►
From YouTube: August 27, 2019 Transportation & Public Works Committee
Description
Minneapolis Transportation & Public Works Committee Meeting
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
I'll
open
this
meeting,
it's
a
regularly
scheduled
meeting
of
the
transportation
Public
Works
Committee
Mother's
Day,
August
27th
I
mean
council
member
Ike,
I
tear
the
committee
and
I'm
joined
by
my
colleagues,
councilmembers
Johnson,
Palmisano,
bender
and
Gordon.
We
are
quorum
and
proceed
with
today's
agenda,
which
has
10
items,
9
of
which
are
consent.
The
final
is
discussion.
A
I'll
go
through
the
consent
items
any
committee
member
can
pull
them
for
further
deliberation
as
they
wish
item
1
as
the
contract
amendment
with
global
specialty
contractors
incorporated
for
a
PV
Plaza
construction
project
item
2
is
the
contract.
Remember
park
construction
company
for
18th,
Avenue,
Northeast,
Street
reconstruction
project
item
3
is
the
memorandum
of
understanding
with
Minneapolis
Park
and
Rec
board
for
solid
waste
and
recycling
services
item
4
is
negotiation
with
Metro
Transit
for
cost
participation
related
to
the
d-line
bus
rapid
transit
project
item
5?
A
Is
the
non
governmental
tax
exempt
parcel
street
maintenance
2020
assessments?
That's
a
designation
of
setting
public
hearing
for
October
15th,
six
related
item
non
governmental
tax
exempt
parcel
for
street
light
operation,
fee
2020
assessments
and
that
public
hearing
will
also
be
October.
Fifteenth
item.
7
is
a
special
service
districts,
the
non
four
to
eight
districts
and
their
proposed
services
and
service
charges
and
setting
that
public
hearing
for
October
fifteenth
I
item
eight
is
the
water
and
sewer
service
line,
repair
assessments,
setting
that
public
hearing
also
October
fifteenth
item?
A
Nine
is
a
26th
Avenue
south
project
and
that's
a
pedestrian
refuge,
island
and
traffic
signal
project,
layout
approval
and
a
cooperative
agreement
as
well.
Does
anyone
wish
to
pull
any
of
the
consent
items
see
none
I'll
move
them
all,
as
submitted
all
in
favor,
say
aye
centi
name
that
carries
me
to
move
to
our
final
item
item
ten
good
morning,
director
Hutchinson
good.
B
Morning,
mr.
chair
members
of
the
committee,
our
discussion
item
today
update
on
the
minneapolis
transportation
action
plan,
specifically
Kathleen
Mayo,
with
transportation
planning
and
programming,
will
be
providing
an
update
on
our
engagement
study.
We
wanted
to
come
and
provide
this
to
you
today,
because
it's
a
critical
piece
of
input
as
we
are
developing
our
strategies
and
our
actions
as
a
quick
reminder
and
I
think
Kathleen
will
also
say
this:
we're
really
building
upon
the
work
of
Minneapolis
2040,
using
that
as
a
critical
piece
of
input,
as
well
as
the
engagement.
C
Morning,
chair
RIKEN
councilmembers,
my
name
is
Kathleen
mail,
supervising
our
transportation
planner
and
the
transportation
planning
and
programming
division
of
Public
Works
and
here
to
share
a
lot
about
what
we
heard
over
the
earlier
part
of
this
year,
I'll
quickly
frame
up
where
we're
at
and
give
some
context,
also
at
the
end
for
our
upcoming
draft
plan.
So
the
transportation
action
plan
again
is
this
tenure
document
which
will
guide
our
planning,
design
and
implementation
of
transportation
projects
throughout
the
city,
building
from
2040
and
developed
in
coordination
with
the
vision,
0
action
plan.
C
So
the
engagement
piece
that
I'm
reporting
on
was
co-hosted
with
vision,
0
public
engagement
as
well.
There
are
six
goals
that
frame
all
the
work
that
we're
doing
around
the
transportation
action
plan
looking
at
climate
change
and
how
we
can
mitigate
and
not
be
such
a
contributor
toward
climate
change,
our
vision,
zero
work,
developing
equitable
outcomes
for
all
prosperity,
increasing
mobility
options
and
working
with
our
partners,
because
we
know
we
can't
do
this
alone.
C
We
are
organizing
all
of
our
upcoming
strategies
and
actions
around
these
seven
topic
areas
to
develop
the
transportation
action
plan
so
from
January
through
June
of
2019.
All
quite
you
know,
most
everybody
in
our
transportation
planning
and
programming
division
was
engaged
and
just
want
to
recognize
some
of
my
colleagues
around
the
room.
This
was
a
really
the
results.
Here
are
the
product
of
a
lot
of
effort
on
many
people
and
I'm
just
presenting
the
work
of
our
team.
C
So
we
hosted
three
different
organization
based
workshops:
community
dialogues,
which
I'll
explain
more
in
a
bit
ten
different
board
forums
hosted
by
different
council
members
throughout
the
city,
five
community
workshops
an
online
open
house,
which
was
the
first
time
we
had
done.
