►
From YouTube: December 16, 2020 Bicycle Advisory Committee
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
right,
so
this
is
the
december
16th
meeting
of
the
minneapolis
bicycle
advisory
committee,
and
I
just
had
it
open
a
second
ago
and
of
course
lost
it.
I
have
20
windows
open.
B
B
B
A
Thank
you,
nelson.
I
would
I
would
request
for
a
future.
We
add
that
back
to
the
bottom
of
the
agenda,
because
it
was
on
last
month's,
but
not
this
month.
That's
right
before
well!
Welcome
everybody!
Let's
see,
so
I
think
what
we
did
last
month
is.
A
We
did
our
roll
call
in
connection
with
the
acceptance
of
the
november
minutes
and
so
I'd
request
that
we
do
that
again.
So,
if
you
have
before
we
go
ahead
with
that,
are
there
any
additions
or
changes
to
last
month's
minutes.
A
Hearing
none
is
there
a
motion
to
approve
the
minutes.
C
A
So
if
you
want
to
take
the
roll
and
check
everybody
in
millisecond,
we're
ready
when
you
are.
B
Nope
janice
here
and
yes,
hey
jennifer,
I'm
here
and
yes,
john,
yes,
awesome,
didn't
see
you
there,
jordan
present.
F
B
B
B
J
K
B
L
M
B
N
A
Great,
thank
you
thanks
everybody
so
getting
into
discussion.
I
was
just
hoping
and
being
it's
my
last
meeting
as
chair.
I
think
I'd
like
to
take
a
little
bit
more
times
for
so
first
I'll
just
say
thanks
to
everybody
who
has
served
on
the
bac
and
is
leaving
and
and
will
take
a
lot
more
time
to
do
that
in
the
end,
I'm
gonna
put
the
majority
of
that
conversation
at
the
end,
so
we
just
have
a
little
more
time
to
chatter
about
it
after
we
complete
our
business.
A
So
it's
maybe
it's
motivation
to
keep
things
moving
and
that
gets
us
into
the
midtown
greenway
bridge
resolution,
which
has
been
milling
about
the
last
couple
weeks
and
thank
you
matthew
for
taking
the
lead
on
that.
For
us
I'll
hand
it
to
you.
F
Sure
so
this
is
something
that's
been
discussed
a
couple
times.
I
think
in
a
few
different
venues.
The
really
short
background
on
this
is
that
there
is
a
railroad
adjacent
to
the
midtown
greenway
in
between
the
seward
and
longfellow
neighborhoods,
and
that
railroad
includes
a
bridge
over
31st
avenue
south
and
that
bridge
needs
some
repairs
and
in
order
to
have
some
cost
sharing
with
those
repairs,
the
railroad
is
coming
to.
I
believe
it's
the
state
seeking
some
cooperation
on
the
bridge
and
there's
also
a
level
of
cooperation
needed
from
the
city
as
well.
F
This
particular
railroad
has
been
very
resistant
to
engaging
with
the
public
sector
on
any
conversations
related
to
extending
the
greenway
over
the
mississippi
river,
and
so
this
is
an
opportunity
to
essentially
take
advantage
of
a
moment
when
the
railroad
is
looking
for
something
from
local
government
to
try
to
get
the
railroad
to
engage
in
conversations
about
what
could
happen
with
the
river
crossing.
So
that's
the
background.
I
can
put
the
suggested
resolution
in
the
chat
if
that's
helpful
or
read
it.
Whatever
is
most
helpful.
F
Here
I
should
also
note
that
the
city
council
adopted
us
and
passed
a
strong
resolution
along
these
same
lines,
so
we're
in
essence
we're
providing
encouragement
and
further
support
to
the
city
council
for
something
that
it
as
far
as
I
understand
fully
intends
to
pursue.
J
And
maybe
I
could
just
speak
to
that
briefly,
so
I
just
put
in
the
chat
some
language
that
we
are
looking
to
get
into
the
city's
legislative
agenda
for
on
on
friday
when
that
passes
formally.
So
it
basically
says
the
same
thing
that
that
matthew's
text
says
essentially,
we
would
only
support
state
funding
for
the
31st
avenue
bridge
crossing
if
there's
some
sort
of
workable,
durable
agreement
between
the
railroads
and
the
public
sector
to
let
us
use
the
bridge
over
the
mississippi
for
the
midtown
greenway
crossing
I'll.
J
Also
just
note
our
office
is
working
on
a
letter
to
be
signed
by
multiple
elected
officials.
We've
been
working
on
this
with
the
sierra
club
folks
to
send
to
met
council
chair,
charlie,
zelly
and
mndot
commissioner
margaret
and
anderson
kelleher
iterating.
Basically,
these
same
points
just
in
case
there
are
any
non-legislative
pools
of
money
out
there
that
the
railroad
might
be
able
to
go,
get
access
to
without
legislative
action,
and
so
far
we've
got
a
few
state
reps.
A
state
senator
members
of
the
park
board
all
signing
on
with
us.
J
So
this
is
a
pretty
broad-based
effort.
That's
already
well
underway.
C
P
I
just
have
one
question:
this
is
janice.
Is
this
the
same
railroad
that
owns
the
right-of-way?
That's
just
across
the
river,
where
we
want
the
a
bike
connection,
you
know
what
I
mean.
You
know,
there's
that
railroad
right-of-way
it's
where
is
it
it's
just
near
the
between
the
stone
arch
bridge
and
that
no
different
railroad.
J
I
think
it's
a
different
railroad,
I'm
not
entirely
sure
so
so
in
this
particular
spot,
the
the
bridge
is
owned
by
canadian
pacific
and
the
railroad
that
is
actually
going
and
requesting
this
funding
from
the
state
is
minnesota
commercial.
I
think
that
what
you're
talking
about
right
now
is
vnsf
blind.
F
I
should
also
mention
that
I
can't
take
any
credit
for
writing
this
resolution.
It
was
all
it
came
to
me
from
joshua
hodek,
who
until
recently
was
a
member
of
this
committee,
so
he's
still
working
hard,
even
though
he's
not
on
the
list
for
this
committee
anymore,.
A
Matthew,
would
you
like
to
read
the
motion
that
you
put
in
here
for
those
on
the
phone
and
just
for
recording
sake
and
and
then,
if
you
like,
you
can
move
it
forward
and
we
can
have
discussion.
F
Sure
yeah
so
I'll
move
the
following
motion.
The
midtown
greenway
is
an
incredible
asset
for
the
city
of
minneapolis
and
the
entire
twin
cities
region.
The
greenway
is
the
most
well
used
trail
for
walking,
bicycling
and
rolling
in
minnesota,
and
more
people
use
the
midtown
greenway
on
an
average
day
than
90
percent
of
minneapolis
streets
in
november
2020
mayor
melvin
carter
mill
trail
in
st
paul
and
committed
to
supporting
connecting
this
new
trail
to
the
midtown
greenway.
F
The
bridge
was
built
for
two
railroad
tracks
and
now
has
only
one.
It
has
plenty
of
space
for
a
bike.
Ped
trail
the
primary
impediment
to
making
the
crucial
connection
between
minneapolis
and
st
paul
has
been
the
lack
of
cooperation
from
the
railroads
that
own
and
operate
the
corridor
respectively.
Canadian
pacific,
railway,
cp,
rail
and
minnesota
commercial
railroad,
mcr
hennepin
county
did
great
work
to
accommodate
cp's
concerns
about
the
railroad,
but
the
railroad
made
untenable
demands,
including
that
the
county
accept
liability,
not
just
for
the
bicycle
trail,
but
for
the
railroad
itself.
F
F
The
city
of
minneapolis
should
include
in
its
intergovernmental
relations
legislative
agenda,
opposition
to
any
state
assistance
to
the
railroads
until
they
work
with
city,
county
and
state
officials
to
facilitate
the
crucial
connection
of
the
midtown
greenway
over
the
mississippi
river.
In
the
form
of
a
memorandum
of
understanding
for
use
of
the
short-line
bridge,
the
public
and
its
elected
representatives
have
never
had
leverage
in
this
issue.
We
must
use
this
opportunity.
J
I'll,
just
for
the
purposes
of
of
the
note
that
matthew
made
in
the
chat,
I'll
read
the
language
that
I
put
in
the
chat.
So
here's
the
language
that
our
office
is
attempting
to
add
to
the
city's
legislative
agenda,
quote
supporting
state
funds
for
the
reconstruction
of
the
rail
and
non-motorized
trail
bridge
over
31st
avenue
south
only
as
part
of
a
durable
and
workable
agreement
between
the
railroads
and
the
public
sector
for
the
use
of
the
short
line
bridge
to
extend
the
midtown
greenway
across
the
mississippi
river.
J
No,
I'm
just
trying
to
to
tell
everybody
that
that's
the
language
that
we're
looking
to
get
into
the
city's
legislative
agenda.
So
it's
it's
fully
fully.
In
line
with
the
motion
that
matthew
has
made.
A
J
A
J
They're
seeking
enough
to
fully
reconstruct
the
bridge
over
31st
and-
and
I
don't
so
you
know.
Q
Do
you
know
if
the
if
the
bridge
is
condemned
right
now
or
is.
J
J
A
All
right,
all
those
in
favor
of
the
motion,
nelson,
can
take
the
role
when
you're
ready.
L
B
R
L
B
B
H
F
B
A
L
B
S
L
A
Thank
you,
wilson,
thank
you,
matthew
and
robin
and
thanks
to
joshua,
for
the
work,
definitely
an
unprecedented
opportunity.
Well,
we
won't
hope
we're
lucky,
we'll
work,
hard
and
and
hope
we're
lucky
with
this
one,
all
right.
Moving
on
to
reports
from
our
fabulous
sub
committee
chairs,
starting
off
with
five
e's
and
alyssa.
C
Thanks
nick
we
had
a
great
meeting
at
the
beginning
of
the
month,
it's
hard
to
believe
we're
already.
At
the
end
of
the
year,
we
covered
a
lot
of
stuff
at
5es.
We
spent
some
good
time
talking
about
year-end
processes
which
included
the
cip
process.
