►
From YouTube: November 5, 2020 Public Health & Safety
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Present
you,
madam
clerk.
I
know
that
councilmember
ellison
is
not
feeling
well
today,
so
sending
him
well
wishes.
Colleagues,
we
have
10
items
on
today's
agenda.
If
there's
no
objection,
I'm
going
to
take
this
the
agenda
slightly
out
of
order,
and
we
will
begin
with
the
last
item
on
the
agenda,
which
is
item
number
10,
our
monthly
update
from
the
health
department
on
covid19
I'll
invite
our
health
commissioner
gretchen
musicant.
To
give
that
report.
Welcome,
commissioner,.
C
Thank
you,
councilmember
cunningham.
I
hope
that
my
there,
I
am
there's
my
slide,
so
I'm
going
to
give
you
an
a
quick
update
about
10
minute
update
since
our
last
report
to
you,
which
was
a
month
ago,
and
so
if
I
report
changes
unless
I
say
otherwise,
it's
a
change
from
my
last
report
a
month
ago.
C
So
to
date
we
have
over
14
000,
confirmed
cases
in
minneapolis,
which
is
a
28
percent
increase
over
last
month,
and
we
have
seen
really
a
growth.
Even
within
the
last
month,
two-thirds
of
those
cases
were
diagnosed
after
october
15th
and
we're
seeing
this
increase
across
ages,
racial
and
ethnic
groups,
and
it's
due
to
community
spread
with
that
increase
in
cases
also
comes
an
increase
in
hospitalizations
and
the
use
of
icu
within
hospitals
and
that
has
doubled
over
the
last
week.
C
C
So
this
graphic
shows
you.
The
blue
line
is
minneapolis
and
the
orange
line
is
the
state
of
minnesota,
and
recently
we
have
had
a
rate
that
is
not
as
high
as
the
state,
but
you
will
see
that
we
are
now
with
the
state
in
the
red
zone
and
really
only
were
briefly
in
the
red
zone
back
in
the
spring,
and
so
there's
no
curving
of
that
line.
It's
it's
going
straight
up,
and
so
this
is
a
very
concerning
place
to
be.
C
We
hope
to
stay
below
a
five
percent
positivity
rate
the
state
seven
day,
average
is
nine
percent
and
climbing
so
lots
more
testing
going
on,
but
a
lot
more
positive
people
or
people
finding
that
they
are
positive
for
kobe
19
as
well,
and
as
the
numbers
increase
in
our
community
contact
tracing.
While
we're
still
doing
it
is
much
more
challenging
and
less
effective
because
there
are
just
so
many
cases
and
people
don't
always
know
where
they
have
gotten
the
case
from.
C
We
have
dedicated
part
of
our
staff
now
to
following
up
with
contact
tracing
in
higher
risk
settings
in
schools
and
workplaces,
so
that
we
can
be
more
efficient
in
notifying
those
who
might
have
been
exposed
because
of
being
together
with
someone
with
a
case
in
one
of
those
settings.
C
We
are
purchasing
saliva
testing
kits
20,
000
of
them
that
we
will
make
available
in
a
variety
of
scenarios
for
the
next
60
days
and
that's
for
2.1
million
dollars.
C
C
And
here
we
are,
with
the
food
security,
just
wanted
to
tell
you
a
little
bit
more
about
this,
so
we
were
able
to
allocate
970
000
of
cares,
funding
to
37
community
nonprofits
and
they're,
using
that
funding
to
purchase
food
and
hygiene
products,
and
also
food
distribution,
supplies
and
equipment,
and
the
awards
range
from
like
two
thousand
dollar
awards
to
fifty
three
thousand
dollar
awards
paying
for
a
variety
of
of
needs,
and
we
prioritize
organizations
that
are
serving
the
communities
with
most
need,
and
some
of
the
targeted
special
populations
in
addition
to
a
real
attention
to
bypass
communities,
are
those
who
are
serving
folks
who
are
hiv
aids,
positive,
older
adults
and
persons
experiencing
homelessness.
C
C
The
first
phase
will
go
to
hospital
and
long-term
care
facility
staff
and
sort
of
a
phase
one
b,
if
you
will
will
go
to
first
responders
and
and
others
in
that
category
phase
two
will
be
high-risk
populations
such
as
seniors
and
essential
workers,
and
then
phase
three
will
be
availability
for
the
general
public,
and
we
expect
the
first
doses
to
come
in
mid
to
late
december.
The
federal
government
will
determine
how
much
comes
to
minnesota.
C
Next,
please-
and
this
is
a
graph
just
to
kind
of-
let's
be
prepared
for
some
bumps
in
the
road
graphic,
and
so
even
as
we
get
that
first
vaccine,
it's
not
going
to
be
a
lot
of
vaccine
that's
available,
and
so,
even
while
we're
in
phase
one,
we
may
have
a
lag
of
a
few
weeks
to
have
enough
to
finish
phase
one.
But
then,
by
the
time
we
get
to
phase
two,
which
is
the
at-risk
populations.
We
should
be
in
pretty
good
supply
category
supply
territory.
C
C
C
Thank
you,
so
part
of
what
we're
thinking
about
is
is
really
how
do
we
engage
the
community
to
be
ready
for
the
availability
of
vaccines,
so
they'll
take
advantage
of
an
opportunity,
that's
placed
before
them
to
stay
healthy,
and
so
we
have
been
starting
that
by
sharing
information,
gathering,
insights
and
questions
on
vaccine
from
the
community.
C
We've
done
that
a
couple
ways
one
is
to
host
larger
presentations
and
listening
sessions,
even
on
the
radio
and
with
community
groups
and
neighborhoods,
and
we're
following
that
up
with
recruiting
and
training
some
vaccine
community
liaisons
building
on
work.
We
did
earlier
in
the
outbreak
with
our
shared
power
advisory
committee
and
some
of
those
members
will
be
helping
us
as
well
as
some
newly
recruited
folks.
C
Some
of
the
things
that
we've
heard
in
the
in
the
community
have
been
questions
about
the
inter
interaction
of
the
vaccine
with
the
seasonal
flu
shot,
and
we
do
understand
that
there
will
be
some
guidance
about
trying
to
create
a
space
of
time
between
when
you
get
a
flu
shot
and
when
you
get
a
vaccine
for
covid
and
we'll
learn
more
about
that
as
we
go.
Other
questions
had
to
do
with
the
distribution
process
and
the
timing
and
I've
just
shared
with
you.
C
C
So
we
have
been
diligently
working
on
expanding
the
testing
availability
in
our
community
and
with
the
cares
dollars,
we've
been
able
to
have
20
community
testing
events
that
were
led
by
the
health
department.
Two
more
are
planned
before
the
15th
of
november,
one
this
saturday
and
then
one
on
the
14th
of
november.
C
C
Now,
as
winter
comes
we're
evaluating
what
kind
of
indoor
options
there
are
and
the
purchase
of
saliva
tests
was
part
of
our
approach
to
winter,
because
there's
a
number
of
ways
you
can
deliver
it.
That
might
not
require
so
much
intensive
interaction
inside
and
then
we
have
just
heard
that
the
state
is
opening
on
monday,
a
daily
testing
site
at
our
own
convention
center
using
saliva
tests,
and
that
will
operate
seven
days
a
week.
Weekdays
will
be
noon
to
seven
and
week.
C
So
I
just
want
to
share
with
you
some
feedback.
We
got
from
a
a
testing
event.
We
had
at
shiloh
temple
just
to
let
you
glimpse
into
how
people
are
receiving
the
work
that
we're
doing
on
behalf
of
the
city.
It's
your
team
was
a
pleasure
to
work
with.
Also
your
commitment
to
the
health
of
north
minneapolis
communities
is
unwavering
because
of
you.
People
of
color
and
all
those
who
call
minneapolis
home
can
thrive
and
be
healthy
in
this
great
city,
so
that
wonderful
affirmation
of
of
the
work
that
we're
doing
in
the
community.
C
As
we
look
out
into
the
future,
we
are
very
concerned
about
the
ending
of
the
cares
of
funding
and
what
that
means
for
financial
support
for
meeting
the
needs
that
will
be
coming
up
after
november
15th.
C
A
D
Thank
you,
chair
cunningham.
There
was
some
reports
about
shortages
of
beds
and
shortages
of
workers
to
staff
icu
facilities.
D
C
Yes,
thank
you,
council,
member
fletcher
and
chair
cunningham.
C
Yes,
this
is
a
shortage
that
has
just
emerged,
just
as
the
use
of
of
icu
beds
and
hospitalizations
have
increased
just
most
recently,
and
we
have
a
regular
check-in
with
dr
hick
from
hcmc,
who
is
also
in
charge
of
statewide
efforts
to
make.
E
C
Make
sure
hospital
capacity
is
is
sufficient.
I
think
there
it
may
get
to
the
point
where.
C
C
Less
than
urgent
procedures
need
to
be
delayed
so
that
we
can
see
that
staff
are
redirected
from
some
units
and
hospitals
to
other
parts.
I
have
also
the
the
re.
The
metro
region
is
really
good
at
sharing
and
thinking
together
as
a
whole
amongst
the
hospitals,
and
so
we
can
be
really
grateful
for
that.
I
know
with
the
outbreak
across
the
state,
there
has
been
more
interaction
between
hospitals
across
the
state
and
the
metro
area.
C
In
fact,
I
heard
that
there
it
was
necessary
to
move
some
folks
from
the
metro
area
to
regional
centers
in
the
state
just
because
of
that
very
shortage.
So
yes,
we're
reaching
a
point
where
we
need
to
start
using
some
of
the
strategies
that
maybe
were
in
the
planning
book
that
we
had
didn't
have
to
use
yet.
But
it's
it's
very
significant
issue.
Right
now,.
D
Thank
you
and
then
it
felt
like
kind
of
a
news
making
piece
of
information
that
we're
expecting
a
vaccine
in
mid-december
is
how
concrete
is
that?
How
sort
of
well-known
is
that
I
I
hadn't
heard
that
so
I
guess
I'm
curious
about
how
how
solid
that
is
and
how
much
people
can
start
making
plans
around
the
phasing
that
you
described.
C
C
I
think
we'll
probably
have
like
a
three
week
notice
that
okay
now
now
the
that
chart
that
I
showed
you
is
ready
to
begin,
and
so
that's
our
best
guess
right
now
and
we'll
just
wait
for
some
confirmation
to
make
sure
that
the
testing
of
the
vaccine
is
is
all
sound
and
good
and
we're
ready
for
the
phase
of
of
distributing
the
vaccine.
There
is
one
company,
that's
on
a
trajectory
to
reach
this
timeline.
C
A
Thank
you
for
that.
I'm
I'm
curious
as
well
thinking
about
the
vaccine.
Is
it
expected
to
be
available
for
free
or
will
there
be
a
cause
associated
with
it,
or
is
it
way
too
soon
to
be
able
to
know
that
yet.
C
Chair
cutting
ham,
I
feel
like
I
have
an
answer
for
that,
but
I
don't
feel
100
confident
I
I
think
I
believe
I
have
heard
that
the
vaccine
itself
might
be
free,
but
then
there's
all
that
goes
with
it
and
you
know
paying
staff
to
administer
it
and
and
finding
the
funding.
For
that.
That's
what
I
believe
I
know.
A
Yes,
that
part's
not
free,
absolutely,
and
I
and
I
just
had
a
follow-up
question,
because
you
know
I'm
very
concerned
about
us
being
in
the
red
zone
and
and
the
consequences
of
that
so
two
questions
related
to
that.
Are
there
recommendations,
oh,
like
are
the
recommendations
for
us
to
be
able
to
address
this
locally,
and
what
can
we
do
as
elected
officials
and
maybe
the
public
watching?
How
can
we
communicate
with
the
folks
around
us
our
constituents,
our
neighbors
as
to
how
do
we
slow
this
down?.
C
Thank
you
for
that
question.
Chair
cunningham.
I
don't
have
a
list
of
things
that
we
can
do
as
regulators
necessarily
at
the
local
level
that
I
think
will
be
highly
impactful.
There
are
a
few
things
that
we
have
forwarded
up
to
the
state
that
we
think
might
be
have
some
contribution.
C
One
idea
I
heard
was
just
to
think
about
a
finite
amount
of
time,
like
two
weeks
like
let's,
let's
spend
the
next
two
weeks,
really
social
distance,
physical,
distancing
wearing
our
masks,
remembering
to
wash
our
hands,
which
we
kind
of
got
lazy
about.
Maybe.
C
In
the
in
the
interest
of
hospitals
in
the
interest
of
people
in
nursing
homes,
in
the
interest
of
our
kids,
who
want
to
go
back
to
school,
let's,
let's
see
what
an
intensive
two-week
period
would
be,
and
so
maybe
creating
some
kind
of
a
a
challenge
for
for
ourselves
might
be
a
communication
approach.
But
I
think
it
might
also
prove
to
be
somewhat
effective.
A
That's
great,
thank
you
for
that.
Are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
my
colleagues
all
right
saying.
None!
Thank
you
so
much,
commissioner,
for
that
monthly
update
this
it's
been
great
to
be
able
to
create
this
space
for
us
to
dig
into
this
a
little
bit
more.
So
thank
you
for
your
expertise.
Please
pass
the
gratitude
along
to
your
hard-working
staff,
who
are
doing
all
that
they
can
to
make
sure
that
our
city
is
healthy.
So
thank
you.
C
A
You
for
this
opportunity,
of
course,
seeing
no
further
discussion.
I
will
direct
the
clerk
to
file
that
report
with
that.
We
will
proceed
back
to
item
one
on
the
agenda,
which
is
a
public
hearing
on
the
neighborhood's
2020
plan.
We
will
begin
with
a
staff
presentation
which
I
believe
will
be
introduced
by
the
director
of
neighborhood
and
community
relations
david
rubidor,
mr
rubidor,
are
you
on
the
line
and
ready
to
go.
A
G
Cunningham
and
good
afternoon
committee
members,
I'm
david
roberto,
I'm
the
director
of
the
neighborhood
and
community
relations
department
and
with
the
city
of
minneapolis
and
I'm
joined
today
by
steve
gallagher,
who's
our
policy
specialist
at
ncr,
as
well
as
see
terrence
anderson,
who
is
with
the
university
of
minnesota
center
for
urban
and
regional
affairs.
Both
of
them
will
be
joining
me
in
this
presentation
today.
We're
here
to
present
the
final
recommendations
for
the
neighborhoods
2020
program.
G
We're
excited
to
be
bringing
these
to
you,
these
recommendations
to
you
today,
as
they
reflect
a
year's
worth
of
work
that
we
have
been
doing
with
neighborhood
organizations,
community
organizations,
residents,
elected
officials,
city
leadership,
as
well
as
staff
for
the
presentation.
Today,
I'm
going
to
kick
it
off
with
doing
some
context
setting
and
going
through
some
of
the
background
information
is
what's
led
us
to
today.
Mr
anderson
will
be
reviewing
the
work
that
cara
has
completed
and
then,
after
that,
mr
gallagher
will
go
over
the
program
components.
G
I
do
want
to
note
that
mr
anderson
is
participating
via
phone
because
we
had
some
technical
issues
getting
them
connected,
so
apologize
in
advance.
If
there
happens
to
be
any
slight
delay
in
communicating
with
him
next
slide,
so
one
of
the
things
over
the
last
18
months,
this
work
has
been
guided
by
what's
been
called
the
neighborhoods
2020
steering
committee.
This
committee
was
established
by
the
council
back
in
may
of
2019
and
kind
of
refreshing
everybody's
memory.
G
It's
been
18
months,
since
we
really
revisited
this
with
the
or
visited
this
with
the
council.
The
syrian
committee
has
been
guiding
a
lot
of
this
work.
It's
been
chaired
by
council
member
cunningham
and
also
our
city's
budget
director
micah
entermill.
It's
also
had
representation
from
other
council
members,
andrea
council
vice
president
andrea
jenkins,
councilmember
andrew
johnson
city
coordinator,
the
city's
attorney's
office.
The
mayor's
office
has
had
representation.
G
The
committee's
actually
added
a
lot
of
significant
capacity
to
the
development
of
the
guidelines
and
added
a
lot
of
value
into
these
conversations,
and
I
have
to
say
just
on
a
personal
note
that
I
have
found
working
with
this
group
of
people
to
be
very
powerful
and
very
informative,
and
I
want
to
thank
all
the
committee
members
for
their
contribution.
They've
been
working
18
months
on
putting
this
these
recommendations
together.
G
The
steering
committee
also
reflects
a
different
approach.
It's
really
looking
at
our
neighborhood
organizations
and
how
we
as
an
enterprise,
support
them
from
a
broader
citywide
perspective
and
bringing
in
more
disciplines
than
just
the
ncr
department
into
these
conversations
next
slide
before
the
council
today.
G
There's
a
set
of
actions
that
we're
requesting,
the
first
of
which
was
which
has
multiple
components,
is
to
authorize,
recommend
authorization
of
the
neighborhoods
2020
program
guidelines
and
funding
formula
in
that
there's
a
couple
pieces,
the
first
of
which
is
to
extend
the
current
community
participation
program
contracts
for
six
months
to
july.
First
of
2021..
G
The
purpose
behind
this
is
to
really
allow
a
little
bit
more
of
a
smoother
transition.
Give
us
a
little
bit
more
time
and
neighborhoods
more
time
to
get
this
up
and
running
and
also
to
be
able
to
incorporate
the
new
census
data
which
should
be
arriving
sometime
in
april.
G
Second
piece
is
to
authorize
recognition
of
neighborhood
organizations
through
the
end
of
2021.
G
The
new
program
actually
has
kind
of
an
authorization
component
to
it
and
again
to
help
smooth
the
transition
into
the
new
program.
Just
give
the
blanket
trans,
provisional
recognition
of
neighborhoods
organization
recognition
status
through
the
end
of
next
year
to
get
us
and
the
neighborhoods
working
together
on
putting
the
program
into
place.
G
This
isn't
really
a
subnet
substantive
change,
but
it
is
a
clarification
change
for
for
the
program
next
slide
and
the
last
piece
which
I'll
talk
about
more
at
the
end
of
the
presentation,
but
authorizing
the
continuation
of
the
neighborhoods
2020
steering
committee
to
review
the
programmatic
and
legislative
adjustments
to
the
neighborhood
revitalization
program
for
the
purposes
of
achieving
our
equity
goals
and
creating
greater
flexibility
for
neighborhoods
and
again
I'll
talk
about
more
more
about
this.