Something
like
this
received
over
a
thousand
views,
a
really
effective
way
to
reach
a
lot
of
people.
C
Although
it
was
a
more
of
a
one-way
dialogue,
community
contracts,
we
issued
six
community
contracts
but
I'll,
which
I'll
explain
in
a
bit
more
detail
and
a
lot
of
different
opportunities
to
engage
online
through
our
transportation
action
plan
website
we've
produced
three
different
products
that
are
all
available
on
our
website.
The
first
is
actually
a
bundle
of
seven
different
summaries
from
our
community
dialogues
and
I'll
share
a
little
bit
of
the
highlights
from
those
in
a
minute,
a
summary
from
our
community
contracts
work
and
then
a
total
summary
of
our
phase.
C
Two
engagement
for
the
community
dialogues,
which
I'll
focus
on
first
the
main
themes
that
we
heard
through
these
conversations,
which
we
co-hosted
with
our
neighborhood
and
community
relations
department,
as
well
as
our
coordinators
office
office
of
equity
and
inclusion.
They
were
hosting
community
dialogues
around
the
strategic
racial
equity
action
plan,
and
so
we
hosted
these
conversations
jointly
in
order
to
make
efficient
use
of
those
community
members.
We
were
asking
to
come
join
a
conversation
and
the
focus
on
the
transportation
side
was
really
on
pedestrian
issues,
transit
issues
and
safety.
C
So
I'll
go
into
a
little
detail
of
the
major
themes
from
each
of
the
different
workshops
that
we
hosted
are
the
dialogues,
but
those
were
really
across
the
board.
The
themes
that
we
heard
the
most
about
in
the
East
African
community
dialogue,
a
real
focus
on
pedestrian
safety,
both
through
lighting
and
our
infrastructure,
and
specific
projects
in
the
community.
That
they
felt
were
important
to
really
improve
their
community.
C
Now,
with
the
African
American
community
dialogue,
there
was
a
focus
again
on
convenient,
safe
and
efficient
transportation,
improving
transit
through
safety,
improvements,
Comfort
and
affordability
and
again
pedestrian
scale.
Lighting
was
another
theme
with
the
Southeast
Asian.
There
was
a
focus
community
dialog.
There
was
a
focus
on
the
building
of
relationships
and
how
that
can
support
accessing
new
modes
of
travel.
C
There
were
safety
concerns
again
related
to
lighting
on
the
street,
and
you
know
this
is
a
pretty
broad
statement,
but
the
idea
that
making
travel
safe
and
easy
is
really
important
in
terms
of
opening
up
transportation
options.
With
the
Latino
community
dialogue,
there
was
focus
on
improving
year-round
transportation
options
for
those
who
don't
drive,
linking
toward
our
sidewalk
condition
and
maintenance
of
our
bikeways
and
sidewalks
in
the
winter
and
again
transit
and
wanting
the
more
feeling
of
safety
and
comfort
on
transit
in
our
Native
American
community
dialogue.
C
There
was
more
of
a
focus
on
some
of
the
illegal
vehicle
behaviors
that
they're
experiencing
this
links
with
some
of
the
data
from
our
vision,
zero
crash
studies
that
we
looked
at
where
our
Native
American
residents
are
most
disproportionately
impacted
by
severe
and
fatal
crashes.
So
it
follows
that
this
was
a
large
concern
within
that
community.
There
was
the
desire
to
want
to
see
increased
access
to
transit
and
shared
mobility
options
in
the
community,
both
through
education
and
outreach,
and
then
broader,
just
collaboration
around
transportation
issues
with
the
community
with
the
peoples
with
disabilities
conversation.
C
And
finally,
we
hosted
a
conversation
with
the
Minneapolis
Youth
Congress
and
these
are
high
school
students,
and
the
focus
here
was
really
on
support
for
those
non-motorized
option,
walking,
biking,
transit
and
the
link
there
to
climate
change
as
being
very
important.
There
was
a
desire
to
see
increased
reliability
and
service
and
reduce
costs
for
public
transit
and,
broadly
speaking,
transportation
safety,
particularly
around
transit
and
I.
Think
that
this
last
quote,
which
is
a
direct
quote,
is
a
really
interest.
You
know
it's
a
it's
one.
C
We
need
to
pay
attention
to
because,
right
now
it's
saying
I
assume
I'll
be
driving
a
car
in
ten
years,
because
it's
the
easiest
way
to
get
around,
and
so
that's
the
reality
of
somebody
looking
toward
their
future.
And
you
know
we
heard
a
lot
of
links
about
that
in
terms
of
age
restrictions
say
for
scooters
or
you
know,
you're
able
to
get
a
driver's
license,
but
not
right
a
scooter
at
sixteen.
That
type
of
thing
so
interesting
to
have
these
conversations
and
hear
in
their
own
words.
C
So
we
did
something
a
little
bit
different.
