►
Description
Minneapolis Public Safety & Emergency Management Committee Meeting
A
Good
morning,
everyone
welcome
to
our
regularly
scheduled
public
safety
and
emergency
management
committee.
Today
is
February
20th,
2019
and
I
am
joined
by
council
members,
Jeremiah
Ellison,
councilmember,
Steve,
Fletcher,
council
member
lenay
Palmisano,
and
my
name
is
alundra
Conner
and
I'm.
The
chair
of
this
committee
and
therefore
we
have
a
quorum
for
this
committee
and
we
can
conduct
the
official
business
of
the
City
Council
on
public
safety
and
emergency
management
matters.
A
So
today
we
have
a
an
agenda
that
contains
seven
items
and
before
we
start
I
do
want
to
say
thank
you
so
much
to
all
of
the
council
members
who
were
able
to
make
it
here
today
on
Snowmageddon
I
forget
which
version
this
is
if
it's
like
five
or
six,
not
sure,
but
we
are
very,
very
happy
to
be
able
to
conduct
their
business.
So
we
don't
have
to
push
these
items
out
and
we
do
have
a
very
important
report
on
the
police
body,
worn
camera
program
that
we
have.
So
with
that
our
first
item.
A
Well,
as
you
see,
we
have
the
agenda
here
before
us.
If
there
are
any
questions
or
changes
to
the
agenda,
if
none
all
those
in
favor
of
approving
the
agenda,
please
say
aye
aye,
and
our
first
item
is
to
receive
and
file
a
public
comment.
So
we
typically
have
30
minutes
scheduled
in
our
public
safety
meetings
for
anybody
from
the
public
that
is
interested
in
addressing
the
council
and
any
matters
relating
to
Public
Safety
and
emergency
management.
A
I
do
not
see
any
community
members
here
today
to
speak
to
us,
so
we
shall
just
go
ahead
and
receive
and
file
no
public
comments
for
that
portion
of
the
agenda.
Our
consent
to
items
include
a
contract
authorizing
a
contract
with
SMG
for
bomb
detection
and
911
dispatch
services
at
US,
Bank
Stadium
item
number
three
includes
authorizing
a
contract
with
SMG
for
the
Minneapolis
Police
Department
SWAT
officers
to
provide
extra
security
and
a
tactical
response
during
large-scale
events
at
u.s.
A
Bank
Stadium
item
number
four
is
authorizing
a
contract
with
the
University
of
Minnesota
for
the
Minneapolis
Police
Department
bomb
bomb
detection
at
TCF
stadium
for
football
soccer
and
homecoming
during
the
20
19
year.
Item
number
five
is
the
passage
of
a
resolution.
Accepting
a
gift
from
the
national
network
for
Safe
Communities
at
the
John
Jay
College
for
travel,
related
costs
and
I.
Remember:
six
is
a
authorizing
a
contract
with
the
twins,
Ball
Park
LLC,
for
bomb
detection
at
Target
Field
for
up
to
30
large-scale
events.
A
Any
questions
on
consent
items
looks
like
we're
golden
all
right,
all
those
in
approval
of
the
consent
items,
please
say
aye
aye
and
that
moves
us
on
to
our
one:
a
discussion
item,
which
is
the
2018
fourth-quarter
Minneapolis
Police,
Department
body,
worn
camera
metrics
report
and
if
we
could
have
mr.
Granger,
join
us
and
lead
us
in
this
conversation.
Thank
you.
So
much
for
being
here,
Thank.
B
C
Okay,
these
next
slides
represent
a
comparison
by
percentage
of
the
overall
or
specific,
a
defense
that
required
activation
of
a
body,
worn
camera
and
the
individual
officers
who
arey
equipped
with
a
body
more
camera
and
responded
to
these
incidents.
The
percentage
does
not
include
events
where
an
officer
canceled
off
the
event
before
arriving
and
the
percentages
of
my
month
before
we
get
into
the
specific
results.
I
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
an
anomaly
we
saw
in
the
data
a
couple
of
them
so
one
when
we
were
looking
at
the
data.
