►
From YouTube: November 10, 2021 Redistricting Group
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
D
Good
afternoon
welcome
to
this
live
broadcast
of
our
virtual
meeting.
This
meeting
includes
the
remote
participation
of
members
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statutes,
section
13d
0.021
due
to
the
local
health
pandemic.
The
city
is
recording
and
posting
this
meeting
to
the
city's
website
and
youtube
channel
as
a
means
of
increasing
public
access.
This
meeting
is
public
and
subject
to
the
minnesota
open
meeting
law.
I'm
barry
clegg,
I'm
the
chair
of
the
redistricting
group
and
I'm
calling
this
meeting
to
order
and
we'll
ask
the
clerk
to
please
call
the
role.
F
E
G
E
F
D
I
F
J
E
A
F
D
K
D
I
F
F
J
E
F
B
D
That
motion
carries
and
the
minutes
are
adopted.
Next
is
the
chairs
report
and
I
don't
have
anything
to
report.
That's
not
already
on
our
agenda,
so
we'll
move
on
to
item
five,
which
is
reviewing
submitted
draft
maps
for
awards,
as
we
did
park
districts
the
last
time
just
a
couple
of
thoughts
on
process.
First,
I
thought
we
would
go
through
and
have
mr
munson
call
on
group
members
who
have
submitted
proposals
and
give
each
group
member
a
minute
or
so
just
to
describe
the
the
main
part
of
their
proposal.
D
What
plan
they
used,
what
their
goals
were
any
big,
significant
movements
that
they
want
to
point
out,
etc
and
then
we'll
come
back
and
discuss
those
in
considering
these
proposals.
I
just
remind
everybody
of
the
language
of
the
charter
itself.
Every
ward
must
not
have
a
population
more
than
five
percent
away.
D
And
finally,
it
must
minimize
change
in
existing
boundaries,
except
as
necessary
to
affect
the
foregoing
criteria
that
I
just
read.
So
just
keep
those
in
mind
as
we
go
through
I'll
now,
turn
it
over
to
mr
munson,
so
he
can
call
on
those
who
submitted
a
map.
Oh
by
the
way.
I
know
some
of
you
submitted
multiple
maps
and
sometimes
you
might
have
submitted
a
map
as
your
plan
and
then
submitted
later
a
corrected
map.
D
M
You
chair
clinic,
so
I
have
eight
maps
to
share
and
I
only
for
those
who
submitted
multiple
maps.
I
only
opened
up
the
latest
version
of
it.
So
if
you
would
prefer
that
I
open
an
earlier
version,
please
let
me
know
I'll
just
give
you
a
profile
of
who
is
going
to
be
called
on,
so
everybody
can
be
ready.
First,
we
have
group
member
calendar,
remember
carrie,
group
member
clegg,
remember
johnson
group,
member
kim
group,
member
kozak
group
member
new
house
and
group
member
schwarzkopf,
so
we
will
start
with
group
member
calendar.
M
All
right,
hopefully,
you
can
see
that
now.
M
N
So
I
was
looking
at
a
lot
of
I
made
my
own
map
first
and
then
I
started
looking
at
other
people's
maps
as
well,
and
I
liked
eduardo
ramirez's
plan
and
I
tweaked
it
a
little
bit.
So
if
you
want
to
go
into
district
r,
you
can
see
that
the
deviation
is
improved.
N
It
was
3.46
and
there
were
a
lot
of
good
ideas
about
trying
to
keep
all
of
downtown
as
one
district,
and
I
found
that
that
made
other
things
impossible,
and
so
this
one,
the
only
drawback
to
it,
is
that
it
did
not
have
just
ward.
Three,
I
believe,
is
that
teal
color
that
one
split
across
the
river-
and
I
was
okay
with
that.
N
Otherwise
using
boundaries
like
the
river
and
highways
like
394
and
35w,
kept
neighborhoods
together
that
needed
to
be
together
or
separated
other
neighbor,
neighborhoods
or
districts
apart
the
the
idea
of
having
a
district
that
went
below
the
creek
or
south
of
the
creek,
like
that.
I
really
liked
that
idea,
even
though
it
spans
35w,
because
that
part
of
the
city
seems
to
have
a
very
common
flavor,
and
so
I
like
to
keeping
that
one
together
all
the
way
across
the
city.
D
O
Hi,
so
this
is
a
map
I
made.
I
was
trying
to
minimize
too
many
changes
from
the
current
map
and
trying
to
keep
neighborhoods
together
as
much
as
possible.
O
I
actually
made
it
before
we
did
the
parks
maps
and
I
don't
know
that
I
would
have
kept
everything
exactly
the
way
it
is
if
I'd
have
seen
some
of
that
work
done,
because
I
think
I
got
some
better
ideas
out
of
that
discussion,
and
I
you
made
this
one
a
bit
ago,
but
I
I
liked
generally,
the
compactness
of
you
know,
like
the
wards
tend
to
be
a
bit
they're,
not
wide
or
long
more
so
than
I
think
would
be
allowed
by
the
charter,
and
I
think
I
only
split
two
neighborhoods,
maybe
three
neighborhoods
yeah,
I
think
I
said
38th
avenue
north.
O
I
meant
30th
avenue
north,
I
think
for
jordan,
but
then
I
split
lindale
and
I
split
key
widen
and
I
think
that
was
about
it
pretty
straightforward.
I
I
enjoyed
the
process,
but
ultimately
I
don't
know
that
it's
the
best
option
out
there.
Personally,
I
kind
of
like
the
idea
of
keeping
downtown
together
as
its
own
ward.
I
I
that
discussion
has
kind
of
popped
up
in
the
in
the
on
the
website
portal
and
I'm,
I
think,
I'm
kind
of
interested
in
that
so,
and
this
of
course
doesn't
do
that.
D
My
attempt
here
was
to
again
minimum
change,
keep
neighborhoods
together
as
much
as
possible
and,
if
not
possible,
use
natural
dividing
lines.
For
example,
I
had
to
divide
marcy
holmes,
but
I
divided
it
at
35w
is
a
very
unnatural
boundary,
but
nevertheless
is
has
distinct
parts
of
the
neighborhood
on
either
side.
D
I
also
wanted
to-
and
I
think
we
probably
all
wanted
to
do.
This
is
to
keep
ward
5
as
a
single
minority
majority
award,
that
technology
means
or
that
terminology
means
that
in
ward
5
there
is
one
racial
group
that
is
black,
that
has
an
absolute
majority
over
50
percent.
That
was
the
case
10
years
ago,
and
it's
still
the
case
in
this
plan.
