►
From YouTube: February 28, 2018 Housing Policy & Development Committee
Description
Minneapolis Housing Policy & Development Committee Meeting
A
I'm
councilmember
kam
Gordon,
chair
of
the
committee
and
joined
today
by
councilmember
Schrader,
councilmember,
bender
and
councilmember
Goodman.
We
have
a
quorum
of
a
committee,
so
we
can
start
a
meeting
and
conduct
our
business.
Big
meeting
has
four
items
on
the
agenda.
We
have
a
public
hearing
where
land
sale,
one
consent
item
and
two
discussion
items.
A
B
You
good
afternoon,
a
chair,
Gordon
and
members
of
the
committee
on
Erica
Coleman
I'm,
a
senior
project
coordinator
with
C
fed
housing.
So
today
staff
is
recommending
self
3210
Morgan
Avenue
north
through
the
Minneapolis
homes
program.
Policies
for
the
program
were
established
by
the
City
Council
in
December
11
2015,
and
on
February
10
2017
staff
recommends
the
cell
of
3210
Morgan
Avenue
north
to
Gini
Investments
LLC
for
its
appraised
value
of
$34,000,
subject
to
conditions.
B
3210
Morgan
Avenue
north
was
acquired
from
Hennepin
County
tax
forfeited
land
for
$1
staff
marketed
this
property.
With
an
open
house
held
on
October
2017
and
with
notification
sent
to
a
listserv
of
over
1,900
prospective
developers
and
homebuyers,
there
were
two
applications
received.
Ccw
group
was
the
other
applicant
based
on
program
criteria
stated
in
our
Minneapolis
Homes
Program
manual.
We
use
that
to
evaluate
all
offers
receipt.
B
Jenny
Investments
is
recommended,
as
the
purchaser
CTW
group
is
not
recommended
as
an
alternate
purchaser
at
this
time
to
evaluate
responsibility,
staff
consulted
with
Department
of
regulatory
Services
staff
to
verify
the
status
of
any
vacant,
buildings,
rental
properties
and
or
any
other
properties
owned
by
the
prospective
purchaser.
In
the
city
of
Minneapolis,
there
were
no
concerns.
B
The
property
was
constructed
in
1939
as
a
1176
finished
square-foot
three-bedroom,
one-bathroom
single-family
house.
The
purchaser
intends
to
invest
one
that
one
hundred
forty-seven
thousand
three
hundred
dollars
to
rehabilitate
3210
Morgan
Avenue
north
into
a
1500
finished
square-foot,
three-bedroom,
two-bathroom,
single-family
home
to
be
to
be
sold
exclusively
to
owner
occupants.
B
Cps
construction
management
staff
reviewed
the
scope
of
work
and
estimates
that
were
submitted
by
the
applicant
and
confirmed
that
the
scope
of
work
and
estimates
are
sufficient
to
meet
the
minimum
rehabilitation
standards
of
the
Minneapolis
homes.
Program
notification
was
provided
to
the
foul
neighbourhood
on
November
22nd
2017.
They
recommended
Jenny
Investments
LLC.
Are
there
any
questions?
I.
A
A
Anyone
here
seeing
no
one,
then
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
any
questions
committee
members
have
seeing
none.
Then
I
will
move
approval
of
this
land
sale.
All
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
any
posts
say
no,
any
abstentions.
That
motion
carries
then
we're
ready
to
move
on
to
our
discussion
items,
and
the
first
item
has
to
do
with
many
townhomes,
and
this
is
approving
a
supplemental
award.
C
Welcome
Thank
You,
chair
Gordon
and
committee
members.
My
name
is
Angie
skilled,
oh
no,
I'm,
the
manager
of
residential
finance
division
team
at
C,
ped
and
I'm
here
today
to
present
the
staff
recommendation
for
a
supplemental
award
of
240,000
dollars
from
the
family
housing
initiative
program
for
many
townhomes.
C
This
Minnehaha
townhomes
is
an
important
and
unique
public
public
partnership
between
the
city,
the
county,
the
state
and
importantly,
the
minneapolis
public
housing
authority
as
project
developer
to
construct
16,
affordable
housing
units
for
some
of
the
city's
most
vulnerable
households,
families
that
are
homeless
and
coming
out
of
shelter.
