►
From YouTube: February 24, 2021 Bicycle Advisory Committee
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
D
A
Welcome
everybody
to
the
february
24th
2021
meeting
of
the
minneapolis
bicycle
advisory
committee
notice.
This
meeting
may
involve
the
remote
participation
by
members,
either
by
telephone
or
other
electronic
means
due
to
the
local
public
health
emergency
novel
coronavirus
pandemic.
Pursuant
to
the
provisions
of
minnesota
statutes,
section
13
d,
.021.
A
Do
the
I'm
gonna
take
the
rope.
B
B
E
C
F
G
E
H
I
B
J
C
B
E
E
B
K
A
A
Sounding
like
no
great
next
would
entertain
a
motion
to
adopt
the
agenda
and
then
accept
the
january
27th
meeting.
C
B
E
M
E
E
B
N
B
E
B
F
B
K
G
A
And
millicent
can
I
jump
in
and
make
sure
was
there
anybody
who
voted,
who
hasn't
completed
their
oath
of
office,
that
we
need
to
mark,
as
did
not
vote.
A
Well,
thank
you
everybody
for
dealing
with
all
of
the
logistical
stuff.
I
appreciate
it.
It
is
a
lot
of
extra,
so
I
will
now
turn
it
over
to
matthew
for
elections.
O
All
right,
so
this
is
something
that
has
feels
like
a
long
time
that
we've
been
waiting
for
this
very
long
time,
but
today
we're
gonna
finally
have
our
elections,
and
so
I
I
did
send
out
a
one-pager
yesterday.
I
believe
with
the
basically
I'm
just
exactly
what
I'm
going
to
go
over
today.
O
So
if
you,
if
you
have
that,
feel
free
to
pull
that
up
and
follow
along,
but
we
are
going
to
essentially
go
through
a
process
to
elect
seven
positions
that
make
up
the
executive
committee
and
again,
the
the
executive
committee
is
responsible
for
setting
this
agenda
and
they
meet
a
week
before
on
microsoft.
Teams.
O
To
do
that,
robin
garwood
is
an
honorary
member
of
the
executive
committee
as
well,
but
we
don't
vote
on
robin
because
he's
you
know
he's
there's
only
one
robin
and
then
and
then
staff,
so
me,
milson
and
and
chris
attend
those
as
well.
O
So
again,
the
the
role
of
that
is
to
create
the
agenda
for
this,
but
also
to
wrestle
with
any
committee
issues
that
need
to
be
dealt
with
to
prepare
the
committee,
so
we're
just
gonna
go
in
order
of
chair
vice
chair
secretary,
then
we'll
go
with
the
chair
of
the
let's
call
it
the
engineering
subcommittee
first
and
then
vice
chair
and
then
chair
and
vice
chair
of
the
5e
subcommittee.
O
I
also
want
to
go
down
to
the
bottom
of
the
page
and
just
to
be
very
clear
with
people
that
you
should
and
we
encourage
you
to
nominate
yourself
or
somebody
else.
You
know,
there's
there's
no
shame
if
you're,
if
you're
interested
in
a
position,
I
think
you
should
just
say
that
I
think
it
just
helps
people
no
and
it's
okay.
O
If
we
have
more
than
one
person
for
each
position,
we'll
just
vote
and
that's
that's
fine,
that's
a
part
of
this
process
agency
members
are
also
we'll
say
technically
eligible
as
well.
Typically,
it
is
more
typical
that
the
appointed
resident
members
are
a
part
of
it,
but
we
have
had
agency
members
in
the
past
be
on
the
subcommittees
and-
and
I
think
that's
fantastic
as
well,
so
I
just
want
to.
I
guess
I
just
want
to
pause
there.
I
see
janice
has
her
hand
up,
but
also
what
are
people
thinking
about
this
process?
O
Does
everyone
feel
comfortable
or
I
hope
people
are
interested
in
different
positions,
but
anyway,
let's
let's
pause
before
we
dive
into
this
process?
Are
there
any
questions?
This
makes
sense.
Janice.
D
Well,
I
did
two
things.
First,
I
was
just
going
to
add
that
we
had
agreed
that
if
more
than
one
person
is
nominated
for
a
position,
then
we'll
give
those
people
a
chance
to
say
a
word
to
about
themselves.
Maybe
why
they're
interested
to
help
people
decide?
The
other
thing
was
my
hand
was
raised
because
I
was
ready
to
nominate,
so
I
can
wait
until
you're
ready
for
nominations.
O
Let's
wait
a
second
just
to
see
if
others
are
and
and
and
I
think
we
should
just
give
everybody
an
opportunity,
even
if
there
is
just
one
but
just
to
hear
what
they're,
what
they're
excited
about
for
that
position
or
what
they're
interested
in
any
other
comments,
questions
about
this
about
this
process
or
what
they
do.
What
the
roles
roles
are.
A
Like
is
somebody
about
to
jump
in?
Do
I
like?
We
don't
have
the
benefit
of
that
this
time,
so
like
just
want
to
re-emphasize
again
like
if
folks
are
interested,
definitely
just
throw
your
name
out
there.
We
can't
necessarily
read
as
well
that,
like
maybe
you're
interested,
maybe
you'd,
be
interested.
You
know
so.
Limitations
of
online.
O
All
right
well
with
that,
I'm
just
gonna,
let's
start
the
process.
I
guess
why
don't
we
entertain
any
motions
for
the
chair?
Oh.
E
O
Last
last
thing
I'll
just
just
say:
I'm
gonna
do
this
process
for
the
chair
and
then
ask
the
chair
to
take
over
the
process
to
go
through
the
rest
and
then
I'm
here
for
any
questions
about
process.
So
sorry
janice,
I
know
you're
dying
to.
O
O
Okay,
you
can,
you
can
always
say
no
to,
and
I
think
that's
important
because
you
know
we
wouldn't
want
you
know
if
you're
not
interested
in
in
doing
the
work
you
know
or
representing
that
role
you
should.
You
should
be
clear
about
that
and
there's
no
shame
in
that
either.
Thank
you,
alyssa.
Do
we
have
a
second
any
other
or
not
any
other
nominations
for
the
position
of.
O
A
E
A
Yeah,
obviously
I
love
the
bicycle
advisory
committee.
I've
been
serving.
This
will
be
like
a
weird
what
fourth,
fourth
and
a
half
year
now,
since
we
were
supposed
to
have
these
elections
way
back
in
july,
but
I
mean
this
stuff
is
my
bread
and
butter.
I'm
really
excited
to
continue
supporting
the
committee.
However,
I
can
and
looking
forward
to
working
with
you
all
in
whatever
capacity
so.
O
I'm
I'm
gonna
say
what
we
have
to.
What
we
have
to
do
is
vote
by
voice
roll
call.
It's
called
roll
call.
We
have
to
do
that.
That's
that's.
O
B
Okay,
you
guys
ready
okay,
aaron
was
here
bri,
you
vote
yes
or
no
or
listen.
Where
did
you
vote.
E
K
B
G
B
G
H
B
R
K
E
C
K
O
A
I
will
I
will
give
it
a
go.
Thank
you
everyone
for
the
vote
of
confidence.
I
will
try
very
hard
to
live
up
to
that
vote.
So
yeah
matthews,
you
said
next
is
vice
chair,
so
I
will
open
the
floor
for
nominations
for
the
position
of
vice.
D
O
F
You
know
I'm
usually
not
a
shrinking
violet,
but
I
I
actually
feel
like.
I
should
wait
and
learn
a
bit
more
about
the
committee,
but
so
it's
it's
hard
to
pass
up
the
opportunity
to
serve
and
serve
with
alyssa,
but
I
think
I
think
I
should
decline.
This
should
be
here
for
a
little
longer.
D
O
So
I'll
just
say
not
to
not
to
counter
directly
phil,
but
maybe
for
all
the
all
the
newer
newer
folks,
I
think
vice
chair
might
be
like
an
ideal
position
as
a
newer
person.
You
know
because
the
you'd
get
the
opportunity
to
participate
in
the
executive
committee,
which
is
kind
of
the
main
role,
and
then,
if
you
know,
if
alyssa
can't
make
the
meeting,
then
then
you
you'd
chair
the
median
and
staff
and
other
members
of
the
bac
are
always
available
to
help
make
that
transition
smooth.
F
O
E
E
F
I
can
feel
the
vibe
here
well
sure,
if
there's
sure
but.
K
O
Well,
so
I
I
think
I
heard
philip
music
get
nominated
by
dan.
Q
Q
C
C
B
B
U
E
E
E
B
E
D
J
E
B
M
B
K
H
A
Congratulations,
phillip
and
since
this
is
my
first
elections,
of
course,
I
didn't
give
you
an
opportunity
to
say
why
you
were
interested
in
the
position
before
we
voted.
Do
you
want
to
say
anything
now
before
we
move
on
to
secretary.
F
You
know
for
me
the
in
addition
to
just
you
know,
helping
in
helping
bring
in
a
more
bicycle
friendly
community.
It's
really,
you
know,
I
think,
we're
just
helping
create
a
creating
a
city
where
land
uses
and
sort
of
appreciation
of
place
are
favorable
for
modes
other
than
cars.
So
it's
it's
exciting
to
serve
on
the
on
the
committee.
Yeah.
F
J
D
A
Cool,
that's
very
exciting.
Do
we
have
any
other
nominations
for
the
position
of
secretary
cadence?
It
sounded
like
you
accepted
okay,.
M
A
R
I
have
served
as
secretary
two
previous
times
on
two
other
boards
in
my
past,
so
I
do
have
experience
with
taking
minute
meeting
minute
meetings
and
robert's
rules,
even
if
I'm
not
the
first
person
to
second
the
motion.
