►
From YouTube: December 7, 2020 Audit Committee
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
As
we
begin,
I
will
note
for
the
record
that
this
meeting
has
remote
participation
by
members
of
the
audit
committee
and
city
staff
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statutes,
section
13d
.021
due
to
the
declared
local
public
health
emergency.
At
this
time.
I
will
ask
our
clerk
to
call
the
role,
so
we
can
verify
a
quorum
for
this
meeting.
C
D
B
B
B
F
F
C
F
B
Thank
you.
The
agenda
is
adopted.
The
second
item
on
our
agenda
is
to
accept
the
minutes
of
our
our
october
19th
meeting.
Could
I
have
a
motion
for
that?
Please
so
moved.
B
B
There
are
six
eyes.
Thank
you.
Those
minutes
are
adopted.
Colleagues
before
us
today.
The
new
report
is
around
the
minneapolis
park
and
recreation
board.
That
audit
report
was
sent
to
you
earlier
today
and
as
we
receive
it,
and
we
will
seek
to
publish
it
as
a
result
of
this
meeting,
as
is
do
audit
process.
I
will
turn
this
over
to
director
ryan,
patrick,
mr
patrick,
welcome.
G
Thank
you,
chair
palmisano,
I'm
going
to
momentarily
turn
it
over
to
my
staff
who
work
directly
on
this
project,
but
first
I
wanted
to
thank
them
and
thank
our
colleagues
over
at
the
park
board
for
working
on
this
right
up
until
the
deadline.
I
know
we
had
a
lot
of
work
to
do
on
this
and
I
I
sincerely
appreciate
their
efforts
to
get
this
done
in
preparation
for
this
meeting.
So
without
further
ado,
I
think
I'll
turn
it
over
to
hugh
get.
Who
is
going
to
begin
the
presentation.
H
Thanks
ryan,
madam
chair
committee,
members,
good
morning
before
we
start
the
presentation
of
this
audit
report,
I'd
like
to
introduce
our
two
guests
from
the
park
board
so
joining
us
today
are
julie,
wiseman
finance,
director
and
cliff
swenson,
director
of
design
and
project
management.
H
I
There
you
go
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
committee,
so
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide
some
background
here,
this
was
okay.
So
this
was
a
added
to
the
audit
plan.
I'm
kind
of
following
up
work
with
the
city
grant
management,
as
well
as
with
cpe
directly.
I
So
the
objective
was
to
the
objective
is
to
review
the
grand
administration
processes
and
related
related
controls
to
ensure
compliance
and
fraud
risk
are
sufficiently
mitigated.
I
The
park
board
uses
kind
of
user
grants
for
diverse
use
of
activities,
including
part
funding,
recreation
activities,
capital
infrastructure,
etc,
and
they
work
with
our
stakeholders,
including
you
know,
including
the
neighborhood
utilization
program,
grants
as
well
as
others
at
the
city
through
the
grants,
account
for
further
mandates,
and
they
also
do
not,
notably
have
sub-recipients
for
the
grants,
and
they
also
have
recently
been
applying
for
grant
funds
rated
to
the
coronavirus
pandemic
as
impacts
and
emergency
funds
for
the
encampments.
I
Grant
managers
are
within
kind
of
each
individual
department,
working
with
finance
staff
to
manage
the
grants
and
they
work
actively
with
the
accountants
to
track,
monitor,
make
sure
that
reimbursements
are
paid,
but
the
grant
managers
are
within
each
individual
unit
of
activity
at
the
park
board
and
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide
on
here,
so
for
this
one,
we
started
with
looking
at
some
grant
data
as
an
order
in
issue
three.
I
We
do
have
some
caveats
in
just
the
way
that
we're
able
to
analyze
and
receive
the
data,
but
for
the
top
period
order.
We
know
that
approximately
about
51
million
grants
in
grants
and
then
ordered
into
two
main
activities,
including
capital
grants
and
recreation
grants
and
capital
grants
for
the
by
far
the
largest
amount
of
the
total
awarded
grant
remote.
I
If
you
just
go
to
the
next
slide,
so
here
is
a
breakdown,
as
seen
also
in
the
report
of
just
a
number
of
grants.
