►
From YouTube: October 31, 2019 Zoning & Planning Committee
Description
Minneapolis Zoning & Planning Committee Meeting
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
Good
morning
and
happy
Halloween,
my
name
is
I'm
going
to
call
to
order
this
regular
meeting
of
the
zoning
and
planning
committee
for
Thursday
October
31st.
My
name
is
Jeremy
Schrader
and
I'm.
The
chair
of
this
committee
with
me
at
the
diocese
or
council
president
bender
counts
member
Reich
and
councilmember
Goodman.
Let
the
record
reflect
that
we
have
a
quorum
first,
we're
gonna
be
a
little
unusual.
We're
gonna
do
an
announcement
that
we
have
a
city
council
member
from
can-do
Philippines
joining
us
join.
A
We
have
11
items
on
today's
agenda,
including
a
public
hearing,
a
quasi-judicial
hearing
and
three
discussion
items,
and
the
first
thing
we'll
do
is
we'll
dispense
with
the
consent
agenda.
Item
number
3
is
the
environmental
assessment
worksheet
for
the
North
Loop
green
project.
Item
number
4
is
the
park
dedication
requirements,
waiver
associated
with
the
river
loop
development
project
item
number
5
is
a
rezoning
application
submitted
by
meredith
Barneveld
Barnhardt
420
2800
University
Avenue
southeast
item
number.
A
Are
there
any
discussion
on
any
of
these
items
or
any
committee
members
like
to
pull
anything
off,
not
seeing
anything,
I
move
the
consent
agenda,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye,
all
those
opposed
say.
No.
The
ice
habit
and
the
motion
carries
we'll
now
move
on
to
our
public
hearing
item
number
1,
which
is
the
application
submitted
by
North
Star
community
rowing
for
an
interim
use
permit
at
51:34
Avenue
north
and
33
33
16
orth,
1st
Street
in
Alaska
for
the
staff
presentation.
First.
B
Good
morning,
chair,
Schrader
councilmembers:
this
is
an
application
by
Northstar,
kameen,
Penelope,
pate
green
is
here
with
the
organization
she
has
applied
for
an
inner
muse
permit
to
allow
a
park
with
a
walkway
to
and
a
dock
in,
the
Mississippi
River.
The
property
is
located,
51,
34th,
Avenue,
north
and
then
33
16,
North
first
Street.
This
is
the
southern
portion
of
the
upper
Harbor
terminal
site.
B
This
is
located
just
north
of
33rd
Avenue
between
the
railroad
tracks
and
the
Mississippi
River.
As
I
said,
this
is
part
of
the
upper
Harbor
terminal
site
that
is
owned
by
the
city
of
Minneapolis
and
the
city.
The
city,
as
you
know,
is
working
on
a
redevelopment
strategy
for
the
entire
property
and
the
property
has
been
and
is
currently
being
used
for,
open
storage
of
both
materials.
B
Is
to
allow
a
community
rowing
facility
on
a
portion
of
the
site,
Northstar
commuter
rowing.
Their
program
provides
rowing
opportunities
for
adults
and
adolescents
with
physical
disabilities,
youth
from
under-resourced
communities
and
members
of
the
community
who
wants
to
benefit
from
my
health
and
recreational
benefits
of
rowing.
They
are
seeking
the
interim
use
permit
for
full
five
years
until
from
November,
8th
or
until
November,
8th
of
2024.
Excuse
me,
they
are
making
physical
changes
to
the
site.
B
Specifically,
the
ones
that
are
being
captured
under
the
interim
use
permit
today
are
to
reduce
the
grade
from
the
street
level
to
the
shoreline
by
establishing
a
four
foot
wide
walkway
and
then
installing
an
accessible
dock
in
the
Mississippi
River.
The
use.
It
has
been
determined
that
this
uses
substantially
similar
to
a
park
which
is
allowed
in
the
i2
zoning
district
and
I
should
say
that
the
site
is
zoned
I
and
is
also
located
in
the
shoreland
overlay
in
the
floodplain
overlay.
Districts
parks
are
permitted
use
in
those
zoning
classifications.
B
However,
those
aspects
that
walkway
and
then
the
dock
require
conditional
use
permits,
and
so
that
is
what
you
are
actually
voting
on
today.
Under
the
interim
use
permit,
that
is
what's
triggering
the
interim
use,
because
those
needs
to
you
peez
see
you
pet
does
find
that
the
interim
park
with
a
walkway
to
and
a
dock
in,
the
River
will
not
be
detrimental
to
endanger
the
public
health,
safety,
comfort
or
general
welfare,
and
that
it
they
will
not
be
injuries
to
the
use
and
enjoyment
of
other
property
in
the
vicinity.
B
A
You
let
the
record
reflect
we've
been
joined
by
councilmember
Gordon,
not
seeing
any
questions.
Thank
you
very
much
and
seeing
no
other
questions
from
my
colleagues.
I
will
now
open
the
public
hearing
and
I
want
to
see.
If
anyone
is
here
to
speak
on
the
item
number
one
and
if
you
could
say
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
C
Councilmembers,
my
name
is
Penelope
pate
Greene
I'm,
the
board
chair
for
North
Star,
community
rowing
and
a
co-founder
North
Star
community
rowing
has
been
providing
equitable
access
for
people
in
the
Twin
Cities
and
specifically
North
Minneapolis.
Since
2016,
we
look
forward
to
the
opportunity
to
provide
equitable
access
to
our
river.
The
river
is
a
beautiful
fabulous
resource
and
it
is
something
that
too
many
people
have
no
way
of
accessing
for
any
type
of
recreation,
so
we're
looking
forward
to
doing
that
with
this
equitable
access
opportunity.
Thank
you.
Thank.
D
E
D
F
You
mr.
chair
I
just
can't
help
it
also
echo
what
comes
Mike
just
said,
and
it's
really
exciting
to
see
this
vision
for
the
river
coming
to
life
in
all
of
these
ways,
and
especially
in
a
way
that
helps
connect
our
youth
to
nature
in
the
city
and
especially
helps
you
know,
bring
all
of
our
community
together
around
this
amazing
asset.
G
Good
morning,
chair,
Schrader
and
councilmembers,
the
the
appeal
before
you
is
an
appeal
of
the
Planning
Commission's
decision
to
approve
a
parking
variance
at
forty,
seven,
thirty,
six
and
forty
seven
forty
grand
this
was
accompanied
with
a
state
plan
review
application
for
twenty
three
dwelling
units
and
the
applicant
had
proposed
to
provide
ten
parking
spaces.
Here,
an
appeal
was
filed
on
October
16th
by
Eric
Takeshita
for
the
Planning
Commission's
decision
to
approve
the
parking
variance
and
I'll
I'll
quickly
run
through
some
of
the
plans
that
were
submitted
by
the
applicant.
This
is
a
four-story
building.
G
G
This
is
a
kind
of
a
unique
part
of
the
city,
so
the
the
building
itself
isn't
does
not
qualify
for
the
transit
incentive
parking
reduction.
That
reduction
was
adopted
in
2015
as
a
way
to
potentially
reduce
housing
costs
by
allowing
infill
development
on
smaller
sites.
And
this
you
know
if,
if
the
site
were
to
qualify
for
this
and
of
reduction,
there
would
be
no
parking
required,
since
there
are
fewer
than
50
units
in
the
building.
G
So
while
the
site
is
not
located
within
so
the
definition
within
the
zoning
code
is
that
the
site
has
to
be
located
within
a
quarter
mile
of
one
bus
transit,
stop
with
Midway
headways
of
fifteen
minutes
or
less,
and
so
the
site
is
not
located
within
a
quarter
mile
of
one
bus
transit
stop.
However,
it
is
located
within
a
quarter
mile
of
many
transit
stops
that
have
somewhat
frequent
transit,
although
they
don't
call.
G
No
one
stop
qualifies
for
that
transit
incentive
reduction,
so
the
site
is
located
between
two
high
frequency
routes
throughout
for
and
they're
out
18.
It's
also
just
over
half
a
mile
away
from
the
35w
stop
at
46th
Street,
which
will
be
it
served
by
many
express
routes
and
will
be
served
by
the
future.
Orange
Line
BRT
route
I
prepared
this
map
that
shows
the
transit
routes
and
the
frequency
within
a
quarter
mile
of
the
site.
So
to
the
north
of
this
area
of
the
city.
G
We
do
consider
the
route
4
to
be
a
high
frequency
route.
However,
when
it
gets
farther
south
in
the
city,
it
does
split
and
parts
of
the
route
4
go
down.
Lyndale
and
parts
of
the
route
4
go
down
bryant,
and
so,
while
the
state
is
located
within
a
quarter
mile
of
the
route
4
on
wind
ale,
there
that
stop
itself
is
not
served
by
all
of
the
routes,
so
it
doesn't
have
that
Midway,
midday
headways.
G
G
While
this
site
does
not
explicitly
qualify
for
the
transit
incentive
reduction,
it
does
have
excellent
access
to
transit
and
and
because
of
the
unique
orientation
of
bus
routes
in
this
part
of
the
city,
staff
finds
that
the
request
is
reasonable
to
reduce
the
parking
from
23
spaces
to
10.
So
staff
is
recommending
that
the
zoning
and
planning
committee
uphold
the
Planning
Commission
decision
to
approve
the
variance
to
reduce
the
minimum
parking
from
23
basis
to
10
spaces
and
I
will
stand
for
any
questions.
A
Reminiscing
any
other
questions.
Thank
you
very
much.
This
point,
I'll
open
up
the
hearing
and
I'll
first
give
the
applicant
the
appellant
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
the
committee.
