►
From YouTube: April 23, 2021 Local Board of Appeal and Equalization
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
Good
afternoon
welcome
to
this
live
broadcast
of
our
virtual
meeting.
This
meeting
includes
the
remote
participation
of
members
as
authorized
under
minnesota
statutes,
section
13d.021
due
to
the
declared
local
health
pandemic.
The
city
will
be
recording
and
posting
this
meeting
to
the
city's
website
and
youtube
channel
as
a
means
of
increasing
public
access
and
transparency.
B
B
I
will
now
call
this
meeting
to
order
open
meeting
law
requires
a
roll
call
vote
to
be
conducted
during
the
virtual
meeting
and
a
certification
form
to
be
completed
for
each
local
board.
Meeting.
This
initial
roll
call
will
allow
the
city
assessor
to
complete
the
certification
form
on
behalf
of
the
board
members
with
a
verbal
signature.
D
B
E
D
F
B
That
motion
passes
the
agenda
is
adopted
new
business
today
there
are
total
of
40
cases
to
consider
during
our
afternoon
session
today.
I
will
summarize
the
process
for
conducting
hearings
in
this
virtual
format.
B
First,
we
will
call
an
applicant
who
will
be
given
5
minutes
to
present
their
appeal
when
your
case
is
called,
you
will
need
to
press
star
6
on
your
phone
to
activate
your
microphone
and
wait
to
hear
the
pre-recorded
message
before
speaking.
We
ask
that
you
state
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
and
then
present
your
appeal
to
the
board.
B
B
G
We
do
continue
to
receive
appeals
and
the
board
will
accept
appeals
until
the
board
adjourns
when
the
board
adjourns
the
appeal
process
has
closed
and
we
will
no
longer
accept
appeals.
The
assessor's
office
staff
is
monitoring
incoming
appeals
and
will
notify
the
board
of
all
appeals
received
right
before
we
adjourn
today.
G
So
with
that,
we
are
moving
on
to
our
cases
scheduled
between
1
and
2
pm,
starting
with
case
number
210436
found
on
page
496
of
your
packet.
It's
a
residential
property
at
2921
knox,
avenue
north.
This
property
is
owned
by
mr
mark
langmaid
and
if
you
recall
from
yesterday,
mr
langmaid
appeared
and
made
it
known
to
the
board
and
staff
followed
up
with
him
that
he
wished
to
have
all
of
his
cases
sustained
by
the
board
and
will
pursue
working
with
staff
on
the
next
phase
of
the
appeal
process.
B
Second,
it's
been
moved
by
buderitha
seconded
by
chow
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
172
thousand
dollars.
If
there's
no
discussion
on
the
motion,
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll.
D
H
G
Board
members
moving
to
case
21-0437,
a
commercial
property
at
121
washington
avenue
south
number
35
found
on
page
503
in
your
packet.
This
is
a
property
owner
that
did
not
respond
to
staff's
request
to
schedule
a
phone
in
or
write
an
appeal
and
the
market
value
for
2021
is
27
600
and
the
board
can
go
ahead
and
take
action.
B
E
Yes,
this
appears
to
be
the
garage
space
for
this
particular
condo
unit
and
so
21
or
2
washington
avenue.
South
number
35
is
the
garage
space
and
I
move
that
we
sustain
the
value
of
27.6.
B
Thank
you.
Is
there
a
second
okay,
it's
been
moved
by
bland
second
by
chow
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
twenty
seven
thousand
six
hundred
dollars.
There's
no
discussion
on
emotional
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role.
D
D
I
G
G
B
Thank
you,
I
mean
there's
no
information
to
work
from.
I
may
have
a
motion.
E
B
Has
been
moved
by
chow,
second
by
bland
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
211
900.
There's
no
discussion
on
the
motion
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role.
D
J
H
H
G
B
Thank
you
quickly,
answer
a
motion
again.
B
Second
has
been
moved
by
bland
seconded
by
buddhirtha
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
69
200.
If
there's
no
discussion
on
the
motion
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll.
I
K
B
D
I
B
I
H
B
I
H
G
G
L
It's
essentially
the
exact
same
property
as
3632
bryant
avenue,
which
is
three
doors
to
the
north,
and
that
property
is
valued
at
373..
L
B
L
Comparing
it
again
to
the
property
three
three
doors
to
the
north:
it's
got
an
equal
two-car
garage.
It
has
the
exact
same
building.
Footprint
mine
would
be
a
1031
square
feet.
Theirs
is
1020
square
feet.
Neither
of
us
have
anything
going
on
in
the
basement,
so
our
overall
square
footage
would
be
equivalent
at
2500.
L
And
then,
additionally,
my
lot
is
actually
a
smaller
than
an
average
lot
at
35
and
a
half
feet
instead
of
42
feet
and
in
current
market
conditions
along
bryant
avenue,
there's
probably
more
of
an
appetite
to
buy
houses
to
tear
them
down
and
a
7
foot
reduction
in
your
lot.
Size
has
significant
devaluing
of
the
property.
E
Yes,
mr
chair,
there
again
there
may
be
a
case
here
for
adjusting
the
value,
but
we've
received
so
little
information,
just
a
couple
of
lines
about
a
neighboring
property
and
a
few
comments
from
the
homeowner
that
we
really
don't
have
anything
to
go
on
here.
So
I
guess
I
would.
E
If
we
sustain
this
value,
I
would
encourage
the
homeowner
to
move
on
to
the
next
step
and
work
with
the
assessor
to
see.
If
we
can
provide
some
information
that
would
be
helpful
to
determine
whether
or
not
to
lower
the
value.
B
We
will
now
take
consider
an
act
on
the
appeal
of
3648,
bryant
avenue.
South
may
have
a
motion.
Please.
B
Has
been
moved
by
bland
second
by
chow
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
427.
000,
no
objection
to
the
motion
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the.
I
I
G
H
B
I
G
G
M
Yeah,
this
is
ben
farstad,
1915
sixth
street
northeast
and,
as
you
can
see
from
my
package,
I
didn't
have
a
lot
of
time
to
prepare
for
this.
I
was
actually
planning
on
going
to
the
june
14th
through
the
pandemic
and
I'm
not
fully
vaccinated.
But
by
chance
I
called
matthew
banker,
and
he
told
me
about
this
teleconference,
so
I'm
gonna
give
it
a
try
here.
M
In
the
last
two
years,
my
property
has
gone
up
on
market
value
by
95.
000
went
from
225
000
to
320
000.
So
that's
the
reason
I'm
calling
I
did
happen
to
find
a
house
basically
a
minute
walk
from
my
house,
which
is
pretty
comparable,
612
19th
avenue
northeast
it's
a
five
bedroom,
so
it
has
one
bedroom
more
than
mine,
comparable
square
footage.
It
just
sold
last
month
march
19th
for
279
thousand
nine
hundred
dollars.
M
F
M
B
Okay,
do
you
have
any
additional
comments
you
want
to
make.
M
Yeah
yeah
there's
some
other
things
too,
that
I
I
think
you
should
know
when
I
did
talk
to
matthew
banker.
He
explained
to
me.
I
really
didn't
have
any
experience
with
any
of
this
and
he
explained
to
me
that
basically
he's
looking
at
square
footage
type
of
house
number
of
bedrooms
and
when
I
did
start
looking
on
realtor.com,
I
did
see
that
it
seemed
like
his
assessment
was
pretty
fair,
but
you
know
mostly,
the
the
big
prices
came
up
with
houses
that
had
original
woodwork,
original
molding
around
the
windows
original
baseboards
stained
glass.
M
This
isn't
that
kind
of
house.
This
house
had
been
gutted
at
one
time,
there's
none
of
the
the
final
things
that
people
like
with
these
old
houses.
In
addition,
I've
got
at
least
a
30
year
old
furnace.
I've
got
some
original
plumbing.
As
I
said,
some
original
windows
I'm
going
to
need
some
foundation
work.
M
I
have
an
old
roof,
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
are
going
to
need
to
be
done
with
this
property
and
what
I
found
in
my
limited
search,
this
property
612
19th
avenue
northeast,
maybe
a
little
bit
better
than
mine,
but
it's
the
closest
one.
I
found
to
the
condition
that
my
house
is
in
and
again
it
went
for
279
thousand
nine
hundred.