The
annual
report
to
the
pw
committee,
as
well
as
the
like
year-end
review,
that
staff
does
internally.
C
So
we
did
some
some
planning
around
some
of
those
things.
Matthew
deardahl
collected
a
little
bit
of
feedback
on
how
the
cip
process
went
last
cycle
and
some
of
the
changes
that
staff
made
so
that
he
could
bring
that
feedback
internal
to
staff
and
and
improve
the
process
for
the
20
21
2020
2021
cycle,
which
is
obviously
a
little
bit
behind,
because
everything
is
behind
in
2020
with
covid.
So
in
terms
of
when
public
works
staff
will
be
coming
to
give
us
our
sort
of
year-end
review.
That's
going
to
happen.
C
Usually
that
happens
in
december
or
january,
and
that's
looking
like
more
of
a
january
activity
because
we're
at
the
end
of
december,
and
then
we
also
did
a
little
bit
of
brainstorming
on
the
transportation
and
public
works
report
that
is
like
typically
a
co-presentation
between
the
pac
chair
and
the
bac
chair.
I
think
math.
It
was
matthew
who
sort
of
noted.
We
should
pay
attention
to
the
timing
relative
of
the
new
membership
being
voted
on.
C
Typically
we're
not
in
a
position
where
our
membership
is
turning
over
right
in
advance
of
the
time
we
start
planning
this
report,
so
it
was,
I
think,
great,
that
we
started
the
conversation
with
the
group.
That's
here
today
and
we'll
keep
talking
about
some
of
those
conversations
in
january
february
march.
C
It
sounds
like
tentatively,
staff
are
thinking
that
march
makes
sense
as
a
time
frame
just
because
we
need
a
little
bit
of
extra
time
and
want
to
give
new
folks
some
time
to
get
acclimated
to
that,
so
those
were
sort
of
the
year-end
processes
we
we
covered
as
a
group.
Does
anyone
have
questions
on
that
before?
I
summarize
our?
We
also
had
a
conversation
about
onboarding
and
off-boarding,
which
we
are
gonna,
be
doing.
Some
of.
C
C
All
right
awkwardly
long
pause,
so
yeah,
the
the
other
big
thing
we
talked
about
was
member
onboarding
and
off-boarding
preparation
spending
some
time
planning
for
how
we
are
going
to
be
saying
goodbye
to
all
of
the
members
who
for
whom
this
is
their
last
meeting
today
and
then
also
collecting
thoughts
on
how
do
we,
you
know
as
a
as
a
body
who
has
a
lot
of
experience
on
the
bac.
How
do
we
set
new
membership
up
for
success,
especially
in
this
virtual
time?
C
Where
you
know
thing,
things
are
hard
and
things
take
more
time
and
information
is
not
necessarily
as
as
readily
in
some
ways
is
more
readily
available
and
in
other
ways
is,
is
not
as
much
so
there's
a
good
list
of
suggestions
that
folks
made
in
the
in
the
meeting
minutes
that
were
sent
out,
including
planning
for
introductions,
doing
some
technical
training
on
teams
and
limbs
since
the
limbs,
rollout
kind
of
happened
in
the
middle
of
covid
some
overview
stuff
that
we
want
to
continue
doing,
such
as
review
of
the
cip
pro
process
review
of
the
bylaws
review,
links
to
like
the
capital
budget
requests
as
part
of
the
cbr
process
sending
out
the
annual
calendar
so
yeah.
C
E
Yeah
millicent
sent
out
a
list
of
the
new
board
that
will
take
place
in
january
and
there
were
some
vacancies
still
on
it
and
I
think
matthew
maybe
wants
to
comment
a
little
bit
about
the
status
on
that
for
the
meeting
is.
Am
I
correct
on
that
matthew.
Q
Yeah
I'd
love
to
so
we
we
appointed
10
of
the
13
open
seats
for
the
award
appointments
and
there
are
three
vacancies
still
that
is
wards,
4,
10
and
12.,
and
I
believe
we
have
candidates
for
10
and
12,
but
ward
4,
I
think,
is,
is
still
wrestling
with
finding
some
candidates,
and
I
know
georgiana
had
done
some
work,
but
I
guess
you
know
thanks
dan
for
bringing
this
up.
Q
If
anybody
knows
folks
in
in
ward
4,
we
still
need
to
build
those
positions
and,
frankly,
10
and
12
in
case
in
case
there's
some
other
other
really
good
candidates
that
should
apply
dan.
Is
that
what
you
were
looking
for
from
me.
E
O
R
R
Did
you
have
make
any
contact
with
bonzi
vu
or
anybody
else
in
ward
4.
R
C
Sorry,
everyone,
I'm
gonna,
interrupt
millicent
you're
screen,
sharing
your
whole
screen
right
now
and
I
can
see
a
handful
of
people's
full
email
addresses
since
the
meeting
is
being
recorded.
Can
you
change
it
so
that
we're
not
able
to
see
those
thanks.
M
Q
Q
E
Yeah,
I
guess
your
thought
matthew
is
that
if
we
have
some
feelers
out
there
to
just
have
them
contact
you
and
if
there's
interest.
Q
Yeah
contact
me
and
then
I'll
share
the
application
with
them.
If
you
want
to
do
that
as
well,
that
would
be
good
the
sooner
they
get
it.
You
know
maybe
they'll
fill
it
out,
but
yeah
I'd
be
happy
to
to
do
that.
A
I
I
do
know
that
there's
at
least
one
fabulous
candidate
in
others
for
ward
12
and
I
think
andrew
johnson
is
just
deliberating
to
make
a
good
choice.
I
followed
up
with
him
today
and
I
did
hear
from
council
member
council
president
bender
that
she
was
close
to
a
decision
as
well,
so
hopefully
those
two
will
get
finalized
in
the
next
couple
of
weeks.
C
Awesome,
I
think
the
only
other
thing
I
want
to
note
as
far
as
our
offboarding
conversation
is,
if
you
are
leaving,
we
really
want
you
to
come
back
for
the
annual
bac
bike
ride,
we're
going
to
do
our
best
to
keep
a
list
and
reach
out
to
you
whenever
we
are
in
a
world
where
group
bike
rides
feel
like
a
possibility
again,
but
we
we
want
you
to
come
back.
So
please
join
us.
Please
mark
your
your
virtual
calendars.
C
C
Well,
so
matthew
brought
up
that,
so
this
is
26th
street
where
it
crosses
the
hiawatha,
lrt
trail,
it's
just
to
the
east
of
of
the
trail.
It's
where
we
just
had
the
second
stoplight
installed
not
too
long
ago,
and
there
are
some
concrete
barriers
on
the
certain
northeast
corner
of
that
intersection
that
mimic
a
proposed
safety
improvement.
C
Matthew
brought
up
that
even
with
this
test
improvement,
it's
still
a
pretty
difficult
intersection
to
cross
and
the
the
second
light
is
not
as
effective
as
we
had
hoped.
It
would
be,
there's
a
lot
of
through
traffic
that
makes
the
right
turn
anyway
and
ignores
the
red
light
at
that
intersection
and
why
the
the
turn
radii
so
there's
still
wide
sweeping
turns
that
are
a
problem
and
since
the
test
project
hasn't
really
been
built
to
the
final
stage,
yet
matthew
brought
that
to
our
committee
in
develop.
C
We
developed
a
draft
resolution
which
I
will
read
aloud,
because
I
think
it
summarizes
pretty
well
what
we
tried
to
yeah
what
we
discussed
and
what
we
saw
at
the
meeting.
C
The
minneapolis
bicycle
advisory
committee
requests
that
minneapolis
public
works
explore
adding
a
substantial
center
median
to
26th
street
and
the
hiawatha
lrt
trail
crossing,
as
shown
in
the
provided
diagram.
The
provider
diagram
has
that
reducing
westbound
traffic
to
one
lane
and
reducing
the
width
of
the
eastbound
traffic
lane.
C
That's
in
addition
to
the
planned
north
side
bump
out,
which
the
committee
supports.
The
committee
also
requests
that
public
works
explore
signalization
improvements
to
this
intersection
yeah,
so
the
matthew
hendricks.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
see
more
about
the
median,
but
the
idea
here
right
is
to
make
sure
that
the
we
reduce
the
width
of
lanes,
reduce
the
number
of
lanes
and
actually
provide
a
center
median
that
folks
can
stop
at
because
the
median
currently
is
not
really
effective.
A
F
No,
you
summarized
it
really.
Well,
I
mean
it
really
is
a
situation
where
there's
there's
a
not
really
a
center
median
as
much
as
a
really
small,
concrete
strip
there.
Maybe
a
foot
and
a
half
wide
on
on
the
one
side,
so
getting
a
median
and
a
place
for
people
to
stop
would
make
a
big
difference.
There.
E
F
I
would
I
would
welcome
that.
I
emailed
the
diagram
to
millicent
and
I
think
a
couple
others
is
there
any
easy
way
to
add
it
to
the
resolution.
Millicent.
Q
Yeah,
so
I
want
to
give
some
context,
and
this
is
not
in
any
way
a
rebuttal
or
or
saying
this.
You
know
well
I'll,
just
say
context.
You
know
so
this
project
is
is
at
and
I
brought
this
up
at
the
subcommittee,
but
I
just
want
to
say
it
here
is:
is
beyond
100
designed
and
was
supposed
to
be
built
this
year,
and
they
just
happened
to
not
get
to
it,
which
frankly
was
a
little
frustrating
to
me.
Q
But
that's
where
we
are
so
this
this
request,
I
just
want
to
be
clear,
is:
is
is
going
to
be
a
hard
one,
or
at
least
my
assumption
is
that
this
will
be
a
hard
one
to
to
get
changed,
and
I
guess
I
just
wanted
to
note
that
I
I
I
reached
out
to
steve.
We
had
a
meeting
today.
It
unfortunately
was
cancelled.
He
couldn't
make
it
so
I
will
talk
to
him
about
this
and
and
report
back
on
what
I
hear.