We
put
out
an
open
call
for
engagement
services
at
the
end
of
last
year
and
we
contracted
with
six
different
organizations
and
artists
to
extend
our
outreach
and
we
partnered
with
these
six
organizations
here
who,
together,
hosted
30
different
events
throughout
the
city
and
reached
over
750
people
through
these
and
I'll
share
a
bit
of
the
highlights
as
well
for
these.
Through
these
events,
some
of
the
themes
that
ran
across
all
of
them
were
major
support
for
reliable,
safe,
equitable
transportation
options
to
access
jobs,
services
and
education.
C
So
major
themes
from
clues,
they
hosted
a
series
of
different
events
focused
on
Latino
family
access
to
food.
There
was
the
recognition
that
driving
is
really
important
still,
but
there
was
the
desire
for
more
different
options
available
that
were
safe,
convenient
and
affordable.
That
really
reflects
a
lot
of
what
we
heard
during
our
phase
1
engagement
2
when
we
asked
broadly
the
public.
How
do
you
get
around
now?
How
do
you
want
to
get
around?
C
Here
is
the
neighborhood
hosted
a
series
of
events
focused
on
neighborhood
residents
in
a
particular
focused
on
East,
African
and
Southeast
Asian
residents,
and
here
there
was
a
lot
of
comments
around
Olson,
Memorial,
Highway
and
safety
concerns
their
sidewalk
maintenance
in
the
winter
and
then
bike
education
to
promote
bicycling.
So
that's
the
theme
we
heard
throughout
several
different
conversations:
the
need
to
couple
infrastructure
and
new
options.
C
Move
Minnesota
hosted
a
series
of
focus
groups
with
MCTC
students,
and
here
the
focus
was
on
the
cost
of
transit,
the
comfort
of
transit
and
again
winter
maintenance
on
our
sidewalks
Seward
redesign
and
the
West
Bank
CDC
partnered
together
and
focused
on
reaching
Somali
community
residents.
The
focus
here
was
again
on
pedestrian
safety
and
access
making
streets
safer
from
crime.
So
we
heard
you
know
about
that
as
well,
and
then
pedestrian
connections
to
transit
being
very
important.
C
Finally,
we
have
a
Phase
two
summary
that
encapsulates
all
of
the
different
events
we
hosted
throughout.
In
all
the
different
comments,
we
got
received
more
than
2,500
individual
comments,
4000
responses
to
multiple-choice
questions
through
all
of
our
engagement
activities
throughout
the
first
half
of
the
year
and
I'm
just
going
to
share
a
couple
highlights,
but
there's
a
lot
more
detail
again
in
our
summary
online.
C
So
we
asked
not
not
all
these
events,
but
at
many
of
these
events
we
asked
folks
the
city's
got
a
goal
to
reduce
greenhouse
gas
emissions
by
80%
by
2050,
and
to
do
so
we
need
to
reduce
single
occupancy
vehicle
driving.
What
would
it
take
to
make
you
get
out
of
your
car
if
you
don't
drive
not
ride
in
a
car
as
much
top
77
percent
of
the
respondents
said:
better
transit,
more
bike
weighs
40
percent
and
then
sorted
shorter
distances
to
destinations
was
the
runner-up.
There.
C
We
also
asked
how
would
you
measure
the
success?
We
know
what
our
goals
are.
We
know
what
we're
trying
to
do.
What
are
your
top
priorities
here,
so
nearly
two
thirds
said
getting
more
people
to
walk
bike
and
take
transit,
which
would
be
a
successful
outcome
of
this
work
and
again
going
to
the
land
use,
reducing
the
distances
and
frequencies
that
people
drive
improving
equity
of
our
transportation
investments.
A
third
of
the
people
as
well
noted.
C
C
C
There
was
a
real
desire
to
see
more
access
to
these
shared
modes
that
are
accessible
by
all
people,
so
keeping
equity
and
accessibility.
In
the
forefront
of
that
conversation
with
pedestrian
topic,
there
was
a
real
desire
to
see
more
streetscape
improvements
embedded
as
a
part
of
how
we
deliver
our
capital
projects,
as
well
as
a
desire
to
see
more
pedestrian,
only
streets
and
plazas
within
biking
and
low
low
powered
vehicles.
C
There
was
a
desire
to
see
increased
access
to
scooters
bike
share
and
that
we
consider
non-traditional
commuters
when
we're
designing
and
implementing
our
bike
ways
throughout
the
city
with
transit.
There
was
a
lot
of
support
for
bus
only
lanes.
There
was
a
lot
of
talk
about
the
affordability
of
transit
and
desire
to
either
want
to
see
reduced
fares
for
zones
in
the
city
or
certain
population
groups
in
the
city
or
altogether
free
transit,
as
well
as
the
connection
with
winter
maintenance,
as
bus
stops
being
a
big
deal
with
in
the
freight
topic.
