►
From YouTube: May 7, 2019 Transportation & Public Works Committee
Description
Minneapolis Transportation & Public Works Committee Meeting
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/
A
I
will
call
the
to
order
its
the
regularly
scheduled
meeting
of
the
transportation
Public
Works
Committee
I'm,
a
committee
chair,
councilmember,
right
I'm
joined
by
my
colleagues,
councilmembers
Paula
Sano
Fletcher
and
Gordon
comer
Bender's
on
her
way
and
council
member
Johnson
is
representing
the
city
at
the
Capitol.
Today
it
may
not
be
joining
us.
We
have
on
the
agenda
15
items.
We
have
a
public
hearing,
a
discussion
item
item
for
teens
listed
as
a
separate
receiving
file,
but
I'll
be
moving
it
with
the
consent.
A
A
10
is
a
grant
application
for
the
Minnesota
Pollution
Control
Agency
for
electric
vehicles
charging
stations,
those
are
different
actions
for
their
similar
project
item.
11
is
a
request
for
proposals
over
the
2020
2023
Public
Works
consulting
pool
item
12
is
the
Minneapolis
Duluth
Superior
passage
rail
Alliance
board
membership.
We
will
be
regionally
in
that
group
as
a
member
item
13
as
the
agreement
with
the
Minnesota
commercial
Aero
for
33rd
Street
East
reconstruction
project
and
item
14
receiving
file
for
traffic
zones.
Restrictions
controls
for
the
first
quarter
of
the
2019
report
does.
B
C
D
Morning,
mr.
chair
and
members
of
the
committee,
my
name
is
Stephanie
Marburg
I'm,
an
engineer
with
Public
Works
transportation,
engineering
and
design,
and
I
am
here
to
present
for
the
public
hearing
for
the
area
way.
Removal
on
the
Hennepin
Avenue
south
project
specific
address
is
30
32
through
30
38
Hennepin
Avenue,
South,
PID,
zero,
four,
zero,
two,
eight
two,
four
two
one:
zero
zero,
seven,
two:
the
work
basically
consists
of
removing
an
area
away
which
was
in
conflict
with
the
Hennepin
Avenue
South
project.
D
D
Today,
Public
Works
is
asking
the
City
Council
to
pass
resolutions
to
adopt
and
levy
assessments
in
the
amount
of
6025
dollars
or
twenty
eighty
one
dollars
and
25
cents
for
the
unpaid
charges
for
the
area
way.
Removal
in
addition,
we'd
also
we're
also
requesting
the
board
of
estimation
and
Taxation
to
authorize
the
city's
issuance
of
assessment
bonds
in
the
amount
of
6080
$1.25
for
certain
purposes
other
than
the
purchase
of
utilities.
And
that
concludes
my
presentation.
I'll
stand
by
for
questions.
A
Any
questions
per
the
stretch,
staff
presentation,
I,
see
none
I
will
then
open
the
public
hearing.
This
is
public
hearing
number
one
anyone
signed
in
anyone
wish
to
come
forward.
Anyone
wish
to
come
forward
seen
no
one
coming
forward.
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
move
the
item
as
submitted
by
staff.
Any
further
discussion
see
none
all
in
favor,
say:
aye
I
sent
a
name.
That
item
carries
and
we
can
now
go
to
the
discussion
item
15.
A
C
Chair
members
of
the
committee,
with
a
point
of
privilege,
I'm
going
to
introduce
Danielle
Elkins
with
a
little
bit
of
a
backstory.
This
is
an
item
that
was
born
out
of
work
completed
about
a
year
and
a
half
ago
by
members
of
our
staff
who
participated
in
the
national
smart
cities
collaborative
organized
by
transportation
for
America
Kathleen
mail
is
here,
she
participated,
Jon
Huertas
also
participated
in
judge.
Johnson
has
also
participated
out
of
work.
We
completed
with
transportation
for
America
and
the
smart
cities
collaborative.
C
We
recognized
that
we
needed
a
an
acceleration
of
our
work
in
the
smart
cities
area
and
you'll
get
a
better
definition
of
that
as
Danielle
is
speaking.
Transportation
for
America
stepped
in
and
assisted
us
to
obtain
funding
from
the
McKnight
Foundation
to
fund
a
fellow
in
our
department,
who
is
part
of
a
national
organization
called
fuse
fuse
places
fellows
in
a
number
of
US
cities
to
tackle
their
toughest
challenges.
