►
From YouTube: February 26, 2020 Committee of the Whole
Description
Minneapolis Committee of the Whole Meeting
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
Good
afternoon,
I
am
going
to
call
to
order
this
regular
meeting
of
the
committee
of
the
whole
for
Wednesday
February
26
2020.
My
name
is
Andrea
Jenkins
and
I
am
the
chair
of
this
committee
and
with
me
at
the
Dyess
today,
our
council
members
Palmisano
Johnson
Ellison
Schrader
council
president
bender
council
member
Gordon
councilmember
rank
with
Fletcher
and
the
vice
chair
of
the
committee
council
member
Cunningham.
At
the
we
like
a
record,
reflect
that
we
do
have.
B
A
Quorum
and
colleagues
today
we
have
one
item
for
discussion
today
and
that
is
the
report
of
the
neighborhood
revitalization
program
and
the
community
participation
program,
fund,
balance
and
I
will
invite
up
staff
from
our
neighborhood
communications
department
to
give
that
presentation.
They
have
to
know
mr.
Lou
Boudreau,
the.
C
Chair
Jenkins
and
committee
members
good
afternoon,
I
am
David
Rubin
or
the
director
of
the
neighborhood
and
community
relations
department
and,
as
the
chair
mentioned,
I
am
here
today
to
present
a
report
on
the
current.
What
is
often
referred
to
as
the
NRP
fund
balance
and
basically
giving
you
some
background
and
some
understanding
of
what
that
term
actually
means
and
what
is
in
there
and
I'm
the
computer.
C
So
on
February
12th,
the
City
Council,
the
CAO
at
the
qaol
meeting,
the
City
Council
directed
the
NCR
Department
to
work
with
development
finance
to
come
back
and
present
a
report
to
you
today
about
the
current,
unspent
and
unn
contracted
and
contracted
money
with
the
NRP
fund
balance.
Today's
report
is
really
a
receiving
file
for
your
information.
A
A
C
Problem
to
continue
on
first
of
all,
really
kind
of
starting
from
the
high
level
what's
called
the
NRP
fund.
Balance
actually
includes
all
the
money
that
is
currently
unspent,
both
contracted
and
unn
contracted,
but
it
was
currently
unspent
by
our
neighborhood
organizations,
which
includes
n
RP
phase
1
in
our
P
phase,
2
and
also
the
community
participation
program.
The
community
participation
program,
when
it
was
first
put
into
place
in
2010,
was
actually
added
to
the
NRP
ordinance
and
so
therefore,
technically
is
considered
part
of
the
NRP
program.
C
So
the
total
balance
currently
in
the
n
RP
fund
balance
is
37
million
320
dollars,
as
you
can
see
on
the
chart
here,
the
vast
majority
of
that
are
actually
the
slight
majority
of
that.
Sorry
is
money.
That's
in
currently
in
the
NRP
phase
2
program.
The
next
biggest
chunk
is
the
money.
That's
left
over
a
little
over
9
million,
that's
in
the
NRP
phase
1
program
and
then
the
green
area.
That's
on
the
chart
is,
what's
it
currently
in
the
community
participation
program.
C
C
So,
first
of
all,
looking
or
secondly,
I
was
gonna,
say
looking
at
the
allocation
by
neighborhood.
The
fund
balance
is
actually
allocated
out
to
every
neighborhood
in
the
city
and
the
balance
varies
considerably
across
the
city
about
who
has
what
kind
of
balance
left.
The
map
that
you
see
here
really
kind
of
shows
the
distribution
of
where
the
money
is
currently
allocated
to
in
remaining
unspent.
That
includes
the
the
lighter
areas
which
are
shaded
in
yellow,
basically
have
a
fund
balance
from
0
up
to
about
$100,000
the
dark
area.
C
First
of
all,
in
2010
the
City
Council
took
an
action
to
reprogram
ten
million
dollars
out
of
the
NRP
program
into
the
CPP
program
and
basically
stopped
the
capitalization
of
the
community
participation
program
for
two
years,
and
so
that
money
was
taken
out.
In
essence,
the
total
amount
of
money
that
was
available
and
allocated
to
neighborhoods
had
dropped
by
ten
million
dollars.
That
was
done
in
an
effort
at
that
time.
