►
From YouTube: November 28, 2018 Committee of the Whole
Description
Minneapolis Committee of the Whole Meeting
A
A
Today's
meeting
is
a
continuation
of
the
markup
session,
this
past
Monday.
At
that
time,
we
process
all
recommendations
from
the
City
Planning
Commission,
as
well
as
several
proposed
amendments
submitted
by
City
Council
members
tied
to
goes
one
two
and
three
in
the
draft
comprehensive
plan
and
as
I
hope,
to
complete
all
the
remaining
amendments
proposed
by
City
Council
members
today.
That
will
give
our
staff
sufficient
time
to
revise
and
to
revise
the
entire
draft
plan
for
final
review
next
Wednesday.
A
14
identified
goals
we
already
process
our
recommendations
forwarded
from
the
Planning
Commission
I,
do
want
to
just
note
that
there
are
some
additional
amendments
that
have
been
brought
forth
today
and
we
will
address
those
the
completion
of
our
regular
agenda,
and
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
complete
items
from
the
markup
session
that
went
in
first,
and
we
want
to
complete
those
and
then
begin
with
the
proposed
amendments
tied
to
go
area
for
in
order
to
move
as
quickly
as
possible.
This
is
the
process
that
we
will
follow
for
each
major
goal
area.
A
A
Those
items
will
be
separated
from
the
amendment
packet
and
set
aside
also
if
people
want
to
strike
amendments
at
that
time,
that
is
acceptable
as
well.
We
will
then
vote
on
all
of
the
remaining
amendments
for
the
entire
goal
area
packet.
After
disposing
of
the
packet
of
amendments,
we
will
go
back
and
take
up
individual
amendments
in
numerical
order
and
handle
those
one.
At
a
time
once
we
complete
the
entire
slate
of
proposed
amendments
for
each
goal
area,
we
will
proceed
to
the
next
goal
and
we
will
follow
the
same
procedure.
A
The
people's
focus
and
use
our
time
efficiently.
I'm
going
to
ask
that
any
motions
be
very
clearly
expressed.
I
will
confirm
each
motion
with
the
clerk
before
taking
the
vote,
to
avoid
any
confusion
and
I'm
going
to
ask
that
all
council
members
focus
your
comments
on
the
actual
motions
and
or
amendments
we
will
vote
on
each
motion
or
amendment
as
it
is
made.
The
clerk
has
pointed
out
that
each
proposal
is
technically
an
amendment,
in
the
first
degree
to
the
draft
resolution
that
adopts
the
comp
plan.
A
A
With
that
we
will
proceed.
I
do
want
to
note
that
we
will
be
using
in
speaker
management.
So
hopefully
everybody
has
that
technology
in
play
and
we
will
proceed
to
the
amendments
proposed
by
council
members
that
were
held
over
from
Monday's
markup
session,
and
the
first
proposed
amendment
that
was
postponed
from
Monday
is
under
goal
area
number
one
reduce
disparities
item
number
two,
which
relates
to
informing
residents
about
new
land
use
and
zoning
changes.
A
B
C
B
B
If
there
are
a
lot
of
things
that
happen
with
this,
some
of
which
we
spoke
about
last
time.
Things
such
as
you
know
what
actually
prompts
our
community
planning
department
to
notify
property
owners
is
any
notice
for
a
cpad
public
hearing,
but
that's
not
really
what
we
were
going
after
and
this
kind
of
notice.
It
was
more
about
the
process
as
a
whole.
There
are
different
ways
that
are
more
or
less
effective
to
communicate
across
the
city
and
I'm.
Very
aware
of
that,
we
also
want
to
make
it.
B
My
intention
was
not
to
send
several
notices
every
time
we
make
a
change
through
the
implementation
phase,
but
rather
one
clear
communication
to
let
people
know
what
to
expect
and
to
include
residents
of
our
city
instead
of
just
property
owners
of
our
city.
So
my
draft
language
for
a
staff
direction
later
is
directing
staff
to
notify
the
public
in
a
ward,
specific
communication
through
multiple
methods
and
I'll
be
bringing
this
later
and
floating
it
around.
B
To
my
colleagues,
the
other
piece
of
this
is
broader
and
it
is
about
how
we
communicate
on
citywide
initiatives
as
a
whole
and
that's
the
piece
that
will
come
with
a
amendment
later
on
in
the
process.
So
all
this
to
say,
that's
where
this
is
gone.
I
would
like
to
withdraw
this
amendment.
Madam
chair,
thank.
A
D
Vice
president
I'm
sorry
to
interrupt,
there
was
one
amendment
that
I
failed
to
capture
on
Monday
and
it
relates
to
this
item.
So
unless
there's
objection
from
the
rest
of
the
council,
councilmember
Cunningham
vice
chair
of
this
committee
had
asked
to
retitle
the
goal
title
here
from
number
one.
You
may
recall
there
was
some
discussion
about
changing
the
title
from
reduced
disparities
to
eliminate
disparities,
and
so
if
the
council
is
willing
to
consider
that
now,
we
could
formally
then
change
the
title
of
goal,
one
from
reduced
disparities
to
eliminate
disparities.
A
C
A
Opposed
the
next
proposed
amendment
that
was
postponed
from
Monday's
mark
obsession
is
under
though
area
number
three
affordable
and
accessible
housing
items
number
33
and
35
were
submitted
by
council
member
Johnson.
These
were
postponed
at
the
request
of
councilmember
Fletcher,
so
first
we'll
take
up
number
33,
which
is
about
design
standard
to
maximize
access
to
natural
sunlight.
Is
there
further
discussion
on
this
proposed
motion?
The
chair
will
recognize
council
member
Johnson.
Thank.
F
F
G
F
So
I
talked
yesterday
with
councilmember
rikes
senior
policy
aide.
He
was
interested
in
adding
energy
efficiency
language
to
this
section,
but
I'll
note
that
the
specific
policy
47
that
this
is
under
relates
to
physical
and
mental
health
within
buildings,
where,
as
energy
efficiency,
would
really
be
captured
in
policy
68.
So
after
consulting
with
others,
the
advice
I
give
back
to
or
the
message
I
gave,
accident
councilmember
rikes
senior
policy
aide
is
that
energy
efficiency
language
is
really
captured
in
policy
68.
You
should
go
in
section.
H
I
H
H
A
A
B
The
language
in
the
intent
here
is
to
prohibit
schools
of
any
type
from
being
built
in
production
and
processing
areas
in
further
discussion
with
councilmember
Reich
on
this
matter
and
just
addressing
as
I
thought
through
it
further
the
other
day
there
is
some
additional
language
just
to
make
absolutely
sure
that
training,
academies
things
that
would
require
industrial
types
of
Zoning
would
remain
and
continue
to
be
allowed
in
industrial
areas.
The
industrial
areas
of
our
city
do
not
have
the
right-of-way
set
up
for
people
walking
to
school,
and
that
is
my
primary
concern
here.
B
I
know
that
that's
many
of
my
colleagues
concerns
too
so
I
do
have
that
language.
I
will
send
it
out
here
as
soon
as
I
have
it
together,
but
essentially
it
would
say
it
would
say,
prohibit
schools
of
any
type
except
for
training
facilities
that
require
this
kind
of
zoning
to
be
to
be
an
industrial
zoned
areas.
