►
From YouTube: April 15, 2019 City Planning Commission
Description
Minneapolis City Planning Commission
A
B
A
Next,
we
will
work
through
the
agenda
to
determine
which,
if
any
items
we'll
hear
on
a
public
hearing
for
those
in
the
audience,
we'll
work
through
each
one
of
the
agenda
items.
If
you
wish
to
speak
on
the
agenda
item,
please
raise
your
hand
or
speak
up
when
I
list
it
off.
If
you
don't
speak
up,
we
will
not
have
a
public
hearing
on
that
item.
So
our
first
agenda
item
is
the
Nico
properties,
29
29,
1st
Avenue,
south
and
119
and
120
to
East
Lake
Street
in
Wharton.
It's
a
preliminary
and
final
platicas.
A
A
A
Item
number
four
is
Penn
Avenue
Union
at
22,
Golden,
Valley,
Road,
1911
to
1915
Penn
Avenue
North
in
1906,
1914,
Queen,
Avenue
North
in
Ward
5,
a
variety
of
applications
related
to
community
space
and
residential
development.
There
is
anyone
wishing
to
speak
up
that
application
scene.
No
one
will
put
item
for
incentive
item
number
five
is
the
East
Lake
Street
McDonald's
signage
at
3110,
Lake
Street,
East,
29:25,
31st,
Avenue
South
in
Ward
2.
Anybody
wish
to
speak
on
the
mcdonald
science,
one
person.
Okay,
we
will
discuss
item
number
five,
okay,
yep.
A
C
A
B
Item
number
for
Penn
Avenue:
when
that
item
went
to
committee,
the
whole
I
had
accused
myself
at
the
time.
I
suppose
this
employer
have
been
working
with
a
potential
commercial
tenant
in
that
project.
That
tenant
is
no
longer
part
of
the
project,
so
it's
been
determined.
There
is
no
longer
a
potential
conflict
of
interest
there,
I
just
wanted
to
disclose
that
affiliation.
Nonetheless,
perfect.
Thank.
A
A
D
Afternoon,
president
commission
members
I
did
just
touch
base
with
the
sign
contractor.
The
issue
at
hand
was,
regarding
the
pole,
sign
variance
that
staff
was
recommending
denial
of
in
working
with
McDonald's.
D
They
were
open
to
converting
the
menu
and
pre
browse
boards
to
a
monument
sign,
as
opposed
to
a
pole,
sign
simply
adding
a
skirt
around
the
base.
Mcdonald's
was
fine
with
that
sounds
like
the
applicant
is
as
well.
So
if
there's
other
concerns
from
the
Commission
I
can
answer
those,
but
otherwise
I
think
we're
pretty
good.
A
A
C
A
A
E
The
variance
reduced
to
minimum
distance
from
dynamic
signs
item
D
the
variance
reduced
the
duration
of
the
message,
the
duration
of
the
message
on
the
dynamic
sign
item
e,
very
to
increase,
number
of
freestanding
signs
and
the
variance
for
same
type,
which
is
a
denial
girls.
All
several
seedy
conditions
on
each
one.
Alright,.