►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
E
A
B
Present,
let
the
record
reflect
that
we
have
a
quorum.
I
want
to
take
a
moment
to
introduce
a
new
member
of
our
business
inspections,
housing
and
zoning
committee
council
member
jamal
osman.
Welcome
to
the
committee.
We're
very
excited
to
have
the
opportunity
to
work
with
you,
and
I
thank
you
for
diving
right
in
just
a
few
days
after
you
have
been
sworn
in.
Today's
agenda
is
in
front
of
us
we'll
be
we'll
begin
with
the
consent
agenda,
which
includes
items
six
through
24
on
the
printed
agenda.
B
Item
number
six
are
liquor,
license
approvals
and
item
seven.
Are
the
gambling
license
approvals?
Item
number.
Eight:
are
business
license
operating
conditions
for
a1,
hauling
and
roll
offs
item?
Number?
Nine
is
accepting
a
grant
from
the
met
council
through
their
livable
communities,
demonstration
account
program
item
10
are
guidelines
for
the
property
development
fund.
Item
number
11
is
accepting
grants
from
the
deed,
metropo
and
council's
tax
base.
Revitalization
account
brownfield
grants.
B
B
B
B
B
G
G
staff
recommends
the
side
yard
sale
of
1512
23rd
street
east
to
the
american
indian
community
development
corporation
or
aicdc
for
its
appraised
value
of
2
300.
Subject:
conditions:
this
property
was
acquired
on
december
18
2000
from
hennepin
county
tax
profited
land,
it's
adjacent
to
another
person
owned
by
the
purchaser
at
1510
23rd
street
east,
and
this
is
the
only
application
that
we
receive
for
this
parcel.
It's
a
substandard
parcel
at
24
feet
by
130
133
feet
approximately
3192
square
feet.
G
G
B
H
B
C
B
D
C
B
G
G
The
staff
recommends
the
sale
of
2803
aldrich
avenue
north
to
curt
recce
for
its
appraised
value
of
5
400.
Subject:
conditions:
this
property
was
acquired
on
december
30
2015
from
hennepin
county
tax
profited
land
on
august
8
2019,
the
city
approved
the
sale
of
this
property
to
richard
ayook,
who
failed
to
close
staff.
That's
contingency
marketers
property
on
the
program
website
census
acquisition
to
a
list
server
now
for
three
thousand
people.
This
is
the
only
application
we
receive
for
this
property.
G
The
purchaser
intends
to
invest
six
hundred
twenty
eight
thousand
two
hundred
seventy
seven
thousand
dollars
to
build
a
triplex
with
one
thousand
one
hundred
and
seventy
five
finish
square
feet
per
unit.
Each
unit
will
have
three
bedrooms
and
two
baths
and
one
stall
and
a
detached
three-car
garage,
the
cped's
construction
management
staff,
reviewed
the
plans
and
estimates
by
the
applicant
and
confirmed
they
are
sufficient
to
meet
the
minimum
new
construction
standards.
Notification
was
provided
to
the
health
or
neighborhood
council
on
february
27
2020,
but
the
neighborhood
board
did
not
respond.
B
B
A
G
A
A
B
B
H
C
H
H
C
E
G
Chair
goodman
members
of
the
committee,
we
have
11
11
james
avenue,
north
the
sale
again
through
the
minneapolis
homes
program
staff
recommends
the
sale
of
11
11
james
riverfront
development
partners
llc
for
its
appraised
value
of
fifteen
thousand
nine
hundred
dollars.
So
you
can
get
two
conditions.
Staff
further
recommends
the
approval
of
award
of
up
to
twenty
thousand
in
home
buyer
incentive
funds
to
re
to
riverfront
development's
approved
buyer
for
adulthood.
G
Hassan
11,
11
james
was
acquired
on
june
11
2010
as
part
of
the
level
square
limited
partnership
foreclosure
on
june
17
2017,
the
city
approved
the
sale
of
this
property
to
a
vision
llc
under
the
minneapolis
home's
development
assistance.
However,
the
developers
decided
not
to
proceed
and
resold
the
property
back
to
the
city.
The
city
has
marketed
this
property
on
its
website
to
now
over
3
000
people
and
again
this
is
the
only
application
received.