C
For
us
that
challenge
is
in
Public
Works
keeping
up
with
technological
advancements
and
understanding
how
that's
shaping
our
city,
Danielle
is
about
halfway
through
her
fellowship
with
us.
I
know
that
you've
each
had
a
chance
to
meet
her
and
talk
with
her.
She
has
done
a
sizable
amount
of
work
and
her
time
here,
working
both
within
Public
Works
and
with
staff,
as
well
as
within
our
regional
community
and
I've,
asked
Danielle
to
give
the
committee
a
mid-year
update
on
her
progress.
C
E
E
Defining
advanced
mobility
can
be
tough.
The
easiest
way
is
to
use
the
acronym
case,
so
it's
connected
autonomous,
shared
and
electric,
the
obvious
ones
so
autonomous
as
our
car
is
becoming
increasingly
autonomous.
We
are
using
the
Society
of
Automotive
Engineers
definition
of
the
level
of
autonomy
and,
as
the
technology
changes
we
become,
potentially
more
autonomous
connected
is
vehicles
and
their
ability
to
communicate
with
infrastructure
with
our
systems.
E
Our
signs,
our
striping,
our
traffic
control
systems,
as
well
as
our
wireless
network,
to
be
able
to
talk
to
other
cars
in
your
emergency
vehicles,
as
well
as
people
other
people
on
the
road,
one
that
is
becoming
more
frequent
here
as
you're
seeing
is
shared
all
shared
system,
shared
scooters,
shared
bikes,
car
share
and
in
additionally
electric
as
we
try
and
meet
our
greenhouse
gas
goals,
transitioning
our
vehicles.
So,
within
my
work
plan,
the
first
item
was
knowledge
transfer.
E
How
do
we
make
sure
that,
as
these
issues
are
changing
on
a
daily
basis,
that
we
are
keeping
up
as
a
city
understanding
what's
happening
in
other
cities?
What
best
practices
are
so
on
a
daily
basis
and
reading
articles
reports
plans
from
other
cities
to
understand
what
we
need
to
do
as
a
city
to
not
only
prepare
but
make
sure
that
anything
that
is
coming
is
happening
with
us
and
we
are
deciding
what
the
outcome
is
and
it
matches
our
values
as
a
community.
E
The
challenge
is
that
a
lot
of
this
does
not
exist,
so
we
are
trying
to
tell
a
story
that
has
not
been
realized
yet
and
sometimes
painting.
That
picture
can
be
additionally
challenging
and
making
sure
that
the
picture
that
is
painted
and
the
graphics
that
are
created
tell
the
story
that
we
want
for
our
city.
E
So
we
have
had
some
really
great
conversations
regionally
about
creating
some
new
materials
to
tell
these
stories
the
way
that
we
want
them
and
showing
the
outcomes
that
we
want
for
our
city
and
trying
to
explain
this
in
a
way
that
anyone
can
understand
it.
The
second
main
piece
of
my
deliverable
is
assisting
in
the
transportation
action
plan,
which
is
our
10
year
transportation
plan
that
you
are
familiar
with.
We
have
a
settle
on
topic
within
the
transportation
action
plan
on
advanced
mobility.
E
We
are
wrapping
up
our
public
engagement
and
we've
had
some
really
meaningful
conversations
with
the
public
around.
How
does
advanced
mobility
potentially
impact
those
particularly
those
that
are
most
vulnerable
in
the
community,
so
those
that
are
unbanked
that
do
not
have
smartphone
access
and
data
plans,
those
with
accessibility
challenges.
How
does
anything
that
is
coming,
make
life
easier
and
not
harder
for
them
to
interact
with
their
system
and
to
get
around
the
city?
And
the
third
piece
of
my
work
is
around
public-private
partnerships
since
joining
the
city.
E
It's
also
been
very
important
to
have
partners
with
within
the
public
agencies
talking
constantly
with
MnDOT
Metro
Transit
and
really
making
sure
that
anything
that
is
happening
within
the
community
is
happening,
we're
building
each
other
up.
We
have
common
goals,
we
understand
what
we
want
to
get
out
of
this
and
sharing
the
knowledge
that
we're
developing
as
a
city
with
other
cities
around
the
region
as
well.
