►
From YouTube: May 17, 2019 Minneapolis City Council
Description
Minneapolis City Council Meeting
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/
A
C
C
It's
been
an
incredible
year
for
Public
Works,
and
this
is
a
moment
where
we
can
collectively
recognize
everything
that
has
happened
and
all
the
recognition
that
we
have
received
nationally
and
locally
and
I'm
joined
by
so
many
Public
Works
colleagues,
our
directors
and
our
staff,
our
Award
winners
and
I'm.
Going
to
just
tell
you
quickly
about
some
of
the
awards.
Here
this
year,
Kathleen
may
L
1
the
innovative
transportation
solutions
award
from
the
women's
transportation
seminar.
They
only
issue
one
a
year
and
she
was
the
winner.
So
congratulations
don't
clap.
C
Yet
if
you're
gonna,
clap,
if
you're
tempted,
there's
a
lot
of
them.
So
just
hang
on
Nicollet
Mall
won
numerous
awards.
This
is
led.
This
was
led
by
Donnell
wood
and
Rik
Reiser
and
a
whole
team
of
Public
Works
people.
It
won
the
2018
project
of
the
year
for
from
the
American
Public
Works
Association,
that
is
a
national
award,
there's
six
of
them.
A
year
nationwide.
C
It
won
the
2025
plan
leadership
award
from
the
downtown
Council.
It
won
the
project
of
the
Year
award
from
the
city
engineer's
Association
of
Minnesota.
It
won
an
award
for
landscape
and
urban
redevelopment
from
engineering
News
Record,
which
is
a
national
publication.
There
are
a
lot
of
people
here
who
contributed
to
that
truly
an
amazing
project.
We
want
a
green
fleet
award
from
the
green
fleet
forum
alpha
workers
to
represent
fleet.
We
won
a
number
of
awards
for
the
st.
Anthony
bridge.
C
This
is
the
one
where
we
rolled
a
prefabricated
steel,
truss
bridge
into
place
over
several
BNSF
tracks.
It
was
like
watching
paint
dry,
but
it
was
really
cool.
This
particular
bridge
won
an
award
from
the
American
General
Contractors
Association
for
the
Minnesota
bridge
award
from
the
Illinois
structural
Society
from
finance
and
commerce
from
American
civil
engineers,
ACEC
American
Council
of
ACC
civil
engineers,
yeah
thanks
the
Minnesota
grand
award
and
the
Minnesota
Minnesota
grand
concept,
our
award,
so
five
awards
and
we've
got
a
number
of
Engineers
in
the
room
that
worked
on
that
project.
Truly
great.
C
We
won
the
us
composting
council,
2018
organics
diversion
of
the
Year
Kelli
Kish
is
here
huge
work
on
her
part.
We
want
an
award
for
the
Samet
are
crossing.
It
was
named
America's
tenth
one
of
America's
10,
best
new
bike
ways
of
2018
for
people
for
bikes
anything
Koster,
mezrab,
Alana,
the
whole
traffic
team
worked
so
hard
on
that,
and
then
we
also
had
sixty
Star
Award
winners
within
the
Star
Wars
program
for
the
city.
So
I
want
everyone
to
come
up
and
join
me.
Please,
and
if
you've
won
an
award,
please
please
grab
it.
C
C
A
D
A
A
A
To
thank
you
horse
trader,
so
I'll
ask
if
there
are
any
other
amendments.
I
have
an
amendment
to
amend
the
agenda
to
include
under
the
order
of
adjournment
the
legal
matter
relating
to
the
rental
license:
verification
for
Steve
friends
as
part
of
the
closed
session.
Are
there
any
other
amendments
to
the
agenda.
A
A
A
Approval
P
say
aye
aye,
any
post,
a
note
that
carries
and
those
referrals
are
made.
The
next
order
of
business
is
the
reports
of
our
standing
committees.
I'll
note
that
I
was
still
getting
set
up
here,
so
ask
for
Schrader's
help.
If
anyone
has
comments
and
speaker
management
as
we
go
along,
so
the
first
order
of
business
under
reports
of
our
standing
committees
is
the
report
of
the
committee
of
the
whole
presented
by
the
chair.
Vice
president
jang
keun-suk
thank.
F
Those
appointees
are
Judy
poplin
seat,
one
ward,
1
C
Terrence
Anderson
C
for
North
for
t90
Omar,
c5,
Ward,
5
and
approving
the
council
appointment
of
Samantha
priest,
ensign,
C
10
for
10
for
two-year
terms,
beginning
May,
1st
2018,
ending
April,
30th,
2020
and
I
move
approval
on
that
those
items.
Council.
A
G
You,
madam
president,
I,
have
someone
for
the
race,
equity,
Advisory
Committee
from
my
ward,
but
it
took
until
this
morning
in
order
to
get
it
confirmed,
so
I'll
be
bringing
it
forward
in
the
next
cycle.
That
I
think
that's
the
last
appointment.
I'm
super
excited
about
this
young
woman
that
we're
going
to
a
point
who
works
with
former
mayor
of
share
and
sales
Belton's,
so
I'm
really
excited
about
it,
we'll
bring
it
forward
soon.
Thank.
A
G
You,
madam
president,
the
economic
development
and
regulatory
services
committee
is
bringing
nine
items
forward
for
approval
today.
Item
number
one
I'm
going
to
move
to
postpone
one
cycle,
so
council,
member
Johnson
is
back
and
he
will
be
able
to
address.
Some
of
the
concerns
that
have
been
raised
in
the
interim
item.
Number
two
is
that
some
changes,
Tarbert
building
permit
fee
ordinance
item
three:
is
the
liquor
license
approvals
for
like
liquor,
license
renewals,
five
or
the
gambling
license
approvals
and
six
is
accepting
a
grant
from
deed
item.
G
Seven
are
contract
amendments
to
our
great
streets,
business
support
grants.
This
is
allowing
them
to
have
a
little
bit
more
time.
Item
eight
is
appointments
to
the
upper
harbor
terminal,
Community,
Planning
and
engagement
committee
and
then
item
number.
Nine
is
changing
the
name
of
that
committee
and
to
be
more
inclusive
with
that,
I
will
move
items
two
through
nine
for
approval.
This
morning,
I
move
to
postpone
item
number
one
Thank.
A
A
H
You
very
much
president
bender.
The
housing
policy
development
committee
is
bringing
six
items
forward
for
approval.
The
first
is
a
passage
of
a
resolution
approving
the
read
well
tax,
increment
financing
plan.
This
is
for
development
at
1,000
third
Street.
The
second
is
a
decertification
of
three
of
our
tax
increment
financing
districts.
The
first
is
the
philips
park
project
tax,
increment
financing
district.
The
second
is
the
Hennepin
and
seventh
entertainment
tax
increment
financing
district,
also
known
as
Block
E,
and
the
third
is
the
many
rivers
east
tax,
increment
financing
district.