C
A
lot
of
talk
around
prioritizing
transit
over
general
purpose
traffic
on
our
streets,
particularly
downtown
to
improve
operations
for
those
walking
on
our
streets
and
to
more
broadly
integrate
our
Complete
Streets
policy
into
how
we
do
business
and
then,
finally,
in
street
design.
A
lot
of
conversation
around
designing
our
streets
for
slower
vehicular
speeds
to
increase
safety
that
way
that
there's
more
trees
and
greening
on
our
streets
and
that
there
are
space
dedicated
for
all
users.
So.
C
C
So
we've
seen
an
increase
of
the
the
percentage
of
the
the
greenhouse
gases
accounted
for
transportation
because
of
reductions
in
other
areas.
The
trend
line
is
a
slight
decrease
within
the
transportation
sector,
but
it's
not
been
particularly
dramatic
between
2006
and
2016,
so
the
city
of
Minneapolis.
You
know
you
all
are
familiar
with
the
ambitious
climate
goals
and
ambitious
actions
laid
out
through
these
different
plans
and
policies
and
challenges
and
we're
really
looking
and
taking
to
heart.
C
How
do
we
outline
a
series
of
strategies
and
actions
that
can
that
can
help
us
make
good
on
these
commitments?
So
the
climate
action
plan
looked
at
a
reduction
of
31%
from
2010
levels
to
2025
and
we're
closer
to
2025
than
we
are
2010
right
now
and
we
haven't
seen
you
know
the
same
rate
of
decline
that
that
we
were
anticipating
here.
Despite
you
know,
one
of
the
pieces
called
out
in
the
climate
action
plan
was
to
build
30
miles
of
protected
bikeways,
which
we
will
reach
and
we're
still
not
seeing
those
reductions.
C
So
again,
bold
vision
set
they're
working
on
it.
Are
we
going
far
enough
with
the
American
cities,
climate
challenge,
which
the
city
joined
in
2018,
really
focused
on
the
near-term
next
few
years?
What
can
we
do
to
reduce
emissions
through
quick
implementation
projects?
We've
implemented
bus
only
lanes
on
Chicago
and
have
more
coming
yet
this
year,
as
well
as
next
year.
C
So
there's
work
and
we're
tying
to
this
work
and
learning
from
this
work
and
seeing
where
we
can
take
this
and
elevate
it
within
the
transportation
action
plan,
as
well
as
well
as
the
idea
of
mobility
hubs,
how
you
can
bring
all
the
different
modes
together
in
a
centralized
space
and
let
people
have
options
and
finally,
in
Minneapolis
2040
as
well.
You
know
articulating
again
the
commitment
to
reduction
of
greenhouse
gas
emissions
and
then
outlining
a
series
of
policies
and
actions
there.
C
So
this
really
sets
the
vision
for
us
to
do
our
work
in
the
reducing
reducing
the
single
occupancy
vehicle
piece
of
our
transportation
system.
And
you
know
all
these
different
reports
and
studies
pull
on
different
pieces
and
they
have
different
metrics
around
electrification
or
the
amount
of
charging
stations
or
the
miles
of
protected
bikeways
that
we
need
and
as
we're
working
on
this,
it
really
is
evident
that
these
bold
climate
driven
strategies
dictate
really
bold
strategies
and
actions
through
this
transportation
action
plan,
and
so
there's
this
consistent
team.
C
Despite
order
of
magnitude,
differences
and
actions
set
through
these
other
pieces
that
really
frame
up
how
we
are
going
to
put
forth
our
strategies
and
actions
for
our
transportation
action
plan
and
then
finally,
there's
work
that
is
happening
concurrently
or
has
been
recently
completed.
That
also
helps
set
the
stage
for
the
strategies
and
actions
in
our
transportation
action
plan,
our
vision,
zero
action
plan,
which
we
anticipate
releasing
the
draft
next
month.
We've
really
these
two
documents
support
each
other.
In
terms
of
the
you
know,
street
design
elements
and
the
different
pieces.
C
Our
greenways
study
is
up
on
our
city's
website
and
that's
evaluating
the
potential
for
different
greenways
and
kind
of
how
we
can
think
about
implementing
greenways
throughout
the
city
and
evaluating
some
current
and
past
efforts
there.
Similarly,
our
shared
streets
study,
which
will
be
on
our
website
shortly,
does
the
same
thing
for
shared
streets
in
the
city.
Where
do
they
exist?
What
are
the
best
practices
around
that
and
helps
us
set
up?
There
was
a
research,
an
internal
research
piece
that
then
helps
us,
set
stronger
strategies
and
actions
for
our
transportation
action
plan.
C
So
that's
where
we're
at.
We
are
actively
working
on
the
draft
plan.
We
are.
Our
team
is
out
at
open
streets
events,
letting
people
know
this
work
is
happening.
We
will
be
releasing
a
series
of
transportation
talks
with
our
planners
talking
about
the
different
topic
areas,
what
we
heard
from
engagement-
and
we
are
focused
now
on
getting
the
draft
plan
together
in
order
to
release
that
for
a
public
comment
period,
so
I'm
happy
to
take
any
questions,
and
thank
you
for
your
time.