This
project
will
serve
very
large
families
with
primarily
three-bedroom
and
some
two-bedroom
units.
As
a
region,
we've
had
an
extremely
difficult
time:
housing
this
population
that
are
well
behind
on
our
ending
homelessness
goals.
C
So
just
to
orient
you
there's
a
slide
on
your
screen
that
highlights
the
project
location
at
54th
and
Riverview
Road
in
Ward
12.
This
is
a
non
concentrated
area
of
the
city
that
will
offer
families
expanded
vocational
choice
in
their
housing,
as
well
as
access
to
light,
rail
and
bus
transit
parks,
schools,
jobs
and
other
amenities.
The
city
previously
supported
this
project
with
an
$800,000
award
from
the
family
housing
initiative
in
2016.
C
Subsequent
to
that
time,
the
project
experienced
significant
cost
overruns.
These
Purdue
in
part
to
the
late
discovery
of
unstable
soils
on
the
site
and
both
exterior
facade,
upgrades
and
stormwater
requirements
of
the
city
of
Minneapolis
mPHA,
has
taken
their
role
as
a
developer,
very
seriously,
bringing
on
a
new
architect
to
redesign
the
project
to
reduce
costs,
new,
experienced,
consulting
expertise
and
assign
a
new
internal
project
management
staff
they've
been
able
to
significantly
reduce
the
project
gap
through
these
efforts,
but
a
gap
does
remain.
C
This
slide
shows
you
the
new
site
plan
and
highlights,
for
you,
I,
think
the
community
scale
of
this
project
that
transitions
from
the
existing
senior
high
density
building,
which
is
the
kind
of
l-shaped
gray
building
on
the
back
side
of
the
site
through
the
transition
through
the
townhouse
units
that
are
colored
and
then
out
until
the
surrounding
single-family
homes.
The
proximity
to
this
senior
building
offered
also
offers
unique
intergenerational
opportunities
for
residents
of
both
projects
and
here's,
an
elevation
that
shows
the
property
from
the
front.
C
Looking
from
the
Northeast
staff
understands
that
this
recommendation
for
supplemental
funds
is
a
big
ask
on
a
per
unit
basis
for
this
project
paired
with
the
original
Ward.
This
request
will
bring
the
total
city
grant
support
to
$65,000
per
unit
which
does
exceed
the
normal
family
housing
initiative
limit
of
$50,000
per
unit,
but
staff
is
recommending
that
you
authorize
this
special
award
under
the
same
model
of
the
council
created
contingency
pool
in
the
affordable
housing
trust
fund,
which
allows
up
to
an
additional
$15,000
per
unit
to
projects
that
are
similarly
stuck
in
the
development
pipeline.
C
The
family
housing
fund
are
the
family
housing
initiative.
Excuse
me
account,
has
a
high
program
balance
right
now,
due
to
staff's
inability
to
recommend
those
funds
for
other
projects
due
to
program
rules.
In
fact,
this
project
is
the
first
of
several
projects
that
staff
will
be
bringing
forward
to
this
committee
in
the
coming
months
to
creatively
to
creatively
utilize
the
family
housing
initiative
funds
to
address
the
severe
shortage
of
three-bedroom
units
at
30%
of
ami.
Here.
C
C
The
total
focus
of
this
project
is
to
construct
a
high
quality
community
asset
that
will
remain
permanently
affordable
to
help
address
our
community
goals
around
addressing
family.
Almost
with
that
I'd
like
to
note
that
representatives
from
the
Minneapolis
Public
Housing
Authority,
executive,
director,
Greg
Russ,
deputy
executive
director,
Tracy
Scott
and
director
of
planning
and
development
or
I
come
on
thanks
pronounce
that
are
in.
C
E
E
C
E
Mr.
chair
I
actually
support
the
staff
recommendation.
I
told
Andrea
this
before,
but
I,
don't
think
it
would
be
correct
to
suggest
at
all
there's
so
much
money
in
this
fund.
We
should
just
give
them
more
per
unit.
There's
a
reason
we
say:
there's
a
limit
per
unit
and
that's
to
build
more
and
all
we
need
to
do
is
say
it's
not
going
to
be
used
for
this
purpose,
but
any
other
project
at
30
and
50
percent,
and
there's
lots
of
those
in
the
pipeline
too.
That
meet
our
requirements.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
I
appreciate
that
I
have
a
question.
