►
From YouTube: February 4, 2020 Transportation & Public Works Committee
Description
Minneapolis Transportation & Public Works Committee Meeting
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
I'll
call
this
meeting
to
order
it's
the
regular
scheduled
meeting
of
the
Transportation
and
Public
Works
Committee
of
this
day,
February
4th
2020
I'm
council
member
Ike,
I
chair
the
committee
and
I'm
joined
by
my
colleagues,
councilmembers
Johnson,
Palmisano,
bender,
Fletcher
and
Gordon
we're
a
full
complement
and
we'll
proceed
with
today's
agenda,
which
we
have
six
printed
items
and
we'll
have
an
additional
lock-on
resolution.
I
will
go
through
the
consent
items
if
that
is
okay
with
the
committee
and
go
through
the
resolution
prior
to
the
public
hearings.
A
Given
the
importance
of
that
resolution
and
some
of
the
statements
there
are
in
the
first
item
on
consent
is
the
contract
amendment
with
global
specialty
contractors
incorporated
for
P
V
Plaza
construction
project,
for
is
the
contract
amendment
with
Swanson
and
young
Dale
incorporated
for
cleaning
coding
and
thickener
tanks
at
the
dewatering
plant
v
is
the
joint
powers
agreement
with
the
city
of
Columbia
Heights
for
the
37th
Avenue
Northeast
street
resurfacing
project
and
six
is
the
bid
for
the
Hennepin
Avenue
downtown
roadway,
streetscape
reconstruction
project,
I'll
move
all
items.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
the
consent?
A
A
It's
moved
and
seconded
any
further
discussion,
all
in
favor
of
the
resolution,
as
stated
say:
aye
dissenting
name
any
comments
from
committee.
I
will
just
say
that
the
implications
of
these
broad
statements
do
have
direct
implication
in
projects
both
contemplated
soon
to
be
implemented
and
soon
to
be
designed,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
this
lens
is
before
I.
Send
all
those
actions
and
all
those
contemplations
I
know
folks
have
been
working
on
the
very
groups
that
have
sponsored
this
and
very
specific
projects
throughout
our
community
I
see
the
council
president
has
the
floor.
A
B
You
mr.
chair
really
I'm
just
wanted
to
speak,
really,
echoing
what
you
have
said,
I
think
our
new
transportation
action
plan,
which
will
be
coming
out
in
draft
form-
you
know
in
a
couple
of
months
or
so
will
help
really
articulate
our
city's
vision
for
transit,
equity
and
transportation
equity
generally,
in
a
new
way,
of
course,
seeking
comment
from
community
about
ways
we
might
be
able
to
even
strengthen
what
what
will
be
in
that
draft.
B
We've
taken
a
strong
position
as
a
city
on
a
couple
of
important
projects
recently
and
you
know,
are
fighting
for
funding
for
projects
like
the
d-line
bus,
rapid
transit
project.
It's
one
of
our
very
highest
priorities
on
our
legislative
agenda.
We
are
engaging
with
the
252
94
conversation
really
making
sure
that
our
in
North
Minneapolis,
the
mistakes
of
the
past
in
freeway
expansion
through
communities
are
not
repeated
and
really
strongly
advocating
for
transit
there.
C
Appreciate
this
I
guess,
I
was
expecting
something
a
little
bit
different,
based
on
some
of
the
communications
that
I
got
recently
from
some
groups
who
seem
very
concerned
about
what's
happening
with
I-94
and
the
lack
of
planning
that
a
dedicated
bus
lane,
or
at
least
an
HOV
Lane
of
some
kind
like
we're.
Trying
like
we're
doing
down,
35,
isn't
going
in
there
and
I
think
when
we
start
looking
at
freeway
reconstructions,
we
really
have
some
opportunities
to
really
make
a
big
difference.
C
I'm,
actually
very
appreciative
of
the
council
for
supporting
the
comp
plan
policy
that
actually
talks
about
kind
of
recovering
from
the
damage
that
was
done
to
us
as
a
city
by
the
freeway
system.