R
So
I
was
secretary
for
the
minnesota
cycling
federation
for
two
years
and
then
I
was
also
one
of
those
student
government
people
in
college
and
served
as
secretary
for
a
year
there
as
well.
So
thanks
for
nominating
me
and
having
me
here.
A
C
K
J
E
B
D
I,
and
does
this
mean
that
from
now
that
from
now
on
for
the
rest
of
this
meeting
cadence,
you
have
to
be
taking
the
notes.
I
say
yes,
jennifer.
N
K
F
B
E
F
S
O
I
was
like
I
was
like
I
just
can't
get
a
word
so
janice
were
you
joking
or
is
cadence?
Actually
I
just
we
should
be
clear.
Like
are
you
gonna
finish
the.
D
O
So
this
is
the
one
position
where
there's
like
a
product
that
you
have
to
like
provide
so
like
I
don't
it
might
be.
It
might
be
a
good
idea,
janice
if
you're
available
to
just
like,
do
it
this
time
and
then
maybe
meet
with
cadence
and,
like
I
don't
know,
or
unless,
unless
you're
just
ready
to
rock
kittens.
R
Sure
janice,
are
you
working
in
google
docs
or
a
word
document.
B
R
A
Jumping
right
in
exciting
all
right,
I
will
now
open
up
the
floor
for
nominations
for
the
actually
before
I
open
up
the
floor,
for
nominations
for
the
positions
for
the
engineering
subcommittee
just
wanted
to
talk
through
really
briefly.
Typically,
we
have
had
a
chair
and
a
vice
chair
right,
which
means
you
have
a
point
person
for
the
committee
and
then
sort
of
a
backup
for
the
committee.
It
operates
very
similarly
to
the
the
chair
and
vice
chair
of
the
of
the
whole
committee,
but
that's
not
written
in
the
bylaws.
A
We
definitely
could
approach
that
as
more
of
a
co-chair
ship
so
like
in
this
past
cycle.
I
think
what
happened
at
the
engineering
committee
is
those
were
that
operated
functionally
more
like
a
coach
co-chair
position
and
five
e's
has
operated
more
traditionally
as
a
chair
in
a
vice
chair
position.
So
I
think,
if
for
whoever
is
elected
into
those
roles,
those
folks
can
have
a
conversation
about
how
they
want
to
approach
that,
but
the
default
would
be
that
we
have
a
chair
with
a
vice
chair
as
sort
of
the
starting
point.
C
A
Any
other
nominations
for
the
position
of
engineering
subcommittee.
A
T
I
I
took
over
the
the
absence
of
ward
one
and
then
was
appointed
the
last
term
and
served
as
the
assistant
or
the
vice
chair
for
that
term,
and
I
will
tell
you
that
there's
a
lot
to
learn-
and
I
was
first
of
all
wanted
to
represent
my
ward.
I
wanted
to
represent
my
city
and
I
wanted
to.
I
had
a
lot
to
learn.
T
I
had
a
lot
to
learn
and
think
about,
and
so
I
did
that
and
but
this
time
around
we've
had
a
lot
of
change
with
many
long-term
members,
leaving
that
that
really
coached
me
and
were
mentors
to
me-
and
I
guess
I
I
I
decided
to
run
for
this,
because
I
felt
that
there's
a
calling
to
the
bac
as
a
committee
that
I
felt
was
important
and
that
I
truly
want
to
treat
this
committee
as
a
co-chair
and
as
to
develop
a
really
interesting
next,
two
years
together,
people
that
are
on
the
engineering
committee.
I
E
B
T
U
B
H
B
E
L
C
J
F
B
E
Q
A
Congratulations
dan.
Thank
you.
I
will
now
open
the
floor
for
nominations
for
the
position
of
engineering
subcommittee.
Vice
chair.
T
I'd
like
to
make
a
nomination
please
and
I'll,
follow
it
up
afterwards.
If
she
accepts-
and
I
would
like
to
nominate
marty
grimes.
N
A
L
It's
it's
just
an
honor
to
be
a
part
of
this
group.
I
am
passionate
about
biking
and
I
just
want
to
make
our
city
just
be
the
biking
capital
of
the
entire
world,
so
yeah,
I'm
excited.
I
have
no
idea
what's
going
on
yet
so
I'm
looking
forward
to
learning,
but
thank
you
for
the
opportunity.
A
Thanks
marnie
millicent,
would
you
call
the
roll
aaron.
E
C
E
E
B
E
B
E
J
F
B
Q
A
Congratulations
marty.
Thank
you.
Okay,
we're
getting
close
to
the
end.
This
is
a
perfect
example
of
something
that
takes
10
minutes
in
person
and
it's
going
to
take
us
almost
an
hour
online.
I
will
now
open
the
floor
for
nominations
for
the
position
of
five
e's
subcommittee,
chair.
A
With
that,
I
will
close
nominations
for
the
position
of
5e
subcommittee
chair
bree.
Do
you
want
to
say
a
few
words.
N
I
yeah
I'm
really
excited
to
be
a
part
of
the
bac
and
I
think
in
the
subcommittee
for
the
five
e's
I'm
looking
most
forward
to
having
deeper
conversations
moving
us
forward
to
make
sure
that
minneapolis
residents
and
anyone
who
is
within
our
borders
is
able
to
bike
safely
and
really
make
sure
that
that
is
equitably
dispersed
as
well.
Yeah.
Thank
you
for
the
nomination
reason.
A
Thanks
bree
millicent,
will
you
call
the
roll
erin.
C
E
J
B
B
E
J
E
B
E
B
M
B
E
K
B
D
E
E
B
K
B
A
T
I'd
like
to
make
a
nomination-
and
I
hope
she
accepts
this
heather
gillick.
Q
A
A
A
M
E
A
Thanks
heather
millicent,
will
you
call
the
roll
sure
erin.
E
C
C
B
E
E
S
B
B
F
B
K
A
Congratulations:
heather!
Congratulations!
Everybody
thank
you
for
bearing
with
us,
as
we
just
called
the
roll
like
nine
times
in
a
row
which
is
not
the
most
fun
part
of
serving
on
a
committee
right
now.
I
cannot
wait
until
we
are
all
back
in
person
and
get
to
bike
to
be
together
on
a
beautiful
day
like
today
and
have
votes
that
don't
take
us
50
minutes
so
fingers
crossed,
but
by
the
next
time
we
need
to
do
elections.
We
will
be
able
to
do
this
in
a
slightly
less
unwieldy
way.
A
So,
all
right
with
that,
I
think
we
are
done
with
elections.
Matthew.
Is
there
anything
else
we
need
to
cover
before
we
move
on
to
the
next
agenda
item.
K
I
don't
think
so
excited
I'm
excited
for
the
first
executive
committee
next
month.
O
Oh,
I
guess
I
should
say
milsim
will
get
all
of
the
new
names
on
that
invite
which
again,
is
I
don't
know
if
I
said
this
is
one
week
before
this
meeting
at
one
o'clock
on
teams.
So
probably
the
only
thing
oh
and
that
can
change
too
so
I
mean
that
should
be.
Maybe
we
can
address
that
via
email.
It
should
be
whatever
works
for
the
group.
So.
J
V
This
is
chris.
Can
I
jump
in
real,
quick
yeah?
I
I
just
want
to
say
congrats
to
the
new
5e
chairs
and
we
do
have
a
meeting
next
tuesday,
so
just
know
that
I'll
be
reaching
out
by
email
after
this-
and
hopefully
we
can
connect
some
time
before
then,
but
and
congrats.
Everyone
else.
A
Cool
thanks
chris
next
on
the
agenda
is
the
hiawatha
maintenance
facility
and
we
were
hoping
to
have
a
city
staffer
come
present
about
this,
but
they
were
not
able
to
do
so.
So
I
am
going
to
present
about
this
because
I'm
somewhat
familiar
with
the
project,
and
so
I'm
going
to
do
a
little
bit
of.
A
Robert's
rules,
wizardry
and
actually
philip,
ask
you
to
call
be
the
be
the
presiding
officer.
While
I
do
the
presentation
and
be
the
one
who
calls
the
question
because
chairs
generally
shouldn't
bring
forward
motions
so
sure
so
I'll.
Do
the
presentation
on
the
hiawatha
maintenance
facility
and
we'll
talk
about
some
motions
near
the
end
of
that?
So
that's!
What's
up
next,
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
pull
up
my
notes
and
share
my
screen.
Give
me
just
a
second,
as
I
switch
mental
gears
here.
A
All
right,
hopefully,
folks,
can
see
my
screen
now
and
I
am
gonna
try
to
keep
this
presentation
pretty
high
level.
This
is
like
a
huge
project
with
a
lot
of
detail
in
it
part
of
the
reason
we're
discussing
it
today,
there's
some
bicycle
elements
of
the
site.
It's
very
close
to
the
midtown
greenway.
A
It's
currently
undergoing,
like
an
environmental
review
as
part
of
the
process
and
there's
a
public
comment
deadline
until
march
11th.
So
it's
pretty
timely
that
we
get
it
on
our
committee
agenda
today.
Otherwise
this
would
probably
be
more
typically
shown
at
a
subcommittee
meeting.
A
So
the
the
document
is
like
is
like
a
the
public
document
is
about
a
thousand
pages.
We
are
obviously
not
going
to
go
through
at
all
I'll,
try
to
highlight
some
stuff
and
keep
things
really
high
level
for
this
discussion
today,
and
then
we
can.
We
can
talk
about
some
potential
motions
at
the
end,
so
for
folks
who
some
folks
may
be
familiar
with
this
site.
So
this
is
the
hiawatha
maintenance
facility.
It's
a
consolidation
of
some
maintenance
facilities
that
exist
right
now
in
northeast
and
fridley.