M
I
would
be
willing
to
send
pictures
anything
like
that
that
you
guys
need.
B
The
the
board
here
is
your
case
with,
what's
been
presented
in
fi
the
five-minute
allotment
today.
There
is
a
second
phase
of
this
after
we
vote.
If
you're
not
satisfied
that
you
can
work
with
the
assessor
and
hopefully
get
someone
out
and
you'll
have
time
to
prepare
and
get
a
few
more
comparable
properties
in
which
to
utilize
I'll
open
it
up
the
board
members
now,
if
they
have
any
additional
questions,.
E
Mr
chair,
mr
parstad,
I
realize
you
had
very
little
time
to
prepare,
and
so,
as
a
result
of
that,
we
really
have
no
helpful
information
that
we
can
use
to
to
adjust
your
property
value.
But.
E
If
you'd,
let
me
finish,
please
thank
you
yeah,
so
you
know
we
really
need
to
see
things
that
that
give
us
in
writing
some
evidence
of
why
that
particular
value
is
something
you
think
not
just
this
household.
For
this
and
this
household,
for
that
houses
are,
are
different,
they're,
not
exactly
alike.
They
need
to
be
comparing.
I
E
Given
the
fact
that
you
didn't
really
have
time
to
prepare
more
than
likely,
I'm
going
to
vote
that
we
sustain
this
value
and
suggest
that
you
move
on
to
the
next
step,
where
you
can
move
work
with
the
assessor
and
get
together
information
that
can
help
the
assessor
determine
what
the
the
value
of
your
property
should
be.
E
So,
mr
chair,
given
that
I
vote
right,
pardon
me,
I
move
that
we
sustain
the
value
at
this
property
of
328
thousand.
B
D
I
G
Board
members:
the
next
case
is
21-046
a
residential
property
at
one
three,
two
one
knox
avenue
north
found
on
page
561
of
your
packet.
This
is
another,
mr
mark,
langmaid
property.
The
original
2021
estimated
market
value
is
133
000.
The
board
can
go
ahead
and
take
action
to
sustain
the
value
at
mr
lane,
may's
request.
D
I
J
I
B
That
carries
in
the
motion
is
adopted.
Thank
you.
G
The
next
case
is
21-047:
a
condominium
property
located
at
317
groveland
avenue
number
unit
number
213
found
on
page
568
of
your
packet.
The
original
2021
estimated
market
value
is
273
thousand
dollars.
The
property
owner
jordan,
nelson,
is
on
the
line.
If
the
property
owner
would
please
press
star
6,
please
state
your
name
and
address,
and
then
you
may
present
your
case
to
the
board.
You
have
up
to
five
minutes.
Thank
you.
N
I
was
looking
at
the
property
values
of
the
other
units
that
have
sold
in
this
condo
residential
community
lately
and
maybe
a
year
or
a
year
and
a
half
ago
we
were
getting
close
to
the
the
number
that
was
recently
assessed.
N
I
believe
this
is
in
the
packet
that
you
have.
The
the
average
price
was
two
hundred
and
forty
five
thousand
seven
hundred
and
fifty
dollars
for
the
the
three
most
recent
one
bedroom
condos
that
have
sold
currently
there's
two
one-bedroom
properties
listed.
N
Let's
see
on
the
same
floor
as
me,
they
they've
been
listed
from
about
either
two
weeks
all
the
way
up
to
about
two
or
three
months
for
at
the
price
of
250
000,
and
neither
of
them
have
received
any
offers.
Let's
see,
yeah
that's
unit,
207
and
204.
Those
are
the
two
that
are
are
listed.
N
N
The
the
two
that
are
currently
listed
are
listed
at
substantially
lower
without
being
able
to
find
a
a
buyer,
and
my
neighbor
directly
next
to
me,
with
the
the
exact
same
floor
plan
had
has
owned
this
unit,
for
I
think
since
the
building
was
built
10
15
years
ago,
and
that
unit
was
put
on
the
market
about
three
months
ago
at
280.,
it
has
an
extra
garage
stall
in
mind.
N
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
about
15
or
20
25
000
more
in
in
the
downtown
market
it
was
put
on
at
280.
It
was
reduced
to
270
reduced
to
265,
and
my
neighbor
took
it
off
the
market
about
two
or
three
weeks
ago,
because
he
wasn't
able
to
find
a
buyer
at
all,
so
he's
looking
at,
maybe
renting
it
out.
If
he
can
we're
we're
limited
on
when
we
can
rent
our
properties
out
based
on
who
else
is
renting
in
this
building.
N
N
My
request,
I
guess,
would
be
I'll
wrap
this
up
here.
Hopefully
I'm
not
over.
My
five
minutes
is
instead
of
the
273
that
it
be
brought
down
to.
I
believe
245
is
what
I
had
yeah
245
000.
Oh
the
one
last
thing
we
have
some
structural
damage
in
our
building
and
we're
all
being
assessed
a
substantial
amount.
This
summer,
the
concrete
of
all
of
our
balconies
is
crumbling
and
needs
structural
engineering
resurfacing.
N
If
we
need
to
grind
off
the
top
and
then
so
that's
for
my
unit,
it's
estimated
about
twenty
five
hundred
dollars
of
work
this
summer
that
will
be
incurring
and
then
also
the
the
pond,
the
drainage
swamp
area
behind
our
building
between
us
and
the
highway
that
we're
responsible
for
we're.
Also
having
structural
engineers
estimate
how
much
that
will
cost
to
realign
and
then
redo
the
brick
work
around
it.
So
some
some
bigger
work
coming
up
with
costs
associated
there.
B
Well,
thank
you
very
much
I'll
open
it
up
to
the
board
for
questions
and
comments.
N
H
N
Wish
I
could
send
you
a
picture
right
now,
I'm
about,
I
would
guess,
maybe
15
feet
from
off
ramp
going
from
94
westbound
the
hennepin
lindale
exit.
B
B
Did
you
have
a
show
the
other
night
when
the
car
collided
with
the
guardrail
and
burst
into
flames.
B
Was
hoping
I
haven't
heard
either,
but
the
video
footage
was
quite
striking,
probably.
N
B
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
board
members.
B
E
Mr
chair,
I
find
I
I
have
to
agree
with
mr
nelson
that
273
is
more
than
reasonable
value,
and
so
I
would
move
that
we
reduce
the
value
to
last
year's
value.
245
000.
B
To
decrease
the
2021
estimated
market
value
to
245
000,
there
is
no
discussion
on
the
motion.
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role.
D
N
G
F
F
The
appeal
is
based
on
a
pre,
pretty
straightforward
market
value
argument.
We
purchased
the
condo
in
february
of
2020
closed.
In
april,
the
purchase
price
was
559
000,
which
included
two
garage
stalls
that
are
were
each
appraised
at
eighteen
thousand
dollars.
F
That
is
our
basic
argument.
I
looked
at
one
unit,
that's
comparable
to
ours
and
I
I
thought
it
was
listed
at
5.65.
I
just
looked
again
and
it
seemed
like
it
was
lifted
last
summer
at
5.75,
but
it
was
unable
to
sell.
It
was
taken
off
the
market
after
it
had
been
on
the
market,
all
fall,
and
I
don't
know
if
you
look
at
things
like
zillow
or
realtor.com,
but
they
listed
as
value
of
558
000,
including
the
two
two
garage
sales
that
come
with
that.
F
F
B
Just
from
my
review
appraisal
appraisal
from
march
of
2020,
the
appraisal
amount
was
565
000..
So
if
you
take
out
36
000
for
the
garage
you're
at
529,
I'm
not
counting
any
appreciation
for
the
remainder
of
the
year.
F
So
yeah
that
was
that
was
the
initial
appraisal
for
the
bank.
As
they
say,
we
were
arguing
for
523
based
on
the
actual
price.
B
If
the
board
has
no
other
questions
or
comments,
we'll
con
consider
and
act
on
the
appeal
for
2840
brian
avenue,
south
number
301
may
have
a
motion.
Please.
E
I
move
that
we
adjust
the
value
from
541
000
to
530
000.
B
Is
there
a
second
second,
it's
been
moved
by
bland
seconded
by
borderthe
to
decrease
the
2021
estimated
market
value
to
530
000.
D
G
G
O
Thank
you
good
afternoon
board
members.