D
Ward
6
10
years
ago,
was
also
a
single
minority
majority.
I
was
not
able
to
do
that
in
a
reasonable
basis
in
a
reasonable
fashion
on
this
map.
I
know
one
of
the
community
submitters
tried
to
do
it
and
it
looks
sort
of
like
a
spider
drawn
up
by
the
texas
legislature,
but
it
to
do
a
practical
rendition
of
ward
6.
I
believe
this
has
a
48
black
population
and
I
have
maintained
wards
four.
D
Six
and
nine
as
multiple
minority
majority
wards,
because
in
those
in
those
words
the
sum
of
the
black
population,
the
latinx
population
and
the
asian
population
exceeds
50
percent.
P
Thank
you
so,
building
on
wide's
group
member
kerry
said
quite
a
few
of
the
comments,
as
I
reviewed
them
over
the
weekend
were
talking
about,
should
downtown
be
its
own
ward.
I
want
to
bring
it
up
for
discussion,
because
I
know
one
of
the
major
issues
to
this
is:
it
does
not
follow
the
minimum
change.
P
So
if
you
wouldn't
mind
opening
this
up
in
district
or
for
this
one
just
to
zoom
in
a
little
bit,
so
the
one
concern
I
did
come
across,
and
this
is
actually
a
pretty
significant
difference
from
the
last
time
registering
happens-
is
that
the
downtown
area
which
I
more
or
less
bounded
by
the
river
35,
w
and
94-
has
a
population.
That's
now
too
big
to
be
its
own
ward
by
itself.
It
needs
to
have
some
part
of
it.
P
That's
outside
of
that
that
was
quite
a
bit
different
than
it
was
back
when
restricting
was
happening
in
2011
and
2012,
and
it
was
quite
a
bit
below
that.
P
That's
why
ward
7
goes
into
downtown
as
well
as
ward,
3
and
ward
6.,
so
I
started
with
that
carved
out
and
kept
the
ward
6
elliot
park
portion
and
then
left
everything
else
outside
of
that
in
the
downtown
new
ward
again,
the
numbers
on
this
are
not
particularly
important,
although
if
you
wouldn't
mind,
could
you
just
do
the
the
data
layer
for
numbering
the
wards?
I
think
it
might
be
a
little
bit
easier
to
to
see
for
that
one.
P
Thank
you.
So
I
just
moved
nine
arbitrarily.
Of
course
we
would
number
it
based
upon
what
it
mostly
came
from.
So
there'll
be
discussion
about
that,
but
I
just
want
to
talk
through
like
what
are
the
ramifications
getting
at
group
member
countin's
comments.
There
are
quite
a
few.
P
The
biggest
one
is,
if
you
do
split
downtown
all
of
the
surrounding
wards.
That
used
to
be
part
of
downtown
need
to
shift
the
biggest
ones.
There
are
three
and
seven
because
they
more
or
less
were
about
45
and
40
percent
of
downtown
apiece.
So
if
we
do
that
ward
3
grew
the
most
over
this
last
10
year
period,
but
if
we
want
to
keep
it
on
the
northeast
side
of
the
river,
it
needs
to
extend
a
little
bit
in
each
direction
again
relatively
compact.
P
But
I
could
certainly
see
some
conversation
about
the
boundaries
ward,
one
and
three
then,
would
be
entirely
on
the
northeast
side.
Two
still
has
to
span
the
river.
There
was
no
way
around
that
if
we
decide
to
use
the
river
as
a
boundary.
The
other
thing
I
wanted
to
point
out
is
that
it
did
mean
that
seven
had
to
creep
further
south
again.
I
had
to
make
some
more
arbitrary
decisions
about
where
to
draw
the
lines.
Of
course,
board
10,
as
shown
here,
is
not
compliant.
P
P
If
we
decide
the
community
is
of
interest
and
other
reasons
could
override
to
minimize
the
change
and
then
it's
just
one
last
thing:
if
you'll
indulge
me,
if
you
go
to
the
evaluation
tab
on
this
one
and
then
pull
down
the
population
by
race,
one
thing
that,
and
if
you
look
at
the
population
by
race
and
not
the
voting
age,
one.
P
And
so
the
one
thing
that
came
up
in
the
comments
pretty
much
in,
I
would
say,
like
50,
60
percent
of
the
submitted
maps.
I
know
there
were
some
today
I
didn't
get
a
chance
to
dig
into
too
much.
There
was
a
major
emphasis,
just
like
chair
clegg
was
sharing
to
have
multiple
wards
across
the
city
that
really
represented
different
racial
groups
in
the
area.
P
But
if
you
look
at
some
of
the
other
wards
in
south
minneapolis,
especially
like
the
new
six,
eight
and
ten
there's,
probably
quite
a
bit
of
flexibility
in
trying
to
look
at
communities
of
interest,
even
with
a
downtown
ward,
to
perhaps
create
four,
maybe
even
five
bipac
majority
wards,
depending
on
how
things
were
sliced
and
moved
apart
in
those
areas.
So
I
just
want
to
put
this
out
here
as
more
a
thought
experiment.
P
D
M
Pat,
yes,
all
right.
The
next
map
up
belongs
to
group
member
kim,
who
I
don't
think
is
with
us.
I'm
here,
oh,
you
are
okay.
Are
you
ready
to
talk
about
your
app?
Yes,
I
am
you
want
me
to
open
it
in
district
or
I
mean
sure,
yeah,
okay,.
J
So
yeah
so
for
my
map,
I
actually
I
started
with
the
map
that
was
submitted
a
little
while
ago,
under
the
name
felix
the
cat
which,
as
chair
clegg
indicated,
that
was
a
map
that
he
made
and
I
basically
started
with
that
and
I
kept
pretty
much
all
of
those
changes
in
place.
So
this
is
probably
very
similar
to
the
map
that
chair
clegg
just
showed
us
all.
J
I
think
the
only
real
big
difference
I
made
was
some
shifts
around
ward
9
you'll
notice
that
the
cooper
neighborhood
had
been
in
ward
9.
J
J
The
voting
age
population
to
also
be
a
majority
minority,
and
so
that
was
just
a
suggestion
I
had
if
we
not
only
wanted
to
keep
the
ward
9
as
a
minority
opportunity
award
to
also
maybe
consider
voting
age
population
instead
of
just
population,
but
that
was
pretty
much.
The
only
substantial
difference
between
my
map
and
chair
clegg's
map.
M
All
right
group,
member
new
house,
you
are
up
next.