Two
examples
of
regional
collaboration
we
joined
by
the
city
of
st.
Paul
for
a
regional
solicitation
for
funding
for
the
our
car
electric
car
sharing
network.
E
So
one
of
the
things
that
I'm
working
on
through
that
that
group
is
developing
some
regional
workshops
to
be
able
to
do
spoke,
asan,
specific
issues
that
are
the
most
challenging
for
us
in
the
region.
Right
now
and
the
first
one
is
going
to
be
June
6th.
It
is
mobility
hooks.
We
as
a
region
have
decided
to
define
mobility
hubs
as
a
place
where
people
can
connect
with
multiple
modes
of
transportation
in
a
safe,
comfortable,
accessible
environment,
facilitating
convenient
and
reliable
travel.
E
It's
about
creating
a
safe
place
where
you're
transferring
between
modes
that
encourages
people
to
try
new
modes
to
interact
within
their
community,
and
we
are
starting
to
understand
what
do
we
want
as
a
region
for
a
bare
minimum
of
hubs
throughout
the
region?
What
kind
of
amenities
were
kind
of
branding
placemaking?
What
do
we
want
in
our
hubs
that
are
be
defined
within
the
Twin
Cities,
and
then
that
would
allow
the
city
of
Minneapolis
to
continue
with
our
individual
pilot
programs,
as
well
as
the
city
of
st.
E
Paul
and
other
cities
with
with
our
partners
such
as
Metro
Transit,
so
really
looking
forward
to
that
we
are.
We
have
a
list
about
of
120
people
that
we
are
going
to
be
inviting
to
this
workshop
and
we've
got
some
really
good,
facilitated
activities,
as
well
as
national
speakers
that
are
going
to
be
coming
in.
For
that,
our
the
second
workshop,
we're
focusing
on
is
all
around
data
sharing
there
is.
This
is
a
very
important
issue.
You
know
it's
very
important
to
see
you
come
in
and
we
have
you've
done
really
good
work.
E
I
think
I
can
say
I'm
really
impressed
by
the
city
staff
and
what
they've
been
able
to
put
together
and
create
and
I
know
you
heard
from
Josh
on
March
5th.
It
really
has
become
a
national
standard
hearing
from
people
constantly
wanting
to
talk
to
our
people,
which
is
a
really
great
thing.
So
what
we
want
to
do
with
this
workshop
is
share
with
the
rest
of
the
region.
What
we've
been
able
to
accomplish
as
a
city?
E
What
is
happening
at
the
national
level
on
this
topic,
since
it
is
changing
so
quickly,
and
we
have
very
specific
rules
within
the
state
of
Minnesota
of
how
we
deal
with
data,
making
sure
that
the
privacy
of
our
residents
still
stays
number
one
and
fostering
those
relationships.
So
the
second
half
of
this
workshop
I
was
awarded
a
Innovation
Lab
grant
from
fuse
my
host
organization
to
bring
in
a
facilitator
to
help
us
problem-solve
through
some
of
the
issues
to
determine.
E
Are
there
any
things
that
we
need
to
change,
either
on
the
governance
of
policy
side
or
on
the
data
practitioner
side,
to
make
it
easier
for
individuals
and
public
agencies
to
share
information
to
problem-solve
and
using
really
continue
to
use
that
data
to
drive
specific
decision-making
and
understanding
what
we're
using
it?
For
so
we
get
better
outcomes
in
the
city.
E
The
third
and
final
workshop
that
I
am
working
on.
This
is
going
to
be
more
focused
internally.
This
is
focused
on
staff
throughout
the
city.
This
is
a
very
important
topic
right
now,
nationally
is
what
do
we
do
with
the
curb?
It
is
the
most
dynamically
changing
area
of
our
public
right-of-way
is
impacted
by
the
increase
in
e-commerce,
delivery,
pick-up
and
drop-off,
uber
and
lyft.
E
You
have
a
lot
more
potential
for
conflict
and
need
for
flexible
use
going
forward,
so
we're
gonna
be
convening
a
really
interesting
group
of
people
with
special
invites
to
the
private
sector
as
well
that
have
expressed
interest
in
this
topic
in
working
with
us
on
this
topic.
Researchers,
additionally,
and
hopefully
getting
some
some
small
pilots
doing
kind
of
a
design,
sprint
problem-solving
session.