C
If
I
recall
correctly,
there
was
some
significant
tax
increases,
property
tax
increases
across
the
city,
and
that
was
done
as
an
attempt
to
mitigate
that,
while
still
continuing
to
have
money
go
out
to
neighborhoods
that
money
in
2017
the
City
Council
committed
to
repaying
that
money
back
into
the
program
and
over
the
last
three
years
that
ten
million
dollars
has
come
back
into
the
program.
So
a
ten
million
dollar
repayment,
in
essence
also
neighborhood,
started
the
NRP
program
at
different
times.
C
The
first
neighborhood
I
believe
started
in
1992
and
the
last
NRP
Phase
two
plan
was
approved
in
2017,
so
there's
a
significant
span
of
time
and
when
people
are
in
neighborhoods,
went
into
neighborhood
organizations
went
into
the
program,
and
so
some
of
the
neighborhoods
that
went
in
early
had
obviously
a
more
time
to
spend
it
down
than
others
that
came
into
it
later.
Also
in
the
37
million
dollar
balance,
the
allocation
for
2020
into
the
community
participation
program
was
just
released
or
just
allocated,
and
that's
another
4.1
million
dollars.
C
I
came
in
just
a
couple
of
a
month
ago.
Neighborhoods
also
received
program
income
which
I
want
to
talk
about
in
a
minute
and
go
in
a
little
bit
more
greater
detail
and
also
in
neighborhoods
were
given
the
possibility
or
the
ability
to
spend
the
money
at
theirs
that
their
pace
and
so
depending
on
the
priorities
and
the
decisions
that
they
made
about
where
the
money
was
going.
C
C
They
often
are
the
first
funder
into
some
difficult
or
challenging
housing
developments
across
the
city
and
that
money
goes
contracted
and
then
will
sit
there
for
a
period
of
time,
while
developers
actually
go
out
and
try
to
get
the
rest
of
the
money
into
place
and
that
can
tie
up
the
money
for
an
extended
period
of
time
oftentimes
years
so
there.
Those
are
just
some
of
the
factors
that
really
affect
the
fund.
C
In
this
particular
situation
for
n
RPS
phase,
one
and
Phase
two
only
CPP
doesn't
allow
this
but
or
doesn't
have
this,
but
in
n
RP
phase
one
and
Phase
two
thirty
little
over
thirty,
five
million
dollars
has
been
paid
back
into
the
program
from
a
program
income.
That's
a
little
over
fifteen
percent
of
the
total
capitalization
of
NRP
phase
one
and
Phase
two.
So
it's
a
significant
amount
of
money.
I
should
say
about
of
that.
Thirty-Five
million
that's
come
back
a
little
over
half
of
that
has
come
back
just
in
the
last
ten
years.
C
So
it's
been
fairly
recent
that
the
amount
of
money
coming
back
in
has
increased
one
other
thing
I
want
to
mention
before
I
conclude.
Is
that
the
first
20
years
of
NRP
there
wasn't
any
role
expectations
set
on
neighborhood
organizations
on
the
timing
of
spending
their
money?
It
was
really
left
up
to
the
low
local
organizations
to
determine
how
quickly
they
wanted
to
disburse
funds.
Some
neighborhoods
move
that
money
out
quickly
into
the
end
of
the
community.
C
Others
spent
that
over
a
more
of
an
extended
period
of
time
in
2015
and
part
of
a
effort
to
make
sure
that
the
monies
were
actually
getting
out
in
a
timely
manner
and
also
to
make
sure
that
the
plans
that
neighborhoods
had
developed
for
spending
those
monies
we're
still
relevant.
The
council
passed
what
Scott
was
called
the
NRP
expenditure
policy,
which
sets
some
thresholds
in
place.
This
affected
NRP
phase
one
and
phase
two.
C
Only
and
basically
the
thresholds
are
that
within
seven
years
of
the
allocation
or
the
plan
being
approved,
they
have
to
be
95%
contracted
and
eighty-five
percent
of
the
funds
need
to
be
expended
again.
This
was
an
effort
to
give
an
adequate
amount
of
time
to
fund
projects
and
programs,
but
also
making
sure
that
the
money
was
moving
out.
We
do
an
ongoing
compliance
check
on
that
and
all
neighborhoods
right
now
are
in
compliance
with
that
expenditure
policy.