Q
Okay,
I
will
tell
you,
I
made
this
map
on
election
day,
and
I
did
so
because
I
am
just
coming
off
of
like
three
or
four
years
of
intensive
voter
engagement
through
the
league
across
the
entire
city
in
almost
every
neighborhood,
and
so
I
really
wanted
to
see
what
I
could
do
with
a
map
that
that
didn't
create
a
lot
of
change
that
honored
the
geographic
boundaries
that
worked.
Q
You
know
kept
achieved
some
compactness
to
the
to
the
awards
that
kept
neighborhoods,
mainly
as
a
focus
of
of
a
collective
organizing
planning
entity
that
I
was
fortunate
enough
to
work
through
over
these
years.
I,
and
then
beyond
that
also
mindful
of
how
people
connected
and
organized
around
you
know
getting
out
the
vote
and
and
as
they
organized
around
communities
of
interest.
Q
I
guess
I
would
say
my
map
definitely
is
impacted
by
knowledge
of
coalitions
that
exist
across
the
city
and
when
it
comes
to,
you
know
how
they
organize
to
accomplish
different
ideas
and
things
and
and
campaigns
that
they
have.
So
basically,
I
also
worked
the
numbers.
Q
A
little
bit
to
my
goal
is
to
keep
it
to
a
three
percent
standard
deviation,
and
I
I
tried
to
over
represent
the
the
the
older
wards,
the
ones
that
are
least
likely
to
grow
as
much
and
and
also
ones
that
have
more
single-family
homes,
and
I
under-represented
slightly
more
of
the
renter.
You
know.
Minneapolis
became
a
renter-majority
city
in
the
last
year
or
so,
and
so
so
those
wards
will
be
growing
more
and
that's
where
most
of
the
housing
permits
have
also
been
taken
out
to
to
build
more
density.
Q
And
so
I
I
try
to
be
mindful
of
under
populating
some
of
those
wars
to
some
extent,
and
if
you
go
into
that,
can
you
put
the
neighborhood
check
on
box?
I
can't
sure.
Q
So
what
you'll
see
is
essentially
a
neighborhood
map,
there's
a
few
and
where
I
did
not
like
in
harrison
between
five
and
seven
along,
so
it
splits
along
glenwood,
but
it
splits
along
glenwood,
because
that's
the
natural
split
between
the
north
side
and
bryn
mawr.
Basically,
so
I
tried
to
use
geographic
boundaries
that
I
discovered
were
more
of
the
natural
boundaries
in
different
neighborhoods.
Q
I
moved.
I
tried
for
some
more
compactness
over
time
as
developing
this
map
through
the
central
wars,
the
central
city
wards,
which
you
know,
I
think
it's
going
to
be
the
biggest
issue
for
all
of
us,
and
I
don't
know
that
people
we
had.
We
had
received
comments
about
people
wanting
to
keep
neighborhoods
together
and
also.
Q
I
think
there
was
a
comment
right
before
I
made
this
map
about
unif,
putting
the
north
northeast
back
together,
and
so
I
worked
to
try
to
kind
of
do
that
a
little
bit
and
I
know
some
people
will
not
be
turned
up.
They
will
be
turned
off
by
splitting
of
I
split
the.
Q
U
I
put
more
some
of
the
you
with
kind
of
more
the
augsburg
side,
but
I
will
tell
you
from
experience
that
there
are
some
natural
coalitions
that
exist
throughout
that
region
and
just
putting
you
all
together
doesn't
necessarily
acknowledge
those.
Q
Q
If
you
do
voting
age
population
by
race,
it
doesn't
necessarily
acknowledge
some
of
the
other
realities
that
break
down
further
across
there
about
age
and
socio-economic
demographics
as
well.
So
those
numbers
like
especially
in
ward
9
and
in
ward
6,
where
they
seem
closer,
you
know
between
like
say,
white
and
black
voting
age
populations,
there's
actually
coalitions
that
exist
there.
That
belie
those
those
racial
demographics.
M
All
right,
thank
you
so
much
and
next
up
is
group.
Member
schwarzkopf.
M
This
was
the
very
last
one
that
you
had
submitted,
but
we
can
look
at
all
of
the
one
just
whoops
all
the
launches.
All
I
want
to
talk
about
is
the
last
one.
Okay,
that's
this!
That's
the
and
I
will
open
it
in
district
here
for
you,
and
I
think
it's
number
three.
If
I
remember
right
when
I
called
it,
let's
make
sure
this
says
revised
plan
number
one.
M
D
M
M
It
is
yes,
that's
two
point,
eight
percent
right.
Okay,
this
is
the
date
a
little
bit.
Let's
see,
this
is
revised
plan
number
one.
M
M
M
Okay,
what
that
shows
is
that
there
are.
M
There
are
oh
boy.
M
Yeah,
that's
what
I
want
to
look
at
yeah
right.
So
what
we
have
then
is
ward.
5
is
a
majority
ward
black
board,
where
four
and
six
are
opportunities
for
all
people
of
whatever
color
they
may
be
board
worn.
Nine
is
again
an
opportunity
award
for
whole
groups
of
people,
and
so
I
tried
to
make
sure
that
we
had
those
kind
of
opportunities
for
other
people
to
be
elected,
as
we
have
in
the
past
the
last
10
years.
M
So
that's
what
I
was
working
on
and
and
then
I
tried
to
keep
the
boundaries
compact
and
I
also
tried
to
change
as
much
as
little
as
possible
of
the
present
awards
to
keep
with
our
the
concepts
that
we
came
up
with
and
what
we
wanted
to
do.
So
that's
quickly.
What
I
did
on
this
one.
D
No
before
we
entertain
comments,
the
the
one
thing
in
in
these
presentations
that
has
given
me
a
little
heartburn
is
the
the
downtown
creating
a
a
downtown
ward,
because
to
me,
that's
that
is
more
than
a
minimum
change
and
it's
also
inconsistent
with
what
has
been
the
situation
in
in
most
cycles.
Downtown
sort
of
the
the
goal
was
to
have
more
than
one
ward
represented
downtown,
so
you
don't
have
one
council,
member
with
all
the
all
of
the
developers
in
their
ward.
You
have
you
spread
that
around
a
little
bit.
K
It
definitely
impacts
the
ability
to
minimize
changes,
which
is
what
we
have
as
a
requirement:
a
guy,
a
guiding
principle
in
our
charter
for
redistricting,
and
I
don't
see
how
you
can
get
around
doing
that
and
also,
as
you
said,
not
to
just
repeat
your
comments.
But
I
think
putting
all
the
changes
or
putting
all
the
award
in
downtown
saddles
that
council
member
with
some
real
challenges.
D
K
B
H
Thank
you.
