll
move
to
delete
from
the
agenda
item
number
seven,
that's
all
ankles
I!
Do
it
over
that
chart
we're
not
debating
it.
Bullwinkle's
has
paid
their
fees,
that's
why
we
would
be
revoking
now
we're
not
going
to
revoke.
A
H
E
H
B
You,
my
speaker,
management,
was
acting
funky,
so
I
just
wanted
to
let
all
my
colleagues
know,
and
also
the
public
know
that
on
Tuesday
at
the
EDRs
meeting,
we
had
a
thorough
presentation
about
the
amendments
for
the
conduct
on
licensed
premises,
ordinance.
So
for
folks
who
are
interested
in
learning
more
about
that,
we
have
quite
a
thorough
presentation.
That's
available
online
through
the
city
of
Minneapolis
aslim
system.
On
this
upcoming
Tuesday.
We
will
be
having
a
public
hearing
so
folks
being
able
to
come
in
and
share
their
thoughts
about
it
as
well.
G
Thank
You
president
on
items
2
through
6
I,
want
to
note
that
items
2
through
6
are
all
rental
license
denials.
These
are
all
Steve,
Friends
properties,
barest,
Obama's,
formerly,
spirit
soar,
but
Bhalla
properties
that
we
were
moving
to
deny
the
rental
license
for
the
various
applicants
as
a
result
of
the
properties
being
purchased
or
a
contract
for
deed,
which
our
staff
does
not
believe
is
a
clean
transaction
moving
out
the
old
owner.
G
Those
who
understand
a
contract
for
deed
will
know
that
that
means
that
the
previous
owner
would
hold
the
paper
and
we
need
to
have
more
of
a
clean
process.
In
the
meantime,
the
city
has
filed
a
tra
action
on
these
properties,
and
some
progress
is
being
made
with
regard
to
the
tenant
remedies,
actions
that
could
result
in
a
warranty,
deed
ownership,
as
well
as
potential
the
potential
ability
to
maintain
tannic
occupancy,
providing
further
stability.
G
The
compromise
should
last
90
days
and
at
the
end
of
the
90
days,
if
they
were
able
to
promote
a
sale
that
resulted
in
a
warranty,
deed
ownership,
we
might
be
able
to
transfer
the
licenses
and
if
they
don't
we'll,
move
forward
with
the
Revit
king
with
a
denial
to
the
new
owners.
So
hopefully
that
explains
where
we're
at
on
these
items-
and
it's.
G
A
E
G
I
E
G
To
the
city
attorney
and
the
clerk
and
mr.
Nelson
I
think
it's
important
to
be
looking
at
this
every
two
weeks
sitting
on
the
agenda,
because
the
lives
of
like
1500
people,
her
in
state
care
and
while
we're
willing
to
take
some
time
to
see
if
our
tenant
remedies
act
and
our
negotiations
work.
I
don't
want
to
forget
the
fact
that
these
licenses
are
hanging
out
there
and
we
need
to
make
a
decision
at
some
point.
G
I
also
understand
the
complication
of
a
quasi-judicial
decision
and
I
don't
want
to
send
it
back
to
committee,
so
we're
willing
to
give
them
90
days.
Otherwise,
at
the
end
of
the
90
days,
we
might
go
ahead
and
license
them
if
there's
a
warranty
deed,
we
might
not
based
on
the
quasi
judicial
action
and
mr.
Nelson's
here.
So
he
can
absolutely
correct
me
if
I
have
said
anything
wrong.
A
J
Yeltsin
Thank
You,
president
bender
and
I
know
it's
a
rare
thing
to
allow
speaking
at
a
council
meeting.
I
think
the
the
post
moment
for
90
days
would
be
fine.
I'd
also
suggest
that
if
the
council
felt
reticent
about
doing
that,
a
postponement,
a
shorter
post
moment
that
we
could
revisit
to
perhaps
the
meeting
of
November
16th
would
also
be
fine.
It
holds
some
pressure
over
the
the
negotiation,
which
is
not
a
bad
thing
and
as
councilmember
Goodman,
she
accurately
relayed
the
tenor
of
the
discussion.
J
A
Is
there
any
discussion
it
becomes
member
Goodman
motion,
so
you
know
you
know.
I
will
just
say
that
I
so
appreciate
the
chairs
leadership
in
this
as
compliment
Goodwin
mentioned,
you
know
the
tenants
who
are
in
these
buildings
and
there's
there's
thousands
of
tenants
across
the
city
in
buildings
where
we're
considering
license.
Revocation
our
utmost
priority
is
to
protect
them
from
displacement
and
and
to
do
anything
else
would
go
against
all
of
the
work
that
we're
doing
to
try
to
stop
residential
rent
our
displacement
in
the
city.
A
H
A
K
Thank
You
president
bender,
the
elections
and
Rules
Committee
brings
forward
one
item
pertaining
to
ethics
and
government.
The
ethics
and
government
ordinance
is
the
passage
of
ordinance
amending
title
to
chapter
15
of
the
Minneapolis
Code
of
Ordinances,
relating
to
administration,
ethics
and
government,
amending
provisions
related
to
conflict
of
interests
outside
employment,
statements
of
economic
interest
and
definitions,
and
just
for
those
who
might
be
watching
from
home.
