►
From YouTube: May 5, 2020 Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting
Description
Minneapolis Heritage Preservation Commission Meeting
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/
A
A
B
You
good
afternoon
welcome
to
this
live
broadcast
of
our
virtual
meeting
of
the
May
5th
2020
regular
meeting
of
the
Minneapolis
Heritage
Preservation
Commission.
This
meeting
includes
the
remote
participation
of
members
as
authorized
under
Minnesota
Statutes,
section
13
D
point
0
to
1
due
to
the
declared
local
health
pandemic
for
the
record.
My
name
is
Madeline
Sandberg
and
I
serve
as
chair
of
the
Minneapolis
Heritage
Preservation
Commission
I
will
now
call
this
meeting
to
order
and
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll,
so
we
may
verify
the
presence
of
a
quorum.
D
C
C
C
B
B
So
our
first
order
of
business
is
to
adopt
the
agenda
for
this
meeting.
We
will
work
from
those
agendas
that
are
available
online,
so
I'll
go
through
the
agenda
and
sort
out
which
items
will
be
continued
to
a
future
meeting.
What
items
will
be
discussed
and
what
items
will
be
put
on
the
consent
agenda
is
to
be
approved,
as
recommended
by
staff
without
further
discussion.
So
item
number
4,
which
is
800
Washington
Avenue
North,
Ward
3,
will
be
on
the
consent
agenda.
B
Okay,
seeing
none
I'll
put
that
on
the
consent
agenda
item
number
five
is
23:09
Plymouth
Avenue,
Ward,
five,
a
demolition
of
historic
resource.
This
item
will
be
discussed.
Item
number
six
is
the
Joyce
Memorial
Methodist
Church,
landmark
designation,
which
is
twelve
nineteen
West
31st
Street
Ward
10.
That
I
am
will
be
discussed
and
I
know.
B
Number
seven
is
the
National
Register
of
Historic
Places
nomination
for
sound
eighty
studios
at
2709,
East
25th,
Street
war,
two
and
that
item
will
be
discussed
so
the
proposed
agenda,
the
consent
agenda
will
be
item
number
four
800
Washington
Avenue
North
again.
Is
there
anyone
who
wishes
to
speak
in
opposition
to
staff
recommendations
for
item
number
four.
B
We
will
prove
that
consent
agenda
item
in
one
motion
at
the
start
of
the
meeting
items
number
five,
which
is
2309
Plymouth,
Avenue
items,
number
six,
12:19,
West,
31st
Street
will
have
staff
presentation,
public
comment
and
the
Commission
discussion
in
action
and
then
item
number
seven
2709,
East,
25th
Street
will
have
a
staff
presentation
and
Commission
discussion.
Commissioners
may
I
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
proposed
agenda.
B
B
F
B
You
the
minutes,
are
approved
before
I
open
the
hearing
to
public
comments.
Let
me
summarize
the
process
for
conducting
the
public
hearing
in
this
virtual
format.
The
process,
but
the
public
hearing
will
be
as
follows.
First,
we
will
act
on
the
consent
agenda
that
we
just
set
once
the
centage
Enda
item
is
approved,
the
Commission
is
done
with
that
item
and
the
applicant
may
contact
the
planning
staff
tomorrow
about
next
steps.
B
After
that,
we
will
take
each
remaining
item
in
order.
First,
planning
staff
will
present
its
report
and
the
commissioners
may
ask
questions
of
staff.
Then
we
will
hear
from
the
applicant
and
the
commissioners
may
ask
questions
of
the
applicant
after
that.
I
will
open
the
public
hearing
and
we
will
invite
public
comment
will
be
taking
the
speakers
in
the
order
they
pre
registered.
Speakers
will
be
limited
to
two
minutes.
B
We
ask
that,
after
your
name
is
called
you
state,
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
then
proceed
with
your
comments
after
we've
completed
the
list
of
the
pre
registered
speakers,
we'll
see
if
there
are
any
other
speakers
in
the
queue
who
have
called
in
and
in
order
to
activate
your
microphone
just
a
reminder
to
press
star
six
on
the
phone,
so
we're
just
asking
everybody
to
keep
their
comments
to
the
specific
application
that
is
here
before
us
and
after
the
public
comments
are
complete.
I
will
close.
B
B
B
C
B
Okay
motion
passes:
item
number
four
800
Washington
Avenue
North
Ward
three,
as
approved
as
recommended
by
staff
on
the
agenda.
The
applicant
for
that
item
may
contact
planning
staff
tomorrow
about
next
steps.