My
name
is
lisa
frances
and
I
live
at
4243,
wentworth
avenue
south.
I
appreciate
this
opportunity
to
speak
with
you.
I
am
concerned
about
the
the
price
of
my
property,
primarily
when
I
look
at
sales
in
my
neighborhood
over
the
last
two
years,
but
it
really
the
last
year,
my
home
and
I
sent
in
a
couple
pictures.
I
don't
know
if
you
actually
got
those
pictures
but
the
front
of
my
house.
O
O
O
It's
still
got
the
old,
copper
piping
that
the
city
has
told
me
I'm
going
to
need
to
replace
it.
Has
no
original
woodwork
or
molding,
unlike
a
lot
of
the
houses
on
the
street,
there
was
a
home
of
actually
good
friends
of
mine
that
sold
in
february
of
this
year,
just
down
the
block
same
side
of
the
street.
O
First,
it
had
total
square
foot
of
1682
square
feet
and
it
sold
for
372
000
that
you
know
for
a
total
of
221
dollars
per
square
foot.
O
There
was
also
a
house
that
sold
just
a
month
or
so
ago,
at
4300
blaisdell,
just
around
the
corner
from
here
very
similar
home
1400
square
feet
sold
for
hundred
and
one
thousand
dollars
at
a
total
of
two
hundred
and
thirteen
dollars
per
square
foot,
another
home
just
on
the
other
side
of
the
street
4115
blaise
dale
sold
for
220
dollars
at
two
hundred
and
fourteen
dollars
per
square
foot
at
the
proposed
value.
That's
that's
been
put
forth
for
my
home.
O
It
would
be
at
232
dollars
per
square
foot
so
significantly
higher
than
homes
that
have
been
sold.
You
know
in
this
neighborhood
that
are
very
comparable
and
again,
my
house
is
very
much.
We
have
done
no
renovations,
so
it's
pretty,
like
you
know,
somebody's
going
to
walk
in
and
see
the
1950s
bathrooms,
etc.
O
So
it
just
strikes
me
that
that
this
proposed
value
is
really
higher
than
what
things
have
been
selling
for
on
a
square
footage
basis
at
the
old
value
of
three
hundred
and
twenty
six
thousand
dollars
that
averaged
221
dollars
per
square
foot,
which
actually
is
higher
than
just
about,
is
higher
than
all
those
prices
of
homes
that
I
I
just
cited
to
you
recent
sales
in
my
neighborhood.
O
H
C
E
There's
really
very
little
data
here
for
us
to
go
on
and
again
miss
franchette
may
have
a
case.
I
don't
know,
but
I
can't
make
that
decision
based
on
what
we
have
and
what
we
heard
just
simply
citing
addresses
and
square
footage
numbers.
E
Don't
give
us
helpful
information,
so
I
would
probably
vote
to
sustain
the
value
and
encourage
her
to
move
on
to
the
next
step,
where
she
can
work
with
the
assessor
and
get
some
better
information
to
work
with
and
have
it
determine
whether
or
not
her
value
can
be
adjusted.
E
And
with
that
I
would
propose
a
motion
that
we
sustain
the
value
of
the
property
at
343
thousand
dollars.
I
B
You
it's
been
moved
by
bland
seconded
by
borderthe
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
343
000..
If
there's
no
discussion
on
the
motion
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role.
D
H
B
You,
the
that
carries,
and
the
motion
is
adopted.
G
Board
members,
we
are
moving
down
into
the
next
hearing
session.
We
did
reach
out
to
some
of
the
property
owners
that
are
further
down
on
the
agenda
and
they
were
able
to
join
us
early.
So
we
are.
I
know
this
is
somewhat
challenging
when
we
skip
around.
So
I
apologize
for
that.
G
P
Okay
good
afternoon,
if
you
can
can
hear
me,
my
name
is
joseph
schroeder,
I'm
the
property
owner
at
2305,
52nd
street
west
in
minneapolis,
the
appraised
value
for
2020
was
885,
with
an
increase
to
954
for
the
2021..
P
I
mean
I
guess,
for
those
the
tax
year.
I
guess
a
general
general
comments
in
terms
of
the
lot.
The
square
footage
on
the
lot,
as
you
may
notice,
is
relatively
large,
but
it's
listed
as
an
improved
hillside.
I
mean
it
slopes
down
towards
the
creek
and
there's
little
or
no
improvable
land.
The
driveway
is
is
gravel.
That's
unimproved!
P
The
house
is
the
oldest
one
in
the
neighborhood.
It
was
built
in
1908.
It's
listed
as
an
is
a
one
and
a
half
story,
so
there
are
dormers
on
the
upper
floor
to
the
bedrooms.
There
has
been
no
renovations
in
the
last
three
years,
as
noted
there,
and
then
just
some
miscellaneous
comments.
It's
on
the
corner
of
penn
avenue
and
50
seconds
or
52nd
street,
which
is
a
you
know,
a
busy
thoroughfare
between
the
crosstown
and
the
50th
street
business
areas.
P
There
are
some
retaining
walls
and
some
steps
below
the
house
that
are
in
significant
need
of
repair
and
then,
if
you
look
at,
I
supplied
some
a
couple
of
different
forms
of
information.
One
of
them
was,
you
know,
just
basically
a
simple
plot
of
what's
been
going
on
in
the
neighborhood
and
up
and
down
the
street.
P
P
Valuations
have
been
very
flat
over
the
last
really
three
to
four
years,
and
I
I
don't
see
why
our
house
should
vary
versus
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood
and
then
I
I
supplied
a
number
of
references
to
other
four
bed,
four
bath
homes
that
either
sold
last
fall
or
are
are
currently
on
the
market.
Right
now
and
generally
speaking,
those
homes
fall
into
the
category
of
you
know,
825
to
about
900
000
for
for
sale
values.
P
And
while
I
would
say
that
you
know,
maybe
our
our
lot
size
is
a
little
bigger,
maybe
than
than
some
of
those.
Well,
I
would
list
this
as
comparables.
P
P
I
think
you've
got
the
rest
of
the
info.
I
guess
I
don't
feel
like.
I
need
to
go
through
the
specific
houses
that
I
provided
for
comparables.
Unless
someone
has
questions
about
how
I
picked
those
or
or
why
I
thought
they
were
comparables,
but
I
would
ask
for
a
lesson
of
the
assessment
down
you
know
closer
to
you
know
under
900
a
thousand.
B
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
I'll
open
up
to
the
board
for
questions
I'll
have
one
to
start
it.
Your
your
home
backs
up
to
minnehaha
creek.
P
Yes,
there
was
a
an
assessment
or
an
easement
taken
in
the
I
believe,
back
in
the
70s,
so
the
original
yard
and
space
was
diminished
quite
a
bit
back
then,
and
so
there's
some
some
foot
traffic
that
goes
behind
our
house
along
the
creek
yep.
B
Okay,
thank
you
and
then
also
your
your
home
borders,
penn
avenue
on
the
on
the
east.
P
E
Mr
anderson,
I
am
quite
familiar
with
this
house
because
I
know
the
neighborhood
fairly
well
and
yes,
it
does
back
to
the
creek.
The
what
interests
me
here
is
that
the
land
value
and
the
structure
value
are
are
the
same
as
the
city
has
determined.
So
a
lot
of
the
value
in
that
house
is
in
the
land.
E
Based
on
that,
I
don't
feel
qualified
to
make
an
assessment
here
of
value
and
would
think
that
that
could
be
something
that
the
homeowner
could
move
on
to
the
next
step
and
work
with
the
assessor,
because,
according
to
the
picture
he
sent
and
remarks
he
made.
There's
a
you
know:
it's
a
steep
lot.
I
know
that
and
there's
some
maintenance
that
needs
to
be
done
with
retaining
walls
and
whatnot.
E
So
I
would
encourage
him
to
move
on
to
the
next
step,
and
in
order
to
do
that,
I
would
sustain
the
value.
B
Okay
and
reviewing
the
comps,
I
didn't
see
any
that
actually
backed
up
to
the
creek
or
fronted
on
the
creek.
E
Yes,
some
of
the
comps
were
pretty
far
afield
so
as
a
as
a
realtor,
making
a
determination
very
few
of
those
comps.
If
any
would
have
been
ones
that
I
would
have
chosen.
