►
From YouTube: April 22, 2021 Local Board of Appeal and Equalization
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Good
morning,
welcome
to
this
live
broadcast
of
our
virtual
meeting.
This
meeting
includes
the
remote
participation
of
members
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statutes,
section
13d
021,
due
to
the
declared
local
health
pandemic.
The
city
will
be
recording
and
posting
this
meeting
to
the
city's
website
and
youtube
channel
as
a
means
of
increasing
public
access
and
transparency.
B
This
meeting
is
public
and
subject
to
the
minnesota
open
meeting
law.
For
the
record,
my
name
is
neil
anderson
and
I'm
chair
of
the
local
board
of
appeal
and
equalization.
I
will
now
call
this
meeting
to
order.
The
open
meeting
law
requires
a
roll
call
vote
be
conducted
during
a
virtual
meeting
and
a
certificate
certification
form
will
be
completed
for
each
local
board.
Meeting.
This
initial
roll
call
will
allow
the
city
assessor
to
complete
the
certification
form
on
behalf
of
the
board
members
with
a
verbal
signature.
D
E
B
G
B
That
motion
passes
and
the
agenda
is
adopted.
There
are
excuse
me,
there
are
a
total
of
41
cases
to
consider
at
today's
meeting.
I
will
summarize
the
process
for
conducting
hearings
in
this
virtual
format.
B
First,
we
will
call
on
the
applicant
will
be
given
five
minutes
to
present
their
appeal
when
your
case
is
called,
you
will
need
to
press
star
six
on
your
phone
to
activate
your
microphone
and
wait
to
hear
the
pre-recorded
message
before
speaking.
We
ask
that
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
then
present
your
appeal
to
the
board.
Next,
the
board
will
have
five
minutes
to
ask
questions
and
discuss
the
case.
The
board
will
consider
and
take
action
on
each
case
as
they
are
presented.
B
Property
owners
will
be
notified
of
the
decision
by
mail
after
the
board
has
adjourned.
I
will
ask
rebecca
malmquist
from
the
assessor's
office
to
guide
us
through
the
cases
on
today's
agenda
rebecca.
Please.
H
H
B
Okay,
43-14
habit,
it
was
there
was
an
appraisal
done
in
october
of
2020
and
the
appraised
value
came
in
at
540
000..
The
owner
is
requesting
that
their
tax
value
be
reduced
to
536
000.
F
F
Mr
chair,
I
find
the
appraisal
is
acceptable.
It's
it's
reasoned
enough
and
I
think
the
comps
were
reasonable.
Also.
F
I
would
make
a
motion
that
we
said
that
we
reduced
the
value
of
the
property
at
4314,
abbott
avenue
south
from
555
000
to
540
000,
as
indicated
on
the
appraisal.
B
G
G
H
B
Okay,
go
go
ahead,
mr
donovan.
J
J
J
Okay,
so
generally
I've
done
enough
of
these
types
of
properties
to
know
the
main
issues.
One
of
the
issues
is
it's
the
right
property
to
avv
galvanizing
plant.
Hopefully,
you'll,
look
over
our
packet
and
see
if
these
are
generally
inferior
type
buildings
as
far
as
class,
construction,
quality,
etc,
and
I
do
believe
from
what
I
recall.
J
If
you
tell
me,
if
I'm
wrong,
but
we
have
a,
we
should
have
hopefully
a
cost
approach,
and
do
we
also
have
a
market
sales
approach
either
way.
I
think
what
usually
happens
with
these
type
of
properties
is
that
the
county
tends
to
look
at
is
just
a
typical
industrial
type
facility,
but
especially
the
wear
and
tear
on
these
properties
from
being
galvanizing
plant
owner
occupied
they're
built,
you
know
just
to
for
their
purpose,
not
necessarily
to
lease
out
inferior
property,
materials,
etc.
So,
hopefully,
we
have
supplied
what
I
believe
you
look
at.
J
Our
cost
approach,
look
at
the
sales
and
whatever
else
we
have
and
compare
those
comparables
to
the
subject
towards
the
lower
value.
May
I
ask
the
board,
as
far
as
did
we
supply
what
I
remember
market
sales.
J
It's
just
because
it's
early-
and
I
don't
believe
I
can't
find
a
packet
here.
I
believe
we
supplied
market
sales.
Is
that
correct
that.
J
Right
so
from
market
sales
and
whatever
other
approaches
we
have
again.
If
you
look
at
those
and
if
we
did
supply
market,
we
must
have
supplied.
Obviously
the
cost
are
full
pages
of
those
sales
so
again
we're
talking
about
as
an
overall
basis
land
improvements
and
we're
also
talking
about
comparing
the
subject
to
our
market
sales
as
an
overall
basis.
I
mean
this
type
of
property.
We
definitely
believe
even
the
inferior
nature
of
it
compared
to
the
comparables
should
support
a
lower
value.
B
Okay,
thank
you.
Are
there
any
questions
or
comments
from
board
members.
E
I
have
a
question:
I'm
seeing
the
land
sales,
but
I'm
not
seeing
any
improved
building
sales
in
my
packet
does.
J
Anybody:
okay,
I'm
not
when
we
just
supply
the
cost
approach.
Does
it
say
we
supplied
you
see
any
lease
comparables
or
is
it
mainly
just
the
cost
basis
of
land
sales
and
and
improvements?
If
that
is
the
case,
one
of
the
problems
is.
It
is
hard
to
compare
it
to
other
properties
that
have
sold,
and
that's
why
oftentimes
we
do
not
include
market
sales
because
it
is
so
inferior.
We'd
have
to
make
a
tremendous
amount
of
adjustments.
So
it's
a
difficult
property
to
value.
It's
just
that.
F
Yes,
mr
chair,
this
is
a
commercial
property.
I
am
not
I'm
a
residential
realtor.
I
do
not
have
knowledge
of
commercial,
so
I'm
not
really
prepared
to
make
a
judgment
on
this,
and
it
would
be
my
motion
that
we
sustain
the
value
and
invite
the
appellant
to
move
on
to
the
next
phase
of
the
process
where
there
may
be
those
who
are
better
equipped
to
handle
this
kind
of
judgment.
D
I'd
like
to
say
something:
this
is
steve.
I
am
very
familiar
with
industrial
property,
especially
in
the
city
of
minneapolis,
and
there
needs
to
be.
There
are
sales
of
properties
like
this
they're,
typically
properties
that
don't
have
heat
and
that
sort
of
thing
they
are.
There
are
properties
out
there
like
this
and
land
values
in
minneapolis.
A
lot
of
the
comps
were
from
outside
of
the
city,
and
I
know
industrial
land
in
minneapolis
is
is
much
higher
than
with
this
appraiser
or
whoever
did
the
report
came
up
with.
D
I
know
it's
probably
more
in
the,
and
maybe
mr
chow
would
agree
with
me,
but
more
in
the
four
to
seven,
depending
on
where
it
is
sometimes
ten
dollars
a
square
foot
for
industrial.
If
it's
over
near
the
university,
this
isn't
near
the
university,
but
I
think
we
carry
it
or
the
city
of
minneapolis
carries
it
at
five
dollars
and
forty
cents
a
foot,
and
that
seems
reasonable
to
me.
E
D
E
E
B
Correction,
1
million
375.
D
B
Correct:
okay:
I
have
a
motion
from
voldertha
second
by
ciao,
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
1
million
275
000.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
the
motion?
G
G
B
That
carries
an
emotion
is
adopted
rebecca.
Will
you
please
bring
up
the
next
case.
H
L
Good
morning,
well,
we
we
are
appealing
because,
as
you
guys
have
in
front
of
you,
our
condo
was
recently
reappraised
and
the
value
the
value
was
went
from
270
to
286
thousand
dollars
for
21
taxes
payable
and
22..
We've
owned.
This
condo
since
may
2018
purchase
price
of
250
000
and,
coincidentally,
we're
also
in
the
process
of
selling
this
condo.
You
should
see
attached
to
our
to
our
form
for
asking
to
have
it
reduced
two
comps
that
were
presented
to
us
by
our
real
estate
agent.
L
One
is
a
direct
comp
which
is
two
floors
above
us
with
the
exact
same
floor
plan,
the
exact
same
square,
footage
that
was
sold
in
december
of
2020
at
247
thousand
dollars,
and
then
the
second
comp
is
on
the
first
floor,
number
117,
which
was
sold
at
265
000.
Now
the
with
both
of
these,
the
the
four,
the
one
that
is
unit
404
two
floors
above
us
it
has
upgrades
our
unit
does
not
including
a
fireplace
it
is.
L
L
So
in
consideration
of
these
comps
and
others
that
our
real
estate
agent
looked
at
when
we
decided
to
list
our
condo,
we
listed
ours
at
250
000
over
two
weeks
ago.
We've
only
received
a
couple
showings
in
the
in
time.
The
amount
of
action
and
interest
is
really
quite
low
and
we
think
you
know
we
get
245
or
I
mean
if
we
get
245
000
as
a
sale
price
on
this
place.
I
think
we'll
be
lucky.
L
B
Okay,
thank
you
board
members.
Do
you
have
any
questions
or
comments.
F
Okay,
okay
and
then
117
was
what.
B
The
information
presented
to
me
looks
reasonable.
Can
I
get
a
motion
here.
F
B
G
G
B
That
carries
in
the
motion
is
adopted.
Rebecca
item
number
six.
H
B
Thank
you.
The
whole
property
owner
of
pride
sent
in
appraisal
dated
july
of
2019
that
amount
was
for
333
000..
B
B
F
That,
mr
chair,
that
appraisal
was
done
what
two
a
year
year
and
a
half
ago
july
of
19.
I
think
it
was
yes,
so
it
is
dated.
I
think.
However,
their
request
for
340
is
on
the
low
side
and
I
would
probably
propose
something
somewhat
higher
than
that,
but
not
the
384..
D
I
I'd
agree
with
that
and
I
I
feel
like
there's.
The
appraisal
might
have
taken
into
consideration
the
old
growth,
but
that
seems
to
be
an
issue
right
here
and
that
would
affect
any
future
or
current
sale
of
the
property
if
it
was
sold
without
the
roof
being
fixed.