G
The
purchaser
intends
to
invest
300
000
to
move
an
existing
historic,
two-story,
fast,
single-family
home
with
four
bedrooms
and
two
bathrooms
onto
a
new
foundation
that
will
have
a
two
bedroom
one
bathroom
rental
unit
in
the
basement,
creating
a
new
3196
square
foot.
Duplex
with
a
new
detached
three-car
garage
and
and
sell
this
property
to
a
pre-approved
buyer
who
will
be
the
owner
occupant
cpes
construction
management
staff
has
reviewed
the
plans
and
estimates
and
confirmed
they
are
sufficient
to
meet
the
minimum
construction
standards.
G
Notification
was
provided
to
the
northside
residence
redevelopment
council
on
august
7th.
The
neighborhood
executive
committee
met
on
august,
the
10th
2020
and
notified
staff
of
their
support
for
riverfront
development
partners.
Llc
proposal,
the
developer
ian
alexander,
was
also
notified,
not
sure
if
he
is
available
for
today.
B
Are
there
any
questions
for
mr
ramadan
on
item
number
three,
seeing
none?
I
am
informed
by
the
clerk
that
no
one
is
registered
I'll
just
give
a
moment
to
see
if
anyone
is
registered
or
we
didn't
catch.
Their
registration
would
like
to
speak
to
this
issue
sounds
like
no
one
is
registered
to
speak
to
this
issue,
I'll
call
on
council
member
ellison.
J
H
A
K
Thank
you,
chair
goodman
and
members
of
the
committee.
This
is
erica
coleman,
senior
project
coordinator
of
cped
housing
and
so
on.
Our
hud
consolidated
action
plan
consolidated
plan
action
plan
amendment
it
was
approved
on
july
31st
by
city
council,
was
the
revisions
to
the
minneapolis
homes,
home
buyer
products
and
that
was
to
align
the
products
better
with
the
2040
comp
plan
and
the
strategic
and
racial
equity
action
plan.
K
The
revision
recommendations
came
after
much
community
engagement
and
adopted
cped
department
goals.
Due
to
the
revisions,
we
were
required
to
submit
an
amendment
to
our
hud
consolidated
plan
five-year
action
plan
that
was
approved
by
council
on
april,
8th
for
home
single-family
program
funding
activities,
which
is
the
home
ownership
works
or
better
known
as
howe
program.
The
how
program
is
administered
under
our
city's
minneapolis
homes,
financing
program
umbrella
due
to
the
coven
19
pandemic
and
needed
urgency
for
any
programming
response.
K
K
The
program
waiver
was
approved
on
april
13th
of
2020
and
therefore
the
city's
hud
consolidated
plan.
Citizen
participation
plan
has
been
updated
to
reflect
the
public
comment
and
hearing
changes,
and
so
we
did
provide
the
public
the
opportunity
to
review
and
comment
on
the
amendment
language
posted
on
the
city's
website
from
july
thirty.
First,
through
august
thirteenth,
twenty
twenty,
we
did
not
receive
any
comments.
B
B
H
C
H
I
C
I
B
There
are
six
nines.
That
item
has
been
referred
back
to
staff,
we'll
move
on
to
our
last
public
hearing,
then,
which
is
a
quasi-judicial
hearing
on
our
agenda.
This
item
is
an
appeal
submitted
by
matt
boyes
of
haven
construction
regarding
the
decision
of
the
heritage
preservation
commission,
denying
a
certificate
of
appropriateness
for
the
building
for
a
building
at
2022.
B
L
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
and
council
members,
my
name
is
sheila
vemmer
and
I
am
a
senior
city
planner
in
the
historic
preservation
department
of
cpad.
Today,
I'm
presenting
an
appeal
application
submitted
by
matt
boyes,
the
appellant
and
homeowner
of
the
august
11th
2020
heritage
preservation,
commission's
denial
of
the
replacement
of
all
wood,
siding
with
vinyl
siding
on
the
home
at
2022,
2nd
street
south
and
the
washburn
fair
oaks.
Historic
district
next
slide.
Please,
the
home
was
constructed
in
1884
and
was
built
by
minneapolis
construction,
company,
hagelin
and
morse
next
slide.
Please.
L
This
is
a
map
of
the
location
of
the
property.