H
The
third
item
is
authorizing
some
middle
of
grant
applications
to
the
Metropolitan
Council
to
support
a
number
of
projects.
The
third
I
mean
sorry.
The
fourth
also
has
to
do
with
the
red
well
project
on
1,000
third
Street,
and
this
is
a
resolution
granting
approval
for
Hennepin,
County,
Housing
and
redevelopment
authority
to
undertake
housing
project
on
behalf
of
the
limited
partnership
for
the
project
through
the
issuance
of
seventeen
million
dollars
of
multifamily
housing
revenue
bonds.
H
H
At
six
we
will
be
appointing
Tessa
legend
to
seat
nine,
to
finish
out
a
one-year
term
move
the
confirming
the
mayoral
reappointment
of
Tamir,
Ali,
Mohammed
and
Michael
Beckman,
and
also
confirming
the
mayoral
appointment
for
a
three-year
term
of
the
new
chair
of
the
board
should
show
Varkey
Issa
and
we
will
be
waiving
his
residency
requirement
because
he
doesn't
live
in
the
city,
but
he
works
in
the
city
and
grew
up
in
the
city.
So
I
will
move
all
six
items
forward
for
approval.
A
E
A
F
You,
madam
chair,
the
intergovernmental
relations
committee,
brings
forward
four
items
today.
Number
one
and
two
are
contract
amendments
for
federal
representation
services.
Item
number:
three:
is
the
appointment
of
councilmember
Palmisano
to
the
MSP
noise,
Oversight,
Committee
and
item
number
four
is
a
resolution
supporting
passage
of
Medicare
for
all
I
move
approval.
All
these
items,
council.
A
A
I
You,
madam
president,
the
public
health,
environment,
civil
rights
and
engagement
committee
brings
four
five
items
for
approval
today.
The
first
is
the
neighborhoods
2020
framework
recommendations.
I
will
be
moving
to
delete
1.1
and
1.2
is
a
staff
direction.
The
item
number
two
is
mayoral
and
council
appointments
to
the
violence
prevention
steering
committee
number
three
is
gift.
A
D
A
Items
carry
and
are
adopted,
and
that
returns
us
back
to
item
number
one,
which
was
the
neighborhood's
2020
framework
recommendations.
The
item
1.1
that
councilmember
Cunningham
referred
to
was
a
staff
direction
which
the
chair
has
moved
to
delete
and
then
the
item
2.2
is
consideration
of
the
actual
framework
that
was
coming
to
us.
As,
oh
sorry,
it's
actually
a
second
staff
direction.
A
I
A
You
mr.
chair
and
I'll
just
note
as
well
that
the
clerk
has
passed
out
a
new
staff
direction
which
incorporates
some
of
the
elements
from
things
that
were
discussed.
That
committee
and
that
is
from
Council
members,
Cunningham,
Palmisano,
Gordon
and
myself,
and
so
a
recognize
council
member
Gordon
and
then
I
may
suggest
that
we
just
for
simplicity,
sake,
take
up
that
staff
Direction
first
and
then
return
back
to
counselor
Gordon's
motion
here.
H
That
would
be
fine
with
me
I,
just
whatever
pathway
gets
us
there,
I
just
wanted
the
opportunity
to
consider
both
the
staff
direction
and
the
what
is
labeled
as
a
substitute
resolution.
Perhaps
incorrectly.
Let
me
bore
you
all
right
now,
so
I'll
defer
to
the
president
to
get
us
on
the
proper
pathway.
A
Thank
you
and
so
councillor
Gordon
has
moved
this
motion,
which
is
before
us
by
himself
and
the
council.
Vice
president,
this
is
an
amended
version
of
the
neighborhood's
2020
framework,
as
he
presented
as
a
resolution
before
the
City
Council
I
believe
there
are
probably
copies
at
the
end
here.
If
anyone
wants
one
of
those
so
as
I
mentioned,
I
think
what
I'll
do
then
first
is
go
ahead
and.
A
Take
up
this
staff
direction,
which
I
will
move
on
behalf
of
the
authors
and
then
pause
and
recognize
any
one
who
would
like
to
speak
to
this
staff
direction
and
I'll
just
mention
that
this
is
taking
a
kind
of
a
bigger
picture.
Look
at
how
the
city
itself
does
Community.
Engagement
I
may
have
some
more
comment,
but
I'll
turn
it
over
to
councilmember
Cunningham.
Thank.
I
This
also
is
in
reflection
of
the
concerns
of
the
neighborhood
2020
workgroup
3,
which
did
a
lot
of
work
around
laying
the
groundwork
for
a
conversation
around
the
citywide
community
engagement
policy,
and
so
this
is
to
also
signal
to
them.
That
work
was
not
in
vain
that
we
are
keep.
We
are
carrying
that
forward.
It
was
a
bigger
conversation
than
neighborhoods
2020,
and
so
that
is
how
that
is
reflected
here.
So
I'm
really
excited
to
dig
into
this
work.
I
I
think
that
it's
powerful
for
us
to
actually
as
a
city
enterprise,
to
say,
we're
going
to
own
city
engagement,
that
this
is
something
that
is
important
to
us.
We're
gonna,
do
business
differently
and
we're
gonna
be
thinking
more
about
what
is
Co
governing
really
look
like
from
a
participatory
perspective,
and
so
thank
you
to
the
co-authors
for
bringing
this
forward
and
thank
you
to
everyone
who
was
taking
the
time
to
help
lay
the
groundwork
for
it.
For
us
to
be
good.
Thank
you.
Thank.
J
You,
madam
chair
I,
wanted
to
show
my
appreciation
for
councilmember
Cunningham's
work
in
starting
to
help
us
see
this
in
a
it.
You
know
broader
way
and
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
the
two
pieces
of
the
staff
direction.
The
first
is
about
conducting
an
enterprise-wide
evaluation
of
how
we
currently
do
community
engagement.
One
part
of
that
is
how
we
communicate
as
a
city
and
what
we
passed
at
the
end
of
last
year
was
the
communications
audit,
and
that
is
about
how
we
communicate,
but
not
necessarily
how
we
engage.
J
So
this
kind
of
makes
a
different,
broader
kind
of
work.
The
the
communications
audit
is
in
process
and
the
person
that
is
doing
that
for
us
or
the
company
that
is
doing
that,
for
us
is
probably
not
the
right
person
for
this
kind
of
an
evaluation,
but
how
we
communicate
is
one
thing
how
we
evaluate
our
community
engagement
efforts
is
much
broader
and
I
wanted
to
thank
councilmember
Cunningham
for
recognizing
that
and
making
that
part
of
that
conversation.
J
The
second
piece
of
the
staff
direction
is
about
coming
up
with
a
citywide
engagement
policy,
and
that's
something
we've
been
talking
about.
