►
From YouTube: August 28, 2018 Committee of the Whole
Description
Minneapolis Committee of the Whole Meeting
A
Good
afternoon
I'm
going
to
call
to
order
this
regular
meeting
of
the
race
equity
subcommittee
and
the
committee
of
the
whole
for
Tuesday
August
28th.
My
name
is
Andrea
Jenkins
and
I
am
the
chair
of
both
these
committees
and
at
Dyess
with
me.
Today
are
councilmembers
Johnson,
Ellison,
Schrader,
tano
and
Fletcher.
B
Recast
overall
is
committed
to
seeking
and
supporting
community-based
initiatives
aimed
at
reducing
and
responding
to
trauma.
As
many
of
you
know,
our
support
addresses
trauma
and
many
forms,
including
incident
based
events
well
as
the
trauma
from
long-term
persistent
trauma
like
institutional
and
systemic
racism.
The
funding
that
we
have
through
this
program
supports
projects
that
increase
trauma,
awareness,
promote
resiliency
in
healing
and
also
deepen
resident
knowledge
around
policy
and
systems
change
work.
That
is
the
overall
gamut
of
our
work,
and
our
resiliency
project
aims
to
take
some
of
that
work
to
another
level.
B
It
aims,
as
I
said,
to
redo
to
increase
trauma
awareness,
build
skills
around
healing
and
resiliency
promote
systems
change
throughout
the
city
through
we
came
to
this
project
because
of
a
strategic
planning
process
that
we
did
with
our
advisory
team
in
2017.
That
advisory
team
consists
of
men,
members
of
community
organizations
agencies
as
well
as
city
department
and
staff,
and
strategic
planning
process.
B
Our
advisory
team
wanted
to
use
a
participatory
budgeting
model
as
a
vehicle
to
reach
program
goals
and
engage
residents
in
decision-making
to
make
sure
that
those
who
are
typically
not
a
part
of
decision-making
processes
have
access
to
those
types
of
opportunities.
The
resiliency
365
Fund
is
a
direct
response
to
that
guidance,
which
is
also
an
outgrowth
of
several
different
bodies
of
work,
including
our
referent
response
to
officer-involved
shootings
and
our
critical
incident
protocol.
B
Initially,
we
were
not
clear
about
how
we
were
going
to
use
the
funding,
but
we
were
given
an
opportunity
to
have
access
to
our
Year
fun
our
year.
One
funds
in
May
and
that
give
us
gave
us
an
opportunity
to
think
about
how
we
were
gonna,
use
this
big
chunk
of
funds
and
we
conceptualize
the
resiliency
365
process.
B
So
I
talked
about
how
we
started.
Let's
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
process,
so
we
announced
the
funding
opportunity
at
the
last
price,
equity
and
subcommittee
hearing
back
in
its
second
June.
We
talked
about
how
these
funds
would
be
available
to
give
organizations
and
Institute's
an
opportunity
to
apply
for
different
bodies
of
work
throughout
the
city
we
created
three
different
funding
levels,
including
our
ripple
effect
funding
level,
which
gave
organizations
that
have
very
small
capacity,
an
opportunity
to
apply
for
two
thousand
and
two
hundred
and
fifty
dollars.
B
We
also
constructed
our
wave
effect
funding,
which
gave
members
an
opportunity
to
apply
for
between
what
was
the
ripple
effect
in
anything
up
to
twenty
five
thousand,
and
we
also
constructed
the
tsunami
level
that
gave
people
an
opportunity
to
apply
for
up
to
seventy
five
thousand.
We
endeavour
to
give
out
40
grants
in
the
ripple
effect
category
up
to
ten
in
the
wave
effect
and
two
in
the
tsunami
effect.
So
we
have,
we
announced
the
funding
opportunity.
We
had
different
funding
levels.
B
We
also
communicated
about
the
opportunity
as
far
and
wide
as
we
possibly
could,
starting
with
the
City
Council
meeting.
In
addition,
we
push
the
opportunity
out
on
social
media
through
email,
our
personal
networks,
as
well
as
partnering
with
different
city
departments,
to
let
them
know
about
the
opportunity
we
provided
and
when
I
say
we
I
mean
our
staff.
We
all
provided
opportunities
for
those
who
wanted
to
submit
proposals
to
receive
technical
assistance
from
us.
B
One
of
the
things
that
we've
realized,
as
we
have
been
doing
recast,
is
that
a
lot
of
people
are
interested
in
funding
opportunities
and
don't
know
how
to
get
through
the
city
contracting
process.
You
have
may
have
questions
about
our
few
language.
They
may
have
questions
about
just
how
to
fill
out
the
application
in
general,
and
so
because
we
know
that
economics
is
so
deeply
tied
to
trauma.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
provided
hands-on
technical
assistance
to
those
who
had
those
barriers,
and
then
we
had
this
voting
piece.
