►
From YouTube: October 2, 2019 Housing Policy & Development Committee
Description
Minneapolis Housing Policy & Development Committee Meeting
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
Good
afternoon,
everyone
I'm
in
it
calls
the
housing
policy
and
Development
Committee
camp
Gordon
I
chair
the
committee
I'm
joined
today
with
my
vice
chair,
councilmember
Olsen,
also
councilmembers,
Goodman,
Bender,
Schrader
and
write
or
a
quorum
of
the
committee.
We
can
conduct
the
business
before
us.
We
have
on
our
agenda
public
hearings,
one
consent
item
in
one
discussion
item
before
we
take
up
the
public
hearings,
I'd
like
to
just
move
the
consent
item,
and
this
is
item
three
on
the
printed
agenda.
A
A
Seeing
none,
then
I
will
move
that
item
for
approval
all
those
in
favor,
please
say
aye
any
opposed,
say
no,
any
abstentions.
That
motion
carries
then
we'll
move
back
up
to
item
number
1,
which
is
our
first
public
hearing,
and
this
is
on
the
land
sale
of
822,
Elwood
Avenue
and
mr.
Ramadan
will
make
the
presentation
welcome
good.
B
Afternoon
mr.
chair
members
of
the
committee,
we
have
one
land
sale,
which
is
822
Elwood
Avenue
North,
the
sellers
through
the
Minneapolis
homes
program,
the
policies
of
the
program
established
by
the
City
Council
on
December
11,
2015
and
February
10
2017.
The
staff
recommends
the
sale
of
822
Elwood
Avenue
north
to
javelin
tally,
doing
business
as
822
Elwood,
Avenue
North
LLC
for
its
appraised
value
of
$65,000,
subject
to
conditions.
Staff
has
continuously
marketed
this
property
to
an
email
listserv
for
well
over
2,800
recipients.
A
total
of
nine
applications
were
received
for
this
property.
B
Our
recommendation
is
based
upon
the
application
that
ranked
highest
by
our
staff
review
and
it
reflects
the
neighborhoods
preference.
The
purchase
of
a
22
L
without
the
North
has
secured
sufficient
bank
financing
to
rehab.
This
for
place
intends
to
be
the
owner
occupant
of
one
of
the
units.
She
will
lease
other
three
units
to
low
to
moderate
income.
Households,
see
fence
instruction
management
staff,
reviewed
the
scopes
of
work
and
estimates
submitted
by
the
applicants
builder
and
confirm
their
sufficient
to
meet
the
minimum
construction
standards
of
the
program.
B
B
A
Will
open
the
public
hearing
man
if
any
in
case
anybody
wants
to
come
and
speak
to
this
issue?
You
can
step
forward
now
and
introduce
yourself
seeing
nobody
step
forward.
Then
I'll
close
the
public
hearing.
Any
council
members
want
to
make
any
comments
or
make
the
motion
I'm
happy
to
make
it
Relson.
C
A
A
D
Afternoon,
chair
Gordon
members
of
the
committee
I'm
Emily
Carr
senior
project
coordinator
with
C
ped
before
the
committee
today
are
several
actions
related
to
the
financing
of
the
Gateway
northeast
project.
The
Gateway
Northeast
project
development
by
common
bond
communities
is
a
hundred
and
twenty
eight
unit
mixed
income
and
mixed-use
project
located
at
24:35,
Marshall
Street
northeast
in
the
Bottineau
neighborhood.
The
project
is
five
stories
above
grade
includes
97,
underground
parking
spaces
and
8,500
square
feet
of
commercial
space
of
the
128
units.
D
77
units
are
affordable
with
a
range
of
affordability
from
30%
area
meeting
income
to
60%
area
median
income.
Ten
three-bedroom
units
will
be
at
30%
area
median
income
or
a
my
and
will
be
reserved
for
families
experiencing
homelessness.
16
of
the
units
will
be
at
50%,
AMI
51
units
at
60%,
ami
and
51
of
the
units
will
be
at
market
rate.
D
The
26
units
that
will
be
at
30%
of
my
own
50%
ami
will
be
assisted
with
project-based
vouchers,
from
Minneapolis
public
housing
authority
and
the
households
in
those
units
will
not
pay
more
than
30%
of
their
income
towards
rent.
The
total
development
costs
of
the
project
is
39
million
dollars,
one
hundred
and
twenty
nine
thousand
and
nine
hundred
and
seventy
eight
dollars.
Primary
financing
includes
four
percent:
low-income
housing,
tax
credits,
housing
revenue,
bonds
and
tax
increment
financing.
The
first
staff
recommendation
before
you
is
to
establish
a
new
housing
TIF
district
for
the
Gateway
Northeast
project.
D
It
is
currently
projected
that
the
note
would
be
paid
back
in
26
years,
the
maximum
allowed
under
state
law.
The
second
staff
recommendation
is
to
issue
up
to
twenty
three
million
dollars
in
bonds
to
fund
the
permanent
financing
of
this
project.
The
third
staff
recommendation
is
to
approve
up
to
two
hundred
eighty
thousand
dollars
in
a
supplemental,
affordable
housing,
trust
fund
award.
This
supplemental
trust
fund
award
rate
reflects
two
things.
D
The
approval
of
the
TIF
bonds,
an
additional
trust
fund
dollars
are
the
last
remaining
funding
pieces
to
this
project.
Approval
of
these
sources
will
position
the
project
to
close
in
November
and
start
construction
this
year.
So
with
that
I'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
There's
also
representatives
from
common
bonds.
Here
is
love.
I,.
A
Don't
see
any
questions
but
I,
thank
you
for
that
excellent
report
and
also
for
all
the
work
that's
gone
into
this
rather
large
and
complicated
project.
Let's
appreciate
that
this
is
an
opportunity
for
a
public
here.
You
know
on
this
issue,
so
I
will
open
the
public
Gary
and
then
somebody
from
common
bond
wants
to
come
up.
That
would
be
fine,
not
necessary,
but
appreciated.
E
Welcome
good
afternoon
my
name
is
Andy
Hughes
on
the
director
of
acquisition
development
for
combine
communities,
I'm
joined
by
Cecile
beador
executive
vice
president
for
real
estate,
account
on
and
pleased
to
be
here
today
and
ask
for
the
community
support
for
our
TIF
tax
exemption
bond
and
affordable
housing
trust
fund
financing
for
our
Gateway
Northeast
project.