And
actually,
if
you
look
at
where
the
freeways
were
built,
they
cut
through
and
tore
out
housing
in
some
of
the
poorest
most
diverse
areas
of
our
city,
and
this
includes
a
94
up
through
North
Minneapolis
that
basically
severed
the
community
from
the
river
and
did
long
lasting
harm
to
ours
to
our
to
our
city
in
general.
C
So
I
hope
we
can
be
thinking
about
that
history
and
how
we
can
repair
and
heal
from
some
of
the
damage
as
we're
moving
forward,
I,
of
course,
and
make
no
effort
to
hide
my
desire
to
put
some
lids
on
some
of
those
freeways
and
reconnect
some
of
those
neighborhoods.
But
I
also
think
we
should
look
at
it
when
we're
actually
building
on
them.
If
we
really
are
serious
about
climate
change
as
well
as
equity,
we
need
to
make
sure
that
mass
transit
is
a
piece
of
those
projects
going
forward.
D
D
They
were
asking
questions
about
some
polluting
businesses
along
the
river
and
and
trying
to
understand
what
was
contributing
to
the
air
quality
in
their
neighborhood,
and
one
of
the
answers
that
they
got
was
that
it
was
actually
very
tough
to
give
an
answer
on
that,
because
it
was
very
hard
to
disaggregate
the
pollution
from
94
with
the
pollution
from
some
of
the
industrial
polluters,
and
so
recognizing
that
we
have
a
we've
clearly
identified
an
issue
that
we
we
have
higher
rates
of
asthma.
We
have
higher
rates
of
other
health
problems
related
to
air
quality.
A
Thank
you
for
those
comments
and
obviously
resonates
very
deeply
with
me.
We
share
those
boundaries
and-
and
it
definitely
is
an
exaggerated-
enable
and
needs
to
be
addressed
with
certain
urgency,
the
additional
language
that
would
be
a
specific.
This
is
a
general
broad
compass
for
how
we
want
to
act
and
prioritize.
Those
specific
work
is
ongoing.
A
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we
nail
it
down
correctly
and
every
document
that
we
forward
every
statement
we
make
should
be
contextualized
with
the
overall
comprehensive
goals
and
priorities
to
make
sure
that
a
standalone
state
is
has
a
companion
of
statements
and
actions
that
will
have
the
ultimate
impact
for
all
our
communities
in
the
city.
Moving
forward
and
they're
very
committed
of
that
work
and
I
know,
staff
is
very
committed
to
that
work
as
well.
I,
don't
know
if
director
Hutchinson
wanted
to
make
any
closing
comments.
E
You
mr.
chair
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
to
this
I
believe
this
is
a
really
important
recognition
that
we
tie
together
both
equity
and
climate
and
see
transit
as
a
solution
that
solves
for
both
long-standing
issues
that
we
see
in
our
community.
My
staff,
my
team,
has
been
working
very
hard
very
closely
with
teams
at
both
MnDOT
and
really
all
of
our
partners
to
be
forthright
about
the
city's
position
on
no
addition
of
lanes
and
no
freeway
expansion.
E
You
will
see
that
in
all
of
our
work,
whether
it's
the
transportation
action
plan
which
will
set
very
lofty
goals
for
modes
mode
shift
or
our
assistance
with
any
resolution
that
the
council
would
like
to
take
up
so
strong
statements
can
be
anticipated
from
Public
Works
and
we're
very
happy
to
support
you,
the
council
and
the
community
and
recognizing
transit
equity
day.
Thank.
A
You
well
I
think
we
all
look
forward
to
that
work
and
again
thank
the
people
who
are
here
today,
who
highlighted
this
I
think
it's
important
because
it
not
only
clarifies
but
it
gives
direction
but
I
think
more
importantly,
it's
motivating
and
it
deeply
appreciate
that
partnership
in
the
community
and
I
think
my
colleagues
spoke
very
well
in
terms
of
our
intentions
moving
forward.
So
with
that
we
have
this
resolution.
It's
been
approved.