D
We've
just
had
a
lot
of
questions
about
how
we're
gonna,
potentially
fund
neighborhoods
and
I
thought
it
was
important
to
really
get
this
number
out
there
and
really
get
a
little
more
explanation
for
me
when
I
read
the
curia
part
and
just
have
that
one
line
about
34
million,
especially
coming
from
neighborhoods,
there's
a
lot
more
to
that
number,
and
we
just
wanted
to
make
sure
all
my
colleagues
knew
you
know.
34
million
is
a
lot,
but
that's
not
money.
D
C
Chair
Jenkins
and
a
customer
Schrader
if
I
understand
you
correctly,
these
these
funds
are.
These
are
allocated
to
the
neighborhood
organization,
they're
either
contracted
or
on
contract
at
at
this
point,
but
it
is
available
to
each
of
the
organization's
and
I
believe
with
the
RCA
there's
a
listing
of
each
neighborhood
and
which
neighborhood
has
which
how
much
money
in
each
one
of
those
categories
for
both
phase
one
and
Phase
two,
as
well
as
a
CPP
program.
So
these
funds
are
available
for
neighborhoods
to
use
okay,
yep
Thank.
E
Thank
you
very
much.
I
have
a
couple
questions.
It
looks
like
there's
over
19
million,
that's
unspent
and
unn
contracted.
Could
you
just
talk
a
little
bit
about
why
that
isn't,
contracted
and
maybe
how
much
time
we
expect
it
to
get
committed?
I
mean
you
mentioned
the
seven
years,
but
I
think
it
might
help
us
to
understand
why
some
neighborhoods
would
still
have
significant
amount
of
you
know
hundreds
of
thousands
of
dollars
that
they
haven't
haven't,
spent
and
have
a
contracted.
Yet.
C
Chair
Jenkins
and
councilmember
Gordon,
my
colleagues
will
probably
jump
up
and
add
a
little
bit
more
detail.
To
this
again,
remind
part
of
that
is
a
little
over.
Four
million
is
from
the
CPP
program.
Is
this
a
recent
allocation
that
went
out
also
the
the
kind
of
speed
of
program
income
coming
in
right
now
has
picked
up,
and
so
neighborhoods
are
getting
that
money
back
and
they
may
not
have
moved
that
into
a
contracting.
C
Yet,
basically,
when
that
when
the
program
income
comes
back
in,
it
goes
back
into
the
same
plan
strategy
that
it
was
before,
but
neighborhoods
can
move
that
to
a
different
strategy
and
then
that
then,
that
has
to
go
through
a
contracting
process
as
well
know,
if
you
guys
had
a
little
bit
more
that
you
wanted
to
add
on
detail
on
that.
But.
F
Counsel,
Steve,
Gallagher
and
policy
specialist
for
the
NCI
department
and
part
of
that
part
of
the
explanation
would
be
some
neighborhoods
might
have
planning
going
forward.
I
would
say,
like
the
Southwest
rail
area,
where
those
neighborhoods
have
a
long-term
plan
of
where
they
might
spend
their
funds,
but
there's
no
contracting
opportunity
at
that
time.
However,
all
of
those
dollars
are
in
strategies
which
which
the
council
approves
and
they're
in
there
phase
one
or
phase
two
plans,
so
they're
accounted
for
with
planes
to
go
forward.
They're
just
not
contracted
at
any
one.
F
Think
all
of
them
will
be
reviewed
within
the
seven-year
seven-year
time
time
period,
depending
on
where
what
their
intent
for
those
funds
are.
A
waiver
could
exist
like
if
the
light
rail
or
commuter
rail
does
not
happen.
For
a
few
more
years
there
could
be
a
waiver
issued
because
that's
where
they're
planning
for.
E
And
I
guess
my
other
question
might
be
just
as
complicated,
but
I
was
so.
It
looks
like
there's
a
lot
of
money.
That's
come
back
and
program
income,
but
we
don't
necessarily
and
I'm
sure
we
could
come
up
with
an
accounting
of
how
much
of
that
makes
up
the
the
totals
in
each
one
of
the
categories.
Have
one
contracted
and
not
contracted?
Is
it
significant
is
that
much
of
it
I
mean
that
the
total
program
income
is
35
million
and
then
the
total
figure
for
the
other
one
is
37
million,
or
something
like
that.
E
C
Chair
Jenkins
and
council
member
Gordon
I'm
going
to
invite
Bob
Cooper
from
Development
Finance.