As
a
council
with
many
people
over
time
and
neighborhoods
are
certainly
a
part
of
that,
an
important
piece
of
that
as
workgroup
3,
helped
us
kind
of
suss
out,
but
that's
not
the
whole
story.
It's
also
about
how
every
single
city
department
acts
and
that's
why
this
has
been
modified
accordingly.
J
J
The
kind
of
engagement
that's
necessary
to
share
it
with
people
who
will
be
influenced
by
the
decisions
we
make
and
what
is
what
is
that
path,
and
so
I
think
this
pairs
really
nicely
with
future
work
on
how
we,
as
policymakers,
develop
rules
on
how
we
give
fair
consideration
and
fair
notice
to
people
about
legislation.
So
that's
kind
of
work,
that's
maybe
to
come
with
councilmember
Ellis
I
just
wanted
to.
K
H
You
I
just
wanted
to
add,
as
a
city
representative
on
workgroup
three
that
had
to
do
with
citywide
community
engagement,
I
think
the
staff
Direction
is
in
alignment
with
the
work
that
they've
been
doing.
There
may
even
be
a
desire
to
have
that
group
keep
meeting
to
reflect
on
this
external
evaluation
and
see
how
it's
going
and
weigh
in
on
some
recommendations
for
the
future
and
I
think
that
could
be
critically
important.
H
I
also
appreciate
that
we've
lifted
this
element
outside
of
the
original
resolution
where
it
was
buried
and
it
will
be
a
we
can
look
at
that
as
kind
of
a
separate,
significant
thing.
It's
helped
focus
the
framework
resolution
more
closely
on
neighborhood
organizations
as
well.
So
I
was
happy
to
work
with
the
co-authors.
On
this.
A
A
This
is
part
of
what
that
is
addressing
is
taking
responsibility
for
our
own
role
in
engaging
and
making
sure
we
have
the
right
resources
and
the
right
places
to
do
a
better
job
of
engaging,
particularly
with
communities
that
haven't
typically
been
engaged
or
where
there
are
some
barriers
to
engagement,
and
we've
done
so
much
work
in
that
direction.
So
this
will
be
a
place
to
collect
what
we've
learned
to
look
at
best
practices
and
see
again
to
make
sure
that
it's
resourced
correctly
going
forward.
A
A
E
A
That
returns
us
back
to
councilmember
Gordon's
substitute
motion,
which
is
here
in
front
of
us,
and
it
is
I,
know
something
that
has
a
number
of
some
changes
and
amendments.
I
just
want
to
make
sure
my
colleagues
have
the
time
they
need
to
review
it,
but
I
also
see
if
there
is
any
discussion
on
this
item.
H
So
I
would
I'd
like
to
discuss
it,
maybe
in
talk
through
it
a
little
bit
and
I'm,
making
the
assumption.
Now
that
the
motion
is
properly
before
us
for
consideration,
so
okay
I've
moved
it,
and
this
is
a
motion
by
councilmember,
Jenkins
and
I.
The
copy
and
in
front
of
you
will
have
some
highlights
on
it
and
I
want
to
stop
and
talk
on
those.
But
first
just
let
me
note
that
this
is
a
much
streamlined
in
more
concise
resolution.
H
Some
of
the
details
that
have
been
taken
out
in
terms
of
specific
things
like
what
absolutely
has
to
go
in
the
bylaws,
although
we
call
out
that
there
will
be
uniform
requirements
of
bylaws
that
will
be
developed.
Also,
we
took
out
almost
all
the,
whereas
clauses
I
think
it
went
from
13
pages
down
to
six
part
of
the
reduction
in
pages
was
because
of
the
staff
direction
we
just
passed,
so
we
moved
out
that
part
about
the
citywide,
Community
Engagement
effort
and
we're
seeing
recognizing
that
as
separate
work.
H
I'll
now
just
note
some
of
the
more
significant
changes,
some
of
them
reflect
amendments
that
were
made
in
committee.
The
first
one
was
actually
adding
another
public
purpose
to
neighborhood
organizations.
This
is
public
purpose
for
creating
a
sense
of
place
in
celebrating
community,
something
they
don't
organizations
often
do.
We
also
clarified-
and
this
was
from
the
committee
motion
that
passed
about
the
base
funding-
that
the
minimum
neighborhood-based
funding
allocation
will
be
twenty
five
thousand
dollars.
H
That's
currently
what
it
is,
there's
a
few
neighborhoods
I
think
for
we
get
that
amount,
all
the
other
neighborhoods
get
more
than
that.
There
was
also
some
concerns.
We
heard
about
discretionary
funding
who
was
going
to
the
neighborhood's.
We
got
some
impact
that
it
was
getting
too
specific,
so
I
deleted
some
terms.
This
is
on
page
two
item
number
C
having
to
do
with
discretionary
funding,
rather
than
say
that
they
are
available
only
for
one-time
projects
or
projects
that
could
be
potentially
self-sustaining
in
the
future.
H
We
just
say
they're
available
for
projects
unique
to
the
neighborhood
or
area
that
gives
more
discretion
to
the
neighborhood
organizations
to
determine.
We
still
included
the
list
of
eleven
ideas
in
some
specifics.
The
third
item
that
we
heard
a
lot
about
during
the
community
kind
of
involvement
in
discussion
and
public
hearing
had
to
do
with
the
funding
for
community-based
organizations.
I
think
there
was
a
significant
fear
and
concern
that
we
were.
This
would
end
up
taking
money
away
from
neighborhood
organizations
because
they
don't
know
exactly
how
much
they're
going
to
get.
H
We've
made
an
amendment
in
the
committee
and
it
has
been
refined
for
this
resolution.
I
will
just
read
the
two
sentences
that
were
adding
to
clarify
that,
which
is
noted
as
a
25%
of
the
overall
funding
would
go
to
community-based
organizations,
and
this
is
what
is
in
the
amended
resolution.
Community-Based
organizations
that
receive
funding
from
this
program
must
partner
with
a
neighborhood
organization.
H
H
If
the
coordinator
determines
that
a
suitable
neighborhood
organization
cannot
be
found
and
that
the
funding
will
support
work
that
meets
our
city's
racial
equity
goals,
that
the
next
change
was
also
a
change
that
came
through
the
committee,
it
was
to
make
the
neighborhood
election
day
a
voluntary
thing
that
people
could
neighborhood
groups
could
participate
in
I'll.
Just
know
it
that
the
hope
is
that
it's
going
to
be
such
a
big
success,
that
everyone
will
want
to
opt
into
that.
H
It's
seen
as
an
opportunity
for
the
city,
elections,
Department
and
all
of
us
to
get
turnout
and
get
more
people
interested
in
participating
in
their
neighborhood
organizations.
So
could
actually
be
a
great
pathway
into
diversifying
those
and
strengthening
them,
and
so
just
the
fact
that
I'm
supporting
making
them
voluntary
doesn't
mean
I,
don't
think
it's
an
idea
worth
trying.