The
project
promise
has
become
an
important
community
resource
upon
its
completion
in
early
2021,
that'll
include
120
units
of
housing
in
a
neighborhood
and
neighborhood
oriented
resale,
as
well
as
underground
parking.
E
The
housing
will
be
true:
mixed
income
with
their
various
affordability,
levels
of
30,
50
and
60%
ami,
as
well
as
market
rate
units.
The
requested
financing
is
critical
to
the
project's
feasibility
and
we
work
strenuously
to
identify
outside
resources
to
minimize
the
city's
participation
to
the
grace
is
impossible.
This
includes
investing
our
own
substantial
resources
in
the
project.
Thank
you
for
you
to
pour
thank.
A
A
Then,
on
councilmember
rights
motion,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
any
opposed
any
abstentions.
That
motion
carries
then,
and
the
financing
is
approved
now
we'll
move
on
to
our
discussion
item.
This
is
a
report
on
the
anti
displacement
policy
network,
something
that
the
city
participated
in
and
will
lead
off
the
presentation
or
make
the
presentation
welcome.
Thank.
G
G
Paul
had
a
joint
team
that
participated
in
this
network
that
was
hosted
by
a
policy
link
and
I'm
going
to
get
into
more
details
about
the
network
itself,
but
first
just
wanted
to
mention
when
the
opportunity
to
apply
to
be
part
of
this
network
came
up
on
the
city
together
with
st.
Paul
jumped
at
the
chance,
because
it
really
was
in
line
with
a
lot
of
the
work.
The
city
was
doing.
That's
really
rooted
in
racial
equity.
G
H
Thank
You
Katie,
I'm,
chair
guarda
and
committee
members,
I'm
so
yeah
before
Katie
gets
our
gets
into
the
report
on
the
anti
displacement
policy
network.
The
division
of
race
inequity
would
like
to
write
a
very
brief
update
on
the
strategic
and
racial
equity
action
plan.
Specifically,
we
wanted
to
ensure
we've
grounded
the
conversation
and
the
work
happening
through
Fanta
displacement
network
in
the
context
of
the
housing
priority
of
the
plan
that
adopted
in
July,
and
so
this
is
the
strategic
need
that
City
Council
adopted
at
the
end
of
July.
H
As
you
recall,
the
the
need
shifted
from
what
council
what
you
all
drafted
back
in
February,
which
explicitly
targeted
reducing
evictions
to
focus
on
reducing
involuntary
displacement
in
rental
housing
for
black
indigenous
and
people
of
color.
Again,
this
was
refined
after
two
full
days
of
work
sessions
where
city
staff,
community
partners
residents
used
data
to
both
refine
the
strategic
need
and
develop
the
various
components
of
the
plan
for
this
priority
area.
One
of
the
major
drivers
of
this
shift
away
from
focusing
solely
on
formal
evictions
was
the
evidence
that
suggests
by
pod
communities.
H
Experiment
experienced
displacement
outside
of
that
formal
eviction
process,
so
this
is
again
the
content
that
was
adopted
back
in
July.
We
are
division,
we'll
leave
it
to
regulatory
services
and
see
ped,
who
are
the
process
owners
for
this
specific
priority?
Recognizing
regulatory
services
Kim
Keller
wasn't
able
to
make
it
today.
H
She
had
a
conflict,
but
they
can
provide
any
more
detailed
updates
on
the
work
happening
in
this
priority
area
and
I
do
want
to
note
that
through
the
planning
process,
the
focus
of
leveraging
the
city's
relationship
with
property
owners
is
specifically
called
out
in
this
priority
of
the
plan,
partly
because
for
all
the
work
happening
throughout
the
region
to
reduce
displacement
and
by
pot
communities,
including
the
work
happening
in
the
anti
displacement
Network,
the
city
is
in
the
Union.
Unique
is
unique
in
that
it
has
a
very
formal
relationship
with
property
owners.
H
H
Not
not
that
we're
nothing
has
been
changed
yet
as
what
was
adopted
that
I'm,
aware
of
but
again,
regulatory
sirs
I
had
more
info
on
that.
What
we
know
that
we
as
a
city,
don't
necessarily
capture
data
on
that
right
now,
but
from
home
line
is
in
the
room
and
we
use
some
of
that.
Their
data
that
they
capture
with
who
calls
their
kind
of
hotline
and
what
the
breakdown
of
those
calls
are
to
help
us
understand
how
many
people
are
experiencing
those
informal,
involuntary
displacement.
H
H
I
This
chair,
I,
didn't
mean
to
be
a
start-up,
but
I
wondered
if
you
could
highlight
for
us
and
and
if
not
it's
okay,
we
can
follow
up
too
sure
what
what
can,
because
this,
this
issue
of
adding
non
eviction
displacement
came
from
the
community
process.
Mm-Hmm
we
had
started
out
with
something
we
were
pretty
sure
we
could
measure,
and
that
was
very
narrowly
focused
on
eviction
and
because
members
from
the
community
matt
said
we
want
to
really
focus
on
both
that's
included
here.
Anything.
J
I
Think
it's
great
I
mean
you
should
welcome
that.
Was
there
we're
folks
people
to
voice?
What
are
some
of
the
underlying
reasons
that
folks
are
facing
non
invocation?
Displacement
I
mean
rising
rent
seems
to
come
to
mind
whether
other
have
we
gotten
that
far
in
the
process,
so
that
we
know
what
measures
people
mm-hmm.
H
K
Thanks
mr.
chair
council,
president
bender,
so
cpad
and
reg
services
are
sort
of
Co
process
owners
on
this
action
item
and
something
in
the
community
discussion
that
we
had
around
this.
There
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
the
need
to
work
upstream
from
the
eviction
the
formal
eviction
process,
so
there's
a
lot
of
recognition
that
a
lot
of
displacement
occurs
outside
of
the
formal
eviction
process.
First
of
all,
and
second
of
all,
to
make
sense
that
ultimately,
displacement
does
come
from
the
eviction
process.
K
I
Guess
I'm
just
curious
the
timeline
for
taking
those
kind
of
elements
and
back
to
the
chairs
underlying
question.