We
do
this
in
collaboration
with
development,
finance
and
managing
this,
and
that
would
be
a
question.
I
think
that
he'd
be
able
to
answer
a
little
bit
better
than
me
as
far
as
what
is
the
breakdown
within
there.
That
number.
G
This
question
will
quickly
drive
us
deep
into
the
weeds
of
NRP
in
phase
one.
There
was
a
little
distinction
made
between
program,
income
and
action
plan
funds,
so
we
do
have
a
sense,
but
not
an
exact
sense
in
phase
two,
because
the
rules
changed.
We
do
know
a
separation
on
the
contracted
side
of
what
program
income
dollars
are
contracted
in
which
action
plan
dollars
are
over.
On
the
expenditure
side,
we
just
track
overall
expenditures
by
contract.
G
So
on
the
contracted
side
we
can
get
a
pretty
good
sense
and
I
think
it's
safe
without
having
done
the
actual
analysis
that
a
fair
portion
of
the
uncontacted
dollars
are
program,
income
funds
that
have
returned
along
with.
Let
me
quickly
add
so
I
don't
leave
a
misperception.
It's
only
within
the
last
three
years,
the
ten
million
dollars
of
action
plan
funds
have
returned
for
it
to
be
available
to
neighborhoods
to
contract,
and
so
some
of
those
also
sit
there
as
neighborhoods
begin
to
do
the
planning
and
to
get
those
funds
out.
G
E
It's
because
it
sounds
like
there's,
probably
a
big
variety
and
people
that
and
groups
that
organized
and
planned
it
out
and
may
have
program
income
coming
back.
It
would
have
more
resources
and
more
flexibility
than
those
neighborhoods
who
didn't.
It's
also
possible
that
those
neighborhoods
that
were
able
to
do
those
kinds
of
programs
were
a
little
bit
wealthier,
because
people
could
pay
back
those
loans
that
they
got
for
their
home
improvements.
So
have
we
done
any
kind
of
analysis
about
that?
E
G
Do
track
program
income
by
neighborhood
and
know
exactly
how
much
program
income
has
come
back
to
each
neighborhood
you're
correct
some
neighborhoods,
the
residents
of
the
neighborhood
needed
home
improvement,
grants,
not
loans,
and
so
that
didn't
offer
a
repayment
option.
Some
of
the
neighborhoods
because
of
the
condition
of
the
housing
invested,
their
money
in
commercial
development
projects
or
what
we've
seen
a
lot
lately
is
investment
and
affordable
housing
projects.
Citywide
few
neighborhoods
have
had
little
or
no
program
income.
E
There
were
the
three
categories
of
neighborhoods
when
NRP
started,
so
I
would
have
just
a
theory
that
would
say:
oh
that
would
give
an
opportunity
for
a
wealthier
neighborhood
to
have
more
program
income,
because
they
would
have
peep
who
could
afford
to
pay
back
loans
where,
as
if
area
that
was
poorer,
they
would
have
a
bigger
need
to
invest
in
their
housing
and
they
wouldn't
have
an
ability
to
do
it
quite
the
same
way.
Does
it
look
like
my
little
Theory
here
is
borne
out
in
any
fact.
Madam.
G
Chair
councilmember
Gordon,
we
haven't
done
that
specific
analysis.
It
would
be
easy
enough
to
do
I'd
be
glad
to
pull
that
together.
The
three
types
of
neighborhoods
that
councilmember
Gordon
refers
to
were
an
an
integral
part
of
the
original
NRP
program,
where
every
neighborhood
designated
itself
as
a
revitalization
redirection
or
protection
neighborhood,
and
that
was
part
of
the
20-year
revitalization
plan
that
the
City
Council
approved
those
three
neighborhoods.
But
it
would
I'd
be
happy
to
pull
that
sort
of
information
together.
It.
E
A
C
C
C
C
H
C
Jenkins
and
councilmember
Cunningham
the
it
would
take
a
City
Council
action
to
change
any
of
that
any
redirection
of
any
of
that
money
so
just
be
really
clear:
it's
not
something
that
would
be
decided
by
the
department.
What
I'm
speaking
of
as
far
as
making
this
simpler
is
really
programmatic
changes,
which
still
would
need
to
come
to
the
council
for
approval
and
again
that's
trying
to
basically
simplify
the
system
in
our
peace
complex.