So
I
do
agree
that
our
our
motion
to
reduce
this
value
should
be
somewhere
between
the
333
and.
B
384.,
thank
you.
If
there
are
any
other
questions
or
comments,
I
would
entertain
a
motion.
F
B
Do
I
have
a
second
second,
it
is.
A
motion
has
been
made
by
bland
and
the
second
by
chow,
to
decrease
the
2021
estimated
market
value
to
365
000.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
the
motion
hearing?
None
all
else.
Click
call
the
role.
G
G
B
That
carries
and
the
motion
is
adopted
rebecca
the
next
case.
Please.
H
Yes,
moving
on
to
agenda
item
number
seven
case:
two
one
dash
zero
three
six
seven.
This
is
a
residential
property
located
at
two
four
zero
zero
bryant
avenue
south.
It
is
located
at
page
on
page
151
in
your
pdf
packet,
the
property
owner
is
french
schneider
and
mr
schneider
is
on
the
line.
Mr
schneider,
you
will
just
need
to
press
star
six
to
unmute.
B
M
K
N
N
So
yeah,
basically
you
know
the
home
we
bought
is
was
was
purchased
for
955
000.
It
is
the
most
expensive
home
that
ever
sold
in
this
neighborhood
there's
only
one
home
that
is
somewhat
comparable.
It's
on
the
same
block
and
it's
sold
in
2007
for
seven
hundred
thousand
dollars.
N
Looking
at
other
properties,
there
seems
to
be
a
distinct
divide
between
you
know:
homes.
It's
like
three
thousand
square
foot
in
size
and
houses
that
are
much
bigger.
For
example,
our
home,
you
know,
has
a
ballroom
which
most
people
don't
know
what
to
do
with
it.
Also
has
you
know
the
original
layout
of
all
the
bathrooms,
so
the
master
bathroom
is
extremely
small.
N
N
For
example,
most
recently
1788
fremont
avenue
south
minneapolis
sold
for
940
thousands
on
march,
2nd,
it
is
much
more
updated,
has
updated
kitchens
updated
bathrooms
that
are
larger,
has
a
more
open
floor
plan
home
was
also
built
in
1901.
It's
in
lowry
hill,
which
is
a
more
desirable
neighborhood
and
yeah.
The
increase
of
95
thousand
dollars
is
just
based
on
an
algorithm
rather
than
on
comparable
market
values,
and
I
submitted
a
few
other
properties
that
were
all
very
closely
sold
to
the
date.
I
think
what
is
it
february
or
january
of.
N
2021,
if
you
have
any
questions
happy
to
answer
those.
B
Thank
you
board
members.
Do
you
have
any
questions
or
comments
regarding
2400,
brian.
F
Mr
chair,
I
am
excuse
me,
I
am
somewhat
familiar
with
this
property.
I
toured
it
when
the
current
owner
bought
it
when
it
was
on
the
market.
It
is
exquisite,
it
was,
I
see
a
lot
of
properties,
and
this
is
one
that
I
remember
very
well
and
have
and
think
of
every
now
and
again
I
live
in
the
neighborhood
and
I
drive
by
it
frequently
and
I'm
reminded
how
impressed
I
was
when
I
saw
it
now,
given
that
I
will
also
say
that
he
is
absolutely
correct.
F
That
is,
would
be
the
highest
value
in
the
neighborhood.
It's
20
he's
right
on
24th
street,
which
is
a
somewhat
busy
street.
It
is
a
bus
line.
There
is
nothing
right
around
it
in
that
area,
which
would
be
this
high.
I
noticed
in
the
photos
that
were
sent
in
there
were
some
issues
that
need
to
be
addressed
on
the
exterior.
At
least
the
interior
is
beyond
compare.
B
Are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
board
members?
There
is
an
appraisal
from
2019
and
I
believe,
an
update
from
2020.
F
B
Correct
here
you
know
other
questions
or
comments.
I
will
may
I
have
a
motion.
B
G
G
B
That
carries
on
the
motion
is
adopted.
Rebecca
item
number
eight.
H
B
Mr
zulkey
press
star
six.
O
It's
miss.
Can
you
hear
me.
O
I
believe
that
you
have
a
write-in
and
an
appraisal
included.
Can
you
confirm
that
you
have
that.
O
Great,
I
bought
the
house
in
2018
for
purchase
price
of
410
000..
I
did
a
refinance
last
year
in
april
and
had
the
goal
of
getting
a
cash
out
refi
and
the
appraisal
first
came
in
at
418
000..
I
requested
that
the
appraisal
be
revisited
because
I
wanted
to
get
more
cash
out
and
it
went
up
to
just
420
000,
as
you
can
see
in
the
appraisal.
O
That's
the
final
value
that
was
reflected
I
in
getting
the
the
notice
of
what
the
taxable
value
was
noting
a
and
over
20
increase
from
the
previous
year's
taxable
value
would
request
that
there
be
considerable
revisitation
of
the
appraised
value
being
closer
to
that
of
the
appraisal.
From
last
year.
O
B
Okay,
thank
you
board
members.
Do
you
have
any
questions
for
comments.
F
My
it
says.
Excuse
me,
it
says
that
the
purchase
price
was
420
what's
written
here,
but
I
believe
I
heard
you
say
you
purchased
it
for
410.
I
O
B
For
me,
the
appraisal
looks
in
order.
There
was
some
appreciation
in
the
last
half
of
last
year
and
I
don't
know
if
that
should
be
considered
in
this
or
not
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
board
members.
F
Mr
chair,
I
would
say
that
the
appraisal
is
a
year
old
and
you
are
right.
There
has
been
appreciation
since
the
appraisal
was
done.
F
I
would
move
that
the
property
at
249
vincent
avenue
north
the
value
should
be
reduced
from
466
000
to
440.
440
000.
B
Thank
you.
Do
I
have
a
second
second,
it
has
been
moved
by
bland
seconded
by
chow
to
decrease
the
2021
estimated
market
value
to
440
000.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
the
motion
hearing
none
I'll
ask
clerk
to
call
her
all.
F
G
G
H
B
D
Yes,
mr
chair,
I
I
didn't
mind
the
you
know
the
analysis,
but
I
would
have
preferred
to
see
something
more
than
one
and
a
half
and
two-story
homes
when
it
when
the
subject
was
a
one-story
home.
D
B
F
B
If
there
are
other
questions
or
comments,
we
will
now
consider
and
take
action
on
the
appeal
for
forty
six,
forty
thirty
seven.
Forty
third
may
have
a
motion.
Please.
F
B
G
B
That
carries
in
the
motion
is
adopted.
Rebecca
item
number
ten.
H
Yes,
chair
anderson
and
board
members.
The
series
of
the
next
five
appeals
are
cases
where
we
reached
out
to
the
appellant
and
they
did
not
respond
to
us
indicating
a
desire
for
either
a
phone
or
write
an
appeal,
and
so
we
are
presenting
these
as
non-confirmed
cases
to
you.
The
first
one
agenda
item
number
10
case:
210370
is
an
apartment
property
located
at
1827,
lasalle
avenue.
B
Thank
you
from
what
I
was
able
to
review.
There
was
just
a
one
line
complaint
with
no
additional
information.
Unless
someone
has
additional
comments
on
that,
I
will
ask
for
a
motion.
B
A
second
and
a
third
motion
by
bland
seconded
by
about
darth
and
chow,
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
3
million
20
dollars.
B
And
is
there
any
discussion
on
the
motion
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
her
all.
G
G
B
That
carries
in
the
motion
is
adopted.
Rebecca
item
number
12.
H
B
Thank
you,
you
know
same
situation
as
the
previous
two.
Just
no
information
provided
impossible
to
make
any
determination
unless
there's
any
discussion,
I'll
call
for
a
motion.
B
It
has
been
moved
by
board
earth
seconded
by
chow
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
seventy
three
thousand
dollars.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
the
motion?
Hearing
none
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role.
G
G
B
Thank
you
with
this
particular
property.
There
were
no
comps
or
appraisal
provided.
B
Just
the
applicant
did
say
they
sent
photos
to
adam
sword.
B
Oh
okay,
thank
you.
Are
there
any
questions
or
comments
from
the
board.
F
Mr
chair,
I
found
nothing
here
that
was
compelling
to
make
any
kind
of
decision
other
than
to
sustain
the
value.
B
Hearing
nana's
we'll
now
consider
an
act
on
the
appeal
for
4928
logan.
G
B
That
carries
on
the
motion
is
adopted
case
number
14
rebecca.
Please.
H
B
Thank
you
from
the
notes
I
have
here
is
purchased
in
december
of
2020
for
290,
000
and
appraised
at
that
same
time
for
295
000,
so
a
very
recent
sale.
Are
there
any
questions
or
comments
from
the.
B
B
If
there's
no
questions
or
comments,
I
will
now
consider
act
on
the
appeal
for
3119.
We
know
not
place,
may
have
a
motion.
Please.
G
B
C
H
P
Hi,
this
is
john
silverman.
Can
you
hear
me.
P
Okay,
so
this
is
for
3325
irving
avenue.
South
we've
lived
here
for
30
plus
years,
and
the
2021
appraisal
puts
the
house
at
623
000.,
the
2020
appraisal
was
566
500,
so
that's
an
increase
of
66
500
and
I
did
include
some
photos
I'll
just
go
through
some
notes,
real
quick,
if
I
may
so,
our
house
is
about
1800
square
feet
and
it's
about
800
little
over
800.
On
the
first
floor,
a
little
over
600
second
floor,
we'll
finish
the
third
floor,
which
is
300
square
feet.
P
So
when
our
lot
is
narrower
than
most
of
our
neighbors
and
our
house
is
smaller
as
a
result,
but
this
is
a
neighborhood.
That's
got
a
lot
of
variability,
so
it's
a
mixture
of
single
family
and
duplexes
and
some
apartment
buildings
and
a
mixture
of
larger
and
smaller
houses
and
so
we're
on
the
smaller
side.
The
one
salient
point
is
the
neighborhoods
about
a
block
away
from
bidet
mccoska
and
we're
on
the
wrong
side
of
the
block
to
get
a
view.
