►
From YouTube: March 4, 2021 Civil Rights Commission Accountability for the Killing of George Floyd Task Force
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
The
city
will
be
recording
and
posting
this
meeting
to
the
city's
website
and
youtube
channel
as
a
means
of
increasing
public
access
and
transparency.
This
meeting
is
public
and
subject
to
minnesota
open
meeting
law.
At
this
time,
I
will
ask
the
clerk
to
call
the
role,
so
we
can
now
verify
a
quorum
for
this
meeting.
A
quorum
will
be
five
members
of
the
task
force,
so
not
five
total,
but
five
of
the
task
force.
E
A
A
A
F
A
A
A
The
kind
of
item
three,
I
guess
on
the
agenda
is
task
force
outcomes
and
I
think
this
is
perhaps
the
one
of
the
most
the
most
important
discussion
of
the
evening
and
I'd
like
to
open
it
up
to
our
task
force,
members
and
others
for
suggestions
on
that
and,
if
possible,
I'm
wondering
and
forgive
me
if
I'm
getting
your
name
wrong.
Commissioner
rants,
I
believe
that's
the
correct
pronunciation.
D
D
A
H
G
A
G
You
know,
recognize
that
the
person
on
the
other
side
of
the
demonstration
is
also
either
respecting
their
beliefs
or
being
is
there
because
of
their
beliefs,
and
so
I
I
don't
know
if
we
can
take
a
a
strong
side
on
this.
I
don't
I
don't
know
if
that's
our
role
here,
we're
supposed
to
be.
You
know
a
neutral
arbiter
of
these
of
these
decisions.
So
I
would
urge
a
more
neutral
statement.
A
A
J
Okay,
thank
you
for
agreeing
to
lead
us
in
this
wonderful
idea
and
I'm
just
wondering
about
the
work
that
you
recently
done
with
the
policing
task
force
in
terms
of
actually,
the
house
is
considering
passing
a
bill
regarding
you
know,
choke
holds,
and
you
know
how
can
we
use
what
we
already
have
and
make
a
statement
based
on
what
we
have
and
the
work?
That's
already
been
done.
J
Yeah
and
I
think
for
our
new
members,
they
may
not
know
some
of
the
work.
That's
already
been
done,
so
maybe
resending
that
out,
and
maybe
that
could
be
our
base
ground
to
say,
hey
fellow
commissioners
is
this
is
some
of
the
work
that
has
been
done
and
how
can
we
use
it
if
you're
interested
in
using
this?
Is
this
something
that
you
would
like
to
use.
A
A
H
Me
yes
hi,
I
just
was
I
had
some
thoughts
is
that
is
that
all
right,
or
is
this
just
okay?
Just
regarding
some
of
the
notes
that
I
had
taken
from
the
when
this
task
course
was
formed
so
wondering
we
had
sort
of
talked
about
disseminating
information
regarding
people's
rights
during
demonstration,
and
so
I'm
just
wondering
what
role
that
could
have
as
far
as
people,
knowing
what
their
rights
are
and
then
some
thoughts
as
well.
Regarding
how
this
letter
or
how
this,
how
our
statement
like
what?
H
However,
I
think
it
would
be
a
great
idea
if
we
were
to
create
a
statement
that
has
information
about
people
knowing
their
rights
and
that
the
city
will
not
infringe
on
people's
rights
as
an
ordinance
that
was
going
to
be
passed
in
st
paul,
where
they
were
infringing
on
people's
rights
to
protest.
If
we're
able
to
pass
that
through
to
the
city,
council
or
the
mayor
to.
A
J
C
Yes,
hello,
everyone.
I
am
new
to
this
commission
and
the
chair
who
just
spoke
before
me.
I
feel
really
strongly
as
she
does
about
educating
the
public
of
their
rights
when
they
are
demonstrating
and
what
they
are,
and
I
just
really
feel
this
is
a
great
opportunity
for
the
commission
of
civil
rights
to
get
you
know
out
there,
because,
as
a
new
member,
when
I
tell
people
I'm
on
the
commission
and
really
excited
about
it,
they're
like
what
is
it
I've
never
heard
of
it.
So
I
just.
C
G
Thank
you,
one
of
the
things
that
we
probably
should
be
careful.
We
are
not
a.