Out
of
this
workshop.
E
E
Is
it
complementing
transit
use
or
not,
and
we're
also
partnering,
with
MnDOT
and
Metro
transit
on
two
of
those
research
projects?
And
then
the
last
one
I
wanted
to
share
with
you.
There
is
an
ideas
competition
put
on
by
Metro
lab,
and
this
was
an
anticipation
of
a
Civic
innovation
challenge,
grant
that
the
National
Science
Foundation
is
going
to
be
putting
out
in
the
next
six
months.
We
said
it
is
an
idea
with
the
Hennepin
University
partnership
and
the
University
of
Minnesota.
E
Our
idea
was
focused
on
how
do
we
connect
those
in
our
recipients
of
County
Human
Services,
with
increased
use
of
shared
mobility
and
making
sure
that
those
that
are
receiving
those
services
are
able
to
use
shared
mobility
and
we're
understanding
it
from
the
user
perspective?
Our
idea
was
very
well-received.
E
It
was
accepted
for
the
ideas
festival
that
happened,
April,
29th
and
represented
from
the
you
and
Hennepin
County
were
able
to
attend
that
our
idea
was
one
of
the
most
popular
and
they've
encouraged
us
to
apply
for
a
federal
grant
program,
so
I'll
be
coming
back
and
hopefully
I'm
getting
your
approval
to
be
able
to
join
that
team.
To
do
so.
F
Thank
you
mr.
chair,
and
thank
you
for
this
presentation
and
for
the
work
that
you're
doing
I.
Think
it's
really
exciting
that
Public
Works
is
investing
in
really
thinking
about
the
future,
and-
and
this
actually
is
a
set
of
questions
that
I
was
just
asking
director
Hutchison
about
carbon
stuff
and
she
said
week.
F
There's
a
presentation
coming
and
and
I'll
tell
you
that
that
conversation
is
anxiously
awaited
by
many
of
my
constituents
who
are
observing
the
study,
conflicts
that
are
happening
and
really
seeing
that
the
way
we're
trying
to
position
parking
and
drop-offs
and
bike
lanes
that
everything
else
that
happens
right
up
against
the
curb
is
often
coming
into
conflict
and
and
I'm
anxiously
awaiting
the
results
of
the
work.
So
so,
thanks
for
moving
that
forward
and
again
thanks
for
the
focus
also
on
data
privacy
and
data
sharing,
I
think
this
is
something
that
we
should
be.
F
B
You
mr.
chair,
thank
you
for
this
presentation.
It
was
short,
but
really
interesting
and
I
agree
with
you
that
the
time
is
right
to
really
be
considering
this
stuff.
A
couple
questions
that
might
just
ask
you
another
layer
of
depth
on
some
of
your
slides.
Could
you
give
us
a
preview
of
what
the
connected
bucket
might
mean
as
a
first
step
for
Minneapolis?
That
was
the
part
that
was
maybe
not
as
clear
as
the
other
pearls.
Sorry,
what?
E
The
town
summer
palace,
no,
it
is
I,
think
that
probably
the
most
challenging
for
the
technical
community
as
well
the
biggest
challenges
that
we
currently
do
not
have
federal
guidance.
That
would
explain
to
us
which
technology
is
the
preferred
route
for
connected.
So
we
have
kind
of
two
trucks
right
now
that
are
evolving
between
the
automotive
manufacturers,
the
cell
service
providers
and
other
suppliers,
they're
kind
of
working
in
tangent
with
each
other,
which
means
that
we
still
don't
know
what
our
infrastructure
as
a
city
needs
to
be
prepared
to
handle.
E
So
we
usually,
when
we
talk
about
connected
its
vehicles,
talking
to
infrastructure,
so
being
able
to
see
this
and
know
what
the
infrastructure
is
and
where
it
is
and
also
be
able
to
talk
to
the
signal
system
to
know,
there's
a
red
light
up
ahead
or
there's
an
emergency
vehicle
that
tells
the
signal
that
it
needs
to
change,
and
that
tells
the
car
that
it's
going
to
be
stopping
as
well.
It's
the
the
Challenger
with
the
investment
in
cars
is,
as
we
manufacture,
cars,
it's
usually
a
seven
or
eight
year
cycle.
