►
From YouTube: September 17, 2018 City Planning Commission
Description
Minneapolis City Planning Commission Meeting
A
Good
afternoon,
I
will
call
to
order
the
September
17th
meeting
in
the
Minneapolis
City
Planning
Commission.
My
name
is
Matt
Brown
I
serve
as
president
of
the
Commission
I'm
joined
today
by
commissioners,
Allison
cron,
xur,
Schrader,
Swezey,
Coleman,
Cole,
Gill
and
Rockwell
this
time,
we'll
ask
that
you
silence
any
mobile
devices
and
we
can
get
started
with
our
meeting
first
item.
Business
today
is
to
approve
the
actions
from
the
August
27th
meeting.
Commission's
me
have
a
motion
to
approve
those
actions.
A
If
a
motion
and
a
second
all
in
favor
and
that
motion
carries
next,
we
will
sort
through
the
agenda
will
determine
which
items
will
be
considered
on
consent
which
we
will
discuss
and
which
will
be
continued
to
another
meeting.
You
can
find
our
copies
of
the
agenda
in
the
hallway
starting
at
the
top
item.
One
is
mosaic
phase
3
at
1320,
Lagoon,
Avenue,
1350,
Lagoon,
Avenue
and
2900
Fremont
Avenue,
south
conditional
use
permit
for
some
modifications
to
the
PUD
for
a
master
sign
plan.
Commissioner
cron
sorry
I
know
earlier
you
had
some
questions
about
that.
A
I
think
you've
had
those
answered,
though
so
we
can
see
if
anyone
else
would
like
to
speak
on
item
1.
Seeing
no
one
will
put
item
1
on
consent.
Item
2
is
at
30
1817
Avenue
South,
that's
an
expansion
of
a
non-conforming
use.
Is
anyone
wishing
to
speak
in
opposition
to
or
modify
the
staff
recommendation
on
item
2?
Seeing
no
one
will
put
that
on
consent.
A
Item
3
is
a
2805
26th
Avenue
south.
That's
a
conditional
use
permit
to
allow
a
third
dwelling
unit.
So
anyone
wishing
to
speak
in
opposition
to
or
modify
the
staff
recommendation
on
item
3,
seeing
no
one
will
put
item
3
on
consent.
Item
4
as
the
liquor
exchange
at
28:19
through
2821
Nicolette
Avenue
conditional
use
permit
for
off
sale.
Liquor
store
at
that
location.
Is
anyone
wishing
to
speak
in
opposition
to
or
modify
the
staff
recommendation
on
item
4c?
No
one
will
put
that
on
consent.
A
Item
5
is
that
1001
through
1015
Glenwood
Avenue
a
conditional
use
permit
for
a
school.
Also
a
conditional
use
permit
for
building
height.
We
will
discuss
item
five
and
just
so
I
have
a
sense.
Is
there
anyone
here
to
speak
on
item
five?
So
we
have
a
couple
people
here,
we'll
discuss
that
item
item
six
is
Lauren
community
school
at
2,640?
Fourth,
Avenue
North:
that's
conditional
use,
permit
and
site
plan
review
for
a
school
addition.
Is
anyone
wishing
to
speak
in
opposition
to
or
modify
the
staff
recommendation
on
item
6c?
A
No
one
will
put
that
on
consent
item
seven
is
twenty
twenty
seven
twenty
twenty-nine
and
twenty
thirty
three
West
Broadway
23:01
Oliver
Avenue,
North
21:04
and
2106
23rd
Avenue,
north
and
2101
West
Broadway
several
applications
or
related
to
a
building.
Addition
at
that
location.
That
item
will
be
continued
to
the
October
1st
meeting.
So
if
anyone
is
here
for
item
seven
that
will
be
considered
on
October
first
item
8
is
11:25
lagoon,
that
is
at
1116
West
Lake
Street.
A
Several
applications
for
a
new
multi-family
building
at
that
location
is
anyone
wishing
to
speak
in
opposition
to
or
modify
the
staff
recommendation
on
item
8c?
No
one
will
put
that
on
consent.
Item
nine.
As
the
zoning
code
text,
amendment
related
to
the
definition
of
entertainment.
Is
anyone
wishing
to
speak
in
opposition
to
or
modify
the
staff
recommendation
on
item
nine
see?
No
one
will
put
that
on
consent.
Item
ten.
Is
the
zoning
code
text
amendment
related
to
split
zoning
as
anyone
wishing
to
speak
in
opposition
to
or
modify
the
staff
recommendation
on
item
10c?
A
Finally,
item
11
is
also
a
zoning
code
text,
amendment
related
to
rooftop
mechanical
equipment,
penthouses
and
height,
and
is
new
and
wishing
to
speak
in
opposition
to
or
modify
the
staff
recommendation
on
item
11
see.
No
one
will
put
that
on
consent.
So
our
agenda
as
amended,
is
as
follows:
items
1,
2,
3,
4,
6,
8,
9,
10
and
11
will
be
on
consent,
will
discuss
item
and
item
seven
will
be
continued
to
the
October
1st
meeting.
