►
Description
Additional information at
https://lims.minneapolismn.gov
A
B
D
D
A
D
D
A
C
F
A
H
C
A
B
B
C
B
B
B
G
B
G
A
K
C
C
H
D
B
Okay,
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
read
the
land
of
acknowledgement
as
we
meet
here
today.
We
are
reminded
that
minneapolis
is
situated
on
the
homelands
of
the
dakota
people,
an
area
that
is
steeped
in
rich
indigenous
history.
It
is
home
to
indigenous
people
from
more
than
30
different
nations.
As
a
city,
we
have
a
responsibility
to
care
for
the
land
on
which
we
live
and
work
in
all
of
its
natural
surroundings.
B
E
D
B
K
B
D
Okay,
I
was
just
saying
if
folks,
here
or
folks
that
you're
connected
to
are
interested
in
finding
ways
to
get
connected
with
the
stop
line.
3
campaign
up
north
feel
free
to
email
me
after
this
meeting
or
yeah,
and
I
can
give
information
on
how
folks
can
get
connected
this
summer.
There's
several
different
camps
and
ways
to
get
involved
and
be
helpful
thanks.
B
A
L
L
So
first
I
want
to
frame
this
by
saying:
we've.
We
in
the
sustainability
office
have
been
seeing
two
emerging
ideas
regarding
cities
and
climate
action.
One
is
that
cities
must
adopt
more
aggressive
greenhouse
gas
emissions
reduction
goals.
This
is
in
line
with
a
lot
of
the
more
recent
ipcc
recommendations
and
there's
a
great
recognition
that
cities
need
to
step
up
and
do
more.
You
know
many
cities
set
their
first
goals
a
decade
or
so
ago,
and
science
evolved.
Since
then.
L
The
second
emerging
idea
is
that
cities
are
also
not
in
complete
control
of
accomplishing
those
goals
early
on
again,
a
decade
or
so
ago.
Once
these
making
goals,
they
were
also
showing
wedge
diagrams.
That
would
show
how
they're
going
to
accomplish
those
goals
and
a
lot
of
times
giving
the
impression
that
that
it
was
completely
within
their
power
to
meet
those
goals
and
now
there's
a
growing
recognition
that
that's
not
the
case,
unfortunately,
and
I'll
come
back
to
the
both
of
those
points
here
throughout
the
presentation.
L
L
So
this
is
a
campaign
that
they're
asking
cities
to
to
sign
on
to
to
make
declarations
in
support
of
the
race
to
zero.
And
specifically,
what
is
being
asked
of
cities
is
to
do
five
things.
One
is
to
publicly
endorse
a
number
of
principles
shown
here
for
most
of
which
is
declaring
or
recognizing
global
time
and
emergency,
which
the
city
of
minneapolis
has
done
as
well
as
then
other
commitments
to
making
or
as
well
as
making
other
commitments
regarding
the
climate,
emergency
and
actions.
L
L
L
So
so,
although
inexact
at
this
point
and
an
exact
determination
would
be
made
at
a
later
point
in
racist
real
process,
it
would
be
a
70
to
75
percent
reduction
by
2030
and
then
rounding
out.
The
five
elements
that
make
up
the
racist
zero
pledge
is
that
we
would
immediately
proceed
with
planning
one
inclusive
and
equitable
climate
action
and
there's
a
very
long
list
and
I'll
show
a
few
examples
of
that.
L
L
L
If
you
then
were
to
look
at
that
historical
data,
which
are
the
purple
dots
on
on
this
graph,
you'd
see
we're
trending
down.
Although
there's
a
little
fluctuation
here
over
here
and
the
blue
line
is
actually
not
a
trend
line,
although
it
looks
like
it,
the
blue
line
is
the
trajectory
we
would
need
to
meet
to
hit
those
reduction
goals
in
2025
and
in
2050..
L
So
our
trend
line
right
now,
although
it
looks
like
we
are
in
line
with
these
goals,
once
we
get
to
decarbonize
electricity,
we
will
start
to
deviate
from
the
trend
line.
If
we
don't
do
something
to
substantially
reduce
emissions
from
gas
now
we
can
stack
up,
then
our
current
goals
and
those
current
required
trajectories
with
the
new
goals.
L
L
Again,
that's
that
fair,
share,
science-based
reduction
and
then
culminating
with
100
reduction
at
the
end.
But
having
that
reduction
be
on
the
earlier
side,
2040.,
there
could
be
seen
a
more
conservative
pathway,
which
would
be
at
70
reduction
by
2030
and
that
our
100
percent
reduction
occurs
in
2050
at
the
latest.
So
there
is
a
difference
between
those,
particularly
in
the
longer
term,
because
there's
a
difference
of
10
years
accomplished
and
decarbonization,
but
they
both
are
very
similar
to
each
other,
especially
compared
to
where
our
current
goals
are.
L
So
this
would
be
representative
adopting
these
goals
in
a
as
official
city
policy
and
within
an
updated
climate
action
plan
would
represent
a
whole
new
level
of
effort
needed
to
meet
them,
and
it
would
be
not
continuing
activities
we're
doing
that.
We're
finding
some
success
in
it
would
be
redoubling
those
and
tripling
those
and
adding
many
many
more
activities
to
achieve
those
goals.