I
just
think
this
is
the
way
to
try
it,
the
other.
H
H
But
we
still
call
out
that
such
a
group
will
be
created,
but
it's
just
giving
one
sentence
that
NCR
shall
develop
an
enabling
resolution
for
a
new
Community
Engagement
Commission
by
August
26,
aimed
at
implementing
monitoring
and
supporting
the
citywide
engagement
policy.
It's
in
the
other
staff
direction,
so
the
details
of
that
are
have
been
taken
out.
But
we
have
maintained
the
details
of
the
more
significant
change
in
government
governance,
which
was
strengthening
the
NRP
policy
board
and
we
are
adding
eight
neighborhood
representatives
to
it.
H
This
wasn't
the
recommendation
that
came
to
the
committee,
but
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
it
here
for
our
purposes
and
I
believe
that's
the
best
introduction
that
I
can
come
up
with
an
overview
of
the
resolution.
Hopefully
folks
have
had
a
chance
to
read
it,
and
you
can
ask
any
questions.
If
you
have
it
happy
to
hear
views
and
I
think
we
can
entertain
amendments
to
it
now
that
it's
before
us
and
I
did
all
that
in
six
minutes.
Thank
you.
I
I
This
is
backwards
because
I
can
say
us
past
in
this
resolution
today
is
asking
my
community
a
historically
and
presently
marginalized
community,
to
trust
us
that
we
are
going
to
course-correct
and
address
their
valid
concerns
and
issues
at
some
point
down
the
road.
There
is
very
little
evidence
that
asking
my
community
for
that
faith
is
well-founded.
There
has
been
tremendous
work
that
has
been
done
thus
far
on
this
work.
However,
the
framework
as
it
is
operates
from
a
deficit
perspective.
I
Additionally,
it
lacks
high-level
program
goals
and
outcomes,
as
well
as
a
racial
equity
analysis.
It
is
incredibly
challenging
to
develop
program
guidelines
without
these
foundational
elements
included
in
the
framework,
ward
or
neighborhood
organizations
are
doing
amazing
work
neighborhoods,
like
Falwell
victory
and
Jordan,
saw
between
826
and
41
percent
decrease
in
violent
crime
last
year.
I
believe
this
is
largely
due
to
the
significant
work
led
by
neighborhood
associations
to
connect
neighbors
as
well
as
community
led
Public
Safety
efforts.
I
Despite
neighborhood
associations,
in
my
ward
being
so
strong
in
their
work,
my
constituents
who
participated
in
the
workgroups
all
came
back
to
report
that
they
felt
shut
down
and
that
their
concerns
and
ideas
were
not
addressed
or
included.
This
has
done
significant
further
damage
to
trust
between
Northside
neighborhood
organizations
in
the
city
to
pass.
The
proposed
framework
now
disregards
the
voice
of
the
Northside
neighborhood
council,
a
congress
of
Neighborhood
Northside
neighborhood
organizations
and
the
will
of
the
committee
which
did
not
pass
the
resolution
creating
the
framework.
I
I
As
the
program
guidelines
are
developed
and
to
tighten
up
the
framework
and
address
gaps
like
overall
programmatic
goals
and
outcomes,
a
racial
equity
analysis
beyond
just
the
amount
of
people
of
color
represented
on
the
boards,
as
well
as
metrics
for
accountability
and
to
expand
the
base
of
participation
to
folks
who
are
not
currently
involved
in
neighborhood
organization
and
renters.
I
cannot
support
this
new
resolution
for
the
reasons
I
have
listed,
but
respect
if
that
is
the
will
of
my
colleagues,
depending
on
the
will
of
the
call
of
my
colleagues.
I
I
Aspects
of
the
work
should
include,
but
are
not
limited
to
one
development
of
overall
program
goals
and
outcomes:
two
metrics
to
measure
progress
towards
goals,
three,
defining
a
racial
equity
analysis
of
neighborhood
organization
operations
and
activities
for
development
of
a
logic
model
for
the
new
neighborhoods
program
that
includes
inputs
activities.
Outputs
and
outcomes,
five
convening
of
the
governance
and
funding
workgroups
as
an
including
additional
stakeholders
such
as,
but
not
limited
to
NRP
policy,
board
members
and
CEC
commissioners
and
members
of
the
neighborhood
organizations.
Six.
I
Throughout
the
process,
there
should
be
an
emphasis
on
community
members
who
are
not
currently
engaged
in
neighborhood
associations,
as
well
as
renter's
7,
identifying
a
budget
neutral
structure
for
the
city
to
best
support,
neighborhood
associations,
skipping
2.
We
then
nine
developing
a
development
of
the
neighborhoods
2020
program
guidelines,
10
development
of
accountability,
measures
for
exclusionary
practices,
practices
and,
as
well
as
the
body
of
work
described
above,
it's
expected
to
operate
within
the
following
parameters.
I
The
first
is
to
operate
within
the
4
point:
1
million
dollars
currently
allocated
to
neighborhood
organizations
for
the
proposed
program,
outcomes
and
goals,
racial
equity
analysis
and
any
necessary
amendments
to
the
framework
to
align
with
the
goals
and
racial
equity
analysis
are
to
be
published
for
public
comment
by
July
1st
and
then
have
those
three
components
be
brought
before
the
Peace
Committee
on
July
15th,
and
that
Kira
will
meet
bimonthly
with
in
colonel
city,
an
internal
city
steering
committee.
That
includes
the
NCR
director.
I
The
NCR
leads
staff
for
neighborhoods
2020,
the
peace
committee
chair,
two
council
members
are
representative
from
the
mayor's
office,
the
city
CFO
and
the
city
coordinator.
The
proposed
guidelines
and
logic
model
are
to
be
reported
back
to
the
Peace
Committee
on
October
28th
2019
and
will
be
posted
at
that
time.
For
public
comment.
The
final
draft
is
to
go
before
the
Peace
Committee
on
November
18
2019,
with
final
approval
by
the
City
Council
on
November
22nd.
2019
I
will
defer
to
my
colleagues
to
vote
on
the
new
resolution
before
bringing
forward
either
of
these
updates.
A
I
Wasn't
sure
if
I
should
pass
out
the
staff
direction
or
if
I
should
pass
it
out
as
an
addition
to
the
new
resolution
is
where
I
was
a
little
bit
confused,
so
I'll
pass
out
now
the
staff,
an
updated
version
of
the
staff
direction
and
sorry
I
wasn't
sure.
Procedurally,
how?
If
we
should
vote
on
the
new
resolution
and
then
address
this,
but
I
just
wanted
to
bring
this
in
into
the
conversation
as
well,
so
I'll
defer
procedurally
to
how
we
should
proceed.
Thank.