There's
87
of
them
and
the
total
was
about
51
million
dollars,
with
the
average
grant
being
586
000
and
then
the
most
frequent
granter
for
these
are
generally
the
met
council
and
some
of
the
other
state
and
local
agencies
for
funding
for
the
parks
and
the
next
slide.
I
We
do
have
the
recreation
grants
which
are
there's
about
42
of
them
and
they're
generally,
that
small,
with
the
most
frequent
grants
of
being
hennepin
county
and
the
average
amount
being
about
eight
thousand
dollars.
So
for
those
we
started
with
those
with
the
data
looking
at
analyzing
where
the
money
is
coming
in
and
then
on
the
next
slide.
H
Thank
you
travis
and
madam
chair
committee
members.
So
as
a
result
of
the
work
we
performed
on
this
audit,
we
identified
three
areas
for
improvement.
We
can
move
the
next
slide,
so
I
can
just
go
into
the
details
of
this
all
right.
So
the
first
one
relates
to
the
grand
closeout
and
reporting
requirements.
H
So
and
the
detail
for
this
is
in
the
report-
and
this
one
is
very
important
to
mention
that,
although
those
documents
and
reports
were
required
for
the
grant
agreements,
grantor
agencies
did
not
specifically
request
them
from
the
park
board
and
with
the
previous
grant
management
audits.
We've
done,
like
the
grant.
H
Grantor
agencies
were
very
specific,
with
requesting
reports
that
were
in
the
agreements
from
the
grant
recipient,
but
in
this
case,
for
some
reason,
they
did
not
specifically
request
them
from
the
park
board,
which
I
believe
made
it
appear
as
if
they
were
not
actually
required,
and
it's
also
important
to
know
that
conversations
are
already
ongoing
with
the
grantor
agencies
to
clarify
requirements
and
make
sure
that
anything
that
is
not
applicable
is
kind
of
spelled
out
or
that
amendments
are
made
to
the
current
agreements
in
the
future.
H
H
Okay,
the
second
area
for
improvement
relates
to
the
documentation
of
the
grant
administration
and
oversight
procedures,
so
as
they
work
with
grand
project
managers,
the
park
board
to
ensure
that
the
park
board
spends
grant
funds
in
accordance
with
the
clauses
and
the
grant
agreements
grant
project
accountants
perform
various
tasks,
including
tracking
and
and
accounting
for
grant
activity,
submitting
reimbursement
requests
and
ensuring
that
those
reimbursement
applied
to
the
right
funding
codes.
H
However,
during
the
audit,
we
noted
that
those
daily
tasks
are
not
documented
so
and
we
believe
that
formally
documenting
them,
like
as
a
best
practice,
will
help
with
training
compliance,
business
continuity
or,
in
the
case
that
someone
is
out,
someone
else
can
just
pick
up
and
do
their
job,
so
documentation
was
missing.
There
next
slide.
H
And
the
last
area
for
improvement,
we
noted
relates
to
this.
The
system
limitations
that
kind
of
make
it
hard
to
confirm
completeness
and
accuracy
of
grand
data
in
order
to
provide
grant
population
for
these
audits,
the
staff
had
to
pull
data
from
various
sources
and
use
some
manual
processes
to
gather
the
data.
H
For
example,
the
system,
as
it
currently
is
kind
of
distinguished
between
grants
and
contracts,
and
also
project,
may
have
many
funding
sources
and
a
single
funding
source
may
go
to
various
projects
as
well,
and
I'd
like
to
note
here
that
this
issue
is
not
unique
to
the
park
board.
We've
experienced
the
same
issues
with
the
previous
grain
management
audit
and
that's
the
reason
why
we
recommend
it
that
they
work
to
as
a
long-term
solution
with
it
to
idea,
ideally
have
a
system
in
place
that
has
little
to
no
mineral
processes,
and
that
is
more
efficient.
H
D
Hi,
I
was
just
my
question-
was
related
to
issue
number
three:
is
that
considered
a
low
priority
just
because
it's
a
more
of
a
long
term
in
nature,
or
it
seems
to
me
that
the
kind
of
the
accuracy
piece
would
make
it
a
at
least
a
medium
priority.
So
if
you
could
just
give
me
a
sense
of
that,
please
thank
you.
H
Yeah
definitely
so
this
we
rated
it
as
low,
because
our
low
risk
rated
issues
do
not
require
response
from
management
right
away
and
because
we
know
that
this
is
out
of
control
of
the
control
of
management.