It's
just
north
of
the
minneapolis
institute
of
arts
and
the
grade
area
is
the
washburn
fair
oaks
historic
district
next
slide,
please,
the
applicant
is
proposing
to
remove
all
original
three-inch
wood,
lap
and
shingle
siding
to
incl
include
the
eaves
fascia
and
trim
next
slide.
Please,
and
to
replace
it
with
three
inch:
double
lap,
vinyl
siding
in
a
rough
wood
impression
finish
or
a
smooth
finish.
L
We
received
two
different
answers
on
that
matching.
The
shingle
style
vinyl
siding
to
be
used
with
our
matching
the
original
shingle
style,
siding
with
vinyl
shingle
style
style,
siding
on
august
11
2020,
the
minneapolis
hpc
heard
the
certificate
of
appropriateness,
application
for
the
subject,
property
staff
recommended
denial,
and
the
commission
voted
in
agreement
with
staff
recommendations.
L
The
heritage
preservations
motion
was
based
on
the
following
findings.
The
alteration
is
not
compatible
with
the
designation
of
the
historic
district,
including
the
period
and
criteria
of
significance,
and
will
negatively
impact
the
integrity
of
this
contributing
building
to
the
washburn,
fair
oaks,
historic
district.
I
L
L
B
E
G
E
To
be
completely
taken
off
and
repaired
so
that
the
windows
can
be
properly
wrapped,
so
we
can
look
for
mold
damage.
That's
occurred
over
the
neglect
of
the
property
of
the
last
few
decades,
so
I
at
first
just
want
to
establish
that
the
need
to
completely
replace
the
siding
is
absolutely
dire
and
immediate
we're
trying
to
protect
the
health
and
safety
of
the
tenants,
as
well
as
those
foster
living
in
the
home
from
further
water
damage.
E
Second,
you
know
looking
at
our
options
to
follow
the
historic
guidelines.
First,
you
know
the
1976
historic
district
guidelines
it
there
is
no
requirement
to
replace
the
original
material
with
exactly
the
same
type
of
material.
The
guidelines
make
that
clear
in
a
few
places,
it
even
mentions
quote:
if
the
original
material
is
clapboard.
E
E
One
reason
we
are
not
able
to
replace
exactly
like
for
like,
which
is
not
even
a
requirement,
is
the
exceeding
cost
of
the
project
which
would
be
over.
Ninety
thousand
dollars,
the
home
value,
is
four
hundred
fifteen
thousand
so
that
that
type
of
economic
equation
just
doesn't
just
make
sense.
It's
it's
just
impossible
for
us
to
to
achieve
that.
So
in
looking
at
alternatives,
most
of
the
general
contractors
are
recommending
that
this
material
type,
which
is
much
more
advanced
from
what
people
originally
think
of
as
vinyl.
E
The
overall
value
of
the
home,
it's
a
couple
places
I'd
like
to
call
out
just
you
know,
specifically
within
the
guidelines
just
again
to
to
kind
of
make
a
case
of
why
we
believe
strongly
that
we
are
following
the
guidelines
and
it
it
it's
essentially
just
that
it
should
match
the
direction
dimensions.
It's
actually
the
covering
on
a
per
square
foot
level,
the
entire
home.
E
B
B
One
of
the
things
that
stood
out
to
me
in
the
report
was
that
houses
that
had
been
redone
with
vital
sighting
were
then
non-contributing
structures
to
the
historic
district
based
on
the
secretary
of
interior
standards,
and
that
is
perhaps
not
the
direction
that
we'd
like
to
go.
For
those
reasons,
I
am
going
to
move
to
deny
the
appeal
and
ask
the
staff
to
supplement
the
findings
of
fact,
with
my
comments
and
see
if
anyone
on
the
committee
would
like
to
speak
to
this
issue
as
well.
I
Thank
you
manager.
I
I
just
want
to
second
everything.
You
said,
I
think
it
is
something
the
historic
preservation
commission
is
really
the
experts
here,
and
we
really
did
not
hear
anything
that
that
would
justify
this
change
of
materials.
So
I
appreciate
bringing
up
all
those
points
and
I
will
be
voting
to
support
your
motion.
B
So
I'm
going
to
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role,
and
I
would
just
note
that
perhaps
the
applicant
could
meet
directly
with
preservation
staff
to
identify
what
some
alternatives
could
possibly
be
so
that
they
could
put
an
investment
into
re
redoing.