Thank
you.
D
Just
a
couple
of
questions
and
really
appreciate
all
the
work,
that's
gone
into
this
tool
and
the
engagement
that's
done
in
emphasis
of
this
presentation
when
you
so
my
questions,
you
talked
briefly
about
shared
streets,
aren't
all
our
streets
being
shared
by
other
users.
What
does
that
mean,
and
how
does
that
I
was
I
mean
green
wings
aren't
shared
necessarily
because
they're
for
bikes
and
pedestrians,
but
could
you
just
define
that
a
little
better?
For
me
sure.
C
Thank
you
for
the
clarification,
councilmember
Cheh
right
so
shared
streets.
Are
you
are
right
that
you
know
users
can
be
on
our
streets,
our
shared
right,
but
when
speaking
about
shared
streets
in
these
context
and
there's
a
lot
of
different
names,
people
have
for
this
oners
shared
streets
is
the
one
we
kind
of
settled
on,
but
the
idea
that
there's
less
of
a
delineation
between
space
for
cars
versus
bikes
versus
people
walking
so
an
example
that
the
city
recently
that
we're
evaluating
is
the
West
29th
in
the
OP
town
area.
C
C
D
I
appreciate
that
now
I
understand
exactly
what
you're
talking
about
I'm,
not
sure
that's
the
best
name
for
it,
though,
in
terms
of
marketing
are
one.
We
want
to
explain
to
other
people
what
we're
talking
about,
because
it
is
definitely
a
different
kind
of
street,
then
we're
used
to
which
people
will
think
is
being
shared
by
pedestrians
crossing
in
bikes
and
everything.
I'm.
D
D
Then
I
had
another
question
about
a
slightly
new
idea
that
I
also
heard
in
the
report:
mobility
hubs:
how
large
are
they?
How
many
are
they?
What
do
we
mean
by
this?
Is
this
just
a
bus,
stop
with
some
bike,
sharing
and
scooters
at
it,
or
is
this
like
a
major
hub
where
commuter
buses
stop
and
drop
people
off,
and
are
there
different
kinds
of
it
just
talked
about
a
little
bit
more
about
it's
an
exciting
and
interesting
idea
and
I'd
like
to
learn
more
sure.
C
Thank
you
for
that
clarifying
question
as
well.
Councilmember
chair,
Mike
mobility
hubs
can
be
a
range
of
things,
as
you
just
described
almost
perfectly
I'd
say
you
know,
I
mean
we're
planning
on
starting
small
and
looking
at
ways.
We
can.
You
know,
bring
together.
Co
join
different
options,
making
it
easy
to
transfer
between
one
or
another
that
there's
information
available,
but
you
can
certainly
scale
up
so
I
mean
I
would
I.
Would
you
know
you
could
challenge
that?
C
We
have
mobility
hubs
where
we
have
the
Dhokla
sand,
we
have
docked
and
we
have
a
train
station.
You
know
on
the
light
rail
and
you
know
those
are
the
beginnings
of
what
we're
seeing,
and
so
how
do
we
be
a
bit
more
intentional
to
bring
those
pieces
together
and
have
places
where
people
can
go
and
have
multiple
options
that
they
can
decide
based
on
their
needs
that
day,
what
works
for
them
great.
E
You
mr.
chair,
when
we
talk
about
vision,
zero,
one
element
of
that
is
traffic
or
speeding.
Modification
and
enforcement
has
varying
degrees
of
support
on
that
from
a
traffic
enforcement
police
kind
of
response
to
that.
The
other
piece
of
it
is
design
street
design
modifications,
including
sometimes
speed
humps.
E
Today,
as
I
understand,
we
have
over
70
requests
for
analysis
and
cue
and
residents
strongly
lobbying
council
offices
on
how
they
get
their
Street
analyzed
to
see
whether
or
not
speed
humps
would
be
an
option
on
their
on
their
block.
We
also
have
a
highly
inequitable
old
petition
and
assessment
process,
a
process,
I've
told
actually
no
longer
even
exists,
and
yet
there's
no
policy
update
being
reviewed,
or
rather
I'm
told
that's
not
on
any
deadline
according
to
staff
and
that
it's
actually
not
part
of
the
transportation
action
plan
or
vision.
Zero.
E
C
C
You
know,
there's
we
cities
recently
got
the
authority
to
change
speed
limits
as
well,
so
there's
there's
a
whole
suite
of
things
as
a
city
that
we
can
do
across
the
system
to
address
some
of
these
challenges
and
I.
Think
what
we
heard
loud
and
clear
is
people
want
to
feel
safe
using
their
streets
and
not
have
that
be
the
reason
that
they're
choosing
one
mode
versus
another
versus
another.
B
Chair
councilmember
Palmisano,
you
have
a
whole
series
of
questions
there
that
some
I'll
address
now
and
others
I'm
happy
to
talk
with
you
further.
We
are
going
through
a
review
of
our
traffic
code
right
now.