A
You
may
also
have
heard
it
colloquially,
referred
to
as
the
roof
depot
site.
There's
a
building
on
the
site.
It's
the
roof
depot
building,
that's
going
to
be
demolished,
so
this
is
actually
an
expansion
of
an
existing
facility.
So
sorry,
this
is
the
citywide
I'll
describe
it
for
folks
on
the
phone.
So
this
is
the
citywide
map
you
can
see.
A
The
site
is
located
adjacent
to
highway
55,
it's
a
little
bit
north
of
lake
street,
so
right
above
the
north
of
the
pioneers
and
soldiers
cemetery
and,
like
I
said,
the
the
midtown
greenway
runs
directly
adjacent
to
it.
A
This
is
a
slightly
zoomed
in
or
much
zoomed
in
picture
of
the
site,
so
you
can
see
there's
highway
55
just
to
the
the
eastern
boundary.
The
northern
boundary
here
is
2
east
26th
street,
the
southern
boundary
is
28th
street
and
then
the
most
of
the
western
boundary
is
longfellow
avenue.
There's
a
it
has
a
little
bit
of
a
jog
where
there's
like
a
half
block
of
residential
housing.
A
I
will
say
this:
the
site
itself
has
some
history
of
contention,
so
it's
in
located
in
the
east
phillips
neighborhood,
and
there
are
a
lot
of
folks
in
the
east,
phillip
neighborhood,
which
is
in
ward
9.
I'm
the
ward
9
rep
a
lot
of
folks,
any
philip
who
have
been
organizing
for
a
long
time
to
have
something
else
put
on
this
on
the
roof
depot
site.
That
does
not
include
expansion
of
public
works,
maintenance
facilities.
So
just
some
some
context
to
be
aware
of
as
we're
we're
going
through
the
project.
A
Part
of
the
reason
we
need
to
discuss
the
project-
let's
see,
if
I
I
might
actually
want
to
pull
up
just
one
more
view
here
of
the
project,
so
you
can
kind
of
see
what's
being
proposed.
A
Let
me
zoom
out
a
little
bit,
so
this
is
a
picture
of
the
buildings
that
are
going
to
be
built
on
the
site.
It's
it's
turned
a
little
bit,
so
the
last
picture
was
a
north
south
picture.
This
is
everything
sort
of
been
rotated,
so
you
can
see.
26Th
street
now
is
sort
of
over
on
the
right
side
of
the
page
and
28th
is
on
the
left,
so
there's
a
number
of
facilities
on
the
site.
A
The
two
that
I
would
highlight
as
as
ones
we're
going
to
discuss
later,
are
this
building
b,
which
is
a
really
big
parking
ramp
and
then
there's
also
building
h,
which
is
a
training
center,
which
is
going
to
be
the
sort
of
community
and
publicly
accessible
portion
of
the
site.
The
rest
of
this
is
really
going
to
be
for
the
maintenance
facility
rather
than
for
for
the
public
to
be
accessing,
and
then
this
is
just
one
more
view
of
the
project
from
a
slightly
different
angle.
A
So
you
can
see
here
we're
looking
at
it
from
the
south
west
corner
of
the
project
now,
and
so
you
can
kind
of
more
clearly
see
on
the
right
hand,
side
the
adjacent,
midtown
greenway,
going
up
to
the
sabo
bridge
over
55
there,
so
that's
an
overview
of
the
site.
I
wish
I
could
show
you
things
side
by
side,
but
this
is
a
single.
The
public
document
for
this
is
a
single
document.
A
That's
about
1100
pages,
so
we're
gonna
just
keep
flipping
through
things
to
give
you
a
sense
of
the
bike
facilities
around
the
site
and
why
the
site
is
important,
so
you
can
see.
Obviously,
we've
already
discussed
the
a
lot
large
portion
of
the
western
or
sorry
eastern
border
of
the
site
is
the
midtown
greenway
leading
up
to
the
sabo
bridge.
Here,
there's
also
a
bike
facility
that
runs
directly
along
hiawatha,
that
borders
the
site,
and
then
we
obviously
have
the
east,
26th
and
east
28th
street
bike
lanes.
A
In
terms
of
bike
traffic
on
and
through
the
site,
so
this
is
a
picture
of
the
site
again
with
26th
street
on
the
north
side,
28th
street.
On
the
south
side,
you
can
see
here
to
the
right,
there's
that
midtown
greenway
trail
and
and
this
is
sort
of
the
proposed
flow
of
bicycles
into
and
out
of
the
site.
So
you
can
see
there's
an
exit
on
to
26th
street,
it
kind
of
ju
the
bike,
the
flow
of
bicycle
traffic
through
the
site.
A
They
anticipate
sort
of
weaves
around
here
and
goes
to
some
bike.
Storage.
That's
in
the
northeast
corner
of
the
site
located.
Actually,
I
think,
in
the
parking
ramp,
anticipating
bicycles,
will
flow
sort
of
through
the
parking
ramp
to
get
to
the
midtown
greenway
on
when
they're
accessing
from
the
east
side
of
the
site.
A
And
then
you
can
also
see
down
in
the
southern
portion
near
28th
street,
anticipating
that
people
are
going
to
be
exiting
to
the
west
and
sort
of
looping
back
around
the
corner
to
get
to
the
greenway.
So
that's
how
they
anticipate
their
planning
for
bikes
to
circulate
through
the
site.
A
I
think
it's
also
useful
to
see
this
is
this
map
here
is
exactly
the
same
map,
but
with
walking
and
vehicle
overlay
on
flow.
So
you
can
see
there
are
a
number
of
spaces
where,
especially
as
bikes
are
exiting
through
the
north
side
and
and
exiting
through
the
south
side,
there's
some
they
plan
for
bikes
and
vehicles
to
be
running
along
the
same
pathway.
A
So
this
this
maintenance
facility
is
going
to
have
quite
a
few
hundred
vehicles
on
it.
We'll
get
into
the
specifics
of
how
many
vehicles
later,
but
the
the
two
primary
purposes
of
the
of
the
facility
are
going
to
be
to
have
maintenance
vehicles
and
equipment,
and
then
there's
also
going
to
be
some
water
processing
happening
on
the
site.
So
there's
going
to
be
quite
a
lot
of
traffic,
and
this
flow
of
vehicles
through
the
site
is
really
important,
not
only
for
people
commuting
to
the
site.
A
One
of
the
things
that
is
probably
of
particular
interest
to
this
group
is
the
fact
that
they're
proposing
a
one
block,
two-way
off-street
bike,
trail
along
the
southern
portion
of
the
site
on
28th.
A
So
again
you
can
see
here
on
the
right
side.
There's
the
midtown
greenway
in
this
running
from
sort
of
horizontal
horizontally
across
you
can
see
some
of
the
existing
bikeways.
So
there's
a
dotted
line,
there's
a
one-way
on-street
bike
lane
there
that
has
bollards
for
three
quarters
of
the
year
until
they
get
knocked
down
in
the
winter,
and
then
that
connects
to
an
off-street
bike
trail
here.
A
If
folks
have
ridden
the
greenway,
that's
sort
of
you
either
have
the
option
to
to
cross
28th
and
go
straight
stay
on
the
greenway
and
go
up
the
sabo
bridge
or
continue
on
that
bike
trail.
That
leads
you
directly
to
hiawatha,
where
you,
where
you
cross
at
at
the
same
level
as
the
rest
of
the
traffic,
so
there's
that
proposed
bike
path,
I'll
walk
through
what
they're
proposing
for
options
and
they're
pretty
similar.
A
I
think
I
want
page
81,
so
this
is
a
view
of
of
what
they're
proposing
for
the
bike
trail.
So
this
is
a
bike
lane
option
one.
So
you
can
see
here
it
has
a
four
foot
boulevard,
a
six
foot
sidewalk
a
three
foot
buffer
between
the
the
sidewalk
and
the
bike
trail
and
then
has
a
bike
trail
next
to
the
building.
A
A
The
other
option
is
solve
flip
to
bike
lane
option
two,
which
is
basically
the
same
option
except
the.
So
all
of
the
the
widths
are
all
the
same.
It's
still
a
six
foot,
sidewalk
still
a
seven
and
a
half
foot
trail,
but
instead
of
having
the
sidewalk
portion
be
adjacent
to
the
street,
the
sidewalk
portion
is
adjacent
to
the
building
and
the
bike
trail
is
adjacent
to
the
street
in
terms
of
how
that
looks
in
practice.
A
So
now
we're
going
to
flip
to
an
overhead
view.
So
this
is
option
one
with
the
bike
lane
closer
to
the
building,
and
you
can
see
here.
So
it
has
a
number
of
spots
where
the
where
the
bike
lane
takes
a
pause
because
of
vehicle.
Well,
it
doesn't
exactly
take
a
pause.
I
don't
know
quite
how
to
describe
it,
but
it
doesn't.
The
paving
doesn't
go
all
the
way
through
because
there
are
stairs
and
entrances
into
the
building.
A
It
also
has,
on
this
west
ham
side
a
little
bit
of
an
odd
truncation
in
which
I'm
unclear
why.
A
It
looks
like
that,
because
now
I'll
flip
to
this
second
option,
where
you
can
see
now,
the
bike
facility
is
closer
to
the
street
and
the
sidewalk
is
adjacent
to
the
building,
and
you
can
see
it's
a
seems
to
be
a
lot
smoother
in
terms
of
experience,
because
the
they're
not
taking
pauses
in
in
the
process
to
make
space
for
the
the
the
building
entrances
because
there's
already
sidewalk
there
and
then
it
seems
to
have
a
much
clearer
way
to
access
the
street
on
the
end.
A
It's
not
truncated,
quite
so
awkwardly
on
that
west
side.