We
are
not
a
commission
charged
with
saying
what
people's
rights
are
are
not
we'd
like
to
suggest
we
have
the
city
attorney
and
the
minneapolis
journey
supporting
us
come
forward
with
those
that
statement.
I
think
we
have
the
ability
to
say
what
we
encourage
when
what
we
support.
We
support
the
rule
of
law
and
the
protections
that
the
city
as
well.
G
D
So
you're
saying
that,
how
can
you
be
for
civil
rights
and
not
take
a
position
and
when
I
hear
language
like
a
more
neutral
statement
and
and
an
unwillingness
to,
even
even
if
it
was
to
publish
the
the
law
or
the
code
or
what
the
citizens
rights
are,
there
seems
some
resistance
to
that
and
I
don't
I
don't.
Quite
I
don't
quite
under
understand
that
as
a
as
a
commission
right
and
us
being
about
civil
rights,
we
have
to
take
some
sort
of
stance.
A
G
G
G
I
am,
but
I'm
just
not
sure
that
this
body
has
the
ability
to
to
extend
itself
in
the
manner
you're
suggesting,
and
you
know
I
would
suggest
we
have
the
city
attorney,
give
us
a
list
of
what
is
what
is
lawful.
What
is
what
is,
what
are
the
rights
that
we
are
going
to
publish?
I
think
I'm
in
favor
of
that,
but
again
to
come
up
with
something
that
would
be
seen
as
political
or
divisive.
G
I
don't
know
is
really
what
what
the
commission's
here
to
do
we're
here
to
be
arbiter,
arbiters
of
complaints
and
so
the
more
polarized
you
you
are
seen
as
a
group
of
people
reviewing
and
judging
something.
I
think
that
you,
you
diminish
what
the
commission
can
do,
but
you
know
I
do
understand
what
you're
saying
commissioner
rants
and
I
do.
I
do
empathize
with
it.
J
I
hear
what
both
mark
and
ken
are
saying.
However,
we
would
not
be
here
as
commissioners
if
we
didn't
walk
if
we
didn't
sit,
if
we
didn't
stand
up
for
to
correct
the
wrongs
of
our
ancestors
and
the
people
before
us,
so
we
have
to
acknowledge
why
we're
here
as
civil
rights
activists
based
basically
and
it's
a
historical
chain
of
advance,
and
I
think
we
do
have
a
due
diligence
in
my
personal
opinion.
J
However,
I
did
put
in
the
chat
that
we
should
talk
to
andrea
neaf,
which
was
basically
what
mark
said
in
terms
of
what
we
can
and
cannot
do,
and
thank
you,
commissioner,
ferrara,
because
I
also
remember
when
cindy
and
paul
and
some
of
us
were
you
know
at
the
library
you
know
trying
to
get
people
to
come
out
regarding
the
disparities
in
the
minneapolis
public
schools
and
that
that
is
one
way.
So,
there's
there's
multiple
ways
to
protest.
J
J
C
Oh
yeah,
I
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
what
I
meant
by
rights,
but
it
seems
like
a
lot
of
people
understood
what
I
was
saying,
but
you
know
I
really
really
appreciate
what
commissioner
rant
said.
That
to
me
really
spoke
to
me
and
commissioner
stagnanti,
like
I
understand
where
you're
coming
from,
and
I
appreciate
your
your
outlook
because
you,
you
are
a
lawyer
and
I
don't
have
that
background
and
that's
what
makes
this
commission
great,
but
I
didn't
join
the
commission
of
civil
rights
to
remain
neutral.
C
That's
not
why
I'm
here
and
I
think
we're
doing
a
disservice
to
the
minneapolis
citizens
by
not
educating
them
of
the
the
right
to
assembly
the
right
to
free
speech
like
what
happens
when
you
get
kettled
by
the
police
and
it's
unlawful.
I
don't
think,
there's
anything
wrong
with
that
and
maybe
I'm
out
of
line
guys
but
yeah.
I
that's
kind
of
like
where
I
s
that
the
outcome,
that's
how
I
feel
so.
L
No,
it's,
commissioner,
fine.
I
just
want
to
make
a
small
account.
I
had
my
hand
up,
maybe
that's
what
it
was
showing
and
it's
in
respect
to
everyone.
We
we
all
know
that
we
are
civil
civil
rights
activists
and
we-
and
one
thing
we
need
to
be
careful
about
which
I
think
commissioner
stegnani
is-
is
trying
to
make.
That
point
is
we
are
actually
a
trial.