A
I
really
appreciate
the
discussion
by
the
committee
and
we
wouldn't
have
had
it
if
it
wasn't
brought
forward
by
the
people
are
here
today
from
the
advocacy
world
and
the
communities
themselves.
So
with
that,
we
can
now
move
to
public
hearing
number
one,
which
is
the
four
streets
street
resurfacing:
project
approval
and
assessment
director
hutchinson.
Mr.
E
Chair
members
of
the
committee,
Mike
Kennedy,
director
of
transportation
maintenance
repair,
will
present
on
both
public
hearings.
I
will
introduce
him
once
and
allow
him
to
do
both
presentations,
the
first
of
which
is
the
4th
Street
southeast
street
resurfacing
project,
approval
and
assessment.
Thank.
F
Morning
mr.
chair
members
of
the
committee,
again
Mike
Kennedy
I'm,
the
director
of
transportation
maintenance
repair
for
Public
Works,
we're
here
following
the
designation
on
December
13th
of
the
2020
street
resurfacing
program
to
talk
about
two
projects
within
that
program.
The
first
one
that
we'll
talk
about
is
called
the
4th
Street
southeast
street
resurfacing
project
it
is
made
up
of
two
segments
of
the
first
is
4th
Street
southeast
from
malcolm
avenue,
to
Bedford,
and
then
Bedford
Street
southeast
from
4th
Street
to
University
Avenue.
F
As
shown
on
the
diagram
on
your
monitor
there,
these
streets
were
reconstructed
in
1979
and
they
have
PCI
range
of
46
to
49.
The
proposed
Street
resurfaced
of
special
assessments
were
determined
by
applying
the
2020
uniform
assessment
rates
to
land
area
of
benefited
parcels
located
within
the
street
influence
zone
along
those
improved
streets.
These
assessments
were
not
calculated
based
on
project
cost
alone.
The
city
uses
a
formula
that
combines
influenced
area
with
an
annual
list
annually
established
Universal
assessment
rate.
F
The
formula
is
carefully
considered
and
applied
by
city
staff
and
is
intended
to
account
for
and
reflect
for,
the
project's
value
to
benefited
properties.
The
2020
rates
are
66
cents
per
square
foot
for
non
residential
properties
and
22
cents
per
square
foot
for
residential.
The
proposed
total
assessment
amount
for
the
4th
street
resurfacing
project
is
143
thousand
three
hundred
eighty
seven
dollars
and
81
cents.
There
was
a
pre
public
hearing
meeting
held
on
Thursday
January
29th.
There
were
no
attendees
at
that
meeting.
F
It's
a
fairly
small
project,
so
our
recommendation
today
is
passage
of
a
resolution
ordering
the
work
to
proceed
in
adopting
special
assessments
in
the
amount
of
that
was
mentioned
before
for
the
4th
Street
project
and
passage
of
a
resolution
requesting
board
of
us
that
mitten
taxation
to
authorize
the
city's
issuance
and
sale
of
assessment
bonds
in
the
amount
of
one
hundred
forty
three
thousand
three
hundred
eighty
five
dollars
for
the
project.
That's
my
presentation.
My
can
stand
ready
and
we
have
other
folks
here
from
Public
Works.
That
can
answer
questions
if
needed.
Thank.
A
You
any
questions
privileged
staff
presentation,
seeing
none
I
will
open
the
public
hearing.
Anyone
signed
in
no
one
signed
in
anyone
wish
to
come
forward
and
make
comment.
Anyone
wish
to
come
forward.
Seeing
no
one
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
move
item
one
as
described
in
the
presentation.
I
knew
further
discussion,
see
none
all
in
favor,
say
aye
dissenting
name
that
carries
and
we
can
now
go
to
item
two
as
presented
by
director
Kennedy
Thank.
F
You
mr.
chair,
this
is
the
second
project
we'll
be
talking
about
today
from
the
2020
resurfacing
program.
This
is
the
doorman
South
residential
street
resurfacing
project,
as
you
can
see
on
the
map
here,
which
is
in
this
same
program.
The
Durham
and
South
is
bounded,
as
you
can
see,
and
the
streets
included
in
the
project
are
on
the
math.