At
this
point,
they
really
need
to
work
with
it
to
fix
this
issue,
putting
it
as
a
medium
and
requiring
them
to
close
it
within
six
months
was
kind
of
unrealistic,
so
because
it
it
it
goes
beyond
just
a
park
board.
H
J
Thank
you,
chair
palmisano,
when
you
note
that
the
park
board
should
be
working
with
city
minneapolis
I.t
on
this
issue.
Does
that
mean
that
the
city
of
minneapolis
has
already
identified
a
tool
in
which
to
track
this
information
and
the
park
board
will
be
able
to
piggyback
off
of
that
tool?
Or
are
you
suggesting
that
the
park
board
acquire
software
for
this
purpose
and
implement
it.
H
Yeah
thanks
for
the
question,
so
we
we
identified
the
same
issue
with
the
city
of
minneapolis
and
I
know
they've
been
working
or
trying
to
get
to
a
solution
and
during
our
discussion
with
the
park
board,
I
know
I
talked
to
the
city
of
minneapolis,
the
grain
management
folks
there
to
just
they're
going
to
be
working
together,
going
forward
our
understanding.
So
we
just
recommended
that,
because
this
issue
was
identified
for
the
city
in
the
past,
just
talking
to
them
and
figuring
out,
how
are
they
going
about
fixing?
B
We
often
hear
from
the
group
that
was
audited,
so
I
invite
ms
wiseman
or
others
to
to
chime
in.
K
Yes,
thank
you,
chair
pamasano
and
committee
members,
I'd
like
to
thank
the
internal
audit
committee.
They
did
a
quite
thorough
job
and
you
know
during
the
time
of
the
pandemic
and
all
other
audits
of
being
completed.
I
appreciate
my
staff
and
the
other
park
board
staff,
as
we
are
very
decentralized
when
it
comes
to
the
grant
process
to
further
clarify
for
commissioner
music.
K
E
Yes,
we
can
okay,
thank
you
and
like
julie,
I'd
like
to
thank
the
committee
as
well
and
for
their
thoroughness,
and
the
great
part
about
audits
right
is
that
we
find
out
what
our
weaknesses
are,
but,
but
we
also
we
get
to
see
what
we're
doing
right
and
there
are
a
lot
of
things
that
we
do
right.
So
it's
it's
nice
to
know
that
we
have
some
things
we
need
to
work
on
and
we'll
continue
to
do
that.
We
appreciate
the
cooperation
that
we
get
with
the
city.
E
Even
this,
the
staff
that
worked
with
us
from
the
city
on
this
audit
were
great
and
we're
going
to
continue
to
work
on
a
few
things
here,
try
to
try
to
make
sure
that
we
get
our
close-out
process
kind
of
worked
out
with
with
met
council
and
and
a
few
other
grantors.
But
again
we
just
we're
grateful
for
the
to
go
through
the
process
and
for
the
way
that
it
was
handled
the
way
city
staff
handled
it.
Thank
you
very
much
chair.
B
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
my
colleagues
on
committee.
B
A
C
B
G
Thank
you,
chair
palmisano,
so
I'm
going
to
deliver
the
auditor
update
today
I'll
give
you
a
little
information
about
the
work
we
have
in
progress
is
there's
quite
a
bit
going
on
and
then
we'll
talk
about
some
of
the
open
audited
issues
and
and
what
we
plan
to
do
about
those.
So
if
we
could
go
to
the
next
slide
now,
we
can
skip
this
so
one
more
ahead.
G
So
yeah
first
we'll
talk
about
the
completed
and
in
progress
audit
work
next
slide,
that's
a
kind
of
the
most.
You
know
important
things
that
are
going
on
right.
Now,
I'm
going
to
try
and
summarize
those
a
lot
of
the
work
is
in
flight
right
now,
so
we
don't
have
detailed
updates
for
you
on
it,
but
I
can
assure
you
that
the
work
is
very
much
ongoing
and
going
well.
G
So
the
first
is
the
2021
risk
assessment,
so
we're
using
that
covet
19
phase
one
project
to
kind
of
inform
how
we
proceed
on
our
our
annual
risk
assessment.
It's
really
important
to
have
that
information
incorporated
into
it.