L
We
are
trial,
judges
ourselves,
we
actually
hear
cases
on
civil
rights
and
we
have
to
be
careful
that
that
when
we
do
so,
we
are
publicly
trying
to
tell
people
that
we
are,
you
know
open
and
we
want
a
fair
process
and-
and
we
want
it
to
be
said
that
there
is
a
fair
process
here.
We
we
have
to
walk
the
line
so
that
people
don't
say
we
aren't
we're
actually
a
trial
group,
that's
just
civil
rights
activists
and
we
rubber
stamp
any
civil
rights
complaint.
L
So
I
think
we
need
to
be
cautious
about
the
statement
we
make
and
and
the
statement.
We
can
still
make
a
statement
that
would
advocate
and
respect
civil
rights
and
we
would
encourage
that
there
be
a
peaceful
protest,
but
I
think
we
have
to
be
careful
where
we
start
to
steer
this
away
from
what
is
should
be
a
fair
trial,
but
we
still
can
make
a
statement.
L
M
Yes,
if
you
don't
mind-
and
I
I'm
just
hoping
that
this
might
be
somewhat
helpful
and
kind
of
talking
about-
where
kind
of
the
commission's,
both
like
duties
and
expectations
lie.
And
so
I
just
wanted
to
echo.
What
chair
may
had
noted
that
you
absolutely
have
power
to
advocate
to
the
mayor
and
city
council
and
that
in
doing
that,
that's
a
great
place
to
take
a
position
right
because
you're
not
advocating
or
advising
them.
If
you're,
not
taking
a
position
on
something.
So.
E
N
M
To
point
that
out-
and
then
I
also
in
reference
to
andrea
and
speaking
to
her-
I
just
wanted
to
put
out
there
that
anything
that
was
put
together
tonight
could
absolutely
be
run
by
andrea
from
the
city
attorney's
office
before
it
went
to
the
larger
commission.
So
there
would
be,
you
know,
a
chance
to
make
sure
that
she's
kind
of
in
line
with
whatever
is
decided
upon.
A
G
G
You
know
that
peacefully
protesting
is
a
protected
right
and
that
you
know
protection
protest
loses
its
protection
and
its
power
when
it
becomes
destructive.
So
I
mean
bullet
points
like
that.
I
think
would
be
in
line
with
what
a
commission
could
say
and
still
not
you
know
be
seen
as
as
picking
aside,
I
guess.
A
A
You
know
this
being
an
opportunity
to
provide
our
point
of
view
on
policing
reform
and
there
have
been
some
voices
that
have
been
advocating
for
provided
this
being
an
opportune
time
to.
You
know,
really
take
a
stand
on
civil
rights
and
really,
you
know
remind
our
community
of
the
opportunity
at
hand
to
advance
civil
rights
at
this
time
in
our
community,
so
I'm
probably
doing
a
terrible
job
of
summarizing
those
disparate
points
of
view,
but
those
kind
of
those
three
different
objectives.
A
E
A
A
D
D
H
That's
what
I
was
mention
this
is
chair,
may
also
with
not
infringing
on
their
rights
to
peacefully
demonstrate,
like
I
stated
st
paul
tried
to
pass
legislation
or
some
sort
of
act
that
would
be
infringing
on
people's
rights,
which
was
ending.
It
was
ended
up
getting
shut
down,
but
I
you
know
see
this
as
a
position
to
make
sure
that
city,
council
and
the
mayor
do
not
do
the
same.
D
A
Proposed
I
mean,
I
think,
that's
a
great
idea.
Personally,
I
guess
I'll
speak
up.
I
think,
having
a
a
communication
that
exhorts,
our
council
members
and
our
mayor
to
use
this
as
an
opportunity
for
progress,
real
progress
and
commitment
to
civil
rights
as
well
as
cautioning
them.
You
know
and
encouraging
them
to
support
peaceful
protests
would
be
great.
I
think
that's
a
great
idea.
G
Thank
you.
So
we
are
we
proposing
that
we
bifurcate,
you
know.
One
is
a
public
facing
statement
and
one
is
a
request
more
in
line
to
the
mayor
and
and
the
city
council
to
publicly
publicly
state
that
they
will.
They
will
abide
by
peaceful
protest
guidelines
and
then
the
public
statement
of
the
councils
that
you
know
that
would
be.