At
the
end
of
the
presentation.
G
So
the
syrian
committee
is
bringing
this
the
recommendations
forward
into
two
in
two
pieces.
This
is
these
are
some
major
changes
both
with
how
neighborhood
organizations
will
operate,
but
also
even
how
the
city
will
be
supporting
that
work
and
in
order
to
help
kind
of
dissect
this
down
into
kind
of
manageable
pieces
for
discussion.
G
The
steering
committee
is
bringing
this
forward
in
two
pieces,
the
first
of
which
is
what's
before
you
today
for
the
public
health
and
safety
committee.
I'm
really
looking
at
and
reviewing
and
approving
the
program
guidelines,
the
policy
behind
it
and
the
funding
formula.
G
Your
recommendation
today
will
then
be
forwarded
to
the
full
city
council
to
be
discussed
friday
november
13th.
So
a
week
from
tomorrow.
G
I
want
to
make
a
note
to
the
public
that
the
november
12th
meeting
is
not
a
public
hearing.
There's
a
presentation
by
the
department
to
the
budget
committee
and
that
the
budget
city
budget
process
has
multiple
opportunities
for
people
to
be
able
to
comment
and
make
and
participate
in
public
hearings.
G
They,
the
public,
can
find
that
on
the
city's
website,
as
well
as
ncr
will
continue
to
send
out
updates
to
our
neighborhoods
2020
list
to
inform
people
about
upcoming
budget
conversations.
Next
slide.
G
As
I
mentioned
at
the
beginning,
the
city
council
looked
at
this
and
passed
a
number
of
steps
back
in
may
of
2019..
I
just
wanted
to
refresh
people's
memory.
To
put
this
into
context.
There
was
a
staff
directive
that
was
passed
in
may
of
2019.
That
was
actually
rather
lengthy.
This
is
not
the
entire
staff
directive,
but
really
kind
of
highlighting
the
major
components
of
it.
G
This
really
set
forth
the
work
that
has
led
us
to
today.
The
staff
directive,
in
summary,
approved
the
neighborhoods
2020
framework
kind
of
a
general
guideline
of
what
this
program
should
look
like.
They
directed
the
development
of
guidelines
to
be
consistent
with
the
framework,
as
well
as
keeping
the
program
budget
neutral
and
within
the
4.1
million
dollar
budget.
G
It
established
or
directed
the
completion
of
a
racial
equity
analysis,
as
well
as
it's
the
directive
that
actually
put
the
steering
committee
into
place.
What
comes
before
you
today
is
largely
reflective
of
the
adopted
framework
that
that
was
back
in
may
of
2019.
G
I
do
want
to
point
out.
There
is
one
significant
change
coming
from
the
steering
committee
and
recommendation
based
on
the
results
of
the
racial
equity
analysis
conducted
by
kira.
The
syrian
committee
is
recommending
that
the
base
level
funding
for
neighborhood
organizations
be
reduced
from
an
ongoing
level
of
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
to
a
phased-in
level
of
ten
thousand
dollars
over
four
years
and
that
those
additional
funds
that
are
saved
as
a
result
of
that
be
put
into
what's
called
the
equitable
engagement
fund,
which
steve
will
talk
about
later.
G
The
idea
here
was
to
put
more
of
an
emphasis
into
the
funds
that
are
more
specifically
designed
and
directed
by
the
racial
equity
formula.
That's
included
in
the
program.
That's
not
a
that's,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
that
discussion
is
intended
to
be
had
through
the
city's
budget
process,
which
will
start
on
november
12th.
I
start
for
this
program
on
november
12th.
G
The
recommendation
of
this
different
funding
level
for
the
ongoing
base
funding
was
included
in
the
guidelines
that
were
sent
out
for
public
comment
and
has
been
publicly
released
for
many
months
now.
Next
slide
a
little
more
context,
setting
just
a
little
bit
why
we
are
here
and
what
is,
and
what
are
we?
Why
are
we
doing
this
neighborhoods
2020?
Is
the
recommendation
for
the
city's
future
programming
and
funding
for
our
neighborhood
organizations?
G
Neighborhoods
are
funded
currently
through
the
neighborhood
revitalization
program,
as
well
as
the
community
participation
program,
otherwise
known
as
cpp.
The
community
participation
program
actually
ends
this
year
in
less
than
two
months,
and
a
new
program
is
needed
to
move
forward.
G
The
service
model
for
our
neighborhood
organizations
has
largely
remained
unchanged
for
30
years,
all
the
while
that
our
city
goals,
demographics
and
residents
have
changed
dramatically.
Our
city
is
more
diverse
and
renters
make
up
a
majority
of
residents,
and
we
are
much
more
aware
of
the
equity
issues
facing
our
community
next
slide.
G
Through
this
work,
the
sharing
committee
has
kept
equity
as
a
core
value
of
our
work,
and
we
believe
that
the
guidelines
being
brought
to
you
today
reflect
the
goal
included
in
the
adopted
minneapolis
2040
plan,
where
minneapolis
will
have
an
equitable
civic
participation
system,
then
that
enfranchises
everyone
recognizes
the
core
and
vital
services.
Neighborhood
organizations
provide
to
the
city
of
minneapolis
and
builds
people's
long-term
capacity
to
organize
and
improve
their
lives
and
neighborhoods
next
slide.
G
This
is
a
high-level
timeline.
There's
been
many
many
meetings,
many
many
conversations,
many
discussions,
many
learnings
many
engagement
sessions
since
about
2016.
When
we
took
on
this
this
work.
This
is
just
a
real
high
level
summary.
I
won't
go
through
it
in
any
detail,
but
just
wanted
to
again
help
put
this
into
context
about
this.
What
is
being
brought
forward
today
next
slide
just
a
little
more
context,
setting
before
I
hand
or
move
this
into
the
program
itself
for
the
public's
purpose.
G
G
G
The
city
has
also
invested
heavily
into
this
work.
Funding
over
300
million
dollars
over
the
past
28
years
and
neighborhoods
really
focus
a
lot
of
the
work
on
leveraging
volunteer
hours
and
just
in
between
2016
and
2019
leveraged,
almost
half
a
million
volunteer
hours
in
their
work.
G
Neighborhoods
are
really
leaned
into
this
work
in
in
partnership
with
the
city
and
it's
been,
and
that
they've
done
a
lot
of
work.
So
I
wanted
to
point
out
just
a
few
of
the
significant
contributions
that
they
have
worked
with
the
city
on
over
this
past
year
and
those
are
included
on
this
slide
next
slide.
G
G
That
shows
that
bypac
and
renters
are
significantly
underrepresented
at
the
neighborhood
board
level
and
that
the
survey
which
has
been
conducted
three
times
since
2014
shows
that
we
are
not
making
progress
and
getting
more
diversity.
More
people
of
color,
more
renters
involved
in
our
neighborhood
groups
having
diverse
representation
at
the
board
level,
where
decisions
affecting
resource
allocation
program,
development
and
staffing
decisions
are
made,
is
really
important,
and
diversity
and
leadership
matters
next
slide.
G
My
last
slide
before
I
hand
it
over
to
see
terrance
who's
going
to
go
over.
The
racial
equity
analysis
is
really
just
to
illustrate
the
amount
of
resources
that
the
department
provides
to
neighborhood
organizations
strictly
through
funding
allocations.
G
G
H
I
Just
a
little
bit
of
feedback
and
there's
definitely
a
delay
on
the
video.
So
sorry,
if
I'm
responding
back
a
little
bit
slower
but
going
into
the
next
slide
to
racial
equity
analysis
representation,
just
as
a
reminder
to
do
a
racial
academic
analysis,
care
was
asked
by
this
indianapolis
through
our
contract,
with
ncr
to
perform
a
historical,
racial
equity
analysis
to
sort
of
understanding
context
on
that
this
work
is
existing
in.
So
we
looked
back
to
one.
I
We
did
our
own
analysis
of
the
data
that
the
city
currently
had
looking
through
history
as
much
as
we
can
tie
program
outcomes
program,
analytic
analytics
to
racial
outcomes.
We
looked
at
all
of
that
data
as
well
as
we
looked
at
a
number
of
reports
going
back
to
reports
and
studies
going
back
to
1991,
I
believe,
was
the
earliest
report
studying
the
nrp
program
and
continue
into
the
cpp
program
and
then
into
what
we
study
today
and
so
really.
Our
racial
equity
analysis
is
a
summation
or
a
broad
sort
of
broadcast.
I
Look
that
what
we
reasonably
believe
racial
equity
was
achieved
or
not
achieved
in
the
context
of
neighborhood
association
work
without
going
through
this
all
games.
I
think
we
talked
about
this
broadly
with
the
city
council,
but
just
as
a
reminder
to
what
we
found
in
that
nearly
nearly
universally
from
the
beginning.
Renters
are
very
underrepresented
on
neighborhood
association
boards.
Similarly,
with
black
indigenous
and
other
people
of
color
are
have
been
since
the
very
beginning
of
this
work
very
underrepresented
on
neighborhood
association
boards.
I
Of
course,
the
more
recent
data
that
david
just
went
through
from
the
recent
ncr
board
diversity
surveys.
You
can
sort
of
see
that
in
context,
but
researchers
were
finding
that
very
same
thing
since
the
very
beginning,
in
fact,
my
boss,
akira
ed
getz,
did
a
study
in
1994
that
showcased
that
boards
were
a
little
bit
more
diverse
prior
to
nrp
right
ports.
I
Neighborhood
association
organizations
existed
prior
towards
the
city
formalizing
a
lot
of
those
organizations
in
in
the
early
1990s,
but
that
really
sort
of
dissipated
as
those
nrp
funds
remain
more
available.
They
sort
of
became
more
dominated
by
white
homeowners,
business
owners
and
and
property
owners.
So
talking
about
landlords
really
became
sort
of
the
focal
point
of
who
was
sitting
on
these
boards
that
still
more
or
less
carries
today,
to
maybe
a
slightly
lesser
degree,
but
really
that
across
the
system.
That's
what
we
probably
see.
I
Of
course,
we
see
some
neighborhood
associations
who
have
been
doing
really
good
work
in
recent
history
on
diversifying
their
work,
but
still
plenty
that,
I
think,
would
self-admit
that
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
do,
but
also
there's
a
lot
of
work
to
do
to
do
that
going
forward
going
to
the
next
slide,
which
I
think
should
be
representation
continued
shows
that
so
one
of
the
things
that
we
found
is
what
neighborhood
associates
had
to
do
was
to
ratify
or
to
put
forward
action
plans
about
what
their
neighborhood
association
was
going
to
do
with
that
nrp
money.
I
Part
of
this
representation
story
is
about
who
participates
or
what
percentage
of
neighborhood
organizations
or
our
neighborhoods
participate
in
our
neighborhood
association's
work.
Sort
of
historic
looks
like
this.
One
of
these
studies
from
2005
showed
that
sometimes
less
than
or
most
of
the
time
on
average,
less
than
two
percent
of
neighborhood
residents
attended
these
meetings
with
lows
of
0.4
and
highs
of
3.3
and
that's
in
reference
to
in
the
early
1990s
through
mid
and
late
1990s.
I
As
these
neighborhood
organizations
were
formalizing,
creating
these
action
plans
about
how
to
spend
their
nrp
dollars
very
small
percentages
of
neighborhood
residents
participated
once
again,
largely
dominated
by
white
homeowners,
business
owners
and
property
owners,
largely
some
of
those
boards
across
the
system,
mainly
finding
that
you
know.
Of
course,
the
context
of
a
lot
of
the
nrp
work
was
preventing
white
flight.
The
sort
of
the
the
city
was
in
perhaps
described
as
not
the
best
place,
and
so
nrp
was
sort
of
con
was
designed
around
that
time,
preventing
homeowners
from
leaving
the
city.
I
You
know
bolstering
different
neighborhoods
from
a
variety
of
different
perspectives
from
a
business
perspective
from
a
safety
perspective,
parks
became
focal
points,
but
I
think
researchers
have
sort
of
talked
about
this.
You
know
first
and
foremost,
nrp
was
conceived,
if
not
explicitly
but
implicitly
as
a
program
for
homeowners
and
to
prevent
disorder
of
that
white
flight,
and
you
know
once
again,
since
1995
researchers
find
mainly
middle
income,
mainly
white
homeowners,
dominated
the
process,
and
I
think
what
you
saw.
I
What
you
might
also
find
is
that,
prior
to
sort
of
the
nrp
process,
and
certainly
within
it,
there's
always
these
calls
to
sort
of
take
care
of
renters
to
look
into
affordable
housing
and
building
affordable
housing
and
a
lot
of
different
things.
Of
course,
some
of
that
was
done,
but
sort
of
what
one
researchers
found
in
2002
they
sort
of
described
as
sardonically
described
as
an
outright
attack
on
renters.
I
I
So,
really
just
to
shorten
all
that
conversation.
Once
again,
nrp
was
not
designed
to
be
a
racial
equity
program.
It
was
designed
around
different
goals.
It
did
try
to
address
other
city
characteristic
imbalances
right.
There
was
these
three
different
characterizations
of
neighborhoods
that
allocated
money
in
in
different
ways,
but
the
primary
benefactor
across
the
work
I
think
through
nrp
even
to
today,
is
white
homeowners
and
so
there's
been
pushback
and-
and
I
always
ask
the
question:
if
not
white
homeowners,
then
who
was
the
primary
benefactor
of
this
work?
I
So
hopefully
this
isn't
a
controversial
statement,
but-
and
perhaps
it's
not
even
surprising
to
most
folks
who've
been
very
attuned
to
neighborhood
association
level
work,
but
just
to
state
and
as
a
fact
that
is,
it
is
the
case
with
neighborhood
association,
the
primary
benefactor.
This
work
is
white,
homeowners,
historically,
a
thing
that's
still
out
there.
I
I
think
this
number
may
not
be
accurate
today
and
I'm
not
sure
exactly
what's
happened
in
the
last
couple
of
months,
but
when
we
did
this
racial
equity
analysis,
there
was
still
a
huge
amount
of
nrp
dollars
that
were
still
out
there.
I'm
at
the
time.
I
think
35
million
some
of
it
contracted
some
of
it
uncontracted.
I
I
think.
Maybe
the
split
was
around
half
but
there's
still
a
lot
of
these
legacy
dollars
and
sort
of
program
attention
that's
still
out
there,
and
so
I
think
that's
something
to
think
about
in
the
context
of
advancing
racial
equity
in
this
future
works.
One
thing
to
point
out:
it's
it's
a
lot
of
work
to
do
this.
Neighbor
association,
work
david,
pointed
out.
I
The
amount
of
volunteer
hours
and
sort
of
the
dollar
amount
that
it
takes
to
do
this,
but
it's
it's
plain
to
the
case
that,
regardless
of
what
these
program
or
what
we
decide
or
what
the
city
decides
as
the
program
intentions,
many
neighborhoods
do
not
have
the
staff
capacity
to
do
significant
work
so
to
whatever
question
we're
asking
neighborhood
associations
to
do.
We
just
have
to
recognize
what
do
they
have
the
resources
to
be
able
to
do,
and
certainly
I'm
sure
that
will
be
a
conversation
among
the
city
council.
I
I
would
say
that
you
know
if
we,
when
we
talk
about
institutional
racism,
we
sort
of
talk
about
this
as
an
abstract,
I'm
seeing
often
and
sort
of
not
naming
that
it's
what
are
their
individuals
or
what
programs
are
sort
of
leading
to
these
broader
societal
trends
that
we
see
in
the
city
of
minneapolis.
I
What
I
just
want
to
point
out
in
from
this
racial
economy
analysis.
I
think
this
is
what
it
looks
like
right.
If
we're
getting
an
underrepresentation.
J
I
Renters
and
under
representation
of
black
brown
and
indigenous
folks
right,
if
that
continues
to
today,
if
the
primary
benefactor
was
white,
homeowners,
property
owners,
business
owners
in
history.
What
else
would
we
call
that,
and
so
just
bringing
that
to
the
forefront
that
this
is
what
this
looks
like
and
I
think
part
of
what
in
discussion
with
the
neighborhoods
residents
and
neighborhoods
and
the
city,
what
we're
over
hoping
to
overcome
or
point
towards
overcoming
in
the
four
programs
neighborhoods
2020..
K
Thank
you,
chair
cunningham
members.
We
built
these
guidelines
from
the
framework
passed
in
may
of
2019
next
slide.
Please,
and
these
funding
programs
consist
of
actually
four
aspects
that
essentially
work
with
one
another
and
I'll
go
through
each
one
of
these.
K
These
funding
programs
next
next
slide,
please
the
city
neighborhood
network
fund.
Its
purpose
is
the
continuation
of
the
neighborhood
network
by
supporting
base
administration
funding.
This
program
creates
minimum
standards
for
neighborhood
organizations,
which
will
ensure
membership
is
open
to
all
residents,
ensure
equity
and
decision
making
create
a
sense
of
place
and
pride
within
communities
as
part
of
the
neighborhood
network
fund.
K
The
equitable
engagements
fund's
purpose
is
to
ensure
neighborhood
organizations,
engage
all
residents
in
their
community,
underrepresented
or
under
engaged.
Residents,
are
informed
connected
to
the
community
and
feel
represented
and
heard.
This
is
a
significant
and
key
portion
of
the
new
programming,
which
is
allocating
resources
that
targets
areas
in
the
city,
which
has
have
historically
been
underserved
neighborhoods,
will
propose
activities
that
will
be
reviewed.
K
Some
of
the
criteria
for
the
proposed
activities
will
include
the
value
of
neighborhood
organization.
Contributions
are
in
proportion
of
the
amount
requested.
The
people
who
directly
benefit
from
the
project
are
actively
involved
in
this
development.
K
There
are
measurable
benefits
which
are
well
planned
and
realistic,
which,
in
the
time
frame
time
frame
this
program
also
allows
for
an
innovative
approach
to
a
basic
need
that
involves
new
ways
for
people
to
work
together.
In
fact,
this
program
allows
new
approaches
that
would
not
normally
be
allowed
under
other
funding
programs
in
which
this
is
a
learning
program.