Our
first
item
for
discussion
is
item
number
five
309
Plymouth
Avenue
Ward
5.
The
staff
presentation
is
presented
by
Sheila
Beamer.
H
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
Sheila
BEMER
and
I'm.
A
senior
centers
senior
city
planner
for
the
historic
preservation
team
in
cpad
I
will
be
presenting
the
staff
report
for
the
demolition
of
historic
resource
applications
or
to
309
Plymouth
Avenue
and
Ward
5
plan
105
8
8
and
can
I
get
the
next
slide.
Please.
H
The
subject
property
is
a
former
church
initially
identified
in
2002
historic
resources,
survey
of
north
Minneapolis.
It
was
also
identified
as
the
contributing
resource
in
the
homeland.
Historic
designation
study
in
January,
see
pen
staff
completed
a
historic
review
letter
for
the
property
and
determined
that
it
may
be
a
historic
resource
as
an
individual
landmark
next
slide.
Please.
H
The
applicant
is
proposing
to
demolish
the
former
church
and
construct
a
four-story
36
unit
apartment
building
with
50%
ami
area
median
income,
affordability,
the
owner
also
purchased
the
vacant
lot
across
the
alley
to
the
west
and
is
proposing
a
four-story
27
unit.
Building
13
of
the
units
will
be
set
aside
for
housing
support
through
Hennepin
County
for
people
experiencing
chronic
homelessness.
Next
slide.
Please.
H
Constructed
in
1910
as
the
Homewood
Presbyterian
Church,
this
was
the
first
non
residential
building
constructed
in
a
newly
planted
neighborhood
called
Homewood
in
1948.
The
cannon
kanessa
Israel
congregation
moved
into
the
former
Presbyterian
Church
in
the
building
became
a
synagogue,
Jewish
and
African
residents
of
Minneapolis
moved
to
the
north
side,
where
the
lack
of
racially
restrictive
covenants
allowed
them
to
participate
in
the
American
dream.
However,
relationships
between
the
two
cultures
changed
after
World
War
Two
as
housing
options
and
job
opportunities
became
more
readily
available
for
Jewish
citizens
than
for
African
Americans.
H
Next
slide,
please
by
the
1960s
North
Minneapolis,
showed
signs
of
civil
unrest
in
response
to
the
racism
evident
in
Minneapolis
and
throughout
the
US,
culminating
in
two
major
events.
The
first
in
1966
involved,
looting
and
arson
on
Plymouth
Avenue
North
in
a
stretch
of
businesses
which
are
no
longer
extant.
The
second
event
began
on
the
opening
of
July
19th
1967.
When
a
group
of
young
african-americans
began
to
vandalize
shops
and
businesses
along
Plymouth
Avenue.
For
three
days,
the
violence
continued
in
the
National
Guard
was
deployed
before
the
unrest
ended
on
July
22nd.
H
There
were
fires,
shootings
injuries,
arrests
and
damages
totaling,
4.2
million
dollars,
but
no
fatalities
in
response
to
this
event,
business
owners
and
government
officials
formed
the
urban
coalition,
a
nonprofit
test
with
helping
minority
communities
in
policy
and
advocacy.
These
photos
are
courtesy
of
the
starch
review.
H
This
potential
landmark
may
have
significance
under
two
local
criteria.
One
and
three
next
slide.
Please,
since
the
late
1960s
from
the
eastern
boundary
of
the
Willard,
a
neighborhood
to
the
Queen
Queen
Avenue
north,
the
shops,
businesses
and
homes
that
once
lined
Plymouth,
Avenue
North
had
been
cleared
and
replaced
with
warehouses,
housing
complexes
or
nothing
at
all,
erasing
all
built
evidence
of
not
only
the
vibrant
mixed
culture
neighborhood,
but
the
physical
markers
that
have
been
important
event
in
civil
rights
relations
in
the
city.
H
Sorry
survivor
reflective
of
the
perseverance
of
the
community
right
up
to
the
present
day
as
such,
the
building
at
309
Plymouth
Avenue
North
is
eligible
under
criterion,
one
for
its
association
with
significant
events.
Next
slide,
please
309
Plymouth
Avenue
North
is
the
oldest
extant
non-residential
building
on
Plymouth
Avenue
north
in
both
the
Willard
Hey
and
near
North
neighborhoods
constructed
in
1910
as
a
Presbyterian
Church
with
the
Homewood
development,
the
Church
excuse
me.