L
Now
we're
seeing
this
recognition
that,
although
the
cities
are
setting
these
goals,
it's
really
cities
and
partners
that
need
to
pressure
the
national
governments,
which
are
the
official
bodies
to
the
cop
talks,
to
act
in
order
for
these
sub-national
actors
to
meet
their
climate
action
goals.
So
I
highlighted
this
element
at
the
bottom
of
the
statement
from
race
0.
C
L
This
will
send
governments,
namely
national
governments,
a
resounding
signal
that
cities,
regions,
businesses,
investors
are
united
in
meeting
the
paris
goals
and
create
a
more
inclusive
resilient
economy.
So
the
idea
is
not
that
cities
have
the
power
unto
themselves
to
meet
these
goals,
but
by
declaring
it
they're
signaling
to
their
national
governments.
The
need
for
those
governments
to
also
make
similar
declarations
and
promises.
L
So
this
recognition
of
in
some
ways,
humility
of
towards
our
climate
goals,
is
a
different
way
that
cities
are
starting
to
think
about
this,
and
it
is.
It
is
in
some
ways
a
little
jarring,
because
I
think
in
the
first
generation
of
climate
action
plans
that
many
cities
created
there
was
a
lot
of
to
be
frank,
cheerleading.
L
L
L
Even
though
we're
making
these
very
aggressive
climate
goals
in
another
visual
from
boulder,
it
may
be
hard
to
see
your
screens,
but
I
encourage
you
to
look
at
the
the
pdf
that
kim
sent
out
is
then
putting
that
new
context
into
action,
and
what
that
looks
like
is
here,
as
they
say,
acting
beyond
their
boundaries.
Thinking
about
the
ways
they
can
best
work
within
those
different
spheres
that
they
can.
L
There's
a
lot
of
emerging
concepts
on
drawing
down
carbon
in
preparation
for
having
a
negative
carbon
world,
as
well
as
to
offset
the
the
areas
with
the
city
does
not
have
an
ability
to
reduce
carbon.
We
can
at
least
offset
or
draw
down
carbon
within
our
boundaries
by
things
such
as
our
urban
forest.
L
Also,
we
have
a
responsibility
to
count
all
of
our
emissions,
so
we
can
be
fully
transparent.
We
need
to
expand
our
focus
to
be
just
beyond
our
traditional
accounting
methodologies
and
then
working
hand
in
hand
with
our
community,
which
is
our
most
valuable
asset
for
climate
action,
particularly
at
the
local
level.
L
L
Many
sub-bullets
on
here
are
very
specific
actions,
but
the
city
will
be
looking
to
implement
one
of
those
and
there's
actually
to
be
frank,
many
of
them
already
in
the
climate
action
plan
and
many
that
have
actually
been
accomplished
by
the
city
already.
But
what
would
be
interesting
is
maybe
thought
of
this
conversation
would
be
to
hear
directly
from
ciac
individually
and
then,
as
a
group.
L
If
you
were
to
look
at
this
list
and
we'll
provide
resources
in
the
future
to
look
at
this
list,
what
would
you
say
is
the
one
climate
action
that
really
needs
to
be
prioritized
for
inclusion
into
any
upcoming
climate
action
plan.
Update
we're
hoping
to
hear
from
you
all
is
your
thoughts
on
what
is
again
meaningful
in
terms
of
ghg
reductions
is
within
the
city's
control
to
actually
make
progress
on
and
also
then
helps
create
a
more
inclusive
and
equitable
climate
action.
L
D
A
Yeah
but
honestly,
I'm
sorry,
I
might
have
a
little
echo
there.
Okay,
I
I
that
the
great
presentation,
I
know,
there's
a
quite
a
number
of
different
pieces
in
here
to
sort
of
unpack,
but
one
of
the
things
we
wanted
to
do
is
have
like
to
think
about.
Having
c
make
a
recommendation
on
one
of
the
activities
that
we're
gonna,
you
know
obviously
pledge
to
do,
and
so
that
would
be
really
important.
A
F
L
And
that's
a
good
question.
I
picked
boulder
just
as
an
example
here,
because
they
are
one
of
the
dozen
or
so
cities.
We
are
part
of
the
carbon
neutral
cities
alliance
with,
so
we
are
communicating
with
them
pretty
regularly
and
they
honestly,
they
actually
reached
out
to
our
network,
and,
I
think,
really
kind
of
started
this
conversation
about
needing
to
think
about
local
climate
action
differently.
L
L
I
Thanks
luke
great
presentation,
I
really
like
the
framework
about
sphere
of
control
versus
influence
and
I'm
curious
from
sustainability's
perspective,
kim
and
luke.
What
do
you
feel,
like
you
know,
is
kind
of
the
lowest
hanging
fruit
that
you
know
the
city
can
really
achieve
through
the
climate
action
plan.
I
think
that
could
help
us
sort
of
frame
what
would
be
or
triangulate
what's
of
interest
to
the
community
versus
what
is
really
achievable
and
high
impact.