Looking
for
new
best
practices,
neighborhood
organizations
should
not
be
afraid
to
fail
in
new
engagement
practices,
but
rather
learn
from
it
and
come
up
with
something
new
and
even
better.
K
I
Yep,
I'm
hoping
folks
can
hear
me
so
the
equitable
engagement
fund.
You
know
one
of
the
things
that,
of
course,
we're
thinking
about
is
not,
of
course,
just
digging
into
history,
but
sort
of
like
what
does
it
look
like
to
sort
of
point
towards
doing
racial
equity
in
the
future,
so
the
equitable
engagement
fund,
I
think,
is
sort
of
the
response
within
this
programming
to
do
that
most
significantly.
Talking
about
how
do
we
sort
of
allocate
funds
across
the
city
to
do
that?
Equitable
engagement
to
do
that
engagement
among
underrepresented
populations?
I
So
we
don't
have
a
slide
in
here
that
sort
of
shows
a
map.
I
don't
think,
but
actually
I
think
it
might
be
the
next
slide-
and
I
can
talk
about
it
then,
but
the
equitable
engagement
fund
is
comprised
of
three
different
characteristics
that
the
the
fund
is
sort
of.
Looking
for,
first
being
areas
of
concentrated
poverty,
which
was
fifty
percent
of
the
allocation,
two
was
cost
per
in
households,
that's
thirty
percent
of
the
allocation
and
the
neighborhoods
that
are
experiencing
gender
gentrification
being
the
last
twenty
percent
of
the
allocation.
I
So
I
think
that
sort
of
the
way
that
we're
thinking
about
creating
this
fun
or
creating
the
formula
for
this
fund
was
more
or
less
defined
those
populations
of
people
who
have
been
under
under
engaged
historically
in
the
context
of
neighborhood
association
work,
but
even
more
importantly,
too.
If
we're
talking
about
who
are
the
populations
of
people
or
groups
of
people,
that
should
be
the
benefactors
of
today's
equity
work,
then
that's
where
these
dollars
should
be
allocated
most
primarily,
and
so
yes,
folks
that
are
in
poverty.
I
Folks,
that
are
sort
of
at
risk
of
being
pushed
out
of
the
city
in
sort
of
two
different
ways
are
the
focus
of
the
fund,
so
you
can
see
the
sort
of
allocation
breakdown.
I
didn't
put
the
math
up
there,
but
I
can
talk
about
that
too.
If
that
would
be
helpful,
but
more
or
less.
This
is
in
the
most
simple
way
to
explain.
I
It
was
the
way
that
we
comprise
the
formula
yeah,
oh,
and
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide,
I
think
it
might
be
a
little
bit
slow
on
my
computer.
I
I
believe
there
will
be
two
maps
that
will
show
short
of
the
change
yep
there
we
go
of
the
different
formulas,
so,
on
the
left,
you
see
the
sort
of
the
current
form
of
the
cpp
formula,
the
darker
the
color
shows
where
the
majority
of
the
funds
are
going
today
and
then
on
the
right
with
including
the
ten
thousand
dollars,
assuming
a
ten
thousand
ten
thousand
dollar
base
funding
for
each
neighborhood.
I
I
Of
course,
there's
been
a
lot
of
conversations
with
a
lot
of
different
neighborhoods,
who
this
is
a
pretty
marketable
change,
and
if
I
know
the
city
will
be
having
a
conversation
about
funding
as
a
whole,
but
just
in
terms
of
as
it
is
being
presented,
you
can
sort
of
see
the
change
today,
which
hopefully
maps
up
with
what
you
think
even
anecdotally,
are
sort
of
these
neighborhoods
that
comprise
those
populations
that
I
just
talked
about,
and
then
I
think
that
is
going
back
to
steve
yep.
Thank
you.
Next
slide.
K
This
fund
was
partially
created
to
bring
other
voices
forward
through
effective
engagement
and
help
community-based
organizations
and
neighborhoods
work
collectively
for
a
common
goal.
This
should
increase
the
diversity
of
organizations,
as
well
as
create
a
comprehensive
engagement
system
that
values
all
voices
within
the
city
next
slide.
Please.
K
The
collaboration
fund
or
collaboration
and
shared
resources
fund
is
available
for
two
or
more
organizations
who
may
want
to
voluntarily
consolidate
their
organizations
and
share
resource
or
share
resources,
realizing
that
in
the
long
term,
funding
for
70
neighborhood
organizations
is
a
tough
endeavor
with
the
amount
of
funding
available.
Many
organizations
through
discussions
and
meetings
have
indicated.
This
is
a
great
need
to
remain
viable
long
term.
Many
over
the
years
have
already
combined
to
share
staff
office
space,
while
some
have
even
managed
to
fully
merge
together
next
slide.
Please.
K
The
steering
committee
is
recommending
the
extension
of
the
current
community
participation
contracts
for
six
months.
This
extension
will
allow
both
neighborhoods
and
the
ncr
department
to
transition
to
the
new
program
which,
which
would
start
july
1st
2021..
K
The
numbers
you
see
in
this
slide
are
prorated
prorated
for
2021
to
account
for
this
transition
period.
The
base,
funding
and
total
program
amounts
will
be
discussed
during
the
ncr's
budget
presentation.
Any
adjustments
to
these
will
be
made
accordingly,
with
all
these
funding
programs
bring
supportive
services
throughout
the
throughout
the
enterprise.
K
Please,
as
director
rubidar
previously
mentioned
in
the
beginning
of
this
program,
there
was
a
multi-departmental
endeavor,
utilizing
a
comment
review
committee
consisting
of
amazing
staff
from
various
departments
which
reviewed
the
public
comments
to
identify
themes,
meanings
while
identifying
additional
tweaks
or
languages
or
changes
to
the
guidelines.
Next
slide,
we
received
354
public
comments,
which
included
26,
independent
neighborhood
neighborhood
comments,
as
well
as
20
neighborhoods,
who
co-signed
a
shared
letter.
Some
of
the
highlights
of
the
comments
were
an
overall
positive
sentiment
of
the
equity
goal
and
the
equity
goals
being
supported.
K
Some
believe
neighborhood,
some
believe
the
goals
of
neighbors
2020
do
not
go
far
enough.
As
regards
to
in
regards
to
equity,
some
said
at
least
15
000
base
funding
is
needed
from
the
city-wide
base
fund
over
the
long
term,
ncr
needed
to
provide
more
technical
assistance
and
written
guidelines
to
neighborhoods
going
forward.
K
That
was
part
of
the
20
neighborhoods,
that
combined
on
a
joint
letter
and
then
some
neighborhood
or
some
reviewers
recommend
in
adding
additional
language
and
the
program
guidelines.
That
explains
the
incentives
to
be
recognized
as
a
neighborhood
association
by
the
city
and,
lastly,
a
desire
for
additional
assistance
and
technical
support
for
neighborhood
organizations
to
implement
equity
goals.
K
Here
I
I
do
want
to
specifically
mention
armitage,
tangle
town,
nokomis,
east
neighborhood
as
being
large,
the
largest
contributors
to
these
public
funds.
Their
outreach
behind
the
neighbors
2020
shows
how
neighborhood
organizations
rallying
around
a
cause
can
create
a
broad
audience
and
broad
audience
to
engage
next
slide.
Please
and
director
rubidor.
G
I'll
jump
back
in
here,
thank
you,
steve
and
see
terence
for
providing
that
initial
comments
or
conversation.
The
one
thing
I
will
just
mention
too,
when
steve
was
talking
about
the
public
comment
period.
We
did
start
that
in
early
february
we
extended
that
the
syrian
committee
extended
that
several
times
or
a
couple
times
actually
due
to
covet
in
the
civil
unrest
and
we
ultimately
closed
that
at
the
end
of
september.
G
So
it
was
open
for
about
a
six
month
period,
which
is
unusually
long,
but
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
everybody
that
wanted
to
weigh
in
on
this
and
comment
on
it
could
what
again
before
you.
These
are
the
city
council
actions.
I
had
mentioned
these
at
the
beginning.
G
I
do
want
to
jump
to
the
next
slide,
though,
and
just
as
I
mentioned,
I
wanted
to
at
the
end
of
the
presentation,
just
give
a
little
bit
more
of
a
clarity
on
this
one,
so
this
one
is
about
authorizing
the
continuation
of
the
neighborhoods
2020
steering
committee
for
until
july,
first
to
look
at
some
programmatic
and
legislative
adjustments
to
the
nrp
program.
G
The
one
thing
that
we
and
see
terence
hit
on
this,
the
one
thing
that
we
realized
as
we
were
going
through
this
work,
is
the
community
participation
and
now
the
neighborhoods
2020
program
moving
forward
is
only
a
piece
of
a
larger
puzzle.
This
really
is
about
how
the
city
interacts
with
neighborhood
organizations.
It's
about
how
departments
collectively
work
together
to
support
that.
G
That's
actually
part
of
the
there's,
a
community
engagement
evaluation
going
on
right
now,
that's
looking
at
ways
that
could
actually
help
improve
those
those
connections,
but
also
that
we
have
the
nrp
program
out
there
and
just
to
put
out
the
correct
balance.
It's
around
30
million
dollars.
That's
still
left
in
that
fund
balance.
A
lot
of
that
is
return
funds.
G
What
is
called
program
income
where
neighborhoods
have
invested
money
and
it's
come
back,
but
the
bottom
line
on
that
is
that
there's
still
a
lot
of
significant
resources
in
that
program
and
what
we
would
like
to
do
is
explore
ways
to
basically
look
at
ways
to
make
that
program
more
equitable
as
well.
Nrp
is
a
laborious
program.
Administratively,
it's
very
very
bureaucratic,
and
there
are
a
lot
of
restrictions
that
are
put
on
it
by
by
the
state
of
minnesota.
G
The
enabling
statute,
which
limit
our
ability
to
really
kind
of
end
neighborhoods
ability
to
use
this
from
an
equity
lens
that
became
really
apparent
with
covet
this
year
and
neighborhoods
were
trying
to
use
those
funds
to
really
address
some
of
the
community
needs
and
demands
that
were
resulting
as
a
were
a
result
of
cobid
everything
from
business
support
to
actually
getting
health
and
safety
items
out
into
the
community
very
limiting.
G
A
Thank
you,
everyone
for
your
participation
in
in
presenting
this
work.
Much
appreciated
lots
of
good
information
there.
A
So
at
this
point
I
will
open
up
the
public
hearing.
Staff
has
provided
me
with
the
list
of
speakers,
as
is
our
typical
practice.
Speakers
will
have
two
minutes
each
to
present
to
the
committee
and
if
you
hear
the
buzzer
and
when
you
hear
the
buzzer
your
time
is
up
when
you
are
called
on
to
speak,
please
press
star,
6
to
unmute
your
phone.
Please
wait
a
moment
for
a
recorded
message
that
says
you're
unmuted
before
you
begin
speaking
with
that.
Let
me
pull
up
the
list
here.
A
So
first
up
on
our
list
today
for
the
public
hearing
is
john
shanahan,
followed
by
kaylee
brown,
with
courtney
sanders
on
deck.
Mr
shanahan,
you
have
two
minutes
and
the
I
do
believe
we
may
have
some
interpreters
here.
Do
we
have
mr
shanahan
on
the.
A
A
Okay,
we
will
circle
back
for
that.
Next
up.
We
have
give
me
one
moment:
okay,
we
are
now
we
we'll
move
on
and
we'll
circle
back
to
mr
shanahan.
Next
up
we
have
kaylee
brown,
followed
by
courtney,
sanders
kaylee.
If
you
want
to
push
star
six
wait
a
moment
and
the
floor
is
yours
for
two
minutes.
E
Thank
you,
chair,
cunningham.
Welcome,
thanks
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
today.
My
name
is
kaylee
brown,
I'm
the
executive
director
of
the
whittier
alliance,
neighborhood
organization.
We
are
located
at
10
east
25th
street
in
ward
10.,
and
I
know
that
there's
likely
a
number
of
people
that
want
to
speak
today.
So
I'll
keep
my
comments
brief.
E
So
this
point
is
that
we
do
not
operate
and
engage
with
our
stakeholders
in
an
equitable
manner
and
regardless
of
whether
each
neighborhood,
regardless
of
where
each
neighborhood
organization,
is
right
now
in
their
journey
to
pursuing
justice
and
equity.
In
our
view,
I
think
these
guidelines
provide
some
previously
non-existent
teeth
to
ensure
that
if
an
organization
is
receiving
city
funds
moving
forward,
then
they
must
do
what
is
necessary
to
make
that
transition.
E
A
A
A
All
right
we'll
go
ahead
and
circle
back
to
courtney.
L
Yeah,
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
for
opening
up
this
hearing
to
the
public
and
just
calling
in
I'm
a
10-year
resident
of
the
city
of
minneapolis
and
I'm
a
renter.
So
one
of
the
people
that
you're
speaking
about
that
is
is
highly
underinvolved
in
neighborhood
communities
and
community
groups
and
I've.
You
know,
like
I
said:
I've
lived
here
for
almost
10
years
and
I've
never
even
known
that
these
neighborhood
groups
were
receiving
this
kind
of
money
from
the
city.
L
Had
these
kind
of
directives-
and
you
know
it
sounds
like
you
guys-
are
being
responsive
with
creating
the
equity
fund
and
kind
of
you
know,
making
sure
that
there's
a
pot
of
funds
that
people
can
use
for
those
sort
of
initiatives
that
really
need
to
happen
in
the
city.
But
I
just
you
know.
I
just
feel
really
strongly
that
that
you
know
if
we're
using
city
funds
for
things
like
neighborhood
groups.
L
These
neighborhood
groups
are
should
have
some
directive
from
actual
data
and
research,
and
they
should
have
to
actually
try
like
it
sounds
like
you're
doing
a
lot
of
work
around
equity,
but
making
sure
that
they
address
things
for
their
neighborhood,
and
you
know,
with
covid
too
I
mean
being
able
to
use
those
funds
for
emergency
situations
in
neighborhoods
seems
really
important
too.
L
So,
hopefully
you
know,
maybe
in
addition
to
the
equity
fund,
there
needs
to
be
emergency
funds
for
neighborhood
groups,
because
you
know
none
of
us
have
seen
the
kind
of
things
that
we've
seen
in
over
100
years
that
happen
in
minneapolis
and
also
across
the
globe
and
so
to
make
sure
that
those
neighborhood
groups
can
really
be
responsive
to
their
communities.
Needs
is
really
important
and
also
just
making
sure
people
that
our
renters
can
can
know
about
this
stuff.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
so
much
great
to
have
you
here,
it's
very
important
to
have
voices
like
yours
involved
in
our
process.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
taking
the
time
to
be
here
today.
Next
up
we
have
alex
palacios,
followed
by
morgan
whitman
alex.
If
you
are
on
the
line,
please
push
star
six
just
wait
a
moment
as
the
message
lets
you
know,
you're
unmuted
and
the
floor
is.
A
A
I
am
not
sure
if
alex
is
still
on
the
line
with
us,
so
we'll
go
ahead
and
move
on
to
morgan,
whitman
morgan.
Welcome,
please
push
star
six
and
the
floor
is.
A
Yours
all
right,
we
may
not
have
morgan
whitman
on
the
line
as
well,
so
we
have
so
that
is
all
that
we
have
on
our
line
to
who
is
pre-registered
to
speak.
Is
there?
Is
there
anyone
else
who
is
on
the
line?
Who
would
like
to
speak
today
to
the
to
this
item
of
neighborhoods
2020?
A
M
B
M
Okay,
thank
you.
So
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I
was
I'm
really
happy
that
we've
had
the
research
into
this
and
that
we
have
this
roadmap
that
really
can
help
guide
neighborhood
associations
and
understanding
how
equity
can
be
a
part
of
the
work
that
they
do
and
should
be
a
part
of
the
work
that
they
do.
However,
I
and
I
just
want
to
highlight
some
of
the
things
that
we've
been
doing:
pre
covet
and
post
covet.
M
So
before
kovid,
you
know
we
have
been
doing
organics
recycling
that
have
made
organic
recycling
available
to
renters,
and
this
is
a
program
that
has
been
acknowledged
by
the
state
legislature
and
then
there
are.
There
are
a
lot.
You
know,
there's
work
being
done
to
figure
out
how
to
replicate
this
program
and
make
it
something
that
can
be
available
to
people
across
the
city
and
across
the
state.
M
We
were
probably
one
of
the
first
organizations
that
I
could
figure
out
anywhere
that
provided
sexual
violence,
bystander
intervention,
training
to
anybody
in
the
community,
and
we
had
about
two
dozen
people
take
that
since
kovid
we
have
had
de-escalation
training
so
that
people
in
our
neighborhood
renters
homeowners,
whoever
can
learn
ways
to
be
peacemakers
and
peacekeepers
in
the
system.
In
our
neighborhoods
we
built
a
you
know
when
it
comes
to
public
safety.
M
We
had
an
800
member
watch
group
that
popped
up
immediately
to
really
keep
our
eyes
on
the
white
supremacists,
who
came
in
here
to
cause
trouble
in
our
neighborhoods,
and
we
also
have
been
starting
an
ongoing
public
forum
to
so
that
we
can
learn
about
the
things
going
on
in
different
parts
of
the
city.
A
Great
thank
you
so
much
for
being
here
and
also
just
to
to
note
that
we
also
will
be
having
a
public
hearing
related
to
the
budget,
so
that
might
be
a
good
opportunity
for
you
to
circle
back
as
well,
because
we
know
some
folks
will
be
coming
to
speak
specifically
around
the
budget,
so
the
budget
related
to
neighborhoods
2020,
so
just
want
to
throw
that
out
there
for
consideration
as
well-
and
thank
you
for
being
here
today
are
there?
A
Please
push
star
six,
please
push
star
six
and
then
introduce
yourself
for
the.
A
And
I
will
so
I
I'll
close
the
public
hearing
and
we'll
move
approval
of
this
item
with
that.
Colleagues.
Is
there
any
discussion
related
to
this
item.
A
Okay,
my
apologies
councilmember
gordon,
followed
by
councilmember
fletcher.
O
Yeah,
first
of
all,
I
really
want
to
thank
everybody
for
all
the
work
in
this
and
I'm
very
supportive
of
all
the
actions
I
think
before
us
today
and
the
guidelines.