Mr.
takeshita,
would
you
like
or
you
a
representative
like
to
speak.
You
could
say
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
right.
I
Good
morning,
chair
Schroeder
and
committee
members,
I'm
Paula,
Colley's
and
I'm,
representing
Eric
Takeshita
who's,
the
appellant
here
and
on
behalf
of
many
of
the
neighbors,
and
that
are
here
and
others
who
are
not
present
here
today.
I
know
that
you
have
already
received
a
lot
of
material
from
us
and
documentation
with
regard
to
this
matter.
So
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
everything
point
by
point,
but
I
do
want
to
address.
I
That
means
that
this
property,
the
particular
site
at
issue,
must
has
trouble
complying
with
ordinance
standards
because
of
unique
circumstances
to
that
particular
site
and
that
are
not
based
solely
on
economic
conditions
and
also
it
is
the
applicants
burden
to
prove
that
they
that
a
warrant
variance
is
warranted.
In
this
case,
it's
not
up
to
other
people
to
to
disprove
it.
It's
up
to
the
applicant
to
prove
why
the
variance
is
necessary.
I
I
They
could
build
it,
but
parking
is
expensive
and
it
would
cost
more
that's
an
economic
consideration
that
isn't
a
reason
for
granting
the
variance,
but
second,
and
and
primarily
here
there
isn't
any
circumstance-
that's
unique
to
the
property
and
as
planning
staff
has
indicated,
they
do
not
qualify
for
the
parking
incentive.
It
may
be
that
they
there
is
access
to
other
routes,
but
it
doesn't
meet
the
criteria
for
a
parking
incentive
in
this
case,
and
also
the
location
of
transit
lines
is
something
that's
general
to
the
entire
community.
I
It's
not
specific
to
this
parcel
and
there
is
not
any
Minnesota
case
law,
any
court
decision
that
has
interpreted
a
variance
in
this
way
by
applying
something
that
is
applicable
to
a
general
neighbourhood
condition
and
finding
that
that's
a
unique
circumstance
to
this
property.
That's
it's
the
complete
opposite
of
being
unique
to
this
property.
Everybody
in
this
area
is
affected
in
the
same
way
by
the
fact
of
the
location
of
the
bus
lines.
I
It
may
be
that
the
city
wants
to
encourage
public
transit,
but
that's
a
completely
different
issue
from
whether
or
not
this
property
is
eligible
for
a
variance
and
I.
Think
all
of
this
discussion
about
the
bus
lines
is
actually
irrelevant
to
the
issue
at
hand,
because
the
applicant
has
not
shown
that
there
is
a
circumstance
unique
to
this
property
that
justifies
a
variance
ordinarily.
I
The
law
requires,
you
know,
defines
that
term
in
relation
to
particular
physical
conditions
of
the
site,
somehow
related
to
what
can
be
done
on
that
on
this
site,
and
that's
just
not
the
circumstances
here
by
their
own
admission
and
by
what
the
staff
is
telling.
You
also
there's
nothing
about
that
inherent
about
this
site.
It
has
to
do
with
the
general
neighborhood
condition
that
that
is
is
what's
driving.
I
This
request
for
a
variance
so
I
think
what
the
Planning
Commission
did
by
approving
this
variance,
and
what
you
would
do
is
if
you
approve
this
variance,
is
really
turn
the
standard
upside
down.
There
is
no
practical
difficulty
and
you
would
just
be
saying:
well
we
like
this
idea,
let's
grant
the
variance
here.
I
City
of
Minneapolis
does
have
impressive
goals
for
improving
diversity
and
housing
and
encouraging
public
transit,
but
good
ideas,
don't
trump
the
law
and
in
this
case
the
the
requirements
for
obtaining
a
variance
are
just
not
satisfied.
So
I
will
stand
for
questions
and
may
come
up
again
to
respond
to
those,
but
there
are
many
other
people
who
want
to
address
the
particular
evidence
that
that
addresses
the
particular
circumstances
here.
K
K
I
also
was
a
deputy
director
of
the
local
initiative
support
corporation
Liske
I
want
to
be
clear,
I'm
here
not
for
myself,
but
actually
for
the
400
and
plus
people,
four
hundred
four
people
that
signed
a
petition,
as
you
see
here,
opposing
this
variance
and
the
30
plus
families
that
have
actually
taken
money,
other
their
pockets
to
feel
to
file
the
appeal
and
to
hire
the
attorney.
Many
folks
couldn't
be
here,
but
some
are
and
I
would
like
to
ask
them
actually
just
to
stand
if
they
could.
K
Thank
you.
Our
sincere
hope
is
that
the
council
will
prevent
the
need
for
future
litigation
by
doing
the
right
thing,
the
legal
thing
and
denying
the
variance.
We
know
that
you've
read
our
appeal
and
a
letter
from
our
attorney
and
other
letters
outlining
all
the
reasons
why
this
is
a
wrong
project
for
this
location.
So
I'll
try
to
limit
my
comments
and
we'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
or
provide
additional
information.
K
K
New
neighbors
I
would
welcome
the
opportunity
to
work
with
Josh
and
his
team
on
building
a
great
project
in
our
neighborhood,
that's
great,
but
as
the
Planning
Commission
said
at
the
plane
Commission,
they
also
said
that
they
need
the
variance
because
they
want
to
make
the
units
more
affordable
and
wanted
to
create
a
more
luxury
product.
Unfortunately,
when
you
look
at
it,
that's
exactly
what
they're
doing
here,
they're
proposing
to
charge
1,200
to
1,400
dollars
for
studio
apartment,
which
is
comparable.
K
K
With
all
due
respect
to
staff,
the
proximity
transit
is
Paula,
said,
or
the
lack
thereof
is
simply
not
a
practical
difficulty,
and
just
because
you
don't
qualify
for
an
incentive,
it
doesn't
mean
it's
a
practical
difficulty.
It
just
means
you
don't
get
the
incentive
right.
I
mean
that's
kind
of
clear
and,
as
has
been
mentioned,
as
staff
said,
the
site
doesn't
qualify
right.
There's
three
buses
that
travel
at
midday.
Only
three
one
travel
is
like
every
hour,
the
other
two
travel
every
half
an
hour
and
they
go
in
different
directions.
Right.
K
Anybody
that
takes
a
bus
knows
that
having
two
buses
that
go
in
different
directions
isn't
the
same
as
having
one
bus
that
goes
in
one
direction:
every
15
minutes,
it's
just
not
high
frequency
transit
I
will
also
add,
as
Paula
mentioned,
that
this
unique
orientation
to
transit
is
not
unique
to
the
property
right.
It
may
be
unique
orientation
to
transit,
but
it's
not
unique
to
the
property
and
that's
the
standard
version
of
variance
right.
It
has
to
be
unique
to
the
property.
K
The
other
side
of
this
required
findings
piece
is
that
the
project
can't
change
the
essential
character
of
the
location
or
hurt
the
neighbors,
and
unfortunately,
the
plan
currently
under
proposal
would
do
both
of
those
things.
Despite
having
an
r5
zoning.
This
is
not
a
high-density
area,
they're,
mostly
single-family
homes
and
duplexes.
On
this
block,
there
are
three
triplexes.
There
are
four
four
flexes
and
there's
one
six
unit
apartment.
K
K
This
project
will
clearly
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
neighbors,
and
others
will
speak
to
this
later.
The
neighbors
to
the
south
are
being
asked
or
more
or
less
told
that
they're
going
to
share
their
driveway
with
23
23
unit
apartment
instead
of
a
single-family
home.
That's
a
huge
difference
and
a
huge
impact.
The
neighbors
to
ignore
us
we're
gonna,
be
facing
a
47
building
that
goes
100
feet
long
with
a
97
feet.
Long,
that's
gonna
be
only
11
feet
from
the
property
line
right.
The
neighbor.
K
The
press
told
me
that
it's
gonna
make
his
unit
basically
feel
like
a
dungeon.
So
clearly,
this
will
have
a
negative
impact
on
the
immediate
neighbors.
The
project
will
also
be
detrimental
to
the
general
public,
even
if
everyone
who
lives
here
doesn't
in
a
car,
which
kind
of
seems
unlikely,
there'd
still
be
hundreds
of
new
commercial
vehicles
with
Amazon
drop-offs
or
bites
quartered
or
or
lifts
or
other
kind
of
car
services.
That
will
cause
a
problem
for
emergency
vehicles
for
bicycles
and
for
pedestrians
in
the
neighborhood.
K
The
evidence
here
is
clear
and
overwhelming
this
project
does
not
meet
the
required
findings.
There's
no
practical
difficulty,
it
will
change
the
essential
character
and
it
will
be
detrimental
to
the
well-being
of
others.
It's
simply
the
wrong
project
for
this
location
and
someone
who
truly
believes
in
government.
One
of
the
things
that's
been
most
painful
for
me
is
to
have
my
neighbors,
some
of
whom
are
here
say.
What's
the
point,
the
city
is
already
made
up
its
mind
and
it's
going
to
do
whatever
the
heck
it
wants
to
do.
K
They're
not
gonna,
follow
along
and
to
be
honest
with
you,
I
get
it
kind
of
seems
that
way.
Staff
has
deemed
the
application
complete,
even
though
is
ripe
with
errors
such
as
the
applicants
and
the
building
would
have
20
spaces
when
it
only
has
10
or
that
the
variance
was
needed
to
reduce
number
of
spots
from
15
instead
of
23
staff
didn't
seem
to
care
that
the
applicant
didn't
post
proper
notification
for
the
public
hearing
and
it
was
staff,
not
the
developer.
