►
From YouTube: May 6, 2020 Policy & Government Oversight Committee
Description
Minneapolis Policy & Government Oversight Committee Meeting
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/
B
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
Lisa
fender
and
the
president
of
the
Minneapolis
City
Council
and
chair
of
the
policy
and
government
oversight
committee
I'm,
going
to
call
to
order
a
regular
committee
meeting
for
May
6th
I'll
note
for
the
record
that
this
meeting
has
remote
participation
by
council
members
and
city
staff
as
authorized
under
the
Minnesota
Open
Meeting
Law
Section
13
D
point
0
to
1
due
to
the
declared
state
of
local
public
health
emergency.
At
this
time,
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll
to
verify
the
presence
of
a
quorum
council.
C
D
E
B
The
record
reflect
that
we
do
have
a
quorum
for
today's
meeting.
Without
objection.
I
will
add
a
walk-on
item
from
the
council
vice
president,
as
item
20
under
the
consent
agenda,
and
this
is
a
gift
acceptance
from
Xfinity
mr.
Karl
emailed
the
materials
to
the
council
just
prior
to
this
meeting.
So
you
should
all
have
that
in
your
inbox.
B
F
Good
afternoon
Council
President,
Ben,
bender
and
committee
members,
my
name
is
Arlene
Robinson
senior
project
coordinator
and
CPA
residential
finance.
In
the
report
before
you,
staff
is
recommending
that
the
City
Council
authorized
housing
improvement
area
financing
for
the
summit
house
project
through
the
series
of
actions
indicated
in
the
RCA
a
note
on
the
HIA
bond
fee
resolution.
F
There
was
a
clerical
error
in
the
original
file
and
we
corrected
it.
You
should
have
a
corrected
version.
The
resolution
is
not
posted.
All
cut
required.
Public
notifications
related
to
this
public
hearing
were
properly
made.
Summit
house
is
in
Ward
7
the
Lauren
Park
neighborhood
and
is
made
up
of
three
residential
towers,
one
at
400
Groveland
with
26
floors
in
176
units
and
one
at
410,
Groveland
Avenue,
with
23
floors
in
120
units
built
in
1968
in
1967,
respectively.
Summit
House
was
converted
to
condominiums
in
1980.
F
Despite
past
deposits
into
the
replacement
reserves,
the
condo
association
has
been
confronted
with
repairs
that
exceed
their
ability
to
pay
for
them
and
is
seeking
city
housing
improvement
area
financing
to
address
the
critical
needs
which
includes
replacement
of
heating
ventilation,
cooling
systems
that
are
50
years
old
in
our
failing.
The
new
mechanical
systems
and
their
improvements
were
also
significant,
significantly
increase
energy
efficiency.
F
C
E
C
B
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
A
Madam
chair,
the
webcast
is
working
now,
but
the
the
telecast
is
not
I
think
we
should
proceed
with
just
the
webcasts.
The
public
can
watch
it
on
mini
a
postman,
gov
/
TV,
slash,
council
TV,
and
then
the
video
will
be
available
afterwards
on
YouTube
from
the
city's
YouTube
channel
and
upload
it
to
TV.
Later.
B
I
B
So
I
will
go
ahead
and
sort
of
reintroduce
this
item,
which
is
item
number
one,
which
is
the
our
first
order
of
business
under
public
hearings.
This
item
is
on
the
summit
house.
Housing,
improvement
area,
ordinance
and
I
will
turn
it
over
to
our
chief
of
staff
for
the
details.
Thank
you.
Miss
Robinson,
mm-hmm.
F
Good
afternoon
councilmember,
bending
and
committee
members,
my
name
is
Arlene
Robinson
senior
project
coordinator
in
cpad
residential
finance.
In
the
report
before
you,
staff
is
recommending
that
the
City
Council
authorized
housing
movement
area
financing
for
summer
house
project
through
the
series
of
actions
indicated
in
the
RCA.