A
A
F
O
A
Appreciate
it,
thank
you
great.
So
this
is
the
discussion
part
I
I
would
say
that
that
just
does
not
go
far
enough
towards
the
point
about
advocating
the
city
to
lean
into
our
city
leadership,
to
lean
into
its
commitment
to
civil
rights.
Right
now-
and
I
think
that's
an
important
part
of
the
motion.
A
O
I
captured
some
language
that
you
mentioned
madam
chair
and
I'm
attempting
to
put
it
into
the
chat,
so
you
can
tell
me
if
I've
captured
it
correctly.
If
you
give
me
just
a
moment,
I
should
have
that
into
the
chat
so
that
all
members
can
review
it.
I
have
put
asterisks
around
the
added
material
again,
it's
a
draft
motion.
It's
in
the
chat
now
I've
bifurcated
that
into
two
parts
there
should
actually
be.
I
guess
a
number
two
and
number
two
encourages
the
city's
leadership
to
lean
into
its
commitment
to
civil.
I
Rights,
commissioner,
lord,
can
I
ask
a
question
while
people
are
reading
for
you
specific
and
maybe
for
those
who
have
been
on
committees
like
this
before
I've,
never
in
my
three
years
been
on
a
committee
where
we
have
to
actually
use
robert's
rules
in
the
midst
of
this,
and
it
seems
like
it
might
potentially
slow
down
the
conversation
where
we're
going.
So
I
don't
know
I
would
yield
to
you
and
to
anybody
else
if
we
need
to
do
motions
and
all
of
the
above
in
this
format,.
O
Madam
chair,
this
is
casey
carl,
I'm
the
city
clerk.
I
I
don't
know
that
this
is
the
correct
answer.
It's
looked
for.
You
certainly
do
not
need
to
follow
strictly
robert's
rules
of
order
and
it's
900
pages
in
conducting
your
business.
However,
any
action
of
this
body
is
taken
by
a
vote,
and
so
the
simplest
method
of
getting
that
done
is
putting
something
in
writing.
O
Having
members
modify
that
which
is
called
an
amendment,
we
don't
have
to
call
it
that
but
modify
it
until
the
body
as
a
whole,
or
at
least
the
majority
of
the
body
agrees
to
that
statement
and
adopts
it
by
a
vote.
That
then
becomes
the
action
or
position
or
statement
if
you
will
of
the
body.
So
I
concur,
you
don't
need
to
go
through
a
very
formalized
process.
This
is
a
work
group.
O
Informal
discussion
is
usually
best
in
that
environment
into
the
chat
I've
placed
what
I've
captured
so
far
as
a
potential
statement
from
this
group
you're
welcome
to
continue,
modifying
and
refining
that
so
that
it
captures.
I
think
the
consensus
of
the
majority
of
the
work
group
happy
to
help
if
there's
more.
A
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
as
long
as
we're
in
amendment
mode,
I
don't
see
why
we
wouldn't
to
the
point
commissioner
debonish
made
earlier
recap
in
this
communication:
the
recommendations
that
this
body
has
already
endorsed
for
police
reform
that
were
highlighted
in
our
policing
task
force
report.
A
H
J
E
A
C
I
just
wanted
to
say
something
that
commissioner
rant
said
early
on
and
I
don't
know
how
we
all
feel
about
it.
But
I
think
that
some
sort
of-
and
I
don't
know
where
it
sits
if
it
sits
in
you-
know
going
to
the
marin
city
council
or
if
it
comes
from
the
commission
itself,
but
some
sort
of-
and
I
don't
know
if
the
wording
is
correct,
but
public
apology
to
address
the
trauma
and
the
read
traumatization
that
is
going
on
for
our
bipolar
community.
D
D
C
J
O
G
A
H
Would
that
be
taking
a
stance?
This
is
jeremy
kayla.
Are
you
still
on
the
line?
I'm
just
wondering
if
that
would
be
like
providing
a
bias.
If
we
are
then
apologizing
as
the
commission,
I
I
just
wonder
you
know,
there's
thoughts
that
all
right,
I'm
gonna
stop
speaking
and
I'm
gonna.
Look
at
these
recommendations.
J
J
A
I
mean,
I
guess
I
I'll
just
throw
my
two
cents
on
this.
I
feel
like
we
have
limited
a
limited
arsenal
or,
like
limited
number
of
bites,
of
the
apple
to
really
get
listened
to
by
the
community
at
large
as
well.