K
E
A
L
President,
there
are
five
items
for
your
consideration
and
Enterprise
Committee
this
cycle.
The
first
is
a
contract
for
computer-aided
dispatch
with
our
multi
jurisdictional
kinds
of
partners.
Item
number
two:
is
a
contract
for
risk
management,
information
and
claims
processing.
Item
number
three:
is
a
software
upgrade
for
something
called
Project
Docs
item
number
four:
is
a
contract
for
our
I
teenage
related
to
our
investments,
capital
and
debt
management
services?
L
A
E
A
M
You
president
bender,
the
housing
policy
and
Development
Committee
is
bringing
forward
six
items
for
consideration
today.
Item
number
one
is
a
land
sale
at
31
10
up
to
the
Avenue
North
item
number
two
is
acknowledging
that
were
receptive
to
the
livable
communities.
Act
applicants
that
have
applied
to
the
metropolitan
council
I
will
note
that
this
includes
four
different
projects
within
the
city,
and
one
of
them
is
the
Red
Lake
project
at
21st
and
cedar.
The
third
item
is
approving
exclusive
development
rights
to
Park
Place
Apartments
at
2806.
Park.
Avenue.
M
Fourth
item
is
a
resolution
authorizing
submission
and
priority
ranking
of
the
grant
applications
to
the
Metropolitan
Council
livability
community's
demonstration
account.
The
fifth
item
is
a
tenant
management
staff
direction
and
directing
our
staff
to
develop
a
scope
of
services
in
a
budget
to
provide
some
case
management
services
to
tenants
who
are
dislocated
because
of
the
Stephen
friends.
E
A
B
You,
madam
president,
the
public
health,
environment,
civil
rights
and
engagement
committee
will
be
bringing
forward
brings
forward
three
items
today.
The
first
is
the
passage
of
the
resolution.
Recognizing
October
2018
is
Domestic
Violence
Awareness
Month.
The
second
is
request
for
proposals
for
community
solar
gardens
and
the
third
is
community
solar
garden
agreements,
which,
notably,
is
increasing
our
amount
of
annual
kilowatts
because
we
are
producing
locally
renewable
energy
at
a
much
higher
rate
pace
than
we
expected
on.
That
I
will
approve
all
these
items.
E
A
N
You,
madam
president,
the
committee
for
its
ten
items
today
item
one
is
the
special
service
districts,
none
for
two
8a
districts
and
it's
2019
proposed
services
and
service
charges.
Item
2
is
the
4th.
Street
southeast
street
lighting
district
establishment
area
will
go
from
25th
out
of
southeast
of
malcolm
avenue.
South
east
item
3
is
the
consolidating
sanitary
sewer
requirement.
N
Ordinance
and
4
is
the
regulation
of
the
disposal
of
fats,
oils
and
grease
miles/hour
father
ordinance
item
five
is
a
temporary
easement
agreements
for
Cedar
Avenue
south
from
51st
Street
to
52nd
Street
sanitary
reconstruction
project
item
six?
Is
the
contract
amendment
global
specialty
contractors
incorporated
for
the
northbound
bridge
interpretive
site
project
item?
Seven?
Is
the
contract
amendment
Hennepin
County
for
road
maintenance
item?
Eight?
N
Is
the
a
Street
South
Street
reconstruction
project
and
that's
the
project,
designation,
cost
estimate
and
setting
that
public
hearing
which
is
set
for
November
27th
of
this
year
item
nine
is
a
North
Loop,
paving
project
reconstruction
project
and
that's
also
a
designating
the
project.
The
cost
and
its
public
hearing
is
the
same
day:
November
27th.
The
final
item
is
a
highway
turn
back
deed
from
state
of
Minnesota
for
land
adjacent
to
the
trunk
highway
55
Madam
President,
all
items
estimated.
E
A
O
O
Item
number
2
is
a
2018
property
tax
special
assessment
item
number
3
is
a
contract
amendment
for
upgrades
to
the
Minneapolis
Convention
Center's
online
ordering
portal
item
number
4
is
a
bid
for
Minneapolis
Convention
Center
terrazzo
update
wall
I'm
number
5
is
a
contract
amendment
with
live
tech
services
for
emergency
medical
services
at
the
Minneapolis
Convention
Center
iron
number
6
is
a
request
for
proposal
to
establish
the
city's
legal
services
panel.
I
have
number
seven
is
a
grant
from
the
United
States
Department
of
Justice
Bureau
of
Justice
Assistance
for
body,
worn
cameras.
O
O
Travel
expenses
for
the
big
city
planning
directives.
Institute
item
number:
ten
is
an
agreement
with
the
Minneapolis
local
organizing
committee
for
the
2019
men's
basketball.
Final
Four
item
number
11
is
a
navigation
Center
development
to
105
to
109,
2,
1,
1,
3,
Cedar
Avenue
and
1820
22nd,
Street,
East
and
I.