C
C
That's
not
happening
with
neighborhoods
2020
I
just
wanted
to
be
really
clear.
That
is
something
that
we
will
start
addressing
as
we
move
forward.
Ultimately,
as
we
move
into
this
vision
of
having
our
neighborhood
organizations,
be
partners
with
the
city
around
racial
equity
and
building
greater
inclusion
and
diversity
within
their
decision-making
process,
we
need
to
look
at
all
the
programs
that
are
affecting
that
in
order
to
make
sure
they're
in
alignment
with
each
other
around
those
goals.
C
Neighborhoods
2020
is
about
that.
We
will
come
back
and
take
a
look
at
NRP
as
a
program
in
ways
that
we
can
make
dual
alignment
changes
to
that
to
make
that
actually
in
alignment
with
those
goals
as
well
I
mean
basically
at
this
point.
What
we're
talking
about
is
a
new
new
neighborhood
program.
Whatever
we
call
it,
neighborhoods
2020
is
about
4.1
million
dollars
a
year,
there's
still
about
30
million
dollars
left.
C
C
I
It
was
significantly
lower
by
those
who
went
through
their
community
route
programming
versus
being
exposed
to
some
of
the
predatory
practices
or
the
open
market.
So
that
might
be
something
a
good
place
to
start
to
start
probing.
The
questions
that
council
member
Gordon
raised
just
recently
also
I
just
wanted
to
know
just
for
the
record.
You
know
this
is
a
timely
report.
I
We
had
one
last
term
that
maybe
this
is
the
kind
of
thing
we
do
every
term
as
I
just
really
revisit
this
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
was
highlighted
in
the
last
term
was
that
seven-year
wasn't
an
arbitrary
number.
It
was
based
on.
A
couple
of
things
was
based
on
basically
looking
back
and
seeing
what
the
statistical
actual
rate
of
expenditure
was
over
the
program.
I
Seven
was
kind
of
that
number,
but
I
was
also
recognized
that
it
was
coincidental
to
the
fact
that
that
was
in
practice,
though
it
wasn't
a
formal
requirement
in
practice
that
was
sort
of
an
expectation.
You'd
have
a
certain
amount
of
years
to
plan.
You
have
a
certain
amount
of
years
to
put
together
a
strategy
to
implement
that
plan.
I
That's
what
happened
I
mean
so
the
seven
is
far
from
an
arbitrary
number
and
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
that,
because
I
was
definitely
discussed.
The
last
time
you
gave
this
report
and
so
again,
I
think
the
council
members
have
raised
a
certain
level
of
interest
in
what
the
data
can
mean.
Moving
forward
and
I'm
certainly
going
to
be
engaged
in
that
as
well.
A
B
I
am
excited
about
the
ways
in
which
that
I
think
we're
trying
to
provide
a
little
more
guidance
and
consistency
for
neighborhoods
so
that,
if
they
didn't
choose
to
do
a
revolving
fund
30
years
ago,
they're
not
like
now
left
with
no
money,
and
now
they
can't
do
anything
right.
So
I
yeah,
I
think,
just
providing
that
clear
and
consistent
approach
as
much
as
we
can
as
we
look
for
it
is
I.
Think
one
of
the
goals
that
we
all
have
and-
and
it
was
reinforced
by
looking
at
the
status
of
what's
happened
so
far.
C
I
could
just
sir
Jenkins
and
council
president
bender
yeah,
I,
totally
agree
and
I.
Think.
As
you
see,
it
was
a
little
bit
of
Luna
2
in
here,
but
even
over
the
last
seven
or
eight
years,
our
work
with
neighborhood
organizations
has
changed
a
lot.
We've
been
a
lot
more
specific.
We've
been
a
lot
more.
We
started
the
board
diversity
survey.
For
example,
in
2014
it's
been
going
on
now
it'll.
C
This
will
be
the
sixth
year
that
we
do
it,
because
we
know
that
diversity
in
leadership
matters
and
it
affects
how
resources
are
allocated,
and
so
we've
been
growing
on
this.
This
path
basically
are
trying
to
provide
better
guidance
and
expectations
around
our
neighborhood
organizations,
while
respecting
their
independence.
A
bit
of
attention
that
exists
between
that,
but
we
do
have
a
network
of
70,
so
I
mean
independent,
nonprofit
organizations.