Commissioners
may
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
agenda
as
amended.
A
C
Yes,
we
had
a
land
acquisition
of
for
the
emergency
stabilization
pilot
program
that
was
approved
as
being
found
consistent
with
the
Minneapolis
comp
plan,
and
we
also
had
Atlanta
3950
Thomas
Avenue
North
that
was
approved
is
also
being
consistent
with
the
Minneapolis
comprehensive
plan
for
sustainable
growth.
All.
A
A
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second
all
in
favor,
and
that
motion
carries
next
may
have
a
motion
to
continue
items
7
to
the
October
1st
meeting
motion
and
a
second
all
in
favor,
and
that
motion
carries
next
we'll
move
on
to
our
public
hearings
and
at
this
time,
I'll
open
the
public
hearing
for
the
items
on
the
consent
agenda.
Again,
that's
items
1
2,
3,
4,
6,
8,
9,
10
and
11.
A
A
D
Good
evening,
mr.
chair
and
members
of
the
Commission,
as
you
mentioned,
this
is
an
application
at
1001
and
1015
Glenwood
Avenue
to
conditional
use
permits
1
for
the
use
as
a
school
and
a
second
to
increase
the
height
for
the
penthouses.
The
elevator
overrun
currently
in
the
site
is
owned.
C3A
with
the
pedestrian
oriented
overlay
district,
it's
on
Glenwood
Avenue,
which
is
a
commercial
corridor,
and
it's
designated
as
mixed-use
an
aerial
image
showing
where
the
site
is.
D
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
renovate
the
existing
building
and
then
add
two
additional
floors
to
the
existing
circulation
core
at
the
southwest
end
of
the
site.
In
order
to
provide
adequate
fire
access
or
means
of
egress
from
the
third
and
fourth
floors,
they
would
redesign
the
parking
lot
that
is
currently
in
front
of
the
building
in
order
to
accommodate
the
vehicles
at
landscaping,
as
shown
here
all
along
Glenwood
Avenue
and
on
the
south
end
of
the
site,
and
then
the
current
metal
building
on
the
east
end.
D
That's
right
against
Colfax
Avenue
would
be
used
for
additional
parking
in
order
to
meet
their
minimum
parking
ratio,
and
then
they
have
shown
that
they
can
accommodate
all
of
the
bus
movements
for
drop-offs
and
pickups
on
sites
and
then,
as
far
as
the
CP
for
additional
height,
it
would
be
increasing
it
from
56,
which
is
the
allowable
to
59,
feet,
10
inches
and
that's,
as
I
mentioned,
for
the
elevator
in
the
stair.
Core
staff
has
found
that
the
school
would
not
be
a
detriment
to
or
endanger
the
public.
D
Health,
safety,
comfort
or
general
welfare
would
not
impede
the
development
of
surrounding
properties.
The
site
does
have
adequate
utilities,
access
and
drainage
to
accommodate
the
school
traffic
congestion,
as
I
mentioned,
could
be
handled
on
site,
they're,
meeting
their
parking
ratio
and
they're,
showing
that
they
have
adequate
room
for
bus,
drop-off
and
pickup
on
site.
It
does
meet
the
comprehensive
plan,
land
use
policies,
as
outlined
on
page
3
of
your
staff
report.
D
However,
it
does
mention
that
it
is
designated
as
an
excuse
and
as
far
as
the
small
area
plans
go
in
the
comp
plan,
but
with
recommended
conditions
of
approval
it
would
conform
to
the
district
regulations
and
staff
has
five
conditions
recommended
conditions
of
approval,
which
are
noted
here
and
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
All.
A
F
Evening,
commissioners,
I'm
Carol
Lansing
and
representing
the
applicant,
who
is
the
building
property
owner
and
wishes
to
lease
that
building
to
Yuba
medical
Academy
for
our
presentation.
First
Nancy
Alexa
with
the
super
pho,
is
going
to
talk
to
you
just
a
little
bit
about
the
building
improvements.
And
if
you
have
any
questions
regarding
that
and
then
Musa
Farrar
who's,
the
school's
director
is
going
to
speak
to
you
about
the
school
and
I'll
end
by
addressing
the
CEP
good.
G
G
We
typically
buy
buildings
that
need
serious
renovation
and
this
one
because
it
was
built
as
a
Creamery
and
had
been
used
as
a
lab.
It
had
some.
You
know
significant
issues
with
it
before
it
could
really
be
turned
into
anything
else,
and
so
we've
kind
of
been
going
through
that
process
and
were
approached
by
UBA
Medical
Academy
a
little
bit
ago
and
they're
interested
in
leasing
the
property.
B
H
When
we
moved
to
happiness,
we
were
almost
250
students
and,
as
we
continue
growing
all
that
years,
our
population
is
mainly
from
Minneapolis
80
percent.
I
gave
you
a
kind
of
a
folder.
You
see
all
of
you.