J
Thank
you,
madam
vice
president.
I,
don't
have
any
amendments
but
I
wanted
to
commend
my
colleagues
G
4.3,
councilmember,
Cunningham
and
G
4
point
4,
councilmember
Johnson's
input
in
terms
of
if
we
want
to
reduce
disparities
or
eliminate
disparities
in
the
state
of
Minnesota
in
the
city
of
Minneapolis,
investing
in
youth
programs
and
youth
development
and
training
and
making
sure
that
we
give
opportunities
to
you
know
in
a
city
and
people
of
color.
C
B
Yes,
madam
chair
I
did
just
email
it
to
all
of
my
colleagues
into
the
clerk's
office.
So
here
is
what
that
language
says:
prohibit
schools
accept
training,
centers
that
require
facilities,
zoned
for
production
and
processing
from
being
built
in
production
and
processing
areas.
It's
not
the
most
eloquent
language,
but
it
sure
certainly
covers
it.
I
submit
I
make
that
motion
as
an
amended
piece
of
what's
in
front
of
you.
A
A
A
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
first
I
wanted
to
say
thank
you
to
a
council
member
Schrader
for
his
vigilance
on
making
sure
that
we
have
an
intergenerational
perspective
on
the
policies
that
we
make.
You
were
very
intentional
about
making
sure
that
folks,
seniors
community
elders,
as
well
as
folks
with
disabilities,
have
been
represented
so
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
for
that,
as
well
as
I
would
like
to
amend
my
Shoji
five
one
six
to
include
so
it
does
encourage
intergenerational
housing,
development
and
I
wanted
to
clarify
in
single-family
homes
and
multi-family
homes.
E
E
C
K
You
madam
chair
first
I'd
like
to
pull
g54
I'm
happy
with
councilmember
Johnson's
I,
think
it's
a
little
more
extensive
than
mine
and
I'm
happy
to
go
with.
It
also
very
much
appreciate
the
customer
Cunningham's
comments
and
I
really
love
his
addition
with
five
one,
six
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
getting
that.
In
fact,.
A
A
H
E
A
A
F
You,
madam
chair
I'd,
like
to
withdraw
item
six
one
six,
sixteen
six,
eighteen
and
620
and
I'll;
just
repeat
those
items:
six,
one:
six,
sixteen
six,
eighteen
and
six
twenty
on
which
one
of
them
that
will
note
I
plan
on
reworking
the
language
on
six.
Sixteen
a
bit
I
think
it's
a
goal
to
try
to
get
in
on
our
final
passage.
Thank
you.
K
You,
madam
chairman,
looking
for
some
staff
direction
and
my
amendment
on
66.6
I
worked
with
staff
a
little
bit
to
come
up
with
the
the
best
intention
to
continue
to
have
the
current
setbacks
that
we
have
under
our
zoning
code.
But
we
have
multiple
proposed
amendments.
Then
I
just
wanted
to
make
have
staffs
kind
of
talk
to
that
and
talk
about
which
kind
of
what
is
the
best
direction
for
the
Comprehensive
Plan.
M
N
M
M
Yeah
I'm,
just
so
looking
at
the
two
of
these
together
I
would
say
that
the
6.5
is,
it
seems,
more
specific
and
intent
relating
to
existing
structures
on
the
date
of
the
approval
of
the
plan.
I
wouldn't
I,
wouldn't
note
that
that
one
reads
a
little
bit
more
like
zoning
code,
language
I,
wonder
if
mr.
Nelson
might
have
some
insight
into
this,
our
ability
to
say
the
date
of
approval
of
the
Comprehensive
Plan
in
this
language.
O
Council
vice
president
Jenkins
and
councilmember
Schrader,
the
the
you
know,
the
language
in
with
this
is
not
just
applicable
to
this
scenario,
but
in
several
others,
I've
noticed
that
we're
sort
of
blurring
the
lines
between
what
were
you
appropriate
for
the
plan
and
what
would
be
more
appropriate
for
zoning,
and
there
are
two
distinct
things:
the
specificity
in
6.5,
particularly
as
it
starts
to
sound
like
the
the
string
test
for
a
front
yard.
Setback
that
already
exists
in
the
code
seems
to
me
more
appropriate
for
the
zoning
regulations
and
I.
A
K
I
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I,
just
wanted
to
comment
on
and
make
a
very
tiny
amendment
to
this
new
policy
in
action
steps
under
G
6.24.
We
heard
a
lot
of
feedback
during
the
public
hearing
portion
about
the
shoreland
overlay
and
while
I
will
maintain
and
I'm
sure
mr.
Nelson
will
agree,
the
shoreland
overlay
is
not
a
height
restriction.
I
It
states
that
properties
within
the
shorter
land
need
to
be
at
2.5
stories
unless
and
then
there's
like
a
dozen
things
that,
if
they
abide
by
then,
and
that
it's
not
a
height
overlay
and
I,
also
want
to
note
that
if
it
was
a
height
overlay,
we
wouldn't
have
any
story
building
surrounding
Lake
Calhoun
right
now.
So
it's
a
bit
of
a
misnomer
to
suggest
that
it's
a
height
restriction,
but
in
an
attempt
to
make
sure
that
properties
that
are
built
along
lakes
and
rivers
are
consistent
with
the
character
of
existing
lakes
and
rivers.
I
I
have
combined
all
of
the
shore
land
overlay
protections
with
the
help
of
staff
into
a
new
section.
Titled
well,
you'll
see
it.
It
says
a
new
policy
and
action
step
and
it's
basically
seeking
to
ensure
preservation
and
improvement
of
the
built
and
natural
environment
near
cities,
lakes
and
waterways,
and
it
lists
all
of
the
things
that
the
shore
land
overlay
listed
in
the
past,
except
for
it,
does
not
speak
to
the
issue
of
heiped.
I
It
speaks
to
the
issue
of
character
of
the
surrounding
properties,
which
I
think
is
more
consistent
with
what
the
shoreline
overlay
is
doing,
and
you
can
note
that
there's
just
up
to
Oh
a
variety
of
different
points
under
it,
which
I
think
accomplished
what
the
shoreline
overlay
accomplished.
But
madam
chair
I,
do
want
to
make
one
change
under
Section
and
I'd
like
to
strike
the
word
required.
So
this
would
read,
encourage
the
use
of
word,
safe,
glass
and
other
building
materials
and
features
that
are
not
detrimental
to
national.
I
I
A
A
I
A
I
So
madam
chair
I
just
also
want
to
say,
if
there's
anyone
who
who
represents
areas
of
rivers
or
lakes
in
the
city,
that
has
other
additional
comments.
They
would
like
to
make
to
strengthen
this
shoreland
new
version
of
the
shoreland
overlay
absolutely
talked
to
me
or
councilmember,
bender
or
staff.
I
think
this
should
address
the
concerns
that
we
heard
ongoing
throughout
this
process,
and
that
was
the
attempt.
Madam.
L
Just
have
a
procedural
suggestion,
I
think
just
returning
back
to
what
the
chair
had
before
it
as
a
process
to
just
encourage
the
council.