C
We
want
to
respect
that,
but
also
at
the
same
time
as
we
invest
public
dollars
into
that
we
are
looking
for
public
outcomes
and
around
specific
goals,
so
it
kind
of
getting
back
to
what
I
was
referring
to
council
with
the
council.
Member
cunningham
is,
as
we
roll
out
2020,
and
we
expect
we're
expecting
to
release
those
program
guidelines
this
friday,
there's
more
there's
a
lot
more
clarity
in
there
about.
Basically,
the
role
between
the
city
and
neighborhoods
and
expectations.
C
C
What
I'm
saying
also
just
kind
of
pull
back
to
the
NRP
conversation
is
then,
given
the
amount
of
money,
that's
really
in
both
of
those
programs
is
really
working
on
ways
that
we
can
adjust
that
program
as
well
to
be
in
concert
with
the
alignment
of
the
new
neighborhoods
2020
program
as
well,
and
so
that
bringing
that
clarity
together
because
it
doesn't
do
is
anything
good.
If
we
have
one
program
has
a
lot
of
clarity
and
the
other
one
is
is
maybe
incongruent
with
with
that
and
trying
to
bring
that
better
into
Alliance
and
I.
C
B
Agree
and
I
think
one
of
the
things
that
I
think
is
most
exciting
about
where
we're
headed.
Is
this
idea
of
us
encouraging
and
supporting
more
collaboration
between
organizations
across
the
city
because
take
you
know,
loans
for
example,
or
homeownership
opportunities
I
mean
that
may
be
something
that
sparks
from
a
particular
neighborhood
but
would
be
really
impactful
and
lots
of
neighborhood
citywide.
B
Just
as
one
of
many
examples,
I
think
of
patterns
we're
seeing
across
the
city,
often
in
neighborhoods
that
are,
you
know
far
apart
geographically
within
our
city,
but
that
are
facing
similar
dynamics,
displacement
or
change,
and
so
I
think
that
piece
of
neighborhoods
2020
is
really
exciting.
To
think
about
how
we
can
better
support
that
partnership
and
collaboration
across
the
city.
A
Hey
well
seeing
no
further
discussion
and
before
I
move.
This
report
I
do
announce
that
we've
been
joined
by
councilmember
Sammy
and
with
that
I
will
move
to
receive
and
file
this
report,
all
those
in
favor
say
aye.
Let
me
pull
say,
nay,
and
that
item
carries
thank
you,
mr.
Luthor,
and
to
your
staff
and
to
the
finance
department
staff
as
well
sure
your
timely
report
and
then.
A
J
Thank
you,
madam
chair
Edie
are
the
economic
development
and
regulatory
services
community
has
six
items
to
bring
forward
to
the
full
council?
One
is
the
liquor
license
approvals.
2?
Is
the
liquor
license,
renewals
3?
Is
the
gambling
license?
Renewals
and
4
is
a
rental
dwelling
license
conditions
for
a
number
of
addresses?
A
E
Thank
you
very
much.
The
housing
policy
and
development
committee
will
be
bringing
forward
three
items
for
consideration.
The
first
deals
with
land
sales
to
implement
our
missing
middle
housing
pilot
program.
There
are
several
lots
that
are
being
sold
to
help
promote
the
preservation
and
also
the
creation
of
more
medium
density.
E
Housing
second
item
is
authorizing
a
notice
of
funding
availability
for
the
implementation
of
the
housings
stabilization
pilot
program
funds,
and
the
third
item
is
a
motion
to
delete
something
from
the
agenda
from
a
previous
meeting,
which
is
a
resolution
calling
on
the
minneapolis
public
housing
authority
to
delay
further
section
18
demolition
and
disposition
action
on
its
scattered
site
housing.
That
motion
failed
in
committee
five
to
one
and
the
committee
is
recommending.
We
move
to
deleted
from
the
agenda.
H
Thank
you,
madam
vice
president,
the
public
health
environment,
civil
rights
and
engagement
committee
is
bringing
forward
two
items
for
approval.
The
the
first
is
a
slate
of
Minneapolis
Advisory
Committee
on
Aging
appointments
and
item
number.
Two
is
also
a
group
of
transgender
equity
Council
appointments.
I,
really
recommend
for
my
colleagues
to
check
out
the
rca's.