That's
shown
the
streets
are
local
city
streets,
commonly
called
residential
sturdy
streets
for
the
most
part
and
reconstructed
in
1980,
and
have
a
current
pavement
condition.
F
Again,
the
proposed
street
resurfacing.
Special
assessments
were
determined
by
applying
the
2020
uniform
assessments
rate
to
the
land
area
of
benefit
of
properties
and
parcels
located
on
the
street
influence
zone
and
the
improved
streets.
The
same
rates
as
mentioned
earlier
66
cents
per
square
foot
and
22
cents
per
square
foot
were
used
in
the
calculations.
The
proposed
total
assessment
amount
for
the
Dorman
South
residential
street
resurfacing
project
is
745
thousand
four
hundred
and
twenty
three
dollars
and
forty
seven
cents.
Again.
There
was
a
pre
public
hearing
community
meeting
held
on
Thursday
January
30th.
F
There
were
21
attendees
at
this.
This
is
a
fairly
large,
much
larger
project.
We
do
have
a
lot
of
interest
and
therefore
our
recommended
recommendation
today
is
passage
of
resolution
or
during
the
work
to
proceed
in
adopting
special
assessments
in
the
Amano
that
have
been
mentioned
before,
for
this
project
and
passage
of
resolution,
requesting
the
board
of
estimate
and
Taxation
authorized
to
cease
issuance
and
sale
of
assessment
bonds
in
the
amount
of
seven
hundred
forty
five
thousand
four
hundred
twenty
dollars
for
this
project
again,.
A
C
So
when
that
was
resurfaced,
everyone
was
assessed
for
that,
but
because
of
the
size
of
the
Lots
or
the
way
the
city
was
developed
and
the
back,
they
also
have
a
street
which
is
doormen
and
so
they're
assessed
again
in
my
history
here.
I,
don't
think
we've
ever
made
accommodations
for
that.
But
I'm
just
wondering.
C
Do
we
account
for
that
when
we're
doing
our
uniform
assessments,
because
in
a
sense,
we're
thinking
when
we
pay
to
get
the
street
in
front
of
our
house
fixed
other
people
are
paying
to
get
it
in
front
of
theirs
and
we're
all
sharing
that
benefit.
But
now
we
have
a
couple
people,
maybe
who
are
feel
like
they
might
be
getting
none
I,
don't
know
hit
twice.
So
maybe
you
could
just
talk
about
that
a
little
bit
before
we
hear
from
folks
thanks.
F
Mr.
chair
council,
member
Gordon,
yes
I'd,
be
happy
to
talk
about
that
and
I.
Think
many
of
you
are
aware
that
there
are
have
been
some
letters
of
objection
filed
by
folks
along
the
West
River
Parkway,
with
those
exact
questions
and
I
think
we
can
answer
answer
all
those
letters
with
at
one
time
here,
I
put
on
the
overhead
a
map
graphic,
showing
the
assessment
areas
based
upon
the
uniform
assessment
rate
process
that
we
use
for
the
entire
project.
F
If
you
look
along
here,
the
Westerville
Road
West,
River
Parkway
is
here
and
then
Dorman
Avenue
is
here.
Most
of
the
properties
we
have
I
do
have
a
unique
situation
that
most
of
the
properties
along
that
stretch
do
about
boast.
The
West,
River,
Parkway
and
doormen,
and
the
the
properties
exist
all
the
way
across
that,
and
so
you
don't
have
that
typical
situation
that
we
have
where
we
calculate
the
influence
area
of
a
typical
block
with
an
alley
between
the
streets.
F
When
the
as
you
can
see
on
the
drawing
there,
the
influence
area
only
covers
half
of
those
properties,
so
they
were
not
assessed
based
upon
the
entire
parcel
size.
But
upon
the
amount
of
area
that
was
within
the
influence
area
for
this
project
for
the
doorman
for
doormen
Street,
the
same
thing
happened.
When
they
were
assessed
for
the
West
River
Parkway
project,
they
were
only
assessed
a
certain
portion
of
their
property.