P
So
the
houses
on
the
other
side
of
the
block
do
have
an
obstructed
view.
So
I
suspect
some
of
them
get
a
view.
P
Okay
and
there
are
have
been
on
the
other
side
of
the
block,
a
few
tear
downs
of
some
houses
and
newer
homes
built
and
so
there's
a
big
difference
in
home
quality
on
our
side
block
on
the
other
side.
So,
as
I
said,
we
haven't
done
any
improvements
in
the
house
for
probably
close
to
20.
Maybe
more
years
I
sent
some
photos
to
tim
for
the
instructions
I
received
and
I
tried
to
take
the
photos
from
a
corner
of
the
room.
P
So
you
could
get
a
view
of
the
full
size
of
the
room
and
I'll
just
point
out
a
few
photos
that
show
some
of
the
differences
and
I
counted
the
photos.
Unfortunately,
I
didn't
number
them
in
the
document
in
the
pdf
that
I
sent
them,
but
the
third
photo
shows
what
we're
talking
about
the
smaller
size
of
our
house.
So
the
downstairs
bathroom
is
a
half
bath.
P
Photo
five
shows
our
staircase
going
from
the
first
floor
to
second
floor
and
it's
only
32
inches
wide
okay,
and
so
it
makes
a
bit
challenging
getting
furniture
up
there
and
then
photo.
Eight
shows
the
upstairs
bathroom
and
it's
five
feet
by
eight
feet.
You
can't
see
the
toilet,
because
it's
behind
the
door,
that's
the
size
of
it
and
I
showed
bathrooms
just
because
from
what
I
saw,
it
seems
people
show
bathrooms
and
the
newer
ones
have
or
the
ones
that
have
significant
work
done,
have
a
lot
more
work
done.
P
Photo
nine
shows
the
entryway
to
the
third
floor.
Staircase
was
actually
inside
one
of
the
second
floor
rooms,
okay,
and
so
you
can
see
how
you
have
to
walk
through
there
and
so
that's
a
bit
of
instruction
and
then
photo
10.
Unfortunately,
these
aren't
in
order
shows
the
upstairs
hall
and
that's
looking
from
the
bathroom
to
the
two
bedrooms
in
the
front
that
I
showed
also
photos
of
and
then
photo
12
shows
a
third
floor
that
we
finished
and
you
can
see,
you've
got
the
knee
walls
and
the
slanted
ceiling.
P
So
while
it's
300
square
feet
on
the
floor,
it's
you
know
smaller
than
that.
Okay.
So
then
I
I
don't
have
an
appraisal,
but
I
did
look
at
some
recent
sales
and
one
that's
for
sale.
I
put
that
underneath
the
evidence
section
and
so
3229
irving
avenue
south
sold
in
january
for
575
000,
I
should
say
the
information
I
got.
I
got
off
of
realtor.com
and
confirmed
on
zillow.com,
okay
and
it's
list
is
having
so
four
bedrooms.
Three
baths.
P
Twenty
two
thousand
six
hundred
fifty
three
square
feet.
Now
I
my
wife
was
in
that
house,
and
so
I
know
it
has
more
potential
than
our
house,
but
our
house
we've
kept
it
a
little
better
up,
okay
and
so
to
me,
that's
the
most
salient
one.
You
know
if
I
look
at
square
feet,
it's
much
bigger
than
us,
but
if
I
look
at
upkeep,
we've
done
a
better
job,
3244
irving,
avenue
south
sold
november
for
599
thousand
it.
P
This
is
a
corner
house,
okay,
so
it's
right
on
33rd,
street
and
irving,
and
so
it
has
a
little
bit
of
a
view
of
to
like
probably
more
than
the
ones
that
are
mid
block.
Okay
and
it's
on
the
other
side
of
the
block.
As
I
mentioned,
so
it's
three
bedrooms.
Three
baths.
P
So
it
has
2008
square
feet,
so
it's
comparable
in
size,
but
it's
got
that
view
of
the
lake
and
then
the
last
one
I'll
point
out
is
there's
one
for
sale,
3141
humboldt
for
599
thousands,
it's
a
little
bigger,
2416
square
feet,
four
beds,
two
baths,
and
so
that's
what
I
was
trying
to
point
out:
we're
smaller
we're
mid
block
with
the
other
side
of
the
block,
and
so
I
guess
I'll
stop
there.
If
you
got
questions.
B
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Are
there
any
comments
or
questions
from
board
members?
I
I
was
unable
to
access
the
photos
they
weren't
in
the
packet
but
they're
in
the
team
folder.
If
someone
has
been
able
to
look
at
them
and
then
comment,
please
thank
you.
F
Mr
chair,
while
I
would
agree
that
the
increase
in
value
over
the
previous
year
is
somewhat
substantial,
the
information
provided
does
not
serve
to
convince
me
that
it
is
not
that
we
wouldn't
sustain
it.
I
would
certainly
like
to
see
something
more
fleshed
out
about
the
comparables,
and
you
know
I
would
not
be
prepared
to
make
to
do
anything
but
sustain
this
value
at
this
point,
and
perhaps
the
appellant
would
want
to
move
on
to
the
next
step.
B
Hearing,
none
will
now
consider
an
act
on
the
appeal
for
33
25
irvine
avenue
south
may
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
B
G
H
Chair
anderson
board
members,
we
are
now
moving
into
our
10
to
11
a.m
session.
We
are
running
slightly
ahead
of
schedule.
However,
I
will
note
that
for
item
number
16
case
21-0397,
it
does
not
appear
that
our
caller
is
has
joined
us
yet.
But,
as
I
mentioned,
we're
running
slightly
ahead
of
schedule,
but
I
do
believe
we
can
wait
or
we
can
move
to
a
caller
that
is
here.
I
know
we
didn't
want
to
get
out
of
order,
so
I'm
just
asking
what
is
the
pleasure
of
the
board.
B
Please
go
ahead
with
the
caller.
That's
in
the
queue.
H
H
Q
R
Yeah
hi,
can
you
hear
me.
B
Yes,
we
can
please
proceed
with
your
appeal.
R
Yeah
hi,
my
name
is
matt
mayotte.
I
am
property
owner
at
3837
chicago,
so
I
don't
feel
the
market
value
the
appraised
value
matches.
What
the
actual
value
is
due
to
the
streets
being
closed
off
in
all
directions.
R
No
I've
attached
a
couple
of
pictures
as
well,
showing
the
streets
and
the
the
condition
of
the
alley.
Well,
I
guess
the
other
thing
is
the
the
amount
of
work
that
I
put
into
the
property
doesn't
match
the
the
value
the
appraised
I
did
put
in
an
appraisal
that
was
done
just
over
three
years
ago
and
it
appraised
for
considerably
less.
F
Yes,
I
have
a
question
for
mr
matt.
You
are
just
south
of
george
floyd's
square
at
what
point
south
of
on
chicago
is
the
barrier.
B
Are
are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
board
members.
B
It
has
been
extremely
disrupted
for
the
proper
property
owners
who
there
I'm
not
sure
if
this
is
the
place
to
address
all
the
issues
there
but
might
be
in
order
due
to
lack
of
services.
F
F
This
seems
to
me
to
be
somewhat
a
special
case
and,
and
I
would
move
that
we
sustain
the
value
from
the
2020
value
of
two
hundred
six
thousand
five
hundred
dollars.
B
Okay,
that's
needs
to
be
worded
as
a
a
as
a
decrease.
F
B
B
F
All
right,
I
will
substitute
motion
is
I
I
move
that
we
reduce
the
assessment,
assess
value
for
the
property
at
3837,
chicago
from
220
2
000
to
206
500.
B
G
G
B
That
carries
an
emotion,
is
adopted.
Item
number
17.
H
Q
Hi
yes,
good
morning,
please
let
me
know
how
you
would
like
me
to
proceed
dude.
I
haven't
done
this
process.
B
Q
Q
Okay,
perfect,
thank
you,
so
I
just
wanted
to
touch
base,
and-
and
I
can
I
mean
every-
I
included
everything
in
that
process
that
I
was
after
I
had
talked
with
the
assessor
and
he
he
explained
to
me
how
the
process
works
and
to
go
through
that
and
to
include
all
the
information
and
comp
values
for
the
area
to
the
best
of
my
ability
and
and
also
you
know,
information
about
the
condition
of
the
property.
Q
I
can
answer
additional
questions
if
you
want,
or
I
can
sort
of
go
through
the
same
information
I
already
put
in
that
up
that
online
process,
so
I
don't
want
to
take
any
additional
time
of
yours.
That's
not
needed
to
be
taken
unless
there's
something
specific
that
you
all
would
like
me
to
address
today.
B
Q
Okay,
I
will
happily
do
that.
The
main,
the
main
issue
that
we
have
with
this
property
is
it's
a
it's
a
it's
an
ancient
house
that
was
converted
kind
of
poorly
into
a
pseudo
duplex
at
some
point
in
its
history,
I'm
guessing
it
may
have
been
the
property
that
was
like
a
farmstead
property
or
something
here
because
it
has
no
basement,
has
a
foundation
that
the
house
was
built
on
this.
That's
crushed,
that's
kind
of
falling
apart,
all
around
it
and
the
property
is
sinking
in.
So
it's
really.
P
Q
You
know
spitting
band-aids,
kept
together,
apparently
over
the
years,
and
at
this
point
it's
it's
a
functioning
property.
But
it's
you
know.
If
it
were
to
sail
in
this
market,
it
would
certainly
be
a
tear
down
property
and
to
for
us
to
invest
additional
monies
in
it
would
be
sort
of
good
money
to
after
bad.
Q
So
when
I,
when
I
look
at
the
property-
and
I
consider
that
all
those
aspects-
and
we
consider
valuation
of
it-
we
would
you
know
I
I
I
put
a
bunch
of
comps
together
and
for
for
duplexes
that
are
all
significantly
nicer
structures
than
this
one,
and
there
were
a
bunch
of
them
that
were
between
199
000
and
279,
000
and
456
of
them
in
the
in
the.