C
We
noticed
that
there
were
parking
problem
events
that
had
a
significant
impact.
Two
in
particular
one
was
related
to
a
parking
enforcement
detail,
that's
conducted
in
the
first
Precinct
and
what
we
determined
from
our
analysis
was
54%
of
those
parking
problem.
Incidents
didn't
have
video,
and
what
we
also
learned
was
that
there
was
some
confusion
as
to
whether
video
was
actually
required
for
these
events.
C
At
the
time
after
we
discovered
that
we
clarified
that
with
the
precinct
the
video
was
required,
then,
in
looking
at
the
data
again,
we
noticed
a
similar
effect
was
caused
by
snow
emergencies.
Again,
there
is
more
confusion
as
to
whether
or
not
body
more
camera
was
required.
For
these
events,
we
had
three
snow
emergencies
declared
one
on
january
28th,
one
on
february
7th
and
the
other
on
February
12th
and
more
to
come
with
this
week's
snow
about
75%
of
the
parking
problems
in
January
and
February
of
this
year
appeared
to
be
snow.
C
Emergency
related
again,
we
sent
an
email
to
all
the
officers,
reminding
that
policy
currently
requires
a
PwC
activation
for
these
results,
we're
in
the
process
of
working
on
a
more
practical
way
of
recording
these
events
and
CAD
and
determining
the
best
way
to
document
these
events.
In
the
future
statistics
on
the
following
slides,
where
there
appeared
to
be
an
impact
on
performance
percentages
involving
parking
problems
will
be
presented
in
a
comparison
format.
C
Statistics
excluding
parking
problems,
will
be
presented
in
red
and
before
we
get
into
that,
I
just
wanted
to
just
give
you
some
more
statistics
that
we
found.
There
was
definite
impact
in
October
January
in
February,
as
you
can
see
quite
a
bit
of
impact
in
February,
so
overall
CAD
events
that
required
camera
activation
and
the
officers
with
cameras
that
responded
to
those.
C
As
you
can
see
in
October
when
we
included
parking
problems,
our
percentage
was
at
88
percent
when
we
excluded
89
percent,
a
small
change
in
November,
our
percentage
was
91
percent
overall
December
91%
again
overall
and
then
in
January,
where
the
snow
emergencies
occurred.
If
you
include
parking
problems,
we
were
at
88
percent
when
you
exclude
them
89
percent
and
then
in
February,
a
significant
increase
with
parking
problems,
85
percent
and
without
the
90
percent
percentage.
C
We
looked
at
traffic
law
enforcement
only
and
buying
officers
equipped
with
body
worn
cameras
in
October.
We
were
at
92%
November
94%
in
December
93%
and
as
of
February
13th
we're
at
90%,
and
here
is
the
breakdown
by
precinct.
One
of
the
things
that
I
would
like
to
point
out
is
as
of
February
13th
in
precinct
three,
their
percentage
was
seventy
seven
percent
but
and
I'm
going
to
talk
about
this
in
a
coming
slide.
C
C
Okay
percentage
interpretation:
this
data
should
be
viewed
as
a
snapshot
in
time
as
it
is
updated
daily
when
viewing
partial
month
data
the
numbers
of
cat
events
in
BWC,
video,
maybe
lower,
which
means
any
missing
video
can
have
a
greater
impact
on
the
percentage
for
the
individual
or
precinct.
The
cat
information
is
added
to
the
dashboards
automatically.
C
C
What
we
found
was
officers
were
still
labeling
their
labeling,
their
videos
with
case
number
year,
18,
as
opposed
to
19
just
from
the
switchover
from
18
to
19,
and
when
that,
when
you
take
a
video
that
you
recorded
in
2019,
but
you
label
with
a
2018
case
number,
it
doesn't
match
properly
and
it
appears
as
if
they
don't
have
video
when
in
fact
they
might
videos
weren't
properly
categorized
as
startups
when
they
are,
they
are
excluded.
From
the
missing
case
number
count.