That
suggested
the
transit
incentive
was
a
justification
for
a
merits.
K
Comment
that
the
Planning
Commission
also
made
it
clear
that
at
least
some
of
the
commissioners
didn't
make
their
decision
based
on
the
evidence
in
the
specific
case,
so
I
may
just
be
nice.
I
may
just
be
naive,
but
I
do
believe
in
government.
I
do
believe
in
this
process
and
I
believe
that
you
all
will
not
act
in
an
arbitrary
and
capricious
way
that
you
will
now
provide
preferential
treatment
to
this
a
beginner
to
this
project
and
that
you'll
follow
the
law
in
closing
I.
J
K
City
can't
approve
of
variance
just
to
advance
a
public
policy
objective,
no
matter
how
noble
such
as
increase
in
density,
reducing
parking
or
increasing,
affordable
housing,
but
we
may
or
may
not
like
a
developer
or
project.
We
have
to
treat
them
all
the
same
and
while
we
may
or
may
not
like
the
laws
regarding
public
hearings,
transit
incentives
or
needing
to
make
the
required
findings,
the
granted
variance
we
have
to
follow
the
law,
elected
leaders,
appointed
officials
and
government
employees
are
stewards
of
the
sake.
The
public,
sacred
trust
and
I.
K
A
L
Good
morning
and
I
think
it'll
be
a
two-part
presentation,
I'll
be
myself
and
then
Josh
immediately
afterwards.
I'll
keep
my
comments
brief.
My
name
is
Dean
Davao
Louis,
333,
Washington,
North,
Minneapolis,
Minnesota,
Eric
and
others
are
right.
We
did
have
a
choice
on
how
to
shape
this
project
in
terms
of
units
and
number
of
parking
spaces.
L
We
made
this
a
conscious
choice
of
providing
what
you
see
today
on
really
two
basis,
because
it,
the
thesis,
is
number
one.
This
type
of
project
actually
generate
less
parking
and
I'll
explain
that
a
little
bit
and
it
allows
for
affordability.
The
reason
I
will
akina's
conclusion
partially
is
based
on
my
experience
and
I.
Don't
mean
this
to
be
bragging,
but
we've
been
involved
in
more
housing
projects
from
Annapolis
any
of
the
architect
and
in
the
surrounding
suburbs,
and
like
Liberty,
Mutual
Insurance,
we've
seen
a
lot
and
we've
seen
a
lot.
L
L
One
project,
for
example,
he's
a
couple:
parkway
25
in
which
San
has
a
1.75
parking
ratio
reside
happens
right
in
the
border
to
me,
a
plus
ain't
Paul
large
units
lecture
units
in
every
unit
generates
two
cars
or
better
the
one
bedrooms,
because
they're
husband
and
wife
to
two
bedrooms,
because
our
couples
to
three
bedrooms,
you
know
I
have
a
garage,
that's
large.
It
has
a
waiting
list
and
Cartersville
and
neighborhood,
because
people
self-select
to
a
type
unit.
L
They
want
same
with
both
t25,
which
on
the
product
we
have
on
for
the
Greenway
here
in
Minneapolis
same
basis,
rods,
we've
done
for
it
yellow
tree
development,
which
is
an
area
which
are
have
ratios
between
point
four
and
point.
Seven.
Their
garages
are
actually
running
full
or
partially
full
on
this.
So
it
made
a
choice
to
do
less
parking
and
appeal
more
of
those
type
of
residents
for
the
affordability,
because,
as
you
know,
parking
costs
twenty-five
to
thirty
thousand
install
it's
Airy
have
some
faces.
L
Forty,
so
more
parking
you
have
the
more
expensive
housing
we
were
suited
for
housing
is
filling
that
may
see.
Average
1864
sign
sixty
five
to
seventy.
Five
percent
ami
at
just
a
median
income.
How
was
our
goal
and
to
do
it
was
a
mix
we
came
up
with
to
make
this
work
on
this
process,
so
you're
done
asking
for
the
scent
of
we're.
L
Just
acted
for
variance
tool,
also
create
housing
that
part
of
the
state
and
neighborhoods
goals
as
a
creative
affordability,
which
we
are
doing
and
to
actually
lessen
the
parking
impact,
because
the
type
of
tenants
that
were
attracting
his
tenants
that
are
selecting
not
to
have
a
car,
some
luta
for
ability.
Some
pseudo
lifestyle
sums
commitment
to
have
a
list
back
then
earth,
and
so
the
basic
project
is
one
that
actually
does
afford
to
benefit
a
less
park
in
a
man
and
does
afford
the
benefit
of
affordable
housing
and
Joshua.
E
Mr.
DeVos,
that's
all
good,
but
how
does
that
meet
the
criteria
set
up
under
the
request
for
a
variance
which
essentially
means
something
very
specific
about
this
property
is
unique.
That's
what
we're
judging
this
by,
not
whether
or
not
you're
doing
a
good
thing,
but
whether
or
not
you
meet
the
letter
of
the
law
and
as
I
understand
it.
I
I'm
unclear
about
what
your
practical
difficulty
is
other
than
cost
the.
E
E
M
E
M
M
M
We,
there
was
actually
three
stories
from
the
back
of
the
rear
of
the
site.
We
went
back
to
the
drawing
board.
We
tried
to
provide
an
underground
ramp.
We've
tried
to
provide
automated
parking,
it
just
didn't
work.
The
site
was
too
small
that
turning
radii
was
too
small.
The
ramp
was
too
steep.
We
did
our
very
best
to
provide
Park
and
sufficient
for
the
number
of
units
and
we
went
back
to
the
drawing
board
and
understood
what
type
of
tenant
would
be
in
that
location.
And
that's
where
we
found
to
appeal
more
to
studios.
G
This
is
kind
of
a
unique
block
that
the
entire
block
is
r5
and
hasn't
been
that
way
for
a
long
time,
but
it
will
be
interior
200.
The
new
plan,
although
that
isn't
in
effect
yet
and
obviously
the
even
once
that
2040
plan
is,
is
effective.
On
January
1st,
the
r5
zoning
will
still
be
in
place
for
the
foreseeable
future.
Thank
you
thank.
A
M
M
So
my
my
intention
was
to
come
up
here
and
to
explain
that
we've
tried
to
make
some
compromise
with
the
neighbors.
We've
sat
down
a
few
times
two
times
with
the
South
neighbors
to
try
to
get
on
the
same
page.
We
can
do
to
alleviate
any
concerns
through
building
and
through
operations
of
the
building.
I'd
like
to
just
go
through
a
few
quick
steps
that
we've
taken.
We
had
promised
to
construct
our
building
a
specific
way
in
which
we
will
not
interfere
with
the
shared
driveway.
The
driveway
will
stay
in
use
throughout
the
project.
M
We
will
pay
for
two
years
of
snow
removal
in
any
repair
if
needed,
and
eighty
percent
of
all
future
costs.
If
not
more,
we
will
be
gifting
the
South
neighbor,
shrubs
and
small
landscaping
of
choice,
state
and
minimizing
any
additional
light
impact
for
more
drive
drivers
using
the
shared
driveway.
We
will
work
together
with
the
South
neighbor
and
certain
all
lighting
is
appropriately
directed
onto
the
47:38
property
and
surrounding
sidewalks.
The
lighting
is
reflected
downward
and
not
towards
the
47:44
building.
M
Additional
measures
will
be
taken
to
ensure
simplicity
in
the
shared
driveway
such
as
trash
pickup
will
only
occur
between
9
a.m.
and
3
p.m.
and
we
believe,
one
time
a
week
is
feasible.
We
were
open
to
neighbor
and
input
on
our
final
color
choices.
We
believe
the
neighborhood
progress
is
about
compromise
and
coordination.
M
Keeping
the
driveway
open
during
construction
will
add
substantial
cost
to
our
logistics
and
carpentry
labor.
The
working
agreement
is
just
one
aspect
of
our
willingness
to
compromise.
We
are
happy
to
provide
this
work
in
agreement
with
our
neighbors.
It
should
be
noted.
This
is
quite
the
opposite
of
economic
reasons
in
which
the
appealant
incorrectly
stated
we
intend
to
be
get.
We
intend
to
be
as
green
and
environmentally
friendly
as
possible.
M
As
a
reminder,
we
are
partnering
with
Bruce
Brunner
and
he'll,
be
moving
the
duplex
and
most
likely
the
single-family
to
the
same
lot
just
one
mile
away.
This
will
alleviate
a
150,000
pounds
of
waste
into
the
landfills
and
provide
three
additional
units,
if
not
more
affordable
housing.
We
believe
that
the
design
and
function
of
this
building
has
been
a
collaborative
approach
and
the
outcome
is
what
we
believe
is
best
for
the
neighborhood.
Thank
you
and
we
hope
you
appalled
the
decision.
I.
A
Have
some
questions
if
he
can
stay
back
I'm,
just
seeing
if
other
my
colleagues
do
just
I
guess,
maybe
a
couple
comments
like
I
think
you
talked
about
working
with
the
neighbors
and
just
I
know.
This
is
one
of
your
first
projects
when
we
see
other
developers
you
you
have
reached
out
to
neighbor,
but
other
developers
have
done
a
lot
more
like
developing
in
the
city
as
its
difficulties.
A
So
it
is
something
of
having
more
of
a
dialogue
with
neighbors
being
able
to
not
just
hear
like
when
you
say
that
you're
concerned
about
being
as
environmentally
conscious
as
possible.
That's
fantastic!