If
I
had
any
other
choices
to
make.
B
Okay,
thank
you.
If
there
is
I'll
go
ahead,
sir.
P
P
B
B
P
J
B
H
E
Yes,
mr
schroeder,
I
would
like
to
be
able
to
preserve
your
ability
to
move
on
to
the
next
step
to
work
with
the
assessor,
because
I
don't
feel
qualified
to
make
an
adjustment
here
based
on
the
information
that
I
have.
All
I
know
is
that
your
land
is
valued
very
highly,
as
mr
anderson
pointed
out
any
any
frontage.
You
know
whether
it
goes
right
down
to
the
creek
or
or
lake
or
whatever
is
a
value
as
opposed
to
houses
that
aren't
in
that
type
of
location.
E
So,
in
order
to
preserve
your
ability
to
move
on
to
the
next
step,
I
I
would
suggest
that
we
sustain
the
value.
E
E
You'll
be
getting
instructions,
I
believe
in
the
mail.
Is
that
right,
ms
manquest,
about
what
his
next
step
would
be?
That's.
G
G
You
will
continue
to
work
with
our
appraisal
staff,
that's
very
familiar
with
your
neighborhood
and
your
property,
and
if
you're
able
to
come
to
a
resolution
of
value,
if
they
staff
feels
that
the
property
is
overvalued,
and
you
agree
with
that,
we
simply
bring
that
before
the
county
board
as
a
concurrence
as
we
call
it.
If
you
disagree
with
staff's
determination,
you
are
able
to
bring
your
case
to
the
county
board
of
appeal
and
equalization,
and
that
does
they
do
not
convene
until
june.
So
there's
adequate
time
in
between.
P
B
We've
expired
our
time.
We
will
now
consider
an
act
on
the
peel
for
2305
52nd
street
west.
May
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
B
Thank
you
is
there
a
second
second
move
by
bland
second
by
chow
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
954
000.
There's
no
discussion
on
the
motion.
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll.
I
H
G
Board
members
we
are
going
to
move
to
the
next
case
this
property
owner
has,
I
believe,
it's
approximately
eight
parcels
that
you're
going
to
hear
about.
G
G
G
P
Thank
you
very
much.
My
name
is
james
ostland
I
am
presenting
on
2742
hennepin.
Everybody
can
hear
me.
Okay,.
P
Okay,
perfect
yep,
so
this
is
a
12
unit
apartment
building,
early
1970s
build,
and
in
looking
at
this,
I
sort
of
looked
at
it
from
the
income
approach
and
a
little
bit
from
the
sales
comparables
approach
as
well,
and
the
main
thing
here
and
the
all
the
other
seven
that
I'm
presenting
kind
of
the
main
theme
is
the
uptick
in
vacancy
that
we
did
did
experience
during
2020,
especially
starting
later
in
quarter
two
and
then
through
quarter.
Three
and
four
due.
D
P
A
lot
of
factors,
including
the
pandemic
and
unrest,
so
this
property
in
particular,
I
think
we
were
getting
closer
to
the
10
to
15
percent
vacancy
near
the
end
of
the
year.
We
did.
If
you
look
at
the
the
profit
and
loss
statements,
we
still
were
up
a
little
bit
on
our
top
line
numbers
and
our
revenue,
but
we
did
see
a
decrease
in
net
operating
income,
and
that
was
due
to
more
turnover
work.
P
We
did
also
kind
of
across
the
board
have
property
insurance
rates
go
up
in
kind
of
that
10
to
15
range
as
well,
which
has
compressed
our
net
numbers.
This
property,
in
particular,
being
right
along
hennepin
avenue
where
it
is,
did
have
some
direct
negative
impact
due
to
the
the
unrest
over
the
summer.
P
It
wasn't
as
much
vandalism
at
the
building
as
it
was
several
residents
moving
out
as
a
direct
result
of
it
so
just
kind
of
finishing
up
with
income
approach.
You
know,
I
think
our
noi
was
about
seventy
thousand
eight,
seventy
seven
for
2020,
which
was
down
a
little
bit,
and
I
I
kind
of
raised
it
back
up
just
to
do
an
analysis
to
kind
of
look
at
a
more
stabilized
one
up
to
76.5
and
applying
a
pretty
aggressive
cap
rate
at
five
percent.
P
That's
that's
where
I
was
coming
out
with
one
million
five.
Thirty.
As
far
as
sales
comparables,
there
was
one
that
really
did
catch
my
eye.
That
was
about
eight
or
nine
blocks
to
the
north.
It's
actually
two
apartment
buildings,
1907
to
1915,
colfax
avenue
south
and
that
sold
september,
1
2020.
P
So
the
the
two
apartment
buildings
there
was
one
the
one
that's
at
1907
itself
is
a
21
unit
that
was
similar
vintage.
I
think
late
60s
that
that
one,
if
you
kind
of
break
it
out
and
look
at
that
whole
property.
P
I
was
coming
out
with
that.
One
selling
about
113
850
70
units,
the
aggregate
on
the
whole
for
that
comp
was
97
a
unit,
but
the
the
building
at
1917
the
15
unit,
was
a
smaller
studio,
type
building
so
kind
of
going
off.
That
is
the
comp
and
then
given
the
fact.
Our
property
has
has
more
two-bedroom
units,
which
would
cause
an
upward
adjustment
of
that
comp
that
that
kind
of
circles
back
to
127.5
a
unit
for
the
subject
which
comes
back
to
that
that
number,
just
above
1.5
million
on
that.
I
H
B
You
I'll
open
it
up
to
the
board
members
for
questions
and
comments
here,
I'm
afraid
for
myself.
The
five
minutes
isn't
enough
to
analyze
properties
of
this
level
in
detail.
But
if
any
other
board
members
want
to
comment,
please
go
ahead.
J
So
I
have
quite
a
bit
of
experience
of
apartment
buildings
in
this
area
and
I
would
agree
that
2020
was
kind
of
a
challenging
year
in
that
immediate
area
with
not
only
colbit.
But
you
know
the
social,
social
unrest
and
stuff
like
that,
and
I've
seen
values
kind
of
decrease
in
pockets
of
minneapolis.
J
But
it's
kind
of
hard
in
this
setting
to
determine
what
the
proper
value
is
on
your
building
without
a
more
thorough
analysis.
And
so
I'm
thinking
having
an
assessor
really
delve
deeper
into
the
valuation
might
be
appropriate.
B
Thank
you
for
that
interpretation.
Are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments
hearing?
None
will
now
consider
an
act
on
the
appeal
for
2742.
Hennepin
avenue
may
have
a
motion.
Please.
J
B
Is
there
any
discussion
on
the
motion?
Hearing
none
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll.
I
H
G
Board
members,
it
looks
like
miss
gleason
has
joined
us,
so
we
are
just
going
to
back
up
to
case
21-04
a
residential
property
located
at
48
19
29th
avenue
south
I'm
on
the
wrong
page.
In
my
prop
my
pdf
here
sorry,
the
property
owner
is
on
the
line.
Looking
on
page
592,
the
2021
market
value
is
217
thousand
dollars.
Ms
gleason,
if
you
would
press
star
six
to
unmute,
please
state
your
name
in
the
property
address
and
you
can
present
your
case
to
the
board.
You
have
up
to
five
minutes.
Yes,
can
you
hear.
Q
Q
Q
So,
looking
at
some
of
the
20
20
values
in
that
area,
I
would
say
almost
most
of
them
that
are
under
that
1000
square
feet
and
in
that
range
of
700
square
feet
or
lower,
have
sold
at
below
the
200
000
dollar
mark.
I
I
don't
think
it
follows
this
size
of
property
and
these
characteristics
don't
follow.
Q
So
for
that
reason
I
think
I
included
in
the
information
that
I
sent
in
the
appeal
several
addresses
of
similarly
sized
properties
that
sold
in
2020,
some
of
them,
the
ones
that
I
pulled
out
of
there
were
50
35,
36
avenue
south
at
624
square
feet
that
sold
in
november
of
2020
at
172
000.
There
was
5409
31st
avenue,
south
570
square
feet
that
sold
in
april
of
2020
for
177
thousand
55
48
26
avenue
south
it
sold
at
197
500
in
october
of
2020.
Q
B
H
Okay,
go
ahead.