What's
our
process
for
taking
those
things
that
we've
heard
through
the
capacitor
that
any
of
us
could
list
off
that
we
hear
from
our
constituents
and
turning
them
into
measurable
indicators,
sure.
K
Mr.
chair
counts
the
president
bender
we
we
had
intended
on
coming
back
to
this
committee,
either
later
this
year
or
possibly
in
early
2020
to
just
report.
As
a
sort
of
you
know,
discussion
or
receiving
file
or
presentation
on
just
the
the
like
collective
work.
That's
happening
around
eviction
prevention,
so
you
know,
there's
there's
a
fiction
prevention
work,
that's
happening
at
the
county
and
reforming
the
emergency
assistance
process,
which
we
think
is
really
critical
to
this.
There's
the
the
work
that
the
city
is
funding
around
legal
representation
in
evictions
and
habitability
cases.
K
A
I
think
that
would
be
helpful
and
I
look
forward
to
that
I.
Just
some
of
the
measures.
Look
like
they're
easier
to
have
a
number
on.
One
of
them
is
a
frequency.
So
how
are
we
going
to
measure
that
frequency
and
it's
a
frequency
of
the
movement
relocation?
So
how
do
we
measure
that
and
then
how
are
we
gonna,
even
if
we're
able
to
find
out
every
time
somebody
moves?
A
So
just
from
my
position
up
here,
that's
pretty
tricky
people
do
that
on
their
own
there's,
nobody
registering
I'm
moving
now
and
then,
whether
it's
voluntary
or
involuntary,
so
that
I
guess
my
question
about.
Do
we
have
the
baseline
information
yet
I
think
that's
going
to
be
important
that
we
try
to
figure
out.
How
do
we
get
that
who
are
partners
who
are
going
to
help
us?
What
are
we
working
with
just
so?
We
can
think
we're
making
a
difference
later
when
we
get
back
and
try
to
measure
it
later.
A
A
G
All
right,
thank
you,
so
you
just
wanted
to
get
into
a
little
bit
more
detail
than
about
the
anti
displacement
policy.
Network
work.
What
the
network
was,
what
our
team
focused
on
and
next
steps
and
one
of
our
team
members
Owen
Duckworth,
was
the
director
of
policy
and
organizing
with
the
Alliance,
is
going
to
come
up
in
a
few
moments
to
help
with
the
presentation
as
well
so
and
in
what
we're
bringing
forward
today.
G
G
Data
and
strategy
support
to
build
equitable,
thriving
cities,
and
so
the
network
goal
which
is
up
on
the
slide
here
is,
was
for
low-income
people,
indigenous
people,
marginalized
LGBTQ
people
and
people
of
color
to
experience,
increased
housing,
security
and
less
housing,
business
and
cultural
displacement
in
their
communities,
and
so
that
was
the
overarching
goal
of
the
network,
our
team.
So
there
were
ten
cities
that
participated
in
this
network
and
I
will
show
you
who
those
cities
were
on
the
next
slide.
Our
team
was
unique
because
we
were
made
up
of
Two
Cities
Minneapolis
and
st.
G
Paul.
Every
team
that
was
in
the
network,
had
a
mix
of
elected
officials,
city
staff
and
community
advocates
that
made
up
team.
So
our
Minneapolis
team
was
council.
Vice
president
Jenkins
councilmember
Ellison,
our
housing
director,
Andrea
Brennan,
Owen
Duckworth,
who
you'll
hear
from
a
moment
and
then
Shannon
Jones
who's,
the
executive
director
of
hope
community.
She
couldn't
be
here
today,
but
will
Delaney
from
hope,
is
here
and
then
I
participated
on
the
team
as
well,
and
then
we
had
lots
of
support
from
others
as
well,
including
councilmember,
Ellison
and
council.
G
Vice
president
Jenkins
policy
aides,
who
did
a
lot
of
work
in
the
network
and
then
the
st.
Paul
team
had
a
similar
makeup
of
council
members,
staff
and
community
advocates,
and
there
were
ten
cities
and
here's
the
list
of
cities
that
participated
in
the
network.
All
of
these
cities
are
experiencing
challenges
similar
to
those.
We
are
feeling
here
where
there's
economic
growth,
but
then
communities
who
are
at
risk
of
displacement
because
of
some
of
that
growth
and
the
network
met
monthly
and
what
policyLink
called
Learning
Labs
but
webinars.
G
We
learned
interesting
strategies
from
other
cities.
There
were
a
lot
of
common
themes
which
were
around
tenant
protections,
community
ownership
and
community
engagement.
So
a
couple
examples
Portland
shared
about
a
large
community
engagement
strategy
and
and
campaign
that
was
undertaken
to
get
anti
displacement
strategies
in
their
comprehensive
plan.
Santa
Fe
shared
work.
They
are
doing
to
explore,
creating
an
anti
displacement,
zoning
overlay
district
and
really
the
idea
is
that
there'd
be
a
zoning
district
where
certain
infrastructure
and
housing
investments
would
be
prioritized.
G
Our
team
got
the
opportunity
to
travel
to
Austin
together
last
fall,
which
is
one
of
the
network
cities
and
this.
What
on
the
slide
here
is
a
poster
we
brought
to
help
facilitate
discussion
there,
and
so
we
created
this
poster
to
talk
about
some
of
the
goals
that
our
team
had
and
you'll
see
the
goal
listed
here.
G
All
people
in
marginalized
communities
will
be
able
to
remain
in
place
with
access
to
stable
housing
opportunities
to
build
wealth
and
a
sense
of
belonging
while
maintaining
cultural
assets
and
identity,
and
we
identified
a
number
of
strategies
that
we
discussed
throughout
the
year
to
help
achieve
this
goal
and
no
one's
going
to
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
the
themes
around
those
strategies.
In
a
moment
at
that
convening,
we
learned
about
efforts.
Austin
is
undertaking
to
create
long-term
affordability.
They
had
a
ballot
initiative
to
bond
to
fund
affordable
housing.
Just
before
we
got
out
there.
G
And
then
our
team,
this
past
spring,
held
a
couple
of
community
forums
to
share
out
what
we
had
learned
from
being
in
the
network
and
then
also
to
get
input
from
members
of
our
community
to
see
if
the
strategies
we
had
learned
about
and
talked
about
resonated
or
if
there
were
other
things.