It's
something
that
I
hope
that
we
are
able
to
propose
changes
to
policy
and
code
that
matches
the
ideas
that
we're
discussing
in
the
transportation
action
plan,
I'm
hopeful
that
in
2020
that
will
come
forward.
B
We
know
that
there
is
a
high
demand
for
addressing
concerns
on
residential
streets.
We
do
our
very
best
to
analyze
them
as
they
come
in.
We
know
it's
important
to
residents
who
bring
them
forward.
What
we're
looking
for,
when
we're
doing
that
analysis
is
where
the
data
matches
the
perception,
and
we
seek
to
swiftly
correct
issues
that
we
have
there,
but,
as
you
can
imagine
where
we
we
have
all
those
seventy
also,
and
we
have
to
prioritize
based
on
on
data
and
need.
But
we
do
recognize
that
there
is
high
demand.
B
So
what
we
have
less
that,
then
we
can
do
and
we
will
have
more
tools
and
in
closing,
I
will
tell
you
that
you
are
going
to
be
hearing
in
more
detail
than
vision,
zero
action
plan
and
that's
coming
before
you
in
a
matter
of
a
month
or
so
so
well,
I
anticipate
we'll
be
having
additional
discussions
there.
One.
E
B
E
Thank
you,
I
really
do
appreciate.
All
the
engagement
going
on
here
I
appreciate
that
what
residency
as
solutions
might
not
be
the
actual
best
solution
coming
forward.
I,
just
guess,
I
want
to
press
the
point
that
the
public
is
expecting
to
see
implementation
on
some
of
these
great
ideas.
So
thank
you.
Thank
you.
F
You
mr.
chair
excuse
me
first
of
all,
I
want
to
say
there's
a
lot
of
great
outreach
work.
That's
gone
into
this
and
I've
seen
everybody
at
open
streets
and
everybody
braved
a
blizzard
to
come
to
a
board
meeting
in
Ward
3
that
nobody
thought
anybody
would
come
to
and
in
fact
we
had
like
25
or
so
constituents
show
up
and
staff
showed
up
and
I
really
appreciated
that
one
reflection
I
want
to
give
on
this
presentation
and
and
and
maybe
a
hope
for
the
the
draft
that
comes
out
is
I.
F
Think
one
of
the
challenges
of
community
engagement
and
one
of
the
strengths
of
some
of
the
community
engagement
we've
done
previously
is
that
we
let
challenging
voices,
be
part
of
the
conversation
and
so
I'm
a
little
bit
worried
and
I
kind
of
can't
believe.
I'm
gonna
say
this
because
I
take
heat
from
these
folks
all
the
time
right.
F
There
are
people
in
my
ward
who
show
up
who
showed
up
to
this
engagement
event
related
to
this,
who
you
know
the
question
here
that
says
what
would
support
you
in
getting
out
of
your
car
and
their
answer?
Wasn't
better
transit
or
more
bikeways?
It's
like
you
can't
support
me
in
that
I
mean
my
life
is
built
around
my
car
and
that's
what
I'm
gonna
do,
and
that
was
not
a
majority
voice.
That's
not
the
voice.
F
F
I
totally
agree
with
the
direction
that
it's
going
in,
but
I
think
that
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that
everybody's
getting
heard
and
then
everybody's
at
the
table
because
definitely
I've
had
people
take
the
time
to
weigh
in
with
a
perspective
that
feels
different
from
the
one
that's
in
this
proposal
and
they
live
in
the
city
too.
It's
important
that
being
said,
I
guess
my
other
question
is
so
what's?
Can
you
talk
through
the
timeline
a
little
bit
more
about
they
we're
gonna,
get
a
draft
in
September.
C
Thank
you
for
the
questions.
Councilmember
Fletcher,
chair
Ike,
one
point
on
your
first
first
piece:
absolutely
there
are,
there
are
opinions
that
differ
from
what
we
heard
pretty
loud
and
clear
consistently
and
we
have
those
documented,
and
we
heard
those
voices-
and
you
know
pointing
out
even
the
one
eye
the
one
quote
I
did
read
was
a
voice
of
the
country
like
it's
easy
to
drive,
so
that's
what
I
assume
I'll
be
doing
right
so
I
think
there.
There
definitely
are
people
who
definitely
had
a
challenge
to
some
of
this
right
and
I.
C
Think
one
thing
that
we
were
intentional
about
in
terms
of
how
we
approach
the
outreach
is,
we
knew
that
the
vision
was
set
in
2040,
so
we
were
asking
more
questions
about.
How
can
we
get
there?
Not?
Should
we
get
there
right?
How
do
we
do
this,
which
is
a
little
bit
of
a
different
question
and
I
think
Trent
trends
toward
then
the
answers
that
more
focus
on
that
rather
than
I,
don't
want
to
get
there
I
want
to
keep
driving,
because
that's
my
life,
you
know
those
types
of
things.
C
Your
second
question
around
the
schedule.