It
happened
that
we
used
the
same
resurfacing
rate
back.
Then
it
was
21
cents.
F
A
square
foot
now
is
22
cents,
a
square
foot,
so
it's
virtually
identical,
but
the
idea
is,
they
didn't
get
double
assessed
or
double
taxed.
They
did
get
kind
of
a
stacked
tax
or
assessment
because
it
happened
within
you
know
a
few
years,
so
there's
gonna
see
those
assessments
on
their
property
taxes
unless
they
paid
them
off.
But,
yes,
they
were
assessed
two
times,
but
only
for
the
appropriate
area
of
the
influence
area
for
each
individual
project.
I.
C
D
I'll
just
note
that
this
is
consistent
with
how
we've
done
this
in
other
places
and
if
we
are
going
to
open
this
can
of
worms
and
start
making
accommodations
I
have
some
building
owners
between
Hennepin
and
Nicolette.
Who
would
like
to
have
a
conversation
and
I?
Don't
think
that
we
want
to
open
that.
A
Noted
any
further
questions
for
the
staff
for
the
presentation.
Seeing
none
I
will
then
open
the
public
hearing.
I
do
have
people
signed
in
I
will
go
through
that
list.
Anyone
else
can
sign
in
subsequently
for
the
public
hearing.
So
at
the
top
of
list
we
have
Joshua
Howe
deck.
Please
come
forward
and
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
G
G
Moved
to
the
area
in
October
of
20
2015,
so
I
started
2005,
so
I've
been
there
about
15
years,
neighbors
have
been
talking
about
the
intersection
of
38th
Avenue,
South
and
28th
Street
East,
which
is
at
the
entrance
to
Brackett
Park.
It's
all
now
also
an
entrance
to
the
Midtown
Greenway.
A
few
years
ago,
the
Minneapolis
Park
and
Recreation
Board.
We
did
it.
The
mullet
is
now
a
multi-use
path
entrance
from
the
park
to
this
intersection.
G
This
three-way
stop
sign
controlled
intersection,
but
the
neighbors
have
been
asking
for
improvements
and
to
this
intersection
daily
in
this
summer.
When
there's
league
play
on
the
on
the
on
the
ball
fields,
it
gets
all
parked
up
all
the
way
up
to
the
stop
signs.
Public
Works
has
been
great
about
improving
the
stop
signs
and
putting
the
do
not
park
up
to
30
feet
and
finally,
last
year
they
put
bollard
protected,
curb
bump
outs,
temporary
ones.
G
Here,
and
here
this
schematic
was
put
together
by
neighbors.
There's
been
two
documented
crashes
there,
between
pedestrians,
bicyclists
and
and
drivers
sight
lines
are
our
problem
and
then
also
complaints
with
the
stop
signs.
We're
asking
the
Longfellow
community
council
has
weighed
in
and
I
can
share
all
this
with
you.
This
isn't
back
in
2016.
G
Here
are
emails
dating
back
to
2011,
which
I'll
share
with
you
and
at
at
national
night
outs
over
the
years
I
have
over
40
signatures
of
neighbors
asking
for
improvements.
They
ask
here
is
simply
to
make
those
bump-outs
curbs,
because
the
threat
is
not
going
away.
Despite
the
argument
that
we
don't
know
the
exact
alignment
of
the
38th
Street
Greenway,
which
I
don't
we
can
see
that
you
can.
But
this
is
your
map.
G
This
is
the
city
of
Minneapolis
and
Minneapolis
Public
Schools,
or
they
call
it
walking
routes
for
youth,
and
so
I'll
supply
this
with
you.
But
it
is
a
here's
that
intersection
that
red
dot.
You
know
it
is
also
on
the
Public
Schools
map
for
for
children
trying
to
get
to
the
various
schools
in
the
area,
so
they
ask
here
is
spend
a
few
few
few
cents
on
permanent
curbs
at
that
intersection.
Thank
you.
A
H
H
It
has,
however,
taken
a
year
and
two
months
and
its
worst
when
the
two
engines
are
running
now
and
truly
I
am
about
15
to
20
feet
from
the
exhaust
their
there.