A
F
Can
madam
chair
I'm
just
gonna
note
that
I'll
be
voting?
It's
item
number
10
I
know
it
has
a
but
a
8
$100,000
public
subsidy
in
there
I
do
thank
staff
for
their
work
to
encourage
the
host
committee
to
fundraise
as
much
as
possible
to
cover
the
public
expenses.
I
am
very
excited
to
see
that
in
c-double-a
coming
to
Minneapolis
I
think
it's
a
great
thing.
It
is
also
an
organization
that
cleared
over
a
billion
dollars
in
revenue
last
year
and
105
million
dollar
profit
and
I.
F
A
E
H
M
I
H
O
Navigation
Center
development.
There
are
four
sub
items
and
that
item
which
is
I'll,
read
them
out
to
you
number
one
is
the
passage
of
resolution
declaring
that
the
navigation
Center
project
is
a
neighborhood
revitalization
for
the
purpose
for
which
consolidated
redevelopment,
TIF
district
funds
may
be
expanded.
O
M
Thank
you
very
much.
Well,
I
guess:
I
can
clarify
what
the
amendment
says,
and
this
is
what
we
discussed
about
a
little
at
committee.
Of
the
whole.
There
were
concerns
about
using
their
funding
from
the
consolidated
TIF
district
fund.
Of
course,
my
original
proposal-
you
may
recall
it
committee
the
whole-
was
instead
to
rely
on
the
pension
funds.
The
sense
from
the
finance
directors
did
both
funding
sources
would
of
adequate
funds
to
cover
this
expense.
M
In
fact,
the
pension
fund
was
identified
as
a
back-up
plan,
but
understanding
that
some
of
my
colleagues
also
had
deep
concerns
about
putting
our
pension
fund
at
risk,
and
it's
not
like
we
can
go
to
that
for
everything.
I
agree
with
those.
What
I
thought
would
be
helpful
is
if
we
just
defined
it
and
limited
the
amount
coming
from
the
consolidated
TIF
district
to
$1,000,000
and
the
amount
coming
from
the
pension
debt
fund
up
to
$500,000.
A
A
H
H
E
H
A
Carries
and
so
that
amendment
has
passed
that
brings
us
back
to
the
underlying
motion
to
appropriate
1.5
million
dollars
for
the
development
of
a
navigation.
Center
I
wanted
to
make
a
comment
and
share
some
updates
that
I
heard
from
staff
yesterday,
which
other
plus
members
may
also
have
so
as
of
yesterday,
the
structures
that
staff
had
indicated
to
us
many
times
and
committee
and
council
meetings
that
they
hadn't
to
purchase
have
fallen
through.
So
there
is
not
currently
a
specific
structure.
Type
identified,
I
know
that
staff
told
me
that
they
were
considering
three
options.
A
One
is
called
a
sprung
structure
for
the
record.
I
feel
that
that
is
by
far
the
most
the
option
that
is
the
most
flexible.
It's
reusable
it's
used
specifically
for
shelter
in
other
cities,
so
I've
been
hopeful.
That
staff
would
consider
that
kind
of
structure,
I've
put
them
in
touch.
My
office
called
this
company
ourselves
and
I
could
share
any
information
about
that
with
anyone
who
would
like
to
I
believe
they're,
also
looking
for
other
trailer
providers
as
well
as
a
different
kind
of
smaller
structure.
That
would
be
more
like
a
detached,
smaller
structure.
A
We
also
have
not
identified
an
operator
who
has
committed
to
operate
the
shelter
or
the
navigation.
Center
I
have
really
encouraged
staff
to
directly
communicate
with
the
shelter
operators.
There
are
five.
There
are
only
five
operators
who
operate
shelter
in
the
city
of
Annapolis,
two
of
which
are
in
my
ward,
so
I've
talked
with
the
one
that
was
highlighted
to
us
and,
while
I
think
it
is
clear
that
there's
a
lot
of
support
from
our
shelter
operating
community
in
helping
step
up
and
make
sure
that
this
is
successful,
they're
able
to
lend
their
expertise.
A
There
has
not
been
a
specific
commit
made,
and
so
again
my
continued
desire
hope
demand.
Whatever
you
want
to
call.
It
is
that
our
staff
are
directly
communicating
with
people
who
have
experience
operating
shelter
as
they
procure
and
design
the
structure
and
facility.
So
I
have
a
verbal
commitment
room
from
staff.
Now
that
that
is
happening
as
of
yesterday
I
understand
that
the
shelter
operators
will
be
asked
to
help
volunteer
their
time
to
help
design
a
structure.
A
P
P
If
we're
really
serious
about
housing
being
a
human
right
that
everyone
deserves
a
home,
we
need
to
identify
this
problem
more
and
we
need
to
be
very
serious
about
our
outcomes
and
how
we
spend
every
single
dollar
for
everyone
in
need
and
for
me,
I
think,
looking
at
this
is
what
are
we
gonna
have
in
April?
You
know
this
is
a
very
short-term
solution
to
some
people
that
are
very
much
in
need,
but
in
April,
what
are
we
going
to
have?
Are
we
going
to
have
a
process?