Q
Immediate
area,
and
then
I
tried
to
find
some
comps
for
tear
down
value,
and
I
could
find
a
couple
that
were
listed
at
about
250
or
225
or
200
for
the
property
for
the
lot
and
then
obviously
you
have
you
know,
tear
down
and
disposal.
You
know
costs
involved.
So
I
was
trying
to
put
all
that
information
together
and
kind
of
come
up
with
a
number
that
felt
like
a
reasonable,
a
reasonably
accurate
kind
of
valuation
for
us
at
current
and
then
obviously
there's
a
whole
bunch
of
maintenance
needs
that
are
occurring.
Q
It
needs
a
new
roof
it
the
foundation,
like
I
said
you
have
pictures
of
it.
It's
it's
destruct.
It's
destroying
it's
destructed,
all
the
way
around.
There's
no
insulation
in
the
property,
because
there's
no
basement
so
we
have
always.
We
have
pipe
issues.
Every
year
there
was
a
addition
put
on
the
back
of
the
property
to
put
in
some
mechanicals
that,
because
the
property
obviously
didn't
have
indoor
plumbing
at
some
time
when
it's
pre
in
its
you
know
original
construction,
so
that
area
is
not
insulated
and
it's
falling
into
the
cistern.
Q
So
I
mean
there
are
significant
issues
with
this
property
that
certainly
affect
the
valuation.
Our
question
is:
when
you,
when
the
city
assesses
the
value
on
it,
is
there
a?
Is
there
a
recourse
for
a
property
owner
to
say
hey?
If
you
think
it's
worth
that
much,
can
you
please
come
and
give
us
a
check
for
that
and
we'll
leave
tomorrow,
because
we
would
happily
do
that
at
the
at
the
proposed
value,
and
I
I
assume
that's
not
a
system
in
place,
but
it
should
be.
Q
Q
If
there
is,
we
would
love
to
sell
the
property
for
that.
You
know
proposed
value
to
you
and
we
would
leave
tomorrow,
and
it
would
be
wonderful
for
us
so,
like
I
said,
we're
just
sort
of
keeping
it
going
and
trying
to
keep
it
in
condition.
That's
functional,
but
in
terms
of
a
market
valuation,
I
think
it's
significantly
as
the
information
that
I
shared
puts
it
at
a
significantly
lower
level
than
what
you
guys
have
it
at
which
you
haven't
proposed.
Q
I
was,
and
I
told
the
assessor-
I
was
actually
going
to
call
last
year
when
the
number
went
to
where
it
did,
because
it
was
significantly
higher.
We
just
didn't,
do
it
and
didn't
get
around
to
it,
just
because
life
is
busy
and
then
this
time
when
it
cranks
up
again,
we
said
well,
we
have
to
make
sure
we
go
through
that
process
this
year.
B
Thank
you,
sorry
for
your
unfortunate
purchase
there
and
there
the
city
is
not
to
my
knowledge
in
the
business
of
buying
properties
at
market
value,
but
you're
always
open
to
put
it
on
the
open
market,
but
that
that's
not
our
our
job
here
either.
Are
there
any
questions
or
comments
from
board
members.
F
F
The
comps
that
are
presented
may
or
may
not
be
relevant,
but
all
the
information
we
have
about
them
is
what
they
sold
for,
and
they
were
quote.
Excuse
me
nicer
or
significantly
nicer,
and
that's
not
really
enough
information
for
me
to
go
on
as
to
whether
or
not
these
comps
are
relevant
to
the
situation.
F
So
I
would
not
be
able
to
make
any
determination
other
than
to
sustain
the
value
and
encourage
the
property
owner
to
go
on
to
the
next
step
and
perhaps
provide
some
somewhat
more
helpful
information.
Q
P
B
The
it's
helpful
to
have
the
square
footage
photographs,
even
the
listing
information
of
the
comparable
properties.
So
you
can
see
sales
dates,
square
footage,
condition
of
the
comparable
properties.
B
F
Mr
chair,
if
I
could
clarify
what
what
I
had
said
earlier,
is
that,
while
I
do
not
question
that
the
comps
provided
are
nicer
or
significantly
nicer,
what
we
need
is
evidence
that
that
is
the
case,
and
there
is
nothing
here
except
the
address
and
the
price,
so
we
don't
have,
as
mr
anderson
pointed
out,
any
information
about
square
footage
or
what
these
properties
are
have
to
offer.
All
we
have
is
the
address
and
the
price
in
your
comments
that
they're
nicer.
F
Q
B
So
some
people
have
gone
on
zillow
or
other
websites.
You
can
contact
a
realtor
that
you've
worked
with
in
the
past.
They
can
provide
the
information
or
you
can
hire
an
appraiser.
Those
are
all
all
acceptable.
B
We
have
to
request,
we
have
to
request
a
motion
from
the
board
and
if
the
value
is
sustained,
then
you
can
take
or
or
even
if
it's
lowered
and
you're,
not
accepting
of
it,
you
can
take
it
to
the
next
level.
B
Okay,
okay,
you
know
hopefully
be
successful
in
your
appeal
at
that
point,
okay
makes
sense.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
We'll
now
consider
an
act
on
the
appeal
for
37.27
aldridge
avenue
south
may
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
F
B
The
emotion
is
made
by
been
made
by
bland
and
seconded,
I
believe,
by
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
369
000.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
the
motion
hearing
none
of.
Q
B
B
You
can
have
the
the
city:
assessor
can
come
out
as
board
members.
We
we're
not
paid
to
do
that.
Nor
have
the
time
to
do
that.
B
Q
Okay,
I'm
disappointed.
I'm
disappointed
that
you're,
accepting
that
that
big
jump,
like
you
said
with
all
of
the
information
I've
already
given
you,
so
I
would
at
minimum,
expect
you
to
to
leave
it
at
where
it
was
before
or
lower
it
down
to
the
price
worth
you
know
those
other
ones
sold.
So
I
guess
that's
the
disappointment
that
I
have
in
this
process.
B
Well,
from
from
our
standpoint,
it's
impossible
to
make
a
decision
with
the
lack
of
information
provided,
so
I'm
sorry
that
we,
we
can't
rule
any
differently
at
the
present.
You
know-
and
I
I
wish
that
do
you
have
luck
in
in
the
next
stage
of
the
process.
B
We
have
a
motion
and
a
second.
I
will
ask
clerk
to
call
her
all.
G
H
B
Thank
you
from
what
I
see
here.
It
was
a
10
word
appeal.
F
Mr
chair,
I
certainly
wasn't
convinced
by
the
information
that
was
provided,
that
you
said
a
10
word
appeal
house,
a
block
away
with
two
bedrooms
and
one
bath.
That's
it.
What
does
that
mean
so,
based
on
that?
I'm
prepared
to
move
that
we
sustain
the
value
at
4409
grand
at
275
thousand
dollars.
B
G
B
That
carries
the
motion
is
adopted
case
number
19.
B
That
that
will
be
be
fine
rebecca.
How
do
we.
A
S
Mr
chair,
thank
you.
I
was
having
technical
difficulties,
but
I'm
back.
I've
rejoined
the
meeting.
Of
course.
If
there
are
callers
on
the
line,
I
would
defer
that
you
stay
with
the
board
but
and
then
take
a
break
when
you're
able
to,
but,
of
course
I
would
defer
to
board
members
as
well.
If
you
want
to
take
a
couple
minute
break.
B
At
this
point,
it's
it's
10
13.
I
propose
a
three-minute
break.
G
B
G
S
Board
member
bland
aye
here
board
member
bedertha.
B
That
carries,
we
have
a
quorum
rebecca
case
number
19.
H
B
Yes,
we
can
please
please
proceed.
Mr
carlson.
M
Yes,
thank
you
for
taking
my
call
and
I
apologize
I'm
in
boston,
visiting
my
grandchildren.
I
haven't
seen
since
august
of
2019
due
to
covet,
and
I
don't
have
my
materials
with
me,
so
I'm
going
to
do
the
best
for
my
memory,
I'm
I
reside
at
6
grove
street
number
6b
in
our
18
unit.
Historic
grow
street
flats
that
was
renovated
in
1982
and
originally
built
in
1877,
and
is
it
is
on
the
national
historic
registry,
the
of
the
18
units.
M
There
are
eight
units
across
the
top
and
I
realized
the
floor
plans
that
I
applied
provided
to.
You
are
at
best
difficult
to
read,
but
they're
from
the
original
founding
documents
of
the
association.
The
best
I
have
of
floor
plans.
The
eight
units
on
top
have
about
200
square
feet
more
than
I
do.
They
have
better
views
of
the
river
downtown
minneapolis
and
they
also
have
rooftop
decks.
M
M
Of
those
five
units,
in
fact
of
all
of
the
units-
and
I
can
only
base
this
on
my
taxes-
as
I
remember
them-
which
I
know
are
based
on-
assessed
values-
I
provided
a
letter
to
miss
beloit,
who
is
the
assessor
for
my
area,
with
all
of
my
arguments
in
it,
which
you
have
of
these
units
that
are
similar.
M
Actually,
there
are
six
b
units
all
have
the
same
square
footage
two
of
the
b
units
have
full
basements
and
whereas
I
only
have
a
third,
all
of
us
have
lived
in
our
units
pretty
much
the
same
amount
of
time,
with
the
exceptions
of
unit
14b
and
16b.
These
are
the
ones
I'm
comparing
to.
M
M
I
think
it's
if
I
remember
correctly,
1200
to
2
000
less
I
paid
2
000
I
paid
2
000,
I'm
I'm
sorry.
I
paid
more
than
the
other
two
units.
B
H
H
Just
a
clarification
on
the
valuation
that
the
property
owner
spoke
to,
and
I
would
have
to
defer
to
our
members
of
the
leadership
team
regarding
the
difference
in
value.
We
don't
have
that
necessarily
at
our
fingertips
right
now.
So
if
that's
something
you
want
us
to
look
into,
we
would
have
to
get
back
to
you
tomorrow
on
that.
H
B
Thank
you
other
board.
Members
have
any
opinions
on
this.
F
Mr
chair,
this
is
a
very
unique
property.