A
Yeah,
I
mean,
I
think
you
know,
one
of
the
things
that
we
were
planning
on
doing
and
following
up
is
really
taking
a
look
at
all
the
actions
in
there
and
having
some
feedback
on
things
that
we've
already
initiated
or
completed
or
or
passed
to
see
how
that
relates
to
those
particular
actions,
and
then
we
can
kind
of
see
what
additional
components
that
are
offered
in
there
how
they
relate
to
these
different
sort
of
spheres
of
influence.
So
that's
a
good
question.
A
We
don't
have
it
specifically
tied
down
based
on
these
these
examples,
but
like
starting
a
food
council,
we
we
know,
we've
had
that
going
on
for
quite
some
time.
Of
course,
that's
something
we
have
direct
control
over,
so
that's
an
example
of
one
of
the
things
that
they
had
put
out
there,
but
we
will
go
through
the
list
and
provide
some
feedback
on
where
things
are
at
currently
with
city
policy,
on
their
on
those
actions.
G
G
It's
it's
a
both
about
kind
of
these
general
spheres
of
influence.
But
then,
specifically,
the
bubbles
are
big.
How
much
of
that
bubble
falls
within
the
city's
influence
versus
another
one?
I
know
another
topic
that
seak
has
talked
about.
Quite
a
lot
is
zero
waste
and
and
whether
there's
a
connection
between
zero
waste
and
the
herd-
and
you
know
the
city
can
do
a
lot
to
reduce
waste,
but
that
still
might
not
fix
the
hurt
problem.
B
F
Thank
you.
I
have
a
question
because
we're
you're
working
on
this
plan
cutting
down
pollution
and
all
these
great
ideals
going
on
here
and
the
city
only
has
so
much
control
over
certain
entities.
I'm
wondering
to
make
this
successful.
Have
you
thought
about
including
the
county
into
this,
because
they
have
a
lot
of
well.
L
Yeah
leslie,
I
would
say
you're
absolutely
right.
I
mean
the
county
is
had
and
and
has
been
a
big
partner
of
the
city
on
many
initiatives,
but
doesn't
necessarily
mean
we
see
eye
to
eye
on
every
issue
too.
So
I
would
kind
of
in
general,
put
hennepin
county
within
that
sphere
of
influence,
and
you
know
you
can
include
in
that
many
of
their
policies
and
their
operations,
and
things
like
you
know,
herc
as
well,
but
I
think
the
county
kind
of
squarely
fits
in
that
sphere
of
influence.
L
A
Yeah,
I
think
too,
you
know
we're.
We
have
some
very
specific
interest.
You
know,
because
of
the
direct
impact
that
we
have
from
county
operations
like
like
the
herc
within
minneapolis,
and
it's
it's
probably
more
of
an
issue
for
the
city,
because
if
we
see
the
direct
impacts
of
it-
and
you
know-
but
it's
obviously
a
very
significant
component
of
the
services,
the
hennepin
county
provides
to
much
broader.
A
B
Having
more
aggressive
goals
makes
a
lot
of
sense
to
me,
because
greenhouse
gas
emissions
stay
in
the
atmosphere
for
or
at
least
co2
stays
in
the
atmosphere
for
over.
I
forget
what
the
timeline
is
like
300
years
or
whatever,
so
we
as
the
us
and
as
many
politicians
have
more
responsibility
for
historic
levels
of
emissions
that
are
causing
the
climate
change
we're
feeling
now,
so
we
have
more
responsibility
for
reducing
our
emissions
as
a
developed
city
in
country,
that's
been
responsible
for
past
emissions,
so
I
really
like
that.
E
H
I
take
it
that
this
whole
report
was
about
the
actual
operations
of
the
city
of
minneapolis,
not
the
totality
of
the
city
of
minneapolis,
which
includes
all
its
citizens
and
and
so
forth.
And
if
that
is
true,
I
think
it
should
have
should
one
should
make
it
clear
that
it
is
the
really
it
is
discussing
the
operations
of
the
city
itself.
L
L
And
I
might
just
add
one
last
thought
a
little
bit
to
sandy
to
your
question
about
you
know
what
did
kim
and
I
think
maybe
is
in
that
sphere
of
control
as
I've.
Just
as
I
was
making
this
presentation,
I
think
in
the
last
few
days
it
just
struck
me
that
we
may
need
to
think
less
that
I
think
I
need
to
think
less
too
about
in
absolute
terms
like
metric
tons
of
co2
saved
by
an
action,
because
that
is
a
benefit
seen
by
the
entire
world.
L
But
it's
a
benefit.
That's
often
not
felt
viscerally
by
the
community,
which
means
that
it,
like
our
climate
action,
I
think,
isn't
as
resilient,
because
people
aren't
seeing
that
benefit
day-to-day,
and
it
just
happens
that,
what's
within
our
sphere
of
control,
is
often
those
items
that
actually
do
have
a
difference
in
people's
lives.
So
maybe
we
need
to
spend
more
time
focusing
on
that
sphere
of
control
and
particularly
those
items
then
that
have
co-benefits
beyond.
L
B
L
H
B
A
We
don't
have
to
necessarily
do
it
at
this
meeting,
but
on
you
know,
kind
of
what
what
would
be
our
action
as
part
of
the
race
to
zero,
and
I'd
also
like
to
get
sort
of
thought
feedback
recommendation
in
regards
to
the
science-based
targets
is
that
is
that
something
we
should
be
teeing
up
for.