That's
gonna
help.
P
Others
in
our
city,
that's
gonna,
help
us
identify
and
work
on
this,
some
of
the
hardest
to
house
people
in
Minneapolis,
and
how
is
this
going
to
help
the
folks
on
other
parts
of
that
spectrum
and
I
think
we
just
need
to
be
very
conscious
when
we're
making
these
choices
that
we're
looking
at
that
and
making
sure
that's
some.
How
we're
gonna
turn
the
corner
on
on
homelessness
and
those
that
are
not
in
stable
housing
and
I.
Think
that's
that's
the
hard
thing
for
me
is
that
do
we
have
anything
in
April?
B
The
amount
a
president
I
actually
don't
know
if
we
have
any
staff
here,
but
maybe
I
could
ask
just
generally
speaking,
is
there?
Has
there
been
any
conversation
about
a
contract
with
someone
to
come
and
help
project
manage
around
this
issue
and
this
project
in
general?
You
know.
A
So
I
think
cpad
may
be
available
somewhere
in
your
body.
So
I
can
see
that's
true.
There.
Ewing
I
do
know
that
the
state
office
has
provided
funding
for
the
group
of
entities
that
are
meeting
which
include
the
city,
the
county
in
the
state
and
community
leaders
to
hire
someone
who
has
experience
working
on
these
issues
in
Seattle
and
that
person
I,
believe,
has
started
this
week.
So
I
think
that
will
help
lend
that
that
expertise
and
experience.
Q
Good
morning,
madam
president,
customer
cutting
I'm
David
Frank
from
cpad.
The
council
president
has
accurately
stated
that
there
is
a
woman
who's
been
hired
as
the
project
manager,
who
has,
as
the
council
president
is
getting
started,
I'll
say
it
that
way
and
who
is
available
to
coordinate
the
efforts.
The
many
efforts
of
the
different
public
partners
thank.
B
You
that's
so
great
I,
as
a
city
leader
have
been
just
feeling
concerned
about
our
city
department
heads
having
to
be
spread
so
thin
for
this
work
and
so
really
wanting
to
make
sure
we
have
the
additional
capacity.
So
that
folks,
who
are
leading
departments,
can
lead
the
departments
and
not
have
to
be
stretched
so
thin.
For
an
emergency
like
this.
So
great
I'm
glad
to
hear
that
thanks
councillor.
M
F
You,
madam
chair
I,
appreciate
council,
member,
Gordon
and
or
somebody
making
the
change
on
this
general
appropriation
resolution.
I
still
don't
feel
great
about
the
funding
source
of
the
consolidated
TIF,
especially
that
we
didn't
have
this
post
in
advance
and
engage
our
stakeholders
that
have
an
interest
in
this
I
know,
there's
a
lot
of
other
funding
sources
that
could
have
potentially
been
tapped
but
again,
given
that
late
notice
and
late
timeline
I,
don't
think
we
had
an
opportunity
to
fully
explore
other
options
as
well.
Thank
you.
Thank.
K
K
A
If
we
did
not
have
the
strong
partnerships
that
we
do
in
the
community
and
the
fact
that
the
Red
Lake
nation
has
stepped
up
and
is
hosting
this
on
their
land
and
is
such
an
important
leader.
It
gives
me
comfort
and
the
fact
that
we
have
a
number
of
community
led
and
Native
led
organizations
that
are
at
the
table
gives
me
great
comfort.
A
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
we
are
listening
to
those
community
partners
as
we
design
the
structure
and
that
that
it
is
led
by
people
who
understand
the
challenges
that
will
be
faced
at
this
site
and
can
help
us
design
a
solution
and
operate
something
that
is
humane,
that
we
would
ourselves
feel
comfortable.
Being
in
that,
we
would
that
we
would,
that
is
that
a
standard
that
we
would
expect
for
any
of
our
relatives.
I,
think
that
should
be
the
goal
here.
I
know
we're
moving
quickly
and
I
know
that
we
are
moving.
A
A
E
A
P
You,
madam
president,
the
zoning
planning
committee
will
bring
forward
four
items
today.
I'll
start
with
number
two
through
four
number:
two
is
the
passage
of
a
split
painting
plant
zoning
ordinance
amending
title
20
of
the
Minneapolis
Code
of
Ordinances
item
threes,
the
passage
of
a
limited
entertainment
ordinance
amending
title
20
of
the
Minneapolis
Code
of
Ordinances
number
four
is
the
passage
of
an
ordinance
regulating
rooftop
mechanical
equipment,
penthouses
and
building
hydric
building
height
amending
title
20
of
the
minneapolis
Code
of
Ordinances
I
move
approval
of
number
two
through
four.
F
This
is
a
case
where
the
outcome
of
our
zoning
code
actually
worked
against
fulfilling
activation
on
the
street
in
creating
commercial
space
and,
ultimately
fulfilling
the
small
area
plans
that
our
communities
support
and
that
the
council
supported-
and
this
is
making
it
easier
not
only
for
developers
but
also
for
small
businesses
by
allowing
for
an
easier
time,
creating
commercial
space
on
our
commercial
corridors,
and
so
it's
it
is
a
small
change.