Members
coming
up
I
see
a
number
of
folks
in
queue
to
just
state
the
numbers
that
they
want
to
pull
for
discussion,
so
that
the
chair
can
then
move
the
send
items
for
approval,
and
then
we
will
be
able
to
go
back
to
each
of
these,
so
that
were
able
to
track
the
discussion,
because
right
now
we're
starting
to
get
into
the
amending.
Yes.
E
A
E
B
A
A
A
C
A
D
A
A
O
A
P
I
L
I
Not
sure
I
don't
want
to
take
up
a
lot
of
time.
I
counsel
Thomas
on
Oh
has
advised
me.
We
could
work
this
out
afterwards,
ironically
so
I'm,
okay
with
that,
but
I
just
want
to
be
on
record
as
saying
that
we've
had
people
who
are
extremely
upset
that
they
believe
the
setbacks
are
going
to
be
changed
and
we
keep
saying
no
they're
not
but
taking
out
language
that
says:
they're,
not
an
adding
language
that
says
only
in
areas.
One
is
what
they're
saying.
K
And
to
address
that
I
mean
that
this
is
really
going
off.
What
the
city
attorney
said
and
working
with
staff.
My
staff
Direction
is
talking
about
what
we'll
be
doing,
which
will
be
a
part
of
when
we
talk
about
what
will
be
in
the
zoning
code.
The
staff
Direction
is
really
moving
toward
what
I
will
be
talking
about
and
if,
as
you
talked
about
interior
through
two
and
three
being
very
important,
I
courage
you
and
would
be
happy
to
help
on
working
on
that
as
we
get
into
the
zoning
code.
Well,.
I
K
What
I
bring
when
I'm
gonna
work
on
I
mean
those
are
what
I'm
talking
about
with
my
constituents
about
what
they're
concerned
that
I
completely
respect
and
understand.
You
want
to
work
on
your
things
too,
and
this
is
just
primarily
for
my
area
and
it's
not
to
say
at
the
exclusion
of
anybody
else,
but
it
is
to
say
we
have
other
other
folks.
They'll
be
a
part
of
that
process
when
it
happens,
and
this
seemed
to
be
the
best
course.
I
Well,
I
just
simply
do
not
agree.
The
whole
point
was
to
try
to
figure
out
how
to
solve
these
problems
on
a
broader
city
wide
basis,
not
to
have
a
citywide
issue
wide
issue
handled
by
one
councilmember,
just
in
their
own
Ward,
and
leave
everybody
else's
concerns
out
and
that's
my
objection.
I
tried
to
not
do
anything
that
would
screw
over
someone
else
in
their
own
Ward
and
I.
Feel
like
what's
happening
here.
I
K
We
will
be
talking
about.
All
of
us
is
still
up
for
discussion
when
we
get
to
the
zoning
code.
It's
just
blocking
the
fine
line
of
what's
going
to
be
on
the
comp
plan
and
what's
in
the
more
appropriate
in
the
zoning
code,
that
will
be
need
to
be
addressed
on
a
much
different
basis
than
the
wants
to
every
ten
year
plan.
I.
I
L
You,
madam
chair
and
I,
know
we've
had
a
lot
of
discussion
about
this
amongst
ourselves:
offline,
but
I.
You
know,
I,
just
I
do
think
we're
viewing
too
far
into
zoning
in
a
lot
of
areas
of
this
plan
and
particularly
when
we're
talking
about
setbacks
and
I.
Think
that's
partly
what's
causing
the
confusion.
Interior
two,
for
example,
as
I
know,
we've
talked
about
at
length.
L
L
Think
too,
is
that
it's
in
parts
of
the
city
that
are
changing
significantly
like
areas
that
are
transitioning
from
industrial
to
residential,
for
example,
the
current
setbacks
don't
make
sense
for
new
properties,
so
I
think
that's
why
we
would
rely
on
the
zoning
code
to
make
sure
that
we're
able
to
address
context
by
contacts
throughout
the
city
in
the
ways
that
councilmembers
are
describing.
That
said,
I
understand.
L
You
know
that
a
lot
of
my
colleagues
have
a
lot
of
concern
about
setbacks
in
particular,
and
really
want
to
have
language
in
the
comp
plan,
but
I
just
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
you
know
I
think
we
have
to
be
cautious
about
assuming
we
want,
what's
there
now
everywhere
in
the
city,
just
because
it's
true
in
single-family
neighborhoods.
K
A
H
D
C
P
Member
right
I
will
just
note
that
you
want
to
make
sure
that
this
isn't
contradiction
to
other
areas
that
suggest
sunlight
and
also
potential
design
that
incorporates
energy
efficiency
as
a
primary
goal.
Just
to
note
there
a
potential
conflict
there
in
your
staff
direction,
so
maybe
they're
amended
language
too,
notwithstanding,
etc,
etc.
A
A
P
N
Gordon
I'm
just
a
little
bit
confused.
Are
we
actually
voting
now
on
a
six
point?
Six
and
the
staff
fraction
is
a
separate
item,
so
we
had
a
motion
handed
out
twisted
relates
somehow
to
to
this
item,
but
I
understood
that
it
was
a
separate
motion
and
the
staff
direction.
So
what
we're
voting
on
right
now
is
six
point
six,
as
presented
in
our
packet
here,
which
is
adding
the
language
to
ensure
consistency,
reform
guidance
in
existing
context.
Is
that
correct?
That
is.
A
K
A
A
D
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I,
just
wanted
to.
If
it's
okay
through
the
chair,
ask
council
member
Johnson
for
clarification
on
it.
I
don't
necessarily
have
an
issue
with
it.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
it
was
grounded
in
data
and
that
it's
not
gonna
be
harmful
in
some
way.
So
I
just
wanted
to
get
some
clarification
about.
What
is
this
based
on?
Certainly.
F
Thank
you
for
asking
the
question
comes
from
overcoming
ham,
I
would
venture
to
say
my
work
probably
has
more
self
storage
along
hiawatha
than
probably
most
other
parts
of
the
city
and
that's
obviously
billion-dollar
transit
investment
and
we've
actually
seen
storage
companies
interested
in
building
more
self
storage.
But
we
have
lacked
the
tools
to
make
sure
that
that
includes
active
retail
spaces,
active
spaces
around
our
transit
stations,
and
so
the
intent
of
this
is
to
prevent
conflict
with
our
other
goals
around
having
walkable
active
livable
transit
spaces.
F
And
so
the
idea
behind
this
is
that
we
want
self
storage
of
businesses
within
our
city.
We
also
recognize
because
they
happen
to
have
a
particular
impact
that
stands
out
from
a
lot
of
other
businesses
in
terms
of
the
level
of
activation
in
the
community
that,
like
other
things,
we
are
limiting,
for
instance,
drive
through
those
sort
of
things
that
this
would
be
one
where
we
want
to
see
those
businesses
incorporated
into
active
spaces
or
have
some
level
of
activation.
F
P
Thank
you,
madam
vice
president,
you
know,
I,
echoing
what
the
author
had
just
suggested
in
terms
of
the
importance
of
this
I,
would
even
probably
have
gone
stronger.
These
are
areas
that
take
up
acres
and
acres
and
acres
of
space,
and
it's
just
for
that.
