►
From YouTube: June 5, 2019 Committee of the Whole
Description
Minneapolis Committee of the Whole Meeting
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/
A
Afternoon,
I'm
going
to
call
to
order
this
regular
meeting
of
the
committee
of
the
whole
for
Wednesday
June
5th
2019.
My
name
is
Andrea
Jenkins
I
am
the
chair
of
this
committee
and
with
me
at
the
dais
today,
our
council
members,
Palmisano
Goodman
Ellison,
Schrader
council,
president
bender
council,
member
Fletcher,
Reich
and
Gordon.
Let
the
record
reflect
that
we
do
have
a
quorum
on
the
agenda.
Today.
We
have
one
discussion,
item
and
reports
of
committees
and
we'll
begin
with
our
discussion
item,
which
is
the
2019
report
from
the
local
board
of
Appeal
in
equalization.
A
B
Afternoon,
madam
chair,
may
it
please
the
committee
I'm
here
to
introduce
the
final
report
from
the
city's
local
board
of
Appeal
in
equalization,
the
2019
local
board
was
established
pursuant
to
resolution
62,
which
is
adopted
on
March
1st.
Its
members
included
this
year.
Patricia
Warner
Jeff,
Larson,
Paul,
Crawford
Michael
tinker
Neil,
Anderson
and
Faye
bland
the
board
convened
on
April,
23rd
and
MS
Warner
was
elected
chair.
The
board's
proceedings
were
included
in
your
briefing
materials
they're
contained
in
the
clerk
file
number
2019,
zero,
zero,
zero,
zero
five.
As
reflected
in
the
request
for
committee
action.
B
Minneapolis
received
a
total
of
1766
applications
for
appeal
hearings.
This
year,
staff
has
included
a
chart
in
your
briefing
materials
that
show
that
this
year's
filings
represented
the
highest
number
of
applications
received
since
2010.
In
fact,
over
the
past
nine
years,
the
city
has
experienced
a
growth
rate
of
more
than
two
hundred
forty
five
percent
in
the
number
of
applications
received.
Despite
this
incredible
increase
in
volume
of
those
1,000
766
applications
filed
this
year,
only
17
actually
carried
forward
and
resulted
in
an
appeal
before
the
board.
B
So
that
equates
to
less
than
1%
of
the
total
volume
of
applications
that
were
received,
resulting
in
hearings
in
real
numbers.
That
means
that,
in
the
nine
year
period,
from
2010
to
2019,
the
city
of
Minneapolis
forwards
between
0
and
34
appeals
to
the
county
board
level.
All
of
the
rest
are
successfully
resolved
at
the
local
level,
either
by
the
assessor's
office
directly
or
through
our
local
board
of
appeal
and
equalization.
B
First,
the
appeals
process,
as
established
under
state
law,
provides
three
levels
in
order
to
maximize
the
opportunity
for
all
property
owners
to
address
any
grievances
they
might
have
in
the
classification
or
valuation
process
of
their
property,
starting
of
course,
first
at
the
local
level
it
moves
on.
Then,
to
the
county
level
and
finally,
then,
to
the
state
level,
the
local
and
county
levels
are
free
to
property
owners.
B
So
our
local
board
is
the
entry
point
in
a
three
tiered
system
designed
to
give
property
motors
as
much
flexibility
as
possible
in
achieving
parity
in
the
classification
and
market
valuation
of
their
properties
within
the
parameters
of
state
law.
As
a
consequence,
it's
important
that
our
process
be
fair,
accessible
and
transparent.
B
So
that
again,
the
vast
majority
of
those
cases
don't
need
to
escalate
either
to
Hennepin
County
or
to
the
state
tax
court
and
that's
a
benefit
both
to
the
city
and
to
our
property
owners,
and
finally,
I
would
point
out
that
the
year
after
your
process,
improvements
that
we've
made
led
by
the
assessor's
office
have
helped
to
bring
greater
visibility
to
the
appeals
process,
thereby
ensuring
that
the
entire
team
is
available
to
the
community.