C
C
We
also
found
this
to
be
the
case
with
some
officers
in
training
which
we
have
addressed
with
the
training
unit
and,
as
a
result
of
this
422
audits
were
packaged
with
events
that
appeared
to
need
correction
with
an
average
of
five
potential
issues
per
audit
from
January
in
February
2019
and
sent
out
the
supervisors
on
February
13th
to
ensure
Corrections
were
made
as
part
of
their
return
responses.
We
also
asked
them
to
let
us
know
if
there
were
any
discrepancies
in
the
audit.
C
C
We
did
activation
audits
again.
These
audits
examine
whether
individual
officers
were
activating
their
BW
CS
when
required
for
calls
that
responded
to
data
from
all
three
months
and
quarter.
Four
were
included
in
the
audits
compared
to
our
first
round
of
audits
from
quarter
three,
which
included
data
from
one
of
two
months,
focusing
on
the
month.
That
indicated
the
greatest
need
for
improvement.
The
first
group
of
quarter
for
activation
arts
focused
on
the
lowest
performers,
which
totaled
66
officers
focused
for
this
group
was
to
ensure
immediate
improvement.
C
These
audits
were
sent
out
to
the
precincts
commands
for
action
on
January
11th.
The
second
group
of
quarter
for
activation
audits
focused
on
middle
performers,
which
totaled
110
officers.
The
focus
for
this
group
was
to
ensure
more
consistency
in
they're
BWC
usage.
These
audits
were
sent
out
to
the
precincts
on
February
1st
and
again,
with
this
round
of
audits,
the
auditors
were
directed
to
select
only
cat
events
where
the
officer
was
assigned
when
arrival
time
was
present
and
where
there
was
no
BWC
video
recording
for
the
incident.
The
presumption
was
for
there
was.
C
The
presumption
was
that
most
of
these
calls
should
have
recordings.
No
additional
analysis
was
conducted
at
this
point
by
the
auditors.
This
basic
methodology
was
chosen
because
our
goal
is
to
reach
as
many
officers
as
possible,
who
appeared
to
need
improvement
and
then
the
supervisors,
when
they
get
these
audits,
were
directed
to
review
the
calls
identified
any
audits
and
conduct
any
additional
review
or
inquiry
needed
to
verify
whether
or
not
PwC
video
was
required
for
each
incident,
which
could
include
9-1-1
call
information,
evidence.com
data
police
reports.
C
We
asked
them
to
indicate
on
the
form
whether
they
agreed
or
disagreed
that
there
should
have
been
a
recording.
If
they
disagree,
they
were
required
document
the
basis
of
their
decision.
For
this
round
of
audits,
we
added
we
asked
the
supervisors
to
cite
this:
the
specific
section
of
policy
that
supported
their
disagreement.
We
did
that
because
we
were
noticing,
in
some
of
the
returns,
that
there
were
some
instances
where
people
weren't
clear
what
the
policy
was.
C
So
this
was
a
way
to
ensure
that
there
was
sort
of
a
review
of
the
policy
and
that
learning
would
then
be
passed
on
to
the
officer
who's.
The
subject
that
he
added
if
the
supervisor
determined
that
an
officer
was
not
activating
they're
BWC,
is
required
by
policy
they're
required
to
mentor
the
officer
on
what
the
body
on
what
the
policy
requires
and
to
convey
to
the
office
or
the
expectation
that
change
in
their
BWC
usage
was
needed
immediately
and
then
another
change.
We
added
to
this
round
of
audits.
C
Okay,
our
next
set
of
audits
were
we.
We
did
our
random
sample
of
25
officers
again
for
quarter
4.
It
was
a
random
sample
from
all
the
precincts
of
25
officers,
equipped
with
body
worn
cameras
who
primarily
responded
to
911
calls
from
October
1st
to
December
31st,
a
random
sample
of
10
body,
worn
camera.
Videos
were
selected
for
each
officer
for
qualitative
review.
The
metric
used
metrics
used
were
was
their
full
30-second
pre
event.
Recording
the
deactivation
at
the
conclusion
of
the
call
appeared
to
be
appropriate.