That
really
helps
the
development,
but
here
all
I'm
hearing
is
you're
you're,
taking
the
current
buildings
and
moving
them
somewhere
else.
Fantastic
I'd
say
that's
one
very
high
standard,
but
what
I'm
not
hearing
is
what
you're
doing
with
the
current
building.
You
know
what's
gonna
happen
with
the
stormwater
on
the
project.
A
What's
gonna
happen
with
landscaping,
there's
just
a
lot
other
things
you
can
do
with
building
materials,
solar,
ready,
there's
just
a
long
list
of
things
to
do
that
this
committee
takes
seriously
I.
Think
that
would
be
just
something
we
would
also
look
for
so
kind
of
want
to
give
you
an
opportunity
if
there
are
some
of
those
things
being
built
in
be
hopeful
to
hear
about
those
okay.
M
You
know
one
goal
was
to
have
as
much
greenery
as
possible
in
the
lobby
as
well
I'd
hate
to
bring
up
another
restaurant,
but
you
know
there's
a
green
wall
and
a
couple
of
restaurants
and
we
had
vision
the
green
wall
in
our
lobby.
We
have
canopy
trees,
we
have
shrubs,
we
have
grasses,
we
have
stones,
we
have
pavers
the
11
feet
behind
the
site
will
be
sod.
One
thing
that
we
would
advocate
was
like
a
doggy
station
where
we
would
provide
bags.
M
We
would
actually
take
a
DNA
sample
of
the
dog
to
make
sure
that
any
of
the
fecal
would
be
picked
up
and
if
not
the
tenant
would
be
fined
at
the
second
time
they
would
be
expelled.
We
have
the
utmost
care
to
protect
the
site,
the
neighborhood,
and
we
think
the
amenities
are
around
fuller
park
and
the
walkability
of
that
area
and
to
be
really
lean
on
the
building
side.
We
do
want
to
be
cautious
and
thoughtful
and
I
think
we
are
okay.
H
Thank
you
I'm
curious.
If
this
concept
of
the
grade
change
was
anywhere
in
the
staff
report
or
in
your
application,
anything
because
I
thought
I
reviewed
it
very
carefully
in
this.
The
first
time
I
heard
about
this
and
at
9
foot
this,
which
means
I,
haven't
had
any
time
to
look
at
okay.
What
are
neighboring
properties?
What's
the
great
change
there?
How
normal
is
this?
How
unique
is
it
how
one
unique
it
is,
it
doesn't
feel
very
unique
and
it
feels
a
little
bit
like
this.
Just
came
in
today.
I,
don't.
M
Think
so,
we've
worked
with
staff
for
probably
14
months
on
this
to
try
to
get
a
concept
that
would
work
well
and
that
would
be
supported
with
the
city
and
we
felt
that
would
be
supported
by
the
neighborhood.
We
didn't
expect
the
backlash
and
we
did
our
very
best
to
also
provide
a
concept
plan
that
would
alleviate
parking
concerns.
M
We
felt
that
we
addressed
that
with
the
actual
concept
and
the
function,
the
design
of
the
building.
It's
also
90
feet
shorter
than
what
it
could
be,
and
it
just
was
the
design
that
would
alleviate
that
great
change
and
I'm.
Sorry
that
it
wasn't
a
focus,
but
that
was
we
thought
we
already
addressed.
That.
H
So
all
that
I
found
in
here
in
your
application
was
the
variance
is
needed
in
order
to
allow
the
development
of
23
apartment
units
on
the
property.
Without
the
adjustments
no
practical,
feasible
configuration
of
the
building
can
be
achieved,
nor
can
the
parking
for
bicycles,
so
so
I,
don't
think
you
I.
H
F
You
mr.
chair
I
just
wanted
to
note
the
time
and
the
two
items
we
have
in
front
of
us
and
we
haven't
had
a
chance
to
hear
from
the
public
yet
so
I
just
I
think
these
are
great
questions.
I
think
some
of
them
are
going
a
little
bit
farther
afield
than
the
question
of
the
parking
variance.
So
I
don't
want
to
take
away
from
the
time
from
the
applicant
to
share
anything.
They
want
us
to
hear,
but
I
wanted
to
just
check
in
make.
N
A
A
Style
open
the
hearing
to
other
members
of
the
public
would
like
to
address
the
committee
and
to
please
limit
your
comments
to
two
minutes
per
person
and
I'll
be
tracked
on
the
clock
by
the
clerk.
What
any
members
of
the
public
like
to
speak,
you
can
come
up
and
say
your
name.
We
sometimes
that
people
queue
up
behind
the
mic.
Just
in
the
interest
of
time.
I
want
to
make
sure
everybody
has
a
chance
to
speak.
J
Thank
you.
My
name
is
Nancy
Grabow
I
live
at
47,
44
Grand
Avenue
unit
3
in
the
triplex
condominium,
which
shares
the
driver
with
the
proposed
Fullerton
flats
project
I'm
very
concerned
regarding
the
adverse
impact.
A
building
of
this
scale
will
have
on
my
do
daily
overall
enjoyment
of
my
neighboring
home.
The
store
for
a
building
will
greatly
reduce
the
natural
light
to
my
living
spaces
and
significantly
reduce
my
privacy
and
sense
of
security
and
safety,
which
are
key
elements
in
choosing
my
home.
J
This
development
will
essentially
turn
our
driveway
into
an
alleyway,
increasing
the
noise
and
streaming
of
car
headlights
shining
into
my
living
room,
as
well
as
increasing
the
potential
for
for
being
inconvenienced
by
blockages
and
bottlenecks
and
accessing
our
garages.
Pulling
out
of
our
driveway
is
already
dicey
as
it
is,
and
turning
left
is
almost
is
sometimes
almost
nearly
impossible
due
to
being
blinded
by
the
cars
parking
right
up
to
the
edge
of
our
driveway
and.
J
J
J
We
don't
see
similar
properties
most
conforming
to
the
standard
standard,
because
it
simply
isn't
done
due
to
the
inherent
in
packs
which
one's
private
is
privacy,
safety
and
depreciation
ones,
property
value,
please
don't
gamble,
and
my
safety
in
making
me
and
my
family
and
friends
to
guinea
pigs
for
testing
this
dual
property
relationship.
Thank
you
thank.
O
Hello,
my
name
is
Linda
Carlson
I
live
at
47,
28,
Grand,
Avenue
South
one
door
down
from
this
proposed
development,
my
neighbors
and
I
love
Minneapolis.
We
embrace
the
city
where
housing
is
affordable,
where
the
environmental
impact
of
new
design
is
scrutinized,
where
development
adds
to
the
character
of
the
neighborhood
where
developers
are
following
the
law
and
voices
are
heard.
This
proposed
development
which
promises
ten
spots
for
23
units
in
this
particular
location.
O
At
this
moment
in
time,
the
Minneapolis
is
not
adequate,
it
will
stress
our
already
congested
streets
and,
additionally,
by
channeling
all
of
the
nutrition
traffic
in
and
out
of
this
building
across
the
sidewalk.
Instead
of
utilizing
the
alley,
the
developers
would
create
a
dangerous
sidewalk
crossing
one
quarter
block
from
a
popular
neighborhood
park.
So
granted
the
curb
cut
already
exists,
but
the
traffic
across
it
will
increase
exponentially
and
there
is
no
precedent
for
a
transit
incentive
that
is
just
somewhat
close,
but
does
not
actually
meet
their
requirements.
O
17
years
ago,
we
put
an
offer
in
our
current
home,
but
before
we
did
that,
my
husband
sent
me
over
to
fuller
Park
to
sit
for
an
hour
underneath
the
flight
paths.
True
story,
I
was
so
charmed
by
the
park
and
the
families
there
that
I
completely
forgot
to
register
airplane
noise.
I
say
this
only
because
I
learned
recently
than
in
the
1970s,
the
city's
wanted
to
build
a
huge
apartment
complex
on
the
land
that
is
now
fuller,
Park.
O
We
have
an
amazing
Park
and
only
because
committed
citizens
resisted
committed,
neighbors,
organized
and
public
speaking,
as
you
can
tell,
is
way
out
of
my
comfort
zone
I'm
here,
because
I
believe
in
fatica
Lee
that
we
are
in
the
right
as
year-round.
Bikers
my
husband
and
I
fill
our
tiny
one.
Car
garage
with
bikes
winter
bikers
know
that
by
removing
obstacles
to
the
actual
ride
is
paramount.
O
If
a
mid
winter
I
had
to
haul
my
bike
up
from
the
basement
in
order
to
bike
to
work,
I
would
hit
snooze
a
few
more
times
and
opted
to
drive
overcome
by
the
effort
of
it
all
because
we
choose
bikes
instead
of
a
car
in
our
garage.
I
have
no
lower
temperature
limits
for
riding
my
bike.
Ask
my
colleagues,
Eric
and
I
are
bikers
and
car
owners,
and
we
rely
on
access
to
street
parking.
I'm
gonna
say
that
again
we
rely
on
street
parking
because
we
are
bikers.
O
P
My
name
is
Denise
Takeshita
and
I
live
at
47:37.
Harriet
Avenue
I
have
over
20
years
of
experience
in
riding
the
bus
in
this
neighborhood.
This
project
is
being
presented
as
if
it
has
excellent
access
to
frequent
transit,
but
merely
saying
that
doesn't
make
it
true.
You
really
need
to
look
at
the
facts.
This
area
only
has
frequent
transit
to
downtown
and
to
the
yule
during
rush
hour
personally,
I
don't
like
to
drive
I
would
love
to
be
able
to
rely
on
transit
but
I.