Ms
mom
quest
will
highlight
some
of
those
processes.
Improvements
in
her
presentations,
I'll
save
that
for
her.
B
However,
as
the
city
officer
who
is
charged,
the
city
clerk
was
supporting
the
local
board.
I
can
attest
that
each
year
we
put
considerable
energy
into
evaluating
improvements
to
drive
greater
awareness,
greater
access
and
transparency
and
that
those
efforts
are
the
result
of
the
professional
cadre
of
Assessors
who
take
great
pride
in
their
work.
As
I
mentioned,
deputy
a
City
Assessor
Rebecca
Mon
Quest
is
here
to
present
the
report
from
the
2019
local
board
of
Appeal
in
equalization.
Your
City
Assessor,
Patrick,
Todd
and
I
are
also
available
to
answer
any
questions.
B
Following
her
presentation,
you'll
note
that
staff
has
presented
a
series
of
recommended
actions
on
the
agenda
today.
That
includes
a
draft
resolution
for
your
consideration,
which,
if
approved,
would
confirm
the
recommended
action
submitted
to
you
by
the
local
board
to
equalize
all
of
the
assessed
evaluations
of
real
and
personal
property
across
the
city
and
also
direct
the
City
Assessor
to
file
the
final
adopted
assessment
roles
with
both
Hennepin
County
and
the
state
Department
of
Revenue,
with
requests
that
they
take
final,
lawful
action
to
give
effect.
C
As
it's
true
with
the
majority
of
the
work
in
our
office,
everything
that
we
do
is
really
dictated
by
statute
and
our
rules
governed
by
the
Department
of
Revenue,
whether
it's
the
fact
that
notices
have
to
be
mailed
within
10
days
of
the
local
board
of
appeal
and
equalization
convening,
or
that
the
local
board
must
adjourn
20
days
after
they
start.
Unless
we're
granted
an
extension,
everything
is
really
guided
by
statute
and
there's
not
a
lot
of
wiggle
room
for
us
to
make
any
changes
to
the
process.
C
We
are
very
grateful
with
to
our
partnership
with
the
City
Clerk's
office,
primarily
Casey,
and
Jackie,
and
sue
who
are
here
with
us
today.
We
really
couldn't
do
it
without
them.
There
are
a
lot
of
moving
parts
as
we
work
through
the
local
board.
We
never
know
truly
how
many
meetings
we're
going
to
have.
Is
it
going
to
be
one?
Is
it
going
to
be
five
or
six,
and
we're
really
grateful
to
them
to
make
sure
that
they're
there
and
present,
and
that
our
meetings
are
professional
and
accessible
to
the
public?
C
Casey
did
touch
on
a
few
of
the
process.
Improvements
and
I
just
want
to
highlight
them
again,
one
of
them
this
year.
That
we
first
time
is
that
we
use
the
Lin
system
and
we
had
our
agendas
and
all
the
supporting
documentation,
Xin
limbs
for
greater
transparency
and
access,
and
we
also
have
been
year
but
after
you're
trying
to
find
the
best
way
and
space
for
our
meetings.
We
never
know
how
many
people
are
going
to
join
us
at
those
meetings.
C
C
The
members
of
the
local
board
this
year
again
were
outstanding
many
many
years
of
experience
and
levels
of
experience.
They
bear
a
true
passion
to
serve
the
city
and
the
community,
and
it
really
showed-
and
it
was
obvious
to
all
that
were
involved.
You
approved
seven
members.
However,
only
six
were
present,
but
six
were
almost
all
six
were
present
at
all
times
and
so
that
it
was
really
great
to
see
they
were
very
engaged.
You
also
established,
then
the
local
board
of
Appeal
in
Equalization
and
in
Minneapolis.
Here
we
have
a
special
Board
of
Equalization.