I
just
want
to
echo
some
of
the
other
comments.
I've
heard,
and
you
know
it
would
be
very
useful
if
we
had
a
cheat
sheet
of
the
priorities
we
know
some
are
required.
The
5
plus
or
minus
5,
but
others
are
sort
of
something
we're
working
towards,
but
it'd
be
nice
to
have
them
laid
out
because
I'm
hearing
people
say
things
like
you
know.
Well,
we
know
compact,
contiguous
and
everything,
but
it'd
be
nice
to
have
it
laid
out
the
new
one.
H
The
downtown,
I
think,
violates
our
desire
to
minimize
changes
toward
boundaries.
So
that's
I'm
fine
with
that,
but
it'd
be
nice
to
have
something.
That's
a
little
bit
more
clearly
laid
out.
H
Sir
and
some
of
those
yes
but
one
page,
a
one-page
cheat
sheet,
it's
not
just
in
the
charter.
Commissioner
clegg,
it's
also,
I
mean
things
like
the
federal
issues
and
so
forth.
So
and
it's
in
our
principles
for
the
redistricting.
So
it
goes
beyond
the
charter.
I
believe
anyway,
that's
just
my
comment.
L
Thank
you,
mr
chair.
I
agree
with
your
view
of
having
one
downtown
ward
and
I
wanted
to
add
that,
as
I
was
going
through
the
maps,
I
looked
at
it
in
those
proposed
maps
where
there
was
one
downtown
ward.
I
tried
to
trace
the
impact
on
other
wards
in
terms
of
minority
opportunity
or
a
majority,
and
it
seemed
to
throw
that
off
as
well
in
a
negative
way,
and
so
for
that
reason
as
well,
I'm
very
much
against
one
downtown
ward.
S
Thank
you,
chair
clegg.
I
also
am
against
the
downtown
ward
and
if
you
remember
10
years
ago,
when
we
did
redistricting
one
of
the
reasons
that
we
wanted
to
split
up,
the
wards
is
that
neighborhoods
came
in
and
asked
for
the
wealth
and
businesses
of
downtown
to
be
shared,
to
be
shared
with
other
awards
to
bring
opportunity
to
other
neighborhoods
and
other
wards.
So
I
am
also
looking
at
it,
though.
It's
not
an
indicator
from
an
economic
development
standpoint
as
well,
and
I
also
in
working
downtown.
S
I
think
it's
very
helpful
to
have
more
than
one
voice
involved
with
downtown,
because
it's
you
know
so
complex
and
it
has
all
the
employees
and
it
has
all
the
invis
visitors
and
they
have
the
conventions,
and
it's
just
very
helpful.
I
think,
to
have
more
than
one
voice
focused
on
downtown.
N
Yes,
when,
when
I
was
looking
through
the
maps,
there
were
some
written
comments
from
the
community,
and
I
was
I
was
hoping
that
someone
could
pull
up
the
comment
that
was
about
this
idea.
It
was
from
somebody
who
lived
downtown
requesting
that
we
consider
that
is
that
a
possibility
to
pull
that
comment.
N
M
Yeah
here
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen
again,
because
I
think
this
is
it.
M
M
Yes,
so
this
one's
titled
downtime
by
christy,
marsden
here
and
I'll,
go
ahead
and
read
this.
I
think
this
is
the
one
you
met
right,
hello
as
the
ward
7
president.
I
think
that
downtown
should
be
separated
to
become
its
own
ward.
It
is
clear
that
the
interests
of
downtown
differ
vastly
from
other
parts
of
ward
7
and
that
residents
of
downtown
are
not
listened
to,
nor
represented
well
on
city
council.
T
Thank
you,
chair
clay.
I
also
want
to
speak
to
not
having
downtown
in
one
ward
and
further,
even
ensuring
that
downtown
is
now
one
world
and
like
the
dinky
town
area,
is
also
a
separate
ward.
Given
all
the
redevelopment
that's
going
on
there
like
mature
commissioner
mechsky.
I
agree
with
splitting
up
the
economic
opportunity,
but
I
think
that.
T
T
And
I
think,
if
we
have
enough
kind
of
pitting
pitting
people
against
each
other
based
on
race,
that
if
people
of
non-downtown
white
affluent
people
can
listen
to
and
be
with
their.
T
D
O
Chair
clegg,
I
wouldn't
mind
speaking
on
behalf
of
a
downtown
board,
if,
if
that's
acceptable,
of
course,
okay,
just
just
to
offer
a
bit
of
a
different
perspective,
because
I've
spoken
with
a
few
people,
you
know
who
approached
me
about
this
sort
of
thing,
and-
and
I
just
I-
I'm
not
hearing
this
from
from
other
folks
on
the
group.
So
I
just
wanted
to
throw
this
out
there
that
I
think
to
a
certain
extent,
one
of
the
reasons
why
there
might
be
some
interest
in
a
downtown
ward.
O
Is
that
there's
a
sense
that
the
developer
needs
might
be
different,
downtown
versus
other
places
and,
and
some
folks
maybe
feel
like
too
much
of
the
discussion
of
the
needs
is
focused
on
downtown
and
that
perhaps
allowing
there
to
be
more
cm's
who
aren't
representing
downtown
might
allow
those
voices
to
prosper.
That's
one
of
the
things
that
I
know
I
heard
a
bit
of
when
people
were
talking
about
the
downtown
plans.
I
don't
know
if
other
people
have
heard
that
too,
but
that's
just
something.
O
D
Is
there
are
there
any
other
comments
again
if
you're,
just
repeating
that's,
not
necessary,
but
if
you
have
something
new
to
add.
J
Yeah,
I
guess,
for
the
record,
I'm
fairly
agnostic
towards
a
downtown
ward.
I
don't
have
strong
feelings,
one
way
or
the
other,
but
I
guess
to
kind
of
echo
what
group
member
kerry
just
said.
You
know
I've
heard
not
just
members
in
today's
discussion,
but
also
several
comments
that
were
submitted
talk
about
desiring
a
lot
of
diversity
within
wards,
and
I
guess
as
just
a
clarifying
question.
My
understanding
is
that
that's
not
explicitly
one
of
our
redistricting
principles,
but
one
of
our
principles
is
to
maintain
communities
of
common
interest.
J
Now,
obviously,
there
are
a
lot
of
different
types
of
communities
of
common
interest
and
as
group
member
newhouse
has
talked
about,
you
know
there
are
coalitions
that
might
go
beyond
just
the
immediate
statistics
that
we
have
available
to
us,
but
I
do
think
it
might
be
worth
kind
of
considering
when
we
talk
about
desiring
diverse
wards,
what
the
actual
added
benefit
of
that
diversity
would
be,
and
if
the
pursuit
of
diverse
wards
could
at
a
point
come
at
a
cost
of
splitting
up
communities
of
interest
and
maybe
preventing
them
from
being
able
to
unify
as
one
voice.