Our
you
know
is
that
a
recommendation
to
the
city
to
tee
up
as
part
of
our
update
to
the
climate
action
plan.
A
B
Sounds
good
thanks
kim
all
right?
Let
me
pull
up
the
agenda
again
so,
as
I
started
to
say
before
the
next
item
on
our
agenda
is
the
upper
harbor
terminal.
This
is
a
really
really
big
topic
and
we
wanted
to
give
ample
time
to
it.
I
think
may
if
we
could
maybe
till
6,
30
or
so,
because
we've
got
a
few
more
things
to
talk
about
afterwards.
B
If
we
want
to
talk
about
it,
that
long
I'll
sort
of
tee
it
up
and
kim
feel
free
to
interject
and
then
add
on,
if
you
wouldn't
mind
to
my
very
minimal
introduction,
but
the
upper
harbor
terminal,
I
think
folks
are
aware,
is
a
development
project
that
the
city's
been
working
on
for
several
years
in
north
minneapolis.
It's
some
significant
land
along
the
mississippi
river,
that
was
a
former
industrial
use
that
is
being
reimagined
and
redeveloped
in
terms
of
process
there.
B
A
B
B
I
know
it's
kind
of
difficult
to
to
draft
a
letter
in
a
meeting,
so
we
could
also
propose
a
different
process
for
come
for
submitting
comments
but
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
open
up
the
the
group
to
discuss
the
possibility
of
submitting
comments,
thoughts
about
the
project,
thoughts
about
the
a-u-a-r
and
anything
else
and
kim
if
you
could
do
some
damage
control
on
everything.
I
just
said.
A
It's
all
good
yeah.
I
did
post
the
sort
of
link
to
the
comments
there
and
also
to
the
presentation
that
they
did
do
about
10
days
ago
at
the
green
zone's
seat.
Bed
staff
wasn't
available
to
come
to
this
meeting,
but
I
felt
like
because
of
the
30-day
comment
period
ending
on
june
24th.
It
was
important
to
bring
folks
forward
so
I'm
happy
to
walk
through
I'm
familiar
with
the
auar,
I'm
happy
to
walk
through
the
presentation.
A
A
A
So,
as
anna
kind
of
mentioned
early
on
auar
is
really
a
hybrid
between
an
environmental
assessment
worksheet
and
an
eis
environmental
impact
statement,
and
it
also
is
kind
of
a
planning
document.
So
it's
looking
at
various
different
types
of
uses
and
different
scenarios
and
seeing
what
the
impacts
are
from
those
uses
and
analyzing
the
cumulative
impacts
both
during
the
construction,
as
well
as
during
operations
of
of
the
site,
and
this
is
intended
to
inform
zoning
changes.
Land
use
permits
that
kind
of
thing.
A
And
so
the
scenario
we'll
talk
about
the
different
scenarios
that
they
looked
at.
But
there's
really
two
phases
of
development
that
they're,
proposing
and
there'll
be
different
mixed
uses
that
will
go
through
as
far
as
what
they
look
like.
So
here's
the
the
scenarios
that
the
aur
looked
at,
and
so
they
analyzed
basically
doing
no
build
scenario
of
residential
and
basically
a
hundred
and
ten
thousand
square
feet
of
single-story
commercial
industrial
that
was
sort
of
the
the
baseline.
A
There
would
be
no
music
venue,
no
recreation,
so
that's
sort
of
like
baseline,
almost
basically
where
it
is
today,
then
in
scenario,
one.
They
looked
at
having
520
units
of
of
housing
and
315
000
of
non-commercial
office.
Industrial
and
scenario
2
is
sort
of
the
maximum
density
that's
allowed
under
the
current
comprehensive
plan
and
includes,
of
course,
the
music
venue
as
well
and
doesn't
include
any
industrial
storage.
A
So
what
would
be
the
sort
of
impacts?
Here's
a
nice
picture
of
sort
of
the
no
build
scenario.
This
is
what
it
would
stay
like,
and
here's,
of
course,
the
big
riverside
plant
on
the
northeast
side,
and
so
here's
the
various
scenarios
that
they
would
have
a
park
land
here,
the
community
performance
center
here
urban
food
production
processing,
other
manufacturing,
housing,
mixed
income,
affordable
housing,
senior
housing
along
the
riverfront
here.
So
those
would
be
this.
A
The
proposed
outdoor
amphitheater
is
not
currently
part
of
a
recognized
use
in
any
minneapolis
code,
so
the
zoning
would
have
to
be
updated
to
be
able
to
recognize
that
there
would
have
to
be
also
a
rezoning
to
allow
for
housing,
development
and
other
future
land
use.
There's
also
building
height,
related
aspects
too,
because
of
its
proximity
to
the
mississippi
river.
A
There's
geology
and
soils.
I
think
I'll,
just
sort
of
go
through
some
of
these
here,
a
little
more
quickly.
The
water
resources
they're
looking
at
are
surface
storm,
water,
waste,
water
and
some
of
the
issues
that
are
needed
there
in
regards
to
permitting
the
infrastructure
what
they
would
need
to
meet
and
be
compliance
with
the
new
storm
water
regulations.