This
year,
they
put
in
brand
a
brand
new
thing
that
doesn't
create
as
much
exhaust.
It's
a
lovely
new
system
that
they
put
in.
However,
it
goes
24/7
and
it
must
because
they're
pumping
water
out
of
the
tunnel
underneath
so
they
can
operate.
H
So
that's
just
kind
of
the
background
of
what
I
have
been
putting
up
with
cuz
the
exhaust
is
really
not
healthy
or
happy,
and
yes
in
the
summertime,
they
don't
have
to
run
the
pumps
because,
but
but
they
had
to
quit
last
year
at
the
end
of
February,
because
there
was
so
much
water,
so
they're
back
again
this
year
there
was
supposed
to
be
done
June
of
last
year.
So
this
is
an
ongoing
project.
I
have
a
great
respect
for
the
project.
H
The
process
and
I
also
respect
the
four
of
us
who
live
on
the
corner
of
said.
I
live
in
the
oldest
house
in
the
neighborhood
I'm
literally.
The
street
is
just
like
right
in
front
of
my
house
and
beside
that
house.
Was
there
long
before
I
think
was
built
in
1888
1892
and
I've
lived
there
for
42
years,
so
I'm
pretty
familiar
with
the
whole
place,
and
now,
with
this
street
resurfacing,
that's
happening.
I'm
very
concerned
the
timing
of
these
two
events.
I
know.
H
Last
year
we
didn't
go
until
June
and
the
project
was
done
that
I
have
no
idea
when
they
think
they
can
be
done
this
year,
because
it
is
totally
weather.
Dependent
I
have
a
great
concern
that
this
resurfacing
project
is
going
to
impact
if
they
come
and
they
resurface.
They
clearly
can't
resurface
until
the
storm
drain
process
is
completely
done
and
the
excavation
has
had
time
to
settle,
or
else
we'll
just
have
another
sinkhole
there
in
no
time
at
all.
So
I
really
would
really
want
reassurance.
All
of
our
neighbors.
H
H
Seven
hundred
five
dollars
and
sixty
six
cents
to
me
is
a
tremendous
amount
of
money
and,
given
the
just
I
can't
even
tell
you
inconvenience
of
having
that
storm
drain
project,
is
there
I
mean
I,
don't
even
have
a
parking
space
in
the
front,
because
I've
got
14
trucks
and
cars
parked
there
every
day
from
6:30
in
the
morning,
till
4:30
at
night
or
seven
depending
on
when
they
can
quit
I,
don't
mind
that
we
can
deal
with
that.
I
have
very
it's
very
difficult
for
me
to
back.
Out
of
my
the
whole
side.
H
Street
is
completely
torn
up
and
closed
off.
I
haven't
seen
my
neighbors
unless
I
go
up
to
the
second
floor
and
look
out,
I
haven't
seen
my
neighbor's
house
for
a
year
and
two
months,
because
it's
this
huge
thing
is
blocked
off.
It's
very,
very,
very,
very
inconvenient.
My
neighbors
can't
turn
around
the
corner.
There's
no
access
there.
So
my
own
personal
request
is
that,
because
of
the
extraordinary
inconvenience
that
this
has
been,
that
certainly
for
myself
and
also
for
my
other
three
corner,
neighbors
receive
a
reduction
in
the
assessment
for
the
resurfacing
project.
H
A
A
I
I
have
lived
in
this
neighborhood
right
about
here
for
the
past
30
some
years,
I
won't
waste
a
lot
of
your
time.
What
I
will
say
is
these
streets
are
actually
pretty
okay
in
our
neighborhoods
I
Drive
these
every
day
and
I
think
there
are
better
places
to
spend
money
patching
and
resurfacing
than
here
right
now.
I
Certainly
if
you're
living
next
to
a
diesel
generator,
you
don't
want
to
have
to
pay
$1700
for
the
privilege,
so
wait
until
the
streets
have
some
potholes
in
it
and
come
home
as
the
rescuing
heroes
fixing
those
horrible
potholes
that
everyone's
gotten
annoyed
with
we're.