It
looks
like
it
just
goes
into
a
cur
into
a
wide
one
of
those
really
wide
curb
cuts.
A
So
those
are
the
two
proposed
bike
paths
for
that
one
block
segment:
the
the
stated
purpose
of
the
bike
path,
obviously
they're
having
they
have
bike
parking
inside
the
facility
here,
and
so
I'm
gonna
go
back
to
this
map,
which
is
the
the
big
picture
map,
because
the
exit
right
is
on
this
west
hand,
side
it
seems
like
the
proposed
bike
facility
is
an
attempt
to
make
sure
that
folks
who
are
sort
of
looping
around
don't
have
to
cross
28th
street
to
get
to
the
bike
facility
on
the
other
side
of
the
street
and
then
to
to
get
to
the
greenway.
A
It
seems
unlikely
that
people
would
do
that.
Everyone
would
probably
just
ride
on
the
sidewalk.
So
it
seems
like
a
good
addition
that
they're
actually
putting
in
some
bike
facilities
there
I'm
going
to
take
a
quick
pause,
there's
some
other
things
in
terms
of
bike
parking
and
bike
racks,
some
of
the
overall
parking
situation
in
use
on
the
site.
But
I
wanted
to
pause
here
to
see
if
folks
had
any
questions
specifically
about
the
proposed
bike
facility.
Since
I
imagine
that
that's
something
we'll
want
to
comment
on.
A
And
I
can't
currently
see
the
chat,
so
I
would
be
relying
on
either
philip
or
matthew
to
call
and
raise
hands.
F
Question
yeah.
Thank
you.
Actually,
I
was
just
jumping
to
the
the
first
thing
that
caught
my
picture
in
this
schematic
was
the
the
parking
ramp
and
it
looked
like
it
was
a
sloped
parking
ramp
and
that
always
raises
a
red
flag
for
me,
because
in
20
25
30
years,
are
we
going
to
need
this
entire
facility
for
parking?
Although,
if
it's
an
increase
of
what
is
now
a
surface
lot
for
maintenance
vehicles,
maybe
it's
always
going
to
be
for
city
of
minneapolis
vehicles,
but
it's
it.
F
It
makes
the
facility
less
adaptable
for
other
uses
other
than
parking
so
that
that
doesn't
relate
to
biking.
It
just
relates
to
locking
in
facilities
for
cars,
which
is
a
problem.
A
Yeah
and
I
will
definitely
touch
more
on
some
of
the
parking
situation
later
in
the
presentation.
I
have
a
few
thoughts
on
that
as
well.
G
I
think
one
of
the
kind
of
questions
I
have-
and
I
know
you'd
probably
not
be
able
to
answer
this
right
now,
because
you're
not
from
the
city
but
like
it
seems
like
the
the
second
option,
is
probably
going
to
be
like
the
preferable
option,
except
that,
like
the
sidewalk
immediately
adjacent
to
the
site
to
the
east,
would
need
to
kind
of
be
aligned
a
little
bit
better
coming
into
this
site.
G
So
if
you
had
this
option,
it
seems
like
the
the
sidewalk
to
the
east
would
need
to
be
kind
of
shifted
up
a
little
bit.
At
least
you
know,
transition
up
that
way,
and
I
don't
know
I'm
wondering
at
least
a
question
for
the
city
would
be
is:
would
that
still
be
on
the
table?
Can
can
they
adjust
that
sidewalk
further
to
the
east,
or
is
it
only
like
what
they're
showing
what
they
can
do.
A
Yeah,
I
think
that's
a
great
question
and
here's
one
of
those
like
my
new
details
so
later
in
the
in
this
thing,
they
meant
make
mention
of
the
fact
that
the
midtown
greenway
trail
will
potentially
need
to
be
realigned
during
project
construction.
A
So
obviously
they're
going
to
be
touching
things
to
the
east
of
the
project
boundary,
and
I
think
it
would
be
very
reasonable
to
ask
them
to
align
the
sidewalk
as
they're
moving
other
things
around
yeah.
That
makes
sense.
R
I
have
a
quick
question,
so
this
site
design
has
been
adopted
like
there
isn't
going
to
be
any
other
change
to
the
site
plan.
As
far
as
we
know,.
A
Yeah,
that's
a
great
question,
so
I
think
it
that
could
be
the
case.
There
are
a
couple
things
that
are
happening
right
now,
so
this
environmental
review
process
is
open
for
right.
Things
are
open
for
public
comment.
One
of
the
things
that's
particular
to
this.
This
point
in
this
environmental
review
process
is
that
the
city
has
to
respond
to
all
the
public
comments
that
are
submitted
on
the
project
and
if
they
commit
to
doing
something
in
responding
to
those
comments,
they
will
have
to
do
it.
A
So
this
is
a
nice
leverage
point
there.
The
project
also
is
gonna
have
to
go
through,
like
the
planning,
commission
and
probably
a
couple
other
points
before
it
gets
to
final
approval.
So
I
think
there
are
a
number
of
places
in
which
there
might
be
some
opportunities
for
change,
but
this
is.
This
is
a
good.
R
Yes,
I
was
just
wondering
how
much
latitude
there
might
be
for
something
to
change.
I'm
also
familiar
with
some
of
the
work
that
epic
has
done
over
the
last
five
years
to
try
to
have
something
different
proposed
for
the
site
and
I'm
just
curious
to
see
what
they're
continuing
to
do
around
around
the
site
in
terms
of
organizing
so.
A
Yeah,
so
I'm
aware
that
the
minnesota
center
for
environmental
advocacy
mcea
is
currently
partnering
with
epic
to
do
turnout
in
the
neighborhood
mcea's
goal-
maybe
not
gold,
that's
probably
too
strong,
but
they
are
approaching
their
advocacy
from
a
framework
of
is.
It
is
still
potentially
possible
to
halt
the
entire
project.
A
N
Yeah
just
some
background
question
and
it's
okay,
if
no
one
knows,
but
I
was
wondering
where
all
these
people
staffed
currently
in
these
public
works
department
currently,
and
why
are
they
moving
here.
A
Yeah-
that
is
a
great
question,
so
there
are
two
other
sites.
So
let
me
let
me
see
if
I
can
come,
I
don't
think
I
can
flip
back
to
the
page
right
now,
but
there's
sort
of
the
like.
I
said
the
north
half
of
the
site,
where
there's
already
some
public
works
staff
and
and
that's
already
a
public
works
facility,
it's
the
roof
depot
half,
that's
really
the
the
expansion
and
obviously
they're
doing
some
development
across
the
north
and
south
parts
of
the
site.
A
They
are
relocating
a
water
treatment
facility
that
I
believe
is
located
in
fridley
and
then
a
maintenance
facility.
That's
in
northeast
in
in
particular,
it
sounds
like
the
water
treatment
facility,
like
needs
to
be
expanded
and
there's
just
not
enough
footprint
to
do.
It
is
the
messaging
I've
seen
from
the
city,
I'm
a
little
less
clear
on
why
they're
relocating
the
maintenance
vehicles
and
the
maintenance
operations
from
northeast.
A
A
F
A
Yeah,
I
have
a
little
bit
more
to
present
we're
probably
two-thirds
two-thirds
of
the
way
through.
I
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
parking
situation,
and
then
I
do
have
a
draft
resolution
for
us
to
consider
on
sort
of
the
project
as
a
whole,
and
I
think
then
also
would
be
interested
in
sort
of
a
separate
resolution
just
on
the
bike
facility
portion
of
it.
H
A
A
So
those
those
spaces
are
allocated.
There's
some
fleet
vehicles
that
are
going
to
be
parked
indoors,
but
it
is
about
half,
are
going
to
be
in
the
parking
ramp
and
then
about
half
are
going
to
be
surface
parking,
so
there's
currently
a
three-story
parking
ramp
proposed
and
also
just
as
much
parking
proposed
as
surface
parking.
A
So
I
think
that's
something
to
note
they
anticipate
a
lot
of
the
trips
in
and
out
of
the
the
site
will
be
about.
Half
of
them
will
be
employee
vehicles.
So
I
think
that's
that's
noteworthy.
A
A
So
we
can.
We
can
talk
about
that
further,
but
generally,
when
you
build
a
parking
ramp,
it
you're
trying
to
eliminate
parking,
and
it
would
be
a
great
opportunity
to
maybe
then
repurpose
a
lot
of
the
you
know:
land
use
of
the
site
for
other
things,
rather
than
having
both
a
giant
parking
ramp
and
a
lot
of
surface
parking.
A
One
other
thing
I
wanted
to
touch
on
so
right
on
the
screen.
Now
is
just
a
list
of
what
they're
calling
complete
streets
and
vision,
zero,
brainstorm
ideas,
and
we
don't
have
time
to
go
into
these
in
detail.
So
here's
like
there's
here's
a
page,
there's
a
second
page,
there's
a
third
page,
there's
a
fourth
page.
A
A
lot
of
these
things
are
really
great.
They
involve
things
like
removing
slip,
turns
and
near.
You
know
narrowing
lanes,
there's
a
a
proposed
potential
road
diet
for
the
26th
and
28th
streets
to
go
to
do
a
four
to
three
lane
or
a
four
to
two
lane
conversion.
A
A
One
thing
I
I
wanted
to
note
that
we
may
want
to
consider
having
a
discussion
on
at
a
sub-committee
meeting
potentially
engineering.
They
make
reference
to
the
hennepin
county,
cedar,
avenue,
test
project
that
started
this
past
fall.
They
basically
took
two
of
the
lanes
and
and
tried
to
remove
vehicle
traffic
from
them,
and
it's
made
there's
some
room
for
improvement
in
the
in
that
there's.