B
I
J
H
B
G
Q
Q
Q
So
I
can
really
talk
about
what
has
changed
since
their
since
the
2019
assessment,
so
that
the
house
was
reassessed
in
2019
for
that
2019
tax
period
at
431
000
dollars,
and
what
has
changed
since
that
assessment
is
that
there
have
been
two
additional
years
of
of
life
against
the
some
of
the
basic
systems
in
the
house
of
the
I'm,
referring
mostly
to
hvac
and
plumbing.
So
this
house
has
not
been
updated
for
many
years.
Q
When
anyone
looks
at
a
listing
for
a
home
when
something
has
been
updated,
new
hvac
system
or
recently
updated
hvac
system
roof
plumbing.
Those
are
all
mentioned,
as
top
line
items
to
support
the
market
value
that
is
being
asked
for
the
sales
price
value
it
it's.
The
same
is
to
be
expected
from
buyers
when
they
make
a
purchase
at
considering
what
will
need
to
be
updated
in
the
home,
and
I'm
not
talking
about
cosmetic
updates
like
painting
or
flooring
or
window
treatments.
Q
These
are
elements
that
are
necessary
for
the
survivability
and
the
sustainability
of
the
home,
so
these
systems,
both
the
boiler
heat
heating,
cooling,
boiler,
water,
heater.
All
of
those
systems
are
well
past
their
useful
life
of
15
years.
They
are
over
20
years
and
they
will
need
to
be
replaced
in
the
near
future.
Q
What
has
also
changed
in
the
past
year
or
so
is
that
the
cost
of
making
these
renovations
in
terms
of
labor
cost
materials
have
also
because
of
of
covid,
primarily
supply
chains
have
been
disrupted.
Factory
shutdowns
have
meant
that
the
materials
that
would
be
used
in
these
particular
renovations
have
also
increased.
Q
In
one
article
that
I
read,
it
said
consider
that
things
will
cost
fifty
percent
more
and
probably
take
fifty
percent
more
time
in
the.
In
light
of
that,
and
the
fact
that
the
tax
amount
should
reflect
the
actual
situation
of
the
home.
I
I
do
not
think
it
is
appropriate
to
raise
the
taxable
value
of
the
home
at
this
time
prior
to
making
those
types
of
renovations
that
will
be
needed
very
shortly
and
would
be
considered
in
any
buyer's
calculation
in
making
a
purchase
of
this
particular
home.
At
this
particular
time.
B
Thank
you,
miss
gleason,
unfortunately
ev
every
house,
the
mechanicals
age
at
the
same
rate
or
generally
the
same
rate,
and
we
need
to
look
at
comparable
sales
and
other
justification
for
determining
value
in
the
short
time
that
we
have
to
review
these
properties.
B
I
would
suggest
that
after,
if
you're
not
accepting
our
decision
here,
that
you
move
on
to
the
next
level
and
provide
some
more
detail
to
the
assessor
to
aid
their
research
and
with
that
I'll
open
it
up
for
the
rest
of
the
board.
If
they
have
any
questions,
one
other
thought
we
we
have
had
about
16
appreciation
in
this
area
in
the
last
two
years.
So
based
on
the
2019
assessment,
we
added
16
onto
that
we'd
be
well
above
the
446.,
but.
B
Q
Yeah
I
did
look
through
when,
when
the
assessor
was
not
able
to
provide
me
with
any
comparables
or
didn't
have
them
available
to
provide
me,
I
did
look
at
the
other
homes
on
the
same
block
for
to
see
how
that
assessed
value,
and
there
wasn't
really
an
established.
Q
There
were
some
that
had
gone
up
some
that
had
gone
down
some
that
had
stayed
the
same.
So
it
was
unclear
to
me
how
to
determine
whether
there
was
simply
a
straight
okay.
Let's
apply
a
percentage
across
the
board.
There
didn't
appear
to
be
that
approach
that
was
taken.
B
In
this
area,
it's
a
complex
algorithm
that
takes
into
many
different
aspects,
so
being
that
all
the
houses
on
woodlawn
very
few
look
alike,
they
will
be
treated
differently
by
the
by
the
system
and
when
people
are
not
in
agreement,
that's
what
this
appeal
process
is
for,
but
again,
if
you're
not
accepting
what
the
board
decides
here
today,
you
have
your
right
to
move
on
to
another
level
and
provide
more
detail.
B
B
They'll
they'll
provide
a
written
letter
to
you
with
information,
and
you
can
work
with
the
assessor
to
get
the
information
that
you
need
and
the
time
that
you
need
to
get
this
done.
Okay,
thank
you.
Yep
with
that.
Are
there
any
other
questions
or
comments
from
the
board.
E
Without
any
hello,
mr
chair,
given
that
the
purchase
price
of
this
property
was
430
000
in
october
of
2018,
there
certainly
have
been
increases
on
homes
that
have
had
nothing
done
to
them
in
that
amount
of
time.
So
I'm
actually
quite
comfortable
with
the
increase
in
the
value,
and
I
would
vote
that.
We
sustain
it
at
446,
000.
B
It's
been
moved
by
bland
seconded
by
bodertha
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
446
thousand
dollars.
Is
there
any
discussion
on
the
motion?
Hearing
none
I'll
ask
the
click
to
call
the
role.
I
G
Board
members,
we
are
moving
back
down
to
the
properties
represented
by
mr
osland
case
number
21-04,
an
apartment
property
located
at
2108,
pleasant
avenue.
It
is
on
page
636
of
your
packet
and
then
mr
austin,
you
just
need
to
unmute
again
by
pressing
star
six.
Please
state
your
name
in
the
property
address
for
the
record
and
you
may
proceed.
You
have
up
to
five
minutes.
P
Thank
you.
This
is
james
allison
again
the
address
2108
pleasant
avenue,
so
the
the
case
actually
going
to
be
fairly
similar
to
2742
hennepin,
which.
P
Of
these
are
so,
I
guess
you
know,
given
that
it's
only
five
minutes
here
I
mean
I
can.
I
can
go
through
and
present
them
all
or
you
know
I
can
kind
of
move
on
and
continue
to
work
with
the
assessor
which
it
sounds
like.
Maybe
the
given
the
complexity
of
the
cases
that
that
is
sort
of
what
the
board
was
thinking.
Anyhow,.
P
F
P
That
case,
I'm
I'm
comfortable
with
this
one
and
the
remaining
six.
If
you
know
just
to
save
time
for
everybody,
if
we
you
know
push
those
through
and
I'll
continue
to
work
with
the
assessor
on
them,.
B
B
B
Is
there
a
second,
I
second
that
it's
been
moved
by
chaos
seconded
by
bodertha
to
sustain
the
2021
assessed
market
value
at
five
million
five
hundred
forty
four
thousand
544,
or
five
million
five
hundred
forty
four
thousand
dollars
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll.
D
G
J
B
D
H
G
Board
members
onto
case
21-0455,
an
apartment
property
located
at
2115,
blaisdell
avenue,
page
number
667
in
your
packet
again
as
suggested
or
requested
by
mr
austin.
You
can
go
ahead
and
take
action
on
this
case.
The
original
2021
market
value
is
two
million
four
hundred
and
fifty
six
thousand
dollars.
D
D
H
B
Thank
you.
Is
there
a
second.
D
F
H
B
Thank
you
that
carries
in
the
motion
is
adopted.
G
Case
21-0457
an
apartment
property
located
at
2621
third
avenue
south
found
on
page
685
of
your
packet.
The
original
estimated
market
value
for
2021
is
one
million,
sixty
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
and
as
requested
by
mr
ostlund,
the
board
can
go
ahead
and
take
action.
B
I
B
I
H
G
Case
number
21-0458,
an
apartment
property
located
at
2829
park,
avenue
phone
on
page
694
of
your
packet.
The
original
2021
estimated
market
value
is
one
million
four
hundred
fifty
seven
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
and,
as
was
requested
by
mr
austin,
the
board
can
go
ahead
and
sustain
and
take
action.
D
I
H
G
Board
members
case
number
21.0459
and
apartment
property
at
3725,
cedar
avenue
on
page
703
in
your
packet.
The
original
estimated
market
value
was
four
million
two
hundred
forty
three
thousand
five
hundred
dollars
and,
as
was
requested
by
mr
ostland,
the
board
can
go
ahead
and
take
action
sustaining
the
value.