But
it
is
one
of
those
ones.
This
consistent
with
trying
to
make
the
city
easier
for
small
businesses
and
helping
to
support
them.
P
Just
want
to
take
this
opportunity
to
thank
staff.
You
know
a
lot
of
times.
We
city
council
members,
see
the
effects
of
zoning
on
every
single
block
and
have
suggestions,
and
it's
really
a
lot
of
hard
work
to
come
up
with
these
very
specific
ordinances
that
don't
affect
the
whole
city
and
for
staff
to
take
the
time
to
balance
that
out
and
to
make
something
that
will
work
and
answer.
Our
code
is
a
lot
on
top
of
everything
else.
We
ask
of
them.
So
I
really
appreciated
that.
Thank.
A
R
Thank
you,
madam
president.
So
this
item
I'll
admit
I'm
a
little
bit
late
to
the
game
because
it
frankly
did
not
seem
controversial
coming
through
my
office,
and
part
of
that
is
I
just
want
to
signal
the
cpad
staff
that,
if
you're
bringing
things
to
me
that
have
a
long
history
and
a
complicated
history
in
context
that
predates
my
time
on
the
council,
I'd
appreciate
being
cute
in
that
being
said,
I
appreciate
my
colleagues
on
the
zoning
and
planning
committee
rustling
with
that
on
the
dynasty,
I
sort
of
learned
information
that
hadn't
been
clear.
R
I
think
that
if
we
were
considering
this
item,
you
know
in
in
a
vacuum
it's
really
marginal
I
think
we
could
go
either
way,
there's
justifications
for
the
variances,
those
justifications
for
denying
them
I'd,
probably
lean
a
little
bit
towards
denying
but
I,
don't
know.
I
I
mean
I,
think
we'd
have
to
look
at
it,
but
we
kind
of
can't
look
at
it
that
way
and
I
was
trying
to
figure
out
what
I
was
going
to
do
and
I
was
thinking
about
it.
R
Last
night
and
I
was
running,
an
errand
and
I
was
trying
to
pull
out
of
my
parking
lot
in
my
apartment
building
and
there
was
a
delivery
truck
for
the
building
next
door.
Blocking
the
alley
and
I
had
a
bunch
of
options
about
how
I
could
respond
to
that.
I
could
have
responded
by
getting
really
mad
about
it
and
calling
3-1-1
I
could
have
sent
him
this
and
taking
a
picture
of
it
and
send
an
angry
tweet
to
the
company
of
the
delivery
truck
and
so
Robin
Hutchison
and
said
this
is
an
outrage.
R
How
can
you
allow
this?
Legally,
all
those
things
were
within
my
right
to
do,
but
I
could
also
recognize
that
I
live
in
a
city.
I
live
in
a
place
where
there
is
traffic,
where
you
will
sometimes
encounter
other
cars,
or
you
will
sometimes
encounter
the
effects
of
there
being
a
lot
of
people
and
by
the
way,
that's
what
makes
our
neighborhoods
awesome.
R
That's
what
makes
it
really
fun
to
live
in
neighborhoods
like
the
nil
district
in
the
North
Loop,
and
the
idea
that
these
16
parking
spaces
on
this
shared
driveway
are
somehow
going
to
create.
So
much
traffic
when
there's
already
300
parking
spaces
used
in
that
driveway
and
deliveries
and
garbage
trucks
and
everything
else.
R
This
is
going
to
be
a
three
to
five
percent
increase
in
traffic
at
most
that
this
has
gotten
held
up
in
the
kind
of
contentious
dispute
that
it
has
over
a
year
puts
us
in
a
situation,
that's
really
frustrating,
and
so
what
I'm
gonna
do?
The
the
proposal?
That's
in
front
of
us
is
plan
B.
The
proposal-
that's
in
front
of
us
is
only
being
proposed
because
the
proposal
that
the
council
approved
that
made
a
lot
of
sense
is
being
held
up
and
so
I'm
gonna
move
to
postpone
this
until
November
16th.
R
The
council
meeting
on
November,
16th
and
I
wanted
to
make
sure
to
make
some
comments
about
this.
To
make
sure
that
we're
not
sending
a
signal
that
continuing
to
Stonewall
is
going
to
be
an
effective
strategy,
actually
I'm,
really
hoping
that
we're
gonna
get
back
to
plan
a
and
I
really
hope
that
we
can
get
to
the
table
and
just
be
a
little
bit
more
reasonable
about.
R
We
live
in
a
city
and
we
need
to
share
some
space
and
sometimes
enforcing
the
letter
of
the
law,
which
maybe
you
have
the
right
to
do,
and
maybe
not
I
guess
the
courts
will
decide
that
doesn't
make
it
the
right
thing
to
do
and
doesn't
make
it
make
sense
in
a
community
and
so
I'm
asking
everybody
to
take
a
breath,
be
neighbors.
So
what
I
did
last
night
and
that
trucks
blocking
me
and
I
sat
there
for
about
90
seconds
and
I
waited
to
seal
is
going
to
happen.