B
I
was
a
part
of
the
Parsis.
As
I
said,
it
was
a
participatory
budgeting
model,
and
so
we
wanted
to
make
sure
we
have
participants
all
throughout
the
city
of
Minneapolis
those
who
would
live,
worked
and
played
in
the
city
as
a
primary
place
that
they
had
access
to
voting
opportunities.
We
constructed
three
different
voting
opportunities
and
physical
that
were
physical.
We
partnered
with
open
streets
to
host
the
table
there
we
tabled
at
Brian
Coyle
as
well,
and
we
also
partnered
F
lo.
B
By
doing
that,
we
were
able
to
really
tap
into
the
things
that
were
our
existing
in
community
instead
of
creating
something
new
which
also
really
gelled
nicely
with
our
very
tight
timeline
as
well.
In
addition
to
the
physical
voting
locations,
we
also
gave
opportunity
for
people
to
vote
online.
By
far
it
was
the
most
prevalent
way
that
people
voted
with
over
2,600
votes
on
online.
B
The
other
thing
that
we
did
is
we
provided
an
opportunity
for
organizations
that
we
knew
had
language
barriers
and
technology
barriers
the
opportunity
to
print
off
the
ballot
and
hand
those
in
in
person.
We
knew
that
we
wouldn't
be
able
to
translate
the
ballots
into
certain
languages
before
we
started.
B
Throughout
these
voting
mechanisms
we
had
300
people
participate
in
an
in-person.
We
had
100
people
participate
through
an
online
voting
ballot
process
and
total
we
had
about
3,000
104
votes
throughout
the
whole
process.
As
I
said
again,
our
online
voting
mechanism
was
the
most
popular
way
in
which
people
voted,
and
we
also
collaborated
with
city
departments
in
doing
this
work.
One
really
fantastic
testimony
is
that
our
urban
scholars
really
pitched
in
a
lot
during
the
last
two
weeks
of
of
July
to
make
sure
that
this
process
was
done
really
really
well.
B
They
volunteered
to
help
us
well
not
volunteer,
but
they
were
compensated
to
help
us
put
together
the
ballots
and
they
also
helped
us
table
at
some
of
the
voting
events
as
well.
We
also
partner
what
NCR
to
think
about
what
we
could
do
around
language
accessibility,
and
we
push
this
word
out
through
our
health
department,
as
well
as
our
arts
and
creative
City
making
department
as
well.
B
In
the
end,
because
of
all
of
these
efforts,
as
I
said,
we
were
able
to
recruit
3104
people
to
vote
which
ended
up,
resulting
in
29
projects
being
funded
based
on
community's
participation
in
the
voting
process.
The
amount
of
these
projects
spanning
all
categories
is
four
hundred.
Ninety
five
thousand
and
seven
hundred
dollars
with
alleged
eleven
projects
being
funded
in
the
ripple
effect
category.
B
Sixteen
in
the
wave
and
two
in
the
tsunami
we'll
talk
about
this
a
little
bit
later,
but
one
of
the
reasons
why
we
were
able
to
fund
more
in
the
wave
effect
category
than
we
initially
anticipated
was
because
we
did
not
get
that
initial
40
and
the
ripple
effect
which
we
were
anticipating,
which
is
really
really
great,
because
this
would
have
been
administrative
nightmare.
But
we
ended
up
getting
less
within
that
category,
and
people
in
the
wave
effect
didn't
apply
up
to
seven
twenty-five
thousand
dollars.
B
So
we
had
more
wiggle
room,
which
gave
us
an
opportunity
to
spread
those
dollars
even
further
than
we
initially
anticipated,
and
so
this
is
a
breakdown
of
our
voting.
Demographics
in
terms
of
ethnicity,
age
and
gender
and
sex,
as
you
can
see
through
this
slide,
are
the
most
overwhelming
representation
that
we
had
was
from
African
Americans
and
African.
Immigrants
followed
by
European
Americans,
but
we
also
did
have
representation
from
Asian,
Pacific,
Islanders
and
Southeast
Asians,
as
well
as
Latinas
and
American
Indians.
B
As
well
overwhelmingly
for
the
age
category,
we
had
the
highest
participation
between
the
35
and
555
age
category
followed
by
21
through
40
34.
We
did
allow
people
under
14
to
vote.
One
of
the
reasons
that
we
did.
That
is
because
we
know
that
for
some
firms
for
some
immigrants,
that
language
barrier
really
plays
a
role
until
whether
or
not
people
can
access
opportunities-
and
we
know
that
many-
you
do
end
up
translating
for
their
parents,
and
so
we
wanted
to
give
opportunity
for
younger
younger
people
to
do
it.