We
should
be
thinking
about
that.
We
maybe
didn't
learn
about
by
participating
in
the
network,
and
so
we
had
one
in
Saint
Paul
one
in
Minneapolis
and
the
discussions
that
the
forums
are
also
reflected
in
the
written
report
and
helped
inform
that
report.
G
Some
of
the
themes
we
heard
about
there
again
really
an
emphasis
on
the
need
for
strong
tenant
protections
and
an
emphasis
on
community
ownership
and
that
it
should
really
focus
both
on
home
ownership
and
business
ownership,
and
then
there's
just
a
lot
of
discussion
about
community
engagement
and
how
to
do
development
with
engaging
community
early
in
the
process
and
so
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
Owen.
To
talk
about
our
some
of
the
themes.
Our
team
discussed
a
lot
throughout
the
year
and
some
of
the
benefits
and
challenges
of
participating
in
this
network.
L
I'll
run
through
themes
really
quickly
here
and
then
talk
a
little
about
some
of
the
challenges
and
benefits
that
we
saw
as
part
of
the
process.
So
only
things
we
started
with
right.
This
is
an
opportunity
we
felt
to
talk
about
narrative
talk
about
the
ways
in
which
cities
the
ways
in
which
decision-making
bodies
approach
talking
about
thinking
about
problems
as
it
pertains
to
the
housing
issues
and
specifically,
in
this
case,
displacement
issues.
A
lot
of
our
work
has
been
with
the
alliance
with
equity,
a
place
to
sort
of
push
for
reframing
narratives.
L
Frequently,
we've
encountered
even
folks
doing
affordable
housing,
advocacy
repeating
narratives,
that
sort
of
subtly,
or
not
so
subtly
reinforce
negative
stereotypes
about
people
of
color
about
tenants
about
communities
of
color
that
either
forward
the
logic
of
of
displacement
or
disinvestment.
So
we
really
wanted
to
Center
sort
of
an
approach
that
shifted
language
in
the
context
of
these
conversations
and
also
understanding
the
arc
of
history
right,
our
understanding,
the
arc
of
of
segregation
of
redlining
disinvestment
racial
covenants.
L
All
these
things
that
are
still
very
present,
even
if
some
of
them
exist
in
the
past
they're
still
very
present
in
terms
of
the
landscape
of
housing
opportunities
in
our
in
our
region.
So
so
that
was
one
of
the
major
themes:
community
ownership
again,
as
mentioned
land
trust
models,
cooperative
models,
ways
to
allow
especially
poor
communities
who
traditionally
haven't
been
given
access
to
quality,
banking
and
credit
opportunities
to
potentially
own
homes.
Own
stake
in
in
their
buildings,
equitable
development.
So
again,
thinking
about
how
have
especially
communities
have
experienced
decades
of
disinvestment.
L
How?
How,
when
new
development
is
happening,
are
there
ways
for
community
to
actually
help
drive
or
name
what
community
needs
are
and
influence
processes?
So
a
lot
of
conversation
around
that
in
particularly
some
piece
about
the
equitable
development
scorecard,
which
is
a
tool
that
a
number
of
communities
are
using
in
our
region
to
assess
what
our
principles
of
equitable
development
and
then
how
do
when
they
interact
with
with
planners
with
developers
with
the
city,
have
those
be
sort
of
manifested
in
in
the
creation
of
new
development
center
protections,
the
preservation
of
affordable
housing.
L
So
a
lot
of
conversation,
of
course,
on
NOLA
preservation,
naturally
occurring
affordable
housing
and
with
that,
of
course,
a
set
of
other
policies
around
tenant
protection.
Of
course,
the
city's
moving
on
a
number
of
these.
So
that's
much
appreciated
to
see
that
that's
becoming
some
of
those
are
becoming
real
and
tangible
in
meaningful
ways.
Community
engagement
is
mentioned
as
well.
How
do
how's
community
participate
in
in
processes
around
decision-making
and
especially
as
pertains
to
the
potential
displacement
risk?
So
there's
a
lot
there.
L
I
won't
get
into
that,
but
an
important
piece
as
well
and
then
a
regional
approach.
Obviously
this
was
a
a
cohort
locally
that
included
Minneapolis
and
st.
Paul,
both
the
cities.
Obviously,
these
issues
are
a
regional
and
scale
is
what
people
get
displaced,
either
from
the
cities
to
other
parts
of
the
region
or
move
to
the
cities
after
being
displaced
right.
L
L
As
you
might
imagine
deciding
how
to
prioritize
right,
you
can
come
up
with
a
laundry
list
of
things
to
do
when
figuring
out
what
is
most
impactful,
what
is
feasible,
what
is
most
relevant
to
community
voices
all
were
part
of
that
and
then
again
working
through
different
viewpoints
and
positions,
and
that's
both
sort
of
thinking
of
the
world.
Thinking
of
the
issues,
people's
politics,
but
then
also
kind
of
positionally
righty.
This
is
a
unique
situation
where
you
have
community
organizations.
L
You
have
city
staff,
you
have
elected
officials,
they
have
vastly
different
roles
in
the
context
and
sort
of
power
in
terms
of
moving
and
working
on
these
issues.
So
a
lot
of
conversation
as
well
around.
Who
does
what,
in
that
context,
so
I
think
that's
it
from
for
me,
happy
I,
guess,
I'm
supposed
to
take
questions.
G
Thank
You,
Owen
and
I
really
want
touched
on
sort
of
the
relationships
and
how
that
was
a
huge
benefit
of
being
part
of
this,
and
it
was
really
I
think
valuable
for
from
a
city
staff,
standpoint
I
think
the
council
members
found
it
valuable
to
have
just
that
that
team
of
both
community
advocates
and
city
staff
and
council
members
all
at
the
table
talking
through
these
issues
together.
So
thank
you
for
being
part
of
it
and
for
being
willing
to
speak
today
and
I
just
wanted
to
emphasize
too
so
that
that
relationship.
G
The
relationship
working
across
cities
has
been
really
helpful
because,
as
I
mentioned,
our
cities
are
working
on
some
similar
policies,
some
different
policies,
but
we
really
were
able
to
learn
a
lot
from
each
other
and
and
plan
to
continue
to
do
so
as
part
of
this
network,
and
then
one
other
thing
I
just
wanted
to
mention
is
the
relationships
we
made
with.