H
The
events
of
1966
and
1967
along
Plymouth
Avenue
north
left
a
lasting
mark
on
the
neighborhood,
the
kanessa
israel
congregation
moved
out
of
their
synagogue
and
sold
the
property
to
New
Salem
Missionary
Baptist
Church
in
1972
New
Salem
remained
in
the
Church
in
the
building
until
2006,
the
former
church
has
survived
decades
of
changing
congregation
urban
renewal
and
important
events
that
destroyed
many
of
the
buildings
along
Plymouth
Avenue
north.
The
neighborhood
has
changed,
but
the
former
Church
internal
to
the
communities
that
live
there
remained.
H
Therefore,
the
building
is
eligible
under
criterion
3
for
its
association
with
distinctive
elements
of
neighborhood
identity.
Next
slide,
please,
the
building
has
been
baked
vacant
for
more
than
five
years
and
isn't
fair
to
poor
condition
and
is
in
need
of
rehabilitation
but
retains
good
historic
integrity,
integrity
in
all
seven
aspects.
H
The
existing
building
requires
extensive
renovation
costs
in
order
to
continue
as
a
church
and
the
cost
to
renovate
for
residential
use
exceeds
the
rental
revenue
it
can
generate
and
that
the
needed
renovation
work
for
the
church,
repairs
or
new
residential
use
far
exceeds
the
economic
value
and
usefulness
of
the
property
cost.
Estimates
are
1
million,
nine
hundred
thirty
two
thousand
six
hundred
and
forty
five
dollars
for
rehabilitation
of
the
building
into
six
residential
units
and
cost
estimates
for
new
construction
is
ten
million.
H
Nine
hundred
and
fifty
eight
thousand
nine
hundred
and
seventy-six
dollars
or
sixty
three
units
next
slide,
please
see
had
recommends
that
the
historic
Heritage
Preservation
Commission
deny
the
demolition
of
historic
resource
application,
establish
interim
protection
and
direct
the
planning
director
to
prepare
a
cause
to
be
prepared.
A
designation
study
of
the
former
Church
located
at
309
Plymouth
Avenue
North.
This
concludes
my
staff
report.
Thank
you
and
I'm
available
for
any
questions.
H
B
You
for
your
report,
it
looks
like
Commissioner,
Van
Dyke
is
recusing
herself
just
for
the
record
and
there
was
a
question
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
can
answer
Sheila,
but
do
you
know
if
Amy
Lucas
was
consulting
on
this
application.
H
I
B
B
It's
just
the
formal
part.
I,
don't
see
any
questions
for
staff
coming
into
the
chat.
So
I
will
now
open
the
public
hearing
for
the
item.
But
I
would
like
to
ask
the
applicant
to
speak
first,
so
we
can
hear
what
they
have
to
say.
First
before
the
the
rest
of
public
speaks.
Oh
yeah.
B
J
James
Archer
resident
10:15,
Queen,
Avenue,
North,
I'm,
the
developer,
I'm
a
local
developer
and
live
right
down
the
street
person
of
color
who
lives
right
in
the
community
and
has
went
by
this
property
for
the
12
years
that
I've
been
here
is
it's
been
an
eyesore,
to
say
the
least,
seeing
how
all
the
deferred,
maintenance
and
whatnot
but
I
did
have
one
question
you
get.
The
four
page
documents
that
I
sent
in
I
gave
the
she'll
I
didn't
get
a
response
that,
if
you
guys
received
it,
was
that
received
by
the
commissioners.
B
We
received
quite
a
few
public
comments.
Yes,
I'm
seeing
the
answer
in
the
chat.
Yes,
it
was
one
of
the
public
comments
we
received
it.
J
J
J
The
neighborhood
group,
but
I
know
that
they
were
vigorously
opposed
to
the
designation
a
couple
of
few
years
ago
and
we're
able
to
be
successful.
And
then
you
know,
I
came
up
with
this
plan
and
there's
just
been
I
mean
I've
been
told
directly
and
indirectly
it's
going
to
be
stopped
and
shut
down.
So
I
don't
know
if
this
is
the
avenue
that
the
they're
trying
to
do
that
or
not.
But
that
is
something
to
keep
in
mind
as
you
make
a
decision
on
this.
J
The
reasons
were
I
mean
not
wanting
to
have
you
know:
affordable
housing,
homeless,
housing
for
homelessness
and
the
perceived
crime
that
comes
with
it
too
much
density
lack
of
parking,
so
those
were
those
are
the
reasons
for
the
lack
of
support
and
not
liking
the
project.