As
you
know,
even
though
circumstances
are
changing
on
what
seems
like
a
daily
basis,
we
plan
ahead
for
our
2021
audit
plan
and
acknowledge
those
those
issues
as
we
think
about
what
we're
going
to
work
on
next
year.
G
So
we'll
be
beginning
that
this
month
and
plan
to
have
a
report
back
to
the
audit
committee
in
february
discussing
the
2021
risk
assessment.
The
next
is
the
civil
unrest
after
action
review.
So
this
was
requested
back
in
july
by
council
that
the
city
staff
explorer
methods
to
do
an
after-action
review
related
to
the
civil
unrest.
This
past
summer.
G
G
The
final
project
proposal,
including
a
vendor
selection,
so
part
of
that
included,
looking
for
funding
for
the
project
to
be
completed
next
year
and
as
we're
completing
the
budget
process
and
finding
that
funding
we'll
know
exactly
how
that's
going
to
play
out
and
kind
of
proceed
with
the
rest
of
vendor
selection
so
more
to
come
on
that
in
the
next,
probably
a
few
weeks
with
budget
and
then
hopefully
we'll
be
beginning
work
and
getting
vendors
in
to
discuss
the
project
with
city
staff
with
council
the
mayor's
office
to
really
make
sure
that
all
of
the
relevant
questions
are
being
addressed
in
january,
and
we
made
sure
to
make
sure
to
include
in
the
vendor
interviews
and
in
the
vendor,
questions
that
also
the
vendor
would
engage
with
the
community
and
make
sure
that
issues
the
community
feels
are
important
are
addressed
in
the
after
action
review
as
well.
G
B
Thank
you
actually,
mr
patrick,
there
was.
I
want
to
point
out
that
this
was
something
that
was
discussed
last
week
in
our
budget
recommendation
in
our
budget
amendment
process,
because
there
was
some.
There
were
just
a
lot
of
questions
about
the
scope
and
while
we
had
spoken
about
it
back
in
july
at
this
point
july
feels
like
years
ago.
B
G
So
the
scope
you
are
correct
is
about
10
days,
and
it
begins
almost
immediately
at
after
the
death
of
george
floyd.
So
the
what
the
after
action
review
currently
does
not
include
is
the
specific
incident
that
led
to
the
death
of
george
floyd,
but
it
picks
up
immediately
after
that
and
includes
all
the
city
response,
both
in
the
initial
hours
and
then
the
weeks
to
come.
So
it
will
be
a.
G
It
would
be
broad
in
scope
in
that
it
will
address
all
of
the
city
agencies
who
participated
in
this
process
and
in
everything
that
occurred
and
all
the
relevant
departments,
including
how
we
worked
with
outside
agencies
during
that
process
and
then
a
robust
community
engagement
to
receive
input
from
the
community
and
try
and
tie
all
of
those
things
together
to
develop
a
timeline
of
events
that
occurred
with
detailed
notes
about
all
of
their
various
city
departments
and
how
they
responded
and
then,
as
the
project
goes
on,
recommendations
about
how
we
might
do
a
better
job
in
the
future.
G
Addressing
some
of
these
issues.
So
that's
that
is
in
broad,
strokes,
the
scope
of
the
project.
I
will
note
that,
as
we
kind
of
get
closer
to
the
project
itself,
when
we
work
with
the
vendor,
we
can
remain
somewhat
flexible
in
case
we
need
to
but
address
other
things
in
the
project.
A
I
think
it's
your
problem
just
to
follow
up
on
that
director,
patrick
just
the
the
concern
is
really
when
the
peaceful
protest
that
started
the
day
after
the
murder
of
george
floyd
went
to
the
third
precinct,
because
there's
just
been
concerns
about
whether
the
city,
you
know
learned
enough
from
the
the
what
happened
at
the
fourth
precinct
previously
to
see
if
the
third
precinct
was
prepared
for
what
was
going
to
happen
and
just
kind
of
really
be
able
to
look
at
that.
A
So
I
think
that
being
being
able
to
say
that,
with
that
specificity
that
that's
in
the
scope
is
is
kind
of
what
I
took
away
from
the
the
budget
hearing.
Could
you
clarify
that
a
little
bit.
G
Yes,
so
the
after
action
review
is
going
to
examine
everything
immediately
following
those
events,
so
that
that
10-day
period
is
really
the
detailed
unit
of
analysis
and
all
the
actions
that
took
place
there.