Not
there
right
now
the
streets
are
pretty
good.
I
would
say
just
do
patch
and
fix
up
and
give
it
a
few
years.
So.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
your
comments.
Anyone
else
wish
to
come
forward.
Anyone
signed
in
and
one
wish
to
come
forward.
Seen
no
one
coming
forward.
I
will
close
the
public
hearing
and
may
be
asked
to
have
to
comment
on
some
of
the
statements
made.
I
think
it's
the
curb
situation,
as
described
by
mr.
Hoek,
and
then
the
lady
of
course
wanted
to
know
about
the
relationship
between
the
storm
drain
project
and
the
proposed
project
for
resurfacing
and
in
the
final
comment.
Why
here?
Why
now?
Why
don't
we
wait
for
the
potholes
to
appear.
F
Mr.
chair
No
take
these
not
quite
in
that
order,
but
regarding
the
sewer
project
and
that
work
that's
happening.
That
is
a
met
council
deep
tunnel
project.
That's
not
a
city's
project
or
our
project
managers
are
very
much
aware
of.
What's
going
on
want
to
have
that
done,
they
will
not
do
the
resurfacing
until
that
project
is
completed.
Full
disclosure-
it's
gonna,
get
real
busy
again
in
that
neighborhood
this
year,
because
there's
also
going
to
be
a
lot
of
Centrepointe
energy
inside
meter.
F
Moves
it's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
holes
cut
in
the
street
and
Sprint
has
something
too.
So
it's
going
to
get
probably
maybe
worse
before
it
gets
better,
but
the
idea
is
we're
watching
all
of
it
and
and
the
resurfacing
will
be
the
the
finishing
touch
to
recap
all
the
streets
and
make
them
look
real
good
once
we're
all
done.
So
the
the
last
question
about
the
the
condition
the
the
pavement
condition
index,
as
I
mentioned
in
my
presentation
for
this
section
Street-
is
in
the
high
40s.
F
That's
it
in
a
condition
that
we
typically
like
to
do
these
types
of
projects.
It's
just
the
right
time
to
catch
it
before
we
hit
the
slippery
slope
and
the
condition
drops
out
very
very
fast.
If
we
wait
for
a
years
for
a
few
years,
it
may
get
to
a
point
where
we
can't
do
it
with
a
simple
resurfacing.
We
would
have
may
have
to
do
it
with
a
very
much
heavier
renovation
or
full
reconstruction
project
which
is
double
and
quadruple
the
cost
of
the
assessments.
So
we're
right
in
line
now
to
do
that.
F
Sometimes
yes,
it
doesn't
appear
to
the
public
that
it
may
not
be
in
that
bad
of
shape,
but
actually
that's
the
best
time
to
resurface
this
before
you
know
it
it's
gone.
We
do
have
enough
of
our.
We
do
have
to
do
enough
patching.
We
look
at
that
condition
on
the
average
for
the
whole
whole
residential
project
or
the
whole
project.
So
it's
kind
of
an
aggregated
thing,
so
someone
might
look
at
their
street
think
it's
not
that
bad,
but
there
are
other
streets
that
might
be
worse.
F
So
that's
kind
of
an
average
on
the
question
at
28,
the
on
the
corner
there
at
bracket,
Park
I'm,
actually
going
to
let
Jenny
Hager
the
director
of
transportation
planning
a
program
address
that
I'm
not
aware
fully
of
that
project.
But
I
do
know
that,
as
I
mentioned
in
my
presentation
that
we're
going
to
restore
what's
there
at
least
so
Jenny.
J
Morning,
mr.
chair
council,
members,
jennifer
hagar,
director
of
transportation,
planning
and
programming,
thank
you
for
the
question.
We
are
aware
of
the
concerns
at
bracket
park
and
at
particular
intersection.
The
current
recommendation
is
you
heard
what
the
presentation
was
to
reinstall
the
existing
pedestrian
safety
measure
at
that
intersection?
As
you
know,
what
the
resurfacing
project
the
scope
of
work,
is
to
take
off
the
existing
pavement
and
not
move
curb
lines.