So
the
September
September
date
was
for
the
vision,
zero
action
plan
separate
document
than
the
transportation
action
plan.
This
will
come
at
a
later
date.
We
are
working
on
the
timeline
right
now
of
the
transportation
action
plan
and
we
are
working
hard
to
to
finalize
the
timeline
and
put
all
this
together
into
a
draft
plan.
So
I
don't
have
an
exact
date
to
give
you
at
the
moment.
F
Anxiousness
to
get
this
process
moving,
I
think
there's
been
a
lot
that
it
felt
like
this
year.
There's
been
a
sort
of
let's
wait
for
the
transportation
action
plan.
You
know,
as
we
have
ideas
and
I
think
a
lot
of
my
constituents
have
a
lot
of
ideas
and
have
a
lot
of
desire
to
see
stuff
implemented
and
and
we're
getting
tired
of
waiting
for
the
transportation
action
plan
process.
We
want
to
start
seeing
stuff
happen
and,
and
I
just
want
to
push
everybody
that
like
if
there
are
delays
that
we
can
avoid.
F
B
Chair,
if
I
might
add
here,
councilmember
Fletcher,
we
had
a
draft
schedule.
We
presented
it
to
the
policy
committee.
There
was
a
strong
desire
to
have
a
faster
timeline
and
that's
the
schedule.
We're
working
on
right
now
so
know
that
we've
heard
that
and
we're
we're
working
on
it
needs
to
be
a
well-thought-out
plan.
B
That's
currently
in
place
with
the
Complete
Streets
policy,
with
our
work
on
the
American
cities,
climate
challenge,
we
have
a
number
of
items
that
we
have
really
catapulted
forward,
knowing
that
we
have
the
policy
support
and
we
have
the
council's
support
to
implement
things
like
the
bus
lanes
like
the
mobility
hubs,
like
the
interventions
on
streets
that
we're
doing
in
in
many
neighborhoods
we're
not
waiting
on
those
things.
We
have
the
tools
we
need
so
I
hope
that
helps.
G
You
mr.
chair,
like
to
tear
him
a
member
of
the
steering
committee,
so
got
the
chance
to
weigh
in
a
bit
earlier
and,
as
the
director
said,
have
also
been
voicing
this
sort
of
sense
of
urgency,
because
you
know,
even
with
rising
housing,
costs,
I'm
kind
of
creating
a
sense
of
urgency
on
that
issue.
For
my
constituents,
it's
a
pretty
close
match
in
terms
of
how
much
we
hear
from
folks
about
concerns
over
speeding
traffic
in
their
neighborhoods
there's.
G
So
much
public
support
right
now
for
making
the
changes
that
we
need
to
in
our
streets
and
I
think
even
the
ones
that
are
more
challenging
that
are
more
constrained,
I
have
of
them.
In
my
ward
after
a
year,
two
people
really
start
to
adjust
to
it.
Folks,
even
who
you
know
we're
very
vocally
concerned
or
opposed
to
things
they're
like.
Oh,
you
know
it's
in
now.
G
Folks
love
the
fiber-optic
under
Hennepin,
even
though
we're
still
working
out
the
details
of
that
design
like
there's
a
lot
of
community
support
and
I
think
as
well,
people
are
starting
to
notice
the
flooding
increases
that
we
have
been
planning
for
and
even
if
constituents
or
stakeholders
or
businesses
and
my
ward,
don't
immediately
make
the
connection
themselves
between
climate
change
and
flooding
when
I
talk
about
it.
That
way,
they
understand
and
so
I
think,
there's
also
an
opportunity
for
us
to
help
make
the
case
in
the
public.
G
In
part,
that
will
be
supported
by
the
careful
look
that
you're
taking
to
data
and
making
the
case
and
really
setting
us
us
up
to
make
some
big
changes
after
this
plan
comes
forward
in
the
careful
way
that
you're
developing
it
so
I
appreciate
that
too,
and
you
know
I
there's
a
balance
to
strike
there.
I
have
some
of
the
highest
number
of
you
know
when
we
look
at
the
intersections
that
have
really
high
crash
rates.
A
lot
of
them
are
on
board
10.
G
A
lot
of
them
are
county
roads,
and
we
need
to
be
able
to
make
the
case
to
our
partners
about
why
we
want
to
see
particular
changes.
I'm
really
excited
about
our
the
notion
that
we
could
take
a
citywide,
systematic
approach
to
four-lane
roads
instead
of
looking
at
one
by
one
by
one
was
saying:
how
do
we
want
to
look
at
this
issue
holistically
in
our
city,
which
ones
do
we
see
he's
where
we
really
want
to
try
new
things?
G
How
can
that
help
us
inform
the
ones
that
have
higher
traffic
volumes
or
transit,
so
I
think
there's
going
to
be
so
much
benefit
to
taking
this
data-driven
citywide
approach.