The
other
piece
I
would
like
to
add
is
that
staff
actually
never
viewed
the
interior
of
the
building
to
assess
I
mean
the
condition
inside
so
I
mean
there
are
some
representations
in
here
about
the
condition
and
viability
of
it.
J
J
K
All
right,
this
is
Amy
Lucas
with
landscape
research,
and
there
was
a
question
about
work
with
James
Archer
I
did
actually
walk
through
the
building
with
mr.
Archer
and
did
look
at
the
documentation
that
he
had
successful
building
quite
a
bit
and
the
designation
criteria.
I
did
not
feel
that
this
building
actually
warranted
the
50
page
statement,
documentation
and
research,
but
now
that
we're
here
and
we
have
a
negative
staff
recommendation,
I
guess
I'll
talk
a
little
bit
more
than
I
wanted
to.
K
First
I,
don't
know
if
anyone
in
the
conservation
condition
knows
that
the
hpc
actually
paid
for
Garth
Peterson
to
complete
the
context
study
in
1997
called
resettlement
than
he
concedes
to
1972.
It's
not
mentioned
anywhere,
but
I
just
want
to
know
that
when
that
was
completed
in
1997,
there
were
recommendations
for
buildings
to
be
designated
at
that
time.
Micron
kodesh
was
in
1926
was
designated
Shaarei
Tzedek
was
built
in
1936
was
also
designated.
Those
two
buildings
were
synagogues
in
North
Minneapolis
designated
for
their
architectural
significance.
K
The
second
thing
that
report
doesn't
notice.
The
staff
report
is
in
2007
when
meeting
hunch
review
this
property.
They
actually
determined
it
ineligible
for
local
designation.
That
wasn't
mentioned
in
the
staff
reports
and
I'm
not
going
to
get
into
the
homework
historic
district
from
2017
denomination
other
than
I.
Think
most
of
you
know
that
when
you
have
a
district
I
think
that
there
can
be
a
lower
integrity
for
properties,
but
when
you're
looking
at
a
building
for
individual
basis,
there
is
a
higher
standard
for
integrity
and
significance.
K
K
K
L
K
A
car
wreck
in
front
of
my
house
is
my
help
worthy
of
being
designated.
That's
how
random
criteria
number
one
is
being
used
in
this
discussion
and
staff
report
criteria.
Number
three
says
that
the
building
is
old,
that
it's,
the
oldest
survivor,
not
a
commercial
survivor.
It
was
another
building
built
in
1908
or
ten,
but
on
Plymouth
Avenue,
because
something's
old
doesn't
mean
that
that
gives
it
its
significance.
K
K
M
K
Criteria
for
designation
I
felt
that
the
criteria
were
misused.
I
walked
through
the
spleen,
it
is
not
heated
had
not
been
heated
and,
like
I
said
almost
20
years.
The
building
foundation
was
not
evaluated
for
sexual
strength,
but
the
basement
is
very
wet.
I
would
not
go
congregations
in
this
building
again
they
are
sitting
on
very
few
wood
posts
and
multiple
alterations
of
the
basement
to
this
building
I
did
not
Jeff
clients.
James
Arthur
actually
did
go
through
alone
and
look
at
me
having
cuffs.
K
They
could
fit
six
units
in
this
building
and
you
saw
the
price
that's
more
than
three
hundred
thousand
per
units
in
this
building
for
residential
use.
There
has
not
been
a
community
group
or
an
organization
or
church
that
has
wanted
this
building
with
two
thousand
two
I'm
available
for
questions,
and
those
are
just
my
initial
comments
upon
reading.
I
N
Yes,
this
is
this:
is
Linda
Mac
I,
wonder
if
Amy
could
go
over
the
mean
Dan
hunt
steady
again,
if
you
could
repeat
that
a
little
bit
there
were
a
couple
of
elements
there
and
and
I'd
like
to
see.
If
Sheila
could
respond
to
norms.
M
K
K
Understanding
the
meeting
hun
study
was
from
2007
I
believe
is
that
was
it
2000s.
They
have
to
go
back
to
my
own
eye.
I
actually
realized
under
this
that
they
had
done.
106
had
done
a
2011
survey.
I
did
not
see
that
2011
survey
did
the
1
of
6
group
come
up,
saying
that
the
building
should
be
plated.
M
K
B
Don't
see
any
so
I
am
going
to
open
up
the
public
hearing
to
the
rest
of
the
public.