It's
on
nicolette
island
and,
as
the
owner
said,
it's
on
the
historical
register.
F
I'm
not
sure
that
the
the
values
that
the
other
properties
in
that
building
are
at
would
necessarily
reflect
what
this
one
should
be,
simply
because
we're
talking
about
there's,
also
the
question
of
who
what's
updated,
and
you
know,
while
they're
very
similar
properties.
There
are
differences,
as
he
pointed
out
in
in
you
know
what
people
have
the
fact
that
part
of
his
unit
as
a
garden
level
leads
me
to
think
that
there
would
be
lesser
evaluation
there,
but
not
having
seen
the
unit.
F
It
just
strikes
me
that
this
is
the
kind
of
property
that
really
needs
a
much
closer
look
by
the
the
appraiser
by
the
assessor
to
be
able
to
determine
you
know
what
the
value
is
and,
as
as
ms
malthus
pointed
out,
the
value
has
been
dropped
from
the
2020
value
and
it's
actually
even
a
lower
slightly
lower
than
the
2019
value.
B
Yes,
I
I
see
that
I
also
you
know,
agree
with
the
property
owner
that
the
the
difference
here
seems
a
lot,
but
the
information
provided
does
isn't
enough
to
make
a
decision
here
today.
But
if
we
sustain
this,
will
the
the
appellant
have
a
chance
at
the
next
level
to
have
the
assessor
look
at
the
property
and
and
assist
in
this
process?.
B
Comments
we'll
now
consider
an
act
on
the
appeal
for
six
grove
street
number.
Six
b
may
have
a
motion.
Please.
F
I
move
that
we
sustain
the
value
at
for
the
property
at
six
grove
street
number
six
b
at
four
hundred
and
ninety
two
thousand
dollars.
B
It
has
been
moved
by
bland
and
seconded
by
boderta
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
492
thousand
dollars.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
the
motion
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll.
G
G
B
That
carries
in
the
motion
is
adopted
suggests
that
the
homeowner
moved
to
the
next
level.
Item
number
20.
H
B
Thank
you.
The
homeowner
did
provide
an
appraisal
dated
10
27
20
for
315
000.
The
owner
is
requesting
a
valuation
I
believe
of
310
thousand
dollars.
Are
there
any
questions
or
comments
from
board
members.
F
I
B
Okay,
there's
no
other
discussion,
we'll
now
consider
an
act
on
the
appeal
for
4704,
16th
avenue.
South
may
have
a
motion.
Please.
F
I
move
we
reduce
the
value
of
4704
16th
avenue
from
343
000
to
315
000,
as
per
the
appraisal
dated
october
of
2020.
B
Thank
you.
Is
there
a
second.
B
G
G
B
That
carries
the
motion
is
adopted.
Rebecca
item
number
21.
H
Agenda
item
number
21,
mr
chairs
case
21-0402.
It
is
three
one:
zero
four
james
avenue
south
the
property
owner
is
on
the
call.
This
is
located
on
page
425
of
your
pdf
packet
and
caller.
You
would
just
need
to
press
star
six
to
unmute.
T
Oh,
thank
you
very
much.
I'm
sylvia
manning,
I'm
the
property
owner.
Thank
you
for
affording
me
this
opportunity
and
taking
your
time
to
do
this.
When
I
got
my
assessment,
it
was
an
increase
of
10
over
the
year
before
and
for
a
minute
I
thought.
Well,
that's
great!
Maybe
the
value
has
gone
up,
but
then
I
thought
about
it.
T
I
thought
it's
impossible,
so
I
started
to
do
the
research
which
I
submitted
with
my
materials,
so
the
new
assessment
was
653
000,
but
there
had
been
three
very
recent
sales,
two
on
the
next
block
on
irving
in
january
of
2021
at
considerably
less
539
and
575,
and
these
are
both
houses
with
more
bedrooms
and
more
bathrooms,
and
then
the
house
just
across
the
street,
on
james
avenue
sold
in
february
for
six
hundred
thousand
and
it
has
the
same
number
of
bedrooms,
but
it
has
three
baths
and
my
unit
actually
only
has
one
and
a
half
baths.
T
T
What
actually
happened
was
that
in
january
the
entire
house
froze
every
radiator
was
broken,
every
appliance
that
has
water
the
toilets,
the
sinks,
the
fridge,
the
dishwasher,
even
the
faucets
in
the
tub.
All
of
that
was
destroyed
and
had
to
be
replaced.
The
the
floors
on
the
ground
floor
were
ruined
and
there
was
wall
damage
because
of
the
pipes
that
froze
inside.
T
So
we
did
spend
a
lot
of
money,
but
the
house
is
not
at
all
improved.
It's
just
brought
back
sort
of
to
where
it
was
it's
a
very
old
house.
T
T
I
F
Mr
chair,
I
would
note
that
the
permits
that
were
pulled
all
indicate
what
was
going
on
and
they
they
stay.
They
state
that
it
was,
you
know,
frozen
heating
lines
and
radiators
and
plumbing
freeze
damage,
and
so
it
was
pretty
clear
that,
although
there
were
permits
pulled
they
weren't
for
upgrades,
they
were
simply
for
preparing
the
damage.
B
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
comments
or
questions.
D
Yes,
mr
chair,
I
I
did
notice
that
those
permits
were
on
the
field
card
and
there
was
also
no
new
improvement
included
in
the
assessment.
So
therefore,
I
would
guess
the
assessor
did
not
add
any
value
for
the
improvements
that
were
made.
B
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
questions
or
any
other
questions
or
comments.
B
We
will
now
consider
an
act
on
the
appeal
for
3104
james
avenue.
May
I
have
a
motion.
B
B
If
no
one
has
a
motion,
I
would
appreciate
more
comments
as
to
why
not.
D
Sorry
thanks,
I
I
noticed
she
did
mention
a
few
sales
in
that,
but
I
have
no
other
information
about
sales
and
comparables
to
make
a
decision
on
what
to
do
with
this
value,
there's
nothing
to
compare
it
to,
in
a
sense
size
of
other
properties
or
number
of
rooms
and
and
date
of
sales,
and
that
sort
of
thing.
E
Yeah
I'm
seeing
a
chart
that
shows
the
sales
with
the
square
footage,
number
of
bedrooms
and
bathrooms
sale
price
and
I
think
some
of
the
ones
that
just
recently
sold
seem
like
they're
right
in
the
same
exact
area.
B
B
G
B
Motion
failed
for
lack
of
a
majority.
Could
I
have
another
motion,
please.
D
The
the
when
I
mentioned
before,
I
didn't
have
any
sales
data.
Mr
chair,
I
was
referring
to
the
new
sales
that
took
place
on
irving
and
james
that
I
had
no
real
information
on,
so
I
will
defer
to
others
on
the
board
for
a
value
on
this.
B
Property
board
member
chow:
will
you
revise
your
motion
or
board
member
bland?
Will
you
supply
a
new.
B
B
F
G
H
B
Thank
you
very
much.
I've
sold
in
the
building
I
agree
with
with
the
property
owner,
but
since
they
have
not
chose
either
option
I'll
call
for
a
motion.
B
B
000.
is
there
any
discussion
on
the
motion
hearing
none
allows
clerk
to
call
the
role.
F
G
G
B
H
J
J
I
have
recently
completed
an
appeal
to
minnesota
tax
court
with
the
with
the
and
that
completed
at
the
end
of
march
2021,
and
the
agreed
value
was
for
505
000
via
the
assessor's
office,
and
it
was
agreed
based
on
comps
within
the
area
and
attached
to
this
case.
There
is
files
for
the
tax
court
stipulation.
J
B
H
Chair
anderson
and
board
members:
yes,
while
I'm
not
intimately
familiar
with
this
tax
court
appeal,
it
does
appear
based
on
what
was
provided,
that
we
did
stipulate
to
the
property
value
of
505
000,
and
that
was
done
in
march
of
this
year.
So
it
appears
I
mean
that
is
at
the
will
of
the
board.
If
you
believe
that
the
value
for
2021
would
also
be
505
000,
as
we
stipulated
to
for
assessment
year,
2020.
F
Mr
chair,
there's
really
no
information
provided
here
that
helps
me
to
determine
what
current
value
might
be.
So
with
that
in
mind,
I
guess
I'd
encourage
the
homeowner
to
move
on
to
the
next
step.
If
we,
if
we
sustain
the
value,
that's
on
it
currently
and
provide
additional
information,
the
stipulation,
as
is
pointed
out
as
for
last
year
and
we're
dealing
with
this
year,.
B
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments?
We'll
now
consider
an
act
on
the
appeal
for
609,
east
minnehaha
parkway
may
have
a
motion.
B
B
G
B
Thank
you
that
carries
in
the
motion
is
adopted.
Case
number
24,
rebecca.
H
B
Thank
you.
The
numbers
supplied
by.
B
The
appellant
are
kind
of
complex
and
also
in
some
ways,
hard
for
me
to
discern
anything
about
them
and
being
that
they're
not
here
to
present
the
case
unless
there's
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
the
board.
I'll
ask
for
a
motion.
F
E
I
don't
have
any
additional
information
other
than
what's
presented
here
in
the
packet
and,
like
chair
anderson
said
it's
not.
I
mean
it's
just
a
few
income
statements,
no
comparable
sales
or
analyzing
of
those
statements.
So
I
would
like
to
thank.
B
I'll,
second,
that
that
has
been
moved
by
child
seconded
by
budertha
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
one
million
three
hundred
and
twenty
thousand
one
million
three
hundred
twenty
thousand
dollars.
G
G
B
Thank
you
that
carries
a
motion
is
adopted.
B
B
Well,
I
still
won't
see
it
till
this
evening,
but
thanks.
I
item
number
25.
D
Mr
chair,
yes,
I've
noticed
on
these
that
past
petition
or
the
past
appellant
or
application
and
the
future
next
few
are,
I
I
don't
know
the
building
at
all,
but
it
appears
to
be
the
same
building
there
are
different
tracks.
The
first
one
we
looked
at
was
a
basement
only.
I
noticed,
and
I
think
that
it
might
be
a
new
building.