I
know
that
there
mPHA
has
constructed
some
senior
public
housing
in
the
last
ten
years,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
I
know
of
any
new
projects
of
a
new
family,
public
housing
that
have
been
built
in
the
city
since
I
first
was
elected
to
the
council.
Can
you
tell
us
when
the
last
or.
C
The
federal
government
has
largely
pulled
back
from
providing
capital
to
the
public
housing
authorities
around
the
country
for
construction,
so
they
have
operating
resources
in
this
case
special
resources
through
their
Faircloth
authorization
to
provide
services,
I'm
Support
Services,
but
there's
not
resources
available
for
the
capital
construction
costs.
That's
why
we
have
this
unique
public
public
partnership.
In
this
case,
yeah.
A
F
Thank
You
mr.
chair
and
thanks
to
the
committee
for
the
opportunity
I
do
want
to
call
out
our
partners.
This
has
just
been
a
tremendous
effort,
as
we
try
to
put
these
units
in
the
ground
and
just
to
re-emphasize
here
today
that
we
feel
that
there'll
be
more
things
coming
like
this,
where
we're
looking
at
either
rejiggering
the
units
that
we
have
in
some
way,
but
attaching,
wherever
we
can,
this
very
deep
subsidy
that
allows
us
to
reach
down
to
the
very
low
end
of
the
income
spectrum.
F
So
we
appreciate
very
much
the
city's
support
and
you're
the
monetary
contribution,
and
in
exchange
we
feel
we
can
bring
the
kind
of
subsidy
that
we've
all
been
talking
about
for
the
folks
who
are
30%
in
below,
and
we
think
this
kind
of
model
is
one
that
we
could
replicate
elsewhere,
including
in
our
scattered
site
portfolio,
when
we
come
time
to
revisit
that.
So
thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
A
You
I
don't
see
any
other
questions
or
comments.
I
will
note
that
I
see
one
I'll
note.
They
down
counts.
Member
Johnson
spoke
with
me
before
the
meeting
and
I'm
sure,
and
he
wanted
to.
Let
me
know
how
supportive
he
was
of
this
and
that
he
couldn't
be
here
necessarily
to
speak
on
its
behalf,
but
he
was
supportive
council
member
bender
Thank.
D
You
mr.
chair
I
just
want
to
briefly
note
that
I'm
supportive,
as
well
of
the
staff
recommendation
and
I,
see
some
of
our
partners
here
that
sit
at
the
heading
home
Hennepin
table.
You
know
what
we've
learned
in
the
brief
amount
of
time.
I've
been
involved
in
the
work
of
our
partnership,
to
make
homelessness
as
brief
and
as
possible.
D
Where
you
know
a
large
percent
of
our
students,
I
think
it's
8%
our
homeless
are
highly
mobile.
We
see
those
impacts
in
our
schools.
You
know:
I
have
a
dream
that
nearer
our
public
community
schools,
we
would
have
this
kind
of
housing
in
every
neighborhood,
where
low-income
families
could
live
within
walking
distance
of
a
great
public
school
I
think
this
is
a
great
model
and
I'm,
like
I,
said
just
wanted
to
voice.
My
support.
D
A
A
That
motion
carries
then
we
have
our
final
item
before
us,
and
this
is
it's:
it's
a
contract
amendment
for
a
home
line,
but
we
thought
this
would
be
a
good
opportunity
for
us
to
get
some
information
as
a
committee
and
maybe
an
update
on
what
home
lines
work
has
been
and
some
of
the
metrics
for
the
last
year.
So.
A
G
So
some
background
information.
The
contract
originated
in
2015
through
regulatory
services.
It
was
a
hundred
thousand
dollar
contract,
with
home
line
to
provide
legal,
free
legal
services
for
such
as
fiction's
leases,
Security+
issues
to
Minneapolis
renters
in
English,
Spanish
and
Somali,
phone
email
and
distribution
of
applicable
material
and
then
following
here
in
2016
regulatory
services,
again
receive
$100,000
to
continue
the
contract
and,
at
the
same
time,
it
receive
approval
from
the
permanent
review
committee
to
waive
the
contract.
G
From
going
through
the
request
for
a
proposal
process,
mainly
because
online
is
a
fairly
unique
organization
that
provides
services
that
work
across
lines
with
many
organizations.