If
anyone
is
wishing
to
speak
for
against
this
application
again,
we'll
take
the
speakers
in
the
order
that
they
registered
and
ask
each
speaker
to
provide
their
name
and
address
before
they
make
their
comments
and
then
press
star
six
on
your
phone
to
activate
your
microphone,
so
that
we
can
hear
you
and
I
think
if
the
clerk
could
call
the
first
speaker
and
the
queue
that
would
be
great.
A
C
Oh
Veronica,
if
you
could
just
please
state
your
address
for
the
record
and
then
go
ahead
with
your
comment.
Please
thank
you.
Okay,.
I
So
my
English
is
not
good,
so
but
I
don't
want
it.
I
don't
want
it
I,
don't
I,
don't
want
out
of
like
that
to
do
so
that
properly
do
it,
some
for
some
apartment.
I
I
I
B
B
O
Well,
we
can
hear
you
yes,
okay,
great
sorry,
I
do
not
know
what
happened
yep.
My
name
is
Anna
Shmuel
and
my
personal
address
is
732
Hulk
Street
northeast,
but
I
work
at
the
North
Side
Economic
Opportunity
networks
at
one
0:07,
West,
Broadway,
Avenue,
north
and
so
I'm,
just
speaking
on
behalf
of
my
organization
neon
and
be
strongly
support,
the
designation
of
two
3:09
Plymouth
Avenue
as
a
historic
landmark.
O
You
know
it's
far
away
from
like
a
major
commercial
zone,
so
that
could
be
a
really
good
usage
for
it,
and
so
we
think
that
it
would
be
a
great
opportunity
to
celebrate
and
preserve
the
history
of
Northside
by
really
allowing
there
to
be
a
place
that
has
a
lot
of
history
now
brought
into
the
present
for
a
present
usage
for
the
community's
benefit.
So
that
is
what
we
are
supporting.
A
B
Okay,
thank
you.
Seeing
no
other
speakers,
I
will
close
the
public
hearing.
Commissioners,
let's
discuss,
are
there
any
concerns
or
comments
on
the
proposed
application.
N
P
Speak
I'll
speak
to
this
one.
At
the
moment,
all
I
confess
I,
don't
know
how
the
exact
specifics
I'm
not
aware
of
a
2007
meet
and
hunt
study.
I
am
aware
of
a
2002
median
hunt
survey
that
included
this
area
and
did
look
at
the
homeland,
larger
home
or
district
in
terms
of
identify.
I
don't
have
the
specifics
other
than
that
I
think
Sheila
made
can
look
it
up,
but
in
that
it
was
included
in
the
survey
area.
Was
it
probably
specifically
called
out
as
an
individual
landmark
in
the
2002
study?
P
No
I,
don't
think
so,
but
the
research
that
Sheila
had
done
Miss
nomer
had
done
in
the
2002
20
20
January
letter
was
it's
more
expanding
upon
this
property
as
an
individual
landmark
in
that
it,
in
addition
to
its
relationship
to
Homewood,
but
more
focusing
on
its
potential
landmark
significance
under
criterion?
One
and
three
I
hope
that
answers
your
question,
but
I
will
try
to
look
up
more
if
you
have
more.
Thank
you.
B
N
It
is
certainly
one
of
the
few
older
buildings
in
this
neighborhood,
but
it's
it's
also
a
bit
troubling
when
you
think
about
studying
its
integrity
and
the
integrity
of
location
has
just
disappeared,
it's
just
it's
just
out
there
and
it
doesn't
feel
like
it's
part
of
the
neighborhood
anymore
it
and
it's
obviously
I've
been
sitting
vacant
for
some
time.
I
was
I
had
to
really
think
about
mr.
Roberts
letter.
You
know
it's
been
there
when
something
is
going
to
be
demolished.
N
There's
always
like
a
rush
to
say:
oh,
it
could
be
a
wonderful
whatever,
but
there's
been
no
impetus
to
make
that
happen.
I
know,
that's
actually
not
our
job.
We
just
need
to
look
at
its
whether
it
really
meets
the
criteria
for
historic,
designation,
there's
or
not.
I'm.
Sorry,
I
I
wandered
off
into
another
into
another
field.
Here
another
realm.
N
D
I'm
really
struggling
with
this
one
too
I
appreciate
Commissioner
Mac's
comments
and
I,
often
I
usually
agree
with
miss
Lucas
I,
understand
her
gut
feeling
and
so
I'm
feeling
that
as
well,
but
I
don't
feel
like
I
have
enough
information
to
say
whether
or
not
this
property
could
be
individually
designated
there.
Just
isn't
enough
information
in
this
packet
to
be
able
to
make
that
case.