H
There
are
short
blurbs
about
each
one
of
the
applicants
and
the
appointees
we
are
very
blessed
to
have
folks
with
such
experience
and
knowledge
and
expertise,
volunteering
their
time
to
help
advise
us
as
an
elected
body,
so
recommend
folks
check
that
out.
We
also
had
a
presentation
from
the
office
of
violence
prevention,
with
an
update
about
the
strategic
planning
process
that
they're
in
right
now
with
a
timeline
and
just
kind
of
discussing
where
they've
been
what
they're
doing
so.
A
K
You
vice
president
Jenkins,
the
public
safety
and
emergency
management
committee
is
bringing
forward
five
items
for
consideration.
The
first
is
the
reappointment
of
Barrett
lean
is
director
of
emergency
management.
Second,
is
our
contract
with
the
University
of
Minnesota
for
bomb
detection
at
TCF
stadium?
K
The
third
is
a
contract
with
the
BCA
for
participation
in
the
state's
human
trafficking
task
force.
The
fourth
item
is
another
sorry,
both
three
and
four.
Our
contracts
related
to
the
human
trafficking
task
force
and
item
number.
Five
is
training
reimbursement
from
the
Minnesota
Board
of
firefighter
training
and
education.
I'm
happy
to
stand
for
questions.
A
I
You,
madam
vice
president,
the
community
14
15
items
for
consideration.
Item
1,
&
2,
our
street
resurfacing
projects
in
the
city.
Three
is
the
2020
Minneapolis
open
streets
list
of
routes.
Item
4
is
the
highway
252
I-94
min
pass
expansion
project.
We
continue
to
have
further
refinement
of
the
language
that
will
come
before.
Council
five
is
the
contract
with
employee
strategies
for
training
and
Public
Works
Department
six
is
also
a
contract
with
Park
Marble.
I
A
mobile
payment
application
for
on
street
parking
7
is
a
grant
application
for
the
2020
metropolitan
council
regional
solicitation
for
federal
transportation
funds.
8
is
request
for
proposals
for
upper
harbour
terminal
redevelopment
project
planning,
engineering
services
for
Street
and
public
utility
infrastructure.
I
9
is
the
Industrial
Boulevard
multi-use
trail
appropriation
increase
10
is
the
president's
bicycle
boulevard
layout
approval
some
improvements
there
in
the
final
items
11
through
14
are
all
bids
for
activities
of
the
department,
and
the
final
was
the
report
from
the
Americans
with
Disability
Act
transition
plan
for
Public
Works,
which
generated
a
lot
of
interest
and
discussion
at
committee.
I'll
stand
for
questions,
madam
vice
president
Thank.
A
L
You
thank
you,
madam
vice
president.
Means
Committee
brings
19
items
for
approval
on
Friday
item
number.
One
is
a
Civil
Service
Commission
appointment.
Item
number
two:
is
the
reappointment
of
the
City
Assessor
item
number
three
and
for
legal
sediments
item
items
number
five
to
thirteen
our
contract
amendments
with
regards
to
the
public
service
building
project
item
number:
fourteen
is
a
bid
for
custom
vinyl
artwork
for
the
public
service
building
project.
Item
number
15
is
a
contract
amendment
with
ap
Midwest
LLC
for
the
east
side,
storage
and
maintenance
facility
item
number.
L
Sixteen
is
a
bid
for
roof
depot
hazardous
materials
abatement
project
item
number
17
is
a
Capitol
long-range,
Improvement,
Committee
or
click
appointments.
Item
number
18
is
a
2021
to
2026
capital
budget
process
and
met
that
bond
resource
levels
and
the
final
item
item
number
19
is
the
downtown
traffic
control
services,
funding
for
2020
to
2022
and
I'm
happy
to
stand
for
any
questions.
Thank.
A
D
You,
madam
chair,
the
zoning
and
planning
committee
will
bring
forward
five
items
for
approval
on
Friday.
The
first
is
the
appointment
of
three
new
commissioners.
The
City
Planning
Commission
also
just
encourage
my
colleagues
to
take
a
look.
We
were
really
lucky
to
have
some
really
qualified
people
they'll
be
joining
us
on
the
Planning.
Commission
second,
is
the
approval
of
a
vacay
of
a
vacation
at
one
to
five
first
Street
north.
The
third
is
a
approval
of
a
Street
vacation
at
907,
Sibley
Street
northeast.