B
Because
of
that
reason,
but
also
we
know
that
many
young
people
have
a
very
solid
analysis
around
our
systems
and
when
it's
a
not
discount
them
because
of
their
age,
and
then
you
see
the
breakdown
with
gender
sex
as
well
overwhelmingly
more
participants
that
were
female,
followed
by
male.
But
we
also
had
some
representation
with
our
transgender
and
two-spirit
communities
as
well.
B
A
A
A
C
You
had
sent
us
a
couple
of
emails
asking
us
to
do
so.
I
didn't
choose
any
one,
because
I
didn't
think
I
was
supposed
to
choose
any
one.
I
just
wanted
to
say:
I
did
do
the
entire
survey.
It
took
almost
an
hour
to
read
through
all
of
the
applications
and
I
thought
it
was
extremely
well
presented.
It
was
easy
to
understand
what
everyone
was
suggesting.
I
understood
the
three
different
categories
and
I
didn't
feel
like.
B
B
D
E
D
B
D
B
B
D
B
So
we
also
wanted
to
be
able
to
show
you
a
breakdown
of
the
demographics
and
geography
of
the
projects
that
were
funded
and
so,
as
we
said,
there
were
29
total
projects
that
were
funded
representing
work
that
will
be
targeted
towards
African
Americans
Native
Americans
was
African
East
African,
including
Somali
youth
of
color,
Latin,
etics,
European,
American,
males,
females,
LGBTQ
representing
all
ages,
all
in
Minneapolis,
and
so
that's
our
target.
That's
that's
where
the
grant
is
situated,
and
so
all
of
this
work
is
targeting
people
in
Minneapolis.
B
But
if
you
look
at
the
map
to
your
right,
you
will
see
the
breakdown
in
which
projects
were
funded
across
different
neighborhoods
and
across
north
and
south,
as
well
and
so
of
the
four
hundred
four
hundred
nine
four
hundred.
Ninety
six
thousand
six
hundred
eighty
nine
dollars
over
three
hundred
thousand
were
funded
in
north
and
a
little
over
a
hundred
thousand
were
funded
in
South
Minneapolis,
and
you
see
a
total
of
at
a
different
neighborhoods
across
those
different
regions
and.
B
So
with
the
resiliency
365
funding
opportunity,
as
we
said,
we
announced
this
at
the
city
council
meeting
and
we
really
put
this
together
really
really
quickly,
because
we
knew
we
had
an
opportunity
that
we
wanted
to
move
on,
and
we
didn't
want
to
wait.
And
so
the
metaphor
that
I
use
in
describing
this
process
is
that
we
were
building
flying,
maintaining
and
repairing
the
plane.
At
the
same
time,
because
there
were
so
many
different,
you
can
see
it's
a
metaphor
that
works.
B
There
were
so
many
different
pieces
that
we
needed
to
make
sure
that
we
were
done
in
our
eyes
and
crossing
our
T's,
and
so
one
of
the
things
with
the
decisions
along
the
ways
that
we
adjusted
the
project,
descriptions
and
compositions
of
teams
after
the
ballasts
were
already
printed
and
already
posted.
One
of
the
reasons
we
did.
That
is
because
we
project
teams
came
back
to
us
and
said:
well,
you
didn't
get
my
name
correct
or
there's
an
organization
here
that
shouldn't
be
listed
or
this
organization
wasn't
listed.
B
B
Think
we
made
two
different
calls
and
there
was
one
call
and
an
email
that
we
ended
up
missing
out
on
because
those
rules
weren't
clear
in
the
beginning.
We
also
needed
to
make
further
clarifications
around
our
funding
restrictions.
Samsa
provides
a
list
of
things
that
we
cannot
use
the
funds
with.
We
also
know
that
the
city
also
provides
us
with
some
guidance
around
how
we
can
fin
spend
funding
dollars,
and
we
didn't
put
that
in
the
funding
restrictions.
B
There
are
also
things
that
we
were
convinced
as
a
team
that
we
needed
to
be
really
clear
about
things
that
we
weren't
going
to
purchase
and
that
wasn't
there
either,
but
we
knew
that,
based
on
the
validity
of
our
relationship
with
the
city,
the
work
that
we
wanted
to
be
able
to
continue
to
stand
up
and
do
that.
We
couldn't
fund
those
things
and
they
wasn't
clear-cut.
B
In
the
beginning,
we
had
to
go
back
and
make
sure
that
people
were
aware
that,
at
the
end,
as
I
said,
we
added
more
projects
in
the
wave
category
than
we
initially
anticipated.
We
initially
anticipated
adding
only
having
10
projects
represent
in
that
category.