Some
of
that
information
would
come
out
in
a
designation
study,
so
I'm
struggling
with
this
one.
Q
Thank
you
yes,
I
I
home
word
is
such
a
special
place.
It
has
such
a
great
fabric.
Is
all
the
buildings
contribute
to
being.
You
know
a
potential
historic
district,
but
I
I
really
don't
think
this
single
building
is
merits
individual,
designation
and,
and
we
did
get
strong
input
from
the
neighborhood
that
they
did
not
want
their
neighborhood
designated.
So
I
am
inclined
to
approve
the
demolition
of
this
building.
B
Thank
You
commissioners,
80,
I
I,
think
I
understand
where
everybody
seems
to
be
coming
from
with
how
this
is
a
little
and
I
had
a
gray
area.
I
guess
I
would
like
to
point
out
that
this
is
just
us
directing
the
Planning
Director
to
prepare
a
designation
study
and
so
I
understand
that
there
might
not
be
as
much
information
as
we
would
really
like
to
see.
I
guess
in
my
mind,
that's
what
the
step
is
for
is
to
bring
out
that
information.
B
So
I
guess
personally,
I
agree
with
staffs
findings
at
this
point,
but
I
I
certainly
see
why
there
are
kind
of
two
sides
to
this.
Are
there
other
commissioners
who
would
like
to
speak
on
this
item.
D
This
is
Howard.
I
can
make
a
motion
just
to
get
maybe
get
the
rest
of
the
commissioners
into
the
conversation.
I
would
move
to
deny
the
demolition
of
the
historic
resource
application,
establish
interim
protection
and
direct
the
planning
director
to
prepare
across
three
prepared
a
designation
study
of
the
church
located
at
2309
Plymouth
Avenue
North.
B
B
Well,
seeing
none
with
the
clerk
call
the
roll
on
that
motion.
C
A
N
B
R
R
The
designation
study
was
prepared
by
historical
consultants,
new
history
in
the
winter
of
2019
to
2020,
and
that
concluded
that
the
property
was
eligible
for
local
designation
under
criterion.
Four
and
six.
The
study
was
submitted
for
review
and
common
to
both
the
State
Historic
Preservation
Office
and
the
Minneapolis
City
Planning
Commission
Joyce
Memorial
Methodist
meets
the
following
designation
criteria.
Could
you
go
back
to
the
slide?
Please
thank
you.
Criteria
number
for
the
property
embodies
the
distinctive
characteristics
of
an
architectural
or
engineering
type
or
style,
or
method
of
construction.
R
The
church
embodies
the
distinctive
characteristics
of
the
California
Mission
Revival
style.
It
features
a
number
of
the
defining
elements
of
the
style
which
includes
stucco,
cladding,
deep
arched
windows
and
doors
of
bell
tower
quatrefoil
windows,
hipped
clay,
tile
roofs,
an
arcade
of
entry,
porch
and
elaborate
curved
and
shaped
parapets.
There's
not
currently
a
California
Mission,
Revival
style
building
that
is
locally
designated
in
Minneapolis
and
the
building
is
one
of
two
California
mission
style
churches
in
Minneapolis
and
of
the
two
it
retains
integrity.
R
The
building
also
meets
criterion
number
six:
the
property
exemplifies
the
works
or
works
of
Master
Builders
engineers,
designers,
artists,
craftsmen
or
architects.
The
Joyce
Memorial
Methodist
Church
exemplifies
the
work
of
master
architects,
downs
and
EADS,
who
were
known
for
their
period,
Revival
style
buildings
and
their
commercial
civic,
religious
structures
between
1905
and
1928
thousand
etes
were
prolific
architects
in
the
city
and
designed
buildings
of
many
different
styles.
R
R
The
following
policies
of
Minneapolis
2040
would
apply
to
the
designation
of
Joyce
Memorial
Methodist
Church
Policy
90,
to
identify
and
evaluate
historic
resources.
The
California
Mission
Revival
style
is
not
currently
represented
in
the
body
of
Minneapolis
locally
designated
historic
resources.
The
property
has
been
identified
as
the
city's
best
example
of
a
church
that
retains
and
conveys
the
significance
of
this
particular
style
policy.
R
60
intrinsic
value
of
properties
joyce
memorial
is
the
only
intact
california,
Mission
Revival
style
church
in
the
city
and
designation
would
allow
for
the
protection,
increased
awareness,
appreciation
intrinsic
and
potential
economic
value
of
this
unique
piece
of
the
city's
architectural
history
and
also
policy
93,
which
is
stewarding
historic
properties.