This
is
the
picture.
The
tallest
bar
is
the
bar,
that
is
from
Minneapolis
the
rest
of
students
Hopkins.
Where
we
live.
We
only
get
four
students
from
Hopkins
st.
Louis
Park
Eden,
Prairie
Edina.
We
get
about
ten
students,
the
rest
of
our
students
come
from
either
some
of
them
about
15
students
come
from
st.
H
H
We
are
one
of
the
best
schools,
our
authorizer
is
PUC
and
our
history
is
in
their
book.
The
only
reason
we
were
coming
back,
we
love
many
will
love.
Hopkins
will
love
it
because
they
start
us
and
we
get
what
we
want,
but
one
of
the
difficult
things
we
have
is
when
we
have
parent-teacher
conferences
or
when
we
have
to
meet
a
child's
parents,
it
takes
them
long
hours
or
even
days
to
come.
H
We
never
get
more
than
50%
of
our
parents
on
parent
teacher
conference,
which
is
when
the
parents
and
the
teachers
meet
the
reason
the
parents
are
complaining.
Is
you
you
are
too
far
well.
Luckily,
at
the
end,
we
now
found
a
building
in
1:05,
Glenwood
Avenue.
That
was,
you
know,
abandon
it
for
a
long
time,
but
now
it's
kind
of
come
to
life
and
we
were
in
the
beginning.
I
want
you
to
understand.
We
were
in
Minneapolis,
we
were
in
to
277
12th
Avenue
North
Minneapolis.
Therefore
we
outgrew
the
current
ad
building
in
Minneapolis.
H
We
move
to
Hopkins
and
we're
now
coming
back,
therefore,
will
not
outsiders
to
Minneapolis
the
middle
school
and
the
elementary
school?
They
are
right
now
in
the
same
building.
Are
our
feelings
when
the
Edwards
will
graduate
from
where
they
are
they
have
to
happens?
We
mostly
get
at
most
40%,
because
the
next
60%
of
the
graduating
class
says
to
us.
It's
too
far.
Parents
don't
want
to
drive
down
low.
H
B
Cross
I
have
a
question
about
your
site
plan
now,
I'm
interested
to
know
you
have
pedestrians
walking
right
through
the
bus,
drop-off
area
I
find
it
not
a
terribly
safe
condition.
Have
you
thought
about
how
to
get
pedestrians
to
the
front
door
from
the
public
sidewalks
without
having
to
walk
through
the
bus,
drop-off
area,
which
are
we
all
know
how
big
school
buses
are
and
how
hard
it
is
to
see
children
so.
G
G
F
So
we
understand
from
comments
that
you've
received
and
from
discussion
in
the
neighborhood
that
there
are
people
who
are
going
to
ask
you
to
deny
the
CEP
largely
because
they
for
school,
because
they
would
rather
have
office
or
retail
in
this
location
on
Glenwood
I
believe
it's
been
argued
that
the
plan
that
the
school
of
school
use
isn't
consistent
with
the
Basset
Creek
Valley
master
plan.
To
the
contrary,
a
high
school
is
consistent
with
the
applicable
land
use
guidance,
as
has
been
indicated
to
you
by
staff.
F
F
They
should
be,
and
they
don't
say,
there's
any
place
that
they
shouldn't
be
they're,
just
really
an
ignored
use,
but
the
Basset
Creek
plan
more
recently,
the
van
white
memorial
plan
and
the
city's
comp
plan
all
guide
this
site
as
mix
juice,
and
although
the
Bassett
Creek
plan
has
a
rather
specific
vision
of
what
they'd
like
to
see
for
mixed
use
with
retail
and
housing
above
it,
the
city's
makes
juice.
Category
is
not
that
fine,
grained
and
the
city
has
not
applied
and
should
not
apply
small
area
plans
to
be
that
prescriptive.
F
More
specifically,
they
encourage
both
public
and
private
institutions
to
provide
a
wide
range
of
educational
choices
for
Minneapolis
students
throughout
the
city
and
particularly
encourage
them
to
locate
in
transit
oriented
sites
like
commercial
corridors,
so
location
of
a
school
on
a
commercial
corridor
is
specifically
within
theirs
within
the
more
specific
land
use
guidance.
We
have.
F
Now,
the
zoning
of
this
area
after
the
Bassett
Creek
plan
it
was
rezone
to
c3a
on
the
commercial
districts,
are
mixed
use
district.
So
it's
consistent
with
the
guidance
there
and,
as
you
can
see,
from
the
purpose
purpose
statements
for
both
commercial
uses,
districts
generally
and
the
c3a
district.
It's
a
little
hard
to
see
there,
specifically
both
of
those
just
both
districts
are
intended
to
include
institutional
uses
and
also
promote
ad
adaptive
reuse
of
existing
buildings,
which
is
what
this
proposal
will
do.
So
why
are
we
here
with
the
CEP?