Space
versus
other
productive
activities
and,
as
a
matter
of
fact,
it's
most
threatening
to
our
production
areas,
which
is
our
job
and
every
component
opportunity.
So
I
wholeheartedly
support
this
and
actually
I
think
he
gave
it
a
softer
touch
than
I
would.
E
A
A
G
G
A
F
Emma
Johnson,
thank
you,
madam
chair
I
will
take
that
sentiment.
I
can
understand
that
sentiment,
and
so
what
I
would
do
is
propose
a
amendment
to
this
by
striking
the
words
by
transit
station
and
such
as
pull
ups
and
parallel
bars
such
as
pulping,
parallel
bars
and
then
I'll
know
so
to
read
pilot
active
street
furnishings
that
encourage
spontaneous
exercise.
F
I'll
note
that
this
is
something
being
done
in
a
number
of
other
cities
as
a
growing
trend,
and
if
you
look
at
policy
7,
the
language
within
policy
7
mentions
all
sorts
of
things:
everything
from
street
furnishings
to
interpretation
of
history,
public
our
place,
making
trees,
all
sorts
of
stuff
and
I
think
there
is
a
role
in
there
for
having
something
about
active
street
furnishings
that
help
encourage
healthy
activity.
So
I
hope
that's
viewed
as
a
compromise
and
that
that
will
work
and
I'd
like
to
move
that
language.
N
A
L
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I,
actually
have
suggested
language
that
I'm
about
to
send
out.
So
this
just
felt
very,
very
specific
and
thinking
long
term,
20
years
from
now.
Hopefully,
we'll
have
a
couple
of
other,
maybe
colored
lines,
and
so
I
don't
want
it
to
be
specific
just
to
the
blue
line.
So
I
am
moving
to
change
the
language
to
collaborate
with
Metro
Transit
to
implement
technologies
to
improve
the
flow
of
traffic
along
light.
L
P
Thank
you,
madam
vice
president
I
suppose,
council
president
Pender
might
be
making
that
adjustment
for
me,
it'd,
be
simpler
to
even
say
and
remaining
consistent
with
complete
Street
policy
and
and
for
my
colleagues
to
note
that
we
don't
have
to
be
too
specific
in
this
document,
because
the
transit
action
plan,
whatever
we're
going
to
call
it
moving
forward
and
in
subsequent
work,
will
be
much
more
detailed
and
much
more
specific
and
we'll
tease
out
some
of
these.
These
issues.
C
L
Transfer
president
bender,
thank
you,
madam
chair
I.
Apologize
I
have
emailed
to
the
council,
including
the
original
author
of
the
amendment,
the
language
that
we
discussed
verbally,
so
that
would
read
and
collaborate
with
Metro
Transit
to
implement
technologies
to
improve
the
flow
of
traffic
along
light
rail
light,
light
rail
transit
routes
and
bus
rapid
transit
routes,
while
maintaining
safety
for
all
users
consistent
with
the
Complete
Streets
policy.
A
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I
sent
out
language
already
to
my
colleagues.
The
I
would
like
to
sub
for
add
language
saying,
for
it
to
say,
require
consistent
and
uniform.
Directional
signage
and
accessible
Skyway
system
Maps
in
multiple
languages,
near
Skyway
entrance
says
particularly
along
their
primary
transit
and
pedestrian
routes
include
navigations,
publicly
accessible
restrooms.
I
I
E
So
so
they
require
was
already
in
there
and
the
only
amendment
that
had
been
brought
forward
with
to
include
navigation,
so
so
I'm
I
think
that
that
was
that
had
already
come
from
staff,
I'm
cool
with
it
saying,
encourage
substituting
required
or
encouraged
I'm
not
attached
to
that
particular
language.
That
was
what
was
just
already
written
in
the
comp
plan.
So
if
I
need
should
I
make
a
motion
to
substitute
or
add
that
to
my
amendment,
perhaps.
D
L
I
think
my
chair
I
support
that
change
and
generally
again
have
concerns
similar
to
ones
comer
Goodman
expressed
about
places
where
we
are
saying
require
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
which
is
a
legally
binding
document,
though
implemented
through
the
zoning
code.
When
we're
talking
about
private
property,
I
think
we
just
have
to
be
careful
when
we're
using
that
term
require
and
make
sure
we're
checking
in
with
the
attorneys,
so
I
support
the
amendment.
L
E
C
E
Think
you,
madam
chair,
this
is
just
a
friendly
amendment
with
language
to
be
able
to
make
sure
that
we're
using
accessible
language,
so
I'm
moving
to
in
paragraph
three
strike,
eliminate
the
phrase
in
21st
century
21st,
century
cities
and
additionally
group
eliminates
a
water-cooler
defect
in
which
and
replace
cluster
with
clustering.
So
that's
just
minor
wording.
Changes.
N
A
N
A
A
D
D
A
A
D
A
So
we
will
now
move
to
go
area
number
eight,
creative,
cultural
and
natural
amenities
and
now
take
any
proposed
amendments
under
that
packet
for
goal
number:
eight,
creative,
cultural
and
natural
amenities.
Do
any
council
members
wish
to
remove
an
item
from
the
list
of
amendments
of
goal?
Number
eight
council,
members,
johnson,
cunningham,
bender
and
gordon.
L
A
N
A
A
A
L
A
C
A
E
E
A
N
C
E
E
B
K
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
I,
just
wanted
to
through
through
the
chair,
ask
council
member
Gordon
for
clarification.
The
way
that
this
reads,
I
would
read
that
single-family
homes
would
also
be
required,
and
so
I
wanted
to
get
clarification.
If
you
did
in
fact
mean
multi
single
family
or
were
you
thinking
more
multi
family,
larger
buildings,
customary.
A
N
This
would
include
single
family
homes
and
it's
part
of
what
an
ordinance
amendment
it's
actually
I'm
being
drafted
and
coming
forward
if
it
will
be
done
through
the
truth,
in
sale
of
housing.
So
it
would
be
a
one-time
notification
when
a
house
was
sold,
there'd
be
some
kind
of
assessment
and
on
it
that
the
new
potential
buyers
could
access
and
see.
So
it's
that's.
That's
the
intention
and
it's
based
on
ordinance
language
that
I'm
working
on
with
mr.
Schrader
right
now,
councilmember
Schrader.
E
E
I
just
have
some
concerns
about
there
being
an
additional
financial
burden
on
Northside
homeowners,
because
we
do
have
a
large
single-family
housing
stock
and
so
I
just
want
to
be
mindful
that
we
are
not
adding
undue
pressure
than
to
community
members
to
be
able
to
participate
in
this
when
it
is
a
little
bit
more
accessible
with
the
commercial
buildings.
I
mean
we
have
like
that,
something
like
an
85
percent
compliance
rate,
or
you
know
so,
I
mean
it's.
E
N
N
Thank
you.
I
also
did
want
to
point
out
it
for
rental
properties
for
single-family
homes
that
are
rental.
It
would
also
be
something
information
that
would
be
shared
at
the
time
of
applying
for
a
lease,
so
it
wouldn't
just
apply
for
the
you,
the
truth
and
sale
of
housing
for
ownership,
but
we
are
working
with
utility
companies
to
make
it
so
that
the
infirm
to
get
about
the
energy
use
is
easily
accessible.