They
do
even
receive
referrals
from
legal
aid
for
client
services
and,
at
the
same
time,
in
2016,
the
City
Council
approved
the
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
the
contract.
Extension
for
new
total
$200,000
in
2017
regulatory
services
again
went
through
the
same
process,
receive
another
hundred
thousand
dollars
to
extend
the
contract
and
receive
another
approval
to
waive
the
contract
through
the
RFP
process
from
the
PRC
and
then
recently
in
February.
A
Have
a
small
question
just
in
terms
of
what
our
practices
are
about,
I'm
waiving
RFPs
I'm,
going
out
for
requests
for
proposals,
make
sense.
I
know
that
a
lot
of
our
general
practices
are
that
we
force
ourselves
to
do
it
so
to
speak
every
once
in
a
while.
How
long
could
this
be
waived
into
the
future
or
is
there?
Is
there
a
guideline
that
will
tell
us
we
should
go
out
for
one
or
says
something
at
our
discretion.
G
G
H
Hi
mr.
chair
members
of
the
committee
I
believe
that
is
something
that
is
discretionary.
It
has
to
meet
certain
criteria.
There
has
to
be
a
good
reason
for
it,
in
other
words,
and
we
believe
that
we
know
that
there
there
aren't
other
nonprofit
organizations
that
can
handle
the
same
level
of
volume
that
we
really
need
for
services
from
for
Minneapolis
renters
outside
of
home
line.
H
So
we
know
that
that
you
know,
we've
talked
informally
to
other
organizations
that
are
nonprofits
that
do
provide
tenant
services
and
all
of
them
agree
that
the
organization
that
really
is
qualified
in
terms
of
meeting
the
different
language
requirements
and
having
the
capacity
to
meet
the
volume
that
we
need
is
online.
So
I
don't
think
that
there
is
a
limit
on
the
extension,
but
we
will
certainly
look
into
that
and
verify
that
and.
A
I
appreciate
that
sometimes
we
do
request
for
qualifications
to
do
a
more
formal
check-in
to
find
out.
What's
out
there
I'm,
not
suggesting
we
do
that
now,
necessarily
just
reading
the
report
and
noticing
it
what
a
long
term
relationship
we've
had
with
the
organization
and
I'm
sure
we're
going
to
find
out.
They've
done
some
fabulous
work
too.
So
I
just
wanted
to
bring
that
up.
So
I
was
clear
on
it
myself.
Okay,
there.
G
I
I'll
get
started
char,
Gordon
and
members
of
committee.
Again,
my
name
is
Eric
Howie
I'm,
with
home
line
I'm.
Also
a
Minneapolis
resident
Minneapolis.
Sorry
Oh
mine
is
located
at
34
55
Bloomington
Avenue
Avenue
in
Minneapolis,
but
we
are
a
statewide
nonprofit
organization.
We
serve
renters
throughout
the
state.
All
right.
Thank
you
so
I
think
most
you
are
familiar
with
organization,
but
I'm
going
to
quickly
just
run
through
some
key
items
and
then
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
services
that
we
provided
last
year
to
Minneapolis
renters.
I
Again,
our
primary
program
in
the
core
service
that
the
city
of
Minneapolis
helps
resource
is
our
tenant
hotline.
It's
a
free
and
confidential
legal
hotline
that
renters
can
call
or
access
via
email
on
our
website.
We
have
15
employees,
six
of
whom
are
attorneys
in
a
variety
of
other
tenant
advocates
and
we
serve
folks
in
English,
Spanish
and
Somali.
We
are
in
the
midst
of
seeking
funding
until
to
add
a
Hmong
language
capacity
as
well.
I
I
So
last
year
in
2017
we
serve
just
under
three
thousand
renter
households
in
Minneapolis
statewide,
it's
about
it's
around
fifteen
thousand
that
we
serve
so
the
bulk
of
our
services
in
in
the
metro
area
and
particularly
in
Minneapolis,
the
costs
associated
with
that
service
with
our
ten
a
hotline
service.
Again,
that's
just
providing
basic,
quick
free
legal
confidential
advice
over
the
phone
was
about
a
hundred
twenty
nine
thousand
dollars.