A
note
on
the
HOA
bond
fee
resolution
had
a
clerical
error
and
the
original
in
the
original
file,
and
if
you
do
now
have
the
corrected
version
of
the
resolution
all
required.
Public
notifications
related
to
this
public
hearing
were
properly
made.
F
Sumit
house
is
in
Ward
7
the
Lauren
Park
neighborhood
and
is
made
up
of
two
residential
towers,
one
at
400,
Groveland
Avenue,
with
26
floors
and
177
units,
and
one
at
410,
grovel
and
Avenue
with
23
floors
and
a
hundred
and
twenty
units
built
in
1968
in
1967,
respectively.
Seventh
house
was
converted
to
condominiums
in
1980.
F
Despite
passing
process
into
the
replacement
reserve,
the
condo
association
has
been
confronted
by
repairs
that
exceed
their
ability
to
pray
for
them
and
is
seeking
city
housing,
improvement
area.
Hia
financing
to
address
critical
needs,
including
replacement
of
heating
ventilation
and
cooling
systems
that
are
over
50
years
old
and
are
failing
the
new
mechanical
systems
and
other
improvements
will
also
significantly
increase
energy
efficiency.
F
Hia
financing
is
financing
of
last
resort
when
private
long-term
financing
options
are
not
available.
Summon
house
submitted
an
application
in
June
of
2017
and
now
meets
all
the
guidelines
and
criteria.
Minimum
criteria
of
the
city's
HOA
policy,
including
exceeding
the
requirement
that
that
75%
of
residents
signed
a
petition
supporting
the
HOA
financing.
To
date,
the
Association
has
received
sign
petitions
from
260
owners,
which
is
87
point
5
percent
of
the
homeowners
based
on
bids.
The
total
project
cost
is
approximately
21
point
two
million
dollars.
F
The
Association
will
allocate
this
cost
to
each
of
the
297
units
based
on
each
units.
Interest
of
the
property
HIA
financing
requires
a
public
hearing
and
notice
of
this
public
hearing
was
sent
to
all
owners.
If
HIA
financing
is
approved,
each
owner
has
two
options:
prepay
in
full
to
the
Association
by
August,
31st,
2021
or
finance
their
portion
through
HIA
financing.
F
The
city
will
enter
into
finance
an
agreement
with
Summit
households,
summit
homes,
association
according
to
the
term
sheet
in
the
report,
Western
alliance
bank
look
issue
a
short
term
construction
loan
to
the
Association.
The
Association
will
pay
for
the
repairs
and
the
construction
loan
proceeds
reserves
and
any
cash
we
see
from
prepaid
condo
owners
when
the
project
is
complete,
the
city
will
issue
long
term
general
obligation,
bonds
or
a
loan
and
proceeds
will
be
used
to
pay
off
the
construction
loan
with
Western
Alliance
Bank
and
cover
other
and
cover
other
financing
costs
and
reserves.
F
When
the
project
is
complete
in
2021,
the
city
will
impose
HOA
fees
on
each
condo.
Unit
fees
will
vary
between
four
thousand
three
hundred
dollars
and
eleven
thousand
two
hundred
dollars
per
year
with
ninety
percent.
97
percent
of
the
units
paid
an
annual
fee
between
four
thousand
three
hundred
and
six
thousand
nine
hundred
the
city
will
have
first
lien
on
the
property.
F
In
the
event
of
foreclosure,
the
city
reserve
received
one
written
public
comment
that
raises
concerns
related
to
Colvin
19,
although
city,
although
the
city
is
involved
in
the
finances
of
the
construction
activity,
the
agreements
related
to
kovat
19
construction
protocols
are
between
the
condo
association
board
and
they're
selected
contractors.
We
urge
them
to
agree
on
terms
for
completing
the
work
consistent
with
best
known
practices
for
the
residents
and
the
worker
protection.
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
I
So
this
is
Dennis
hedge
Hall
I'm,
a
resident
at
Summit
house
I'm.