I
know
we've
worked
on
this
a
long
time
I
have
to
especially
thank
those
of
you
who
served
on
the
steering
committee.
O
I
have
a
small
concern
that
we
want
to
keep
the
steering
committee
going
forever,
because
I
know
it
was
an
intense
amount
of
work,
but
I
think
it
makes
absolute
sense
to
keep
it
going
for
a
while.
So
I'm
happy
to
support
that
as
well,
I
did
want
to
move
a
staff
direction
to
maybe
help
us
as
we
prepare
for
our
future
discussions
about
the
the
budget.
O
I'm
happy
to
talk
about
that
staff
direction
and
see
how
where
people
are
and
I'm
flexible
about
what
to
do.
But
I
think
it
would
be
good
if
we
could
get
some
clear,
some
clear
understanding
and
a
presentation
of
what
it
might
look
like
to
increase
that
base
funding
as
we're
working
and
grappling
with
maybe
making
those
decisions
as
part
of
the
budget
process.
I
know
we
had
a
lot
of
people
who
were
emailing
and
asking
us
to
consider
that.
O
O
Maybe
it
is
10,
but
maybe
there's
some
room
up
for
us
to
increase
that
base
funding,
because
I
do
see
a
lot
of
good
work
that
the
neighborhood
organizations
do,
and
I
think,
especially
as
we're
turning
to
them
more
and
more,
to
help
us
achieve
our
goals
and
move
forward
the
priorities
that
they
have
and
that
we
have
for
the
city.
A
All
right,
councilmember
gordon,
are
you
moving
approval
of
the
staff
direction?
Did
you
just
want
to
put
it
out
there
for
discussion?
What
how
would
you.
A
Thank
you
for
that.
So,
council,
member
gordon,
has
moved
approval
of
a
staff
direction
that
reads:
direct
staff
to
develop
and
present
options
for
increasing
the
base,
funding
to
25
000
for
all
neighborhood
organizations
at
the
next
public
health
and
safety
committee
meeting
on
november
19th.
So
that
is
the
staff
direction.
A
I
would
like
some
clarification
from
council
member
gordon.
If
possible,
are
you?
Do
you
mean
25
000
within
the
current
4.1
million
dollar
budget.
O
O
Okay,
I
mean
there
may
be
it
would
be
nice
for
staff
to
maybe
recommend
a
way
to
find
that
funding.
I
know
there
are
some
reserves
and
some
other
issues,
but
I
wasn't
I
didn't
want
it
necessarily
to
be
restricted
to
that.
In
fact,
I
would
prefer
if
it
wasn't,
because
that's
been
the
problem
where
we
see
what
that
does
to
our
equitable
funding
formula.
A
Great,
that's
why
I
wanted
to
just
get
some
clarification,
because
we
have
had
that
particular
information
presented
so
didn't
want
to
have
to
duplicate
it.
If
that's
the
information
you
were
looking
for.
So
thank
you
for
that
clarification.
So
now,
with
this
motion
on
the
table
for
the
staff
direction,
I
see
council
member
fletcher
in
queue,
I'm
assuming
to
speak
to
this
to
this
motion.
D
Yes,
thank
you,
so
I
I
guess,
I'm
I'm
wondering
what
the
staff
direction
does
and
why
bring
it
back
to
this
committee,
as
opposed
to
the
budget
presentation
that
we
know
we're
going
to
hear,
which
seems
like
a
really
appropriate
place
for
them
to
lay
out
some
scenarios.
For
us
I
mean
it
feels
like
the
math.
Maybe
isn't
that
hard?
D
If
we're
talking
about
something
additive,
to
know
that
okay,
well,
you
know
15
000
times,
however
many
neighborhood
organizations,
we
could
probably
do
it
here
right
so
like
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
what
the
what
the
value
of
the
staff
direction
is
and
I'll
just
signal.
I
am
in
general,
not
in
favor
of
of
increasing
base
funding.
D
I
would
prefer
that
if
we
were
looking
at
additional
investments
actually
to
speak
to
the
some
of
the
feedback
that
we
heard
today
about
you
know,
I
think
courtney
sanders
spoke
about
emergency
funds
and
I've
been
thinking
along
a
similar
line
about
sort
of
building,
resiliency
capacity
and
thinking
about
in
relationship
to
our
transforming
public
safety
work.
D
If
there
were
investments
in
neighborhoods
that
we
might
want
to
create
more
programmatic
resources-
and
so
I
think
I'm
kind
of
open
to
you
know
thinking
about
some
budget
conversations,
but
I
want
to
make
sure
that
I'm
not
signaling
by
supporting
the
staff
direction
that
I
am
in
favor
of
increasing
base
funding.
D
I
I
like
the
way
that
this
neighborhood
group
has
approached
equity
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
that
we
continue
in
the
in
the
spirit
of
that.
A
All
right
with
with
that,
I,
oh
I'm,
sorry
councilmember
palmisano.
I
thought
you
wanted
to
speak
to
the
main
motion.
My
apologies,
councilmember
palmisano,.
N
Hi
there
thank
you.
Well
I
I
see
that
council
member
gordon
in
the
chat
function
said
he
would
be
fine,
bringing
this
to
budget
committee
and
through
that
process.
I'm
also
supportive
of
that.
If
we,
if
there
isn't
enough
time
to
report
back
to
the
next
public
health
and
safety
committee
meeting,
I
don't
know-
and
I
think
my
colleague
and
I
were
equally
as
confused
as
to
whether
this
committee
can
direct
such
a
thing
into
budget
committee,
but
I'm
supportive
of
that.
N
As
chair
of
the
budget
committee,
you
know,
I
I'm
a
little
concerned
that,
at
the
beginning
of
this
presentation
that
we
weren't
real
clear
on
what
is
and
is
not
happening
at
budget
committee
on
november
12th,
there
wouldn't
be
any
action
on
the
funding.
Next
week
at
budget
committee
on
november
12th,
it's
a
receive
and
final
presentation.
That's
about
the
entire
ncr
office.
N
I
think
that
council,
member
gordon,
is,
is
requesting
what
kinds
of
things
we'd
like
to
see
in
it
and
that
would
be
increasing
the
base
funding
for
neighborhood
organizations
in
general,
and
I
am
supportive
of
that
because
I
see
this
is
a
critical
function
of
whether
we
have
a
network
of
neighborhood
organizations
or
not
neighborhood
organizations
are
value,
adds
to
the
city
and
on
a
very
micro
public
safety
level.
N
We
we
have
groups
these
neighborhood
organizations
that
bring
people
together,
they
introduce
neighbors,
they
build
community
and
they
do
the
hard
work
of
our
time.
Like
we
heard
through
some
of
the
public
hearing
testimony
today,
I
think
that
they
are
some
of
the
strongest
public
safety
investments
that
we
have
and
when
we
talk
about
investing
outside
of
traditional
law
enforcement,
I
think
it
would
be
detrimental
to
lose
these
investments
to
inadequate
funding.
N
I
don't
know
that
a
ten
thousand
dollar
base
salary
is
going
to
help
to
you
know,
I
think
the
difference
between
being
viable
or
not
for
one
year
could
come
down
to
simply
whether
or
not
they
receive
competitive
funding
or
not.
So
I
am.
I
would
be
happy
to
move
this
into
the
budget
conversation
because
it
needs
to
be
in
context
of
all
of
our
other
competing
needs
across
the
city
enterprise.
N
So
that's
what
I
have
to
say.
I
guess
both
about
the
main
motion
and
about
council
member
gordon's.
I
think
smart
staff
direction
as
well
thanks.
A
You
councilmember
palmisano.
I
have
council
member
gordon
in
q,.
O
So
one
of
my
questions
has
to
do
with
the
process,
because
I
know
that
for
a
while
now
all
staff
directions,
at
least
for
this
entire
term
and
maybe
last
term,
go
to
the
full
council
before
they're
actually
approved,
and
I
think
the
budget
committee
could
take
it
up
anyway,
and
maybe
we
could
we'll
I'm
sure
I'll
bring
it
up
there,
and
so
we
can
talk
about
that.
But
I'm
just
not
quite
sure
that's
the
appropriate
action
that
we
can
direct
to
do
from
here.
O
I
also
just
wanted
to
note
that
I
am
very
interested
in
exploring
options
that
council
member
fletcher
also
lifted
up
in
terms
of
funding
to
address
certain
priorities
that
the
city
might
have.
So
I
would
love
the
opportunity
to
explore
those
as
well,
and
this
may
give
us
a
little
bit
of
a
better
frame
to
explore
those
when
we
look
at
what
kind
of
an
increase
would
do
and
where
some
funding
might
come
from
and
what
would
be
some
of
those
trade-offs.
A
All
right,
thank
you
for
that.
I
I
appreciate
it.
I
would
like
to
get
some
clarification
from
the
clerk
around
the
staff
direction,
given
that
it
does
say
the
next
public
health
and
safety
committee
meeting
on
november
19th
to
see
what
language,
perhaps
we
should
take
up
in
this
in
this
motion
just
for
clear
for
clarity's
sake,
so
madam
clerk
or
mr
carl,
any
guidance
on
that
would
be
appreciated.
A
P
Chair
this
is
casey.
I
don't
want
to
overstep
irene.
She
is
quite
well-versed,
obviously,
but
I
just
wanted
since
I,
since
I
did
put
into
the
chat
the
fact
that
you
don't
need
a
motion,
obviously
to
refer
this
to
the
budget
committee.
The
budget
committee
has
its
own
ability
to
bring
this
up,
as
I
believe
councilmember
gordon
even
alluded.
So
you
know
if
council
member
gordon
wishes
to
just
withdraw
his
proposed
motion
on
the
staff
directive.
P
The
committee
moves
forward
this
subject
or
question
of
funding
amounts
for
neighborhood
organizations
can
certainly
be
taken
up
within
the
budget
committee,
which
is
the
proper
place
for
that
to
happen,
and
either
councilmember,
gordon
or
any
other
member
could
certainly
raise
that
at
the
appropriate
time
and
I'm
so.
I
think
the
point
here
is
to
say
that
this
motion
could
be
withdrawn
by
the
council
member.
P
The
intent
could
certainly
be
taken
up
in
the
appropriate
committee,
which
is
the
budget
committee
on
which
all
13
council
members
sit,
and
that's
where
that
conversation
then
could
take
place
within
the
scope
of
the
entire
funding
package
for
the
the
city's
operations
in
the
fiscal
year.
2021.
A
Thank
you
for
that
clarification,
mr
carl.
With
that
additional
information
councilmember
gordon,
did
you
have
any
follow-up
thoughts
around
how
to
proceed.
O
Yeah
trying
to
gather
my
thoughts
about
how
to
proceed
so
we
haven't
discussed
it
at
length
here,
but
I
think
we
did
have
a
fruitful
discussion.
I
suppose
an
option
would
be
to
hold
this
staff
direction
and
make
it
on
the
12th,
perhaps
as
well,
but
maybe
we'll
get
some
good
information
from
from
that.
O
I
do
think
that
it
might
actually
take
some
work
on
the
part
of
staff
in
the
budget
office
to
explore
some
options
and
some
strategies
for
doing
this,
because
it's
not
really
simple
or
maybe
I
could
have
figured
it
out
myself
if
it
was
super
simple.
So
I
will
re
withdraw
my
motion
with
the
understanding
that
this
will
be
coming
up
at
the
budget
committee
and
I
may
bring
the
staff
direction
forward
there,
how's
that
sound.
A
Sounds
great,
thank
you
for
that,
so
council
member
gordon,
has
withdrawn
the
motion
which
takes
us
back
to
the
main
motion
of
approving
the
program
guidelines
that
were
presented
today
related
to
the
council
actions.
I
have
councilmember
palmisano
in
queue.
N
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I'm
a
little
bit
can
you
can
someone
help
me
understand?
Probably
director
rubidor
the
action.
One
of
the
parts
of
this
action
today
is
to
approve
guidelines
and
adopt
the
funding
formula.
N
If,
instead,
we
are
seeking
to
take
up
the
funding
formula,
or
rather
the
base
funding
amount
in
budget
committee
which
I'm
happy
to
do
then
are
we?
Is
there
language
in
this
council
action
that
discretely
states
that
the
minimum
base
funding
for
neighborhood
organizations
is
ten
thousand
dollars
or
twelve
thousand
dollars.
G
G
Basically,
what
see
terence
walk
through
about
what
that
formula
would
be
the
level
of
money
that
would
be
going
into
the
neighborhood
network
fund,
which
is
the
one
that
actually
sets
the
minimum
base
is
the
piece
that
would
be
at
discussion
at
your
committee
when
this
goes
to
the
budget
committee
and
so
any
either
additional
money
that
comes
into
the
program
that
could
be
targeted
back
into
that
specific
program
would
raise.
G
You
know,
give
us
the
ability
to
raise
that
or
if
the
council
chose
to
shuffle
money
it
doesn't
change
the
formula.
It
would
change
the
amount
of
money
actually
in
that
specific
segmented
program.
So
the
formula
stays
the
same.
It's
just
less
money
going
through
the
formula.
If
that's,
if
that's
the
direction
we
ended
up
going,
does
that
make
sense.
N
G
Think
so,
if
I
may
just
so
think
of
it,
this
way
the
the
the
layout
of
where
the
money
goes,
how
it's
distributed
between
the
funds
is
static.
G
It's
a
matter
of
how
much
money
you
plug
into
the
neighborhood
network
fund,
which
could
raise
the
base
up
or,
if
you
keep
it
at
the
same
level
as
is
currently
what's
in
the
recommendations,
and
it
would
phase
down
to
ten
thousand
dollars
or
if
you
would
move
money
out
of
the
the
racial
equity
fund,
it
would
lower
the
total
amount
of
money
going
through
there,
but
it
would
still
be
moved
through
that
formula.
N
That
any
better
cunningham,
if
I
may
yes,
please,
I
just
want
to
make
it
clear
that
we're
not
taking
any
final
action
on
november
12th
at
committee
we're
having
a
conversation
about
it,
but,
as
is
the
typical
budget
process,
it's
really
just
a
departmental
conversation.
N
It
sounds
like
from
what
you
said
that
there
is
a
way,
then,
through
the
budget
process,
to
allocate
more
money
that
would
essentially
go
toward
the
base
funding
of
neighborhoods,
if
that's
the
will
of
the
council
or
not,
but
that
I
think
what
council
member,
I
don't
mean
to
speak
for
council
member
gordon.
I
think
what
his
interest
is.
G
Chair
cunningham,
if
I
may
I
I
would
concur
with
everything
you
said
in
my
apologies
for
at
the
beginning
of
the
presentation
council
member
palmisano,
to
be
clear
with
the
public
as
well.
The
budget
discussion
is
an
introduction
of
this
conversation
and
through
the
budget
process,
the
council
will
deliberate
this
with
ultimately
making
their
decision
in
december.
H
N
O
Yeah,
I
just
wanted
to
acknowledge
that
I
agree.
I
want
to
be
able
to
move
forward,
building
that
and
addressing
the
equity
disparities.
In
fact,
one
of
the
options
might
be
to
add
funding
to
the
whole
pie
to
the
whole
program
and
then
have
it
spread.
O
You
guys
couldn't
read
all
my
hand
signals
sorry
about
that.
I
just
was
in
agreement
with
councilmember
palmisano
that
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
addressing
the
disparities
and
the
formula
we
supported
that
one
idea
might
also
be
to
put
money
in
the
overall
budget
of
all
the
neighborhoods
2020
programs,
and
then
we
could
see
each
one
of
those
funds
grow
for
a
little
bit
too.
A
I
will
just
speak
to
this
briefly,
while
I
might
be
slightly
biased,
given
that
I
was
one
of
the
co-chairs
for
the
steering
committee,
I
just
have
to
say
that
I
do
feel
very
grateful
for
the
work
that
that
has
gone
into
these
recommendations
around
the
program
guidelines
themselves,
the
the
programmatic
structure,
what
the
future
of
neighborhood
organizations
look
like
in
our
city,
we
can
dig
into
how
much
money
goes
into
it,
and-
and
I
and
I
look
forward
to
those
those
conversations,
I
think
that's
some
some
rigorous
work
that
we
need
to
dig
into
as
as
policy
makers,
but
with
our
emotion
here
today.
A
I
I
believe
that
this
is
the
right
direction
for
us
to
be
able
to
leverage
the
city-wide
network
of
neighborhood
organizations
to
further
our
goals
as
a
city
as
a
city
enterprise.
So
both
the
city,
council
and
the
mayor
have
agreed
that
racial
equity
is,
is
our
primary
goal,
eliminating
disparities,
that's
our
number
one
goal
in
our
2040
plan,
it's
in
our
goals
and
and
all
of
the
other
components
that
we've
worked
on.
A
We
have
named
clearly
that,
as
an
organization,
this
city
is
focused
on
eliminating
racial
disparities,
and
so,
therefore,
we
have
to
use
every
tool
at
our
disposal
to
be
able
to
do
that.
I'm
grateful
for
the
work
that
that
cura
and
see
terrance
brought
to
the
table.
It
was
incredibly
informative
as
we
were
going
through
the
process
of
how
do
we
most
effectively
leverage
the
neighborhood
organizations
to
further
racial
equity,
and
we
did,
as
a
council,
give
the
clear
directive
of
to
come
back
with
a
budget
neutral
recommendation.
A
So
that's
why
our
next
steps
are
for
us
to
then
begin.
Having
that
conversation
as
policy
makers,
I
really
love
the
structure
around
the
equitable
programming,
as
well
as
the
partnership
with
community-based
organizations
and
the
way
that
it
really
equalizes
power
between
the
community-based
organizations
as
well
as
neighborhood
organizations.
A
I'm
really
excited
about
the
collaboration
fund
that
was
discussed.
We
really
have
an
opportunity
to
be
able
to
pull
resources
and
expertise
amongst
neighborhood
organizations
in
a
way
that
also
helps
them
be
more
competitive
for
outside
funding,
so
that
the
city
doesn't
have
to
be
the
primary
and
only
funder
of
the
neighborhood
organizations,
and
it
also
doesn't
make
them
have
to
compete
in
a
pool
of
70
to
be
able
to
access
those
outside
dollars.
So
some
of
them
do
and
some
of
them
do
that
very
well.