P
Don't
always
work
8:00
to
5:00
and
I
go
to
client
sites
that
are
all
over
the
Twin
Cities,
sometimes
I
Drive
to
the
wedge,
where
I
know,
I
can
wait
just
a
few
minutes
to
catch
a
bus
that
actually
does
have
frequent
transit
service.
Midday
I've
looked
at
this
into
taking
the
bus
to
clients
and
Maple
Grove
in
Eden
Prairie.
But,
to
be
honest,
it
just
wasn't
practical.
Another
example
is
our
neighbor
Jane
who's,
a
college
student
at
Augsburg?
It
takes
her
to
buses
in
almost
90
minutes
each
way.
P
Q
Thank
you,
hello.
My
name
is
Alma
ravine
before
I
get
to
my
prepared
notes.
I
just
want
to
note
that
I
may
have
misunderstood
by
god.
I
was
a
bit
confused
by
the
architect
and
Josh's
replies,
considering
the
fact
that
the
original
reason,
the
original
answer
for
the
parking
had
to
do
with
with
affordable
housing
and
being
green,
but
when
they
replied
and
they
explained
their
process
of
thinking,
they
actually
said
that
they
started
out
by
wanting
as
much
parking
as
possible,
but
to
other
restrictions
could
not
cannot
make
that
happen.
Q
So
I'm
a
bit
confused
by
that,
but
I
may
have
misunderstood
to
my
prepared
notes.
I
just
want
to
say,
as
you
maybe
can
tell
by
my
name,
oh
by
the
way
I'm
from
the
adjacent
property
up
for
73
to
Grand
Avenue
South,
as
you
can
tell
from
my
name
I'm
not
from
around
here
I,
actually
come
from
Haifa
Israel
a
few
years
back,
I
found
out
with
the
woman
from
Minnesota
who
brought
me
back
and
moved
me
to
to
Minnesota.
Q
She
owned
an
apartment
and
she
chose
it
because
it
was
a
quaint,
quiet,
residential
area
that
was
still
within
city
limits
and
did
not
provide
that
cement
to
feel
that
she
felt
was
in
the
city
about
three
years
ago.
She
moved
me
back
into
this
apartment,
and
the
community
was
amazing,
as
we
moved
in
people
offered
to
help
us
move,
and
one
person
went
as
far
enough
as
to
offer
to
teach
me
to
drive
in
the
snow.
They
were
incredibly
welcoming
and
made
me
feel
at
home.
Q
Q
There
will
be
a
dramatic
change
to
the
quaint
and
quiet
neighborhood,
as
we
are
possibly
more
than
doubling
in
the
number
of
residents
on
the
ball.
I
will
no
long
enjoyed
the
same.
Sunlight
I'm,
truthfully
concerned
with
other
matters
that
are
all
speculation,
such
as
increased
potential
crime,
a
lot
of
people
visiting
the
area.
We
talked
about
Amazon
boxes,
all
that
stuff.
Those
are
concerns,
but
they
are
speculation,
time's
up.
I'm.
Sorry
excuse
excuse
my
sentimental
remarks,
but
let's
be
realistic.
Q
We
are
talking
about
people's
homes
and
people's
lives
where
they
spend
time
with
their
family
where
they
come
back
home
every
day
they
eat
their
meals
and
they
sleep.
It
is
not
a
matter
to
be
treated
lightly.
We
cannot
assume
that,
because
we've
seen
positive
change
from
from
reduced
parking
in
some
places,
what
this
will
have
the
same
effect
as
here.
R
He
said
that
originally
they
plan
to
build
the
building
five
structures
with
a
whole
floor
of
parking
and
from
my
memory
said
that
he
went
to
the
Planning
Commission
and
they
said.
Oh,
no.
No,
no,
don't
that's
not
a
good
idea.
Don't
build
the
extra
floor
and
I
asked
him
about
there
why
he
needed
the
less
parking
and
he
said
what
we're
gonna
have
ten
bike
stones
and
he
said:
well,
we
you
know
the
Greenway
buildings.
They
you
know
they
don't
need.
R
The
extra
parking
and
I
tried
to
explain
to
him
that
you
can't
compare
a
greenway
apartment,
building
to
a
building,
that's
being
built
in
our
neighborhood,
because
with
the
bus
routes
that
are
available,
they're,
not
comparable
to
the
public
transit
that
is
available
around
the
Greenway,
my
son,
my
oldest
son.
We
were
in
a
triple
rollover,
car
accident
and
he
was
too
afraid
to
drive
for
quite
a
while,
and
he
decided
that
he
wanted
to
use
the
public
transportation
he
was
going
to
school
at
Normandale.
He
worked
in
Edina.
R
I
know
it
is
not
an
efficient
bus
system
if
you
are
not
going
to
downtown
if
you're
not
going
to
uptown,
if
you're
not
going
to
you
most
people
who
decide
to
move
into
our
neighborhood
I'm,
not
going
to
choose
bikes
as
their
primary
form
of
transportation,
and
when
you
calculate
how
many
cars
are
going
to
be
in
a
building
like
this
you're
going
to
want
to
take
the
number
of
units
and
multiply
it
by
at
least
two
and
this
I
have
to
say
this
I'm
sorry
make
it
quick.
It's
grantee.
R
S
Today,
is
actually
my
23rd
anniversary
and
living
in
the
neighborhood
I
purchased
my
home
in
Halloween
1996,
good
regulations.
Thank
you.
My
dad
actually
grew
up
in
Minneapolis
saw
nor
sight.
Actually,
as
his
father
did
as
well,
but
I
want
to
reiterate
what
my
sister
was
saying.
Quickly.
Cuz
she
ran
out
of
time
was
a
Grand.
Avenue
is
a
snow
emergency
route
and
the
last
several
winters.
We
have
had
parking
restrictions,
I'm
parking
only
one
side
of
the
street,
but
on
Grand
Avenue,
it's
an
old
parking
on
the
side
at
all.
So
what
missing?
S
All
these,
the
only
going
out
and
having
23
spots
for
the
23
tenants
and
the
fact
that
you
have
studio
apartments,
single
bedrooms,
double
bedrooms
unit,
triples
that's
more
cars
and
can
be
accommodated,
so
it
will
be
a
nightmare
during
the
winter
and
our
last
winters
have
been
not
so
good,
so
this
will
be
a
burden
upon
the
neighborhood.
The
second
point
is
this:
building
does
not
fit
being
in
the
middle
of
a
block
in
the
middle
of
this
neighborhood.
S
Now
in
terms
of
thinking
outside
the
box,
47th
and
Nikola
Tommy
land
has
an
abandoned
their
property,
and
if
the
neighboring
one
was
purchased,
it
would
be
an
ideal
location
for
a
structure
of
multiple
florists,
because
there
already
is
a
precedence
in
other
buildings,
Nicollet
that
hi
and
so
a
very
good
compromise
to
putting
an
unaffordable
housing
in
this
neighborhood
with
just
a
few
blocks
away.
So
thank
you
for
your
time
and
I
hope
you
know
reveal
this
variance.
Yep.
T
U
Stasia
Johnson
Steinhagen
I've
lived
in
Tangletown
23
years
and
raised
a
couple:
young
adults
there
I
think
I'm
the
resident
that
Josh
wants
in
that
building,
so
I'll,
say:
I
work
from
home,
I
work,
an
SL
in
the
st.
Louis
Park
I
have
a
side
hustle
in
Uptown,
I
own
property.
There
miss
bender,
I
bike
and
drive
a
Prius
to
work
because
I
care
about
the
environment
in
my
health
and
because
the
bus
can't
get
me
there
not
reasonably.
U
My
kids
drove
a
car
or
rideshare
to
their
high
school
sports
and
events,
because
the
bus
couldn't
get
them
there
at
all
and
certainly
not
reasonably
if
it
could
and
they
went
to
school.
Downtown
I've
lived
in
Chicago,
Seattle,
San
Francisco,
where
I
use
public
transport
predominantly
and
I
still
had
a
car.
As
do
my
family
members
who
still
live
there.
I
have
homesteaded
and
rented
a
duplex
in
the
uptown
district
for
almost
30
years
and
I've.
Seen
density
done
well,
I've
seen
it
not
done
well
and
I've.
U
Seen
on
the
transit
system
come
so
perhaps
at
some
time
that
will
happen
in
our
neighborhood,
but
we
have
an
r5
Island.
We
are
talking
just
so
those
of
you
who
haven't
been
there.
This
is
an
r5
block,
that's
it
among
single
residential
I'm,
not
sure.
If
we're
gonna
get
that,
but
perhaps
one
day
our
terrific
r5
Island
will
have
been
bought
up
and
transitioned
into
a
row
of
higher
density
buildings
where
the
residents
call
for
that
transit
and
the
lord
of
the
possibility
of
fewer
cars.
We
all
welcome
that.
U
But
you
know
what
each
of
every
one
of
those
buildings
will
likely
be
built
in
the
style
of
the
2040
plan
has
bringing
the
best
of
the
past
into
the
denser
future
single
lot:
lower
storey
buildings
and
moderate
density,
not
a
twenty-three
unit.
Two
lot
four-story
building,
so
I
want
to
be
clear
that
I
think
if
we
hold
up
this
two
variants
and
this
building
is
built,
this
r5
neighbourhood
will
likely
never
have
another
one
of
these
buildings
on
its
block
and
it
will
stand
out
like
a
ginormous,
sore
thumb
and
I.
U
N
N
You
know
we
we've
been
the
Planning
Commission
approved
this
meeting.
My
wife
and
my
son
had
some
serious
conversations
about
you
know.