It
intersects
pretty
closely
with
the
24th
street
and
26th
street
bike
lanes
and
has
made
some
things
pretty
unpredictable
and
dangerous.
A
So
that
may
be
something
we
want
to
comment
on
at
the
committee
level
separate
from
this
project
as
a
whole.
A
So
the
last
thing
I
will
highlight
before
bringing
in
motion
is
some
of
the
the
mode
split
goals
for
the
site,
so
this
is
specific
to
the
employees
commuting
to
the
site.
This
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
fleet
vehicles
on
the
site,
and
so
these
are.
This
is
a
table
of
mold
split
goals
where
it
says
you
know
how
are
employees
getting
here?
Are
they
walking
biking
taking
transit
using
some
other?
A
You
know
thing
like
remote
working
or
are
they
taking
a
single
occupancy
vehicle,
and
I
want
to
know
that
for
the
current
site,
it's
about
90.
So
it's
pretty
bad
nine
out
of
nine
out
of
ten
people
drive
to
the
site
and
the
site
specific
goal,
which
is
for
reducing
that
is
66
right.
So
they're
saying
we're
going
to
go
from
having
nine
of
every
10
people
commuting
by
themselves
in
a
car
to
the
site
and
we're
going
to
have
that
be
two
of
every
three
people
right.
A
So
it's
an
improvement,
but
it
is
not,
as
you
can
see
in
the
last
column,
in
the
table
anywhere
close
to
the
citywide
2030
mode
split
goal
for
trips
right.
So
they're
they're,
anticipating
they'll,
have
you
know
maybe
10
of
people
taking
transit
between
remote
options,
walking
biking,
another
20-ish
percent
of
people
using
sustainable
transportation
and
then
still
two-thirds
of
the
people
using
the
site
are
are
going
to
be
taking
cars
and
that
needs
to
look
more
than
the
opposite
way.
It
needs
to.
A
You
know
the
the
citywide
goal
is
that
we
have
20
percent
of
people
in
no
more
than
20
of
people
using
a
single
occupancy
vehicle
trips
by
2030.
This
site
is
going
to
be
operational
by
2025..
A
They've
outlined
a
lot
of
really
great
what
are
called
transit
demand
management
strategies,
so
behavior
change
strategies
to
get
folks
to
shift
to
their
behavior
as
best
they
can,
and
we
know
that
parking
is
an
incredible
incentive
for
driving,
and
so
you
know,
they're
going
to
have
five
years
to
make
up
quite
a
bit
of
ground
and
there's
not
a
clear
pathway
in
this
plan
for
how
to
do
that.
What
they've
committed
to
is
taking
an
annual
doing
an
annual
survey
of
employee
commuter
habits
and
working
on
it.
Basically.
A
N
Question
I
was
wondering
I'm
just
assuming
that
the
car
parking
is
free,
but
I
just
want
to
have
a
confirmation
also.
A
Yeah,
I
could
not
find
any
reference
to
paid
parking
in
this
document.
It
is
possible
that
I
missed
it
because
it's
1100
pages,
but
I
did
not
see
any
reference
to
paid
parking.
That
is
one
strategy
that
could
be
used
to
actually
disincentivize
people
from
driving
once
the
parking
is
built.
I
do
think
there
are
some
philosophical
challenges
with
using
taxpayer
money
to
build
a
parking
ramp
that
we
then
plan
to
not
use
because
parking
ramps
are
very
expensive.
F
I
I
would
also
add
that,
if,
if
monthly,
if
the
issue
of
a
monthly
contract
is
being
discussed,
monthly
contracts
are
also
just
such
an
incentive
for
oh
well,
I've
paid
for
the
whole
month.
Why
should
I
bike
bus?
You
know
get
a
ride,
walk,
but
yeah
1100
pages,
I'm
sure
you
missed,
may
have
missed
that.
Let's
see
john,
we
have
a
hand.
F
H
Was
just
wanting
to
to
comment
about
the
you
know,
the
parking
ramp
itself
and
the
fact
that
I
don't
know
what
the
cost
is
per
per
space,
but
it
averages
around
twenty
to
thirty
thousand
dollars,
which
is
definitely
not
a
cheap
thing
with
the
infrastructure,
the
the
biking,
infrastructure
that
is
right,
adjacent
and
funneling,
really
throughout
the
the
city
and
then
plus
the
walkability
of
that
particular
area.
H
Wow.
I'm
just
amazed
that
those
that
two
percent
and
five
percent
is
as
low
as
it
is
not
to
mention
the
access
to
to
the
blue
line,
which
is
a
block
and
a
half
away.
A
Yeah,
that's
a
that's
a
great
point:
it's
not
only
the
blue
line,
but
the
future
bee
line,
I
think,
will
be
operational
by
2025
if
not
soon
after
2025..
So
yes,
I
would
agree.
These
all
feel,
and
you
know
the
greenway
is
our
premier
bike
facility
as
a
city,
it
does
feel
quite
low.
F
Let's
see
cadence
and
then
brie.
R
Yeah
so
also,
similarly
like
when
I
have
attended
epic
events
or
read
through
the
materials
and
try
to
get
a
sense
of
how
many
employees
currently
like
current
employees,
actually
live
within
the
surrounding
neighborhood,
because
I
it's
it's
a
big
ask
to
ask
people
who
are
driving
from
maplewood
or
white
bear
lake
to
bike
like
we're,
just
not
going
to
get
those
employees
who
live
outside
of
minneapolis
to
bike
here
and
transit
really
isn't
an
option
from
some
of
those
more
remote
spots.
R
So
I
understand
that
there
just
aren't
a
ton
of
employees
that
currently
live
within
a
walkable
or
bikable
distance
of
this
facility
and
also
considering
the
hours
that
people
might
be
working.
You
know
if
your
shift
ends
at
2
a.m.
I
think
you're
less
likely
to
to
bike
commute
or
to
walk,
particularly
if
it's
colder
or
you
need
someone
to
come
pick
you
up,
and
you
can't,
because
most
of
people
that
you
know
in
your
life
are
asleep.
R
So
I
know
that
these
initial
employee
commuting
goals
are
really
disappointing,
but
I
think
they're
also
like
overly
ambitious
for,
like
the
employee
pool
that
they
have,
and
so
I
know
that
that's
also
been
part
of
the
conversation
is,
if
you're
going
to
build
this
facility
and
put
it
in
this
neighborhood,
you
need
to
employ
people
who
actually
live
in
the
neighborhood
so
that
they
don't
have
to
drive
to
work,
but
I'm
not
sure
where
that
conversation
stands
now.
R
I
think
that's
important
to
note
in
any
resolution
that
it
you
can't
ask
people
who
won't
be
able
to
bike
here
based
on
geographic
distance
to
bike
here.
So
that's
just
one
consideration.
There.
A
Yeah
and
cadence
looks
really
great,
so
I
mentioned
that
public-facing
training
facility.
One
thing
they
particularly
call
out
is
that
they
expect
a
number
of
employees
on
this
site
like
a
large
number
of
employees
on
the
site
to
be
retiring
in
coming
years,
and
so
they
do
have
that
job
recruitment
that
training
center.
That's
you
know
the
stated
goal
of
it
is
to
do
that
recruitment
and
be
hiring
people
who
do
live
in
the
neighborhood.
A
So
I
think
that's
you
know
as
a
stated
goal.
That's
good
context
for
us.
The
other
thing
I
will
say
I
was
paging.
I
was
trying
to
page
through
really
quick,
but
I
cannot
find
it.
They
have
a
an
hour
by
hour
flow
in
flow
out
of
traffic
to
the
facility,
and
it
looks
like
based
on
when
they're,
anticipating
everyone
to
write.
Excuse
me,
everyone
arriving
and
everyone
leaving
everyone's
gonna
be
working
not
necessarily
nine
to
five
but
like
daytime
hours.
F
N
Yeah
I
I
just
feel
that
it
is
a
really
odd
place
to
put
a
facility
that
large
near
one
of
the
pre-eminent
bike
facilities
of
disabled
bridge
and
making
that
area
less
bike
friendly,
even
when
they
add
the
bike
infrastructure
just
because
of
the
amount
of
vehicles
traffic
going
through
that
neighborhood
at
all
the
times
of
the
day
yeah.
It
doesn't
make
sense
to
me
and
that's
my
comment.
W
The
site's
been
there
a
long
time
and
in
fact,
what
they
did
is
they
got
rid
of
some
other
uses
on
the
site
that
were
not
so
clean
and
then
put
this
particular
facility
on
it
and
they
went
through
a
great
deal
of
trouble
to
try
to
make
it.
You
know
sustainable
at
least
and
but
at
that
time,
even
10
years
ago
they
were
eyeing
the
site
next
door
to
do
the
final
consolidation
of
all
of
all
of
their
people,
and
these
are
not
remote
people
for
the
most
part.
These
are.
W
These
are
hands-on
kind
of
people.
I
guess
my
question
really
is,
and
you
went
through.
You
went
through
the
the
parking
spaces
kind
of
quickly.
Why?
I
guess
to
to
think
about
what
they
should
be
doing,
then
they
should
be
providing
just
enough
parking
spaces
for
their
fleet
and
then
to
take
our
to
take
their
goals
and
say
well,
then,
what
what?
How
many
parking
spaces
then
remain?
W
I
was
a
little
confused
too
why
they
would
have
the
the
the
covered
parking
as
well
as
the
uncovered
parking.
Their
current
uncovered
parking
by
the
way
is
on
is
actually
on
impervious
surface
as
part
of
their
sustainability
efforts
when
they
first
built
it,
but
it
would
be
nice
to
know
whether
they
have
actually
worked
through
the
formula
that
says
I
need
this
many
parking
spaces
only
for
my
fleet
and
this
many
for
my
employees.