I
will
make
sure
to
provide
all
the
relevant
background
for
any
vendor,
that's
selected,
so
that
we're
making
sure
we're
asking
the
right
questions
up
front
and
that
they
have
access
to
that
previous
information
and
kind
of
could
compare
and
contrast
what
we
learned
from
the
fourth
precinct
event
to
what
happened
during
the
past
summer.
Civil
unrest.
G
And
I'll
continue
to
solicit
feedback
before
we
get
ready
to
conduct
the
project,
so
we
plan
to
continue
to
be
very
engaged
with
all
the
parties,
as
the
process
goes
on,
making
sure
that
the
vendors
really
prepared
to
begin
this
we
want
them
to
come
in,
be
able
to
hit
the
ground
running,
and
part
of
that
is,
is
having
gotten
enough
feedback
from
the
parties
involved,
so
that
that
we're
really
addressing
the
core
issues
here.
G
So
I'll
move
on
to
the
remaining
updates.
B
I
will
just
I
will
just
add
that,
as
a
result
of
some
of
the
conversation
last
week,
mr
patrick
had
mentioned
that
we
can.
We
will
also
be
bringing
this
conversation
in
to
council
for
an
update
and
to
get
feedback
from
all
council
members
on
some
of
both
to
increase
the
understanding
of
the
scope
of
the
project
and
also
to
get
some
feedback
in
a
in
a
council
committee.
Setting,
probably
in
january,
pretty
early
on
in
january.
Is
that
accurate.
G
Yes,
we'd
like
to
begin
the
project
in
january
and
part
of
beginning,
the
project
is
really
having
everything
to
the
extent
possible
hammered
out
that
the
vendor
is
going
to
contemplate.
So,
ideally
that
would
be
early
january.
So
by
mid-january
we
have
that
detailed
scope
and
that
feedback
for
the
for
the
vendor,
so
they
can
start
their
work.
G
B
G
So
the
next
item-
I'd
like
to
discuss
is
the
field
training
officer,
fto
program
special.
So
we
discussed
this
at
the
last
meeting.
The
kickoff
for
this
and
the
status
update
right
now
is
that
we've
completed
our
scope.
Memo
we've
completed
our
project
planning
our
risk
control
matrix
and
now
our
field
work
is
underway.
So
we're
making
good
progress
on
that.
G
We've
had
great
participation
from
the
team
over
in
professional
training
in
the
police
department
and
fieldwork's
underway,
so
we'd
like
to
ideally
have
that
that
project
back
to
the
audit
committee
by
february,
but
obviously
as
as
time,
allows
we'll
be
working
on
that
and
getting
that
that
special
project
done.
G
The
next
is
the
city
department
survey.
So,
like
I
mentioned
in
my
previous
discussion
of
the
risk
assessment,
we've
been
surveying
the
city
over
since
we
finished
our
phase
one
covid
project
to
really
get
into
some
of
the
specific
covid
related
issues.
G
We
have
a
nice
background
from
from
many
departments
on
how
they've
been
impacted
by
covid
and
that
further
allowed
us
to
refine
how
we're
going
to
go
about
our
2021
risk
assessment,
so
that
project
will
again
inform
the
the
risk
assessment
we'll
be
using
that
and
hopefully
be
reporting
that
back
to
you
again
in
february
as
we
complete
it
before
we
move
on
to
our
next
section.
I
just
wanted
to
note
one
thing:
we,
we
don't
have
a
continuous
monitoring
section
for
this.
G
This
audit
committee,
we
had
a
pretty
robust
discussion
of
the
sexual
assault
kits
memo
at
the
last
meeting,
so
we
don't
have
any
major
updates
there
outside
of
the
fact
to
say
that
we
kids
are
being
tested
per
the
discussion
that
we
had
the
last
meeting,
so
that
work
is
still
in
place.
They've
they've
completed
those
items
that
you
that
were
discussed
at
the
last
meeting
and
perhaps
in
february
again
will
bring
back
information
about
how
many
kits
were
completed.
G
G
G
The
most
likely
next
project
that
we'll
be
beginning
is
related
to
after
action
reviews
amongst
city
departments,
as
they
relate
to
smaller,
less
notable
events
we're
in
these
large
discussions
right
now
about
these
big
after
action
reviews-
and
we
often
hear
about
these
large-scale
events
and,
as
I
discussed
this
past
summer,
perhaps
it's
wise
that
we
look
at
how
we're
conducting
after-action
reviews
on
a
number
of
different
incidents
in
the
city
that
either
lead
to
judgments
or
significant
outcomes
among
city
staff.