Other
cities
in
the
network
has
been
incredibly
valuable
as
we're
working
on
policy
development.
G
Here
in
the
city,
we've
been
able
to
reach
out
to
other
cities
that
are
considering
similar
policies
or
have,
in
many
cases
already
passed
similar
policies
and
get
get
just
feedback
from
them
or
research
or
things
they
looked
at
to
develop
their
policies
and
that's
been
really
beneficial
and
we've
also
had
cities
reach
out
to
us
quite
a
bit
to
ask
similar
questions.
So
that's
been,
that's
been
great,
I
think.
C
Just
want
to
make
comment
just
for
my
colleagues.
Who've
all
been
spaces
where
we're
collaborating
the
folks
who
are
not
who
who-who
are
in
the
community,
but
I
just
wanted
to
sort
of
emphasize
how
how
unique
the
experience
felt
collaborated
with
community
with
community
members
and
city
staff
I
feel.
C
Like
often,
you
know
we're
where
decisions
happen
and
how
decisions
get
made
can
be
pretty
opaque
and
I
think
it
was
patina
and
often
you'll
have
elected
officials,
maybe
sharing
time
with
with
community
members,
but
for
for
our
staff
to
be
able
to
also
be
interfacing
with
with
community
members
as
well
in
in
a
kind
of
an
intimate
space.
I
would
I
would
use
that
word
over
the
course
of
a
year.
It
almost
feels
inappropriate
to
have
Owen
presenting
to
us.
I
feel
like
we
should
be
presenting
to.
C
You
know
hope
in
the
Alliance,
like
you
know
that
were
really
committed
to
the
work,
because,
because,
because
community
that's
to
take
a
year
out
of
their
out
of
their
out
of
their
time,
to
spend,
to
spend
this
time
with
us
and
to
spend
time
with
staff
giving
us
their
their
thoughts
and
ideas.
So
I
just
wanted
to
our
you
know,
give
you
that
thanks,
even
though
yeah
in
a
public
forum.
So
thank.
A
G
So
I'm
gonna
wrap
up
here,
but
before
close,
just
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
a
number
of
the
strategies
that
we
are
working
on
related
to
this
displacement
work
and
then
just
we're
where
we're
going.
What
our
next
steps
are
from
here.
So,
throughout
the
course
of
participating
in
the
network,
we
along
the
way
evaluated
city
policies,
programs
and
strategies
to
try
to
reflect
what
we
were
learning
in
the
network
and
through
our
team
discussions,
so
Minneapolis
2040.
G
That
was
wrapping
up
as
we
were
in
the
early
stages
of
the
network.
But
we
did.
There
is
a
policy
that
was
influenced
by
what
we
were
learning
around
involuntary
displacement,
that's
in
in
Minneapolis
2040,
and
it's
that
we
will
minimize
the
involuntary
displacement
of
people
of
color,
indigenous
people
and
vulnerable
populations
such
as
low
income,
households,
the
elderly
and
people
with
disabilities
from
their
communities
as
the
city
grows
and
changes.
G
The
network
as
Owen
commented,
also
helped
confirm
for
us
that
a
number
of
the
strategies
we
were
considering
or
had
already
undertaken
were
in
line
with
other
anti
displacement
strategies
in
cities
around
the
country.
So
one
of
those
is
inclusionary.
Zoning
policy,
the
renter
protections
and
the
fair
access
to
housing,
ordinance
that
was
recently
adopted.
G
And
then
I
just
also
wanted
to
touch
on
our
Minneapolis
Homes
programs,
which
really
are
anti
displacement
strategies
as
well,
particularly
owner-occupied
rehabilitation
programs,
which
are
aimed
at
keeping
people
in
homes
that
are
affordable
and
safe
and
as
part
of
a
work
in
Minneapolis
Homes.
We're
looking
at
new
long-term
affordability
models.
G
So
that's
another
strategy,
that's
sort
of
ongoing
in
this
in
this
vein,
so
those
are
just
some
of
the
strategies
that
we
have
been
working
on
and
continue
to
work
on
around
anti
displacement
in
the
city.
So
then,
next
steps.
Where
is
our
team?
Going
from
here?
We
have
identified
a
number
of
ways
we
want
to
continue
working
together
as
a
team,
the
council
had
a
staff
direction
for
us
to
pilot
anti
displacement
strategies
around
specific
development
sites
and
it's
specifically
upper
harbor
and
north
and
south
of
green
zones.
G
So
staff
is
working
on
some
recommendations
to
bring
through
the
collaborative
planning
committee,
that's
working
on
upper
harbour
project
and
then
bring
those
forward.
I
mentioned
earlier.
The
idea
of
a
community
preference
policy-
and
that's
really
the
idea
behind
that-
is
that
there
would
be
some
sort
of
defined
area
where
or
excuse
me.
G
Some
people
define
an
area
where
people
may
be
at
risk
of
displacement
and
different
communities
have
done
something
like
this
and
define
these
areas
in
different
ways
and
that
people
living
people
at
risk
of
displacement
in
certain
geographies
would
potentially
have
preference
for
certain
housing
programs
and
that
there
this
is
a
really
complex
policy.
There
are
a
lot
of
legal
questions
around
it,
there's
a
bit
of
straight
of
questions,
and
it
would
really
need
to
be
based
on
sound
data.
J
You
you
know
I
just
wanted
to
take
a
moment
to
publicly
thank
staff
and,
and
echo
councilmember
Allison's
comments
about
community
members
being
at
the
table.
It
was
a
really
awesome
opportunity,
I
think,
to
sit
with
groups
like
hope,
communities
and
the
Alliance
and
and
the
team
from
st.
Paul,
and
really
think
about
these
issues.
Talking
to
other
cities
and
seeing
some
of
the
policies
and
initiatives
that
they
are
putting
forward.
J
So
I'm
proud
to
have
been
a
part
of
this
work
and
continue
to
be
a
part
of
this
work.
I
think
it
really
don't
tell
really
great
with
our
2040
and
the
strategic
race
equity
work
that
we're
doing,
and
it's
a
big
part
of
it.