If
I
make
these
general
assumptions
and
then
that
would
be
the
what
they
would
propose.
A
A
I
have
prepared
a
draft
resolution.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
share
my
screen
again,
and
obviously
this
doesn't
include
any
of
the
comments
that
you
all
just
provided.
This
was
just
an
attempt
at
a
first
draft.
Like
I
said
this,
doesn't
this
doesn't
address
the
specifics
about
the
one
block
long
bike
facility
on
28th?
A
A
Additionally,
many
of
the
items
listed
on
table
c2-
that's
that
table
I
scrolled
through
really
fast,
would
provide
significant
improvements
to
vehicle-related
safety
for
people
walking,
biking
and
rolling
in
the
neighborhood.
However,
the
increased
levels
of
traffic
at
the
site
will
create
additional
conflicts
between
people
driving
and
people
walking
and
biking.
These
additional
conflicts
will
undermine
these
improvements.
A
A
While
significant
efforts
have
been
made
to
constrain
parking
on
the
site,
parking
garages
and
surface
parking
provide
sustained
incentives
to
drive
once
built.
It
is
unlikely.
Any
additional
tdm
strategies
will
succeed
at
the
necessary
scale,
given
the
site's
use
of
parking
and
even
a
future
tdm
strategies
such
as
increased
parking
fees,
are
successful
that
will
leave
the
site
with
unused
parking
infrastructure
financed
by
taxpayers.
A
Similarly,
it
is
discouraging
to
see
the
widespread
use
of
surface
parking
alongside
a
parking
ramp.
If
a
parking
ramp
of
any
size
must
be
built,
surface
parking
should
be
extremely
limited
or
eliminated,
given
the
site's
location
near
the
metro,
blue
line
and
future
beeline
brt,
as
well
as
adjacency
to
the
midtown
greenway.
As
the
city's
premier
bike
facility,
the
site
should
plan
to
reduce
its
parking
facilities
to
the
point
that
commuter
patterns
align
with
citywide
mode
split
goals
and
further
increase
facilities
and
incentives
for
walking
biking
and
transit.
E
G
Do
we
have
a
preference,
for
there
was
two
options
for
the
bike
facilities
on
the
south
part?
Do
we
have
a
preference
for
which
side
the
bike
facility
should
be
on
compared
to
where
the
sidewalk
is.
W
Yeah,
could
we
invent
an
option
yeah?
Could
we
amend
bullet
2
to
include
that
we
favor
option
two.
F
And
that's
that's
the
bicycle
bicycles
closest
to
the
to
the
travel
lanes.
Traveling.
G
A
Does
that
cover
it?
So
it's
changing.
G
The
city
it
should
be,
the
city
should
align
the
existing
sidewalk
with
the
new
sidewalk.
A
Okay,
yes,
so
now
bullet
two
reads:
the
addition
of
a
trail
on
the
southern
edge
of
the
site
along
the
north
side
of
28th
street,
to
facilitate
access
to
the
neighborhood
into
the
midtown
green
may,
with
bike
trail
option
two
as
the
preferred
option,
the
city
should
align
existing
the
existing
sidewalk
to
the
east,
with
the
new
sidewalk.
F
All
right
any
other
comments
before
we
sounds
like
we
should,
because
we're
submitting
this
before
the
march
11th
comment
period,
which
is
before
any
other
bc
subcommittee's
meet.
So
let's
see
matthew,
hi.
S
Yeah
and
first
I
wanted
to
say
thank
you
to
alyssa
for
and
the
rest
of
the
subcommittee
for
going
through
all
the
work
of
reviewing
the
plan
and
coming
up
with
this
motion,
I
have
a
pretty
strong
preference.
I
guess
I'd
say
for
surface
parking
over
structured
parking,
not
because
surface
parking
is,
is
beautiful
or
wonderful,
but
because
structured
parking
is
such
a
massive
investment
that
it's
extremely
rare
and
infrequent
for
structured
parking
to
get
repurposed
for
anything
else.
S
Whereas
surface
parking
lots
are
often,
you
know,
turned
into
housing
or
turned
into
other
other
useful
uses.
So
I
think
we
may
want
to
make
some
kind
of
comment
that
if
there's
any
way
to
accommodate
the
parking
without
a
parking
structure,
that
would
be
preferred.
S
Not
least
because
you
know
the
optics
of
investing,
you
know
many
many
millions
of
dollars
in
a
parking
ramp
right
next
to
the
sabo
bridge
is
really
odd
as
well.
It
just
makes
a
very
strange
statement,
I
think,
about
the
city's
priorities.
So
that's
that's
my
comment.
I'm
not
sure
if
there's
an
easy
way
to
adjust,
adjust
the
language
to
accommodate
that.
G
F
G
Have
any
language
for
parking
ramps.
G
I
E
G
F
And
does
the
city's
transportation
demand
management
policies
talk
about
trying
to
avoid
monthly
parking
contracts
because
those
those
really
those
really
lock
people
into
driving
all
the
time,
even
if
they
want
a
bike?
It's
like.
Oh
I've,
already
paid,
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
drive.
If
not,
that
maybe
is
a
future
discussion.
A
Yeah,
I
was
going
to
say
I
don't
know,
and
I
also
am
aware
that
the
tdm
ordinance
is
under
review.
So
that
would
be
a
great
thing
to
discuss
at
a
subcommittee
meeting
matthew.
I
changed.
So
there
was
the
sentence
about
not
having
surface
parking
and
a
parking
ramp.
So
I
that
now
reads.
Similarly,
it
is
discouraging
to
see
the
widespread
use
of
circuit
surface.
Sorry,
I'm
going
to
get
rid
of
the
word
widespread.
A
F
Excellent
okay,
so
as
a
as
amended
moved
and
seconded,
we
have
we
have
this
resolution
to
submit.
Are
we
ready
to
call
the
call
the
roll.
F
Okay,
millicent,
okay,.
B
H
B
Hi
bri,
hi
and
booty.
C
I
E
E
B
B
B
U
G
E
B
N
E
C
B
B
I
K
F
All
right
the
motion
passes
and
thank
you
alyssa
for
this
thousand
page
speed
read
and
your
rather
thorough
resolution
here
brought
up.
F
A
Yeah,
so
I
will
go
through
the
5e
subcommittee
report
very
quickly.
It
should
only
take
a
few
minutes.
We
didn't
have
any
actions.
We
covered
three
things.
We
talked
a
little
bit
about
the
capital
improvement
program,
also
known
as
the
cip.
A
We
got
a
year-end
review
from
of
the
bicycle
advisory
committee's
work
from
last
year
from
chris,
and
then
we
did
some
orient
orientation
stuff
and
reviewed
some
key
documents,
so
the
notes
are
pretty
thorough.
I
think
what
I
would
say
about
the
capital
improvement
program
discussion
is
that
it
was
pretty
high
level
and
introductory
mike.
A
The
staffer
who
came
to
give
the
presentation
is
going
to
be
joining
us
again
relatively
soon
to
talk
about
the
plans
for
the
the
next
cip
cycle,
and
so
he
was
really
looking
to
get
comments
and
questions
in
preparation
for
that
more
detailed
visit.
So
that
will
be
exciting
to
see
in
the
coming
months.
V
Alyssa,
can
I
jump
in
on
that
as
well?
Hey.
This
is
chris,
so
I
did
just
want
to
put
in
a
plug
for
the
5e
meeting
this
coming
tuesday.
I
think
that's
going
to
be
where
the
bulk
of
the
work
for
this
upcoming
cip
resolution
is
done.
So
please,
if
you
have
ideas
for
what
you
want,
that
resolution
to
look
like
and
what
you
want
to
be
in
our
cip.
A
Thanks
chris
yeah,
the
other
two
things
so
the
bac
year-end
review
and
the
key
documents
review,
there's
links
to
all
that
stuff
in
the
meeting
notes.
A
So
if
you
didn't
have
a
chance
to
attend,
please
take
a
look
at
some
of
those
chris
put
together
a
great
presentation
with
pictures
of
some
of
the
projects
that
happened
in
2020
and
then
those
resources
that
chris
covered
are
really
useful.
Context
to
you
know
be
referring
back
to
and
are
things
that
the
committee
refers
to,
often
even
in
the
last
resolution.
You
know
somebody
mentioned
the
transportation
action
plan
right,
so
that
was
one
of
the
documents
we
went
over.
A
I
don't
know
that
the
subcommittee
notes
are
on
the
limbs
attachment
for
this
meeting.
You
should
have
gotten
them
underneath
at
the
very
bottom
of
the
email
and
then,
if
you
go
back
to
the
subcommittee
meeting,
I
believe
they
eventually
get
attached
and
limbs.
A
Yeah
so
there's
like
the
body
of
the
email
where
there's
like
the
button
that
says
like
view
the
agenda
for
the
meeting
and
if
you
scroll.
A
A
T
Okay,
millicent,
if
you
could
put
up
the
near
north,
safe
routes
to
school
project
materials
that
were
presented
at
the
subcommittee
and
we'll
scroll
just
to
the
basic
layout
of
it.
T
This
was
presented
by
forrest,
hardy
who's,
the
city
contact,
it's
a
project
that
will
be
going
along,
16th
avenue
north
from
queen
avenue
north
to
aldrich.
So
it's
an
east
west
route
and
it
will
be
the
planned
construction
is
for
summer
of
2022.
T
It's
it's
a
bike,
boulevard
on
the
all
ages
and
abilities
network,
and
it
is
connected.
It
connects
three
different
schools,
so
it's
that
might
be
the
reason
for
the
naming
of
it
as
well
as
the
funding
for
it.
What
was
presented-
and
I
apologize
it's
it's
a
little
difficult
to
get
all
this
stuff
going
up
at
the
same
time.