Also,
a
professor
of
mathematics
at
the
University
of
Minnesota
I,
have
expertise
in
stochastic
processes
and
diffusion
theory
such
as
the
aerosol
of
flow
of
aerosol
aerosolized
virus
particles
in
the
air
and
I'm.
The
one
who
wishes
to
raise
some
concerns
about
Coco,
vat19
I
think
it's
fair
to
say
that
a
normal
times
this
whole
matter
about
the
ordinance
would
really
be
rather
perfunctory
and
probably
could
be
dealt
with.
I
I
Maybe
beyond
that
I've
been
looking
at
the
documents
and
I
don't
see
in
the
documents
that
there
is
really
any
anything
speaking
to
legitimate
residents,
safety
concerns
and
so
I
thought
that
at
least
I
should
try
to
make
some
input
here
and
I
and
I
had
given
the
written
it
put
input
I
don't
want
to
be
wasting
too
much
time
going
over
over
that.
But
there
is
a
issue
here
about.
I
The
coab
819,
one
of
the
primary
modes
of
transmission,
is
by
asymptomatic
or
pre
symptomatic
patients.
The
cases
if
you
want
to
call
it
that-
and
this
is
by
way
of
aerosol
particles,
for
instance,
just
coming
from
talking-
and
the
problem-
is
that
some
in
house
you
know
with
the
construction
we
have
over
400
people
living
here
and
for
many
many
people
here,
they're
their
home,
it's
their
unique,
safe
space,
and
you
know
there's
people
here
with
that
have
vulnerabilities,
as
defined
by
the
CDC
and
senior
citizens
and
medical
issues.
I
Now
the
issue
that
I
see
here
is
that
the
summit
house
management
and
summit
house
board
the
vested
interest
and
trying
to
before
a
provider
trying
to
avoid
delays
in
this
work
because
we're
still
paying
and
at
the
same
time
you
also
have
employees
of
the
construction
company
that,
if
they're
not
salaried,
they
may
be
under.
You
know
financial
pressure
to
come
to
work,
even
if
there
are
they're
ill
and-
and
you
know,
even
if,
as
I
wrote,
it's
just
a
sniffle.
I
Now
nobody
knows
exactly
what
scenario
in
the
SI
draft
report
is
going
to
take
place
in
the
summer
in
the
fall,
if
we're
in
scenario,
1
&
2
we're
basically
in
very,
very
bad
shape.
Anyone
who's
paying
attention
to
the
news
knows
this:
when
you
talk
about
hundreds
of
thousands
of
deaths
within
the
next
18
months,
I
mean
this
is
unreal.
I
And
you
know
it's
very
difficult
when
you're
in
the
situation
where
people
have
vested
interests
who
represents
the
resident
safety
and
I,
have
submitted
some
documents
with
the
written
documents
to
provide
fuller
information
here
and
I
see
in
the
policy
document.
This
is
not
part
of
it.
Apparently,
it's
a
policy
document
that
is
not
part
of
the
ordinance
under
basic
city
financing
terms
and
conditions.
I
see
away
under
one
of
the
items
15
in
there
that
the
city
can
help
us
proactively.
Come
everybody
here.
The.
I
Word
the
residents
in
the
construction
company
that
we
can
help
solve
whatever
situation,
health
situation
we
have
during
the
period
of
this
construction
in
people,
safe
spaces
and
so
I
mean
as
I
wrote
here
on
my
two-page
letter.
It
is
my
hope
that,
in
conjunction
with
your
passage
of
this
HIA
ordinance,
the
city
of
Minneapolis
can
help
facilitate
a
good
mutual
safety
cooperation
by
all
parties
involved
here
by
means
of
its
oversight,
powers
I
think
that
if
the
city
I
mean
things
are
happening
here
in
this
city,
you
are
you're
blocking
off
Parkway
systems
to.