So
thanks
to
Andrea,
Vernon
and
Katie
to
be
an
anonymous
OC
first
after
that,
helped
to
bring
this
together
well,.
J
M
No
I,
just
I've
read
the
next
steps.
All
right,
I
didn't
mean
to
cut
off
Katie
a
couple
of
things.
I
agree
with
council
member
jenkins
that
this
is
are
just
an
ongoing
persistent
problem
and
to
me
it
often
feels
like
the
collective.
We,
the
policymakers,
the
staff
that
do
all
the
work
on
a
daily
basis
and
the
advocates
take
two
steps
forward.
But
then
we
have
to
consistently
take
one
step
back,
do
two
things
that
often
have
something
to
do
with
us
and
often
don't
have
something
to
do
with
us.
M
Yet
it's
going
to
displace
five
duplexes,
so
five
houses
are
going
to
be
torn
down
to
build
market
rate
housing
in
Harrison,
and
that
might
be
a
place
where
we
can
look
at
this
exploring
the
preference
policy
we
certainly
could
see
if
that
is
something
that
we
could
voluntarily
do,
because
there's
a
lot
of
excitement
surrounding
the
first
market
rate
housing
project
happening
after
leaf
and
Wellington
and
art
space
have
done
such
amazing
work.
And
yet
then
the
neighborhood
is
embracing
a
market
rate
project
in
that
area.
M
So,
as
I
see
this
next
steps,
thing,
I
guess
I,
don't
see
where
this
rent
control
motion
falls
into
that
because
it's
not
on
this
list,
I
mean.
So
you
have
this
whole
process
that
we've
gone
through
and
all
of
these
partners
have
been
involved
and
everyone
is
thanking
everybody
for
all
the
work
they're
doing
and
yet
in
two
minutes
we're
gonna,
have
you
say
I'm
you
should
do
rent
control,
which
isn't
even
part
of
this
presentation.
So
how
does
that
all
fit
together?
A
So
that's
foreshadowing
I
think
a
motion
that
somebody's
going
to
make
it
the
committee,
and
so
let's
keep
that
in
mind
as
we
move
forward
and
let's
make
sure
the
staff
has
a
chance
to
go
through
the
next
steps.
If
you
want
to
complete
I,
think
you
got
to
community
ownership
strategies.
Do
you
want
to
just
finish
to.
J
J
Seriously,
you
know
discussing
you
know
how.
How
are
we
going
to
really
make
a
dent
in
this
problem?
And
you
know
I
guess:
I
was
trying
to
allude
to
the
fact
that
we're
gonna
have
to
continue
to
think
about
creative
and
innovative
and
and
potentially
old
ideas
that
we
sort
of
abandoned
and
and
how
we
can
address
this
issue
because
it
seemingly
is
not
going
away
and
either
we
are
think
about.
How
do
we
subsidize
or
try
to
maintain
rent
as
they
are.
G
Thank
You
mr.
chair,
so
another
strategy
we're
digging
into
a
little
bit
more.
Our
community
ownership
strategies.
I
already
touched
on
the
long-term
affordability
report
that
will
be
coming
forward
next
spring
and
I
know.
There's
already
been
a
discussion
on
some
of
the
budget
discussions
about
cultural
corridors,
but
that's
more
in
the
business
ownership
side
and
then
our
team
has
committed
to
continuing
to
meet.
G
G
What
exactly
the
meetings
themselves
will
look
like,
but
I
think
everybody
is
committed
to
working
on
a
number
of
the
strategies
identified
in
the
report
and
also
thinking
about
how
to
work
together
on
a
more
regional
basis
or
to
tackle
things
that
might
be
state
or
federal
issues
and
how
to
use
the
team
to
do
some
of
those
things
and
then.
Lastly,
as
I
mentioned,
one
of
the
benefits
of
this
was
being
able
to
exchange
information
with
the
other
network
cities
and
planning
to
continue
to
do
that.
G
One
of
the
other
cities
already
hosted
a
conference
call
with
a
number
of
us
to
continue
talking
about
some
of
the
strategies
we've
been
working
on
here
and
how
they
might
be
able
to
consider
similar
things
in
their
city.
So
that
concludes
my
report
and
I'm
happy
to
take
other
questions.
If
there
are
any
I.
A
A
C
Yeah,
so
a
couple
of
things
one
is
I:
do
want
to
really
thank
staff
for
your
time.
Spending
on
the
anti
displacement
Network
I
know
that
it
was
quite
the
time
commitment,
even
though
we
were
only
talking
about
maybe
a
few
hours
a
month,
it's
still
every
month
for
a
year
and
that's
a
huge
dedication
for
you
all
to
put
towards
this,
and
so
I
wanna.
C
I
do
and
I
would
echo
what
the
council
vice
president
said,
which
is
that
this
was
a
topic
that
came
up
a
lot
during
our
year
in
office,
not
just
from
community
members
from
Minneapolis
and
st.
Paul,
but
it
came
up
a
lot
of
other
cities,
even
cities
that
were
that
are
also
stay
preempted
from
pursuing
this
kind
of
policy
are
still
really
interested
in
figuring
out.
How
do
we
pursue
a
policy
like
this
and
I
think
that,
while
there
are
two
questions
on
the
the
table,
one
is
the
can.
C
We
can
tweak
question
that
that
councillor
Goodman
pointed
out-
which
I
think
is
a
good
question,
and
it's
a
it's
a
it's,
it's
a
it's
something
that
we
that's
not
irrelevant
in
this
discussion.
I
also
think
that
there's
there's
the
should
we
shouldn't.
We
question,
there's
the
question
of
what,
if
we
in
under
ideal
conditions,
what
would
a
policy
like
this
look
like
and
I
do
think
that
we
owe
it
to
our
constituents
to
explore
that
question
to
sort
of.
C
Let
them
know
what
the
roadblocks
are
not
just
say,
not
just
shrug
our
shoulders
and
say:
hey
sorry.
This
would
be
a
really
great
policy.
This
would
help
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
constituents,
but
we're
just
not
going
to
pursue
this
because
we
we're
just
not
sure
if
we
can
or
can't
and
so
I'm
happy
to
pass
out
this.
The
the
motion
he
I
to
my
colleagues
and
I
think
I
have
enough
copies
that
I'll
put
a
few
to
the
public
as
well.