J
I
Chance
yeah:
this
is
a
group
member
abbott.
I
would
just
very
briefly,
I
I
I'm
with
the
consensus
against
a
downtown
ward.
The
only
thing
I
would
add
I
mean
the
dilemma
of
representation
cuts
both
ways
right.
I
I
think
they'll
get
better
representation
that
way.
In
addition
to
all
the
other
reasons
that
I
think
a
downtown
ward
does
not
make
sense,
which
have
been
advanced
by
other
speakers,
that's
my
two
cents.
D
Thank
you,
I'm
gonna
suggest
we
take
a
vote
on
this
because
it's
a
it's
a
significant
issue.
If,
if
people
want
to
include
a
downtown
ward
in
the
calculus
going
forward,
it's
going
to
be
a
different
analysis,
it's
fine
that
it's
a
different
analysis,
but
I
I
don't
want
us
to
go
down
two
roads
in
different
directions
at
the
same
time.
So
if
we
resolve
whether
or
not
we're
going
to
continue
with
this
with
the
concept
of
a
downtown
ward,
then
we
can
help
us
refine
our
our
work
going
forward.
D
R
F
J
K
F
F
D
D
Q
Well,
I
I
also
made
a
change,
and
that
was
member
clary.
My
change
was
just
simply
to
rework
the
the
blocks
the
census
blocks
going,
so
they
were
less.
They
were
less
east
and
west
and
more
north
and
south
to
represent
that
particular
neighborhood
on
the
edge
of
the
city.
M
All
right,
let's,
let's
look
at
group
member
carrie.
First.
O
O
Okay-
I
just
I
just
talking
to
you
know
over
the
last
couple
years
talking
to
people
who
serve
on
neighborhood
organizations.
There
was
a
little
bit
of
a
of
a
desire
to
see
you
know
right
now:
ward
4,
cuts
into
jordan
and
then
a
little
bit
into
the
neighborhood
immediately
to
itself,
I'm
forgetting
its
name
off
the
top
of
my
head.
O
It
it,
I
kind
of
call
it
the
jut
out
a
little
bit,
and
I
think
there
was
an
idea
that
maybe
that
that
jut
out
should
be,
I
think,
it's
willard,
hey
yeah.
There
we
go.
I
think
it
was
the
idea
that
minimizing
that
might
just
make
it
easier
for
folks
to
have
events
with
their
cm,
or
you
know
the
election
discussions,
or
you
know
that
that
kind
of
thing
that
was
that
was
my
motivation.
I
think
I
said
it
at
30th
and
just
tried
to
minimize
the
changes
where
possible.
M
We
can
whoops
that's
closer
okay,
here's
new
house.
Q
Q
But
now
we're
talking
like
colloquial
neighborhood,
not
like
actual
neighborhood
association
boundaries.
There's
a
group
of
houses
that
where
people
connect
to
they're
right
on
the
park
and
the
boundary
for
the
neighborhood
goes
right
along
the
south
side
of
that
park,
but
the
people
who
are
south
of
the
park
in
those
particular
areas
they
tend
to
be
more
cohesive
with
the
neighborhood
around
the
park.
That's
all
that's
why
I
included
what
I
did.
D
What,
if
we
sort
of
what,
if
we
combine
those
two
proposals
and
put
willard
hay
all
back
into
the
fifth
ward,
but
but
left
what
you've
done
to
jordan.
D
So,
mr
munson,
this
is
where
your
job
gets
hard.
Yes,
so
you
should
start
with
a
a
map
of
existing
wards.
D
So
paint
the
parts
of
willard
hay
that
are
green
paint
them
purple.
R
D
No,
no
because
the
parts
that
were
in
jordan
should
have
stayed
green.
M
Yeah,
I
am
going
to
yeah.
D
What's
your
group
members,
newhouse
and
kerry,
does
that
work
for
both
of
you.
Q
M
E
E
D
Port
4
is
compliant
yes,
okay,
continuing
on
our
starting
with
the
north,
let's
look
to
toward
one
ward,
one
is:
is
too
small,
it's
got
to
get
bigger,
which
is
convenient
because
it's
next
to
ward
three,
which
has
to
get
smaller.
D
N
N
N
Okay,
do
you
see
this
big
park?
Is
it
here
or
no
it
it?
It
covers
a
two
block
square,
or
maybe
it
right
right
here.
N
M
N
I
think
that
addresses
the
the
need
to
keep
that
community
around
the
park
intact.
D
Let's
look
back
over
to
the
to
the
first
ward.
M
M
D
Right
so
again,
a
number
of
people
suggested
moving
botano
into
the
first
ward.
Other
people
suggested.
M
D
D
So
that
solves
our
population
problem,
most
botno
is
mostly
white.
D
So
but
so
is
ward
three,
so
I
don't
think
it's
going
to
affect
racial
statistics
in
any
meaningful
way.
Q
I
believe
that
there
was
a
commenter
talking
who
was
actually
from
sheridan
neighborhood
at
one
of
our
earlier
meetings,
who
made
the
request
that
we
reconnect
northeast
with
the
rest
of
northeast,
I
think,
is
how
she
put
it.
So
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
leave
sheridan,
which
is
definitely
part
of
northeast.
I
think
hennepin
avenue
makes
a
very
good
geographic
boundary
because
it
also
it
also
exists
as
kind
of
a
you
know,
a
boundary
between
that
part
of
northeast
and
the
and
downtown
you
know,
and.
I
D
Let's
try
it,
let's
paint
share
it
in
blue
and
see
what
happens.
M
N
M
G
Yeah,
thank
you,
I'm
sorry,
for
being
a
party.
I
just
wanted
to
say
you
can
reduce
the
size
of
ward
one.
As
you
see
what
I
did
in
mine,
I
move.
I
combine
recombine
como,
the
como
neighborhood,
so
it's
all
now
in
word
in
word,
word
two
where
it
used
to
be
back
in
the
olden
days
and
it's
been
split.
I
think
for
the
last
two,
but
that's
one
way
you
can
relieve
some
of
the
pressure
off
of.
D
D
If
you
moved
all
of
como
into
from
ward
part
of
it
is
now
in
ward
one.
If
you
took
the
part
that
was
in
ward
one
and
moved
it
toward
two.