A
There's
some
folks
there
there
hasn't
been
as
much
testing
as
some
folks
would
like
to
see
on
here
to
determine
whether
the
hazardous
waste
is
here.
They
basically,
you
know,
are
working
with
the
mpca
to
coordinate
any
handling
or
disposal
of
hazardous
waste.
They
find
they
are
looking
at
the
fish
and
wildlife
native
vegetation
and
planting
really
working
to
do
shoreline,
restoration
and
much
of
the
park.
Land
will
create
a
buffer
along
the
mississippi
river
and
then
we've
also
got
historic
properties
right
now.
A
So
I
won't
go
through
all
these
different
pieces
here
as
far
as
the
mitigation
strategies,
but
that's
sort
of
the
general
overview
of
the
components
that
are
included
in
it.
The
schedule
here
is
that
there's
a
comment
period
that
runs
through
the
24th
of
june
they'll
that'll,
be
reviewed
again
published
and
then
a
final
review
by
the
city
council
on
september
21st-
and
there
is
hillary
dvorak-
is
the
lead
principal
planner
for
this
particular
project.
A
C
B
A
G
G
I
would
strongly
suggest
kim
if
we
can
trying
to
get
somebody
from
cped
at
our
july
meeting,
since
it
says
that
they're
going
to
publish
the
final
auar
in
july,
and
we
have
the
opportunity
to
write
a
letter
both
as
a
public
comment.
That's
due
this.
This
month,
but
also
write
a
letter
directly
to
the
council,
based
on
what
that
final
auar
looks
like,
and
especially
if
there
are
comments
that
are
highlighted
in
our
letter
that
are
reflected
by
the
community
that
don't
make
it
into
the
final
plan.
I
think
we
should.
F
Thank
you.
I
just
got
concerns
about
this
way
that
they
did
the
environmental
statement
and
the
changes
that
has
been
happening
with
the
way
the
policies
and
the
permits
are
written
and
they
don't
have.
I
I
looked
over
it
and
I
don't
even
see
how
they
plan
to
remove
any
contaminants,
soils
or
anything,
and
so
I'm
so
against
this
auar,
because
it's
not
as
detailed
as
an
eaw-
and
I
really
want
to
if
I
really
would
like
the
opportunity
to
go
out
there
with
them
on
the
site
and
see
how
they
analyze
it.
F
I
think
that
would
be
a
great
thing
for
me
to
do,
because
I
like
doing
that,
but
that
was
my
core
class
at
you.
That
was
my
favorite,
but
anyway,
I'm
really
curious
about
it
and
see
how
they
they
just
make
these
decisions
on
such
a
vast
land
and
just
take
it
the
this
one
entity
and
just
say
this
is
how
it
is
when
there's
more
things
to
it
on
this
landscape
that
they're
redeveloping
and
my
whole
thing-
I
don't
you
know,
let's
make
it
clear,
I
don't
care
what
people
build
there.
F
I
don't
care
what
to
do.
Let's
just
manage
it,
so
it's
a
healthy
and
safe
environment
for
all,
because
everything
interconnects-
and
I
just
have
issues
about
the
removal
of
the
sort
of
this
contaminants.
Where
is
it
going
to
go
from
here?
How
far
is
it
going
to
travel
and
what
neighborhood
is
it
going
to
go
through?
Because
these
little
droplets
are
going
to
be
everywhere?
We
already
have
this
mass
construction
all
over
the
city
almost
over
the
state,
and
we
don't.
F
F
Yes,
I
I
definitely
would
because
they're
lacking
the
pla,
the
placement
of
where
they're
taking
these
contaminants-
and
I
know
it's
starting
at
over
north
minneapolis,
but
then
the
journey
on
that
road,
where
it's
going.
Who
knows
if
they're
going
to
jump
on
the
freeway,
because
we
don't-
I
don't
know
these
drivers,
I
I
drove
down
freeways
and
truck
stuff
is
falling
out,
but
I'm
just
saying
the
removal
and
how
they
plan
to
do
that.
It
needs
to
be
included.
F
I
want
an
eaw,
but
the
eaw
has
changed
too,
because
there
was
a
a
couple
of
months
ago
or
a
couple
weeks
ago
the
pollution
control
asked
for
inputs
for
people
to
see
how
the
changes
were
going
and
what
did
you
think
about
it
and
yada
yada
because
they
were
reconstructing
it?
And
I
I
don't.
That
means
you
know.
Some
things
had
changed
in
there
and
there,
as
well
as
the
permits
for
the
city.
So
now
we
don't
have
soil
management.
F
We
only
have
storm
water
management,
which
is
to
me
crazy,
because
then
you
take
out
another
important
entity.
So
I'm
looking
at
I'm
thinking
back
in
the
dust
bowl
time
when
all
the
land
is
open
and
everybody
just
la
la
la
you
know.
So
it's
it's
coveted
has
gone
crazy.
Our
population
in
the
city's
gone
crazy,
and
now
we
got
the
soil
going
crazy
and
my
whole
thing
is
the
health
and
welfare
of
all
people
that
dwell
here,
and
so
I'm
I'm
I'm
against
this
aaw
and
I
would
look
like
again
yeah.