C
C
Then
Patrick
and
I
presented
to
you
in
March
the
2019
assessment
report,
and
this
was
the
first
time
we'd
ever
done
that,
and
we
look
forward
to
doing
that
year
after
year
to
provide
to
you
what
we've
done
with
the
assessments.
So
you
have
that
information
for
your
constituents
leading
up
to
the
mailing
of
the
notices
we've
presented
that
to
the
Ways
and
Means
Committee
this
year,
and
then
we
were
able
to
have
some
one-on-one
conversations,
Ward's
specific,
with
some
of
you
to
provide
some
more
Ward
specific
data.
C
C
This
was
another
process
improvement
this
year,
and
this
was
in
coordination
with
the
IT
collaboration
team
so
kudos
to
them.
It
was.
They
were
very,
very
helpful
and
easy
to
work
with.
We
were
leveraging
the
same
platform
that
the
4d
application
is
so
this
was
a
new
online
application
to
the
local
board
of
appeal
and
equalization,
and
you
could
use
it
on
your
computer.
It
worked
beautifully
on
a
mobile
device
and
this
is
an
administrative
tool
that
we
use
to
collect
information
about
those
wishing
to
appeal.
C
We
collect
information
about
why
they
feel
that
their
market
value
is
incorrect.
We
collect
supporting
documentation,
so
they
can
attach
supporting
information,
and
if
it's
a
rental
property,
they
can
provide
confidential
information
that
way
for
us,
and
then
it
feeds
into
a
database
for
us
and
amazingly
so
there
are
so
many
ways
throughout
my
presentation
today
that
are
reminders
to
me
that
we
need
to
express
our
gratitude
to
all
of
you
for
the
the
funding
for
our
new
camera
system
that
we're
moving
forward
into,
and
this
is
just
one
of
those
examples.
C
Our
new
camera
system
will
have
an
e
file
option
that
will
eventually
take
the
place
of
this,
but
we
were
actually
able
to
make
it
work
and
have
an
online
application
that
was
somewhat
able
to
feed
into
our
archaic
current
camera
system
and
save
a
little
bit
of
data
entry.
So
this
was
a
really
useful
tool
and
we
got
really
good
feedback
from
our
appellant.
So
we,
this
is
the
usage
of
the
online
application
this
year
and
so
you'll
see
that
the
great
majority
of
our
applicants
did
choose
to
use
this.
C
It
was
about
66
percent
of
our
applicants
and
that's
skewed
a
little
bit
because
at
the
convening
of
our
board
meeting
on
April
23rd,
we
did
take
the
online
application
down
just
as
an
administrative
tool
and
a
workflow
tool
and
everybody
that
appealed
after
that
appealed
via
email.
So
it
is
skewed
slightly,
but
we
will
continue
to
use
that
tool
next
year
and
probably
refine
it
a
little
bit.
I
next
want
to
talk
about
the
timeline.
C
I,
don't
know
if
you
remember,
but
last
year,
when
we
presented
to
you
this
chart,
it
was
a
very
spot.
A
very
large
spike
right
when
the
board,
convened
by
about
a
few
hundred
applications
and
I,
want
to
explain
the
change
in
process
over
the
over
history.
We
had
traditionally
had
an
appeal
deadline,
and
that
was
pretty
common
across
the
state
jurisdictions
had
an
appeal
deadline
and
in
Minneapolis
the
appeal
deadline
was
typically
seven
to
ten
days
before
the
board
would
have
convened.
C
So
it'd
have
been
about
10
days
before
April
23rd,
and
we
would
have
made
it
clear
to
everybody
that
appealed
after
that
that
their
cases
would
have
been
been
heard
by
the
county
board
room
versus
the
local
Board
of
Equalization.
Our
staff
continued
to
work
on
the
appeals
and
inspect
the
properties,
but
they
would
have
been
heard
at
the
county
board
level
should
they
have
needed
a
hearing.