A
But
I
think
that
this
is
just
a
really
great
way
of
thinking
about
structurally.
How
our
do
we
want
to
see
neighborhood
organizations
most
appropriately,
most
effectively
function
as
as
extensions
of
the
city
in
some
way,
and
so
I
I
want
to
thank
so
much
steve
gallagher
want
to
thank
david
roubador.
A
I
want
to
thank,
see,
terrance
and
and
brad
cousins,
our
city
attorney,
who
helped
us
with
it
and
helped
us
be
able
to
figure
out
how
to
be
able
to
move
forward
with
the
goals
that
we
would
like
to
be
able
to
achieve
through
the
work.
This
has
been
an
incredibly.
A
Long
time
coming,
there
was
lots
of
work
that
has
gone
into
this
and
we
are
in
a
completely
different
place
than
we
were
a
year
and
a
half
ago
when
this
last
the
last
time
it
came
before
the
city
council,
as
as
a
as
an
item
specifically
for
us
to
take
action
on
so
that,
and
that
really
goes
to
the
work
of
ncr
as
well
as
cura,
as
well
as
the
neighborhood
organizations
who
have
consistently
shown
up
been
involved.
A
We
are
very
lucky
to
have
this
infrastructure
in
place
of
a
city-wide
network
of
neighborhood
associations,
and
I'm
excited
to
see,
what's
what's
in
the
future,
for
for
next
steps
with
with
this
work.
So
just
thank
you
to
everybody.
Who's
been
involved,
and
with
that
I
have
a
motion
on
the
floor
to
approve
the
council
actions
that
are
listed
on
the
agenda,
and
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll.
O
D
A
A
A
Thank
you
again
for
those
that
presentation
and
for
everyone
who
joined
us
for
the
public
hearing,
we'll
move
on
to
the
consent
agenda,
which
is
items
two
through
eight
item
number
two
is
accepting
a
grant
from
the
us
department
of
housing
and
urban
development
for
a
three
and
a
half
year
period
for
corrective
lead-based
paint,
hazards,
correcting
lead-based
paint
hazards
and
other
housing-based
health
hazards
in
minneapolis
residential
units
for
income.
Qualified
properties.
A
Item
number
three
is
accepting
a
grant
from
the
minnesota
department
of
human
services,
slash
economic
assistance
and
employment
support
division
in
the
amount
of
157
113
to
assist
sheltered
and
unsheltered
homeless
persons
in
obtaining
essential
services
related
to
coven
19
prevention
and
mitigation.
From
october
1st
2020
through
september
30th
of
2022
item
number.
A
Item
number
seven
is
setting
a
public
hearing
for
november
19
2020
to
consider
the
appointment
by
the
executive
committee
of
brian
tyner
to
the
appointed
position
of
fire
chief
for
a
two-year
term,
beginning
january,
2nd
2020
and
item
number.
Eight
is
approving
council
and
mayoral
appointments
to
the
police
conduct
oversight.
Commission.
A
With
that
I
will
move
approval
of,
I
will
move
approval
of
the
consent
agenda.
Are
there?
Are
there
any
comments,
questions
or
items
that
folks
would
like
to
pull
for
more
discussion.
A
All
right
not
hearing
any-
I
just
want
to
take
a
quick
moment
to
talk
about.
I
believe
it's
item
number
four
and
really
just
be
able
to
name
that
that
that's
really
exciting
work
related
to
particularly
serving
the
latinx
community.
So
I
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
noyah
woodrich
for
her
work
with
that.
It's
incredibly
important
that
we
are
leveraging
all
resources
as
much
as
possible
to
be
able
to
serve
all
of
our
cultural
communities.
A
So
thank
you
for
for
that,
and
also
for
item
number
three.
That's
I
I.
I
wanna
also
make
sure
that
folks
know
that
it's
gonna
be
actually
sub
granted
to
two
organizations,
the
aliveness
project
and
indigenous
people's
task
force,
and
that's
really
gonna
be
doing
some.
A
Some
great
work
around
supporting
folks
who
are
iv
drug
users
to
be
able
to
help
them
with
with
the
substance,
abuse
issues
as
well
as
hiv
prevention,
and
also
with
covid19
prevention
as
well
so
really
pulling
together.
A
Multiple
needs
there.
We
have
an
amazing
staff
of
hardworking
folks
who
really
dig
deep
into
finding
outside
dollars
that
could
be
invested
into
our
community
and
then
the
last
thing.
I
want
to
mention
is
related
to
the
smoke
detectors,
what
a
great
donation
so
thank
you
to
get
a
fire
for
doing
that.
A
They
are
going
to
begin
by
distributing
them
through
the
city's
community,
full
service
community
schools
as
a
way
to
ensure
that
we
are
distributing
the
resources
prioritizing
through
to
be
bipac
communities
and
then
what's
left
then
will
be
sent
to
the
fire
stations
for
anybody
to
be
able
to
come
so
and
and
to
be
able
to
get
some.
So
that's
a
really
great
resource
and
really
innovative
thinking
about
how
do
we
get
the
resources
to
the
folks
who
need
them
the
most
most
urgently?
A
So
so
thank
you
to
everybody
in
the
fire
department,
as
well
as
as
the
donors
for
making
that
happen.
I
have
council
member
palmisano
in
queue.
N
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
just
briefly
wanted
to
mention
item
number.
Eight.
The
new
pcoc
appointments,
our
police
conduct
oversight.
Commission
has
been
down
a
number
of
members
for
too
long.
I
am
thrilled
to
have
been
able
to
personally
participate
in
this
process.
We
had
so
many
really
great
candidates
that
each
would
add
their
own
unique
piece
to
this
commission,
which
I
invest
a
lot
of
time
and
energy
in,
and
I
know
some
of
the
rest
of
you
do
as
well.
N
A
Thank
you
for
that
council
member,
paul
masano.
I
100
agree,
I'm
very
excited
for
this
work
to
be
up
and
running
right
now,
it's
just
an
incredibly
critical
time
for
the
police
conduct
oversight
commission
to
be
up
and
running
as
we're
having
these
really
big
conversations
around
the
future
of
public
safety,
which
includes
the
future
of
policing
in
our
city.
So
thank
you
for
bringing
that
up
and
and
highlighting
that
great
well.
A
That
is
all
that
I
see
in
queue,
so
I
have
moved
approval
for
the
consent
items
items
number
two
through
eight
and
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
please
call
the
roll.
E
A
A
That
item
carry
those
items,
carry
and
the
consent
agenda
is
approved.
We'll
now
move
on
to
our
final
item.
For
today,
which
is
item,
number
nine,
an
update
on
the
911
mpd
work
group.
I
will
invite
steph
to
give
that
presentation.
I
know
we
have
quite
a
few
folks
who
will
be
helping
give
this
presentation
lots
of
robust
work
happen,
so
I
will
turn
it
over
to
staff
from
here.
Thank
you.
So
much.
F
Good
afternoon
committee,
chair
cunningham
and
council
members,
I'm
gina
allen
from
the
program
a
program
manager
on
the
performance
and
innovation
team
and
I'll
be
presenting
an
update
on
the
public
safety
work
that
my
team
and
others
are
working
on,
which
includes
alternative
to
police
response
pilot
recommendations
for
2021
from
the
911
mpd
work
group.
F
F
F
F
F
F
Several
ideas
arose
as
needing
further
exploration
to
determine
viability
for
pilot
and
starting
with
this
list
of
ideas,
we
work
to
increase
the
levels
of
community
engagement
throughout
the
process
by
creating
two
surveys:
to
gain
broader
community
input
into
the
alternative
solutions
and
asking
community
members
to
lead
the
development
of
the
recommendations.
You
will
see
today
next
slide.
Please.
H
Thank
you
gina
good
afternoon
committee,
tara,
cunningham
and
council
members.
My
name
is
taylor,
crouch
dawson
and
I
am
a
planner
analyst
with
the
office
of
performance
and
innovation.
Today,
I'll
be
sharing
with
you
all
the
results
from
two
result
resident
surveys.
We
were
created
to
better
understand
the
lived
experiences
of
those
reporting
mental
health
crises,
non-emergency
crimes
to
the
city.
H
Many
people
expressed
that
they
called
9-1-1
for
help,
even
though
they
were
uncomfortable
with
the
choice.
This
discomfort
is
connected
to
the
likelihood
that
police
will
respond,
even
though
their
presence
is
not
wanted
or
needed.
Overall
folks
want
excellent
customer
service
and
empathetic
treatment
when
reporting
incidents
to
the
city.
In
addition,
people
value
autonomy.
They
want
the
ability
to
choose
how
they
report
their
incidents
and
who
responds.
H
Finally,
many
did
not
request
police
presence
when
reporting,
because
they
wanted
to
protect
themselves
or
others
from
police
violence.
Respondents
were
particularly
protective
of
their
black
indigenous
and
neighbors
of
color
many
referenced.
The
recent
murder
of
george
floyd
and
the
ongoing
realities
of
police
violence
nationwide
as
an
influencing
factor
when
choosing
to
report
incidents
to
the
city
or
not
next
slide,
please.
H
We
were
very
pleased
with
the
response
rates
for
both
surveys.
We
partnered
with
communications
and
local
agencies
to
engage
residents
via
social
media.
The
response
rates
are
visualized
to
your
right
for
each
survey
between
the
two
surveys,
our
team
of
five
staff
analyzed
responses
from
more
than
8
000
people,
including
over
23
000,
individual
open-ended
statements.
H
The
purpose
of
this
survey
was
to
help
our
city
gather
info
on
people's
experiences
when
experiencing
or
witnessing
a
mental
health
crisis.
Some
key
takeaways
from
this
slide
include
that
a
majority
of
people
do
not
call
for
help
and
a
majority
of
people
who
have
a
close
relationship
with
the
person
in
crisis.
H
H
We
do
not
know
the
demographics
of
the
other
60
of
respondents,
so
we
cannot
make
assumptions
of
their
identities
since
these
questions
were
optional.
Our
team
recognizes
that
these
demographic
breakdowns
do
not
reflect
the
racial
makeup
of
the
city.
That's
why,
later
in
this
presentation,
my
colleagues
will
share
how
we
engage
with
black
indigenous
and
people
of
color
and
workshops
that
were
pivotal
to
the
development
of
our
recommendations.
H
H
Let's
compare
those
findings
to
the
chart
on
the
right.
Respondents
were
asked
to
rate
how
comfortable
they
were
with
a
set
of
predefined
options
from
the
bottom.
People
were
uncomfortable,
interacting
with
911
police,
as
we
moved
to
the
top
people
were
most
comfortable,
interacting
with
cope
social
workers
and
the
crisis
helpline.
H
H
In
each
survey,
we
provided
respondents
with
some
open-ended
questions
and
we
took
those
responses
and
conducted
a
qualitative
analysis
by
coding
their
answers
by
themes.
This
slide
shows
how
frequent
each
theme
appeared
in
people's
answers,
but
when
we
start
on
the
left,
we
see
that
a
majority
of
people
prefer
a
mental
health,
professional
or
a
social
worker
to
respond
to
a
crisis.
H
In
contrast,
very
few
people
prefer
the
current
co-responder
model
and
even
less
prefer
a
police
officer,
as
you
see,
towards
the
bottom,
when
we
move
to
the
right,
people
want
mental
health
responders
to
be
well
trained,
unarmed
and
have
access
to
resources.
In
particular,
they
mentioned
having
a
trauma-informed
professional
trained
in
de-escalation
and
crisis
intervention.
H
H
So
the
second
survey
was
about
non-emergency
crimes
and
the
purpose
was
to
help
the
city
gather
information
on
people's
experiences.
When
reporting.
In
particular,
we
focused
on
three
crime
types:
non-violent
theft,
such
as
a
stolen
bike,
property
damage
such
as
graffiti
and
parking
or
traffic
issue,
which
would
be
like
a
par.
A
cart.
Excuse
me,
a
parked
car
obstructing
your
road
next
slide.
H
Just
like
the
mental
health
survey,
demographic
questions
for
this
survey
were
also
optional.
You'll
see
that
about
70
of
survey
respondents
answered
the
demographic
questions.
Therefore,
we
cannot
make
assumptions
on
the
30
that
did
not
answer
majority
of
people
who
did
answer
these
questions
identified
as
white
women
straight
and
between
the
ages
of
25
to
34
years
old.
Again,
our
team
recognizes
that
these
demographic
breakdowns
do
not
reflect
the
racial
makeup
of
our
city
and,
as
a
reminder,
these
results
are
just
one
piece
of
information
used
to
inform
our
work
next
slide.
H
On
this
slide,
we
see
at
the
top
how
many
people
experienced
and
reported
each
of
these
crimes.
A
major
takeaway
from
this
slide
is
that,
regardless
of
the
crime
majority
of
people
report
the
incident
to
the
city,
this
demand
emphasizes
the
need
for
our
reporting
process
to
meet
the
needs
of
residents
next
slide.
H
At
the
top
of
this
slide,
you'll
see
how
many
people
request
a
police
presence
when
reporting
a
crime
to
the
city.
We
then
ask
people
to
explain
why
we
will
start
with
a
few
that
did
request.
Police
presence
here
are
the
top
two
things
we
found.
People
wanted
their
crime
to
be
tracked
in
a
record
management
system
with
adequate
data
entry
and
evidence
collected
from
the
scene.
H
Top
two
themes
include:
first,
regardless
of
crime
type
people
wanted
to
protect
their
neighbors,
especially
their
black
indigenous
and
neighbors
of
color
from
police
violence.
In
addition,
respondents
indicated
that
police
presence
was
unnecessary
or
unwanted
for
their
incidents.
This
connects
the
themes
of
low
urgency,
low
value
of
damage
and
no
evidence
to
collect
these
themes,
mirror
our
insights
from
the
mental
health
crisis
survey
in
which
people
believe
police
are
unsafe
or
unnecessary
in
a
crisis
and
prefer
an
unarmed,
community-based
responder.
H
H
H
At
the
end,
we
ask
people
to
describe
their
ideal
reporting
process
for
future
non-emergency
crimes.
Three
key
themes
emerged.
First,
people
prefer
a
customer
service
type
reporting
process,
that's
dedicated
to
reaching
a
resolution
in
an
empathetic
and
respectful
manner.
Respondents
prefer
phone
digital
and
online
reporting
options,
that's
not
connected
to
911
or
police,
and
third
people
want
to
see
ongoing
process
improvements
to
reporting
options
to
stay
current
and
reliable
while
meeting
the
needs
of
residents.
H
A
All
right,
thank
you,
so
much
feel
free
to
continue.
H
H
H
Therefore,
we
will
be
recommending
enhanced
training
for
911
dispatchers,
as
well
as
embedding
a
mental
professional
9-1-1
to
enhance
the
response
process.
Finally,
people
value
being
treated
with
respect.
They
also
value
having
a
sense
of
safety,
a
quick
response
time
and
want
professionals
with
proper
training
to
respond
to
crises.
H
Therefore,
we
will
be
recommending
the
city
eclipse
a
mental
health,
professional
and
emt
team
to
respond
to
future
edp
calls
for
the
non-emergency
crime
survey.
We
found
the
majority
of
people
experiencing
a
crime
actually
reported
to
this
city
and
have
not
requested
police
presence,
because
police
make
them
feel
unsafe
or
unhelpful
in
resolving
the
situation
or
unnecessary
for
the
type
of
incident.
H
H
F
F
As
taylor
described,
the
insights
from
the
survey
respondents
were
used
to
ground
the
community-centered
work,
prototyping
workshops.
Normally,
these
sessions
would
be
a
robust
in-person
experience,
but
due
to
covid,
our
team
worked
to
translate
them
into
an
online
covered
friendly
format
to
ensure
the
safety
of
both
residents
and
staff.
F
Given
that
the
911
mpd
work
group
consisted
of
more
staff
members
than
community
some
feedback
we
received
was
that
staff
voice
sometimes
overshadowed
that
of
community
to
address
us
address
this
issue.
Our
team
worked
with
ncr
our
neighborhood
and
community
relations
team
to
identify
additional
residents
to
participate
in
the
workshops.
F
F
The
set
of
mental
mental
health
recommendations
is
best
thought
of
as
a
package
deal.
They
are
an
effort
to
address
mental
health
crisis,
calls
from
a
holistic
perspective
by
making
improvements
to
each
stage
of
a
call
for
service
by
taking
a
multi-pronged
approach.
The
hope
is
that
the
person
in
crisis
gets
the
best
experience
possible
all
the
way
from
before.
A
call
begins
until
responders
arrive
to
provide
that
service.
F
Dispatching
mobile
crisis
teams
focuses
on
the
fact
that
many
responders
do
not
have
specialized
training
in
mental
health,
and
we
want
to
ensure
that
community
gets
the
help.
That
is
most
supportive,
supportive
of
their
needs.
Also,
data
shows
us
that
most
mental
health
calls
are
non-violent
and
do
not
require
a
police
response.
Next
slide.
F
This
pilot
will
consist
of
mobile
crisis
teams,
made
up
of
a
mental
health
made
up
of
mental
health
providers
and
an
emt
or
other
medical
professional,
such
as
a
psychiatric
nurse
teams,
will
respond
to
low
risk.
Mental
health
calls
across
minneapolis
that
do
not
involve
a
weapon
and
where
there
is
no
immediate
safety
risk
to
sell
for
others,
communities
stress
the
desire
for
these
responders
to
be
unarmed,
dressed
down,
have
extensive
de-escalation
training
and
be
diverse
in
race
and
gender
to
best
serve
our
cultural
communities.
F
F
Our
second
recommendation
is
to
provide
specialized
mental
health
training
to
9-1-1
staff.
This
focuses
on
the
need
to
provide
the
most
appropriate
response
to
mental
health
calls
right
now.
Mental
health
calls
are
coded
together
as
edp
or
emotionally
disturbed
person,
even
though
a
one-size-fits-all
approach
does
not
allow
for
the
best
service
to
residents
next
slide.
F
F
Equipping
our
911
call
takers
and
dispatchers
with
specialized
training
in
emergency
mental
health
dispatch
will
help
ensure
that
they
have
what
they
need
to
recognize.
Mental
health
factors
in
all
call
types
pass
that
information
on
to
responders
and
know
when
to
dispatch
the
mobile
crisis
teams
described
in
the
previous
slides
next
slide.