So
that
is
the
reason
for
that
existing
recommendation
for
the
for
the
project.
A
That's
that's
good
to
hear
I
mean
with
the
Youth
connection
component
that
was
highlighted.
I
think
we
are.
We
should
be
motivated
to
find
maybe
even
additional
resources,
there's
different
funding
for
that
very
purpose
that
we
could
potentially
also
explore
as
an
add-on
component
to
the
resurfacing
project.
It's.
A
C
C
C
How
do
we
make
sense?
Out
of
that
I
mean?
Is
there
really
something?
Oh
we're
tearing
up
part
of
the
street
already
we're
gonna
attracts
out
there
and
people
working
on
it.
Maybe
there
is
an
efficiency
if
we
were
to
make
an
improvement
now
or
maybe
there
isn't.
So
we
need
to
think
about
that
and
if
it's
gonna
cost
more
money,
we
have
to
think
about.
How
do
we
have
some
resources
to
make
this
improvement
because
we
think
it's
going
to
be
beneficial.
So
that's
a
bigger
discussion,
but
it's
really
highlighted
each
time.
C
A
resurfacing
comes
along
in
my
ward,
because
people
say
hey
how
about
this
and
that
we
need
this.
So
let's
keep
that
in
mind
as
we
work
on
that.
The
other
thing
that
I
wanted
to
mention
was
right
near
the
sewer
work.
I
believe
that
that
house
is
actually
bordered.
It's
a
trying,
it's
on
a
very
tiny
little
block
and
I,
don't
know
if
this
is
your
house
or
your
next
door,
but
with
streets
on
three
sides
of
it.
It's
almost
like
a
little
piece
of
road.
C
We
don't
really
need
where
the
sewer
work
is
because
if
you're
there
you
would,
you
would
see.
Oh,
oh,
it's
a
kinda
like
a
cut
through
that
got
put
in
just
to
finish
the
grid,
but
really
it
with
the
way
it
works
there.
It's
a
little
bit
strange
I'd
like
to
say,
let's
just
take
it
out
and
put
in
green
space,
but
that
really
wasn't
that
wasn't
one
to
focus
on
I
just
wanted
to
ask:
is
there
some
assistance?
C
We're
going
to
give
you
some
kind
of
I
mean,
but
could
somebody
speak
about
maybe
options
that
the
property
owner
could
pursue
that
might
help
pay
for
this
cost
or
reduce
it?
Potentially.
Mr.
F
F
C
A
You
Thank
You
councilman
Ryan
with
Miss
Beatty.
Here,
perhaps
staff
can
just
address
her
not
only
for
her
use,
but
given
that
she's
in
communication
with
their
other
neighbors,
that
might
be
a
nice
way
to
extend
that
information
even
deeper
in
the
community.
So
she's
right,
there
I
think
there's
a
commitment
to
work
with
her
they'll
work
with
you
directly.
A
Yeah
they
will
go
through
all
the
different
offerings,
including
deferment
and,
and
the
other
thing
that
you
mentioned
so
with
that
and
I.
Think
councilmember
Gordon
did
raise
an
interesting
thing
for
us
to
contemplate
in
terms
of
having
perhaps
some
additional
opportunity,
funds
that
are,
above
and
beyond
a
street
resurfacing
project
keeping
those
projects
hold
with
our
formulas
that
are
entailed,
but
also
knowing
that
we
have
things
that
are
not
only
on
the
books
but
actually
are
in
the
community
on
a
temporary
basis.
A
We
permanency
so
I
think
that's
something
we
can
all
over
and
contemplate
and
I
think
that's
something
we've
done
in
the
past,
depending
on
the
context
of
the
situation
or,
if
there's
additional
funding
that
I'd
referenced
earlier,
like
safe
routes
to
schools,
etc.
That
could
be
coordinated
effectively
to
that
end.
So
with
that,
we
have
the
item
before
us
any
further
discussion,
seeing
none
all
in
favor,
say
aye
dissent,
a
name
that
carries
and
we
have
completed
today's
agenda.
Thank
you.