Well,
the
state
has
made
it
very
clear
to
the
entire
state
all
jurisdictions
that
deadlines
are
inappropriate
because
of
the
Open
Meeting
Law.
C
We
can't
have
deadlines,
so
we
continue
to
accept
applications
all
the
way
up
through
when
the
board
adjourned
on
May
14th.
So
we
did
see
a
spike
in
applications
on
April
23rd,
and
that
was
about
150
applications
if
I
remember
correctly,
and
then,
after
that,
we
saw
about
average
of
14
applications
a
day.
C
So
while
we
were
still
working
on
the
files
and
presenting
cases
to
the
local
board,
applications
still
continued
to
come
in
until
the
board
did
adjourn
on
April
24th
I
just
wanted
to
point
that
out,
because
it
is
different
process
than
we've
had
in
the
past.
This
is
a
history
of
our
Appeals,
which
mr.
Carl
did
mentioned
this
year.
We
had
1766
appeals.
Last
year
we
had
1400
and
there
was
quite
a
bit
of
media
about
our
1,400,
and
we
didn't
hear
quite
as
much
this
year
about
the
1766.
C
This
is
the
slide,
that's
probably
of
interest
to
you,
and
this
is
our
appeals
by
award
at
the
end
of
this
meeting
later
this
afternoon
or
early
tomorrow,
we
will
be
sending
out
your
lists
of
Appeals
by
ward,
for
all
of
you.
We've
been
doing
that
the
past
few
years
and
people
provide
that
to
you.
We
haven't
been
able
to
get
it
ready
for
you
yet
because
we've
been
doing
a
bunch
of
data
cleanup
to
make
sure
it's
accurate,
so
it's
it's
almost
ready,
and
so
we
will
get
that
out
and
send
out
to
you.
C
This
is
a
heat
map
that
we
started
doing
last
year
as
well,
to
show
you
where
the
majority
of
the
appeals
have
come
from.
I
would
point
out
that
in
certain
areas
like
in
Ward,
3
you'll
see,
we
have
had
a
spike
in
some
of
the
condominium
complexes
appeals
in
there,
and
so
that's
why
you'll
see
concentration
in
certain
areas.
There.
A
C
Chair
Jenkins,
that
is
correct.
So
if
you
remember,
we
did
present
to
you
at
the
assessment
report
the
value
changes
by
community
and
Ward
and,
if
I
remember
correctly
down
in
Ward
13,
the
increases
were
about
2.75
percent
and
up
in
wards
four
and
five
year
old,
remember
seeing
double-digit
increases.
C
However,
the
you'll
see
the
inverse.
When
you
see
the
appeal
count
and
in
a
few
slides
we
will
show
you
some
of
the
proactive
outreach.
We
did,
though,
in
two
the
northern
communities
notifying
them
about
their
options
to
appeal,
because
we
were
worried
that
we
may
not
see
people
taking
advantage
of
the
their
appeal
options.
C
This
is
just
a
pie
chart
quickly
of
the
breakdown
by
property
type,
and
this
is
pretty
common
that
you
will.
You
would
expect
that
most
of
our
appeals
will
come
from
our
residential
properties.
Most
of
our
commercial
and
apartment
properties
traditionally
will
appeal
through
the
Minnesota
State
Tax
Court.
D
C
Karle
mentioned
that
we
had
seen
over
5,000
inquiries
or
received
over
5,000
market
value
increase
in
classification
enquiries
this
year,
and
this
is
a
breakdown
of
those
inquiries,
because
I
think
it's
always
important
to
remember
that,
even
though
you'll
see
that
we've
received
1766
Appeals
yeah,
when
you
actually
start
at
how
many
people
first
contacted
us,
the
appeal
count
is
much
less
than
those
people
that
initially
reached
out
to
us.
So
we.
C
Those
that
were
resolved
that
big
blue
piece
of
the
pie
chart
the
3581.