T
But
what
what
was
presented
to
the
group
were
was
the
existing
conditions
and
then
three
options
of
different
layouts
that
might
include
things
from
traffic
circles
to
an
extension
sort
of
a
a
grassy
connection
to
there
we
go
so
if
we
can
keep
on.
I
think
it's
after
this
millicent
yep
keep
going
keep
going,
and
this
is
also
online
for
you
on
the
limb
site.
If
you
want
to
go
through
and
review
more
deeply
and
if
you
just
stop
for
a
second
go
back
to
the
original
concept.
T
One
one
up
beyond
that:
there
we
go
so
that's
what
it
looks
like
today
and
that's
the
rough
layout
to
the
left
is
queen
is
is
basically
queen
the
north
south
route
and
to
the
right
side.
The
north
south
route
is
aldrich
and
you
will
notice
the
the
dark
brown
features
being
schools
that
exist
now
and
one
that
is
vacant
in
ward
hay.
T
T
T
Let's
see
is
that
emerson
there
I
think,
which
is
a
busy
street
and
then
the
third
option
is.
T
If
you
look
in
the
middle
just
to
the
south
of
north
commons
park,
you'll
see
a
little
sort
of
solid
green
area
that
would
kind
of
flow
into
the
the
streets
section.
T
Now
these
are
three
options
and
this
project's
at
15
review.
So
it's
very
early
on
they
are
likely
to
take
elements
of
all
three
of
these
and
kind
of
combine
them
after
they've.
They
are
an
active
with
the
community
now
to
get
their
feedback
and
they
will.
They
will
be
coming
up
with
the
design.
T
We
we
were
asked
if
we
could,
if
we
would
do
a
resolution
on
this,
and
there
was
some
comfort
uncomfort
level
that
that
this
might
be
the
final
time
we
see
this
document
at
15.
So
the
group
sort
of
agreed
that
it'd
be
nice
to
have
them,
come
back
and
see
more
detailed
plans
as
to
what
actually
is
going
to
come
about
to
that
effect.
T
We
had
an
action-
and
I
guess
before
I
read
that,
is
there
anybody
from
the
engineering
group
that
would
like
to
add
anything
that
I
may
have
missed
in
that
brief
discussion.
T
Okay,
so
if
not,
this
is
the
the
draft
resolution
that
the
group
came
up
with
and
matthew.
Hendricks
went
away
and
sort
of
fine-tuned
for
us,
and
I
will
read
that
now
it
is
the
minneapolis
bicycle
advisory
committee
is
generally
supportive
of
the
near
north,
safe
routes
to
school
project.
T
We
are
especially
supportive
of
the
diverter
that
would
connect
the
north
high
school
campus
to
north
commons
park.
Two.
We
encourage
the
city
to
design
and
install
helpful
wayfinding
signage
on
this
facility,
concurrent
with
primary
construction
and
three.
We
request
that
public
work
staff
bring
the
project
back
to
the
bac
after
the
project
has
been
narrowed
down
to
a
single
concept,
but
before
the
design
has
been
finalized.
T
So
if
I
could
get
a
second
on
that,
we'll
have
some
discussion.
T
Okay,
thank
you,
phillip.
All
right
any
comments,
sir
con,
that
people
would
like
to
raise.
I
will
be
looking
at
the
at
the
participants.
Things
for
hand
raised
or
you
can
just
come
out,
and
I
see
one
up
but
where
they
are,
is
I
somebody
has
their
hand?
Oh
here
we
go
okay.
How
about
jamie
neldner.
U
Hey
there,
thank
you,
so
I
shared
my
concern
last
week
with
the
subcommittee
I
was
at
that
meeting
and
it's
a
really
really
great
proposal
and
project
we
have
cons.
Oh
I
shouldn't
specify
I'm
the
park
board
staff
rep.
There
is
considerable
issue
with
people
speeding
and
running
stop
signs
in
their
automobiles
around
north
commons
park
consistently,
and
so
I
am
in
huge
support
of
anything
to
diminish,
speed
around
that
particular
property.
U
However,
the
thing
that
makes
me
pause
a
bit
is
the
diverter
idea
that
I
know
people
were
really
excited
about
and
it
is
really
cool,
but
I
think
there
need
to
be
some
really
important
discussions
with
the
park
board
with
school
board
and
with
emergency
services
before
we
make
it
just
feels
like
we
should
be
privy
to
those
conversations
and
outcomes
before
we
make
a
decision
on
that.
As
a
committee.
P
P
You
know
somebody
on
the
admin
that
said
they
really
were
not
in
favor
of
a
diverter
at
their
school.
So
I'm
not
sure
if
more
engagement
needs
to
be
done
on
that
on
that
particular
topic.
If
I'm
ready
to
say
that
I
would
support
that.
P
P
Just
really
felt
unsafe
with
personal
safety
and
talked
about
guns
and
gang
violence
and
slow
cars,
and
men
in
cars
was
another
when
a
car
pulls
up
on
you,
and
I
don't
know,
if
there's
any
way
that
we
could
ask
in
this
resolution,
just
at
the
city
just
investigate
that
connection
between
the
built
environment
and
personal
safety
and
be
able
to
articulate
that,
with
with
some
of
the
suggestions
that
they're
making
for
the
area,
street
lighting
probably
comes
to
mind
as
as
something
that
that
might
be
helpful.
P
But
I
just
I
just
would
imagine
that.
That's
something
that
you
planner
people
study
like
how.
How
can
a
I
don't
know
the
way
that
you
can
change
a
road,
how
you
can
make
that
both
be
more
safe
and
feel
more
safe
for
those
who
are
using.
T
S
Yeah
I
want
to
first
of
all
say
I
think
the
points
from
the
previous
two
speakers
are
are
really
well
put
and
well
taken.
I
I
still
think
it
may
make
sense
for
us
to
support
the
diverter
for
a
couple
reasons
one
is
while
I
don't
think
it
would
completely
solve
some
of
the
personal
safety
issues
that
jenny
mentioned.
S
I
think
it
could
have
a
a
positive
contribution
to
that,
because
if
it's
harder
for
people
to
you
know
drive
through
an
area
or
quickly
drive
in
and
drive
out,
then
I
think
it's
harder
for
them
to.
You
know
harass
people
or
harass
students
from
a
car
if
it's
harder
to
drive
their
period
and
and
with
some
of
the
other
safety
concerns.
S
You
know
if
it's
not
possible
to
just
quickly
drive
through
it,
would
it
would
help
address.
Those
diverters
have
been
used
in
in
a
variety
of
places
around
minneapolis,
where
there
were
concerns
about
either
traffic
safety
or
personal
safety,
and
you
know,
I
think,
have
a
pretty
good
traffic
track
record.
S
Many
have
been
in
place
for
decades
and
have
been
very
popular,
so
I
think
that
it
does
make
sense
for
us
to
to
support
it.
I
also
want
to
make
that
case
in
the
sense
that
the
bac
isn't
making
this
decision.
It's
not
our
decision
to
make
we're
merely
making
a
recommendation,
and
I
think
that
recommendation
will
be
kind
of
tossed
into
the
mix
with
the
preferences
of
the
school
and
the
preferences
of
the
park
board.
And
so
clearly
you
know
if
all
the
local
stakeholders
think
it's
a
bad
idea.
S
It
won't
happen,
but
I
think,
from
our
experience
and
from
our
ability
to
see
what's
happened
when
schools
and
parks
have
been
connected
in
other
parts
of
minneapolis
and
how
positive
that
is.
I
think
it
makes
sense
for
us
to
add
that
voice
to
the
conversation.
W
Yes,
I
too
had
expressed
some
concern
that
this
seemed
kind
of
early
before
we
had
heard
from
the
community
and
before
we
had
heard
from
the
school
whether
this
was
even
something
that
was
a
good
idea,
and
it
seems
I
guess
I'm
I
would
not
want
to
support
it
this
early
on.
I
was
wondering,
though,
if
we
could
take
that
first
bullet,
maybe
and
add
some
conditions
on
it,
conditional
upon
the
feedback
from
the
school
and
from
the
neighborhood.
W
L
I
was
just
going
to
say
you
know
part
of,
I
think
our
responsibility.
L
So
it's
important
to
have
those
structures
up,
and
I
guess
what
I'm
saying
I
like
the
idea
of
being
connected
to
the
school,
but
it
will
also
be
connected
to
other
bikers
in
the
area-
and
I
know,
biking
on
the
north
side
is
kind
of
sad.
You
know
as
far
as
connection
so
I'm
kind
of
forward,
I
do
think
well.
Jen
has
a
good
post
on
the
district,
so
I
I
think
she
would
be
a
good
person
to
kind
of
take
a
temperature
reading
with,
but
I
just
wanted
to
throw
that
in.
L
T
So
we're
getting
very
close
to
our
six
o'clock
time
and
I
feel
that
there's
been
some
very
good
input
here
that
I
would
be
someone
in
favor
to
maybe
table
this
and
and
see
if
we
could
write
down
those
thoughts
they
you
could
send
them
to
me,
and
maybe
we
could
rework
this
for
our
next
month.
If
that
would
be
helpful.
T
It's
at
15
percent,
so
it's
it's
pretty
early
on
and
I
think
what
so
I
think
I
think
there's
room
yes
and
to
to
do
a
more
thoughtful
or
actually
to
capture
some
of
the
comments
that
that
we've
heard
tonight
and
just
to
kind
of
fine-tune
this
and
make
it
a
little
more
of
a
stronger
document
that
I
would
be
if
somebody
wants
to
take
that
on
to
lead
that.
I
would
please
raise
your
hand.
