►
From YouTube: May 13, 2020 Local Board of Appeal and Equalization
Description
Minneapolis Local Board of Appeal and Equalization Meeting
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/
A
B
Good
morning,
welcome
to
this
live
broadcast
of
our
virtual
meeting.
This
meeting
includes
the
remote
participation
of
members
of
authorized
under
the
state
under
Minnesota
statute,
section
13,
D
0
to
1
due
to
the
declared
local
health
pandemic.
For
the
record,
my
name
is
Neil
Anderson
I
am
chair
of
the
local
board
of
appeal
and
Equalization.
I
will
now
call
this
meeting
to
order.
The
open
meeting
law
requires
a
roll
call
vote
to
be
conducted
during
a
virtual
meeting,
and
a
certification
form
will
be
completed
for
each
local
board
meeting.
F
B
Let
the
record
reflect
a
quorum.
Four
of
the
board
is
present.
We
will
proceed
to
the
agenda,
a
copy
of
which
was
posted
for
public
access
to
the
city's
legislative
information
management
system,
which
is
available
at
Li
M
house
minneapolis,
MN
gov
members.
There's
one
amendment
to
the
agenda
for
item
number
19,
which
is
to
add
case
number
two
0b
h,
0
2,
4,
3
4,
the
condominium
unit
at
unit
number
307
and
9
West
Franklin
Avenue
may
hat
may
I
have
a
motion
to
adopt
the
agenda
with
that
edition.
H
B
B
B
Motion
passes
in
the
minutes
are
accepted.
As
presented
new
business.
We
will
first
consider
a
series
appeals
which
have
been
submitted
in
writing
to
the
board.
We
have
calling
hearings
scheduled
for
10:30
and
at
11:30
and
we'll
go
to
those
cases
at
the
appointed
time.
Let's
begin
with
item
four
5205
Washburn
Avenue
South
case
number:
two
0bh
zero
zero
one,
zero.
D
B
B
B
G
F
J
J
D
D
D
D
J
D
D
D
B
D
B
And
with
that,
we
will
begin
item
number
five.
Thirty,
three,
twenty
two,
thirty
eighth
Avenue
South
case
number
two
0
eh,
zero,
zero.
Two
three
I'll
remind
the
board
to
please
turn
on
your
camera
when,
when
speaking,
this
property
is
again
thirty,
three
twenty
two
thirty
eighth
Avenue
Kreg
Christensen
is
the
owner
and
it's
a
single
family
residence.
B
B
F
Yes,
I
would
I
would
encourage
the
property
owner
to
contact
the
city
to
see
what
he
can
do
about
that
there
is
a
process
if
the
house
is
a
nuisance
next
door,
but
despite
that,
I
didn't
see
clear
and
convincing
evidence
to
support
a
value
change
on
this.
There
just
wasn't
that
much
market
derived
information
provided
so
I
move
for
no
change
in
this
particular
case.
D
Yes,
I
have
some
familiarity
with
this
house.
It
was
a
bungalow
with
a
low
roofline
which
the
previous
owner
had
raised
the
roofline
to
make
a
more
of
a
second
story
and
put
a
extension
on
the
back
for
the
kitchen.
It
had
a
real
industrial
feel
with
what
they
did.
So
one
of
the
things
that
the
homeowner
pointed
out
was
that
the
floor
was
plywood.
Well,
that's,
oddly
enough
what
the
previous
owner
wanted.
That
was
the
look
they
wanted.
It
wasn't
that
they
didn't
finish
it.
They
wanted
that
kind
of
look
and
the
house.
D
B
Okay,
my
main
concern
here
was
the
lack
of
photos
of
of
their
property
and
mainly
photos
of
the
neighbor's
property,
we're
trying
to
assess
the
value
of
their
property
and
not
providing
significant,
comparable
properties
of
that
have
sold
in
the
nearby
area.
That
would
justify
a
lower
price.
So
mr.
tinker
back
here,
if
you'd
like
to
make
that
motion.
D
J
B
J
B
Very
recent
appraisal,
thank
you
any
other
discussion
on
it.
The
Belize
was
added
or
remodeled
that
a
seseri
Welling
unit
there
was
permits
pulled
for
two
hundred
ten
thousand
and
twenty
tooth
I
was
twenty
three
thousand
in
2019,
so
combined,
two
hundred
and
thirty,
three
thousand
for
the
permits
in
2019.
D
B
The
prison
was
2020,
so
I
believe
it
was
the
it
was
assessed
in
2017
for
nine
hundred
ninety
nine
thousand
Justin
2018
for
a
million
forty
nine
thousand
dollars
same
in
2019,
and
now
it
is
jumped
basically
90
thousand
dollars,
and
that
was
after
again
200
and
some
two
hundred
thirty
seven
thousand
dollars
where
the
permits
being
pulled
does
not
seem
under
reason,
unreasonable
jump
to
me.
But
okay
on.
D
Page
65,
it
says
the
additional
rooms
are
detached
from
the
home
above
the
attack
detached
garage
he
has
already
applied
for
the
permits
with
the
city
of
Minneapolis.
They
have
very
strict
building
codes.
I
will
make
the
extraordinary
assumption
the
work
will
be
completed
during
the
current
building
using
the
current
building
codes.
He
did
also
state
that
there
will
be
a
railing
on
the
stairs.
So
that
says
to
me
that
the
appraisal
was
done
with
the
assumption
that
that
accessory
unit
was
completed.
J
G
K
J
B
B
J
B
B
B
D
B
D
E
B
With
motion
being
pass,
we'll
move
on
to
item
number,
eight
to
nine
five:
zero
Dean
Parkway
number.