C
C
Some
of
the
patterns
we
observed
when
we
did
these
audits
were
some
pre
event.
Recordings
were
less
than
30
seconds,
but
they
still
began
prior
to
arriving
on
the
call
some
officers
were
activating
their
cameras
after
arriving
on
the
call-
and
both
of
these
points
speak
to
that
increase
in
the
lack
of
a
30-second
free
recording.
There
was
some
unintentional,
partial
or
full
camera
obstructions
from
seat
belts
and
jackets,
and
then
deactivation
occasionally
occurred,
while
the
officer
was
still
on
scene
in
the
call
had
not
completed.
D
You,
madam
chair
commander,
Granger
I'm,
just
curious.
We
have
our
own
just
general
public
understanding
of
when
a
call
is
over.
But
could
you
tell
me
when
per
the
body-worn
camera
policy
when
officially
would
have
call
be
completed
where
an
officer
is
supposed
to
turn
off
their
body
camera?
Is
it
a
certain
signal
it
can
you
can
you
help
us
understand
yeah
how
long
it's
supposed
to
be
on
typically.
C
C
They
leave,
or
the
officer
leaves,
and
the
call
usually
what
we
generally
see
is
it's
it's
an
obvious
ending
to
the
call
like
for
a
traffic
stop.
For
example,
you
know
when
the
officer
has
completed
their
contact
with
the
driver
and
they
pull
away
deactivation
occurs
or
if
the
officer
still
remains
at
the
scene,
maybe
to
write
a
report
and
the
person
that
they
stopped
pulls
away.
They
can
deactivate.
C
C
C
Our
mandatory
mentoring
program
was
implemented
on
February
1st.
The
criteria
for
the
program
for
entry
into
the
program
was
low
performance
from
quarter
3
along
with
overall
performance
from
the
last
two
quarters
and
the
number
of
times
the
officer
had
been
audited
in
2018
were
all
used
for
criteria
in
this
process.
The
officer
is
required
to
record
all
calls
they
were
dispatched
or
assigned
to
during
their
shift
on
a
written
log.
A
shift
supervisor
meets
with
the
officer
to
review
the
log
from
the
previous
shift
to
ensure
BWC
video
was
recorded,
as
required
by
policy.
C
They
are
also
required
to
address
any
BWC
policy
issues
they
discover
in
the
process.
If
the
officers
found
not
in
compliance,
the
supervisor
must
document
the
issue
along
with
the
direction
they
gave,
the
officer
to
improve
their
performance.
The
supervisor
then
forwards
the
usage
log
and
a
memo
summarizing
the
outcome
of
the
meeting
to
the
officers
lieutenant
and
the
BWC
audit
group
who
reviews
them
daily
for
accuracy.
Any
deficiencies
in
the
documentation
are
communicated
to
the
officers
lieutenant
requesting
correction.
C
Next
steps,
we're
gonna,
do
be
doing
a
lot
of
reviewing
for
the
remainder
of
the
quarter
and
probably
then
some
which
will
include
the
total
of
176
activation
on
its
we
sent
out.
In
addition
to
all
the
mandatory
mentoring
logs
is
on
an
80
of
those
and
then
422
case
number
and
category
audits.
We
also
plan
to
conduct
quarter
1
activation
audits.
Our
mandatory
mentoring
program
will
continue
to
be
used
for
our
lowest
performers.
We
also
added
a
category
for
act.
Accidental
activation.
C
These
activations
are
caused
by
individual
users
and
by
acts
on
signal
used
to
the
category
or
make
tracking
activation
performance
more
efficient.
So
just
to
remind
you
about
acts
on
signal,
that's
the
automatic
activation
caused
by
activating
the
emergency
lights
and
the
squad
cars.
So
what's
happening,
what
has
been
happening
is
an
officer
might
be
leaving
the
precinct,
for
example,
responding
to
an
emergency
call
activate
the
lights,
while
anybody
within
that
range,
who
has
a
camera
or
on
their
cameras,
are
going
to
be
activated.