D
D
B
I
I
would
suggest
that
we,
you
know,
send
them
on
to
the
next
level.
So
if
I
could
have
a
motion,
please.
D
I
move
to
sustain
the
value
it.
Let's
see,
we
have
million
320
nope.
That
was
the
point.
We
moved
on:
5
million
450.
Yes,
you.
B
Have
a
second
second
has
been
moved
by
bodertha
seconded
by
chow
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
five
million
four
hundred
and
fifty
thousand
dollars.
There's
no
addition
or
discussion
on
the
motion
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
a
role.
G
G
H
Yes,
agenda
item
26
case
21-0411,
an
apartment
property
located
at
1320
lake
street
west
sim
same
scenario
as
the
previous
two
cases
unconfirmed
cases.
B
Thank
you
similar
bare
minimum
information
of
a
rent,
roll,
no
comparables.
B
Has
been
moved
by
bedertha
seconded
by
chow
to
sustain
the
2021,
the
estimated
market
value
at
2
million
140
000.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
the
motion
lacking
such
I'll?
Ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll.
G
B
Thank
you
that
carries
the
motion
is
adopted
case
number.
H
H
The
agenda
item
number
four
agenda.
Item
number
27.
The
case
number
is
21-0-4-1-2:
it's
apartment
property
located
at
2919,
gerard
avenue,
south
again.
This
is
a
non-confirmed
appeal.
B
Thank
you.
If
the
property
owner
is
listening,
I
would
suggest
checking
their
numbers.
The
indicated
value
is
40
000
and
they've
requested
a
valuation
at
22
million,
750
000..
I'm
sure
the
city
would
be
delighted
with
that,
but
barring
any
other
discussion,
I'll
call
for
a
motion.
E
B
F
H
Chair
anderson
board
member
bland,
the
estimated
market
value
on
the
cover
sheet
of
forty
thousand
dollars
is
the
accurate
2021
estimated
market
value,
and
that
is
what
you
should
be
sustaining
to
to
board
member
bedertha's
point:
I'm
not
exactly
sure,
but
this
may
be
a
multi-parcel
property
that,
where
they
appealed
all
parcels
that
are
part
of
it
and
they
just
may
have
accidentally
entered
incorrect
information.
But
the
cover
sheet
is
correct.
At
forty
thousand
dollars
for
the
2021
estimated
market
value.
H
G
G
B
H
B
H
B
H
Right,
okay,
so
I
can
explain
that
and
I'm
sorry
for
this
confusion.
We
are
going
to
update
the
cover
sheet,
but
because
this
is
a
property
that
has
multiple
tracks
the
the
address.
If
you
look
in
the
hennepin
county
system,
is
actually
2923
gerard
avenue
south.
So
that
will
be
the
address
that
references,
this
property
specifically.
H
H
B
B
Then,
motion
has
been
made
by
bland
and
second
by
ciao,
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
of
26
million
dollars.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
the
motion?
Scary,
none
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
their
all.
G
G
B
That
carries
in
the
motion
is
adopted
case
number
29
or
item
number
29.
Excuse
me.
H
B
F
B
Well,
I'm
sure
this
the
city
would
love
it
if
we
agree
with
the
homeowner
here
or
a
property
owner
here,.
B
E
B
A
motion
has
been
made
by
voderta
seconded
by
chao
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
three
thousand
two
hundred
dollars.
If
there's
no
discussion
on
the
motion,
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll.
G
G
H
All
right,
chair
anderson
board
members.
We
are
moving
to
our
11
a.m,
to
12
p.m.
Hearing
session
we
are
going
to
have
to
be
efficient
and
stay
on
schedule
so
that
we
can
recess
on
time
today
you
do
have
a
number
of
phone-ins
and
a
couple
of
write-in
appeals
during
this
time
slot.
H
V
Great
great,
so,
as
I
stated
in
my
initial
note,
the
increase
from
2019
to
2020
is
I'm
sorry
from
2020
to
2021
is
pretty
steep.
Our
building
did
undergo
improvements
in
you
know.
It
is
42
years
old,
so
exterior
work,
including
a
new
roof
and
exterior
restoration,
took
place,
and
then
maybe
is
that
that
might
be
reflected
in
all
of
this,
along
with
that
new,
safe
up
to
code,
balcony
railings.
V
So,
along
with
those
renovations
we
we
did
receive
hefty
assessments.
In
addition
to
our
normal
dues,
of
course,
and
I
have
financed
those
assessments
and
I
pay
that
that
assessment.
I
pay
that
monthly.
V
As
for
other
data,
just
sort
of
to
back
up
my
appeal,
I
know
a
condo
in
our
building
with
a
significant
recent
remodeling,
much
much
more
recent
than
what's
happened
in
my
unit.
That
is
comparable.
Has
this
pretty
similar
square
footage
to
mine?
V
Things
have
been
severely
affected
here.
In
the
last.
Within
the
last
year
and
summit
house,
a
condo
was
used
as
an
example
in
today's
star
tribune
of
an
exam,
a
condo
that
has
has
not
sold
for
for
quite
some
time.
It's
it's
been
for
sale
since
pretty
much
for
more
than
a
year,
so
just
in
just
some
examples
there.
So
this
is
the
first
time
I've
ever
done.
F
F
They
are
having
a
hard
time
selling
these
units
and
need
to
reduce
prices
beyond
what
they'd
like
to
in
order
to
get
a
sale,
and
sometimes
that
doesn't
even
do
it.
So
I
do
believe
there
is
some
reason
for
considering
a
reduction
in
the
value
current
value.
B
The
the
the
narrative
provided
was
was
good
and
compelling
a
a
more
concrete
evidence.
As
far
as
actual
seeing
the
listings
and
or
comparable
sales
would
be
helpful
in
making
a
decision
does
anyone
else
have
any
comments.
B
F
E
G
B
That
carries
the
motion
is
adopted,
rebecca.
H
Yes,
agenda:
item
31
case
number:
21-0405
is
a
residential
property
at
620
upton
avenue,
south
laura
wade
is
the
appellant
submitted
a
right
in
appeal?
I
would
also
note
that
there
were
additional
documents
supplied
to
us
after
we
had
already
compiled
your
packet
and
sent
it
out,
but
those
files
are
available
in
the
teams.
Folder.
B
Thank
you.
The
narrative
is.
B
Rather
long
and
gets
into
some
obscure
detail,
but
there
is
a
massive
new
development
behind
this
property
and
I'm
not
even
not
sure
which
way
it
will
affect
the
valuation.
B
Lacking
any
other
comments,
we'll
now
consider
an
act
on
the
appeal
for
the
property
at
620
upton
avenue
south.
May
I
have
a
motion.
B
D
I'll
move
to
sustain
the
the
value
at
258
000.
thank.
E
B
Has
been
moved
by
buddhists
seconded
by
chao
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
258
000.
If
there's
no
discussion
on
the
motion
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role.
G
G
B
The
motion
carries
yeah
or
that
carries
in
the
motion
is
adopted,
rebecca.
H
H
H
B
What
I
noted
on
this
was
the
tremendous
increase
from
the
assessed
year.
2020
of
231
000,
jumping
to
426
000
and
the
appellant
did
provide
an
appraisal
but
correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong
the
they
didn't
respond,
whether
they
would
want
us
to
consider
it
as
a
write-in
or
or
a
call-in.
B
Okay,
given
the
lack
of
the
homeowner
providing
direction
here,
I'll
call
for
a.
B
F
Mr
chair,
based
on
that
appellants
not
confirming
or
denying
presenting
today
or
asking
for
a
write-in,
I
would
move
that
we
sustain
the
value
of
426
000
and
perhaps
they
can
move
on
to
the
next
step.
H
I
would
just
like
to
note
you,
you
noted
the
increase.
There
was
an
improvement
amount
of
144
thousand
dollars
added
for
the
2021
assessment.
B
Okay
but
again
the
homeowner
has
not
requested
it
to
be
reviewed
as
a
write-in
and
they
have
not
called
in.
H
B
Okay,
thank
you.
We
have
a
motion
that
needs
a
second.
The
motion
is
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
426,
000.
I'll
second
tab.
B
G
H
Okay,
chair
anderson
and
board
members
moving
on
to
agenda
item
33.
It's
case
two
one:
zero,
four,
zero
three,
so
the
series
of
the
next
five
cases
are
will
be
presented
by
the
same
property
owner
mark
link
made
mark.
You
will
just
need
to
push
star
six
to
unmute,
starting
with
property
address
two
four
three
one.
Fourth
street.
B
K
K
Sure
on
fourth
street,
just
just
a
little
history
back
in
back
in
17,
it
was
worth
292
000
and
then
it
went
up
in
in
18.
I
appealed
it
at
that
time.
The
assessor
came
out
and
he
he
agreed
that
the
property
was
in
terrible
condition.
He
said
I'll
I'll
I'll,
give
it
a
condition
of
just
a
side
of
tear
down
and
and
then
and
the
value
was
dropped
to
87
000..
K
Since
then,
there's
just
been
a
steady
increase
year
after
year,
it's
the
same
tenant
same
family,
the
kid
the
house
only
gets
gets
in
worse
condition
and
most
recently
the
increase
this
year
was
a
30
increase
to
150
000,
and
it
that
the
house
needs
at
least
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
worth
of
work.
One
of
the
bathrooms
is
not
functioning
the
kitchen.
Isn't
everything
has
to
be
gutted
the
bathrooms,
the
kitchens
much
of
the
wall,
many
of
the
walls,
the
lath
and
plaster,
would
have
to
be
removed
and
re-rocked.
K
The
house
is
in
very
tough
condition,
and
so
it
truly
is
a
project
housing.
A
we
buy
ugly
home
type
of
a
house
and
I've
sent
pictures
to
the
assessor,
and
but
apparently
it
wasn't
early
enough
for
her
to
to
to
respond
and
to
to
make
a
determination
at
her
level.
So
that's
why
it's
here
at
the
board.
A
K
Yeah,
no,
no,
it's
just
that
it's
in
it's
in
really
really
tough
condition
and
the
one
thing
I'll
say-
and
this
would
be
true
for
all
of
all
the
properties
that
we'll
be
talking
about
today.