B
Won't
thanks
leslie
yeah.
That's
it's
definitely
noted
and
especially
yeah
being
so
close
to
the
river.
You
know
if
there's
contaminated
soil,
that's
not
being
managed,
then
that
goes
into
the
river,
which
affects
drinking
water
for
folks
and
so
noted
that
yeah
requesting
an
eaw
on
the
site
is
something
we
could
add
to
the
letter.
F
Excuse
me
not
just
the
not
just
the
water
but
the
air
itself,
you
know,
and
this
stuff
is
going
to
travel
on
your
car.
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
go
outside
and
look
at
your
cars,
but
there's
sometimes
there's
beads
of
soil
on
there
and
that's
stuff,
we're
breathing,
and
so
this
stuff
is
going
to
pick
up
wind
and
it's
going
to
catch
up
somebody's
going
to
catch
it
and
that's
all
I'm
saying
is,
and
it
goes
in
the
air,
not
just
the
water.
You
know,
yeah,
that's
totally
the
point.
J
It
doesn't
look
at
climate
and
greenhouse
gas
impacts
at
all,
including
the
likelihood
that
the
performing
arts
center
would
be
heated
with
fracked
gas,
and
then
the
other
thing
that
I
think
is
missing
from
the
aur.
That
we
should
mention
in
the
letter
is
that
the
cumulative
potential
effects
leaves
out
the
traffic
on
94.
B
J
F
Yes,
I
do
yes,
I
do.
My
question
is
because
of
what
they're
doing
are
they
playing?
I
know
they
use
their
own
inspectors.
Are
they
planning
to
contribute
to
having
more
inspectors
and
training
them?
You
know,
even
if
it's
students
or
something
working
part-time,
because
the
city
cut
them
so
who's
going
to
make
sure
and
ensure
that
this
stuff
is
happening
and
managed
properly.
F
F
So
a
very
I'm
I'm
very
confused
about
that,
but
with
all
the
construction
and
then
you
cut
it,
and
then
you
depend
on
these
people
just
like
we
depend
on
people
to
manage
their
own
storm
water
and
these
facilities,
and
you
see
how
that's
working
so
I'm
just
very
curious
about
you
know
these
people
wanting
to
play
with
the
dirt
and
opening
the
soil-
and
I
don't
know
even
know
if
they
realize
this.
You
know
it's
like.
Oh
it's
over
north
or
it's
in
this
area
that
this
stuff
travels
and
that's
all.
A
I
I
think
it
would
be
useful
to
include
in
the
comments
and
actually
my
office
we
did
request
an
extension
were
denied
the
extension.
So
yes,
it
would
be
helpful
for
us
to
have
that.
I
you
know
just
because
you
know
like
this
too.
We
wanted
to
put
this
out
there
and
it
kind
of
had
to
move
very
quickly
from
the
time
that
it
was
out
so
requesting
some
additional
time
for
review.
I
think,
is
certainly
worthwhile
putting
in
in
the
letter
whether
they
all
extended.
A
I
I
like,
I
said
that
we
we
have
asked,
but
it
doesn't
hurt
to
ask
again.
I
guess-
and
certainly
you
know
we.
We
certainly
could
also
like
within
the
comments
put
that
in
there,
but
then
also
we
can
write
a
letter
to
the
city
council
at
a
later
date
because
of
course,
they're
voting
on
it
later
in
the
year
too.
So
it's
just
sort
of
trying
to
get
in
on
the
the
sort
of
immediate
schedule,
but
there's
an
opportunity
for
additional
comment.
Discussion
with
the
council.
B
G
The
point
that
folks
have
made
about
94
in
cumulative
impacts
has
reminded
me
that
mndot
is
currently
doing
a
study
to
determine
whether
they
will
make
improvements
to
252
and
whether
those
improvements
to
252
will
result
in
changes
on
94
as
far
south,
as
potentially
all
the
way
down
to
downtown
minneapolis,
but
definitely
they're.
Looking
at
the
area,
two
dollars
from
the
north,
and
so
I
think
when
we
have
the
conversation
about
cumulative
impacts,
we
need
to
encourage
that.
G
They
not
only
consider
cumulative
impacts
of
what
exists
now
plus
this
project,
but
also
acknowledging
that
this
project
is
not
happening
in
isolation
from
other
potential
infrastructure
projects.
That
could
increase
impact
that
the
city
has
less
control
over.
So
this
is
an
example
where
the
city
can
at
least
try
to
mitigate
when
it
is
land
that
the
city
owns
and
ultimately
has
some
control
over,
where
mndot
may
be
able
to
do
what
they
want
with
less
opportunity
for
the
city
to
weigh
in.
B
Right
if
there's
going
to
be
known
additional
cumulative
impacts
within
a
couple
years,
they
should
be
taking
that
into
consideration
thanks
everyone
so
far,
not
to
stop
the
discussion
at
all,
but
I
I
just
really
appreciate
this.
All
this
really
really
thoughtful
feedback.
So
far
any
other
thoughts,
questions
nick
did
your
hand
just
go
up
again.
I
couldn't
tell.