Q
Perhaps
at
you
know
whatever
the
next
meeting
is
that
makes
sense,
so
I
just
wanted
to
share
that.
If
there's
any
questions,
let
me
know.
F
I
appreciate
that
matthew.
I
think
we're
definitely
going
into
it
with
eyes
open
to
the
fact
that
there's
a
a
project-
that's
scheduled
to
happen-
you
know,
hopefully,
next
summer
or
next
spring,
and-
and
hopefully
this
is
viewed
as
additive
to
that,
rather
than
canceling
it
or
criticizing
it,
but
really
trying
to
improve
it
so
that
it
has
the
intended
impact.
F
And
hopefully
the
fact
that
there
is
a
project
happening,
helps
something
better
happen
here
in
the
sense
that
we're
not
starting
from
square
one
where
there
is
no
project
happening
at
all
or
public
works
isn't
concerned
about
the
intersection
at
all.
So
hopefully
we're
able
to
get
to
a
good
resolution,
but
I
understand
the
concern.
I
think
it's
very
reasonable.
What
you're
raising.
Q
F
So
paul
it
is
intended
for
both
and
in
order
to
get
enough
space.
There
are
a
couple
options,
including
narrowing
the
eastbound
lane,
that's
on
the
south
side
of
a
potential
median
and
or
reducing
from
two
to
one
westbound
lanes,
which
would
be
on
the
north
side
of
the
median
either
of
those
gets
to
a
median
big
enough
to
stop.
If
both
are
done
together,
then
you
have
a
really
an
ample
median.
Then,
at
that
point,.
A
I'll
I'll
just
say
is
someone
who's
been
through
it
hundreds
of
times
and
all
the
iterations
that
it's
seen,
I'm
excited
to
to
make
it
that
much
better
and
I've
definitely
spoken
to
more
than
one
person
who
rides
through
there
regularly.
That
said,
they
like
it
less
now,
because
it
sets
up
expectations
that
were
not
there
before,
and
people
are
not
following
those
expectations,
and
I
think
what
matthew
has
brought
forward
will
help
people
actually
follow
the
expectations
that
we're
hoping
everyone
will
do.
So
I
support
this
as
well.
L
B
P
Janice,
yes,
jennifer.
L
B
B
R
L
B
H
H
I
L
O
B
M
C
Not
on
the
five
e's
report,
I
assume
that
we
should
talk
about
the
17th
avenue
at
the
end.
After
the
engineering
report.
A
That
sounds
great
to
me.
Thanks
all
right,
thanks,
five
ease
an
engineering
report
up
next.
E
All
right
millicent
would
it
be
too
much
trouble
to
pull
up
the
osceola
road
bac
presentation.
E
Yeah
well,
we
had.
We
have
several
actions
today
that
came
out
of
that,
and
the
first
one
will
be
regarding
the
osseo
road
reconstruction
and
we're
going
to
try
to
pull
these
up
as
they
come
along.
E
If
you
are
not
aware
of
it
in
the
minutes
that
or
the
announcement
that
maleficent
sent
out,
there
is
a
connection
to
the
limb
site
and
on
that
limb
site
is
basically
the
bac
present.
I
mean
the
osseo
road
presentation
and
several
others
that
came
before
us
and
those
are
really
really
helpful
to
kind
of
take
a
look
at
even
during
the
meeting,
because
you
can
scroll
back
and
forth
compared
to
the
kind
of
controlled
scenery
that
you'll
see
when
millicent
gets
it
on
the
screen.
E
But
to
summarize
a
little
bit
about
the
osseo
road
project,
it
it's
basically
going
and
don't
it's
from
the
city
limits
in
north
minneapolis
down
to
near
44th,
and
that
road
is
primarily
going
to
be
two
travel
lanes
with
designated
right
and
left
turn
lanes
and
center
median
in
some
sections
it
has
a
a
brand
new.
This
came
at
this
meeting.
E
A
brand
new
10
foot
wide
2
foot,
10
foot
two-way
trail
on
the
south
side,
with
an
adjacent
six-foot,
sidewalk
and
there's
a
little
gripe
that
goes
between
them.
That
demarcates
the
difference
between
that
two-way
trail
and
the
sidewalk.
E
And
it's
also
going
to
be
getting
five
foot
boulevards
and
pedestrian
lighting
and
grass
boulevards
and
perhaps
even
more.
E
There
is
a
zebra
and
conflict
zone
crossing
at
victory,
memorial
drive
and
queen
avenue,
where
the
queen
bike
boulevard
will
come
in
next
year.
Improved
metro,
transit
stops
and
constructions
anticipated
in
2022
one
of
the
pieces.
This
is
an
extension
of
work
that
was
completed
in
2019
in
brooklyn
center
that
runs
from
bass,
lake
road
sort
of
the
there.
You
go
sort
of
the
way
that
so
there's
a
trail,
that's
north
of
here
from
49th
going
all
the
way
up
to
bass
lake
road
about
another
mile
and
a
half.
E
So
this
is
quite
a
nice
run
and
quite
a
nice
trail,
and
it's
looking
forward
if
you
can
scroll
down
a
little
bit
and
listen
to
show
some
of
the
sections.
E
So
there's
five
there's
six
different
street
scenarios
here
and
some
of
the
concerns.
If
we
continue
to
scroll
millicent
to
the
next
one.
Some
of
the
concerns
were
that
the
in
fact,
the
the
big
concern
that
came
out
and
came
jumping
out
was
we
had
11
foot
lanes
on
this
plus
two
footer
wider
gutter,
our
gutters
and,
and
that
seemed
to
be
a
little
bit
extreme
to
try
to
slow
down
the
traffic
along
this
path.
E
There's
a
good
example
of
it:
well,
not
right,
yeah
right
there,
some
of
the
things.
Besides
the
wide
gutters
and
the
11
foot
lanes,
the
we've,
the
it
was
brought
up
that
the
trail
does
not
get
to
44th
and
that
we
should
either
seal
some
trail
or
multi
use
trail
to
get
that
far.
E
We
discussed
tabled
crossings
of
intersections
along
the
trail.
There's
a
nice
view
of
the
trail
and
and
that
this
be
considered
at
all
street
intersections.
There's
tyler
brought
up
that.
He
felt
if
we
can
to
get
some
additional
greening,
in
other
words,
trees
in
this
area.
E
That
might
you
know,
make
it
a
little
bit
more
personal
and
close
down
the
street,
and
we
also
discussed
wayfinding
plan
that
encourages
use
to
destinations
and
important
intersections
and
extending
that
dash
striping,
which
showed
up
on
the
minneapolis
portion
all
the
way
up
to
base
best
lake
road,
and
this
was
coming
to
us
at
30
percent,
and
it
was
mentioned
that
these
were
the
what
is
being
proposed.
E
They
aren't
actually
what's
in
it's
what
being
proposed,
and
we
asked
that
perhaps
they
would
come
back
at
60
percent
to
review
the
status
of
these
proposals
as
well
as
some
of
the
recommendations
we
made,
which
I
think
is
probably
easiest
to
go
into
with
the
the
action
if
we
can
so
millicent.
If
we
could
turn
to
that
action.
Maybe
that's
the
next
piece
to
do.
E
The
bicycle
advisory
committee
appreciates
staff
efforts
and
their
proposal,
which
includes
an
off-street
asphalt,
marked
two-way
bikeway,
visually
and
physically
delineated
from
the
adjacent
cement,
pedestrian,
sidewalk,
pedestrian
lighting
in
green
boulevards,
zebra
crossings
and
conflict
zones.
At
the
victory
memorial
and
queen
bike
boulevard
intersections.
E
A
A
F
Yeah
this
is
a
matthew,
hendricks.
I'm
curious
to
run
an
idea
past
the
group
to
see
if
this
would
be
considered
an
improvement
or
not,
so
that
the
trail
is
on
the
west
side
of
the
street
and
between
the
trail
and
the
road
or
street,
there's
typically
about
a
five
foot
green
space
that
may
or
may
not
have
trees.
But
five
feet
is
a
little
bit
minimal
for
trees
and
may
feel
pretty
close
to
the
street
there.
F
So
I'm
curious
if
this
is
a
location
where
it
might
be
better
to
have
a
wider
green
buffer
between
the
motor
vehicle
traffic
and
the
trail
and
instead
of
having
essentially
17
feet
for
non-motorized
uses,
have
something
like
a
12
or
a
14
foot
multi-use
trail.
So
the
trade-off
is
you'd
share
the
trail
occasionally
with
pedestrians.
F
Who
would
be
you
know,
it'd
be
more
than
zero
in
this
kind
of
a
location,
but
not
it's
not
thick
pedestrian
traffic
like
you'd,
expect
in
like
the?
U
of
m
area
or
or
close
to
downtown
and
in
exchange
for
that
sharing
there'd
be
a
much
more
generous
green
buffer
between
motor
vehicle
traffic.
In
the
trail.
E
I
can
only
this
is
dan
and
I
can
only
speak
from
experience
of
the
18th
avenue
trail,
which
is
13
feet
wide
from
johnson
and
central
avenue,
and
at
one
time
that
was
going
to
be
marked.
It
was
originally
marked
as
a
five
foot
bike
lanes
and
six
foot.
E
Well,
it
wouldn't
have
been
that
it's
13
feet
so
five
feet:
eight
foot,
two,
eight
two,
four
foot
bike
lanes
and
a
in
a
five
foot,
sidewalk
and
so
they're
going
to
do
a
solid
white
and
a
striped
yellow
line.
I
think
that
they
made
the
smart
move
and
just
striped
it
right
down
the
middle
and
with
a
dashed
line
and
my
fairly
extensive
experience
of
using
that
that
bike
path
is
it's.
It's
working
really
well
with
mixed
use,
and
so
that's
just
my
observations.
E
I
don't
know
if
they
would
go
for
that,
but
I
think
it
really
helps
to
you
know:
help
inform
people
that
which
side
to
be
on
that
dashed
line.
Q
Matthew,
you
know
yeah
so
I'll,
provide
this
a
couple,
a
little
perspective,
so
to
me
the
the
denser
and
and
busier
the
environment.