C
C
The
contract
deliverables
generally
should
include
the
following:
1
establish
a
baseline
and
identify
key
factors
for
assessing
annual
rent
increase
caps
as
a
rent,
stabilization
policy
in
Minneapolis,
which
may
include
distribution
of
rent
burden,
rent
cost
trends,
vacancy
and
turnover
composition
of
housing
stock,
including
age
ownership
and
geographic
distribution
of
rental
property.
To
analyze.
These
fact,
these
key
factors
within
the
Minneapolis
context
to
understand
potential
impacts
on
renters
and
building
owners.
C
Key
factors
could
include
financial
analysis
of
return
on
investment
for
rental
property
owners,
economic
impacts
to
overall
local
economy
and
housing
supply
in
the
short
and
long
term
associated
with
capping,
annual
rent
increases,
housing,
stabilization
outcomes
for
tenants
and
three
provide
potential
models
for
consideration
of
rent
stabilization
policies.
That
include
ranked
you
increased
caps
and
the
economic
and
peace
impact
of
those
models.
I
You
mr.
chair
I
just
wanted
to
speak
to
the
motion
and
was
happy
to
bring
this
forward
together
with
councilmember
Allison,
and
thank
you
mr.
chair,
for
your
support.
As
we
contemplated
how
to
start
this
discussion
in
our
city,
we
we
did
consider
several
options,
one
of
which
was
to
simply
bring
this
idea
for
it
as
part
of
our
budget
process,
but
wanted
to
give
the
chance
to
ground
ourselves
in
the
policy
discussion
and
the
kind
of.
Why
of
why.
J
I
An
anti
displacement
strategy,
so
this
was
designed
to
introduce
the
idea
and
as
transparent
away
as
possible,
give
ourselves
time
to
create
a
scope
of
work,
give
staff
time
to
create
a
scope
of
work
for
us
to
understand.
If
there
is
a
budget
need
that,
we
could
then
bring
forward
through
the
budget
process,
as
we
do
at
the
end
of
the
year
and
then
undertake
the
study
from
there,
so
maybe
a
multi-step
process
and
depending
on,
if
there
is
funding
and
budget
available
for
this
within
the
department's
existing
budget,
which
happens
all
the
time.
I
Of
course,
staff
are
contracting
with
consultants
all
the
time
without
getting
council
approval,
you
know
under
our
rules,
but
if
needed,
we
can.
You
know
there
will
be
time
to
do
the
more
formal
process,
depending
on
the
scale
and
scope
of
the
amount.
So
I
want
to
kind
of
describe
some
of
those
procedural
things.
I
I
So
for
me
to
be
able
to
do
this
in
a
transparent
way
where
we're
able
to
discuss
it
here
at
committee
and
then
able
to
discuss
it
as
a
budget
process
is
really
important,
I'm
not
able
to
to
go
through
a
kind
of
under
with
a
non
transparent
process
to
see
whether
or
not
we
might
be
able
to
bring
something
forward.
So
that's
important
to
me
on
this
and
I
think
will
continue
to
be
important
as
we
go
forward
into
the
future
I.
Thank
you
mr.
chair,
for
allowing
this
discussion.
Thank.
M
M
So,
let's
start
with
that.
The
biggest
issue
is
the
property
taxes
going
up
as
a
result
of
unlimited
spending,
and
so,
if
we
just
were
able
to
cut
a
few
things
here
and
there,
we
wouldn't
have
to
raise
taxes
as
much
and
that
wouldn't
affect
rental
rates
as
well
as
it
affects
everyone's
everything
mortgage
rates,
all
that
kind
of
stuff.
M
So
we
also
have
a
lot
of
regulation
that
we've
put
into
place
on
a
whole
number
of
levels,
blower
door
tests
and
cutting
holes
in
doors,
and
all
sorts
of
things
were
asking
people
to
do
that.
Increase
regulation.
In
addition
to
property
taxes
going
up
so
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
things.
We
can
do
short
of
rent
control
to
patrol
rising
rents
and
no
one
seems
to
be
suggesting
that
I
also
know
the
ongoing
direction
of
cutting
the
city's
housing
policy
staff.
M
Who
is
our
housing
policy
person
in
charge
of
this?
But
we
would
just
send
this
to
the
coordinators
office
at
the
same
time
that
we
don't
have
a
coordinator
permanently
so
I
think
that's
an
issue
and
then
I
would
just
ask
the
author's
if
this
date
is
incorrect,
because
it
says
that
there
would
be
an
update
brought
by
November
13
2019,
but
the
consulting
contract
shouldn't
be
should
be
in
place
no
later
than
March
15th
of
2020,
so
that
maybe
I
don't
know.
If
that's
incorrect,
so
I'm
not
sure.
I
really
understand
that
I.
A
M
M
M
A
I
A
F
Thank
You
mr.
chair
I,
guess
in
a
more
mechanical
version
of
what
Tom's
member
good
in
brodo
I
do
question
why
this
would
go
to
the
coordinators
office
even
through
this
committee.
This
is
not
even
the
home
committee
for
that
department
to
make
a
staff
direction.
It
would
be
the
home
committee
of
the
coordinator,
which
is
I,
think
the
Enterprise
Committee
and
furthermore,
I
kind
of
agree
that
this
should
be
the
work
of
the
department.
That's
in
charge
of
housing.
I
You
mr.
chair
I,
don't
support
changing
the
Department
of
the
staff
direction
as
it
is
I'm
happy
to
continue
have
that
discussion.
We
have
repeatedly
heard
that
there
is
a
concern
about
staff
capacity
and
so
I
think
that's
one
issue
that
this
was
intended
to
address.
The
other
piece
is
that
this
work
that
we
just
heard
about
is
multidisciplinary.
I
So,
as
we
heard
the
so,
we
heard
two
pieces
of
work
today.
This
anti
displacement
work.
That
was
a
collaborative
you
know
multi-city
process
with
community
partners
and
policy
link,
as
well
as
the
a
sweep
goal
and
strategy.
That
was
one
of
the
three
strategies
at
the
council
earlier
this
year
adopted
as
our
three
priorities
right
and
so
that
s
rework
is
being
coordinated
through
the
coordinators
office.
In
that
case
the
renter,
you
know
the
renter
goal
is
being
co-managed
by
C
ped
and
regulatory
services.