B
B
B
H
A
B
C
A
E
E
E
A
E
Okay,
just
kidding
yeah,
my
name
is
karen
peterson.
I
am
on
the
board
of
the
sheridan
neighborhood
organization
in
emergency
minneapolis
and
I'm
also
a
member
of
the
above
society
and
loving
everything.
I'm
hearing
you
say
our
traffic
is
really
lacking
and
I
I
worry,
the
city
has
sort
of
forgotten
that
this
is
a
once-in-a-generation
opportunity
and
if
we're
going
to
do.
K
E
We
should
be
celebrating
the
river
with
a
boat
launch
that
will
allow
dinner
cruises
kayak
rentals.
Well,
that
was
one
thing.
You've
already
mentioned,
the
bird's
safe
glass-
and
I
totally
agree
with
everything.
Leslie
was
saying
that
this
is
a
soft
touch,
environmental
review
and
it
really
should
be
a
bigger
thing
for
dive
if
the
cumulative
tubular
effect
is
talking
about
totally
that's
what
I
pay
for
here.
I
appreciate
your
patience.
E
I
am
very
concerned
about
tree
canopy.
I
don't
know
how
many
of
the
really
mature
trees
would
be
lost.
We
still
need
them
for
climate
shading,
it's
an
electric
sensor,
I'm
hoping
that
trees
are
saved
instead
of
quickly
done.
So.
Thank
you
really.
That's
all
I
wanted
to
add,
and
I
agree,
leslie
was
talking
about
more
work
needs
to
be.
F
F
B
I
think
that
I
think
car
makes
a
couple
of
good
points
that
I
I
might
want
to
add
to
as
river
access
is
is
important.
I
don't,
I
can't
remember
if
that
is
specifically
called
out,
but
ensuring
that
you
know
maybe
not
just
park
space
but
boat,
launch
and
recreation
are
made
available
to
that's
one
of
the
non
quantum
quantifiable
things
in
an
environmental
assessment
is
how
the
space
can
cultivate,
love
and
appreciation
for
the
natural
environment.
B
A
Mentioned
I'm
taking
down
notes
here
as
well
and
we'll
but
yeah
whoever
would
like,
I
I
believe
most
folks
would
be
able
to
have
access
to
this.
I
think
everyone
should
have
access
to
it
if
you
can
click
on
it
from
the,
and
I
can
also
folks
want
to
send
it.
I
can
send
around
the
link
as
well
too
after
the.
G
G
I
don't
want
to
call
somebody
else
out,
but
sandy
hi,
you
had
some
great
ways
that
you
talked
about
the
engagement
issues
on
roof
depot
and
I'm
wondering
if
some
of
this
conversation
about
the
document
coming
out
being
very
large
and
very
difficult
for
community
members
to
review
in
such
a
short
period
of
time
if
it
invites
some
of
that
same
language
that
you
had
used
for
root
depot.
If
that
would
be
a
good
addition
here,
you
think
enough,
on
the
spot.
H
B
B
B
G
B
G
B
B
G
I'm
I'm
happy
to,
since
I
know
how
we
need
to
so.
I
move
that
we
approve
this
letter
with
the
additional
topics
that
anna
just
read
out,
including
access
to
water,
tree
canopy
and
other
related
issues.
Community
engagement,
subject
to
final
edits
by
the
chair
and
vice
chair
before
sending
prior
to
the
june
24
2021
due
date.
C
K
C
G
C
B
Yes,
I
can
read
the
list
really
quickly
complete
an
environmental
assessment,
worksheet
discuss
soil
contaminants,
how
they'll
impact
the
air
water
and
how,
if
soil,
is
contaminated,
how
they're
planning
to
transport
it
and
mitigate
impacts
from
that
cumulative
impacts
from
emissions
from
94
construction,
construction
emissions
in
the
supply
chain,
using
fracked
gas
for
heating
and
additional
anticipated
cumulative
impacts?
If
from
94,
if
there's
an
improvement
to
252.
B
mitigation
or
enforcement
around
mitigation,
so
ensuring
that
there
are
inspectors
both
during
construction
and
afterwards
during
operation,
to
make
sure
they're
doing
what
they're
saying
saying
they're
going
to
do
around
mitigation
of
environmental
impact
public
comment
period
that
there
should
be
another
option
to
weigh
in
besides
written
comments
and
that
the
30
day
time
length
was
too
short
tree.
Canopy
should
be
assessed
and
transparent
and
maybe
that
they
shouldn't
they
should
mitigate
any
trees.
F
I
have
a
question
about
the
soil.
Oh
man,
I
kind
of
blanked
out
on
that
is.
Is
that
going
to?
Is
there
a
place
in
there
that
we
need
to
know
where
they're
going
to
deposit
the
waste
the
contaminant
waste
is
there?
Did
you
include
that
in
there
where
the
location
for
the
contaminants
are
going
to
be
stored,.
B
A
A
A
H
I
H
E
B
C
H
D
B
J
J
So
the
city
council
has
been
considering
a
resolution
of
opposition
to
line
three
and
the
saint
paul
city
council
has
been
doing
the
same.