A
A
L
You,
madam
president,
I
I'm
very
lucky
and
get
to
represent
some
amazing
neighborhoods,
and
they
got
that
way
not
because
of
the
people,
because
my
neighbors
and
the
neighbors
before
them
stepped
up
to
lead
in
the
neighborhood
organizations
and
they
didn't
get
there
because
of
the
rules
and
because
of
the
bylaws
and
I
one
of
the
things
I
will
be
supporting
councillor
Gordon's
motion
today.
Frankly,
cuz
I
think
we're
running
out
of
time.
We
knew
we
do
need
something
better.
L
L
Many
of
us
sitting
up
here
believe
that
same
thing,
but
unfortunately
this
does
not
get
there
and
I
hope
the
department,
as
well
as
other
the
city's
departments.
Working
on
this
take
note-
and
we
take
these
next
six
months
to
work
on
the
trust
that
has
been
lost
and
in
many
parts
of
the
city,
including
parts
of
mine,
but
I
think
that
we
need
to
concentrate
again
on
what's
how
we're
going
to
support
neighborhoods
financially,
as
well
as
with
other
resources.
M
Thank
You
president
bender
I'm
gonna
be
opposing
this
today
and
I
wanted
to
share
a
little
bit
about.
Why
I
think
it's
important
that
we
understand
I,
just
don't
have
a
constituency
for
a
yes
vote
anywhere
in
my
ward
I
that
I've
heard
from
neighborhood
leaders
who
are
really
invested
in
the
neighborhood
associations
who
have
said
this
is
this
is
not
a
good
document.
This
doesn't
represent
us,
we're
not
happy
with
this
process.
M
We
want
to
see
something
different
I
have
heard
from
my
constituents
who
feel
alienated
from
neighborhood
associations
who
don't
feel
represented
by
them
and
who
want
to
see
them
held
accountable
in
different
ways
so
that
they
could
participate
in
them
or
say
this
doesn't
do
that.
Please
vote
no
on
this.
I!
Don't
have
a
constituency
for
yes.
So
for
me
to
represent
my
constituents,
that's
where
I
need
to
be
I
really
appreciate:
councilmember
Cunningham's,
adding
the
instruction
to
reach
out
to
people
who
don't
participate
in
neighborhood
associations
to
really
find
know.
M
M
Think
if
the
conversation
is
not
about
something,
that's
relevant,
it
doesn't
matter
how
much
support
you
provide
per
people
for
people
to
come
to
a
meeting
to
talk
about
something
they
don't
care
about,
and
we
really
need
to
connect
better
with
what
you
know
with
how
this
works
and
so
I'm
feeling
very
disappointed
with
this
process
and
with
this
outcome
I
think.
Maybe
we
tried
to
make
so
many
compromises
that
it
ends
up,
not
accomplishing
anything
for
anybody
in
the
end
and
so
I.
You
know
I'm
I'm,
pretty
frustrated
with
it.
M
I
have
a
feeling
that
it
might
pass
today
and
so
in.
In
that
spirit,
I
do
when
I
at
least
try
to
amend
this
in
in
one
way
that
feels
important,
which
is
I,
went
on
for
an
amendment
to
strike
the
language
that
I
know
was
added
in
Peace
Committee
that
the
minimum
neighborhood-based
funding
allocation
will
be
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
and
I.
A
D
E
A
Motion
fails
because
they
did
not
have
a
majority
of
the
votes,
and
that
returns
us
back
to
discussion
on
the
resolution
itself
in
front
of
us.
Is
there
any
other
discussion
or
emotions
from
Council
members,
I'll
pause
and
say
that
in
discussions
with
the
clerk
and
councilmember
Cunningham,
chair
Cunningham
has
decided
to
move
the
staff
direction
before
us
that
as
a
staff
direction,
so
we'll
take
that
up
separately
after
the
discussion
of
the
resolution
itself
and
again
happy
to
take
any
further
amendments
or
comments
or
discussion
from
council
members.
I.
A
Don't
see
anyone
now
so
I'll.
Add
myself
and
Q
just
want
to
make
a
couple
of
comments
as
myself
as
present
over
for
Ward
10
I
really
feel
a
lot
of
alignment
with
comments
that
customers
coming
in
and
Fletcher
have
made,
and
then
there's
a
reflection,
I
think,
which
is
that
those
of
us
who
represent
neighborhoods
that
are
have
you
know.
A
A
solution
for
that
so
I
do
continue
to
want
to
work
together
with
folks
to
look
for
solutions
for
those
kinds
of
problems,
but
I
also
just
want
to
recognize
that
the
complexity
of
organizing
in
neighborhoods
that
are
facing
stress
and
really
want
to
thank
the
folks
who
are
doing
that.
Work
and
I
hear
as
well
from
my
neighborhood
organizations
that
they
feel
like
they're
not
being
supported
enough
by
the
city.
A
That's
before
us,
but
I
also
look
forward
to
continuing
this
bigger
picture
work
and
building
toward
I
think
as
customer
cutting
hands
that
our
shared
goals
of
making
sure
that
our
engagement
is
is
empowering
and
is
reaching
out
to
diverse
communities
in
meaningful
ways.
Is
there
any
other
discussion
seeing
none
clerk?
Please
call
the
roll
councilmember.
E
A
I
So
this
is
just
us.
This
is
just
the
first
layer
and
then
there
will
be
additional
work.
This
is
not
the
end
of
the
road.
The
work
that
will
be
brought
back
will
have
a
lot
of
the
concerns
that
have
been
expressed
to
me
and
through
the
public
hearing.
That
is
where
we
will
be
able
to
address
that.
So
this
is
not
the
end.
This
is
like
not
the
end
all
be
all
those
this
framework
will
be
tightened
up.
I
The
gaps
that
are
currently
have
that
have
been
identified
will
be
addressed,
and
we
will
continue
this
conversation
moving
forward.
There
will
be
lots
of
decisions
that
are
going
to
be
made
between
now
and
the
end
of
next
year
when
the
money,
the
consolidated
TIF
district
dollars,
run
out.
So
there
will
be
lots
of
decisions
that
are
made
throughout.
So
this
is
just
the
first
one
and
then
next
we
will
be
taking
what
what
is
here
and
then
bringing
forward.
I
I
It's
not
the
final
decision,
that's
being
made
and
and
I
know
that
the
if
it's
backwards
to
ask
for
marginalized
communities
like
ours
to
to
have
faith
that
we're
going
to
course-correct
but
I'm
at
the
table
and
I'm
going
to
do
everything
that
I
can
to
make
sure
that
we
that
this
is
course-corrected
and
that
the
concerns
that
are
addressed
by
the
well
high-functioning
neighborhoods
in
North,
Minneapolis,
that
your
leadership
is
represented
here
in
the
framework.
As
we
move
forward,
thank
you
Thank.
N
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
Our
president,
I
I
am
I'm
I'm
open
to
supporting
the
staff
direction.