B
I'll,
second,
that,
let's
move
by
ciao
seconded
by
bodertha
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
four
million
two
hundred
forty
three
thousand
five
hundred
dollars.
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll.
I
I
H
G
E
E
I
move
to
sustain
the
value
at
285
000.
B
H
G
S
Hello,
my
name
is
michael
mcfarland
and
I'm
here
to
talk
about
6104
upton
avenue
south.
Can
everyone
hear
me.
I
S
Okay,
thank
you,
so
my
wife
and
I
just
purchased
this
house
in
january
of
this
year
and
we
purchased
it
for
four
hundred
thousand
dollars
which
is
lower
than
the
estimate
of
four
hundred
and
sixteen
thousand
dollars.
And
additionally,
looking
at
the
listings
for
the
house
which
started
in
october
last
year,
the
original
selling
price
or
listed
price
was
425
000..
S
There
were
no
bids
at
that
price.
So
then
it
was
decreased
to
415
000,
again
no
bids.
At
that
price,
it
was
decreased
to
410
000.
Again
there
were
no
bids,
so
they
decreased
it
to
400
000
and
that's
the
point
at
which
my
wife
and
I
bid.
So
I
believe
the
actual
value
of
the
house
is
four
hundred
thousand
dollars.
B
Any
additional
comments
or
the
recent
sale
is
fairly
compelling.
So
any
other
comments
by
board
members
or
questions.
E
My
comment
would
be
that
there
was
an
entire
year
that
went
by
to
and
we
know
that
there
was
a
lot
of
upward
pressure
in
prices
in
the
area,
so
this
was
purchased
for
400
in
january.
I
would
say
by
december
it
probably
would
have
sold
for
more.
S
E
B
I
I'm
okay
with
this.
If
everyone
else
has
a
look
at
emotion,.
B
E
B
D
H
G
Very
good
board
members,
so
we
are
slightly
ahead
of
schedule
and
we
are
scheduled
to
have
a
brief
break
at
about
three
o'clock,
so
I'm
going
to
propose
something
to
you
and
we
will
see
if
that
is,
if
you
will
agree
with
it,
I'm
going
to
suggest
that
we
look
at
the
next
time
frame.
G
B
I
am,
I
suggested
earlier
that
I
will
have
to
leave
prior
to
four
o'clock,
so
whatever
we
can
do
to
expedite
this
would
be
great.
G
I
G
I
G
H
G
B
Okay,
according
to
my
notes
here,
there
was
a
recent
sale
for
375
000
in
may
of
2020.
Is
that
correct.
E
Well,
mr
chair,
we
do
have
the
option
of
raising
the
evaluation.
B
Thank
you.
Is
there
a
second
second
thank
you
has
been
moved
by
bland
seconded
by
aboard
ertha
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
351
thousand
dollars.
I'll
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll.
D
I
G
It
is
a
property
locate,
a
residential
property
located
at
40.
Oh
I'm,
sorry,
I'm
off
a
line
case.
0
4,
6
5,
a
condominium
property
located
at
100
second
street
northeast
unit,
a
520.
This
is
a
write-in
case.
It's
located
on
page
767
of
your
packet.
The
original
2021
market
value
is
569
thousand
dollars.
B
Thank
you.
I
reviewed
that
package.
There
was
an
appraisal
done
of
april
of
2020
for
520
000.,
there's
been
a
little
bit
of
increase,
perhaps
since
then,
but
the
condo
market
hasn't
been
as
strong
as
a
single
family,
I'm
also
very
familiar
with
the
building
so
and
have
sold
in
it
before
I
would
tend
to
agree
with
the
applicant
here.
B
B
We'll
now
consider
an
act
on
the
pl4
102nd
street
northeast
a520.
I
may
have
a
motion.
J
B
I
H
G
B
Thank
you
with
the
information
provided
by
the
applicant.
There
was
appraisal
done
in
november
of
2019
for
225
thousand
dollars.
If
I
had
even
modest
10
appreciation
since
then,
I
would
put
the
value
at
about
247.
B
Second
has
been
moved
by
bland
seconded
by
chow
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
of
234
thousand
dollars.
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll.
D
H
G
G
B
E
B
H
G
Board
members
moving
to
case
21-0469,
a
residential
property
at
1727
newton
avenue,
north
phone
on
page
849
of
your
packet.
The
original
2021
market
value
is
301
000.
This
is
the
same
owner
as
the
previous
property
or
the
previous
case
did
not
respond
to
steph's
request
to
schedule
a
write
in
our
phone
and
appeal.
B
Thank
you,
as
far
as
I
can
tell
it's
a
rental
and
that
the
applicant
did
not
provide
any
comparable
data
unless
there's
comments
or
questions
by
anyone,
I
would
entertain
a
motion.
B
Second,
it's
been
moved
by
land,
that's
seconded
by
ciao,
to
sustain
the
2021
estimated
market
value
at
one
thousand
dollars
I'll.
Ask
the
click
to
call
the
roll.
D
H
G
B
B
B
D
H
G
G
H
G
G
E
K
Chair
if
you're
prepared,
then
I
would
say
the
board
is
reconvening
at
2
55
pm,
and
I
would
ask
the
clerk
to
please
call
the
role
to
verify
the
presence
of
a.
H
C
C
All
right
board
member
blaine
president.
D
D
J
B
We
have
a
quorum,
we'll
continue
the
meeting.
G
Chair
anderson
and
board
members
welcome
back.
We
have
before
us
five
remaining
phone
and
appeals
and
then
a
little
bit
more
logistical
work
to
do
before
you
are
able
to
adjourn.
I
would
first
start
with
oh,
we
need
to
admit
our
callers
in
and
then
I
think,
chair
anderson.
I
think
it
would
be
best
if
you
could
re-read
the
instructions
for
them.
G
So
so
callers
when
you're
called
on,
we
just
ask
that
you
press
star
six
to
unmute
you'll
state,
your
name
and
your
property
address.
You
have
five
minutes
to
present
to
the
board.
G
G
B
Hi,
please
identify
yourself
in
the
property
and
proceed
with
your
appeal.
R
Hello,
my
name
is:
will
jefferson
on
behalf
of
derek
trexler,
for
the
address
of
101,
glenwood
avenue,
55403
and
what
we
are
doing
today.
We
are
requesting
to
lower
the
market
value
of
the
property,
some
reasons
we
have
we're,
looking
to
get
it
lowered
to
the
sale
price
of
five
hundred
thousand.
It
was
recently
purchased
at
that
price.
R
The
reason
we
feel
it's
valued
at
that
it
has
been
on
the
market
since
2019
at
about
eight
hundred
and
fifty
thousand.
Mr.
E
Mr
chair,
excuse
me,
mr
chair:
could
we
clarify
what
property
we're
talking
about?
I
thought
we
were
talking
about
the
barcelona
333
hennepin
avenue
east.
That.
G
T
G
T
Okay,
thank
you.
Yes,
my
name
is
robert
tivnin,
I'm
a
representative
for
the
taxpayer
and
owner
and
the
property
is
at
333,
hennepin,
avenue,
east
and
it's
doing
business
or
known
as
the
rafter
apartments.
T
It
is
a
subject
class,
a
apartment
with
26
stories,
a
high
rise,
and
it
has
283
apartment
units
with
a
breakdown
of
56
studios
at
approximately
20
percent
137,
one
bedrooms
at
48
percent,
87
2
bedrooms
at
30
percent
and
three
three
bedrooms
at
one
percent.
It
comprises
two
hundred
and
twelve
thousand
five
hundred
square
feet
of
building
area
and
has
two
vacant
commercial
spaces
on
a
0.73
acre
site
prevailing
market
conditions
within
the
last
year
have
prolonged
the
lease
up
of
this
new
apartment.
T
This
situation
has
not
allowed
the
rafters
apartments
to
reach
a
stabilized
level
and
it
and
in
turn,
has
negatively
impacted
the
property's
current
market
market
value
as
of
january
second,
to
2021.,
as
of
december
31st
2020,
the
raptors
still
had
a
hundred
apartments
vacant
or
roughly
40
percent
vacancy
factor.
Nearly
a
year
and
a
half
after
opening,
there
has
been
a
significant
slowdown
in
leasing.