The
Clean
Energy
Partnership
is
working
on
this
as
well
I.
Don't
think
we
want
to
create
any
kind
of
onerous
burden
on
anybody.
K
And
thank
you
and
I
think
that's
an
incredibly
important
point
that
we've
been
thinking
about
as
we've
drafting
the
ordinance
I'm
happy
to
sit
down.
I
do
just
in
case
there's
some
miss
misunderstanding
on
this
way.
We
talked
about
benchmarking,
it's
different
than
like
what
we
currently
require
for
our
large
commercial
buildings,
and
so
that's
that
that's
a
yearly
thing.
That
would
be
a
big
concern.
K
What
our
ordinance
really
is
talking
about
at
point
is
just
point
of
sale
and
point
of
lease,
so
it's
it's
not
a
yearly
requirement
that
we're
burdening
on
a
homeowner
to
do
every
single
year,
but
I'm
very
concerned
about
that
and
I'd
love
to
get
your
thoughts
on
before
we
get
into
the
ordinance.
Thank.
I
That
there
are
a
number
of
authors
who
are
working
on
this
and
that's
really
the
place
to
have
the
conversation
about
whether
or
not
this
would
work.
Couldn't
we
just
again
take
out
the
word
require
since
I:
don't
I'm,
not
comfortable
with
the
comp
plan
requiring
things
and
just
use
a
strong
word
like
incentive
work
towards
or
something
like
that,
I,
don't
know
that
incentivize
would
work,
because
this
is
going
to
be
a
regulation
in
truth
and
South
housing.
I
So
there
is
no
incentive,
they
have
to
housing,
so
it
is
going
to
be
burdensome
and
there
needs
to
be
some
work.
I'm
thinking
through
that
and
I
trust.
The
author's
are
doing
that.
So
why?
Wouldn't
we
just
change?
The
word
require
to
pursue,
and
then
we
can
discuss
the
larger
truth
and
Sayla
housing
issue
when
it
comes
up
as
an
issue
in
that
right
now
is.
I
A
E
E
F
So
I
appreciate
the
comment
that
10.14
incorporates
some
aspect
of
this.
Really
when
you
look
at
programs
like
the
Living
Building
Challenge,
it
is
very
comprehensive.
It
touches
everything
even
down
to
materials
use
within
a
building
and
sourcing.
I,
also
understand
the
comments
of
councilmember,
Cunningham
and
so
I'm
happy
to
pull
this
item
and
work
on
the
language
to
make
it
more
agnostic.
F
Of
a
specific
example,
I
can
use
the
word
like
the
Living
Building
Challenge,
with
the
anticipation
that
if
there
are
future
programs
I
know,
LEED
is
another
one
it's
commonly
used,
and
so
that's
why
I
use
the
word
like
in
there.
But
I
can
certainly
withdraw
and
rework
the
language
to
be
more
agnostic
of
titles
and
get
add
the
different
programs
that
are
available
and
really
the
fact
that
the
city
should
be
promoting
these
and
encouraging
developers
when
possible
to
participate.
A
L
L
This
is
a
document
that
we
submit
to
them
as
our
regional
governing
body,
and
this
is
a
policy
that
actually
speaks
to
their
own
policies
and
while
we
have
been
in
discussions
through
our
IG
our
function
for
many
many
years
about
the
overall
issue
of
sack
fees,
I
just
think
that
this
is
again
kind
of
one
of
those
issues
that
belongs
more
in
our
IG.
Our
function,
that,
in
our
comprehensive
plan.
C
F
A
L
A
F
All
right,
thank
you,
madam
chair.
So
if
you
look
specifically
at
this
policy,
it
does
mention
a
number
of
specific
programs.
That's
what
I
thought
composting
toilet
systems
would
be
something
we
would
want
to
add
in
their
commercial
specifically
but
I'm
happy
to
rework
the
language
on
this
and
kind
of
bring
something
back.
There
would
be
supportable
folks,
so
I
wanted
to
make
that
comment
before
the
vote
and
was
in
cute,
but
we
voted
on
it.
So
I'll
rework
some
language.
Doesn't
he
come
up
with
something
that
makes
sense
that
can
move
instruction,
Thank.
A
You
councillor
Johnson
and
my
apologies-
we
are
now
moving
on
to
goal
area
number
10,
which
is
I'm
sorry
goal
area
number
11
clean
environment
in
2040,
Minneapolis
will
have
healthy
air,
clean
water,
and
a
vibrant
eco
system
will
now
consider
amendments
in
connection
with
goal
area
number
11,
clean
environment.
Do
any
council
members
wish
to
remove
an
item
or
items
from
the
list
of
amendments
under
goal
area
number
11.
F
E
You
council,
on
returning
ham.
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
and
thank
you
council
member,
Johnson
and
I
was
excited
to
see
I'm,
not
the
only
council
member,
along
with
council
member
rikon
who's
excited
about
deconstruction,
so
I'm
happy
to
draw
11.10
since
I
feel
it
is
adequately
represented
in
11.11
and
I
wanted
to
pull
G
11.8
for
further
discussion.
C
A
F
You,
madam
chair
I,
just
wanted
to
make
a
comment
on
this.
This
is
work
that
is
currently
happening.
The
Army
Corps
of
Engineers
is
conducting
a
disposition.
Study
on
this
they've
been
community
meetings.
I
expect
further
engagement
on
it.
I
think
it's
exciting
enough
prospect
to
specifically
call
out
in
the
2040
plan,
because
it
is
work
that
truly
the
exploration
of
what
happens
with,
in
particular
our
exams
along
Mississippi.
Our
work
will
continue
lightly
through
2040.
A
E
First
is
a
bit
concerning
to
me
because
I
don't
want
my
part
of
the
city
on
the
north
side
to
miss
out
on
opportunities
that
the
zoning
changes
offer
and
as
well
as
we
have
significant
flooding
issues
already,
and
so
the
idea
of
prioritizing
areas
that
potentially
already
have
a
lot
of
investment
to
then
have
additional
public
infrastructure
investment.
When
we
already
are
behind
and
experiencing
significant
flooding
issues,
I
just
see
this
and
I
don't
feel
like
it's
applicable
to
the
whole
city
and
I
think
it
actually
could
be
potentially
harmful
for
the
north
side.
A
B
You,
madam
chair,
similarly
Southwest
year,
Southwest
Minneapolis,
has
a
lot
of
flooding
issues
and
I
put
this
forward
because
flooding
areas
with
the
most
need
for
new
flooding
infrastructure
shouldn't,
have
more
density
put
there
until
those
issues
are
addressed.
So
I
think
this
is
consistent
with
how
councilmember
Cunningham
feels
about
this
plan.
I
think
also.
We
could
at
least
look
at
the
work
plan
around
flooding
issues.
L
You,
madam
chair-
and
this
is
an
item
to
that,
because
I'm
upon
the
center
and
I
have
discussed-
and
my
concern
with
this
is
maybe
a
little
different
than
what
this
talked
about
so
far,
and
it's
in
part
a
question
about
the
level
of
specificity
for
this
document,
just
because
it
is
so
prescriptive
about
the
process
that
we
will
use
to
update
our
zoning
code.