Forty
no
to
case
number,
two
0bh
zero,
zero,
three
three
and
it
is
there's
also
the
garage
of
that
unit.
I,
don't
know
if
we
look
at
the
two
together
or
if
we
vote
on
them
separately,
mismo
Quizlet,
pretty
answer
that
question.
J
B
J
D
That
would
work
other
units
in
that
building
have
sold
for
more
than
425
I.
Think
the
seller,
at
the
point
that
it
sold,
was
pretty
well
ready
to
get
rid
of
it.
Having
tried
and
failed
so
many
times
so,
I
think
that
the
buyers
got
a
really
good
value
and
I
would
move
to
sustain
the
value
of
the
assessor's
office.
We'll.
B
F
I
agreeing
with
what
they
just
said:
I,
don't
think
they
provided
clear
and
convincing
evidence
and
the
the
circumstances
beyond
that
sales
behind
that
sale
seem
pretty
atypical.
So,
despite
what
they
paid,
we
don't
know.
That's
not
necessarily
a
relevant
piece
of
evidence
in
this
particular
case,
without
further
investigation,
so,
given
that
they
didn't
provide
any
other
evidence
other
than
what
they
paid
I
agree
with
faith.
B
B
E
C
B
G
B
E
B
D
You
I
would
move
to
sustain
the
value
set
by
the
assessor's
office
in
looking
at
the
other
properties.
They,
for
the
most
part,
seem
to
be
pretty
much
in
line
with
the
type
of
property
we're
looking
at
here,
and
you
know
a
lot
of
updated
kitchens
and
bathrooms
and
whatever
so.
My
motion
would
be
to
sustain
the
value
by
the
assessor's
office.
B
D
E
B
B
B
J
I
J
D
F
B
D
B
B
B
D
Thank
You
mr.
chair,
this
wasn't
a
state
and
as
far
as
I
can
tell,
there
are
peer
two.
Unless
they
did
did
it
without
permits.
There
appears
to
be
not
a
lot
of
substantial
work
done
since
it
was
purchased
knowing
how
difficult
it
is
to
find
homes
in
this
price
range.
In
that
area,
I
would
tend
to
think
that
a
higher
value
is
sustained,
but
also
grand
is
still
kind
of
a
busy
street
there.
On
38th,
it's
a
pretty
small
house
and.
B
F
J
B
J
B
G
Kingsfield's
is
a
very
up-and-coming
area
and
Grand
Avenue
is
busy,
but
not
not
deductible
busy
and
as
a
if
this
becomes
a
rental
you
and
that
it's
a
very
easy
street
to
get
around
on,
because
it
is
on
a
bus
route.
So
I
think
something
should
be
done,
but
maybe
something
in
the
two
forty
five
hundred
range.
I.
G
D
B
D
D
B
B
B
F
J
B
B
B
B
J
J
D
B
B
D
J
J
B
J
D
D
Comps
that
were
provided
are
kind
of
all
over
the
board.
It's
difficult
in
this
neighborhood,
because
the
properties
are
so
diverse.
You
can
have
a
really
expensive
property
right
next
door
to
a
really
inexpensive
property
that
was
maybe
not
well
maintained,
used
as
a
rooming
house,
etc,
and
so
choosing
comps
is
really
I.
Think
difficult,
but
I
know
that
the
there
were
several
offers
on
this
property
and
it
still
didn't
go
up
to
didn't,
sell
for
what
the
assessed
value
is.
B
D
B
B
D
D
B
G
G
B
D
B
E
B
B
J
A
B
B
The
valuation
is
of
the
20/20.
Evaluation
is
two
million
four
hundred
fifty
thousand
and
it
looks
like,
was
purchased
September,
ninth
2019
for
two
million
one
hundred
and
fifteen
thousand
dollars,
and
it
looks
like
there
were
nine
hundred
fifty
thousand
dollars
worth
of
permits
pulled
in
October
of
2019
there.
Any
discussion.
B
B
J
G
Yes,
I'm
vaguely
familiar
with
this
property.
It
was.
It
was
in
a
in
poor
condition
when
he
bought
it
and
he
is
putting
a
tremendous
amount
of
money
in
the
properties
around
Lake
of
the
Isles
over
actually
over
a
million
are
actually
going
down
in
value
when
they're
reselling,
but
in
this
case
he
purchased
a
property
with
the
valuation
of
22,400,000
and
the
city
maintained
the
value.
So,
although
I
I
do
know
that
the
property
values
are
going
down
around
the
lake.
G
F
H
D
He's
asking
the
value
to
be
reduced
to
less
than
he
was
willing
to
pay
for
it.
So
you
know
he
claimed
that
they
were
paying
him
a
premium,
but
apparently
they
saw
that
there
was
value
there
enough
for
them
to
pay
the
premium.
So
I
certainly
could
not
agree
with
the
value
he's
asking
for
my
well
agree
with
Steve
that
the
properties
around
the
lake
aren't
selling
for
some
of
the
inflated
prices.
B
They
they
purchased
it
in
September
of
this
last
year
for
two
million
one
hundred
and
fifteen
thousand
dollars
and
they're
putting
a
protein,
a
million
dollars
into
improvements,
I'm
not
sure
where
they
are
in
that
process,
but
that
would
be
in
excess
of
three
million.
So
to
me
of
the
current
valuation
of
two
million
four
does
not
seem
out
of
line
if
he,
even
a
third
of
the
work
has
been
done.