This
property,
perhaps
with
something
that
is
less
expensive,
but
definitely
not
the
vinyl
siding
that
would
remove
the
secretary
of
interior's
standards
so
that
this
building
would
not
be
taken
out
of
the
district
as
a
contributing
structure.
H
C
H
D
B
J
J
And
so
the
program
is
a
combination
of
rental
assistance
and
supportive
services
to
families
who
are
at
risk
of
or
who
are
experiencing
homelessness
and
whose
children
attend
one
of
15,
minneapolis,
public,
elementary
schools
and
then
the
polad
family
foundation.
Funds,
housing
stability
portion
of
the
program,
which
provides
one-time
assistance
to
families
who
are
at
risk
of
homelessness.
J
And
so
we
are
going
to
provide
an
update
today.
On
just
the
progress
of
those
two
pieces
of
the
program
and
then
charlotte
kinsley
from
minneapolis
public
schools
is
on
the
line
and
she's
going
to
give
a
brief
update
as
well
about
the
progress
on
through
the
end
of
the
school
year
of
the
students
who
are
participating
in
the
program.
So
with
that,
we
can
go
to
the
next
side
slide
please.
J
So
this
is
a
report
through
the
second
quarter
of
2020.
So
again,
the
program
really
started
april,
1st
of
2019,
and
so
this
is,
I
guess,
slightly
past
the
end
of
the
second
quarter,
which
ended
on
june
30th,
but
as
of
july
10th,
there
are
a
total
of
four
just
over
1400
children
who
have
been
served
by
the
different
components
of
this
program.
So
you
can
see
in
the
blue
piece
of
the
pie.
J
There's
230
children
in
families
who
have
been
housed
with
rental
assistance
and
the
rental
assistance
is
funded
by
a
combination
of
city
and
mpha
funds.
Then
there
are
619
children
in
families
who
have
received
one-time
assistance
through
the
housing
stability
fund,
which
is
the
fund
designed
to
prevent
homelessness.
J
That's
funded
by
the
polad
family
foundation
and
then,
as
you'll
recall
at
the
beginning
of
the
the
covid
emergency,
the
city
did
redirect
one
million
dollars
in
funding
from
stable
home,
stable
schools
to
fund
one-time
emergency
response
assistance.
So
that's
very
similar
to
that
eviction,
prevention
or
homelessness
prevention.
Funding
that
pull
ed
provides
for
the
regular
part
of
the
program
there
are.
There
were
city
funds
available
in
the
copa,
19
emergency
response,
and
so
553
children
have
received
one-time
assistance.
Their
children
and
families
have
received
one-time
assistance
through
those
emergency
dollars.
J
Those
dollars
are
have
a
large
number
of
them
have
been
committed
to
families.
Some
are
still
going
out
the
door.
However,
the
application
period
is
is
no
longer
open.
It
was
only
open
for
a
brief
window
of
time.
Next
slide.
Please,
and
so
this
is
just
a
reflection
of
the
number
of
families,
so
the
chil,
the
the
last
slide,
was
the
children.
J
That
number
has
increased
since
then
and
will
be
reflected
in
our
next
report.
Next
slide,
please,
and
then
we
always
report
on
the
demographics
of
the
families.
This
is,
these
are
the
demographics
of
eligible
families,
so
these
are
families
that
are
either
housed,
have
received
assistance
through
the
housing
stability
fund
or
have
been
referred
to
the
program
by
the
schools
and
have
been
have
been
designated
as
eligible,
but
may
not
yet
be
in
housing.
J
So
the
left
side
of
this
slide
shows
the
demographics
of
families
in
the
rental
assistance
side
of
the
program,
and
then
the
other
circle
on
the
right
side
shows
the
demographics
of
families
and
the
housing
stability
fund
next
slide.
Please-
and
this
slide
just
shows
the
families
that
have
been
assisted
in
the
different
schools.
J
So
these
are
the
schools
that
were
identified
as
being
the
schools
for
the
program
based
on
the
rates
of
homelessness
in
those
schools,
and
then
you
can
just
see
the
blue
line
represents
the
families
assisted
through
the
housing
stability
fund.
So
that's
the
homelessness
prevention
and
then
the
pink
line
is
the
families
housed
through
the
rental
assistance
side
of
the
program.