I
think
the
the
more
separation
is
is
useful
and
and
necessary
in
in
this
case,
I
sort
of
like
just
my
personal
view
is
like
six
and
one
half
half
dozen
in
the
other.
Q
But
what
I
will
note-
and
you
know
this
is
part
of
my
role
being
on
both
bac
mpac
is
the
bac
or
the
pacs
felt
pretty
strongly
over
the
years
that
like
we
should
pursue
separation
wherever
and
whenever
possible,
regardless
of
kind
of
the
context
you
know
and
expected
use.
I
haven't
always
agreed
with
that
necessarily,
but
I
just
wanted
to
share
that
perspective
as
part
of
my
role.
I
Yeah,
I
think
separation,
I
think,
seems
fine.
I
think
we'd
have
to
make
sure
to
look
at
locations
getting
further
south
along
the
the
layout.
If
there
are
any
buildings
closer
to
the
right-of-way
that
we
may
need,
we
don't
want
bicycle
traffic,
close
close
to
any
retaining
walls
or
anything
like
that
or
buildings,
and
then
the
the
actual.
I
Once
once
you
combine
them,
then
you
know:
if
you
have
them
separate,
then
the
the
walkway
can
be
the
exclusive
ada
compliant
facility,
and
then
the
bike
trail
may
have
a
little
bit
more
leniency.
I
don't
know
if
that's
why
they
separated
or
not,
but
those
are
just
two
things
to
think
about.
H
Yeah,
I
would
echo
what
dan
said
in
that
having
just
one
single
striped
line
down
the
center
in
my
experience
is
much
more
clear
for
the
pedestrians
as
to
where
you
know
they
want
to
be
on
the
far
right
side
of
of
the
path,
and
if
you
only
separate
them
with
a
narrow
like
one
foot,
I
guess
median
or
whatever
it
is
in
this
case
it
may
be
confusing
for
them.
So
I
guess
if
it's
separated
that's
great,
but
if
we
do
decide,
we
think
it's
better
to
make
it
one
path.
G
Yes,
okay,
so
I'm
just
thinking
about
like
who
is
most
likely
to
use
this
segment
and
whether
or
not
anyone
has
insight
on
if
this
would
be
like
a
lot
of
commuters.
Maybe
who
are
commuting
from
the
northern
suburb
and
like
this
might
be
their
most
direct
path,
and
so
typically
like
for
recreational
trails
or,
like
primarily,
recreational
use,
I'm
in
general.
G
Fine
with
having
you
know
more
shared
space
between
pedestrians
and
cyclists,
because
I
feel
like
people
aren't,
as
in
a
rush
to
you,
know,
get
to
work
time
of
day
like
peak
activity,
might
sort
of
correct
for
like
how
many
pedestrians
might
be.
You
know,
walking
their
dogs
when
people
are
maybe
perhaps
trying
to
ride
their
their
bike
to
work.
G
But
I
think
also,
if
we're
thinking
about
getting
more
people,
to
replace
like
a
three
mile
to
five
mile
car
ride
from
the
northern
suburbs
to
a
minneapolis
neighborhood
like
we
do
need
to
consider
that
they're
trying
to
make
up
some
time-
and
it
may
be
like
a
conflict
like
quite
quite
literally,
a
physical
conflict
of
interest
for
them
to
behave
as
safe
around
people
who
might
be
walking
dogs
or
children
to
school
before
work.
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
something
that
we
can
think
about.
There.
E
Yeah,
the
one
thing
to
consider,
too,
is
the
trail
that
has
been
built
between
city
limits
up
to
bass,
lake
road,
which
is
longer
than
what
this
section
will
be,
is
basically
a
divided
trail,
that
is
a
cement
sidewalk
in
an
asphalt
trail
with
a
boulevard.
So
I
I,
I
think,
matthew's
thoughts
about
trying
to
figure
out
ways
to
expand.
E
The
width
of
the
green
is
a
good
idea,
but
I
think
it's
also
important
to
kind
of
maintain
that
consistency,
so
there
might
be
between
them
trying
to
narrow
down
the
the
gutter
widths,
and
I
don't
know
something
else.
I
think
perhaps
maintaining
that
separation
is
a
is
a
good
idea
for
consistency
done
thanks.
Q
There's
a
there's
a
certain
political
element,
I'm
interested
in
too
just
the
fact
that
hennepin
county
is
is
like
very
voluntarily
and
maybe
excitedly.
Proposing
a
separated
trail
here
is
a
good
is
a
good
thing,
because
we're
gonna
need
that
on
university
avenue
and
east
hennepin-
and
you
know
so,
there's
a
part
of
it
where
it's
like,
I
kind
of
want
to
like
support
them
in
doing
the
separation,
because
we're
going
to
need
it
elsewhere,
I'm
not
sure
if
that's
a
big
factor
or
not,
but.
S
Yeah,
I
would
just
kind
of
echo
as
a
pedestrian,
and
I
know
this
is
the
bac,
but
when
I'm
a
pedestrian,
I
really
do
appreciate
the
separation
from
bicycles
when
I'm
a
bicyclist,
it
doesn't
matter
so
much,
but
so
I
can
see
why
the
pac
would
be
looking
for
separation,
and
I
think,
just
to
echo
what
dan
said
I
thought
I
thought
I
saw
in
the
notes
some
talk
of.
F
Yeah,
so
that's
really
helpful
to
hear
the
the
different
opinions
and
I
think
it
it's
pretty
clear
in
this
situation-
there's
not
a
resounding
call
for
like
yes,
we
absolutely
should
merge
the
trails
to
get
the
extra
green
space.
F
I
think
it's
sort
of
there
are
probably
it
sounds
like
enough
disadvantages
to
merging
the
trails
that
that's
probably
not
the
direction
we'd
really
want
to
push
for,
but
I
think
that
puts
more
pressure
than
on
getting
the
road
narrowed
to
try
to
maximize
the
green
space
in
addition
to
narrowing
it
just
to
make
it
quieter
and
slightly
slower
and
safer
road,
or
to
make
it
more
likely
that
motor
vehicles
will
adhere
to
the
speed
limit
and
for
those
who
weren't
in
the
engineering
committee
meeting.
F
That
was
really
probably
the
biggest
critique
of
this
design
was
the
lane
widths,
they're,
11,
plus
two
in
some
locations,
but
they
get
up
to
like
much
wider,
especially
on
the
bridge
they're.
I
think
11
or
12,
plus
five.
So
there's
some
stretches
where
there's
a
lot
of
room
to
narrow
the
road
and
still
have
plenty
of
space
for
traffic
moving
at
30
miles
an
hour.
A
Thanks
matthew
thanks,
everybody
yeah,
I
guess
I
just
put
that
exclamation
point
on.
I
think
when
I,
when
I
adjusted
language
for
that
lane
with
I
said,
11
plus
two
and
wider
is
unacceptable.
A
Just
you
know,
there's
so
many
reasons.
I
can't
even
begin
to
start.
S
A
Listing
them,
but
I
think
this
captures
them-
and
I
obviously
will
not
be
here,
but
I
hope,
when
you
get
to
that
last
part
of
that
the
county
comes
back
at
60,
that
that
that
happens
and
that
you
hold
them
to
that.
So
any
other
discussion.
S
B
B
H
B
M
L
B
L
B
R
M
E
Okay,
the
next
item
on
the
next
act
or
the
next
item
agenda,
was
the
second
string
east
and
having
northeast
improvements.
You
put
that
up
or
can
people
if
they
want
to
follow
along.
B
Yep,
my
my
internet
connection
isn't
as
quick
as
it
should
be.
Things
are
kind
of
spinning
here.
E
Okay,
this
has
been
something
that's
been
up
for
a
while
with
temporary
boulevards
and
striping
and
they're
going
to
basically
make
it
permanent.
E
It
involves
adding
a
new
median,
a
new
center
median
and
shrinking
the
shrinking
it.
It's
shrinking
that
intersection
set
up
now,
nope
still
still
not.
I've
got
got
it
yeah,
okay
and
so
there's
added
greening
to
this.
There
is,
and
a
little
bit
of
treatment
on
the
corners
to
kind
of
make
the
corners
tighter
for
turning.
E
I
E
So
the
left
side
is
the
existing
and
the
right
side
is
the
proposed.
So
chris,
would
you
like
to
talk
about
this
intersection?
This
is
one
that's
dear
to
your
heart.
T
Sure
you
know
intersections
are
always
close
to
my
heart.
It's
got
a
christmas
present
and
everything.
No,
it
works
really.
Well,
I
you
know
we
had
a
big
the
neighborhood
I
live
in
this
neighborhood.
We
had
a
big
problem
with
traffic
speeds
going
down
second
street
down
off
the
railroad
bridge.
There
was
talk
about
putting
a
stop
sign
in
there,
but
the
stop
signs
are
no
good
because
it
just
it's
really
irritating
to
live
by
a
stop
sign.
Have
people
gunning
their
cars
after
they
stop.
T
So
this
was
done
to
divert
the
traffic,
make
them
kind
of
swerve
a
little
bit,
make
them
slow
down,
and
it
has
worked
both
documented
and
just
kind
of
side,
just
kind
of
noticing
it
as
well.
It's
going
to
be
nice,
it's
going
to
be
nice,
it's
a
great
pedestrian
improvement
and
then
did
you
want
to.
Are
you
going
to
talk
about
the
possible
3rd
avenue?
Yes,.
E
You
can
go
ahead
or
I
can
proceed.
T
Sure
so,
there's
a
not
on
the
second
street,
but
on
third
avenue,
as
you
can
see
in
that
design,
there
is
some
green
striking
conflicts
driving.
There
is
an
old,
the
original
greenway,
the
first
greenway
in
the
city
in
the
70s,
I
believe,
70s
and
early
80s.
T
This
land
was
just
a
quick
history
or
lesson.
This
land
was
scheduled
to
be
for
an
interstate
called.
I
335
that
was
going
to
run
cook
up
basically
94
to
35
w
and
it's
going
to
go
across
northeast.