A
B
D
H
B
I
Chair
Anderson
and
members
of
the
board
when
the
appellant
submitted
the
appeal
information
they
submitted
only
the
garage
stole
and
we
contacted
her
and
her
intent
was
to
actually
appeal
the
condo
unit
and
garage
stall.
So
we
did
add
a
case
because
it
was
her
intent
to
file
on
both
the
condo
unit
and
the
garage
stall,
which
is
why
you
see
a
change
to
the
agenda
today.
Okay,.
B
I
M
B
B
B
H
J
B
B
J
D
It's
all
we
had
in
the
packet
was
the
garage
and
I
actually
have
not
had
a
chance
to
look
at
the
information
about
the
condo.
Is
there
a
possibility
we
can
postpone
making
a
decision
on
this
until
I've
had
a
chance
and
I'm
guessing,
because
no
one
else
has
commented
on
it?
Perhaps
others
haven't
seen
it
I
also.
Can
we
postpone
making
a
decision
on
this
before
it
didn't
get
some
further
information.
I
Chair
Anderson
member
bland,
the
appellant
did
not
provide
any
more
information
for
you
other
than
this
documentation.
The
reason
that
we
suspect
that
she
meant
to
appeal
in
her
condo
unit
was
because
of
the
comparable
information
that
she
supplied.
So
there
is
no
other
information
to
provide
to
you.
Thank.
J
D
B
E
B
D
I
have
no
problem
with
the
value
placed
on
this.
Parking
is
at
a
premium
in
the
area,
and
it's
been
a
few
years.
I,
don't
remember
for
sure
what
the
garage
assault
floor
when
this
was
converted
to
condos
that
I
suspect
it
was
greater
than
what
the
current
assessed
value
is
so
I
would
certainly
sustain
the
value
that
the
Assessor
has
placed
on
it.
B
B
E
B
B
B
F
I
F
D
B
G
B
D
A
J
B
Okay,
let
me
identify
who
you
are
and
allow
the
board
members
to
pull
their
information
together.
We
are
going
to
review
the
property
at
7:18,
Washington
Avenue
North
number
604
case
number,
two,
a
0-0,
five,
seven
zero.
The
owner's
name
is
Lukas
Benson
aye,
it's
a
condominium
and
oh
and
before
we
begin
the
appeal,
let
me
summarize
the
process
for
conducting
hearings
in
this
virtual
format.
B
First,
we
will
call
on
the
applicant
will
be
given
five
minutes
to
present
their
appeal
when,
when
your
case
is
called,
you
will
need
to
press
star
six
on
your
phone
to
activate
your
microphone.
We
ask
the
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
then
present
your
appeal
to
the
board.
Next,
we
will
call
on
the
assessor
staff
and
they
will
be
given
five
minutes
to
present
their
report
to
the
board.
B
O
First,
let
me
share
just
my
appreciation
to
use
the
board
members
and
as
a
board
member
of
myself
of
a
condo
board.
I
can
understand.
Appeals
are
difficult
and
more
times
than
not
emotional,
and
to
that
I
would
also
like
to
just
share
very
briefly
to
Brian
Jim
and
the
rest
of
the
assessor's
office,
an
appreciation
for
their
professionalism
and
decorum
throughout
the
process.
Their
efforts
and
our
collective
negotiation
I
felt
was
seamless
and
what
we
disagreed
slightly
on
what
the
assessed
fair
value
is.
O
I
think
they
certainly
have
helped
me
prepare
today
to
keep
this
road
and,
in
fact,
not
a
motion
and
keep
it
within
the
purview
of
this
board
versus
Hennepin
County
or
the
state
tax
court.
So,
with
those
opening
statement,
I
would
just
like
to
recognize
briefly
the
assessor's
office
assertion
of
state
law
and
properties
being
required
to
be
valued
at
100%
of
fair
value.
O
That
requirement
is
indeed
black
and
white
in
the
law
and
I
acknowledge
that
and,
unfortunately,
determining
fair
market
value
is
not,
and
that
is
evidenced
in
my
appearance
here
today
and
so
well.
I
won't
drive
folks
in
to
all
of
the
exhibits
and
supporting
materials.
I
supplied
exhibit
C
for
those
of
you
who
may
have
the
opportunity
to
look
at
it.
O
Lights
is
not
fair
and
my
goal
is
based
on
a
preponderance
of
the
evidence
just
to
this
board
to
take
that
into
consideration
and
understand
where
my
point
of
view
is
coming.
I
think
the
great
news,
though,
is
that
the
assessor's
office
and
I,
based
on
our
discussions,
generally
agree
that
looking
at
my
particular
property
and
the
neighborhood
I
have
a
unique
situation.
Perhaps
in
the
way
my
condo
unit
and
building
are
not
necessarily
equal
to
similar
buildings
in
the
neighborhood
and
there's
various
reasons
for
that.
J
O
There
are
six
properties
within
the
building
based
on
the
original
building.
Specs
I
believe
back
to
2007
that
we
can
compare
properties
to
within
the
building,
and
that
includes
square
footage.
The
inclusion
of
a
garage
space
and
a
storage
space-
and
you
know
the
original
furnishings,
such
as
appliance
and
cabinetry.
Perhaps.
O
So
I
think
that
just
goes
to
show
that
properties
are
not
and
I
stress
this
not
increasing
in
value.
At
the
rate,
the
general
market
places
that
seven
often
eight
nine
percent.
We
we
hear
about
in
the
news,
and
so
if
I
focus
back
to
Exhibit
A
and
if
folks
have
that,
please
feel
free
to
look
at
that.