So
I
wonder
if
it
might
make
sense
to
create
a
staff
direction
instead.
L
I
do
know
that
see
pet
staff
will
be
updating
us
about
the
process
to
update
the
zoning
code.
The
update
of
this
zoning
code
after
this
comprehensive
plan
is
adopted
will
take
many
many
years
and
the
last
time
the
comprehensive.
The
last
time
the
zoning
code
was
really
fully
update,
was
in
1999,
so
it
will
be
a
long
and
iterative
process
which
may
even
extend
beyond
the
next
comprehensive
plan
update
in
ten
years,
and
so
you
know
my
recommendation
or
my
position
would
be
that
this
would
be
better
served
as
a
staff
direction.
L
I
would
also
note
that
there
are
a
lot
of
other
things
that
we
could
list
as
priorities
for
places
that
should
be
considered
priorities
for
plan
implementation
generally,
and
zoning
updates,
specifically
Council
vice
president
and
I,
have
a
staff
direction
coming
at
the
end
that
talks
about
prioritizing
race,
equity
and
asking
staff
to
come
back
for
a
prioritized
list
of
how
we
implement
race
equity
commitments
in
the
plan.
First,
so
again,
I
think
this
is
very
specific
to
one
issue,
and
there
are
many
other
factors
that
we
will
use
to
prioritize.
L
The
zoning
code
updates,
including
race
equity,
including
you
know,
places
that
are
under
pressure
for
growth
and
a
number
of
other
criteria.
Well,
I
totally
understand
the
intention
behind
this
and
the
need
for
our
infrastructure
generally
to
support
growth.
Customer
Fletcher
and
I
also
have
another
amendment,
that's
related
to
that
topic,
I.
Think
again,
maybe
a
staff
direction
could
accomplish
this.
I
Actually
I'm,
so
sorry,
we
had
earlier
voted
to
take
out
the
language
with
regard
to
requiring
burn
safe
class,
and
here
it
is
again
that
pesky
bird
safe
class
requirement
in
Section
number
G
11.2,
so
I'd
like
to
move
to
reconsider
the
adoption
of
G
point
11
point
2
first
and
have
a
vote
on
the
motion
to
reconsider.
I
will
know
what
staff
did
warn
me
of
this
like
days
ago,
but
it
was
not
on
my
radar.
So
it's
not
your
fault,
but
I
didn't
pay
attention.
I
Simply
to
keep
the
word
encourage
but
eliminate
the
word
require,
as
I
probably
will
mention
now
and
every
other
one
I
see
to
remove
the
word
require.
So
my
motion
is
to
just
simply
remove
the
words
and
require
to
keep
what
councilmember
Johnson's
doing,
which
is
protect
and
enhance
I'm
good
with
that.
I.
Just
don't
want
to
require
anything
in
this.
Second.
I
A
P
Existing
businesses
can
be
impacted
by
changing
costs
of
rents
and
commercial.
Real
estate
displacement
of
business,
not
only
results
in
the
loss
of
jobs
in
retail,
but
assets
to
add
vibrancy
in
social
spaces
for
the
community.
Long
tenured,
businesses
and
the
community
are
economic
assets
to
contribute
to
the
identity
of
place.
This
is
especially
true
in
districts
and
quarters
have
strong
historical
and
cultural
identity.
Therefore,
we
should
identify
an
endeavor
to
support
the
continued
existence
and
success
of
these
assets,
and
that
would
be
I
guess
like
gold
12.2,
if
adopted,.
E
A
H
A
A
All
those
in
favor
of
including
this
amendment
indicate
by
saying
aye
any
opposed,
say,
nay,
and
that
item
carries.
Then
we
have
now
completed
goal
number
12
and
we'll
move
to
goal
area
number
13,
Proactive,
accessible
and
sustainable
government
in
2040
minneapolis
city
government
will
be
proactive,
accessible
and
fiscally
sustainable.
A
F
A
Go
14
and
I
will
note
that
I
believe
that
is
our
final
goal
area
in
the
comp
plan
and
it
is
equitable
civic
participation
systems
and
just
a
little
bit
of
a
descriptor
Minneapolis
will
have
an
equitable
civic
participation
system
that
in
franchises
that
in
franchises,
everyone
recognizes
the
core
and
vital
service.
Neighborhood
organizations
provide
to
the
city
of
Minneapolis
and
bills,
people's
long-term
capacity
to
organize
to
improve
their
lives
and
neighborhoods.
A
A
A
D
L
Mentor
I
think
perhaps
before
staff
starts.
I
could
give
some
context
to
this
because
it
isn't
I'm
bringing
and
then
with
welcome
staff
to
help
walk
us
through
the
changes.
But
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
this.
These
are
assuming
of
math
changes
that
reflect
an
attempt
to
continue
to
have
a
strong
commitment
to
the
stated
goals
of
our
comprehensive
plan
policy,
and
that
is
to
continue
to
allow
for
housing
options
in
every
neighborhood
of
our
city.
L
I
work,
together
with
colleagues
and
staff,
to
make
sure
that
changes
that
might
affect
one
Ward
would
be
applied
citywide.
So
this
is
again
my
amendments
to
the
map
are
intended
to
create
a
citywide
approach
to
policymaking
in
the
built
for
map.
So
with
that
said,
I
think
it'd
be
helpful
to
have
staff,
maybe
walk
through
a
couple
of
the
specific
changes
individual
council
members
may
want
to
speak
to
changes
that
they
particularly
prioritized
and
then
I
might
have
some
comments
again
on
the
particulars
again.
M
Madam
chair
president,
bender
and
councilmembers
I
think
what
I'll
offer
is
just
a
little
guidance
as
to
how
to
how
to
read
these
maps.
That
would
be
helpful,
so
we
as
staff
prepared
the
maps
of
the
request
of
the
council
president
and
what
you're
seeing
is
a
map
sorted
by
Ward
and
what's
what's
faded
out
in
the
background,
is
the
built
form
map
as
forwarded
to
the
City
Council
by
the
Planning
Commission
and
then
highlighted
in
clear
colors?
Are
the
amendments
themselves?
So
what
you
cannot
see
on
these
maps
is
underneath
those
changes.
M
L
K
You,
madam
president,
I
just
want
to
express
I
will
be
supporting
this,
but
this
is
off
the
hardball
a
lot
of
the
changes
that
we
are
reflected
in
my
ward,
come
as
changes
happen
and
throughout
the
whole
city
and
of
course,
what
11
wants
to
do
its
part.
As
we
see
this
coming
growth,
but
in
some
of
these
areas
we're
by
transit,
we
could
be
doing
development.
That's
that
I
think
there's
another
way
to
do
that
in
a
way.
I've
counted
on
doing
that
is
making
sure
that
we're
talking
with
residents
whenever
possible
developments
happening.
B
Thank
you,
madam
chair,
unfortunately,
was
briefly
absent
in
goal
8.1.
The
amendment
that
I
wish
to
bring
forward
is
with
the
city
clerk
right,
but
in
order
to
do
that
on
the
maps
we
need
to
change
the
land
use
designation
in
the
thirteenth
Ward.
That
now
looks
like
a
park.
It
is
not
a
park.