R
A
N
A
E
A
And
that
is
adopted.
The
next
order
of
business
is
notices
for
ordinance
introduction.
So
we
have
three
today.
First
council
member
saumui
gives
notice
of
intent
to
introduce,
at
the
next
regular
meeting
a
subject
matter
of
an
ordinance
to
amend
the
code
related
to
competitive
bidding
thresholds
by
increasing
the
pre-approved
standard
contract
form
from
100,000
to
$175,000,
consistent
with
state
law
and
to
apply
those
same
standards
and
spend
thresholds
to
the
city's
small
and
underlies
underutilized
business
enterprise
program.
A
Are
there
any
questions
on
any
of
those
notices
seeing
none,
those
notices
are
given
and
no
further
action
is
required.
Next,
on
the
agenda
is
introductions
and
referral
calendar
notice
for
these
introductions
work
in
the
last
regular
meeting
and
are
presented
today
for
first
reading
and
referral.
The
first
pursuant
to
notice
is
a
motion
by
councilmember
Schrader
and
myself
to
give
first
reading
to
and
refer
to,
the
zoning
and
planning
committee
to
subject-matter
an
ordinance
to
amend
the
zoning
code
related
to
limiting
lock
combinations
and
lower
density
zoning
districts.
A
Second,
pursuant
to
notice
council
member
Ellison
moves
to
get
first
reading
to
and
refer
to,
the
public
health
environment,
civil
rights
and
engagement
committee,
the
subject
matter
of
an
ordinance
to
amend
the
housing
code
related
to
lead,
poisoning,
prevention
and
control
and
disclosure
notifications
that
are
required.
Third,
pursuant
to
notice,
we
have
a
motion
by
councilmember
Goodman
to
get
first
reading
to
and
refer
to
the
economic
development
of
regulatory
Services
Committee
the
subject-matter
of
ordinance
related
to
the
requirements
for
administrative
citations.
Are
there
any
questions
about
any
of
those
introductions?
I
don't
see.
A
Any
I
will
just
put
myself
in
Cubao
ad
for
the
first
one.
This
is
customer,
Schrader
and
I
doing
something
similar
to
what
we
have
done
with
inclusionary
zoning,
which
is
look
at
an
issue
that
is
coming
up
frequently
during
discussions
of
our
land
use
and
development
intensity
map
and
the
Comprehensive
Plan
draft,
and
seeing
that
the
regulations
that
we
would
eventually
adopt
to
implement
those
high-level
land-use
guidance
principles
are
causing.
You
know,
questions
and
concerns
in
the
community.
So
it
turns
out
that
the
issue
of
lot
combinations
is
more
complex
than
you
might
imagine.
A
So
many
of
your
constituents,
we've
learned,
often
apply
for
a
lot
combination.
Applications
for
all
kinds
of
reasons
that
a
single-family
home
owner
in
Minneapolis
may
want
to
combine
their
a
lot
for
related
to
like
driveways
and
other
small
items,
so
we're
getting
and
we'll
share
more
information
about
those
details
soon.
But
the
intention
here
is
to
codify
as
soon
as
possible
the
direction
and
the
comp
plan
that
says
lock.
Company
shouldn't
will
not
be
allowed
and
the
lowest
density
districts
an
interior
one
and
then
to
create
a
process
by
which
folks
would
apply.
A
For
lock
combinations
in
those
districts
where
they
would
be
allowed,
and
that
is
not
a
big
deviations
from
today's
existing
conditions.
So
again
we'll
get
more
information
to
all
of
our
colleagues
about
those
existing
conditions
first
and
then
invite
you
all
to
to
pitch
in
as
we
tackle
the
regulations
that
will
come
likely
next
year.
Is
there
anything
further
on
any
of
those
introductions,
seeing
none
all
in
approval?
Please
say
aye
aye,
any
opposed,
say
no.
That
carries
in
those
three
subject.
A
This
internal
external
evaluation
is
reflected
in
council
action,
2018
a
dash
0
for
nine
zero
and
I'll
recognize
councilmember
Cunningham
for
comments
before
we
take
up
the
motion
to
charge
the
committee
from
further
work
on
this
item
and
rescind
the
prior
action
to
delete
this
and
she
agenda
this
issue
from
the
agenda.
Councilmember
Cunningham
thank.
B
You,
madam
president,
I
just
wanted
to
take
a
moment
to
explain
the
intention
behind
this,
so
the
this
staff
direction
was
originally
intended
to
address
the
concerns
that
were
being
publicly
discussed,
questioning
the
integrity
of
the
work
of
the
Civil
Rights
Department.
By
having
an
external
analysis
in
the
form
of
a
peer
review
from
police
oversight,
professionals
to
explore
the
OPC
ARS
methodology,
the
staff
direction
was
meant
to
be
in
a
second
additional
scope
of
work
to
the
contract.
B
The
mayor
and
the
chief
were
working
on
and
ensure
this
aspect
was
included
for
good
governing,
given
the
concerns
expressed
publicly
once
the
study
was
completed
and
published.