F
Seup
includes
other
standards
than
just
consistency
with
the
comprehensive
plan
and
I'll
note
for
you
that
other
types
of
schools,
preschools
early
childhood
learning,
centers
and
vocational
schools
are
permitted
uses
in
the
commercial
districts.
Why
does
the
K
through
12
requires
the
U
P
and
not
these
others
I
think
we
know
that
k-12
schools
have
some
unique
traffic,
Jenner
raishin
concerns
and
issues
and
challenges
with
the
come
in
the
morning,
leaving
the
afternoon
cars
and
buses
mingling
together
and
after-school
activities.
F
I
also
think
that
they
can
be
larger
and
there's
concern
about
how
their
site
transitions
into
them
is
buffered
and
in
character
with
surrounding
properties,
but
it's
not
about
the
type
of
use
and
consistent
with
complan.
It's
about
the
other
characteristics
that
come
with
that
use
that
make
it
a
CEP
as
I
understand
it.
So,
in
light
of
the
fact
that
K
through
12
schools
are
allowed
in
commercial
districts
with
the
CEO
P
and
that,
then
it
can't
simply
be
that
they're,
not
commercial
enough
as
a
reason
to
deny
them.
F
C
I
just
was
wondering
in
reference
to
all
the
comments
that
we
did
get
in
regard
to
them.
Since
I'm
I
have
a
cop
drop
to
the
concerned.
Neighbors.
Do
you
know
of
any
meetings
that
took
place
between
the
applicant
and
the
neighborhood
and,
if
so,
at
the
outcome
was
of
those
meetings
deserves
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
people
wrote
in.
F
F
Outcome
was
I've
only
recently
come
on,
since
we
saw
that
there
was
opposition
and
I
think
they
met
with
Nancy
can
tell
you
about
who
they
met
with
Libby.
Great
I
also
think
that,
in
terms
of
timing,
while
the
building
has
been
on
the
market
for
lease
for
some
time,
the
school
use
kind
of
came
up
in
a
time
frame
that
required
moving
ahead
in
order
to
start
work
for
them
to
open
next
year.
So.
G
We
met
last
week
with
I
believe
it
was
a
Glenwood
revitalization
meeting
at
the
Harrison
neighborhood
group,
there
was
I
think
five
neighbors
present
asked
a
lot
of
questions.
Couple
of
the
neighbors
were
pretty
adamant
that
they
did
not
want
to
see
a
school
relocate
to
Glenwood
that
they
would
prefer
an
office
tenant
or
something
like
that.
Thank.
J
G
We're
commercial
real
estate
developer
and
we
have
had
other
properties
in
our
portfolio
that
have
been
looking
good
for
a
school.
Some
of
that
depends
on
how
they
lay
out
the
you
know
the
actual
structure
of
the
facility
and
some
of
the
attributes
that
come
along
with
it.
So
we
have
worked
on
some
charter
schools
in
some
other
other
cities.
C
H
E
H
C
Just
think
for
a
school
to
move
into
a
neighbor,
it's
nice
instead
of
it
from
a
lot
of
the
letters
it
seemed
as
though,
instead
of
trying
to
become
part
of
the
neighborhood,
it
seems
like
it's
indifferent
to
the
fact
that
it's
has
neighbors
and
I.
I
just
want
to
know
if
you'd
made
any
efforts
to
kind
of
bridge
that
gap
so.
F
A
B
A
L
We
have
heard
a
little
bit
about
the
master
plan
that
we
drew
up
and
which
the
City
Council
accepted
in
2006.
One
of
the
reasons
we
did
not
address
schools
along
Glenwood
is
that
we
already
have
a
school
at
Cedar
and
Cedar
Lake,
Road
and
Glenwood,
and
on
Highway
55.
There
are
several
more
schools
and
that's
only
three
blocks
north,
and
so
it
didn't
seem
appropriate
to
us
to
have
schools
in
this
general
area.
L
We
have
God
knows
I,
don't
know
umpteen
public
meetings
where
residents
spoke
out
and
gave
us
their
wishes
of
what
they
wish
to
see
along
the
corridor
and
I
can
only
tell
you
that
when
we
heard
about
the
PUC
about
two
three
days
ago,
that's
the
first.
We
heard
that
there
was
there
was
going
to
be
a
school
in
that
property.
I
have
to
tell
you
that
I
live
two
blocks
or
one
and
a
half
blocks
from
an
Wotton
which
is
a
public
school
middle
school
and
Bryn
Mawr
Elementary,
which
is
an
elementary
school.
L
There
is
no
way
that
that
school
transportation
uses
are
not
going
to
affect
the
neighborhood.
We
have
buses
on
Laurel
all
the
time
and
in
winter
they're
running,
because
it's
too
cold
to
chuck
the
engines
off
as
they
bring
kids
or
as
they
wait
to
pick
up
kids.
This
is
not
a
good
use
on
Glenwood
we're
trying
to
make
it
an
attractive
place
for
businesses
to
come
to
for
businesses
to
build
and
put
above.
L
They
stood
behind
their
members
on
the
rock
back
in
2006
when
the
plan
was
first
introduced
and
they
are
still
standing.