C
Inspectors
and
patrol
attendants
will
receive
access
to
two
additional
dashboards
that
will
allow
them
to
examine
overall
performance
trends
and
transfer
specific
call
types
in
their
precincts.
For
example,
of
compliance
for
traffic
stops
is
down.
They
will
be
able
to
generate
a
list
of
officers
who
didn't
activate
their
cameras
and
address
them
specifically.
B
B
C
Understanding
is
and
I'm
not
an
expert
on
the
details
that
are
done
down
there,
but
my
understanding
is
parking
for
enforcement
is
completed
for
vehicles
parked
illegally
down
there,
and
it's
done
in
an
effort
to
reduce
the
number
of
folks
who
may
be
up
to
criminal
activity
in
the
area.
That's
the
extent
of
my
knowledge
of
that.
Okay.
B
And
what
do
you
think
was
the
source
of
the
confusion
about
why
they
needed
to
use
body
camera
it
just
from
from
where
I'm
sitting
it
feels
like?
We
obviously
want
body.
Camera
is
activated
when
having
interactions
with
residents
of
the
city
or
visitors
to
the
city.
Right
I
mean
that
that
seems
like
the
goal.
So
why
would
people
think
that
the
parking
unit
or
the
like
the
people
assigned
to
that
parking
duty
were
exempt
from
the
body
camera
policy?
I?
Would.
C
So
if
a
vehicle
is
occupied,
if
there's
an
owner,
present
etc,
that
would
be
a
case
where
you'd
want
to
have
body
or
camera
video,
but
I
mean
so,
for
example,
if
it's
just
a
vehicle
that
you're
citing
for
being
in
the
road
during
snow
emergency,
there's
no
one
around,
you
know
the
assumption
was
that
you
know.
There's
no
reason
to
film
that
so.
D
D
C
I've
collaborated
to
some
degree,
with
st.
Paul
and
with
the
Park
Police,
but
no,
not
other
departments
I
mean
we're.
Really
we're
really
just
trying
to
do
our
best
at
examining
our
data,
as
it
relates
to
our
policy
and
really
just
trying
to
determine
how
we
can
best
respond
to
our
trends
and
get
ahead
of
you
know
any
issues
that
could
become
issues
to
increase
our
compliance.
Mm-Hmm.
D
D
Put
body
camera
systems
and
programs
and
I
just
feel
I
our
work
with
the
Park
Police
and
with
st.
Paul
and
just
curious
if
this
is
something
that
would
be
I,
think
it's
an
important
story
to
share,
because
it
shows
how
you've
put
momentum
behind
behavioural
change
of
this
tool.
I
wanted
to
ask
about
a
budget
item
from
late
last
year.
It
was
the
budget
item
that
helped
to
auto-populate
case
numbers
into
reports.
And
could
you
comment
on
how
that
might
be
going?
I
know
it
would
not
probably
have
happened
in
this
data.
D
C
Has
not
been
implemented
yet
it
is
in
currently
in
the
budget
process
with
axon.
The
plan
is
still
to
incorporate
the
auto
case
number,
the
official
name
of
the
cat
integration.
Thank
you.
That's
the
official
name
of
the
this
program
so
once
that
budget
process
is
resolved
and
I
would
imagine
that
will
include
your
involvement
as
well
at
some
point
and
then
we
can
implement
that
into
this
process.
C
A
Well,
I
do
have
a
couple
of
questions,
so
it
is
really
just
two
something
come
summer.
Palmisano
just
mentioned:
soso
I
did
I
just
want
to
clarify
so
that
there
was
a
slide
in
your
presentation
that
talked
about
the
difference
between
logging
in
as
2018
versus
2019,
and
so
currently
that
that
logging
in
process
happens
manually,
like
the
officer,
has
to
write
it
down
or
type
it
in.
They.
A
And
what
we
just
discussed
here
is
that
we
have
a
clear
plan
to
get
that
autumn.
Automated
correct,
okay,
beautiful
my
other
question,
I
have
one
question
and
then
the
66,
the
number
66,
which
were
the
number
of
officers
that
we
were
still
trying
to
get
into
compliance
and
then
sort
of
a
broader
question
about
the
culture
of
body
cams
in
the
world
of
policing.