F
Again,
you
can
see
some
of
the
details
of
the
pilot
here.
An
important
consideration
to
keep
in
mind
is
that
we
could
see
the
volume
of
mental
health
related
calls
increase
if
calls
that
would
have
previously
been
coded
differently,
such
as
suspicious
or
unwanted
person,
are
now
recognized
as
needing
a
mental
health
response.
F
Similar
to
the
previous
recommendation,
embedding
mental
health
professionals
in
9-1-1
will
help
to
triage
costs
so
that
eligible
mental
health
calls
receive
a
specialized
mental
health
response
next
slide.
Thank
you
for
this
pilot.
Mental
health
professionals
will
be
housing
911
in
our
911
call
center.
This
may
allow
the
city
to
thoroughly
triage
call
three
triage.
These
calls
to
determine
the
best
response
of
the
available
options
and,
in
some
cases,
divert
the
calls
thereby
not
even
requiring
an
in-person
response.
O
Thank
you
so
much.
I
just
wanted
to
get
clear
on
those
last
three
recommendations
are
those
three
distinct
recommendations,
because
it
almost
looked
like
the
recommendation
on
the
pilot
and
then
the
recommendation
to
embed
the
mental
health
professionals
were
very
similar
and
I
wasn't
sure
if
they
were
complementing
complementary,
complementing
or
complementary
to
each
other.
F
Those
are
two
related,
but
somewhat
distinct
recommendations,
and
so
for
those
two,
since
they
are
addressing
a
similar
need
of
making
sure
that
we
can
triage
the
cost
to
get
them
to
the
mobile
crisis,
teams
that
we
could
try
one
or
the
other
or
we
could
try
both
to
see
which
ones
produce
the
most
effective
outcomes
for
residents.
O
And
if
I
wanted
to
try
to
figure
out
what
it
would
cost
to
give
us
a
24
hour,
seven
days
a
week
coverage
because
for
the
for
the
embedded
mental
health
professionals,
which
could
be
maybe
mental
health
professionals
and
emts,
this
is
in
the
I
think
it
that
would
be
in.
O
Let
me
see
here,
I
guess,
number
three:
what
do
you
think
the
costs
are
because
the
cost
saved
from
between
200
and
5
000
to
610
000,
depending
on
how
many
shifts
would
be
covered
in
the
number
of
professionals
per
shift?
F
We
did,
and
we
can
certainly
follow
up
with
that-
more
detailed
breakdown
after
this
meeting,
and
I
can
get
that
to
you.
A
You
all
right,
thank
you
so
much.
We
will
now
welcome
nicole.
Thank
you
so
much
for
taking
the
time
to
be
here
today
and
for
your.
A
A
A
Gina,
I'm
not
seeing.
Let
me
see,
I'm
not
seeing
nicole,
maybe
I'm
confused,
but
if
you
can
clarify
what's
going
on.
F
I
am
not
sure
I
believe
she
received
the
invite,
but
I
could
certainly
speak
to
this
and
yep.
F
Yes,
so
for
this
recommendation,
we
wanted
to
provide
de-escalation
and
community
trainings
to
members
of
our
coming
community,
such
as
qpr
training,
which
stands
for
question,
persuade
refer
which
is
similar
to
cpr,
in
that,
when
someone
is
having
breathing
difficulties,
bystanders
can
respond
on
the
spot,
and
so
for.
Qpr
is
recognizing
those
same
kind
of
issues
as
they
relate
to
suicide
and
being
able
to
intervene
and
provide
a
service,
whether
that
is
supporting
that
person
yourself
or
potentially
calling
9-1-1
and
getting
them
to
services
to
help
them
work
through
that
crisis.
F
And
so
what
this
pilot
would
look
like
would
be
to
provide
a
micro
grant
to
community
leaders
and
we're
defining
community
leaders
broadly
in
this
sense.
So
not
only
those
who
are
recognized
leaders
of
established
nonprofit
organizations
or
neighborhood
organizations,
though
those
would
be
included.
F
We
also
want
to
recognize
that
there
are
folks
on
the
ground
responding
to
these
issues,
especially
after
the
uprisings,
and
so
we
want
to
include
them
in
this
process
as
well,
and
this
would
really
help
communities
to
support
each
other
and
potentially
prevent
some
of
those
calls
from
getting
nine
to
911.
If
they're
able
to
provide
enough
support
for
the
person
in
crisis
or
if
they
are
going
to
911
being
able
to
provide
the
dispatcher
with
adequate
information
so
that
they
can
begin
assessing.
That
call
and
get
the
right
response
to
that
community.
F
F
And
again
here
you
see
some
of
the
costs
associated
with
that
which
include
the
training
for
training
fees
for
community
members
funding
for
those
micro
grants
so
that
those
community
community
members
can
be
paid
a
market
rate
wage
for
their
work,
because
they
would
be
the
ones
identifying
folks
within
their
unique
communities
to
train
after
their
kind
of
train,
the
trainer
training
and,
oh
sorry,
one
more
thing
on
that.
F
One
just
wanted
to
highlight
that
this
one
could
be
one
of
the
considerations
that
this
one
is
training
enough
community
members
to
really
be
able
to
measure
an
impact,
and
this
would
go
in
kind
of
a
core
whole
cohort
based
process
and
again
this
could
increase
the
demand
for
those
mobile
price
mobile
crisis
teams.
If
more
community
members
are
learning
that
this
is
an
option
and
police
involvement
doesn't
have
to
be
a
factor
next
slide.
J
All
right,
thank
you,
gina
good
afternoon,
community
to
your
cunningham
and
council
members.
My
name
is
moya
onyuke,
I'm
a
planner
analyst
with
the
office
of
performance
and
innovation.
Today
I'll
be
sharing
with
you.
The
911
nmpd
work
group
recommendations
for
reporting
non-emergency
crimes
next
slide.
Please.
J
J
We
focused
on
these
non-emergency
reporting
issues
because
we
felt
that
they
were
low
risk,
but
they
could
have
a
high
impact
in
regards
to
freeing
up
mpd
officers
to
focus
on
more
pressing
issues.
Today,
I
will
go
over
three
recommendations
to
implement
and
two
recommendations
to
pilot,
and
these
recommendations
are
currently
in
front
of
you
next
slide.
Please.
J
For
this
recommendation,
we
identified
a
need
of
community
members,
that
is
non-emergency
issues
should
go
to
non-emergency
responders
and
not
9-1-1
or
mpd,
allowing
911
and
mpd
to
focus
on
more
emerging
issues.
From
the
survey
results,
you
see
that
respondents
are
more
comfortable
with
311
and
reporting
to
301
than
any
of
the
other
options,
regardless
of
the
crime
type.
J
Thank
you.
We
would
like
to
implement
this
recommendation
because
301
currently
takes
these
type
of
reports.
This
recommendation
will
completely
transfer
the
responsibility
of
taking
non-emergency
reports
to
3-1-1.
This
will
free
up,
9-1-1
and
mpd
by
decreasing
their
call
volume
and
allowing
them
to
focus
their
efforts
on
emergencies
and
high
priority
crimes.
This
will
also
allow
us
to
reduce
duplicative
services
in
the
city.
As
now,
31
will
be
the
sole
party
responsible
for
these
report
only
calls.
I
would
also
like
to
add.
J
J
Here
you
see
the
cost
timing
and
some
considerations,
the
main
competence
of
the
cost
would
be
personal
and
equipment
for
3-1-1.
One
of
the
main
considerations
for
this
recommendation
is
that
it
takes
about
four
to
five
months
for
three-on-one
staff
to
be
fully
trained.
This
means
that
the
sooner
that
they
are
higher
is
the
sooner
they
can
start
taking.
These
calls
next
slide.
Please.
J
The
second
recommendation
for
reporting
non-emergency
crimes
is
to
create
a
to
create
one
comprehensive
online
reporting
system.
For
this
recommendation
we
identified
a
community
need
that
is,
residents
want
to
have
an
online
reporting
option
that
is
simple,
efficient,
transparent
and
accessible,
and
when
we
think
about
accessible
we're
talking
about
being
able
to
translate
into
different
languages
and
being
easy
to
use.
J
Now,
both
the
surveys
and
the
work
group
identified
the
need
for
reporting
non-emergency
crimes
via
a
friendly
online
system
that
can
receive
a
wide
variety
of
issues,
with
a
status
tracker
and
an
immediate
response.
That's
the
an
immediate
response
that
they
can
use
for
insurance
next
slide.
Please.
J
We
would
like
to
implement
this
recommendation
because
our
current
301
and
police
websites
can
be
a
little
bit
confusing
and
require
residents
to
figure
out
where
they
can
make
the
report.
We
want
to
reduce
this
confusion,
and
this
will
also
allow
the
city
to
improve
the
way
with
which
we
route
calls
that
are
reported
online
to
our
various
city
responders.
J
The
main
goal
of
this
recommendation
really
is
to
you
know,
as
I
said
before,
is
to
provide
residents
with
a
simple,
efficient,
transferable
and
accessible
system.
This
recommendation
will
also
allow
us,
as
a
city,
to
provide
residents
with
a
new
experience
allowing
them
to
regain
their
autonomy
and
feel
empowered
to
use
city
services
to
resolve
their
issues,
creating
a
friendly
and
accessible
system
that
lets
residents
track
their
service.
J
Their
service
request
creates
an
accountable
approach
to
reporting
that
will
instill
trust
in
our
residence
and
we'll
also
potentially
reduce
the
instances
of
multiple
requests
for
the
same
issue.
Next
slide,
please,
the
city
of
minneapolis
I.t
department
has
let
us
know
that
they
may
not
have
the
capacity
to
do
this
internally.
J
The
implementation
will
take
anywhere
between
six
to
ten
months
because
it
involves
custom
and
complicated
technology
builds.
I
would
also
like
to
add
the
survey
respondents
express
the
need
for
transparency
in
the
process.
They
want
to
know
what
happens
to
the
report
after
it's
taken.
They
want
to
know
the
next
steps
in
the
process,
and
they
want
to
have
follow-ups
upgrading
our
online
reporting
services
giving
residents
the
ability
to
track
their
cases
will
get
us
one
step
closer
to
that
transparency
and
accountability
that
we
strive
for
as
a
city
next
slide,
please.
J
The
third
recommendation
for
reporting
non-emergency
crimes
is
to
conduct
an
awareness
campaign
about
reporting
options
via
3-1-1.
For
this
recommendation,
we
identified
the
need
for
residents
to
be
aware
of
the
reporting
options
available
and
the
appropriate
ways
to
use
them.
The
work
group
identified
the
need
for
the
city
to
be
more
closely
engaged
with
residents
and
establish
ongoing,
intentional
and
culturally
competent
relationships
with
our
residents.
The
work
group
also
identified
that
there
are
that
there
needs
to
be
a
clear
list
of
steps
online
for
how
to
report
these
various
issues
next
slide,
please.
J
J
Promoting
this
guide
to
reporting
will
help
us
and
residents
empower
them
and
give
them
the
autonomy
to
use
city
services
in
the
right
way
to
resolve
their
issues.
J
Next
slide,
please,
the
cost
of
the
implementation
will
be
heavily
dependent
on
the
different
reporting
options
and
strategies.
The
and
the
mediums
that
we
use
to
spread
awareness.
We
will
continue
event
we'll
continuously
evaluate
the
effectiveness
of
our
messaging
throughout
the
whole
process,
to
ensure
that
we
are
pushing
the
right
messages
at
the
right
times
and
to
the
right
people
next
slide.
Please.
J
When
asked
what
the
ideal
reporting
experience
looked
like
for
reporting
non-emergency
crimes
when
it
came
to
in-person
responses,
respondents
expressed
that
they
want
an
unarmed
dressed
down.
City
staff
with
specialized
training
and
excellent
customer
service
to
respond
to
their
non-emergency
needs
next
slide.
Please.
J
We
would
like
to
pilot
this
recommendation,
because
this
would
be
a
new
level
of
service.
The
city
would
be
providing
301
currently
takes
reports
over
the
phone.
However,
in
certain
cases
there
might
write
a
need
for
an
in-person
response
to
take
these
reports
when
necessary.
We
would
like
to
be
able
to
provide
residents
with
this
in-person
response
that
is
quick
and
provides
excellent
customer
service
and
helps
residents
resolve
their
issues.
J
You
know,
reading
through
a
few
thousand
survey
responses
from
the
minneapolis
residents.
It
was
clear
that
they
felt
that
when
they
report
crimes
with
the
current
system,
they
felt
unheard
and
at
times
you
know
they
felt
unheard
of
times,
and
they
really
did
express
that
they
would
like
an
empathetic
response
and
they
really
just
wanted
to
felt
to
feel
heard
and
to
feel
like
the
issue
that
they
were
reporting
mattered
next
slide.
J
Please
now
this
will
be
a
new
service
in
the
city
and
there
will
have
to
be
a
lot
of
trial
and
error
as
we
go
through
this
process.
As
we
pass
this
recommendation,
we
want
to
learn
what
works
and
what
doesn't
and
during
a
pirate
pilot.
This
will
allow
us
to
adjust
accordingly
until
we
find
the
best
way
to
provide
the
service
to
our
residents,
and
this
is
why
we're
recommending
this
for
a
pilot
next
slide.
Please.
J
The
fifth
and
final
recommendation
for
reporting
on
emergency
crimes
is
to
transfer
parking,
related,
call
responses
to
traffic
control.
For
this
recommendation,
we
identify
the
need
of
community.
That
is
non-emergency
issues
once
again
should
be
handled
by
a
non-emergency
responder
and
not
9-1-1
and
mpd,
who
have
more
pressing
issues
to
attend
to.
As
I
mentioned
earlier,
and
as
you
saw
in
the
survey
responses
and
the
work
group
sessions,
residents
would
like
an
unarmed
response
that
can
help
with
enforcement
and
resolution
of
their
non-emergency
parking
concerns,
and
our
traffic
control
meets
this
criteria
next
slide.
Please.
J
J
This
pilot
will
involve
expanding
the
operating
hours
of
regulatory
services
and
traffic
control
agents.
This
could
come
in
the
form
of
expanding
shifts
or
giving
current
staff
overtime,
but
this
is
what
we
will
learn
as
we
design
the
pro.
The
pilot
traffic
control
agents
are
trained
to
be
excellent.
Customer
service
representatives
for
the
city
and
they
do
provide
residents
with
resolutions
for
their
parking
concerns
next
slide.
Please.
J
We
know
that
traffic
control
already
responds
to
most
parking
calls
during
the
daytime.
However,
they
have
limited
operating
hours
in
the
hours
when
they
are
closed.
This
is
when
mpd
responds
to
a
majority
of
the
parking
problems.
It
will
be
important
for
us
to
design
the
pilot
in
a
way
that
accounts
for
traffic
controls
limited
hours.
J
However,
understanding
the
high
volume
of
parking
calls
that
police
respond
to
happen
between
5
p.m
and
1
a.m,
and
as
we
look
into
potentially
expanding
traffic
controls
hours
for
the
pilot,
and
with
this
I
conclude,
the
recommendations
for
the
non-reporting
for
the
non-emergency
reporting
crimes
and
I'll
now
be
handing
the
next
section
of
this
presentation
to
my
colleague
gina.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
F
Thank
you
monya,
and
we
were
having
a
few
technical
difficulties
because
our
community
member,
nicole
weiler,
says
she
is
in
the
meeting
so
we're
trying
to
figure
out
if
we're
able
to
go
back
to
one
of
the
recommendations,
so
she
could
cover
it
more
thoroughly
and
chair
cunningham,
I'm
not
sure
where
we
are
at
with
that.
So
if
it
could,
let
me
know
if
I
should
just
continue
or
if
we're
able
to
get
her
on.
A
If
she
is
logged
in
does
she
have
the
ability
to
unmute
herself?
We,
we
just
don't
see
her
logged
in,
but
if
she's
saying
she
is.
F
Well,
that's
the
end
of
the
pilot
recommendation
presentation
that
we
have
prepared
for
you
today.
There
is
additional
information
included
in
the
appendix
regarding
the
racial
equity
impact
assessment,
particularly
on
how
these
programs
stand
to
reduce
the
contact
with
law
enforcement
for
black
indigenous
and
people
of
color.
F
I'd
like
to
offer
my
appreciation
to
all
community
members,
city
staff
and
subject
matter,
experts
who
invested
in
this
work
over
the
last
year
and
a
half
and
thank
you,
committee,
chair,
cunningham
and
council
members
for
having
us
here
today.
We
are
available
for
questions
before
we
move
into
the
next
two
presentations.
A
Thank
you
for
that
council
member
palmisano,
followed
by
councilmember
fletcher.
N
Thank
you
I,
this
is
really
exciting
stuff.
Thank
you
for
all
of
this
work.
I
do
have
a
couple
of
questions
and
I'm
not
sure
who
it's
for
so
I
guess
if
I
could
direct
them
to
gina
and
you
can
weigh
in
as
to
who
might
I'm
curious.
N
You
had
said
that
part
of
your
effort
to
gain
knowledge
about
how
the
public
felt
about
these
were
from
surveys,
and
then
you
also
mentioned
focus
groups,
but
were
there
other
ways
that
you
came
to
these
recommendations
like,
for
example,
where
mental
health
professionals
consulted
on
how
we
would
design
a
new
response,
and,
and
how
like,
can
you
tell
me,
was
it
a
professional
group
or
were
they
individuals?
N
Q
One
chair,
cunningham,
councilmember
palmisano-
this
is
brian
smith,
director
of
performance
and
innovation
good
afternoon,
taylor's
likely
not
the
best
person
to
answer
that
question.
The
person
who
had
the
most
intimate
knowledge
of
it
would
be
gina
since
she
was
the
project
manager
for
the
311
work
group,
and
the
answer
is
yes,
and
she
can
speak
to
the
list
of
people
that
we
did
have
involved
in
that
process.
F
Thank
you
chair
cunningham
and
councilmember
palmisano
and
brian.
Yes,
we
did
consult
with
a
variety
of
mental
health
providers
from
different
organizations.
F
F
We
also
have
spoken
with
nami
and
the
executive
director
there
sue
abrahalden,
as
well
as
speaking
with
several
programs
similar
to
this
across
across
our
country,
one
of
which
being
denver
star
who
operates
a
similar
pilot
program.
Currently.