It's
a
private
golf
course.
I
would
like
it
to
be
zoned
for
residential
future
use.
It
would
be
designating
the
mini
cata
golf
course,
as
urban
neighborhood
for
land
use
and
interior
to
for
built
form.
B
L
Thank
You
Kanta
my
promise
on
and
so
I
can
put
the
clock.
I'll.
Take
that
as
a
motion
to
amend
the
map
amendment.
So
why
don't
we
take
that
up
now?
If
that's
all
right
with
the
author,
perfect,
so
I'll
come
over
Palmisano
x'
motion
that
would
be
to
designate
the
mini
kata
golf
course,
as
urban
neighborhood
for
land-use
and
interior
to
for
built
form.
Are
there
any
discussion
on
that
motion.
L
Seeing
none
all
an
approval,
please
say
aye
aye
any
opposed
that
carries
I
put
myself
in
queue
because
I
wanted
to
describe
one
particular
change.
As
council
members
looked
through
the
pocket
and
I
don't
see
anyone
else.
Thank
you.
So
I'll
do
that.
Now
earlier
in
the
meeting
today,
we
created
a
new
built
form
designation.
This
is
not
a
small
change
to
make
at
this
stage
in
the
process.
L
I
want
to
acknowledge
that,
and
also
just
you
know
acknowledge
that
this
gives
folks
about
a
week
to
give
a
particular
feedback
on
the
new
built
form
category
before
this
item
comes
back
to
the
committee
of
the
whole
next
week,
so
that
new
built
form
classification
is
called
corridor.
Three
and
I
am
looking
for
the
language
that
I
can
read
it
out
loud,
but
I
can't
find
it.
Okay,
that
was
item
G
6.2,
which
passed
earlier
authored
by
me.
L
The
corridor
3
the
district
typically
applied
along
transit
routes
farther
from
downtown
that
are
on
narrower
rights-of-way
and
serves
as
a
transition
between
lower
intensity,
residential
areas
and
areas
immediately
surrounded
by
metro
stations
and
so
new
and
remodeled
buildings
in
the
corridor.
3
district
should
reflect
a
variety
of
building
types
on
both
small
and
moderate
sized
Lots,
including
on
combined
Lots
building
heights,
should
be
one
to
three
stories.
Requests
to
exceed
three
stories
would
be
evaluated
on
the
basis
of
whether
or
not
a
taller
building
as
a
reasonable
means
for
further
achieving
comprehensive
plan
goals.
L
So
just
a
brief
to
comment
on
how
that
was
applied.
Really
what
this
is
is
looking
at
places
in
the
city
where,
while
the
previous
comprehensive
plan
did
have
a
goal
and
land
use
designations
around
growing
new
transit
corridors,
because
we
didn't
complete
a
rezoning
study,
a
lot
of
the
zoning
is-
and
some
of
these
corridors
is
quite
low
today.
So
this
creates
a
little
bit
of
a
transition
for
us
to
look
to
a
new
land
use
category
that
will
be
applied
to
those
kinds
of
transit
corridors.
C
M
M
Comments
apologize
for
the
interruption,
I
wanted
to
point
out
what
I
think
is
a
minor
staff
error
that
we
just
caught,
which
is
a
number
of
the
titles
of
the
maps,
are
incorrect,
so
you'll
notice
that
most
of
these
maps
relate
to
the
built
form
map
in
the
draft
comprehensive
plan.
Some
of
them
relate
to
the
future
land
use
map,
and
but
a
number
of
them
are
misidentified
in
the
title.
All
the
content
is
correct.
M
E
Council
member
Cunningham
thinking
about
I'm,
chair
I
am
just
seeing
the
shade
of
difference
home
between
1
and
2,
so
I'm
gonna
be
bringing
forward
a
motion
to
change
a
stretch.
If
you
look
at
the
built
form
or
for
sale,
wrote
in
the
upper
northwest
corner,
the
built
form
around
that
area
does
not
accommodate
increased
density
just
based
on
how
it
is
built.
There's
lots
of
runways
or
dead
ends.
Excuse
me,
and
it's
just
generally
speaking,
not
really
set
up
for
increased
density.
Unfortunately,
it
is
along
a
transit
corridor
plate.
E
M
E
P
P
I
took
the
opportunity
a
few
weeks
ago
to
meet
with
every
council
member
to
sort
of
see
where
they
were
coming
from,
and
that
was
very
helpful
and
enriching
for
me
to
know
these
amendments
that
overall,
they
came
in
the
spirit
of
not
sort
of
debating
the
purpose
and
intent
of
the
overall
goal
of
the
Comprehensive
Plan
and
the
objectives
they're
in,
but
really
to
provide
context
and
insight.
Those
very
local
and
nuanced
and
I
think
it
was
an
additive
not
a
destructive
overall
and
I
think
that
should
be
stated
for
the
public.
P
So
as
we
interpret
these
changes,
what
the
intentions
were
and
I
would
say,
even
though
the
nuance
and
details
were
unique
to
every
area,
and
that
should
be
expected,
and
representatives
of
those
areas
would
be
the
ones
to
know
that
be
expert
in
that.
But
they
very
much
comported
though
I
have
to
say
it
wasn't
always
automatic.
L
You,
madam
chair
I,
just
wanted
to
echo
those
sentiments
and
just
think
every
council
member
for
just
being
so
thoughtful
so
engaged
with
your
own
constituents,
but
also
as
council
member
right
stated,
checking
back
in
into
that
citywide
context
and
I
also
really
wanted
to.
There
would
be
lots
of
time
to
thank
staff,
but
I
just
wanted
to
particularly
thank
staff
for
the
enormous
effort
that
went
into
making
these
map
amendments.
L
I
A
B
You,
madam
chair,
this
would
replace
the
existing
goal
8.1
that
we
were
trying
to
develop
to
distinguish
this
Golf
Course
separately
from
any
other
golf
course
currently
in
the
city.
All
of
those
other
golf
courses
are
public.
They
are
owned
by
the
park
board,
but
this
one
was
to
make
it
its
own
designation
in
last
minute,
conversation
with
planning
staff.
It
appears
that
the
easiest
way
to
do
that
is
simply
to
call
it
out
by
name.
That's
why
this
language
is
in
front
of
you.
A
The
amendment
text
reads:
invest
in
transportation,
infrastructure
and
locations
experiencing
growth,
particularly
in
locations
that
have
existing
transportation
infrastructure
that
needs
to
adapt
to
the
demands
and
opportunities
by
that
growth
and
in
goal
area
number
three
affordable
and
accessible
housing.
Is
there
any
discussion.
A
Next
we
have
a
motion
by
councilmember
Fletcher
to
amend
policy
number
38,
affordable
housing,
near
transit
and
job
centers
of
the
comprehensive
plan
to
add
access
step.
Ii
quote:
support
education
and
housing
stability
by
encouraging
the
development
of
larger
family,
supportive
housing
units
with
at
least
two
bedrooms
in
close
proximity
to
Minneapolis,
Public
Schools
and
our
long
Minneapolis
walking
routes
for
youth.