I
was
just
in
touch
with
cam
gordon,
who
said
that
they,
he
cam,
gordon
jeremy,
schroeder
and
elon
drakano,
had
drafted
this
resolution
that
I
sat
around
they've
been
asked
to
hold
off
until
after
the
end
of
the
special
legislative
session
before
they
reintroduce
it.
J
But
since
that
is
likely
to
happen
before
our
next
meeting
and
any
chance
for
us
to
take
action,
I
wanted
to
bring
it
up
tonight
and
cam
said
that
it
would
be
helpful
to
have
cx
support.
So
I
guess
if
we
just
want
to
yeah
so
there's
the
resolution
express
to
city
council
that
cx
supports
passage
of
this
resolution.
B
B
G
I
I
think,
knowing
some
of
the
issues
we
ran
into
with
clerk
related
things
in
our
last
term,
I
think,
having
nothing
going
into
the
letter
for
the
chair
might
be
a
little
dubious,
so
I'd
suggest
we
at
least
give
the
chair
something
to
work
with,
and
then,
if
we
have
additional
points
that
we
can't
work
out
tonight,
there's
at
least
guidance
and
I'm
about
to
hit
enter
in
the
chat,
with
a
draft
statement
that
I
just
sketched
together.
Unless
there's
somebody
else
that
wants
to
draft
something.
D
B
B
H
I
realize
that
I'm
in
a
minority,
but
I
feel
that
the
present
pipeline
is
at
the
end
of
her
anyway.
The
present
pipeline
is
at
the
end
of
its
life
and
that
environmental
concerns
could
be
even
greater
than
than
a
decent
actual
construction
of
a
new
one.
So
I
I
oppose
opposing
the
it's
a
double
negative,
but
I
I
am
in
favor
of
the
new
draft
line
three
pipeline
and
I
realize
I'm
in
a
minority.
I
just
wanted
to
say
it.
G
D
A
G
F
B
K
B
B
A
G
And
kim,
while
you're,
while
we're
working
or
while
you're
working
on
that,
the
wording
that
I
put
in
the
chat
for
environmental
justice
and
indigenous
oops
rights
issues
shouldn't
have
an
apostrophe
is
slightly
different
than
what
you
had.
Okay,
I
don't
know
if
people
have
a
preference
of
one
versus
the
others.
B
J
Not
sure
which
version
is
the
most
up-to-date,
I
think
oh
cross-country
and
very
much
injustice
issues,
because
it
is
like
community
impact.
Environmental
justice
and
equity
are
part
of
ciac.
Like
the
description
of
what
we're
supposed
to
do,
I
would
maybe
include
in
the
last
sentence
goals
to
improve
environment,
maybe
say
environmental
justice
there,
health
and.
J
H
I
C
B
A
K
D
I
H
H
D
H
A
B
Excellent,
thank
you.
Everyone,
I'm
really
appreciating
everyone's
input
tonight
and
always,
but
I
guess
it's
different
being
in
the
driver's
seat
a
little
bit,
but
thanks
for
making
my
job
easy
old
business,
there
are
still
notes
from
the
group
groups
in
google
doc.
When
we
talked
about
the
climate
action
plan,
that
link
is
still
available
announcement
from
commissioners.
I
our
next
meeting,
will
be
held
in
person
starting
july
1st,
at
city
hall,
with
the
governor
lifting
his
emergency
powers.
B
A
Sure
yeah,
so
I
just
we
will
still
have
a
link
you
can
join
through
the
link,
though
it
you
have
to
be
limited
to
the
number
of
times.
You
join
in
a
year
to
three
rules
around
everything.
If
the
order
is
not
lifted
by
the
time
this
meeting
is
theoretically
we
could
still
have
the
meeting
virtually.
But
at
this
point
looks
like
it's
going
to
be
out,
and
so
we
have
reserved
room
132
city
hall,
for
the
july
21st
meeting
from
five
to
seven
again.
A
G
You
had
a
question
yeah
kim
just
to
clarify
so
you're
saying
that
a
member
can
be
a
voting
participant
up
to
three
times
per
year,
virtually
or
if
you're
participating
virtually
you're
participating
as
a
member
of
the
public
and
not
able
to
vote,
because
I
think
the
the
old
policy
was
the
latter
that
you
could
listen
in.
But
you
couldn't
vote.
A
No
because
there
you
can,
they
do
are
allowing
it
according
to
what
we've
heard
so
far
that
if
there
is
a
reason
you
cannot
make
it
to
that
meeting.
You
can
be
participating
in
the
meeting
as
a
voting
member,
because
you're
either
ill
or
some
other
reason,
but
it
has
to
be
it's
limited
to
three
times
a
year.
B
Any
other
questions
I
know
that's
a
big
change
and
feel
if,
if
there
are
additional
questions,
feel
free
to
email
kim
about
it,
I'm
sure
he's
happy
to
answer
all
right.
We
are
right
at
7,
00
pm.
You
can
see
the
list
of
additional
proposed
june
16th,
cf,
meeting
topics
and
the
agenda.
It
includes
the
sustainable
building
policy,
lift
scooters
and
bikes.
The
saint
anthony
falls
lock
and
dam
sale,
metro,
transit,
ev
bus
purchases,
100
renewable
electricity
blueprint.