G
So
the
next
project
will
be
spinning
up,
relates
to
that
and
I'll
have
more
information
for
you
about
that
at
the
february
audit
committee
meeting
and
then
also
the
peace
officer,
standards
and
training
licensing
process.
As
it
ties
into
mpd,
we're
looking
at
that
and
figuring
out
how
we're
going
to
begin
that
project
as
well.
G
G
I
received
a
question
about
it
and
I
wanted
to
acknowledge
it
that
we
don't
have
specific
information
about
it,
but
we'll
be
monitoring
that
situation
as
it
goes
on
and
as
it
presents
recommendations
to
the
city
that
might
pertain
to
audits
work
in
the
future
in
our
race
and
equity
impact
analysis,
work
paper
that
we
we
discussed
earlier
in
the
summer.
We
will
be
using
that
on
future
audits,
so
you'll
you'll
have
more
information
about
that,
as
our
projects
continue.
G
C
G
Thank
you,
mr
fisher.
The
work
for
the
most
part
is
completed
on
that
project.
We
still
consider
it
in
continuous
monitoring
in
the
sense
that
we'll
be
making
sure
that
they
continue
to
test
kits
and
provide
status
updates
on
those
kits,
but,
as
their
recommendations
were
addressed
per
our
memo
that
we
issued,
I
think
back
in
february.
B
G
Okay,
move
on
to
the
next
one,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
travis
com,
the
auditor
responsible
for
following
up
on
prior
audit
issues,
I'm
going
to
thank
him
again.
These
issues
are
are
challenging
to
follow
up
on
challenging,
to
complete
he's
very
diligent
in
the
work
that
he
does
getting
these
closed
out,
and
I
will
turn
it
over
him
to
provide
an
update
on
prior
audit
issues.
I
There
you
go
good
morning
again,
I'm
maddington
members
of
the
committee,
so
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
we
kind
of
start
with
our
regular
update
on
just
open
audit
issues.
For
this.
One
you'll
note
that
we
have
nine
currently
related
as
open,
and
that
includes
the
two
that
we
just
discussed
with
the
park
board
grand
administration
process
11
that
are
marked
as
overdue
and
then
15
marked
as
validations
and
progress,
and
I
would
note
that
we've
been
since
these
sites
have
been
assembled.
I
We've
been
working
with
on
the
finance
team
to
remediate
a
couple
of
the
issues
and
we
should
have
more
updates
kind
of
with
those
at
the
next
audit
committee
just
to
not
make
it
into
this
review
there.
You
go
sorry
and
then
also
we
have
been
able
to
close
four
audit
issues
since
the
last
audit
committee,
which
we
will
just
kind
of
discuss
in
the
next
slide
to
follow.
I
So
those
include
two
moderate
rated
audit
issues
from
the
contract
amendments
audit
phase
two
presented
on
august
24th,
there's
issues
one
six,
that
responsible
for
the
convention
center
and
park
board
management,
and
we
thank
them
for
their
work
and
getting
making
sure
that
they
were
fixed
and
remediated
timely,
and
we
also
note
that
all
issues
from
that
report-
I'm
looking
forward
seven
with
two
moderate
and
five
low-rated
are
now
closed.
I
mean
we
also
reached
an
agreement
with
the
finance
finance
on
aeg
contract
management.
I
Audit
issue,
one
presented
in
february
2019
and
also
the
other
one-
is
a
low-waited
audit
issue
from
the
grand
administration
process
review
presented
today
and
also
note
that
we've
been
working
with
finance
on
the
gift
card.
Our
payroll
audit
issues
and
some
of
those
are
several
of
those
are
close
to
remediation.
So
we
think
their
time
and
effort
through
those
on
the
next
slide.
We
have
a
regular
I'm
not
an
over
autod
or
overdue
audit
issues.
I
So
for
a
lot
of
these
as
we're
working
with
to
get
a
response
and
more
updates
on
them,
we
have
been
noting
that,
if
they're
overdue
or
not
just
based
on
those
timelines
and
then
the
next
slide,
we
have
open
overdue
audit
issue
details.