T
Otherwise
I
will
try
to
pull
that
stuff
together
and
have
it
in
some
format
for
the
next
engineering
meeting
and
I'd
really
appreciate
everybody
that
has
talked
to
maybe
pen
just
a
few
of
your
comments
down
so
I'd.
I
don't
have
to
try
to
pull
it
out
of
my
memory
here.
So
I
think
that
they're
very
good
comments
and
we
could
make
this
a
little
stronger.
O
That's
something
to
I'm
very
curious
to
have
this
like
bigger
picture
conversation,
I'm
actually
like
not
alarm
bells,
but
I
find
this
like
very
interesting
because,
like
we
have
very
few
streets
that
we're
going
to
be
considering
diverting
or
impacting
cars
at
all,
and
these
like
neighborhood
greenway
routes
are,
are
one
of
them
and
I
think
there's
just
tremendous
benefit
to
this.
This
concept
and
I
think
we
need
to
go
maybe
farther
than
this
and
do
it
in
more
and
more
spots,
and
so
I'm
not.
O
O
You
know
almost
all
of
our
streets
have
cars
and
we
we
very
rarely
like
ask
our
street
to
not
have
cars
and-
and
I
just
want
to
like-
provide
that
perspective
and
see
what
people
think.
Maybe
it's
like
you
know-
even
5e
or
the
next
engineering
committee,
but
so.
E
A
Sure
that
so
really
really
quick.
I
just
want
to
jump
in
and
say
we
do
have
we
did
do
we.
We
made
the
motion
and
had
a
second,
I
believe
cadence
can
jump
in.
So
we
would
need
to
officially
vote
to
table
the
motion
or
vote
to
withdraw
the
motion
to
to
close
out
the
business
on
the
motion.
We
can't
just
leave
it
hanging.
S
So
can
I
make
a
proposal,
and
that
would
be
to
add
language,
that
deanna
suggested
to
that
first
bullet
saying
essentially
conditioned
on
support
from
local
stakeholders
and
then
put
that
up
for
a
boat
about
today.
I
also
really
like
matthew's
idea
of
doing
a
more
in-depth
look
at
diverters
and
and
the
role
of
streets
going
forward,
but
I
think
deanna's
idea
of
making
it
conditional
could
could
really
strengthen
this
and
get
it
to
where
it
needs
to
be
today,
if
that,
if
others
agree.
P
I
I
really
like
that,
because
what
I
was
really
trying
to
say
is
it
just
there's
just
this
vibe
of
the
community
right
now,
not
feeling
really
part
of
it,
and
so
just
I
think,
a
little
more
engagement
is
needed,
and
so
that
that
to
me
is
something
that
I
can
can
go
with
in
terms
of
like
we
support
this,
you
know,
along
with
you,
know,
stakeholders
supporting
it.
A
Well,
I
see,
wes
has
a
hand
up
and
and
chris
and
then
would
want
to
move
on
to
either
voting
on
the
resolution
or
voting
to
table
it.
I
I
think,
like
maybe
part
of
what's
happening
here
and
because
I
get
like,
is
that
when
I
hear
diverter
so
like
I
don't
know
where
exactly
I
land
on
this,
but
I
think
maybe
something
that
didn't
come
through
in
the
presentation
quite
strongly
enough
is
that
if
this
diverter
went
in
it
would
be
for,
like
these
systematic
reasons,
thinking
about
it's
a
neighborhood
greenway
and
all
of
that
kind
of
thing
because,
like
when
I
hear
diverter
I
think
of
like
there
are,
there
are
a
lot
of
diverters
in
the
city.
I
That
probably
aren't
helpful,
and
I
don't
know
that
like
right,
like
the
solution,
the
solution
to
getting
more
people
to
bike
versus
walking
and
that
kind
of
thing
is
not
necessarily
putting
up
like
random
roadblocks
right
and
maybe,
like
I
initially
when
I
was
in
engineering
and
was
listening
to
this,
like
maybe
have
that
reaction
to
it
and
might
have
been
incorrect
there
so,
like.
I
think
I
just
wanted
to
respond
to
you
in
that.
V
Yes,
sorry
so
I
do
just
want
to
clarify
I'm
not
quite
sure
dan.
To
be
frank,
if
if
we
do
have
time
to
table
this
and
again,
I'm
not
100
sure,
but
just
because
it's
at
15,
I
think
this
project's
moving
a
little
quickly,
which
is
why
they
asked
for
a
resolution
at
this
time.
So
I
I
would
strongly
encourage
taking
a
stance
on
things
now
and
perhaps
putting
in
the
caveat
that
you're
talking
about.
V
I
won't
give
an
opinion
one
way
or
the
other
on
that,
but
I
I'll
just
suggest
that
from
the
staff
point
without
100
certainty,
I
I
think
that
it
would
be
best
to
do
something
this
month,
because
it
might
be
a
little
too
late
to
influence
some
big
things
by
next
month.
A
Thanks
chris
with
helpful
context,
philip,
maybe
you
can
give
us
your
comment
while
millicent,
would
you
pull
up
the
motion
again
that
is
under
consideration?
Are
you
able
to
do
that.
F
Yes,
I
I,
I
think
several
people
have
suggested
and
I
would
propose
that
we
amend
the
first,
the
first
sentence,
leaving
in
especially
supportive
but
add
language
being
cognizant,
that
more
neighborhood
and
school
input
is
required.
S
Sure-
and
this
is
really
borrowing
from
deanna
so
credit
to
deanna
for
this,
but
after
that
north
commons
park,
comma
conditioned
on
support
from
local
stakeholders.
T
Yes,
I'd
like
to
this
is
dan.
I'm
sorry,
I
couldn't
find
the
raised
hand
thing
I'm
wondering
in
in
the
second
bullet
point
if
we
might
be
able
to
add
in
some
of
the
language
that
that
jenny
had
regarding
safety
of
you
know,
I
heard
lighting,
which
I
think
is
a
as
a
real
good
one,
and
but
I
think
she
had
a
jenny.
Are
you
still
there
that
you
could
kind
of
expand
on
on
that.
P
F
C
And
do
we
want
to
condition
the
very
first
sentence
on
increased
engagement
with
the
schools
and
community,
the
very
first
sentence
of
the
resolution,
sort
of
like
what
we
did
with
the
first
bullet?
But
I
think
jenny
had
expressed
some
concern
that
maybe
people
hadn't
been
doing
quite
enough.
Engagement
with
the
schools
and
community.
V
Hand
alyssa
this
is
chris.
I've
got
the
raised
hand.
I
just
want
to
point
out
from
the
staff
perspective
that
I
think
safety
is
maybe
a
little
too
general
safety
means
a
lot
of
different
things
to
a
lot
of
people,
and
I
think
right
here
we're
specifically
talking
about
what
I
would
call
probably
public
safety
as
opposed
to
traffic
safety,
yes
or
personally,
or
personal
yeah
safety.
A
All
right,
I'm
gonna
add
I'm
gonna
ask
millicent
to
call
the
roll.
This
has
been
a
really
good
discussion
and
I
think
the
resolution
is
much
improved
for
everyone's
comments
and
input.
So
thank
you
all
for
your
attention.
Millicent.
If
you
would
call
the
roll.
E
B
N
G
E
E
N
C
B
E
I
A
Thanks
millicent,
so
this
is
the
last
scheduled
action
on
our
agenda.
I
know:
there's
two
there's
one
more
brief
project
report
out
that
dan
are
you
able
to
stick
around
for
a
minute
and
finish
that
up.
T
I
think
we
could
table
it,
and
I
think
that
the
notes
and
the
the
you
know
the
project
materials
are
are
online
and
people
could
take
a
look
at
it
then,
and-
and
we
can
bring
it
up
next
week,
if
we,
if
we
want
to
again
or
next
month,
yeah.
A
Awesome
that
sounds
like
a
great
plan,
thanks
dan
for
getting
us
through
that
thanks
everybody
imagine
how
early
we
would
have
gotten
out
if
we
didn't
have
to
spend
50
minutes,
calling
the
roll
nine
times
in
a
row.
Q
So,
just
briefly,
I
think
it
would
be
great
if
we
could
have
a
conversation
about
parking
minimums.
Probably
at
5e
cam
is
co-authoring
getting
rid
of
parking
minimums
in
minneapolis
and
there's
some
really
interesting
stuff
in
the
travel
demand
management
requirements.
That
staff
are
looking
at
that.
I
think
folks
are
gonna
like
quite
a
bit,
so
I'd
love
to
get
us
before.
F
I
would
second
that
you
know:
barb
thulman,
formerly
from
transit
for
livable
communities,
has
been
doing
quite
a
lot
of
work
the
last
few
months.
So
it's
a
great
topic.
Yeah.
Q
O
Alyssa,
do
you
want
me
to
give
give
give
update
on
your
participation
in
that
that
we
heard
today
me
too
yeah,
okay,
joe
joe
bernard
reached
out
today,
to
see,
if
you
know
the
chairs
of
of
this
committee
and
in
the
pc
wanted
to
participate
in
a
kind
of
an
advisory
capacity
in
their
in
their
role
and
not
not
not
to
presume
that
alyssa
was
going
to
be
chair,
but
you
know
acting
vice
chair,
her
and
abigail
johnson
from
the
pack
are
taking
that
so.
F
A
C
A
Okay,
thank
you
all
for
for
joining
us,
I'm
very
excited
about
the
new
exec
team
and
all
the
new
folks
on
the
committee.
I'm
looking
forward
to
continuing
to
work
with
you
all
in
the
coming
weeks
and
months,
and
I
guess
years
for
some
of
you
and
I
hope
you
all
got
out
to
enjoy
the
nice
weather
today
and
have
a
good
rest
of
your
evening.
I
will
call
us
adjourned.