However,
the
these
concerns
were
quelled
by
the
high
quality
final
product
produce
further,
since
we
as
a
council,
voted
to
not
fund
the
King
&
Spalding
contract.
B
The
next
steps,
according
to
the
recommendations
of
the
study
itself,
is
for
city
leaders
to
meet
with
HCMC
and
County
leaders
to
discuss
concrete
next
steps
to
address
this
concrete
issue,
which
has
not
happened
yet.
If
my
colleagues
still
feel
that
this
is
necessary,
I
am
open
to
it,
of
course,
but
I
urge
us
to
keep
moving
forward
to
a
true
resolution
of
the
findings
of
these
other
study.
Thank
you.
Thank.
L
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
agree
with
what
councilmember
Cunningham
said
at
the
very
end
of
his
statements,
but
I
just
want
to
make
it
clear
that
the
community
requested
an
external
review
from
outside
city
government
committing
to
that
investigation,
which
we
did
unanimously
after
receiving
a
lot
of
public
input
back
in
June,
there
was
council
unanimous
approval
of
this
On
June
29th
only
to
quietly
back
out
later,
I
think
really
undermines
the
Community
Trust
in
our
city,
so
I,
disagree
and
I
want
good
and
conscience
vote
on
this.
L
A
L
A
I
think,
do
and
would
have
been
another
option,
but
rather
just
taking
this
head-on
and
explaining
the
reasoning
behind
this
I
have
had
the
opportunity
to
talk
to
a
number
of
stakeholders
about
this,
and
it
seems
to
me
from
what
I
am
hearing
which
may
not
be
the
full
picture.
That
folks
are
comfortable
with
the
final
report
that
came
out
of
the
civil
rights
department.
A
At
the
time
that
we
took
the
initial
action,
it
was
still
in
draft
form,
then
it
had
been
shared
with
the
media
prior
to
the
completion
of
the
report
and,
in
fact,
briar
to
too
many
of
the
stakeholders
and
partners,
seeing
the
report
and
having
a
chance
to
review
it,
which
was
an
intended
part
of
the
process,
so
I
feel
comfortable
at
this
time.
Moving
forward
with
councilmember
Cunningham's
motion
I
do
want
to
note
that
there
are
two
other
external
evaluations
currently
underway.
A
The
results
of
one
will
be
due
will
be
available
soon
and
the
second
I
believe
shortly
after
and
we
may
want
to
reevaluate
the
city's
role
going
forward
after
those
two
external
reviews
are
completed
that
are
more
focused
on
the
medical
professionals.
For
us
really,
the
purview
of
the
city
was
directly
the
please
buzzers
behavior,
which
has
been
addressed
by
the
chief
very
swiftly,
the
chief
and
the
mayor.
K
You,
council
president
I'll
be
supporting
councilmember
Cunningham's
motion
to
discharge
this
staff
direction.
I
think
that
this
is,
you
know
a
it
is
a
very
public
way
to
delete
an
item
and
I
think
that
that
in
and
of
itself
is
a
testament
to
councilmember
Cunningham's
commitment
to
transparency
and
and
ours
as
a
body,
and
so
I
appreciate
that.
K
K
S
Thank
you,
madam
president.
As
the
chair
of
public
safety,
my
message
is
more
around.
How
can
we
use
this
opportunity
to
have
more
consistency
in
the
decisions
that
we
make
moving
forward
around
issues
that
are
that
are
pretty
public
and
have
a
high
profile?
So,
at
the
time
when
the
ketamine
issue
happened,
I
felt
like
there
was
a
lot
of
pressure
on
me
to
have
a
response
to
demonstrate
how
our
public
safety
committee
was
tackling
this
issue
and
and
I
feel
like
we're
kind
of
dialing
back
on
some
of
that
and
I.
S
Don't
know
if
it's
just
like
a
matter
of
time
and
now
things
are
more
clear
and
there's
been
more
conversations,
but
as
I
look
back
on
this
year
and
still
hope
that
the
members
of
our
public
safety
committee
can
more
strongly
hold
the
reins
of
the
conversation
of
Public
Safety
in
our
city.
That's
an
invitation
to
see
what
we
can
do
together.
I
I
realized
that
you
know
this
year
is
almost
coming
to
a
close
and
I
know.
S
You
guys
aren't
gonna
like
this,
but
pretty
much
money
schedule
has
already
booked
out
until
December
7th,
and
then
we
have
our
two
final
council
meetings
of
the
year:
December,
7th
and
December
15th,
and
so
in
a
way
this
year
is
almost
done,
and
we
only
have
two
more
public
safety
committees
this
year,
and
then
we
have
three
more
years
of
governing
together
and
so
for
me.
I
want
us
to
reflect
on
that
experience
and
to
see
what
happened.
S
My
first
question
was:
what
is
the
county
doing
on
this?
What
what
are
the
medical?
You
know,
staff
members
who
are
responding
to
these
situations?
Why
are
they
taking
orders
from
MPD?
Why
are
they
letting
MPD
influence
them
so
much?
So
that
was
my
gut
reaction
to
that
discussion.