R
M
M
D
We're
obviously
going
to
have
to
give
two
and
three,
but
that
the
numbers
do
look
good
for
one
and
we're.
E
You,
if
greg,
could
you
scroll
up
a
little
bit
on
this
map?
For
me
sure.
E
Oh
I'm
sorry,
I
meant
the
other
way
this
way,
okay,
so
there,
where
the
purple
and
the
yellow
meet
up.
If
we,
because
I
know
the
purple
is
really
low
on
numbers,
so
there's
that
two,
the
two
areas
it
looks
like
I'm
trying
to
read,
augsburg
university.
E
F
M
M
M
So,
do
we
want
this
in
yeah.
B
D
What
we
did
there
is
we
put
sheridan
and
and
botano
into
ward
1,
and
we
put
como,
we
restored
it
to
ward
2,
which
is
its
ancestral
home.
If
you
will.
I
I
D
D
Assuming
that
all
those
can
be
cleaned
up
and
if
we
can't
we'll
know
that
by
the
time
we
get
to
talking
about
our
final
maps,
okay,
just
to
clarify
that.
Thank
you.
So
one
is
just
about
perfect
now
in
terms
of
population,
and
it
truly
is
a
northeast
ward.
D
Two
and
three
are
still
too
big,
but
we
have
to
work
our
way
south
to
do
that,
and
five
is
also
too
big.
D
So,
let's
talk
about
what
I'd
like
to
do
tonight,
if
we
can
is
get
this
two
three
five
problem
solved
and
if
we
can
do
that
and
have
a
possible
solution,
then
we
can
come
back
on
friday
night.
I'm
willing
to
keep
going
tonight
as
long
as
anybody
else
is
is
willing
to,
but
I
think
you
know
around
six
will
probably
burn
out.
A
D
So
five
is
still,
I
think
it
is
still
what's
our
maximum
size.
D
D
There,
and
not
only
do
I
think,
that's
a
good
division
point,
but
it
also
gets
the
population
of
ward
5
to
be
just
about
perfect
yeah.
N
P
D
H
Oh,
I
was
just
one:
oh
I'm
sorry,
camera
issues.
I
was
just
wondering
if
we
could
look
at
the
racial
breakdown.
I'm
sure
it's
fine,
but
we've
been
close
on
some
of
those
numbers.
So
I
just
thought.
Maybe
we
should
see
that.
D
Still
leaves
ward
5
as
52.1
black
and
at
least
right
now,
ward
6
is
50.8,
but
that's
because
we
haven't
increased
its
size.
Yet
so,
let's
go
back
to
the
population
numbers.
D
The
way
we
various
people
handled
ward
three
was
some
made
the
downtown
border
consistent,
so
it
sort
of
shrunk
downtown
a
little,
I
believe
to
fifth
street
and
others
cut
off
pieces
of
marci
homes.
D
It
divides
the
residential
community
and
puts
dinky
town
in
ward
two,
but
dinkytown
was
already
in
was
on
the
border.
I
think.
M
D
B
D
Go
downtown
you'll,
see,
you'll,
see
that
the
the
third
ward
for
the
east-
half
it
the
boundary,
is
5th
street
and
then
the
west
half
it's
8th
street.
M
R
D
To
go
deeper
three
is
within
is
within.
What's
the
deviation
on
three.
D
D
P
One
of
the
concerns
about
the
downtown
ward
was
that
too
many
of
the
downtown
amenities
would
end
up
under
one
council
member,
and
I
believe
this
now
puts
a
large
portion
of
them
all
under
three.
I
just
want
to
bring
that
up
since
I
was
a
point
brought
up
by
commissioners
earlier.
D
Let's
see
what
we,
when
we
just
moved
from
fifth
to
eight,
did
that
include
the
viking
stadium.
P
Yes,
it
does
that
was
currently
in
three.
I
believe
that
maybe
leaves
target
center
as
well.
I
mean
I
just
happened
to
notice
that
city
hall
has
now
moved
over.
You
know
it's
all,
but
the
convention
center
now
that
would
be.
That
would
be
in
word
three.
It
just
struck
me
that
we
had
this
conversation
before
about
being
very
concerned
about
all
this
being
under
one
council,
member
and
we've
just
created
that
problem
here
with
word
three.
I
Yeah
I
mean
the
problem:
is
that
the
neighborhood
that
the
stadium
is
in
is
is
like
one
I
mean
that's.
What
is
that?
I
forget
the
name
of
the
neighborhood
east?
That's
the
east
downtown,
but
you
can't
move
the
stadium
out
of
there
without
crossing
neighborhood
lines.
P
D
Okay,
let's,
let's
we
need
to
reduce
two
and
we
need
to
increase
six
question.
N
I
have
a
question:
could
we
take
out
the
whole
neighborhood
with
the
viking
stadium
and
add
it
to
six
and
then
talk
about
redrawing
three,
some
other
ways
just
you
could
try
that.
D
B
D
So,
let's
let's
go
ahead
and
look
at
moving
east
downtown,
which
is
a
neighborhood
immediately
north
of
ward.
Six,
moving
that
into
ward
six.
O
D
Then
go
look
at
the
let's
see
that
that
gives
six
about
the
right
population.
Three
is
now
too
small,
but
what
it
go
to
the
evaluation
now.
D
No
six
actually
looks
pretty
good
at
46.9
percent.
That
looks
pretty
solid.
I
So
now
we
need
to
move
some
of
ward
two
into
ward
three.
D
Yes,
but
we
could
go
back
up
and
move
that
part
of
marcy
holmes.
That's
east
of
the
freeway
that
back
into
ward
three.
D
M
M
I'm
sorry,
I'm
not
seeing
the
freeway
it's
it's
right
here.
M
B
F
B
P
So
so
marci
homes
is
just
a
gigantic
population
for
that
area.
So
it's
it's
one
of
those
decisions
we
probably
have
to
make
between
three
and
two
and
then
work
from
there
just
because
we
we
can't
shift
it
back
and
forth
and
not
have
major
consequences.
Otherwise,
and
the
other
comment
I'll
make
is
you
know
if
we
decide
that
it
needs
to
be
part
of
three
or
two?
What's
probably
gonna
have
to
happen?
Is
it
really
is
going
to
directly
impact
six?
P
Whatever
we
decide
here,
because
those
are
the
boundaries-
and
I
know
we've
moved
a
piece
of
ward
three
into
ward
six
and
we
said
that
didn't
make
a
large
difference
in
the
population
so
far,
but
other
changes
will
have
to
happen
for
six
just
because
of
the
boundaries
as
they're
shown.
So
it
might
be
something
that
we
need
to
again
circle
back
to
I'm
just
not
quite
sure
what
the
order.