We
ended
up
having
16.
For
us.
This
was
really
really
significant,
because
it's
meant
that
there
were
some
organizations
that
represented
working
with
immigrant
and
refugees
that
were
just
in
that
that
bottom,
six
that
were
able
to
be
funded
as
a
result.
B
So,
I'm
really
glad
that
we
were
able
to
extend
that
opportunity
further
than
we
initially
conceptualized.
We
also
randomized
the
project
order
on
the
online
battle.
It's
because
we
didn't
want
multiple
holders
coming
in
thinking
that
the
and
only
voting
for
the
top
projects
and
not
scrolling
down
to
figure
out
the
rest
of
them.
So
we
wanted
to
give
more
opportunities
for
all
of
the
projects
to
get
to
get
voted.
B
So
our
lessons
learned,
while
building
flying,
maintaining
and
repairing
the
plane,
we
should
build
in
a
more
cohesive
screening
process
before
the
community
voting.
We
did
have
an
opportunity
to
screen
beforehand
and
we
should
just
given
us
ourselves
more
time
between
when
the
about
I
mean
when
the
projects
were
doing
when
the
ballots
were
printed,
to
make
sure
that
that
screening
process
could
be
more
robust.
We
really
value
the
community
voting
process,
and
so
we
turn
most
of
that
decision-making
over
to
the
community.
B
But
we
should,
as
a
city,
make
sure
that
we
have
more
oversight
over
what
we
can
get
funded.
So
we
don't
have
to
go
back
and
make
corrections
in
the
end.
One
of
the
other
things
was
this:
having
simplified
ballots,
I
really
appreciate
the
comment
that
councilmember
Goodman
made
about
how
easy
it
was
to
go
through
the
computer
voting
process,
and
we
also
know
that
wasn't
the
case
for
everyone
and
that
some
people,
because
of
time,
because
access
because
of
language
just
didn't
have
that
luxury
to
sit
for
that
amount
of
time.
B
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
in
the
future
we
have
simplified
ballots.
One
of
the
things
that
I
did
not
mention
before
is
that
we
also
partner
with
the
City
Clerk's
office
as
the
ballots
came
in
and
got
some
technical
assistance
from
them
about
how
we
should
respond
to
some
things
in
this
project,
but
also
how
we
can
make
sure
that
we
build
more
measures
and
moving
forward.
B
Another
really
beautiful
lesson
that
we
had
is
that
we
did
what
we
set
out
to
do.
We
accomplished
and
providing
more
voting
opportunities
for
individuals.
Who've,
never
voted
before
by
not
requiring
IDs
or
people
to
be
citizens
or
some
of
the
other
mechanisms
that
our
systems
put
in
place.
To
say
that
people
are
legitimate
to
vote.
B
We
were
able
to
make
sure
that
people
that
have
had
records
or
have
not
voted
before
or
who
are
not
documented
and
all
those
other
barriers
were
able
to
be
a
part
of
this
process
which
is
healing
in
Kothari,
because
that
means
that
people
who
live
work
and
play
in
Minneapolis
all
get
to
participate
and
not
just
a
select
few.
The
other
unfortunate
lesson
is
that
there
was
some
three
competition
between
the
project
teams.
B
I
think
this
lends
itself
bigger
than
what
recast
is.
This
is
a
non-profit
industrial
funding,
philanthropy
problem,
it's
also
a
trauma
response
as
well,
but
in
the
future
we
would
like
to
make
sure
that
when
we
are
putting
out
projects
that
were
mitigating
the
competition
as
much
as
possible,
one
of
the
vendors
that
initially
submitted
an
application
actually
would
drew
the
application
because
she
in
her
word,
she
said
that
she
didn't
want
to
compete
against
people
that
she
needed
to
build
relationships
with
and
work
with,
which
I
think
is
real.
B
A
F
You,
madam
chair
I,
this
the
issue
of
the
inherent
competitive
nature
of
grants,
is
something
that
I
feel
like
I've
really
struggled
with
as
a
council
member
and
as
somebody
who's
really
thinking
about.
Well,
how
do
we
do
participatory
budgeting
without
a
competitive
aspect,
because
the
inherently
the
model
of
a
participatory
budgeting
is
through
the
granting
process
and
so
I'm
curious
from
the
perspective
of
a
racial
equity
analysis?
B
Otherwise
I
really
don't
I.
Think
that's
something
that
we're
all
trying
to
figure
out,
because
it
is
such
a
huge
issue
and,
as
I
said,
the
issues
and
just
remains
to
be
recast.
It's
all
over
our
city
or
state
or
our
country.
Quite
frankly,
so
it's
a
big
thing
that
we
should
continue
to
solution
around.
So
I
have
some
answers,
but
not
all
answers
which.