I
So
we
fully
appreciate
the
support
that
we
get
from
the
city
of
Minneapolis
and
the
track
record
we've
had
in
the
city
and
we
have
served
residents
in
Minneapolis
since
2014
when
we
expanded,
but
just
just
so
you
know,
there's
there's,
there's
costs
associated
with
that
and
not
covering
the
entire
cost.
It
also
doesn't
cover
other
services
that
we
provide
some
of
those
education
services
and
other
types
of
outreach.
I
We
do
spend
an
average
about
a
half
an
hour
with
each
client,
but
that
will
varies
widely
if
somebody's
facing
an
eviction
we
may
have
them
come
in
to
a
consultation
and
spend
a
lot
more
time
reviewing
documents.
Other
people
are
calling
us
asking
how
do
I
get
my
renter's
credit
back?
That's
a
really
quick
response
there.
I
So
just
a
little
bit
of
information
about
this
is
a
demographics
of
our
clients
just
last
year
in
2017
and
just
in
Minneapolis.
So
it
predominately,
as
you
can
see,
predominantly
families,
sorry
female
clients,
people
of
color.
We
don't
have
the
stats
for
families
with
kids,
but
we
do
serve
many
families
with
kids.
We
can
run
those
numbers
and
then
display
it
not
having
any
sort
of
we
don't
restrict.
The
ink
based
on
income
limits
or
issue
will
advise
any
renter
about
any
issue
as
long
as
there's
not
a
conflict
of
interest.
I
The
vast
majority
85%
are
low-income
households
under
HUD
guidelines,
so
you
can
take
a
look
and
see
just
the
the
numbers
of
families
served
by
Ward
here
and
just
one
quick
note
share.
Gordon
our
numbers
are
a
little
low
in
your
ward
and
that's
because
we
have
a
relationship
with
a
university
student
legal
services.
We
do
a
lot
of
referrals
to
them.
University
students
are
paying
for
that
service
as
as
students.
So
that's,
and
then
this
is
sort
of
the
last
last
slide
here.
I
I
Those
are
important
distinctions
in
terms
of
formal
eviction,
actions
in
the
court
that
we're
advising
about
and
then
notices
to
vacate
or
perhaps
lease
non-renewals
that
are
not
necessarily
at
that
level
where
somebody
is
facing
a
formal
court
eviction,
but
I
know
a
couple
weeks
ago
that
the
innovation
team
did
a
presentation
about
evictions,
and
so
you
can
see
we
did
advise
a
good
number
of
people.
We
know
we.
A
J
Say
thank
you.
First
I
was
like
kind
of
side
note.
I
do
want
to
agree
with
the
chairs
questioning
of
just
the
the
contracts,
and
this
is
a
completely
side.
Note
kind
of
separate
of
this
individual
contract
I
think
as
an
issue
of
transparency
we
should
be
going
out,
but
that
issue
aside
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
the
phenomenal
work
that
home
warning
does
for
the
city,
Thank
You.
D
D
Just
wanted
to
note
that
the
work
that
home
line
is
doing
on
the
front
and
even
just
advising
people
about
their
rights
if
their
landlord
isn't
keeping
up
with
maintenance
or
repair,
helping
us
refine
and
give
feedback
on
our
rental,
tiered
system
and
the
you
know
the
policies
and
procedures
that
we
have
as
a
city
and
how
we're
doing
inspections,
all
of
that
I
think
is,
is
making
an
impact
on
people's
day-to-day
lives.
It's
really
important
and
it's
doing
it
in
a
way.
D
That's
avoiding
some
of
these
more
disruptive
things
like
a
formal
eviction,
so
I
think
the
work
is
really
important.
We
also
noted
yesterday,
in
a
meeting
with
legal
aid
counsel,
Moore,
Ellison
and
I,
that
we
don't
really
have
anyone
in
the
city
staff
like
in
our
city,
enterprise,
whose
job
it
is
to
like
look
out
for
renters.
D
We
have
lots
of
staff
for
doing
things
related
to
that
work,
but
there's
no
one
who's,
who
I
think
would
maybe
there
isn't
I'm,
not
thinking
of
it
but
who's,
who
we
sort
of
imagined
as
their
client
or
their
rent.
The
51%
of
people
in
our
city,
who
are
renters
and
I,
think
that's
another
place
where
home
line
and
organizations
like
it
are
filling
that
gap.