Rock-Solid
behind
I've
worked
on
the
passage
master
plan.
I've
worked
on
the
Bremen
neighborhood
Land
Use
Plan
small
area
I've
worked
on
the
shrinking
of
the
impound
lot
in
order
to
get
more
development
land
for
the
basic
recovery
and
I've
worked
on
all
the
caps
for
the
Southwest
LRT.
L
In
order
to
ensure
that
we
have
transportation
in
and
transportation
out
that
people
who
live
in
the
valley
can
get
themselves
to
job
wherever
they
happen
to
be
in
the
metro
area
and
for
jobs,
maybe
to
come
into
the
area.
This
school
does
not
strike
us
I'm,
sorry,
I'll
say
it
doesn't
strike
the
BMA
and
it
doesn't
strike
me
as
an
individual.
We
have
not
had
a
chance,
as
a
committee
Rock
to
say,
yay
or
nay,
as
a
personal.
L
M
Name
is
Pat
Kearney
and
I
own,
a
building
at
8:37
Glenwood
Avenue
directly
across
the
street,
from
from
the
from
Excel
labs,
one
thousand
two
one
thousand
fifteen
to
the
building
in
question.
The
only
reason
we
would
we
ended
up
here
is
that
I
saw
a
sticker
placed
by
a
by
a
city
worker
on
the
tin
shed
across
the
street
from
my
office.
M
There's
been
no
other
tact
with
us
up
until
the
bath
Creek
until
the
Glenwood
revitalization
meeting,
which
was
unanimously
not
recommended
by
that
committee,
I'm
not
on
that
committee,
but
I
am
as
a
member
a
kind
of
person
I'm
on
the
rock
I'm.
The
new
guy
on
the
rock
I've
only
been
on
it
for
16
years
and
envita
who's.
A
real
veteran
has
been
on
it
much
much
longer
and
I'm.
M
Also
a
member
of
the
of
the
HMA
board
and
the
hna
board
does
not
have
a
chance
to
be
able
to
vote
on
this
because
we
haven't
had
a
meeting
yet
and
it's
the
same
with
with
Iraq.
Neither
of
us
have
had
it
had
our
opportunity
to
have
an
organized
reaction
to
to
this
proposal
anyway,
and
no
one
has
ever
contacted
me
about
the
building
and
they're
going.
M
Anyway,
we
that's,
we
just
think
that
there's
some
little
there's
a
lot
more
answers
to
be
gained,
and
if
this
building
was
if
this,
if
this
school
decided
to
be
a
hundred
yards
to
the
north
or
south
of
its
location
and
not
on
our
commercial
street,
everybody
here
would
be
welcoming
the
school,
but
this
is
the
wrong
spot.
This
is
where
we
want.
We
want
commerce
on
the
street
and
we're
steadily
running
out
of
properties.
M
A
N
M
In
the
long
run,
I'm
afraid
that
no
is
our
is
our
answer
to
to
too
many
questions
that
we
might
have.
But
there
are
questions
about
the
model
about
the
amount
of
parking
which
is
there's
like
60
parking
spot
spots
for
400
students
and
80
faculty
members.
It
seems
like
not
enough
especially
high
school
students.
That
would
be
one,
the
the
building
that
they're
replacing
the
air
the
or
the
tenants
that
they're
replacing
in
this
building
we're
not
the
best
neighbors
in
the
world.
M
You
know
they
promised
every
year
that
they
were
gonna,
that
they
were
going
to
improve
the
landscaping
and
in
20
years
they
never
planted
so
much
as
a
weed
and-
and
it
takes
us
a
phone
call
to
forget
them
to
Tim
Tim
otha,
the
the
boulevards
anyway,
it's
the
most
important
thing
is,
we
would
be
it
had
they
come
to
us
first
and
said
we
want
to
be
in
the
neighborhood
we
would
have.
We
would
have
turned
over
every
stone
to
be
able
to
find
them
a
building
other
than
on
Glenwood
Avenue
I
mean
I.
M
Think
that's
the
most
important
thing
I
mean
we
are
not.
This
is
not
an
indie
group.
This
is
a
not
in
my
front
yard
group.
We
we
don't
want
them
in
our
front
yard,
because
our
front
yard
is
going
to
be
the
difference
between
this
being
a
vital
neighborhood
or
a
neighborhood
of
of
solid
nonprofits
that
run
from
from
garage
a
parking
ramp.
A
that's
going
to
end
up
all
the
way
to
Cedar
just
to
Cedar,
Lake
Trail,
sooner
or
later,
I
mean
we
just
we
just
every
time
we
ignore
our
own
plan.
M
O
My
name
is
Lisa
Goddard
and
I
live
at
290,
Market
Street,
which
is
International
Market
Square,
but
I've
only
lived
there
for
about
four
years
and
previous
to
that.