That's
gonna
make
sense
here.
D
D
G
It
parallels
the
freeway
by
one
block.
M
So
10th,
I'm
sorry
it's
not
marked
here,
but
it's
it's
right
here.
I
guess
now.
I
J
Mr
munson
tenth
avenue
like
truncates
west
of
the
freeway,
and
then
it
picks
back
up
east
of
the
freeway
further
south.
So
that
might
be
the
confusion.
R
M
M
R
I
M
M
G
You're
starting
to
you're,
starting
to
split
the
university.
M
M
B
D
So
really,
I
think
the
next
step
we
have
to
do
is
probably
move
nine
over
into
the
southern
part
of
two,
because
nine
is
too
small
and
two
is
too
big
and
then.
D
Okay,
seven
seven
is
just
about
right.
A
Okay,
you
said
we'd
run
until
about
six,
so
let's
keep
going
all
right.
M
G
Right
so,
mr
mr
chairman,
there's
another
way
of
reducing
two,
and
that
is
to
bring
ward
12
up
at
least
to
lake
street,
because
that
way
you
you
will
reunite
longfellow.
J
D
Yeah,
why
don't
you
erase
everything
that
is
in
ward,
2,
color,
yellow
in
those
southern
two
neighborhoods.
N
Can
I
make
a
suggestion-
yes,
of
course,
oops,
that
the
area
north
of
94,
that
kind
of
juts
over
to
hiawatha
there
that
that
be
erased
as
well
and
see
if
that
brings
it
closer
because
it
that
might
be
an
opportunity
to
expand
another
neighborhood?
N
Do
you
see
what
I'm
talking
about
it's
it's
between
20,
8th
street
and
24th
street.
M
N
B
N
All
the
way
over
to
the
border,
where
the
line
is
for
the
word
six,
I
can't
see
what
the
name
of
that
street
is.
I
think
it's
25th
avenue.
M
D
So
that
gets
word
two
at
about
the
right
size,
but
it
puts
that
neighborhood
in
three
wards.
Q
If
we
kind
of
slice
off
the,
I
think
it's
called
lowering
heights
and
stephen
square
neighborhood
and
put
that
back
hole
into
ward
7
as
as
just
all
the
whole
neighborhood.
In
one
ward.
We
can
expand
it's
basically
a
trade
of
population
from
one
to
the
other,
and
we
could
extend
that.
The
southern
half
of
seward
into
ward
6.
D
But
I'm
afraid
we
might
dilute
our
our
population
of
color
in
word
six.
If
we
do
that,
but
we
can
try.
P
If
we're
looking
at
in
this
case,
the
the
black
population
for
these
areas,
it
might
be
useful
to
have
the
overlay
that
gives
the
black
population
by
by
census
tract
that
way.
We
can
see
it
on
the
map
when
we're
talking
about
adding
or
subtracting
different
areas
around
here.
P
So
if
we
did
the
population
by
race
under
demographics,
there
sorry
not
under
the
evaluation
but
under
the
data
layers.
P
Some
better
sense
of
when
we're
talking
about
adding
or
subtracting
areas.
D
We
struggled
mightily
with
with
the
way
ward
six
looked
10
years
ago,.
U
Chair
chair
clegg,
I
was
getting:
is
there
like
a
goal
of
what
the
minimum
black
population
should
be
for
ward
6.?
I
know
from
reading
articles
from
10
years
ago
the
minimum
population
that
the
east
african
community
was
trying
to
seek
was
40
and
it
seems
like
we
still
have
some
room
to
get
there
because
right
now,
it's
46.
We
can't
really
mess
or
change
or
the
voting
age
population
is
out
of
our
hand.
U
B
M
D
Ward
6
is
a
little
bit
big,
but
go
look
at
our
evaluation
numbers.
V
Mr
chairman,
yes
I
I
don't
mean
to
interrupt
the
discussion
of
ward
six,
but
before
I
know
it's
getting
late,
but
before
we
leave,
I
think
we
need
to
revisit
word
four,
because
I
think
what
happened
we
redistricted,
the
commissioner
or
council
member,
elect
pizza
out
of
the
out
of
the
fourth
ward.
P
Just
a
quick
comment,
so
group
member
kim-
and
I
discussed
this
earlier
today
this
week,
sometime
very
recently-
that
this
is
certainly
not
one
of
our
considerations
about
where
council
members
live,
and
I
guess
I
would
prefer
not
to
know
you
guys
are
making
our.
V
V
We
are
an
appointed
group,
as
we've
heard
many
times
over
the
last
year,
and
I
think
if
people
are
going
to
get
rid
of
council
members,
it's
up
to
them
not
up
to
us,
and
I
don't
think
we
have
to
do
any
serious
stretching
but
to
redistrict
someone
out
of
their
ward
a
week
after
they've
been
elected,
I
think,
is
a
is
something
that
goes
beyond
what
our.
What
our
charge
is.
H
Thank
you
very
much
as
as
much
as
I
respect
group
member
kozak.
I
absolutely
disagree
in
fact.
I
pride
myself
on
the
fact.
I
have
no
idea
where
anybody
lives
and
I
don't
want
to
know,
because
I
do
not
think
that
is
part
of
our
mission.
Our
mission
is
try
to
look
at
the
residents
and
voters
in
the
city
and
put
together
these
awards
in
a
way
that
makes
sense.
H
D
But
let
me
just
note
that
first
of
all
these,
these
are
the
first
draft
maps
which
are
at
least,
in
my
view,
mostly
intended
to
just
encourage
discussion,
get
the
something
out
there
to
the
population.
So
they
can
see
what
we're
thinking
about
and
educated
comment
about
it,
and
also
we're
going
to
look
at
this
again
on
friday.
We're
going
to
look
at
the
whole
thing
so
just
because
of
where
we
are
in
the
discussion.
D
I'd
I'd
prefer
to
put
this
off
until
either
friday
or
during
the
time
period,
between
the
the
draft
maps
and
the
final
draft
maps.
But
for
the
record,
I
agree
with
commissioner
sandberg
that
we
should
really
be
agnostic
about
where
people
live,
but.
A
Disagree,
I
agree
with
commissioner
kozak.
I
think
our
credibility
as
an
appointed
body
would
be
seriously
compromised
if
we
were
to
draw
district
award
boundaries
in
such
a
fashion,
particularly
with
regard
to
the
sixth
ward,
where
commissioner
latricia
was
elected
by
sixty
percent
of
the
vote.
That
would
be
a
a
serious
bow
to
our
credibility
if
we
were
to
draw
boundaries
that
excluded
her
from
the
fourth
ward.