So
I'm
curious.
A
C
A
At
present,
okay,
and
do
we
know
if
the
out
of
the
66
officers
in
that
category,
do
we
have
folks
who
are
consistently
not
participating?
Not
not
participating
is
not
the
right
word,
but
you
know
who
having
challenges
complying
or
do
they
are
they
different?
Is
it
a
different
batch
of
people
from
like
last
year?
Well,.
C
Generally
speaking,
it
changes
over
time.
We've
had
folks
that
we've
audited
initially
when
we
started
that
are
in
the
95th
and
above
percentile,
now
no
longer
an
issue
at
all.
We
have
our
the
folks
that
are
currently
involved
in
our
mandatory
mentoring
program
are
represented.
Some
of
those
folks
are
represented
in
the
bottom
of
that
66.
So.
A
C
We're
looking
for
that
too
I
mean
we're
looking
for
I
mean
part
of
the
criteria
that
we
use
is
not
just
your
performance,
so
we
might
look
at
a
person's
performance
for
a
month
three
months,
six
months,
but
we're
also
gonna
look
at
how
many
times
that
we've
audited
the
person
as
well.
You
know,
and
how
is
that,
are
they
improving?
Are
they
not
improving
so
yeah?
What
that's
definitely
going
to
be
part
of
our
criteria
going
forward?
Okay,.
A
And
my
other
questions
may
be
more
of
like
I.
Don't
know,
I
want
to
say
soft
question,
but
it's
less
technical
and
more
about
your.
How
you're
assessing
the
field
of
how
policing
has
engaged
with
an
integrated
police
body
camera
into
their
into
their
work,
so
I'm
just
going
to
start
with
a
little
story
and
back
in
20,
2013
I
used
to
work
for
a
councilman
Burt
here
and
some
council
members
at
the
time
we're
running
for
mayor,
including
Betsy,
Hodges
and
Gary
chef,
who
was
then
the
councilmember
for
the
9th
and
I.
A
Remember
the
conversations
of
police
body
cameras
being
a
campaign
issue
for
them.
It
was
something
that
they
were
proposing,
something
they
were
thinking
about
and
so
now
fast-forward
to
2019,
where
our
City
Enterprise
has
integrated
this
tool
into
our
policing
strategies
and
so
I'm
curious
from
your
perspective
as
a
professional
in
this
field.
A
But
maybe
in
the
future,
it
won't
I'm,
just
I'm
just
trying
to
gather
sort
of
what
is
the
the
employee
sort
of
interface
with
with
this
particular
tool
and
trying
to
assess
if
we're
moving
towards
the
policing
culture,
where
police
body
cameras
are
seen
as
a
helpful
thing
that
are
part
of
like
your
bread
and
butter
everyday
work.
You
know,
just
like
you
put
on
the
badge
you
like
turn
on
the
camera,
because
I
feel
like
institutionally
in
a
very
formal
official
way.
A
We
have
said
yes
we're
doing
this,
but
we
know
that
running
organizations
with
a
large
number
of
employees,
there's
also
like
an
unofficial
culture.
That
happens
right
of
like
how
things
are
done
in
a
certain
officer
department,
so
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
if
some
of
them
the
ways
that
we
can
reach
a
hundred
percent
consistent
compliance
over
time
has
to
deal
with
not
just
the
official
culture
of
the
institution,
but
also
sort
of
like
the
unofficial
ways
that
people
perceive
body
cameras
and
some
of
the
challenges
that
come
with
that
just
to
understand.
A
C
Yeah,
so
I
guess
I
would
compare
what
you're
experiencing
something
similar
to
our
MVR
policy.
When
that
came
about
you
know,
there's
always
I
think
human
nature
is,
you
know
when
you're
being
recorded
when
you're
on
TV
things
like
that
I
mean
you
know
that
makes
some
people
uncomfortable
nervous,
so
there
might
be
some
element
of
that
and
then
I
think
I
think
there's
definitely
sentiment
out
there,
where
people
recognize
that
you
know
the
the
cameras
really
are
I
mean
it's.