I
lived
in
Harrison
neighborhood
and
had
been
on
the
hair,
so
neighborhood
board
for
many
years
and
part
of
the
planning
that
went
into
the
basket
valley,
master
plan
and
some
of
the
neighborhood
meetings.
O
I
went
into
the
new
our
side
redevelopment
plan,
which
is
out
heritage
park,
and
so
I've
got
a
lot
of
history
with
some
of
the
same
things
that
have
been
talked
about
already
and
I.
Guess
I
want
to
reiterate
something
that
Pat's
it
at
the
very
end,
which
is
also
what
I
had
written
in
my
very
long
email
is
that
we
already
have
too
many
tax-exempt
parcels
on
Glenwood
Avenue
and
in
particular,
but
in
our
neighborhood
in
general.
O
O
The
loss
of
that
opportunity
is
very
concerning
to
me
in
particular
and
and
a
lot
of
my
neighbors
as
well,
and
then
I
wanted
to
speak
to
some
of
the
other
things
that
were
brought
up
by
the
developer
and
I
guess
for
the
the
proposed
school
app.
Cannot,
yes,
I'm
I'm
not
opposed
to
the
school
in
general
I.
Just
think
this
is
not
the
right
site
for
it,
and
you
know,
like
Pat
said:
maybe
somewhere
else
in
the
valley
would
be
a
great
site.
O
So
what
I
wanted
to
ask
was
one
yeah?
How
well
did
you
publicize
to
the
communities
in
the
area
and
not
just
Harrison,
because
I
live
across
the
street,
which
is
Sumner
Glenwood?
How
well
did
you
publish
to
these
communities
about
this
meeting
and
you
know:
was
it
just
to
the
Neighborhood
Association
or
was
their
emails
pote?
You
know
postcards
or
whatever
that
went
out,
and
then
I
also
wanted
to
talk
about
the
history
of
the
bastard,
Creek
Valley
master
plan,
and
why
the
site
may
not
have
been
investigated
previously.
O
Till
now,
and
part
of
that
is
that
plan
was
approved
in
2006
I
believe
right
and
Ryan
companies
had
been
given
exclusive
development
rights
for
a
little
while
and
then
that
housing
market
crashed,
and
so
then
we
had
the
Great
Recession
and
nothing
happened,
and
then
Ryan
companies
lost
their
exclusive
development
rights
for
whatever
reason
I'm,
not
not
judging
I
have
no
idea.
Why
that
one
way,
but
they
don't
longer,
have
it
and
then
it's
at
vacant
there
were
no
incentives
to
develop.
O
You
know
Loring
Park
area,
so
there
hasn't
been
much
interest
in
development
of
this
area
until
more
recently
and
I
know.
Wellington
is
doing.
Excuse
me
some
development,
a
little
farther
west,
but
what
we're
I
guess
what
I'm
saying
about
this
whole
site
is
the
fact
that
nobody's
really
been
interested
in
the
last
couple
of
years
doesn't
mean
that
nobody
would
have
been
interested
and
that
this
site
would
have
been
sitting
vacant
for
a
while.
Yet
it
just
maybe
needed
the
right
incentives
and.
O
And
that
this
flipping
it
over
real,
quick
making
a
decision
to
go
to
a
non
or
a
tax-exempt,
land-use
seems
kind
of
short-sighted
and
and
one
last
question
for
the
developer.
/
owner
is
what
I
understood.
There
is
a
proposal
to
put
in
some
like
office
mixed-use
space
that
came
I
think
it
was
published.
It
was
in
the
newspaper
or
something
we
heard
about
it,
and
not
even
that
long
ago,
and
I
wondered
how
that
was
generated
and
where
that
went
to
and
why
that
went
away.
O
And
then
a
question
for
the
school
is
now
there's
a
brewpub
opened
up
around
the
corner
and
there
will
be
a
distillery
around
the
corner
opening
soon
and
how
do
those
uses
not
too
far
from
high
school
effect,
you're
thinking
of
that
site
and
the
city's
thinking
of
that
site,
as
appropriate
for
the
other
uses
going
on
around
it?
That
we
frankly
would
like
to
see
more
of
all.
A
P
Thank
You.
Mr.
president,
other
commission
members,
my
name
is
Jerry
Krause
I
live
at
417,
Oliver
Avenue
South,
that's
in
Bryn,
Mawr,
just
off
of
Penn
Avenue
I'm.
Also
a
member
of
the
Basset
Creek
redevelopment,
Oversight
Committee
I'm
kind
of
in
between
Pat
and
Vito
I've
only
been
there
now
seventeen
and
a
half
years
and
about
400
meetings
later
I'm
here
to
speak
in
opposition
to
the
conditional
use
permit
for
their
charter
school.
P
But
someone
else
used
the
word
indifferent
about
the
neighborhood
or
different
to
the
neighborhood.
This
is
kind
of
what
I
call
the
outlier
I
know.
Mr.
Abdulla
I
actually
know
swerve
oh
I,
like
many
of
the
projects
that
he
has
done
and
I
had
high
hopes
for
this
project
as
well,
but,
unlike
every
other
project
that
I've
been
aware
of
over
the
last
17
years,
that
needed
some
vote
by
the
plan
board
or
some
consideration
by
the
City.