I
was
definitely
open
to
supporting
it.
Had
the
resolution
not
passed,
but
given
that
the
resolution
is
passed
and
I
just
wanted
some
clarity
for
my
colleague
are
we
setting
up
Kira
to
possibly
fail
in
their
work?
They
are
a
trusted
community
partner.
N
H
Thank
you,
I'll
just
note
it
in
the
resolution
that
we
just
passed.
We
approved
doing
something
a
lot
like
this
there's
a
section
there
that
says
that
our
staff
will
work
with
a
consultant
or
consultants
to
develop
program
guidelines,
including
a
logic
model
with
inputs
activities,
outcomes,
metrics
for
evaluation
and
monitoring
working
with
the
consultants.
H
It
also
has
a
paragraph
that
we
just
approved
that
in
partnership
with
neighborhood
organizations
and
working
with
the
consultant
or
consultants,
our
staff
will
conduct
an
internal
review
of
its
services
and
support
to
neighborhood
organizations,
with
the
focus
on
budget
neutral
options
and
there's
a
little
bit
more
in
there
as
well.
So
I
could
say
we
already
covered
this.
Why
do
we
need
a
special
staff
direction
or
I
could
say?
Oh
well,
this
is
already
supported
by
the
resolution.
H
So
if
it's
the
will
of
the
body,
why
don't
we
move
forward
with
these
more
specifics
and
drilling
down
into
it?
I'm
I
said:
I
choose
the
latter.
Probably
I
have
a
couple
of
questions
about.
Is
this
gonna
cost
us
money?
Have
we
approved
a
funding
source
for
this?
Is
it
our
practice
to
identify
a
consultant
to
work
with
this
soon
at
the
council
level,
before
we've,
given
any
opportunity
for
research?
So
I
have
some
misgivings
about
the
specificity,
maybe
in
the
depth
of
the
staff
direction.
H
But
I
will
tell
you
honestly
that
at
the
committee
level,
I
was
willing
to
support
a
modified
framework
that
addressed
community
needs
and
then
digging
into
say
how
we're
gonna
actually
develop
it.
So
the
program
addresses
those
better,
so
I
see
this
staff
Direction,
coupled
with
the
framework
that
passed
as
a
potential
compromise
that
would
require
it
and
I
know
some
people
voted
against
the
framework,
but
now
it's
there,
but
we
require
those
that
maybe
don't
like
the
staff
direction
too
much
to
recognize.
H
This
might
be
an
opportunity
for
us
to
come
together
under
something
that
can
all
live
with
us,
recognizing
that
each
of
us
individually
brings
a
very
important
perspective
to
this,
and
it's
important
that
we
listen
to
them
and
honor
what
they
do.
We
each
have
an
election
certificate.
We
each
have
our
constituents.
We
have
to
give
a
voice
to
and
represent-
and
sometimes
it's
worth
making
a
compromise
as
a
body
so
that
we
think
we're
moving
forward
better
together
as
an
entity
representing
the
whole
city.
H
B
B
It's
just
sort
of
a
transparency
accountability
because
you
have
an
RFQ
or
an
RFP,
a
scope
of
services
reviewed
and
drafted
even
before
that
went
out,
and
it
seems
like
we're
picking
someone
in
advance
of
that
work
and
I
say
that
not
to
disregard
the
work
that's
outlined
in
the
staff
direction.
As
a
matter
of
fact,
I
say
that,
because
I
think
what's
outlined
in
that
staff
direction
is
so
important
and
so
how
we
get
there
and
how
we
do
that.
I
You,
madam
president,
so
I
just
wanted
to
address.
A
couple
of
concerns
that
were
brought
up
first
Kira
is
has
submitted
a
contract
to
the
city
coordinators
office.
It
is
beneath
$175,000,
so
there
is
not
a
need
for
a
formal
RFP
process
and
said
it
would
go
through
the
target
market,
vendors
and
since
its
specialised,
then
being
able
to
work
with
them
because
they
do
have
the
specialized
skill
set.
I
We,
it
is
possible
that
Kira
could
bring
forward
an
amazing
body
of
work,
and
then
this
council
voted
down
like
that
is
a
possibility
and
I
and
I.
Think,
though,
that
it's
it's
our
work
to
be
able
to
make
sure
that
we
are
building
together
because
I
in
the
conversations
that
I've
had
with
NCR
staff
and
leadership,
it's
an
iterative
process
and
so
I
that
this
is
not
the
end-all
be-all
that
there's
openness.
I
So
what
we
bring
forward
in
July
is
just
an
addition,
an
extra
layer
of
details
and
refinement
of
the
framework,
because
we
really
got
to
tighten
it
up.
We've
got
to
address
some
of
the
concerns
and
some
of
the
gaps
like
a
racial
equity
analysis
like
that,
is
that
it's
complex
work,
it's
specialized
work
and
Kira
has
the
skill
sets
to
really
be
able
to
have
an
explicit
framework.
Speaking
to
council
member
of
Fletcher's,
you
know
concern
about
a
one-size-fits-all
approach.
I
I,
definitely
hear
and
understand,
but
have
done
my
due
diligence
to
make
sure
that
that
we're
crossing
all
covering
all
of
our
bases
and
making
sure
that
this
is
as
transparent
and
by
the
process
as
possible.
So
another
fine
second
time,
I'm
speaking
on
this,
so
I,
don't
know
if
I'll
be
able
to
address
any
further
concerns
that
might
come
up
along
the
way.
But
I
do
ask
for
my
colleagues
to
please
support
this
staff
direction
there.
I
There
are
very
valid
well-founded
concerns
from
my
community,
as
well
as
other
communities
that
are
predominantly
folks
of
color
renters,
concentrated
areas
of
poverty,
so
I
do
ask
for
folks
to
please
support
this
and
for
us
to
be
able
to
continue
the
work
forward
of
getting
that
racial
equity
analysis,
getting
those
high
level
program
goals
and
then
amending
as
necessary.
What
we've
passed
here
today.
Thank
you.
F
F
Recommendations
being
received,
it's
my
understanding
from
staff
direction
that
there
will
be
a
body
of
people
working
together.
The
the
council
city
coordinators
office,
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
representatives,
along
with
cure
and
so
I
believe
that
that
collaborative
process
should
bring
forward
some
recommendations
that
we
can
all
live
with,
and
so
that
means
then
I
will
be
supporting
this
staff
direction.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you.
Sorry.
Any
further
discussion
from
Council
members
on
customer
cutting
hands,
resolution,
I'll
just
say
I'm
I,
think
I've
ever
flush
on
cue,
I'll,
say
here
that
I've
been
open
to
supporting
this
and
really
appreciative
of
councilmember
Cunningham's
work
and
leadership.
I
do
also
want
to
note,
as
Cosmo
Gordon
said
this.