F
F
But
what
actually
happened
is
folks
got
really
competitive,
even
more
competitive
at
the
table,
no
really
uncomfortable
that
they
had
to
like
have
a
conversation
with
somebody
that
they
felt
like
they
were
competing
with
for
money.
So
I
would
love
to
keep
talking
to
all
of
you
about
this
and
and
keep
thinking
through
it,
because
this
process
is
just
one
example
of
an
opportunity
for
us
to
build
trust
in
government
era
and
for
government
to
do
business
differently.
A
D
B
So
right
now
we
are
putting
together
the
contracts
and
getting
people
in
voice
so
that
they
can
start
on
the
work.
One
of
the
things
that
we
built
into
the
contract
for
the
wave
in
the
tsunami
and
that
we
are
also
requiring
of
the
ripple
as
well,
is
that
people
participate
in
evaluation
measures
on
the
backend,
and
so
we
are
still
defining
what
those
will
look
like.
But
we
are.
We
have
an
evaluator
that
we're
working
with
for
recasts.
B
We
also
have
our
technical
advisor
I
mean
our
technical
assistance
team,
who
has
been
providing
some
leadership
to
this.
We
also
had
our
advisory
team
meeting
last
week,
where
people
gave
us
some
really
solid
pointers
on
what
the
evaluation
could
look
like
and
to
kind
of
get
to
some
of
the
competition
pieces.
At
the
same
time,
we
have
thought
about
bringing
all
of
the
providers
and
vendors
together
to
kind
of
have
a
listening
session
about
how
to
do
this
differently
and
in
the
end,
in
the
future.
B
We
also
are
asking
all
of
our
providers
to
fill
out
reporting
forms,
so
we
give
from
them
a
high
level
sense
of
evaluation
around
what
what
has
worked
in
their
program.
We
also
will
be
providing
surveys
to
all
of
the
participants
so
that
those
who
are
participating
in
the
projects,
but
also
have
an
opportunity
to
weigh
in
and
so
we're
building
an
evaluation
at
different
components
of
of
the
grant
that
we'll
be
able
to
follow
up
with
you
on
that.
Probably
late
fall,
I.
D
G
D
G
H
A
H
You,
madam
vice
president,
so
thank
you
so
much
for
this
thorough
presentation
and
I
was
able
to
log
online
and
participate,
and
so
I
got
to
feel
the
process
myself
and
just
as
you're
you're
doing
the
lessons-learned
conversation.
I
just
wanted
to
share
from
my
experience
as
an
elected
official
engaged
with
the
collaborative
safety
strategies
program
and
how
it
played
out
over
the
last
two
years.
I
have
some
comments
and
that
I
have
a
question
for
for
this
program.
H
So,
on
the
point
of
unnecessary
competition,
what
we
learned
from
the
collaborative
safety
strategies
program
the
first
year
was
exactly
that
and
so
the
second
time
that
it
was
put
together.
I
think
the
health
department
worked
with
NCR
to
give
this
birth
to
this
idea
of
bringing
people
together
to
brainstorm
together
before
they
submitted.
H
The
application
and
I
can
just
speak
to
my
experience
on
how
that
went
this
year
in
south
Minneapolis
and
it
ended
up
bringing
together
a
variety
of
people
at
medical,
synthetic
to
hold
a
session
that
folks
called
revolutionary,
and
there
was
like
a
lot
of
really
I
guess:
dynamic.
Conversations
between
different
groups,
who
were
thinking
about
similar
issues
and
and
met
new
folks
and
built
relationships
and
encouraging
that
ideation
was
really
the
game
changer
for
the
South
Minneapolis
component
of
the
program.
H
Just
because
I
think
part
of
the
challenge
of
doing
some
of
this
work
in
in
City
Hall
is
that
there
are
so
many
different
units
that
are
touching
similar
conversations.
And
sometimes
we
don't
allow
ourselves
the
time
or
energy
to
build
in
that
internal
collaboration
as
we're
rolling
out
future
initiatives
and
just
learning
from
that
experience
where
the
health
department
was
able
to
help
NCR
kind
of
conceive
and
think
through
this.
H
You
know
via
email,
I
mean
I,
remember,
emailing,
a
lot
of
folks,
just
letting
them
know
like
this
process
is
about
to
happen.
You
know
you're
going
to
be
able
to
participate,
make
sure
it's
on
your
calendar
and
sending
out
even
calendar
invites,
through
my
own
calendar
Outlook,
to
make
sure
that
it
was
on
people's
radar
and
the
last
thing
I'm
just
curious
as
you're.