P
Mr.
Abdul's
group
has
not
come
to
us
to
seek
any
kind
of
input
or
recommendation.
That's
his
prerogative.
I
guess
but
I
know
that
staff
report
includes
a
reference
to
use
policy
1.5
five,
one
that
says
attention
to
surrounding
uses
community
needs
and
preferences,
and
we've
only
been
able
to
express
those,
apparently
through
some
emails
and
also
in
this
sort
of
short
notice
to
this
meeting.
Today.
P
A
couple
of
the
things
in
the
staff
report
I'm
not
sure,
accurately
reflect
what's
going
on
in
the
valley.
If
you've
not
walked
through
the
valley,
you
would
have
a
sense
of
what's
going
on
or
what
has
gone
on
over
the
last
17
years.
I've
watched
about
one
parcel
a
year
and
I
can
identify
every
one
of
those
four
you
should
like.
That
has
been
redeveloped,
and
this
is
one
of
them.
P
P
Is
there
and
also
you're,
aware
of
I
think
the
banana
long
interstate
394,
which
was
referenced
a
little
bit
ago
by
Lisa,
relating
to
the
Ryan
companies
that
used
to
have
an
exclusive
del
1
right,
where
the
new
at
Southwest
LRT
station
is
to
be
located
as
to
the
project
itself,
item
number
four:
there's
a
reference
to
sort
of
loading,
spaces
and
parking,
and
apparently,
by
sort
of
squeezing
everything
possible
into
this
parcel.
They
got
to
the
minimum
number
of
parking
spaces
of
60.
P
That's
allowed,
apparently
under
the
city's
guidelines,
but
it's
sort
of
question
how
seven
school
buses
are
going
to
move,
which
I
did
some
research
earlier
today,
the
school
currently
has
three
hundred
and
sixty
some
students.
The
building
a
parent
is
going
to
have
24
classrooms
with
capacity
for
20
students
each.
That
means,
if
fully
occupied
but
480
students,
maybe
more
I,
don't
know
I'm,
not
sure
how
you
move.
That
number
of
students
through
this
area
very
effectively
and
I
only
have
questions.
I,
don't
have
answers
and
I
understand.
P
The
school
has
done
a
tremendous
outreach
to
the
Somali
community,
which
I
think
is
highly
admirable,
but
there's
also
a
reference
and
their
own
materials.
Whether
or
not
have
any
concern
to
you
or
from
mr.
Abdul
that,
apparently
they
have
been
operating
at
a
general
fund
loss
over
the
last
two
fiscal
years
of
a
couple
hundred
thousand
each
year.
P
So
I'm
not
sure
exactly
how
this
is
going
to
fit
very
well
with,
what's
going
on
elsewhere
in
the
valley
and
as
mr.
Kearney
has
said,
this
is
sort
of
a
property
that
is
in
our
front
yard
along
this
particular
corridor,
and
the
staff
recommendation
is
is
that
everything
is
consistent
with
these
plans
that
I'm
not
sure
the
2017
plan
calls
for
a
mix
of
commercial
and
residential
uses.
P
The
basket
big
master
plan
calls
for
office,
retail
housing
and
densities
of
dwellings
of
40
to
70
per
acre
40
to
75
per
acre
and
I'm,
not
in
opposition
of
charter
schools.
In
fact,
if
you
would
have
been
at
the
rock
over
the
last
decade,
we
had
someone
who
approached
us
about
a
charter
school
and
we
were
actually
quite
enthusiastic,
but
it
wasn't
not
in
Glenwood
Avenue,
it's
on
the
site
that
now
art
space
is
going
to
be
developed
on.
P
A
G
A
G
H
H
N
N
N
J
A
Right,
we
have
a
motion
to
deny
item
a
the
conditional
use
permit
for
a
new
high
school.
Is
there
a
second?
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second
and
Commissioner
Cole
go,
and
we
should
be
sure
if
we
are
going
to
go
against
staff
recommendation
that
we
make
some
findings
related
to
the
criteria
listed
in
the
Stafford
right.
J
J
Investing
in
Metro
transit
passes
for
their
their
students.
It's
gonna
be
a
drastic
change
in
location
and
is
certainly
a
commercial
corridor,
and
then
I
would
also
go
to
main
use
policy.
1.10
support
development
along
the
commercial
or
that
enhances
the
Suites
characters
and
fosters
pedestrian
movement
range
of
goods
and
services.
I,
don't
know
I.
J
Don't
know
if
a
charter
school
I'm
not
convinced
that
a
charter
school
would
be
within
the
scope
of
an
enhanced
good
or
service.
In
fact,
I
think
there's
certainly
some
amount
of
debate
as
to
whether
or
not
they
enhance
opportunity
for
the
students
of
Minneapolis
in
general.
I,
don't
know
if
that's
sufficient,
but
those
are
some
of
my
thoughts.