H
I
The
city
I
believe,
has
some
responsibility
to
show
some
Pro
activity
here
in
trying
to
help
the
parties
concern
here
and
as
far
as
I'm
concerned,
you
know
it
would
be
greatly
appreciated
and
so
I
think
that's
the
main
point
that
I
wish
to
make
I
did
here
in
the
Indy
report
by
Arlene
that
it
was
stated-
and
this
was
not
on
the
original
policy
document-
that
I
read
last
night-
hope
that
19
is
not
under
the
jurisdiction.
Basically
of
what
we're
doing
here
today.
Excuse
me
it
may
it
is
I
agree
with
you.
I
I
B
B
J
J
Third
see
PMI
is
the
construction
manager
for
the
project
see
PMI
is
a
national
organization.
They
have
extensive
experience
on
large,
complex
projects,
see
PMI
has
been,
and
continues
to
work
closely
with
the
Association
to
develop
and
implement
robust
kovat
19
protocols.
As
an
example,
this
evening
see,
PMI
is
meeting
with
the
board
in
a
work
session
whose
whole
focus
is
continuing
to
work
on
the
Coe
bid.
19
protocol
comment
for
the
construction
workers
on
the
project
are
as
concerned
as
anyone
about
the
kovaydin
18
risks,
and
these
concerns
have
been
repeatedly
expressed.
J
B
B
Last
call
for
comments
all
right.
Thank
you.
I
will
go
ahead
and
close
the
public
hearing.
The
final
action
for
this
item
will
be
on
Friday.
So
if
we've
missed
anyone
for
any
technical
reasons
or
anything
else,
you
can
always
feel
free
to
email,
the
staff
or
your
councilmember,
and
we
will
get
any
comments
submitted
for
the
public
record
as
well,
so
Miss
Robinson.
You
had
originally
addressed
this
issue
around
the
co
vid
questions,
but
I
think
since
it
came
up
during
the
hearing,
its
would
be
helpful
for
you
to
just
talk
through
that.
B
F
K
Thank
You
Marlene
council,
president
fender
and
members
of
the
committee,
so
Arlene
did
run
through
this,
but
just
to
reiterate,
based
on
comments
that
we
have
just
heard.
The
city's
role
in
this
project
is
strictly
related
to
the
financing
that
is
being
made
available
to
help
pay
for
these
critical
repairs
that
the
association
was
unable
to
get
financing
anywhere
else
in
the
private
market.
The
appropriate
place
for
any
agreements
to
be
negotiated
related
to
kovat,
19
or
any
other
construction
safety
measures
is
between
the
Association
Board
of
Directors
and
their
selected
contractors.
L
Thank
you,
madam
president.
I'm
happy
to
move
approval.
I
will
make
a
few
comments.
If
you
don't
mind,
it's
really
unusual
actually
for
us
to
even
be
taking
up
any
major
action
during
the
kovat
crisis,
but
the
situation
at
Summit
House
warranted
this
action
today.
I
want
to
remind
my
colleagues
that
this
these
are
two
towers
in
the
Loring
Park
area.
That
house
almost
500
people
and
by
today's
standards
would
be
considered
affordable,
homeownership.
L
The
major
improvements
that
need
to
happen
in
the
building
are
critical
life
safety
issues,
as
identified
both
by
the
condominium
association
that
are
consultants
as
well
as
the
city
staff
who
have
analyzed
this
HIA.
This
is
probably
one
of
the
largest
housing
improvement
area
projects
that
we've
done.
L
I'm
happy
that
the
staff
have
been
city
staff
have
been
clear
that
we
need
to
make
sure
that
everything
happened
as
everything
happened
in
a
way.
That's
consistent
with
CDC
and
mdh
guidelines
and
I
appreciate
Dennis.
Bringing
up
this
issue.
I
have
heard
it
before
in
other
buildings
as
well.
I've
also
spoken
with
the
City
Attorney's
Office,
the
mayor's
office
and
others
about
whether
or
not
we
as
a
city
have
the
right
to
be
telling
condominium
associations.