A
I
have
been
wondering
if
we
might
consider
a
couple
of
small
changes
to
the
staff
direction,
one
just
maybe
taking
out
the
specificity
of
Kiera
with
council
members
raising
concerns
about
process
and
just
using
our
more
sort
of
typical
process.
That's
would
would
use
to
contract
with
an
outside
vendor,
and
then
I
also
just
want
to
offer
this
idea
that
perhaps
there
would
be
an
opportunity
to
align
the
dates
that
are
in
the.
A
Portion
that
customer
in
Gordon
read
that
was
the
November
4th
date
using
sort
of
adding
that
here,
so
that
that
is
reflected
in
that
there's
no
confusion,
and
perhaps
you
know
using
these
July
dates
as
a
as
a
interim
or
a
check-in
period
for
some
of
the
work
and
then
that
bigger
piece
coming
through
in
November,
so
I
won't
move.
Those
I
just
wanted
to
describe
some
of
the
thoughts
I
had
about
how
we
might
be
able
to
get
some
of
the
comments
that
have
been
voiced
so
far
into
the
snap
direction.
Kessler
Fletcher.
M
M
Available
and
engaged
you
know,
given
the
way
things
are
developing
so
yeah
I,
think
that
makes
sense.
I
also
think
it's
hard
to
imagine.
Somebody
would
seem
more
qualified
for
the
work
given
their
deep
work
with
neighborhoods
over
time,
assuming
that
they
are
still
interested
so
I
would
expect
that
to
work.
I
I'm
supportive
of
this
I
think
one
of
the
really
important
things
here
is
that
this
is
a
step
direction
to
the
city
coordinators,
office
and
I.
F
You,
madam
president,
just
and
that
we
do
already
have
a
standing
contract
with
the
University
of
Minnesota
to
help
us
research
ideas,
thoughts,
review
plans
and
such
and
so
I
feel
like
the
specificity
of
cura.
Being
included
in
this
actually
meets
that
standard.
Since
we
do
have
this
standing
contract
with
the
University
of
Minnesota.
B
You,
madam
president,
I'll
just
note
that,
though,
there's
a
strong
association
between
cure
and
the
U
of
M,
they
are
not
the
same
entity
and
so
in
the
in
the
spirit
of
council
presidents.
Adjustments
that
she
suggested
and
Fletcher
I
think
reiterated.
I
would
also
those
modifications
were
a
part
of
the
staff
direction.
I
feel
comfortable
supporting
it.
So
I
don't
know
if
the
clerk
do.
We
need
to
make
that
I
think
here
that
we
wish
to
amend
the
staff
direction
curve,
council,
presidents,
accountants
and.
A
I
A
A
H
Thank
you
very
much,
I
think
that
it's
in
the
reasonable
time
frame,
but
I'm
gonna
defer
to
the
clerk
to
see
if
they
looked
at
the
dates
and
compared
and
I
think
that's
gonna
create
problems
for
staff,
because
we
have
so
many
different
dates
listed.
Is
there
a
way
to
align
them
better?
If
that's
all
right,
okay,
mr.
Karle,
would
you,
madam.
D
President
I
think
the
clerk's
office
has
a
clear
understanding
of
the
need
of
the
council
to
reconcile
the
dates
that
are
slightly
different
within
the
two
versions
and
we're
happy
to
do
that
with
the
direction
I
understood
to
be
to
make
those
follow
the
same
timeline
that
is
within
the
resolution.
That's
already
been
passed,
and
so
that
slightly
modifies
the
language
that
would
be
in
the
staff
directive.
A
Thank
you,
it
seems
I
can't
covered
it.
So
then
I'll
just
clarify.
We
have
before
us
an
amendment
from
councillor
Cunningham
to
the
previously
introduced
staff
direction,
and
that
is
just
that
change
to
change
the
language
that
had
said
Kira
to
a
consultant.
Is
there
a
second
to
that
motion
amendment
that
has
been
moved
and
seconded
I'll
just
see?
If
there's
any
comment
on
that
amendment,
seeing
on
all
an
approval
piece
say:
aye
aye,
any
opposed
that
carries
so
that
has
been
amended
and
brings
us
back
to
the
staff
direction.
Customer
Thomas
on
him.
A
J
You
man,
I'm
sure
some
of
my
concerns
with
this
may
have
just
been
addressed.
I
think
it's
important
to
lift
up
and
make
sure
that
we
are
not
doing
deficit
based
work
like
councilmember
Cunningham
has
helped
us
to
steer
I
appreciate
and
have
worked
hard
for
an
ongoing
relationship
with
the
University
of
Minnesota,
but
I
appreciate
us
taking
out
that
specific
language,
because
sure
is
a
little
bit
different
I
also
have
issues
with
no-bid
contracts
and
money.
J
A
Thank
You
Franz
member
I
have
been
trying
to
avoid
having
our
staff
come
up
and
answer
questions
which
starts
to
turn
our
council
meetings
into
a
little
bit
of
more
like
committee
work.
But
if
we
need
to
do
that
and
have
our
coordinator
come
up
and
answer
that
question
I'm
happy
to
do
that,
I
could
also
Kepler
Cunningham.
I
Thank
You
Madame,
president
I
can
go
ahead
and
speak
to
it,
based
on
conversations
that
I've
had
this,
we
don't
have
to
put
them
on
the
spot,
so
a
portion
of
it
will
be
coming
from
NCR
and
then
the
core
dater
is
helping
us
to
be
able
to
figure
out
how
we
can
fill
in
the
gaps
that
that
might
be
there.
So
that's
why
the
staff
direction
is
to
the
coordinators
office
is
for
to
be
able
to
be
more
flexible
and
for
us
to
be
able
to
find
the
funding
that's
necessary
for
it.
O
Bender
members
of
the
committee
and
members
of
council
I
just
want
to
say
that,
as
in
keeping
with
everything
that
we
that
we
receive
and
any
staff
directions
that
we
get,
we
will
of
course
be
looking
at
what
that,
like
I,
have
spoken
with
the
director
of
NCR.
They
have
some
small
availability
of
funds
to
do
that.
We
are
looking
internally
as
well,
but,
frankly,
it's
going
to
pen
down
scope
as
in
anything
just
like
the
first
staff
direction
and
this
staff
direction.
O
We
will
look
at
scope,
we
will
see
what
we
get
and
we
will
certainly
endeavor
to
make
it
happen
within
our
own
resources.
Traditionally
staff
looks
at
staff
savings
or
perhaps
they
D
prioritize
projects.
If
there
is
an
issue,
we
will
come
forward
to
counsel
but
know
that
we
have
started
identifying
those
funds,
Thank
You.
H
Just
wanted
to
note
that
we
should
assume
that
if
it
does
not
come
out
of
the
existing
budget
as
we
approved
that
staff
will
have
to
come
back
and
ask
us
to
amend
the
budget
and
as
we
heard,
they
think,
there's
wiggle
room
within
their
existing
budget
to
find
these
resources.