They
bought
the
land,
they
cleared
the
land,
but
they
did
not
build
the
freeway.
It's
kind
of
a
one
of
these
things
that
you
hear
about
how
they
wish
we
would
have
wouldn't
have
built
the
intersections
through
parts
of
our
city.
Well,
this
is
one
instance
where
the
actually
they
didn't
they
stopped
it.
T
So
a
nice
little
kind
of
note
on
that,
and
then
they
also
kind
of
wanted
to
put
a
greenway
a
bikeway
in
its
place
to
the
interstate,
which
I
thought
kind
of
neat.
But
anyway,
it's
it
needs
to
get
maintained.
There's
been
some
disagreement
on
who
owns
the
land
or
who
I
mean
who's
supposed
to
maintain
the
land
and
it's
in
great
disrepair
so
much
that
it's
basically
unusable.
E
E
We
urge
public
works
to
assume
maintenance
responsibilities
for
this
bikeway,
which
connects
users
to
the
mississippi
river
saint
anthony
park
and
central
avenue.
Its
pavement
condition
is
poor
and
not
plowed.
In
the
winter.
This
bikeway,
which
was
once
on
the
bicycle
master
plan,
needs
to
be
reinstated
on
the
all
ages
and
abilities
network.
T
H
Yeah,
this
is
kyle
real,
quick.
Is
that
supposed
to
say
the
18th
street
northeast.
E
No
eight,
no
that's.
H
A
T
Got
it
thank
you,
so
I've
always
dreamed
about
their
their
there's
a
webster
school
that's
opened
up
on
which
just
opened
within
the
past
few
years
on
fifth
and
fifth,
so
it's
a
would
be
a
really
nice
kind
of
safe
routes
to
school
project.
I've
always
thought
so
it
would
be.
That
would
be
a
really
good
use
of
that
funds
and
create
a
safe
route
to
school,
while
also
fixing
making
for
a
bike
path
as
well.
So.
L
B
R
B
Janice,
yes,
jennifer,
yes,
dan.
M
B
L
H
B
I
M
O
J
B
Okay,
tyler
john.
M
E
Hey
next
item
that
came
up
at
the
subcommittee
meeting
was
west
31st
street
pedestrian
safety
improvements
30
by
amy
morgan
and
this
one.
I
think
there
was
a
link
issue
in
lim,
but
it
was
the
plan
was
or
the
project
sheet
was
on,
melissa's
email
and
it's
two
intersections
and
they're,
replacing
basically
temporary,
bump
outs
that
have
been
there
for
a
while
that
they've
been
testing
on
emerson
and
dupont.
Both
are
one-way
streets
and
they
will
be
building
those
out
they'll
be
adding
green
space.
E
If
you
add,
come
to
the
next
scene,
there
yep
that
shows
the
improvements
with
the
next
and
everybody
was
supportive
of
this.
They
asked
if
the
bump
odds
could
be
increased
on
emerson
and
dupont
to
slow
down
the
turning
behavior
there.
They
said
they'd,
look
at
that
and
we
passed
a
motion
and
that
motion
reads.
A
That
I
heard
paul
and
aaron
we'll
give
it
to
paul,
since
he
won't
be
doing
that
next
month.
Thank
you.
A
A
All
right,
well,
you're,
all
quiet,
so
I
think
we
like
this
one,
but
you
make
the
call
nelson
ready
when
you
are.
L
B
Okay
janice,
I
jennifer
I
john.
L
B
L
H
A
B
F
B
J
B
All
right,
sorry
armand
is
gone.
Tyler's
gone
wes,
yes,
matthew,
deardoll,
yes,
16,
yes,
and
one
abstention.
Thank
you.
Melissa.
E
Okay,
the
next
one
was
franklin
avenue
west,
it's
at
15.
It
was
presented
by
katie
white
minneapolis,
public
works
millicent.
If
you
can
pull
it
up
on
the
screen
be
appreciated.
Basically,
the
plan
includes
a
one-way
five-foot
wide,
the
gray
ice
bike
lanes.
So
that's
the
grade,
cement
on
both
sides
of
the
street
six
foot
concrete
sidewalks,
a
one
foot
tactile
strip
separating
the
bike
lane
from
the
sidewalk
new
green
boulevard,
an
enhanced
bryant
bike,
boulevard
crossing
enhanced
traffic
transit
stops,
and
I
think,
if
you
pull
up
that
there
you
go.
E
That's
the
scene.
Single
travel
lanes
with
designated
left
turns
at
hennepin
and
lindale
intersections
construction
is
planned
for
2022..
So
that's
that
15,
so
they're
gonna
go
back
and
do
some
more
work
on
this.
Some
of
the
comments
that
that
we
had
were
can
the
intersections
be
tabled,
receive
zebra
striping
for
increased
safety.
That's
under
consideration.
E
Second,
one
can
the
south
side
trail
jog
between
bryant
and
evan,
bryant,
avenue
and
aldrich
be
straightened.
You
can
see
that
little
gray
ice
wiggle
on
this
right
in
the
center,
underneath
the
left
of
number
one,
which
is
the
little
size
and
then
and
then,
if
bike
lanes
can
have
bike
symbols
with
directional
arrows
or
something
to
indicate
that,
and
that
seems
to
be
doable
too.
So
this
was
enthusiastically
supported
and
seconded
and
we
have
a
resolution.
Any
questions
before
I
proceed.
D
There
is
one
thing
that
I
have
heard
from
a
resident
on
franklin
since
the
since
last
week
was
just
that
they
they
were
kind
of
pointing
out
that
if,
if
the
reason
we
wanted
those
those
handful
of
parking
spots
that
you
can
see
in
the
rendering
is
for
food
delivery,
and
things
like
that,
it
might
be
worth
considering
a
recommendation
of
putting
like
a
15
minute
limit
or
put
some
sort
of
time
limitation.
Maybe
we
let
them
decide,
but
it
might
be
worth
at
least
considering
an
amendment
to
that.
D
Just
adding.
A
Q
This
is
matthew.
I
I
think
saying
that
now
would
be
would
be
really
helpful
to
to
help
prepare,
for
you
know
the
30
time
frame,
and
I
like
that
idea
and
maybe
maybe
not
specifying
a
specific
type
of
science,
but
maybe
noting
they
should
like
think
creatively
about
that
space.
Given
you
know,
curbside
use
like
policies
that
we're
exploring
that
type
of
thing,
something
to
that
effect.
L
Q
A
So,
in
conjunction
with
the
curbside
use
policy
developments.
Q
Maybe
policies
currently
being
explored
how
about
that
policy.
M
D
E
M
B
Okay,
aaron.
L
T
B
F
G
A
L
B
O
Q
A
Wilson,
dan
anything
else
from
engineering
or
chris.
A
C
I
am
let
me
attempt
to
share
my
screen.
Hopefully
you
all
can
see
this.
C
I
got
in
an
email
from
the
ward
9
office,
which
is
where
I
am
so
this
is
you
can
see
the
very
bottom
of
the
diagram
is
lake
street
and
then,
on
the
right
hand,
side
you
can
see
cedar
avenue,
and
this
is
the
area
between
cedar
and
bloomington,
so
16th,
17th
and
18th
avenue,
18th
avenues
between
26th
street
and
20
or
at
lake
street
have
all
been
turned
into
one
ways.
C
This
includes
17th
avenue,
which
is
which
is
a
bikeway
facility,
and
it
means
if
you
would
like
to
say,
exit
the
greenway
and
then
go
southbound
on
17th
avenue
on
as
a
bike.
You
are
technically
breaking
the
law
to
do
that.
So
folks,
who
are
attempting
to
use
any
of
this
stretch
of
17th
avenue
as
a
southbound
bikeway
can
no
longer
do
so.
C
So
I
have
a
draft
motion
saying
that
the
city
should
fix
it.
As
far
as
I
understand
this
was
really
the
changes
here.
We're
really
born
out
of
engagement
with
the
east
phillips
neighborhood
loosely
from
some
conversations
with
folks
in
the
neighborhood.
I
understand
this
to
be
not
a
traffic
mitigation
strategy,
but
a
response
to
complaints
about
crime
in
the
neighborhood.
I
don't
think
it's
particularly
effective
as
a
strategy
to
mitigate
crime.
I
do
think
it.
C
C
C
And
while
you
pull
that
up
wondering
if
anyone
has
any
questions
about
what
happened
there
and
why
I'm
bringing
this.
N
Yes,
my
question
is:
are
there,
is
there
still
on
street
bike
facility
at
all
or
is
it
or
was
there
an
on-street
bike
facility
there
in
the
first
place,
or
was
it
just
dumping?
The
folks
from
the
greenway
onto
a
residential
street.
C
Yeah,
so
it
was
a
bike
boulevard,
so
the
especially,
I
don't,
I
think,
both
north
and
south
of
lake
street.
There
are
roundabouts
and
there's
paint,
but
it's
not
a
separated
bike
facility,
but.
C
They
did
not
remove
the
paint
so
technically,
yes,
folks
can
still
ride
it.
Northbound
for
this
stretch
between
lake
street
and
26,
but
they
cannot
ride
at
southbound.
Q
Like
I,
I'm
I'm
not
raising
this
question
because
I
want
to
be
right,
but
I
I
have
a
curious
legal
question
so
that
statute,
I
believe,
is,
is
really
speaking
to
dedicated
bike
facilities.
I
think
you
could
make
a
legal
argument
that
this
is
not
a
dedicated
bike
facility.
That
is
a
shared
condition.
That
kind
of
happens
to
be
enhanced
by
by
paint.
So
I'm
wondering
I'm
wondering,
like
I
hate
that
argument
for
the
group,
but
what
I'm
wondering
is
is
that
is
that,
like?
N
I
think,
because
it
still
is
a
shared
facility
going
in
one
direction.
It
really
doesn't
doesn't
get
the
statute
in
the
first
place.
I
haven't
done
the
analysis
I
heard
about
this
just
now
and
I
haven't
called
up
my
opinion,
but
I
think
we
might
actually,
if
we
want
to
make
resolutions
cite
the
statute.