T
T
In
fact,
the
subject
property
started
offering
two
months
free
rent
at
the
end
of
2020..
The
property
also
includes
two
commercial
spaces
that
have
been
marketed
for
leased.
However,
there
has
been
no
active
negotiations
for
either
commercial
space
taking
place
due
to
the
decline
in
market
conditions.
T
They
may
not
reach
stabilization
for
another
year,
so
the
the
current
proposed
income
by
the
assessor
is
88
million,
480,
000
or
312
thousand
six
hundred
and
fifty
per
unit.
We've
done
an
income
analysis
using
fee,
simple
rents
and
also
made
deductions
and
came
up
for
the
concessions
and
came
up
with
the
final
market
value
in
the
range
of
81
81
million
215
000
or
approximately
286,
000
or
rounded
up
to
287
000,
a
unit
which
is
roughly
an
eight
percent
decrease
from
the
assessor's
office.
T
And
we
will
request
that
the
board
review
review
this
material
that
was
submitted
and
render
relief.
B
B
Thank
you
very
much
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
board,
or
at
least
part
of
the
board
anyways.
This
is
beyond
our
scope
to
analyze
this.
In
a
period
of
about
five
minutes,
we
will,
I
suspect,
sustain
the
current
value
and
you
will
be
eligible
to
proceed
on
to
the
next
level,
where
you
work
with
the
assessor
and
get
get
and
hopefully
get
relief
at
the
next
level.
T
H
B
You
are
there
any
questions
or
comments
from
board
members.
D
D
I
G
I
G
U
U
U
U
U
We
did
since
the
2019
estimates
assessment
that
the
city
made.
We
did
replace
parts
of
a
chain-link
fence
in
the
backyard
that
had
fallen
down,
but
it
is
only
for
part
of
the
backyard
other
than
that.
We
have
made
no
further
improvements
to
the
property
in
the
home
or
outside
the
home,
since
the
time
the
city
assessor
was
out.
U
The
flooring
that
we
put
in
in
1999
when
we
purchased
the
home
was
the
laminate
that
was
available
at
the
time,
which
is
apparently
no
longer
appealing
to
new
buyers,
because
it's
quite
slippery.
U
U
U
B
Thank
you
very
much
board
members.
Do
you
have
any
questions
or
comments
you'd
like
to
provide.
D
I
I'd
like
to
make
a
comment.
It
appears
that
this
property
has
had
some
attention
from
the
assessor,
noting
the
value
and
as
mentioned
by
the
appellant,
that
she
has
had
reviews
in
the
past,
so
not
knowing
without
any
sales.
I
I'm
thinking
the
property
value
will
be,
will
warrant
a
reduction.
B
Agreed
any
other
comments
or
questions.
E
Mr
chair,
I
certainly
agree
that
the
367
thousand
for
a
two
bedroom,
two
bath
house
with
not
a
lot
of
updates,
seems
quite
steep.
So.
E
Oh
two
bedroom
one
bath.
Yes
exactly
so,
yes,
it
does
seem
quite
high,
I'm
not
altogether
sure
what
would
be
appropriate,
but
I
think
I
would
suggest
you
know
things
have
gone
up.
That's
for
sure.
B
Has
been
moved
by
bland
seconded
by
chow
to
decrease
the
2021
estimated
market
value
to
three
hundred
thousand
dollars
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
roll.
I
G
G
P
F
P
My
name
is
clark
ordolaska
and
I'm
the
owner
and
resident
of
the
property
at
4739
upton
avenue
south.
My
wife
and
I
have
lived
here
for
eight
years
and
I
did
provide
some
information,
some
notes
and
comparative
information,
along
with
a
some
information
from
the
market
value
tools
in
the
assessor's
office.
Do
you
have
those.
P
So
a
couple
of
points
and
then
I
would
like
to
just
look
at
a
couple
of
similar
properties
in
the
fulton
neighborhood,
since
we
moved
in
we've
not
made
any
improvements
after
adding
a
dormer
eight
years
ago.
P
P
I
know
we're
close
to
the
lake
and
it
is
really
fun
to
have
people
walk
by,
but
upton
is
a
busy
street
and
when
I
consider
some
of
the
sales
comparatives
when
I
consider
the
street
that
we're
on
I'm
really
feeling
like
the
assessed
value
that
was
formerly
used.
592
is
much
more
appropriate
than
increasing
the
assessed
value
to
661,
as
is
proposed,
and
that's
why
I'm
appearing
before
you
today.
B
B
Is
it's
got
quantity,
but
what
we're
looking
for
is
quality
I'd
rather
see
four
or
five
comparables,
with
with
photographs
comparing
to
photographs
and
dimensions,
and
things
of
your
house
would
be
much
more
useful
for
us
to
make
an
assessment.
If
you're
unhappy
with
our
ruling
today,
you
will
have
the
opportunity
to
revise
this
and,
with
the
help
of
the
assessors
department,
they
will
aid
you
in
this
process
and
we'll
go
from
there.
That
would
be
great.
P
That'd
be
great,
I
didn't
realize
that
you
know
didn't
really
have
guidance
on
how.
H
B
You
board
members
any
other
questions
or
comments.
E
I
would
move
that
we
sustain
the
value
at
651
thousand
dollars.
J
D
H
P
Sure
so
I'm
I'm
missing
the
reasoning
behind
sustaining
this,
and
is
it
simply
that
I
didn't
provide
you
with
what
you're
looking
for
and
that's
what
I
would
need
to
do.
I
B
It's
not
that
we
don't
believe
you
or
your
the
information
that
you've
provided.
It's
just
that
it's
not
clear
enough
for
us
to
make
a
ruling,
and
so
I
would
suggest
that
you
proceed
to
the
next
level
and
work
with
the
assessor
department
to
you
know
come
up
with
a
valuation.
That's
mutually
agreeable!.
G
R
Thank
you,
my
name
is:
will
jefferson
I'm
calling
on
behalf
of
a
commercial
property
at
101,
glenwood
avenue?
R
The
reason
for
the
for
the
appeal
today
is
that
the
market
value
is
at
850
000.,
I'm
sorry,
I'm
sorry.
The
market
value
is
626
000.,
that's
the
valuation.
It
was
purchased
at
the
end
of
march
of
this
year
for
500
000,
but
it
was
actually
listed
at
850
000
for
the
past
two
years
since
lee's.
R
That's
the
establishment
that
was
there
closed,
and
the
reason
for
the
closing
was
also
the
fact
that
there's
a
light
rail
construction
project
going
on
right
there
on
glenwood
right
in
front
of
the
right
in
front
of
the
property
which
actually
took
away
about
80
plus
parking
spaces
that
the
establishment
had
used
for
for
decades.
R
It
was
a
an
agreement
that
they
had
with
the
city
and
some
of
those
things
were
supposed
to
be
resolved,
but
they
never
never
got
around
to
that
and
subsequently
the
property
did
close
for
business
back
then
so,
basically,
another
another
reason
why
we're
requesting
that
is
because
the
entire
upstairs
3600
square
feet
is
under
it's
basically
unfinished.
R
So
it
cannot
not
be
rented
for
a
commercial
purpose,
along
with
the
downstairs
also
has
issues
that
would
have
to
be
tended
to
prior
to
to
opening
for
business,
so
we're
kind
of
asking
for
the
board
if
they
could
lower
the
the
the
market
value
to
the
actual
purchase
price.
R
B
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Are
there
any
questions
or
comments
from
board
members
here.
J
I
have
a
question
for
the
caller
about
the
recent
acquisition:
was
the
property
put
on
the
market
openly
exposed
to
the
market.
R
Yes,
it
was
kenwood
was
the
and
I
can
get
you
that
listing.
If,
if
you
want
that
documentation,
but
yes,
it
was,
it
was
through
kenwood
realty
at
850,
000.
J
B
You
has
the
property
closed,
yet
I'm
sorry
has
the
property
closed.
The
transition.
R
Oh
yes,
yes,
the
transaction
is
quote
well,
it
is
under
it's.
F
R
Yeah,
it's
under
contract,
it's
being
financed
through
the
through
the
seller.
So
so
we
have
that.
B
Yeah
and
when
is
it
due
to
actually
the
buyer
to
take
possession.