Those
were
the
ones
that
were
resolved
with
no
official
application
or
change
in
valuation.
Those
are
the
people
that
would
contact
us
via
email
or
phone.
All
our
appraisal,
staff
or
another
member
of
staff
would
talk
to
them.
They
may
share
some
crumpled
sales
with
them.
They
may
share
their
market
data
with
them
and
then
those
collars
would
choose
not
to
appeal
their
value.
So
those
we
consider
kind
of
an
informal
interview
or
just
an
inquiry.
C
The
697
are
those
properties
that
we
can
have
that
were
concurred
with
our
staff
that
the
staffer
inspected,
the
property,
did
a
review
of
the
property
and
recommended
a
property
reduction
or
value
reduction
and
the
property
owner
agreed,
and
so
that's
what
we
would
call
a
concurrence.
There
are
130
cancels
there
and
I
actually
included,
sustains
and
with
the
cancels
and
those
are
different.
From
our
perspective,
a
cancellation
is
somebody
that
just
says
they
just
decide
to
stop
the
process.
A
sustained
is
where
they
say.
C
You
know
what
I
ended
up
agreeing
with
you
after
you've
reviewed
the
value.
It's
only
17
properties
this
year
that
were
heard
by
the
local
board.
There
are
910
cases
at
the
conclusion
of
the
local
board
that
are
still
being
worked
through
the
county
board
process.
But
again
our
staff
still
handle
those.
We
had
a
handful
six
that
were
unable
to
schedule
and
then
six
at
that
point
in
time
that
we're
being
prepared
for
the
County
Board
of
Equalization.
As
far
as
a
hearing.
C
And
then,
if
we
start
from
the
very
beginning,
we
mail
about
125,000
value
notices
at
the
beginning
of
the
year
or
in
March.
Excuse
me
and
then
that
generated
the
5347
informal
reviews
or
inquiries
that
that
total
pie
chart
represented.
We
received
a
thousand
seven
hundred,
sixty-six
formal
appeal
applications
and
on
the
Left
you'll
see
there
were
nine
hundred
and
sixteen
open
cases
working
through
the
process
and
then
850
resolved
at
that
point
in
time.
C
This
is
the
action
that
the
local
board
took.
This
was
in
the
RCA
that
you
saw
at
the
top.
That
represents
the
total,
the
17
that
they
heard
representing
a
2.2,
eight
percent
decrease
they
sustained
11
properties,
and
then
they
reduced
six
properties
and
then,
at
that
point
in
time,
697
concurrences
right,
which
was
a
twelve
point.
C
Three
nine
percent
reduction
and
I
list
those
as
far
as
board
action,
because,
again
in
statute,
if
we
are
not
able
to
notify
property
owners
10
days
before
the
local
board
convenes
about
a
change
to
their
valuation,
the
local
board
actually
has
to
take
action
on
that.
And
what
that
means
is
that
we
stand
before
the
board
and
we
read
them
their
property
ID
number.
C
We
had
some
people
add
on
and
to
change
their
mind
and
want
to
come
back
and
go
back
to
the
county
board.
So
we
have
940
open
cases
right
now
or
we
did
I'm
sorry,
we've
concurred,
466
of
those
cancel
the
14
and
sustain
the
value
of
54.
We
have
one
refused
entry,
26
enabled
as
scheduled.
I'm
sorry
I
keep
stepping
away
from
the
microphone.
We
have
18
that
we're
preparing
board
cases
for
right
now
and
361
are
open.
Then
those
numbers
are
constantly
in
flux
that
was
of
this
morning
when
I
cut
the
data.
C
So
this
is
some
of
that
proactive
communication
that
I
mentioned
earlier.
We've
been
really
working
with
community
patience.
To
get
the
word
out
about
the
there
options
to
appeal.
There
was
a
news
release
that
went
out
to
community
meet
community
media,
including
neighborhood
and
cultural
newspapers.