They
cannot
do.
L
Construction
and
I
have
been
outright
told
that
we
do
not
have
the
authority
to
do
that.
The
governor's
order
actually
calls
construction
and
essential
service
and
we
don't
run
condo
associations.
The
boards
of
directors
do
so.
I
am
happy
that
we
have
ensured
that
guidelines
are
being
met,
but
we
are
not
going
to
be
in
a
position
to
tell
them
any
more
than
we
already
have,
as
well
as
enforce
those
kinds
of
actions.
L
Perhaps
some
of
these
assessments
will
be
as
much
as
the
value
of
some
of
these
units,
so
this
is
a
case
where
this
is
a
desperate
situation
where
this
work
needs
to
happen
and
we're
stepping
in
to
be
able
to
finance
it,
because
we
are
the
financier
of
last
resort,
and
that
is
our
role
here.
So,
for
those
reasons
I'm
going
to
move
approval
this
morning
and
thank
everyone
who
has
been
involved
in
trying
to
get
this
financing
together
so
that
we
can
preserve
this
very
valuable
asset
of
affordable
homeownership
in
the
city.
B
B
L
You,
madam
chair
I,
was
the
author
of
this
ordinance
about
15
years
ago,
so
I
know
a
lot
about
it.
The
big
issue
here
councilmember
Jenkins,
is
when
there
are
major
life
and
safety
issues
in
buildings
that
no
bank
will
lend
an
association
money
to
fix,
so
they
actually
have
to
have
three
legitimate
efforts
and
rejections
from
private
financial
institutions
or
public
financial
institutions
saying
that
they
will
not
finance
this.
In
addition
to
that,
they
then
have
to.
L
After
knowing
what
the
costs
would
be
to
every
individual
owner,
they
have
to
get
petition
signatures
and
access
of
75%
of
all
of
the
residents
who
will
be
assessed
for
these
improvements.
So
this
is
actually
not
a
subsidy
to
this
condo,
because
they'll
have
to
be
not
only
paying
back
the
cost
of
the
improvements,
but
the
costs
associated
with
issuing
bonds,
and
that
is
a
very
high
price
when
bonds
are
issued,
it's
not
like
taking
out
a
regular
loan.
L
So
in
this
case
it's
a
multi-million
dollar
investment,
so
the
bonds
are
spread
over
a
very
large
investment,
but
projects
that
come
in
under
several
million
dollars,
don't
make
sense
for
housing
improvement
area
financing,
because
often
the
bonds
is
about
equal
to
what
the
improvements
were.
So
we
actually
have
a
we're
condominium.
Associations
can
apply
to
the
housing
division
and
they
will
let
those
there's
a
fee
associated
with
it,
and
then
they
need
to
go
through
the
process
of
being
rejected
by
many
banks,
which
does
not
feel
good
to
condo
boards.
L
Most
of
the
time,
then
they
have
to
agree
to
these
really
high
payments
assessed
against
their
property,
so
it
it's
almost
odd
to
have
someone
signing
up
to
speak
to
us
to
say.
Yes,
please
tax
me
six
thousand
dollars
a
year,
but
the
alternative
is
worse.
It
basically
there's
no
value
to
their
units
if
they
can't
get
these
life
and
safety
improvements
fixed.
L
There
have
only
been
in
my
memory
three
others,
one
in
councilmember
benders
Ward
at
2500
Blaisdell,
one
in
councilmember,
Palmisano
Zwarte
on
West,
Lake,
Street
and
one
in
the
Loring
Park
neighborhood
at
the
Wellington
I
know
the
most
about
the
Wellington
because
they
had
a
ingress,
egress
fire
safety
issue
where
their
fire
exits
would
have
collapsed
if
they
weren't
able
to
fix
them.
So
they're,
serious
life
safety
issues
assessed
with
the
permission
of
the
owners.