B
E
Yeah,
we
don't
need
that
at
this
point,
but
you
know
we're
all
still
mourning
the
closing
of
lee's
liquor
lounge,
but
thank
you
for
rescuing
it
as
best
you
can.
R
R
Yeah
that
that
that
that's,
what
we've
been
here
and
a
lot
of
people
loved
it
and,
and
that
and
that's
the
the
hopes
in
the
future,
is
to
kind
of
keep
it
keep
it
the
way.
It
is:
there's
not
a
lot
of
places
in
minneapolis
that
have
that
that
vintage
style
and
we
we
definitely
like
to
keep
it
that
way.
D
As
you
say,
I
have
a
question
mr
chair,
seeing
this
is
a
contract
for
deed
purchase,
which,
if
there's
no
bank
financing
there,
probably
will
be
no
appraisal
done.
Was
there
an
appraisal
done
either
by
the
buyer
or
the
seller?
In
this
case?
R
E
O
J
I
have
another
question:
it
looks
like
the
interest
rate
on
the
contract
for
these
at
seven
percent.
That's
a
little
bit
above
what
you
could
get
from
bank
financing.
Was
there
any
specific
reason
why
the
interest
rate
at
seven
percent
was
chosen.
R
I
don't.
I
don't
know
the
reasoning
behind
the
the
actual
percentage
rate
on
that
or
why
they
didn't
do
them.
H
J
J
Okay,
I
find
the
the
listing
history
and
the
sales
history
pretty
compelling
in
this
case,
the
above
market
interest
rate
would
have
an
impact
on
the
actual
sale
price.
However,
so
I
mean
I'd
be
willing
to
reduce
the
assessed
value
to
maybe
550
in
that
ballpark
to
account
for
that
non-market
financing,
but.
F
J
Okay,
well
I'll
make
a
motion
that
we
reduced
the
valuation
to
550
000..
Thank
you.
Is
there
a
second.
E
R
Oh
also,
and
then
just
just
an
additional
thing
about
the
financing.
There
was
50
down
payment,
also.
B
G
G
V
Yes,
my
name
is
michael
dukett
and
I'm
calling
about
626
south
9th
street,
which
is
downtown
and
elliott
park.
It's
one
of
the
beautiful
old,
great
red
brick
buildings
from
1886..
M
V
V
This
is
the
year
before
which
I'm
now
going
to
court
for
to
fight.
So
my
taxes
went
from
8
000
to
13
500,
and
then
I
assume
the
city
has
changed
the
classification
to
residential
miscellaneous,
which
I'm
not
sure
what
that
is,
and
if
it
relates
to
an
airbnb
there.
V
On
the
property
one
of
three
units
and
if
we're
counting
last
year
as
the
valuation
70
percent
of
that
rental
income
was
longer
than
30-day
rentals
last
year.
So
it's
really
not
short-term
rental
totally.
So
I
also
if
you
look
at
valuations
and
on
that
this
is
a
pretty
hard
property
to
value.
But
there
are
two
other
units
in
that
row
of
housing.
V
V
B
Questions.
Thank
you
very
much.
I
do
not
believe
that
this
particular
board
can
change
classifications,
rebecca.
G
Chair
anderson
and
board
members,
you
do
have
the
ability
to
change
classification
of
properties.
If
you
would
like
me
to
provide
some
history
about
the
classification
of
short-term
rentals,
I'm
happy
to
do
that
and
take
a
minute
to
explain
that.
G
Okay,
so
in
for
the
2019
assessment,
no
the
2020
assessment
year.
Excuse
me:
the
direction
from
the
department
of
revenue
was
that
the
properties
that
meet
certain
qualifications
should
be
classified
as
commercial.
Now
we
know
that
the
commercial
classification,
commercial
class
rate
is
higher
than
residential
properties.
G
Then,
in
the
fifth
special
session
of
2020,
the
legislature
passed
language
that
told
the
assessors
to
classify
short-term
rentals
as
what
we
have.
There
is
rm,
that's
residential
miscellaneous
and
that
has
a
class
rate
of
1.25,
so
a
lower
class
rate,
and
so
that's
why
you
will
see
the
change
in
the
classification
rate
for
that
or
change
in
the
classification
for
this
property
and
the
property
owner
is
correct.
We
did.
We
do
require
people
to
complete
this
survey
to
come
so
that
we
have
the
accurate
information
about
the
property.
G
As
he
stated,
he
is
appealing
and
via
tax
court,
the
2020
classification,
so
the
board
can
change
classifications.
However,
you
know
we.
He
can
also
continue
to
work
with
our
staff
appraiser
on
the
correct
valuation
and
classification.
B
Personally,
I'd
feel
more
comfortable
with
that,
because
I
don't
understand
the
classifications
well
enough.
Any
other
board
members
want
to
comment
on
this.
E
I
don't
feel
that
I
have
the
expertise
or
no.
The
documentation
provided
here
doesn't
give
me
enough
information
either
to
make
that
decision,
and
I
would
encourage
the
owner
to
work
with
with
the
assessor
to
try
and
rectify
this.
H
B
You'll
have
whatever
decision
here
is:
you'll
have
the
right
to
move
on
to
a
another
level
and
work
with
the
assessor
to
change,
value
and
classification,
okay,
and
I
think
that
would
be
the
most
appropriate
at
this
point.
I
B
Thank
you
any
other
questions,
if
not
I'll
I'll
entertain
a.
D
Motion
I'll
move
to
sustain
the
2021
market
value
of
778
000..
Thank.
B
D
G
Board
members.
That
concludes,
I
believe,
all
the
cases
that
we
had
before
you
today.
The
individual
cases
just
wanted
to
remind
you
that
we
do
have
a
list.
It's
in
the
teams,
folder
of
approximately
60
some
cases
that
we
can
received
post
your
convene
on
on
monday
april
19th,
and
that
when
the
board
adjourns,
we
would
just
like
you
to
make
a
motion
and
state
that,
when
the
board
adjourns
the
appeals
process
closes-
and
we
will,
you
will
no
longer
be
accepting
appeals
at
the
local
level.
E
When
the
board
adjourns
today
at
the
end
of
this
meeting,
we
will
no
longer
be
accepting
appeals,
but
the
appeals
that
have
been
submitted
until
this
time
will
be
considered
by
the
asses
assessor's
office.
B
Thank
you.
Do
I
have
a
second
second,
it's
been
moved
by
bland
and
and
seconded
by
both
other
board
members
to
close
taking
applications
after
the
german
of
the
meeting
today
I'll
ask
for
call
of
the
roll.
D
B
That
carries
and
the
motion
is
adopted.
Is
there
any
final
comments,
rebecca.
G
Yes,
so
board
members,
we
just
really
want
to
express
our
sincere
gratitude
for
all
of
your
time,
energy
and
expertise
that
you've
provided,
allowing
minneapolis
property
owners
to
have
this
local
appeal
process.
G
Thank
you
for
your
time
over
the
past
week
and
all
the
time
when
you're,
not
in
sessions
preparing
you're,
very
patient
with
staff
and
the
appeals
process
and
very
adaptable,
as
we
needed
to
make
some
changes.
So
thank
you
very
very
much.
I
also
want
to
take
a
moment
to
thank
our
staff,
our
appraisal
staff,
our
administrative
staff,
our
technical
staff
and
our
supervisor
staff
in
the
assessor's
office.
G
It's
been
a
it's
been
a
long
few
weeks
as
we
worked
on
appeals-
and
we
have
a
few
weeks
left
ahead
of
us
as
we
start
to
work
on
county
appeals,
but
their
dedication
to
a
fair
appeals
process
has
is
very
much
appreciated.
I
also
want
to
thank
the
city,
clerk's
office
team
and
their
partnership
in
this
process,
knowing
that
they
help
administer
the
boards,
and
then
we
have
teams
from
I.t
and
communications
and
some
staff
from
the
convention
center
that
help
support
these
live
virtual
meetings
and
the
recordings
of
the
meetings.
G
B
Thank
you
and
again
thank
you
to
the
board
members,
the
staff
from
the
city
assessors
and
the
city
clerk's
office,
as
well
as
the
tech
team
for
all
their
work
and,
if
not
and
without
objection,
I
will
declare
the
2021
local
board
of
appeal
and
equalization
adjourn
for
the
year.