H
Looking
at
the
future
of
this
program,
can
you
speak
to
a
little
bit
about,
because
what
I've
noticed
is
that
when
we
start
a
program
and
then
we
let
it
play
out
for
one
or
two
years
and
then
we
discontinue
it
I
feel
like
we
miss
some
of
the
evaluative
tools
of
weather
and
on
those
things
worked,
and
then
we
like
move
on
to
something
else,
because
we
think
that's
going
to
work
better
and
I'm
just
kind
of
wondering
what
your
perspective
is
in
terms
of.
Like
will
this
program?
H
Because,
with
the
sample
collaborative
safety
strategies
program,
it
was
funded
for
two
years
and
now
it's
discontinued
and
it's
kind
of
like
we're
just
like
figuring
it
out
lean
on
and
there's
not
enough
time
to
learn
from
like
what's
happening
to
figure
out
what
the
future
holds
so
I'm
just
curious
about
like
what
you're
thinking
about
this
program
and
what
the
next
you
know
three
to
five
years.
Look
like
you.
B
I'm,
not
sure
if
we
will
have
that
sort
of
thing
in
year.
Three
I
also
don't
want
to
wait
to
the
end
of
almost
the
end
of
year.
Three
to
think
about
whether
or
not
we're
going
to
move
this
forward.
However,
we
are
conceptualizing
what
does
having
a
hybrid
of
a
critical
incident
response
resiliency
through
65,
like
a
process
that
lends
itself
to
participatory
budgeting.
That
also
includes
city
staff
and
city
staff
departments,
in
a
deeper
way.
B
That's
one
of
the
things
that
we
conceptualize
and
having
our
critical
incident
response
protocol,
though
we
weren't
able
to
bring
forward
completely
in
this
process,
and
so
we
will
have
something
to
this
complete
nature.
No,
but
it
will
give
people
an
opportunity
to
participate
in
the
budgeting
process
and
also
give
us
an
opportunity
to
bring
city
staff
and
electus
in
that
conversation
in
a
deeper
way.
E
You
know
provide
the
leadership
about.
You
know
if
there's
particular
geographies
that
aren't
as
represented
through
this
process.
Maybe
we
do
consider
in
this
budget
funding
some
continued
client.
You
know
that
sort
of
approach,
the
collaborative
safety
approach,
or
perhaps
we
consider
augmenting
this
through
that
or
I-
mean
I,
think
there's.
E
We
would
look
to
staff
as
well
to
hear
you
know
how
the
outreach
went
in
particular
communities
or,
if
there
any
missing
pieces
of
this,
that
we
might
want
to
consider
continuing
to
fund
through
the
collaborative
safety
safety
strategies,
because
to
the
point
that
councillor
McConnell
just
made
I
think
over
time.
If
we
don't
sort
of
support
the
successes
that
we're
starting
to
see,
we
probably
lose
a
lot
of
the
value
of
the
investments
that
we've
been
making
so
far.
E
B
A
really
great
question
really
solid
points.
Thank
you.
I
can't
speak
to
how
we
would
move
something
like
that
forward,
but
I
think
we
should
continue
to
be
in
conversation
about
how
we
do
collaborate
in
a
deeper
way
around
a
cross
apart
across
many
of
our
programs
and
projects,
but
I
think
it's
a
great
idea.
A
And
there
other
questions
or
comments
seen
on
I
want
to
thank
you
for
this
report.
I'm
I'm
really
just
curious.
If
we're
thinking
about
I
mean
this
process
seemed
to
have
worked
really
well,
it
feels
a
bit
unbalanced
in
terms
of
the
distribution
of
resources
and
I'm
wondering
are
we
thinking
about
ways
to
either
increase
outreach
or
or
how
we
try
to
ensure
more
parity
across
the
city?
Yes,.
B
I
think
that's
a
great
question.
One
of
the
things
that
I
mentioned,
as
we
were
talking
about
the
wave
effect
projects,
is
that,
because
it
was
a
participatory
voting
process,
people
are
able
to
vote
on
as
many
projects
as
they
liked.
We
were
because
we
extended
that
process.
We
were
able
to
fund
organizations
that
represent
an
immigrant
and
refugees.
Without
that
extension,
we
would
not
have
been
able
to
do
that.
B
A
B
A
You
and
see
no
further
business
before
the
race
equity
subcommittee.
We
will
continue
with
the
remaining
committee
of
the
whole
business
before
us,
which
is
to
receive
reports
from
the
standing
committees
on
manners
to
be
considered
by
the
full
council
at
our
regular
meeting
this
Friday,
and
we
will
begin
with
the
budget
committee
chaired
by
a
councilmember
Palmisano.
Thank.
J
You,
madam
chair,
as
you
just
mentioned,
there
will
be
nothing
being
forwarded
to
Council
this
cycle
and
nearly
all
of
you
were
there,
so
I
won't
belabor
it,
but
I
did
want
to
mention
that
we
received
and
filed
the
mayor's
budget
and
began
our
overview
of
it.