Hopefully
that
answers
your
questions
and
I'm
sure
Angie
skilled
offline
could
answer
others
as
well.
Thank
you,
ma'am
sure.
E
C
H
B
Are
11
eyes
that
carries
and
that
item
is
supported
with
recommendation,
I
meant
to
actually
comment
on
a
couple
of
items
that
were
raised
during
the
public
hearing
just
for
my
colleagues
in
the
public,
some
of
the
questions
around
safety
of
residents
and
multifamily
buildings
and
that
of
workers,
particularly
those
who
are
deemed
essential
or
soon
to
become
deemed
essential
in
the
future.
Those
are
topics
of
robust
conversation
from
our
city
staff
as
well
as
I,
know,
other
units
of
government
and
partners,
and
so
I
think.
B
Those
comments
that
were
raised
are
really
important
for
us
to
think
about
as
policymakers.
Even
though
this
particular
financial
agreement
didn't
give
us,
you
know
an
Avenue
into
that
particular
private
agreement.
Those
topics
are
ones
that
our
staff
are
working
on
holistically
for
the
city
at
large,
so
I
really
appreciated
the
comments
and
understand
where
they,
the
desire
was
coming
from
for
sure.
B
D
Right
good
afternoon,
council,
president
bender
and
members
of
the
community,
my
name
is
Nathan
Kemmer
I'm,
a
project
engineer
with
the
transportation,
engineering
and
design
division
of
Public
Works.
Today
I'm
here
to
introduce
the
public
hearing
for
Sheridan
Ave
South
unpaved
alley
project.
The
proposed
project
consists
of
constructing
two
legs
of
the
alleyway
off
of
Sheridan
Ave
South.
The
total
project
cost
is
220
thousand
five
hundred
eighty
dollars
as
with
every
capital
improvement,
paving
project.
This
project
includes
a
special
assessment
for
alley
projects.
Only
the
parcels
of
budding
alley
improvement
are
assessed.
D
The
total
amount
of
assessments
for
the
project
is
nine
thousand
eight
hundred
twenty
three
dollars.
This
is
based
on
the
2020
uniform
assessment
rate
of
twenty
nine
cents
per
square
foot
of
assessed
parcels.
These
assessment
payments
are
spread
over
a
10-year
period
beginning
next
year.
The
rest
of
the
funding
sources
are
$150,000
in
net
debt
bonds
and
once
the
final
project
costs
are
available,
any
additional
funding
needed
will
be
identified
in
the
capital
projects.
Fund
staff
has
conducted
numerous
outreach
activities
throughout
the
planning
and
design
of
the
project,
a
pre-assessment
meeting
to
provide
an
overview.
D
The
project
discuss
planned
improvements
and
answer.
Any
questions
related
to
the
assessment
method
and
process
was
held
on
April
29th,
with
six
people
attending
today,
Public
Works
is
asking
City
Council
to
passed
resolutions
ordering
the
board
to
proceed,
adopting
special
assessments
and
authorizing
sale,
decent
bonds.
That
concludes
my
presentation
and
I'll
stand
by
for
questions.
B
B
G
B
Carries
and
that
will
recommendation
will
be
forwarded
to
the
full
council
on
Friday
that
completes
our
two
public
hearings.
The
next
order
of
business
is
the
consent.
Agenda,
I
will
read
the
consent
agenda
items
and
please
feel
free
any
council.
Member
to
let
me
know
if
you'd
like
to
pull
any
offer
for
their
discussion.
There
are
now
18
items
on
the
consent.
Agenda
and
I
will
read
them
for
the
record
item.
B
3
is
the
legal
settlement
of
a
workers,
compensation
claim
by
Kathie
Lawler
and
the
authorization
of
the
city's
Attorney's
Office
to
execute
any
necessary
documents.
Items
4
through
8
are
to
set
public
hearings
for
land
sales,
all
of
which
will
be
conducted
at
the
regular
meeting
on
May
20th
and
those
details
are
provided
on
the
agenda
for
item
4.