At
least
that's
how
I
interpreted
that
or
maybe
there's
clear
alignment
called
wiggle
room,
but
there's
already
alignment.
It
would
allow
for
this,
and
if-
and
I
just
want-
I
like
that-
everybody
was
nodding.
J
A
Thank
you,
I
think,
that's
something
we
can
do
that
way
or
I
can.
We
can
also
potentially
take
a
an
official
action
to
refer
it
to
Ways
and
Means.
A
Thank
you.
Is
there
any
further
discussion
on
the
staff
direction?
I
don't
see.
Any
I
do
want
to
pause
before
asking
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll
on
this.
That
you
know,
we've
had
a
long,
long
discussion
here
and
a
number
of
things
coming
forward,
which
is
not
unique
in
such
a
complex
and
important
multi-year
process
and
just
want
to
take
the
time
again
to
thank
particularly
Chair
Cunningham
for
his
leadership
and
all
the
council.
Members
have
been
so
engaged
in
this
and
who
will
be
continuing
to
work
on
this
going
forward.
A
D
A
A
K
A
B
Is
the
special
service
districts,
2019
operating
plan
and
budget
amendments
for
the
locations
listed
item?
9
is
a
grant
for
Minnesota
Pollution
Control
Agency
for
electric
vehicle
charging
stations
and
10
is
the
grant
application
to
Minneapolis
Pollution
Control
Agency
for
electric
vehicle
charging
stations.
11
is
request
for
proposals
for
the
2020
2023
public
works,
consulting
pool
item
12
is
the
Minneapolis
of
luth
superior
passage,
rail
Alliance
board
membership
and
the
final
item
13
is
agreement
with
the
Minnesota
commercial
railroad
for
33rd
Street
East
reconstruction
project,
Madam,
President
I
knew
all
items
are
submitted.
Council.
A
E
A
P
You,
madam
president,
Louisa
means
committee
has
seven
items
to
get
a
pool
for
today.
I
don't
number
one
is
a
contract
with
Baker
Tilly
and
wildcard
quote
for
information
technology.
Cyber
security
audit
I,
don't
know,
but
to
use
a
contractor
man
with
HCM
architects
for
Minneapolis
Police
Department
warehouse
project.
I.
Remember
three
is
a
bid
for
the
public
service
project.
This
is
for
the
drywall
and
fireproofing
item.
Number
four
is
a
request
for
proposal
for
investment
management
services.
P
Item
number:
five
is
a
gift
acceptance
from
blue
from
Bloomberg
philanthropies
for
lodging
and
food
related
expenses
for
the
Stockholm
by
a
car
project.
Meeting
item
number:
six
is
a
gift
acceptance
from
Rocky
Mountain
Institute
for
travel
lodging
and
food
related
expenses
for
the
solar,
energy,
innovation,
symposium
and
the
final
item
is
a
gift
acceptance
from
Simpson
Housing
Services
Inc,
and
this
is
for
the
navigation,
Center
and
I
move
approval
of
all
seven
items.
Councilmember.
A
L
You,
madam
president,
the
zoning
and
planning
committee
will
have
two
items
for
approval
today.
The
first
is
the
approval
of
rezoning
for
5043,
rear
wing
Avenue
south,
and
the
second
is
the
approval
of
a
rezoning
for
1906
through
1914
Queen
Avenue
north
as
well
as
1911,
through
1915
Penn,
Avenue,
north
and
I
move
approval
of
these
items.
Councilman.
A
A
Carrying
the
report
is
adopted.
Next
we
have
the
introductions
and
referrals
calendar.
We
have
two
items
today:
first
person
to
notice
council
member,
where
Tommy
moves
to
introduce
a
first
reading
to
and
refer
to
the
economic
development
of
regulatory
services
committee,
the
subject
matter
of
an
ordinance
to
amend
the
building
code
related
to
sustainability
thresholds
on
certain
new
construction.
A
The
second
pursuant
to
notice,
comes
mother
elephant
moves
to
introduce
first
reading
to
and
refer
to
the
economic
development
regulatory
services
committee,
the
subject
matter
of
an
ordinance
to
amend
the
housing
code
related
to
the
addition
of
first
right
of
refusal
for
the
sale
of
affordable
housing.
Are
there
any
questions
from
customers
on
either
of
those
introductions
or
coming?
Oh.
A
L
A
You
counselor
trainer.
Thank
you,
I,
see
in
the
printed
agenda
the
correct
author,
so
I
all
dressed.
We
read
the
introductions
so
first,
pursuant
to
notice,
council
members,
Gordon
and
trader
we've
to
introduce
the
subject
met
our
introducing
the
subject
matter
of
ordinance
to
amend
title
5
of
the
quote:
ordinances
related
to
the
building
code
for
first
reading
and
referral
to
the
economic
development.
A
So
I
will
see
if
there's
any
questions
on
those
introductions,
seeing
none
all
in
approval,
please
say
aye
aye,
any
opposed,
say
no
that
carries
and
those
are
introduced
and
referred
to
the
proper
committees
in
the
next
cycle
and
Thank
You
councillor
Schrader.
For
that
clarification.
Finally,
we
have
announcements
before
we
adjourn
to
our
closed
session.
Are
there
any
announcements
from
council
members
right?
A
B
You,
madam
president,
I
know
we
got
the
heads-up
last
meeting
regarding
our
world,
but
the
events
so
big.
It
deserves
two
announcements
and
it'll
be
from
Friday
through
Sunday
and
I.
Just
will
note
you
know
every
year
there
might
be
something
new,
and
this
year
we
will
have
a
new
building
to
join
the
consolation
of
buildings
that
make
up
the
bulk
of
the
event
with
the
studio
spaces,
and
this
is
a
I
believe.
It's
called
flux,
it's
at
Monroe
and
Lowry,
and
what's
significant
about
this,
this
is
the
first
studio.
B
H
You
very
much
I
just
wanted
to
introduce
and
and
note
that
the
newly
appointed
chair
of
the
minneapolis
public
housing
authority
is
with
us
today.
I
don't
think
I
noticed
that
he
had
arrived
during
my
committee
report,
so
this
is
Jo
Markey,
Issa
and
I
think
it's
significant
that
he
was
here
for
this
and
he
attended
the
whole
meeting
and
got
to
learn
a
lot
more
about
how
we
work
so
welcome
and
so
glad
to
have
you
here.
A
Thank
you
any
further
announcements,
I
don't
see
any
so
then
I
will
look
for
a
motion
to
adjourn
to
our
closed
session
to
discuss
the
to
litigation
matters
that
are
on
our
agenda.
The
one
is
the
rental
license,
revocation
for
Stephen
friends
and
the
other
is
a
litigation
matter
of
James
Clark
manager.