The
next
step,
as
far
as
our
Budget
Committee
is
concerned,
is
September
12th
and
that's
a
one-hour
scheduled
meeting.
Half
of
that
topic,
as
was
in
your
email,
we
actually
did
end
up
getting
into.
G
A
C
A
K
Edrs
has
11
items
to
bring
to
the
full
council
this
Friday.
The
first
is
the
issuance
of
up
to
seven
hundred
and
five
thousand
501c3
bonds
to
the
Eastside
neighborhood
service
services
issue.
2
is
the
issuance
of
up
to
a
million
eight
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
501c3
bonds
to
a
vivo,
formerly
resource
for
1810
and
1820
Columbus
Avenue.
South
third
item
is
a
on
sell
liquor
license
for
Elliot
Park
Hotel.
Item
number
four
is
on
sell
wine
and
strong
beer
license
for
mixed
blood
theatre
company
item
number.
K
K
Item
number
seven:
is
the
liquor
license
approvals
item
number
eight?
Is
the
general
license
renewals
number
nine
of
the
gambling
license
approvals
and
10?
Are
the
gambling
license
renewals
and
item
number?
Eleven
is
exclusive
development
rights
for
aec,
om
for
800
Washington,
South
Avenue
south
and
with
that
I
will
stand
for
any
questions
all.
A
D
Thank
You
vice
president,
the
housing
policy
and
development
committee
has
six
items
that
we'll
be
bringing
forward
for
approval.
The
first
is
a
report
on
our
2017
consolidated
annual
performance
in
evaluation
report.
This
is
known
as
the
capers
report
and
has
to
do
with
the
various
programs
that
we
get
funded
through
the
HUD
program.
The
federal
government
second
item
is
approving
contracts
with
neighbor
works
home
partners
in
build
wealth
Minnesota
to
provide
lending
administration
services
for
20:18
home
ownership.
Opportunity
Minneapolis
program
third
item
is
establishing
a
new
Minneapolis
small
and
medium
multifamily
loan
program.
D
Fourth
item
is
approving
program
guidelines
for
the
Minneapolis
Noah
preservation.
Fund.
Fifth
item
is
approving
some
modifications
to
our
Minneapolis
home
program
and
the
last
item
was
receiving
a
report
from
our
consultant
on
inclusionary
zoning
and
also
some
staff
directions
related
to
that
to
kind
of
T
us
up
to
make
some
some
decisions
later
on.
This
fall
about
potential
program,
a
pilot
program
for
the
short
term
and
also
recommendations
for
a
longer
run,
inclusionary
zoning
program
for
the
future
happy
to
stand
for
any
questions.
D
F
Thank
you,
madam
vice
president,
the
public
health
environment,
civil
rights
and
engagement
committee
will
be
bringing
forward
four
items
for
consideration
at
Friday
City
Council
meeting.
The
first
is
amending
council
action
to
reflect
an
upgraded
or
updated.
Excuse
me
grant
dollar
amount
from
the
Washburn
Center
for
children
for
four
amounts
up
to
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
address
youth
mental
health
needs
at
our
school-based
clinics.
These
second
is
accepting
a
grant
from
Minnesota
Department
of
Human
Services
for
a
school
school-based,
clinic
clinician
training
and
for
this
fall.
F
Three
is
a
site
agreement
with
AmeriCorps
to
host
for
one
year,
a
Minnesota,
opioid
response
board
member
to
work
on
designing
and
framing
the
work
of
the
Minneapolis
Health
Department,
in
collaboration
with
the
mayor's
Task
Force
on
the
opioid
epidemic,
and
the
last
item
is
clean.
Car
Sanders
authorizing
the
sustainability
manager
and/or
the
city
attorney
on
behalf
of
the
city,
to
join
in
any
state
or
national
coalitions
of
government
entities
to
defend
the
2016
clean
car
standards.
F
I
would
also
like
to
recommend
for
my
colleagues
and
for
folks
watching
at
home
to
check
out
the
presentations
at
our
August
20th
meeting.
The
first
presentation
was
about
healthy
sexuality
and
healthy
and
safe
children
and
youth,
which
highlights
some
of
the
critical
work
that's
happening
in
the
health
department.
We
have
some
work,
that's
specific
to
developing
East
African
immigrant
peer,
healthy
sexual
educators.
We
have
some
work,
that's
happening
with
the
school-based
clinics,
a
healthy
relationship,
education,
trauma-informed
work
and
so
on.