It's
sort,
I,
think
the
cameras,
help
and
I
think
I.
C
Think
officers
see
this
as
well.
They
help
more.
They
work
more
than
they
could
ever
hurt.
I
mean
they
provide
context
for
interactions.
You
know
which
reduces
you
know
the
kinds
of
claims
that
people
can
make
I
mean
if
someone
makes
a
false
claim,
for
example,
and
I
saw
this
in
my
internal
affairs
capacity.
If
someone
makes
a
false
claim,
you
pull
up
the
video
and
you
can
say
that's
false-
that
never
happened
so
I
mean
there's
definite
benefits
for
that.
C
There's
also
benefits
as
far
as
evidence,
evidentiary
kinds
of
situations
for
criminal
courts
or
you
know,
parking
violations
so
to
speak.
So
I
think
where
we
are
at
is
a
combination
of
some
of
those
things.
Is
it
still
cumbersome
to
a
certain
degree
it
might
be
yeah
I
would
I
would
speculate
that?
That's
still
part
of
the
case
also,
you
know
so.
You
know
use
use,
and
we
see
this
from
time
to
time.
Where
and
I
hear
anecdotal
stories
about
this
too,
where
you
know
an
officer
will
be
on
their
way
to
a
call.
C
You
know
and
they'll
be
listening
to
all
the
pre
call
information.
They
want
to
get
suspect
descriptions
and
all
the
details
and
things
that
they
need
to
know
before
they
arrive
and
then
when
as
they're
arriving
depending
on
what
kind
of
call
it
is
they're
taking
in
the
environment
the
people
who
are
present,
you
know
if
people
might
be
armed
things
like
that.
So
in
the
midst
of
all
that,
they're
also
attempting
to
remember
to
activate
their
tool
and
we're
seeing
a
lot.
C
I
mean
people
are
doing
this
successfully,
but
there
are
still
instances
where
you
know
it
might.
There
might
be
a
delay
in
the
activation
because
of
these
factors
were
their
main
gist
and
but
we're
also
seeing
I
think
we're
also
seeing
too
just
it's
not.
It
means
for
some.
It
may
not
just
be
a
muscle
memory
thing
enough
in
everyday
activities
and
obviously
my
job
is
to
make
sure
that
you
know
people
know
the
policy
and
and
that
we
get
them
to
a
place.
Where
you
know
this,
is
they
activate
the
camera
from
muscle
memory?
A
I
think
you
I
appreciate
your
insights
on
that
and
I
also
wanted
to
hear.
If
you
know,
I
appreciate
the
patterns
that
we're
seeing
and
we're
seeing
positive
trend
in
the
use
of
body,
cameras
and
I
think
your
work
has
been
instrumental
in
bringing
accountability
and
capacity
and
and
learning
to
do
that
for
our
officers
and
so
I'm
I'm
generally
very
happy
with
what
we're
seeing
I
don't
want
to.
Let
my
guard
down,
you
know
and
like
be
like.
A
Oh
ultra,
Congrats
congratulatory
when
we
know
we
still
have
to
reach
100
and
we
still
have
a
couple
of
years
to
kind
of
prove
that
we
can
get
to
100
or
that
we
can
sustain
that
100
overtime
and
so
I
appreciate
the
meticulous
and
and
disciplined
nature
of
getting
down
through
the
details
and
figuring
out.
What
are
the?
What
are
the
tweaks
we
need
to
make.
How
can
we
make
this
better
and
I'm
up
and
also
curious?
A
A
So
do
we
have
a
system
in
MPD
where
folks,
who
are
doing
a
good
job
of
like
you,
know,
fulfilling
the
body,
camera
usage
policy,
there's
some
kind
of
recognition
of
that
or
you
know
just
because
we
do
want
to
get
to
100
and
I'm,
just
trying
to
brainstorm
about
the
carrot
and
the
stick,
and
how
do
we
get
there?
Well.