N
Going
to
speak
because
I
have
to
leave
at
5:30,
so
I
may
or
may
not
be
here
for
the
vote,
but
I
am
convinced
that
the
application
meets
the
conditional
use
permit
requirements.
It
is
a
permitted
use.
While
there
are
some,
as
my
colleague
described,
there
are
some
land
use
policies
that
may
or
may
not
support
that
in
totality
I
do
think
that
we
have
a
responsibility
for
permitted
conditional
use
to
consider
the
conditions
and
I
believe
that
the
conditions
here
are
adequate.
A
Yes,
there
any
further
discussion,
so
we
have
a
motion
to
deny
item
any
of
the
conditional
use
permit.
Commissioner
kögel
outlines
the
findings
related
to
criteria
number
5
related
to
comprehensive
plan
policies
that,
through
the
Bassett
Creek
Valley
master
plan,
other
planning
guidance.
This
area
is
guided
more
for
retail
and
other
commercial
uses,
as
opposed
to
institutional
uses.
K
Schrader
I
just
wanted
to
I
mean
I
agree
with
Commissioner
Coleman
that
this
is
a
the
it
meets
the
standard
for
conditional
use
permit
and
that
that
said,
I
think
Commissioner
cool-girl
really
made
some
good
points
that
the
applet
really
needs
to
think
more
about
the
impact
of
traffic
about
how
many
buses
are
coming
in
and
what
that's
going
to
do.
The
neighborhood.
A
B
K
Q
K
E
Commissioners
are
some
concerns
have
been
articulated
about
whether
the
applicant
is
adequately
addressing
the
transportation
concerns,
and
but
there
are
more
buses
than
perhaps
anticipated
on
the
site.
So
I
believe
a
case
could
be
made
that
free
or
discounted
bus
passes
are
reasonably
related
to
the
criteria
for
a
CEP.
A
N
A
F
Other
charter
schools,
I've,
been
involved
with
public
works,
had
been
looped
in
I
think
because
of
the
type
of
applications
and
they
did
require
a
sort
of
modified
tdmp.
And
so
what
I
would
recommend
or
suggest
is
to
not
be
that
specific,
but
to
say
that,
as
a
condition
of
approval,
the
applicant
will
consult
with
Public
Works
on
some
form
of
tdmp
strategies.
C
Yeah
that
sounds
good
I
mean
I
can
I.
Can
I
clarify
and
say
that
it's
fine
I
find
one
thing,
particularly
they're,
disturbing
that
the
applicant
is
not
does
not
seem
inclined
or
interested
in
outreach
to
the
neighborhood
their
community
they're
moving
into
in
it
I
find
that
to
be
a
little
bit
sad,
because
I
always
look
for
people
to
take
a
genuine
interest
in
what
their
future
neighbors
are,
whether
whether
they
agree
with
them
or
not.
C
Unless
one
goes
there,
they
are
moving
into
a
community
and
it
would
be
nice
if
at
least
they
were
saying
hello,
and
so
in
this
kind
of
effort
in
particular,
people
are
raising
concerns
about
things
such
as.
You
know
the
fact
that
it's
it's
not
the
business,
they
thought
it's
not
housing
that
they
thought
and
now
they're
gonna
have
all
these
students
and
how
are
they
gonna
get
there
and
and
I
don't
know
they're.
You
know
six
to
eight
buses,
we
heard
and
I'm
weird
15
buses
and
then,
and
then
an
alternative,
moans
I.
C
Think,
oh,
is
that
going
to
be
400
and
these
students
dropped
parents
driving
them
there,
which
is
even
worse,
so
I,
I,
guess
I'm.
Looking
for
a
little
bit
of
concern
for
the
fact
that
they're
moving
into
a
community,
that's
been
there
for
100
year-old
plus,
building
and
I
think
that
if
they
can
kind
of
understand
the
the
reasoning
behind
it
and
also
from
an
ecological
perspective,
an
environmental
perspective
would
be
better
to
reduce
the
amount
of
but
saying
if
we
can
take
city
buses,
it's
also
better
for
them.
F
A
G
Just
as
a
developer,
I
mean
we
clearly
have
heard
some
of
the
some
of
the
concerns
and
and
will
work
with
our
tenant
to
address
those
issues
and
again
apologize
for
the
miscommunication
on
and
the
whole
traffic
in
the
and
the
busing.
So
just
wanted
to
make
make
sure
you
knew
that
we
will.
We
will
address
the
issues
that
we've
heard
today
to
try
and
come
with
a
better
solution
for
the
neighborhood.
All.
A
A
Is
there
a
second
to
add
that
sixth
condition
a
motion,
a
second
further
discussion?
If
there
is
none,
we
can
add
that
on
a
voice
vote
all
in
favor
any
opposed,
and
that
motion
carries
we've
added
that
six
condition.
Is
there
any
further
discussion
going
back
to
the
original
motion
to
approve
now,
with
six
condition,
condition
added
related
to
transportation?