We
provided
stories
for
your
ward,
newsletters
we've
been
leveraging
social
media.
We
internally
have
our
own
communications
plan
and
then
we
work
with
communications
to
send
out
our
social
media
blasts.
C
C
Those
are
the
options
for
contacting
the
county.
The
preferred
method
is
the
email
method
they
can
call.
However,
the
county
board
will
convene
on
the
17th.
However,
the
minneapolis
hearings
will
likely
occur
at
the
end
of
that
week
and
it's
at
the
end
of
the
following
week
by
statute.
The
county
board
has
to
convene
by
june
30th
and
then,
if
people
are
still
unhappy
with
their
value
or
if
they've
missed
all
the
filing
dates,
they
can
appeal
to
the
Minnesota
State
Tax
Court
and
they
have
until
April
30th
of
next
year.
C
Looking
to
2020
and
beyond
so
we
know
that,
because
of
the
increasing
appeal
counts
as
far
as
and
the
uncertainty
of
the
appetite
for
Appeals
for
next
year,
we
really
truly
as
a
team.
We
didn't
think
that
we
would
see
more
Appeals
than
we
saw
last
year,
so
we
aren't
sure
what
to
think
about
next
year.
C
So
we
have
decided
that
we
are
going
to
go
back
to
the
drawing
board
and
just
make
some
decisions
about
how
the
best
way
to
handle
Appeals,
whether
it's
going
to
go
back
to
how
we
intake
Appeals,
how
we
process
Appeals
and
how
the
board
process
there
peels.
So
we
working
with
the
City
Clerk's
office,
our
appraisal
team
and
though
the
board
members
themselves
to
get
some
feedback
so
that
we
can
find
better
ways
faster
ways,
more
efficient
ways
to
process
these
appeals,
because
we
are
beyond
capacity
at
this
point
in
time.
C
March
through
right
now
we
are
$30,000
and
to
unbudgeted
overtime.
Just
so
that
we
can
process
these
appeals,
and
we
still
have
over
300
to
go
as
I
mentioned
due
to
the
large
number
of
Appeals.
We
are
at
least
one
month
behind
in
the
next
cycle
of
our
year,
and
that
cycle
is
the
quintile
revaluation
where
appraisers
are
out
in
the
field,
doing
that
20
percent
knocking
on
doors
and
collecting
the
physical
characteristics
going
neighborhood
by
neighborhood
they'll
begin
that
work
immediately
following
the
county
board
or
if
they
don't
have
a
county
board
case.
C
Hopefully
they'll
be
on
the
field
before
that,
but
we
will
be
behind
schedule
on
that
as
well,
so
we're
gonna
have
to
make
up
some
time
there
and
then
last
but
not
least,
I
just
want
to
thank
our
staff.
They've
put
in
many
many
hours
of
overtime
and
typically
like
I,
said
most
of
these
cases
come
from
the
residential
side.
We've
pulled
in
our
commercial
team.
They've
we've
had
some
illnesses
in
the
office.
C
We've
had
many
strange
things
come
up
this
year,
we've
had
to
shift
things
around
and
they've
been
flexible
and
adaptable
and
provided
excellent,
excellent
customer
service.
It's
been
so
delightful
to
get.
We've
got
one
from
board
your
office
yesterday,
11:00
yesterday,
just
it's
so
great
for
appraisers
to
get
positive
feedback
about
the
their
customer
service.
C
That
they're,
providing
it's
always
a
difficult
position
to
be
in
to
have
to
give
people
bad
news,
or
maybe
not
the
exact
value
that
they
were
hoping
for,
but
to
know
that
there
and
a
professional
for
professional
manners
is
really
great
and
so
I
just
think
the
staff.
We
really
truly
have
the
best
here.
D
F
C
A
A
Seeing
none
all
those
in
favor,
say
aye
any
opposed,
say,
nay,
and
that
item
carries
and
just
before
we
move
on
I
want
to
just
be
sure
to
formerly
express
my
thanks
to
mr.