The
bottom
line
is
I
used,
two
hundred
forty
thousand
as
a
starting
point
for
the
rest
of
my
and
I
focus.
Just
on
that
statement.
The
improvements
between
the
two
properties
and
using
606
is
our
starting
point.
H
O
O
Those
components,
those
a
law
of
maximization,
for
lack
of
better
words
in
the
bathroom.
Just
using
that
as
one
of
the
top
two
items
purchasers,
look
at
a
rational
average
consumer
I
would
argue,
would
put
some
type
of
value
to
that
and
they're
going
to
use
a
real
estate
agent
or
they're
going
to
use
a
Google
search.
I
asked
Siri
and
find
what
those
values
are,
and
so
I
did.
That
and
I.
Don't
believe.
O
I
submitted
that
to
you
actually
I
did
their
links
in
exhibit
a
but
I,
took
a
very
conservative
cost,
because
I
do
believe
in
being
fair
and
having
a
properly
assessed
value
for
my
property
and
in
total,
just
using
conservative,
everyday
layman
type
search
$4,250
for
getting
at
parity
with
unit
6
or
6
on
a
polished
floor
and
roughly
3000
for
a
bathroom
and
I.
Consider
that
very
conservative
would
bring
an
adjustment
to
that
240,000
starting
points
roughly
aligned
with
my
2020
valuation,
and
so
with
that
I
won't
keep
you
any
longer.
O
L
Good
morning
mr.
chair
members
of
the
board,
I'm
Jim
Swanson
principal
appraiser,
part
of
the
downtown
CBD
team,
I'm,
presenting
on
case
2005,
7-0
718,
Washington
Avenue
north
unit
604
a
condominium
unit.
This
condominium
unit
was
part
of
a
conversion
that
went
back
to
2006
with
the
building
is
in
a
former
industrial
building
that
was
created
into
commercial
condominiums,
along
with
residential
condominiums
and
individual
parking
stalls
and
parking
units.
L
As
part
of
that
conversion,
a
common
interest
community
was
created
and
all
of
the
parcels
had
Parcel
identification
numbers
created
for
them.
The
assessed
value
for
January,
2nd
2020
is
two
hundred
and
forty
nine
thousand
dollars.
Our
indicated
number
in
the
report
is
two
hundred
and
eighteen
thousand
two
hundred
dollars
for
the
individual
condominium
unit.
If
you
go
to
the
sales
comparison
approach
on
page
two
you'll
note:
that's
the
subject:
property
is
in
there,
along
with
the
storage
unit
and
the
storage
stall
or
the
parking
stall
excuse
me,
we've
got,
we've
got
four
comparables
chosen.
L
The
comparable
the
appellant
mentioned
is
comparable
one
and
in
two
selling,
both
in
2019
and
2018.
All
of
the
comparables
are
within
the
building
and
sold
over
the
course
of
the
last
three
years
comparison
items.
Adjustments
were
made
for
time,
size
and
lack
of
storage
unit
and
comparable.
Three
I
just
want
to
note
that
we
did
a
paired
sales
analysis
to
come
up
with
our
time.
Adjustments
for
each
of
the
individual
years
and
questions
going
back
to
the
earlier
sales.
L
The
resulting
time
adjustment
based
on
the
analysis
indicates
for
2017
to
the
2018
assessment
of
5%
increase
for
the
2018
and
2019
assessment,
with
zero
percent
increase
in
time
and
then
for
the
19
assessment
to
the
2020
assessment.
We
our
analysis,
indicated
of
negative
3%
adjustment
for
the
last
year
in
question.
After
comparing
those
properties,
we
reconciled
to
arrange
239
200
to
255
100.
L
Most
weight
was
placed
on
the
first
comparable,
which
is
next
door
to
the
subject,
property
and
did
sell
within
a
month
of
the
assessment,
after
after
reviewing
that,
we
reconciled
to
overall
value
of
240
thousand
dollars
for
the
unit
stalls
and
parking
after
you
take
the
$240,000
taking
off
the
garage
amount
of
19
thousand
three
hundred
and
the
storage
unit
of
twenty
five
hundred.
Our
final
value
is
for
the
individual
common
unit
condo.
Even
it
is
218
200
thanks
any
questions.
B
L
A
J
O
J
O
B
I
I
B
I
J
B
B
B
B
E
B
I
Good
morning,
Shir,
Anderson
and
members
of
the
board,
yes
I,
do
have
two
lists
of
properties.
To
read
to
you
the
first
item:
24,
are
those
properties
was
working
with
the
appellant
and
came
to
a
resolution
within
the
10
day
window,
leading
up
to
the
convening
of
the
local
court
of
appeal
and
equalization.
I
I
The
first
one
is
property.
Id
number
one:
zero,
zero,
two,
eight
two,
four,
four:
three:
zero
zero:
two
five
original
value,
640
thousand
five
hundred
dollars,
indicated
value
six
hundred
thousand
dollars
property
ID
number
one:
two:
zero:
two:
nine
two,
four:
three:
three:
zero:
zero:
four:
eight
original
value:
three
hundred
forty
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
recommended
or
indicated
value
of
$325,000
property,
ID
number
of
one:
five:
zero:
two,
eight
two,
four:
four:
four:
zero:
zero:
seven,
nine
original
value.
I
Three
hundred
and
twenty
eight
thousand
dollars
property
ID
zero
to
eight
excuse
me:
zero,
eight,
zero
to
eight
two,
four
one:
one:
zero
zero;
four
one
original
value:
six
hundred
sixty
one
thousand
dollars
indicated
value.