E
So
as
they're
investing
in
those
changes,
we
still
have
another
seven
or
eight
years
to
really
know
what
we
need
to
be
prepared
for.
So
for
us,
it's
just
making
sure
that
our
systems
are
going
to
be
compatible
with
what
comes
that
were
prepared
as
a
city
for
that
and
then
working
with
any
other
partners
to
test
those
systems
as
well.
Does.
E
Tear
right
through
the
council
and
I,
it's
a
good
question.
I
think
that's
still
kind
of
an
evolving
thing,
because
if
we
end
up
with
one
potential
scenario,
it
should
be
able
to
understand
the
different
types
of
Lane,
striping
ins
and
signals
and
I
think
that's
still
a
big
question
for
the
community
is
at
what
point
are
we?
Is
it
autonomous
or
connected
enough
to
actually
understand
correctly
the
way,
the
the
level
of
autonomous
that
we
have
now
and
say
like
a
Tesla
as
its
driving
down
the
road?
E
It
recognizes
striping,
but
it
doesn't
recognize
if
there's
an
exit
on
the
freeway
and
the
striping
goes
off
that
it
should
jump
back
over.
So
a
lot
of
these
cars
will
start
to
go
with
it
and
then
cut
back
in
when
it
realizes
it
wasn't
supposed
to
be
doing
that.
So
technology
is
not
there
yet
and
so
I
think
it's
still
got
to
be
seen
and
we
don't
know.
Thank.
C
You,
sir
chair
and
councilmember
apanasana
you're,
asking
really
smart
technological
questions
that
I
hear
a
lot
and
one
thing
that
I've
worked
with
Danielle
on
and
with
all
of
our
team
on
is
that
we
should
continue
to
build
the
city
we
want
and
expect
that
private
sector
technology
matches
to
the
community.
We
want
to
build
and
that's
a
little
bit
of
a
chicken
in
and
I
think
if
we
hold
true
to
what
we
hold
as
important
as
a
city
that
we
should
expect
the
technology
to
come
along
to
where
we
are
versus
vice-versa.
B
Thank
you.
That's
really
helpful
and
encouraging
another
question
I
had
was
you
had
a
slide
about
mobility
hubs
and
I'm
curious?
It
was
there's
a
cute
cartoon
in
picture,
but
I'm
curious
to
mo.
Do
mobility
hubs
exist
yet
and
if
so,
as
there
are
in,
if
not,
rather
there
are
other
cities
looking
to
do
this
type
of
thing
too,
through.
E
The
chair
council
found
out
yes,
they
they
do
exist
in
limited
capacity
in
Europe,
so
that
key
little
graphic
is
actually
from
a
European
model.
That's
already
been
created,
it
is
in
the
works
in
many
US
cities.
Right
now,
LA
has
an
active
RFP
where
they
are
looking
for
assistance
and
they've
done
some
limited
amenities,
installation,
a
lot
of
cities
that
are
at
the
same
kind
of
point
is
us
what
we're
trying
to
define.
What
does
that
mean
for
us?
E
What
does
it
look
like
for
us
and
then
starting
to
do
some
pilots
and
starting
to
do
some
smaller
improvements
to
get
incrementally
to
a
much
bigger
scale
of
mobility
hubs?
The
hope
that,
when
we
do
that
regional
workshop
is
that
we've
already
created
kind
of
a
draft
pamphlet.
If
this
is
what
we
want,
mobility
hubs
to
look
like
within
the
region
and
we've
got
a
national
interest
of
like
once,
you
guys
figure
out
what
that
is.
B
E
Tearing
right
through
the
chair
how's,
my
pals
found
out,
the
two
of
them
were
a
request
that
came
from
the
University,
but
it
was
a
result
of
our
conversations
with
them
of
explaining
to
them.
These
are
the
things
that
are
the
most
challenging
for
us
right
now
and
then
also
understanding
what
the
national
so
research
we're
doing
here
could
have
national
relevance
so
particularly
that
ecommerce
deliveries
that
everyone's
dealing
with
that
right
now.
E
So
that
was
an
obvious
one
for
them
to
ask
us
to
work
with,
and
the
the
one
about
getting
kind
of
more
feedback
from
people
in
terms
of
how
they
want
to
deal
with
autonomous
vehicles
is
also
kind
of
a
continuation
of
some
research.