T
N
I
I
believe
the
statute
is
section
160.264..
Yes,.
I
Q
I'm
impressed
and
then
I
also
want
to
say
from,
like
you
know,
my
actual
role,
which
is
not
legal.
I
agree
we
should
fix
it
so.
J
So
I
two
things
I
just
want
to
be
clear:
that
there
are.
This
connects
to
some
pretty
significant
stuff
south
of
here
that
we
invested
quite
a
bit
in
I
mean,
I
think,
there's
a
there's
a
way
to
get
the
signal
at
lake
street
on
17th,
and
then
there
are
a
bunch
of
roundabouts
south
of
lake
street.
So
for
folks
who
are
trying
to
use
this
facility
to
get
north
from
down
in
you
know,
corcoran
or
even
further
south
to
get
up
to
the
greenway
this.
J
This
presents
a
really
big
problem
and
barrier.
I
I'm
curious.
If
matthew
has
any
inside
scoop
on
what
the
heck
happened,
did
they
just
not
think
about
it
do
do
we
have
any
idea
who,
like
is
responsible
for
this.
Q
I
I
think
I'll
say
this:
I
did
not
know
about
it
until
it
was
brought
to
my
attention
by
alyssa,
so
I
am.
I
am
actively
interested
in
helping
fix
it.
I'll
just
say
that,
like
alyssa
mentioned,
I
believe
it
was
it
was.
Q
You
know
it
was
driven
or
related
to
some
neighborhood
concerns,
and
I
think
there
was
like
a
some
somebody
acted
quickly
and
maybe
didn't
think
through
the
implications
of
that
street,
in
particular
to
say
nothing
of
the
other
issues,
but
I
think
we
we
definitely
need
to
explore
correcting
it
on
17..
Q
J
So
I'll
just
we
may
benefit
from
putting
something
in
here
that
makes
kind
of
the
meta
point
of
this
cannot
happen.
This
is
not
a
thing
that
we
should
be
catching
after.
It
occurs.
If
we
have
a
complete
street
streets
policy,
which
we
do,
it
should
be
consulted
when
we
are
having
conversations
about
like.
Should
we
flip
a
bunch
of
streets
to
one
ways,
because
we
have
concerns
about
crime
on
these
streets
and
I'm
loathe
to
say
you
know
we
do
everything
so
slowly
anyway,
I'm
both
to
say
slow
it
down.
J
So
that's
not
really
what
I'm
saying
what
I'm
saying
is
like
when
we've
got
a
bicycle
facility
on
on
a
roadway.
We
have
to
think
about
that
and
who
somebody
in
public
works
has
got
to
think
about
that,
and
so
just
calling
attention
to
the
fact
that
this
is
a
real
failure
of
our
system,
and
it
should
not
happen.
C
So
it
sounds
like
maybe
there's
some
suggested
additional
language
that
folks
are
thinking
about
for
this
resolution.
Why
don't
I
read
out
what
I
have
and
then,
if
folks
have
things
that
they
would
like
to
suggest
as
additions?
We
can
do
that,
but
I
know
that
folks
on
the
on
the
phone
have
not
actually
seen
the
resolution
yet
and
then
I
do
have
a
an
example
photo
of
the
bikeway.
If
folks
are
like
struggling
to
figure
out
how
that
looks,.
A
Alyssa
jesse
did
you,
you
had
your
hand
up
and
down.
Did
you
still
have
something.
I
A
C
The
street
has
recently
been
converted
to
a
one-way
street
that
limits
its
use
as
a
bicycle
facility,
which
is
unacceptable,
given
that
17th
avenue
was
a
designated
bike
boulevard
in
the
city's
bicycle
master
plan
and
is
intended
to
connect
to
several
other
major
bike
facilities
in
the
network,
including
the
greenway
28th
street
26th
street
and
24th
street.
In
accordance
with
the
priorities
outlined
in
the
transportation
action
plan,
the
street
should
immediately
be
amended
to
reallocate
parking
space
to
safe,
comfortable
bike
facilities,
so
moved.
A
F
And
then
cadence
go
ahead.
Cadence.
C
I
don't
know
I
don't
know
millicent
if
I
just
booted
you
from
screen
sharing.
Sorry,
I
don't
quite
so.
This
is
a
picture
of
17th,
so
we're
looking
currently
southbound,
which
is
the
way
you
cannot
go
anymore.
On
17th
and
the
first
intersection
right
in
the
photo.
There
is
29th
street
and
then
you
can
see
further
down
is
lake
street
you
can
see,
for
example,
I
took
this
photo
around
four
o'clock,
all
the
entire,
basically
the
entire.
What
is
that?
C
The
west
side
of
the
street
that
you
can
see
between
lake
and
29th?
There's
two
cars
on
the
entire
block.
There
is
a
business
at
the
far
end
near
the
stoplight
they
did.
They
did
retain
partial
two-way
at
the
very
ends
of
the
blocks
for
business
access,
even
as
they
removed
all
of
the
bike
park,
bike
ability
to
use
the
network
and
then
they've
also
added
some
bollards
to
remind
cars,
not
to
turn
the
wrong
way
on
the
new
one
ways.
G
So
if
I
understand
it
correctly,
if
we
install
a
contraflow
bike
lane
here
like
we
would
have
to
remove
parking,
I
mean
I,
I
would
prefer
that
parking
be
removed
on
the
west
side
of
the
street,
so
that
there's
just
like
no
possibility
of
being
like
going
head
head
first
into
a
door
being
opened
into
your
path.
Is
that
correct.
G
C
Yes,
so
that
would
be
removing
parking,
and
my
thought
as
a
resolution
is
to
ask
for
the
thing
we
actually
want.
I
am
not
necessarily
under
the
illusion
that
public
works
is
magically
tomorrow,
going
to
take
away
four
blocks
of
street
parking
without
maybe
a
little
bit
more
pushing,
but
I
think
you
know
we
should
ask
for
the
best
possible
solution
to
this
and
see
what
public
works
does
with
that.
F
So
I'm
a
little
concerned
about
the
potential
for
unintended
consequences
with
designing
the
streets
as
one
ways,
because
that
might
encourage
speeding.
And
so
I
wonder
if
there
will
be
any
sort
of
monitoring
of
how
this
is
working
out
and
then
consideration
for
using
diverters
at
intersections
or
using
bump
outs.
Mid
block
that
are,
you
know,
extend
across
the
center
line
or
other
speed
mitigation
techniques
that
might
have
fewer
unintended
consequences.
So
just
curious
about
what
other
things
were
considered
and
how
this
is
going
to
be
monitored
for
safety.
C
Yeah
matthew,
I
think
those
are
great
questions
I
don't
know,
I
will
say
these
changes
were
made.
I
think
in
october
sometime
I
got
the
email
from
ward
9
at
the
very,
very
end
of
september,
and
so
have
kind
of
been
waiting
to
see
like
is,
is
this.
It
is
this
is
this
all
public
works
was
planning
on
doing
and
they've
now
had
a
couple
months,
and
I
it
doesn't
seem
like
there's
any
additional
plans
beyond
what
they've
put
here,
at
least
that
they've
communicated
communicated
about
publicly.
M
F
My
my
concerns
are
maybe
broader
and
more
for
the
long
term
how
this,
how
it's
either
adopted
or
made
made
permanent
or
adjusted
to
to
address
the
speeding
that
might
result.
O
J
Sorry
so
I'm
going
to
read
aloud
the
language
fragment.
I
came
up
with
here
to
to
try
to
say
the
the
meta
thing,
so
the
city's
complete
streets
policy
should
prevent
this
kind
of
outcome
where
a
bicycle
facility
is
partially
removed
without
notice
or
discussion.
The
bac
urges
public
works
and
other
departments
to
put
in
place
processes
that
will
prevent
this
kind
of
negative
outcome
in
the
future,
including,
but
not
limited
to
discussing
changes
to
signage
and
striping.
That
will
have
a
significant
impact
on
a
bicycle
facility
with
the
bicycle
and
pedestrian
coordinator.
A
Awesome
thanks
is
that
a
friendly
amendment
accepted
by
the
motion
maker
and
seconder.
C
P
Love
it
I'd
like
to
see
it
again.
It
was
behind.
I
was
on
the
bottom
of
the
screen
and
I
couldn't
see
it.
I
can
get
the
wording
from
a
screenshot
if
it's
not
blocked.
A
All
right,
dan
and
paul.
P
A
All
right
dinner,
if
you're
talking,
we
can't
hear
you.
E
Sorry
about
that,
what
I'm
understanding
from
this
melissa
is
you're
you're
talking
about
a
counterflow
lane
that
northbound
traffic,
a
north
pond
bicyclist,
would
be
in
this
counter
flow
lane
and
then
a
south
northbound
lane
would
be
in
the
regular
street
half
would
it
be
and
that
a
dedicated,
two-way
bikeway
is
not
what
you're
asking
for
and
is
that
something
that's
worth
asking
for.
C
C
J
C
C
Thanks
robin
yeah,
so
that's
what
I
was
thinking
of
is
like
a
good
comparable
model
in
terms
of
this
is
also
a
pretty
low
volume
traffic
street
most
of
the
traffic
is
on
bloomington
and
cedar,
and
so
not
a
lot
of
cars
are
using
it
to
to
cut
through.
But
if
folks
are
interested
in
pushing
for
that,
I
I
guess
I
would
consider
it.
I
just
have
haven't
it
didn't
seem.
A
Thank
you
paul
robin
and
jesse.
K
Is
it
my
understanding
that,
right
now
you
can't
go
south
on
17th
from
the
greenway?
Is
that
right,
correct
yeah?
I
think
I
think
that
is
that
should
be
changed.
One
other
thing:
this
is
a
bike
boulevard.
I
think,
and
it
goes
all
the
way
to
the
bike
trail
on
minnehaha,
parkway
or
the
creek,
and
I
have
used
that
17th
to
go
north
and
south
between
like
lake
street
and
the
parkway,
so
I
think
obviously
it
may
be
used
more
than
you
think
it
might
be
because
of
that
connection,.