U
P
Yeah
and-
and
I
guess
in
this
discussion-
one
point
I
think
would
be
really
helpful-
is
just
not
adding
anyone
else's
locations
where
they
live
to
this
conversation.
Right
now
I
mean
again,
I
I
think
whatever
we
do
decide
on
this
it'd
be
very
bad
to
have
these
be
discussed
right
now,
just
because
we
can't
take
that
back
as
we
go
through.
P
So
if
we
can
just
not
talk
about
council
members
addresses
and
be
very
helpful
and
again
if
this
is
something
that
some
group
members
are
proposing,
we
consider
as
a
factor
you
know.
I
would
ask
that
we
point
to
where,
in
the
charter
or
other
case
law,
this
is
actually
a
consideration.
O
I
have
a
comment
I
did.
I
remember
carrie
had
her
hand
up.
Somebody
mentioned
the
credibility
of
this
board
if
or
this
this
this
advisory
board.
If
we
make
a
decision
that
excludes
an
elected
official
from
their
ward,
I
would
argue
that
it
actually
affects
our
credibility.
If
we
make
decisions
in
order
to
include
somebody
in
their
ward,
we
should
not,
under
any
circumstances,
be
even
discussing
this.
As
we
make
these
decisions
elections
happen,
people
can
choose
where
they
live
in
order
to
get
elected.
O
I
Let's
go
group
member
abbott
here
right,
I
I
tend
to
agree
with
that
comment.
I
think
I
don't
think
we
should
be
looking
at
where
people
live.
Certainly,
at
this
stage
of
the
game
and
and
frankly,
I'm
curious
what
the
public
feedback
on
this
will
be.
I
think
we
should
draw
our
map
without
reference
to
where
people
live.
Put
that
map
out
for
discussion
and
debate.
You
know,
have
our
public
hearings
and
you
know
if
there's
some
sort
of
outcry
from
the
fourth
ward.
I
You
know
that
might
be
worth
listening
to,
but
but
in
general
yeah
I
I
tend
to
agree
that
we
should
not
be
accommodating.
You
know
the
residence
of
a
single
person
when
we
draw
these
boundaries.
T
I
think
that
if
you
employ
the
redistricting
principle
to
do
as
little
movements
as
possible
and
we
should
leave
ward
4
and
ward
6
as
it
is
the
question
about
a
percentage
of
blacks
in
ward
six,
I
think
it's
we
don't
have
really
a
quota
and
we
really
did
the
hard
work
should
be
to
be
more
inclusive.
T
And,
lastly,
I
actually
do
agree
about
the
credibility
of
the
charter
commission
in
question.
Specifically,
this
last
election
was
very,
very
racially
charged
and
had
a
lot
of
acrimony
with
regard
to
race,
and
I
think
there
is
clearly
a
historically
disproportionate
difficult
time
when
it
comes
to
people
of
color
and
home
ownership.
T
Yes,
people
have
choice
of
where
they
live,
it's
much
easier
for
some
people
to
choose
where
they
live
than
others,
and
I
don't
know
what
council
members
rent
or
own,
but
I
think
we
ought
to
if
we
employ
the
principle
of
doing
as
few
changes
as
needed,
then
we
keep
four
and
six
as
it
was.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
D
Well,
remember:
garcia:
first
of
all,
we
couldn't
keep
six
as
it
was
because
six
was
too
small,
so
we
have
to
change
six.
D
We
can
talk
about
whether
or
not
to
adjust
ward
4
before
we
approve
this
map
and
and
if
somebody
has
a
valid
reason
for
wanting
to
adjust
it
other
than
somebody
who
lives
other
than
where
somebody
lives,
I'm
willing
to
entertain
it,
but
I
think
for
right
now
we
close
the
discussion
and
move
back
to
towards
six
and
nine.
I
Well,
I
mean
my
my
concept:
is
we
just
ignore
the
concept
of
of
where
people
live
individuals
until
all
public
hearings
and
feedback
is
completed?.
I
A
I
I
think
that
suggestion
violates
the
first
amendment
of
the
constitution
and
the
right
to
free
speech.
K
Mr
chair
remember:
yeah
can,
can
I
suggest
that
we
move
on
as
you
suggested
and
we
we
have
work
to
do
and
a
lot
of
it.
So
I'd
like
to
just
move
on.
D
We're
gonna
we're
gonna,
put
that
issue
aside
and
continue
to
work
on
boards.
Nine
and
seven
and
six
thank
you
can.
Can
we
eliminate
the
shading
for
the
population
by
race?
Please.
D
3.93
percent
ward-
nine
is
too
small.
Word
eight
is
too
small.
So
I
think
this
is
where
we
start
moving
nine
around
and
perhaps
move
nine
to
the
east
and
give
part
of
ward
nine
that's
in
the
west
toward
eight,
but
I'm
going
to
suggest
that
we
think
about
that.
It's
six
o'clock
or
a
couple
minutes
two
and
get
back
to
it
on
friday,
but
it
seems
to
me
the
ward.
D
9
options
are
limited:
we've
got
to
add
toward
board
nine,
we've
got
to
add
toward
eight
and
we've
got
to
add
to
ward
11.,
but
the
ways
to
do
that
are
fairly
discreet
in
number.
So
I
think
we
should
be
able
to
to
get
it
done
on
friday
night.
U
D
That's
that's
a
good
idea
and
mr
munson,
just
before
you
save
it
and
post
a
link
to
it,
see
the
erased
area
in
ward.
D
All
right
and
obviously
we
have
to
take
some
of
ward
9
and
give
it
to
ward
8,
because
ward
8
is
too
small.
So
let's
just
save
it
like
that,
and
people
can
look
at
it
and
play
around
with
solutions.
I
encourage
you
to
do
that
to
play
with
ward
eight
through
through
thirteen
it'll,
primarily
be
playing
with
8,
9
and
11,
because
those
are
the
words
that
have
got
to
change
and
can
you?
What
are
you
going
to
call
this?
M
Yeah,
I'm
sorry
I
I
will.
I
don't
need
to
save
it
in
the
portal
view,
if
you'd
prefer
that
we
just
save
it
in
district,
or
I
mean
you,
you
can
see
the
the
url
which
is
right
here
and
I
could
send
that
to.
M
M
Okay,
good,
so
we
will
call
this
the
districting
oops
smell
it
right,
poop,.
M
M
I'm
just
going
to
call
it
a
draft
again
here.
Okay,
then
I'm
going
to
put
my
own
email,
I'm
going
to
put
the
redistricting
group
email
address
so.