N
So
in
your
efforts
with
these
groups,
have
you
found
people
interested
in
participating
in
such
a
pilot
on
the
provider
side
of
this
work.
F
Specific
conversations
about
who
would
actually
be
on
those
mobile
crisis
teams,
those
conversations
are
in
process
and
we
were
waiting
to
hear
what
direction
council
was
wanting
to
go
with
the
recommendations
before
we
got
kind
of
more
into
those
details.
However,
we
also
did
hear
that
there
will
be
some
interest
in
being
a
part
of
this
program.
N
Great
chair
cunningham,
if
I
may,
I
have
another
question
about
the
3-1-1
piece.
Yes,
of
course,
I
appreciate
that
these
survey
results
show
that
people
have
the
greatest
comfort
in
calling
9-1-1
and
it's
clear
from
this
data
that
they
want
a
government
official
to
report
these
incidents
to.
N
But
did
you
go
so
far
in
the
survey
to
see
if
they
are
then
satisfied
with
311
to
solve
their
problem?
Right,
for
example,
trying
to
think
of
a
constituent
example
modifying
a
police
report
that
they've
made
because
they
found
more
things
missing
right
of
their
property.
It
have.
We
have
we
gotten
through
to
that
part
of
it.
F
And
I
believe
I
will
pass
that
question
to
moana,
who
has
been
working
both
closely
on
the
survey
and
with
3-1-1
in
the
theft
report
only
implementation
plan-
someone
if
you
have
some
insight
to
that
that
you'd
like
to
share.
J
Yeah,
of
course,
thank
you
gina,
so
I've
been
working
with
301
to
develop
the
implementation
plan
to
transfer
theft
reports,
so
that's
already
underway
and
during
this
process,
what
we've
learned
is
that
3-1-1
they
will
need
additional
access
to
pims,
which
is
the
system
in
which
the
reports
are
entered
now.
To
get
this
additional
access,
mpd
would
need
to
provide
them
this
additional
access.
J
J
There
are
various
non-mpd
departments
in
the
city
that
do
use
pims
and
have
that
increased
access.
You
know
be
that
opcr
or
certain
departments
and
regulatory
services,
so
it
is
something
that
is
possible
for
311
to
do
and
something
that
we
are
looking
into,
especially
if
we're
trying
to
give
residents
the
best
service
possible
right.
We
don't
want
to
be
bouncing
them
around.
You
want
them
to
be
able
to
call
through
one
to
say:
hey,
I'm
taking
I'm
giving
you
this
report.
Oh,
I
have
additional
information
aina.
Can
you
enter
this
report
for
me?
N
And
then
I
guess
my
last
part
of
that
was
just
melania.
Were
residents
familiar
with
the
current
hours
of
operation,
or
did
they
weigh
in
on
what
appropriate
hours
of
that
kind
of
service
might
be?
I
think
they
could
realize
it
would
not
be
a
24
7
kind
of
operation.
J
Yes,
yes,
if
reading
the
qualitative
responses,
it
came
up
here
and
there,
knowing
that
311
is
not
a
24-7
response,
it's
not
a
24-7
operation.
I
will
say
in
the
implementation
plan
kind
of
when
I
go
through
it.
It
is
something
that
we
did
address.
You
know
there
are
work
around
that,
whether
that
be
you
know
when
residents
do
call
301.
J
You
know
if
they're,
not
if
resident,
calls,
301
and
301
is
closed.
They
get
a
voicemail
that
lets
them
know
that
they
can
report
online,
which
will
be
the
exact
same
thing
as
reporting
over
the
phone
or
they
can
call
back
during
business
hours.
Also,
if
they
do
call
9-1-1
to
report,
9-1-1
and
3-1
is
closed.
9-1-1
also
gives
that
gives
them
that
message,
letting
them
know
that
they
can
report
online
or
they
could,
or
they
could
call
back
zero
on
one
during
the
regular
business
hours.
D
Thank
you
cunningham
and
thank
you
to
the
entire
team.
That's
worked
on
this
there's
some
incredible
work
here
and
I
think
it's
really
valuable
to
have
this
kind
of
feedback
and
what
I
really
love
about
this
is
that
we
are
challenging
ourselves
as
a
city
to
provide
a
higher
level
of
customer
service
and
to
provide
a
higher
level
of
quality
interaction.
D
You
know
at
a
number
of
different
levels,
and
I
think
it
you
know
if,
if
we're
getting
the
feedback
that
that
percentage
of
people
are
uncomfortable,
calling
911,
that
tells
us
we
have
to
fix
our
response.
We
have
to
do
things
differently,
so
that
our
goal
should
be
that
everybody
feels
comfortable
calling
9-1-1.
D
Our
goal
should
be
that
every
single
person
in
the
city
whose
taxes
fund
our
activity
feels
comfortable
calling
911,
knowing
that
we're
going
to
send
an
appropriate
response,
and
I
think
that
the
recommendations
here
move
us
closer
to
that.
I
think
that
we're
you
know
really
making
some
headway.
So
I
appreciate
this
framing.
I
appreciate
the
really
positive
opportunity
in
front
of
us
to
move
this
work
forward
and
I'm
excited
about
both
tracks.
D
Both
the
the
mental
health
response
and
the
three
on
one
reporting,
so
thank
you
for
all
of
the
work
that's
gone
into
this
and
for
really
establishing
a
framework
for
us
to
move
forward.
I
think
people
are
going
to
be
very
excited
about
this.
D
One
thing
that
I
am
wondering
about
is,
I
think
people
are
so
excited
about
the
mental
health
response
that
I
think,
there's
going
to
be
a
little
bit
of
impatience
with
a
pilot
that
only
covers
two
shifts
with
only
putting
two
teams
out,
and
so
I'm
interested
in
having
us
really
look
at
how
how
quickly
do
we
think
we
can
ramp
up
to
covering
the
whole
city
and
covering
the
whole
city,
24
7,
in
the
mental
health
response-
and
you
know
I
I
understand
that
there
are
some
practical
reasons
why
it's
a
little
bit
easier
to
implement
something
if
you're
implementing
it
in
a
you
know
in
a
smaller
scale,
so
that
you
can
work
out
the
bugs.
D
But
I
I
think
it's
really
important
too,
that
for
us
to
get
good
data,
I
don't
think
people
are
going
to
start
treating
911
differently
until
they
know
that
we
have
the
citywide
coverage
and
know
that
wherever
they
are
in
the
city,
they'll
they'll
get
this
new
response
and
then
I
think
people
will
start
more
reliably
trying
it.
So
I'm
my
question
is,
I
guess
you
know
how
far
can
we
push
this?
D
Because
I
really
think
that
this
is
an
exciting
opportunity
and
I'm
hopeful
that
at
some
point
in
the
next
year
we
could
ramp
up
to
a
much
bigger
scale,
pilot.
Q
This
is
brian
again
thanks
for
your
question,
and
the
only
thing
that
I
can
say
to
that
question
is
that's
what
the
performance
and
innovation
team
is
here
for
and
all
of
our
partners
to
test
this
and
make
sure
that
we
get
it
right,
but
that
is
literally
a
decision
for
the
council
to
make
in
our
recommendations
we
talked
about
how
how
long
it
would
take
us
as
far
as
a
timeline
to
implement
what
we've
currently
proposed
and
I'm
assuming
it
might
take
just
a
little
bit
more
time
if,
if
the
decision
that
the
council
makes
is
to
ramp
this
up
more,
but
I
think
that
is
something
again
that
we're
willing
to
try.
Q
If
that's
the
direction
that
we
get
from
the
council,
the
considerations
again
would
be
time
and
then
additional
money
because
of
what
we're
proposing
at
two
teams,
and
if
you
wanted
to
ramp
it
up
cover
more
shifts
and
even
more
parts
of
the
city
more
thoroughly.
Then,
of
course
those
are
some
considerations
that
would
need
to
be
that
you
guys
would
have
to
deal
with.
However,
if
that's
the
direction
that
we
get,
then
you
can
go
back.
Q
Rework
numbers
have
different
conversations
to
expand
it
and
get
back
to
you
with
some
more
solid
answers,
but
right
now
the
only
thing
we
have
for
you
is
the
pilot
that
we
propose.
Q
Q
R
Chair
cunningham,
council
member
for
sure
one
other
thing
to
keep
in
mind,
is
that
on
the
slides
you'll
see
for
our
timeline.
We
have
planning
implementation
and
analysis
and
know
that
while
we're
giving
some
benchmarks
for
what
to
expect
for
those
timing
for
that
timing,
it's
not
as
though,
during
implementation,
we're
not
sort
of
like
regularly
evaluating
how
things
are
going
so
that
time
is
not
as
distinct
as
it
looks
in
reality.
R
During
the
pilot
phase,
we
would
regularly
be
checking
in
to
see
how
things
are
going,
and
I
think
that
opens
an
opportunity
if
we're
able
to
figure
things
out
quickly
and
things
are
going
really
well
and
the
response
is
really
positive.
That's
one
path!
If
we're
experiencing
a
lot
of
barriers,
we're
seeing
there's
technology,
that's
needed,
you
know
that
would
take
us
down
a
different
path,
so
the
process
looks
very
distinct,
but
it's
quite
adaptable
in
during
the
pilot
itself,.
D
That's
great,
thank
you,
and
I
know
when
you've
presented
previously,
you've
had
some
analysis
around
the
volume
of
calls.
If
we
were
to
take
all
of
the
calls
that
are
proposed
to
be
taken
from
the
mental
health
teams
and
then
all
the
reporting
calls
how
many
911
calls
that
are
currently
being
dispatched
to
mpd.
Does
this
sort
of
take
out
of
mpd's
queue.
R
Chair
cunningham,
council
member
fletcher,
it's
hard
for
us
to
be
able
to
answer
that
at
this
point,
I
think
we
need
to
do
some
further
analysis
and
that
will
include
the
nature
of
the
pilot,
the
design
of
the
pilot
and
also
you
know,
I
think,
we'll
have
to
do
some
early
testing
to
better
understand
that.
So,
for
example,
we
don't
know
today
how
many
well
we
have
the
volume.
We
don't
know
how
many
times
there
are
competing
calls
at
the
same
time
or
whether
they
are
spread
out.
R
We
don't
know
whether
the
a
pilot
of
an
alternative
response
in
giving
a
different
kind
of
and
different
level
of
service
would
take
longer
or
be
more
efficient,
and
so,
at
this
stage
it's
a
little
early
for
us
to
be
able
to
answer
that
with
with
high
levels
of
confidence.
R
D
A
All
right,
thank
you.
I
do
want
to
take
a
quick
step
back
because
nicole
wheeler
was
able
to
join
us,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
create
space
for
community
voice,
given
they
have
put
so
much
time
and
energy
into
this
work
as
well
so
gina.
I
want
to
pass
it
back
over
to
you
so
that
you
can
set
up
nicole
to
to
be
able
to
speak
to
this
item.
F
Thank
you,
committee,
chair
cunningham,
yes,
want
to
value
nicole's
time
for
joining
us
here
today,
and
I
also
know
that
she
will
do
a
much
better
job
explaining
the
community
component
than
I
I
did
so.
Her
slide
begins
on
slide
number
34.
So
if
we
could
go
back
there
to
allow
nicole
to
speak
to
that.
S
Lovely
thank
you
so
much
I've
been
in
the
meeting.
I
really
appreciate
you
making
space.
I
committee
chair,
cunningham
and
council
members.
My
name
is
nicole
weiler
and
I've
served
as
a
volunteer
community
voice
on
this
work
group
since
the
spring
of
2019.
S
A
S
Know,
thank
you
next
slide,
please.
S
I
know
that
gina
mentioned
that
the
goal
is
multifaceted,
so
this
pilot
program
really
helps
to
train
leaders
for
the
majority
of
our
83
minneapolis
neighborhoods,
so
that
they
can
de-escalate
community
issues.
So
vice
chair
fletcher,
what
you
were
just
saying
about
feeling
like
the
timeline
might
be
kind
of
long.
This
pilot
might
be
something
to
consider.
In
the
meantime,
it's
designed
to
not
only
acknowledge
but
invest
in
existing
leaders.
S
So
it
would
behoove
the
council
to
create
and
invest
in
circumstances
to
bring
those
tools
to
the
community,
rather
than
potentially
continue
to
punish
them
for
exercising
alternatives
that
the
city
is
only
now
willing
to
fund
a
potential
course
would
be
qpr,
which
again,
I
think
was
mentioned
as
like
the
mental
health
version
of
cpr.
It's
an
intervention
tactic
that
identifies
the
crisis,
interrupts
it
and
directs
that
person
to
care
and
if
qpr
is
paired
with
bystander
intervention,
then
we'll
build
skills
that
further
help
our
neighborhoods
build.
S
The
micro
grants
also
contribute
to
funding
for
supplies
and
shared
meals,
building
community
and
each
micro
grant
would
support
those
community
leaders
to
provide
free,
no-cost
trainings.
In
their
area,
whether
that's
a
neighborhood
organization,
a
faith-based
group
or
other
gathering
space
next
slide,
please.
S
The
planning
period
involves
community
outreach,
a
nomination
portal
to
identify
and
engage
with
a
diverse
set
of
existing
community
leaders,
as
well
as
the
development
and
management
of
the
micro
grant
program
and
a
process
for
contracting
with
a
trusted.
Non-Enterprise
facilitation
group
over
the
course
of
four
to
six
months.
Existing
leaders
will
be
trained
and
supported
to
bring
this
education
back
to
our
communities
and,
as
far
as
considerations
go,
it
can
be
difficult
to
measure
the
impact
of
adding
something
in
order
to
eliminate
something
else.
S
A
Thank
you
again,
nicole,
so
appreciate
you
being
here
taking
the
time
to
be
here
today,
as
well
as
the
service
that
you
have
provided
the
residents
of
our
city.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
doing
that.
Truly,
truly
appreciated
with
that
we
have
council,
member
gordon
in
q,.
O
Thank
you
very
much,
and
I
don't
have
to
take
a
lot
more
time,
but
it's
really
exciting
to
see
this
work
come
forward.
I
will
say
that
I've
been
meeting
with
lots
of
block
clubs
in
my
ward,
talking
to
a
lot
of
people
in
this
alternative
response
is
something
that
really
resonates
with
folks.
O
I
also
will
note
that
san
francisco
recently
unveiled
a
proposal
that
they're
working
on
where
the
fire
department
and
the
health
department
in
san
francisco
are
working
together
to
create
this
fourth
alternative
response.
O
O
I'm
really
hopeful
that
the
county
will
be
willing
to
partner
with
us
on
this,
so
that
we
can
do
something
with
it
and
I'll
actually
note
that
I
think
the
alternative
responses
to
reports
and
crimes
that
are
property
crimes
through
311
and
other
departments
is
really
promising,
as
well
as
the
training
of
community
members
in
this
area.
So
I
think,
you've
given
us
a
lot
of
really
good
information
here.
O
But
really,
I
think
we
can
make
a
really
big
difference
moving
forward
and
I'm
really
glad
that
the
timing
of
this
comes
before
our
budget,
public
hearings
and
those
kinds
of
considerations.
So
we
can
take
this
into
account
and
look
at
how,
at
least
next
year,
we
can
have
some
of
these
initial
pilots
up
and
running.
A
Ray
thank
you
so
much
I'd
like
to
just
add
my
excitement.
This
is
really,
I
think,
an
amazing
example
of
process
of
how
to
be
able
to
do.
You
have
an
idea
that
the
policymakers
say
this
is
something
we
would
like
to
see
and
then
just
a
really
solid
process
of
producing
the
outcomes.
A
I
I
I'm
a
big
nerd
for
that
and
just
want
to
make
sure
to
take
the
time
to
say
that
opi
is
an
amazing
work
with
thinking
about
inclusive
design,
human
centered
design,
also
thinking
about
the
budgetary
implications,
how
it
roll
out
how
it
would
be
evaluated,
I
mean
really
phenomenal
work
team.
So
thank
you
and
I
also
want
to
make
sure
to
say
thank
you
to
all
of
the
community
members
who
have
participated
in
this
work.
This
has
been
quite
a
bit
of
time
coming.
A
So
thank
you
very
much
for
for
investing
time
and
energy
to
be
of
service
to
our
city.
So
thank
you
so
much
for
that.
I
I
have
a
question
around
next
steps
and
it's
totally
okay.
A
If
this
this
hasn't
been
quite
figured
out
yet,
but
with
the
pilots,
the
the
pilots
and
well
specifically,
we'll
say,
with
the
the
pilots
related
to
mental
health
response,
do
we
have
any
idea
of
what
the
next
steps
look
like
in
terms
of
how
those
pilots
would
roll
out,
because
office
of
performance
and
innovation
does
not
necessarily
do
mental
health
work?
So
I'm
just
curious
about
if
there's
been
any
clarity
around
what
those
next
steps
would
look.
R
Like
cheer
cunningham
thanks
for
the
question,
the
the
team
does
not
have,
you
know
is:
are
not
mental
health
professionals,
certainly,
but
we
do
have
expertise
in
running
and
standing
up
pilots,
and
so
you
know,
I
think,
the
way
that
this
typically
works
when
we
take
on
projects
like
this
is
to
do
the
work
to
figure
out
who
would
be
involved,
how
they'd
be
involved,
what
the
goals
and
and
metrics
and
hypotheses
of
the
pilot
would
be
standing
up
partners
engaging
the
partners
who
are
involved
in
actually
running
the
pilot,
and
so,
for
example,
we
may
not
be
the
ones
responsible
for
holding
a
contract.
R
If
there's
someone
outside
the
city
partnering
with
us,
we
would
work
with
a
department
to
do
that,
and
so,
but
we
would
support
them
in
that
and
support
them
in
evaluating
how
things
are
going,
etc,
so
that
work
would
start
by
identifying
our
internal
and
external
partners
and
the
structure
and
goals
etc.
For
the
pilot
itself,.
A
So,
thank
you
for
that.
So
from
your
from
your
perspective,
then
these
pilots
would
continue
to
primarily
live
in
as
soon
as
they
continue,
but
this
work-
I
guess
I
could
say,
would
continue
to
live
in
the
city
coordinator's
office.
R
Yeah,
I
think
we're
we're
equipped
to
and
prepared
to
support
the
pilots
themselves.