C
As
far
as
incentives
go,
that's
something
that
is
on
our
list,
you
develop
something
like
that.
We
haven't
yet,
but
it
is
on
our
list.
We've
really
just
kind
of
really
been
busy
with
just
trying
to
get.
You
know
everybody
moving
in
the
same
direction.
I
do
want
to
comment
on
something
you
said,
though
you
mentioned
a
statistic
of
a
hundred
percent.
C
I,
do
not
think
we're
ever
gonna
get
to
a
hundred
percent
and
part
of
that
reason
is
you
know,
because
of
the
way
this
machine
works,
I
mean
the
CAD
data
is
not
always
accurate
or
complete.
I
think
our
intent
is
still
to
do
some
analysis
or
calculate
our
error
rate
to
figure
out
where
we
are
I,
but
I
but
I,
just
don't
think
it's
possible
to
get
to
100%
I
think
we're
close
to
our
finish
line,
but
we're
not
there.
Yet
we
have
more
work
to
do
and
we're
going
to
keep
doing
that.
Thank.
A
D
C
C
You
know,
as
far
as
statistics
are
concerned,
I
mean
there's
a
lot
of
inaccurate,
missing,
incomplete
data,
which
I
mean
we
could
get
to.
We
could
figure
out
all
the
instances
where
there
is
no
video,
but
I
mean
that
would
be
an
incredible
undertaking,
so
I
I
don't
want
to
be
misunderstood
in
the
sense
that
I
would
ever
tell
anybody.
You
know,
there's
my
you
know
this
as
long
as
you
got
in
for
most
calls,
you
don't
have
that
video.
For
the
rest,
that's
not
what
I'm
saying
thank.
D
You
for
that
clarification,
I
am
I,
also
think
it's
important
that
we're
managing
a
program
and
not
statistics
I,
think
that's
where
police
departments
in
the
past
have
gotten
themselves
into
trouble
in
terms
of
how
far
we've
come.
Thank
you
for
that
context.
Chair
Cano
I
want
to
point
out
that
it
was
about
a
year
and
a
half
ago.
We
should
recall
that
MPD
is
a
department
and
other
leadership
here
in
our
city.
D
You've
added
to
this
round
of
audits,
asking
them
to
document
any
direction
they
gave
the
officer
for
improvement
or
not
I.
Think
these
kinds
of
things
are
really
going
to
help
the
mandatory
mentoring
piece.
I'm
really
excited
about
I.
Do
think
that
this
might
well
decrease
your
percentages
for
next
quarter
when
any
officer
selected
for
the
program
is
going
to
be
automatically
audited
for
the
next
two
quarters
to
ensure
their
performance
improves.
That's
going
to
change
your
metrics
a
little
bit,
but
you
sure
sure
are
attacking
the
problem
the
right
way.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
C
E
E
And
so
could
you
walk
us
through
on
on
your
end?
You
know
when
an
officer
you
mentioned
earlier
when
somebody
makes
a
false
report,
you
can
look
at
the
camera
and
see
that's
false
report.
But
when
an
officer
you
know
sort
of
unjustly
strikes
a
citizen-
or
you
know,
is
you
know,
maybe
verbally
aggressive.
What
are
what
are
the
steps
for
the
police
force
to
start
kick?
What
are
the,
what
are
the
gears
that
get
kicked
in
to
start
holding
officers
accountable
for
those
kinds
of
actions
when
they're
caught
on
camera?
E
C
C
A
Beautiful
all
right,
it
looks
like
we
don't
have
any
more
questions
for
you
today.
Thank
you
very
much.
We
look
forward
to
seeing
you
at
the
next
quarterly
report.
So
without
further
questions
or
items
on
our
agenda,
it
looks
like
our
business
is
adjured
and
oh
I'm.
Sorry,
yes,
thank
you.
So
I
shall
make
the
motion
to
receive
and
file
the
2018
fourth-quarter
Minneapolis
Police
Department
body,
worn
camera
metrics
report,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye,
and
with
that
our
business
is
adjourned.
Let's
go
get
her
car
service.
No
somebody
just
got
their
car.