Do
we
want
to
stick
around
for
this
nonsense
or
not,
and
we've
made
the
decision
if
this
gets
approver
to
move
this
building
right
on
top
of
us
is
forever
gonna
change
the
livability
of
our
home
and
changed
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
It's
just
not
something
we
want
to
be
a
part
of
jazz
Benson
to
you.
N
That's
you
know
he's
come
forward
to
us
to
kind
of
work
on
some
of
the
issues
at
hand
with
the
driveway
and
so
forth.
Well,
he
didn't
come
forward
to
us.
We
reached
out
to
him
with
the
understanding
that
inevitably
it
sounds
like
this
is
gonna
pass.
We
hope
it
doesn't
pass.
We
want
you
to
make
the
right
decision.
N
Josh
says
he's
working
with
us
to.
You
know,
figure
out
snow
removal,
yet
he
doesn't
do
anything
with
the
property.
We
have
right
now
his
he's
been
sharing
that
driveway
since
August
of
2018
and
has
done
nothing
to
approach
us
in
sharing
the
financial
responsibility
of
that
driveway.
We
I
find
it
interesting
that
it's
come
up
to.
Josh
now
wants
to
move
these
buildings
because
that's
in
his
heart,
yet
the
seedbed
staff
reports
to
the
states
specifically
that
these
buildings
are
gonna,
be
destroyed.
N
So
it
seems
like
that's
a
new
development
as
well
through
this
whole
process,
I'm
just
I'm,
just
a
bewildered
as
to
how
the
city
can
you
know,
pick
and
choose
what
laws
it
wants
to
follow
and
which
ones
that
wants
to
bend
or
just
ignore
all
together.
It
just
I
had
more
trust
in
my
in
my
leaders
than
what
I'm
seeing
unfold
right
now,
so
please
I
mean
do
what's
right
for
the
city
of
Minneapolis
and
oppose
and
deny
this
variance.
V
Good
morning
my
name
is
Michael
Reid,
my
husband
and
I
live
at
47
49
Grand
Avenue.
We
have
owned
the
building
since
1978
and
it
became
our
residence
in
1995.
We
purchase
our
duplex
with
retirement
in
mind
to
make
it
our
permanent
home.
We
brought
in
the
area
because
it
was
secure
neighborhood
with
the
urban
feel
without
being
overcrowded.
He
had
public
transportation
and
was
close
to
work.
When
I
sought
the
definition
of
what
zoning
was.
V
It
was
a
find
as
a
law
that
provide
for
separate
commercial
and
residential
districts
with
the
use
of
the
property
within
each
district
to
be
reasonable,
reasonably
uniform.
When
I
learned,
what
a
variance
is
it
states
that
variance
can
only
be
issued
if
it
does
not
change
the
essential
character
of
a
neighborhood,
and
it
cannot
adversely
impact
neighbors.
Our
block
consists
of
single-family
homes,
plus
two
plexuses
and
four
flexes.
If
he
walked
on
grand
to
Lake
Street,
you
will
find
similar
buildings
all
along
the
way.
V
If
you
walk
west
on
Harriet
and
Garfield
in
east
along
Pleasant
in
Pillsbury,
you
will
find
similar
structures.
A
23
unit.
Four-Story
building
will
change
the
character
of
this
neighborhood
neighborhood
forever.
It
will
adversely
impact
me
in
decreasing
my
ability
to
rent
our
lower
unit
plus
could
decrease
my
property
value
bill
and
I
lived
in
New
York
City
for
16
years,
and
we
loved
it.
It
is
a
great
place
to
live.
I
am
a
not
against
density.
V
If
it
is
done
correctly,
this
development
is
being
pushed
through,
even
as
a
city
council
has
approved
2040
under
the
guise
of
solving
the
housing
shortage.
Well,
the
can't
console
can
still
help
solve
the
housing
shortage
by
asking
the
developer
to
build
a
smaller
unit
and
perhaps
57%
less
parking
than
the
law
requires.
V
Here
in
the
last
40
years,
we
chose
to
invest
in
Minneapolis
because
we
trust
in
its
leaders
and
it's
a
sense
of
fairness.
Please
do
not
put
betray
our
trust
and
do
your
job
listen
to
all
gods,
who
are
taxpayers
and
homeowners
in
this
neighborhood.
It
is
your
vote,
but
please
bear
in
mind
that
we
will
have
to
live
with
your
decision.
Thank.
W
Good
morning
my
name
is
Eugenio.
Mckinney
originally
came
from
Argentina
live
in
south
Minneapolis
for
19
years,
and
I
think
that
understand
that,
sometimes
being
the
first
one
to
to
come
through
what
what
the
city
vision
is
for
the
future
I
think
that
I
understand
and
I
hear
that
the
concerns
of
the
neighbors,
but
the
reality
is
like
we
want
to
open
up
our
neighborhood
too.
We
want
to
be
open.
W
We
want
diversity,
we
want
people
that
realities
today
cannot
afford
to
live
in
our
neighborhood,
which
is
precious
and
we
all
love
it
and
we
all
take
very
good
care
of
it
unless
projects
like
this
take
place,
so
I
think
I.
Welcome
that
the
opportunity
for
for
new
people
to
come
into
our
neighborhood
and
the
reality
is
I
I,
don't
think,
is
necessarily
fair
to
blame
it
on
the
developer.
W
For
all
the
growing
pains
that
the
city
has
addressing
issues
such
as
transportation,
it's
not
removal
I
think
that
we
will
sort
those
out
as
they
come,
but
the
reality
is
I.
Think
that
opening
the
neighborhood
to
others
is
I.
Think
it's
quite
it's
quite
a
great
idea
and
the
only
way
some
people
can
leave
in
our
great
neighborhood.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
X
You,
my
name
is
Dennis
gray
and
I'm.
A
lawyer
I
represent
Betsey
Brooks
who
lives
at
4708
grand.
She
couldn't
be
here,
I'm,
not
here,
to
talk
about
the
law.
That's
been
adequately
addressed,
but
I
just
did
sort
of
a
little
investigation
for
the
last
two
weeks
for
seven
days,
I
was
at
I
drove
down
and
counted
the
cars
parking
on
both
sides
of
grand
between
47th
and
48th.
X
Every
day,
every
parking
space
was
taken
on
the
street
58
cars
every
morning
between
6:30
and
7:00.
I
know
I'm
there
frequently
at
night,
I
know
how
little
parking
there
is
at
night.
I
was
interested
in
learning
how
little
parking
there
is
in
the
morning.
There
isn't
any
on
the
street
now
to
add.
Another
building,
apparently,
are
going
to
add
another
building
23
units,
but
to
reduce
the
parking
I
mean.
X
If
you
were
going
to
do
anything,
you
should
increase
the
parking
required
by
23
units,
not
reduced
the
parking,
so
it
has
a
significant
impact
is
building
reducing
the
number
of
parking
spaces
has
a
significant
negative
impact
on
the
native
the
neighbors.
As
far
as
the
ability
to
park
on
the
street
Paige
thank.
Y
Good
morning
right,
my
name
is
Jeremy
really
I've
lived
with
my
wife
and
family
at
47
17-grand
for
almost
40
years,
I
appreciate
you
hearing
us
I'm
very
concerned
about
this
development
and
specifically
in
regard
to
the
parking
and
busing
issue.
I've
been
a
bike
rider
and
transit
user
for
close
to
15
years.
I
don't
have
a
car
of
my
own
I've
relied
on
public
transit
to
get
to
my
job
in
st.
Louis
Park
for
a
number
of
years,
and
it
was
not
efficient.
Y
Y
It's
uphill
both
directions
to
the
most
frequent
transit,
Nicollet
and
lyndale
or
brandt,
and
it
will
affect
people
who
have
mobility
issues
or,
as
there
are
in
our
neighborhood
people
approaching
their
elderly
years,
I'm
concerned
about
that
it
doesn't
fit
the
incentive
it's
inconvenient.
You
have
to
rule
in
regard
to
those
regulations.
I
appreciate
your
time.
Thank
you.
Z
Good
morning
my
name
is
9
Amol
and
I
live
at
4701
Harriet
Avenue,
South
I've
lived
there
for
45
years.
I
also
have
been
a
principal
and
a
teacher
in
Minneapolis
for
30
years
and
I'd
like
to
speak
to
you
this
morning.
From
my
role
as
a
principal
in
Minneapolis
for
30
years,
I
looked
out
for
the
safety
of
children.
Z
Safety
is
number
one
in
my
mind
for
children.
What
I'd
like
to
talk
to
you
about
is
the
great
change
on
this
particular
piece
of
property.
The
great
change
is
actually
more
like
fort
Jeane
feet.
The
plans
call
for
a
ten-foot
retaining
wall
in
the
back
of
this
building,
with
an
11
space
or
11-foot
space
between
the
back
of
the
building
and
this
10-foot
retaining
wall.
The
fact
of
the
matter
is
that
this
property
has
a
4-foot
retaining
wall
that
goes
along
the
shared
driveway
all
the
way
to
the
sidewalk.
Z
The
proposed
way
to
handle
the
great
change
right
now
is
to
put
another
4-foot
retaining
wall
along
the
sidewalk,
so
it
would
be
80
feet,
4-foot,
retaining
wall
right,
angled
right
at
the
end
of
the
driveway,
with
another
4-foot.
Retaining
wall
cars
coming
out
of
that
driveway
cannot
see
anything
if
you're
a
car
coming
out
and
you
look
to
the
south.
You
can
see
ease
some
there's
about
11
feet
that
you
can
see
anyone
walking
on
that
Sidewalk.