As
you
know,
people
like
the
mayor
and
the
city
council,
and
I
would
I
would
rather
take
my
limited
opportunities
to
advocate
for
change.
J
A
I
think
the
some
of
the
things
that
commissioner
rams
talked
about
in
terms
of
really
seeing
a
commitment
to
civil
rights.
I
I
think
that
point
about
recognizing
the
racism
as
a
public
health
emergency.
I
think
putting
weight
behind
that.
I
think
some
of
these
policing
recommendations
that
we've
developed
that
could
have
real
impact
on
people's
lives
in
a
positive
way
going
forward
were
they
to
be
adopted.
C
This
is
commissioner
gold
and
chair
lord.
I
I
see
your
point
and
maybe
you
know
the
apology
is,
is
also
weaving
into
a
fabric
of
healing
that
this
is
you
know
some.
Maybe
we
can
word
it
in
a
way
because
I
think
there's
a
lot
of
healing
that
needs
to
happen
within
minneapolis
and
also
obviously
globally,
because
anti-blackness
isn't
just
america's
problem.
So
maybe
that
that
way
you
know.
H
I
Yeah,
this
is
a
a
slightly
broader
conversation,
but
I've
been
figuring
out
where
to
put
it
in
because
it's
not
directed
to
this
specific
motion.
But
I
I
wonder
if
we
just
need
to
broaden
this
out.
It
feels
like
we're
getting
very
detailed
and
to
kind
of
back
up
what
I
when
I
said,
I
that
this
is
something
I'd
be
interested
in
being
a
part
of
for
me.
I
Like
many
of
you,
I
was
thinking
about
what
I
would
want
to
communicate
and
I
have
three
things
and
whether
I
I
want
it
communicated
broadly
not
just
some
goes
to
hearing
some
goes
to
there,
but
broadly
as
a
representative
of
the
civil
rights
commission,
I
would
want
first
and
foremost,
we
condemn
violence
period.
We
could
the
violence
brought
us
to
this
point.
I
It
brought
us
to
this
point
on
the
neck
of
george
floyd,
and
it
brought
us
to
this
point
on
this
systematic
way
in
which
we
use
violence
that
needs
to
have
a
different
way
forward.
Secondly,
I
think
it's
important
we
encourage
and
we
promote
peaceful
demonstration.
Now,
though,
that
can
have
a
sub
point
as
well
and
we
can
give
ways
for
that.
But
first
we
condemn
violence.
I
Then
we
encourage
and
promote
peaceful
demonstration
and
then
third-
and
this
is-
I
think,
what
we're
talking
about
now,
we
exhort
the
city
council
to
lead
in
a
specific
way
forward,
with
voice
and
action,
and
then
we
could
leave.
Then
we
could
put
some
of
these
sub
things
like
a
pathway
to
safety
and
demonstration
and
policing
and
funding
that
promotes
the
equitable
representation
for
all
people.
A
A
G
I
Yeah,
I
was
just
yes,
I'm
an
agreement,
commissioner,
lord,
and
it
could
be
something
to
the
general,
but
then
that
we
would
also
let
the
city
council
they
they
would
see
it.
We
would
ask
them
to
pay
special
attention
to
kind
of
that.
Third
point:
what
we
encourage
and
exhort
them
to
do
and
follow
up
and
even
give
us
a
response.
G
My
daughter
had
an
issue,
so
I
I
I
think
I,
like
commissioner
hurtman's
approach
here
better.
I
think
that
you
know
the
outline
that
he
has
brought
forth
is.
I
think,
something
that
we
could
say
both
publicly
and
also
offer
as
a
framework
to
the
mayor
and
the
city
council,
with
the
specific
bullet
points
below
it.
I
think
that
apologizing
is
not
something
we
are
able
to,
or
an
apology
from
us
is
less
meaningful
that
we
should.
G
G
K
A
Gain
some
alignment,
so
we
can
take
some
action.
I
I
want
to
make
sure
we
hear
from
other
members
of
the
task
force
victoria
can
cindy
with
respect
to
commissioner
herkman's
and
apologies.
If
I
missed
anyone,
anyone
else
who
hasn't
spoken
yet
on
paul's
proposal
for
a
more
general
public
communication.