J
So
I
wrote
some
text
to
matthew's
point,
which
I
thought
was
a
very
good
one,
so
I'm
reading
it
now,
the
bac
is
also
concerned
that
one-way
streets
have
a
tendency
to
increase
vehicle
speeds.
We
we
further
encourage
public
works,
to
monitor
and
evaluate
speeds
on
these
streets
and
remove
the
one-way
conditions
if
they
increase
vehicle
speeds.
A
Great
is
that
acceptable
to
the
motion
maker
and
seconder?
Yes,.
I
Yeah
in
the
last
sentence
of
the
first
paragraph,
would
it
be
beneficial
to
say,
after
the
transportation
action
plan
and
in
accordance
with
minnesota
statute
160.264,
which
is
the
having
to
replace
a
bikeway
that
has
been.
N
P
A
G
O
G
I
just
have
a
quick
question.
I
don't
know
if
it's
possible
to
request
like
a
recorded
decision
of
like
how,
how
and
why
this
change
was
like
formally
made.
I
know,
alyssa.
You
said
that
it
was
like
due
to
non-traffic
related
safety
concerns
but
like,
if
there's
some
sort
of
like
study
or
article
that
that
was
pointed
to
or
if
it
was
like,
just
purely
a
request.
I
I
would
be
interested
in
in
knowing
how
this
got
support
to
be
implemented
and
and
the
way
that
it's
currently
implemented.
O
Q
I
think
I
think
that's
an
interesting
question.
I
would
note
I
I
have
a
feeling
there
isn't
a
record
of
of
decision
in
the
same
way
that
there
are
for
capital
projects,
because
I
think
this
is
likely
considered
an
operational
change
and
so
I'm
not
necessarily
sure
what
would
count
as
a
record
of
decision
in
this
case.
But
I
don't
think
there
is
like
an
official
action
or
something
that
that
was
passed
or
or
formalized,
and
I
could
be
wrong.
So
maybe
I
should
look
into
that,
but.
J
J
For
me
to
get
a
single
four-way,
stop
has
taken
10
years
and
and
to
the
record
letter.
So
they're
damn
well
better,
be
a
a
paper
trail
on
this,
and
we
should
be
able
to
find
out
exactly
who
signed
off
on
it
and
who,
whose
idea
it
was
and
have
some
accountability
for
this,
because
it's
just
not
okay,
it
is
not.
Okay,.
A
Thanks
robin,
I
really
needed
that
in
my
last
meeting,
so
I
just
want
you
know,
I
appreciate
it.
Anybody
else
on
the
discussion.
C
A
All
right,
any
other
discussion,
very
I'm
very
happy
with
this
motion
about
this
very
unhappy
project
development.
Any
other
discussion,
all
right
melissa.
I
think
we're
ready
when
you
are.
L
F
B
H
B
I
A
B
O
B
D
A
Okay,
the
other
announcement
I'm
aware
of
is
we've
got
some
folks
stepping
off.
A
I
sure
would
like
to
start
with
those
that
are
here
today
and
give
you
the
opportunity
to
say
whatever,
whatever
you
like,
so
I'm
going
in
the
order
of
the
official
email
from
ellison
here.
So
that's
my
order,
chris
lindy.
Thank
you
for
all
of
your
service
leadership
and
dedication.
We're
definitely
gonna
miss
you.
We
wouldn't
be
the
same
without
you.
Thanks
for
bringing
all
you
have
to
engineering,
let
you
say
a
few
words.
T
Yeah,
thank
you.
It's
been
nice.
It's
been
nice
to
develop
new
skills
kind
of
in
a
professional
way
and
also
to
be
able
to
make
a
little
bit
of
a
difference.
Yeah.
I
can
look
back
at
things
that
good
wins,
like
fifth
avenue
bridge
over
the
35
has
been
was
really
nice.
T
Hennepin
avenue
is
going
to
be
really
nice
third
avenue
over
the
river's,
going
to
be
nice,
also,
some
losses
university
avenue
in
first
penn,
maybe
and
also
some
future
projects.
T
I
think
I'm
definitely
gonna
be
still
working
advocating
for
projects
that
I
really
like
more
in
my
neighborhood,
such
as
third
avenue
bikeway,
that
we
already
discussed
and
also
the
great
northern
greenway
getting
the
bnsf
bridge
open
from
north
to
northeast
is
a
huge
lift,
but
we
have
a
small
group,
including
dan
miller,
who
does
a
lot
of
work
so
working
on
that
so
and
maybe
I'll
find
some
other
volunteering
gosh.
I
can't
remember
it's
been
it's
been
eight
years
I've
been
on
the
board,
so
it's
time
to
roll.
K
I've
enjoyed
being
on
this
committee
for
the
last.
I
think
it's
nine
years
I've
enjoyed
the
people.
I've
worked
with
everybody's,
been
really
informative
and
and
have
brought
about
between
the
group
a
lot
of
good
changes
in
the
last
nine
years,
I'm
going
to
miss
the
meetings
and
and
miss
the
camaraderie.
I've
had
with
everybody
on
the
committee
over
the
last
nine
years,
but
I
think
it's
probably
time
to
get
off
anyway.
It's
it's
longer
than
I
would
have
thought
I
would
be
on
the
committee.
K
So
it's
time
to
have
some
new
blood.
I
guess
and
just
good
luck
to
you
for
the
remaining
years
that
you're
all
on
the
committee.
A
Really
appreciate
all
the
energy
that
you've
put
in
to
showing
up
being
here
doing
the
homework,
saying
yes
to
all
the
extra
little
projects
and
meetings
that
we've
needed
over
the
years
and
and
our
bylaws.
So
again
we
wouldn't
be
where
we
are
without
you
either.
So
thanks,
we
do
not
have
here
today
emily
smoke,
richard
anderson
or
liz
johnson,
who
all
made
their
contributions.
I
do
want
to
call
out
richard
anderson
as
when
I
started
which
we'll
get
to
he
was
here.
A
He
had
already
been
here,
so
I'm
sad
that
we
weren't
able
to
say
an
official
goodbye.
But
again,
maybe
in
the
post-vaccine
era,
we'll
be
able
to
all
get
together,
go
for
a
bike
ride
and
celebrate
somewhere
outside
together.
So
and
sorry.
A
Trying
not
to
get
too
emotional
here,
but
bear
with
me
the
only
reason
I'm
still
doing
this
here
is
because
of
you
all.
A
It's
been
an
amazing
18
years,
believe
it
or
not.
I
can't
believe
I've
been
doing
anything
for
18
years.
A
It
was
18
years
this
probably
week
that
I
had
moved
to
minneapolis
in
october,
and
I
made
some
calls
and
went
to
this
weird
meeting
with
these
bunch
of
nerds
in
city
hall,
and
you
know
the
thing
is
it's
amazing,
because
the
work
continues
today
so,
and
things
really
happen.
So
never
a
couple
piece
of
pieces
of
advice
is
never
take
for
granted
the
work
that
you're
doing
here
that
has
meaning
just
for
fun.
A
I
I
went
back
as
far
as
my
email
would
go
on
the
bac,
which
was
only
10
years,
and
I
was
looking
back
at
some
of
the
things
like
the
lowry
avenue
bridge
that
we
were
talking
about
when
I
started
the
bikeway
master
plan.
A
It
was
one
page,
it
was
a
map,
it
was
such
a
joke
and
the
200-page
version
that
we
all
helped
on
was
good
in
its
own
ways,
but
it
had
its
issues.
Amazing
projects.
I
was
looking
back
with
one
of
our
our
members
who's
now
leading
our
parks,
commission,
jennifer,
reingold
ringgold.
A
A
I
also
saw
one
of
the
first
emails
from
lisa
bender
when
she
got
involved
and
was
telling
us
to
all
make
sure
we
are
open
streets
to
make
it
happen.
For
the
first
time.
A
I'm
so
glad
you're
here
jenny,
but
I
really
missed
roy
who
passed
away
one
of
our
best
members
and
who
helped
this
committee
lead
our
commercial
driver
training
as
well
as
are
behind
the
big
wheel,
public
effort
that
we
did
over
the
years.
So
it
is
when
you
think
about
these
accomplishments.
A
They
wouldn't
have
happened
without
all
of
you
and
all
of
us
so
keep
doing
the
work,
and
I
I
have
to
say
that
I'm
grateful
to
the
staff.
I
can't
say
enough,
good
things
about
matthew,
so
I
may
I
won't
say
any
no
just
kidding
it's
been
amazing,
working
with
matthew
these
many
years,
but
I
don't
wanna
forget
that
it
was
ten
ish
years
after
my
involvement
that
the
city
got
its
first
bike.
A
And
then
the
last
piece
of
advice
is
to
just
keep
working
together.
We're
we're
and
respect
one
another,
because
we
are
unique
among
city
committees.
In
that
we
don't
have
attack.
A
We
don't
have
a
citizens
group
we're
all
in
this
together
and-
and
I
think
that
has
made
all
the
difference
in
the
world
and
how
we've
been
able
to
get
things
done
so
keep
doing
that,
keep
listening
to
each
other
and
know
that
it's
okay,
not
to
agree
and,
as
you
know,
my
perspective
is,
if
we're
all
shouting
different
things,
we're
gonna
get
you
know
taken
over
by
the
cars,
and
so
it's
always
better
when
we
agree,
but
we
don't
always
have
to
agree
so
listen
to
each
other
and
just
a
couple
of
specific
people
I
wanted
to
call
out.
A
One
is
millicent:
it's
been
so
awesome
working
with
you
these
last
couple
years
and
having
your
expertise
and
all
that
you've
done
to
support
this
committee
and
help
us
be
the
professionals
that
we
are
and
having
you.
A
I'm
sorry
that
we've
taken
you
on
and
kind
of
brought
you
into
the
like,
like
nerdiness,
that
we
are,
but
I
really
appreciate
you
and
jessie
you're,
one
of
our
newest
members,
and
I
just
want
you
to
know,
because
mckenzie
is
one
of
the
longest
people
I've
I've
worked
with
in
my
career
here
that
she
would
be
really
proud
of
all
the
great
contributions
you've
already
made.