Six
hundred
and
fifteen
thousand
dollars;
property;
ID
numbers;
zero;
six,
zero;
two,
eight
two,
three
one:
one:
zero
one:
four:
six
original
value:
four
hundred
sixty
three
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
indicated
value.
I
Property
ID
number
one:
two:
zero
to
nine
to
forty
one:
zero,
zero;
three
nine
original
value;
five
hundred
seventy-one
thousand
dollars
indicated
value
five
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
property;
ID
number:
three:
one:
zero
to
nine;
two:
three
one:
three:
zero:
zero:
zero,
seven
original
value;
five
hundred
eighty
three
thousand
dollars
indicated
value:
five
hundred
and
thirty
thousand
dollars
to
zero
zero.
Two
eight
two,
four
one:
three:
zero
one:
two:
nine
original
zero
one:
five
nine
excuse
me
original
value.
I
Two
hundred
and
fifteen
thousand
dollars;
property
ID,
zero,
two
zero;
two,
eight
two,
four
one:
one:
zero
one:
three,
eight
original
value:
two
hundred
fifty
nine
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
indicated
value.
Two
hundred
and
forty
thousand
dollars
property
ID;
three:
four:
zero:
two:
nine
two,
four
one:
three:
zero:
zero:
four:
three
original
value:
1
million
$549,000,
indicated
value;
$1,470,000
property,
ID,
zero.
Nine
is
zero
to
nine.
Four
excuse
me
in
my
awfully
no
property.
Id
number
is
zero.
Nine
is
zero.
I
Six
hundred
and
forty
four
thousand
dollars
indicated
value:
six
hundred
thousand
dollars;
property
ID
number
one:
five,
zero;
two,
eight
two,
four:
four
one:
zero
one:
zero:
six
original
market
value;
six
sixty
one
thousand
three
hundred
dollars
indicated
value.
Forty
two
thousand
dollars
property
ID
number:
three:
two:
zero:
two:
nine
two,
four
one:
one:
zero:
zero,
nine,
zero
original
values;
eight
hundred
sixty
five
thousand
five
hundred
dollars,
indicated
value
of
a
seven
hundred
and
sixty
thousand
dollars
property
ID.
I
Five
hundred
and
fifteen
thousand
dollars
property
ID
one,
seven
zero;
two,
eight
two,
four
one:
four:
zero:
zero:
two:
five
original
value,
586
thousand
five
hundred
dollars,
indicated
value
of
five
hundred
and
forty
thousand
dollars:
property;
ID,
1,
2,
0,
2,
9,
2,
4,
4,
3,
0,
1,
5,
0,
original
value
of
360
$7,500.
At
the
indicated
value
of
$345,000.
I
N
B
Item
number
24
for
1415
month
curve
Avenue
case
number
through
0-0
three
eight
one
we
will
first
call
on
the
applicant
will
be
given
five
minutes
to
present
their
appeal.
When
your
case
is
called,
you
will
need
to
press
star
six
on
your
phone
to
activate
your
microphone.
We
ask
that
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
then
present
your
appeal
to
the
board.
After
that,
we'll
call
on
the
suster
staff
and
they'll
be
given
five
minutes
to
present
their
report
to
the
board.
B
And,
finally,
the
board
will
have
five
minutes
for
questions
on
the
case.
The
board
will
consider
and
take
action
on
the
cases
at
the
end
of
each
meeting
day
and
property
owners
will
be
notified
of
the
decision
by
mail
after
the
board
is
adjourned.
I'll.
Ask
the
clerk
to
identify
the
speaker
in
the
queue
for
the
appeal
related
to
1415
mantra
of
Avenue
case
number:
2:
zero,
zero.
Three
eight
one.
M
J
P
Those
cops
show
that
the
you
know
the
sale
price
for
those
four
transactions
is
on
average,
under
two
million
dollars
for
houses
of
similar
square
footage
and
similar
lot
size
to
ours,
the
comparable
that
that
we
think
is
most
appropriate.
The
house
immediately
next
door
to
us
at
1325,
not
curved
Avenue,
which
sold
in
2018
for
two
million
twenty
thousand
dollars
that
the
square
footage
of
that
house
is
11,000
423
the
square
footage
of
our
houses,
roughly
12,000
we're
fee.
P
Seventy
nine
thousand
our
houses
lot
size
is
slightly
bigger.
We
acknowledge
our
view
of
the
value
of
our
house
based
on
these
capables
is
two
and
a
half
million
dollars,
and
that's
what
we
feel
the
appropriate
assessed
value
would
be
they've
been
that's
closest
comparable
is
sixteen
hundred
mile
curve,
which
is
just
slightly
smaller
lot
size,
slightly
smaller
square
footage
of
the
house
at
eleven
million.
Two
hundred
sorry.
A
A
P
A
P
P
Of
that,
for
our
house
is
the
fact
that
the
houses
that
group
is
original,
we
have
replaced
one
small
portion
of
the
roof,
our
neighbors
across
the
street,
that
1324
replaced
their
roof
last
year
and
it
cost
them
over
two
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars.
Our
group
is
bigger,
so
you
know
the
maintenance
cost
to
sign
a
roof
is
substantial.
Our
house
also
has
because
the
weight
then
sort
of
split
up
and
over
the
years
has
nine
different
furnace
and
air
conditioning
units.
P
That's
not
when
their
units,
that's
actual
furnace,
a
human
mine,
so
the
complexity
around
that
and
and
the
cost
try
to
get
it
back
to
a
level
that
people
would
want
to
you
know
some
some
buyer
would
want
to
deal
with
is
significant
and
another
disincentive
down
in
houses
like
this
I
think.