N
J
When
I'm
reading
this
paul-
and
this
is
very
well
said-
I
I
think
of
human
rights-
and
I
think
that
of
our
commissioner
amy,
who
you
know
you
know,
brought
to
the
table.
The
fact
that
other
countries
are
are
at
looking
at
us
to
see
what
will
happen
next.
So
I
you
know,
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
this
is
like
human
rights
in
terms
of
the
right
to
live
peacefully
without
fear
of
being
hurt
because
of
your
skin
color
or
your
religious
belief
or
whatever
beliefs.
D
D
I
I
think
that
this
has
been
a
a
great
discussion,
but
I
think
that
we've
kind
of
strayed
from
the
initial
us
getting
together
and
doing
the
statement,
and
so
I
think,
maybe
for
the
sake
of
time,
we
work
on
the
statement.
But
we
still
continue
the
work
with
what
we
want
to
disseminate
to
the
the
city,
council
and
and
the
mayor,
because,
because
I'm
concerned
that
we
won't
get
a
statement
together
in
time
because
time
is
is,
is
really
becoming
of
the
essence.
With
the
trial.
G
A
A
Commissioner
herkman
mentioned,
and
I'm
looking
in
the
chat
here,
because
paul
captured
it
in
the
chat
condemning
violence,
encouraging
promoting
peaceful
demonstration
and
exhorting
the
city
council
to
lead
and
and
by
lead
with
a
specific
way
forward.
I
I
think
you
mean
lead
with
respect
to
championing
and
championing
civil
rights
with
voice
in
action.
Is
that
right,
paul.
G
I
A
G
A
A
A
L
A
C
D
A
A
If,
before
kind
of
talking
about
the
next
step
of
like
how
we
do
this
statement,
I
want
to
go
back,
because
this
is
a
statement
for
the
general
kind
of
community
and
talk
about
a
communication
to
this
to
the
city,
council
and
mayor
that
could
be
more
appointed,
potentially
a
version
of
this
or
potentially
something
more
going
back
to
the
first
motion
which
we
never
voted
on.
I'm
sorry,
I'm
sure
we're
breaking
some
rules,
some
sort
of
rule
with
that
I
truly
apologize.
A
We
I'll
just
go
back
to
that.
We
had
talked
about
a
statement
to
the
mayor
and
council.
You
know
asking
them
to
commit
to
much
of
what
was
in
what
we
just
voted
on
and
commitment
to
civil
rights
and
maybe
the
policing
recommendations
as
well.
So
do
we
want
to
move
forward
with
a
more
maybe
a
more
pointed
version
for
the
city
council
and
the
mayor
as.
E
G
You
know
recognizing
public
safety
means
more
than
just
policing
increased
transparency
into
the
minneapolis
police
department,
increased
accountability,
rebuild
trust,
et
cetera,
et
cetera.
I
mean,
I
think,
we've
said
you
know
these
the
collective
we
have
said
in
our
recommendations
earlier
and
we
should
follow
through
with
those.
A
G
I
I
So
I
would
suggest,
maybe
that
it's
not
a
one
or
the
other
or
a
both
end,
but
that
we
prioritize
finish
the
public
one
figure
out
how
to
maybe
even
parse
out
the
three
sections
of
this
statement
collate
it
together
to
promote.
And
then,
if
we
do
that,
then
we
can
look
at
that
third
statement
and
say
how
do
we
wanna?
I
How
do
we
wanna
kind
of
work
through
or
the
third
part
of
the
first
statement
holding
the
city
leaders
accountable,
maybe
between
the
next
two
meetings,
so
to
be
more
concise
and
consolidated?
Folks
on
the
public
one
big
way
forward
with
that
work
on
the
one
to
the
lead
to
the
city
leadership.
Next
time
will
be
my
suggestion.
A
So
let's
talk
about
then
kind
of
getting
this
moving.
We
could
maybe
have
a
little
bit
of
discussion
on
just
I
mean
I
think
the
points
are
pretty
straightforward.
I'm
wondering
if
it
might
be
easier
for
us
to
have
a
brave
person,
take
a
crack
at
writing
a
draft
and
then
perhaps
trying
to
reconvene
next
week
to
react
to
something.
I
think
it's
a
lot
of
times,
much
easier
to
react
to
something
as
stimulus
than
try
to
kind
of
create
something
from
whole
cloth.
How
do
people
feel
about
that.
E
I
A
great
idea,
I'm
in
agreement-
I'm
sorry,
go
ahead
chair
well,
I
was
just
for
the
new
people
I
was
going
to.