So
I
think
we
get
a
lot
of
return
on
this
relatively
small
financial
investment.
So
thank
you
for
the
work
and
for
being
here
today.
Thank.
A
You
and
I've
certainly
noticed
a
significant
difference.
We
when
we
weren't
bunny
home
line
and
you
weren't,
helping
us
and
working
on
this
and
that
you
have
been
and
I
think
you
do,
fill
a
niche
and
do
a
great
service
for
us.
I
have
one
little
question,
partly
because
I've
got
one
of
the
more
famous
public
housing
areas
in
my
ward,
I
think
currently
famous
anyway,
locally
famous
and
public
housing
was
here
and
I
was
wondering
and
and
I'm.
A
Also
it's
complicated
in
Ward
2,
because
I
do
have
lots
of
student
housing
and
and
if
there
are
student
at
the
U
they're
paying
for
legal
services
and
I'm,
just
wondering
when
you
say
all
renters
does
that
include
public
housing
residents,
and
so
they
can
call
and
make
an
get
legal
advice
from
you
as
well.
Sure.
I
Gordon,
yes,
the
we
will
serve
any
renter.
The
only
sort
of
conflicts
that
sometimes
arise
are
with
if
we've
advised
a
roommate
or
a
neighbor.
That
being
said,
folks
that
are
in
public
housing,
we
we
will
definitely
advise.
We
will
frequently
also
refer
to
legal
aid
because
they
definitely
will,
in
most
cases,
qualify
for
their
services
depending
on
the
issue.
But
yes,
we'll
definitely
advise
them
about
any
issue.
Public
housing
I
think
any
type
of
subsidized
housing
can.
I
Would
definitely
be
a
conflict
of
interest,
so
we
we
do
get
a
lot
of
calls
from
landlords
and
so
we'll
refer
to
Minnesota,
multi-housing
or
other
resources.
That
being
said,
we
do
offer
general
education
classes.
So
what
we
do
were
one
of
the
organizations
that
the
city
has
sort
of
authorized
as
doing
landlord
training,
so
landlords
can
come
to
our
training
and
then
get
a
reduction
in
licensing
fee
for
rental
conversion
fees.
So
we
we
do
get
quite
a
good
number
of
Minneapolis
landlords
that
were
helping
to
educate,
at
least
not
about
specific,
specific
legal.
A
I
A
I
Mr.
chair
actually
I
think
it
was
just
yesterday
or
yeah.
Yesterday,
I
had
an
opportunity
to
our
some
of
our
staff
had
an
opportunity
to
meet
with,
or
maybe
was
earlier
this
week
with
some
folks
from
the
office
for
police
conduct
to
discuss
some
concerns
that
we've
had
with
the
conduct,
on-premise
and
and
unintended
consequences
it
may
have
on
on
renters
and
their
their
ability
and
wishes
to
access
police
services.
A
Well,
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
this
committee
is
going
to
be
working
on
in
the
months
ahead.
There's
a
lot
of
issues
around
tenant
protections,
tenant
rights,
I
know
a
lot
of
the
ideas
that
come
forward
have
to
do
with
that
and
I
think
that
you
and
your
staff
and
the
expertise
that
you
have
and
in
that
area
will
be
very
valuable
to
us,
so
hopefully
we'll
be
able
to
find
time,
maybe
not
always
within
your
contract,
but
to
get
some
other
help
as
we
start
crafting
policy.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you.
H
Mr.
chair
members
of
the
committee
wanted
to
add,
since
Eric
mentioned,
that
there's
a
need
for
additional
legal
services,
especially
for
very
low
income,
renters,
that
where
home
line
has
identified
that
they
may
have
a
legal
case,
the
the
city
council
did
approve
one
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
in
the
2018
budget.
So
we
are
preparing
to
go
out
for
a
request
for
qualifications
or
requests
for
proposals
for
those
legal
services.
H
A
F
A
I,
don't
see
any
other
questions
or
comments,
I'm
happy
to
move
this
most.
Everybody
else
wants
to
all
right.
Well,
I
will
move
then
approval
in
the
contract
amendment
with
home
line
any
other
discussion,
seeing
none
all
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
any
opposed,
say
no,
any
abstentions,
and
that
motion
carries
and
seeing
no
further
business
before
us.
This
meeting
is
adjourned.
Thank
you.
Everyone.