The
work
we
do
need
to
rely
on
partners
across
the
city
to
do
the
work
itself,
and
so
the
details
of
that
I
mean
we've
been
talking
to
departments.
Of
course,
as
we've
been
heading
into
these
recommendations
and
would
need
to
once
we
know
you
know
which
pilots
we
want
to
move
forward
with
and
to
what
scale.
Then
we
would
start
to
have
more
serious
conversations
about
what
that
would
look
like,
but
yeah.
R
A
Great.
Thank
you
for
that
information.
Are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
my
colleagues.
A
All
right,
and
is
there
more
to
present
related
to
this.
F
Chair
cunningham,
yes,
we
have
the
implementation
plan
for
311.
Transferring
those
theft
report
only
calls,
as
well
as
an
update
on
the
work
with
the
department
to
evaluate
potential
responses
to
additional
problem.
Nature
codes.
A
Okay,
well,
let's
go
ahead
and
get
that
started,
and
I
will
check
in
with
folks
because
we're
running
on
our
three
now
this
was
quite
a
robust
meeting.
We
thought
it
would
be,
but
we
always
need
to
maybe
overestimate
is
because
we
love
to
get
into
the
details
here.
So
I'll
go
ahead
and
let
you
all
get
started
with
this
second
part
of
the
presentation.
J
All
right
good
afternoon
again,
council,
member
cunningham
and
council
members
today,
I
will
be
going
over
the
implementation
plan
to
transfer
step
report
only
calls
from
9-1-1
and
mpd
to
3-1-1
next
slide.
Please
in
front
of
you,
you
see
the
table
of
contents.
This
is
what
we
will
be
covering
today
in
this
update
on
where
the
implementation
plan
is
and
letting
you
all
know
how
we're
going
to
move
forward
next
slide.
Please.
J
Please,
since
then,
the
office
of
performance
innovation
has
been
able
to
work
with
301,
911
and
mpd
to
develop
a
detailed
implementation
plan
which
is
now
complete
and
currently
underway.
Now
I
do
want
to
give
context
on
theft.
Report
only
calls
because
it
can
very
easily
be
mistaken
with
other
calls
such
as
burglaries
and
robberies.
J
J
J
No
firearms
are
involved,
be
that
a
firearm
stolen
or
a
firearm
used
in
the
robbery,
no
injuries
involved
or
threat
of
force,
because
that
would
then
be
considered
a
robbery.
The
incident
did
not
occur
within
the
last
10
minutes.
So
when
we
say
that
before
only
calls,
we
really
mean
those
calls
where
you
know.
Maybe
you
get
to
your
car,
you
left
your
door
open
overnight.
Someone
went
in
and
took
some
things
or
you
are
sitting
in
a
public
space.
You
walk
away.
J
Someone
takes
your
airpods
or
your
iphone,
you
don't
know
who
did
it
no
evidence
and
things
like
that
situations,
where
you're
really
just
recording
the
steps
either
to
report
trends
or
you
need
an
insurance
or
maybe
you
hope
for
some
form
of
resolution,
but
you
really
don't
have
that
many
leads.
It's
those
calls
where
you're
just
reporting
next
slide.
Please
now
the
performance
and
innovation
team.
In
this
process
we
were
able
to
work
with
3191
mpd
to
develop
the
plan
and
manage
and
organize
it
311
mpd.
J
They
worked
well
with
us
to
get
us
the
information
that
we
needed
and
the
plan
is
now
complete.
Next
slide.
Please,
in
this
process,
we
were
able
to
create
a
new
process,
identify
the
major
tasks
and
timeline
and
parties
responsible
for
these
tasks.
We're
also
able
to
identify
the
support
needed
for
successful
implementation.
J
J
I
would
like
to
note
that
the
set
report
only
calls
that
are
handled
by
301
and
mpd
are
treated
both
in
the
same
way,
so
transferring
these
calls
would
really
result
in
an
increased
call
volume
for
301,
but
it
will
also
be
freeing
up
mpd
to
do
other
to
do
more
important
things
and
next
slide.
Please
in
front
of
you,
you
will
see
the
tasks
that
have
been
identified
and
timelines
attached
to
them
with
the
key
personnel
responsible
and
if
council
members
are
interested
in
more
detail,
there
is
a
document
with
more
detail
now.
J
301
has
already
begun
the
hiring
process
and
the
goal
is
to
begin
training.
These
new
customer
service
agents
by
january,
I
would
like
to
note
that
it
takes
about
that
it
takes
three
and
one
about
four
to
five
months
to
complete
training,
so
this
means
they
will
not
be
able
to
completely
transfer
these
calls
until
may
of
2021.
J
next
slide.
Please-
and
I
know,
council
member
paul
masano
brought
this
up,
but
I
did
was
just
want
to
touch
it
again.
301
does
have
limited
access
to
pim
currently
and
301
can
access
pins
to
fill
out
the
report,
but
they
could
not
pull
the
report
back
up
if
the
resident
calls
back
and
to
give
residents
this
holistic
experience,
we
do
need
zero
one
to
have
this
access
for
them
to
be
able
to
do
so.
J
Our
reporting-
and
we
already
touched
accessibility,
reporting
options
and
how
we
do
hope
to
address
these
in-person
reporting
options
with
the
fourth
recommendation
from
the
911
mpd
work
group,
and
next
steps
are
really
just
continuing
the
implementation
plan
that
I
started
with
that.
I
have
completed
the
presentation.
J
Thank
you
all
for
your
time
and
if
you
have
any
questions
I
am
here.
Thank
you.
A
A
All
right
not
saying
any,
thank
you
for
that
thorough
implementation,
implementation
plan
again
big
process
nerd,
so
much
appreciate
that
that,
in
addition-
and
I
do
believe
that
we
are
on
the
final
portion
here
with
the
department
problem-
nature
code
review,
so
I
will
turn
it
back
over
to
you
all.
Thank
you.
T
Sir
cunningham
committee
members,
jonathan
williams,
kinsell
a
program
manager
with
the
office
of
performance,
innovation.
Sorry,
I
did
cut
a
light
on.
I
thought
I'd
have
more
light
than
I
have
now,
but
it
got
darker
timeline,
but
I'm
gonna
be
brief.
So
can
we
skip
two
slides
one
more.
T
Actually,
just
one
final
one
perfect,
so
as
you
all
made
aware,
my
director,
brian
smith,
came
to
all
earlier
this
summer
and
gave
the
results
of
an
initial
survey
that
our
office
did
with
departments
to
determine
what
problem
nature
codes
the
enterprise
could
potentially
directly
respond
to,
without
or
with
little
assistance
from
the
minneapolis
police
department.
T
I'm
after
further
conversations,
some
work
by
my
colleagues
that
you
all
said
saw
on
the
previous
slides.
We
were
able
to
identify
a
regulatory
services
as
a
potential
partner
that
could
potentially
take
on
at
most
10
problem
nature
codes
for
direct
response,
but
with
confidence.
T
Five
problem,
digital
codes
that
can
provide
direct
response
with
in
those
five
are
parking
problems,
as
you
know,
is
being
recommended
as
a
pilot,
animal
bite,
aggressive
dog,
animal
call
and
animal
fight
in
conjunction
with
the
minneapolis
police
department.
I
would
just
like
to
address
that
in
completing
this
review.
T
Regulatory
services
really
focuses
analysis
on
scope
and
risk,
as
well
as
staffing,
training
and
job
classification
and
trying
to
make
sure
that
they
ensure
the
safety
of
their
staff,
which
they're
currently
doing
now
and
would
continue
to
do
as
they
do
this
work
next
slide.
Please.
T
So,
with
primary
focus
being
on
animal
control
calls
that
they
can
take
on
current
take
on
as
soon
as
2022,
but
if
there
is
some
directive
from
council
in
the
committee,
possibly
as
early
as
2021
with
additional
vetting
and
resources,
I
just
want
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
detail
about
what
that
could
potentially
look
like
so
minneapolis.
Animal
care
control
responds
to
animal
problems.
Mr
code
calls
24
hours
a
day,
seven
days
a
week
and
they
run
regular
operations
monday
through
friday.
T
7
30
am
to
1
pm
and
1
daily
shift
from
7
30
on
one
one.
Daily
shift
from
7
30
am
to
3
pm
on
the
weekends
during
the
weekends
and
third
shift.
Macc
relies
on
staff
responding
to
on-call
second
shift
on
weekends
and
third
shifts.
Seven
days
a
week
during
on-call
hours,
staff
responds
to
these
call
codes
in
partnership
with
the
minneapolis
police
department.
T
When
call
codes
when
call
codes
come
in
police
respond
immediately
to
the
scene
and
an
macc
officer
is
dispatched
from
their
home
once
an
macc
officer
arrives.
Police
are
relieved
of
the
call.
I
would
like
to
highlight
that
animal
fight
is
a
potential
felony
in
nature,
and
so
mac
responds
in
conjunction
with
the
police
department,
with
additional
staffing
and
associated
equipment
to
stand
up
a
full
shift.
T
Macc
could
respond
directly
to
the
first
three
problem
codes
without
without
additional
support
from
the
minneapolis
police
department,
because
macc
responds
to
overnight
calls
with
police
having
a
full
shift,
including
a
supervisor
will
provide
backup
and
additional
coverage
to
respond
to
overlapping
or
complicated
calls
and
assist
with
keeping
employees
safe.
T
Furthermore,
macc
officers
respond
directly
to
overnight
calls
increases
public
safety,
because
the
division
has
the
equipment
and
training
to
handle
animals.
This
would
also
improve
time
and
mpd's
capacity
currently
responding
to
calls
by
macc
takes
up
to
60
to
90
minutes
from
call
to
arrival
and
between
that
call
and
arrival
time.
The
police
department
that,
as
they
arrive
first,
has
to
sit
and
wait
for
msc
to
respond
before
they're
relieved.
T
If
we
need
to
provide
any
answers
to
your
questions,
can
keller-
and
I
are
here-
thank
you
for
being
patient
with
us
and
we
can
answer
any
questions
regards
to
problem
nature
codes
and
their
responses
just
trying
to
make
that
brief.
For
you
also.
A
Thank
you
for
doing
so.
I
do
want
to
make
sure,
though,
that
we
have
enough
space,
because
you
all
have
done
really
good
work.
So
do
you
feel
like
you
were
able
to
get
through
anything?
Is
there
any
additional
information
that
you
want
to
make
sure
that
we
know
we
know
and
the
public
knows.
T
The
most
important
data-
yes
or
information
yes,
is
available.
I
was
able
to
speak
on.
I
have
a
lot
of
summary
data
just
to
highlight
you
know
we're
potentially
talking
about
10
of
problem
nature
codes,
which
is
over
31
000
that
were
collected
in
2019
as
mpa
incidents
that
regulatory
services
could
potentially
respond
to
with
additional
resources
and
additional
information.
So
we're
looking
at
a
number
of
incidents
that
an
another
department
within
our
enterprise
could
potentially
respond
to.
A
U
O
O
A
Okay,
it
sounds
like
you're
very
far
away
like
you're
talking
across
the
room,
so
just
if
we
could
try
to
figure
that
out.
A
We
can
also
come
back
as
your
as
you
figure
that
out
are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
my
colleagues
related
to
this
problem.
Nature
code
update.
D
Thank
you
check
on
him.
I
guess
I'm
just
curious,
so
I
I
appreciate
this
work
and
I
actually
do
think
that
some
of
this
makes
sense
for
us
to
look
at
and
it's
a
it's
a
healthy
chunk
of
calls.
So
I
I
appreciate
that
we
identified
some
some
real
work
that
could
transition
and
shift.
D
I
wonder
if
I
I
I
I
guess,
I'm
wondering
from
the
coordinator's
office
what
what
the
status
is
of
the
other
departments,
because
reg
services
looks
like
the
only
one
that
the
goddess
report,
so
we
can
just
kind
of
check
in
on
on
where
other
folks
are
and
thinking
about
this
and
then,
if,
if
we,
if
we
are
able
to
get
director
keller
able
to
communicate
with
us,
I
would
love
to
hear
her
answer
to
the
chair's
question
as
well.
T
Council,
member
fletcher,
jonathan
williams,
kinsell
again
our
initial
survey.
We
did
survey
all
departments
and
many
of
them
gave
thorough
responses.
T
As
you
know,
examples
are
internal
departments
like
hrit
could
not
pay
to
respond
to
those
calls,
so
they're
pretty
easy
to
eliminate,
and
then
there
was
a
a
number
of
report
only
calls
that
we've
had
conversations
in
slides
further
up
with
my
other
colleagues
that
were
going
to
be
talked
about
being
moved
to
301
or
having
a
non-police
staff
member
actually
addressed,
so
that
cut
down
a
significant
amount
of
calls
that
could
respond
to
so
we're
really
down
to
public
works
and
regulatory
services
and
public
works
just
from
a
review
had
the
case.
T
No,
I'm
sorry
on
regulatory
services,
just
for
my
review,
had
the
capabilities
in
the
school
just
to
be
able
to
handle
this
kind
of
scope
of
calls
that
we
have
left.
But
if
asked
and
if
directed
by
my
boss
and
his
supervisor
as
well,
we
can
continue
to
engage
some
other
departments
again
about
some
other
problem.
Nature
codes.
A
Thank
you
for
that
director
keller.
Do
we
want
to
maybe
try
one
more
time
to
see
if
we're
able
to
hear
you
this
time.
U
Lovely
apologies
for
that
consulate.
Member
chair,
thank.
U
For
the
question,
so
during
regular
operational
hours,
mac
responds
to
the
animal
bite,
aggressive
dog
and
animal
calls
all
on
its
own
and
does
not
need
mpd
to
correspond.
Animal
fight
calls
because
of
the
nature
of
the
calls
there's
always
a
co-response
there
during
on-call
hours
or
non-traditional
operational
hours.
U
At
the
same
time,
an
animal
control
officer
is
also
dispatched,
but
they
are
coming
from
home,
and
so
that
is
the
delay
in
service
and
unless
there's
a
true
emergency
happening,
of
course,
the
mpd
will
will
will
step
in
and
handle
that,
but
oftentimes,
the
immediate
danger
has
passed
and
the
mpd
officer,
because
they
don't
have
the
training
and
the
equipment
that
we
have
stand
down
and
wait
for
us
to
arrive.
U
A
Got
it?
Thank
you
so
much,
and
on
that
particular
note,
I
just
have
to
say
that
macc
officers
provide
amazing
customer
service.
They
are
wonderful
to
work
with.
I
have
done
a
ride
along
with
them.
They've
visited
our
house,
and
I
mean
they're
just
amazing
and
I
I'm
so
grateful
for
their
service
to
the
city.
This
is
maybe,
for
you,
director,
maybe
also
for
jonathan
I'm
curious.
You
know
we.
A
We
passed
the
staff
direction
at
the
end
of
last
year
related
to
traffic
enforcement,
and
so
we
have
a
work
group
here
at
the
city
that
that
has
gone
behind
because
of
covet
and
the
uprising.
A
So,
of
course,
like
everything
else,
it
got
delayed
I'm
curious
around
if
there
has
been
any
conversation
around
traffic
enforcement
related
work,
and
that
also
is
a
bit
of
a
public
works
conversation
in
question,
but
just
curious
to
to
hear
where
that
fits
in
and
again
that
could
be
for
director
keller
or
for
jonathan.
More
broadly.
Q
The
team
thank
you,
councilmember
cunningham,
chair
cunningham.
This
is
brian
again
I
didn't
know
I
was
coming
back
on
camera,
so
I'm
in
a
t-shirt,
and
I
apologize
okay,
that's
a
little
better
forgiven!
Q
Apologies,
we
as
a
work
group
and
as
a
team.
We
have
been
talking
about
other
traffic
incidents
and
responding
to
traffic
incidents,
but
it
takes
a
lot
more
detailed
research
because
of
number
one,
the
one
things
we
always
have
to
take
into
consideration
for
our
city
staff
is
personal
safety
and
when
responding
to
different
levels
of
traffic
incidents,
which
could
be
coded
very
differently
depending
on
what
is
actually
happening
at
the
scene.
Q
We
just
need
to
do
more
digging
into
what
all
of
those
types
of
calls
are
the
risk
involved
with
them
current
policies
or
legalities,
that
we
may
have
around
certain
calls
and
who
can
respond,
and
then
we
can
give
a
more
detailed
report
about
what
will
be
included,
and
so,
when
director
keller
says
that
she
is
deferring
to
the
coordinator's
office
and
working
with
us
on
that.
That's
because
there's
so
much
more
information
that
we
need
to
give
them
so
that
they're
prepared
to
respond
to
those
questions
that
it
wouldn't.
Q
You
know
we
just
wouldn't
feel
comfortable
having
them
do
that
without
being
thorough,
so
that
she
can
really
understand
what
she's
taking
on
and
the
risk
and
what
everything
else
that
will
be
involved
with
that.
So
we
we
will
be
able
to
get
you
some
more
information
on
that,
but
we
just
haven't
gotten
into
it.
I
mean
we
haven't
gotten
as
much
information
about
that
as
we'd
like,
but
it
should
be
coming
soon.
A
Great
thank
you
for
that.
I
want
to
close
the
loop.
I
mean
you
all
probably
already
talking,
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that
I
close
the
loop
that
the
traffic
enforcement
work
group
is
is
being
let
up
by
commander
giovales,
who
is
very
committed
to
a
non-law
enforcement
response,
as
well
as
ethan
foley
from
public
works.
A
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
that,
as
those
conversations
are
happening,
we're
closing
that
loop-
you
may
already
be
talking
to
them,
but
just
wanted
to
to
bring
that
in
great.
Thank
you
so
much
for
that
and
are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
my
colleagues.
A
All
right
seeing
none,
I
will
direct
the
clerk
to
file
that
report
with
that.
I
see
no
further
business
before
the
committee.
Thank
you,
everyone
for
sticking
it
out.
It
was
a
marathon
meeting
but
wonderful
content.
Great
work
with
neighborhoods
2020
great
works
with
great
work
with
the
911
mpd
work
group.
These
are
years
of
them
in
the
making,
and
so
it's
an
honor
to
be
able
to
hold
space
as
we
as
we
work
through
the
the
next
steps
together.
So
thank
you.
A
Everyone
and
all
this
work
will
be
going
before
the
full
city
council
on
friday.
Thanks.