Local
designation
would
encourage
the
retention
and
adaptive
reuse
of
a
significant
community
resource
and
ensure
change,
guided
change
to
the
property
under
the
Secretary
of
Interior
standards
for
rehabilitation
slide.
Please.
R
Landmark
designation
would
promote
the
history
of
Joyce
Memorial
Methodist
relaid
through
its
unique
California,
Mission,
Revival
style
architecture
and
as
an
emblematic
example
of
master
architects,
downs
and
EADS,
who
are
known
for
creating
significant
revival
designs.
At
the
time,
the
designation
would
preserve
a
rare
piece
of
the
city's
architectural
history
in
an
area
of
the
city
that
experiences
significant
pressures
from
development.
R
R
The
Department
of
Community,
Planning
and
Economic
Development
recommends
that
the
Heritage
Preservation
Commission
and
City
Council
adopt
staff
findings
for
the
local
designation
of
Joyce
Memorial
Methodist
Church
and
recommend
to
approve
the
local
designation
of
Joyce
Monroe
Methodist
Church
I
would
also
like
to
point
out
that
in
the
staff
reports
and
the
agenda
it
was
mistakenly
listed
that
this
was
a
district.
It
is,
in
fact
not
a
district.
It's
an
individual
landmark
that
is
being
recommended
for
approval
here.
R
B
L
B
Okay,
well,
I
will
open
the
public
hearing
and
if
there's
anything,
you'd
like
to
say
on
the
item,
just
please
state
your
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
L
To
clarify
fact,
1/4
and
I'm
going
to
apologize
right
now,
you're
all
doing
with
my
dog
burps,
and
he
will
surely
barking
I
just
wanted
to
speak
on
my
own
behalf.
The
applicant
is
Brian
Farrell
and
he
acquired
a
church.
He
was
in
the
neighborhood
and
he
just
very
familiar
with
it
and
he
actually
pursued
both
the
nomination
of
the
designation
of
the
property
for
designation
and
the
Commission's
the
designation
study
himself
and
is
just
a
very
strong
believer
and
historic
significance
of
this
property
and
advocate
for
each
generation.
B
B
D
Hi
I
just
wanted
to
say
thank
you
very
much,
the
applicant
for
bringing
this
forward
and
as
a
member
of
this
neighborhood,
when
you
walk
by
you
know
that
this
is
a
special
building,
so
I'm
really
excited
to
see
this
getting
locally
designated
and
that
that
designation
is
being
put
forward
by
the
owner.
It's
a
great
building
in
our
neighborhood,
a
great
asset
to
have
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
seeing
the
work
going
forward
after
designation.
So
thanks
Thank.
F
R
B
D
B
That
was
a
competition
Commissioner
sandaled
I
will
give
you
the
second.
Is
there
any
additional
discussion.
O
B
Thank
you.
That
motion
passes
how
exciting
I
just
I'm
glad
to
see
another
really
prominent
building
designated.
So
that
concludes
our
public
hearing
items.
Our
first
discussion
item
is
sound.
Eighty
Studios,
which
is
2709
East,
25th
Street
or
two
that's
the
National
Register
nomination
and
Commissioner
Howard
is
recusing
herself
and
the
staff
report
is
presented
by
Rob's
clucky.
B
R
R
R
R
The
property
was
highlighted
in
the
2018
Minneapolis
music
history
1850
to
2000
context.
The
historians
noted
that
sound
ad
was
recognized
as
one
of
the
top
recording
studios
in
the
metro
area
at
the
time
and
they
detailed
notable
recordings
made
of
the
studio.
The
study
further
recognized
the
site's
status
for
recording
the
world's
first
digital
recording
for
a
commercial
release,
as
identified
in
the
2020
prints
1950
to
1987,
multiple
property
documentation
form
M
PDF.
The
property
was
recommended
eligible
for
listing
in
the
National
Register
of
Historic
Places
under
criterion
B
for
its
association
with
prints.
R
The
studio
is
a
key
location
that
allowed
the
artists
to
develop
his
production
skills
and
recording
style,
and
it
was
what
would
later
become
the
starting
point
for
the
Minneapolis
sound
style
of
music.
The
M
PDF
also
detailed
that
sound
ad
would
also
meet
criterion.
Consideration
G
for
its
association
to
prints
next
slide.
Please
located
in
the
Seward
neighborhood
sound
ad
is
a
one-story
flat
roof
building
located
at
the
southeast
corner
of
the
intersection
of
East,
25th
Street
and
27th
Avenue
South.