That's
already
being
done
with
the
you
through
the
National
Science
Foundation,
around
autonomous
vehicles.
G
You
mr.
chair,
and
thanks
for
all
the
exciting
work,
it's
great
to
hear
this
presentation
I,
think
very
helpful
for
us
to
get
an
update.
I
wanted
to
talk
a
bit
about
the
workshops,
and
particularly
the
curb,
but
maybe
also
the
mobility
hub
too,
and
offer
the
reflection
that
it
would
be
exciting
to
think
about
this
as
an
opportunity
to
not
only
sort
of
advance
our
technical
expertise,
but
also
to
think
about
how
we're
communicating
and
engaging
about
these
decisions
and
I
think
about
some
conversations.
G
I've
had
with
my
colleagues
in
North
Minneapolis,
who
are
looking
back
to
decisions
that
were
made
last
term
before
they
were
in
an
office
and
have
almost
180-degree
difference
of
opinion
with
what
decisions
were
made
last
term,
where
there
were
projects
where
bicycle
pedestrian
safety
features
were
left
out
of
projects.
Frankly
and
now
wanting
to
figure
out
how
we
could
add
them,
and
now
it
has
become
either
impossible
or
extremely
expensive
and
I.
G
Think
honestly,
if
we
are
doing
our
job
well
as
a
city
of
engaging
the
community
and
laying
the
groundwork
for
making
those
kinds
of
decisions,
we
shouldn't
have
a
180-degree
position.
Change
from
term
to
term,
and
so
I
want
to
thank
going
forward,
how
we
create
more
continuity,
particularly
when
we
look
at
race
equity
in
really
engaging
deeply
in
communities
who
maybe
haven't
had
the
opportunity
or
haven't
been
engaged
in
in
talking
about
a
technical
transportation
terms,
so
that
when
we
go
with
a
decision
about
a
street,
you
know
we're
asking
the
right
questions.
G
E
Right,
councilmen
that
are
absolutely
part
of
what
we're
doing
on
some
of
our
initial
work
and
the
mobility
hubs
is
using
some
data
tools
to
understand.
Not
only
you
know
where
people
are
going
and
kind
of
natural
cluster
of
needs
of
resources,
but
also
connecting
with
where
people
are
accessing
human
services
with
the
county.
So
where
are
those
buildings
and
we've
actually
overlaid
pretty
much?
E
C
Chair
and
vice-chair
offender
I'll
also
add
that
this
is
work.
That
is
an
addition
to
the
work
of
our
transportation
action
plan
and
in
some
ways
is
we
have
to
make
ourselves
smarter
so
that
we
know
even
wanted
questions
to
ask
and
I
was
a
purpose
of
the
fellow
and
I'm
glad
that
Kathleen
is
here
to
hear
your
remarks
about
really
being
sure
that
we
dig
into
the
community
and
I'll
ask
these
two
to
discuss
how
to
make
sure
that
the
two
efforts
are
linked
together
from
a
meaningful
and
realities
perspective.
A
Thank
you
for
that
and
yeah
I
think
that
interface
between
our
ability
to
have
the
conversation
internally
will
directly
affect
our
ability
to
communicate
with
with
the
public,
but
never
losing
sight
of
that
dynamic
is
really
where
we
get
the
value
for
our
action
plan.
Is
that
interface
point,
and
not
just
an
internal
thing,
but.
A
Great
I
think
this
this
report,
as
my
colleagues
have
explored
with
their
questions
a
very
exciting
document.
It's
it's
sort
of
imbued
with
so
much
more
that
we
need
to
do
in
terms
of
our
action
planning,
so
I
just
I
think
such
a
central
piece
and
it
definitely
demonstrates
I-
were
you
know
not
only
forward-looking,
but
we're
forward,
analyzing
and
hopefully
future
shaping
and
not
just
to
be
shaped
by
and
so
I
think
this
is
the
kind
of
inquiry
and
document
direction
that
gets
us
in
that
place.
So
thank
you.
Thank.
A
Future
reports
with
that
there,
no
further
questions
or
comments,
move
to
receive
and
file.
The
report
that
we
just
obtained
from
the
staff
presentation
any
further
discussion.
Seeing
none
approve
item
15,
all
in
favor,
say
aye,
I'm
santi
name
Cary's
and
we
have
completed
the
agenda
and
can
be
adjourned.