But
you
know
I,
I
sell
houses
for
200
000,
but
that's
that's
true.
Houses
do
sell
for
that
down
in
in
that
neighborhood,
but
that's
after
I
put
in
eighty
thousand
dollars
and
four
or
five
months
of
work,
and
so
a
lot
of
times.
K
When
I
sell
a
house
for
200,
I'm
approached
to
sell
it
for
110
to
a
rehabber
and
then
let
them
do
the
work,
and
so
sometimes
I
do
it
that
way,
and
sometimes
I
just
do
the
work
myself
and
so
there's
there's
a
huge
con,
there's
a
huge
difference
between
retail
ready.
Those
are
the
the
houses
that
are
sold
for
top
dollar
and
those
that
are
currently
rented
out
to
a
tenant.
Who's
been
there
for
many
many
many
years.
This
family
has
been
there
for
many
many
years.
K
K
And,
and
because
of
the
the
condition
of
the
house
and
the
tenants,
are
it's
a
been
a
pretty
big,
big
family
and
they're?
Really
rough
on
the
house?
It's
a
very
expensive
house
to
maintain.
I
replace
the
stove
every
year
they
just
the
stove,
gets
basically
destroyed
without
a
stove,
it's
not
a
usable
rental.
So
I
it's
just
been
a
very
high
maintenance
house.
K
And
that's
what
I
think
the
cops
that
are
being
used
by
the
assessor
is
typically
are
the
comps
being
sold
to
retail
buyers
and
the
houses
are
beautiful.
And
I
understand
that
because
I
I've
done
that
to
some
of
my
my
rentals.
I
I
completely
make
them
beautiful
and
but
you
got
to
put
a
lot
of
money
into
them
to
to
to
bring
that
type
of
price.
B
Thank
thank
you.
Have
any
of
the
board
members
been
able
to
access
the
photographs
and
other
information
that
was
sent
late.
F
K
And
that's
the
approach
I
originally
took
and
and
photos
were
sent
over
a
week
ago,
and
I
guess
it
wasn't.
It
just
didn't
arrive.
I'm
sure
the
assessor
was
just
getting
overwhelmed
by
a
lot
of
requests
and
it
was
was
not
we
weren't
able
to
work
on
it
prior
to
this
board.
B
And
I
I'm
I'm
guessing
that
you
know
that,
after
after
our
decision
there
there
you
have
the
right
to
move
on
to
another
level
and
the
city
will
work
with
you
on
that
correct.
So,
thank
you.
Any
other
questions
from
board
members.
B
Thank
you.
Is
there
a
second
second
a
second,
it
has
been
moved
by
bland
segmented
by
chow
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
150
000.
G
B
H
G
K
Yes,
you
know
I,
I
think
this
is
a
waste
of
both
of
our
times.
If,
if
I
couldn't
get
any
move
on
the
first
one,
that
house
cannot
be
sold
for
a
dime
over
over
a
hundred
thousand
right
now
guaranteed
been
in
this
business
for
40
years.
It
cannot
be
sold
for
more
than
a
hundred
thousand,
and
and
so
if
this
is
what
we're
gonna
go
through
for
the
next
four
properties,
let's
just
end
it
right
now.
K
I
I'm
I'm
very
disappointed
with
this
process.
I've
never
gone
in
40
years.
I've
never
gone
to
the
before
the
board
and
when
I
appeal
with
the
assessor,
I
usually
bring
say
a
group
of
properties
like
this,
I
might
have
eight
or
nine
properties,
maybe
ten
and
and
that's
just
a
just
a
portion
of
the
ones
I
own
and
I
usually
get
an
adjustment
down
on
nine
out
of
ten
every
year
every
year,
because
they
they
agree.
K
I
pick
I
pick
my
the
properties
that
are
most
overvalued
and
we
make
we
come
into
an
agreement
and-
and
I
don't
think
that
we're
going
to
be
able
to
accomplish
anything
today.
So
this
is,
this
is.
B
Well
and
unfortunately,
we're
given
not
enough
information
to
make
a
decision
with
you
know
we
are
not
we're
the
tax
appeal
board,
we're
not
the.
B
Yeah
and
you
will
have
the
right
to
continue
on
with
the
assessor
to
work
and
but
from
our
point
of
view,
it's
the
information
is,
is
either
arrived,
late
or
is
incomplete
and
we're
unable
to
make
a
that's
difficult
for
us
to
make
a
ruling.
Based
on
that.
G
I
I
K
City
going
through
a
lot
of
changes
and
I
have
never
had
more
families
giving
notice
to
flee
minneapolis
and
right
now.
So
I'm
just
I'm
just
that's
my
little
editorial
comment,
I'm
concerned
as
a
property
owner.
I've
had
as
many
as
39
homes,
451
doors,
and
I
it's
very
it's
very
sad
what
I'm
seeing
that's
happening
to
our
city
and
but
I
appreciate
your
hard
work
and
your
service,
and
if
you
don't
need
me
any
further
and
I'll,
I
will
remove
my
appeal
on
these.
The
remaining
four
properties.
K
Until
I,
I
guess
I'll
deal
with
the
assessor
directly
yeah.
K
See
exactly
you're
right,
I
I
I
bad
choice
of
words,
but
yes,
I
will
continue
to
work
with
the
assessors
on
these.
So.
G
Okay,
thank
you.
G
K
B
Okay,
can
I
get
a
motion.
F
B
Oh,
oh,
oh,
it's
139.
B
E
G
B
That
carries
the
motion
is
adopted.
Rebecca
will
continue
through
the
next
ones,
rather
rapidly
per
the
property
owner's
request.
So
please
read
the
case
number
and
address.
H
B
Thank
you
any
discussion,
or
if
everyone's
ready,
we'll
now
consider
an
act
on
appeal
for
4224,
colfax,
7,
north.
B
Is
there
a
second
second
motion
has
been
made
by
buderitha
seconded
by
chow
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
146
000.
G
G
B
Thank
you
that
carries
and
the
motion
is
adopted,
rebecca
next
one.
B
For
the
owner's
request
to
move
on
to
the
next
level,
we'll
now
consider
an
act
on
the
peel
for
34
3433
lindell
avenue
north
may.
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
B
You
is
there.
A
second
second
motion
has
been
been
made
by
buderitha
seconded
by
chow
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
144
thousand
dollars.
There's
no
discussion
on
the
motion
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role.
G
G
B
That
carries
in
the
motion
is
adopted
next,
one
rebecca.
H
B
Thank
you
again
for
the
same
property
owner
for
his
request
will
now
consider
an
act
on
the
appeal
for
2635.
Penn
avenue
may
have
a
motion.
Please.
E
G
G
H
Agenda
item
38
case
number
21-0419,
a
double
bungalow
located
at
2910,
15th
avenue
south
the
property
owner
is
here
robert
shea.
It
is
in
p
on
page
617
of
your
packet,
mr
shea,
you
would
just
need
a
star
thick
one.
B
Mr
shade
press
star
six
and
go
ahead.
J
X
Yeah
I'll
just
reiterate
what
I
sent
in
my
packet.
X
X
So
I
think
just
hoping
the
assessment
only
compares
comps
from
say,
maybe
a
half
mile
radius
just
to
be
sure
we're
taking
those
into
consideration
those
unique
issues
and
then
the
property,
the
building
needs
a
new
roof
and
that's
approximately
sixteen
thousand
could
be
up
to
sixteen
thousand
to
complete,
and
that
does
not
include
water
damage
that
we
sustained,
which
I
don't
have
enough
information
on
to
get
a
quote
or
an
estimate,
and
I
think
that's
about
it.
I
think
the
rest
of
my
scent
information
would
go
into
further
detail.
B
Thank
you
just
trying
to
go
through
the
packet
again
here
today.
Is
there
a
photograph
of
your
property
in
in
the
packet.
B
Thank
you
board
members.
Do
you
have
any
questions
or
comments.
F
X
B
So
you
know
I
belie
you
know
believe
the
homeowner
is
cracked
in
in
in
some
of
the
assessment.
Are
there
any
opinions
on
on
valuation.
F
Mr
chair,
I
do
agree
with
you
that
the
neighborhood
has
been
impacted
and
that
it
would
appear
to
me
on
the
surface
that
this
might
be
a
candidate
for
a
reduced
value.
But
I
would
I
would
encourage
the
homeowner
to
move
on
in
the
process
and
work
with
the
assessor
to
come
to
a
more
accurate
value
based
on
all
the
variables
that
need
to
be
taken
into
account.
With
regard
to
the
condition
of
the
property
and,
what's
going
on
in
the
in
the
neighborhood.
B
Hearing
none
we'll
now
consider
an
act
on
the
appeal
for
29,
10,
15
avenue
south
may
have
a
motion.
Please.
F
Yes,
mr
chair
make
a
motion,
and
but
prior
to
that
I
would
again
encourage
the
homeowner
to
move
on
to
the
next
step.
And,
having
said
that,
I
will
move
that
we
sustain
the
value
of
the
property
at
29,
10
15
avenue
south
of
the
392
000.
F
I'm
sorry,
oh
that's
right.
It
went
down.
It
went
down
slightly.
I
revised.
My
motion
sustain
that
383
000
value.
B
That
it
has
been
moved
by
bland
seconded
by
bordeaux
here
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
383
thousand
dollars.
G
B
That
carries
and
the
motion
is
adopted,
the
homeowner's
on
the
line.
I
would
also
recommend
that
they
proceed
to
the
next
level
work
with
the
assessor
to
get
get
some
reduction
rebecca.
H
Chair
anderson,
moving
on
to
case
number
agenda
item
39
case
number
210420
located
it's
a
residential
property
located
at
3915,
chowan
avenue,
south
the
property
owner
did
select
to
have
a
write-in
appeal.
The
case
the
information
is
on
page
646
of
your
packet.
I
would
just
note
on
the
cover
sheet.
We
have
the
value
prior
to
the
board
at
507.
B
Just
noted
that
they
did
not
provide
any
comparable
sales
or
appraisal
that
I
was
able
to
see
just
a
few
photos
in
the
lease.