R
The
building
has
an
irregular
footprints
based
in
a
rectangular
plan
with
two
projecting
bays
the
property's
constructed
of
concrete
block
and
was
originally
an
l-shaped
building
that
was
clad
and
granny
looks
cladding.
The
original
plan
for
the
building
was
designed
in
collaboration
by
nationally
grown
our
COO
sigil
engineer,
Robert,
Hansen
and
Minneapolis
architect,
Douglas
a
Baird
in
the
modern
style.
However,
the
plans
were
given
to
ALM
construction
and
engineering
who
created
a
simplified
version
of
that
design
slide.
Please.
R
The
building
was
designed
utilizing
the
latest
scientific
standards
for
acoustics,
evident
in
the
concrete
block
walls,
sound
retardant
doors
and
sound
locks
and
acoustical
ceiling
tile.
The
interior
includes
a
lobby
area,
five
offices,
a
copy
room
for
staff
and
five
studio
spaces,
acoustical
tiles,
concrete
block,
carpeting
or
well
fabric
and
thick
plate.
Glass
windows
are
just
some
of
the
interior
features
that
showcase
the
studio
is
acoustic
based
design
slide.
Please
the.
R
Nomination
states
that
sound,
ATS,
historically
significant
under
National
Register
criteria
for
performing
arts
music
for
its
statewide
importance
and
association
to
the
Minnesota
music
scene
in
the
1970s
into
the
1980s
sound
ad
was
recognized
among
the
best
recording
studios
in
the
nation
and
the
top
recording
location
in
the
Twin
Cities
from
its
completion
in
1971.
The
property
quickly
drew
nationally
reaching
a
nationally
reaching
reputation
for
excellence
in
recording,
based
in
their
implementation
of
the
lace
of
acoustical
design,
engineering
and
use
of
expert
professionals
and
the
best
clip
equipment
of
the
era.
R
R
Please,
the
building's
Petersons
significance
begins
in
1971
when
the
building
open
and
ends
in
1981
the
last
year,
the
the
record
of
the
left
the
year
the
last
recording
was
made
at
sound,
80
and
then
and
the
building
closed
that
year.
Given
the
documented
importance
of
the
property
significance
under
both
criterion
a
and
criterion
B,
the
property
meets
the
requirements
to
be
considered
for
nomination
under
criteria
criterion,
consideration
G
for
a
property
that
is
less
than
50
years
old
and
has
achieved
significance
within
the
past
50
years
slide.
Please.
R
B
A
A
B
Well,
maybe
it's
not
working
I
guess,
I'll
start
the
conversation
with
Oh.
Are
you
there.
M
B
I,
don't
see
any
something
comes
up
we'll
see,
but
if
we
could
just
start
the
discussion,
does
anyone
want
to
speak
on
this
item?
I.
B
Know
I
was
excited
to
see
this
item
come
through
and
I
did
see.
I
mentioned
that
there's
potential
interest
in
designating
it
as
a
local
landmark,
as
well
as
on
the
National
Register,
which
I
think
we
would
all
be
really
excited
to
see.
I
know
when
we
completed
the
study
on
the
music
history,
we
were
all
hoping
that
we
might
see
some
items
come
out
of
that.
So
I
think
this
is
an
exciting
first
one
to
see
pop-up.
N
Thank
you,
I
haven't
really
mastered
this
yet
yeah
I
mean
what
a
thorough
study
it
is
so
fantastic.
F
Agree
with
Commissioner
Mack,
the
study
was
great.
What
I'm
about
to
say
might
be
a
little
controversial,
but
I
think
that
Bob
Dylan's
blood
on
the
tracks
is
way
better
than
anything.
Prince
did
so
no
but
seriously.
It
was
a
great
study,
huge
fan
of
Bob
Dylan
end
of
prints.
So
I'm
really
glad
to
see
this
one
they're
all
so.
G
B
B
P
Good
evening
again,
Andrea
Park
supervisor
for
historic
preservation,
team
ncpad.
I
just
wanted
to
give
one
update
that
we
are
wrapping
up
the
modern
minneapolis
in
the
modern
era,
context,
study
and
limited
test
survey
or
in
the
final
stages
of
edits
and
revisions
to
that
document,
and
once
it
is
completed
we
will
present
a
well
us
and
the
consultant
will
present
it
as
a
discussion
item
with
some
of
the
findings
and
some
of
the
summary
of
the
context
study
in
some
of
the
survey.