Z
You
can
see
because
there
are
see-through
balconies
on
that
particular
building,
but
your
car
is
already
4
feet
in
front
of
you
before
you're
going
to
stop
before
you
could
see
anything
to
stop
children
behave,
erratically,
I
know
30
years
worth
of
planning
for
children,
children
behave
erratically.
So
if
you
look-
and
you
want
to
turn
to
the
north,
someone
said
they
just
don't
turn
north,
which
makes
a
whole
lot
of
sense.
You
don't
/
north
from
that
piece
of
property
from
that
driveway,
because
you
cannot
see
anything.
Z
You
cannot
see
me
it's
totally
blind
and
what
we
have
right
now
is
a
situation
that
will
be
a
four
foot
pertaining
while
you're
sitting
in
a
car.
You
can't
see
over
the
four
foot
potato.
You
can't
see
you
in
the
front.
You
can't
see
because
there's
vans
parked
here,
you
just
can't
see
we
are
a
neighborhood
with
children.
Many
many
children
go
to
polar
park.
This
is
a
unsafe
condition.
It's
an
unsafe
design.
My.
A
Alright,
I'm
just
gonna
do
it,
but
if
you
also
not
saying
you
know
the
further
discussion
I'm
going
to
move
approval
of
the
appeal
of
the
approve
of
the
appeal
I'll
see,
if
there's
any
discussion,
we
are
in
kind
of
a
time
crunch,
but
I
will
just
kind
of
defer
to
my
earlier
comments.
I
really
feel
like
there's
a
lot
more.
That
could
have
been
done
with
this
and
it
is
a
very
clear-cut
issue
that
does
not
meet
the
requirements
for
the
trans
variants.
I'm
gonna
put
my
motion:
councilmember
Goodman.
Mr.
E
Chair
I'll,
first
ask
staff
to
direct
findings
of
fact
to
support
those
decisions.
Should
it
happen
that
way,
I'd
want
to
make
sure
that
we
note
specifically,
that
this
variance
simply
does
not
meet
the
criteria
that
we
are
supposed
to
be
reviewing,
including
no
practical
difficulty
in
nothing
specific
with
regard
to
the
site
to
justify
this
kind
of
variance
and
I
appreciate
your
time
and
allowing
everyone
to
speak.
Thank.
A
You
I'm
not
seeing
any
other.
Some
eye
has
been
moved,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
all
as
opposed
to
say
no
guys
have
it
and
the
motion
carries
next
up.
We
will
take
the
discussion
items.
We
will
now
hand
all
numbered
items,
9
and
10
together.
Item
number
9
is
an
ordinance
relating
to
three
unit
buildings
and
lower
intensity
districts
that
related
to
development
standards.
I,
remember:
10
is
an
ordinance
related
to
lock
combinations
and
lower
intensity
districts
and
we'll
begin
with
a
brief
staff
presentation.
A
AA
Ordnance
is
being
brought
forward
right
now,
the
first
to
allow
up
to
three
unit
buildings
and
the
lower
intensity
districts,
along
with
a
related
development
standards
such
as
building
bulk
lot
size
for
card
yards
and
setbacks.
The
direction
that
was
given
us
this
was
to
allow
these
within
the
same
building
scale
and
size
allowed
for
currently
allowed
for
single-family
dwellings,
the
second
being
the
limit,
unlock
combinations
and
lower
intensity
districts
with
the
idea
with
that
is
to
maintain
the
small-scale
contract
or
context
of
these
areas.
AA
The
main
policy
that
supports
blowing
up
to
three
units
is
the
first
policy
related
to
access
to
housing
and
the
kind
of
the
idea
with
this.
The
policy
is
to
allow
more
housing
for
significant
population
growth,
that's
expected
and
for
people
who
are
already
living
in
the
city,
and
this
policy
supports
eliminating
disparities,
creating
more
residents
and
jobs
and
affordable
housing
and
access
to
hardest
housing,
as
well
as
complete
neighborhoods.
AA
So
currently,
what's
allowed.
Duplexes
are
first
allowed
in
the
r2
district
and
triplexes
are
first
allowed
in
our
three
district
with
the
amendment.
Duplexes
and
triplexes
would
be
allowed
in
r1
through
r2
b.
Dwellings
with
four
more
units
would
first
be
11
r3,
and
the
map
on
the
right
shows
the
areas.
That
would
be
that
this
amendment
would
affect.
AA
Maintaining
the
small-scale
building
size
is
accomplished
in
a
couple
of
ways
and
the
first
being
subjecting
the
duplexes
and
triplexes
to
the
height
same
height,
a
fairer
lot
size,
lot,
coverage,
impervious
surface
and
yard
requirements
that
currently
apply
to
single
family
dwellings,
and
this
would
apply
in
the
are
ones
who
are
to
the
districts.
The
second
way
to
accomplish
maintaining
the
small
size
is
lemonade.
Lot
combination,
specifically
through
a
proposed
next
door,
lot
size
requirement
that
would
apply,
as
shown
in
the
table,
the
r1
to
r4
districts,
as
well
as
the
Erawan
districts.
AA
AA
I'mso
staff
is
working
on
some
details
for
an
evaluation
framework
and
will
be
reporting
back
to
them
on
how
we're
going
to
do
that
and
then
report
regularly
on
the
data
that
becomes
available.
This
is
an
addition
to
the
work
that
long-range
planning
will
be
doing
on
tracking
goals
or
how
they're
being
accomplished
once
the
comp
plan
is
adopted.
AA
There
are
a
couple
of
things
that
changed
since
the
Planning
Commission
meeting
in
the
ordinance
as
we
found
an
error
and
fix
that
that's
referenced
in
the
RCA,
and
also
we
incorporated
effective
dates
for
each
of
the
ordinances
to
coincide
with
the
adoption
of
the
2040
plan.
So
that
is
my
very
brief
overview.
I
can
take
any
questions.
Thank.
E
You
mr.
chair
I,
don't
have
any
questions.
I
just
want
to
thank
you
for
making
this
easy
to
understand
for
taking
time
to
brief
everyone
who
requested
a
briefing
of
which
I
did
and
to
figure
out
a
way
to
kind
of
take
some
of
the
irrational
concern
out
of
the
way
I'm
essentially
I
describe
it
as
the
boxes,
the
box,
and
we
are
not
picky
about
how
many
families
live
in
the
box,
but
you
can't
be
it
can't
be
bigger
than
the
box.
E
That's
there,
and
so
I
think
that
my
description
is
probably
too
simplistic,
but
when
I
asked,
if
that
was
true
and
I
got
a
yes
from
both
the
chair
and
you,
it
seems
like
that's
a
very
simple
way
for
people
to
understand
it.
So
I
wanted
to
thank
you
for
helping
figure
this
out
in
a
very
truthful
and
transparent
way.
Thank.
G
F
Thank
You
mr.
chair
I'll
go
ahead
and
move
approval
of
the
item
maybe
wanted
to
briefly
comment
on
a
couple
of
quick
things.
First
is
I,
think
there's
another
piece
of
this
which
is
moving
for
units
of
the
one
two
fours,
and
so
four
units
will
now
be
treated
more
like
larger
multifamily,
which
I
think
is
really
a
good
change,
and
we
do
have
some
work
to
do
on
figuring
out
how
to
guide
the
design
and
zoning.
F
For
those
you
know
slightly
large
or
multi,
but
still
very
small
multi-family
buildings,
but
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
treat
one
two
three
units
differently
than
four
and
above
I
also
just
wanted
to
thank
you
for
making
it
so
easy
to
work
on
this.
It's
a
very
simple
change
and
its
effect,
but
it
was
very
complicated
in
the
details,
as
you
can
see
through
all
of
the
different
changes
that
were
required
to
achieve
this
relatively
small.
F
You
know
in
terms
of
its
technical
approach.
Change
I
did
also
want
to
note
that
councilmember
Palmisano
had
offered
a
zoning
code
change
in
2014
related
to
one
then
one
to
four
unit
buildings.
There's
been
some
ideas
coming
from
staff
planning,
commissioners
that
is
about
looking
at
you
know,
increasing
the
point
changing
the
point
system
that
were
using
now,
which
would
be
a
fine
till
one
to
three
unit
buildings.
F
We
talked
about
incorporating
some
of
those
changes
into
this
ordinance,
but
because
she
had
done
so
much
stakeholder
engagement
and
so
much
conversations
about
that
change
back
then
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
had
its
own
discussion,
so
she
is
likely
to
be
bringing
forward
something
that
incorporates
those
recommendations
from
staff
and
others
in
the
near
future,
and
that
would
be
looking
again
at
the
point
system,
that's
required
for
one
with
four
unit
buildings
in
our
city
and
and
essentially
strengthening
them
and
requiring
a
higher
level
of
design.
Thank
you
thank.
A
AB
Morning,
mr.
chair
committee,
members,
my
name
is
paul
mawkish
and
the
manager
community
planning
we
joined
in
a
minute
by
jason
wooden
berg
manager
of
code
development,
and
we
will
talk
fast.
Last
week,
the
city
council
voted
to
place
the
minneapolis
2040
comprehensive
plan
into
a
On
January
1st.
We
heard
from
several
council
members
at
the
committee
of
the
whole
last
week
about
the
importance
of
carrying
the
planning
work
through
to
implementation
and
to
show
our
work
in
progress
along
the
way.
AB
In
fact,
the
council
formalized
this
expectation
in
December
of
last
year
with
the
direction
to
staff
to
provide
regular
updates
on
the
implementation
and
evaluation
of
the
comprehensive
plans,
goals,
policies
and
action.