F
An
environmental
health
inspector
do
like
measuring
air
quality
or
understanding
emerald
ash
borers,
and
the
reason
why
I
wanted
to
bring
this
up
is
because
this
particular
piece
up
is
because
this
is
a
very
powerful
aspect
in
the
environmental
health
division
that
allow
city
staff
to
use
up
to
20%
of
their
time
beyond
their
typical
duties
to
pursue
to
pursue
passion
projects,
and
so
we've
had
some
really
great
work
like
conservation
of
bees.
Some
tree
work,
as
well
as
as
our
STEM
education,
environmental
work,
so
I
just
wanted
to
share
that.
F
A
H
Number
two
is
a
grant
from
the
Minnesota
Department
of
Public
Safety
in
the
Office
of
Traffic
Safety
for
a
DWI
enforcement
officer.
Item
number
three
is
a
redistribution
of
pulse
oximeters
from
the
Minnesota
Department
of
Natural
Resources
to
the
Minneapolis
Fire
Department
I.
Remember:
four:
is
a
Minnesota
Board
of
firefighter
training
and
education,
training,
academy,
reimbursement
and
number
five
is
another
Minnesota
Board
of
firefighter
training
and
education,
training,
reimbursement
redistribution
and
those
are
all
items.
A
I
You,
madam
vice
president,
the
committee
will
be
1415
items
for
consideration:
item
1
as
the
West
Broadway
improvements,
special
service
district
operating
plan
and
budget
amendments
items
2
through
6,
or
all
contract
amendments
with
ongoing
work
of
the
Department
for
existing
projects.
Item
7
is
the
4th
Street
southeast
street
lighting
district
and
that
goes
from
25th
Avenue
southeast
to
Malcolm,
Avenue
southeast
and
setting
that
public
hearing
for
a
date
not
quite
seeing
it
well
I'll
make
sure
that's
in
the
full
report.
A
L
L
I,
don't
number
three
is
a
gift
acceptance
for
a
city
staff
travel
for
Kelly
Millman
to
attend
the
urban
sustainability
directors,
Network
items
number
four
and
five
are
authorizing
small
increases
to
existing
contracts.
Item
number
six
is
a
contract
with
ic
systems
and
diversified
adjustment
services
for
professional
debt
collection
services.
L
Item
number:
seven
is
an
appropriation
for
the
2018
elections.
Budget
item
number.
Eight
is
an
agreement
with
Hillcrest
development
for
Public
Works
perking.
Item
number:
nine
is
an
acquisition
settlement
for
2625,
University
Avenue
north
east
for
the
East
Side
storage
and
maintenance
facility
project
item
number.
Ten
is
a
bid
by
Cabot
companies
for
the
new
public
service
building
site,
work,
utilities,
earthwork
and
deep
foundations.
Item
number
11
is
approving
the
collective
bargaining
agreement
with
the
stagehands
unit
and
item
number
12
is
authorizing
the
city
to
join
the
local
government.
L
G
Straighter,
thank
you.
Madam
chair
zoning
and
planning
committee
will
be
bringing
forward
five
items
for
approval
on
Friday.
The
first
is
the
denial
of
a
site
plan
review
at
1300,
New
Brighton
Boulevard
number
two
is
the
denial
of
a
rezoning
application
at
the
same
address.
Number
three:
is
the
approval
of
a
drainage
and
utility
easement
vacation
for
a
125th
Street
northeast
number?
Four
is
an
item
will
be
deleted.
G
Unfortunately,
our
project
is
not
ready
to
go
and
be
deleted
from
the
agenda
and
number
five
will
be
moving
forward
without
recommendation
and
a
rezoning
application,
as
well
as
an
ordinance
amending
title
24.
The
development
at
23:23,
Jackson
Street
northeast.
Thank
you
and
a
la
stance.
Questions
are.
A
J
You
might
recall,
Andrea,
Brown,
coming
and
speaking
to
us
in
in
the
last
Public
Safety
Committee
session,
and
also
perhaps
during
one
of
our
larger
public
comment
periods
about
the
police,
conduct,
oversight,
Commission
and
some
of
their
work.
The
summer
interns
report
included
a
conversation
around
recruitment
and
some
of
the
barriers
to
recruitment
in
our
Police
Department
that
we
could
look
at
individually
as
a
city,
and
so
the
recommended
step
from
this
in
turn
was
an
audit
and
we
were
the
internal
audit
department
was
engaged
the
partners
in
looking
at
this.
J
A
M
You,
madam
chair,
the
executive
committee
will
be
bringing
forward
three
items.
The
first
is
an
appointed
position
in
the
MPD
or
the
police
department
for
a
director
of
public
information,
then
items
two
and
three
are
collective
bargaining
agreements
on
with
the
machinists
unit
and
the
other
with
the
Teamsters.
The
unit
I'll
stand
for
any
questions
there.