Any
other
comments
or
questions.
E
G
B
That
carries
the
motion
is
adopted.
Item
number
40,
rebecca.
H
I
H
B
W
W
The
first
reason
is
that
we
recently,
as
we
were
looking
at
the
online
views
of
our
home,
realize
that
they
misrepresent
the
finished
square
feet
of
our
house
at
2422
or
2497
square
feet
depending
on
the
source
we
looked
at.
The
actual
finished
square
foot
of
our
home
is
2021..
W
We
just
boxed
the
house
five
years
ago.
I'm
not
sure
why
there's
this
discrepancy,
however,
the
former
homeowner
in
an
effort
to
sell
it
might
have
included
an
unfinished
mechanical
room
that
has
uninsulated
block
walls,
a
concrete
floor
and
radiator
pipes
at
six
feet
so
no
ceiling,
but
that
does
have
like
a
workbench
area
as
finished
space.
W
Also,
our
main
floor
has
971
square
feet,
but
the
second
floor
does
not
extend
that
entire
amount.
It's
only
six
stages
too,
and
then
the
lower
is
actually
a
office,
den
area,
a
bathroom
and
a
laundry
room
that
are
finished
at
368
square
feet.
So
I'm
not
sure
where
the
error
occurred,
but
that's
a
problem
also.
W
The
updates
to
our
home
were
done
in
the
mid
90s
they're,
all
35
years
old,
so
a
home
really
doesn't
have
finishes
or
amenities
that
most
of
the
comparables
in
our
area
that
are
selling
in
this
price
range
do
have
examples
of
that
are
just
cracks
in
the
ceramic
tile
floors,
old
appliances,
faded
cabinet
faces,
and
probably
the
biggest
one
is
that
the
plumbing
in
the
bathroom
upstairs,
which
we
only
have
two
bathrooms.
One
is
five
feet
by
seven
feet.
The
main
bathroom
upstairs
isn't
up
to
code.
W
W
It
essentially
be
the
tiles
around
the
entire
bathroom,
a
very
costly
fix,
we're
nearly
60
years
old
and
can
be
safe
in
that
bathroom,
but
that
hot
water
would
probably
a
younger
family
would
definitely
not.
That
would
not
be
safer
for
children
and
it
is
not
up
to
cold
along
with
that,
the
kitchen
ceiling
has
a
crack
that
this
winter
water
began
dripping
onto
the
countertop.
I
W
W
W
So
much
more
much
newer,
four
beds,
two
baths
all
recently
renovated
20
128
square
feet
and
it
sold
at
480
000
and
actually
had
been
reduced
from
489.
B
Your
your
time
has.
W
F
Mr
chair,
based
on
what
the
homeowner
is
saying,
there
may
be
some
room
for
reevaluation
a
lower
evaluation.
However,
information
provided
either
in
writing
or
in
person
today
is
not
sufficient
for
for
me
to
make
a
decision.
F
The
comparable
properties
provided
simply
state
the
address
and
the
sale
price
and
there's
no
attempt
to
show
how
they
compare
to
the
subject
property
in
in
any
other
way.
So,
based
on
what
I've
heard,
I
could
not
make
a
decision
to
adjust
the
value.
I
encourage
the
homeowner
to
move
on
to
the
next
step
and
work
with
the
assessor.
B
Thank
you.
I
agree
with
all
those
comments
that
to
the
homeowner.
There
is
another
level
to
this.
If
we
don't
make
a
change,
that's
satisfactory
to
you
today.
There
is
another
level
of
appeal
that
you
can
work
with
the
assessor
and
move
on
and
have
it
further
heard?
B
Are
there
any
other
comments
or
questions
by
the
board?
Members.
E
B
G
G
B
W
B
H
Chair
anderson
and
miss
dennan,
we
will
notify
you
of
the
board's
decision,
which
you
just
heard
today
was
to
sustain
your
value,
and
we
will
inform
you
about
next
steps,
the
process
to
actually
appeal
at
the
county
level.
You
will
still
continue
to
work
with
our
staff
appraisers
on
your
property
and
if
a
concurrence
or
resolution
of
stipulation
is
agreed
on
between
you
and
the
appraiser,
you
wouldn't
need
to
attend
the
county
board.
H
Due
to
coved
19,
we
are
still
operating
in
a
virtual
environment
and
we
will
come
collect
photos
from
you.
We
will
do
interview
about
the
property,
but
yes,
it's
similar
to
a
physical
inspection,
just
not
yeah.
H
U
Hello,
I'm
here.
U
We
purchased
it
from
an
older
lady
who
had
been
helping
with
maintenance
just
little
things
like
snow
removal,
replacing
light
bulbs,
anything
to
kind
of
keep
her
off
the
ladder
in
late
2016,
and
the
overall
goal
was
to
put
my
grandmother
there.
It's
a
one-bedroom
house,
it
used
to
be
a
studio
house
and
I
believe
that
the
addition
was
put
on
for
the
one
bedroom
in
the
50s.
U
So
unfortunately,
after
I
returned
from
deployment
in
2017,
my
that
was
not
a
possibility
to
move
her
into
that
did
the
level
of
care
that
she
needed.
So
we
took
a
look
at
what
we
were
going
to
do,
whether
we're
going
to
sell
it
rent
it
out
or
treat
it
as
a
short-term
rental,
and
that
was
the
best
option
at
the
time,
because
we
didn't
know
what
the
future
family
situations
might
be
and
we
wanted
to
avoid
it
being
demolished,
because
I
think
it
has
good
character.
U
Now
I'll
draw
your
attention
to
the
comparable
data
and
comments
sheet
that
I
submitted
in
pdf,
which
outlines
it
pretty
much
summarizes
what
the
comparables
that
were
submitted
to
me
by
the
city
assessor,
and
I'm
of
the
opinion
that
the
comparables
provided
are
not
correct
as
they
are
not
equal.
If
you
look
at
the
spreadsheet
or
the
pdf,
I
cited
that
the
realtor's
listing
description
when
it
was
available.
U
I've
got
that
from
realtor.com,
specifically
the
properties
at
4232,
33rd
52nd,
I'm
sorry,
52,
36,
30.,
53
05
at
43rd
avenue,
south
all
exhibits
superior
finish
features
such
as
fireplaces
refinished
floors,
better
conditioned
garages,
even
a
two-car
garage
as
one
of
them.
The
property
of
four
two
thirty
32
32
33rd
excuse
me-
has
an
enclosed
porch
as
part
of
the
garage,
and
I
included
those
with
the
pdfs
as
and
the
photos
with
that.
U
There's
landscaping
they've
got
newer
kitchens
and
dining
rooms
that
are
open,
as
well
as
new
hvac
windows
and
roof.
I
went
through
and
looked
at
all
the
permits
that
had
been
issued
for
those
properties
now
I'll
say
that
not
all
of
them
exhibit
that,
but
they
all
have
their
own
unique
features
which
I
feel
are
of
higher
quality.
U
I
did
attach
those
listings
now,
if
you
remove
those
properties
from
what
was
submitted
to
me,
I,
which
I
do
not
believe
to
be
correct.
The
three
properties
that
remain
are
the
ones
at
4704,
36,
50,
35,
36
and,
I
did
add,
4616
on
32nd
avenue
south
that
which
is
one
block
away.
U
I
believe
that
these
are
closer
in
size,
finish,
condition
and
reflect
more
of
a
correct
value,
and
if
you
look
at
the
the
pdf
that
I
submitted
at
the
bottom
right,
I
summarized
that
property,
so
I
feel
it's
in
fair
condition,
it's
very
similar
to
those
ones.
I
just
added
there's
no
central
air:
the
bedroom
does
not
have
insulation
or
a
heat
supply
from
the
furnace,
meaning
you
have
to
have
the
bedroom
door
open
in
order
for
the
heat
to
blow
in
there.
The
furnace
is
nearing
the
end
of
its
life
cycle.
U
It
was
installed
in
2000.
I
believe
I
do
have
it
tuned
up
every
year
and
checked
as
part
of
the
annual
maintenance,
the
stucco
west
side
and
the
wood
trim
are
under
constant
repair
due
to
their
age
and
lack
of
maintenance
from
the
previous
owner.
I'm
doing
what
I
can
with
that.
The
garage
is
in
poor
condition.
I
can't
open
the
access
door
all
the
way,
because
the
crack
and
the
floor
and
the
movement
of
the
floor
prevent
that
from
happening.
Property
is
not
landscapes.
U
It
does
have
good
hardwood
floors,
but
they're
not
refinished.
The
kitchen
was
refreshed
at
some
point
by
the
previous
owner,
but
I
couldn't
find
any
data
on
that
or
permits
associated
with
it
pretty
much.
It
was
paint
stove
fridge.
However,
there
is
no
dishwasher
space
for
one
or
a
microwave
and
very
limited
counter
station
storage.
B
One
minute
remaining,
please.
U
Okay
yeah,
I
I
got
original
windows
and
that's
pretty
much
what
I'm
gonna
I'll
wrap
it
up
with
that.
So.
U
F
Members
I
do
have
one
mr
chair,
am
I
correct.
Did
I
see
something
in
here
that
you
do
rent
this
out
as
a
airbnb.
U
That's
correct
so
if
I
did
include
the
income
statement
from
that
in
the
property-
and
it
is
not,
you
know
it's
not
a
revenue
generating
profit
property,
it
doesn't
take
a
loss
in
2019,
it
does
a
loss
of
eight,
roughly
eight
thousand
and
then
last
year
we
had
one
guest
and
pretty
much
a
twelve
thousand
dollar
thirteen
thousand
dollar
loss-
and
you
know
we
do
maintain
that
just
you
know
for
family,
if
possible,
when
we
get
visitors.
U
B
D
B
Is
there
a
second
on
that?
Second,
a
motion
has
been
made
by
boderta
seconded
by
chow
to
decrease
the
2021
estimated
market
value
to
190
thousand
dollars.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
the
motion?
G
G
B
B
I
just
have
one
comment
for
tomorrow:
if
you
can
build
a
break
in
there's
somewhere,
where
we
have
a
little
more
than
three
minutes,
I'd
be
appreciated.