The
third
issue
that
you
know
in
cash,
the
value
of
our
houses-
you
know
it's,
it's
not
contemporary
finishes
in
truth.
P
Today
in
today's
market
seems
to
be
much
more
in
finishes
that
are
more
contemporary
and
ours
are
no,
it's
all
dark
woodwork
and
some
of
it
is
in
the
condition.
Some
of
it
is
not
so
those
are
the
primary
points
we
wanted
to
make
according
to
conversation
that
we
had
with
the
Assessor
a
couple
weeks
ago,
the
Assessor
was
pointing
that
comps
that
that.
A
P
A
P
Because
for
report,
yeah
I
think
we
didn't
include
on
our
list
a
couple
of
other
comps
that
are
worth
mentioning.
13
24
mile
curve
is
another
11,000
plus
square
foot
house,
that's
immediately
across
the
street
from
us
it
sold
in
2013.
But
again
you
know
I
hit
him.
The
last
sale
prices
in
there
at
25
that
price
per
square
foot
there's
a
hundred
and
sixty
four
dollars
significantly
lower
than
the
cap,
we're
using
next
door
to
come
up
with
the
two
and
a
half
million
the
other
cap.
P
P
P
J
N
Very
good
morning,
mr.
chair
and
members
of
the
board,
I'm
Connie
Ferguson
I've
been
appraising
for
a
total
of
18
years
and
have
been
with
the
city
of
Minneapolis
for
four
and
a
half
years.
This
is
case
number
two
0-0
381
located
on
1415
Mount,
curved
Avenue
in
the
Lowry
Hill
neighborhood
I
have
conducted
a
desktop
review
and
video
review
on
April
27th
2020.
In
addition,
my
supervisor
Alisa
Brown
conducted
an
interior
inspection
on
March
31st
2015
for
an
appeal,
Alissa's,
information
notes
and
photos
assisted
me
with
this
analysis.
N
The
20/20
estimated
market
value
is
three
million
three
hundred
seven
thousand
five
hundred
the
indicated
value
in
this
report
is
three
million
three
hundred
thousand
dollars.
The
subject
is
a
historic
one-of-a-kind,
landmark
property.
The
high
quality
exterior
of
the
home
includes
stone
exterior
on
the
entire
home
wrought
iron
gate,
stone,
fencing
clay,
tiled
roof,
a
crenelated,
Tower
accenting
the
front
of
the
house,
a
Porte
cochere
on
the
main
entrance
to
the
house
and
a
carriage
house.
N
The
interior
includes
grand
foyer,
42
stained-glass
windows,
extensive
carved
in
custom,
millwork
high-end
kitchen
remodeled
in
2008,
with
a
large
walk
through
butler's
pantry
high-end
appliances
and
large
center
island.
The
third
floor
includes
two
bedrooms:
bath
living
space
and
kitchen.
The
lower
level
was
remodeled
in
2016
and
includes
a
large
family
room
with
Tudor
style,
wood
beams
in
the
ceiling,
a
wine
cellar
and
two
baths.
Two
half
baths.
The
remodeled
carriage
house
in
2016
includes
a
bedroom
bathroom
living
space
and
kitchen.
N
N
Although
there
have
been
recent
improvements,
the
quality
is
inferior
to
the
subject
as
I'm.
Sorry,
let
me
back
up
here,
let's
start
with
the
comparable
one
comparable
one
at
1701
mount
curve
avenues,
Seoul
for
two
million
six
hundred
and
thirty
six
thousand
forty
one
dollars
and
was
updated
in
2017
with
a
great
room
addition
kitchen,
remodel
and
second-floor
office
addition.
Although
there
have
been
recent
improvements,
the
quality
is
inferior
to
this
subject.
As
the
above
grade
square
footage
is
approximately
1200
square
feet
smaller,
it
has
had
several
additions
throughout
the
years.
N
It
does
not
have
a
carriage
house,
it
has
an
farrier
finishing
in
the
lower
level.
Has
an
esop
asphalt,
shingle
roof
versus
a
clay
tiled
roof
an
overall
has
inferior
architectural
details
comparable
to
at
1903
mount
curve,
Avenue
sold
for
two
million
eight
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
was
renovated
in
2018,
with
painted
woodwork
and
walls
throughout
in
a
remodeled
kitchen
and
bathrooms,
although
recently
renovated.
The
overall
quality
is
considered
inferior,
as
it
does
not
have
a
carriage
house.
The
exterior
is
wood
versus
stone.
N
It
has
a
two-car
garage
versus
a
four
car
garage
and
it
does
not
possess
the
same
superior
architectural
details
as
a
subject
comparable
three
located
at
2424
Lake
of
the
elves
Parkway
sold
for
three
million
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
and
is
most
similar
to
the
subject
in
both
quality
and
condition.
The
kitchen
and
bathrooms
were
updated
in
2016.
N
The
high
quality
architectural
details
include
stained
and
leaded
glass
windows
carved
millwork,
ornate
plaster
ceilings,
a
Tudor
style
third
floor
with
wood,
beam
ceilings,
slate
roof
and
a
port
port
decor
share
the
location
on
Lake
of
the
Isles
is
considered
superior
to
the
subject,
but
does
compete
for
the
same
pool
of
buyers.
Currently,
this
property
is
listed
for
three
million
seven
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars.
N
A
D
P
A
P
Finishes
those
all
have
been
refinished
recently
our
house
hasn't
been
refinished
since
the
first
two
years
after
we
bought
it.