We
will
be
returning
that
item
to
staff
to
give
more
time
for
the
due
diligence
related
to
that
one
project,
but
items
5
through
8
are
recommended
for
approval
at
this
time.
B
Item
9
as
a
contract
amended
for
a
total
revised
amount
not
to
exceed
four
hundred.
Fifty
four
thousand
five
hundred
ninety
seven
dollars
with
the
technology
management
corporation
for
information
technology
and
auto
of
israel's
audiovisual
services
in
connection
with
the
Public
Services
Building
item
10
is
a
contract
amendment
for
a
total
revised
amount
not
to
exceed
11
million.
B
Items
15,
16
and
17
all
authorized
various
grant
applications
related
to
the
federal
and
state
transportation
funding
opportunities,
as
reflected
on
the
agenda
item.
18
is
authorization
of
a
temporary
construction
agreement
for
property
located
at
29
29
Hennepin
Avenue
in
conjunction
with
the
Girard
Avenue
South
Street
reconstruction
project.
B
An
item
19
is
acceptance
of
the
sole
bid
from
Bray
sales
incorporated
for
butterfly,
butterfly
valves
and
actuators,
and
an
estimated
amount
of
not
to
exceed
12
$60,000
for
two
years
in
accordance
with
city
specifications
in
item
20
is
the
new
additional
item,
which
is
acceptance
of
a
gift
from
xfinity
for
9,500
$60,
for
a
donation
related
to
census,
broadcasts
to
encourage
folks
to
complete
the
2020
census.
Would
anyone
like
to
pull
any
items
off
for
discussion
or
comment
on
the
agenda
items?
M
President
bender
I'm,
looking
at
the
resolution
for
the
walk
on
item-
and
it
looks
like
maybe
there's
a
copy
and
pasting
error
or
there's
something
I'm,
not
totally
understanding
and
the
final,
therefore
be
it
resolved
clause.
It
indicates
that
the
funds
are
hereby
accepted
and
so
be
used
for
leadership,
training
for
the
city
controller,
which
sounds
like
a
very
different
purpose
than
what
the
rest
of
the
resolution
is
describing.
So
can
someone
clarify
for
me?
E
E
M
B
All
right,
thank
you
all
for
that
I
think.
Perhaps
the
final
amendment
will
likely
have
a
a
new
different
final
result.
Clause
I
think,
there's
lots
of
different
technical
ways
to
take
this
item
up.
I
think
we
might
possibly
just
forward
it
without
recommendation
and
give
time
to
have
the
proper
amendment
in
front
of
us
rather
than
trying
to
verbally
describe
the
change
here
and
then
we
could
just
make
sure
that
that
goes
out
before
this,
as
you
know,
as
soon
as
possible
before
the
council
meeting
on
Friday.
B
I
don't
see
any
I
just
wanted
to
note.
I
think,
especially
for
my
colleagues
are
on
tpw,
but
maybe
for
everyone
who's
not
as
well
that
items
15,
16
and
17
are
all
as
I
said,
grant
applications
for
transportation
projects,
but
I
really
wanted
to
highlight
how
much
the
staff
comments
and
framing
and
the
RCA
is
really
reflected
our
vision,
zero
work,
the
adoptive
vision,
zero
plan,
as
well
as
a
lot
of
the
high
level
values
and
policy
directions
that
we
set
in
Minneapolis
2040
plan
that
are
reflected
in
the
draft
transportation
action
plan.
B
Is
there
anything
else
on
any
of
the
consent
items?
I,
don't
see
any
so
I'll
just
clarify
that
we
would
be
moving
forward
with
recommendation
to
approve
all
items
except
item
four,
which
would
be
referred
back
to
staff,
an
item
20,
which
should
be
forded
with
recommendation
to
give
time
for
those
grammatical
and
clerical
errors
to
be
corrected.