J
Next
slide.
Please-
and
so
this
is
the
last
slide
I'll
present
before
turning
it
over
to
charlotte
from
mps,
and
this
is
just
the
funding
update.
So
as
of
june
30th,
we
have
spent
1.7
million
dollars
for
this
program
and
that's
1.3
million
for
the
rental
assistance
side,
and
that
is
made
up
this.
So
the
city
and
mpha
jointly
fund
the
rental
assistance
itself,
and
then
we
all
the
city
funds,
the
wrap
around
services
that
are
provided
by
the
ymca
for
the
rental
assistance
side
of
the
program.
J
The
housing
stability
fund
is
funded
by
the
polled
family
foundation
at
the
code,
that
should
say
covet
19
emergency
assistance
program.
That
was
the
funding
committed.
As
of
the
end
of
the
second
quarter
again,
that
number
has
increased
quite
a
bit
since,
since
the
end
of
the
second
quarter
and
then
just
a
couple
of
announcements,
we
did
receive
a
25
000
donation
for
the
housing
stability
fund
side
of
the
program.
So
that's
the
pull
the
part
funded
by
pull
ad.
D
Hi
this
is
charlotte
kinsey
with
minneapolis
public
schools.
Thank
you,
katie,
and
thank
you
chair,
goodman
and
committee
members.
So,
if
you
can
see
the
the
mps
evaluation
slide
here
shows
our
academic
sort
of
the
outcomes
that
we're
tracking,
through
the
rental
assistance
part
of
this
initiative,
and
today,
I'm
just
going
to
spend
a
few
minutes
sharing
with
you
part
of
our
report
on
the
first
school
year
of
this
initiative
and
the
academic
results
that
we've
seen
thus
far.
D
Today,
I'm
just
going
to
be
sharing
our
attendance
and
school
stability
outcomes,
but
this
slide
shows
you
the
full
list
of
outcomes
that
we
hope
to
achieve
through
this
program.
So
it's
our
hope
that
this
initial
data
can
help
us
establish
a
baseline
for
next
year
when
we
have
a
larger
data
set
of
students
who
have
been
housed
for
a
full
school
year.
In
order
to
measure
progress,
you
can
move
to
the
next
slide,
so
this
slide
here
shows
our
school
stability,
enrollment
and
so
the
the
first
column.
D
This
shows
our
attendance
split
up
through
the
year
with
the
dark,
blue
being
our
district
average,
the
middle
column,
the
lighter
blue
being
our
homeless
and
highly
mobile
students
and
then
the
third
column,
being
families
enrolled
in
rental
assistance,
and
I
would
just
draw
your
attention
to
maybe
just
starting
out
quarter.
Four.
You
can
see
on
quarter
four,
this
last
group
of
of
columns
here
just
a
really
wide
difference
in
attendance
and
engagement,
and
this
is
during
distance
learning.
D
So
if
I
bring
your
attention
back
to
the
full
year,
you
can
see
that
attendance
for
our
homeless
and
highly
mobile
students
was
at
84
students
that
were
enrolled
in
the
rental
assistance
attended
at
86
percent,
which
might
not
seem
like
a
big
difference,
but
actually,
when
you
think
about
that,
we're
prioritizing
students
for
enrollment
in
this
program
based
off
of
their
not
attending
regularly.
That
gap
is
actually
statistically
significant.
D
That's
no
longer
going
to
be
in
elementary
school,
and
we
have
added,
as
katie
mentioned,
follow
whittier
and
webster
through
the
homework
starts
with
home
grant.
We
are
also
adding
them
to
the
rental
assistance
part
of
the
initiative
as
well,
and
then
my
last
slide
here.
I
just
wanted
to
say
a
couple
things
about.
D
B
I
Thank
you,
chair
goodman,
first
and
foremost,
I
just
I
just
want
to
thank
all
the
staff
involved.
This
has
been
a
really
great
partnership
between
the
city
and
multiple
partners,
and
the
results
really
speaks
for
themselves.
So
it's
I
think
in
other
times
we
would
go
on
a
lot
longer
about
just
kind
of
the
the
values
and
of
how
well
this
is
doing,
but
I
just
appreciate
the
concise
report
from
staff
and
I'd
like
to
move
this
item
for
approval.