There
was
a
reference
to
our
making
updates
in
2016
to
the
basement
and
the
carriage
house,
those
weren't
made
in
2016
those
were
made
in
2010
or
11.
So
I'm,
not
sure
where
the
information
came
from
the
basement
was
was
updated
in
2008
and
and
there
was
a
reference
to
2016
so
there's
some
confusion.
B
B
B
I
Three
hundred
ninety
five
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
indicated
value,
330
thousand
dollars,
property
ID;
three,
six,
zero,
two,
nine
two,
four
two
one:
zero
three,
five,
nine
original
value,
$595,000
indicated
value.
Four
hundred
excuse
me
indicated
value
five
hundred
and
forty-one
thousand
dollars
property
at
eight,
two:
six,
zero,
two,
nine
two,
four
three:
four
zero
one:
forty
nine
original
value.
Three
hundred
and
seventy
five
thousand
dollars.
I
Okay,
I'm,
going
back
to
property;
ID
number,
two,
one:
zero:
two,
eight
two,
four
one:
two:
zero:
zero:
five:
nine,
the
original
value
for
that
property
was
$595,000
with
an
indicated
value
of
five
hundred
and
forty
one
thousand
dollars:
property
ID;
three:
six:
zero,
two,
nine
two,
four
two
one:
zero:
three:
five,
nine
original
value,
$375,000
indicated
value.
Three
hundred
and
forty
one
thousand
others.
I
Id
two:
three:
zero:
two,
eight
two,
four
two:
four
zero
one:
zero
five
original
valued
533
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
indicated
value.
Four
hundred
and
fifteen
thousand
dollars
property
ID;
three
one:
zero
to
nine
to
three
one:
three:
zero:
zero
one:
zero
original
value.
Five
hundred
eighty
three
thousand
dollars
indicated
value
four
hundred
thirty
thousand
dollars.
Five
hundred
thirty
thousand
dollars.
Excuse
me:
property,
ID
to
five
zero
to
nine
two,
four,
four:
four:
zero
zero
to
two
original
value.
I
Six
hundred
and
eighty
five
thousand
dollars
property
ID,
one:
eight
zero,
two,
eight
two:
three
one:
one:
zero:
zero:
four:
seven
original
value,
456
thousand
five
hundred
dollars,
indicated
value.
Three
hundred
and
eighty
five
thousand
dollars:
property;
ID;
two:
six:
zero:
two,
nine
two,
four
one,
one
zero
two
one
three
original
value,
$393,000
indicated.
I
I
I
Property
ID
to
three
zero
to
nine,
to
four
to
one:
zero:
four:
nine
to
original
value.
Eight
hundred
ninety
five
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
indicated
value.
Eight
hundred
and
seventy
five
thousand
dollars
property
ID
number:
two:
three:
zero:
two,
eight
two,
four:
two:
one:
zero:
zero,
seven:
five
property
I
excuse
me
original
value.
Three
hundred
eighty
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
indicated
value
at
three
hundred
and
ten
thousand
dollars:
property
ID,
one:
zero,
zero;
two,
eight
two:
four:
four:
two:
zero:
zero:
six:
seven
original
value
$273,000
indicated
value.
M
I
I
Excuse
me
so:
nine,
twenty
six
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
with
an
indicated
value
of
six
hundred
and
forty
thousand
dollars.
That
concludes
the
end
of
page
two
I
see
there
is
a
note
that
I
need
to
reread
case
three
nine
one,
so
I'm
going
to
reread
that
case.
It's
property
ID,
two,
five,
zero,
two,
nine
two,
four:
four:
four:
zero:
zero:
zero,
seven
original
value,
five
hundred
forty-three
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
with
an
indicated
value
of
five
hundred
and
fifteen
thousand
dollars.
So,
as
I
said,
I've
been
reading
these
pages
backwards.
I
I
The
indicated
value
is
five
hundred
and
eighty
five
thousand
dollars
property;
ID,
two
one:
zero:
two,
eight
two,
four
one:
four:
zero:
zero
one:
five,
the
original
value
question
and
twenty
three
thousand
dollars
indicated
values.
Four
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
dollars
property.
Id
number:
three:
three:
zero:
two,
nine
two,
four
four
one:
zero
two
zero
one
original
value
was
four
hundred
and
ninety
three
thousand
dollars
in
the
indicated
value
is
four
hundred
and
seventy
five
thousand
dollars
property.
I
Three
hundred
and
seventy
thousand
dollars:
property,
ID,
3,
6,
0
to
9,
4,
2,
1,
zero
to
nine
fighting
original
value
is
five
hundred
and
thirty-five
thousand
dollars
in
the
indicated
value
is
four
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars
property;
ID,
zero,
six,
zero,
two,
eight
two,
three
two:
two
zero
one,
three
to
our
original
value,
is
503
hundred.
Seventy
four
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
and
the
indicated
value
is
three
hundred
and
twenty-five
thousand
dollars:
property;
ID;
three:
six:
zero
to
nine
twenty
four:
two:
one:
zero:
three:
nine
nine
original
value.
Three
hundred.
I
Id
numbers,
3,
4,
0,
9,
4,
3,
0,
0
4.
The
original
value
is
five
hundred
forty
two
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
and
the
indicated
value
is
five
hundred
and
five
thousand
dollars
a
red
property.
Id
number
three:
three:
zero:
two,
nine
two,
four
one:
two
zero
one:
two,
five
original
values:
698
thousand
five
hundred
dollars,
indicated
value;
$635,000.