G
Thank
you
to
Jenkins
I
just
wanted
to
briefly
thank
the
members
of
the
Minneapolis
Public
School
Board,
who
weighed
in
on
this
and
encouraged
me
to
pursue
this
and
I'm
excited
that
we
can
show
a
little
bit
of
our
commitment
to
Minneapolis.
Public
Schools
is
one
of
the
things
that
constitute
neighborhoods
and
our
worth
designing
our
building
patterns
around.
A
A
Q
Sure,
thank
you,
madam
president.
Sorry,
madam
vice
president
and
chair
of
the
committee
today
so
yeah.
What
I
did
is
I
wanted
to
align
this
a
little
bit
more
with
some
of
the
other
designations
that
we're
looking
at,
such
as
cultural
districts
and
be
more
intentional
and
explicit
on
our
racial
disparity
language.
Q
So,
following
some
of
the
lead
of
councilmember
Cunningham
when
talking
about
decentering,
whiteness
and
really
focusing
in
on
the
institutional
disparities
versus
talking
about
this
as
a
way
where
race
is
to
blame
but
more
the
systems
and
the
decisions
that
we
make
are
what
constitutes
the
inequities,
not
the
inherent
differences
in
the
social
construct,
a
race
which
some
would
argue
is
not
real
but
yep.
Here
it
is.
A
L
You,
madam
chair
I,
just
want
to
voice
my
support
for
this
and
just
note
that
this
is
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
really
needs
to
be
prioritized
for
implementation.
Like
all
of
the
things
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
you
know
our
statements
here
are
only
as
good
as
our
commitment
to
implementing
them
and
I
think
that
this
these
additions
are
critical
to
reaching
the
goals
of
centering
race
equity
in
the
plan.
A
A
A
Our
next
item
is
a
motion
by
councilmember
Schrader
directing
cpad
Community,
Planning
and
Economic
Development
staff
to
develop
and
retain
regulations
for
the
interiors
one.
Two
and
three
built
form
district
affecting
building
height
setbacks
and
lot
coverage
that
closely
match
existing
requirements
for
single-family
homes
and
lower
intensity
zoning
districts
and
supports
energy-efficient
design.
K
Chatter,
thank
you,
madam
chair.
We
did
have
a
lengthy
discussion
about
this,
so
I
just
will
just
add
that
my
directions,
thing
designed
to
affirm
Claire
by
the
intentions
and
set
forth
on
the
plan
to
preserve
the
integrity
of
our
forthcoming
rezoning
process
and
also
just
wanted
to
note
that,
as
the
zoning
and
planning
chair,
I
just
want
to
make
it
clear
that
this
consideration
will
be
top
of
my
mind
as
well
as
with
the
zoning
and
planning
committee.
As
we
move
forward
next
year,.
L
You,
madam
chair,
you
know
I
express
some
I'm
concerned
about
this
earlier
and
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
do
think
that
how
we
interpret
this
language
really
differs
a
lot
across
the
city
and
places
that
are
in
particularly
in
the
interior,
two
and
three
districts.
Those
are
in
neighborhoods
that
have
a
lot
of
different
character
today.
L
The
character
of
those
neighborhoods
is
that
they've
grown
organically
over
time
along
streetcar
lines,
and
you
know
in
the
initial
phase
of
their
development
and
so
I,
but
I
appreciate
the
chairs
leadership,
but
I
know
he
will
be
very
thoughtful
in
approaching
how
this
works
in
these
different
contexts
across
the
city.
So
I
will
be
supporting
this
direction.
A
A
Next,
we
have
a
staff
direction
by
bender
and
Jenkins
staff
in
sepia
and
the
city
coordinators
office
are
directed
to
coordinate
with
relevant
departments
to
bring
regular,
but
at
least
annually
updates
on
the
implementation
and
evaluation
of
the
comprehensive
plans,
goals,
policies
and
action.
Steps
to
the
committee
of
the
whole
race
equity
subcommittee,
with
a
particular
emphasis
on
prioritizing
race
equity
commitments
in
the
plan
staff,
will
collaborate
and
align
with
ongoing
city
race,
equity
efforts,
including
the
racial
equity
action
plan
and
racial
equity
community
advisory
committee.
A
L
L
So
that
is
the
intention
of
this,
and
we
worked
closely
with
the
Reece
equity
staff
as
well
as
C
ped
on
this
approach,
rather
than,
for
example,
going
through
every
policy
or
action
step
and
sort
of
adding
the
words
race.
Equity
in
this
is
the
approach
that
we
wanted
to
take
to
make
sure
that
those
things
that
are
most
that
were
identified
through
that
very
deep
dive
that
we
did
in
the
day-long
session
about
race
equity
in
the
comprehensive
plan
really
came
forward.
As
priorities
for
implementation
is.
A
See
no
further
discussion,
all
those
in
favor
indicate
by
saying
aye
any
opposed,
say,
nay,
and
that
staff
direction
carries
next
step
direction
is
by
Connell
ender
and
Fletcher,
directing
staff
in
the
community
planning
and
economic
development
department
to
replace
all
use
of
the
term
citizen
and
citizens
within
the
Comprehensive
Plan
related
documents
and
related
public
communications
to
resident
and
residents.
Where
applicable,
is
there
any
discussion
there?
Any
discussion
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor
indicate
by
saying
aye?
Can
you
oppose
a
name?
And
that
item
is
a
doctor?
A
Comprehensive
plan
policy
ensure
that
cultural
districts
are
supported
by
the
city's
approved
comprehensive
plan.
Subsequent
small
area
plans,
land-use
bill
form
and
zoning
policies
and,
in
collaboration
with
the
communications
department
and
other
key
partners,
develop,
recommended
framework
for
a
narrative,
branding
and
promotion
strategy
to
increase
visibility
and
viability
of
cultural
districts.
The
city
coordinators
office
is
charged
with
ensuring
the
cultural
districts
workgroup
is
comprised
of
a
diverse
representation
stakeholders,
with
particular
emphasis
on
engage
in
those
working
in
the
creative
sector,
small
business
owners,
cultural
institutions
and
economic
development
groups.
A
A
Support
have
given
us
tremendous
feedback
to
make
this
comprehensive
plan
as
comprehensive
and
reflective
the
values
of
our
community,
and
so
I
just
want
to
offer
my
sincere
appreciation
to
our
staff,
to
our
residents
and
and
to
my
colleagues
as
well,
and
if
there
are
no
further
comments.
I
move
to
adjourn
this
meeting.
I'm.
Sorry,
council,
president
bender
thank.
L
You,
madam
chair,
just
very
quickly
wanted
to
note
that
today,
at
the
housing
policy,
Development
Committee,
which
starts
at
1:30,
we'll
be
taking
up
the
inclusionary
zoning
ordinance.
That
was
a
companion
to
the
comprehensive
plan
to
implement
their
commitments
to
affordable
housing
and
new
development.
A
Thank
You
councillor
bender,
and
so
now
this
entire
draft
plan
as
a
minute
will
be
forwarded
to
the
regular
Committee
of
the
Whole
meeting
on
Wednesday
December
5th
for
final
review.
After
that,
the
final
draft
plan
will
be
before
the
full
City
Council
at
its
regular
meeting
on
Friday
December
7th
for
adoption,
with
no
further
business
to
come
before
us.
This
meeting
is
adjourned.