So
you
know
I'm
I'm,
struggling
with
the
balance
to
myself
of
like
wanting
to
get
stuff
done,
and
my
award
wanting
to
respond
to
my
constituents
sense
of
urgency,
knowing
we're
in
a
moment
of
really
high
political
and
public
support
to
make
the
changes
we
want
to
see
and
just
kind
of
building
that
momentum,
so
I
think
striking.
G
This
balance
of
you
know
focusing
on
the
data
bringing
forward
a
carefully
developed
plan,
but
also
trying
things
out.
I'm
showing
change
in
on
the
streets
is
really
great,
so
you
know
I
want
to
see
the
draft
as
soon
as
possible
and
also
appreciate
all
the
hard
work
that's
going
into
the
detail.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
A
G
You
mr.
chair
I
want
to
give
you
a
last
word.
So
did
you?
I
did
want
to
say
one
thing
about
vision,
zero,
because
we
have
also
been
working
on
that
for
three
or
four
years,
probably
since
we
launched
it
and
maybe
three
to
his
last
term-
okay,
though
years
blur
together
for
me,
maybe
that's
when
we
first
arted
talking
about
privately,
but
so
I
also
hear
a
sense
of
urgency
about
vision,
zero
but
I
know
watching
other
cities
that
you
know,
especially
around
this
issue
of
enforcement,
which
we
do
hear
from
constituents.
G
Cities
that
have
rushed
through
that
enforcement
piece
have
had
a
huge
backlash
and
we
know,
unfortunately,
even
looking
at
our
own
departments
data
that
there
is
concerning
trends
around
how
enforcement
has
been
used
historically
in
our
cities
and
I.
Think
rightfully,
communities
of
color
are
concerned
about
increasing
enforcement
without
increased
its
assurance
that
that,
having
more
traffic
enforcement,
more
aggressive
approach
to
track
traffic
enforcement
isn't
going
to
lead
to
continued
racial
disparities
in
traffic
stops,
which
we've
seen
around
the
country.
G
So
I
appreciate
how
much
Public
Works
has
really
taken
the
time
to
look
at
vision.
Zero
holistically
to
learn
from
the
cities
that
we
know
where
that
has
been
a
big
backlash
so
that
when
we
again
when
we
go
forward
with
the
vision,
zero
plan
coming
out
soon,
that
careful
work
has
been
done.
Those
conversations
have
happened
in
community
I.
Think
it's
really
important
and
a
lot
of
it
was
behind
the
scenes.
So
but
again,
I
think
will
help
set
us
up
for
success.
A
And
we
look
forward
to
that
report
in
a
few
cycles,
so
anyways.
In
conclusion,
I
think
this
is
great
work.
I,
think
that
outreach
was
sort
of
the
emphasis
for
this
update.
You
know
the
old
notion
of
doing
it
early
and
often
certainly
was
concluded
rather
well
in
this
first
first
wave
of
input,
but
also
I,
think
that
the
being
intentional
targeted,
deeper
conversations
was
definitely
highlighted
and
will
serve
I.
Think
the
final
product
rather
well
I'll
be
interesting
to
see
how
we
do
get
that
you
know.
A
Obviously
we
don't
want
to
you
know
dally
in
our
in
our
input
process,
but
we
also
want
to
get
that
good
feedback.
We
heard
we
responded
what
what
say
you
public
and
and
I
look
forward
to
seeing
that
reaction,
but
I,
but
I
also
sense
that
we're
going
to
get
a
lot
of
positive
feedback
because
of
the
feedback
we've
gotten
so
far,
I
think
we're
rather
well
aligned,
I.
A
Think,
council
president
vendor
says
well
when
there's
a
political
will
out,
there's
a
sense
of
urgency,
there's
a
sense
of
great
demand
for
a
lot
of
the
tools
in
our
toolbox
that
we
want
to
expand
and
I.
Think
taking
action
is,
is
definitely
anticipated
and
I
think
we
can
be
I.
Think
bold
in
our
sense
of
direction
at
this
point,
but
we
also
want
to
be
thorough.
So
I
will
end
with
that
and
say
thank
you
for
the
work
to
date
and.
A
Future
updates,
in
addition
to
the
other
plans,
with
that,
we
do
have
the
item
before
us
for
a
receiving
file,
all
in
favor,
say
aye,
SNT
name
that
carries
and
we
are
now
adjourned.
Thank
you,
there's
actually
something
else
that
was
not
on
the
agenda
that
we
can
cover.
Now
that
we're
adjourned.
We
do
have
a
new
team
member
in
our
leadership
position.
I
will
let
director
Hutchinson
have
the
honor
of
introducing
this
person.
Mr.
B
Chair
members
of
the
committee,
thank
you
for
this
moment
after
the
meeting
I
wanted
a
chance
to
recognize
and
introduce
you
to
Stephanie
Johnson,
who
has
joined
starting
yesterday
that
turned
off
by
itself.
As
the
director
of
surface
water
and
sewer,
she
is
already
asking
really
great
questions.
You
can
anticipate
meet
and
greet
and
some
time
to
get
to
know
her
and
I
just
want
us
all
to
wish
her.
A
very
warm
welcome.