I
A
B
D
C
E
I
B
I
F
B
E
B
Q
Chair
Anderson,
yes,
chandus
and
members
of
the
board
I
just
want
to
provide
some
clarification
on
the
values
of
this
condominium
unit.
The
owners
value
of
two
hundred
thirty
two
thousand
seven
hundred
and
fifty
includes
the
garage
stall
and
the
storage
unit.
So
after
deducting
those
two
parcels,
the
indicated
value
of
the
condo
unit
is
two
hundred
ten
thousand
nine
hundred
and
fifty
that
compares
to
our
value
for
the
condo
unit
of
two
hundred
and
eighteen
thousand,
two
hundred.
E
Q
Jerry
Anderson,
if
I
may
I'm
sorry
to
interrupt
again
I
know:
I
did
type
my
name
and
I'm
trying
to
catch
this,
but
okay,
his
Nance
Nancy
will
Jack
I
just
added
into
the
chat.
It
is
a
reduction
from
two
hundred
and
forty
nine
thousand
so
I
don't
know
that
a
sustained
would
be
the
correct
verbage
on
this.
Okay.
J
M
B
D
E
J
G
I've
got
some
some
comments
on
this.
Although
mount
curve
is
quite
a
premier
Street,
the
the
the
the
person
that
the
owner
was
correct
in
the
larger
houses
are
not
selling
for
even
close
to
assessed
values.
Also
I
have
a
problem
with
the
assessing
office
using
a
lakefront
home
to
evaluate
of
a
house.
That's
not
on
the
lake.
Those
are
completely
separate
type
comparables.
So
there's
there's
two
comparables
I
think
that
lowering
this
lowering,
this
tax
evaluation
is
is
applicable
and
just
where,
where
does
it
go?
G
J
D
D
Perhaps
there's
some
argument
for
lowering
the
value
I
realized
that
this
is
not
a
property
that
is
going
to
be
there's,
not
a
large
group
of
buyers
who
are
going
to
queue
up
for
this
kind
of
a
property,
but
it
is
a
fabulous
home,
a
wonderful
property.
The
pictures,
don't
really
do
it
justice.
Those
exterior
pictures
make
it
look
like
it's
right
on
the
street.
What
you
see
there
in
front
of
the
pictures?
D
These
homeowner
is
asking
for
an
adjustment
to
two
million.
Five
hundred
I
think
that's
way
low
for
what
it
the
value
would
be.
I.
Think
at
that
price
it
would
be
appealing
to
lots
of
people
so,
but
I
would
like
a
clarification.
Is
the
indicated
value
330,000?
Not
three
hundred
thirty
thousand
seven
hundred
and
fifty.
H
J
C
B
With
that,
we
have
completed
all
items
on
the
agenda
for
this
meeting
board
members.
The
following
are
proposed
for
additional
meeting
dates
to
hear
appeals
to
the
board
Monday
May
18th
for
the
entire
day,
Tuesday
May
19th
in
the
morning
Wednesday
May
20th
in
the
morning,
Thursday
May
21st
the
entire
day
there.
I
Chair
anderson,
I
did
just
want
to
give
a
quick
update
on
the
appeals
just
to
help
guide
your
decisions,
so
on
May
5th
you
heard
or
excuse
me
may
6th.
You
heard
six
cases
today:
May
13,
21,
total
cases
and
tomorrow
the
US.
You
are
scheduled
for
another
additional
41
cases.
That
leaves
us
with
our
remaining
201
cases
to
hear
and
those
are
by
people
that
wanted
to
call
in
and
have
five
minutes
to
present
to
you
and
so
I
would
like
some
guidance
in
addition
to.
I
J
I
Could,
though,
do
them?
We
thought
that
we
could
schedule
them
so
many
per
hour
and
have
them
all
call
in
and
you
take
them
in
the
order
that
received
and
let's
say
you
hear,
five
or
six
or
seven
in
an
hour,
decide
all
that
group
at
the
end
of
the
hour
and
then
hear
another
group
so
that
they
stay
fresh.
Okay,.
L
F
I
Chair
Anderson
and
board
member
bland.
Yes,
all
of
those
that
need
in
that
I
need
to
read.
In
individually,
that's
concluded,
we
will
present
a
long
list
of
those
that
you
just
need
to
approve
in
one
vote
that
I
do
not
need
to
read
into
just
so
that
all
official
applications
and
cases
are
on
the
official
record
of
the
board.
So.
I
B
G
I
I
J
J
I
J
I
So
I
will
repeat
what
I've
heard
and
to
make
sure
that
we're
all
on
the
same
page
on
Monday
May
18th,
you
will
convene
at
from
10:00
a.m.
to
12:30
a.m.
earth,
10:00
a.m.
to
12:30
p.m.
and
come
back
for
another
session
from
1:30
to
4:30
on
Tuesday
May
19th.
You
will
convene
from
9:00
a.m.
to
12:30
on
Wednesday
May
20th.
You
will
convene
from
9:00
a.m.
to
12:30
and
on
Thursday
May
21st.
You
would
have
two
sessions
again
from
9:00
until
12:30
and
then
from
1:30
to
4:30.
I
I
that
I
know
off
the
top
of
my
head
and
then
you
have
a
series
of
hearings
with
our
staff
presentations
included
from
you
have
ten
of
those,
so
you
will
convene
at
9:00
a.m.
and
then
you
will
recess
from
1142
12:40
and
then
the
afternoon
session
begins
at
12:40.
You
have
two
hearings
and
then
it
will
be
all
right.
Ins
for
the
rest
of
the
afternoon
until
4:30.