Steps
to
the
racial
equity
subcommittee,
with
a
particular
emphasis
on
prioritizing
raise
equity
commitments
in
the
plan.
AB
The
first
of
that
update
that
first
up,
it
happened
last
spring
and
at
that
update,
the
long-range
planning
director
have
been
worthington,
provided
this
handout
that
you
see
on
your
screen,
showing
some
of
the
interconnected
efforts
underway
currently
that
our
serving
has
been
used
for
comprehensive
plan
implementation.
The
breadth
of
these
initiatives
touches
the
work
of
most
council
committees
and
city
departments
carrying
forward
the
interdepartmental
coordination
that
took
place
during
the
drafting
of
minneapolis
2040
and
just
as
staff
made
a
concerted
effort
to
show
our
work
during
the
comprehensive
planning
process.
AB
We
also
understand
the
importance
of
tracking
the
city's
progress
toward
achieving
Minneapolis
2040
goals
going
forward.
So
when
the
plan
goes
into
effect
in
January,
there
will
be
a
new
section
of
the
minneapolis
2040
website,
dedicated
to
displaying
an
initial
set
of
metrics
that
will
be
updated
regularly.
This
information,
combined
with
research
that
we
expect
to
be
conducted
by
external
partners,
will
help
us
to
evaluate
the
effectiveness
of
planned
policy
commitments
and
implementation
actions
and
will
inform
any
planned
changes
on
course,
corrections
along
the
way
that
will
help
achieve
plan
goals.
AB
AC
Thank
You
committee
members,
as
you
know,
some
of
the
key
regulatory
changes
that
are
necessary
early
on
in
the
process
are
already
underway,
with
some
that
are
largely
completed.
So
many
apples,
20/40
itself,
of
course,
has
been
acted
on
by
the
council
with
an
effective
date
of
January
1st.
Just
minutes
ago,
you
acted
on
regulations
related
to
one
two
three
unit
buildings,
as
well
as
a
lot
combinations
and
then
led
by
Andrea
Brennan.
We
are
working
across
departments
to
work
on
a
permanent
inclusionary
zoning
ordinance.
AC
The
public
hearing
for
that
will
take
place.
November
18th,
with
HPD
and
znp
review
of
both
that
ordinance
and
unified
housing
policy
changes
in
early
December.
All
of
those
things
will
come
together
with
an
effective
date
of
January
1st.
You
might
recall
that
this
committee
reviewed
and
approved
a
text.
Amendment
work
plan,
zoning
code
text
network
plan
a
few
months
ago,
back
in
July,
that's
guiding
our
early
work
on
Minneapolis
2040
regulatory
implementation.
AC
The
next
major
2040
related
amendment
that
will
be
working
on
will
be
to
create
zoning
districts
that
implement
the
plans,
built
form,
regulations
or
guidance.
So
those
will
govern
things
like
building
height
floor
area,
setback,
setbacks,
etc.
We've
laid
out
a
very
aggressive
timeline
to
draft
and
map
those
changes
over
the
course
of
probably
the
next
eight
to
ten
months.
The
approved
work
plan
has
a
number
of
both
technical
and
policy
items
on
it.
AC
AC
We
expect
that
there
will
likely
be
a
steering
committee
that
guides
this
work
and,
of
course,
land
use
and
regular
and
zoning
regulations
are
simply
one
piece
of
minneapolis
2040s
implementation,
so
the
this
work
will
across
the
enterprise,
both
in
in
terms
of
land
use,
as
well
as
other
city
initiatives
that
will
that
will
work
toward
implementation
of
minneapolis
2040.
With
that
I'll
stand
for
any
questions.
Thank.
F
So
we
know
that
in
some
ways
we
have
a
sense
of
urgency
to
align
our
zoning
code
with
the
plans
guidance
and
to
eliminate
those
inconsistencies
for
neighbors
for
landowners
for
developers
for
policy
makers.
But
on
the
other
hand,
we
have
a
lot
of
very
ambitious
goals
related
to
race,
equity
and
climate
change
and
wanting
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
missing
an
opportunity
to
you
know
really
get
things
right.
F
Knowing
that
you
know
things
will
evolve
over
time,
but
you
know
really
not
wanting
to
you
know,
take
a
leap
into
zoning
changes
without
making
sure
that
we
are
really
centered
and
that
race,
equity,
climate
change
with
bigger
goals.
Can
you
talk
about
that
and
how
staff
is
approaching?
That
balance
sure.
X
H
Well,
I,
don't
want
to
delay
things
too
much,
but
I
have
kind
of
a
specific
process.
Question
it's
come
up
in
from
neighborhood
community
folks
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I'm
clear
on
this.
So
as
we're
moving
forward
with
these
map
changes
and
the
zoning
changes
were
bound
to
have
people
who
come
up
and
say:
oh
that's
what
the
comp
plan
said.
We
were
going
to
be
in
this
law.
H
This
block
face
I'm,
not
sure
we
think
that's
the
right
fit
for
councilmembers
might
come
up
and
say:
oh
I
thought
it
was
i3
and
it's
i2
I
want
to
make
sure
it's
i3
if
we
wanted
to
do
that,
would
that
change
in
that
amendment
also
have
to
go
to
the
Met
Council
for
approval,
so
we'd
be
talking
about
actually
amending
our
comp
plan,
or
is
that
something
we'll
have
some
flexibility
to
do
in
terms
of
one
we're
redrawing
the
map
and
and
changing
the
zoning
councilmember.
AC
Gordon
good
question,
certainly
our
intent
first
of
all
is
to
not
sort
of
relitigate
the
policies
at
Minneapolis
2040
through
the
implementation
process,
and
the
plan
is
much
more
clear
and
detailed
and
a
parcel
by
parcel
basis
than
previous
comprehensive
plans
have
been
so
sometimes
that's
going
to
guide
us
in
a
very
clear
direction
and
where
neighbors
feel
as
though
that
clear
direction
should
be
revisited.
But,
yes,
we
would
have
to
go
back
through
an
amendment
process
that
would
involve
Metropolitan
Council
review.
Of
course,
there
are
cases
where
there's
more
great
area.
H
A
F
F
So
I
think
this
is
a
good
approach
to
some
of
these
really
important
technical
things
that
are
coming
up,
that
mr.
Wittenberg
I've
talked
about.
Thank
you
for
them
and
then
yeah.
But
if
you'd
like
mr.
chair,
we
can
take
all
of
those
staff
directions.
My
I
have
a
staff
direction
that
is
also
in
front
of
all
of
us.
F
This
is
specific
to
an
issue
of
investing
in
transportation
infrastructure
in
places
that
are
experiencing
growth,
especially
those
that
are
already
dense
or
in
places
that
are
changing
a
lot
like
the
place
that
we
just
heard
about
earlier
today
and
I
think
we
can't
we're
not
planning
to
bring
a
staff
direction.
I,
don't
think
about
every
single
specific
topic
that
this
group
will
be
taking
on
and
that
staff
is
in
many
cases
already
working
on,
but
because
this
is
multi,
departmental
and
really
collaborative.
F
Even
with
external
agencies
like
the
county
and
Metro
Transit,
I
thought
it
was
important
to
just
really
be
clear
that
this
piece
of
integrating
transportation
and
land
use
planning
is
so
important
to
us
as
policymakers,
it's
so
important
to
our
constituents
when
I
hear
from
folks
in
Ward
10,
who
are
generally
supportive
or
accepting
of
new
housing
along
transit.
They
always
ask
me:
when
is
the
transit
coming
when?
Where
are
we?
F
When
are
we
going
to
start
to
see
transit
improvements,
and
these
are
neighborhoods
that
are
already
some
of
the
most
dense
in
the
city
that
are
growing
rapidly?
A
lot
of
neighbors
are
adjusting
to
a
lot
of
change
and
simply
want
to
see
that
commitment
from
the
city
and
our
partners
to
invest
in
the
transportation
access
that
we
are
talking
about
planning
around
so
I
appreciate
the
work.
D
D
Specifically
if
we
have
a
mixed
use,
designation,
which
I
think
was
very
wisely
developed
for
the
2040
plan,
that's
great,
but
the
market
doesn't
always
refuse.
You
know,
respect
the
color-coding
and
might
just
say
it's
not
going
to
be
mixed-use
it'll,
be
one
type
of
use
unless
there's
other
policy
guidance,
prohibitions
that
are
identified
very
specifically
to
balance
out
market
forces
and
our
end
intentions,
and
so
mine
specifically
just
has
to
explore
that
and
come
up
with
in-depth
policies
that
address
market
forces
and
our
intentions
for
mixed
areas
and
appreciate
the
work
to
date.
They.
A
Can
just
appreciate
the
work
of
my
colleagues.
This
is
something
it's
but
20.
40
was
is
a
big
deal
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
get
it
right
now.
I'm
and
I
think
the
full
force
of
the
city
is
committed
to
doing
that
and
I
appreciate
my
colleagues
that
are
really
making
sure
that
our
goals
are
going
to
be
seen
as
this
pull
plan
gets
rolled
out.
A
So
with
that
I'm
going
to
kind
of
move
or
take
a
vote
on
the
staff
directions,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
all
those
posts,
they
know
the
ice
habit
and
those
those
three
strap
directions
start
done.
I
will
also
just
move
and
move
to
receive
and
file
to
update
on
2040,
all
those
in
favor,
say:
aye
aye
opposed,
say
no,
the
ice
have
it
and
the
motion
carries
and
seeing
no
further
business
before
this
committee.
We
are
adjourned.