Let
them
know
that
this
would
follow
protocol
of
what
we've
done
in
the
past,
commissioner
devenish
brought
forward
a
resolution
on
islamophobia
that
she
that
went
all
the
way
through
and
she
was
the
first
drafter
and
primary
originator
of
it
and
it
went
through.
So
this
would
follow
past
practices
that
we've
done.
A
C
I'm
just
looking
it
over
and
I'm
wondering
if
adding
to
number
two
encourage
and
promote
peaceful
demonstration
and
then
also
adding
like
encourage
and
promote
a
peaceful
response
by
you
know
the
national
guard.
I
just
feel,
like
I
don't
know,
I
was
just
thinking
about
it
and
I'm
just
sharing
my
thoughts.
J
This
is,
commissioner,
I
was
just
in
regards
to
that
that
national
guard
comment.
I
think
that
might
be
over
our
control
because
you
know
they're
under
the
federal
government,
and
I
you
know,
of
course
that's
something
we
would
all
like
to
see,
but
I
know
that
they
work
under
their
strict
orders.
So
I
don't
know
if
we
can,
we
can
encourage
it,
but
I
don't
know.
K
J
A
J
A
Sure
so,
if
you
take
a
look
at
the
chat,
the
motion
with
kind
of
the
three
messaging
points
is
laid
out
in
there
and
paul.
I
think,
had
a
great
suggestion
that,
before
someone
drafts
something
up
that,
maybe
we
if
people
have
points
or
ideas
against
some
of
the
different
those
three
different
messages
or
just
some
ideas
overall,
to
throw
them
out
right
now,
so
whoever
is
going
to
be
drafting
it
up,
has
some
inspiration
and
stimulus
to
draw
on
in
the
draft.
A
J
A
I
This
might
be
a
good
place
if
there
are
a
couple
of
those
rights
that
we
could
name.
That
would
be
encouraging
and
inspiring
like
you
have
the
right
to
do
this.
You
have
the
right,
you
know
just
maybe
a
couple
of
bullet
points
that
that
aren't
just
inspirational
but
really
come
from
their
from
from
the
legal
book.
H
E
G
G
Other
than
lead
with
compassion
for
both
those
accused
and
those
protesting,
the
accused
I
mean,
if
we
are,
we
do
we
want
to
make
this
really
about
the
schrodinger.
All
there's
just
more
of
a
general
statement
now
at
this
point
that
you
know,
commissioner
stevens
said
earlier
raised
in
the
chat
something
more
pointed
around
the
chauvin
trial
or
the
trial
of
the
other
police
officers
as
well.
So
are
we?
G
G
G
A
Thank
you.
That
sounds
awesome
the.
I
think
it
would
be
ideal
if
we
could
reconvene
next
week,
because
I
think
we
want
to
have
something
this
task
force
has
aligned
on
for
the
next
commission
meeting.
So
let
me
check
with
all
the
task
force
members
about
availability
for
next
week.
Could
we
do
the
same
bat
time
the
same
that
place
or
would
we
yeah
obviously
it'd
be
ideal?
If
all
of
us
all
eight
could
be
available,
are
all
eight
here
today?
Did,
I
think,
are
we
missing
anyone?
J
A
B
A
J
A
E
E
A
B
H
This
is,
commissioner,
may
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
because
it
sounded
like
what
was
going
to
be
happening.
Was
the
letter
was
going
to
be
drafted,
and
then
you
guys
you
were
the
task
force
was
going
to
be
meeting
next
thursday
to
ease
it
together,
and
so,
if
you
meet
on
thursday,
but
it's
already
been
drafted
and
published
to
for
the
agenda
without
your
review-
is
that
that
acceptable.
B
M
And
it
would
normally
be
posted
to
the
agenda
just
to
be
reviewed
as
a
draft,
so
I
mean
mark
you
might
or
commissioners.
Sorry,
I'm
gonna
butcher
the
pronunciation
of
your
last
name,
and
I
don't
want
to
do
that.
So
I
think
you
want
to
make
sure
that
you
just
mark
it
as
a
draft
or
something,
but
it
would
be
normal
to
post
a
draft
to
be
reviewed
because
it's
still
a
public
meeting.
So
members
of
the
public
could
come
to
the
meeting
and
hear
about
the
draft
anyways.