So
please
keep
showing
up,
and
then
you
all
think
it's
me
but
janus
the
committee
we
wouldn't
exist
without
you.
A
Robin
of
course
remembers
the
days
when
there
was
no
record
of
anything
that
we
did
at
all.
A
So
thank
you,
janice
and
thanks
to
all
the
leadership,
especially
alyssa's
vice
chair
and
to
chris
and
dan
subcommittee
chairs,
because
it's
really
it's
a
lot
of
work
to
make
this
happen
every
month,
and
it's
really
important
and
I
just
wanna
say
thank
you.
P
Yes,
certainly
the
when,
when,
as
you
go
through
the
accomplishments,
nick
none
of
it
would
have
been
possible
without
your
leadership.
A
Thanks
james
I'll
keep
facilitating
robin.
J
So
yeah.
J
When
I
started
coming
to
bicycle
advisory
committee
meetings,
midway
through
about
2006
nick,
was
already
there.
So
I'm
I've
been
at
this
for
something
like
what
would
it
be
15
years
and
I
it
is
going
to
be
an
interesting
transition
for
us,
because
there
has
never
been
an
official
the
way
we
are
now.
You
know
with
robert's
rules
and
minutes
and
actions
and
agendas,
and
all
of
that
kind
of
stuff
that
has
only
existed
with
you
nick.
That
has
only
existed,
not
just
with
your
participation,
but
with
your
leadership.
J
J
The
thing
that
we
want
done
cars
own
everything
in
our
whole
society
and
we're
carving
back
just
this
little
bit
of
space
and
of
safety
and
of
dignity
and
comfort
for
ourselves
and
for
our
for
your
kids
and
for
my
mom
and
for
just
you
know
all
of
the
people
who
will
come
after
us
and
the
stuff
that
we
have
gotten
done
was
stuff
that
not
figuratively,
I
literally
did
not
think
it
was
possible
for
us
to
get
done
and
we
got
it
done
over
and
over
again,
the
whole
complete
streets
plan
and
network
and
the
fact
that
we've
now
built
a
bunch
of
them.
J
The
that-
and
I
said
completely
streets
tonight,
that
bikeways
for
all
but
the
but
the
complete
streets
policy
actually
passing
something
like
that
was
monumental
and
difficult,
and
it
would
not
have
happened
without
you
and
without
all
of
the
folks
who
have
put
so
much
work
into
the
into
the
bac
overall.
In
this
time
I
also
just
want
to
say
chris.
I
have
really
really
appreciated
your
your
leadership
on
engineering
stuff.
J
I
I
hope
that
we
have
folks
ready
to
jump
in
in
your
place,
and
I
think
I
think
dan
you're
doing
it
now
and
I
think
it's
going
well,
but
it's
it's
a
lot
of
work.
There
are
a
lot
of
projects
that
come
through
that
committee
and
and
it
and
it
takes
a
lot
and
I
definitely
noticed
it
and
appreciated
it-
a
lot
paul
I
I
have
really
appreciated
your
focus,
especially
down.
J
You
know
the
the
your
specific
knowledge
of
things
that
I
hardly
ever
see
because
they
are
far
enough
south
that
I'm.
Why
would
I
go
there?
You
know
has
been
really
useful
to
to
me
and
to
the
to
the
committee.
I
think
in
in
understanding
the
the
real
life
implications
of
the
things
that
that
we
do
down
there
and
if
and
if
I'm
leaving
somebody
out
somebody
please
let
me
know,
but
I
I
sort
of
alluded
to
this
for
the
folks
who
were
on
the
on
the
call.
J
J
They
only
they
only
exist
starting
last
sunday,
so
so
it
wouldn't
have
worked
out
for
you,
but
anyway,
thank
you
so
much
for
all
of
your
help
and
all
of
your
work
and
putting
your
heart
into
this
work.
Thank
you.
A
Matthew,
you
get
the
last
word,
because
we
have
a
unrecorded
unofficial
social
that
you're
all
invited
to
starting
next
and
one
special
guest
is
already
there.
So
I
don't
want
to
keep
them
waiting
too
long,
so
matthew,
let's
see.
Q
No,
let
me
go
first
real,
quick
and
then
you
can
have
the
last
word
if
that's
okay,
okay,
so
I
just
want
to
say
a
couple
things
one.
I
want
to
start
with
just
how
much
I
appreciate
everybody
on
this
committee
and
how
much
I
appreciate
my
role
in
making
sure
that
your
work
is
honored
in
public
works.
Q
That's
a
that's
a
role
that
I
treasure
more
than
anything
else,
and
I
take
that
very
seriously,
and
so
I
just
appreciate
anybody
who's
willing
to
take
their
time
to
put
so
much
work
into
something
they
care
about
is
just
like
something
that
I
value
so
much.
Q
So
I
appreciate
all
of
you
chris,
like
others,
have
mentioned
I've
just
so
much
appreciated
you
on
on
engineering-
and
this
sounds
maybe
maybe
strange,
but
I
appreciate
you
the
most
when
you're
angry,
because
I
just
like
I
can
relate
with
that,
and
it's
like
it's
always
for
a
really
good
cause,
and
I
appreciate
that
paul
you're,
just
so
reliable
and
I
just
appreciate
your
perspective
as
well:
you're
always
willing
to
jump
in
serve
on
the
committees
and
that's
just
so
so
helpful.
Q
We
appreciate
all
your
time
and
then
nick
gosh-
I
I
wouldn't
be
in
this
role.
If
I
didn't
get
to
know
you
in
2008.
I
really
just
appreciate
you
as
a
friend
and
colleague,
and
what
I
mean
by
that
is.
I
met
nick
in
2008
in
bemidji
in
my
first
job
out
of
grad
school.
Q
He
taught
me
this
this
concept
that
I
never
really
heard
about
called,
like
you
know,
biking
in
the
street
and
like
understanding
how
to
do
that
right
as
I
was
being
introduced
to
active
living,
and
so
I
just
can't
I
can't
over
over
emphasize
how
much
I
appreciate
you
in
this
in
my
career
so
far,
but
then
you
know
when
I,
when
I
applied
for
this
job
and
got
the
job
like
you
were,
you
were
so
important
to
helping
me
understand
what
I
was
getting
into,
and
I
just
I
just
appreciate
you
more
than
I
can
describe
here
in
this
in
this
short
time.
Q
So
I'll
just,
I
think
I'll
just
leave
it
there
for
now.
C
I'll
be
fast,
the
bac
is
like
the
reason
I
am
who
I
am
when
I
joined
the
bac.
I
was
a
person
fresh
off,
be
being
a
person
who
biked
and
got
hit
by
a
car,
and
now
I
work
for
a
transportation
advocacy
organization,
and
it
is
my
entire
life
because
of
the
experience
I
had
on
the
bac
so
like.
That
is
a
collective
thank
you
to
all
of
you
and
then
a
special
thank
you
to
nick
nick.
I
remember
like
being
around
for
the
first
couple
meetings
and
being
like.
C
Am
I
allowed
to
swear
on
recorded
meetings?
Damn
damn
nick
is
a
really
good
facilitator.
I
have
really
appreciated
all
of
your
facilitation
skills.
Your
in
addition
to
all
the
things
that
everyone
else
has
already
mentioned.
C
You're
gonna
be
leaving
some
really
big
facilitation
shoes
to
fill,
and
also
I
don't
know
if
anybody
else
has
other
stuff
to
say,
but
nick
we
have
sort
of
a
special
surprise
for
you,
as
somebody
who
has
put
in
a
lot
of
extra
work
as
chair,
and
we
would
appreciate
it
if
you
would
go
to
the
side
door
of
your
house.
F
F
F
My
kids
are
using
this
intersection
or
if
they're
not
you
know,
the
kids
of
friends
of
mine
are
kids.
I
don't
know
who
are
no
less
valuable
than
kids.
I
do
know
and
there's
always
this
running
calculus
about
you
know,
should
I
put
more
time
and
energy
and
effort
into
bike
stuff
for
minneapolis,
or
should
I
go
spend
some
time
with
my
own
kids
on
a
bike
ride
or
something
and
as
you're
making
this
transition.
F
I
just
want
to
say
from
one
parent
to
another:
there's
no
wrong
answer
and
I'm
really
honored
that
you've
served
so
long
with
us,
and
I
I
wish
you
all
the
best,
as
you
focus
more
on
your
own
kids
and
that's
a
great
decision
so
good
for
you
for
for
looking
for
that
balance
and
thanks
for
all
you've
done.
A
P
Q
Yeah
that
was
me
sorry.
I
something's.
Q
H
A
A
Well,
thanks
everybody
gail
gail's,
ready
for
the
the
party
to
start
and
our
other
special
guest.
If
he's
still
there
sean
murphy.
So
if
you
want
to
hear
about
running
for
office
in
wisconsin
or
organic
farming
or
what
what
it
was
like,
coordinating,
pre-matthew
and
and
chad,
happily
you're
welcome
to
join
that
zoom,
and
thank
you
all
for
everything.
It
has
been
my
highest
honor
to
serve
with
you
all
on
this
committee
and
and
do
all
this
work.
A
A
A
Hopefully,
you
all
got
an
invite.
I
will
invite
you
on
your
calendar
again
right
now
and
be
over
there
in
just
a
few
minutes.
C
And
while
you
do
that
I'll,
just
also
let
you
know
that
in
your
inbox
is
a
digital
card
from
a
lot
of
different
folks
that
they
have
signed.
So
look
forward
to
some
very,
very
spicy
old
photos
and
a
lot
and
a
lot
of
words
of
gratitude
in
your
inbox.
A
Thank
you.
I
will
reshoot
the
invitation
and,
if
you
don't
get
it
just
email
me
at
nick
bikerman.org
you'll
be
watching
my
inbox
in
order
to
shoot
that
directly
to
the
email
address.
You
give
me
all
right.
Folks,
I'll
see
you
for
the
party
in
just
a
few
minutes.
Thank
you
again
for
everything.