It
was
not
primarily
to
go
towards
the
MPD
officers,
and
luckily
we
do
have
a
layer
of
government
government
that
whose
main
job
is
to
do
that,
which
is
the
mayor's
office
and
the
chief,
and
they
did
have
a
good
response
and
I
supported
that
response.
S
At
the
time,
so
so
I
just
want
to
say
you
know
this
is
an
invitation
for
us
to
really
figure
out.
What
is
it
that
we
want
to
do
with
public
safety?
As
a
committee
in
the
coming
three
years,
I
am
starting
conversations
with
council
members
about
doing
a
strategic
planning
session
with
us
in
December
to
figure
out
what
is
it
that
our
committee
needs
to
have
more
of
an
impact
on
this
conversation,
some
of
that
work
is
connected
to
economic
development.
Some
of
that
work
is
connected
to
public
Public,
Health
and
I.
P
You,
madam
president,
I'll,
be
supporting
councilmember
Cunningham's
motion.
I
also
want
to
echo
councilmember
Allison's
point
about
transparency
and
thanking
councilmember
cutting
up
for
bringing
this
up
light.
I
think
that
this
is
a
great
step
forward
and
how
we
should
be
governing,
and
it's
it's
a
way
and
I
applaud
again
councilmember
Cunningham
from
taking
this
very
clear
step
instead
of
things
just
fading
away,
putting
this
out
in
the
public
and
really
involving
them
in
the
discussion.
You
know
this.
P
L
You,
madam
president,
I
appreciate
councilmember
condos
efforts
to
bring
all
of
our
public
safety
priorities
together.
There
are
a
lot
of
them
on
this
council
and
to
help
us
organize
them.
I
wanted
to
point
out
per
some
other
comments
that
this
isn't
about
auditing
civil
rights,
but
rather
it
was
about
auditing,
our
Police
Department,
which
is
where
all
the
public
blame
came
from
within
civil
rights.
We
have
to
acknowledge
that
there
was
a
major
data
breach.
That
was
an
issue
it
biased
the
report.
L
A
You
and
I
do
want
to
just
clarify
that
there
has
not
been
any
determination
of
who
shared
a
draft
report,
but
the
president
certainly
has
not
been
determined
that
that
came
from
within
the
Civil
Rights
Department.
There
were
many
staff
in
outside
of
the
city
that
had
access
to
that
report
and
frankly,
I
mean
I.
Think.
Maybe
it's
important
just
pause
and
and
recognize
that
when
council
member
Cunningham
brought
this
to
committee
for
our
consideration
as
a
staff
direction,
that
was
in
close
collaboration
with
the
civil
rights
department
that
have
been
leading
this
work.
A
And
the
intention
was
to
work
with
a
national
organization
of
which
they
are
a
member
to
provide
assurance
to
policymakers
and
others
who
are
calling
into
question
the
validity
of
the
report
that
our
civil
rights
Department
had
proposed.
And
he
was
working
closely
with
the
department
to
make
sure
that
their
work
was
completed
and,
if
necessary,
reviewed
by
an
organization
that
they
had
recommended
that
they
are
a
partner
of
within
a
national
organization.
R
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I
just
want
to
note
too
I
mean
I.
Think
the
the
context
that
everybody
has
to
remember
is
that
this
was
passed
and
then
the
mayor's
office
worked
on
a
proposal.
We
ended
up
deciding
that
that
proposal
seemed
like
it
was
going
to
be
duplicating
a
lot
more
that
had
already
been
completed
and
was
probably
disproportionate
in
terms
of
spending
who
to
what
we
actually
needed.
I
think
I,
initially
was
picturing
more
of
a
peer
review,
something
that
was
just
more
sort
of
you
know.
R
Looking
over
the
data
that
that
had
been
looked
at
and
I
think
we're
pretty
clear
that
it's
a
fairly
limited
data
set,
it
wouldn't
be
hard
for
somebody
else
to
get
their
eyes
on
it
and
and
look
at
it.
But
there's
not
you
know,
redoing.
The
work
isn't
going
to
generate
a
lot
of
different
results
because
the
data,
so
it's
very
finite
and
so
I
think
it
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
rescind
this.
For
now
and
the
reason
is
that
nobody's
contesting
the
findings.
R
Mpd
is
not
walking
around
saying
we
disagree
with
this.
They
actually
made
policy
adjustments
and
and
change
the
way
that
they're
behaving
in
response
to
this
I've
gotten
one
contact
from
one
constituent
after
after
we
voted
to
not
approve
the
EADS
contract
and
all
of
the
questions
that
that
constituent
raised
need
to
be
answered
in
the
county
studies
that
are
in
progress.
R
I
think
it's
very
important
that
we
continue
to
understand
how
people
are
approaching
medical
experiments
in
our
community
I
think
it's
very
important
to
understand
the
ways
that
that
experiment
was
approved,
the
ways
that
that
experiment
was
conducted
and
and
ultimately
what
we
can
do
to
prevent
vulnerable
populations
from
being
the
subject
of
medical
experiments
without
their
consent.
That
happens
at
the
county
level,
and
that
study
is
in
progress
and
so
I
want
us
to
all.