So
these
are
all
the
public
audit
issues,
the
ones
noting
their
due
dates
and
then
as
well
as
their
status.
I
So
you
note
that
there's
some
coming
over
some
coming
to
do
with
the
records
management,
as
well
as
some
finance
ones
coming
due
at
the
end
this
year
and
then
the
overdue
audit
issues
relating
to
some
of
these
projects
and
work
that
we
are
still
working
with
them,
trying
to
get
we're
getting
a
response
and
making
sure
that
things
are
being
remediated,
timely
and
then
the
next
slide
is
a
detail
on
our
validation
and
progress.
I
And
we
discuss
a
little
bit
more
in
detail
at
the
last
audit
committee
on
some
of
these
specific
audit
issues
and
the
statuses
specifically
in
the
c-pad,
which
you
believe
in
the
next
couple
of
months,
they'll
be
able
to
close
out
league
two.
I
That's
lone
life
cycle
audit,
some
of
the
mpd
ones,
as
well
as
some
of
the
finance
ones,
that
we've
been
continuing
to
work
with
finance
staff
want
to
ensure
that
they're
closed
out
and
the
next
slide.
We
have
just
a
note
that
about
the
non-public
audit
issue,
follow-up.
I
So
there's
two
non-public
reports
with
outstanding
issues
and
that's
why
the
numbers
don't
always
line
up
with
the
ones
that
we
know
and
we
saw
continuing
to
work
with
it
discussing
after
coming
up
with
an
action
plan
to
make
sure
that
I'm
specifically
to
some
of
the
I.t
ones,
that
we
have
a
good
understanding
of
the
issues
that
have
been
fixed
and
that
there's
a
good
process
moving
forward
for
those.
I
And
then,
if
that's
all,
that
we
have
for
open
audit
issues
today
and
if
there's
not
any
open
any
questions,
if
not
I'll
turn
it
back
over
to
ryan.
Patrick.
To
conclude,
the
presentation.
G
Thank
you,
chair,
palmisano
travis
has
been
working
really
hard
on
those,
and
we
like
to
note
just
all
those
validation
and
progress
and
the
open
audit
issues
we're
getting
a
lot
of
response
from
management.
It's
it's
absolutely
necessary
to
work
with
them
to
close
those
audit
issues
and
knowing
everyone
has
has
tight
schedules
right
now.
G
I
believe
we
move
on
to
the
next
slide.
I
believe
that's
all
we
have
for
today
again,
thank
you
to
my
team.
They
worked
comlin.
You
get
travis
worked
very
hard
to
finish
that
that
park
board
grant
management
audit
as
it
was
completed,
and
thanks
again
to
the
park
board
for
being
such
a
good
participant
in
that
project.
G
I
sincerely
appreciate
all
the
effort
to
get
that
done
in
preparation
for
the
december
meeting.
It's
not
going
to
be
until
february
until
we
meet
again,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
before
then,
but
again,
thanks
to
the
staff
and
thanks
to
the
committee
for
your
thoughtful
questions
and
attention
during
this
meeting.
B
F
I'm
not
sure
you're
gonna
adjourn,
so
I
thought
I'd
pipe
up
the
the
system.
Somehow
what
got
wise
to
my
antics
and
muted
me
during
the
last
vote
right
so
yeah,
I
had
the
opportunity
to
vote
at
that
time.
B
B
B
I
did
want
to
mention
that
over
the
last
few
months,
my
office,
along
with
hr
and
orion
consulting,
have
been
working
to
identify
applicants
for
the
permanent
position
of
the
director
of
internal
audit.
Later
this
month,
a
selection
panel
will
convene
an
interview,
finalists
of
that
search
and
following
those
interviews,
a
final
candidate
will
be
selected
and
put
forward
for
the
audit
committee's
consideration
at
our
next
meeting.
I
recognize
the
very
protracted
timeline
for
this.
It
has
been
complicated
by
kovid
and
then
other
hr
priorities
that
just
needed
to
take
precedent
at
this
time.
B
So
I
apologize
for
the
delay
on
that,
but
I
wanted
to
mention
that
so
that
everybody
knew
where
that
was
at
seeing
no
further
business
before
us.
With
no
objection,
I
will
declare
this
meeting
adjourned.
Thank
you
for
your
time.