Todd,
his
mom
quest
and
the
professional
team
in
the
city
assessor's
office.
Thank
you
very
much
as
well
as
clerks,
Jackie,
Hanson
and
Sue
in
Quinto
from
the
clerk's
office.
They
have
made
this
year's
local
board
the
smoothest
and
most
efficient
process
here
at
the
city
and
also
it's
been
extend.
A
Sincere
thanks
to
the
board
members,
Patricia
Werner,
Jeff,
Larson,
Paul,
Crawford
Michael
tinker
Neil,
Anderson
and
Fay
bland.
They
did
excellent
work
on
behalf
of
all
the
residents
of
the
city
of
Minneapolis.
So
thank
you
all,
and
we
will
now
move
to
receive
reports
from
the
standing
committees
on
matters
to
be
considered
by
the
floor
counsel
at
our
regular
meeting.
This
coming
Friday
we'll
begin
with
the
budget
committee
chair
Palmisano.
A
H
H
Those
of
you
with
home
committees
who
are
home
committee
chairs,
will
begin
meeting
with
the
mayor's
office
on
the
mayor's
budget
proposal.
Development
and
I
would
encourage
encourage
all
of
my
colleagues
to
take
the
information
that
we've
learned
from
those
results:
performance
evaluations
with
them
to
those
meetings.
I
think
it
would
help
us,
as
we
start
that
process
I've
been
getting
a
lot
of
feedback
from
department
directors
and
from
some
of
my
colleagues
on
how
results
went
this
year
and
I'll
continue
to
take
that
feedback.
Offline,
Thanks.
I
You,
madam
vice
president,
we'll
be
bringing
12
items
forward
for
approval
on
Friday
item.
1
is
also
a
joint
MC
da
operating
committee
item,
so
there
will
be
an
operating
committee
right
after
the
council
meeting,
and
this
is
passage
of
a
resolution
with
regard
to
a
bond
issuance
for
the
Minnesota
transition
charter
school
facility.
That's
at
twenty
five,
twenty
six,
twenty
seventh
Avenue
south-
that's
kind
of
a
cool
address.
I
Don't
you
think
25
26,
27,
I
kind
of
like
it
item
number
two
are
approving
an
application
for
crave
item
three
is
an
application
for
broken
clock
item.
Four
is
an
application
for
a
POI
item.
Five
is
a
liquor
application
for
Kai,
a
key
item:
six
are
the
liquor
license
approvals
and
seven?
Are
the
renewals,
eight
or
the
gambling
lights
and
super
bowls
item?
9?
Is
business
operating
conditions
for
racer
kitchen
item?
Ten
is
a
contract
amendment
with
a
ploy
Milwaukee
and
item
11
is
a
rental
license
reinstatement
item?
I
12
is
perhaps
the
largest
item
on
our
agenda
in
terms
of
both
historic
importance
and
overall
notice,
and
that
is
authorizing
a
great
streets
grant
to
PCYC
to
complete
the
almost
final
financing
to
get
the
Capri
theater
expansion
in
the
ground
this
year
and
see
that
staff
have
done
incredible
work
to
get
to
this
point
and
we're
really
excited
that.
That's
going
to
happen
so
with
that
I'm
happy
to
answer
questions
on
any
of
the
items
one
through
twelve.
I
A
I
A
J
Thank
You
vice
president
Jenkins,
the
housing
policy
development
committees,
bringing
forward
seven
items
for
consideration.
The
first
item
is
approving
the
2019
consolidated
plan.
Action
plan
and
I
will
be
moving
that
with
an
amendment
that
came
from
the
Ways
and
Means
Committee
having
to
do
with
some
an
increase
in
the
anticipated
funding
that
came
from
the
federal
government.
Second
item
is
passage
of
resolution
approving
our
housing
replacement
district
for
tax
increment
financing
plan.