I
So
in
terms
of
like
a
contractual,
the
work
of
scoping,
a
contract
looking
for
budget
bringing
us
those
recommendations,
we
went
with
a
coordinators
office
because
it
is
truly
more
of
a
citywide
question,
so
some
of
the
data
will
come
from
regulatory
services.
Some
will
come
from
C
peds.
Some
may
come
from
other
parts
of
the
enterprise,
so
I
hope
that's
helpful,
it's
more
of
a
procedural
and
contractual
question,
but
also
a
staff
capacity,
question
and,
frankly,
again,
I
needed
this.
This
we
need
this
conversation
to
be
part
of
a
public
discussion.
I
So
in
the
past
it's
taken
a
long
time
to
get
answers
from
things
like.
Could
we
do
this?
Can
we
do
this?
Should
we
do
this?
Is
it
legal
to
do
this?
What
would
the
budget
be,
and
so
I
just
to
be
very
clear
part
of
the
intention
of
bringing
forward
a
staff
direction
in
this
way
is
to
allow
our
constituents
and
the
public
to
see
this
process
transparently
in
the
public
view.
C
Just
that
you
know,
I
would
echo
the
the
concern
about
capacity.
I
know
that
staff
is
working
on
a
lot
of
things,
a
lot
of
things
that
we've
heard
here
in
this
presentation,
as
well
preference
policies
and
other
than
to
displacement
policy
work
and
because
we're
you
know,
and
it
this
is
a
little
bit
before
my
time,
but
I
know
that
it's
not
uncommon,
for
you
know
contracts
to
go
through
the
coordinators
office.
It
was
that's.
It
went
that
way
through
4:15.
C
C
But
again,
we
have
I
think
that
we've
all
heard
that
concern
about
we've
got
a
number
of
council
members
put
pursuing
large
ordinances
that
are
going
to
be
voted
on
to
become
policy.
This
is
a
research
question
about
about
the
things
that
are
outlined
in
the
staff
direction,
not
an
ordinance
being
written
for
the
council
to
pass
so
I
was
just
kind
of
have
that
council.
I
A
I'll
just
note
and
the
staff
is
listening
to
this
conversation
too
and
I
do
have
some
sympathy
for
your
position.
It
may
be
that
when
we
come
back
in
November,
we
hear
a
different
idea
about
who's
gonna
manage
the
contract
and
who
isn't
so.
This
is
a
first
step
and
I'm
comfortable
supporting
it,
as
it
is
saying,
the
city
coordinators
office
will
read
with
assistance
from
I
would
have
been
comfortable.
A
If
there
was
a
comment,
it
wasn't
with
assistance
from
and
it
was
listed
or
whatever
so
I
mean
I'm
a
little
bit
agnostic
about
all
of
that
at
this
point,
but
I
do
think
this
discussion
is
really
good,
because
now
we're
going
to
figure
out
what's
going
to
happen
when
it
comes
back
and
how
are
we
going
to
be
able
to
move
forward
with
it
and
had
the
confidence
with
our
staff
and
our
in
the
council
about
where
it
goes
from
here?
But
why
don't
you
give
us
your
thoughts?
Thank.
N
You
mr.
chair
council
members
committee,
members
I
appreciate
them
at
the
time
if
I
may
I
would
just
suggest
you
strike
with
assistance
from
right.
The
way
we
do
this
well
as
departments
is
when,
after
you
pass
your
staff
direction,
presuming
that
this
passes
we
get
together
and
we
talk
about
who
is
going
to
do,
which
part
as
to
the
mechanics
and
as
to
who
leads
and
as
to
who
makes
the
report,
and
then
we
will
have
more
information
about
that,
for
you
in
November,
when
we
come
back
currently
has
written
directed
to
this
committee.
N
A
I
You
mr.
chair,
this
was
actually
responding
directly
to
a
situation
that
we
had
recently
where
there
was
those
three
departments
plus
the
city
attorney's
office
involved,
and
there
was
actually
significant
confusion
about
who
was
the
lead
staff
person
and
that
mr.
frank
and
I
had
a
series
of
many
discussions
and
e-mails
back
and
forth
back
and
forth
about
work
wasn't
happening
because
it
wasn't
clear
like
who
was
the
person
who
would
need
to
be
reporting
back.
I
So
the
reason
that
we
stated
in
this
staff
direction
specific
lead,
reporting
back
department
was
because
of
that
experience
of
everyone,
seemingly
not
knowing
that
the
council
had
hoped
to
have
staff
reporting
back
or
its
staff
producing
work.
So
I'm
not
sure
why
that
would
change
in
this
situation.
I
Perhaps
so
I
think
this
was
specifically
in
reaction
to
when
we
have
a
group
of
multiple
departments,
all
equally
responsible
for
work
and
reporting
back.
We
seem
to
have
had
some
timeline
difficulties
with,
even
knowing
who
was
really
ultimately
responsible
or
coordinating
it.
So
the
attention
here
was
to
find
staff
in
the
enterprise
who
have
capacity
to
do
this.
Work
who
welcome
doing
this
work
and
taking
the
lead
on
bringing
us
something
back
so
that
we
may
make
our
budget
decisions
in
a
timely
way
that
we
need
to.
It
wasn't
intended
to
undermine.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
I,
don't
see
anybody
else
in
queue
to
suggest
a
change,
so
we
have
this
motion
before
us.
I
just
want
to
speak
to
it
a
little
bit
because
I
really
appreciate
the
thoughtfulness
of
this
and
how
it's
very
public
and
I
think
the
aim
is
to
get
some
information.
Have
some
accurate
information
and
very
specific
in
some
cases
laid
out
here.
I'd
also
suggested
the
way
this
is
written.
A
It's
clear
that
if
property
taxes
are
a
part
of
the
equation,
we're
asking
them
to
do
a
financial
analysis
of
return
on
investment,
look
at
economic
impacts
in
the
housing
supply
and
short
and
long
term.
So
we
may
get
better
answers
to
some
of
those
questions
as
well,
so
I'm
and
then
we'll
have
another
another
look
at
how
this
process
is
going
forward
on
November
13th
as
well.
So
I
appreciate
that.
Does
anybody
else
want
to
weigh
in
before
we
take
the
vote?