The
third
item
is
extending
exclusive
development
rights
for
Snelling
Yards.
J
The
fourth
item
is
authorizing
agreement
with
tower
site
innovation
district
to
implement
part
of
our
metropolitan
communities.
Livable
serve
Metropolitan,
Council,
livable
communities.
Demonstration
account
grants.
Fifth
item
is
approving
the
minneapolis
homes,
development
assistant
round
four
guidelines,
including
funding
for
a
passive
housing
project,
and
a
sixth
item
is
authorizing
issuance
of
an
rfp
for
our
housing
opportunities
for
person
with
AIDS
program,
and
the
seventh
item
is
approving
a
missing
middle
housing
pilot
program.
Happy
to
stand
for
questions
on
any
of
those
items.
Thank.
A
J
You
very
much
happy
to
give
the
report
on
the
six
items
that
will
be
coming
forward
from
the
public
health,
environment
and
civil
rights
and
engagement.
Committee.
First
item
is
approving
appointments
to
the
Southside
Green
Zone.
Council
second
item
is
approving
appointments
to
the
transgender
equity
council.
Third
item
is
authorizing
an
extension
to
a
contract
with
bridge
healthcare
partners
for
our
school-based
clinic
program.
Fourth
item
is
authorizing
contracts
with
lab
dads,
Hennepin
theater
to
st.
Stephens,
Human
Services
and
Green
Minneapolis
for
downtown
prevention
of
violence
prevention.
Efforts.
A
G
You,
madam
vice
president,
the
committee
will
reporting
13
items
item
1
is
the
temporary
easement
agreements
with
mcnair
sanitary
reconstruction
projects,
items
2,
&
3
are
both
reconstruction
projects
at
the
locations
listed
and
four
are
allowing
large
block
event
permits
for
the
events
that
are
itemized
item
6
and
7
are
two
agreements
with
MnDOT
for
work
that
we
will
proceed
with
item
8
as
a
highway
turn
back
deep
from
the
state
of
Minnesota
for
Terron
highway
55
item
9
is
a
pedestrian
street
lighting
corridor.
Amendment
Lading
plan.
There's
several
actions
related
to
that
item.
G
A
F
You,
chair
Jenkins,
the
Whizzer
Means
Committee
is
bringing
forward
ten
items
for
consideration
today.
The
first
two
are
legal
settlements.
Item
number
three
is
authorizing
the
city
to
join
an
amicus
brief.
Defending
the
Affordable
Care
Act
item
number
four
is
accepting
this
little
bid
on
painting
for
the
public
service
building
project
items
five
through
nine
or
adjustments
to
existing
contracts,
contract
amendments
for
the
public
service
building
project
and
item
number
ten,
as
gift
acceptance
from
field
Regina,
Northrop
neighborhood
group
for
a
public
safety
security,
camera
I'm
happy
to
stand
for
questions.
A
A
E
You,
madam
chair,
we
have
two
items
from
the
executive
committee.
The
first
is
approving
an
increase
in
the
salary
schedule
for
the
plumbers
salary,
for
the
plumbers
bargaining
unit,
and
the
second
is
the
appointment
of
the
director
of
regulatory
services,
which
was
nominated
by
the
mayor,
and
that
is
interim
director
Kim
Keller
to
consider
that
appointment
and
set
a
public
hearing
and
what
which
will
take
place
at
the
EDRs
committee,
and
you
know
I'll
note
that
there
was
some
discussion
in
the
executive
committee.
E
I
did
express
some
disappointment
that
no
council
members
were
part
of
this
particular
process
and
therefore
no
council
members
will
be
able
to
speak
to
the
you
know
to
the
candidates
that
were
considered
through
this
process.
So
I
did
ask
the
mayor
to
hopefully
follow
up
with
councilmembers
and
I
know.
Those
of
you
who
may
have
questions
about
the
process
will
be
able
to
reach
out
to
the
mayor
as
well.